January 21, 2010
— Purple Avenger More good news for democrats.
Stock futures fell after a new report showed jobless claims rose unexpectedly last week, reminding investors a recovery is going to be slow and bumpy.With the administration claiming full responsibility for the "recovery", and Slow Joe claiming the Spendulus exceeded all expectations, they own this now. In total. Lock, stock, and barrel. Full up. All in.The Labor Department said workers filing for unemployment benefits for the first time rose by 36,000 to 482,000. Economists were expecting a small decline.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
05:20 AM
| Comments (173)
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Alex at January 21, 2010 05:23 AM (wFWt7)
Posted by: Barack T. Ogabe esq. at January 21, 2010 05:24 AM (Mhn4l)
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 05:24 AM (1Jaio)
They're the only ones who aren't expecting it.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at January 21, 2010 05:24 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: eman at January 21, 2010 05:25 AM (sqNBZ)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:25 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: The Associated Press at January 21, 2010 05:26 AM (TpXEI)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:26 AM (p302b)
Some 'experts' are 'expecting' 4-5% GPD in 4thQ.
first estimates come out, I think, on the 29th, two days after SOTUBSF
*state of the union bullshit fest
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:27 AM (ouySy)
Posted by: Libtard at January 21, 2010 05:27 AM (ngD76)
Posted by: eman at January 21, 2010 05:27 AM (sqNBZ)
Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama will offer proposals to limit financial institutionsÂ’ size and trading activities as a way to reduce risk-taking, an administration official said.
I thought he didn't want to run Wall Street?
Obama is renewing his focus on economic issues, tapping into voter anger about the struggling economy, taxpayer bailouts and growing bank profits at a time of 10 percent unemployment and a federal deficit that rose to $1.4 trillion last year.
Looks like Barry is breaking out the pitchforks again
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 05:27 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: RM at January 21, 2010 05:28 AM (1kwr2)
They are correct to use unexpected so much though.
With Obama & the Dems in office you really don't have many expectations.
Posted by: Rocks at January 21, 2010 05:28 AM (OOgDc)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:28 AM (p302b)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:29 AM (OlN4e)
The 4thQ will be positive, and that will cause Obama to come out and tell us again how he saved the economy from the brink.
And it will also silence the Republicans on talking about this awful recession we're in. But it will all come crashing down in April. The 1Q GDP and unemployment data are going to be killers.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:29 AM (ouySy)
Posted by: billhedrick at January 21, 2010 05:30 AM (gTZyc)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:30 AM (p302b)
Posted by: eman at January 21, 2010 05:30 AM (sqNBZ)
Yep, unemployment up again even as we try to hide it.
So what do we need to do???
let's go after the banks some more. That's always good for a few votes from the Ghetto and the uninformed.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:30 AM (QrA9E)
Oh, and while were on the subject of the wonderfulness of all of the wonderful things that make people feel all wonderful about the wonderful competence of the current administration, I thought a walk down memory lane would be appropriate. Fortunately, the ObamaBiden YouTube channel is still stocked to the brim with campaign ad fodder that really should be exploited. I defy anyone to find a single promise in this garden of plenty, that Barry has kept. Or, or a play on words;
There are lies, damned lies and Â…
Â… well there are just pretty much damned lies.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2010 05:30 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Soviet Obama at January 21, 2010 05:31 AM (C39a6)
It's half black and bows (more like a decline), it's called the Unexpectedly.
Posted by: James Underwood Crockett at January 21, 2010 05:32 AM (OOgDc)
But then we all know the disposition of a Donk - stubborn and not about to change; despite the protestations of ''That One''®
Posted by: TennDon at January 21, 2010 05:32 AM (o6Yv2)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:33 AM (p302b)
Thrift stores, Big Lots, Dollar Tree.
