September 23, 2010
— Ace He just has some good YouTube moments, it turns out.
It is true that Christie is weak on immigration. It's also true that he hasn't campaigned for a Tea Party candidate.
And?
There are large swathes of the country where Sarah Palin cannot campaign for candidates, because the voters there don't like her, and that's true of Jim DeMint, too.
Or is Levin saying... I don't know what he's saying. He's just bitching. And moaning. And bitching. And moaning. And moaning some more.
Eh, toughen up, Buttercup. It's politics, not Super Best Friends Clubhouse. We don't all have to be so in love with each other we all get mass-married, you know.
He's really getting on my last nerve with his Endless Purge act.
Update your material, dude. I know you have hours to waste every day but there's a lot more to talk about.
Posted by: Ace at
03:30 PM
| Comments (518)
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: kev at September 23, 2010 03:32 PM (V6jmN)
Posted by: Shooter McGavin at September 23, 2010 03:33 PM (cxGtL)
What does it matter if we win in 2012, if the Democrats are allowed to permanently alter the demographics of the country and guarantee themselfs a permanent majority?
Posted by: Tino at September 23, 2010 03:34 PM (CbmBR)
Levin has his uses and is often inspirational when he is on his game. But he can also be a mercurial thin-skinned and obnoxious hater, to his potentially lasting detriment.
Posted by: mike d at September 23, 2010 03:34 PM (W0V5W)
Posted by: Get Along Gang at September 23, 2010 03:35 PM (pUfK9)
Posted by: Matthew Brady at September 23, 2010 03:35 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: Get Along Gang after a Moony wedding at September 23, 2010 03:37 PM (pUfK9)
http://minx.cc/ ?blog=86&post=306063#c10949247
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 23, 2010 03:37 PM (JYxmy)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 23, 2010 03:37 PM (BZ2Bm)
Man, even when I agree with him my ears bleed.
Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2010 07:35 PM (jYQ2v)
It's the shouting... I just get tired of the shouting all the time. He makes Michael Savage sound like an NPR host.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 03:37 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 23, 2010 03:37 PM (Yb/gj)
Who in their right mind listens to Levin?
Man, even when I agree with him my ears bleed.
Don't get him in my market, thankfully. I can't stand Hannity for that exact reason.
(cue "great american" guy, cue "great american" guy . . . )
Posted by: s'moron at September 23, 2010 03:38 PM (UaxA0)
I haven't voted for a candidate that I really liked in forever. I always vote against people, not for people. It is much easier to vote when your goal is to try and eliminate the worst candidate who has a chance of winning. Don't waste your time trying to find somebody who is perfect cause it ain't going to happen.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at September 23, 2010 03:38 PM (IqfKc)
Posted by: Dippingly goodness at September 23, 2010 03:38 PM (ll7GR)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2010 03:38 PM (xtAfO)
Priorities.
Posted by: E at September 23, 2010 03:38 PM (yFU0t)
I like Levin at times but a little of him can go a long way, especially lately. He turning into a marginally more respectable Michael Savage.
Ironic since they both hate each other. They kinda hate everyone though. Levin more so lately.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 03:39 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Alex at September 23, 2010 03:39 PM (K9+WM)
Posted by: Pat Cadell at September 23, 2010 03:40 PM (QBQcg)
And I don't like that he supports Crap and Tax.
Does that mean I don't want to carry his pudding cups? Well, of course not! He's the right guy for the state of NJ, and I'd daresay he'd improve the situation of other financial basketcase states such as Cali and much of the NE corridor.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 03:40 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2010 03:40 PM (xtAfO)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 23, 2010 03:41 PM (BZ2Bm)
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 23, 2010 03:41 PM (JWR6b)
Heh. I haven't seen Savage since he was on MSNBC. MSNBC! Those were the days.
Levin is the poster child for marijuana legalization. Chiiillllllll, maaaaaaaann!!!!!
Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2010 03:42 PM (jYQ2v)
His show is free. You might learn something, buttercup.
Not when you add up the brain cells killed or damaged.
Posted by: s'moron at September 23, 2010 03:42 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 23, 2010 03:42 PM (BZ2Bm)
There's a cage match I'd Pay-Per-View.
And I have never Pay-Per-Viewed.
Mostly.
Posted by: goy at September 23, 2010 03:43 PM (AfU1B)
But DeMint, for all of his conservative creds, just isn't (I hate to say it) Presidential-looking. Like it or not, a person who runs for the top spot has to be easy on the eyes and/or someone that people feel comfortable having in their living room.
There aren't many of those around - Palin and Christie both fit the description, as do Romney and Mike Pence. Another one who hasn't been mentioned much is Rick Perry (don't know if he's considering it, either). There may be others, but at the moment I can't conjure up their images.
And as much as we may like throwing out names of Congresscritters for possible 2012 runs, the fact is that most of the best presidents have executive experience; very few long-term legislators have that.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at September 23, 2010 03:43 PM (ZuXtZ)
Until the Rio Grande moves to Trenton, its not a big deal.
And there are other fish to fry, even in border states.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 23, 2010 03:43 PM (z1N6a)
the Lefty blabbers have done it again!
They renamed The Pledge To America to...
The Pledge To Finish Off America!
hahahahha, aren't they a hoot?
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 03:43 PM (Fe3ZO)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 23, 2010 03:44 PM (BZ2Bm)
(cue "great american" guy, cue "great american" guy . . . )
Posted by: s'moron at September 23, 2010 07:38 PM (UaxA0)
It's the repetition. I just can't stand the word-for-word, item list by item list, constant repetition.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 03:44 PM (tJjm/)
*takes a big ol' hit from a helium balloon*
"Get offa my phone, ya moron!"
I agree when Levin's on, he's pretty good. Like explaining the law and such. But most of the time, he reminds me of BO'R when he cherry picks his callers to hawk his books.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at September 23, 2010 03:44 PM (kFODZ)
wait, ace, so you're "bitching and moaning" about someone else's "bitching and moaning"?? ...
pot and kettle.
levin's point is that we need to keep our powder dry about who we pre-judge as "presidential material".
furthermore, these people who are saying that levin and hannity suck are also saying we all need to get along? ...
pot and kettle, redux.
Posted by: knob at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (d6U73)
He's really getting on my last nerve with his Endless Purge act.
Oh good, its not just me. The man is really sharp and i like him but the constant bitching, especially about Glen Beck is really putting me off. Levin needs to take a step back and keep in the mind that the founding fathers didn't all get along and agree on everything either, but still made significant contributions.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (tJjm/)
26 Didn't he also support Mike Castle and the Victory mosque?
No.
somebody else laid it out in the CC thread already.
He's not sniping at O'Donnell now (big deal about "supporting" castle, I did so after I heard about the ISI suit, because I'm a hard right con, and ISI is a great group, but I'm 100% behind O'D now (i wish)), and CC never "supported" the mosque.
Either refute it or stop with teh suck ass innuendos, Spank.
Posted by: s'moron at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (QBQcg)
Now, if CC Rider wants to really work this weakness into a strength, he can, when appropriate, lay out a very specific (I know, Ace, specifics kill) plan detailing a strict, iron-clad, we'll show you we're serious, borders first steps. And then he can detail some very strong, non-squishey, benchmarks those already here must pass before any consideration of citizenship. Real penalties for breaking the law to come here in the first place, real requirements for consideration, and real steps to be taken to stay.
He could then discuss a step-up effort to deport those undesirables such as gang-bangers, multiple-arrest offenders, etc.
He could then discuss preventing this entire fiasco from repeating itself in the future through a series of reform steps, including changing the anchor baby provision.
Then, he might change so minds, including mine. He might not, but it's his only chance, IMO. And it would allow him to lead....and this issue begs for leadership.
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 03:45 PM (UuQmI)
"He's really getting on my last nerve with his Endless Purge act"
Ace, I was listening to Levin on my commute home, had to shut the damn radio off.
Completely agree with you on this one. Levin was getting on my last nerve as well with his speech against Christie.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 03:46 PM (ACkhT)
We really need some better conservative talkers. Hannity, Levin, Savage, Beck... is Rush the only one who can make it without being either dim-witted (Hannity), obnoxious (Levin, Savage) or just plain weird (Beck)?
I agree with all of them more frequently than I disagree with them, but I can only take any of them in limited doses.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 23, 2010 03:46 PM (plsiE)
Posted by: MissTammy at September 23, 2010 03:47 PM (m8uUu)
Instead of listening to Mark Levin, I prefer to watch S E Cupp and her bouncing betty's!
Posted by: Fish at September 23, 2010 07:43 PM (v1gw3)
I think her name stands for Super E-sized Cup Puppies. Woof!
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 03:47 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Dan at September 23, 2010 03:47 PM (1jzSs)
It's the repetition. I just can't stand the word-for-word, item list by item list, constant repetition.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 07:44 PM (tJjm/)
The Obama Mania Media!
Pull my string again....
She said America is a downright mean country....
Pull my string again....
I own a Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 03:48 PM (A0VTZ)
You don't listen to Levin, do you? Levin is all about the Constitution and the founding principles. Christie supported a big government RINO and Levin called him out for it.
Christie took the cynical root to picking up a seat and placed that ahead of principles. So, you kind of have it ass backwards.
Yeah! Let's show 'em! From now on, only nominate rock solid conservatives that Mark Levin can be proud of, even in blue northeastern states! When they lose, we can always just blame the media and establishment RINOs.
Besides, who cares if Dems end up controlling both houses of Congress? What's the worst that can happen? It's not like they'll go and drive the country into bankruptcy or socialize health care. Oh, wait...
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 23, 2010 03:50 PM (plsiE)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2010 03:50 PM (xtAfO)
Posted by: rickl at September 23, 2010 03:51 PM (hZFhS)
It's the repetition. I just can't stand the word-for-word, item list by item list, constant repetition.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 07:44 PM (tJjm/)
The Obama Mania Media!
Pull my string again....
She said America is a downright mean country....
Pull my string again....
I own a Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 07:48 PM (A0VTZ)
Pull my string again....
Let your heart not be <b>*BANG!*</b>
THUD
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 03:51 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 03:52 PM (UvR6d)
In Delaware, Christine O'Donnell received 30,563 votes in the Republican primary, 3,542 votes more than Mike Castle. In Alaska, Joe Miller won 55,878 votes for a margin of 2,006 over Lisa Murkowski.
Do the math. For weeks now, our national political conversation has been driven by 86,441 voters and a margin of 5,548 votes. A bit of perspective: When John McCain lost in 2008, he received 59.9 million votes.
Rand Paul received 206,986 votes in Kentucky, where there are more than 1 million registered Republicans and nearly 2.9 million registered voters. Sharron Angle won with 70,452 votes in Nevada, a state with more than 1 million registered voters.
SO BIG FUCKING DEAL ABOUT THE TEA PARTY. MARK LEVIN CAN SUCK A BIG DONG.
If the tea party wanted to form their own party, that would be great. But they want to come to your house, act like an asshole, drink your booze and fuck your wife. This is not a grassroots volunteer base who wants to help the GOP win. This is a minority of unruly fascists who insist on a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology.
Look who they've chosen as their standard bearers. A virulently racist and wealthy real estate developer who has dumped tens of thousands on the NY Democratic party and made a small fortune through contracts to lease state offices, and who has no plan but a bunch of slogans and sophomoric taunts. A middle aged Jesus freak who has never held a job, holds homosexuals in contempt, has a library of nutty interviews, is paranoid and is a pathological liar, and has no record by which to take her at her word when she promises real conservative CHANGE. Conservatives mocked Obama for much less.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 03:53 PM (mHQ7T)
Face it...if Levin's talking points and rhetoric weren't conservative, you'd swear he was a lefty. Bitchy, smarmy, snarky, fingernails on chalkboard voice, self-absorbed.....
I've tried to like the guy but he's totally unlistenable.
Posted by: Darren Lewandowski at September 23, 2010 03:53 PM (OX6Bc)
we have a very diverse group of republicans /libertarians Beck- strange not always right on the money, but heck he's a commited showman, -some come off harsh- Levin. , some softies- hannity, some squishy- o'reilly. some dryly sarcastic- dennis miller, some firm, little egotists-savage. and of course Rush, the guy my mum would listen too. They all bring something for us, drag us along at times when we hide under our beds, or need us to calm down and make a plan. I'm grateful to them all, wierd or strangely different as they seem to me. But i'm not an old time gop member.
btw dennis miller is more my particular taste-bud buddy
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 03:53 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 03:53 PM (Jx0x6)
I dunno.
Wickets grammar is too good. Maybe he needs to spell more like those retarded lolcats. Might increase the funny.
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 03:53 PM (zgaoG)
http://minx.cc/ ?blog=86&post=306063#c10949247
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 23, 2010 07:37 PM (JYxmy)
That info his online just by searching his name and neighbourhood. Any moron who wanted to harass that Ed Buck guy could find it easily. That said, don't call him and harass him. He obviously has enough problems in his life.
Posted by: fozzy at September 23, 2010 03:54 PM (lPLCj)
Beck had his rant against Scott Brown after he won, about those playgirl photos.
Yes, I disagreed with some of Brown's votes, but that 41th vote has prevented a whole lot of additional nonsense. And I will be donating to his campaign again for 2012.
