January 25, 2010
— Purple Avenger Even giving away $8,000 isn't enough to re inflate the bubble anymore.
Sales of previously occupied homes took the largest monthly drop in more than 40 years last month, plunging far deeper than expected after lawmakers gave buyers extended time to use a tax credit...For the record, I'm predicting that gravity will fail this afternoon. If you somehow manage to stay plunked in your chairs, that will be quite unexpected....Sales had been expected to fall by about 10 percent, according to economists...
Buyers were no longer scrambling to qualify for a tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time homeowners. It had been due to expire on Nov. 30, but Congress extended the deadline until April 30.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
06:40 AM
| Comments (106)
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 25, 2010 06:43 AM (RwPdb)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 25, 2010 06:43 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Warden at January 25, 2010 06:43 AM (TIGTh)
Posted by: Jack at January 25, 2010 06:44 AM (bvDV5)
Posted by: tmitsss at January 25, 2010 06:45 AM (V4Pya)
Posted by: Blago at January 25, 2010 06:45 AM (wPZU5)
Posted by: eman at January 25, 2010 06:45 AM (ZX8m3)
They keep saying unexpected. I guess that means that those in power, the Democrats, really don't know what their doing.
Posted by: Jack at January 25, 2010 06:46 AM (bvDV5)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 06:46 AM (gbCNS)
Still ordering from the dollar menu, huh?
Posted by: CUS at January 25, 2010 06:47 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 06:48 AM (gbCNS)
This is what happens when the MSM covers for radicals.
The middle class and all business are now frightened to death by their own government.
Yet - the democrats continue to push health care "reform".
Posted by: Pre Paid Sex Monster at January 25, 2010 06:48 AM (0fzsA)
It's amazing how everything is unexpected for these "experts". But don't worry about the economy, Barry is thinking about more one time tax credits. They worked so well last year at jump starting the economy.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 25, 2010 06:50 AM (1Jaio)
I blame Boooooooosh. And maybe Halliburton, too.
Posted by: Josef K. at January 25, 2010 06:51 AM (7+pP9)
Just LOVE the soft texture of that new Ball Dip! Need me some more.
Posted by: Dell at January 25, 2010 06:51 AM (unQuQ)
OT - but worth it.
News of this is going to send Napoletano over the edge!
Her new word for these terrorists will be: ablehabblaableh.
Via Instapundit.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 25, 2010 06:51 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: kansas at January 25, 2010 06:51 AM (mka2b)
Down dooby-doo down down, comma comma down, dooby-doo down down ... *
Makes me glad I rent space from a woman who (I haven't asked but I'd bet money) owns her house and land free and clear.
*That'll be in your head all day now. You're welcome.
Posted by: Joanna at January 25, 2010 06:52 AM (7+WuG)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 06:52 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: billypaintbrush at January 25, 2010 06:52 AM (2TxCj)
I thought it already hit the fan. My REIT is down down down, and strip malls are sitting empty around here.
Posted by: kansas at January 25, 2010 06:54 AM (mka2b)
For just 59 cents more, you can super-size your fries and get an inground pool.
Posted by: CUS at January 25, 2010 06:54 AM (wOGfT)
Unexpected would be an article with bad economic news that didn't use the word "unexpected".
Oh, re the credits for house buying. There's one for people who aren't 1st time home buyers. That was us last year, so I looked up the details. You have to have lived in your house for something like 5 of the last 8 years, which we didn't. But wait, there's a special rule for military homeowners. Good, I thought, since how many military families lived in one house for 5 years?? Of course, the special rule was just about when you buy a new house, so most military people won't be able to take advantage of this.
Good thing they went to the trouble of making a special rule for the military, eh?
Posted by: Mama AJ, muttering to herself...more than usual at January 25, 2010 06:54 AM (Be4xl)
Geithner is a fucking genius!
This is the guy, a tax cheat, who the Republicans were afraid to vote against in confirmation.
Posted by: This is boner at January 25, 2010 06:56 AM (rgfwM)
Posted by: Rich at January 25, 2010 06:57 AM (Qrjpn)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at January 25, 2010 06:57 AM (Q41Zh)
Sales of previously occupied homes took the largest monthly drop in more than 40 years last month, plunging far deeper than expected after lawmakers gave buyers extended time to use a tax credit...
OMG, so one time tax-credits and enabling people to borrow far above their means won't fix this?
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 25, 2010 06:57 AM (9hSKh)
Okay, I say "unexpectedly", you say "inconveniently".
Those words are easy to confuse. Hell, they both end in "ly".
