January 08, 2010
— Gabriel Malor As always, there's more going on here than just the unemployment figure:
The Labor Department said Friday that employers cut 85,000 jobs last month, worse than the 8,000 drop analysts expected.A sharp drop in the labor force, a sign more of the jobless are giving up on their search for work, kept the unemployment rate at the same rate as in November. Once people stop looking for jobs, they are no longer counted among the unemployed.
When discouraged workers and part-time workers who would prefer full-time jobs are included, the so-called "underemployment" rate in December rose to 17.3 percent, from 17.2 percent in October. That's just below a revised figure of 17.4 percent in October, the highest on records dating from 1994.
As always, check out Geoff's unemployment chart over at Innocent Bystanders.
Also [DiT]: Take a look at another one captured by Geoff from Moody's economist Mark Zandi, note the line "Predicted W/O Stimulus" with actuals plotted.
Negligible difference. Except for that whole massive debt thingy.
And more [Gabe:] See this analysis from James Pethokoukis.
And here's the conclusion from John over at Power Line:
What we are seeing, in other words, is Barack Obama's economy--the foreseeable consequence of the terrible economic policies that he, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have imposed or threatened to impose on the nation. There will of course be a recovery, as always; but that recovery will be much stronger and faster if Congress makes clear that it will block any further assaults on the economy in the form of cap and trade, massive tax increases, and so on.
Click over and read the whole thing.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:17 AM
| Comments (196)
Post contains 292 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 08, 2010 05:22 AM (QECjC)
Uh you know thank uh God, um Allah, or Himdu uh um floaty thingy that the media refuses to report this issue with the um, bug-chasing zeal they uh ah uh uh tried to hound Bush with um back when unemployment was er 5% or so and MSNBC in uh particular was saying "but the uh real number is like 7.5%"
The buck stops with ME, and I'll uh give you chagne.
Posted by: Barack T. Ogabe esq. at January 08, 2010 05:23 AM (Mhn4l)
1) Vic no quite the contrary when next month the numbers go up or "stay stable" we'll be treated to another round of "unexpectedly mild improvement news" by the newsies....
they WILL NOT report on this issue with emotion until they smell blood in the ater and Ogabe is facing a donk challenge.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:25 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 05:26 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 08, 2010 05:26 AM (w4rJE)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 08, 2010 05:27 AM (GaTkJ)
/sarc
Posted by: Sisyphus at January 08, 2010 05:28 AM (tf9Ne)
5,
That was last year's grade...Barry is on his way to an A-....he has had his fill of "false" humility
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:28 AM (Mhn4l)
7,
I've got news for you numbnuts the stealth taxhike that Chicago Je$u$ and Slo Joe are going to let happen this year is at least as much to blame for the anxiety in corporate America as "the warmonger party" by the way since your brown-eyed boy just admitted we are at war with Radical Islam you may want to update your talking points Axelload.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:30 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 08, 2010 05:31 AM (w4rJE)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 08, 2010 05:32 AM (GaTkJ)
12,
speaking of typos...how's President Je$u$' polling doing?
I'd wager him finally feeling the need to try to pretend he gives a flying fuck that radical muslims want to kill Americans is tearing him up inside.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:33 AM (Mhn4l)
We're fucked!
Posted by: GarandFan at January 08, 2010 05:35 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: lincolntf at January 08, 2010 05:36 AM (rwlcW)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 08, 2010 05:36 AM (w4rJE)
So how fucking long WILL IT take to fix the mess left by get back to where we were from Bush & Cheney?
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:37 AM (z37MR)
That was you guys. My bad.
Posted by: Techie at January 08, 2010 05:37 AM (zbH+i)
This is seriously bad news, particularly when the European economic news this week is factored in. The EU broached 10% unemployment this week. The news from Greece ain't good, either.
Green shoots? GDP is meaningless, since the Fed continues to pour money into the economy and a lot of the "growth" we're seeing is inflation that hasn't yet been accounted for. The NYSE is a complete bubble, for example, and any profits made there are the children of inflation...
We have not yet hit bottom. With Wrongway Peachfuzz in the White House it's hard to say if/when we ever will...
Posted by: RobM1981 at January 08, 2010 05:37 AM (lV1tZ)
14,
over at hot air they wrote that the panty bomber was "strike two" and they get it....
The idiots in this country thought just hiring President Wonderful was going to have AQ lay down with the libs like jackals with the lambs...well it won't because at the end of the day Jihadi Jim is simply the deniable asset that Islam uses as a tool against the west....
the whole "they are just poor" narrative Jug Ears the clown and friends try passing off is rich.....
neither Hasan nor the panty bomber were poor this is a multi-tiered highly adaptable foe we refuse to fight and Jug Ears will have to be dragged kicking and screaming to prevent a WMD event from happening if/when AQ gets a candle.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:38 AM (Mhn4l)
The Future just called me and said, "Hey, next January 2011 when things are even worse, the Democrats will say, 'Well, it's gonna take longer than 2 years to fix the mess left by Bush & Cheney.'"
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:39 AM (z37MR)
Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009. Obama and all the economic expert rump-swabs said the recession ended in June 2009.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:40 AM (z37MR)
Why, it'll take them 50 years to fix everything, so do you dare vote them out of office, you un-educated teabaggers sans pants creases.
