March 24, 2010
— Ace Taking him out to the woodshed for a whoopin'.
Yesterday, I got an email from a prominent conservative academic; it was, I think, a touch harsh on the object of its attention. Here’s what it said: “Frum's pathetic, desperate whining reeks of self-loathing. At least that shows good judgment: I loathe him, too.”The Frum in question is David Frum, former speechwriter for George W. Bush, and the “whining” that so goaded my correspondent was a blog by David, written on the day the House voted on health care, in which he described the bill’s passage as a defeat for the Republicans akin to Waterloo. He called the bill the Republicans’ “most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.” The GOP’s tactics—“No negotiations, no compromise, nothing”—led, he wrote, to a “disaster” for conservatives: “We went for all the marbles, we ended with none.”
Passionate "extremism" is part of any political debate, and the more of it the better. I especially don't want lectures about excessive rhetoric from the man who wrote “An End to Evil.”I’ve known professionally for almost a decade, and with whom my social interaction has always been very genial. He is a good and energetic man, and has, in the years since he left service at the White House, dedicated himself to being what I call a “polite-company conservative” (or PCC), much like David Brooks and Sam Tanenhaus at the New York Times (where the precocious Ross Douthat is shaping up to be a baby version of the species). A PCC is a conservative who yearns for the goodwill of the liberal elite in the media and in the Beltway—who wishes, always, to have their ear, to be at their dinner parties, to be comforted by a sense that liberal interlocutors believe that they are not like other conservatives, with their intolerance and boorishness, their shrillness and their talk radio. The PCC, in fact, distinguishes himself from other conservatives not so much ideologically—though there is an element of that—as aesthetically.
He goes on to rubbish Frum's entire (non) argument. Frum's central point, to the extent he has one, is that the GOP should have gone into compromise/dealmaking mode in order to... well, secure a compromise and make a deal.
Would this have worked -- even given a very loose standard of what "working" means when you're talking about surrender? Given that this is Frum's big claim, one would like to see a bit of evidence presented it would have worked. Instead, Frum just shrugs off his central assumption as if it's a nit beneath picking.
I cannot escape the conclusion that David’s piece was, in broad terms, simplistic. His argument that Republicans and Democrats were not that far apart just goes to show how naïve he is on this question. Health care, for anybody who has been paying attention, is becoming a referendum on bigger issues like the size of government, and personal freedom. The public option, the individual mandate, all the bill’s taxes, the end of Medicare advantage, none of these were “little” questions to negotiate over and move on. (I also marveled at the audacity of the little fillip—“Could a deal have been reached? Who knows?”—with which David tosses off the most pertinent question.)
I have a somewhat different take on Frum. I notice that Frum is not actually terribly policy-oriented or policy-informed. He is not a wonk. Or, if it is, he seems to hide it well enough on his blog. I don't see a lot of deep policy analysis on his site.
Frum, of course, is constantly castigating conservatives like Limbaugh for supposedly-simplistic thinking, sloganeering, etc. Not doing their homework. Not pouring over the policy details and arriving at a good policy position, but instead preferring easier, gut-level attitudinal posturing.
The thing is -- That's all that Frum does, too. He may criticize Limbaugh for simplifying arguments into easy-to-repeat gut-level impulses and attitudes, rather than going into great detail about policy, but that's all Frum does, too. Except instead of copping one attitude -- "Don't negotiate; stay firm; remain true to principles" -- he cops the opposite attitude -- "Always negotiate; stay flexible; compromise on principles."
But because his attitude is viewed more favorably by the liberal retardentsia whose approval he so craves, he deems that his attitude is the more sophisticated and intellectualized one.
Actually, all he's doing is being the Anti-Limbaugh. If Rush is given to sometimes simplifying affairs into narratives of Pure Conservatives and Corrupt Progressives, Frum's only stock in trade is simplifying affairs into narratives of Corrupt Conservatives and Pure Moderate-Liberals.
Incidentally, I have no problem with simplifying things for political purposes. I'm not knocking Rush. And note I said he "sometimes" does this, not that he always does this. What I'm trying to do is not knock Rush, but note that Frum, who fancies himself an elevated, intellectual policy guru, in fact hasn't the sophistication or patience or learning for actual policy analysis and instead resorts to the exact tropes he is forever shrilling over. Everything with Frum is pure emotional Politics of Resentment stuff -- the stuff he's supposedly so chagrined to see so much of -- it's just that he resents a different power-group.
In Frum's astonishingly stupid -- and talk-radio-level raw-meat bloody -- Waterloo column, Frum prances and minces in his typical self-congratulatory way, telling us all how we should have adopted the attitude of "compromise." But as for actual policy, he has nothing whatsoever to say. He does not tell us which policies we could have gainfully compromised on, and which we could have bent to our own ends; such thinking and analysis is simply beyond him. Instead his entire argument consists of "We should have compromised" -- on what? "Who knows?," as David Frum says about the chances for success in compromising -- and calling Rush Limbaugh stupid and simplistic for the 6000th time.
How is this any different from the caricature of Limbaugh he whines about daily? Replace his caricatured idea of Rush -- someone who, in his telling, only says "Be tougher" and "Shout louder" and "Be more extreme" -- with Frum's formulation of "Be weaker" and "Mumble more soothingly" and "Be more moderate."
How the fuck can someone claim one of those is a more sophisticated argument than the other? Neither is sophisticated at all, and of them -- Frum's -- has the added detriment of being effeminate to boot.
I have less of a problem with self-professed "rodeo clowns" like Glenn Beck than I do with David Frum, who constantly asserts he is possessed of a more thoughtful, more intellectually mature ideology, but whose actual output consists of nothing but fagged-up derivatives of Morning Zoo shock jockery.
Posted by: Ace at
01:13 PM
| Comments (399)
Post contains 1136 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 01:18 PM (Vu6sl)
derivatives of Morning Zoo shock jockery
I try to put in less thought than an angry man with a pink shotgun.
i'm loving it Ace
Posted by: robotwhisper at March 24, 2010 01:20 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at March 24, 2010 01:20 PM (XBuIV)
Posted by: joncelli at March 24, 2010 01:21 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Ira at March 24, 2010 01:22 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 01:22 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Bosk at March 24, 2010 01:22 PM (pUO5u)
Posted by: ray at March 24, 2010 01:22 PM (Vdwyv)
He must have gone to the fanciest prep school imaginable, because I can't imagine him not getting beaten up on a daily basis. It doesn't seem to occur to him that the Democrats might...just might...use Republicans for nothing other than cover.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 24, 2010 01:22 PM (T0NGe)
easy with the "fagged-up" and mincing and prancing stuff or I'll have to ban you. Gabe deserves better. Well, I guess he can defend himself. Should be fun to watch.
In any case, Frum needs to consider how the argument is framed, to borrow one of those overheated, silly memes of the Left. If they know beforehand that you have no principles, and are only negotiating to minimize the damage, then you have already lost. Very Sun-Tzu.
Posted by: pep at March 24, 2010 01:23 PM (0K3p3)
Posted by: ray at March 24, 2010 05:22 PM (Vdwyv)
He's worse than that. He's not "moderate" because he holds a patchwork of positions that are not easily identified. He's not "moderate" because he holds watered-down views.
He's a principled moderate. He's moderate for the sake of being moderate.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 24, 2010 01:24 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 01:25 PM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: David Brooks at March 24, 2010 01:25 PM (GqGQo)
Well, that's about it.
Posted by: ArcticBoy at March 24, 2010 01:26 PM (4fc2a)
How was it a devastating defeat for the Republicans when they were vastly outnumbered in the House, and 34 Democrats joined them - and public support was with the Republicans, not the Demunists?
Dave must have had his beer goggles on when he wrote that shit.
maybe he even had someone whispering in his ear: "get in dey ass, Dave"
Posted by: kallisto at March 24, 2010 01:26 PM (+FkcS)
Frum is an attention whore and the only way he can get attention is to trash conservatives while claiming to be one.
No one ever quotes or interviews Frum for his great insite and intellect on any issue, he dosen't have any. I liked President Bush alot and for alot of reasons. His ability to hire intelligent and loyal staff wasn't one of them.
Also as far as Frums legacy goes, Bush won't be remembered for his great speeches.
Posted by: robtr at March 24, 2010 01:26 PM (fwSHf)
But what do we expect from someone who thinks BUSH was a small government kind of guy.
Posted by: wooga at March 24, 2010 01:27 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: kathleen parker at March 24, 2010 05:17 PM (cEXzj)
You might be right... but he's terrific working from his knees!
Posted by: Barry O. at March 24, 2010 01:27 PM (Rc7Cf)
If only we sought to work with the Japanese in 1942 instead of blindly demonizing them, they wouldn't have bombed Pearl Harbor.
After all, Hawaii has plenty of islands. If we had worked to reach a compromise in which we gave them some of the islands we didn't need yet kept the others, that entire unpleasantness could've been avoided.
Just think of how many Japanese cocktail parties my grandfather got disinvited to because of our unwillingness to work together.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 01:28 PM (plsiE)
Frum is pussy liberal who is into pant creases.
Posted by: Yikes! at March 24, 2010 01:28 PM (Q2mW1)
They went for all the marbles...and lost.
Posted by: David Frumocles at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (7BU4a)
Hey now, some of us make an honest living with fagged-up derivatives of Morning Zoo shock jockery, that's pretty low of you comparing it to Frum's garbage.
Posted by: Baba Booey at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (gh14/)
...with which David tosses off...
hmmm, I wonder if this is the author's cute way of calling Frum a jerk-off?
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (z37MR)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: rightzilla at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (rVJH4)
Frum said Sarah Palin got where she is by sending sexual signals.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT!? This guy is a piece of shit.
Posted by: Dan at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at March 24, 2010 01:30 PM (Xu5Z7)
Posted by: wooga at March 24, 2010 05:27 PM (2p0e3)
Hey, compared to the Precedent I am Thomas Jefferson.
