September 29, 2010
— Ace I doubt many will be interested (most readers seem very anti-remake and very pro-John Wayne, so the idea of remaking this film will seem pretty heinous), but if you care, the trailer can be seen here.
Posted by: Ace at
11:04 AM
| Comments (341)
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 29, 2010 11:08 AM (pLTLS)
And hows this, Bridges will be in a remake(this) and a sequel(tron) opening within a week of each other.
Posted by: Iblis at September 29, 2010 11:08 AM (9221z)
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:10 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 11:10 AM (0q2P7)
Also, I think linoleum is a tasty treat, especially the red-colored kind.
Posted by: cranky-d at September 29, 2010 11:10 AM (0NFrC)
Posted by: Dante Alighieri at September 29, 2010 11:11 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: jimmytheleg at September 29, 2010 11:11 AM (6anXJ)
Posted by: joncelli at September 29, 2010 11:11 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: The White House Review at September 29, 2010 11:11 AM (FcR7P)
John Wayne's True Grit was practically a life-changing event for me in my early teens.
That said, I am an unrepentant Coen Brothers whore.
I will be there. Matt Damon be damned.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 29, 2010 11:12 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:12 AM (ey5wt)
Except that Ms. Whitman actually kept the employment ap as well as copies of the maid's SS card and Drivers license. She's released copies to the media.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 29, 2010 11:12 AM (d4Hvj)
Posted by: joncelli at September 29, 2010 11:14 AM (RD7QR)
Except that Ms. Whitman actually kept the employment ap as well as copies of the maid's SS card and Drivers license. She's released copies to the media.
Can't imagine why the LA Times would keep that part out.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 29, 2010 11:14 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:14 AM (DHNp4)
I really can't think of ANYONE who could do that at the moment, quite frankly. Maybe Adam Baldwin... Naaa, not him either.
Posted by: AllenG at September 29, 2010 11:14 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 11:14 AM (0q2P7)
You like 'em or you don't.
*spoiler*
No country for old men. Worst ending ever....
This +1
Posted by: Iblis at September 29, 2010 11:15 AM (9221z)
Posted by: joncelli at September 29, 2010 11:15 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:15 AM (ey5wt)
Posted by: ktnxbai *cough* at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (RG1R1)
o/t: check out this AP headline:
Note the standard vilification of "corporations".
The republicans have "corporate allies". In other words; the Republicans stand shoulder to shoulder with private enterprise.
Posted by: Fuzzy Handcuffs at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (DHNp4)
MAKE A NEW FUCKING MOVIE GEORGE!!!!!!
Posted by: Iblis at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (9221z)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (ey5wt)
Posted by: Purity Republican at September 29, 2010 11:16 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: Robert at September 29, 2010 11:17 AM (4NAaB)
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:17 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: MWR at September 29, 2010 11:17 AM (4df7R)
It should have ended after he walked out of the house, I guess. I can't see a good place to end that movie. Nothing is really resolved.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:17 AM (IhQuA)
I didn't get it..
The Coens are hit or miss with me..
I might check this out.. If only for the solace that Matt Damon looks like the bad guy and he'll die in the end.
Posted by: Dave C at September 29, 2010 11:18 AM (4uhuW)
Also, even though everyone hates re-makes, two of the coolest movies ever are re-makes: The Thing and Scarface. Most re-makes are terrible cash-grabs, but every now and then there's a good story to tell by going back to a concept that is already out there.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 11:18 AM (N7uu0)
Posted by: joncelli at September 29, 2010 11:18 AM (RD7QR)
But what's worse is Lucas is actually going to re-do all 6 Star Wars films in 3D!
MAKE A NEW FUCKING MOVIE GEORGE!!!!!!
actually, i would much prefer he stayed away from film making for the rest of his life.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:18 AM (wuv1c)
http://tinyurl.com/2bjdymt
Posted by: Iblis at September 29, 2010 11:19 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Paladin at September 29, 2010 11:20 AM (AfORa)
but No Country For Old Men is one of the best movies of the past 10 years.
Overrated. I still don't get the entire message of the film and i've seen it a few times. i have a couple of ideas, but I'm still not one hundred percent sure what the point was.
However i did love Raising Arizona, one of my favorite movies.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:20 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:20 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Jack Spectre at September 29, 2010 11:20 AM (taaCl)
Coen brothers. Whore.
Cormac McCarthy. Whore.
Coen brothers + Cormac McCarthy = Light-bending whoredom.
These are the true confessions of Bat Chain Puller.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 29, 2010 11:21 AM (SCcgT)
I actually don't particularly mind Jeff Bridges saddling up on John Wayne's horse. Nobody could rival The Duke, but Bridges has been damn impressive over the last 10-15 years and could pull off a reasonable alternative.
That said, Matt Damon + Josh Brolin = screw this movie.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:21 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 11:21 AM (/jbAw)
They need to remake the Spice Girls movie. They are due for a reboot.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:21 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Cubachi at September 29, 2010 11:22 AM (SXzw8)
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 29, 2010 11:22 AM (SCcgT)
Shia La Beef plays the John Wayne character; you got a problem with that?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:22 AM (dPcmp)
Also, I am going to commit a crime here, but I can't stand John Wayne movies. I haven't been able to finish one of them. Maybe it is because I am considerably younger than most people her, but I just don't get it.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:22 AM (wuv1c)
When they took an idea out of the movie Sullivan's Travels and spun it into O Brother, Where Art Thou?, that was brilliant. But why simply remake an existing movie, instead of teasing out a thread and spinning something new and original?
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (fgCQL)
Posted by: garrett at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (0BXUB)
35
I'm one of the few who find the 80s Scarface ridiculously overrated, so I won't second that example. I will second your point, though, that remakes can be amazing.
Example #1: Maltese Falcon (Bogie's version was the 3rd, I believe)
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (pfStM)
Wasn't that a modern-day incarnation of the book of Job?
actually, i would much prefer he stayed away from film making for the rest of his life.
Agreed. Lucas has enough money to buy an island somewhere and retire there for the rest of his life.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (9hSKh)
Isn't the message of that movie: If you find a ton of money in the desert, don't go back later to give some water to the guy who'll probably die anyways?
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (0BXUB)
Also, I am going to commit a crime here, but I can't stand John Wayne movies. I haven't been able to finish one of them. Maybe it is because I am considerably younger than most people her, but I just don't get it.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 03:22 PM (wuv1c)
Dude, you're supposed to WATCH them, not eat the DVDs.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 11:23 AM (fgCQL)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at September 29, 2010 11:24 AM (HaYO4)
I hated "No Country for Old Men" and no one can touch this classic from John Wayne. I refuse to watch this.
I wanted to like it. The acting was good. The cinematography was good. The story one its surface was enjoyable yet creepy. But i don't get what point they were trying to make. Anyone care to enlighten me?
Was it that there are bad people in this world and there always have been?
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:24 AM (wuv1c)
Fort Apache, starring Leo DiCaprio as Henry Ford and The Situation as John Wayne.
Coming in 2011.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:24 AM (pfStM)
Yeah, it's terrible. People only like it cuz of the ending, I think. The rest of it is just awful. I'm not even so sure why the ending is so great, either.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (IhQuA)
Shia La Beef plays the John Wayne character; you got a problem with that?
Then they should just call it Fudgepack Mountain II: The Beefening.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (QMtmy)
Trust me I got it. I know what he was saying, what he thought, why he did what he did. I still hated it. On my system of movie rating (1-10) half the points are scored on the ending. This film had four points prior to ending, and four points after it (5 of 10 being the minimum for worth watching once).
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (0q2P7)
MAKE A NEW FUCKING MOVIE GEORGE!!!!!!
actually, i would much prefer he stayed away from film making for the rest of his life.
Amen brother!
Posted by: Mark in Spokane at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (Nmyyl)
.....Plus I'm desperate for new westerns ....
Posted by: AmericanDawg at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (CIVUm)
"Good characters and decent acting in search of a coherent plot"
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:25 AM (dPcmp)
Posted by: garrett at September 29, 2010 11:26 AM (0BXUB)
60
I think the point was that the world was changing, and people like the Tommy Lee Jones character couldn't keep up.
That and that people don't get happy endings, or even tidy endings. Everyone expected Anton to kill Llewyln, but the Mexicans got him first - offscreen.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:26 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:26 AM (ey5wt)
Ace - where's the ban hammer? (kidding, obviously)
Posted by: AllenG at September 29, 2010 11:26 AM (8y9MW)
Isn't it really a story about regret? Tommy Lee and his father both seemed to regret that they never died in the line of duty. His father for sure; Tommy Lee seemed to be that way at the end too.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:27 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: Michael Bay at September 29, 2010 11:27 AM (0BXUB)
You mean "The Kung-Fu Kid", (which was what The Karate Kid remake was named in China IIRC)?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 29, 2010 11:27 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at September 29, 2010 03:24 PM (HaYO4)
Where would you put Matt Damon?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:27 AM (dPcmp)
Only remake I'd ever want to see is one of Airwolf.