/sarc
Posted by: Techie at January 08, 2010 05:42 AM (zbH+i)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 08, 2010 09:27 AM (GaTkJ)
This is so over the top it's hard to tell if it's a parody of the typical lefty response to everything. And for the record Barry has been in office for a year now. That's 12 months not 10.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 05:42 AM (1Jaio)
22, we have not yet hit bottom....
guy I am fairly certain we are just now starting on the first drop of the roller coaster....
think about it the only way to end a recession is to grow out of it, but Team JackA$$ won't let us export coal, fights EVERY new factory tooth and nail under the auspices of the Sierra Club, and is insisting that we hamstring our adaptability to make a new economy by sacrificing fuel exploration on the altar of the Gore cult....
this is gonna make Japan's lost decade look like the blink of an eye unless we get the filibuster back and take our case to the American people for a conscientuous stewardship of an environment exploited to make America work.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:42 AM (Mhn4l)
Actually, I think Hunan Resources may end up being quite apt before to long.
Also:
BOOOOOOOOOSH!!!! <Shakes fist>
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 08, 2010 05:43 AM (pZEar)
btw, I predicted last week that the UE data would remain +/- a tenth of a perecent. I predict the GDP will show modest growth too, say, 2%.
The big increase is coming in UE and big decrease in GDP is coming in this quarter.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:43 AM (z37MR)
So, this one we can pin on Obama now, right? Why'd he break the economy again right after fixing the recession? This is a recovery, isn't it?
Posted by: Techie at January 08, 2010 05:44 AM (zbH+i)
That was good. Which one of you guys did this? It almost had me going.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 08, 2010 05:45 AM (CZI81)
The Democrats will criticize the Republicans for making the unemployment data political in 3...2...1....
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:46 AM (z37MR)
I'm going to leave the Hunan Resources alone mainly because now I want wontons.
Let's go through the rest of this. You know stuff about hiring and unemployment? Good for you! Here's a cookie. Believe it or not, so do many of those who oppose Pres. Obama's plans. Also, not to be a stickler for facts or anything, but one of stated reasons for slamming through the stimulus package was to keep unemployment below 10%. How's that working out for you?
Yourselfs =/= yourselves.
Also, you must be new here since the vast majority of those who comment at this site slammed Bush repeatedly for the drunken sailor spending. Naturally, we're going to even more diligently opposes super sized drunken sailor spending. There's nothing inconsistent about that.
Also, we prefer Morons, thank you very much.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 08, 2010 05:46 AM (8WZWv)
Normal job creation in a good economy is ~50k jobs per month. If any jobs are ever created under Barry and normal job creation is maintained, it will be 2025 before all lost jobs are recouped.
I hope you were counting on your children staying in college for a decade or two because there won't be any jobs for them if they get out sooner.
But look at it this way, all those years of tuition will be a stimulus to the economy, right?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 08, 2010 05:48 AM (r1h5M)
This is a MENSA member we're dealing with here.
Posted by: Techie at January 08, 2010 05:48 AM (zbH+i)
This is what's gonna happen today.
1) The Republicans will come out and say a few words about how the Democrats and Obama are failing our economy.
2) The Democrats will fire back saying a) stop talking down the economy, b) stop being the party of No, c) it's wrong to make the jobless a political football, d) it was the Republicans who created this mess, and e) it's racist.
3) The Republicans will put their heads down in shame and shut their mouths.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:49 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 08, 2010 05:50 AM (w4rJE)
Of course unemployment is high. What do you expect when we fight two illegal wars because we inflamed the Muslim world by occupying their territory and raping their goats, meanwhile Shrub is making payoffs to big business cronies and spending all of his time cutting brush instead of fixing helath care so that the little babies aren't dying in the streets. You should point the finger at yourselfs for not voting for Obama, the Messiah and curer of jock itch.
Posted by: Lib Morgenholz at January 08, 2010 05:50 AM (CZI81)
40 HtP,
You know that is something else that bothers the unholy hell out of me....
part of why we are having Frau Botox and Dingy Harry get away with ramming their Joe-Bidens up our Hillary Clintons is that we are regaled with tales of woe about how the cost of medical work has far outstripped inflation and growth....
yeah and "Big Education" has grown even faster and much further....hell the degree my mom got for 14,000 over four years now costs about 112,000....
"change"
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:51 AM (Mhn4l)
Hunan Resources,
Since you're an expert on hiring and stuff how long will it take to turn things around? Please share some of your vast wisdom on hiring and stuff with us.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 05:51 AM (1Jaio)
43,
I don't think so or rather not much longer....
there is a fight brewing in the GOP effete elites about a lack of Steele in our resolve...or rather Steele's lack of resolve.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:53 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 08, 2010 05:53 AM (QECjC)
At this point, even if we had 5% growth, total jobs can not reach Bush numbers during obambi's first (and only term).
That's not taking into account lowering the massive debt added by Obama, which will take generations.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 05:53 AM (z37MR)
48,
well he/she needs 8 new hires this month to deal with all the returns being shipped back to the warehouse at K-mart ergo "she knows lots"....
OddLots that is
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:54 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 05:55 AM (1ao2R)
52,
We could pay down the deficits we owe if we simply strangled the growth of entitlements in the crib with the Baby Boomers and told the 40 somethings and younger, "good luck you're on your own"....
that's gonna happen one way or the other anyway.