Posted by: Bush 43 at March 24, 2010 01:30 PM (7BU4a)
But what do we expect from someone who thinks BUSH was a small government kind of guy.
I'd love to know when his ancestors moved to Canada.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 24, 2010 01:30 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: t-bird at March 24, 2010 01:30 PM (EqsaE)
In other words, he's a liberal.
Andi without the milky loads or the amateur gynecology.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 24, 2010 01:31 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: rightzilla at March 24, 2010 01:31 PM (rVJH4)
They went for all the marbles...and lost.
Posted by: David Frum in NYC in 1777 at March 24, 2010 01:32 PM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Ira at March 24, 2010 01:32 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 01:32 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Dan at March 24, 2010 01:32 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: Amused Observer at March 24, 2010 01:33 PM (EioPx)
Posted by: Ace's Neurontin prescription at March 24, 2010 05:32 PM
(dQLM/)
Don't you have more important things to do Rahm?
Posted by: 18-1 at March 24, 2010 01:34 PM (7BU4a)
And to continue the analogy, the Republicans should be at least able to take Dorcester Heights this November. But beyond that, I really have no idea of what they are going to be able to do, as I think they need to have a "come to Jesus" moment finally.
I would actually prefer it if people stopped focusing on getting Republicans elected and spent their time reading on fundamental principles of liberty, discussing same with their fellows, and being active in their local governments as private citizens. We have got to stop being mainly campaign followers/supporters and start being self-ruling citizens who delegate to known quantities for the higher governmental offices; a quantity known to them because they themselves have either been active at the local civic level, or know someone who has. To get there is a work in progress, but there is a way. But I am done with the jumping on the Montague bandwagon just because the Capulets overreached. This is not to say there is only a dime's worth of difference, but it is to say that the Founders left us with a system that was fundamentally not designed to deal with the modern politician, and we are going to have to correct the problem.
Posted by: Horatius at March 24, 2010 01:34 PM (yJBTB)
Posted by: maddogg at March 24, 2010 01:35 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 01:35 PM (fA7M/)
David Frum is the"conservative" version of French foreign policy, circa 1983.
You need to go forward or backward. Mitterand pissed the Rooskies off on a regular basis.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (h22YH)
Just wait 'til krugman finds out someone else is hitting his shriveled up squeeze....
Posted by: jason blair at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (Dq9BS)
In grade school, when they were picking teams for a game, Frum is the kid neither team wanted.
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (Vu6sl)
David Fluff evidently missed when the Republicans actually lost, which was 4 years ago and then again in Nov 2008. Those losses made this week almost inevitable, and of course it was David Fluff's own unprincipled devotion to flowery words apart from their actual policy meanings that helped wreck the GOP small-government brand.
David Fluff is part of the problem and will never be part of the solution.
Posted by: Alan Smithee at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (F7GbV)
Posted by: Xoxotl at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (syvX9)
You lost. Frum figured it out. You haven't. But at least you're not also a fag. Jeez, Gabe, you're really fucked.
Posted by: Ace's Neurontin prescription at March 24, 2010 05:32 PM (dQLM/)
--Rush was so right. It's got nothing to do with what's good for people or for the country. It's only about "We won! Nanny nanny boo boo!"
Begone, ergie
Posted by: logprof at March 24, 2010 01:36 PM (Mmw0q)
Posted by: Neville Chamberlain at March 24, 2010 01:37 PM (h22YH)
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 01:37 PM (z37MR)
(American and English slang) frum
noun
from the conraction "front bum", the fatty, large abdomen that protrudes some obese people. Also Fupa, from "front pouch" and Gunt (gut cunt) wow... that's a big frum...Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 01:38 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:39 PM (h22YH)
Hi,
Me again, Sen Stabenow.
I was talking to David Frum the other day and I couldn't help being sturck by how feminine his hands were, very soft, soft as the hair on my ass. Soft as my huge foul-smelling bush. Soft as my ex-husband's pool boy's skin. David is so right about the Conservatives, they are really mean people.
Thank you,
Sen. Stabenow
Posted by: Sen. Debbie Stabenow at March 24, 2010 01:39 PM (tcSZb)
Frum: This is blasphemy! This is madness!
Leondias : THIS...IS...AMERICA
Posted by: Leondias the Tea Partier at March 24, 2010 01:39 PM (7BU4a)
Yeah, pretty much, other than Frum's an insufferable git.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 01:40 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 24, 2010 01:40 PM (I1/U/)
Posted by: David Frumsy at March 24, 2010 01:42 PM (GwPRU)
I fart in your general direction, ergie.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 01:42 PM (otlXg)
What you wrote is exactly what states are doing to fend off HC right now. People are waking up to the fact that we have no more representation in DC anymore, and are falling back, some quickly, some slowly to more state-based and local politics. That's where the real power of freedom is anyway.
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 01:42 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:43 PM (h22YH)
Obama signs order on abortion and healthcare
In part:
The order is intended to ensure the new healthcare law will maintain a ban on the use of federal money to pay for abortions, except in cases of rape or incest, or if the life of a woman is in danger.
The White House announced on Sunday that Obama would sign the order in exchange for support for the massive healthcare overhaul bill from Democratic abortion rights opponents' in the House of Representatives.
The support from the roughly dozen members of that group, led by Representative Bart Stupak, was essential to get the 216 votes necessary for the House to pass the bill.
Abortion rights advocates said they were furious about the signing, which they said gave extra weight to an anti-abortion measure known as the Hyde Amendment, but acknowledged they were unlikely to campaign against healthcare reform or most candidates who supported the bill.
Posted by: Twinks at March 24, 2010 01:44 PM (wRPBa)
How fuckin' retarded if Frum? Who knows?
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at March 24, 2010 01:46 PM (epBek)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 24, 2010 01:46 PM (tzcjs)
You only have to look to the path Tory party in the U.K. has taken.
Six months ago Labor could have ended up as a minority third party in parliament, but the Tories' be-mean-to-no-one policies have turned them into Labor-Lite and the polls reflect this.
In Oz a similar situation was developing, however a grassroots intifada saw a very squishy conservative leader ousted for one who's prepared to use his fists.
Posted by: lotocoti at March 24, 2010 01:46 PM (MMUqa)
Posted by: Onlooker at March 24, 2010 01:46 PM (M3hG/)
Because they know the EO is garbage (as does any sane individual).
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 01:47 PM (otlXg)
21 Frum was actually a mainly economic speechwriter. But I think President Bush definitely delivered some speeches that will be in the history books. The axis-of-evil one, though, will be the only one remotely near to being a contribution from Frum.
/In other words, Frum was great at writing some economic stuff but Gerson & co. wrote the memorable ones.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 01:49 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 01:49 PM (Vu6sl)
Frum reminds me of the Euroweenie set that views diplomacy as a goal unto itself, rather than a means to an end.
The Dems deliberately shut Republicans out of the process, crafting the bill behind closed doors. Their only "compromise" was to dump the public option- and then only because they couldn't get enough Democrats to vote for it. What the hell kind of "compromise" does he think the Dems would agree to when they had no need or desire to do so?
tl;dr: David Frum is an imbecile. Yet another example of why writing speeches that convey someone else's ideas does not make one themself an "idea guy".
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 24, 2010 01:49 PM (plsiE)
Posted by: Onlooker at March 24, 2010 01:50 PM (M3hG/)
Guess what? Frum's blog didn't just rename itself now did it?
You and Varidijian owe Frum an apology.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 24, 2010 01:50 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 24, 2010 01:50 PM (tzcjs)
70 47 Yeah, pretty much, other than Frum's an insufferable git.
True, that. :spoken w/ British accent:
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 01:50 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Johnny I at March 24, 2010 01:50 PM (x9okW)
Posted by: Speller at March 24, 2010 01:51 PM (o0R2E)
Posted by: GarandFan at March 24, 2010 01:52 PM (6mwMs)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 01:53 PM (QxSug)
"I have less of a problem with self-professed "rodeo clowns" like Glenn Beck than I do with David Frum, who constantly asserts he is possessed of a more thoughtful, more intellectually mature ideology, but whose actual output consists of nothing but fagged-up derivatives of Morning Zoo shock jockery."
dammit man, some of your summations like this one on Frum are just so damn solid. Nothing more needs to be said. You nailed him cold to the wall. I couldn't agree more with everything you wrote.
It's odd that this guy who thinks he's some big conservative intellectual heavyweight never does the big dance, never lays out a big argument. He's a little pretender nibbling at the ankles of people like Rush who granted are deserving sometimes of criticism, but come on, that's all Frump has to offer.
Posted by: exceller at March 24, 2010 01:54 PM (jx2Td)
Posted by: Thomas at March 24, 2010 01:54 PM (DuXaT)
Tunku Varadarajan
Posted by: CyclopsJack at March 24, 2010 05:48 PM (a4o2p)
My special superdeveloped Moron Anagram ability gives me "aardvark tuna juna" from that name.
Frum should beware of the aardwark tuna juna. It is not as nice as the Carebear plush toys that Frum like to snuggle with in his Dora the Explorer bunk bed.
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:55 PM (h22YH)
Well, if you listened to Mithc fucking chinless McConnell on Hannity a little while ago, you would've heard the Republicans want to start over -- this time with bipartisan input.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 01:55 PM (z37MR)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 24, 2010 01:56 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Thomas at March 24, 2010 05:54 PM (DuXaT)
No. He just shines them.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 01:56 PM (dQdrY)
I was stuck in Phoenix airport on Monday night and had to listen to this goatfucker go on and on about how the GOP had to change or it was finished as a party. Packing this cocksucker on top of the joys of flying was nearly too much. Only the thought of donkey-punching Campbell Brown made the wait endurable.
I have little to add other than Frum is an excellent Quisling. May he rot for it.
