April 12, 2010
— Ace Do as we say, not as we do:
The president of a state teachers union left a meeting Monday with Gov. Chris Christie after refusing to fire a local president who wrote a memo that joked about the governor's death, further escalating a rift that began before Christie's election.Christie spokesman Mike Drewniak said the governor wants Bergen County teachers union head Joe Coppola fired for his "irresponsible" memo. The memo from the Bergen County Education Association to its locals included a closing prayer that read:
"Dear Lord this year you have taken away my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett, my favorite singer, Michael Jackson, and my favorite salesman, Billy Mays. I just wanted to let you know that Chris Christie is my favorite governor."
Coppola and New Jersey Education Association President Barbara Keshishian have apologized for the memo. Coppola has said the "prayer" was a joke and was never meant to be made public.
Keshishian left her first face-to-face meeting with the governor after 15 minutes Monday afternoon when she refused to fire Coppola.
"Barbara does not have the authority to fire him," New Jersey Education Association spokesman Steve Baker said. "She doesn't intend to ask for his resignation. He has made an apology to the governor; it is a sincere apology. She considers that to be the end of that issue."
Claiming something is a "joke" is the all-purpose escape for anyone who's said something offensive, hateful, or irresponsible. When people claim they were "just joking," they intend to convey the message "I certainly never meant to say anything of a sort."
That is usually a lie. There are ironic jokes like Sean Hannity's reference to "racist teabaggers" -- in that case, he really didn't mean anything of the sort; his intent was to parody liberals' stereotypes of Tea Partiers.
But most jokes are not ironical. Most jokes do not have the intent, as Hannity's did, of suggesting the absolute opposite expression than the literal, surface meaning of the words.
Most jokes intend to say precisely what they say -- they are, as no lesser light than (groan) Senator Al Franken called them, examples of "kidding on the square" -- yeah, you're kidding, in that you're expressing your views humorously, but you're doing so "on the square" -- that is, honestly. It's what you really mean.
Joking is a time-honored method of expressing forbidden/taboo/socially-disapproved thought through a more socially-acceptable manner of expression.
This is news to anyone? No, it's not. Everyone knows this. And everyone knows that in political humor especially, 95% of what is stated as a "joke" is kidding on the square and not ironical at all.
Yeah, if I call Obama "Captain Wonderful" I'm being ironic and I mean the opposite. But if I call him "The Jugeared Jackass," yeah, I'm quote-unquote "joking," but obviously I mean it, or at the very least I mean something very close to that. Maybe I've overstated something for comic effect, but an overstatement is still meant seriously on some level, isn't it?
So why is it that these idiots on the left continue claiming "it was just a joke" as if it's an all-purpose defense against criticizing their words? A few days ago the Mudville Gazette suggested we ID some of the less-reputable guys showing up at Tea Party rallies to vent their crazy and damage (inadvertently) their cause. One guy brandished this sign...

Now, if that jackass got called out on his sign, I'm sure he'd say "It's just a joke."
But it's not just a joke, is it? Would any liberal buy the "just a joke" defense in that situation? No, they wouldn't. In fact, I don't buy it myself. He might, if ID'd and called upon to defend his pro-violence message, claim it was just a joke, but by a "joke," he means only a little bit of overstatement.
Overstatement doesn't mean one doesn't mean what they're saying. Overstatement means only one has exaggerated, for comic effect or shock value, what one actually believes, what one actually wishes, and what one actually intends to communicate.
And so it is with this union thug as well.
During the Bush years, I grew extremely agitated at the intemperate rhetoric against Bush and the clear expressions on the left of a desire to assassinate him. The desire on the left that Bush should be assassinated wasn't the thing I was worried about, per se -- if attention-getting histrionic idiots want to shout out death wishes against the president like some old pathetic gypsy hag who has no power except to spit venom, so what? It exposes them for the ineffectual, hysterical weaklings they are.
No, the danger there was secondary-- that they were communicating to all unbalanced individuals with a rifle that the assassination of George W. Bush would be viewed as a heroic deed among the cohort that matters to such a would-be killer. That a loser in a basement with a decent rifle and nothing left to lose could go from zero to hero -- at least with one largish segment of the population -- by taking a single shot.
And that such hateful rhetoric thus increased the chances that Bush would be shot and killed.
Which was, actually, the intent of such rhetoric. A lot of girlishly-excitable lefties were in fact attempting to psych up the would-be killers in their ranks to do what they themselves were too afraid to do.
Ten years after such hate and incitements-to-assassination were directed on a daily basis at President George W. Bush, the media has finally decided to start calling out such rhetoric as dangerous... just in time to protect the president they elected, Barack Obama.