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:55 AM (Mhn4l)
@7
We're not too worried. Palin is gonna fix it up ASAP when she's POTUS. And retards like you can stand in line to sniff our asses.
Posted by: maddogg at January 08, 2010 05:56 AM (OlN4e)
This is what's gonna happen today.
1) The Republicans will come out and say a few words about how the Democrats and Obama are failing our economy.
Here ya go:
After Attacking Bush During Periods Of Job Growth, And Pledging Their Stimulus Would Create Millions Of Jobs, WhereÂ’s The DemsÂ’ Outrage?
It's from the GOP, got to it on Drudge.
Waiting for apology/ head hanging from Steele in 3...2...1..
Posted by: shibumi at January 08, 2010 05:56 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 08, 2010 05:56 AM (dZnwA)
I'll give you a 9.2. Not enough typos and ChimpyMcBushitlerburton is preferred to Shrub. You stuck the landing though.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 08, 2010 05:57 AM (8WZWv)
Hunan Resources--Keep the Chang! Bwhaaha!!
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at January 08, 2010 05:59 AM (w4rJE)
61 the Germinator,
Ja zat ees right, it is simply un-ameri-keen for us to not send all of us into starvation when we can print as much money as we want or dam eet borrow from ze UN to keep us going!
ow my brain hurts....
thinking like a Cali-tard is painful
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 05:59 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: Twinks at January 08, 2010 06:00 AM (LeFbD)
Remember a few weeks ago when all those stories came out about the phony-baloney cooked created/saved jobs with the Stimulus money? I thought for sure that story would seriously damage Obama and the Democrats. But it didn't.
The Republicans said a few words about it and then shut their mouths as soon as the Democrats told them to.
If the Republicans are only gonna make noise about our worsening economy for one per quarter, then they will never win. The economy is the number one issue and the Republicans need to stay on it every day.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:03 AM (z37MR)
64 Twinks,
I'd leave it with blue-chips like Coke....
not that I am a broker or anything but the "gains" we've seen the street making are the printing press economics in action....
the DJIA may be your best hedge against inflation sans gold...your real purchasing power when you cash out may not be much bigger than now but if you yank it and put in in the sheets so to speak it will be worth less when the inflation train from the pork cannon hits
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 06:03 AM (Mhn4l)
In an unprecedented gesture of my magnanimity, I have singlehandedly reduced Bush's unemployment figures down to 10%. ±10%.
Posted by: Barry Tiberius Obama at January 08, 2010 06:04 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 08, 2010 06:05 AM (dZnwA)
Posted by: jeff at January 08, 2010 06:05 AM (+uoRK)
65,
I'd like to think they are saving their powder in this rainy Bunker Jill for next quarter and then we will hear a thunder....
of course I also thought that even the GOP couldn't fuck up the wild enthusiasm Sarah engendered with the base....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 06:05 AM (Mhn4l)
It's actually worse than you might think. For one thing, Calculated Risk reported the employment to population ratio has dropped back down to early 1980s levels. And keep in mind there are a lot more people living in this country than there were in 1983.
Also, Zerohedge pointed out a few days earlier that the Emergency Unemployment Number has literally skyrocketed---as of Dec 19th, the number of EUCs being filed is over 5.1 million; as recently as Nov 7, it was a little over 3.5 million. The 5.1 million number is a record, by the way.
Bottom line: Don't believe ANY of the happytalk coming from the press or anyone else who are touting "green shoots," a high stock market, cooked-up GDP numbers, and other BS factors; we are still DEEP in the shit and we aren't climbing out of it anytime soon. At this rate, we will need a jobs gain of about 250,000 a month just to get back to even. Who would possibly be delusional enough to think that's going to happen short of an economic miracle engine that the proliferation of the internet produced in the mid to late 90s?
Our entire productive economy is dependant on Americans spending themselves into massive debt, and until THAT particular metric drops even more (the government is the only entity right now that is NOT deleveraging), our economy is NOT going to recover. End of story.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 08, 2010 06:06 AM (/Pw+r)
The New York Times' readership dropped another 17% in 2009, resulting in a corresponding 23.5% drop in annual revenues - both figures worse than expected.
Posted by: alwyr at January 08, 2010 06:06 AM (w2++y)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 08, 2010 06:06 AM (dZnwA)
68 Hatchet,
My investment in "reloading" will pay good future dividends but if it is a windfall I'd say that there are worse places than the dow....
since it seems to be Barry's potemkin village vis a vis the massive TARP outlay
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 06:06 AM (Mhn4l)
REVISED the word of the decade.
Posted by: maverick muse at January 08, 2010 06:07 AM (+CLh/)
This time our enemies have nukes.
B+rry and the Dems are all about protecting their re-election and advancing statism. This country is sliding downward just like it did under Carter and FDR and LBJ. We never seem to learn that liberalism is a mental disease.
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 06:08 AM (1ao2R)
that recovery will be much stronger and faster if Congress makes clear that it will block any further assaults on the economy in the form of cap and trade, massive tax increases, and so on.
Which enforces the notion the precedent bed wetter and co. do not want the economy to improve, they prefer a state of perpetual chaos and doom. They are attempting to convince john q. public that he needs big gov. to take care of him, hold his hands, wipe his nose, WE knew this, WE saw this coming. I pitty those who didn't. This gang of thugs is making Cloward- Piven & Alinsky look like absolute sages and Stalin a piker.