Posted by: U.S.S. Yorktown at March 24, 2010 01:56 PM (sYEpI)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:57 PM (h22YH)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 24, 2010 01:57 PM (0q2P7)
76 After I read the Right Man I immediately threw it in the trash. What a narcisstic piece of crap.
For supposedly being about Bush, it was all about David. He's elevated himself so much that people think he was a major speechwriter. DF only lasted until '03, anyway. He collapsed like a house of cards after people got mad about "axis of evil". Such a spine on that man!
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 01:58 PM (yfJ6g)
The Republicans just don't get it. It's not that we'd rather have them 'fix' our health care system rather than the Democrats 'fixing' our health care system.
IT'S THAT WE DON'T ANY OF THOSE MEDDLING HACKS IN WASHINGTON TO INTERFERE WITH OUR HEALTH CARE.
Fix your own damn house before you meddle in our private affairs!
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 01:58 PM (z37MR)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 24, 2010 01:58 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 01:59 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 01:59 PM (h22YH)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:00 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Monty at March 24, 2010 02:02 PM (HQzxr)
104 Well, if you listened to Mitch fucking chinless McConnell on Hannity a little while ago, you would've heard the Republicans want to start over -- this time with bipartisan input.
Sounds like the R senators want to shaft their colleagues in the House. How noble of them. Regardless, DeMint & Vitter are putting forward bills today stating that they want to repeal all of Hell Care. It won't work, but it's something.
Also read this, it'll make you feel better. The House is holding firm.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:02 PM (yfJ6g)
Fred Thompson: Obama used 20 different pens to sign HC bill. I guess none of them wanted to be the one signing this monstrosity into law.
Our 2008 nominee: Obama is a decent person, and a person who you do not have to be scared of being president of the United States. He's a decent, family man citizen.
Conclusion: Thompson is not really serious about being president.
Correlary: One who wants to win does so by surrendering. McCain voters, YOU ARE DAVID FRUM.
FACE THE FRUM. ACCEPT IT.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 02:03 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 06:00 PM (QxSug)
That odor you detect is not sushi. It's my vagina.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 02:03 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Vidkun Quisling at March 24, 2010 02:04 PM (Kt5vQ)
Posted by: Monty at March 24, 2010 06:02 PM (HQzxr)
I agree with everyone you listed but I'd also add Thomas Sowell to the list. He breaks in down with breathtaking simplicity.
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2010 02:04 PM (VuLos)
If I performed mitotic division, there would be Frums, which is "Smurf" backwards.
I think about this stuff a lot on the bus.
Posted by: David Frum with a bus pass at March 24, 2010 02:04 PM (h22YH)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 24, 2010 05:50 PM (tzcjs)
Whoops. Didn't see your post right above. Beat me by a couple of minutes.
Posted by: CyclopsJack at March 24, 2010 02:06 PM (a4o2p)
OT: White House: Transparency? Are you kidding?
This exchange is fucking incredible!
The Obama White House did not allow the press to cover the president's signing of the executive order created to win Rep. Bart Stupak's vote for Obamacare. At the daily briefing, reporters wanted to know why no press photographer or reporter was allowed in. Press secretary Robert Gibbs told them they should be happy with a picture from the White House photographer, Pete Souza -- a photo produced and selected by the White House. It will be a "nice picture," Gibbs assured reporters.
Reporters tried to appeal to the White House's professed commitment to openness and transparency. Gibbs was having none of it. The White House wanted to limit coverage of the executive order, so in the spirit of openness and transparency it simply shut the press out. This is how Gibbs' back-and-forth with reporters went:
"The president is signing an executive order on abortion that is a pretty big national issue," a reporter asked. "Why would that be closed press, no pictures?"
"WeÂ’ll put out a picture from Pete [Souza]," Gibbs said.
"But what about a picture from the actual national media, not from -- " the reporter started to follow up.
"On, the picture from Pete will be for the actual event," Gibbs answered.
"Right, but what about allowing us in, for openness and transparency?"
"We'll have a nice picture from Pete that will demonstrate that type of transparency."
"Not the same, Robert," the reporter said. "Never has been."
"I know you all disagree with that," Gibbs answered. "I think Pete takes wonderful photos."
Gibbs' suggestion that the press corps thinks Souza is a bad photographer set off the reporters. That's not what they were saying; the point was that the press was not allowed in.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa," the reporter said. "Don't twist this -- it's not an attack on Pete.
"Well, I donÂ’t know why youÂ’d want to attack Pete, Chuck," Gibbs said, "but IÂ’m going to stand up here and defend PeteÂ’s -- "
"It's not transparent and itÂ’s a vital issue."
"And you will have a lovely picture from Pete."
"You really think thatÂ’s all itÂ’s worth, is a photograph, on an issue this important?"
"No, I think youÂ’ll be able to see the President sign the executive order."
"Not hear anything anybody has to say?"
"You'll have a nice picture."
And here it is: a nice photo, exactly what the White House wanted you to see, and nothing more.
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 02:06 PM (Vu6sl)
I'd rather see Paul Ryan devise a plan to win the House in November. Without the House, we are powerless to do anything about The Big Fucking Deal.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:08 PM (z37MR)
David, at least I got an Executive Order out of my sellout.
Plus a free Presidential cock-ring with Eleanor Clift's cell phone number engraved on it...
Posted by: Brad Stupak at March 24, 2010 02:08 PM (h22YH)
Bush won't be remembered for his great speeches.
Neither will Obama, I can't remember a single line from any of his speeches. OK, I must own up that I try to avoid them if I can. Not that I'm defending Frum, Gerson probably wrote most of what I find memorable from Bush's speeches.
Posted by: Decaf at March 24, 2010 02:09 PM (NooBZ)
Posted by: Monty at March 24, 2010 06:02 PM (HQzxr)
I agree completely that Rush, VDH and Steyn are in a class by themselves. Funny you mention Krauthammer though. He's brilliant, but I think he's got a bit of an elitist streak in him (Harvard psychiatrist? go figure) that clouds his vision on the Tea Party movement and Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Cicero at March 24, 2010 02:10 PM (QKKT0)
that's the kind of transparencey that reminds of the ol' CCCP...
weren't the Soviets putting out photos of Andropov to 'prove' he was alive and well, for a while?
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:11 PM (z37MR)
that's the kind of transparencey that reminds of the ol' CCCP...
What's not transparent about Concerned Christian Conservative Persons?
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 02:13 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 06:06 PM
The day the press finally peels its lips from Zero's ass and starts getting confrontational about this shit is the day I'll be fucking amazed.
Posted by: Cicero at March 24, 2010 02:13 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:13 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Mike H at March 24, 2010 02:13 PM (PWj+8)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 24, 2010 02:14 PM (h22YH)
126 I'd rather see Paul Ryan devise a plan to win the House in November. Without the House, we are powerless to do anything about The Big Fucking Deal.
I think that's the purpose of The Road Map for America's Future.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:14 PM (yfJ6g)
I can't remember a single line from any of his speeches.
I sure can because Obama says a variation of the same thing over and over.
"We must act swiftly and boldly to meet/face the challenges of our time."
And the rest of the speeches are: "I, I, I, me, me, me"
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:15 PM (z37MR)
Neither will Obama, I can't remember a single line from any of his speeches.
"Some say..."
"Let me be clear..."
"Uh..., uh"
"I reject the view that [insert straw man argument here]"
From Stuff Obama Said, Vol. 1, Large print edition
Posted by: Cicero at March 24, 2010 02:16 PM (QKKT0)
awww shit, Robert Culp is gone?
So sad. We were just talking about I SPY here a couple of weeks ago.
Robert Culp was a poor man's Robert Stack, but still a great tv presence, nonetheless.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:17 PM (z37MR)
Personally, as a life long conservative, I am concerned that Breshnev and Andropov might still be alive.
I mean there's no reason to believe otherwise if they won't say there isn't. They haven't any reason to lie. If anything is more difficult then a peaceful seccession of leadership, it is trying to rule a country on the authority of a dead guy. Heh. Heheh.
No, that makes no sense at all. I am worried that it seems they must be fine.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 02:17 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: Monty at March 24, 2010 02:17 PM (HQzxr)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:17 PM (QxSug)
128 Neither will Obama, I can't remember a single line from any of his speeches. OK, I must own up that I try to avoid them if I can. Not that I'm defending Frum, Gerson probably wrote most of what I find memorable from Bush's speeches.
The great lines were all from Gerson & co. But I can recall many great lines from Bush, none from Obama--unless you count "This is the moment...". I think that's more creepy than great.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:18 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:19 PM (QxSug)
Ace's Neurontin prescription must be the new face of ObamaCare, not only is it rationed but when you get a prescription it's for wrong medicine. I checked, Neurontin is not prescribed for epilepsy.
Posted by: Decaf at March 24, 2010 02:19 PM (NooBZ)
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:20 PM (z37MR)
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 02:20 PM (CPefM)
Barry Frum was perhaps born and raised in Canada overseas? to a perhaps middleclass family. He doesn't know what it means to be an American, or know what it's like to actually work for a living. He's also a pussy.
hmm, sounds vaguely familiar, but I'm sure I've never heard of Barry Sotero.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at March 24, 2010 02:21 PM (y3seB)
"We are the people we've been waiting for, so goddammit why didn't anyone tell us that we've been standing right here the whole freakin' time? I've got a train to catch."
From Stuff Obama Said, Vol. 1, Large print edition
Posted by: Cicero at March 24, 2010 02:21 PM (QKKT0)
A great people has been moved to defend a great nation. Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shattered steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.
America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world. And no one will keep that light from shining.
Today, our nation saw evil, the very worst of human nature. And we responded with the best of America — with the daring of our rescue workers, with the caring for strangers and neighbors who came to give blood and help in any way they could,
Our nation, this generation, will lift the dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter and we will not fail.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:21 PM (yfJ6g)
Barack is going to change this country.
Beotch wasn't kidding.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 24, 2010 02:21 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 02:22 PM (dQdrY)
But seriously, W's impromptu speech at ground zero was the best speechifying of any politician since 1988
HUGE bar!