I think we're heading into the second dip right now. There's no way to hide all the alt-A resets and foreclosures flooding into the system anymore. Even the Federal Reserve buying up a $1T+ of toxic shit wasn't enough to hold back those rising flood waters.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:34 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (p302b)
Campaigns on worst economy since the depression - gets elected, then claims "the economy was much worse than we anticipated."
If was pass the stimulus, we keep unemployment under 8 - goes to 10.
-------------------------------------
...claims we're in recovery in June 2009, says there's light at the end of the tunnel
...when good economic comes out, Obama brags how he pulled the economy from the brink.
...when bad economic news comes out, Obama trots out the line: It will take more than a few months to fix the mess that took eight years to create.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (ouySy)
Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Expansion in EuropeÂ’s service and manufacturing industries unexpectedly slowed in January, adding to signs the pace of the economyÂ’s recovery may weaken.
It's unprecedented how much unexpected economic news there is.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: the real joe at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (WjerO)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 21, 2010 05:35 AM (8WZWv)
Speaking to that, Batchelor was talking to John Fundt of WSJ about the "new guy at the FHA" and what he is facing. John kept asking if the FHA is where all the new alt A and subprime loans are now.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:36 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:36 AM (y+Brm)
I watched a show about a week ago where a chamber of commerce guy was talking about small and medium size buisinesses.
His opinion was that the real killer right now was the pure uncertainty that was flooding the streets.
Every day Obama and his commie minions are talking about some new project to redistribuite the wealth and/or nationilze some other part of the buisiness cycle with healthcare being the one big one then.
His point was nobody wanted to invest or to hire people when that kind of threat is hanging over their heads.
Based on that I predict that there will be no meaningful recovery, and certainly no rehiring, until after the 2010 elections. And then it is only contingent on the Repubs taking back the House.
If that does not occur we will be in for a long and painful decline even further.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:38 AM (QrA9E)
43 It's unprecedented how much unexpected economic news there is.
That's the nice thing about that word - unprecedented - you can just use it over and over.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2010 05:38 AM (RkRxq)
Beck says she will be his guest today on his radio show on now at this link.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:39 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:40 AM (y+Brm)
Not only has John Edwards admtted (Surprise! Surprise!) that's he's Rielle Hunter's baby daddy, but that baby has the same boutique ambiguous name (Quinn) as the cheerleader from Glee. **BARF**
Posted by: logprof at January 21, 2010 05:41 AM (gJL6J)
Posted by: Hell in a handbasket at January 21, 2010 05:41 AM (C39a6)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:41 AM (p302b)
Palin is guest hosting a radio show?
See? I told you she wasn't running for president; she's looking to make some big $$ in radio and/or television.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:42 AM (ouySy)
Posted by: Gordon Gekko at January 21, 2010 05:43 AM (Pq3ay)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 09:40 AM (y+Brm)
My wife bought Berkshire-Hathaway day before yesterday. It's gonna split 50-1.
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:43 AM (OlN4e)
Change™
Posted by: WTFCI at January 21, 2010 05:43 AM (GtYrq)
You know? With all of this unexpected shit, you would think I would be surprised.
I'm not.
Curious.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2010 05:43 AM (RkRxq)
Mallamutt
I saw over at HA the other day, where Painful Stool was blaming the morons here for "driving him to liberalism", crying in his milk that he was some kind of independant before he came here and got kicked out.
Posted by: mrfixit at January 21, 2010 05:44 AM (Bsm1s)
He is very funny though discussing what "they" are still saying about his Palin interview. He said "they" said he practically french kissed her in the interview and then the next week they said she was trying to take his fox time spot. He also alluded to the fact that several people have said that he wants to take o'really's spot and that is why they are on tour together and business partners since you keep your friends close but your enemies closer. That whole segment was very very funny.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:45 AM (p302b)
In a couple of months we'll learn from the 'experts' that Iran 'unexpectedly' built its first nuke.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:45 AM (ouySy)
Posted by: Hell in a handbasket at January 21, 2010 05:45 AM (C39a6)
Obama and all democrats are saying Scott Brown's "change" is the same as their "change".
yeah - keep lying, Democrats..