Posted by: sherlock at January 25, 2010 06:57 AM (xqzGc)
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 25, 2010 06:58 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Weather forecasters at January 25, 2010 06:59 AM (wPZU5)
Posted by: B. H. Obama at January 25, 2010 07:00 AM (QAmt6)
FIFY, Kratos.
Posted by: Hades at January 25, 2010 07:00 AM (wPZU5)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 07:01 AM (gbCNS)
At least in the end, there will be only chaos.
I'll take it. At least then I'll have an excuse for why I haven't called my mother.
Posted by: Joanna at January 25, 2010 07:02 AM (7+WuG)
It'll be cheaper to just burn it down and collect the insurance. I'm just saying...
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 07:03 AM (+2Sr1)
Posted by: Joanna's Mom at January 25, 2010 07:04 AM (xqzGc)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at January 25, 2010 07:04 AM (Q41Zh)
Posted by: HH at January 25, 2010 07:04 AM (1kwr2)
Perpetual Groundhog Day for these ultramaroons
EXPECT that the PPT and other market manipulators will try and puff up our dead-man walking economy til the elections ... then for the S to HTF. Mao-Mart and other players are already fleeing the US$, and that leak ain't gonna get sealed. No more loans for you gwai-low
Brown in TeddyLand was nice, but either way EXPECT Mau-Mau Man to continue his Czar cum Executive Diktat style of governance. Congressional makeup is immaterial to his crew
Posted by: OhioDude at January 25, 2010 07:05 AM (Nd83J)
Apparently a bunch of people have already thought of that. My sister and her hubby are still trying to sell the house they moved out of a year ago; their insurance on it went UP after they moved out.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 25, 2010 07:06 AM (wPZU5)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the housing supply is still over capacity. The basic problem is that developers built far too many housing units than demand required. By "far too many" I mean an extra 5 years over supply and that not even taking into account the decrease in demand due to the economic slump. This problem will not be fixed until supply meets demand.
I suspect the government's next move will be to propose destroying housing units, reduce supply, since priming the pump with "rebates" don't work anymore (that was their demand side fix). Of course, they'll hide it as some sort of "renewal" project.
Posted by: Ken at January 25, 2010 07:06 AM (Bs34i)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 11:03 AM (+2Sr1)
Such a wave of house fires would be completely unprecedented. Also, totally unexpected.
Posted by: Josef K. at January 25, 2010 07:06 AM (7+pP9)
Don't say stuff like that! We can't take much more of this dipping!!!
Posted by: Chairman Obamao's balls at January 25, 2010 07:08 AM (wPZU5)
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 07:08 AM (QrA9E)
How much longer is the American public going to put up with this, "Unexpected" shit?
Hey 52, We fucking TOLD YOU this was going to happen, but we were called racists, and what not. Now, after the circle jerk is over, and the lube has been put away, everyone is shocked SHOCKED at what has happened to our country.
By all means, let's not interrupt our 'historic' President.
Because after all, it's unprecedented.
This admin and any incumbent Congress critter have to go, NOW.
Posted by: MelodicMetal in MA at January 25, 2010 07:08 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 07:09 AM (gbCNS)
Amirite about 1Q economic data effectively ending the Obama presidency or amirite?
April is gonna be a bad month for Obama. But first Obama will be able to brag about pulling the economy from the brink when positive GDP numbers are released for 4Q 2009, I predict.
Posted by: This is boner at January 25, 2010 07:09 AM (rgfwM)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at January 25, 2010 07:09 AM (TEIZr)
Developers are bulldozing new houses in CA to reduce tax liability.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 07:09 AM (+2Sr1)
You could bulldoze all of Detroit for starters...
Posted by: Ted Nugent's brain at January 25, 2010 07:10 AM (wPZU5)
This is part of the Cap and Trade Bill passed by the House. It is absolutely necessary to fight the imminent demise of all life on Planet Earth from global warming pay for Michael Mann's grant from the Stimulus Bill.
Posted by: Reiver at January 25, 2010 07:10 AM (Yi1Sk)
Posted by: Joanna's Mom at January 25, 2010 11:04 AM (xqzGc)
Ha! I wish. That'd be easier to deal with. (The Drama Llama is a permanent resident at her house.)
Posted by: Joanna at January 25, 2010 07:11 AM (HaYO4)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the housing supply is still over capacity. The basic problem is that developers built far too many housing units than demand required. By "far too many" I mean an extra 5 years over supply and that not even taking into account the decrease in demand due to the economic slump. This problem will not be fixed until supply meets demand.