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 02:22 PM (eL+YD)
Beck is a combo of Will Rodgers with ADHD and H.L. Mencken on a mediocre day.
Frum is a combo of Andrew Sullivan and some whiny bitch broad who's still pissed she hasn't done anything worthwhile since getting good grades in college
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at March 24, 2010 02:22 PM (JrRME)
Posted by: Rodney at March 24, 2010 02:24 PM (XRIh6)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 24, 2010 02:25 PM (wmtV/)
The world must know that this administration will not blink in the face of danger, and will not tire when it comes to completing the missions that we said we would do.
States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
For too long our culture has said, "If it feels good, do it." Now America is embracing a new ethic and a new creed: "Let's roll".
All the decades of deceit and cruelty have now reached an end. Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict, commenced at a time of our choosing.
Where's that one from when the space shuttle blew up? That was poetic, too.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:25 PM (yfJ6g)
Neither will Obama, I can't remember a single line from any of his speeches.
"Some say..."
"Let me be clear..."
"Uh..., uh"
"I reject the view that [insert straw man argument here]"
From Stuff Obama Said, Vol. 1, Large print edition
OK, you got me there. I had in mind something of actual substance though for Obama these are the substance. He probably thinks that if you don't say anything memorable you can't be held to it.
Posted by: Decaf at March 24, 2010 02:25 PM (NooBZ)
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 02:25 PM (CPefM)
147 But seriously, W's impromptu speech at ground zero was the best speechifying of any politician since 1988
Can't decide if I like that one, the speech at the cathedral, or the special address to Congress more.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:27 PM (yfJ6g)
Bush's address to the nation about stem cells was a great speech -- but it was largley dismissed by the propagandists.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:28 PM (z37MR)
Where's that one from when the space shuttle blew up? That was poetic, too.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 06:25 PM (yfJ6g)
High Flight Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings; Sunward I’ve climbed, and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds, — and done a hundred things You have not dreamed of—wheeled and soared and swung High in the sunlit silence. Hov’ring there, I’ve chased the shouting wind along, and flung My eager craft through footless halls of air.... Up, up the long, delirious, burning blue I’ve topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace Where never lark nor even eagle flew— And, while with silent lifting mind I’ve trod The high untrespassed sanctity of space, Put out my hand, and touched the face of God.Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 02:29 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Sphynx at March 24, 2010 02:29 PM (xilNI)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 02:31 PM (otlXg)
Muslims are not allowed to buy any form of commercial insurance.
WTF....does this mean they are not required to buy car insurance too.
Posted by: non_dhimmie at March 24, 2010 02:31 PM (zACGu)
So, I just managed to quote Pres Bush 7 times, & that's only the ones I could find off-hand. Bet I copy + paste many more memorable lines if I took the time (Wiki is selective & left out the better ones).
Also thought he said, "I will not tire, I will not falter, I will not fail"--or was it we? It was during the special address to congress when he had the shield from the fire captain from Ground Zero.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:32 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at March 24, 2010 02:32 PM (IoUF1)
Posted by: rawmuse at March 24, 2010 02:33 PM (NvDv2)
Since arriving in Canada I've been accused of thought crimes, threatened with criminal prosecution for speeches I hadn't yet given, and denounced on the floor of the Parliament (which was nice because that one was on my "bucket list").
-------
I'm not a huge fan, but that was funny.
http://www.anncoulter.com/
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2010 02:33 PM (VuLos)
Thought that was "we", or is this another speech that I don't remember?
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 02:34 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 02:35 PM (CPefM)
yes, Frum, and others like him, are evidently a great influence on the Republican hacks in the beltway.
The Republicans in Washington are buying into that big tent crap fed to them by the media.
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at March 24, 2010 02:36 PM (z37MR)
Expunge him, and the rest of the Democrats who have slipped in through the back door into the Republican Party (Lindsay Graham), and move on.
Ever heard of sabo?
That's what they're doing to our works? Party has been infiltrated. Time to expunge these fuckers with extreme predjudice - and by that, I mean punch them in their fucking trachea's (methaphorically) and kick them the fuck out of the Republican Party.
Posted by: someguy at March 24, 2010 02:36 PM (VRJIW)
Frummy Dummy straddles the fence
We chose not to compromise with libs, commies, and progs,
So f*ck off, Frummy Dummy, back to your failed blog!
Posted by: little evil at March 24, 2010 02:37 PM (Rc7Cf)
The great lines were all from Gerson & co. But I can recall many great lines from Bush, none from Obama--unless you count "This is the moment...". I think that's more creepy than great.
How about "Let me be clear.....".
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 02:37 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 02:37 PM (Vu6sl)
My wife was sneaking off to sleep with her tennis coach a lot. Most knuckle draggers would either threaten to assault the tennis coach or demand that the spouse end the affair. My wife's tennis coach makes me look like ten pounds of shit stuffed into a five pound bag, so my inflexible demand would end up with me having no wife at all.
My brilliant compromising skills saved the marriage by letting the tennis coach bang her on Mondays, Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. While those neanderthals like Limbaugh may laugh and call me a cuckold, my wife is happy and she's still here to enjoy the home I provide and pay the bills for.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 02:37 PM (sYxEE)
He fails to mention that Frum would love to be the next David Gergen, the "Republican" "statesman" who Democrats call upon when they need the fig-leaf of bipartisanship.
Posted by: DelD at March 24, 2010 02:39 PM (eWtdM)
ol_dirty_/b+/tard: Because he gives the left "Conservative" cover to say the criticism is a "bi-partisan" or "from the Right itself." - like a Collin's vote.
AEI should pay him to just shut his trap.
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 02:39 PM (CPefM)
The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”
(Guess who said this?)
Michelle Obama - never heard of her.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at March 24, 2010 02:40 PM (y3seB)
My wife's tennis coach makes me look like ten pounds of shit stuffed into a five pound bag
with lipstick, right?
Posted by: keith at March 24, 2010 02:41 PM (y3seB)
Life imitates art.
Stupak reenacted the pivotal (poorly written) scene from "Star Wars, Episode III" ..."
What have I done ... My Master"
Posted by: Neo at March 24, 2010 02:41 PM (tE8FB)
175 #171 Thought that was "we", or is this another speech that I don't remember?
It's quote as "we"m but he says "I":
This is my reminder of lives that ended, and a task that does not end. I will not forget this wound to our country or those who inflicted it. I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people. The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them.
Plus this:
"We are here in the middle hour of our grief. So many have suffered so great a loss, and today we express our nation's sorrow. We come before God to pray for the missing and the dead, and for those who loved them.
"On Tuesday, our country was attacked with deliberate and massive cruelty. We have seen the images of fire and ashes and bent steel.
"Now come the names, the list of casualties we are only beginning to read. They are the names of men and women who began their day at a desk or in an airport, busy with life. They are the names of people who faced death and in their last moments called home to say, 'Be brave and I love you. . . .'
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:41 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: chai at March 24, 2010 02:42 PM (n1l55)
Letting the legacy media pick our conservative spokesmodels for us is a lot like letting the legacy media pick our republican presidential candidates for us.
The result in both cases is somebody on the left who looks down his nose at the millions of us on the right.
Posted by: Boots at March 24, 2010 02:42 PM (06JTY)
Allahpundit would write a tearjerking thread about how those hardline unbending right wingers have finally driven these bright lights away, but like they say, the spouse is always the last to know.
Posted by: kbdabear at March 24, 2010 02:43 PM (sYxEE)
Taking two to tango doesn't work when your dance partner gives you the finger to open the evening.
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 02:44 PM (CPefM)
177 Frum is listed as the domestic-economic speechwriter. I don't know if he wrote any of the good ones listed above - but I do know W was unable to explain why SS needed to be fixed or the dangers of the CRA and Pelosi's spending.
He only did economic speech-writing, unless he was called to add in some lines. Gerson usually wrote the speeches with Matthew Scully & 1 other guy.
Gerson left in 2006 & was replaced by William McGurn, from NRO & the WSJ.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:44 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 24, 2010 02:44 PM (ZxEhm)
You lost. Frum figured it out. You haven't. But at least you're not also a fag. Jeez, Gabe, you're really fucked.
Posted by: Ace's Neurontin prescription at March 24, 2010 05:32 PM
(dQLM/)
Erg, you're wrong, and you don't even know why.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Purveyor of Fine Meteors at March 24, 2010 02:44 PM (erIg9)
My week sucked before now it really sucks.
Posted by: mpfs at March 24, 2010 02:47 PM (iYbLN)
First of all, Frum is a girl. Let's get that out of the way right at the top.
Let's see, Sarah Palin is a girl and she could send Frum into a pee-on-himself puddle by staring him down.
Hell, as much as I dislike that wicked witch of the west Nancy Pelosi, she could bitch-slap Frum upside the head with that mega-gavel and knock him into next week.
Posted by: Boots at March 24, 2010 02:47 PM (06JTY)
At one point, I recall that the Republican Congressmen were locked out of their own committee, kept from attending the bill's construction.
A great analogy was made by Fred's earlier guest.ObamaCare law demands citizens to make a particular purchase (from the govt.) and opens the gate for theh govt. to demand citizens make further purchases. For instance, what if the govt. mandated that every citizen purchase a specific GM car model?
Posted by: maverick muse at March 24, 2010 02:48 PM (H+LJc)
Sarah Palin is a woman like I am a woman. Frum is a pussy.
Posted by: mpfs at March 24, 2010 02:49 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 02:50 PM (j7e94)
I reject Kathleen Parker's characterization of my love-making abilities - the whole attack reeks of partisan demagoguery.
Besides, Katie is a dead-f*ck anyway.
Peggy Noonan, on the other hand, can suck the rust off a trailer hitch.
Posted by: david frum at March 24, 2010 02:50 PM (cEXzj)
Erickson is reporting "I’m told reliably that moderate Republican senators who voted against Obamacare in December do not want to vote against it again because it would just be “symbolic”. McConnell agrees and is not inclined to push Republicans to go along with any effort to force a vote on repeal during reconciliation,"
The Big Tent blows...