I don't want this rhetoric directed at Obama, either. I certainly don't want any harm to come to the man, apart from the humiliation and ignominy of being voted out of office by 40 states in 2012.
And yet it angers me that the media only cares about the physical safety of a political leader when he's a liberal Democrat.
They're not covering the Christie thing at all, for example. Just a "joke," it seems. A joke communicated to union guys -- who have no history of violence, after all! -- against a governor who is pretty ruthlessly (but necessarily) cutting their compensation. No chance of incitement there, I guess!
It seems to me common-sense (common-sense, though not necessarily accurate) that the risk of assassination becomes acute when a leader is viewed as singularly capable. By which I mean: If this particular politician seems to be almost unique in having the the desire to drive a controversial policy into action, and he seems further more unique in having the political guts and political skills to be effective at doing so, he becomes especially endangered as regards would-be assassins, because an assassin might think that if this one person were eliminated, they'd succeed in having their political ambitions advanced.
By which I mean: A Mitch McConnell seems to me in far less danger of being assassinated than a Newt Gingrich, because a Mitch McConnell will likely just be replaced with another Mitch McConnell, whereas a Newt Gingrich -- the 1992-94 model, I mean -- seems irreplaceable.
So by that sort of thinking, the media is right to afford Barack Obama a special level of protection, a special level of vigilance in calling out and castigating overly-heated, violent rhetoric.
But, on the other hand, so was George W. Bush.
And so, in fact, is Chris Christie, who seems to me (observing from a distance) to be the first guy elected in New Jersey not only willing to take on the unions, but who has unexpectedly become popular in taking these usually-unpopular measures. A hyperpartisan laid-off union thug with a gun might well think that if only someone would remove this troublesome governor from the equation, the unions could get back to business as usual and directing state government.
And yet the media continues to only be concerned with death-rhetoric when it's directed at their Bonny Prince Barack. I guess if Bush were killed, or Governor Chris Christie, it wouldn't be so bad, in the media's eyes. I guess some people's violent deaths are acceptable collateral damage in rhetorical wars.
It incenses me to nearly-physical anger that the media continues deciding for the country which political leaders are worth protecting against assassination, and which others are expendable.
Posted by: Ace at
03:21 PM
| Comments (133)
Post contains 1426 words, total size 9 kb.
No, Chris Christie is not the perennial favorite of the left-elite-teachers-union types, but to say it was not a joke would be to say that they actually, truthfully, wished a violent death on the governor. There's just no evidence of that in my opinion.
Your mileage may vary. But only because you drive a really pussy car. <----See. Joke.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 12, 2010 03:26 PM (LybP+)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 12, 2010 03:27 PM (LybP+)
Posted by: kansas at April 12, 2010 03:29 PM (3oU1g)
There's nothing more hilarious than wishing death on your enemies. I'm still laughing.
Posted by: Cicero at April 12, 2010 03:30 PM (QKKT0)
Gov. Christie should just hold a press conference offering a $10,000 reward and a promise of immediate amensty for anyone who anyone who brings him the head of Joe Coppola. $100,000 bonus if they bring video evidence of horrific torture before the decaptiation.
Three days later, hold another presser to announce that he was "just joking" (and to offer his deepest condolences to Coppola's widow, if need be).
Seems fair to me.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 03:31 PM (kmEfr)
Totally joking, goomba.
Posted by: Teamster Goon at April 12, 2010 03:32 PM (VY5KX)
Posted by: IE COn at April 12, 2010 03:33 PM (/COcn)
Posted by: ace at April 12, 2010 03:33 PM (i6ROy)
<LOOK> - there --->> they are biased.
You will never get a fair shake and will always be disappointed.
Posted by: JavaJoe at April 12, 2010 03:34 PM (e9JZd)
"So why is it that these idiots on the left continue claiming "it was just a joke" as if it's an all-purpose defense against criticizing their words?"
Media provides cover, the victims rarely, if ever, call them out on it, and in cases like this one, the NJ AG/local DA/Feds never haul the dude in and brace him.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 03:34 PM (kmEfr)
It was just a joke when the Qatari said he had been lighting his shoes in the aircraft lavatory. But some jokes fall flat, based on context -- aboard the airplane and speaking to the flight attendant, that joke ain't funny and will get you hogtied for the rest of the flight.
Same here. People used to make the joke about one President or another pardoning John Hinckley and mentioning at the end of the pardon letter, "By the way, my rival is screwing Jodie Foster." Funny in some contexts, not in others.
