Greece, Britain and the rest of the piigs of the Eurozone should be an example to us for what happens to countries when the takers start taking more than the givers are able to give. 

Europeans have had more than a half century to destroy their economies with socialism.  In this country, because our leftists are so convinced of their superiority at being the best socialists evah, the trip will be a lot shorter but the end will be the same - takers grow exponentially as givers are exhausted and outflow cannot exceed inflow - period. 

A government incapable of doing anything would have been a really awesome thing to have around here a few months back.  Total paralysis would be WAAAAAYYY better than what we have suffered.  At least there would have been no health care bill, and businesses could rest assured that the status quo would not be overturned.  Long live gridlock! 

These days every government solution just makes things worse.  Even if we win in the next cycle, I'm not convinced that the Reps will do enough RINO elimination to make them totally safe to give power to.

It was amusing to watch the BBC feed last night. All the analysts were befuddled by the results. The Conservatives released a list of their targets from 'most likely to take' to 'least likely'. They lost a fair number of the supposed low hanging fruit but made up for it by winning seats where they needed a big upset.

This means the Tories need to stop being such wusses.

Its too bad there there really isn't a ideologically conservative party still remaining in Britain so people could vote for real reform to the bloated socialist system.

The UKIP are probably the best of the lot for that.

"This makes me think of the 2x speed, Benny Hill segements."

I actually had the Benny Hill Yakkity Sax music playing in my head while reading that attempt at an explanation...

The nearest they have to that, UKIP, got about a million votes (which is a lot), but no seats, because unbought, ideological constituencies are scattered. That's why we have blue-dot/red-field electoral maps here, too; the GOP, shitty as it is, is more principled than the Ds are, so they don't have high-population "strongholds".

UKIP will never win a seat. No American-style conservative party can, anywhere in Europe. They can (and will) go Nazi again, but they can't go Jefferson, unless there's an unprecedented revolution. It can't happen by vote. Democracy is the antithesis of liberty.

No, Drew; the UKIP are nationalist but free-market.

Only Chuckles the Johnson gets them confused with the BNP, and he does it on purpose.

53 -

Hellz no. Why do you ask, did a sexy Englishman show up at a meeting there as well?

This is all well and good, but it's time for another flaming skull/witty post title as there's NEW UNEXPECTED ECONOMIC NEWS ^TM  today...

Heh.

PS - it's "funemployment", and it's up again.

"as sitting Prime Minister Gordon Prime Minister

Heh. I take it he's the Prime Minister?"

He's with the London Party of Redundancy Party:  London.

Posted by: DocJ at May 07, 2010 11:20 AM (dt6br)

It's not the genes.  It's the ideas.  Remember - the best things about the US when it was founded came from combining Anglo Saxon civilization with the independence and hardening/strengthening of mind and spirit that came from living on a frontier. 

The socialists are 100% to blame for everything wrong with England today. 

59

Ha! Hell to the No once again.

Although my post did sound like something Andrea would say. She better keep away from him, I saw the sexy Brit first!!!11!

#62, Well Said.

UKIP is anti-EU, pro-free market capitalism, pro-civic nationalism, pro-school choice, pro-nuclear power, global warming skeptic, anti-carbon cuts, and pro-civil liberties.

Damn, any chance we can get them to replace the current Republican party?

"there's NEW UNEXPECTED ECONOMIC NEWS ^TM  today"

I hit up Innocent Bystanders first today, so that I could dip in the glory of Geoff's updated tracking chart.

Dipped so deep, it left a little imprint of the recycling code on me.

Maybe we can import the UKIP here and send Lindsey Graham and his Merry Band of Morons to Britain.

Seems like a fair trade to me.

Isn't the UKIP a crazy nationalist near fascist party?

No, that would be the BNP. And given what the Muslim savages are dong, the BNP may have a point. Indeed, their own party leader, Nick Griffin, gave a speech to the rank and file which paraphrased basically said, "Look you lunkheads, Jews aren't the problem..."

"Maybe we can import the UKIP here and send Lindsey Graham and his Merry Band of Morons to Britain."

