January 27, 2010
— Ace Sorry, this story still is finished being written.
Politico found eight Democrats (including sorta-Democrat Lieberman) who were unsure if they'd go the reconciliation route, but today, Ben Nelson -- one of the eight -- is saying he's up for suicide.
Nelson told Nebraska reporters that he could support passing current health legislation using budget reconciliation as long as he believes the underlying bill is good."IÂ’ve been asked about whether IÂ’d support using the process known as reconciliation now," Nelson said. "So, I want to make it clear: If I support a bill, then I will vote for it regardless of whether it takes 50 votes to pass or 60 votes to pass. My position doesn't change just because the House or Senate decides to change the process."
The House wants the "fix" to the Senate bill passed before the Senate bill becomes law, which is... procedurally unprecedented, and may not be permitted. The CBO and parliamentarian are balking.
“Neither the House nor the Senate have figured out how to pass a reconciliation sidecar first,” one senior Senate aide says. “We are being asked to pass a piece of legislation that amends another piece of legislation which does not exist yet. We are having problems with the CBO and parliamentarian on that front.”
Apparently they want us to have a 60 vote filibuster-proof majority by 2012.
Posted by: Ace at
02:09 PM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 02:12 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Ben Nelson at January 27, 2010 02:13 PM (kJLH9)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 27, 2010 02:13 PM (muUqs)
Posted by: Alex at January 27, 2010 02:15 PM (d8/2I)
Posted by: torabora at January 27, 2010 02:15 PM (CH5ak)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at January 27, 2010 02:16 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: the real joe at January 27, 2010 02:17 PM (WjerO)
Posted by: Kensington at January 27, 2010 02:18 PM (LIH4p)
Apparently they want us to have a 60 vote filibuster-proof majority by 2012.
60? I'm thinking 80. Seriously, after Scott Brown, where can we lose?Delaware? Nope.
New York? I'm thinking a teabagger can beat the carpetbagger or the oldbagger there now.
Hell, I think Eleanor Holmes Norton should be nervous.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 02:18 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: antisocialist at January 27, 2010 02:19 PM (Rwudm)
I blame you people for jinxing it.
Posted by: embittered redleg at January 27, 2010 02:20 PM (Ox91r)
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:20 PM (p302b)
Posted by: mystry at January 27, 2010 02:21 PM (kmgIE)
From here on in, all pizza will be by home delivery for Ben Nelson.
Posted by: Cicero at January 27, 2010 02:22 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 27, 2010 02:23 PM (DIYmd)
"IÂ’ve been asked about whether IÂ’d support using the process known as reconciliation now," Nelson said. "So, I want to make it clear: If I support a bill, then I will vote for it regardless of whether it takes 50 votes to pass or 60 votes to pass."
How about if it takes 500 or 600 votes to pass? Think you'll still be around Slick? Keep fuckin' that chicken.
Posted by: Speller at January 27, 2010 02:24 PM (o0R2E)
we think alike. was wondering the same thing especially since someone predicted some monkey business on the night of the election.
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:24 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Barbara Boxer at January 27, 2010 02:24 PM (CH5ak)
Oh, and lets give ourselves pay raises of 100%, then pass a law cutting back 20%, thus telling citizens we're willing to 'take one on the jaw' in order to SAVE MONEY.
Posted by: GarandFan at January 27, 2010 02:24 PM (ZQBnQ)
“Neither the House nor the Senate have figured out how to pass a reconciliation sidecar first,” one senior Senate aide says. “We are being asked to pass a piece of legislation that amends another piece of legislation which does not exist yet. We are having problems with the CBO and parliamentarian on that front.”
Good luck with that, idiots! Just a small detail that you can't enact and amendment to a law that doesn't exist!!
What'll these assholes think of next?
Posted by: rockmom at January 27, 2010 02:25 PM (w/gVZ)
Posted by: Naccy Pelosi at January 27, 2010 02:26 PM (QXKjZ)
Posted by: phreshone at January 27, 2010 02:27 PM (1AnxB)
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:27 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Mjim at January 27, 2010 02:27 PM (mMdWG)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 27, 2010 02:28 PM (gbCNS)
Posted by: mystry at January 27, 2010 02:28 PM (kmgIE)
Posted by: Jayne on the left coast at January 27, 2010 02:28 PM (nIUYy)
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:30 PM (p302b)
Apparently they want us to have a 60 vote filibuster-proof majority by 2012.