Airwolf once had an episode called "Flight 93 Is Missing".
Posted by: Dr. Varno at September 29, 2010 11:27 AM (QMtmy)
I'm not even so sure why the ending is so great, either.
People like the "going down in a blaze of glory" aspect of it.
Those people should watch White Heat instead.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:28 AM (pfStM)
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 03:18 PM (N7uu0)
1) The Thing was not a re-make, it was a separate take on the same source material, the short pulp sci-fi story "Who Goes There?" The 1950 movie barely even nodded to the source material; Carpenter, on the other hand, took it and ran with it way past the goal line and into gross-out country, far, far away from the original creepiness of the story.
2) The Scarface remake made sense in that it dealt with a new generation of gangsters, an entirely different historical period.
True Grit is a real remake: same story, same characters, same historical period. What do the Coen brothers get to do differently that gives it a shot at surpassing the original?
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 11:29 AM (fgCQL)
I think this movie will be a giant FUCK YOU to John Wayne and western fans.
Hollywooders still have a hardon for John Wayne and try to smear him any way they can. Mostly because he represents something to the peons they hate.
I hope I am wrong and they don't make a travesty.
Also, John Goodman should have been Rooster Cogburn.
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 11:29 AM (h1zzT)
60
I think the point was that the world was changing, and people like the Tommy Lee Jones character couldn't keep up.
That and that people don't get happy endings, or even tidy endings. Everyone expected Anton to kill Llewyln, but the Mexicans got him first - offscreen.
Anton did kill Llewyln. Tommy Lee Jones found the hotel room door lock blown out with compressed air at the end of the film didn't he?
Also, I to your first point, I thought that too the first time i saw the film, but there is a conversation in the film when Tommy Lee Jones goes to see his father or uncle or whoever that older guy is and they talk about the story of a man being shot on his front porch in older times. I don't remember the exact details of the story, but I thought the point of it was to say that this isn't a new evil, it has always existed and will always exist.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:29 AM (wuv1c)
Also, even though everyone hates re-makes, two of the coolest movies ever are re-makes: The Thing
Totally agree on that one. Loved it and never miss is it if it's on the tube.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 11:30 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: joncelli at September 29, 2010 11:31 AM (RD7QR)
Why, oh why can't Hollywood come up with something original and good anymore? The writing is for the most part pure crap.
So we get these pale imitations of the original classics. They almost always worse than the original ("Willy Wonka", anyone? How about "The Wiz?" "Psycho?").
Can the remakes of Gone With The Wind and Citizen Kaine be far behind?
Posted by: Log Cabin at September 29, 2010 11:31 AM (slOv8)
"We're all gonna die, man!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
and 'Scarface' was re-made as a comedy, starring Michelle Pfeiffer's almost-visible ta-tas and a Wagnerian ending that was not surreal at all.......not at all
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:32 AM (dPcmp)
Posted by: Mjdzfun at September 29, 2010 11:32 AM (DM6DH)
Anton did kill Llewyln. Tommy Lee Jones found the hotel room door lock blown out with compressed air at the end of the film didn't he?
That's from when he came back for the money, after the Mexican's killed Moss.
ahh. i see.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:32 AM (wuv1c)
>>What's happened is that our narrator has become unreliable.
I thought he was behind the door.
Posted by: Purity Republican at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (Y81Xa)
As far as everyone busting on Matt Damon, Okay I can understand that.
But, I thought the same thing when I seen Donnie Wahlberg playing Carwood Lipton in BoB, but damn if didn't do a fine job there.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (rxVVk)
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: Kerry's iPhone at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (AKYZm)
I always thought that was after the mexicans killed Llewlyn. the lock was still on the door when they first found the scene. Later, when Jones went back the lock was punched. That was when Anton arrived.
I thought Anton was gonna kill Jones, but that never panned out.
Posted by: lorien1973 at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (IhQuA)
50 bucks says they remake the film Legend in the next 5 years
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: JDW at September 29, 2010 11:33 AM (uw+0A)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:34 AM (ey5wt)
I thought Anton was gonna kill Jones, but that never panned out.
yeah you're right, haven't seen it in a bit
the more i think about that film the less i like it.
it didn't seem to have any point.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:34 AM (wuv1c)
I hated "No Country for Old Men" and no one can touch this classic from John Wayne. I refuse to watch this.
I wanted to like it. The acting was good. The cinematography was good. The story one its surface was enjoyable yet creepy. But i don't get what point they were trying to make. Anyone care to enlighten me?
Was it that there are bad people in this world and there always have been?
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 03:24 PM (wuv1c)
Yeah, that's part of it. The Tommy Lee Jones part is about discovering that you're too old to confront the evil in the world anymore -- either he's not what he used to be, or the world is spinning out of control and he can't keep up. The main moral of the story is that "There are no clean getaways." Llewellyn tries to get ahead in life the wrong way and it brings death (personified by Anton Chigurth) to himself and his wife.
It's also amazingly well-made. The cinematography in Texas is fantastic, and if you watch it again you'll notice the three main characters (Llewellyn, Chigurth, and TLJ) are never in the same shot together even as they spend the whole movie on a collision course.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 11:35 AM (N7uu0)
Posted by: JDW at September 29, 2010 11:35 AM (uw+0A)
I always expect a happy ending and for the masseuse to tidy up on her way out.
Release the second shackra
Posted by: Al Gore at September 29, 2010 11:35 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 11:36 AM (ey5wt)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:36 AM (DHNp4)
Why remake a movie when the original was just right?
I get it if technology can improve fight scenes or other crap but this is character driven and doesn't need improvement with the sets or "action" shots.
I agree with Toby, Kim Darby was perfect.
Posted by: mare at September 29, 2010 11:36 AM (i3rnV)
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 03:29 PM (wuv1c)
It was his father, who retired as sheriff; the guy killed on the porch by Injuns was their father / grandfather, who was also sheriff
Some things change; some things don't. I didn't need that movie to enlighten me
I liked the movie while being very conscious of its flaws ( sorta like Life Itself )
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:37 AM (dPcmp)
I'll give it a shot.
MAJOR SPOILER ALERT DO NOT READ!!!!
No country for old men resolves essentially when Josh is suddenly killed without warning or explanation. This was I think the Coen's way of refocusing us on the fact that the "story" was not about Jasj and his attempt to escape with the money but in aging Bell's attempt to capture a dangerous killer. He has the opportunity to do so in the hotel room and passes it up. This end is the point where Bell realizes that he cannot do so and preserve his own life due to being outmatched by such a violent young capable killer; feeling the ravages of time and the loss of his youthful edge he concludes that serving justice in such a wild land is a game for younger men, so he gives up and chooses retirement. It is understood that the antagonist Chigurh would likely continue his habit of killing until captured by someone else. The last scene is him explaining in an abstract manner the fact that he was giving up the part of himself that was the lawman, to become just a man.
/Spoiler
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 11:37 AM (0q2P7)
nine coconuts,
i liked the ending to fargo. Anything that ends with people getting stuffed into a wood chipper is a ok in my book.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:38 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: David Weigel at September 29, 2010 11:38 AM (dUunI)
I really can't think of ANYONE who could do that at the moment, quite frankly. Maybe Adam Baldwin... Naaa, not him either.
You really should be more respectful of a man who names his rifle Vera.
;">Y'all see the man hanging out of the spaceship with the really big gun? I'm not saying y'all weren't easy to find. But it was kinda out of our way, and he didn't want to come in the first place. Man's lookin' to kill some folk. So really, it's his will y'all should worry about thwarting.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 29, 2010 11:38 AM (BDH94)
Can the remakes of Gone With The Wind and Citizen Kaine be far behind?
GWTW wil never be remade. Simply cannot come close to the original. Still stands up today imho. Vivien Liegh, Clark Cable?? No fucking way anything out of Hollywierd today can come close to the charisma those two had.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 11:38 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 11:39 AM (9Cooa)
I loved those endings too!
Posted by: Saddam Hussein at September 29, 2010 11:40 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: toby928™ at September 29, 2010 03:35 PM (S5YRY)
True, but it was 'off screen'; a lotta Stuff in that movie was Off Screen. C McC's books are unreadable ( for me ) because so much is going on but not mentioned.
At the end, TLJ knows the killer is there, but does not seek Vengeance or Justice. Maybe the Worse Movie Ending Evah
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:40 AM (dPcmp)
Posted by: Andrew Sullivan at September 29, 2010 11:41 AM (rl0SM)
How about instead of making remakes, they finish of the Killer Angels trilogy.
I loved Gettysburg and enjoyed Gods and Generals. Are they ever going to make the third one?
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:41 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at September 29, 2010 11:42 AM (SB0V2)
Can the remakes of Gone With The Wind and Citizen Kaine be far behind?