Beck is really getting annoying with his self-adulation.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 03:54 PM (ACkhT)
If I ever meet you I'll "discuss" you're fucking idiotic behavior.
OOOOOOOHHHH, Tough guy.
Forget that we agree on about 90% of everything, just posture on teh internets some more, Rambo.
Posted by: s'moron at September 23, 2010 03:54 PM (UaxA0)
levin's point is that we need to keep our powder dry about who we pre-judge as "presidential material".
Yeah, Levin said point blank that people need to get full information about pols positions before shouting presidential candidate based on some great youtube videos, and he is right. Remember how everyone was saying Brown for president the second he took the swimmer's seat?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 03:55 PM (3k6GF)
Levin has done more for the conservative movement than anyone here. Far as I can tell, Christie is good on basically one issue and that is scaling back pensions and government spending. Very important and needed to be sure, but we need more that just that in a NATIONAL leader. What good is cutting pensions if the border remains unsecure and Illegals swamp the system?
Stating your opinions and showing how you disagree with Chris Christie, or anyone else is not a PURGE ACT.
Christie isn't a national leader, didn't run as one, and as far as I know doesn't represent himself as one. He's a governor. Of a blue state far removed from the Mexican border. Given that he has almost no ability to help secure the border, why bother criticizing him over it?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 23, 2010 03:55 PM (plsiE)
Posted by: DCBrent at September 23, 2010 03:55 PM (ur9wY)
Doesn't look like his wife is into healthy cooking though. That is cool, cause I don't care what peeps tell me to eat, my body you ass wipes. So what I like to order 2 big macs, large fry, apple pie and a large diet coke.
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 03:55 PM (Qa624)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 03:56 PM (VW9/y)
I've heard Christie, he was on Cavuto's show a few months again and said he is not in favor of an energy tax via the cap n tax bill
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 03:56 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: arhooley at September 23, 2010 03:56 PM (JdlP3)
Posted by: jjshaka at September 23, 2010 03:56 PM (0OzvK)
We may be wrong, but I know the way it's been is wrong.
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 03:56 PM (UuQmI)
Posted by: Sean Vannity at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (UpdGw)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (Qa624)
Of course not, because Mark Levin sells more books and has more listeners when people are ANGRY and AFRAID. Same for Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin and Jim DeMint (who are building up their PAC money and followers for a presidential run), Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh. Y'all been rolled.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (mHQ7T)
Screw it, Big Bang Theory is on.
Posted by: Lincolntf at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (EHI/u)
Posted by: alexthedude at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (rkCMG)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (KUUXH)
Beck is really getting annoying with his self-adulation.
Why, that is so mean, I think *sob* I'm just going to *sniff!* cry!
Posted by: Glenn Beck at September 23, 2010 03:57 PM (tJjm/)
63. All of them perform a valuable service, and they help carve out their own niche. But infighting among conservative voices serves absolutely no good in the long run.
You said it much better than I did.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 03:58 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: fluffy at September 23, 2010 03:58 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: Dan at September 23, 2010 03:59 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 03:59 PM (KUUXH)
This actually bothers me a little bit. John Candy, Chris Farley, Victor Buono, etc.
Posted by: arhooley at September 23, 2010 04:00 PM (JdlP3)
And anyone who allows himself to be called "the great one" is too arrogant by a large margin.
What a fucking jerk.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 23, 2010 04:00 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at September 23, 2010 04:00 PM (eNxMU)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:00 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (Jx0x6)
Christie has a job where he actually has to produce, Levin just talks.
Cough, Landmark Legal Foundation.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (8fK1n)
But they want to come to your house, act like an asshole, drink your booze and fuck your wife.
That's every Thursday, right?
Posted by: Mr T Partay at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (rMMMP)
Posted by: swamp_yankee at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (e1+91)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (dPcmp)
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 07:55 PM (Fe3ZO)
O'Donnell will lose. Paladino will lose. Miller and Angle might even lose. And you'll be stuck with a Democratic majority and a second term for Obama. Anger doesn't solve shit. The tea party is playing checkers while Democrats are playing chess. You've snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (mHQ7T)
"Christie is good on basically one issue and that is scaling back pensions and government spending"
That is basically the main issue, the economy and limited govt as adhered to in the constitution, the tea party is not about social issues, there is a reason there are many indies and even dems who support the Tea Party for those reasons alone.
normally Levin is good to listen to for consitutional tutorials, but when he goes off on his rants, its very hard to listen to that.
I like christie, he actually has a job to do straightning NJ, Levin is a radio talk show host, he can rant all he wants, but Christie actually has to do a job of turning a state around, which is much harder than just talking about it.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:01 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at September 23, 2010 04:02 PM (yQWNf)
This is why we lose. The Dems unify under one banner and devote themselves to the singular goal of destroying the opposition.
We constantly destroy ourselves from the inside because we always find the need to play the "Who's a more pure conservative game"...
We get caught up the game, especially the politicians, and slowly, any gains we make, like 1994....slowly whittle away.
Pisses me off.
Posted by: pooter at September 23, 2010 04:02 PM (OX6Bc)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:02 PM (KUUXH)
Call me a Rino, but I prefer the Medved, Bennett, Prager, and yeah even boring ole Hugh "The Mittens Lover" Hewitt's style over the Savage/ Levin scream fest.
The latter can be damn entertaining though, and even insightful, especially when they take a valium.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:02 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 07:59 PM (KUUXH)
Well, if it's attached to Kate Perry, quite a few more wouldn't hurt, ace.
Posted by: Glenn Beck at September 23, 2010 04:02 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Chris R at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (AO4qz)
I also hate what I'm hearing about his being weak on immigration. 2A and immigration enforcement are my #1 and #2 issues. It sucks because his persona and commitment to fiscal conservatism are just magnificent.
Put it this way: as long as he doesn't want to be Pres, I'm a fan. Dude could make a great Cabinet member for a future GOP Pres and is an awesome enforcer /poster guy for budget balancing.
PS: Let me also stress that my reservations about Christie sure aren't a result of M. Levin saying about him, con or pro.
Posted by: smoov at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (DEK54)
Posted by: Soona at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (rrktf)
What purity committee?
Ace, what's your act? You make these posts as bait and you know it. You're looking for an argument.
And stop fucking lying and exaggerating like you're talking to some fucking asshole. I'm fucking sick of it.
okay, now here's the part where you insult me and tell me to go away. You pick these fights and then you act like a fucking cunt. So go ahead. But I'm leaving so I won't have to read your bullshit BECAUSE I'VE READ IT A HUNDRED TIMES BEFORE.
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (zgaoG)
Call me a Rino, but I prefer the Medved, Bennett, Prager, and yeah even boring ole Hugh "The Mittens Lover" Hewitt's style over the Savage/ Levin scream fest.
Prager is great. One of my faves.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Dan at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: Dr Spank at September 23, 2010 07:40 PM (xtAfO)
Didn't most conservatives say the mosque builders technically had the right to build on their own property?
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (mHQ7T)
We really need some better conservative talkers.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at September 23, 2010 07:46 PM (plsiE)
Well, I like Dennis Prager a lot.
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 23, 2010 04:03 PM (JYxmy)
+ 1 million.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 04:04 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Rajiv Vindaloo at September 23, 2010 07:44 PM (BZ2Bm)
Mmmmm, I think he last almost 13 weeks, but it was a Saturday afternoon show, low rated and that was...ppfffttt, years ago! I could look it up but Big Bang Theory is on.
Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2010 04:04 PM (jYQ2v)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:01 PM (mHQ7T)
You make a great case, some of it I endorse wholeheartedly, but you really want to include Miller in that? To me he is a perfect TP candidate.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:05 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:02 PM (KUUXH)
I guess if he runs on a Huckabee/Christie ticket, the GOP can rightfully say they nominated a couple of real heavyweights.
Posted by: Glenn Beck at September 23, 2010 04:05 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at September 23, 2010 07:45 PM (QBQcg)
Shouldn't that be "Old grizzled gym coach with Alzheimers?"
You are woefully ignorant of the facts. Perhaps you should stick to peering at the little boys in the locker room and jerking off.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 23, 2010 04:05 PM (LH6ir)
Sure purge Cristie as being too liberal for New Jersey?
Then you might as well Purge Brown too.
You can also purge me B/C I am way more libertarian than I am conservative, and we's knows how the big Mark hates libertarians.
While we are at it we can purge all who support gay marriage,
All who are pro choice.
All atheists.
All fiscally liberal social cons.
All socially liberal fiscal cons.
All Neo-cons...
And on and on and on.
We can be. The party of ONE!
That one: Mark Levine.
Politics is a rough sport. Purity = Minority. There is always geographic disparity, You shift public opinion to the right and left gradually. And you won't shift anything unless you can put some soft conservatives in some liberal areas and let the people see how cool the real world results of conservatism is.
Levine should have learned you can't shock shift people. They reject it, and you, al-la Obama and Pelosi regime.
Levine has become the Allah Pundit antithesis, one unable to think even in the smallest practical manner and admit not all things are possible and compromises have to be made, the other not understanding that you can't compromise all the time and accomplish anything.
Christie is a good campaigner for Meg, why? Because California is buggered the same way NJ is/was. And Cristie could run for governor in the state right now and win.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 23, 2010 04:05 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Mr T Partay at September 23, 2010 08:01 PM (rMMMP)
Who the fuck do I look like... John Boehner?
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Timbo at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (ph9vn)
Prager is great. One of my faves.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2010 08:03 PM (zgZzy
You are lucky you get him in Philly. I haven't found a Salem guy yet.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (A0VTZ)
You're kidding. Levin has actually persuaded people to change? I thought he was someone that only an already-convinced person could even listen to.
Posted by: arhooley at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (JdlP3)
You are a fucking dink, you know that? You put up this stupid post for bait and then you insult us for making comments you don't agree with.
Have fun with your ass kissers, Charles Johnson Jr.
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (Fe3ZO)
Levin is a tough listen...
Posted by: phreshone at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (1AnxB)
How dare you link the awesomeness that is Christie with Fuckabee?
Christie is the Big Man on Campus; Fuckabee is just a fat fool.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 04:06 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:07 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: exceller at September 23, 2010 04:07 PM (Z7Znk)
If you be conservatism, I be against.
Posted by: Horatius at September 23, 2010 04:07 PM (9q+pu)
Posted by: curious at September 23, 2010 04:07 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Weight Watchers at September 23, 2010 04:07 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:08 PM (KUUXH)
Yea then add Christine O'Donnell to the mix. Chris Christ Christine Charlie.... shit damn what the hell we need some Gilligans and Skippers
Oh you guys see page 1732 of Obamacare makes it mandatory for every kid to have the middle name Barry. Plus I found out today that Iwearadinnerjacket's middle name is Barry.
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:08 PM (Qa624)
I've read your posts for quite a long time, and you are either depressed or in a fucked up mood today. Your playing concern troll tonight. All of those names you mentioned will probably win with the possible exception of O'donnell and Palladino. Have a drink and calm down.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:09 PM (Jx0x6)
Jim DeMint and his 30 virgins is as big a phony as these radical imams telling people to blow themselves up for the cause, and he looks like Gargamel.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 04:09 PM (mHQ7T)
He might not be my #1 pick for nominee depending on who runs, but he would be a Godsend if he wins. He could at least back us away from the fiscal cliff, and give us more time to work on the social issues.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 23, 2010 04:09 PM (0q2P7)
They aren't saying the same thing day after day for you...
they are saying it for the dem base who can't resist listening and need four emails a day from the campaign to know what is expected of them
Posted by: curious at September 23, 2010 04:09 PM (p302b)
Actually, the special sauce on the Big Mac is bull semen.
That's been my little joke all these years.
Posted by: Ray Krock at September 23, 2010 04:09 PM (tJjm/)
We got it. You're fucking awesome. You're two quarter pound patties of 100% awesome with awesome sauce.
I'm sorry, but that line was full of win!
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (zgZzy)
133. midol room alert!
Plus its a full moon. I'd say everyone enjoy an adult beverage, but that could start more fights. probably better to spark up a fatty and pass around UNOPENED pudding cups when we all get the munchies.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (Qa624)
What does it matter if we win in 2012, if the Democrats are allowed to permanently alter the demographics of the country and guarantee themselves a permanent majority?
Posted by: Tino at September 23, 2010 07:34 PM (CbmBR)
QFT!
Posted by: RKS at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (4tRTF)
"he's gotten a lot of the "independents" off their collective asses and have gotten them fired up and involved in conservative politics. "
As an independent, it was not Levin who did that, it was Palin, and it was only b/c I believe she is more libertarian than conservative. Yes, she is a fiscal, defense..etc conservative, but as a liberatarian and a social liberal myself, I can support that. If she starts becoming preachy like Huckabee, harder to support that.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: fluffy at September 23, 2010 04:10 PM (SwkdU)
It's not enough to purge the party of RINOs, making it damn hard to have a majority, we also need to purge the party of the social cons and fiscal cons.
That's going to leave us with what, exactly? Ten senators?
I'm starting to think that the True Conservatives are old KGB sleeper agents.
Better to elect a marxist than a republican who is a squish on social issues and conservative on fiscal ones!