Posted by: Atomic Roach at March 24, 2010 02:51 PM (Oxen1)
Frum had his son call into Levin's show with talking points because he was too chickenshit to face Levin himself.
When Levin shamed it into him, all that Frum could do was make a few snarky comments and giggle to himself a lot
Audio - Mark Levin vs David Frum
Posted by: kbdabear at March 24, 2010 02:51 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 02:52 PM (j7e94)
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 02:52 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:55 PM (QxSug)
What they can never do, however, is provide evidence of the leadership on the left compromising, EVER, on hardcore, leftist, statist principles. They may pause, retrench, regroup, etc (see Clinton, William J.) but they never ever compromise. And when they do drop back five and punt, they will be right back at it the next day, banging the statist drum.
Obama, Gran Nan, etc. would never vote for a solidly principled pro-life bill, no matter what else it contained. NEVER. Why? Because in their heart of hearts, they are socialist, statist, liberals. Nothing more, nothing less.
You cannot deal with the devil. It's a lesson, sadly, they have not learned. Even after the 2008 election they all helped lose and the results it has wrought.
Posted by: The Hammer at March 24, 2010 02:55 PM (YBTwf)
Whereas Ann Coulter is a hateful woman;
"Whereas she has made hateful comments against GLBTQ, Muslims, Jews and women;
OK. That one's got me. Where did the Q come from? What the hell does that stand for?
Is there a barbeque involved? Is that Burger King's new sandwich?
Gorgonzola, Lettuce, Bacon, Tomato, and ....
Quesadillas? Quiche?
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 02:56 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 02:56 PM (QxSug)
Posted by: Neo at March 24, 2010 02:59 PM (tE8FB)
204 The Maine sisters & their ilk, I take it. Why must the Senate always shoot the House in the back? Yes, yes, I know the Senate thinks that they reside on lofty heights & that the House is nothing, but their colleagues did such great work. Are DeMint & Vitter the only senators who're going to stand up to this madness?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 02:59 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 24, 2010 03:00 PM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 24, 2010 03:01 PM (UOM48)
Demonstrations of the other side must be infiltrated and salted with shills spouting crap just as they've done.
We must insure those videos of "racism" at those demonstrations get on YouTube.
There are no rules anymore. I heard some congressman said that...
The shills need to be "snowballs" with no prior history of attending demonstrations or any identifiable online history of voicing opinions. Squeaky clean, to eliminate chances of detection. They'll need to get in, get out, and then vanish forever. They're a "one shot" weapon. Any attempts to reload invite detection.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 03:01 PM (j7e94)
DAMMIT! Now they've really crossed the line!
KFC diner told 'you can't have bacon in your burger here - we're now halal'
A diner was left furious after a KFC restaurant refused to sell him a bacon burger - because it wasnÂ’t halal.
Alan Phillips was told the restaurant was no longer selling his favourite ‘Big Daddy’ burger, which contains a chicken burger with bacon, cheese and salad, because it had decided to sell only halal food.
Posted by: conscious and fucking amazed at March 24, 2010 03:01 PM (Vu6sl)
Anyone who constantly asserts he is possessed of a more thoughtful, more intellectually mature ideology is someone to mistrust or to absolutely ignore.
You see, the useful idiots of yesteryear were at least being guided by the KGB. The handlers had a purpose, so they exhibited restraint. No one's guiding these idiots any more, but that doesn't make them just plain idiots. They're still doing what they were set out to do, but they've gone amok.
I view these people and their work as a slow-release cultural bomb -- weaponized, armed, and detonated a long time ago. For the life of me, I don't know what can be done about it.
I'm taking the ignore route. Wish me the best.
Posted by: FireHorse at March 24, 2010 03:02 PM (cQyWA)
Whereas she violates an unwritten code of 'positive-space';
"Be it resolved that the SFUO express its disapproval of having Ann Coulter speak at the University of Ottawa."
Positive space? Is that a new quantum theory?
SFUO - Shut the fuck up ostrich?
This letter is bizarre.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 03:02 PM (eL+YD)
The bitch on the panel with Brett Braier saying that the MSM allegations of racism in the Tea Party is going to hurt us. Unfortunatley, Krauthammer assumed the allegations were true.
I've been to Tea Party protests, and have taken pictures of the attendees. Many of the TP protesters are older/retired/fixed income folks who have lived through wars and depressions and various disasters and they see where we are headed with the out of control spending at all levels of government.
These people are not brick-throwing anarchists. The brick-throwers are on the left. They come out to play at every WTC meeting, they were out in force during the republican convention in 2008, they were out in force last night when Ann Coulter tried to speak in Ottawa.
Could the various alleged acts of violence committed by "tea baggers" have really been committed by union goons or mob knee-cappers? The violence in politics lives on in the left, it's nurtured on the left, and it's been that way since the 1960's. Just ask Bill Ayers or the Black Panthers.
Posted by: Boots at March 24, 2010 03:07 PM (06JTY)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:07 PM (yfJ6g)
Could the various alleged acts of violence committed by "tea baggers" have really been committed by union goons or mob knee-cappers?
Heck, the whole false flag thing sure worked for me. Reichstag souvenirs, anyone?
Posted by: A. Hitler at March 24, 2010 03:09 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 03:09 PM (QxSug)
Demonstrations of the other side must be infiltrated and salted with shills spouting crap just as they've done.
We must insure those videos of "racism" at those demonstrations get on YouTube.
It's funny you should say that.
I found this link to Ringo the Gringo through Jawa (I think). Pretty funny/scary. Lots of hatred for the Juice on the peace-loving left.
Posted by: Y-not at March 24, 2010 03:09 PM (Kn9r7)
HA also says that the bill contains an amendment whereby the states could opt-out of Obama Care:
It’s called the “Empowering States to be Innovative” amendment. And it would, quite literally, give states the right to set up their own health care system — with or without an individual mandate or, for that matter, with or without a public option — provided that, as Wyden puts it, “they can meet the coverage requirements of the bill.”
Pg 212:
(A) will provide coverage that is at least as comprehensive as the coverage defined in section 1302(b) and offered through Exchanges established under this title as certified by Office of the Actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services based on sufficient data from the State and from comparable States about their experience with programs created by this Act and the provisions of this Act that would be waived;
(B) will provide coverage and cost sharing protections against excessive out-of-pocket spending that are at least as affordable as the provisions of this title would provide;
(C) will provide coverage to at least a comparable number of its residents as the provisions of this title would provide; and
(D) will not increase the Federal deficit.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:12 PM (yfJ6g)
The shills need to be "snowballs" with no prior history of attending demonstrations or any identifiable online history of voicing opinions. Squeaky clean, to eliminate chances of detection. They'll need to get in, get out, and then vanish forever. They're a "one shot" weapon. Any attempts to reload invite detection.
Unfortunately, if it's a left-wing rally, it won't even be mentioned in the media. It may show up on You-Tube, but if the radicals even suspect you're a plant, you run the risk of being beaten to death.....which won't be mentioned by the media either.
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 03:13 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 03:16 PM (CPefM)
Hello again,
I just wanted to let you people know that my husband is now so, so happy. And the reason is that his pool boy Pedro now has full Cadillac health care. We also bought him a nice wagon to carry his things in, he's so cute that way.
Bye for now.
Sen. Debbie Stabenow
Posted by: Sen Debbie Stabenow at March 24, 2010 03:16 PM (9/2L1)
At the risk of repeating something already said, David Frum comes by his kissing up to liberals honestly. His mother Barbara was a talking head on the Canadian broadcasting corp. One doesn't get into that job without being a staunch liberal or smooching more than a few liberal butts. This doesn't surprise anyone up here in the great white north. Par for the course in the Frum family.
Posted by: bob c at March 24, 2010 03:17 PM (R2+kM)
I get these faux conservative guys confused, is Frum the creased trousers dude or was that Brooks?
IÂ’m tired of these media folk trying to act like they are smarter than me and also intimating that 0ur elected officials are smarter than me. IÂ’ve had bowel movements that are more intelligent than Frum and his ilk and some of the crooks in DC.
Posted by: ParnoidGirlInSeattle at March 24, 2010 03:18 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Jean at March 24, 2010 07:16 PM (CPefM)
Prince Charles will go for it. He's big on mutton.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 03:19 PM (dQdrY)
Fantastic beatdown by Jackson. Sheister must've wet his diapers on that attempted ambush of an interview.
More Jackson, please.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 24, 2010 03:22 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:22 PM (yfJ6g)
IÂ’m tired of these media folk trying to act like they are smarter than me and also intimating that 0ur elected officials are smarter than me. IÂ’ve had bowel movements that are more intelligent than Frum and his ilk and some of the crooks in DC.
Can your bowel movements say "obsiquious"? I thought not. I rest my case.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 03:23 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 24, 2010 03:23 PM (mhD2v)
This doesn't surprise anyone up here in the great white north.
OT: What are Dan's chances? You know, for mayor?
Posted by: FireHorse at March 24, 2010 03:23 PM (cQyWA)
Can your bowel movements say "obsiquious"? I thought not. I rest my case.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 07:23 PM (fA7M/)
They can not only fart it, they can spell it right.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 03:25 PM (dQdrY)
Conscious and fucking amazed, thank you for posting that. That was a great interview.
Kevin Jackson made Shuster look like the utter tool he is.
That's exactly how you do a media interview. 1) You don't give an inch to the douchebags and 2) you flip their accusations around and shove them down their throats.
That interview rocked.
Posted by: DelD at March 24, 2010 03:26 PM (eWtdM)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 24, 2010 03:27 PM (AZGON)
Excellent. Loved it when he said the only ones who have lynched black people are Democrats.
Posted by: incognito at March 24, 2010 03:28 PM (u6X4c)
Posted by: ms. docweasel at March 24, 2010 03:29 PM (kgwdA)
Posted by: Al at March 24, 2010 03:33 PM (0lyUI)
Heh. O/T: Shep Smith's pronouncaition of "Marseilles": mar-sails.