The AIP?  So we'd have as political icons an elephant, a jackass, and a gorilla?

Poll: A sample of voters

Pole: What Charles Johnson uses to stuff his head up his ass. 

Benson Maybe we can import the UKIP here and send Lindsey Graham and his Merry Band of Morons to Britain the northernmost island of the Shetlands and then sow mines around its coast.

FIFY

"The AIP?  So we'd have as political icons an elephant, a jackass, and a gorilla?"

Actually, we already have an AIP, which in some states is the Constitution (constipation) Party, in other states is the US taxpayers party.

If they would just put their energy into making the GOP something with more mettle.....

Skippy 82: History, mostly. The Liberals were a free-market / do-gooder party until the First World War. One of the great ideas the Liberals had, though, was to open up the franchise and to allow trade unions; so there came to be a "free stuff!!1" party from the latter. That would be Labour. The Liberals continued their progress toward suicide by screwing up so bad in the Great Chicken-Fucking, 1914-18. The Liberals got left with a bunch of tea-sipping middle-class old ladies who thought the Conservatives were not nice enough. They'd been raking in 25% of the vote and 10% of the Parliament ever since.

Since Blair, Labour is now an ideological mess and the Liberals have decided to morph into the "even MORE free stuff!!1" party. So no, there's no difference anymore.

I've never understood something: what exactly is the major difference between the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties anyway?

The Liberals used to be the traditional opposition to the Tories until about 1910-1920. The Liberals cracked up over (1) Home Rule for Ireland, (2) The general chaos of World War One, (3) the rise of socialist madness. But given that the parliamentary system generally allows 3rd parties unlike our presidential/congressional system that basically squenches them, they hung on as a small party.

The Liberal Party got new life when the Labour Party went full blown Communist in the 1980's, disgruntled and still patriotic Labourites defected (not unlike the "Boll Weevil" and "Blue Dog" Southern Democrats in the USA) and for a time it looked like it would become the #2 opposition party to the Tories.

Then Tony "NuLabour" Blair purged the communists from the party and basically went "nanny state but still tolerating the Thatcherite free market so we can tax it for out nanny state programs and welfare handout vote buys."

Batten down the hatches! Comedy gold  to ensue!

MADRID (AP) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has arrived in Spain to meet with Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and King Juan Carlos for talks.

 the lesson I take from this is the Tories should have been more forthright about fiscal conservative positions and cutting and holding down immigration., Their attempts to be labour lite left some going to libdem to at least have a party that takes a strong stance.

Bingo! Sorry ace, but I must disagree with an earlier post of yours. The Tories faltered because they went wobbly, not because they were too hardcore for the UK electorate, even though so many of them are pussies.

Also, what Curmudgeon said.

OT

Barry: "I've discovered the secret to job growth in this country.  More golf.  I will not rest from playing golf..."

http://tinyurl.com/2cjbmew

MADRID (AP) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has arrived in Spain to meet with Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and King Juan Carlos for talks

Batten down the hatches! Comedy gold  to ensue!

unfortunately, this will be a true statement. 

it's a big f***ing deal we have a VP , that represents the current 'confederacy of dunces', and represents them well

story at 11.   i'll supply  the popcorn

 the lesson I take from this is the Tories should have been more forthright about fiscal conservative positions and cutting and holding down immigration., Their attempts to be labour lite left some going to libdem to at least have a party that takes a strong stance.

Bingo! Sorry ace, but I must disagree with an earlier post of yours. The Tories faltered because they went wobbly, not because they were too hardcore for the UK electorate, even though so many of them are pussies.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at May 07, 2010 11:50 AM (tH7KR)

Plus, the left in Britain has discovered what all socialists instinctively know, the secret to a permanent core constituency and a core source of contributions is handouts.  Patronage works just as well.   That's why they will not cease in this country.

Who will Clegg go with?

The jihadis.

Yeah, heckuva job, Brownie.

The socialists are 100% to blame for everything wrong with England today. 

Posted by: Reactionary at May 07, 2010 11:32 AM (xUM1Q)

Some of the blame must go to their dentists.

Batten down the hatches! Comedy gold  to ensue!