Two better interpretations that are not necessarily mutually exclusive:
A. Apparently they want us to have a 100 vote filibuster-proof majority by 2012.
B. Apparently they want us to have a tar-and-feathers uprising by 2012.
Posted by: sherlock at January 27, 2010 02:30 PM (cq3pU)
Don't you mean silicone? you were talking about Pelosi, right?
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at January 27, 2010 02:31 PM (OZJ/1)
Life insurance paid up, Barry? Not a smart move.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 02:32 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: The Lich King at January 27, 2010 02:32 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Jason Biggs at January 27, 2010 02:33 PM (Vu6sl)
Call me old fashioned, but I prefer to have my legislation actually in existence before voting/amending.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2010 02:33 PM (TtXKB)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 27, 2010 02:33 PM (i3AsK)
Posted by: TC at January 27, 2010 02:34 PM (QXKjZ)
Now Congress could obviously introduce legislation to modify what the just passed. But wouldn't that be starting over, subject to a fillibuster?
Posted by: Dana White at January 27, 2010 02:35 PM (zgeXv)
Did Barry waffle on you sweet tart?
Posted by: Speller at January 27, 2010 02:35 PM (o0R2E)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 27, 2010 02:36 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Trish at January 27, 2010 02:36 PM (yqhkv)
How Puritan of you, ATC. I'll bet that you don't even look at pron.
Posted by: A "Progressive" at January 27, 2010 02:36 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: Max Power at January 27, 2010 02:36 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 02:37 PM (9Wv2j)
Come on you guys. Ben's having some Kool-Aid. Why don't the rest of you Dems have a drink too.
Posted by: Jim Jones Hussein Obama at January 27, 2010 02:38 PM (QKKT0)
Of course not. I'm using those external 1TB drives to store translations of the Bible.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2010 02:38 PM (TtXKB)
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:38 PM (p302b)
This is fun. Relax. I've seen the ending. We win.
Ben Nelson plays shuffleboard at his Florida home.
The more these cocksuckers talk, the more converts we get.
Posted by: gus at January 27, 2010 02:38 PM (Vqruj)
Oh, ye of little faith.
I just hope the chaos holds off until at least March.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 27, 2010 02:39 PM (otlXg)
You should read the site sometime.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 27, 2010 02:39 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Ben Nelson at January 27, 2010 02:40 PM (554T5)
It'll be delicious, knuckleheads. You'll get health care. You'll love it. Now ace can work and not be denied coverage for epilepsy. And in five years you'll be shrieking: "Goverment, hands off my health care!"
Fucking knuckleheads.
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at January 27, 2010 02:41 PM (Z/lpU)
Posted by: Guvnah at January 27, 2010 02:42 PM (Rg8DN)
I'm starting to think the Democrats (the ones in the loop) are not at all worried about this November.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 02:44 PM (k9Ti8)
Mark Levin is really really pissed tonight. More pissed than usual.
I hear ya - wish Mark would give the SOTFU rebuttal tonight - Levin is on fire tonight.
Posted by: paranoid polly at January 27, 2010 02:45 PM (r7Vc3)
Posted by: erg at January 27, 2010 02:46 PM (Z/lpU)
Posted by: Ashen at January 27, 2010 02:46 PM (lZ7M6)
Posted by: Seriously at January 27, 2010 02:46 PM (veuhx)
All the Democrats need to do is win enough to keep control of the houses. And then it's all over because they have the Census as their ace-in-the-hole.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 02:47 PM (k9Ti8)
I tried the sidecar reconciliation once with a girlfriend, she let me know the rules, it wasn't satisfying.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 27, 2010 02:47 PM (DIYmd)
There you go, just fixed a couple of spelling mistakes there for ya.
<pats ergie on numb misshapen skull.>
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 27, 2010 02:47 PM (MXP2z)
I'm starting to think the Democrats (the ones in the loop) are not at all worried about this November.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 06:44 PM (k9Ti
"
Yep so how come? how come they don't seem to care? They are not so altruistic that they would give up all that power for the party and the prez so what is going on then?