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 24, 2010 03:33 PM (vVEjw)
Posted by: joeindc44 at March 24, 2010 03:33 PM (QxSug)
I really wonder some days what the self-proclaimed conservative punditocracy would think of Samuel Adams.
Oh, he's a criminal and they'd hang him or hand him to the British.
But they'd BE the British so it's a moot point.
Bacon is not Kosher I believe that there are other more sinister hidden forces at work here
This must surely be a parody of Andy Rand...
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 03:34 PM (eL+YD)
Off Topic, but I need to ask:
Does anyone have or know where to find a list of days where Google either ignored a US holiday, or chose some other event to commemorate?
I think there are 2 or 3 in 2008, but I can't remember them.
Posted by: Larches Sojnnoh at March 24, 2010 03:37 PM (LhL5n)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:40 PM (yfJ6g)
257 Mitch McFuckingConnell has to go!
Maybe he can borrow some testicular fortitude from John Boehner, who says that the Rs will not be funding O-Care.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:41 PM (yfJ6g)
>>>"I think there are 2 or 3 in 2008, but I can't remember them."
Umm, I suggest you go through the archives of AoS on major holidays and look for posts about gooogle being d-bags on that day.
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 03:42 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: Kemp at March 24, 2010 03:43 PM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 03:44 PM (fFl1M)
Does David Frum have any good qualities other than playing the part of the "token Republican" on MSNBC ?
Posted by: Neo at March 24, 2010 03:45 PM (tE8FB)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 03:47 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: Neo at March 24, 2010 07:45 PM (tE8FB)
I hear he swallows.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 03:48 PM (dQdrY)
Does David Frum have any good qualities other than playing the part of the "token Republican" on MSNBC ?
No. And I say that unequiverically.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 03:49 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: This is Eric Massa at March 24, 2010 03:50 PM (fFl1M)
O/T: How about that Ari Fleisher? He scheduled Tiger's interviews on the day the healthcare vote monopolized the news.
Cool. He's a clever sumbitch.
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 24, 2010 03:51 PM (vVEjw)
Does David Frum have any good qualities other than playing the part of the "token Republican" on MSNBC ?
Posted by: Neo at March 24, 2010 07:45 PM (tE8FB)
David Frum is quite the musician, specializing in the harpsichord, and on occasion, the skin flute.
Posted by: Fish at March 24, 2010 03:52 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 03:54 PM (yfJ6g)
He fucked up bad, he knows he fucked up bad, and now knows the Dems ain't gonna do shit to save his sorry ass because they got other plans for that seat. The Dems are erasing his memory as fast as possible.
Snarlin could hold a dozen press conferences and he wouldn't even be able to draw the janitorial staff to listen anymore.
Today, he could offer free hookers and blow to reporters and they wouldn't even bother to look at him. He's an un-senator.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 03:55 PM (j7e94)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 24, 2010 03:58 PM (KHozN)
Posted by: Fish at March 24, 2010 03:59 PM (M5t+h)
Specter is getting his just desserts.
A year ago...
Obama was 'extremely' popular. Conservatism was dead. And the Republican Party was on the run.
I guess Specter figured he'd ride the Obama coattails into another 6-years in the Senate. (Specter is gonna be 80, btw).
Now Obama's popularity is dwindling by the day, the Democrats are despised, and Conservatism is back by popular demand. Specter does not whether to tack left or tack right. Ha-fucking-ha.
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:00 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 24, 2010 07:58 PM (KHozN)
No.
He ate our salt and betrayed us. There is only one fitting end to that.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 04:00 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 24, 2010 04:00 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: MAJ O at March 24, 2010 04:00 PM (ThQkB)
What if the government mandated that everyone have auto insurance?
What if the government mandated that everyone purchase property insurance?
What if the government mandated that everyone has to purchase a business license in order to buy and sell?
What if the government mandated that everyone...
What if the government mandated what type of plants you can have on your lawn?
What if the government mandated that you cannot have a flag pole in your yard?
What if the government mandated that you can't smoke in a bar?
What if the government mandated the improvements you can make on your own home? ...including exterior paint and color?
What if the government mandated not only when and where you can purchase a gun, but that you had to have a permission from the government to buy one?
What if the government mandated that only certain words and phrases were appropriate while others were inappropriate?
What if...the government mandated taxes on everything in your life, including the air that you breath?
What if...
Well...you get the drift...
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 24, 2010 04:00 PM (wmtV/)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 24, 2010 04:01 PM (5/yRG)
From a CBS poll:
The poll finds that 62 percent want Congressional Republicans to keep challenging the bill, while 33 percent say they should not do so. Nearly nine in ten Republicans and two in three independents want the GOP to keep challenging. Even 41 percent of Democrats support continued challenges.
Americans are split about the fact that the bill largely lacked bipartisan support. Fifty percent said they were disappointed that the bill did not have support from both parties, while 44 percent said that it doesnÂ’t matterÂ…
Despite a Congressional Budget Office analysis finding that the bill will ultimately lower the budget deficit by $143 billion over the first ten years and $1.2 trillion dollars in the second ten years, 57 percent of those surveyed, including most Republicans and independents, say the bill will increase the deficit. Just 18 percent say it will decrease the deficit.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:01 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Fish at March 24, 2010 07:59 PM (M5t+h)
O'Reilly, O'bama.
Separated at birth.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 04:02 PM (dQdrY)
As a disgusted Pa'er, I'm looking forward to Sphincter's immediate political demise with a savage glee.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 04:02 PM (otlXg)
So I looked at instapundit today and see that the definition of medical device is so broad that it could include tampons and even my penis if it enters my wife for a medical purpose, you know, procreation. When is the IRS going to come after me for the flogging I have given her at least twice.
That tax is dependent on length, so it may not be that much.
Posted by: David Frum at March 24, 2010 04:04 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:05 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: SlaveDog at March 24, 2010 04:06 PM (H6Jyg)
283 #275 As a disgusted Pa'er, I'm looking forward to Sphincter's immediate political demise with a savage glee.
Amen to that sentiment.
/Oh, so now you tell us where you live.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:07 PM (yfJ6g)
Re: the CBS poll excerpt posted by the good and honorable gentlelady from...where you from again?..
even with all that, the stupid Republicans in the Senate STILL want to play ball with the Democrats and try to 'fix' The Big Fucking Deal.
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:08 PM (fFl1M)
Who says they haven't been already? NTTAWWT.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 04:08 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: chad feldheimer at March 24, 2010 04:09 PM (Vc/xe)
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 04:09 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 04:10 PM (fA7M/)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 24, 2010 08:00 PM (wmtV/)
Even with all that, I know "conservatives" who then voluntarily put themselves under the iron fist of a home owner's association. I can only shake my head.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 04:11 PM (dQdrY)
C'mon!
Allahpessimist and Newt are only small turds in the punchbowl; Frum is a big turd in the bowl.
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:11 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: 48%er at March 24, 2010 04:12 PM (gxpfq)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:13 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: PaleRider at March 24, 2010 04:13 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: pby at March 24, 2010 04:13 PM (DCuOk)
Amen to that sentiment.
Thanks. Too bad there aren't say TX quality politicians in PA.
/Oh, so now you tell us where you live.
I thought I had already let that slip at times? Regardless, I'm not afraid of you, being in another dimension and all.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 04:13 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: DedicatedFollowerofFashion at March 24, 2010 04:14 PM (Y3I5Y)
Some people can only afford a condo or a tract home. If they have to go along with some annoying agreement to take their first step towards the American dream, is it that big a deal?
Posted by: arhooley at March 24, 2010 04:15 PM (PBv6b)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:15 PM (fFl1M)
Snarlin could hold a dozen press conferences and he wouldn't even be able to draw the janitorial staff to listen anymore.
Today, he could offer free hookers and blow to reporters and they wouldn't even bother to look at him. He's an un-senator.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 07:55 PM (j7e94)
This makes me extremely happy. I'm already imagining the look when he concedes: 50% bitter & 50% clueless. I hope he lives for a long time with the knowledge of how badly he fucked up and why nobody cares about him except the senior care people that get paid for it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 24, 2010 04:16 PM (ZxEhm)
Posted by: arhooley at March 24, 2010 08:15 PM (PBv6b)
It is a deal breaker for me.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 04:17 PM (dQdrY)
Does anyone have or know where to find a list of days where Google either ignored a US holiday, or chose some other event to commemorate?
I think there are 2 or 3 in 2008, but I can't remember them.
Posted by: Larches Sojnnoh at March 24, 2010 07:37 PM (LhL5n)
Go to www.Bing.com and enter "Google doesn't celebrate" or some variation. You'll get some hits.
Posted by: Tami at March 24, 2010 04:18 PM (VuLos)
288 Where do I live? TX. Not sure why that matters... Or you mean my old fictional residence?
That's because, with the exception of Inhoffe, Coburn, DeMint, Vitter, & so others, they're cowards who hate to admit that their House colleagues have more stones than they do. The Senate is nothing more than a glorified country club.
/Too bad Jim Talent lost his reelection bid--man's been fighting against this bill tooth-&-nail in his current policy position job.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:18 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: evil libertarian at March 24, 2010 04:18 PM (BGJM2)
you shoulda changed your name to Dummy
to do the tm-thingy, just type 't' and 'm' and then go up to the buttons up there ^ , and superscript the letters!
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:18 PM (fFl1M)
Posted by: arhooley at March 24, 2010 08:15 PM (PBv6b)
I thought the American Dream was Liberty. Home ownership should not trump that.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 04:18 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:19 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 24, 2010 07:55 PM (j7e94)
Hey, I'll be there!
Posted by: Barry "rings around my nostrils" Obama at March 24, 2010 04:19 PM (Vu6sl)
Oh Lordy.