Posted by: Log Cabin at September 29, 2010 03:31 PM (slOv
I shudder to think what a remake of GWTW would look like in today's PC environment.
What would they do to make "I don't give a damn" as controversial today as it was in 1939? Probably change it to the f word.
Mamie would be recast as an illegal.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 11:42 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:42 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Mjdzfun at September 29, 2010 11:42 AM (DM6DH)
A trailer from I tunes?
Do I have to run a scan to get all their shit off my computer now?
Posted by: Kemp at September 29, 2010 11:43 AM (AQxTm)
Yeah, you nailed it
"Fargo" -- one of the Best Movie Endings Evah
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:43 AM (dPcmp)
I remember my parents having a long discussion about whether they could go see the movie and take me. I was like 5? They were worried about language.
Jeff Bridges??? in a Wayne roll? I didn't know they made movies without John Wayne for most of my childhood.
Bleh
Posted by: dagny at September 29, 2010 11:44 AM (oxG6r)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at September 29, 2010 11:44 AM (QKKT0)
Much as I love the Coen brothers, I don't see them doing the novel or the original movie justice. There's a reason nobody's done a serious remake of Casablanca.
Posted by: jwpaine at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (g4J4S)
Can the remakes of Gone With The Wind and Citizen Kaine be far behind?
I was thinking a remake of Casablanca. This time we'd get to see Richard Blaine fuck her for the plane tickets.
Posted by: Kemp at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (AQxTm)
I bought Chicago because I like CZJ and I don't have many musicals and I thought that would be a good one.
I should have rented it first. It is the prime suck-a-tude.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (/jbAw)
No one can beat John Wayne as Rooster Cogburn. But Kim Darby can be improved upon, and Glen Campbell practically ruins the original. He positively stinks up the screen. The original dialog was intentionally stilted and antique. I'd like to hear a Coen brothers rewrite.
From Crazy Heart, you can see how Jeff Bridges might be a serviceable Rooster, though the original version required a hero of epic stature. Possibly this version is centered more on the kid, as the novel was. If so, it will work much better as drama. It's a good sign that they chose a younger heroine.
The Coens are brilliant at creating a specific sense of time and place, and for balancing dry humor with offbeat characters and violent behavior. This is good material for them. I doubt they would have chosen to remake True Grit if they didn't have a clear strategy for making it better.
Posted by: lyle at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (Twbm+)
Posted by: toby928™ at September 29, 2010 03:35 PM (S5YRY)
True,
but it was 'off screen'; a lotta Stuff in that movie was Off Screen. C
McC's books are unreadable ( for me ) because so much is going on but
not mentioned.
At the end, TLJ knows the killer is there, but does not seek Vengeance or Justice. Maybe the Worse Movie Ending Evah
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 03:40 PM (dPcmp)
It's easy to "seek Vengeance or Justice" when you aren't the one who actually has to confront a monster like Anton Chigurth. That's the whole point. Tommy Lee Jones (Sheriff Bell) is completely outmatched and he knows it. He's done. He's an old man and the world has deteriorated to the point where he can't keep up. He can either confront Chigurth and die, or go home to his wife. He chooses the latter.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (N7uu0)
McCarthy is a misanthrope who writes in sheer spite of readers.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at September 29, 2010 11:45 AM (23kaI)
Probably not, since Gods and Generals bombed at the box office. My Google-Fu is yielding nothing on any thing about a potential The Last Full Measure movie.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 29, 2010 11:46 AM (9hSKh)
Hollywood kills me. There are so many subject they could make movies about. There is an absolute paucity of films set during World War One or concerning the issues surrounding it. I would think that would make for a great period piece.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:46 AM (wuv1c)
I can read all about evil and loss and grief and terror in the morning blogs. Or I can call my Mom on the phone and have her tell me all about her last doctor appointment.
This gritty dark shadowy gothic reboot silliness is too emo for me. When I go to a western I want to feel good. Good guy kicks the shit out of the bad guy.
Keep this Euro-art angst trash in the little sticky-seated theaters in the "arts" district.
Also Matt Damon is a waste of the public oxygen.
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 11:47 AM (h1zzT)
The only thing this movie will accomplish is to provide more evidence of how far Hollywood has fallen. Jeff Bridges is one of our few decent remaining actors, and even he couldn't carry John Wayne's horse's feed bag.
I wonder whether anyone will ever have the cojones to try a remake of The Searchers or She Wore A Yellow Ribbon?
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 29, 2010 11:47 AM (kJXs1)
Posted by: rawmuse at September 29, 2010 11:47 AM (yhrH5)
He has the opportunity to do so in the hotel room and passes it up.
This scene still gives me goosebumps when I watch this movie. The realization dawns on you that the world is actually NOT full of "John McClanes" and forces the viewer to really see how ridiculous Hollywood Cops really are.
Internally, I watch that scene and I realize that I probably would have done the same. It forces you to look into the void.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 29, 2010 11:48 AM (rxVVk)
Posted by: Iblis at September 29, 2010 11:48 AM (9221z)
#128 I loved Gettysburg and enjoyed Gods and Generals. Are they ever going to make the third one?
Probably not, since Gods and Generals bombed at the box office. My Google-Fu is yielding nothing on any thing about a potential The Last Full Measure movie.
yeah, that's a shame.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:48 AM (wuv1c)
Damon wore out his welcome a long time ago.
Posted by: Sponge at September 29, 2010 11:48 AM (UK9cE)
If you're going to remake a picture, remake it it exactly like the first version, frame for frame. Only then can you say that you've paid appropriate respect to the original.
My philosophy is box office dynamite, too.
Posted by: Gus Van Zant at September 29, 2010 11:49 AM (QKKT0)
Robert Duvall could have played Rooster in this one. He was, of course, in the original.
But Jeff Bridges? No.
And I simply cannot separate my politics from my opinion of Matt Damon. He's a Chomskyite and that's just too much for me.
Posted by: FillyourHandsChristineO'donnell at September 29, 2010 11:49 AM (A1WvT)
Posted by: Jack at September 29, 2010 11:49 AM (kCT7A)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:50 AM (DHNp4)
Probably not, since Gods and Generals bombed at the box office. My Google-Fu is yielding nothing on any thing about a potential The Last Full Measure movie.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 29, 2010 03:46 PM (9hSKh)
I'm surprised they made it at all. It is all about "religion" and it is not portrayed as "evil".
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 11:50 AM (/jbAw)
Am I the only one that liked Damon in Departed?
His politics aside, of course
One of the worst movies ever made.
EVER.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:50 AM (wuv1c)
I can read all about evil and loss and grief and terror in the morning blogs. Or I can call my Mom on the phone and have her tell me all about her last doctor appointment.
Oh God, you too?
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 11:51 AM (l/N7H)
Vic,
I think Ted Turner funded the entire movie didn't he? He was in the movie and had a few lines. It was the scene where the southern officers were watching a performance of Bonnie Blue Flag
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:51 AM (wuv1c)
It's easy to "seek Vengeance or
Justice" when you aren't the one who actually has to confront a monster
like Anton Chigurth. That's the whole point. Tommy Lee Jones (Sheriff
Bell) is completely outmatched and he knows it. He's done. He's an old
man and the world has deteriorated to the point where he can't keep
up. He can either confront Chigurth and die, or go home to his wife.
He chooses the latter.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 03:45 PM (N7uu0)
I agree, but the ending is Massive Downer to a movie which kept taking shots at being Profound ( and failing ). The killer is a new Modern Evil; or is it the Mexican Mafia? Both? Everything?
Signs & Wonders...............
As someone noted above, C McC likes to punish his readers; the movie punished the audience
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:51 AM (dPcmp)
Interesting, i never really was sure what to make of that movie, but that soynds plausible.
Posted by: booger at September 29, 2010 11:51 AM (awinc)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 29, 2010 11:52 AM (kJXs1)
One of the worst movies ever made.
Are you serious???
I have the attention span of a flea. And that movie, clocking in at what, over 2 1/2 hours absolutely flew by. I was rivted by it and hooked from the first minutes.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 29, 2010 11:52 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 11:53 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 11:54 AM (h1zzT)
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 11:54 AM (h1zzT)
One of the worst movies ever made.
EVER.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 03:50 PM (wuv1c)
Can't agree: "The Departed" was a linked series of great mini-movies which didn't quite connect, but it was entertaining and interesting. Good, not great, could have been better...........
Compared to what Hollywood cranks out these days, it was better than most
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 11:55 AM (dPcmp)
Read to book, LOVED the Duke's movie. That being said - Jeff Bridges is the only actor alive today who could hope to play the part per the book, Glen Campbell was WOODEN as the Texas Ranger - Matt Damon couldn't be worse and I expect the writing to be tighter than the original - and YES he dies at the end. Brolin as Ned Pepper? Oy - I wouldn't want to try to fill Robert Duvall's shoes in anything he has ever done. Just DON'T. And Brolin is too pretty.
Will I be there? You betcha!
And I bloody well MISS The Duke!