The Democrats brand needs to fall off the rials and over the cliff.
Democrat "change" IS CORRUPTION.
Posted by: pre paid sex monster at January 21, 2010 05:46 AM (0fzsA)
taxes will 'unexpectedly' hit us soon
and then inflation will 'unexpectedly' be hindering our 'recovery.'
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:46 AM (ouySy)
I watched a show about a week ago where a chamber of commerce guy was talking about small and medium size buisinesses.
His opinion was that the real killer right now was the pure uncertainty that was flooding the streets.
Every day Obama and his commie minions are talking about some new project to redistribuite the wealth and/or nationilze some other part of the buisiness cycle with healthcare being the one big one then.
His point was nobody wanted to invest or to hire people when that kind of threat is hanging over their heads.
Based on that I predict that there will be no meaningful recovery, and certainly no rehiring, until after the 2010 elections. And then it is only contingent on the Repubs taking back the House.
If that does not occur we will be in for a long and painful decline even further.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 09:38 AM (QrA9E)
Yep, this administration is an uncertainty machine. I don't think they even know what the fuck they're gonna do tomorrow.
100 billion dollar tax on banks? Nuke the moon? They'll figure it out later.
Posted by: Phil at January 21, 2010 05:46 AM (tOzKE)
Yea, I read about that. That's the "B" shares though. I suspect this will introduce a lot more volatility in that stock as smaller players and day traders start whipsawing it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:46 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: Peggy Joseph at January 21, 2010 05:47 AM (SqAkN)
I saw over at HA the other day, where Painful Stool was blaming the morons here for "driving him to liberalism", crying in his milk that he was some kind of independant before he came here and got kicked out.
He wasn't kicked out, we ran his silly lightweight ass out on a rough hewn rail.
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:47 AM (OlN4e)
http://is.gd/6JVdh
This must be Romer, Summers, and Geithner, no?
Posted by: WTFCI at January 21, 2010 05:48 AM (GtYrq)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:50 AM (p302b)
70% of small businesses have no plans to add employees in 2010 (mine included)
Even liberal economists are starting to admit that unemployment is likely to remain over 9% in 2012. The only people surprised by the bad economic numbers are on tv.
Posted by: bigDon at January 21, 2010 05:50 AM (o0tC+)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:50 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:52 AM (p302b)
Rick Lazio, in NY. Does he have a Gov. chance? I've written to his Web site twice, wanting to work for his campaign. No response. I am going to tweet this, as a complaint, and see if he responds...I've heard it works for ATT and Delta.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 21, 2010 05:53 AM (s2TC6)
79 Idiots don't realize you can't tax a bank, all you can do it raise costs for its customers.
Yeah, but only those making $250,000+ right? Right?
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:54 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:54 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 05:54 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 09:54 AM (y+Brm)
It traps you into having no upward mobility.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:56 AM (p302b)
Posted by: frode at January 21, 2010 05:58 AM (TdgA9)
Posted by: 52% at January 21, 2010 05:58 AM (gJL6J)
Okay, I know I'm a lowly Moron, but I can't get a straight answer on this question- is this tax going to end up hitting the banks that didn't partake in TARP or cause this mess? I ask because I use a small local bank specifically because said bank doesn't get involved in all the exotic leveraged stuff (stuff being a term of art). In fact, when all this went down, my bank was rated in the top 5% of safest banks in the country. From what I can see, the response to my bank being rational and cautious is no lube no reach around. After all, my bank still has money and we can't be having that.
Why, yes, I'm a wee bit peeved about this potential, can you tell?
Posted by: alexthechick at January 21, 2010 05:58 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: the real joe at January 21, 2010 05:59 AM (WjerO)
91 I thought palin steele was banned for using the n-word.
Stool didn't hate black people. It was Jews and Indians (dot) he had a hard on for.
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 06:00 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: the real joe at January 21, 2010 09:59 AM (WjerO)"
What about Peter King?