Posted by: dananjcon at January 08, 2010 06:09 AM (pr+up)
Via Instapundit:
Either Mass. Dems are imbeciles, or...
ok, forget that...
Given Mass. Dems are imbeciles, but if they elect Coakley, do they get some kind of award?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 08, 2010 06:09 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 08, 2010 06:09 AM (dZnwA)
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 08, 2010 10:06 AM (/Pw+r)
Hunan Resources and others like him/her.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 06:10 AM (1Jaio)
#64 If you can hold out until interest rates start their climb, consider the I-Series US Savings Bond as part of your portfolio, if you are looking to hold this stuff long term. Right now it offers a zero % return, but that should kick up again once China knees a couple of Treasury auctions in the testicles.
The important thing: the I's are indexed for inflation...
Something to consider.
Posted by: RobM1981 at January 08, 2010 06:10 AM (lV1tZ)
Posted by: St. Agnostica at January 08, 2010 06:10 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 06:12 AM (ucxC/)
It will take a lot longer than 10 months to fix the mess that EIGHT YEARS of Bush/Cheney left us. I work in Hunan Resources and I know the stuff about hiring and unemployment. Point your stinking fingers at yourselfs for supporting the warmonger party. Idiots.
Hey clown, Obama's administration said the stimulus would prevent the U3 from going over 8% (and as a bonus, predicted that the U3 would go back down to 5% within five years regardless of whether the stimulus was passed or not). Oops. So don't try passing this off on Bush or anyone else. Either Obama puts on the Big Boy Pants, or he needs to GTFO.
You are pathetic, to be quite frank. You are so deep in the Kool-Aid pool that you can't even contemplate the notion that Dear Leader is nothing more than a shit-talker whose mouth is writing checks the nation can't cash.
The math, and the metrics, say you are full of crap.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 08, 2010 06:12 AM (/Pw+r)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 08, 2010 09:57 AM (8WZWv)
Kerri Strug is nothing. That hurt.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 08, 2010 06:12 AM (CZI81)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 10:12 AM (ucxC/)
Neither do we.
Posted by: Hunan Resources at January 08, 2010 06:14 AM (CZI81)
Remember how upset DemocRATS were about how money that went to Iraq seemed to disappear (remember the bank robbery over there that netted a 1/4 billion$$$$)? Well they certainly are quite now. And Republicans are awful quiescent too.
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 06:16 AM (1ao2R)
Eggs ellent, Morgenholtz. The morning isn't wasted: a new star is born, for our future amusement. All hail HUNAN the contrarian!
Reckon it'll be back? Watch that hash...
Posted by: comatus at January 08, 2010 06:17 AM (/VEEI)
personally i don't even trust us bonds anymore....
Gold, silver, copper, lead, and lead delivery systems are the only truly trustworthy investments, IMO....
Want to know why the Democrats f'ed me when they killed SS privatization? They prevented me from taking the $150 that gets taken out of my paycheck every two weeks and putting it in physical gold and silver, and CDs at my credit union. Instead, I'm sinking liquidity into a Ponzi scheme that I'll never get to use.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 08, 2010 06:19 AM (/Pw+r)
The loss of life and sacrifice not forgotten, but the trillion dollars spent in Iraq & Trashcanistan actually helped our economy, somewhat. A lot of those dollars went to the private sector, whereas the trillions being spent by Obama is producing SHIT and TAKING AWAY from the private sector.
The Left knows nothing about economics. Nothing. All they know how to do is spend working people's money.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:19 AM (z37MR)
What we are seeing, in other words, is Barack Obama's economy--the foreseeable consequence of the terrible economic policies that he, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have imposed or threatened to impose on the nation.
No it's not. It's all evil BUSH's fault. Just ask Hunan Resource the expert on hiring and stuff.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 06:20 AM (1Jaio)
93,
and that is what we at the grass roots need to start stressing in our message to the sub 50 crowd....
"these jackals steal from you and YOUR company for a ponzi scheme that they privately acknowledge does not work and cannot continue"....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 06:21 AM (Mhn4l)
When you're invisible, you just don't count anymore in ObamaWorld. Bullshit govt numbers aside, the genuine, out in the street, unemployment rate has been steadily marching upwards at a healthy clip.
These people may be "invisible" on the unemployment figures due to definitional sleight of hand, but they most certainly NOT invisible on the SNAP (i.e. food stamp) data coming out of the Dept of Agriculture and in the spending bills congress passes to fund SNAP.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 08, 2010 06:22 AM (1pKzh)
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 06:22 AM (1ao2R)
When you're invisible, you just don't count anymore in ObamaWorld.
That's true. Obama doesn't give a shit and he'll put a positive spin on the numbers.
But that won't change the fact that is close 20% unemployed out there and they're fucking angry.
So Obama can spin all he wants -- it won't change the facts on the ground.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:25 AM (z37MR)
Hahahahaha. Just wait until the morons in Congress pass Barney Frank's Financial System Destruction Act. There won't be a dime of credit for anyone and bankruptcies are going to go through the roof.
Democrats are trying to drive small business out of business in this country. They want everyone working for big businesses that they can control and unionize, or for the government.
Posted by: rockmom at January 08, 2010 06:26 AM (w/gVZ)
101
"Votes don't count, counters count"
Barack Stalin
See were we still going to be a functioning non-fraud based representative Republic his blindness would give me hope but Chuckles Schumer wanting to force enroll all welfare recipients tells me those folks will be "voting*" even if they are dead or don't vote....