MADRID (AP) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has arrived in Spain to meet with Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and King Juan Carlos for talks.

Posted by: dananjcon at May 07, 2010 11:50 AM (pr+up)

Biden: I just want to say how much we appreciate you Spanish guys and if you ever want to swim across the border you're more than welcome. I've got some lawn work that needs to get done pronto. Any of you guys know where I can get a good buritto around here?

Not much different from Canada last election.

See Mr. Cameron, if you had tried to differentiate your party just a teeny bit more from all the other Gaia-worshipping losers, you'd have a majority!

Indeed. I think the UK would be more like Canada if they had held onto all of Ireland. with four major parties instead of three.

They keep resequencing with better technology and coming up with different answers. Also, a lot of this is statistics and it may depend on who's doing the numbers. I think there probably was interbreeding but I doubt it mattered much to the Neanderthals, who probably either failed to adapt to post-glacial conditions or got hunted down and killed by humans.

Apparently this has been a subject of debate for some time. There were three ideas of why the Neanderthals disappeared:
1. They were not able to adapt a la the dinosaurs (neanderthals were "f**ked up")
2. They were wiped out by cro-magnons (neanderthals were "f**ked over")
3. They mated with the cro-magnons (neanderthals were literally f**ked)

Batten down the hatches! Comedy gold  to ensue!

MADRID (AP) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has arrived in Spain to meet with Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and King Juan Carlos for talks.

Posted by: dananjcon at May 07, 2010 11:50 AM (pr+up)

Posted by: joncelli at May 07, 2010 12:15 PM (RD7QR)

And the Lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.

Will Bush's puppet surrender power to the guy who won the election or not?

You, sir, are gifted.

UK Election Results: Chaos

Good headline for someone presumably itching to say "Anarchy in the UK." A fine display of the restrain that I lack.

Brown might have been able to pick off some seats if he held to New Labour instead of Old. Electoral map shows a sea of blue throughout England, with the LDs taking large segments of Wales & the Southwest, with London being taken by Labour. Then you have Scotland, which is primarily Lib Dem because they still hold a grudge against Thatcher.

Note how their map correctly Identifies Labour as "red". Would that we had the same color scheme in the USA.

_{New around here? Everyone knows that Ace is the hardest working blogger in alll the internets and often is posting at the crack of 3:00 p.m.}

and done by 5:00 p.m.!

Geez snappy, get over it. We won in Iraq. Bush was right. Let go of the hate and move on with your life.

He can't. People like him are still suffereing indigestion from all the fermenting Sandinista Semen they swallowed.

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 12:18 PM (5Etcj)

DUDE...your KOS field is weak, go back to your hole and come back when you can form a cohesive thought.

The BBC's Iain Watson says the mood is surprisingly upbeat at Labour's headquarters. There is still hope there that Nick Clegg will opt for Labour's offer instead of the Tories'. He says there is relief that David Cameron only put an inquiry into the voting system onto the table for Nick Clegg to consider rather than the promise of a referendum itself. As far as Labour is concerned, he says, the "game is still on".

All I can think of while watching this....Thank you James Madison!

all I can think is, another blow to Beck's wishful 3rd party thinking

It's kind of like 2000 when Gore won the popular vote but Bush won the electoral vote.

but this is more confusing then that, because in that election Gore won more votes then Bush nationwide, Bush just so happen to win more states then Gore to win the electoral college and thus the election (something libs brought about themselves by rushing to be crumbled up together in parts of the country during the 80s and costing them that election by doing so); here there is a clear win in seats AND popular vote

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 12:20 PM (Yq+qN)

What a bunch of jerks!

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 12:27 PM (VmtE9)

(Knowing it's a sock) Who did the best job raping you?

 _{The Guardian is reporting that Odumbass has already insulted potential P.M. Cameron by calling him a "lightweight."  More foreign policy brilliance from Duh Won.}

That's coming from a lights kinned fellow with no discernable negro dialect!

Awwwww - Snap! 

Posted by: Reiver at May 07, 2010 12:26 PM (64S5N)

The Indonesian Imbecile is calling someone a "lightweight"?  That's rich.  People with IQs of 83 really have high opinions of themselves, these days.  It's an offense to the intellect.