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:00 AM (p302b)
Posted by: St. Agnostica at January 21, 2010 06:02 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 21, 2010 06:02 AM (IJo6J)
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 21, 2010 06:03 AM (VmtE9)
Posted by: paleRider at January 21, 2010 06:03 AM (/yC9R)
Okay, I know I'm a lowly Moron, but I can't get a straight answer on this question- is this tax going to end up hitting the banks that didn't partake in TARP or cause this mess?
In his initial comments on the "fees" yes it would. His latest though is a whole new swatch of regulations.
All that being said, the way congress is crafting these bills you will never know until just before they vote on it, if then.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 06:03 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Johnny I at January 21, 2010 06:04 AM (JQNiP)
Change™
Posted by: WTFCI at January 21, 2010 09:43 AM (GtYrq)
But now Barry has to go after the big evil banks for making money and ruining the economy along with George Bush
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 06:06 AM (1Jaio)
There's rumors Pataki might take a shot at the Gillibrand seat. Recent polling by Sienna shows he would have a good chance. Pataki is pretty squishy as R's go, but he'd still be an upgrade.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 06:07 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: Son of Liberty at January 21, 2010 06:07 AM (gtZwa)
Posted by: Jean at January 21, 2010 06:10 AM (5ddCw)
In his initial comments on the "fees" yes it would. His latest though is a whole new swatch of regulations.
All that being said, the way congress is crafting these bills you will never know until just before they vote on it, if then.
That's what I thought - I'm assuming that even if the first set of laws/regs doesn't have it, it'll eventually get extended to the entire banking industry.
stompystompystompy
Posted by: alexthechick at January 21, 2010 06:10 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Scott at January 21, 2010 06:11 AM (s0Yl6)
Posted by: St. Agnostica at January 21, 2010 06:11 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:12 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Corona at January 21, 2010 06:14 AM (woZIc)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:14 AM (p302b)
from a secret Shadow Government crypt. Republicans are evil.
Once the Democratic Party turns fully to the left, you bastards are toast!
Posted by: Howard Dean at January 21, 2010 06:14 AM (lD4DZ)
Posted by: George Soros at January 21, 2010 06:14 AM (CoKwa)
Posted by: carin at January 21, 2010 06:15 AM (vOZi9)
Posted by: Jean at January 21, 2010 06:17 AM (5ddCw)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:18 AM (p302b)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 09:24 AM (OlN4e)
Bush + Rep Congress Unemployment: 4.5%
Obama + Dem Congress Unemployment: 22% or so
You can't say that isn't change.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 21, 2010 06:18 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:19 AM (p302b)
How is Obama ever going to schedule his SOTU address if he doesn't have anything good to talk about?
Surely you know the answer to that!
He'll just lie like he always does.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 06:19 AM (QrA9E)
I watched a show about a week ago where a chamber of commerce guy was talking about small and medium size buisinesses.
His opinion was that the real killer right now was the pure uncertainty that was flooding the streets.
Every day Obama and his commie minions are talking about some new project to redistribuite the wealth and/or nationilze some other part of the buisiness cycle with healthcare being the one big one then.
His point was nobody wanted to invest or to hire people when that kind of threat is hanging over their heads.
This is absolutely true. I work for a small business, and our customers are small businesses. Our customer base is national. Our customers are practically paralyzed right now. It's not due to lack of cash or sales, most are actually doing OK financially. They just refuse to commit resources to growth when they have no idea what the government might hit them with next.
Posted by: FB at January 21, 2010 06:19 AM (sjnzG)
Posted by: Tipsy McStagger, somewhere down in Texas at January 21, 2010 06:20 AM (9oNaP)
Basically, it would take a Giuliani to fix any of this shit. Pataki did some things in his first term, but by the end he was *helping* things metastasize (buying SEIU's endorsement with Medicaid freebees, etc.). For all his "tough" image, Spitzer was the same old Democratic shit -- even Patterson is more realistic on the budget.