I suspect the government's next move will be to propose destroying housing units, reduce supply, since priming the pump with "rebates" don't work anymore (that was their demand side fix). Of course, they'll hide it as some sort of "renewal" project.
Posted by: Ken at January 25, 2010 11:06 AM (Bs34i)
That would be an unprecedented move, but not unexpected. I've been reading - for a year - lefties blathering about downsizing cities, returning urban land to rural status, turning cities into urban centers surrounded by a ring of small towns sited in a belt of farms, etc.
If the government does try this stunt, expect for the money to be spent on cities like Detroit, where a Dem mayor can call it "revitalizing," and the Obama regime can claim it is stimulating the local economy.
Yeah, what I thought was nonsense might well become Stimulus 2.0.
Posted by: Josef K. at January 25, 2010 07:12 AM (7+pP9)
prediction: Home Depot's and Lowe's earnings will come in 'unexpectedly' short.
And then they'll 'unexpectedly' announce layoffs...and then unemployment will 'unexpectedly' rise.
hmmm, funny how that works? We're in recovery, my ass.
Posted by: This is boner at January 25, 2010 07:12 AM (rgfwM)
Gone beyond "propose" in Detroit. They're actually doing it on a very large scale.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 07:12 AM (+2Sr1)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 25, 2010 07:13 AM (wPZU5)
The ineptitude of a dem controlled economy is most unexpected.
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 07:14 AM (gbCNS)
After all, the LightWorker was supposed to fix everything just with the awesome power of his total hunky awesomeness. Right?
Posted by: DocJ at January 25, 2010 07:15 AM (dt6br)
Gone beyond "propose" in Detroit. They're actually doing it on a very large scale.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 11:12 AM (+2Sr1)
Yes, but its that nasty populace doing it. We must have a properly planned and administrated Program of trashing renovating failed cities urban areas. How else can we ensure we control it and make sure our cronies profit from the chaos rehabilitation?
Posted by: Rahm Emanuel at January 25, 2010 07:17 AM (7+pP9)
I've had a foreclosed on home on my street for almost 2 years.
My husband and I used to watch them roll up in new cars, get a boat and relandscape the front yard. Having spoken to them and knowing what jobs they had, we kept scratching our heads and asking each other, "How can they do all that? How can they afford it?" and be a little jealous, looking at our older cars and lack of toys.
We're not so jealous anymore, just pisssed having to look at the tall grass and shit slowly accumulating in the yard, and lowering all the property values in the neighborhood.
The rental on our street has 12 people living it.
That is what most neighborhoods in SoCal are like these days.
Posted by: Who Knows at January 25, 2010 07:20 AM (0aQsc)
Posted by: robtr at January 25, 2010 07:20 AM (fwSHf)
The guy that owned the property we now occupy did exactly that . I rebuilt our house on the slab and tied into the chimney that was all that remained after the conflagration . Apparently the insurance company that covered him couldn't prove it despite the locals all treating the arson as common knowledge . If my house burned(god forbid) my insurance company would crawl into my life worse than the watergate investigators.
The previous owner(arsonist) was also an evangelical preacher and ex marine . He ended up skipping out of his next house after defrauding quite a few of his congregation . We live in a poor rural area , so the people he scammed were seriously hurt . Like stealing from widows and orphans .
I'll have to nominate that guy as one of the all time greatest scumbags .
Posted by: awkward davies at January 25, 2010 07:21 AM (wb68R)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2010 07:22 AM (vb5IK)
Even giving away $8,000 dollars isn't enough anymore.
Neither are record low interest rates. Time to kick start the real estate market with exotic mortgages. Its immoral that school bus drivers making $38,000 a year can't qualify for $800,000 houses.
Posted by: Dirk Diggler at January 25, 2010 07:23 AM (jmf9+)
Posted by: Agnostica at January 25, 2010 07:24 AM (gbCNS)
Next up: a Congressional playing up of the idea of maintaining the Bush tax cuts. People will run on the plank of making them permanent; whether they are so made, or just extended will depend on the aftermath of November.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 25, 2010 07:26 AM (bN5ZU)
I'd be happy with an extra relative living with my neighbors. It's those other 10 or 11 (with their cars and noise) that frost my butt.
Kids and prowlers started invading the empty house, making life interesting.
Posted by: Who Knows at January 25, 2010 07:28 AM (0aQsc)
Posted by: Jean at January 25, 2010 07:31 AM (tJF9l)
I don't think that as a general rule we have an over-supply of private housing. I think we have a combination of two major problems:
1st the price of housing has still not corrected from the bubble due to the actions of this admin to attempt to prop it up. Housing is STILL over-priced in a lot of markets. I speak here from some reserch in the area where I used to live in CA. 1950s era track housing is still going for over $500/sq ft. That is insane. You basically have to be wealthy to pay $500/sq ft for a house.