Posted by: Reiver at May 07, 2010 12:26 PM (64S5N)

Hey, I hear you Mexicans make some great Portuguese rolls.

The are too many racist white cracker tea baggers in the UK today. So, I have decided that more Mexicans should relocate to the UK to balance the power from those Anglo Saxons, Irish, etc... whom have stolen from the indegious Hispanic peoples of color from the UK and Northern Ireland.

144 The Guardian is reporting that Odumbass has already insulted potential P.M. Cameron by calling him a "lightweight."  More foreign policy brilliance from Duh Won.

RULE # 1

insult someone

RULE #2

insult someone so you appear to be wittier/better than said person

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 12:34 PM (yfJ6g)

I don't know but 1 seat is left and that 1 seat is to be voted on in 3 weeks

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 12:27 PM (VmtE9)

(Knowing it's a sock) Who did the best job raping you?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 07, 2010 12:30 PM (1Jaio)

Nancy Pelosi.  Remember that giant "gavel" she was carrying for the glorious free-health-care-for-all vote?  When she visited me, it was still attached to her strap-on harness....

 The Guardian is reporting that Odumbass has already insulted potential P.M. Cameron by calling him a "lightweight." 

The funny part is that the Indonesian Imbecile probably called Cameron a "lightwait" ... just like the "57 states" or "profit and earnings ratios".

If I were Cameron, I would respond with, "All I can say is that I am a lighter weight than The Precedent by 3000%.  Imbecile."

Posted by: DocJ at May 07, 2010 11:20 AM (dt6br)

It's not the genes.  It's the ideas.  Remember - the best things about the US when it was founded came from combining Anglo Saxon civilization with the independence and hardening/strengthening of mind and spirit that came from living on a frontier. 

The socialists are 100% to blame for everything wrong with England today. 

Should be blame the Normans?

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 12:37 PM (Yq+qN)

--Don't forget Climaquiddick.  What a beautifully gift-wrapped opportunity to chuck the Greenie agenda that the Tories just pissed on.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 12:36 PM (Yq+qN)

I know i'll get heat for this but Major was their last leader and probably better then Thatcher

Blair was a good debater in the house of commons and enjoyed popularity as PM but Brown came in, embarrassed himself in the debates, and polls as the worst PM, one poll asked British citizens to rank PMs, the top 3 were 1. Churchill, 2. Attlee, 3. Thatcher; Brown kept polling as LAST, I think Blair made the top 10 last I checked; 1 guy ruined his whole party, kinda like what Obama is doing to the coalition Clinton had built up to get Dems electable again

Posted by: Young Renaissance Man (AKA: YRM: Probably The Youngest Guy On Here) at May 07, 2010 12:40 PM (38UQ3)

So, the Brits rank Churchill as the best PM, but they thought it bright to toss him out right after he saved their asses - to descend into the socialist abyss.  Nice folks, there... and smart, too ... yep. 

Batten down the hatches! Comedy gold  to ensue!

MADRID (AP) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has arrived in Spain to meet with Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero and King Juan Carlos for talks.

Posted by: dananjcon at May 07, 2010 11:50 AM (pr+up)

I'd like to thank Spain for sending us Lafayette to help us fight the Civil War.  If not for him, our President could be picking cotton in Mississippi or some other red redneck state instead of saving the free world.

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 12:18 PM (5Etcj)

You liberal fucks really despise freedom in any form don't you?

I am investigating the complaint that thousands of African-Anglo-Saxons in the UK where denied the right to vote. I will keep President Obama advised of the situation.....

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 12:46 PM (5Etcj)

Iraq has elections of parties, not individuals, you blithering idiot.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 07, 2010 12:44 PM (5TNVe)

actually he took back power 5 years later, don't forget people loved FDR back in the 40s and now his legacy has taken big hits, people were unsure about Reagan during his entire time in office polling the most unsures by any President even at the height of his popularity, now he's battling Washington and Lincoln in polls for Best President, Eisenhower was sent off as an average 2 termer now many people consider him a top 10 president, Dubya himself is making a comeback in his legacy, sometimes it takes time to really respect a leader's accomplishments; even Nixon w/ watergate destroying his legacy has seen a bit of a bump in looking at his sucessess; and the best example of this? Lincoln wasn't a popular President for most of his time in office in fact he had to add a dem to the ticket and change the name of his party in 1864 to get re-elected and that only happened after union victories boosted him towards victory

"BNP didn't get a single seat."