Posted by: stuiec at April 12, 2010 03:35 PM (7AOgy)
Hell, I wouldn't offer condolences to the widow. She lived with the jerkoff for some number of years--things are probably easier for her now. Just jokin'.
Posted by: Mike Myers at April 12, 2010 03:35 PM (ktYjH)
Posted by: bigDon at April 12, 2010 03:35 PM (Hj81C)
Posted by: Holdfast at April 12, 2010 03:35 PM (Gzb30)
Just an note on the recently passed Health Care Legislation..the bill passed and corrected the next day carried many provisions changing the IRS code for taxpayers. I have reviewed the bill and the changes made and thought it would be wise to summarize them for the benefit of our staff.
1. Premium Assistance Credit - effective 2014 the ACT provides for the Government to provide a refundable tax credit for eligible taxpayers to assist in the payment of premiums for health insurance costs. This credit will apply to those taxpayers that have annual income from 100% to 400% of the National Poverty Level as established by the Government (based on family size). The credit if refundable, and is increased by inflation beginning in 2018.
2. There will be an excise tax imposed on uninsured individuals beginning in 2014. The tax is 2.5% by which the income of the taxpayer exceeds the new threshold amount established by the Government or $ 695, whichever is greater(per household adult). The tax will be phased in over the next three years, 1% in 2014, 2% in 2015, and 2.5% thereafter adjusted for inflation.
3. Dependant children's health benefits can be claimed by the taxpayer until the dependant is 27 years of age...However, the adjusted gross income offset to medical deductions has been increased from 7.5% to 10 %....effective 2013 (unless you are 65 or older, then it stays at 7.5%)
4. There is a new Hospital insurance tax on wages exceeding $ 250,000. The $250 K wages are for combined wages of Taxpayer and Spouse.. For Married filing separately, the amount is $ 125,000, and for single, the amount is $200,000...the tax is .9% of the excess wages. The effective date of this tax is 2013.
5. There is a new tax being imposed on Net Investment income...the tax of 3.8 % is being imposed on the excess of NII over $250,000 for married filing joint, and $ 200,000 on singles. Tax is effective for years beginning in 2013.
6. The new Act makes your financial disclosures to the IRS now available to the Sec. of Human Services for any purpose they deem necessary - effectively immediately.
7. Flexible spending accounts are now limited to a maximum of $2,500, and they can no longer be used to purchase over the counter drugs...Effective 2013..the over the counter provisions go into effect in 2011.
8. Tax on HSA distributions is increased from 10% to 20% starting in 2011.
9. There is a new small business tax credit offered to employers who pick up the cost of health care plans for their employees. There are significant rules, and qualifications based on the size of the company, and number of employees, and the average salary of employees. Effective for the current tax year.
10. Prescription drug programs by employers to help cover the cost of employees drug costs are discontinued at the end of this year.
11. Employers are now required to make specific and detailed reports to the Government annually for all employees covered by their health care plans.
12. There is a new tax charged to the Insurance Companies who supply health Insurance coverage..$2 per head for all covered taxpayers annually...increased for inflation.
13. There is a new tax imposed on health care plans that exceed the coverage of the National threshold plans. The tax is 40 % of the premium charged in excess of the threshold. beginning in 2018.
14. There is a new tax on medical devices purchased beginning in 2013. The tax is 2.8% of the purchase price. It does not include glasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, and generally those devices bought at a retail outlet...effective 2013.
15. The filing requirement for amounts paid to "an individual of $600 of more within a calendar year", has been extended to amounts "paid to anyone. More than $600 or more per calendar year"(includes Corporations), you must prepare a form 1099, and submit to the Government by Feb 28 of the following year...effective 2012.
16. Adoption credit and assistance programs have been modified, by increasing the limitation for their application.
17. This act has applied the "economic substance" doctrine to the tax law...this is to say that any venture entered into, must pass the economic substance test in order to qualify to be treated for tax purposes. The test has been codified, and will be the new standard...the old " hobby loss" rules are gone, and now any venture must pass the scrutiny of the new rules to be deductable. The accelerated penalty rules will now apply to these matters...effective on passage (now)!
18. There is a new tax imposed on those who go to a tanning salon...10% tax to get a tan...effective July 1, 2010.
These are the highlights of the new law just passed. Most of our representatives did not know that all this was in the ACT...but they have an excuse...they never got to read it before they passed it...