Posted by: sven10077 at January 08, 2010 06:28 AM (Mhn4l)
The two months for the party doesn't count, raaaaaacist.
Posted by: Jug-eared Bumblefuck at January 08, 2010 06:29 AM (mR7mk)
I've got news for you ... It will take a lot longer than 10 months to fix the mess that EIGHT YEARS of Bush/Cheney left us.
Do tell.
I mean tell us how the enlightened 52% plan to pull us out of this ditch since you work in Human Resources and everything (Quoting the great Inspector Harry Callahan: "Personnel is for assholes.").
Because what I see in your statement is a lot of finger pointing and a big fat zero on policy. Kind of like your fearless leader.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 08, 2010 06:33 AM (B+qrE)
I assume the HR person (who here has met more than one HR worker who wasn't a dirt bag?) is a sock. But lest any leftard trolls scanning this forget, the dominos of this crisis were erected during the Clinton years. The Dems had 8 years of easy prosperity to set up good energy policy. Instead they diddled around and raised taxes, thereby putting a brake on the economy right there, which was only felt later. The "oil shortage" is what kicked off the recession and really got the sub-prime situation into a state of collapse. The Dems did nothing to kill Osama, even given 3 chances, thereby allowing the eventual attack on 9-11, which was a dire hit to the economy. Had the US been governed responsibly in the Clinton era we'd be in great shape. Bush 2 did do some damage with his wasteful spending, but a big portion of that was on some long overdue and fully justified war fighting that has, until recently, been going quite well - and is still going well in Iraq. Also, excessive government spending, while bad and inevitably carrying a heavy cost, does not necessarily harm the real economy that much, so long as it doesn't suck up the credit needed to maintain that economy. We didn't have TRILLION dollar deficits in the Bush years, just so a bunch of campaign contributors and friends from Chicago could line their pockets with public funds. The Bush tax cuts and his refusal to implement a bunch of nutty Leftist BS regulation was vital to keeping the private sector going, such as it was.
Now the Dems are holding back the recovery with their insane threats of rampant socialism. They need to be pushed aside, as soon as possible.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 08, 2010 06:33 AM (xUM1Q)
Right now, the Ds can appear to be keeping things from getting worse (when in fact, we're still losing jobs). But the revision will likely be higher-- and announced quietly.
Remember the 3.5% growth we had that got revised twice, lower each time? Now it's a barely existant ~2%?
Posted by: nickless at January 08, 2010 06:36 AM (MMC8r)
yeah, Laura Ingraham was just talking about that
Again, the Republicans will never ever utter the words 'voter fraud' even if their own colleagues are losing their seats to election thieves.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:38 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 06:43 AM (1ao2R)
"I dip, you dip, we dip..."
I always used to love two scoops - but not up my ass.
Posted by: Old Sailor at January 08, 2010 06:44 AM (/Ft4q)
All these 'experts' and not a single one will say:
Gee, maybe this young law professor who never turned a nickel in the private sector doesn't know anything about economics.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:45 AM (z37MR)
What did you guys think of the analysts and small business reps coming out on CNBC today saying there is no demand for loans. No demand? No demand? How could that be. Then on the other side of their mouth they say the banksters are trying to come up with "something on margin" to fix the siutaiton. So, what is it? Is it no demand or is it "we have no chance of getting them to lend to us, so why try? And what will "something on margin" be? Usury rates?
Interesting day.
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 06:45 AM (p302b)
Civilian participation rate plunging badly. 589K more people gave up looking for work in December. There is no recovery.
Sales tax receipts by governments are also plunging showing no recovery.
When will the lies end?
Posted by: markytom at January 08, 2010 06:46 AM (ZG9as)
Yet CNBC maintains the Obama lie that we're in recovery.
CNBC is to financial advice and reporting as Tiger Woods is to marriage counseling.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 08, 2010 06:48 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 08, 2010 06:49 AM (kq9Vv)
Yes, because if we know anything, we know that unemployed people are great for the economy.
The phrase Jobless Recovery is the biggest fraud perpetrated on the American people since Global Warming. You need people working to have a robust economy. When people work they produce shit and buy shit. When they're unemployed they produce nothing and buy nothing and are a burden on the taxpayers, which in turn weakens the economy further.
This is economics 101.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:49 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 06:50 AM (p302b)
http://is.gd/5UOou
Posted by: Paul Krugman at January 08, 2010 06:51 AM (GtYrq)
Ratigan works for the super truth network at MSNBC. I can't be certain that he actually is paid. It is possible he just shows up to read teleprompters for two hours.
Posted by: WTFCI at January 08, 2010 06:52 AM (GtYrq)
Here is what I have tweeting on the subject this AM:
Sorry, I ain't readin that shit. If I wanted to read tweets I would become a twit and start twittering. I don't think it's too much to ask to have someone add some conjunctions and punctuation for a post on their blog.
Posted by: Rocks at January 08, 2010 06:53 AM (Q1lie)
Yes, because if we know anything, we know that unemployed people are great for the economy.
The phrase Jobless Recovery is the biggest fraud perpetrated on the American people since Global Warming. You need people working to have a robust economy. When people work they produce shit and buy shit. When they're unemployed they produce nothing and buy nothing and are a burden on the taxpayers, which in turn weakens the economy further.