Posted by: Justin at September 23, 2010 04:11 PM (6ls2L)
Don't be too sure. Plenty of other people have warned not to take your eye off the winnable fights to obsess on the longshots. We might even lose the races we thought were in the bag.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 04:11 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:09 PM (mHQ7T)
Oh please. I'm no purist but you are goin off the rails a bit.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:12 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:12 PM (HYkZm)
I like Christie because so far he is doing what he said he was going to do. His views on guns and immigration which I disagree with were well known before his election. He won.
If he ever decides to run for president I worry about what i don't like about him then.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2010 04:12 PM (fwSHf)
And I live in NJ and will put my conservative bona fides up against anyone's, except for those asshole purity fucks, who are, of course, the most magnificent conservatives on the planet, and will perpetually be in the wilderness because they are so fucking clueless as to the real world.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 23, 2010 04:13 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:13 PM (Jx0x6)
RINO's suck. Can't say it often enuff. RINO's suck.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:13 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Soona at September 23, 2010 04:13 PM (rrktf)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:14 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 08:12 PM (c0A3e)
I'll spread some newspaper...
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:14 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: CDR M at September 23, 2010 08:12 PM (5I8G0)
I always knew you were a RINO. I wish I was in your FFL so I could beat a RINO, then call Mark Levin and brag about how I beat a RINO.
RINO.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (A0VTZ)
didn't lazio run against Hillary? Do they people have nothing better to do that just run for office all the time?
if they are that addicted to power, just go on a secluded island, and declare yourself king of that island!
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 08:14 PM (HYkZm)
Did I mention RINO's suck?
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: kansas at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (1Vt0o)
Put down the paint filled paper bag and get some fresh air.
Posted by: RKS at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (4tRTF)
Posted by: late to the game at September 23, 2010 04:15 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 23, 2010 04:16 PM (N74P0)
For many of us, it is draining.
Maybe the morons need a short fap break, to restock your vital juices.
/ducks and runnnnnsssssss
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 04:16 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: CAC at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (Gr1V1)
Testify, Brother Dildo!
Posted by: the Maine girls at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (rMMMP)
Posted by: Jeff at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (+5uxG)
Levin seems power-drunk - which makes him a serious power light-weight, the kind of guy who throws up on his shoes after like two cans of 3.5% power.
He has the weird idea that we all need some sort of ideological enforcer on the scene and that he's just the guy for the job. His attack in the PowerLine guys revealed him to be both arrogant and stupid. Besides, who the hell is he anyway, the pied piper of the low IQ end of the movement? Let's see, Chris Christie or Mark Levin? Hmmmmm. Are you f----g kidding me?
Posted by: Rob in Deep Blue Country at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (GPo29)
Posted by: Sugar Ray Bradbury at September 23, 2010 08:16 PM (gzjhZ)
I'm so totally THERE!
Posted by: Barney Frank at September 23, 2010 04:17 PM (tJjm/)
In a national primary I may not vote for him. I know many of the check marks against him. I also know that he is doing more for New Jersey than I would have expected him, or any elected politician,, to be able to do in that state. I'm curious as to where many of the commenters are from. I've lived in Democratic Illinois. I've lived in deep red Alabama. Now I live in a Democratic slice of Missouri. I usually don't have an (R) to vote for in my house district and this time I have a Paultard I will vote for as a token protest vote. Do people understand how jazzed NJ republicans must be to have Chris Christie in office right now? Do they really need to have to listen to Mark Levin bitch and moan about how he isn't good enough for him?
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (HYkZm)
See: Libertarians.
Posted by: Sugar Ray Bradbury at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (gzjhZ)
Well, I like Dennis Prager a lot.
Prager makes more sense on his worst day than Rash Fatblob, Sean Hannity and Kermit-the-Rage-Boy-Frog Levin do, combined, on their best day.
In fact, the Terrible Trio spend too much time in a kind of three-way circle jerk: Fatblob just loooooves Levin (sometimes even devotes some time he could spend praising himself to pimp ol' "F. Lee Levin"), Levin can't bow deeply enough to Fatblob and seems to have a man-crush on Hannity, and Hannity sucks both their toes. Simultaneously.
I will give Levin one prop: he doesn't have washed-up hacks like Newt on his show every day.
But his absolutism and just plain unpleasant demeanor make him unlistenable for me.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: wtfci at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (R4rMI)
I would be willing to suffer some form of immigration reform if a President Chrisite could give us a budget surplus.
that is a sacrifice i would be willing to make.
I honestly believe that if we don't get spending under control, nothing else really matters.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (DKV43)
Timing is everything, so why pick on Christie now? Sure, he's a YouTube sensation, but he's denied wanting to run for higher office so ripping on him just doesn't make any sense at this point. Levin got majorly irritated when people criticize O'Donnell. Perhaps he should live by the rules he sets for others.
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (WGjBM)
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 23, 2010 04:18 PM (N74P0)
Well, I like Dennis Prager a lot.
i do too. i see a lot of people don't like him and i don't know why. i am not 100 percent sure of all of his positions, but when i see him on tv, he is always calm, uses facts, and common sense.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2010 04:19 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:19 PM (Jx0x6)
I think if he is for global warming, it's only to keep his wife happy. Gotta keep that putang happy.
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:19 PM (Qa624)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:11 PM (mHQ7T)
If you are this depressed in the middle of a Republican Avalanche, you must be a barrel of laughs in normal elections. Why not wait and see what happens, its not like your worrying is going to help anything.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 23, 2010 04:20 PM (z1N6a)
Ace...boobies...bacon???
I'm to the right of you on some stuff, but dude, I can't tell you how much I appreciate your blog, your writing talents, your snark, your ability to formulate a modern-day, street-worthy, argument and make it teh funneh.
Thanks for doing what you do...I'll be hitting the tip jar tonight.
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 04:20 PM (UuQmI)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:20 PM (HYkZm)
Ace we are weeks away, i know you must be frikken exhausted dealing with this 24/7. everyone will calm down.- hang in there, we all have opinions even if they aren't always accurate.
It's a Verrrrry exciting time after the damn'd hell of last 2 1/2 years.but's is also mind fkn
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:20 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 04:20 PM (VW9/y)
Excellent point CAC. Imagine how much we would have loved "Arnold The Terminator" to have Christie's attitude.
CC is the real deal while AS is an acting fugazi.
I'll worry about Christie's immigration when he runs for pres or senate. Until then I'll be perfectly content to let him serve as an example of guts, balls, and resolve to other governors nationwide.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:21 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: fozzy at September 23, 2010 04:21 PM (lPLCj)
We might win races we thought were un-winnable. Ain't prophesying FUN and EASY? You can just MSU all day long and say "This or that MIGHT!" and be RIGHT!
FTR, I do believe that the nation is in a bet big or don't bother state. If we had the Congress of 2004 come in next year, they would not have the fortitude to do the necessary things to save us from economic ruin. And that collapse would lead to....Well let's just say the odds of having a free nation and a Constitution that protects rights on the other side are appalling.
Victory at the polls is useless if that doesn't translate into serious victory in the legislature. And your 11 dimensional chess strategy would likely be on about move 3 when the whole thing collapses rendering the entire game moot.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at September 23, 2010 04:21 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:21 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: fluffy at the ready at September 23, 2010 04:21 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: wtfci at September 23, 2010 04:22 PM (R4rMI)
Posted by: The Pricker! at September 23, 2010 08:18 PM (N74P0)
We need better writers. Those founders could rip your gizzard out with a phrase. "Purity Guys suck" versus "Rinos suck" lacks the funny.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 23, 2010 04:22 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:23 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: fluffy at the ready at September 23, 2010 08:21 PM (SwkdU)
I think we are on the cusp of discussing Kirsten Gillibrand's sweater puppies.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:23 PM (tJjm/)
For many of us, it is draining.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:14 PM (KUUXH)
I hear ya Ace. Eyes on the prize until November 2nd. We can have our internal arguments when we are in the majority holding hearings and investigations into the criminal Obama admin. We need to stop the Dems!! All else can be secondary for now!
Posted by: Hedgehog at September 23, 2010 04:23 PM (oQIfB)
i do too. i see a lot of people don't like him and i don't know why. i am not 100 percent sure of all of his positions, but when i see him on tv, he is always calm, uses facts, and common sense.
Posted by: Ben at September 23, 2010 08:19 PM (DKV43)
Big time. Prager rules. He's great in town halls as well. Well read, well spoken, good debater. Smart as hell, doesn't yell or treat his listeners like idiots.
Possibly the best talker in the country.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:23 PM (A0VTZ)
is Lazio really running again? he will cost Paladino the governorship. I have solid dem relatives who will vote for Paladino, cannot stand Lazio.
So Lazio thinks he is that important to cost a repub governorship? The man has been running for office, any NY office, for over a decade now.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:23 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 08:20 PM (HYkZm)
THE HELL WE ARE! TAKE THAT BACK!!!!
Posted by: Oldcat at September 23, 2010 04:24 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Ex-pat in Oz at September 23, 2010 04:25 PM (ezeiO)
Posted by: fozzy at September 23, 2010 08:21 PM (lPLCj)
Ronald Reagan said that was one of his biggest mistakes as President.
Posted by: Steph at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (ZfkPl)
Posted by: Carl Rove at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (mzwMH)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (KUUXH)
We're gonna win big in November. Will we win every race? Probably not, but we'll win enough to take the House and make a serious dent in the Seante. Rejoice, kids.
And again, as Grand Moff Tarkin said, "This bickering is pointless."
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Ex-pat in Oz at September 23, 2010 08:25 PM (ezeiO)
Well, let me say this with all specificity. You are a great American.
Posted by: Sean Hannity at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (Jx0x6)
is Lazio really running again? he will cost Paladino the governorship. I have solid dem relatives who will vote for Paladino, cannot stand Lazio.
So Lazio thinks he is that important to cost a repub governorship? The man has been running for office, any NY office, for over a decade now.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 08:23 PM (ACkhT)
I heard him interviewed today on WABC and he was coy... didn't say he would refuse the Conservative line, and said he wanted to hear Palladino's "full program" before he would decide what he wants to do.
Maybe the host had the best take - Lazio is waiting for Palladino to disclose he loves to watch animal porn while bouncing his baby niece on his knees or something.
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (tJjm/)
I don't agree with everything he says, but then again I don't even agree with my own wife all the time either.
Oh, and Tattoo who shat in your drawer this morning?
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (BP6Z1)
you know who i like Levin, also Christie, also McDonell. who else Sowell who else scott brown, also Sowel, and mm mm west,
what do they have in common?They listen to the people they represent.
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:26 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: sTevo at September 23, 2010 04:28 PM (vXI8N)
Posted by: sTevo at September 23, 2010 04:28 PM (vXI8N)
Posted by: Mel Gibson at September 23, 2010 04:29 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 23, 2010 04:29 PM (JWR6b)
Posted by: nerdygirl at September 23, 2010 04:29 PM (0e/NZ)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:29 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:29 PM (Qa624)
Posted by: Ex-pat in Oz at September 23, 2010 08:25 PM (ezeiO)
--Ditto
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: taylork at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (COyJz)
It's really grating on those of us who don't particularly enjoy these constant internecine battles.
Some people seem to have a real taste for them, and in fact seem to like nothing better.
For many of us, it is draining.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:14 PM
Not sure if it's internecine battle, love that phrase by the way. I think it's simply people who think they know the only way. That they are the arbiters of what is, in this case, Conservatism. This applies to most pundits and talk show hosts too, not just people who post on sites like this. What's ironic is they are more than willing to alter their purity tests to fit the current star or issue that they decide to favor at that moment. As for Levin, anyone who like to be called the Great One is well...an egotistical jerk.
Posted by: Deanna at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (oXALa)
Posted by: Michael Cabbage at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: CAC at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (Gr1V1)
Ace dear, you are really a good egg. take the weekend off, watch movies or get out hang with mellow friends. Everyone needs time to regroup energy. Your business is particulalrly stressful.
as someone said above herding cats all breeds.
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:30 PM (8fK1n)
All of them can say whatever the hell they want without having to face commercial disaster when they cross a line. They never worry about what upper management or stockholders think. Or, for that matter, voters.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 04:31 PM (Ulu3i)
Ronald Reagan said that was one of his biggest mistakes as President.
Posted by: Steph at September 23, 2010 08:26 PM (ZfkPl)
I know. The point is that there is no such thing as a perfect politician. Chris Christie is kicking the shit out of the public employee unions in NJ and he still gets bitches like Levin who is supposed to be on our side complaining that he isn't perfect on this or that issue.
Posted by: fozzy at September 23, 2010 04:31 PM (lPLCj)
Posted by: Ex-pat in Oz at September 23, 2010 08:25 PM (ezeiO)
What a puritanical RINO. Pathetic.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:31 PM (A0VTZ)
And stop fucking lying and exaggerating like you're talking to some fucking asshole. I'm fucking sick of it.
okay, now here's the part where you insult me and tell me to go away. You pick these fights and then you act like a fucking cunt. So go ahead. But I'm leaving so I won't have to read your bullshit BECAUSE I'VE READ IT A HUNDRED TIMES BEFORE.
Posted by: the chief AoS inquisitor at September 23, 2010 08:03 PM (zgaoG)
Ace is the asshole insulting people and picking fights. Uhhu, yep. Definitely.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 04:31 PM (oVQFe)
The odds of it are about 1 in 10 right now.