Richard Echols, CPA, CFF, CFE
Accounting Fraud Examiner
Rocky Mountain Information Network
(623) 587-8201 x 179
(800) 821-0640 x 179
(602) 527-1288 (c)
Posted by: tangonine at April 12, 2010 03:36 PM (C8Pcc)
Posted by: SEIU GOON at April 12, 2010 03:37 PM (muUqs)
Gov. Christie should just hold a press conference firing every teacher in the State of New Jersey
Next day, hold another presser to offer jobs to roughly half of the fired teachers (the competent half, offer many of the older ones a reasonable retirement).
Then, three days later, hold another presser, to see if the Union gets the joke.
Invite only reporters from unquestionably still-solvent publications: The National Enquirer, Star, Globe, ... see if the MSM gets this joke.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 12, 2010 03:37 PM (BqSr3)
Posted by: Dig Dug at April 12, 2010 03:37 PM (QE2Kl)
I want Obama humiliated in 2012, the way Nixon crushed McGovern, the way Reagan crushed first Carter and then Mondale. An unmistakable loss and rejection of his every action in office. I want him too embarrassed to show his face in Chicago!
He needs to eat his wheaties every day and his arugula every night so he's ready to face the voters in 2012.
Some days, I feel like I'm in prison here, and that every day I can mark a big red X on the date as we slowly count down the days till Nov 2012.
Posted by: Boots at April 12, 2010 03:37 PM (06JTY)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 03:38 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Ron Paul Wandering Into the Wrong Thread at April 12, 2010 03:39 PM (oRZ8S)
Posted by: Amused Observer at April 12, 2010 03:39 PM (HksSe)
I didn't mean nothin'. And you didn't hear nothin' or see nothin', if you know what I mean, and I think that you do know what I mean.
Now get outta my office. In fact, get outta the building. Rico, help this guy find the door.
Posted by: Joe Coppola, Jerk for the Union Label at April 12, 2010 03:40 PM (w41GQ)
Why does it seem to me as though the national discourse has de-evolved to the level of not so bright 14 year olds? Know thy enemy: in order to get some semblance of rationality and responsible leadership this entire juvenile behavior trend will have to be addressed at the same time -- talk about the task of Sisyphus.
It would be nice -- in a just world -- if the idiot "jokester" would get into trouble for this, but this world is neither nice nor just. Nor apparently very intelligent either.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 03:41 PM (5/yRG)
All of the incitement they accuse us of is in fact the kind of thing they dream about when no one is looking.
Good points, Ace.
Posted by: Brian72 at April 12, 2010 03:41 PM (GNBk5)
Just sayin'.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 12, 2010 03:43 PM (oRZ8S)
@18: "few years ago, in NY's Orange County Jail, a guard formed a cross from toothpicks, stuck it in a cupcake, lit it, and gave it to a co-worker for a gag."
I remember that story. Wasn't the guy fired simply because the DOC or whomever thought that "someone might be offended" by the joke. IIRC, the guy who was the actual "victim" of the joke was not offended.
Of course, that might have been a similar case elsewhere. Stuff like that is sadly not very unique.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 03:45 PM (kmEfr)
ter formatted differently.
Just sayin'.
-----------------
What are you going to do with your two spare syllables?
Posted by: AARP at April 12, 2010 03:45 PM (3K4hn)
Posted by: steevy at April 12, 2010 03:47 PM (yCFEF)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 07:45 PM (kmEfr)
"Sure he was offended. He just didn't know it." -- libtard
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 03:47 PM (N49h9)
A private "joke." In a secret memo. To thousands of people. In one of the most powerful unions in NJ. Whose membership is the employees of, likely, the largest public employer in the state. Whose impact hits every citizen in the state.
But... it wasn't meant to be public.
Jesus tap-dancing christ these spokespeople and their bosses need to be fired, tarred, and feathered. They're a plague.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 12, 2010 03:48 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: JavaJoe at April 12, 2010 03:48 PM (e9JZd)
Posted by: Jim Carrey at April 12, 2010 03:50 PM (YCVBL)
Posted by: bill-tb at April 12, 2010 03:50 PM (y+QfZ)
Hey, it works for me. See? [*Clown nose on*] What, they're not comedians? Well, they're right anyway. [*Clown nose off*]
Posted by: Bill Bozo Maher at April 12, 2010 03:52 PM (swuwV)
Thank you all for coming here on such short notice. I'll be brief. Seriously, I've got a meatball pizza waiting on me in the office, and I'm not gonna let that sucker get cold.
*laughter*
At any rate, I called this little confab just to announce my latest program aimed at securing our children from those out there who would prey upon their innocence in any form. To that end, I have asked the State Legislature to provide funding for an online, publicly-accessible data base listing the identity and location of anyone convicted of abducting, raping, molesting, or assaulting any individual under the age of 18. I am also hereby designating April 12th as "Joe Coppola Pedophile Awareness Day."