NY Senate is another story, of course. Too bad Rudy passed on running, but it seems to be Pataki's if he wants it.
Lazio still has the loser stench on him from blowing the Hillary contest. He's not going to win anything statewide.
Posted by: someone at January 21, 2010 06:21 AM (njJQD)
Posted by: Tipsy McStagger, somewhere down in Texas at January 21, 2010 06:24 AM (9oNaP)
It traps you into having no upward mobility.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 09:56 AM (p302b)
And what is so wrong with that? Can I tell you how sick I am of noveau riche jerks moving into my neighborhood with their SUVs, McMansions, and business?
Posted by: Some wealthy egalitarian at January 21, 2010 06:24 AM (7BU4a)
Remember the good old days of the "Ohio Savings & Loan Crisis"?
The government "fix" for that is what gave us the financial giantism we're having to "fix" now. Conservatives squawked like hell at the time, yet it seems forgotten in current analysis.
Isn't there Somebody's Law that states that every government solution will soon require another government solution? A corollary to Unintended Consequences, unless you subscribe to conspiracy theories -- which I do. You can't blame the Joos for this one. Yeah, well, not my Joos, anyway.
Posted by: comatus at January 21, 2010 06:24 AM (/VEEI)
Wonder if this will become more and more of a problem for the congress and the administration in the future?
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Opus at January 21, 2010 06:26 AM (IebeI)
Posted by: torabora at January 21, 2010 06:26 AM (fkNZG)
It traps you into having no upward mobility.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 09:56 AM (p302b)
And
what is so wrong with that? Can I tell you how sick I am of noveau
riche jerks moving into my neighborhood with their SUVs, McMansions,
and business?
Posted by: Some wealthy egalitarian at January 21, 2010 10:24 AM (7BU4a)"
Upward mobility is very important. It is the American way. You should be able to pull yourself from one economic group to the next by education and sheer will to succeed. When that is gone, what will have become of America?
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:27 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 06:29 AM (p302b)
All I know is that my son has been out of work for over a year.
Mine too. It's been 14 months now.
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 06:30 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse at January 21, 2010 06:31 AM (AVYqB)
Posted by: the real joe at January 21, 2010 06:32 AM (WjerO)
Posted by: torabora at January 21, 2010 06:33 AM (fkNZG)
Posted by: Jean at January 21, 2010 06:34 AM (7K04W)
Posted by: B+rry Ob+mao at January 21, 2010 06:35 AM (fkNZG)
Posted by: Justin Camp at January 21, 2010 06:39 AM (nF4Jh)
Mallamutt
I saw over at HA the other day, where Painful Stool was blaming the morons here for "driving him to liberalism", crying in his milk that he was some kind of independant before he came here and got kicked out.
Posted by: mrfixit at January 21, 2010 09:44 AM (Bsm1s)
What does he call himself over there?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth (now with 100% more smugness!) at January 21, 2010 06:42 AM (wgLRl)
Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Measures to spur green-energy jobs may end up in a new economic-stimulus bill after Republican Scott Brown's Senate victory in Massachusetts dimmed prospects for legislation to curb carbon-dioxide emissions.
Putting energy provisions into a bill to stimulate job creation instead “makes sense” because that’s the Senate’s next priority after health-care legislation, Senator Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, said before Brown’s win.
By hook or by crook eh comrades.
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 06:42 AM (1Jaio)
ah, mr avenger you may be purple and somewhat darker than the obamafurher but i still call you racist... i can do that because i am a card carrying member of the educated and progressive cabals...
when not monitoring the weather by going outside and then making shit up , i like to monitor these counter-revolutionary sites... and you my purple adversary are a racist...
i can state this with a unhypocritical mind because i once talked to a black man in the street... yes he frightened me and i had to pepper spray him and have him arrested but in the end i feel i accomplished racial dialogue...
later i had to move because i saw another black man and i got a little scared... but nevertheless i have had contact with the OTHER and it went well now that i live in a secure bldg and black people have to leave before dark...
and i dont know anything about this unemployment stuff... just get a obama grant or something...do we sooper progressives have to do everything for you trig-lovers...