This is economics 101.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 10:49 AM (z37MR)"
Well said. so how come everyone is afraid to say stuff like this, particularly on CNBC? (and other cable outlets)
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 06:53 AM (p302b)
Closed and padlocked bankrupt businesses don't seek loans. Neither do the homeless, and those who still own a house that might still have significant equity are suspicious of dealing with banks anymore now that they had cards canceled, limits chopped, etc.
Banks have suddenly become "the enemy" to a generation or two. That does not portend well for them in the future.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 08, 2010 06:54 AM (1pKzh)
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 10:51 AM (1ao2R)
1011X1010!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Hunan Resources at January 08, 2010 06:54 AM (CZI81)
Here's a thought-experiment: Why would a goods-producer, say General Electric, employ people and manufacture and increased amount of goods, thus increasing the GDP, if there are less people out there buying their goods? They wouldn't.
If sales are down, say, 10%, GE is not going to produce more goods, and retailers are not gonna want to add more inventory if their stock is not moving out of their stores.
GE and retailers would reduce CONTINUE to reduce their workforce and match their respective outputs and inventory to current demand.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 06:55 AM (z37MR)
And the bulk of Barry's recovery plan has been to extend unemployment benefits, thereby taxing those working to pay those not working to not work. Not stimulate growth, not to lower the costs of economic activity, but to feed the beast of unemployment. That's just nuts, and we're seeing the results.
My radical plan would have been to just suspend all Federal taxation for three to six months. We'd have less debt from it than the stimulus, plus we'd dump a massive amount into the hands of every person to get their heads above water or move themselves ahead. I can't see anybody making the case that that would have worked any worse than what they're doing now.
Posted by: nickless at January 08, 2010 06:56 AM (MMC8r)
Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks dropped, sending the Standard and Poor's 500 Index down from a 15-month high, after an unexpected decrease in jobs spurred concern the economic recovery will falter.
I'd hate to think that this recovery will falter. It's going so well now.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 08, 2010 06:56 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 06:56 AM (p302b)
#134 Well said. so how come everyone is afraid to say stuff like this, particularly on CNBC? (and other cable outlets).
Because they live in a fantasy world where economics can be fine-tuned by the government despite all logic, reason, and past experience showing that it doesn't work in the real world.
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 08, 2010 06:57 AM (9hSKh)
Don't forget to factor Cash 4 Clunkers and the 787 billion dollar stimulus.
Posted by: WTFCI at January 08, 2010 06:57 AM (GtYrq)
The phrase Jobless Recovery is the biggest fraud perpetrated on the American people since Global Warming. You need people working to have a robust economy. When people work they produce shit and buy shit. When they're unemployed they produce nothing and buy nothing and are a burden on the taxpayers, which in turn weakens the economy further.
It's just like everything else the stupid libs do. Say it often enough and it becomes the truth. Unbelievable how fucking stupid some people in this country still are.
Good God, even my son has come around. Being unemployed for 13 months will do that to you.
Posted by: Jewells at January 08, 2010 06:57 AM (l/N7H)
The fuck does that mean?
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 06:57 AM (mR7mk)
Banks have suddenly become "the enemy" to a generation or two. That does not portend well for them in the future.
I dunno, it worked out okay in the 30's, didn't it?
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 08, 2010 06:58 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: I Am Nobody Jack at January 08, 2010 10:49 AM (IhHdM)
Then you'd have to say those who understand binary, those that don't, and those that don't give a rat's keister.Posted by: Insomniac at January 08, 2010 06:59 AM (v+QvA)
nickless mentions yet another 'stimulus' offered by the brilliant Democrats: extending unemployment benefits.
Yes, that'll do the trick. Keep taking money out of the hands of the producers and give it to the non-producers. Always works in the Universe of Lies.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 07:00 AM (z37MR)
Oh, no, this is where that jerk comes in and tells us all we're stupid for believing that government collecting money from businesses hurts businesses.
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 07:01 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 07:02 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 08, 2010 07:03 AM (kq9Vv)
So, who wants to bet Ace mentions his Cash-Register Montage thingy, again, today?
I hope he does because it's always fun to read. And I'll bet they'll show the register-drawers opening and closing on TV today, too.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 07:04 AM (z37MR)
Hadn't thought of that happening. It's almost a given that obambi is a one termer, but they might just decide to pull the rug out from under him to keep the White House. Get some charismatic Hollywood type with great hair, chiseled chest, an actual birth certificate;
----------------------
Hillary's ears are burning.
Posted by: arhooley at January 08, 2010 07:07 AM (GKXA7)
tithe.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 11:07 AM (z37MR)
That's bullshit. I'd give my left nut to only be paying 10%.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 08, 2010 07:08 AM (CZI81)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 07:09 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: St. Agnostica at January 08, 2010 07:11 AM (gbCNS)
It will either collapse or people will wake up.
Posted by: Mike H at January 08, 2010 07:12 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 07:14 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 08, 2010 07:16 AM (kq9Vv)
Somethings fishy here. I mean 600K people all just decide to stop looking for work. How does the BLS even know this? Just because they stop "reporting" to a state employment service? Telephone survey? What?
I see it as more likely that 600K people have lost their unemployment benefits.