I just watched an TV ad for Betsy Markey(D-Colo). The democrat party must have agreed to pimp the airways with pro-Markey ads because of her unpopular healthcare vote.
The democrats are wild about saying "Republicans stand with the Insurance companies". The vilification trip continues.
She should be gone in November. Easy. If not then there is something wrong with the R party here in Colo.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 24, 2010 04:20 PM (0fzsA)
#258 Miss'80sBaby
Thanks. I just needed a clue as to what to search for. #261 This is ff had the right idea, but I used Bing to eventually find the Google Logo Site.
Google hasn't behaves too badly. It's more like curiously giving others time for no apparent reason. Google seems to have some sort of site for most nationalities. Google might be perceived to be less thoughtless if they were to more carefully divide up how they displayed their logo.
I got roped into a debate with a crypto-leftist recently and called him on most of his BS. But wI as in an area where I had never before had such an argument and was not expecting one. I was unprepared.
Posted by: Larches Sojnnoh at March 24, 2010 04:20 PM (LhL5n)
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at March 24, 2010 08:10 PM (fA7M/)
He was on Laura Ingraham this morning; I stopped paying close attention when he was on so I can't give you any details other than it was his increasingly tiresome boilerplate shit which I consider useless.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 24, 2010 04:20 PM (ZxEhm)
+1. +1!!eleventy!, even.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 24, 2010 04:21 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: This is ff at March 24, 2010 04:21 PM (fFl1M)
Emil to Anthony Weiner:
Weiner,
O'Reilly asked you a very simple question.
What's your fucking problem asshole?
Posted by: Fish at March 24, 2010 04:21 PM (M5t+h)
Poll:
The poll finds that 62 percent want Congressional Republicans to keep challenging the bill, while 33 percent say they should not do so. Nearly nine in ten Republicans and two in three independents want the GOP to keep challenging. Even 41 percent of Democrats support continued challenges.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 24, 2010 04:22 PM (0fzsA)
The Democrats just signed their death warrant. How many Americans work for insurance companies? That's Des Moines' biggest industry.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 24, 2010 04:22 PM (OkT2m)
Posted by: DedicatedFollowerofFashion at March 24, 2010 04:22 PM (Y3I5Y)
Well, at least my reps in both Houston & Longview are good men. Not sure why we put up with Kay Bailey & Cornyn.
I thought I had already let that slip at times? Regardless, I'm not afraid of you, being in another dimension and all.
Oh? What dimension would that be?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:22 PM (yfJ6g)
52 I would actually prefer it if people stopped focusing on getting Republicans elected and spent their time reading on fundamental principles of liberty, discussing same with their fellows, and being active in their local governments as private citizens. We have got to stop being mainly campaign followers/supporters and start being self-ruling citizens who delegate to known quantities for the higher governmental offices . . . . I am done with the jumping on the Montague bandwagon just because the Capulets overreached. This is not to say there is only a dime's worth of difference, but it is to say that the Founders left us with a system that was fundamentally not designed to deal with the modern politician, and we are going to have to correct the problem.
BRAVO! well played, sir!
Posted by: chad feldheimer at March 24, 2010 04:22 PM (Vc/xe)
I'm drinking.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 24, 2010 04:23 PM (OkT2m)
The modern Republican too often plays nice. He has been browbeaten by the partisan press and is now afraid to stand up his hind legs. He's like the battered wife who starts to think, 'you know, maybe I do deserve it.' What this Republican needs to realize is that the beatings will only get progressively worse.
Here's a few simple things the 'modern Republican' needs to get thru his triple thick three ply dense burnt skull:
1) the other side plays hardball, and they play to win.
2) the press will never give you an even break, so quit sucking up
3) political pussies end up fucked
4) you want to win? He brings a knife, you bring a gun; he puts one of yours in the hospital, you put one of his in the morgue. Metaphorically speaking, of course.
I'll tell you this: I am a conservative and am opposed to everything the other side believes in. But goddammit they know how to win.
There's a lesson to be learned here.
Posted by: Jones at March 24, 2010 04:24 PM (JL3qV)
Posted by: LGoPs at March 24, 2010 04:25 PM (tm/sN)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 04:26 PM (kmEfr)
note to self: fuck canada.
what a bunch of little bitches. anthony no weiner would fit right in.
Posted by: evil libertarian at March 24, 2010 04:27 PM (BGJM2)
Once upon a time, we were going to put together a web site that would shine a light on the media and journalists ... not sure what happened to it.
Posted by: incognito at March 24, 2010 04:28 PM (u6X4c)
Borg to Frum: You will be assimilated.
Hmm. Idea for screenplay:
David Frum vs. The Dalek Horde.
Unfortunately the movie is only 12 seconds long.
Maybe I can drag out the kill scene.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 04:29 PM (eL+YD)
I should probably just laugh at the guy, but I just saw him on O'Reilly and nearly blew a gasket. Maybe he thinks being snide to the point of demonic possession will endear himself to the great American public, but somehow I doubt it.
Posted by: Golem14 at March 24, 2010 04:29 PM (2X8VA)
Seriously. He's running on that.
Posted by: Jones at March 24, 2010 04:29 PM (JL3qV)
326 For some that wouldn't fight, specifically those in the conservative Christian community, we are concerned that fighting in that fashion means you're losing your honour & integrity. I have to say, I like Ryan's belief that you find them with ideas, facts, figures, & passion. So, I have no problem fighting them to the bitter end & throwing their words in their faces, but I'm not sure where cheating gets us--if that's what you're saying. Whatever happened to the arena of ideas?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:32 PM (yfJ6g)
1. Did Frum hurt Bush in his administration role?
2. Re: Rush is given to sometimes simplifying affairs into narratives of Pure Conservatives and Corrupt Progressives
There may be no 'pure conservatives', but the progressives are believers in "take no prisoners" political warfare. It's what they do. They believe in moral relativity and that ends justifies means. That's what makes them "progressives."
There is no such thing as a "non corrupt" progressive you can negotiate with, jsut as there's no Al Queda member now, or Nazi in the past, that you can/could negotiate with about sparing the Jews.
Posted by: Eris at March 24, 2010 04:32 PM (HIc7j)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 24, 2010 04:33 PM (OkT2m)
@50: "What he does not seem to have is any political or ideological principle that says 'here is where the line in the sand is drawn. Here is the point for which there is no return. This is the hill I will die on.'"
So, basically.....you're saying that he's a perfect Republican politician.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 04:33 PM (kmEfr)
Also like Coburn's idea of making the Dems have to show their true colours. Whoever also thought of making the Dems recommit on the Stupak-Pitts Amendment was brilliant. Make them hang themselves, as-it-were.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:33 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: conscious, but really fucking incoherent at March 24, 2010 04:34 PM (Vu6sl)
Combining posts:
I have to say, I like Ryan's belief that you find them with ideas, facts, figures, & passion. Also like Coburn's idea of making the Dems have to show their true colours. Whoever also thought of making the Dems recommit on the Stupak-Pitts Amendment was brilliant. Make them hang themselves, as-it-were.
So, I have no problem fighting them to the bitter end & throwing their words in their faces, but I'm not sure where cheating gets us--if that's what you're saying. Whatever happened to the arena of ideas?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:35 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Golem14
i though him looking off camera while bill was talking was cute. and by cute i mean if i was the camera guy i would have punched him in the balls.
Posted by: evil libertarian at March 24, 2010 04:35 PM (BGJM2)
pfffft...
Why do we even care what this guy says? Yes, to mock him, which is good fun! But come on, this guy (and the others mentioned like him, yes I'm looking at you Buckley) are at best just our Olberman, Maddow, etc. Beat him (and them) like five year olds coming off their first sugar buzz beat a pinata at a party. This guys gives poodles a bad name...
Posted by: w at March 24, 2010 04:40 PM (iwMRb)
Weiner failed pretty spectacularly... which is nice.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at March 24, 2010 04:40 PM (swuwV)
346
I might be tempted, but I wouldn't want to risk dropping a perfectly good camera. He ain't worth it.
Posted by: Golem14 at March 24, 2010 04:41 PM (2X8VA)
337 #323 In whatever afterlife you're in now. Egyptian?
Middle-Earth, Aman, Valinor with Nienna, Lady of Mercy.
Where are you? Still at the edge of a cliff?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:44 PM (yfJ6g)
Look. The Democrats are relentless. They are all 100% on message, 24/7. Can the GOP say that? No. We're too busy coddling the McCains and the Snowes. I'm not saying we need a litmus test or a party purge. But we need one game plan that hits the enemy hard across a wide front, night and day, no exceptions, no mavericks, no moderation of the message.
Posted by: Jones at March 24, 2010 04:45 PM (JL3qV)
Frum: This is blasphemy! This is madness!
Leondias : THIS...IS WAS...AMERICA"
Sorry, Leo. The America you speak of is pretty much gone. Zombie George Washington just passed me on the street and asked me: "How faref Our Republic?" When I told him, he wandered off muttering: "Man, fuck that noife."
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 04:46 PM (kmEfr)
Tea party attendees are pretty lame. You wanna see the true crazies?
Look here. This site needs more exposure.
Posted by: Eris at March 24, 2010 04:46 PM (HIc7j)
341 @50: "What he does not seem to have is any political or ideological principle that says 'here is where the line in the sand is drawn. Here is the point for which there is no return. This is the hill I will die on.'"
[Poster's comment on Frum follows]
See, this is where I wish our side would draw that line & say that they'd die on that hill, like Pres. Bush did with the War on Terror. Now, I know that's dangerous because it risks the loss of a political career & results in isolation inside the Beltway, but that's only talk inside that great echo chamber. Don't they realize how much people hunger for a politician who takes a great principled & moral stand & doesn't back down?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:50 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Eris at March 24, 2010 04:50 PM (HIc7j)
352 I'm not saying cheating. I am saying, politics ain't beanbag. It's time we took the gloves off and bloodied the other guy. And not just once or twice.