Posted by: curious at January 27, 2010 02:47 PM (p302b)
Posted by: The Chicken at January 27, 2010 02:48 PM (k/h/i)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 27, 2010 02:48 PM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at January 27, 2010 02:49 PM (a9UO0)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at January 27, 2010 02:49 PM (554T5)
Posted by: erg at January 27, 2010 02:49 PM (Z/lpU)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 27, 2010 02:50 PM (IoUF1)
You understand the difference between getting drunk and dying of alcohol poisoning, yes?
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 27, 2010 02:50 PM (MXP2z)
so what is going on then?
umm, they control an elaborate system of fraud and massive army of cheaters which will generate enough votes for them to win key races and maintain control of government, methinks.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 02:51 PM (k9Ti8)
Ace, why aim low?
66 is one-party constitutional amendment territory.
Posted by: Al at January 27, 2010 02:51 PM (0lyUI)
I'm starting to think the Democrats (the ones in the loop) are not at all worried about this November.
Group delusion.
Posted by: huerfano at January 27, 2010 02:51 PM (kJLH9)
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 02:51 PM (pGELo)
Posted by: Dr. Frankenpelosi at January 27, 2010 06:35 PM (eWtdM)
And here's a picture of it: http://tinypic.com/r/2a9qg41/6
Posted by: Jason Biggs at January 27, 2010 02:53 PM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Amy Winehouse at January 27, 2010 02:54 PM (Ylv1H)
Posted by: Dr. Frankenpelosi at January 27, 2010 06:35 PM (eWtdM)
And here's a picture of it: http://tinypic.com/r/2a9qg41/6
The horror! My eyes!
Posted by: huerfano at January 27, 2010 02:55 PM (kJLH9)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 27, 2010 02:55 PM (MXP2z)
Posted by: jakeman at January 27, 2010 02:56 PM (k/h/i)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at January 27, 2010 02:56 PM (ndlFj)
Posted by: jakeman at January 27, 2010 06:56 PM (k/h/i)
I'm torn about watching. Maybe I'll let you all do it for me.
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 02:57 PM (pGELo)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 27, 2010 02:57 PM (gbCNS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2010 02:58 PM (QECjC)
You are making it too easy for the Republicans at a time when we are trying to improve the herd by eliminating the weak minded diseased moderates.
Posted by: Cliff Claven at January 27, 2010 02:58 PM (kJLH9)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2010 02:59 PM (I/MqP)
My only prayer is that the Dems do ram this POS down America's throat with a legislative gimmick. They will lose 15 seats in the Senate and 100 in the House. Unless they are planning on declaring voting in November illegal, what can they possibly be thinking?
Posted by: Bill MItchell at January 27, 2010 02:59 PM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Griff at January 27, 2010 03:00 PM (MKyfs)
I'm not in the mood to hear Obama's same old bullshit.
And I'm certainly not in the mood to see/hear Republicans stand and applaud President Inherit.
Our republic is being destroyed and the buffoons in the Republican party are sitting on their thumbs.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 03:00 PM (k9Ti8)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2010 03:00 PM (I/MqP)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 27, 2010 03:01 PM (CZI81)
Posted by: willow at January 27, 2010 03:01 PM (7FgWm)
Zinn is dead? Good.
I was just thinking about that asshole today. I picked up a booktoday and it was spoiled because it had his review on the back cover.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 03:02 PM (k9Ti8)
"If you've lost HuffPo and Stewart...."
Posted by: jakeman at January 27, 2010 03:02 PM (k/h/i)
Posted by: "Rowdy" Benny Nelson at January 27, 2010 03:02 PM (zxrQh)
Posted by: Nancy "botoxicated" Pelosi at January 27, 2010 03:03 PM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Just Another Poster at January 27, 2010 03:04 PM (NgoAe)
Unless they are murderers, rapists or pedophiles, I'm not happy when someone dies.
Dreading the fawning obits he will receive, though.
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 03:05 PM (pGELo)
Posted by: Children of the Corn at January 27, 2010 03:06 PM (wPZU5)
We can't play. This is their disclaimer:
NOTE: The Huffington Post in no way encourages binge drinking. This is the comedy section. If you actually drank as much as we suggested you would die, so do not do that.
details, details, set the limit to 6 pack.