Thank you.
Posted by: Gov. Christie at April 12, 2010 03:53 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: JavaJoe at April 12, 2010 07:48 PM (e9JZd)
Now, that's an unfair measure, since most teachers are too stupid to be able to educate anyone, of any age. The education department is known to be the dumbest department in just about every university, with intended education grads scoring the lowest of all grad school applicants on the GRE. Education applicants score lower on the math section than even the English students - and that's pretty friggin bad.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 03:53 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Bill R. at April 12, 2010 03:54 PM (EhlQq)
Coppola has said the "prayer" was a joke and was never meant to be made public.
Oh, well, that makes it okay then. Notice Ace didn't address the private nature of the email. That's because he couldn't refute this point.
Didn't Lee Harvey Oswald get off the hook because he didn't mean for anybody to find out?
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 12, 2010 03:54 PM (PJ1yM)
Posted by: Xoxotl at April 12, 2010 03:54 PM (fnExF)
Posted by: GarandFan at April 12, 2010 03:55 PM (6mwMs)
@38: "Jesus tap-dancing christ these spokespeople and their bosses need to be fired, tarred, and feathered. They're a plague."
Nah, it's Jersey. Just whack 'em the fuck out. Two behind the ear, and an anonymous burial in the Pine Barrens. They'll understand - it's nothing personal, just business.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 03:55 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: sulla at April 12, 2010 03:56 PM (Y4/VY)
All of the incitement they accuse us of is in fact the kind of thing they dream about when no one is looking.
Good points, Ace.
Posted by: Brian72 at April 12, 2010 07:41 PM (GNBk5)
To know what liberals fantasies are just look at what they are accusing and claiming Republicans are doing.
Inciting violence? Violation of personal freedoms? In the pockets of corporations? All things liberals claim Republicans have done that they happily do.
Posted by: buzzion at April 12, 2010 03:57 PM (oVQFe)
Does that excuse what he did? No.
And in normal times, yes, a simple apology with some grovelling should be enough.
But these are not normal times, and this is, as the left likes to say, a teachable moment.
The State Media has been busy arguing that tea party people are coarse and violent. While they use a large dollop of flat out lies, they also take humor and present it as serious commentary.
This is a great opportunity to make the left live up to their ideals, as Alinsky might put it, and the sort of thing every conservative politician should do.
If the target was Obama, for example, and this was email being exchanged in Langley during a debate on prosecuting CIA officers for interrogation, does anyone seriously doubt the "joker" would be fired and the State Media would be making a big issue out of it?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 12, 2010 03:59 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: logprof at April 12, 2010 04:00 PM (Mmw0q)
To know what liberals fantasies are just look at what they are accusing and claiming Republicans are doing.
Inciting violence? Violation of personal freedoms? In the pockets of corporations? All things liberals claim Republicans have done that they happily do.
Posted by: buzzion at April 12, 2010 07:57 PM (oVQFe)
You are certainly correct. Considering the litany of things the Left accused Bush of, this is indeed a disturbing though.
Posted by: 18-1 at April 12, 2010 04:00 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 12, 2010 08:00 PM (67pfW)
I will not take payment in the form of bows or clunkers!!!
Posted by: Hu Jintao at April 12, 2010 04:01 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 12, 2010 04:02 PM (S1Ttj)
Right?
Um.
Posted by: Xoxotl at April 12, 2010 07:54 PM (fnExF)
Oh, sure.
/What a load of Macaca
Posted by: George Allen at April 12, 2010 04:02 PM (bgcml)
You are certainly correct. Considering the litany of things the Left accused Bush of, this is indeed a disturbing though.
Exactly, just think of anything they did accuse him of. Think of the things Obama has done that they are happy about that are exactly those things. And the other things like their "fear" of Bush refusing to step down as president. I mean that's something that even his supporters would be the first in line at the whitehouse with pitchforks and torches if Bush had done that. But so many of them have a wet dream of Obama essentially being president forever at the moment its disgusting.
Luckily I think the dream of repealing the 2 term limit has definitely died.
Posted by: buzzion at April 12, 2010 04:06 PM (oVQFe)
I think the idea of a 4 year term is losing its popularity about now.
Posted by: kansas at April 12, 2010 04:07 PM (3oU1g)
Now, the way these teachers and administrators treat students with their insane "zero-tolerance" is no excuse, but that is the asinine reality we have to live with - thanks to these unions, for the most part.