AND FREE ROMAN POLANSKI- RAPE,RAPE IS NOT A CRIME FOR US BUT FOR THOU....
Posted by: professor von poopyants at January 21, 2010 06:43 AM (91IME)
Posted by: Hucklebuck at January 21, 2010 06:45 AM (oQLnX)
http://tinyurl.com/yjynlk9
The new Governor says he found out at 2pm Tuesday afternoon why the Corzine Administration wouldn't give the information. He explains, "Revenue is projected to be $1.2 billion down year-to-date, to June 30. We're talking now about an additional billion dollar net gap that we have to close for Fiscal Year 2010."
The shortfall is the result of lower than expected tax collections and added spending. Christie says he has no question now why the former Treasurer didn't want to disclose taxation information. He says, "It would not have fit the scenario of the Corzine Administration leaving officeÂ…Â….They didn't tell you about this, but don't feel badly, they didn't tell us either."
"It was only when we took control of government that we found out that in their possession they refused to give us the projections for what June 30 was going to look like," explains Christie. "We're talking about now an additional billion dollar hole that we are going to have to fix."
Posted by: jas at January 21, 2010 06:46 AM (ZM2Bn)
Today its blown off close to 3 points.
Market manipulations anyone?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 06:48 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: Jayne Cobb at January 21, 2010 06:50 AM (FkLiP)
I unexpectedly cooked dinner last. Then I unexpectedly went to bed and unexpectedly slept. Then I unexpectedly woke up this morning and unexpectedly got ready for work and unexpectedly arrived at work and then I unexpectedly went to Ace of Spades for my mornning fix.
Those guys need a new word.
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 06:54 AM (l/N7H)
Who the fuck is doing these estimates?
This sounds an awful lot like the that Boston Globe poll (wow I can't say that without laughing) of Coakley UP by 15 and then losing by 5.
Accountability. Liberals do not haz
Posted by: MelodicMetal in MA at January 21, 2010 06:54 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 21, 2010 07:08 AM (dcKUM)
Shake down the banks... You know.. The one's who capitalize businesses, who employ people.
That's how.
Posted by: Professor of Economics at January 21, 2010 07:08 AM (GKyIE)
Idiots don't realize you can't tax a bank, all you can do it raise costs for its customers.
Yes, they do. But they think you can't figure it out. Malkin had this story about the new bank fees last week.
Valerie Jarrett’s comment (at about 0:43), “…what I would say to them from a PR perspective is: How does it look to pass on those fees to your customers….”
What I would say to Jarrett is, businesses always pass their costs along to their customers. That is how they stay in business, you muppet looking twit.
Posted by: Barry O at January 21, 2010 07:13 AM (kJLH9)
Posted by: Zombie Carl Sagan at January 21, 2010 07:13 AM (6BgmB)
Obama = Vader
Posted by: Dude what sees everything in Star Wars light at January 21, 2010 10:17 AM (lD4DZ)
Can't agree with you on that one - Star Wars has no characters who are both evil enough AND stupid enough to be similar to the current admin. Now - if you took the incompetence of Jar Jar and combined it with the slimy evil of Jabba, then maybe you'd have something.
Frankly, I'd rather have Palpatine and Vader running the show. I get the impression they'd be better on national defense, and probably far more fiscally conservative. And we'd lose nothing on the social issues front - that would be more of a wash.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 21, 2010 07:13 AM (xUM1Q)
I favor bankruptcy for New York State, and the firing of most state workers.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 21, 2010 07:18 AM (bN5ZU)
Can we fire the incompetent bastards? How many times is this administration going to accept "UNEXPECTED" results?