That increases dramatically if we stop this puritanical AHA bullshit. We have an incredible bench coast to cast right now. The fact that some would rather nitpick the nipple ring color on the six-DDbreasted goddess of opportunity that bounces in front of us is just pathetic.
Posted by: CAC at September 23, 2010 08:30 PM (Gr1V1)
+100.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:31 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Michael Cabbage at September 23, 2010 08:30 PM (7+pP9)
How do you feel about the wallbanger?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:32 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: Michael Cabbage at September 23, 2010 04:32 PM (7+pP9)
You aren't really comparing launching a bunch of lawsuits
I am saying you way over generalized that Levin does not work. And before you start calling me names too, I am not making any kind of purity rant. I stated up thread 1. I'm tired of Levin flipping out and 2. that we should not be going apeshit over ANYONE at this point based on their doing one good thing. Christie is doing what he said he would getting NJ's fiscal house in order. Its great because Christie is showing the world won't end when entitlements do, and its highly entertaining watching him tell the libtards off. Levin also serves a purpose in educating about the constitution and urging people to get involved.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at September 23, 2010 04:32 PM (3k6GF)
Posted by: Bulldada at September 23, 2010 04:32 PM (mzwMH)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 08:29 PM (Qa624)
Not very promising, I'm afraid:http://tinyurl.com/33lhrnx
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (VW9/y)
looks like Mike Castle might be doing the write in thing after all. This should help O'Donnell or if Castle wins, then at least Pet Marxist Coons will be kept out.
just saw a story that he is looking at the viability of a write in campaign.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (ACkhT)
I feel like I'm on the "purge" list myself
Lots of young women binge and purge. They are called models. Just remember, it's hard on the teeth.
Posted by: Twiggy Ramirez at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (rMMMP)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (JWR6b)
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 08:31 PM (Ulu3i)
--Um, that and that the liberal foundations get a shitload of GOVERNMENT money.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:33 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at September 23, 2010 04:34 PM (UYJNK)
Mark Levin never unleashed an anti-Semitic tirade, I'll guarantee you that!
Posted by: Mel Gibson at September 23, 2010 04:34 PM (zgZzy)
So, Mark Levin, I love ya, but pick your battles.
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 23, 2010 04:34 PM (A0BM0)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 23, 2010 04:35 PM (oCXnK)
http://tinyurl.com/33lhrnx
Posted by: CoolCzech at September 23, 2010 08:33 PM (tJjm/)
--At least they're real.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:35 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Michael Cabbage at September 23, 2010 08:32 PM (7+pP9)
I like Savage, but he is like that kid in school who constantly whines that he is not getting the credit he deserves. 75% might have the right answer to a question in physics, but since he was the first one called upon and answered it correctly, he wants us to kiss his ass.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:36 PM (Jx0x6)
If Christie ever decides to go bigger than Joisey, we'll all get a chance to judge his positions. He might even moderate or change some (immigration and Crap & Tax, for example) if he has to work for 300 million people instead of however many live in NJ.
In the meantime, he is doing what those yammering motorscooters in Congress can only talk about. He is putting fiscal conservatism into action, and getting out in front to make sure people understand exactly where he stands. No 21-page babble-festo there; he's working.
I think it's a mistake to diss the dude for being who he is and doing what he's doing.
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 04:36 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:36 PM (Qa624)
So, Mark Levin, I love ya, but pick your battles.
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 23, 2010 08:34 PM (A0BM0)
--Ditto to that, too.
(I wonder how much of this is showmanship on Levin's part.)
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:36 PM (BP6Z1)
Mark Levin never unleashed an anti-Semitic tirade, I'll guarantee you that!
Posted by: Mel Gibson at September 23, 2010 08:34 PM (zgZzy)
But I thought Levin was a ni... a ni... a hebrew!
Posted by: Crazy Old Western Coot at September 23, 2010 04:37 PM (tJjm/)
seriously ace you use the words of a Mitt supporter to say Palin can't campaign in MA?
Did you forget the 20,000 that showed up in boston for her and the TPE?
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 04:37 PM (aVGmX)
(I wonder how much of this is showmanship on Levin's part.)
GET OFF THE BLOG, YOU BIG DOPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: The "Grate" One at September 23, 2010 04:38 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 23, 2010 08:34 PM (A0BM0)
I think this in a nut shell. We are a few weeks before an election and he is talking about a guy who isn't running for anything. Not only that, Christie isn't out there talking up immigration or the mosque etc either.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:38 PM (A0VTZ)
Levin, the golfer and the wallbanger are all the same - lazy pallid pukes who don't know how to feed themselves properly.
Posted by: Michael Cabbage at September 23, 2010 04:38 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: blindgoose at September 23, 2010 04:38 PM (Qa624)
LOL, looks like Sptizer is going after Cuomo
Said Spitzer: “The problem that Andrew has is that everybody knows that behind the scenes, he is the dirtiest, nastiest political player out there and that is his reputation from years in Washington.”
“When his father was governor, he was the tough guy. He has brass knuckles and he played hard ball. He has a lot of enemies out there. Nobody’s been willing to stand up to him. When it appeared he was going to win, it was inevitable. If it appears not to be inevitable, things may change.”
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at September 23, 2010 04:39 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: taylork at September 23, 2010 04:39 PM (COyJz)
O'Donnell will lose. Paladino will lose. Miller and Angle might even lose. And you'll be stuck with a Democratic majority and a second term for Obama. Anger doesn't solve shit. The tea party is playing checkers while Democrats are playing chess. You've snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:01 PM (mHQ7T)
Good evening, I'll be your waiter tonight. I'm taking advance orders for November 2'nd. Tell me, how would you like your Crow?
(Will that be with a side order of possum or fries? ...)
Posted by: Warthog at September 23, 2010 04:39 PM (dFJla)
I like Levin and I also think he's right about Christie (let me finish ya big dope!) up to a point.
The man is passionate about the extent to which this country is in trouble and, these are my opinions, he thinks more than this country's fate is at stake if we lose our ability to be an influence maybe not always for good but certainly against evil in the world.
I think that he believes that this country is on the brink and that it isn't a loss is a RINO goes down.
I understand the other side about how important it is to have control and I agonize about it but I also believe half measures will not stop the rapid decline of this country.
Levin, like Hannity who also gets it here alot both can be annoying but their love of this country can't be questioned. Hannity has raised more than 15 million for dead soldiers' kids and Levin is a quiet philanthropist as well.
IMO - I gotta make up a whole lotta ground before I can bash them too much.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2010 04:39 PM (r1h5M)
In fact, I am what most would call, a fundamentalist Christian. My pastor and I have this very discussion a lot with regard to Christ-followers and how "pure" God expects us to be. It's the "we all make mistakes, even Christians, nobody is perfect" vs. "no sin shall enter in, go and sin no more" debate.
It does make for passionate flame-throwing...and it does make the brain hurt after a while. Hopefully, at the end of the counting on Nov. 2nd, we'll all saulve our wounds in some cooling, soothing pudding.
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 04:39 PM (UuQmI)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 04:40 PM (T0NGe)
Conservative leaders speak
http://tinyurl.com/28jny7
Posted by: EZB at September 23, 2010 04:40 PM (fa9yq)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:40 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:40 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:41 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: LGF+ACE=ATTACK CONSERVATIVES at September 23, 2010 04:41 PM (mzwMH)
Posted by: fozzy at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (lPLCj)
Posted by: fluffy will be here all night at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: lowercaseM at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (At9pg)
Right now, Christie is The Man for NJ because NJ's economic situation is dire. We all know this and can profit from his leadership; but let's not ignore some establishment positions which are either a) debatable or b) unacceptable.
Both men are great, but Levin has the superior Constitutional position which he can afford since he doesn't actually have to tame the electorate with actionable policy; however, we should aim for the ideal and as of now, Christie isn't ideal though he's damn good for the situation he's in. He's great for NJ, not so great (yet) for the USA.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 08:40 PM (8fK1n)
I am what I fondle.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (Jx0x6)
(I wonder how much of this is showmanship on Levin's part.)
For years and years there was an earlier radio host in New York City that always yelled at his audience and hung up on them after calling them stupid - I forget the name, but I think Levin is basically ripping off his schtick.
Posted by: Crazy Old Western Coot at September 23, 2010 04:42 PM (tJjm/)
Yeah, what the hell? Newsbusters is probably the most important resources on the web.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 04:43 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 08:40 PM (T0NGe)
Never trust a KC Chiefs QB. Oh, wait that's Matt. Mike Castle, the guy who looks like he has sour coffee breath is who you are talking about.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:43 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: USMC at September 23, 2010 04:45 PM (Cblyc)
For years and years there was an earlier radio host in New York City that always yelled at his audience and hung up on them after calling them stupid - I forget the name, but I think Levin is basically ripping off his schtick.
Posted by: Crazy Old Western Coot at September 23, 2010 08:42 PM
Morton Downey Jr.?
Posted by: Truck Monkey at September 23, 2010 04:45 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:46 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:46 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 23, 2010 04:46 PM (9Cooa)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:47 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:48 PM (KUUXH)
Well, he hasn't posted photos of his bicycle's pedals yet.
When that happens, then I'll start to worry.
Posted by: Gran at September 23, 2010 04:48 PM (kmmbv)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at September 23, 2010 04:48 PM (oCXnK)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:46 PM (KUUXH
Google? A sure sign of a RINO. True conservatives bing it like right wing Bill Gates does.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (A0VTZ)
I just have a thin skin about negativity. I feel like I'm on the "purge" list myself (as do a lot of people I know) and this constant urge to purge is kind of making us feel unwelcome.
It's not a very good political strategy, really.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:26 PM (KUUXH)
I think part of this has come about from blowback. We spent most of the 2008 primary season hearing dipshits saying we have to pick McCain because he'll be electable in the general election. He's more moderate not a hardcore conservative that will get trounced. And then he loses. And after that you still have those people saying that the GOP needs to move to the left to remain viable and win. So they were advocating a purge of people on the right. Well those people have now fought back and basically proven that they aren't they dying breed that Parker Noonan and Frum had claimed they were. But they're essentially falling into the same pattern, Purge those that are more moderate. Its two forms of a purity fight. And you can see it happening right here with people never finding anyone conservative enough or people like Tattoo De Plane essentially saying that anyone to the right of Lindsey Graham is going to lose this election.
Meanwhile everyone in between the two who want to find the common ground to actually hit the brakes on the clusterfuck that is the federal government and work towards possibly rolling it back, are getting really fucking sick of both sorts of these cocksuckers and ready to just say Fuck all y'all.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (HYkZm)
Oh, Hell No!
I would (and have) listened to loooong stretches of Bill O'Reilly, Micheal Medved, Laura Ingrahm and fucking NPR during the turfed out dessert on the AM waves dedicated to Hannity and the "great Americans" that listen to him.
I actually like Mark Levin and wish he were on in the afternoons again, in this market.
Sometimes he does make my ears bleed but I think it a better trade than losing IQ points.
I dunno, pick your poison, I guess.
Posted by: Deety at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (NurK6)
Too much of that is the political equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot. Levin needs to focus on the real danger. To me, the worst piece of legislation in my life was passed 6 months ago and we have out talk show hosts taking their eye off the ball and going after Chris F. Christie.
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 04:49 PM (UvR6d)
Can't comment on the second-tier guys because I've never heard 'em (although I always enjoy Prager's columns).
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:50 PM (BP6Z1)
looks like Mike Castle might be doing the write in thing after all. This should help O'Donnell or if Castle wins, then at least Pet Marxist Coons will be kept out.
I agree. This is the best O'Donnell could hope for. It will be way too hard for her to overcome her deficit.
Castle will believe the self-serving propaganda that he's trying to "save" the seat from the unworthy.
I think in DE he would ordinarily win such a 3-way race, but write-ins are notoriously hard.
You know, for all those people who say that Congressmen go to those fat salaried lobbyist jobs, they must not be all that great because Castle is fighting tooth and nail for a 4-year Senate seat.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 04:50 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: fluffy, black sheep at September 23, 2010 04:51 PM (SwkdU)
Well, he hasn't posted photos of his bicycle's pedals yet.
Fat drunk and sodomized by bicycle seat poles is no way to go through life son.
Posted by: Dean Wormer at September 23, 2010 04:51 PM (Jx0x6)
Good Christ I knew staying away from this thread would probably be a good idea.
Nine mins until The Office.
Wondering if it will suck as bad as the last two seaons.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 23, 2010 04:51 PM (HtbaE)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:52 PM (HYkZm)
That's about right. I'm so far right Genghis Khan defriended me on Facebook, as are many of us. We have to realize that we're about 5 standard deviations out and act accordingly.
At the same time, that McCain thing did really fucking sting.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 23, 2010 04:52 PM (5Xf3c)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:52 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: LGF+ACE=ATTACK CONSERVATIVES at September 23, 2010 08:41 PM (mzwMH)
Yeah Ace, God damn your attacking conservatives. Every day I see you making a post just slamming Rubio. And not to mention your attacks on Toomey in PA. Your constant take downs of Miller in Alaska are really insulting. Bashing Sharon Angle in Nevada saying you'd rather have Reid remain its senator. Every single day its another shot at conservatives. Its just getting so tiring hearing you praise Murkowski, Sestak and Crist.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 04:53 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 08:43 PM
That had an invisible sarc tag on it, right?