Personally, I am for free speech and am not bothered in the least by burning in effigy or anything of the sort for political figures ... The only problem, here, is the exhibition of low class by teachers and their union thugs. Of course, that's no surprise. As I said above, most of them are legitimate idiots who really have no business being in charge of anything.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 04:08 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: S'norin desert at April 12, 2010 04:08 PM (vLwYg)
44 Easy there -- I'm an English major and scored quite high on my GRE (and with constant annoyance from an engineer I knew trying to get answers to questions off me during the test, so there,pfffht!).
Although admittedly, the English department has taken a serious turn towards to inane...and the school of education was mind numbingly dumb (I have hours towards an education diploma, but for the fact that I just couldn't stomach the required classes -- ack!).
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 04:09 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: robtr at April 12, 2010 04:09 PM (fwSHf)
@64: "Luckily I think the dream of repealing the 2 term limit has definitely died."
Until the next socialist God-amongst-men descends from Heaven to rule over us a philosopher-king. The (current) Messiah might have fucked it up for now, but the idea isn't going to go away.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 12, 2010 04:09 PM (kmEfr)
Posted by: Terry at April 12, 2010 04:12 PM (Vui52)
Perfect opportunity to play their game - NJ has a state income tax, correct? How many times has this guy been audited?
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 12, 2010 04:12 PM (67pfW)
Segway-Powered Robotic Sniper Targets
Very cool. Wait around until 5:00 minutes in to see them getting shot.
Posted by: DelD at April 12, 2010 04:12 PM (eWtdM)
Remember that stupid show with DORKS who built LAME ROBOTS and battled each other? It was called Robot Wars, or some such.
It was like watching two monkeys fuck a football old people fuck.
Posted by: Dynomuttwing Plover at April 12, 2010 04:14 PM (tMSKg)
O/T
Romney on O'Reilly and states that Massachusetts is not financially underwater, and the numbers are just as the legislature programed.
What a fucking dork!
Posted by: Fish at April 12, 2010 04:15 PM (M5t+h)
Herr, if the media is going to keep reporting on the dangers of overheated rhetoric that might encourage an already-unbalanced person to do something violent, then they should castigate such rhetoric on the left, too. I think we can at least agree on that.
I clearly remember the media stirring up the people to the point of violent rioting during the Rodney King incident. They showed the edited video so many times that I believe they were cuplable in the 50 or so deaths that followed during the riots. It still amazes me that they weren't held crminially liable for their actions. The media is the enemy. Never forget that.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 12, 2010 04:16 PM (lHn6+)
76 Does it make me a total nerd if I remember more than one episode of that show?
If so, then what show are you talking about? Never heard of it!
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 04:16 PM (5/yRG)
>>>44 Easy there -- I'm an English major and scored quite high on my GRE
Yes, there are a few good people in the English departments. A few. I was just going on the actual reported scores - which I found absolutely shocking when I took my GREs and got back the results with the intended concentration breakdowns. It was a real eye-opener for me.
>>>(and with constant annoyance from an engineer I knew trying to get answers to questions off me during the test, so there,pfffht!).
I came from the math department. We've got engineer jokes out the wazoo.
>>>Although admittedly, the English department has taken a serious turn towards to inane...and the school of education was mind numbingly dumb (I have hours towards an education diploma, but for the fact that I just couldn't stomach the required classes -- ack!).
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 08:09 PM (5/yRG)
Yep. Things were always sort of bad, but they have really gone over a cliff in the past 20 years.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 04:16 PM (N49h9)
Posted by: Dynomuttwing Plover at April 12, 2010 08:14 PM (tMSKg)
Well, I'm an old person and I fuck my young girlfriend quiet well thank you.
At least she tells me this is the case. Do young chicks who only get $3000 a month allowance lie?
Posted by: Fish at April 12, 2010 04:17 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: sifty at April 12, 2010 04:19 PM (60leK)
Do young chicks who only get $3000 a month allowance lie?
Posted by: Fish
Whatever you want me to say baby
Posted by: young chick fucking old guy for money at April 12, 2010 04:21 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: ace at April 12, 2010 07:33 PM (i6ROy)
Your dudeness:
I didn't mean to do a driveby--I had some garden work to attend to.
Of course we agree on a lot of this, especially that the media does a fine job of differentiating between left and right-wing "jokes". It's criminal. But that joke has been told a thousand times, with only the punchline differing depending on circumstance. It's "The Aristocrats" of political rubber chicken dinners.
Do I believe they wish harm to Chris Christie? Probably. They're the left.