After the mess they've made in the Gulf of Mexico....good!

"Iraq ain't really a democracy if the guy who lost the election uses the army the American taxpayers supplied him to stay in power, is it?"

I prefer to source my army locally.

Posted by: Reiver at May 07, 2010 12:26 PM (64S5N)

--To paraphrase St. Teresa of Ávila, if this is how 0bama treats his friends, it's no wonder he has so few of them.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 12:51 PM (Yq+qN)

so a guy who wasn't elected to office, has horrible approval ratings, and who's party almost lost 100 seats in the biggest turnaround against labour since the 30s says he should get a crack at staying on as PM?

61% of Britians polled by BBC said they didn't want Brown to stay on as PM if it was hung parliment

btw isn't the Queen a conservative leaning woman? she had open disagreements w/ Blair & Brown and the Buckinham area is solid conservative voting wise

"If the oil spill is in the Gulf of Mexico, why don't the Mexicans clean it up???"

GASOLINA
GRATIS
------>

The BNP's popularity proves that fascism is alive and well in the UK. You should be grateful that you have my fine blog to point these things out to you.

And I'll ban the first person who gloats at me, stalkers.

Posted by: a sign with an arrow pointing to the Gulf at May 07, 2010 12:59 PM (q/kmn)

kinda happy with the oil spill right now (I know I feel guilty saying that) but not only is it hurting Obama politically but I was offered a potential job in helping to clean it up

Posted by: Mallamutt at May 07, 2010 12:55 PM (OWjjx)

Really.  You were lending crackdragon a semblance of sanity with that post.

Sadly, I don't think Cameron has the balls to do what either of us recommend for him.  If he did, he would have been on top of some of the other major issues, already.  But, I do hope that he comes back with some answer to the indonesian Imbecile that makes it clear that sane people consider him to be a total joke and a retard.  Too much false, fake, lying deference is given to the Imbecile, here - by conservatives.  It drives me crazy.

"The Guardian is reporting that Odumbass has already insulted potential P.M. Cameron by calling him a "lightweight."  More foreign policy brilliance from Duh Won."

So I'm guessing that, if Cameron takes the seat, Barry won't be getting the complete "Fawlty Towers" and "Are You Being Served?" series on DVD?

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 07, 2010 01:00 PM (9hSKh)

she can't affect the decision and yes she's a figurehead but she can make speeches and voice her opinion on matters, that was my point

"BNP didn't get a single seat."

After the mess they've made in the Gulf of Mexico....good!

Posted by: Joe Biden in Spain at May 07, 2010 12:53 PM (q/kmn)

I would like to tell the good people of Hispanica that Americans are tired of crude oil, so we're exploring for nice oil.

Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 07, 2010 01:00 PM (9hSKh)

Don;t know about the UK, but the Queen's representative in Canada, the Governor General, can intervene if there's a danger of a government unravelling.  She did it last year when the three opposition parties threatened a "coup" and she gave Parliament a "time-out" to cool off.  That was one of the best things she did.

She's also hot.

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 01:00 PM (5Etcj)

Your ignorance is world class.

"I was offered a potential job in helping to clean it up"

Lookie here...Big Oil trying to nudge in on the "clean coal" market...

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 01:00 PM (5Etcj)

You douchebags want to let Iran run the whole mideast ... because you're just that stupid and have that much enmity for the West.  I really wish you emotional basketcases would stop letting your issues with your fathers lead you to trying to destroy everything that reminds you of your fathers - our own society.  Go take some anti-psychotics and stay out of politics.  All you people do is destroy everything around you.

"Well, if letting Iran select who runs Iraq is freedom I'm not really for it."

Liberals don't like Iran?