Newsbusters is 99% in-depth exposition of the obvious and 1% actual "newsbusting."
It's kind of like reading a Doctor Zero post on Tepid Air. You can agree a point has been made, but wonder why the hell they have to run it into the ground. Deep, deep into the ground. In many cases, you also have to wonder why the point they are making (and making, and making, and making) wasn't important to them long before, when it really was news in the real world.
I suspect whatever popularity Newsbusters has comes from people who instinctively agree that the media is Teh Evil and think it's wonderful that they're having the point made for them over and over, over and over....
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 04:53 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: fluffy, black sheep at September 23, 2010 08:51 PM (SwkdU)
Hmm..a libtardtarian?
Can't comment on the second-tier guys because I've never heard 'em (although I always enjoy Prager's columns).
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 08:50 PM (BP6Z1)
Who is Randi Rhodes in the family?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:53 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: USMC at September 23, 2010 08:45 PM (Cblyc)
--True. Read Rescuing Sprite and then try to argue what a cretin Levin is.
My mom continues to support Obama, but she's a dog lover and is glad I bought her that book for Christmas.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:53 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:54 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: John at September 23, 2010 04:54 PM (YV3eq)
Wondering if it will suck as bad as the last two seaons.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 23, 2010 08:51 PM (HtbaE)
Yes Lacey, The Office has officially jumped the shark as of last season. It's over but they did have a good run. Oh by the way, magic number is 4. IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: Dean Wormer at September 23, 2010 04:55 PM (Jx0x6)
You really ought to tell that to the female moronettes about Christie. Some posters put your creepy stalker schtick to shame.
In a good way, I suppose. Big man can take care of himself.
Posted by: Randy at September 23, 2010 04:55 PM (GtTYq)
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 04:55 PM (UuQmI)
Bottom line - People are pissed the hell off, and some people are afraid and afraid for their children, and still others are pissed the hell off that they have been made to be afraid.
That anger comes out. Sometimes rationally and sometimes not.
Look up above at some of the shit that has been said here about some of our own guys. Most of it is pure bullshit made to come out by anger and offense.
I understand it but a lot of times I don't like it, but I'm angry too and sometimes it just fucking comes out... on the wrong people.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2010 04:55 PM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Big T at September 23, 2010 04:55 PM (FfyYt)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (HYkZm)
Not hanging it around your neck, Ace. You're acting as a stand in for "the establishment" that foisted him on us, in some people's minds. That's all, unfair or not.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (5Xf3c)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (KUUXH)
Nine mins until The Office.
Wondering if it will suck as bad as the last two seaons.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at September 23, 2010 08:51 PM (HtbaE)
--I can't wait. I'm hoping that since Carrell is leaving that will make the writers more creative. Also, after this year I won't have to expect anything good.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (VW9/y)
Who is Randi Rhodes in the family?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 08:53 PM (A0VTZ)
--A decent guitar player?
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 04:56 PM (BP6Z1)
This.
Thank you, Dave S.
Posted by: Deety at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (aVzyR)
i wasn't online during Bush elections, hell did aol exist during clinton (snark)
what i do know about this specific election is we have alot of liberarians, alot of old school dems, social cons, conservative and social cons, why wouldn't this be particularly difficult?
i find this great, although difficult , we all are trying to make the best thing happen in our country this very difficult time,we All know this winning is a must!, and old time republicans how about we just try to be more patient with eachother... if that isn't too girly?
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (KUUXH)
I can't stand Hannity's repetition and total lack of comprehension of what his callers say, but he has some good guests. (not Newt or Lindsey or Bob Beckell or all those liberal dicks he brings on,) and those Freedom Concerts go to a good cause.
Glen Beck is weird and right on way too many far out things he says.
Rush is right. It can't be denied. You think he's full of himself, and you're absolutely right. You are too, and would be much more so if you had his success, insight and following. Mark Stein replace Rush? Not hardly. He is okay, and I admit I like him as well as any of the guests, but you tune in Rush to hear Rush. Just like there was only one Johnny Carson.
Do any of you remember talk radio back in the 70's? It was pure liberal shit, all day every day. Is that what you'd prefer?
All of these guys are out there giving us their own personal view of what a conservative, constitutional America should look like. Do you have to agree with everything they say? Hell no! Do I think that someone needs to say it that gets national air time? Hell yes!
Everyone has different ideas about what is imperative, and what can be compromised on. Me, personally, I don't compromise on the Second Amendment, Cap and Trade and locking down the borders.
That doesn't mean that I don't like Christy, even though we're on the opposite sides of all those fences. I think he's doing great things where he's at, but I don't want someone that is for gun control, amnesty and cap and steal me blind as my President.
Actually, that guy is already there. I won't vote for another no matter how good he is on other problems. It's all in your imperatives.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (9tt+Z)
My mom continues to support Obama, but she's a dog lover and is glad I bought her that book for Christmas.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 08:53 PM (BP6Z1)
That book changed my opinion of him for the better as well. Not that I ever hated or even disliked him or anything.
I still don't like him inexplicably attacking Christie at this point. This close to an election especially. He showed me something with that book though.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (A0VTZ)
Apparently he's going to do some polling first to see if it's worth the effort.
Posted by: Gran at September 23, 2010 04:57 PM (kmmbv)
Who is Randi Rhodes in the family?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 08:53 PM (A0VTZ)
--A decent guitar player?Decent? Would have been one of the greatest if he didn't think he could fly. I saw him play 2 weeks before he died. Him and that polka-dot flying V were fucking awesome.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 04:58 PM (Jx0x6)
YOU'RE MAKING THIS UP. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN.
John McCain was said to be more electable than who, precisely? The only person I can think of is Mike Huckabee.
More electable than Mitt Romney? Or Fred Thompson? Or Rudy Giuliani?
I am tired of this falsehood put forth to explain your position.
Who the fuck was saying this? QUOTE THEM.
This is bullshit. You are trying to hang the McCain debacle on my neck and he was never my candidate, EVER, until he fucking won and there was no other choice remaining.
But you guys keep up with this bullshit.
WHO SAID THIS? WHEN?
Who was McCain said to be more electable than? Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee? Which of those two losers was your guy?
Because he damn sure wasn't more electable than Romeny, Guiliani, or Thompson.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:52 PM (KUUXH)
Ace, that wasn't meant as an attack against anyone here really. That's why I made sure to specify during the primaries as opposed to the general election. It was about the people who were promoting McCain in the primary because he was the Republican that would get Democrats to vote for him, or whatever bullshit lie they were deluding themselves with.
For the record, even though he had dropped out by the time the primary was held in my state, my Primary vote went to Thompson.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 04:59 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 04:59 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 05:00 PM (8fK1n)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at September 23, 2010 05:00 PM (NurK6)
They make a record of the media. They host videos and highlight some of the most egregious MSM bias.
They provide SPECIFIC EXAMPLES.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 05:00 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2010 05:00 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:01 PM (HYkZm)
Who is Randi Rhodes in the family?
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 08:53 PM (A0VTZ)
--A decent guitar player?Decent? Would have been one of the greatest if he didn't think he could fly. I saw him play 2 weeks before he died. Him and that polka-dot flying V were fucking awesome.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 08:58 PM (Jx0x6)
I meant the Air American shrew. Heh.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (A0VTZ)
At the same time, that McCain thing did really fucking sting.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 23, 2010 08:52 PM (5Xf3c)
I like the mix of your pudding, sir, and would like to join the flavor of the month club.
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (UuQmI)
Posted by: Gran at September 23, 2010 08:57 PM (kmmbv)
He'll do it. The poll will probably show him at 20-25%. His ego will convince him he can make up the gap.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (T0NGe)
The thing that pisses me off about Levin is his total lack of understanding of how Christie helps the movement beyond NJ. Sure Christie has this cool factor that helps make conservatism appealing to those squishy indies.
Beyond that, as a fiscally conservative gonvernor, he is taking the fight to the very heart of the socialism/union complex. When Christie shows that a governor can take a prinicpled stand against bloated government and the unions in New Jersey, it has and will inspire other governors.
I believe the states will lead the second wave in 2011 and 2012 after the Tea Party and conservatives take back the House. That is, states will stand up to more public sector unions and insist the Federal government restrain itself. Just watch the results of the mulit-state suit against portions of Obamacare. I would not be surprised to see a constitutional convention within the next 2 years. Not from the House and Senate, but by the method that has never been used - when 2/3rds of the state houses call for the convention to propose amendments. We have something like 22 states that have joined or are considering joining the Obamacare suit. Just 12 more and all hell could break loose.
Posted by: Knaws at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (xq8rp)
It was his turn. It's the establishment's way. Bob Dole agrees.
I went Fred-Mitt-McCain, like I think a lot of people did. Ron Paul is great the same way Castro is great: like a museum. Huckabee is just a Baptist preacher with Fat-Boy Complex.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (I30wK)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:02 PM (HYkZm)
Mark Fucking Levin can bow down and suck my cock before I listen another thing from that narrow minded pultroon.
We have serious matters on the table, Mr. Levin, and the first and foremost is the death of this country because of debt. We'll deal with the rest later...you jackass.
Crap, I hate that screaming jerk. I knew a bunch of guys like him from Cheltenham and Temple...at least they went off to be slip and fall lawyers.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 23, 2010 05:03 PM (7rfUg)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at September 23, 2010 05:04 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: willow at September 23, 2010 05:05 PM (8fK1n)
Chris Christie did more for the pro-life cause this week by vetoing the abortion subsidy to PP than most pro-lifers will do in a lifetime.
That's the kind of social-liberal squish I can get behind.
Posted by: AmishDude at September 23, 2010 05:05 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: USMC at September 23, 2010 05:05 PM (Cblyc)
For the foreseeable future, we will be featuring Salty Nut.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at September 23, 2010 05:05 PM (I30wK)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:06 PM (HYkZm)
Hell! You pink pantied girly boys prolly don't even like this guy!
And stay the hell outta Georgia, boy!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at September 23, 2010 05:07 PM (r1h5M)
but seriously this 'we pushed mccain on you based on electability" is a lie your brain is telling you.
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:56 PM (KUUXH)
Nope. I think you're reading it wrong. I was trying to be clear that I wasn't calling anyone here out as being a McCain Primary supporter. Obviously should have made it abundantly clear. Really I am not accusing you of ever being one of the inverse-purity purge guys. I actually consider you to be someone that recognizes that if the moderates get their way and kick out all the hardcore conservatives or the hardcore conservatives get their way and kick out all the moderates we're going to be fucked and looking at a permanent 1/3 seat minority in both houses.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 05:07 PM (oVQFe)
Can't we all just acknowledge at some point that the 2008 pool pretty much sucked? That's how I see it at least. I'm starting to think that the longer we talk about this whole "we promoted a moderate in 2008, and look where that got us" mentality, the longer we are attacking governors in New Jersey that are doing pretty good things. Just to try to prove a point about party purity. I think that point is being pretty well proven in the primary this time around, and I hope next time around too. But maybe I'm just a squishy RINO.
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 05:08 PM (UvR6d)
This is double stupid because Christie was only helping out in one of the important close races and is a strong voice in the bluest of States. Why attack Christie now unless you want to start early tearing down '12 candidates, like the kill game we held last time when McLame was the only one left standing?
So we get a circular firing squad going over Delaware like there was triple bonus points there, and go after Christie who is the only one smart enough to go where a little effort might mean a lot. Nuts.
Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2010 05:08 PM (cd6Ip)
Posted by: The Hammer at September 23, 2010 05:08 PM (UuQmI)
Posted by: fluffy at September 23, 2010 05:08 PM (SwkdU)
I thought Fred! was really the best choice in '08. Just wish he hadn't died before really getting into the campaign.
When McCain was nominated, I felt he was better than Osama Obama, and that was enough. I didn't mind the snark aimed at him during the primaries; after all, any candidate gets that, and it's part of the process.
What frosted my ass is that after McCain became the candidate, certain people (*cough* Limbaugh, *cough* Malkin and others) felt they had to keep sniping at him, when the alternative was a dangerous communist Muzzie psychopath.
LOTE voting sucks. We all know that. I hope next time, the self-appointed "opinion leaders" learn to STFU when the choice is made, and don't keep whining about what they don't like.
P.S. Memo to Hannity: Reagan is fuckin' dead, dude, and you won't get him in '12 no matter how much you wish upon a star....
Posted by: MrScribbler at September 23, 2010 05:09 PM (Ulu3i)
Chris Christie did more for the pro-life cause this week by vetoing the abortion subsidy to PP than most pro-lifers will do in a lifetime.
But was that because of a pro life stance or because of his fiscal policy?
Posted by: jewells45 at September 23, 2010 05:09 PM (Z71Vg)
Oh good, Coulter on Hannity. I can look at Coulter and watch that dickweed Hannity interrupt everything she tries to say.
I wish I had a shock collar button on my remote for that fucker.
Posted by: robtr at September 23, 2010 05:10 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 08:46 PM (KUUXH
52% of Voters Say Their Views Are More Like PalinÂ’s Than ObamaÂ’s rasmuseen says.
And if Palin is so unpopular explain how she can pull the crowd she did in downtown boston in apr,2009 during a middaty afternnon. Mitt couldn't pull that size of crowd. And christie couldn't pull that type of crowd in boston. i guess you believe google before your lying eyes.