Is that what Cockholster was saying, in that place and at that time? Probably not. Sure, we can raise hell about it and play their game. I'm certainly not above playing their game. But the fact is that no one will report, so we might as well be screaming at our deaf mothers-in-law.
I see what you did there, and I can't disapprove of the Alinsykite attempt to "make them live by their own rules". But only we have to live by their rules. I just think, with all respect, that it is probably wasted effort.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 12, 2010 04:21 PM (LybP+)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 12, 2010 04:22 PM (S1Ttj)
Posted by: young chick doing it for money at April 12, 2010 04:22 PM (60leK)
"Dear Lord this year you have taken away my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett, my favorite singer, Michael Jackson, and my favorite salesman, Billy Mays. I just wanted to let you know that Barack Obama is my favorite president."
Good to know.
Posted by: Henry David Thoreau You In Walden's Pond at April 12, 2010 04:24 PM (swuwV)
I don't agree with everything he says, however I think, at it's core, his manifesto is spot on.
A decade-and-a-half in the classroom, in higher education, has convinced me that the majority of students would be better served by less formal schooling and more apprentice programs. The one-size fits all attempt to get everyone a college education is stupid.
Not only that, but school bureaucracies at all levels should be slashed, and school policy decisions should be devolved to the absolute lowest (i.e. most local) level possible.
And don't get me started on how public schools train kids to be acquiescent and timid, deferential to authority, the antithesis of what 19th century Americans thought was proper for a free people.
Posted by: DelD at April 12, 2010 04:25 PM (eWtdM)
Cute as a pail full of kittens. Dumb as a slug under the tomatoes.
Posted by: sifty at April 12, 2010 04:26 PM (60leK)
"I just wanted to let you know that Barack Obama is my favorite president."
Posted by: Henry David Thoreau You In Walden's Pond at April 12, 2010 08:24 PM (swuwV)
Sucking the black mamba must be very rewarding Mr. Thoreau, but eventually the snake will turn and bite you. It bit Hillary on her cellulite butt.
Posted by: Fish at April 12, 2010 04:26 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: NJRob at April 12, 2010 04:27 PM (y/IxH)
NJ unions are well known for their prayer humor, every body knows that.
C'mon, you got a sense a humor, right? RIGHT?
Posted by: ontherocks at April 12, 2010 04:29 PM (HBqDo)
Yeah, Christie and his people are being a little thin-skinned about this and I'm wondering why. Surely, to keep it in the news is not a bad idea--right now it's no-holds-barred here and I couldn't care less if Christie looks whiney. You haven't heard the kind of keening and whinging the unions are up to--they look pathetic.
But Christie is a former Federal prosecutor, and joking about killing a prosecutor is no fucking joke. I don't see where his duties now are that far from those of a prosecutor, and for all the jokes about this place, New Jersey can be a very unfunny place.
Anyway, another time, another place I'd be willing to give these jokers a pass. But nobody's giving me any passes, so fuck 'em.
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 12, 2010 04:31 PM (rplL3)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:27 PM (p302b)
After reading the prayer again, I am in complete agreement.
PS I miss Billy Mays and his crap products. The best showman on TV.
Posted by: Fish at April 12, 2010 04:31 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: NJ ethnic teacher at April 12, 2010 04:32 PM (S1Ttj)
81 By non academic, do you mean:
got sick of reading required history class text which was so...stunted any 5th grader with a modicum of intelligence could have taken the class?
got tired of answering all the questions on the rare instances when the prof deigned to make a half assed attempt at Socratic method rather than relying upon power point?
thought the assignments often amounted to how much busy work one could accomplish while still kissing somebody's ass? (I mean really, running the transparency machine is cool and all, but after one go round you have the hang of it -- I really didn't want to waste my time learning how to make cute, motivational posters for a hypothetical classroom; besides, I wanted secondary ed., not kindergarten -- but I rest my case)
Then yeah, sign me up as non-academic, because they certainly weeded me out.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 04:32 PM (5/yRG)
I punish him anyway.
Even when he repeated "Obama is a lying bastard." When I admonished him, he said "just kidding". I still punished him for cursing.
Hopefully, he will grow up to be a man who doesn't say hateful shit and then try to get out of trouble by saying it was just a joke.
Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 12, 2010 04:45 PM (tr6Dy)
And just in case they don't think that this little "joke" might harden his resolve, it will.
Har de har har. Joke is on you.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 04:46 PM (7VvJB)
GW and his dad and even Bill Clinton were warm, genuine, natural and friendly and smiles came easy to them when they were greeting heads of state, and you could tell that they liked people.