Posted by: Sawbuck at September 29, 2010 11:55 AM (v0ZHD)
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 11:55 AM (h1zzT)
Internally, I watch that scene and I realize that I probably would have done the same. It forces you to look into the void.
Ah! The void!
Posted by: Captain Kirk at September 29, 2010 11:56 AM (rl0SM)
Did everybody like The Maltese Falcon with Humphrey Bogart? It was a remake of
(wait for it)
The Maltese Falcon
Well yeah, just because something's a remake doesn't automatically make it shite. For example, I liked the Ford remake of Sabrina much more than the Bogart original, and the Heston version of The Ten Commandments (deMille's second take on it) infinitely more than the 20's B/W version. But it seems like remakes/sequels are all that's out there, and what's more, it's remakes which are entirely unnecessary-- The Karate Kid, srsly? Are there honestly no other screenplays out there?If we had a moratorium on all remakes, sequels, prequels, expanded TV episodes, and series add-ons, theaters would be showing those stupid pre-movie trivia slide shows on 9 screens and nothing else.
But I am hugely looking forward to Secretariat, which opens next week, I think.
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 11:56 AM (GcVt/)
I loved The Departed and liked Damon in it, but he that's probably because he wasn't really acting: he is a two-faced sniveling bitch in real life.
DiCaprio was good, Damon was good, the supporting guys were great (Sheen, Walhberg, Baldwin, the thugs in Costello's gang).
The only one I hated was Jack. He absolutely ruined nearly every scene he was in.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 11:56 AM (pfStM)
One of the worst movies ever made.
Are you serious???
I have the attention span of a flea. And that movie, clocking in at what, over 2 1/2 hours absolutely flew by. I was rivted by it and hooked from the first minutes.
YES. I am so serious.
If you want to say it is entertaining. Fine, so was Oceans11, but they were both terrible movies.
I honestly believe Scorsesie(spelling?) was told that they Academy would give him an Oscar on his next film, so he threw together a garbage script, tossed in some movie stars, and set it in boston and presto blammo, Oscar Award.
Jack Nicholson, who i like, overacted in that film so much that scenes with him were unwatchable.
The entire premise of the film was ridiculous.
The 10-15 homicides in the last 5 minutes was just for shock value. It was like a bloody version of a M.Night Shamalyn twist.
And Boston, dear god, am I the only person getting sick of films set in Boston?
I could go on, but i want the 2 1/2 hours of my life back that i wasted watching that film.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:57 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 29, 2010 11:57 AM (61b7k)
Jeff Bridges is the only actor alive today who could hope to play the part per the book
Duvall could pull it off.
Posted by: FillyourHandsChristineO'donnell at September 29, 2010 11:57 AM (A1WvT)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 29, 2010 11:58 AM (e910j)
Damon is toxic. He ruined Saving Private Ryan for me and I won't watch anything that he's in.
Actually anything that comes out of Hollywood nowadays is a piece of shit so, no thanks.
Posted by: ErikW at September 29, 2010 11:58 AM (BZJdl)
Posted by: The Committee to Rehabilitate Ben Domenech at September 29, 2010 11:58 AM (bN5ZU)
3 of the best scenes evah are in this movie.
This scene alone is worth the price of admission.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 29, 2010 11:59 AM (rxVVk)
Damon is toxic. He ruined Saving Private Ryan for me and I won't watch anything that he's in.
it was a pretty bad movie to begin with. It's only saving grace were the actual battle scenes.
It's moral relativism was too much to bear.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 11:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 11:59 AM (9Cooa)
Very anti-remake, and not big on Wayne either.
Scarface is so well-liked due to it's over-the-topness (to coin a phrase). It's a Pacino hamfest, Pfeiffer is very hot in the movie, and I know some people who tear up at the sight of all that coke on the desks and tables.It's hardly a cinegraphic masterpice, but it is fun.
Posted by: Luca Brasi at September 29, 2010 12:00 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 29, 2010 12:00 PM (XDeui)
Goodman as Rooster, Bridges as La Beef, and Matt Damon as a commie male prostitute killed in the first scene.
But the stopped asking my opinion long ago.
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 12:00 PM (h1zzT)
No question about it. The worst critically acclaimed movie ever made was
There Will Be Blood.
i agree and disagree.
The first hour of that film is one of the best movies i've ever seen. It captured the early america captains of industry and how they built themselves up from nothing, but the second half of the film goes off the rails and ruins it.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:00 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Knemon at September 29, 2010 03:57 PM (PWovt)
The re-make shat all over the original. Robert Mitchum made DeNiro look ridiculous.
Of course having DeNiro as a Jesus-freaked redneck was Hollywood Bullshit, but the original was twenty times better than that sad re-make.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:00 PM (dPcmp)
Be careful what you wish for. The last time that happened, we got JarJar Binks and "I hate sand" as a pickup line.
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (GcVt/)
No question about it. The worst critically acclaimed movie ever made was
There Will Be Blood.
I drink your milkshake!
Posted by: Daniel Plainview at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (awinc)
True Grit wasn't even in the top five of John Wayne movies. Casting Glen Campbell is like casting a dumber version of Barney Rubble. Trailer looks pretty good.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Matt Damon at September 29, 2010 03:48 PM (GUQlk)
I SERIOUSLY want to remake Signs and give it an ending that's a real twist, not a weak rip-off of Day of the Triffids.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (fgCQL)
No question about it. The worst critically acclaimed movie ever made was
There Will Be Blood.
Ever seen Moonstruck?
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (e910j)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 12:01 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 03:45 PM (N7uu0)
I agree, but the ending is Massive Downer to a movie which kept taking shots at being Profound ( and failing ). The killer is a new Modern Evil; or is it the Mexican Mafia? Both? Everything?
Signs & Wonders...............
As someone noted above, C McC likes to punish his readers; the movie punished the audience
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 03:51 PM (dPcmp)What shots at "being profound" are you referring to? It's mostly a chase movie with two themes: 1. you can't get ahead in life by doing the wrong things, and 2. everyone has their time on earth to confront evil and it doesn't last forever. That's about it.
As for it being a "Massive Downer" -- yep, that's about it. But there's no dramatic tension if you know you're getting a happy ending. There was no way that story was going to have a happy ending either; it definitely wasn't building towards one over the first two hours.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:02 PM (N7uu0)
No question about it. The worst critically acclaimed movie ever made was
There Will Be Blood.
Ever seen Moonstruck?
Pretty Women was pretty f'ing bad too.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:02 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: John Galt at September 29, 2010 12:02 PM (F/4zf)
It's moral relativism was too much to bear.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 03:59 PM (wuv1c)
That element escaped me, I guess. I was trying not to be pissed off while I watched it.
Posted by: ErikW at September 29, 2010 12:02 PM (BZJdl)
Posted by: Luca Brasi at September 29, 2010 12:03 PM (YmPwQ)
No question about it. The worst critically acclaimed movie ever made was
There Will Be Blood.
I drink your milkshake!
My vote goes to American Beauty. Total waste of time and boring as all hell. They really made an entire movie about how awful life in the suburbs is? And it won Oscars for that?
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:03 PM (N7uu0)
Of course having DeNiro as a
Jesus-freaked redneck was Hollywood Bullshit, but the original was
twenty times better than that sad re-make.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 04:00 PM (dPcmp)
Mitchum's portrayal was of a kind of evil that was so relentless and nefarious that you were terrified to the bone. De Niro was a fucking cariacature.
And when Gregory Peck told Mitchum he was going to live in that cage a long, long time, that was sweeeeeeet!
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:04 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 12:04 PM (9Cooa)
Scarface as a movie was okay but it does have one of my top ten movie scenes in it.
That would be the shower torture scene.
i think that movie is popular because of never before seen violence and a few good lines. otherwise its a wash.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:04 PM (wuv1c)
Jeff Bridges is the only actor alive today who could hope to play the part per the book
Duvall could pull it off.
I pondered that, and realized Duvall isn't bat-shit crazy enough. Bridges sure is.
Posted by: Sawbuck at September 29, 2010 12:04 PM (v0ZHD)
are you there on the line.......................?
Marion Morrison ( aka John Wayne ) parodied himself in that movie, so remaking it with someone else is sorta Pointless. There are no Movie Heroes, so what is there to parody?
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:05 PM (dPcmp)
Posted by: voting for Alan Grayson at September 29, 2010 12:05 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 04:03 PM (N7uu0)
What I learned from American Beauty is that gay people are psychos who will go on shooting rampages in your quiet suburban neighborhood. Wasn't that the intended message?
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:05 PM (fgCQL)
when most people criticize remakes, they are talking about remakes of Classic, Iconic, Successful movies.
So yeah, a lot of movies are remade because the first time they didn't get it right or didn't get the attention.
Or they want to update the script of effects, or just take another shot at the story. That is fine by me.