Posted by: Ken at January 08, 2010 07:16 AM (+7h25)
let's mandate health insurance AND tax it........and hold off on implementing actual health care services for 3 years.
fixed
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 07:16 AM (z37MR)
I have no friends, so I don't.
Posted by: Hunan Resources at January 08, 2010 07:17 AM (CZI81)
Hadn't thought of that happening. It's almost a given that obambi is a one termer, but they might just decide to pull the rug out from under him to keep the White House. Get some charismatic Hollywood type with great hair, chiseled chest, an actual birth certificate;
----------------------
Hillary's ears are burning.
Posted by: arhooley at January 08, 2010 11:07 AM (GKXA7)
For some time now I've thought that the election of 2012 is going to be a replay of the election of 1968- with Barry playing the part of LBJ. Due to her skill at "triangulation" Hillary should be able to play the parts of both Eugene McCarthy (by bobbing left to energize the crazy base into unseating Barry) and Hubert Humphrey (by weaving to the center to secure the nomination).
It's less clear who will play the roles of Richard Nixon and George Wallace, but the stars do seem to be aligning themselves into the same pattern.
Posted by: Nighthawk at January 08, 2010 07:20 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: . at January 08, 2010 07:20 AM (hyP1j)
Posted by: . at January 08, 2010 11:20 AM (hyP1j)
Well, there's the day old donuts in the dumpster at Krogers. And you can usually cadge a meal on Sundays after church services, depending on the denomination.
But mostly, it's the three magic words "Grandma's Basement".
Posted by: palin-steele (former moron punching bag) at January 08, 2010 07:23 AM (CZI81)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 08, 2010 07:25 AM (kq9Vv)
How many people know someone out of work? I know at least 3 people who have been looking for jobs for over a year.
I personally know 5 people unemployed right now. Two of them for over a year. My niece and her husband both got layed off, lost their home etc. Been a horrible year for them. And they have twin girls a little over a year old.
Posted by: Jewells at January 08, 2010 07:25 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Old Sailor at January 08, 2010 07:26 AM (/Ft4q)
Then again, knowing this Administration, the projected U-6 numbers would have been less than the projected U-3 numbers due to all us of receiving our awesome Skittle shitting unicorns (taste the rainbow).
From a hotel in Lathrop, CA...
Posted by: David in San Diego at January 08, 2010 07:26 AM (OhWG5)
Posted by: . at January 08, 2010 11:20 AM (hyP1j
they move in with their mothers
Posted by: mother willow at January 08, 2010 07:29 AM (7FgWm)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 07:30 AM (PjevJ)
I have a theory about that. I think all they wanted to do was set up a cheapo website where people would self-report all of the "saved or created" jobs and they could tout it. But it was so cheapo that the phantom congressional districts shot it all to hell. Honestly, I think that stimulus is a national joke.
But don't look to Obama's personal numbers. He will not get blame. He's always Obama The Good Boy-King. His advisers are the nefarious ones. Yesterday's speech should mark the beginning of the end. It will be nothing but infighting (chaos) from here on out.
The very strange leak about Rahm wanting to return to Chicago (at the same time as the Democrats announcing they wouldn't seek re-election) suggests to me that the wheels are coming off the bus.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 08, 2010 07:32 AM (T0NGe)
How many people know someone out of work? I know at least 3 people who have been looking for jobs for over a year.
I personally know 5 people unemployed right now. Two of them for over a year. My niece and her husband both got layed off, lost their home etc. Been a horrible year for them. And they have twin girls a little over a year old....this is what makes me angry, that those fools (Rs and Ds) look at public policy as a game. Whose side can win, they don't see the true cost to individual people. It really sickens me...
Praying that your niece and husband find work...
Posted by: Mike H at January 08, 2010 07:35 AM (LdYLm)
Well, I guess the leeches already think he is a god, but his pro-business/freedom program would work. I think he just doesn't believe it.
Posted by: PJ at January 08, 2010 07:35 AM (Qpxxz)
Really?
They're not getting any heat from anyone -- not the Republicans, not the media. If the Obama admin were in trouble, they be purging personnel. The first one to go would be Geithner. Then the National Security Adviser. Then maybe Napolitano.
Then, they'd shitcan Gibbs for being a tool. As log as these utter failures and embarrassments are still in the admin, they are feeling pretty confident in the White House.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 07:36 AM (z37MR)
#143 - spot on. If it's jobless, it ain't a recovery.
This news is horrific.
I'm sure glad we'll be adding Universal Health Care to the shit pile. The 19 employed people who survive this Administration should enjoy paying for the other 300 million of us...
Posted by: RobM1981 at January 08, 2010 07:37 AM (lV1tZ)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 07:37 AM (IcVGZ)
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 10:56 AM (p302b)
Curious, that story is on the sidebar on the main page here. See "Dearborn, MI story.
Posted by: Bill R. at January 08, 2010 07:38 AM (EhlQq)
btw, did any lefty moonbat blogs blast Cafferty for getting on Obama's tits about breaking his promise to televise negotiations on CSPAN?
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 08, 2010 07:38 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: mother willow at January 08, 2010 07:38 AM (7FgWm)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 08, 2010 07:39 AM (ucxC/)
Thank you Mike, I hope they do too, but my real worry is my son. How he stays so optimistic is beyond me. It's been 13 months for him. And to answer another post, well they either move back in with mom and dad or mom and dad help them buy giving them money to live on. We chose door #2. We already have my daughter living with us and my son would NEVER move back home. He'd rather die first. He feels bad taking money from us. We also help support my husbands elderly mother and my mother will also be needing help soon. Yeah lifes a freaking bowl of cherries.