^{Does Mahmoud know?}

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 01:04 PM (yfJ6g)

They really don't have a Constitution.  I know they like to say they do, but they don't.  They are really flying with an unlimited government and rules that can be changed on a whim.  They are close to a true democracy in that sense, with the supreme power really being in the whim of the voters and the whims of whomever controls parliament.  It's a pretty crappy system.

"Well, if letting Iran select who runs Iraq is freedom I'm not really for it."

This, after yesterday suggesting we gut our entire Navy and rely on drones?

Snappie, you're losing focus...

Snapdragon,

FOADIAF, kthx.

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 01:18 PM (5Etcj)

Are you kidding?  Iran's coming power over the middle east has nothing to do with Iraq, you blithering idiot.  BTW, did you know that Saddam INTENTIONALLY spilled 40,000,000 barrels of oil into the gulf and lit just about every single oil well in Kuwait on fire?  I would think that emotionally damaged enviro-wackos would have wanted his head on a stick.

Also, it's nice that you are endorsing the US' support of Iraq and Iran in fighting each other - trying to keep them even and occupied with killing as many of each other as they could.  That was a good policy.  But, after Saddam invaded Kuwait and did the above in his scorched-earth strategy while he was suffering one of the most humiliatiing military defeats in human history, it was clear to anyone with a brain (which leaves you out) that he could not be allowed to remain in control of one of the most strategically sensitive areas of thea world.  But it is surprising that the enviro-wackos weren't bothered by Saddam's enviro-terror and wanted him left in power.  Interesting, though we all know that cognitive dissonance is there the left lives.

"BTW, did you know that Saddam INTENTIONALLY spilled 40,000,000 barrels of oil into the gulf and lit just about every single oil well in Kuwait on fire?"

You know what is interesting to me?  When the MFM needed "perspective" on the current spill in the Gulf, they went to Alaska.  Why didn't they go to this?

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 01:27 PM (Yq+qN)

Yes.  Which means that their government has no serious restrictions on its power - though the standing Executive (the royals) still has a final power (though unused).  But, this is what you get when you have to fashion a modern government around a permanent royal Executive.  Too much ad-hoc transfers of power ot the "legitmate" parliament and no real architecture for where it should go.  So, in the end they have no separation of powers and no limits.  Nasty stuff.  But, that's Europe for you. 

Democrats want the same for us, here.  I got a kick out of the Dems holding "no-confidence" votes against Bush right after they won Congress.  What a bunch of dolts.  They don't even realize that "no-confidence" votes are totally meaningless in our system.  We have some truly dumb people in the dem party.  truly, spectaculary dumb ... and with daddy issues, too.

You know what is interesting to me?  When the MFM needed "perspective" on the current spill in the Gulf, they went to Alaska.  Why didn't they go to this?

Posted by: reason at May 07, 2010 01:32 PM (XiVKO)

Yep.  Typical deceitful, hypocritical, America-hating libs.  They wanted Exxon execs hanged for the Valdez spill - even though Exxon wanted nothing more than getting all of their oil to market and being paid for it, but when Saddam attacks the Earth as he's being allowed to retreat, the libs say nothing - and for a spill over 4 times the size of the Valdez.  It's crazy.  And libs never talk about lighting the wells on fire.  They won't me smoke friggin' cigarettes anywhere and they are all into global warming, but the worst ecological disaster in history (done by an arab in the way that arabs always treat things) and libs are mum.

It's amazing, isn't it?

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 01:45 PM (5Etcj)

Italy had something like 40 governments in 50 years after WWII.  So what?  That is part of the unstable nature of parliamentary systems.  But, you don't understand that.  You and your ilk are pushing for the same sort of shit, here, as you have no respect for our Constitution or the architecture of American governance, as you people have done nothing but shit all over it.

Achmadinejad sends his thanks to you, crapdragon.

Posted by: snapdragon at May 07, 2010 02:10 PM (5Etcj)

Your Indonesian Imbecile is doing everything he can to make sure they don't. 

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 07, 2010 02:06 PM (yfJ6g)"

Hey, I wanted to sleep.  You're the one who kept messin' with me...