I noticed that, at the summit that he is attending, Obama is stiff with phony smiles and his whole demeanor is pretentious, awkward and phony. Thanks 52%ers for electing that empty suit. You stupid assholes.
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 12, 2010 04:46 PM (ITzbJ)
You might say they shouldn't bother with it on either side. I don't think I believe that. I do believe in a thing called undue incitement, and I do think it incrementally increases the odds of political violence. I also think that such speech has little value, so to me it's not a painful retraction to lose it.
That, or something like that.
So Ace, when are you going to get around to stabbing all those co-blogger with whom I disagree?
(stab they guy that wrote that rule about not ending sentences with a preposition too)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at April 12, 2010 04:52 PM (F09Uo)
I hope Joe Coppola's family gets set on fire and the fire gets put out by children weilding baseball bats.
Get it? It's funny if you hear it in the original French. The translation doesn't quite work.
Posted by: Spade at April 12, 2010 04:55 PM (CsRpp)
Hey we never make bad jokes?
Looks like Ace is back to being paid by the word. The union thug or not thug, how many words do we need?
Valu Rite Monday?
Posted by: Kemp at April 12, 2010 04:57 PM (2+9Yx)
I noticed that, at the summit that he is attending, Obama is stiff with phony smiles and his whole demeanor is pretentious, awkward and phony. Thanks 52%ers for electing that empty suit. You stupid assholes."
Hey, you stupid cracker pal, Bush I, Bush II, and Clinton smiled when they met heads of state because they were among peers. I am a god come to earth. I have no peers. Meeting with mere heads of state is beneath Me. Heads of state are simply better-perfumed, better-clothed, better-educated, better-fed, (well, just plain better, okay) versions of peasants like you. Put it this way, when Sarkozy's ho first met Me, she asked to suck My dick (begged, really, but then all you insects do is beg). I refused her, because there was nothing in it for Me. Understand?
Posted by: Prezidizzle Obizzle at April 12, 2010 04:58 PM (kmEfr)
Isn't social security underfunded too?
What is most frightening about all of this is people's reactions. They just accept it like they expected it.
that is one totally frightening map. Was no one doing the right thing?
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 04:59 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Brian at April 12, 2010 05:01 PM (Unq1i)
Posted by: Brian at April 12, 2010 05:04 PM (Unq1i)
So is it wrong for me to wonder what the world would be like if Ogabe, Bidenclown, the cabinet and the Dem congressional leadership had been aboard the Areoflot flight instead of the Polish delegation?
Well, higher ratings for MSNBC for one...
Posted by: HH at April 12, 2010 05:12 PM (1kwr2)
This is an old joke; I saw it last Fall, right after Swayze and Farah had actually died, and Obama was the politician named. I though it was hysterical, and forwarded it to everyone I knew. I got it again with Pelosi as the pol named.
The only thing that bothers me about this is that if someone on the Right had done it, the MSM would have gone apeshit, and the police would have pressed charges.
Posted by: Redneck, tea-baggin' bitch at April 12, 2010 05:14 PM (GXLjK)
Posted by: A. Goon at April 12, 2010 05:56 PM (2X8VA)
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 12, 2010 06:03 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: Pepe LePew at April 12, 2010 07:31 PM (y3VtA)
When I read the joke, I actually laughed outloud. It's funny. It's always been a funny joke.
As it turns out, claiming something is 'offensive, hateful, or irresponsible' is the all-purpose escape for anyone who has no sense of humor.
Political correctness is not pretty when anyone utilizes it but it's particularly disappointing when conservatives do it. There's no victim here, Ace. It's just a joke. Climb off your liberal soapbox and try to get some sleep. You'll feel better in the morning.
Posted by: jojo at April 12, 2010 07:51 PM (tVUAR)
Curiously, the left never got that memo.
I'm not laughing.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 08:02 PM (7htjb)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at April 12, 2010 08:28 PM (lFp7s)
Posted by: BFH at April 12, 2010 09:07 PM (ZN4rj)
Posted by: zirconia-blank at April 12, 2010 09:34 PM (mGDQn)
thank you dear ..
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 13, 2010 02:32 AM (WFYoY)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 13, 2010 05:51 AM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: Math sez at April 13, 2010 07:23 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: Math sez at April 13, 2010 07:31 AM (mhD2v)
What would we do without you guys?
Posted by: VJay at April 13, 2010 08:21 AM (k87Wm)
Posted by: laughswhentyping at April 13, 2010 09:53 AM (cPm3k)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3717 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Barbarian at April 12, 2010 03:23 PM (EL+OC)