Seriously using a Mitt supporter to say Palin can't campaign in the NE? Whats next using an Obama supporter to claim Obamacare is popular?
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 05:10 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:10 PM (HYkZm)
Here's my two cents - These purity wars are destructive and wearisome. That is all.
/And whoever compared Ace to LGF is just plain loony.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 05:12 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: John P, Squibob at September 23, 2010 05:12 PM (lITzF)
Chris Christie did more for the pro-life cause this week by vetoing the abortion subsidy to PP than most pro-lifers will do in a lifetime.
That's the kind of social-liberal squish I can get behind.
And he did it for unimpeachable reasons. The State of New Jersey couldn't afford it and PP makes an "unexpected revenue".
So exactly who the fuck is more effective? Chris Christie or Whiny Levin?
For all the BS that Levin spews he's stopped exactly nothing about which he spews. OTOH, Govenor Chrisite gets shit done. He does so in a rational and clear cut manner. Had he done so reiterating Mark Levin he would not have had the political punch to bring three Republicans back to the fold.
A feat which Mr. Fucking "I served in Reagan's Cabinet" Levin has never done and will never do!
All that fuckwit will do is hawk books and suck Rush's and Hannitiy's junk.
What a jackass.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 23, 2010 05:13 PM (7rfUg)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:13 PM (HYkZm)
In the meantime, he is doing what those yammering motorscooters in Congress can only talk about.
Assuming Christie isn't actually as conservative as you like on all fronts, remember that can work to the conservative's advantage: he may get a listen from many voters that, wrongly or rightly, someone like Sarah Palin would not.
For better or worse, a lot of politics isn't the substance; it's how a voter reacts to a candidate. I suspect a lot of voters could handle Reagan because they were familiar with him over his long public career. Conversely, a lot of voters can't handle Palin because of her geo-personality. Christie is familiar and likable to blue staters. He can be a kind of blue state conservative missionary that many conservative politicians cannot be.
Posted by: ParisParamus at September 23, 2010 05:13 PM (A0BM0)
Here's my two cents - These purity wars are destructive and wearisome. That is all.
/And whoever compared Ace to LGF is just plain loony.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 09:12 PM (c0A3e)
I agree, and I plan to take off my pants just like Herr.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at September 23, 2010 05:13 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 05:14 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 05:14 PM (VW9/y)
Oh, but honey, I'm on the purity committee. And you're a squishy RINO traitor. No lap dance for you!
Posted by: Six DD-breasted Goddess at September 23, 2010 05:14 PM (E97ku)
This is a real question.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 05:15 PM (9tt+Z)
For better or worse, a lot of politics isn't the substance; it's how a voter reacts to a candidate.
Yeah, that worked out well for us with Obumbles didn't it?
Posted by: jewells45 at September 23, 2010 05:16 PM (Z71Vg)
Look past his nasel rants and look at the good he's done.
If you don't, then ya'll are fucking KOSSACKS having the hairy ones dipped in your cavities.
Posted by: AngryWhiteMan at September 23, 2010 05:16 PM (BvVJH)
Posted by: Wallbanger at September 23, 2010 05:17 PM (7+pP9)
Posted by: James at September 23, 2010 05:17 PM (Nljcu)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 09:14 PM (VW9/y)
You need to get educated.
George Will does it all the time. After big electoral and baseball wins.
Posted by: Delta Smelt at September 23, 2010 05:18 PM (A0VTZ)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:18 PM (HYkZm)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 05:19 PM (+bMtX)
Can't we all just acknowledge at some point that the 2008 pool pretty much sucked? That's how I see it at least. I'm starting to think that the longer we talk about this whole "we promoted a moderate in 2008, and look where that got us" mentality, the longer we are attacking governors in New Jersey that are doing pretty good things. Just to try to prove a point about party purity. I think that point is being pretty well proven in the primary this time around, and I hope next time around too. But maybe I'm just a squishy RINO.
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 09:08 PM (UvR6d)
Yeah overall it sucked. That wasn't the main thrust of my point really though at comment 307. I was using at as a frame of reference starting point for what was the call of moving more to the left by some in the GOP. And this call by these moderates and RINOs to essentially purge conservatives from the GOP has caused the backlash which is manifesting for some as a call to purge anyone deemed not sufficiently pure of conservative heart. I consider support of McCain in the primaries to be a symptom of this moderate attempt to purge. But I do not believe anyone here was in support of McCain in the primaries or part of the idea to move the GOP leftward.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 05:19 PM (oVQFe)
Kelly is also hilarious.
The rest, so-so.
Pam's boobies are spectacular as always, though.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 05:21 PM (BP6Z1)
Name them?
Exactly what stupendous event has the Legal Landmark Foundation actually achieved by itself? All they claim? They joined as what is known as a "friend of the court". Known on the schoolyard as "me too!!"
Hell, I could have sent an Amicus Brief to the court for Heller...does that make me a great defender of the Second?
You could have too.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 23, 2010 05:21 PM (7rfUg)
Snicker.
I actually joined the Republican party just so's I could campaign and vote against John McCain in the primaries, in Arizona!
My choice, at the time, was Romney.
And I'll stand by it.
Where the hell were you Monday Morning Quarterbacks, I'd like to know when I was waving my fool head off, in February, on a street corner, trying to get Republicans in AZ to fucking make a choice and not just be sheep?
No where, I'll guess.
My ass he was "the more electable" face of the Republican party!
Only people, who I personally know, that wanted John McCain to win the nomination for President are both lawyers, and live in MD.
So, take that for what it's worth.
Posted by: Deety at September 23, 2010 05:22 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: TimothyJ at September 23, 2010 05:22 PM (G5+tV)
A point here: "the rest" matters in the context of economic recovery and cannot be summarily dismissed as untimely overreach. Christie's positions now on illegal immigration policy and Obamacare, for example, are "nuanced." That's probably politically savvy in NJ but not confidence-building as a conservative matter. Those two issues, if decided moderately or liberally, would be catastrophically expensive. That undermines an economic hawk's argument for fiscal responsibility.
Some of these issues are so intertwined in economics that they simply cannot be ignored or wished away. Ignoring them or nuancing them out of the debate conceals their inevitable impact on the nation and its economy. Levin's mentioning these ancillary issues is not heresy. Christie will need to commit to the conservative POV on other issues or his assault on government waste, mismanagement, and abuse will be futile.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2010 05:22 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: John McCain at September 23, 2010 05:23 PM (yKEQc)
Here's my two cents - These purity wars are destructive and wearisome. That is all.
/And whoever compared Ace to LGF is just plain loony.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at September 23, 2010 09:12 PM (c0A3e)
There always does seem to be one of those douchebags that shows up in a thread like this and accuse Ace of being LGF. And a lot of times you'll notice that it will be the only comment they've made in the thread, and doesn't appear to be one of the regulars hashes either. Hell maybe Ed Anger should drop his sockpuppeting of denny crane and sockpuppet douchebags accusing ace of being Charles Johnson.
And for the record I do not think that anyone at Ace of Spades supported McCain in the primary as the electable candidate. Ace especially.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 05:24 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: JackStraw at September 23, 2010 09:14 PM (VW9/y)
You need to get educated.
George Will does it all the time. After big electoral and baseball wins.
George Will dips his bow tie in pudding? Now that's just gross.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 23, 2010 05:26 PM (E97ku)
Seriously using a Mitt supporter to say Palin can't campaign in the NE? Whats next using an Obama supporter to claim Obamacare is popular?
I live in the Northeast. Sarah Palin is not popular up here. It's unfortunate, but true.
As for the crowd size argument, it's estimated that Palin drew a crowd of 3,000 to her speech in Boston. That's about half a percent of the population of that city. It's .04% of the population of Massachusetts. The enthusiasm of the crowd is great, but those that showed up are a minority up here in the cold north.
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 05:27 PM (WGjBM)
Posted by: JSchuler at September 23, 2010 05:28 PM (yKEQc)
George Will dips his bow tie in pudding? Now that's just gross.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 23, 2010 09:26 PM (E97ku)
Of course it is. He wrote a book about baseball, of all things, you don't think he would stoop to tie-dipping? The man is obviously a maverick.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 05:29 PM (9tt+Z)
#23 and #25 nailed it.
Levin has invited Christie on his show - Chris Christie is a big boy and can take care of himself - if he's a solid conservative, then he has nothing to fear from Levin.
Levin has talked about Christie several times, indicating he just isn't sure about him - there is the Castle endorsement, cap-and-trade thing, etc. He's basically said 'it's too soon for him to be making any decisions about Christie for President.' In fact, I saw Chris Christie make that same statement the other day
Levin is all about the founders, Constitution, and originalism. His breakdown of the whole anchor-baby issue is nothing short of brilliant, as well as the judgement against Arizona's immigration law, etc.
Yeah, he can get a little ranty at times, but, frankly, he is passionate and pissed off about what both Republicans (calling themselves conservatives) and Democrats have done to the country.
I know you're a little hurt, being called out over the Castle v. O'Donnell battle by him.
I say you give him a call and offer to hash out the differences on air. I'll bet he'd be more than happy to talk to you.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2010 05:30 PM (X1Y8q)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 05:31 PM (+bMtX)
Levin is 100% right.
Posted by: Bronson at September 23, 2010 05:31 PM (s6q5G)
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 09:19 PM (oVQFe)
Good points. The problem with the moderates is they don't like to taste their own medicine. They are all for unity when they win. They all want to go 3rd party when they lose. they have no problem mocking social conservatives as bible thumpers, hicks etc but when they are called RINOS/elites they have hissy fits.
Christie has some good points. He is terrible on immigration not a big issue in NJ but a major issue in the Southwest and the South in general.
If given a choice between Christie and Obama I would vote for christie. Now would the moderates turn out to vote for a Demint vs Obama? Somehow I doubt it.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 05:32 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 09:31 PM (+bMtX)
Interesting insight. I think the common thread there is personal responsibility.
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 23, 2010 05:32 PM (JYxmy)
Levin is right.
Christie is good for NJ. He is not a cure for the nation.
Ace is right.
Levin has been grating lately.
Also, Ace and Levin are very similar. Impassioned, dogmatic and prone to emotional explosions at the drop of a hat.
I like them both, carry on.
Posted by: garrett at September 23, 2010 05:33 PM (btcwG)
#413,
I actually think that social conservatism leads to fiscal conservatism - if you are conservative by nature, you recognize it's morally wrong to spend everyone else's money on all sorts of 'programs.'
That being said, your example is a very, very good point, and I hadn't thought of it that way.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2010 05:37 PM (X1Y8q)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 09:31 PM (+bMtX)
--I'd argue that the causal arrow goes the other way.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 05:38 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 09:31 PM (+bMtX)
Interesting insight. I think the common thread there is personal responsibility.
Posted by: Mary in LA at September 23, 2010 09:32 PM (JYxmy)
I think ace has made the point before that often times the guy the claims to be the social liberal but a fiscal conservative, sure does seem to fuck us over on those times when fiscal conservatism is needed.
Now sure you're probably right that taking fiscally conservative routes will lead to socially conservative paths as well but a lot of the guys touting how fiscally conservative they are, are full of shit.
Posted by: buzzion at September 23, 2010 05:39 PM (oVQFe)
I can't agree with you more about the need for fiscal conservatism, but, once again, How does endorsing Cap and Tax even come close to a fiscally conservative idea?
There is no greater example of a contrived problem and solution than cap and trade. It has always been based on maximizing government receipts for no intrinsic value!
It is the major league version of the tobacco company settlement that all the states AG's patted themselves on the back for.
That wasn't about making the tobacco companies pay for cancer, it was about lining the states pockets with tobacco cash. The pay off was even based on future tobacco sales. Nothing but a huge back door tax on the poor.
Cap and tax will be a huge tax on every segment of the economy.
I can't see getting behind that.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 05:41 PM (9tt+Z)
Why do we need to give in to Christy? Sure he's a fiscal conservative, but if he wants to be a major player he needs to re-think some of his positions.
That's a good point...if he had, ya know, actually said he was interested in being a major player. And basically you, and Levin, are saying that to be so he needs to blow you. Essentially you, and small minded people like you, are saying that guys like Christie need to toe *my fucking line* or they are shit.
Sorry, I think the fiscal danger to this nation is a wee hair more important then your soc-con agenda. Not that there isn't a threat...but let's be certain what dyke we're sticking a finger into to prevent the flood.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 23, 2010 05:42 PM (7rfUg)
Now is not the time. Now is not the time.
The races are set, the candidates are in, now let's win.
And if Christie can help win a close one in California, get off his case.
Go after '12 later.
Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2010 05:42 PM (cd6Ip)
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 09:27 PM (WGjBM)
the liberal Boston Globe said 6,000...
anyhow the point was she couldn't campaign in the NE. The boston event proves that wrong. she turned up a very big crowd in one of the bluest states with no major counter protest to speak off. Any candidate running for congress or the senate would love to have 3,000-6,000 people show up for an event they were a part of. she would bring them money and votes. ...
where I live the black population says Obamacare is the greatest thing since slice bread. your point? ....
Or are you using the " I don't know how Nixon won. I don't know anyone who voted for him" defense?