Yeah, I would put Sabrina and 10 Commandments in that category, which is why they didn't bother me-- in fact, I liked 'em better. Shit like another Charlie's Angels and Han shooting first, though? DO NOT WANT.
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 12:06 PM (GcVt/)
My vote goes to American Beauty. Total waste of time and boring as all hell. They really made an entire movie about how awful life in the suburbs is? And it won Oscars for that?
ahh good submission. That movie was unbearable. I remember seeing it in highschool and having to pretend to like it cause everyone else thought it was deep and interesting.
It had a good original soundtrack, otherwise it was your average hollywood tripe.
Suburbs=Seventh Circle of Hell
A Job that isn't glamorous=torture
Ex-Marine= nazi homosexual bigot
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:06 PM (wuv1c)
Speaking of Academy atrocities AND Scorcese:
Dances with Wolves over Goodfellas.
I don't think anything else needs to be said.
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 12:06 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: booger at September 29, 2010 12:07 PM (awinc)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 12:07 PM (9Cooa)
SPOILER No Country For Old Men
All that is needed for bad men to prevail is for good men to do nothing. He went so far, to not take the last step. Standing there knowing, if I didn't try and face him, others, probably innocents would die, I hope that I would face him. I understand he was human....But....At least right now I feel that moving on with the baggage of knowing I failed to stand for what was right when office, position, trust of my countrymen, and God demanded it, lest others fall, I don't think I could live with that, and if I could it would haunt me each day I drew breath thereafter.
So you have an epiphany, your getting to old for this sh*t. Great we all have that at some point. Finish up what you are doing, then retire and pass the torch to someone else. Don't pass up the opportunity to do what is desperately needed just because you got the idea in your head it's time to retire. What if an aging infantry sergeant just walks off during a fire fight because suddenly he realized being in the infantry is a young mans game? He knew who he was after, he knew the dangers of what he was tracking, that was his opportunity to throw in the towel and send somebody younger; but no, he continued the chase until faced with the inevitable confrontation that could have ended the evil, and he, at that point, decided he wasn't up to fulfilling the duties of his office and walks away. I'm sorry I can't abide that. Contrast the ending of 3:10 to Yuma.
/SPOILER
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 12:07 PM (0q2P7)
thought Deep Blue Sea was a remake that improved upon Jaws.
my hat is like a sharks fin.
someone explain that to me. that movie has resulting in the most puzzling rap lyric in human history.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:07 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: rawmuse at September 29, 2010 03:47 PM (yhrH5)
Er, I would say it's the exact opposite of that. There is such a thing as right and wrong and Llewellyn destroys his own family by doing the wrong thing.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:08 PM (N7uu0)
Not to bring race into it, but Scarface is as popular now as it was back then because every two-bit hip hopper is obsessed with the movie.
Without America's fascination with thug music (not the good, underground rap), Scarface wouldn't be so popular
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 12:08 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: Sawbuck at September 29, 2010 12:08 PM (v0ZHD)
How many movies has John Wayne died in the end?
Posted by: polynikes at September 29, 2010 03:55 PM (m2CN7)
I believe 4.
The Shootist, The Alamo, The Cowboys and one more that I can't think of.
Posted by: Dave C at September 29, 2010 12:08 PM (4uhuW)
Speaking of Academy atrocities AND Scorcese:
Dances with Wolves over Goodfellas.
I don't think anything else needs to be said.
Dances with Wolves to me is in the same boat as There Will be Blood.
If the movies ended after the first hour or hour and thirty minutes, they would have been great.
oh, and go get your shinebox.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:09 PM (wuv1c)
It won't fly. Unless you get a star attached to it. The wizards of smart who run the studios are not showmen. They are MBA's with zero "nose" for show biz. They read statistics which tell them that the movie ticket buyers are all male between the ages of 11 and 24. Big explosions and karate with the occasional shot of poozle. THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!
Posted by:J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 04:04 PM (9Cooa)
Et voilà : Daniel Radcliffe is attached to a remake of All Quiet on the Western Front, slated for 2012.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:09 PM (fgCQL)
My vote goes to American Beauty.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 04:03 PM (N7uu0)
The Constant Gardner annoyed the hell out of me. I was dating a lib chick at the time (yeah, I know) and she insisted on seeing it.
Gah.
And no, I didn't get any.
Posted by: ErikW at September 29, 2010 12:09 PM (BZJdl)
American Beauty really is one of the worst movies of all time, and i'd put Pleasantville right up there with it. Both were nothing more than vehicles for liberals to attack a way of life they detested
I disagree re Pleasantville. Just look at what happened to Witherspoon's character in the end. She opted for school and stability over the promiscuity of her former life.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 29, 2010 12:09 PM (pLTLS)
You know what would make for some awesome moviemaking? Certain aspects of the Old Testament. Sex, murder, prostitutin'... all kinds of fun stuff. Your King Davids, your Solomons. The history of Rome in general is bursting with fantastic stories far outside the usual Gladiator realm. I am reading Potius Pilate right now by Paul Maier and I think it would make for a terrific movie. Hollywood wouldn't touch it, though, considering the source.
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 12:09 PM (GcVt/)
Posted by: Aaron at September 29, 2010 12:10 PM (XUIJ5)
do you people like anything?
there are a ton of good foreign films out there.
Recently, The Lives of Others was one of the best films i have seen in some time.
Unfortunatley since Blockbuster went out of business and i don't have netflix, it is hard to see new foreign films.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:10 PM (wuv1c)
I am not anti-remake. Sometimes the remake is better than the original. Example: The original "The Thing" with James Arness sucked glactic donkey dicks, while John Carpenters "The Thing" was fucking awesome and an instant classic.
I do think John Wayne will be tough to top. I didn't watch the trailer, didn't want to download fucking Quicktime.
Posted by: maddogg at September 29, 2010 12:11 PM (OlN4e)
235
3:10 to Yuma - good call. Remake that is better than the original.
236
If you ever wondered why NCIS: LA is so awful compared to the original - that casting, right there (among others).
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 12:11 PM (pfStM)
And, btw, what the heck is with Drudge's headline?
Posted by: Y-not at September 29, 2010 12:11 PM (osFsP)
I thought the whole movies was a series of half-hearted attempts at Being Profound ( while pretending to be bored with actually showing these images to an audience of bozos who can't possibly appreciate the genius of we, the Film-makers )
It's hard to pick one scene out, because they all had the same feel: Now we are showing you that life is a complex riddle which you will never solve. Change happens but it's a Bitch; Evil is complicated, but simple
As I said, I liked the movie while being very aware of being dissed by a writer and director who assumed I could not appreciate his Artistic Genius.
and I want to use that compressed air thingee on a few people one of these days...
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:12 PM (dPcmp)
Posted by: jimmytheleg at September 29, 2010 12:12 PM (6anXJ)
ps....anyone else find it odd that we're five weeks from an historic election and we're spending an entire afternoon on movies??
where the hell is the news? any news??
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 29, 2010 12:12 PM (pLTLS)
The Shootist, The Alamo, The Cowboys and one more that I can't think of
Well, he dies in Liberty Valance but not during it (if you catch my drift).
Posted by: FillyourHandsChristineO'donnell at September 29, 2010 12:12 PM (A1WvT)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at September 29, 2010 04:00 PM (XDeui)
Yes, it was my daughter. She is calling the mortgage company today and try to work something out. Her husband just got a job, so they can manage the payment now. Just hoping they will work with her.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 12:12 PM (l/N7H)
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 12:13 PM (pfStM)
/SPOILER
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 04:07 PM (0q2P7)
Again, it's really easy to say he should have gone after Chigurth when he had the chance when you're just a guy saying how a movie should end. The Sheriff Bell character acted like a real person who didn't want to die just to provide a dramatic ending for a story.
The Hollywood ending would have had Bell confront Chigurth right before Llewellyn is killed, kill him, and then help Llewellyn escape the Mexicans. Maybe if they wanted to do a "moral" Hollywood ending, Bell would kill Chigurth but be mortally wounded in the process. Llewellyn would realize everything he's done wrong as he watches Bell die. He goes to jail; his wife survives.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:14 PM (N7uu0)
If you ever wondered why NCIS: LA is so awful compared to the original - that casting, right there (among others).
Posted by: The Q at September 29, 2010 04:11 PM (pfStM)
True dat: the "LA" cast is diversity-based, with Extra Credit for a British female dwarf as boss.
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:14 PM (dPcmp)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 12:14 PM (DHNp4)
It was a remake of The Shop Around the Corner in the barest possible way, in the sense that the two main characters met via correspondence. The Jimmy Stewart romance flick has actual substance, however, and is therefore a fail in the modern sense of the word.
Personally, in this political climate, I'd like to see a modern take on Mr. Smith goes to Washington, but we all know how that would go.
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 12:14 PM (GcVt/)
Saving private R - Great scenes, but aren't there enough real WWII stories you have go and make up shit? hated it.
exactly. 50 million people died, all of them probably had interesting stories, and you had to make up a retarded one?