The 2nd major problem is that people are OUT of work and have no money. They are having problems buying a loaf of bread and a slice of baloney, much less a house at $500/sq ft.
We don't need to bulldoze housing. We need to get rid of the communists in Washington so the economy can recover and allow the price of housing to seek their own level in the market.
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 07:34 AM (QrA9E)
Apt.-R-Us; who are the creditors now owning all those units?
Would it be the taxpayers when the busters gets a bail-out?
Posted by: maverick muse at January 25, 2010 07:43 AM (+CLh/)
Today CNN had a whole segment about tracking the stimulus money. The gist of it was... cash is either not being used, or being thrown down the toilet. For example, there is $5 BILLION for weatherproofing. Some of the money has been used in Texas, and another state down south, maybe Georgia.
Am I the only one that thinks weatherproofing should be used in states where it (ahem) gets cold and snows?
Posted by: shibumi at January 25, 2010 07:56 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Party Time Ball Dip, Inc. at January 25, 2010 07:56 AM (AZGON)
BTW; it is really stupid to even try to prop this crap up anyway because eventually IT WILL find its own correct price; it always does.
All propping it up does is make different winners and losers. Government is not supposed to be in the buisiness of deterining who the winners and losers are.
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 07:57 AM (QrA9E)
Am I the only one that thinks weatherproofing should be used in states where it (ahem) gets cold and snows?
Texas and Georgia experience more extreem hot days than some Northern States experience extreme cold days. It works both ways. In the North they have high heating bills in the Winter, in the South we have high cooling bills in the Summer.
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 07:59 AM (QrA9E)
Sooo, if the results of your theorys and actions are "unexpected", and of course for the worse, don't you think that you would re-think the theory?
If a physical scientist or engineer has this happen (say the dam collapses), hell is going to pay. Now you could argue that this is social science, and since it fails so often I think you need to strike the science part.
And the worse thing is, these people just crop up on all the Sunday AM talk shows and keep insisting that their policies will make things better. So now the meme needs to be "Really Senator,(or whomever), what if the unexpected happens"?
Make sure they come back the following week or month, and press them hard on what they predicted and what the actual results were of their policy or law.
Sweat them. That would make things really interesting.
Posted by: HH at January 25, 2010 08:05 AM (1kwr2)
Even giving away $8,000 dollars isn't enough anymore.
Gosh, which is amazing considering you could buy an entire house in Detroit for 8k! Course, then you'd have to live in Detroit...
Posted by: runningrn at January 25, 2010 08:07 AM (CfmlF)
Dr Housing Bubble Blog is all over the shadow inventory phenomena. Banks are not foreclosing or delaying foreclosure in order to not take the write downs. Dr. HB has massive stats on this farce. For example, in LA for a very specific zip code, the MLS shows 19,000 homes for sale. But if you add in homes that have had a Notice of Default, plus those in default but not yet foreclosed, he comes up with an inventory of over 100,000 units. You go from a supposed healthy inventory of 3 months to sickening inventory of over 3 years. He's saying another 50% drop in prices in SoCal.
This will be frickin' ugly. And the MSM rides to the rescue and says we're in recovery with a healthy 3 month inventory. Riiiiiiiight.
I'll go out on a limb and say that the banks and the govt are complicit in encouraging this practice, as the govt revenue off of property tax will implode if the prices were set to reflect the reality. Fraud is what I'd call it.
Clearly there are other major motivations/ramifications beyond pptax, but this is one way they are stealing your money even if you are "supposedly" not affected by the housing implosion. (Keeping the home values artificially propped up so your tax assessment remains high.)
Posted by: Derak at January 25, 2010 08:28 AM (sPWq2)
Posted by: George Orwell at January 25, 2010 08:30 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Warden at January 25, 2010 08:32 AM (TIGTh)
Eight grand?
Eight grand barely pays closing costs on a decent house, and doesn't even do that on a really *nice* place.
That's like expecting to "stimulate" care sales by offering to pay for their floormats.
What a bunch of retards.
Posted by: G$ at January 25, 2010 08:37 AM (nEatY)
Posted by: Ken at January 25, 2010 08:40 AM (Bs34i)
65 The ineptitude of a dem controlled economy is most unexpected.
Especially by those who are confused and flustered by the rising of the Sun each morning. But then, life is so much more exciting for them...
Posted by: sherlock at January 25, 2010 08:47 AM (xqzGc)
Gone beyond "propose" in Detroit. They're actually doing it on a very large scale."