Look. The Democrats are relentless. They are all 100% on message, 24/7. Can the GOP say that? No. We're too busy coddling the McCains and the Snowes. I'm not saying we need a litmus test or a party purge. But we need one game plan that hits the enemy hard across a wide front, night and day, no exceptions, no mavericks, no moderation of the message.
Now this ^ I can agree with, & I only follow politicians who do this. Our main problem right now, though, is the Senate. Seems a few good men were sacrificed because they said something politically incorrect. I'd rather have Santorum & Allen (?) than McCain & Snowe.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:53 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 24, 2010 04:55 PM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 04:58 PM (yfJ6g)
@112: "Mike, we don't have a pussy bus. We have a fukkin MRAP."
Given that folks like Frum, Brooks, Parker, etc. are still considered spokesmen for the Right, and folks like McCain, Graham, the Maine Sisters, etc. (and Jeffords and Specter before they went over the hill) were members in good standing, our MRAP would appear to be little more than an undersized Razor Scooter.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 05:00 PM (kmEfr)
361 #359 I don't have hope anymore, remember?
The side of the cliff, then?
/Did the winking face not show?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 05:00 PM (yfJ6g)
Guess so. But if you ever come back, I'll be waiting. (The winking face showed, but I just didn't interpret it properly).
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 05:02 PM (otlXg)
-CHINGIS KHAN, after being named khan.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 24, 2010 05:03 PM (dQdrY)
"Axis of Evilfocaters"........ yeah... I think Frum wrote that for Bush.
As I've alway's said.... despite all of Bush's faults, he understood one thing. Creating an almost perpetual theatre of war on your enemies turf is one of the best defenses.... God bless our troops.
Cheney never had the benefit of speechwriters..... he ate them for breakfast every morning.
Posted by: Last Conservative In Brooklyn at March 24, 2010 05:03 PM (7uAeI)
368 #366 Guess so. But if you ever come back, I'll be waiting. (The winking face showed, but I just didn't interpret it properly).
Gears of War 4: Return to Hades
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 05:04 PM (yfJ6g)
You're having way too much fun with the "Gears of War" thing.
Why Hades? It's totally wrecked.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 24, 2010 05:07 PM (otlXg)
"I will rule them by fixed laws [so] that rest and happiness shall prevail in the world."
-CHINGIS KHAN, after being named khan.
First of all, they've already decided they don't like Jenghis Khan or fashions reminiscient of him.
Secondly, who the hell is this, The 13th Century Nomadic Warlord Formally Known as Prince?
Pick a transliterated spelling and stick with it.
We get it - there's absolutely nothing in the english language that sounds remotely like the Mongolian 'chjgrrzthrp' sound.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 05:10 PM (eL+YD)
373 #372 You're having way too much fun with the "Gears of War" thing.
I blame chemjeff...& Booosh.
Why Hades? It's totally wrecked.
How else am I to return?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 05:13 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: MarkD at March 24, 2010 05:17 PM (YhZfg)
@206: "Gotta stand for something, or you stand for nothing. Lines in the sand must be drawn."
Fair point, but the consequences for crossing the line must be both obvious, and substantial. The Right's proposed consequences are always: do nothing beyond a few phone calls or some letters to the editor from the lesser lights, and the odd "I'm so disappointed in our Democrat colleagues" speech from the leadership. Unfortunately, that's all too obvious to the Left. They know, with absolute certainty, that everyone will ultimately just sit there and take it.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 05:32 PM (kmEfr)
I'm anticipating the usual suspects are already planning on sitting out this yr's elections & it hasn't even been 4 days yet. Patience, people. Besides, that tactic got us Obama, & we all know how well that's worked out.
But, if that's the route you take, I don't want to hear you whining & moaning about the death of America. You let your silence count as a vote for Nan, Harry, & ObaMao. Don't count yourselves as being innocent in this debacle.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 05:46 PM (yfJ6g)
@260: "Maybe he can borrow some testicular fortitude from John Boehner, who says that the Rs will not be funding O-Care."
ObizzleCare hit Boehner where it hurt - tanning.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 05:46 PM (kmEfr)
@308: "Too bad Jim Talent lost his reelection bid--man's been fighting against this bill tooth-&-nail in his current policy position job"
No, he hasn't. He's been arguing. "Fighting" is one of the politician's worst weasel-words; they simply talk. No one has been fighting at all, at least not since Brooks/Sumner I.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at March 24, 2010 05:56 PM (kmEfr)
I did notice, however, that our Miss Brooks has been whining about the Dems pushing a loser of a health care bill up the American rectum like so much Preparation H. Maybe Frum can learn from a fellow bottom smootcher.
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at March 24, 2010 06:23 PM (PY1V4)
No, he hasn't. He's been arguing. "Fighting" is one of the politician's worst weasel-words; they simply talk. No one has been fighting at all, at least not since Brooks/Sumner I.
It still fits the definition in Merriam-Webster. Besides, consider what you're asking--someone almost got killed. If this comes to a civil war, let's fight it on the battlefield.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at March 24, 2010 06:40 PM (yfJ6g)
Besides, consider what you're asking--someone almost got killed.
As opposed to bickering of Obamacare. No one will ever get killed by that.
OH WAIT.
If this comes to a civil war, let's fight it on the battlefield.
If it comes to that, what isn't part of the battlefield?
Why all Marquis of Queensbury?
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 06:45 PM (eL+YD)
You do realize that men who gave you your liberty, and your country, and the men who have preserved it for you, have not been boyscouts?
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 06:50 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: The Borg at March 24, 2010 06:52 PM (SgL5z)
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 06:55 PM (eL+YD)
Posted by: Knight of the Right at March 24, 2010 06:55 PM (Pwj86)
Oh, but by all means, when someone contributes to the death of 49,500,000 babies we must maintain decorum.
That's just perverse.
No wonder the mushy middle gives us no credibility. I'm not sure I believe us.
Posted by: Entropy at March 24, 2010 06:58 PM (eL+YD)
To get some Republicans, he would have had to give them real lawsuit and defensive medicine reform. Democrats would rather cut off an arm and sue themselves.
This is Obama's Way. We've always had bipartisan majorities for all major laws, whether declarations of war, new entitlements or civil rights.
Until now.
Posted by: Noel at March 24, 2010 07:00 PM (Hh13R)
Posted by: JAMBAND at March 24, 2010 07:21 PM (t1bUN)
Liberal Retardentsia. Brilliant.
It's the way Ace just casually tosses those bits of brilliance out there on the page that make me love him, and not in a chaste way, God help me.
Posted by: Less at March 24, 2010 07:24 PM (PGXeZ)
Posted by: underdown at March 24, 2010 07:28 PM (Avj9L)
Posted by: cackfinger at March 24, 2010 07:55 PM (TUBcJ)
Posted by: DANEgerus at March 24, 2010 08:28 PM (LMi2C)
396 Did I ever condemn the rep. from TX for his outburst the other day? Don't think so. That was DrewM, not me, & I vehemently disagreed with that.
We'd also be better-off if we talked in terms of rebellion & not revolution. One comes before the other, & we need to do this in steps instead of jumping-the-gun. The Founders were certainly aware of this.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby is watching the rain at March 24, 2010 09:44 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: saleguccishop at March 25, 2010 12:31 AM (85hwa)
"We're biased? No, ALL OF YOU are biased!
Jamband; no, excuse me, JAMBAND, you're such a worthless twat. Of course we're biased; for example I hate simpleton cocksuckers. Now go suck off one of your two daddies.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 25, 2010 02:17 AM (ZxEhm)
Don't they realize how much people hunger for a politician who takes a great principled & moral stand & doesn't back down?
Sorry, I know that sounds good, but that's what W did, and he was beat down by the left and even abandoned by his own party in a number of cases.
I did not agree with many things he did, but he campaigned as a "compassionate conservative" and he governed that way. He said what he meant, and he meant what he said. Nothing he did surprised me, we knew what we were getting with him, for good or ill. I'm not trying to turn this into a referendum on the merits of W, but I am pointing out he was a no frills guy who did pretty much what you said, and here we are now. And I have heard very few people from the right even acknowledge that he was, in the end, a plain spoken honest guy who consistently tried to do the right thing as he saw it.
Posted by: RM at March 25, 2010 04:15 AM (1kwr2)
So, let me get this straight. Frum isn't a real conservative because he doesn't shout, throw temper tantrums, hurl insults and rave.
You're right. He's acting a like a grown-up.
(CAUTION: Responses to this post will consist of 3rd grade level insults and name-calling).
Posted by: JEA at March 25, 2010 04:23 AM (bWB5j)
You're right. He's acting a like a grown-up.
(CAUTION: Responses to this post will consist of 3rd grade level insults and name-calling).
As opposed to the post itself, which consisted of a substantive analysis of relevant fact and absolutely did not just drive by and call everyone childish and immature.
Thank you David.
Posted by: Entropy at March 25, 2010 05:52 AM (IsLT6)
A while back a friend of mine noted that Brooks runs his operations out of a very nice property in Georgetown. My friend is all too familar with how hard it is to make a living as a blogger and wondered who was paying Frum's bills.
I read Frum's book about working in the Bush White House. Frum came across as a master of very little except self promotion. What really struck me was his misogyny. There is a pattern to how Frum picks his political targets and it runs like this. Any woman who has more political influence than I have must be a bubblehead who is using her sex and not her brains.
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at March 25, 2010 05:53 AM (qYDSa)
Do you crazy for NBA games? Have you hold your breath for the exciting moment? Are you one of NBA super fans? If the answer is YES, COME ON,GUYS!
All kinds of NBA jerseys are designed as authentic styles with High quality,Competitive price, Fast Delivery and Intimate Customer Service . Choose your favorite jerseys to support your team. Enjoy your free style!
They are all in stock!Welcome to buy!
Posted by: sunny at April 08, 2011 12:49 AM (wakeg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5115 seconds, 527 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: kathleen parker at March 24, 2010 01:17 PM (cEXzj)