Posted by: Jewells at January 08, 2010 07:41 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 07:43 AM (PjevJ)
Jean,
smiling,.. i understand. i was trying to have a light moment, I hope you find a great worker than benifits your company.
Posted by: willow at January 08, 2010 07:44 AM (7FgWm)
Posted by: Reactionary at January 08, 2010 07:46 AM (xUM1Q)
That's code for You lose Your job....not me.
Posted by: torabora at January 08, 2010 07:48 AM (1ao2R)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 07:57 AM (IcVGZ)
"Worse than Expected"
The press, even the financial press, is LIBERAL. Because of this, when there is a Democrat president and congress, their every expectation is high, and, when there is a Democrat president and congress, the economic facts are ALWAYS worse than the liberal financial press' predictions - thus, they are always surprised.
I noticed this during the last few administrations, as well. When a Republican is in the White House, and when Dems do not control congress, the same exact liberals who make wild happy positive (and dead wrong) prognostications during Lib administrations tend to make dire, dismal predictions about the economy. The economy under conservatives invariably does better than the predictions of the Karl Marxes in the press, and AGAIN they are always surprised, and the headlines, EVERY SINGLE MONTH during the Bush administration, said....
"...Better than Expected."
It is like physics, like death and taxes, like the sun rising and setting. It is an unchanging, innate feature of the liberal financial press.
Posted by: Taqiyy. at January 08, 2010 07:57 AM (ltfED)
Unemployment probably does pay more than a lot of service-sector jobs. The max is over $500/wk in Minnesota, for something ridiculous like 72 weeks. When I was living in my sister's basement (due to bad choices, the economy was pretty good at the time) I was making $6.50 /hr at an outlet mall. A woman who started after I did quit after a week because she was spending an hour's labor on the gas to get there for a four-hour shift.
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 07:57 AM (mR7mk)
Unemployment probably does pay more than a lot of service-sector jobs. The max is over $500/wk in Minnesota, for something ridiculous like 72 weeks. When I was living in my sister's basement (due to bad choices, the economy was pretty good at the time) I was making $6.50 /hr at an outlet mall. A woman who started after I did quit after a week because she was spending an hour's labor on the gas to get there for a four-hour shift. I was clearing about $125/wk--just enough to keep my car insurance and cell phone (for the job hunt) and food/incidentals (pantyhose for job interviews, puke).
OTOH, the guy who finally hired me to work in my field was only hiring people with "not-what-I-want-but-gotta-do-something" jobs, 'cause that meant they weren't sitting around bemoaning fate or playing WoW all day.
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 08:05 AM (mR7mk)
He comes from wealthy family. The USA better not be paying for his defense....Same with Ft.Hood Hassan......He has money too.
please Mr. Tapper ask Obama this question.
Posted by: non_dhimmie at January 08, 2010 08:05 AM (zACGu)
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 08:06 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Johnnyreb at January 08, 2010 08:07 AM (Mv/2X)
Posted by: chicocano at January 08, 2010 08:12 AM (2n5cq)
I've been funemployed since last May. The job market around here is almost completely barren. Very much worse than when I was laid off in 2002 (and again in 2004). There's just nothing out there to even apply for, much less get hired. I've never seen it this bad.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 08, 2010 08:19 AM (89RxY)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 08:23 AM (QeLzv)
You have to wonder what the real numbers are showing if they decided to report an decrease in employment for December. If it were good, they would have reported something good today and then claimed the January drop was due to a larger than normal seasonal adjustment.
Posted by: Neo at January 08, 2010 08:36 AM (tE8FB)
It's almost as if everything obama has done is doing the exact opposite of what he claimed would happen.
Fancy that.
/sarcasam
The libs will never learn from their own past actions.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 08, 2010 08:50 AM (QEeuq)
Posted by: chicocano at January 08, 2010 08:55 AM (2n5cq)
Posted by: Jean at January 08, 2010 09:02 AM (Zg2/+)
The fuck does that mean?
Posted by: Miss HeatherRadish at January 08, 2010 10:57 AM (mR7mk)"
It means that everyone else who interviews her allows her to dance around the question, change the subject and nestle back into her civil servant cocoon. Erin burnett, to her credit, is the only one who reels her back with "MISS ROMER..." and she keeps asking the question in different way until finally when 'MISS ROMER" doesn't answer Erin Burnett answers for her and 'MISS ROMER" has her own version of an on air visual cow.
BTW, does anyone else think that the growth rate in Education and Government isn't that good of a thing in a democratic republic? If so many people already work for the government or for education (government practically since they have powerful unions) then less people work in the private sector. These government clones and education parrots don't care about the democratic repulbic, they car about themselves only.
It seems he takes care of those who have never held real jobs.
Posted by: curious at January 08, 2010 09:58 AM (p302b)
Posted by: custom promotional prodcuts at June 03, 2010 01:33 AM (mYNod)
Posted by: chi flat iron at May 10, 2011 01:41 AM (btV+t)
Posted by: designer handbags outlet at May 10, 2011 01:42 AM (btV+t)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2021 seconds, 324 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at January 08, 2010 05:21 AM (QrA9E)