The Detroiters have some fun along these lines every Halloween. The solution is to have Halloween at least once a month and have the MSM produce TV shows about how much fun it is, to encourage the spread of the Motown festivities to other cities. It then becomes a citizens initiative and BO can claim the savings in not having the government do it. Everyone wins!
Posted by: chuckR at January 25, 2010 09:13 AM (XLu7l)
Yep. This is why the Federal Reserve bought up $1.3T of those toxic mortgages. They're trying to blunt the impact when the banks do ultimately have to take the hit.
Of course the Federal Reserve got'em cheap and expects to ultimately make a profit. But since nobody audits the Federal Reserve, they can hide any badness a lot longer than commercial banks.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 09:25 AM (+2Sr1)
All that's left in Detroit are criminals, welfare moms with 92 kids and old people who can't get out.
So no, you don't want to live there.
EVER.
And you'd be wasting your eight grand.
Unless someone wants to buy your house and make a parking lot out of it. Then you might see a return on your money.
Posted by: shibumi at January 25, 2010 09:33 AM (OKZrE)
88For example, in LA for a very specific zip code, the MLS shows 19,000 homes for sale. But if you add in homes that have had a Notice of Default, plus those in default but not yet foreclosed, he comes up with an inventory of over 100,000 units. You go from a supposed healthy inventory of 3 months to sickening inventory of over 3 years. He's saying another 50% drop in prices in SoCal.
That's not even counting what it will be next year when the most of the Alt-A and Option ARM loans reset--it's going to be 2007-2008 all over again, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it take down the TBTFs, since another TARP bill could result in honest-to-goodness mayhem. If the people in Congress have to choose at that point between another bank bailout or keeping their jobs, I think they'll throw Citi, BOA, and Wells under the bus without a second thought.
This is why the Federal Reserve bought up $1.3T of those toxic mortgages. They're trying to blunt the impact when the banks do ultimately have to take the hit.
I believe Helicopter Ben said the Fed would stop buying MBSs in March of this year, but I honestly don't expect that to happen--he'll probably find some "emergency" justification for their continued purchase.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at January 25, 2010 10:02 AM (/Pw+r)
"Yep. This is why the Federal Reserve bought up $1.3T of those toxic mortgages. They're trying to blunt the impact when the banks do ultimately have to take the hit."
You tellin' me Obama's got a stash of houses, too? OOOOH-WEEEE, I's gonna vote for him at least four more times next election! I'm gonna write him in on all the 2010 ballots I do!
Posted by: The Obama Stash Czar at January 25, 2010 10:23 AM (5npD/)
Only tangentially related but...
Has anyone noticed that the federal goverment interest payment on the federal debt was only $142 billion last year? For 2008 it was almost $400 billion. Despite the enormous growth in our debt we paid an effective interest rate of 1.1% in 2009 versus 3.9% for 2008 (the Federal Fund rate was only 0.16% in 2009). The Federal Reserve has been artifically holding down the interest rates to help pay for the Obama spending programs. Also I believe a lot of debt was refinanced with shorter term, lower rate, bonds. Essentially, Obama got a little advertised extra $250 billion to play with last year.
The long term trend for the last 30 years has been a decreasing effective interest rate. Extrapolating, it looks like the rate will hit 0% in 2020. I don't know what that means, but everytime the interest rate has gone up it has led to a recession. Before Obama leaves office in 2012 things are going to get even more gruesome. Apparently the Fed has shown little interest in raising rates, but sooner or later they will have to to avoid inflation or entice bond buyers or else default on the debt.
Posted by: Ken at January 25, 2010 11:22 AM (Bs34i)
Apparently the Fed has shown little interest in raising rates, but sooner or later they will have to to avoid inflation or entice bond buyers or else default on the debt.
Yes, the fed is holding rates down trying to hold that housing bubble. This is also one of the reasons nobody is buying bonds except the fed. When Moody's downgrades the bonds there will be hell to pay.
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 11:29 AM (QrA9E)
Not really. Tax receipts collapsed by a similar amount.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 25, 2010 11:37 AM (+2Sr1)
Posted by: Typically Unskilled Obama Voter at January 25, 2010 01:39 PM (xfRfG)
#101 - I doubt that Obama gives much consideration to the revenue side of things.
That reduction in interest payment wasn't saved, it was spent.
Posted by: Ken at January 25, 2010 02:07 PM (Bs34i)
Posted by: apopka real estate at January 26, 2010 03:58 AM (iLXkm)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1725 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Brett Favre at January 25, 2010 06:42 AM (wPZU5)