Posted by: sTevo at January 27, 2010 07:05 PM (eA3tl)
They obviously never watched Animal House.
Posted by: conscious and ready to go at January 27, 2010 03:07 PM (Vu6sl)
You may be, I'll be livetweeting sorting my sock drawer.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 27, 2010 03:08 PM (wPZU5)
Posted by: Ben Nelson at January 27, 2010 03:09 PM (zgZzy)
We can't play. This is their disclaimer:
NOTE: The Huffington Post in no way encourages binge drinking. This is the comedy section. If you actually drank as much as we suggested you would die, so do not do that.
details, details, set the limit to 6 pack.
Posted by: sTevo at January 27, 2010 07:05 PM (eA3tl)
They obviously never watched Animal House.
THEY TOOK THE BAR!!!!!
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2010 03:09 PM (I/MqP)
FIFY.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 27, 2010 03:10 PM (wPZU5)
Posted by: Warden at January 27, 2010 03:12 PM (QoR4a)
A day after delivering a State of the Union address aimed at showing recession-weary Americans he understands their struggles, President Barack Obama intends to award $8 billion in stimulus funds to develop high-speed rail corridors and sell the program as a jobs creator.
He's definitely doubling down on teh stupid.
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 03:13 PM (9Wv2j)
Someone ought to attach one of those remote controlled fart machines to the underside of Pelosi's chair and everytime she leaps to her feet hit the button. I would love to see the expression on Obama and Biden's face.
Posted by: conscious and ready to go at January 27, 2010 03:13 PM (Vu6sl)
The old school democrats have finally figured out that their party has been hijacked and is on a legislative jihad.
Though that just means Nancy, Harry and Barry will stuff this POS down our throats at some point this year...
Posted by: phreshone at January 27, 2010 03:15 PM (1AnxB)
Everything the Democrats do is a job-creator!
Repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell will be a job-creator.
Posted by: This is boner at January 27, 2010 03:15 PM (k9Ti8)
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 06:51 PM (pGELo)
Yes, because that's what first and foremost on the minds of all Americans. Sheesh...
Posted by: Tami at January 27, 2010 03:16 PM (VuLos)
Hi Peaches.
President Barack Obama intends to award $8 billion in stimulus funds to develop high-speed rail corridors and sell the program as a jobs creator.
Right. In about five years....for unions.
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 03:16 PM (pGELo)
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (pGELo)
Seriously, did he learn nothing from Clinton's first term? No wonder Hillary is out of the country-she's too embarrassed to be seen with him.
Posted by: Methos at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (Xsi7M)
oh yeah, that dipping your nads in toothpaste thing i suggested?
dont do it.it hurts like hades.
Posted by: davey- at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (DfiBV)
Posted by: Art Linkfinder at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (s2TC6)
What does Hillary know and why is she sitting out the STFU addy? Maybe she'll be on here with us playing the drinking game.
Posted by: Dang Straights at January 27, 2010 03:19 PM (rGB9a)
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 07:13 PM (9Wv2j)
Hit me!
Posted by: B. H. Obama at January 27, 2010 03:20 PM (CZI81)
oh yeah, that dipping your nads in toothpaste thing i suggested?
dont do it.it hurts like hades.
Mintay!!
Posted by: Andi at January 27, 2010 03:20 PM (CZI81)
Posted by: Just Another Poster at January 27, 2010 03:21 PM (NgoAe)
Posted by: Art Linkfinder at January 27, 2010 03:22 PM (s2TC6)
I am delighted to be unemployed for the rest of my life, if only gays can serve openly in the military. Can I cast an early vote for 2012 yet?
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 03:23 PM (9Wv2j)
Asked to comment, the Ghost of Socks the Cat said, "Bitch ain't stupid, ya dig?"
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 27, 2010 03:24 PM (CZI81)
Peaches I have been dying to catch up with you. Remember the adorable little girl on stage with Scott Brown during his acceptance speech? Turns out she is my niece's good friend and classmate! My brother said his daughter kept talking about this big party that her friend was going to in Boston for her uncle. Brother picks up the paper the next day and there she is on the front page.