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 05:42 PM (aVGmX)
What Levin does is an overreaction. You explain, very well, why he overreacts but I still don't see why Christie is the target. I'd also like to know who Levin proudly and loudly advocated in the 2008 primary. I'd just like to hear who all these radio voices wanted in 2008. By the time it got to my state my choices were McCain and Huckabee, and I heard a lot about who they didn't like but didn't hear anyone staking their reputation on any of the candidates.
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 05:43 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: chemjeff at September 23, 2010 05:43 PM (E97ku)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 05:44 PM (HYkZm)
Exactly. Short, to the point and accurate. Very well said.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 05:46 PM (9tt+Z)
Yeah,there are about four ten-minute sweet-spots, per hour, on broadcast radio nowadays.
On the hour, and on the half hour, you just know you are going to get screwed with at least 10min. of "news".
The trick is, to tune in on the 7 minute mark.
Once you suss out the 7 minutes between soft breaks, you will be golden.
Posted by: Deety at September 23, 2010 05:47 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at September 23, 2010 05:47 PM (Y81Xa)
Well I think you can make a libertarian (more like liberaltarian) argument for something like Cap and Tax, on the basis of requiring people to pay for their externalities that they unwittingly cause by emitting carbon. This of course, however, assumes that CO2 is in fact an externality that requires compensation, and that the government is a reasonable steward for the money. I don't buy those two assumptions so I don't go for Cap and Tax on a purely philosophical level. And then there's the whole power-grab argument.
Posted by: chemjeff at September 23, 2010 05:47 PM (E97ku)
but hes among the best you're going to get in the Blue Tri-State regionj.
Posted by: Mark S at September 23, 2010 05:50 PM (qSdgA)
Posted by: steevy at September 23, 2010 09:44 PM
I would agree with that statement. Just like christie or mitt could campaign in the south, southwest, west and midwest but their supporters would be the minority. My entire point was Ace stated there was large sections of the country she could not campaign in which is simply not true.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 05:52 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: joejm65 at September 23, 2010 05:54 PM (+bMtX)
Yeah, I'm frigging Pauline Kael over here. It's not like I know anything about the political climate of the region I've lived in for 20 years or anything.
BTW, 6,000 people? Impressive, but still only 1% of the population of Boston, .09% of the population of Massachusetts.
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 05:54 PM (WGjBM)
What vitriol? The only vitriol in this thread has been directed at those imaginary "purity police" who have apparently been bashing Christie.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at September 23, 2010 05:55 PM (NurK6)
Posted by: joejm65 at September 23, 2010 09:54 PM (+bMtX)
You won't be thanking me tomorrow.
Posted by: Patron at September 23, 2010 05:55 PM (E97ku)
Posted by: pajama momma at September 23, 2010 05:55 PM (f8giK)
but I believe the government's day-to-day responsibilities are inverse to ours. Finally, I'd like to thank Patron for making these thoughts possible...
Well they have been for the last 100 years or so which is pretty much the problem.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 05:55 PM (aVGmX)
#426 - go listen to him - his episodes are available on podcast, going back that far I believe.
I haven't listened that far back, but maybe I will.
Posted by: blindside at September 23, 2010 05:56 PM (X1Y8q)
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 05:56 PM (WGjBM)
That's my point, it isn't about fixing anything, it's about money and power.
That being said, that is my reason to despise Cap and Tax. I don't despise Governor Christie. I think he's the best thing that has happened in his state for a long time. I just don't think he is right for national office, and I don't think you can brand him as the trademark of the fiscal conservative.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 05:57 PM (9tt+Z)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at September 23, 2010 05:57 PM (Yq+qN)
Chris Christie is the Republican governor of NJ. Jim DeMint is the duly elected Senator of South Carolina.
I think Christie is fulfilling the expectations of New Jersey's electorate and Senator DeMint is doing the job he was hired to do in South Carolina. Why Mark Levin is engaging in some intra-party knifework at this point in time is curious since the 2012 primary cycle will depend very much on how the mid-terms pan out.
No doubt the northeast conservatives are grateful for whatever they can get in their liberal hell-holes, but for most of the country\s conservatives, the Chris Christie line is the ante, not the pot.
Posted by: mrp at September 23, 2010 06:01 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 09:54 PM (WGjBM)
How does that compare to Mitt and Christie rallies in the region? Not being funny would like to know.
I know Mitt was able to get 50 people to come for free pizza in Va but I don't know how he does in his home state.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 06:02 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 09:56 PM (WGjBM)
Yes, I keep hearing that from the MSM and people like Ace but then you have DE. DE, where Christie was not able to help Castle win but Palin was able to help O'Donnell.
If she is more of a liability to candidates in the NE should O'donnell not have lost to Castle?
or is that more of a narrative made up out of thin air by the MSM and Mitt supporters who wanted to keep Palin out of the Va, NJ and MA races in 2009/2010 to limit her power within the Gop?
Her endorsements also helped two NY congress candidates get elected in their primaries and then there was Ny 23 and how her endorsement helped Hoffman surge.
It seems the evidence does not support the narrative.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 06:07 PM (aVGmX)
I understand the emotional reaction against squishy positions on the part of popular Republicans. We've been butt hurt by RINOs so often that it's an easy trap to fall into - lashing out at any symptoms of weakness. Never in my life have I seen a politician hard right enough for my taste (not even the glorious Reagan), so it's a constant nagging irriation.
That said, all elections are nothing more than a choice of evils. You go into the booth and pull the lever for the lesser evil and call it a day, hoping for the best. Christy is a pretty damn good "evil" to be stuck with, considering that his state is INCAPABLE of producing a hard core conservative in the primary. There could have been no better options. If he tries to run for president, that's when we can politely say "no thanks." IF there is someone better. And lately that seems like a pretty damn big IF. I'm pretty far right, but there is no way I'd pick the Huckster over Christy. Buffoonery should lose you points - no matter how conservative you are otherwise.
Besides - the prez doesn't make the laws. He can sign 'em or veto 'em, but he doesn't write them. The danger of Christy's squishiness is limited, so long as congress is under control. There are bigger worries.
Posted by: Reactionary at September 23, 2010 06:07 PM (4nbyM)
That really is the point in a nutshell, isn't it? We have an election that might be the most important one we will see, let's worry about winning it. The primaries are over, anyone supporting our side are the good guys. Let's worry about pointing out their poorer qualities at a more appropriate time. Winning now is our only option.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at September 23, 2010 06:09 PM (9tt+Z)
Who cares? You brought up crowd size. My point is that one's ability to draw a crowd in a particular city doesn't exactly equal general popularity in the region. Christie doesn't need to hold rallies - he's already won and is getting stuff done.
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 06:11 PM (WGjBM)
Posted by: Slublog at September 23, 2010 10:11 PM (WGjBM)
No it doesn't equal general popularity but it does show an ability to campaign in that region. Which was the point of Ace's post which I was responding too.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 06:17 PM (aVGmX)
I've had too many Black&Tans to know whether you are agreeing with me or mocking me, but I laughed when I read it, so...thanks!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at September 23, 2010 06:20 PM (LH6ir)
Anybody else know why I feel a burning nostalgia for the hours I spent arguing with my cousins over who was the cutest New Kid on the Block?
Posted by: Filly at September 23, 2010 06:21 PM (MVKg4)
Posted by: Brett_McS at September 23, 2010 06:22 PM (iA6nz)
We're about to see a test of that constitutional premise in 2011. My bet is that Obama goes hard for regulatory rule.
Posted by: mrp at September 23, 2010 06:25 PM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 06:28 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: Dan Cleary at September 23, 2010 06:29 PM (enR4Q)
He's not out to purge the guy from the GOP. Geez.
Posted by: Dan Cleary at September 23, 2010 10:29 PM (enR4Q)
Agreed.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 06:31 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 06:32 PM (UvR6d)
Posted by: Brett_McS at September 23, 2010 06:36 PM (iA6nz)
Worrying about Christie's opinions in things like the Victory Mosque is like worrying whether the doctor who's treating you in the ER after you've been smashed up an in auto accident is a conservative. The fact is, the nation's economy is at death's door, and we need a tough, hard-assed doctor to keep it alive. Everything else - and I do mean *everything* else - is secondary.
Posted by: Brown Line at September 23, 2010 06:36 PM (g8GkZ)
Posted by: Brett_McS at September 23, 2010 06:38 PM (iA6nz)
Posted by: Dave S. at September 23, 2010 10:32 PM (UvR6d)
which start in about 40 days
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 06:38 PM (aVGmX)
But I'm surprised at how many people are dumping on Levin (a.k.a Da Great One).
I listen to Levin's podcast daily. He knows his job--to encourage the base, to get the facts straight, and to
demonstrate how to dump on liberals. Levin is General Patton and Patton only wants two things-- to crush the Left and to save the country.
He was one of the first real 'Tea Party' Talk Show Activists before it was popular. Go read Liberty and Tyranny and take note that Levin was writing this stuff before Obama was elected.
I campaigned for Christie and will gladly do so again. He's a conservative on fiscal issues and most social issues. He's definitely the best governor I've ever seen in N.J. But I am by no means fooled into thinking that Christie is the One.
Levin simply does not want us to settle for less that a full-blown conservative victory on all fronts.
Now get off my phone you big dupe!
Posted by: Theophilus at September 23, 2010 06:40 PM (EZtdt)
Posted by: Huggy at September 23, 2010 06:42 PM (kYhMU)
Posted by: ace at September 23, 2010 06:43 PM (KUUXH)
Posted by: motionview at September 23, 2010 06:45 PM (OPIZU)
For Levin the snipes are pretty tepid. There's "sniping" and then there's sniping. So far his critique rates about a two on the Eleventy!! meter. Could be that with three hours a day of air time, you kinda end up saying controversial stuff - or that he did so just to get ratings. Who knows.
I think this is just one of those times when Christie's YouTube presence has been ginning up timely interest in him as the national leader which invites some hyper-inflated (which would be premature) praise. Christie surely isn't trumping all this stuff up on his own and he's saying the right things about his desire to remain committed to NJ. That's good. Keeping focus will serve him well and slow down the Christie Train to D.C. even if surrogates act as proxy engineers. Levin's just saying, "Whoa, now," as events drive the narrative.
As far as Christie's glad-handing and campaigning in blue-purple states for Republicans, great. He's a fine ambassador in this political transition phase and doing yeoman's work.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2010 07:34 PM (swuwV)
I think Christie is really a conservative on most issues. Most of the time when he takes a "moderate stance", he's actually not taking a stance at all. On immigration and the mosque, for instance, he mostly just called for civility and not making too much out of an issue. I believe Christie does support some path to citizenship, but that is not the same as amnesty. Sometimes conservatives distory anyone not down for mass deportings.
That said, running in NJ...what issues are best for him to be "moderate" on? Issues that don't matter in fucking New Jersey. On everything that DOES matter in NJ, he has been conservative. Even on social issues. Are you guys aware he recently cut off state funding for Planned Parenthood? How awesome is that? On that, all cons unite...except abortion extremists who think it should be federally funded. His "stances" on certain issues bother people, but where the fuck have ANY of his ACTIONS been moderate or liberal(except the endorsement of a guy you don't like in DE)? It's not there. And actions mean more than words. Seriously, even Rudy actually passed gun restrictions. Christie hasn't done this. Maybe he believes in it, but I prefer to judge actions.
Posted by: Crazee at September 23, 2010 07:35 PM (xsoRi)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at September 23, 2010 07:49 PM (7rfUg)
Says Sarah Palin "is an entertainer".
That's fine, I say you're a fucktard. Apparently this jackoff missed that whole Governor thing up there in Alaska.
I swear, unless and until I see a Ronaldus Magnus tattoo on these "republicans" from Mass., they ALL fucking RINOs. And stupid ones at that.
Why the hell would you just hand ammunition to the libs like that in an election year like this?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacons, and Meteor afficionado at September 23, 2010 07:52 PM (eCAn3)
And yet he's the one instigating it. If this were Salem, he'd be lighting charcoal.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 07:53 PM (mHQ7T)
In NY state, the Conservative Party has a legitimate presence, and to maintain it, their candidate needs at least 50,000 votes. Paladino will lose, even without Lazio in the race. The poll all thee sites started trumpeting was an outlier, yet nobody said so. Paladino would love some fundraising, except his platform in the primaries was, "I am a crazy asshole who will spend $10 million of my own money to defeat Cuomo." He doesn't need the money. He is also a vile, racist POS, and even an R by his name doesn't change that.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:00 PM (mHQ7T)
I can't even believe the worthless nasal gasbag is opening his mouth on this one, though. Christie's a guy who made it into office and is now doing exactly what he said he would do during his campaign -- fighting, in his little corner of America, one of the biggest problems we've got. Mark Levin, on the other hand, gets on the radio every day to run his braying mouth for a few hours, telling the people on the front lines who are actually working that they're doing it wrong.
Conservatism is a doctrine of ideas with an objective of accomplishment. It is not a movement of dumbed-down reactionary emo-fucks like Levin and Christine O'Donnell who get their rocks off by purging, purging, purging until they've eliminated as many of their own allies as possible. If scumbags like this are our new conservative guideposts then we might as well pack it in now.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 08:00 PM (GWMe6)
You wouldn't understand what I wrote if your mom mimed it with hand puppets.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 23, 2010 08:05 PM (swuwV)
The hell he's not. This is just Levin's opening salvo. After all, we all know that Chris Christie is nothing but a dirty, dirty RINO. Hell, he endorsed Mike Castle, which ought to put an end to his career right there, amiright??