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:16 PM (wuv1c)
I think Ted Turner funded the entire movie didn't he?
Yes he did which makes you wonder why.
he's a southerner. Southern pride.
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:16 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Gene Shalit at September 29, 2010 12:17 PM (+lsX1)
Best Retarded movie ever?
A Knight's Tale.
I think its actually what killed Heath Ledger, it just took some time to finish the job
Posted by: Ben at September 29, 2010 12:17 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 12:18 PM (DHNp4)
Posted by: maddogg at September 29, 2010 04:11 PM (OlN4e)
See post #20.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (/jbAw)
Contrast the ending of 3:10 to Yuma.
Gah!!! I hated the ending!!! The original was totally different.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Mjdzfun at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (DM6DH)
I think "Twelve O'Clock High" is the best movie ever made, and watching it will improve your life.
and Dr, Strangelove was kinda funny............
PURITY OF ESSENCE, MANDRAKE
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (dPcmp)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (e910j)
Posted by: maddogg at September 29, 2010 12:19 PM (OlN4e)
Right now, Jeff Bridges is the best actor we've got who's not 80 years old (Robert Duvall and Clint Eastwood).
Besides, here's something else the people who complain about remakes should consider: over the course of your life you'll probably see (or hear of) fifty different versions of Hamlet, yet you'll never any whining about the one with Edwin Booth in 1845 being the bestest ever and therefore they don't need to ever remake that play again.
Just as a restaging of Hamlet with Laurence Olivier, or Kenneth Brannaugh, or Mel Gibson, is a new chance to consider a character in a different ways, so too, can a remade movie be a chance to see what a new set of actors and director can do with the source material.
Yes, John Wayne is a great Rooster Cogburn, but the original movie is more wryly funny than deadly serious.
Why not let the Coen brothers do a version that captures the intensity and horror of teenage girl trying to hunt down a stone-killer like Ned Pepper?
I assume that's why the subtitle of this version is "Retribution".
Posted by: DelD at September 29, 2010 12:20 PM (+39ph)
Nothing on the horizon has the dramatic weight, depth of character, or artistic potential as Lindsay Lohan portraying Linda Lovelace.
It's a stroke of throat clearing box office nitro genius, with a side of German Shepard.
Posted by: Two rigid thumbs up at September 29, 2010 12:20 PM (rMMMP)
Posted by: Jones at September 29, 2010 04:07 PM (ZH73Z)
Nihilism ... but you already pointed that out.
Posted by: Nihilist at September 29, 2010 12:21 PM (UzjcV)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at September 29, 2010 12:21 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: John Galt at September 29, 2010 04:02 PM (F/4zf)
Working title: Geezer Armageddon
Posted by: Cicero at September 29, 2010 12:21 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Mike James at September 29, 2010 12:21 PM (k3VCR)
I loved No Country for Old Men. Saw it three times in the theater. Bought it on DVD the day it hit stores and watched it again that night.
Read the book, too, and thought the film was one of the greatest cinematic adaptations of a novel ever made. Absolutely note-perfect.
Of course, I believe Cormac McCarthy is our greatest living novelist and the greatest American man of letters since Hemingway. So, many may not share my affection for the source material.
The end of the movie is fairly straightforward, I think. Here's how it plays out:
Anton Chigurh doesn't kill Lewelyn Moss. The Mexicans do.
Chigurh keeps his promise to Lewelyn and kills Carla Jean because, though evil, he is a man of his word. (Think of the Lawful Evil alignment in D&D.)
Ed Tom Bell does, in fact, go into the motel room at the end. Before he enters he imagines Chigurh inside, waiting on him, and he goes inside anyway. To his great relief the room is empty. Chigurh has been there to retrieve the money, but he is already gone.
Sherrif Bell retires. Not because the world is growing more dangerous, but because he is finally recognizes true evil and finds himself unable to fight it.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 12:21 PM (dUunI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 29, 2010 12:22 PM (9Cooa)
A Knight's Tale.
I think its actually what killed Heath Ledger, it just took some time to finish the job
Oh God, I had forgotten that horrid movie.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 12:22 PM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 12:22 PM (/jbAw)
Can the remakes of Gone With The Wind and Citizen Kaine be far behind?
GWTW wil never be remade. Simply cannot come close to the original. Still stands up today imho. Vivien Liegh, Clark Cable?? No fucking way anything out of Hollywierd today can come close to the charisma those two had.
Posted by: jewells at September 29, 2010 03:38 PM (l/N7H)
I would like to see a modern adaptation of Gone With the Wind about the Republican takeover in 2010.
The earlier years, when Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters were happy on the Democrat plantation. "I don't know nothin' about fillin' out no financial disclosure forms!"
The cruel and heartless Sarah Palin leading the forces burning down Washington. The city's Democratic majority reduced to smoldering rubble.
Nancy Pelosi making a dress out of the curtains in the Minority Leader's office. "As God is my witness, I shall never be ousted from the Office of the Speaker again!"
Obama as the dashing daredevil who profits from the political turmoil. "But Barack, if you leave me, where will I go? What will I do?"
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:22 PM (fgCQL)
I saw that as a modern morality fairy tale..
You have Big Religion and Big Oil beating each other up throughout the movie..
It's snuff porn for liberals.
Posted by: Dave C at September 29, 2010 12:22 PM (4uhuW)
There's also another ending for NCFOM. When Anton leaves the house after killing the wife, he gets in the car and starts to drive away as he usually does, and then gets broadsided, badly injuring him. Moral: No matter how invulnerable one thinks he is, bad shit still happens.
Posted by: Captain Kirk at September 29, 2010 12:24 PM (SpVpR)
I don't know about any of you but I'm pretty certain that I'll take nuclear strength incompetence of abject evil any day:
When I look at this, all I see are those illustrations from Dante's Inferno come to life.
Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 29, 2010 12:24 PM (RkRxq)
Well....
I'm a big fan of the Coen brothers. I loved "Raising Arizona" and I liked "Fargo", although I did not think of it as anything humorous. Those who do are typical coastal elites who like to sneer at those who struggle in flyover country.
This will be a stretch for them since their forte is doing contemporary American stories set in some area of the country foreign to New Yorkers (which come to think of it includes Hoboken.) But they like to take chances, which is something that you can't say about most of the dreck that comes out of Hollywood.
Jeff Bridges has a damn good sense of what works and I don't see him getting into a screenplay that doesn't hang together. Duvall would have been a better choice five years ago. Sadly, he's pushing 79, so I don't know if he could have pulled it off.
Matt Damon? Well, at least he didn't write the screenplay so we won't see allusions to Howard Zinn. And if he plays the Glen Cambell role, at least people can see him die a horrible death on the screen. Ditto for Josh "W" Brolin.
Posted by: fapo at September 29, 2010 12:25 PM (TcaE8)
Anton Chigurh doesn't kill Lewelyn Moss. The Mexicans do.
Chigurh keeps his promise to Lewelyn and kills Carla Jean because, though evil, he is a man of his word. (Think of the Lawful Evil alignment in D&D.)
Ed Tom Bell does, in fact, go into the motel room at the end. Before he enters he imagines Chigurh inside, waiting on him, and he goes inside anyway. To his great relief the room is empty. Chigurh has been there to retrieve the money, but he is already gone.
Sherrif Bell retires. Not because the world is growing more dangerous, but because he is finally recognizes true evil and finds himself unable to fight it.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 04:21 PM (dUunI)
Maybe. The movie does not make that clear. I couldn't get through the book, but maybe you are imposing your own view ( which could have and should have been made more clear in the movie ).
We are left to wonder, but steered towards Despair
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:26 PM (dPcmp)
'bout the only thing Ted Turner DID fund was Gettysburg. Its been panned, but it was a good representation of the book.
Yep, there is a desperate lack of good cowboy movies from Hollyweird - which is why I rely on my Eastwood/John Wayne DVD collection, until some movie studio grows a pair
"There are two types of men, those that hold the gun, and those that dig..." classic.
Posted by: Fred Zeppelin at September 29, 2010 12:27 PM (R4ffQ)
Posted by: Filly at September 29, 2010 04:09 PM (GcVt/)
From the 1920s to the 1960s, Hollywood made tons of Biblical epics. It may be time for a resurgence.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:28 PM (fgCQL)
We grew up using "John Wayne" as a verb, as in "Why don't you just John-Wayne that door in?"
No one can do Rooster other than Wayne. No one.
Next thing we get will be a Tarantino remake of On the Waterfront.
Posted by: Boris Yeltsin at September 29, 2010 12:28 PM (4sQwu)
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Sands of Iwo Jima and Wake of the Red Witch.
Posted by: polynikes at September 29, 2010 04:11 PM (m2CN7)
Forgot about those..
Posted by: Dave C at September 29, 2010 12:28 PM (4uhuW)
Ed Tom Bell does, in fact, go into the motel room at the end. Before he enters he imagines Chigurh inside, waiting on him, and he goes inside anyway. To his great relief the room is empty. Chigurh has been there to retrieve the money, but he is already gone.