He visited their class (in NH) on Monday and had a picture taken. No telemprompters were present.
How cool is that?
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 03:25 PM (pGELo)
Posted by: Dang Straights at January 27, 2010 07:22 PM (rGB9a)
There's not enough garden hoses in the world to break us up.
Posted by: Construction Worker, Indian Chief, and Police Officer at January 27, 2010 03:25 PM (CZI81)
Because the U.S. has never had the kind of bullet trains found in Europe and Asia, there are no U.S. engineering companies or manufacturers with experience in high-speed rail. Anthony Perl, who heads the National Research Council's panel on intercity passenger rails, said that means much of the technology will have to be purchased abroad.
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 03:26 PM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Tami at January 27, 2010 03:27 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at January 27, 2010 03:27 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Miss Manners at January 27, 2010 03:28 PM (gbCNS)
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 03:28 PM (pGELo)
Are you crying ergie ?
There's no crying in politics .
Posted by: awkward davies at January 27, 2010 07:17 PM (wb68R)
I don't know if you saw the comment at #73 before it got trollbusted, but it was ban-worthy.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 27, 2010 03:28 PM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Tami at January 27, 2010 03:29 PM (VuLos)
Honestly, I'm not sure how I want to react to that news.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 27, 2010 06:59 PM (I/MqP)
Death is just an artificial construct of the imperialistic military-industrial complex.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 03:31 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Peaches at January 27, 2010 03:32 PM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: loppyd at January 27, 2010 06:51 PM (pGELo)
That's some funny populism that there Obama fella's peddlin' doncha think?
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 03:39 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 27, 2010 03:40 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 27, 2010 03:47 PM (U37Ux)
As Agnostica says, "Nelson already slit his own throat."
He's already not going to be re-elected, running slightly behind in the polls against "Random Child Molestor" and even with "Turtle Spit." In his defense, if he runs against "Steaming Pile of Warm S---" he is projected to win by 4 points. But I doubt Ron Paul will move to Nebraska just to run against Nelson.
He'll take one for his team and hope for an appointment somewhere so Obama can demostrate how he takes of his own, Chicago style.
Posted by: Steve O at January 27, 2010 03:53 PM (8Wqsa)
Posted by: Steve O at January 27, 2010 03:55 PM (8Wqsa)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 27, 2010 03:59 PM (QECjC)
They are who we thought they were! They ARE who we thought they were...AND WE'RE NOT GONNA LET 'EM OFF THE HOOK!
Benny and Evan and Russ and Patty and Babs, all standing on the ledge, looking down...
JUMP! JUMP! JUMP! JUMP! JUMP!
Has it occured to Johnny Ketchup that Scott Brown got elected in the same state he has to seek re-election in in a few short years yet?
Does Joe Leiberman realize what happens in Mass. can just as easily happen in Connecticut and that, perhaps the main reason Rich Blumenthal enjoys his current poll numbers is due entirely to the fact that he hasn't staked out a position on ANY issues yet?
2012 approaches, Joe...last time around, you got in on the votes of indies and damn near every Republican in the state voting for you. Something to think about, Champ...
These dopes don't slow down for anything. They just throw open the throttle and cut the break lines even with the sharp turn in sight.
It's gonna be a spectacular crash...
Posted by: SuperCool at January 27, 2010 04:00 PM (DRsTV)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at January 27, 2010 04:04 PM (bSzpw)
Posted by: Toaster Oven at January 27, 2010 04:37 PM (T4x50)
Personally if I knew the jig was up, I would do whatever the hell I wanted. Apparently Nelson wants to stick it up our asses.
Posted by: kansas at January 27, 2010 05:23 PM (Wwi5M)
Somebody kill this fucking bill already!
This dead, not dead, dead, not dead, dead, definitely not dead, maybe dead is really starting to fucking aggravate me.
wtf?
Seriously. Are these Democrats so completely delusional that they think people will love them for this crap?
Well just wait until the Bush tax cuts expire. I know all sorts of people who'll be screaming then.
Posted by: memomachine at January 28, 2010 03:53 AM (/+tPT)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3073 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: rplat at January 27, 2010 02:12 PM (G1ArL)