Posted by: GarandFan at January 21, 2010 07:19 AM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: Reactionary at January 21, 2010 07:21 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 21, 2010 07:28 AM (mHQ7T)
I also noticed some HA commenters remember his presence here, with fondness. In fact, he was being referred to as Dum Dum.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 21, 2010 07:32 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Mephitis at January 21, 2010 07:33 AM (ehXLT)
Sigh. Talk about magical thinking. At this point, I feel more confident that a Skittle shitting unicorn will be delivered to my door than that the economy will improve in the short term.
Posted by: shibumi at January 21, 2010 07:45 AM (OKZrE)
With the administration claiming full responsibility for the "recovery", and Slow Joe claiming the Spendulus exceeded all expectations, they own this now. In total. Lock, stock, and barrel. Full up. All in.
You can say that. And I can say that. And all the rest of moron nation can say that. But the deciders are not gonna say that. History being rewritten in newsrooms across the country starts in..........shit, it already started.
Posted by: pendejo grande at January 21, 2010 07:51 AM (t1aMc)
That word, "unexpected."
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Posted by: Inigo Montoya at January 21, 2010 08:03 AM (WDySP)
Okay, I know I'm a lowly Moron, but I can't get a straight answer on this question- is this tax going to end up hitting the banks that didn't partake in TARP or cause this mess?
Yes--the proposal is that the tax would target the 50 biggest banks, irrespective of whether they took TARP funds or not.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 21, 2010 08:09 AM (/Pw+r)
Posted by: volfan at January 21, 2010 08:14 AM (Lq6p6)
Don't worry, Government spending will get the US out of recession if Obama is smart enough to follow the example of our British Prime Miniter Gordon Brown.
On traditional measures, industrial output, deficit to GDP ratio and such the UK economy is in a worse state than the US economy. But we are all being too pessimistic, Gordon has discovered money does grow on trees. Last week he announced a plan to give free laptop computers to "the needy."
If you run out you just go into the orchard and pick some more.
I'm sure Sarah Brown will give Michelle O some money trees to plant in The White Houe garden.
Posted by: Ed Butt at January 21, 2010 08:19 AM (KVYaq)
I live in the Metro Detroit area. You cannot beg, borrow or steal a job here. Yet all of our local papers (even the non-Communist ones) keep insisting that "things are getting better and the economy is improving."
That's because in Detroit, "getting better" really is a relative term now. It means a gutted house sells for $20,000 instead of $10,000, for example.
I still expect some eccentric millionaire to realize that a lot of land could be had in Detroit for cut-rate prices, and subsequently buy up dozens of lots, tear down the homes, and turn it into a private country estate with a hunting preserve. Christ, the Pontiac Silverdome, and the land, was sold for less than what it cost to build the damn thing in late 1970s dollars; comparatively speaking, inflation probably added another 30% to the sale.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 21, 2010 08:19 AM (/Pw+r)
"Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when JimmyCarter Barak Obama loses his."
Ronald Reagan
Posted by: Speller at January 21, 2010 08:35 AM (o0R2E)
Posted by: Warden at January 21, 2010 09:57 AM (TIGTh)
Only a Democrat could quadruple our national debt without creating even one job.
Thanks, Barky Obunghole.
Posted by: Sam Adams at January 21, 2010 10:20 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: snookered at January 21, 2010 07:38 PM (7Vg6Y)
Well you'd sure think so. But the socialist bastards of the Lamestream Media will keep on shoveling out propaganda for the Dems and Obambi by claiming "It's all Bush's fault!" and "Given the disaster Presentent Wonderful inherited from the last 8 years of horrible GOP control of the White House, no human being--or even a super-human like The One--could possibly have fixed the economy this quickly."
Bunch of lying rat bastards.
Posted by: sf at January 22, 2010 09:17 AM (xz5dP)
Posted by: The Associated Press
FTFY
Posted by: sf at January 22, 2010 09:21 AM (xz5dP)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2337 seconds, 301 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: TC at January 21, 2010 05:22 AM (DYJjQ)