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 08:09 PM (GWMe6)
Posted by: Charlton Heston at September 23, 2010 08:09 PM (gbCNS)
He was speaking about Presidential politics. He said so. More than this site does when they are trying to persuade you.
I love Chris Christie. His videos make me cheer out loud. On physcal policy there is no one better currently in government. He is a great Gov of NJ. Not so great as President . Where does he stand on guns, foreign policy, social issues, etc?
His instincts on these seem well sorta Connecticut. That won't play in large swaths of the country. Swaths that any Republican needs to win to win the Presidency. Those are the swaths Sarah excels in and Christie doesn't.
Posted by: Repeal at September 23, 2010 08:13 PM (8xwyL)
Hell, if you folks want to see a real whiner in action, I can give you no better display than Mike Church.
I used to like the guy, but it seems like lately, he's determined to attack anyone not an absolute PaleoConservative as a 'DeceptiCon' threat to the Republic. Giving Hannity a nose-tweak over Rove's antics? OK. Calling Glenn Beck a 'hack' because they disagree on their respective opinions on Tea Party tactics? Not very nice. Calling Sarah Palin a "DeceptiCon" who's "wrapping her tentacles" around the Tea Party? I think King Dude has done spun a bearing.
Granted, none of these folks are 100% Constitutional conservatives, but shit! It must be terribly lonely for Mr. Church up there on the peak of Mt. Olympus. Compared to Church, Levin is the heart and soul of the Conservative Ascendency.
Posted by: Ex-Dudist-Monk at September 23, 2010 08:29 PM (8tdqI)
Posted by: teh wind at September 23, 2010 08:29 PM (JT6+3)
Posted by: fluffy at September 23, 2010 08:10 PM (SwkdU)
When people start calling others RINO, they are saying that courtesy extends one way only. When Christine O'Donnell can run against Coons instead of the "establishment" who has bent over backwards to kiss her ass or Karl Rove, I will take her seriously.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:30 PM (mHQ7T)
Yes, I keep hearing that from the MSM and people like Ace but then you have DE. DE, where Christie was not able to help Castle win but Palin was able to help O'Donnell.
If she is more of a liability to candidates in the NE should O'donnell not have lost to Castle?
or is that more of a narrative made up out of thin air by the MSM and Mitt supporters who wanted to keep Palin out of the Va, NJ and MA races in 2009/2010 to limit her power within the Gop?
Her endorsements also helped two NY congress candidates get elected in their primaries and then there was Ny 23 and how her endorsement helped Hoffman surge.
It seems the evidence does not support the narrative.
Posted by: unseen at September 23, 2010 10:07 PM (aVGmX)
I don't mean to pick on you because you're by far not the only one I've seen advancing this point, but can we please remember that primaries are not the same as general elections?
Posted by: Paul at September 23, 2010 08:39 PM (DsHk0)
I'm going to beat a dead horse some more here, because it's relevant: A month or two ago, almost nobody outside of Delaware had ever heard of Mike Castle. The guy was no conservative by any stretch, but if he was anything close to the level of Lindsey Graham/John McCain-ism he was made out to be by O'Donnell and her acolytes -- a crusading, backstabbing liberal just waiting for the chance to pull a Jim Jeffords -- he'd have been infamous among conservatives a very long time ago (this guy was in the House for 18 years) and this primary race would have been a rallying cry for conservatives from the moment he announced his candidacy a year ago. But no one had ever heard of him. He was your average, anonymous squish who'd have been content to serve the last four years of a Senate term as an average, anonymous squish.
Castle lost in part because Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Rush himself (as sorry as I am to say it, because I've always loved Rush), and everyone else in their little circle-jerk were so determined to prop up their favored professional candidate, someone with very little of substance to recommend her beyond guest-hosting Hannity's TV show (but I contradict myself), they were willing to make up a record for him that wasn't even true. This was the most damning and hateful thing about the campaign against him -- before it was over, they'd convinced who knows how many people that Castle had voted for everything from ObamaCare to card check to voting to impeach George W. Bush. (This was on top of the O'Donnell campaign's gay-rumor smears and suggestions that he was sending out campaign operatives to attack her, from her own bushes, no less.) Levin was at the vanguard of these total lies. Hannity retracted one or two of his own, er, mischaracterizations; Rush didn't and I very much doubt Levin did. Castle was made an object lesson in the power of conservative kingmakers to defame and destroy, when they so choose. It was sickening beyond belief.
Mark Levin has a nice little side-gig going slandering people. Castle can tell you all about it. Glenn Beck can tell you all about it; Levin's been accusing Beck of plagiarizing his books for a couple of years now without producing a single shred of evidence. Why would it stop with them? Chris Christie, now, ought to be wary of this, for he now seems to have as an enemy this man with very few morals or ethics; after all, when it comes to saving the country from these filthy RINOs, and believe me, Great Americans, we're "finding" more of them all the time, what's a few lies among friends?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 08:41 PM (GWMe6)
On the one hand, the PPP poll right before the primary says 52% of DE hates Palin. But then for week we heard how she was a kingmaker on a winning streak. Everybody loves a winner, and we're just coming out of the primary and seeing encouraging polls in other races. So, Palin's minority support in the Republican party recklessly pushed for O'Donnell in a closed primary. They said sending a message to RINOs was more important than winning or taking back the Senate. To moderates in DE, Christie's endorsement might have meant something, but those were the pragmatists.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 23, 2010 08:55 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: packsoldier at September 23, 2010 08:56 PM (YM0qC)
Posted by: Amerigooner at September 23, 2010 09:17 PM (Af/Q1)
Squishy or not he's likely done more work for the Delaware Republican Party than anyone still alive today. Turning him into some sort of mystical Leahy-Jeffords-Chaffee clone with an R next to his name (which is about what I heard from the likes of Levin) was just sad.
As your man ponders a write in campaign.
RINO is as RINO does.
Posted by: Repeal at September 23, 2010 09:21 PM (8xwyL)
RINO is as RINO does.
Guess that makes Christine O'Donnell a RINO then, per the write-in Senate campaign she ran in 2006 after losing the GOP nomination.
Maybe Levin's right after all... they're everywhere!!
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 09:25 PM (GWMe6)
1. Illegal means illegal
2. Re-election probably means "f**k most voters"
3. A lot of you are pansy fools. That's why U nevah moved. Can you say, "blizzard"? I don't think you can. Exposed flesh freezes in seconds.
4. If you want us to bail-out your fag compromises, we will come for you with lots of b****ts.
Posted by: Wayang Kulit at September 23, 2010 09:26 PM (XB6Qf)
Posted by: Moby at September 23, 2010 09:37 PM (GWMe6)
Posted by: Beth at September 23, 2010 09:48 PM (5NfIh)
Guess that makes Christine O'Donnell a RINO then, per the write-in Senate campaign she ran in 2006 after losing the GOP nomination.
Her Republican opponent, Jan Ting, endorsed Obama in 2008 and quit the republican party. I guess she knew something you don't.
Posted by: Repeal at September 23, 2010 09:51 PM (8xwyL)
Sorry, I forgot witches can see the future in their crystal balls.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 09:57 PM (GWMe6)
Sorry, I forgot witches can see the future in their crystal balls.
Funny and very unifying but no crystal ball needed. RINO is as RINO does.
I get it you like republicans who like Obama. I don't.
Posted by: Repeal at September 23, 2010 10:02 PM (8xwyL)
Mark Levin has written some of the best conservative books I've ever read. They're well-reasoned, well-researched, and written in temperate, measured, carefully considered language.
Mark Levin has written some of the best articles, both in print, and on line, that I've ever read. They're well-reasoned, well-researched, and written in temperate, measured, carefully considered language.
Mark Levin, on the radio, sounds like a precocious but spoiled 3rd grader who never gets picked to be on anyone's kick ball team.
Posted by: notropis at September 23, 2010 10:06 PM (cjcCc)
Heh. Okay. And I get it that you poor suckers for O'Donnell are the most butt-hurt primary winners the country has ever seen and that you in particular are totally devoid of a sense of humor. C'mon; if you're gonna LOSE you might as well have a few laughs on the way down....
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at September 23, 2010 10:07 PM (GWMe6)
Posted by: SEAN! HANNITY! at September 23, 2010 10:14 PM (GWMe6)
Posted by: Hiram Bearss at September 23, 2010 10:36 PM (Opy+G)
As far as I'm concerned, he is a liar without credibility. Screw him with Kos' junk.
Posted by: Adjoran at September 23, 2010 10:36 PM (VfmLu)
As for him being a liar, dare I say you are not concerned and I won't take your word for it. He fights with facts and emotion, tending to dismantle his opponents via sledgehammer! Just ask David Frum, lol.
Posted by: Africanus at September 23, 2010 11:22 PM (TAUno)
Sorry, but Levin's take was pretty mild.
Not at all worth an entire post.
Posted by: logprof at September 23, 2010 11:25 PM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Brian72 at September 23, 2010 11:37 PM (GNBk5)
Posted by: John at September 24, 2010 01:40 AM (YV3eq)
Christie's a great governor in New Jersey. DeMint for president in 2012!
Posted by: breakn70 at September 24, 2010 02:33 AM (0eALC)
And it is not just Levin who is pulling this crap either. I don't even listen to half these guys on the radio anymore because all they do is boss everyone else around.
Tedious and self important.
Posted by: Terrye at September 24, 2010 02:39 AM (bNnwW)
Posted by: D. at September 24, 2010 02:59 AM (plSrP)
Posted by: John at September 24, 2010 03:07 AM (YV3eq)
Posted by: ford sells volts at September 24, 2010 04:25 AM (Ki7fm)
It's as though there's a whole list of positions that Christie has to embrace in order to become part of the club, or something.
It's as though Levin is a progressive Democrat.
Posted by: FireHorse at September 24, 2010 04:41 AM (sWynj)
Posted by: The Real Tattoo at September 23, 2010 09:19 PM (+bMtX)
The happiest time of his life was possibly filming The Man with the Golden Gun. It was like honey in the sandwich between an insecure past and an uncertain future. The real Tattoo, Hervé Villechaize, had been living in his car before then. However, he was also an active member of a movement in 1970s and 1980s CA to deal with child abuse and neglect, often going to crimes scenes himself to help comfort abuse victims. Villechaize's former co-workers recalled that despite his stature, he would often confront and chastise spousal and child abusers when he arrived at crime scenes.
He was a problem on Fantasy Island, constantly propositioning woman and demanding a salary equal to Ricardo Montalban's. The show's popularity waned after this move, and it was soon canceled. According to his former butler in an episode of E! Hollywood True Story, Villechaize never got over losing his job, and for the remainder of his
life practiced an often nightly ritual of drinking in a darkened room
while screaming obscenities at an episode of Fantasy Island playing on his television. Poor little guy drank too much Val-U-Rite and fell into depression. He pulled a gun on his agent before turning it on himself.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at September 24, 2010 04:54 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Burke at September 24, 2010 05:07 AM (Wehh/)
Levin has been around for a long time and he can smell a future valedictorian RINO from 5 miles. I judge a tree by its fruit.
Christie was for Castle
Christie is for illegal immigration
Christie is for Cap and Tax
Christie has YET to support any Tea Party candidate (and he never will due to the fact that he is a fake conservative)
Christie refuse to join other attorney generals in fighting against ObamaCare mandate
Christie is excellent for New Jersey and I support him, only as a New Jersey Governor. He is absolutely not a rock star and definitely not a Constitutional conservative or Presidential material.
The Tea Party is successful because it's leaderless. IMO, I refuse to be unified with a current or future RINO, which is why I refuse to make pledge concerning the House "Pledge." I have already made a pledge on the Founding Fathers document(s). I don't need to make any more pledges.
Thanks but no thanks, I will pass on the Jim "Christie" Jones kool-aid. I will not be duped.
Posted by: anon_mus at September 24, 2010 05:42 AM (ArQzL)
Posted by: doug at September 24, 2010 05:57 AM (dDxif)
I agree. When Levin starts ranting about Glenn, I just ignore and fast forward his podcast.
Posted by: anon_mus at September 24, 2010 06:04 AM (ArQzL)
Yeah, Christie's weak on abortion too -- except that he just stopped making NJ taxpayers pay for the effin' things. In New Jersey!
Posted by: Bob at September 24, 2010 06:38 AM (xh3gA)
Posted by: NJ Mike at September 24, 2010 07:49 AM (MtuoB)
Posted by: Lou Rawls at September 24, 2010 08:15 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Burke at September 24, 2010 08:47 AM (Wehh/)
Pro-9/11 Victory Mosque
Pro Cap and Trade ....
... I've seen enough.
He's great on fiscal issues in the state of NJ, and his work their should be appreciated. But I don't want him to run nationally, and won't vote for him based on his other positions listed above.
Posted by: thirteen28 at September 24, 2010 09:32 AM (s8N54)
Posted by: Hiram Bearss at September 24, 2010 10:52 PM (Opy+G)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3425 seconds, 646 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








First?
Buttercup? Sheesh.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch says... at September 23, 2010 03:32 PM (sJTmU)