Sherrif Bell retires. Not because the world is growing more dangerous, but because he is finally recognizes true evil and finds himself unable to fight it.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 04:21 PM (dUunI)
Looks like I have to go back and re-watch it. That's a really cool take on the last motel room scene.
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:29 PM (N7uu0)
Posted by: The One True Rooster at September 29, 2010 12:30 PM (h1zzT)
When I look at this, all I see are those illustrations from Dante's Inferno come to life.
Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 29, 2010 04:24 PM (RkRxq)
Gee, sanctions on Iran for human rights abuses! And only 15 months after the Green 88 revolutionaries were gunned down in the streets. Well, better late and totally half-hearted than never, I guess.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:31 PM (fgCQL)
I agree with J.J.
138 They got anyone lined up to play the horse yet?
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at September 29, 2010 03:44 PM (QKKT0)
Thread winner. Maybe winner of teh Internets this week.
Posted by: s'moron at September 29, 2010 12:31 PM (UaxA0)
Sherrif Bell retires. Not because the world is growing more dangerous, but because he is finally recognizes true evil and finds himself unable to fight it.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 04:21 PM (dUunI)By the way, that's definitely because he's an old man too. You see the contrast between him and his deputy all movie long. The deputy is a long more gung-ho about tracking down Chigurth.
The movie isn't about despair; it's about one man finding out he can't do what needs to be done anymore. (And maybe *his* despair over that.)
Posted by: robviously at September 29, 2010 12:32 PM (N7uu0)
This makes about as much sense as the new Jack Black "Gullivers Travels" movie...
Some things should just NOT be done...
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 29, 2010 12:33 PM (AdK6a)
Ah Victor Mature movies. Classic.
Posted by: polynikes at September 29, 2010 04:30 PM (m2CN7)
Speaking of Victor Mature, why did they remake Kiss of Death? Mature wasn't real good in the original (I never thought he was real good in anything) but Richard Widmark's Johnny Udo was so over-the-top that there was no point in doing it over.
Posted by: stuiec at September 29, 2010 12:33 PM (fgCQL)
Posted by: nine coconuts at September 29, 2010 12:34 PM (DHNp4)
I am not anti-remake. Sometimes the remake is better than the original.
Agree. Instead making a crappy remake of an old great movie, Hollywood should dare to remake an old crappy movie into a good one.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at September 29, 2010 12:35 PM (QMtmy)
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
John Favreau is working on it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409847/
Posted by: Gene Shalit at September 29, 2010 12:35 PM (+lsX1)
Egads man!
I can't stand Christian Bale. I could only watch the whole thing because they had one of the worlds greatest actors (Crowe) carrying him throughout the flick.
Hell they could have cast a fucking litterbox as Bales' character and it would have improved the movie 1000 percent.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at September 29, 2010 12:35 PM (rxVVk)
Yep, there is a desperate lack of good cowboy movies from Hollyweird - which is why I rely on my Eastwood/John Wayne DVD collection, until some movie studio grows a pair
I read a commentary once that said that "Blazing Saddles" pretty much killed the American western movie. I agree.
Posted by: Soona at September 29, 2010 12:35 PM (SpVpR)
Posted by: Deanna at September 29, 2010 12:36 PM (fDmMD)
318
GAK!!!! Next thing you'll know, Richard Simmons will be the next Captain of the NCC-1701omega.
"Okay, people, people, PEOPLE! Let's get it together, and get into that warp thingie. Oh, and I want to discuss our engine shaft issue, and my promotion to Rear Admiral"
Posted by: Fred Zeppelin at September 29, 2010 12:37 PM (R4ffQ)
I only wish to God he was in charge of Captain America too.
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 12:39 PM (h1zzT)
FIFY.
SPOILER The Natural/NCFOM
Seriously though. If I wanted a sad think think ending with virtually no plot gratification I would read the book. That's why The Natural ends with a Strikeout in the book. I get enough real person let downs everyday I don't need a whole movie, my mindless escape from the everyday, devoted to the topic of "real life sometimes sucks" and "real people sometimes let you down" oh and "bad guys win a lot too" yeah I know all that. You haven't given me anything "deep" to think about no matter how much you think the topic is"original" and telling me all that and pretty much nothing more over a two hour span is not very entertaining. Oh so you want to make me "think"? Well I think I know enough about "real life", far more than Hollywood, and I think I'll rent a movie that makes me feel better then NCFOM did. (even The Mist has a better ending)
BTW there are plenty of real people who would have done the opposite; those types of real people have stories written about them.
/SPOILER
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 12:40 PM (0q2P7)
Also, I don't believe the Coens are Hollywood elitists sneering at the flyover yokels who finance their lifestyles. They aren't really Hollywood types at all. They self-financed their first movie, Blood Simple, and they've blazed their own trail since. Did anyone see Barton Fink? It mocks both faux-literate, self-important artistes and souless Hollywood studio executives. The title character, played by John Tuturo, is a limpdick socialist New York playwright who becomes a Los Angeles screenwriter but can't script a simple Wally Beery wrestling picture because he thinks that genre is beneath his talents. Their films may not be your cup of tea, but they aren't intentionally obscure. Joel and Ethan just follow their muse, I think.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 12:44 PM (dUunI)
And that makes for a pointless film experience. I *know* how to be a coward.
Posted by: Kerry at September 29, 2010 12:44 PM (a/VXa)
I haven't seen NCFOM, but the ending sounds a lot like if Clarice did the logical thing and left quietly, then waited for back up in Silence of the Lambs.
Yes?
Posted by: s'moron at September 29, 2010 12:45 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Bob S at September 29, 2010 12:45 PM (izA2D)
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 29, 2010 12:46 PM (Ly+aE)
I read a commentary once that said that "Blazing Saddles" pretty much killed the American western movie. I agree.
Blazing Saddles was only a symptom, not the cause.
What killed the American western was pretty much the same thing that's been killing American culture since the 1960s: multiculturalism and relativism.
Plus, during the heyday of the Western, from the 1920s to the late 1950s, Americans weren't that far removed from the Old West. Buffalo Bill died in 1917, Bat Masterson in 1921, and Wyatt Earp in 1929.
In fact, we're now farther away from the Korean War than the Americans of 1950 were from the last of the Indian wars (Wounded Knee happened in 1890).
Until the late 1940s, most Americans still had personal experience with horses as a part of everyday life. Many American farmers still plowed with mules, and there were horse-drawn wagons still in use in many cities.
Posted by: DelD at September 29, 2010 12:51 PM (+39ph)
Posted by: rawmuse at September 29, 2010 12:51 PM (yhrH5)
Remakes I'd LIKE to see?
Starship Trooper done right... how can you have a CAP Trooper without Powered Battle Armor?
New movies?
Tactics of Mistake... the first Dorsai novel..
Hammers Slammers... big bad ass HOVER TANKS!
Posted by: Romeo13 at September 29, 2010 12:53 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: rawmuse at September 29, 2010 12:53 PM (yhrH5)
I agree: Don't kill the messenger; don't confuse the symptom with the disease
Hollywood and the pop culture media gave us a steady diet of bullshit in the late 60s and early 70s ( I was there; I saw it all unfold )
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 29, 2010 12:54 PM (dPcmp)
Yes?
SPOILER NCFOM
Not exactly. Bell just leaves. He makes no effort to call for backup and cover the suspect to ensure he doesn't escape. And BTW he knew he had been "made" that the killer knew he was in the hotel room with him. The only reason Bell didn't get in a fight is because the killer did not know that Bell knew he was there. So he was quietly hiding, hoping Bell would go away. Which he does, letting the killer escape, allowing him to kill the innocent Carla Jean.
/SPOILER
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 12:55 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 29, 2010 04:40 PM
See that's the problem with changing things in movies that are important to the bool's theme or story. Malamud's book had an almost entirely different theme than the movie, it wasn't just the ending. Yeah, it's nice to escape and have fun at movies, so why not find books that fit that genre. Why change an excellent novel just to make people happy when there are plenty of other books to adapt? IAt the time it was said that it was Redford who wanted the chnages because he wanted to be a hero.
Posted by: Deanna at September 29, 2010 12:59 PM (fDmMD)
Yep, when I was a kid in the 50s we had an old black farmer who came around in a mule wagon every Spring to plow back yards for people wanting a garden and in the middle of the Summer he came around with bushel baskets of peas.
All that meant more work for me.
Posted by: Vic at September 29, 2010 01:03 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Sarah Jessica Parker at September 29, 2010 03:44 PM (QKKT0)
hahahahahahahaha.....good one.
Posted by: mare at September 29, 2010 01:12 PM (i3rnV)
One thing that gets me about the Coen Brothers' supposedly "more faithful to the book" version of True Grit - why didn't they portray Rooster Cogburn the way Mattie describes him in the book, as resembling Grover Cleveland? Small thing, maybe, but it beats that bizarrely anachronistic homeless Kris Kristofferson thing that Bridges sports in this version.
Posted by: A. Pendragon at September 29, 2010 01:15 PM (qOgyw)
Leave it to the Cohen brothers to be daring.
Imagine casting Matt Damon in True Grit as the female lead!
Posted by: Ellie Light at September 29, 2010 01:25 PM (PTpqi)
Posted by: blackhawk12151 at September 29, 2010 01:25 PM (W2CPd)
I don't believe that my interpretation of the end of the cinematic No Country for Old Men is projection on my part. In both the book and the movie, Ed Tom Bell goes back to the motel where Lewelyn died to look for the money that so many have died for.
At the motel, he finds the lock missing. He's seen this before, at Lewelyn's trailer. He draws his sidearm, which is unusual. Remember the praise of the old lawman who never even carried a gun in the voice-over at the opening? He also declined to draw his firearm when he and his deputy entered Moss's trailer. Not only does he draw his gun, he cocks it. We, as the audience, know that he's taking this very seriously.
He imagines that the unstoppable killer is inside, waiting behind the door. The Coens added the brief shots of Chigurh illuminated by the light streaming through the hole left by the missing lock. McCarthy doesn't include it the book. The directors want the audience to know what's going through the old Sherriff's mind as he stands outside. Even though he knows the risk he's taking, he pushes the door open.
He enters the motel room to find evidence that Chigurh has been there and retrieved the money from Lewelyn's hiding place. Chigurh unscrewed the ventilation grate with a dime, just as he did in the other motel, earlier in the movie. We know this really happens, because Ed Tom cannot make up the details of the grate and the dime. He doesn't know that Lewelyn has been hiding the satchel in the ventilation systems or that Anton Chigurh uses the coins in his pocket to unscrew the grates. As the audience, we have seen these things before. Ed Tom hasn't.
The narrator isn't unreliable, because there is no one narrator. Unreliable narrators are usually first-person narrators. Think of that awful short story The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman which you probably read in college. The unreliable narration is from the first-person perspective. Omniscent third-person narrators are rarely unreliable. We don't only see the events from Ed Tom's point of view. We also follow Chigurh, Lewelyn, Carla Jean, and Carson Wells at various points in the movie. It's a third-person narrator.
Besides, the interpretation that, somehow, to see Chigurh is to die is misconcieved. The old man running gas station isn't killed. The receptionist in the trailer park office who tells him that she "can't give out no information" about the residents doesn't die, either. Neither do the woman who rents him the motel room or the boys who find Chigurh after the car wreck. Someone is over-analyzing the movie if they believe that to see Anton Chigurh is to meet your end.
I might have overdone it with this post. Sorry if I got windy there.
Posted by: Lurk Ness Monster at September 29, 2010 01:28 PM (dUunI)
Posted by: M1911 at September 29, 2010 01:39 PM (o14Iw)
When my father was young there were still a fair number of Civil War veterans living. He and his father (tenant farmer, born in a log cabin in Kentucky) plowed with mules and horses until probably the late forties, early fifties. My father still feels himself very close to the days of the cowboy, and regards the decline and degradation of the western as a deep loss to the American psyche.
Posted by: Kerry at September 29, 2010 01:45 PM (a/VXa)
But in California they beat it out of us in school. All my commie "Social Studies" teachers pounded it into us that all cowboys were genocidal Indian killers and that the American West was stolen from peaceful Mexico.
Having parents that gave a shit and told me the truth is all that saved us kids from becoming the limp-dicked commies our teachers wanted.
By the time we graduated high school my Brother and I both had been sent to the principal's office for arguing with a teacher about westerns and cowboys.
Although, looking back, I think my fight was about the movie The Green Berets.
Posted by: sifty at September 29, 2010 01:56 PM (h1zzT)
Posted by: Coffee Partier at September 29, 2010 02:09 PM (J74Py)
I love John Wayne and what I consider his meticulous attention for facts and details.
Yes, I know there are a few flaws - but that is what happens in every instance of art imitating real life - you cannot slap 1 or 2 hours of flim together and get a chunk of life 100%.
Nevertheless and be that as it may - I love John Wayne very dearly on many levels - his honesty, and his Americanism obviously at the top of it - and after his long history, of wonderful characters, that big craggy face and wonderful blue eyes, and that tired but determined steel that is all too rare, these days.
But as much as I always admired John Wayne, I really could not stand Glenn Campbell.
Oh, he was cute at first, but for some reason, it wore thin really quick, and I am sure he must have run off with Mac Davis' wife before True Grit because when True Grit came out I hated him so badly.
Well, I am wrong - he married Sarah Davis in '76, and made True Grit in '69.
But I still didn't like him at all by then. So I don't know why - but he proved to be the sidewinder I thought he was, anyway.
So a remake of the movie I could never fully enjoy as a John Wayne movie isn't in and of itself a bad thing. Hollywood's sheer stupidity when it comes to remakes is.
Which Hollywood in my mind so often is very incredibly Stupid.
They have a bad habit of making the script worse and the casting even worse than that.
We all realize how hard it is to keep coming up with new plots, and that movies and TV all rehashed all the plots to pieces.
Shame none of them try to achieve a high level of competition of quality, when they do.
But they are big on standing around congratulating themselves as if they surpassed anyone's wildest imaginations.
And looking incredibly stupid doing it.
Best all time remake I ever saw was John Wayne's Rio Bravo. John Wayne's remake of Bogie and Baby's "To Have and Have Not".
Run them back to back a few times and pull it out.
Great fun!
Posted by: Rose at September 29, 2010 02:14 PM (BYsJS)
But, it's a great story and maybe it deserves a re-telling. I think the major concern is that someone will fuck it up.
I looked at the trailer and it doesn't look too bad, so we shall see.
(btw, went through all of this with The Alamo remake, and the remake, while not my favorite, was a decent rendering of the story)
Posted by: mpurinTexas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at September 29, 2010 02:25 PM (xMKKV)
John Wayne is turning over in his grave. RIP.
Posted by: TexBob at September 29, 2010 02:49 PM (7cXE7)
Posted by: moviegique at September 29, 2010 02:53 PM (ey5wt)
Posted by: Birdbath at September 29, 2010 02:54 PM (/DOcw)
Posted by: John Wayne (in a bathhouse) at September 29, 2010 02:58 PM (/DOcw)
They never should have gotten away with killing the hero at the beginning of the last act though.
Wait.....Llewelyn Moss was the hero? Major protagonist, maybe, but only in the context of sharing the limelight with Sheriff Bell and Anton Chigurh. I'm not convinced No Country had a hero as such. (Incidentally, did any one else see what looked like a deliberate effort at parallelism in the actions of Chigurh following his accident and those of Moss crossing over into Mexico after his fire-fight with Chigurh, almost as if the Coens are suggesting that Chigurh is about to begin walking the path Moss walked, to a similar lethal conclusion. Watch it again - it's all duplicated, right down to Chigurh's purchase of a shirt.)
Posted by: A. Pendragon at September 29, 2010 03:06 PM (qOgyw)
Sheriff Bell did nothing to propel the story. He can't be a hero. Between Chigurh and Moss, who did you want to succeed? I like Anton Chigurh's work rate, but Moss is caught up in the gears.
Posted by: Birdbath at September 29, 2010 03:18 PM (/DOcw)
Posted by: A. Pendragon at September 29, 2010 03:28 PM (qOgyw)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at September 29, 2010 03:35 PM (kJXs1)
"Found money" has a long history in storytelling. The most common use is "found money knows no good." Chigurh and Moss are bound by the same goal. Moss is an everyman against a monster. The natural inclination is toward Moss. And they killed him on page 90 without a payoff!
Posted by: Birdbath at September 29, 2010 04:07 PM (/DOcw)
Posted by: theworldisnotenough at September 29, 2010 04:16 PM (O75i4)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 29, 2010 05:34 PM (61b7k)
What handful of hallucenogens are you on??? That was a horrible movie.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 29, 2010 05:38 PM (61b7k)
Posted by: Jack Lipnik at September 29, 2010 05:42 PM (kjErX)
Not talking shit or anything, but where are you from and what do you do? Not stalking, just trying to figure out how you could grow up so different than my 'norm'.
You can't stand John Wayne movies, you like pretentious foreign crap, and you're a Conservative. This doesn't jive with my outdated sensibilities.
And, no, I don't like the cut of your jib, and I doubt there's anything in your newsletter that I would want to read.
Best regards,
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 29, 2010 05:46 PM (9tt+Z)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at September 29, 2010 06:45 PM (XCXhL)
Posted by: Schreiber at September 29, 2010 07:46 PM (AMveJ)
Posted by: Cee_Arr_AL at September 30, 2010 10:21 AM (4u6BM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
61 queries taking 0.2058 seconds, 466 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 29, 2010 11:06 AM (d4Hvj)