December 03, 2010
— Genghis From a Biz/Tech blog by Brier Dudley at the Seattle Times. It appears the statement was released sometime yesterday afternoon by Amazon Web Services. From the blog post:
”Amazon.com is finally explaining why it stopped hosting the latest batch of WikiLeaks content, saying it wasn't because of pressure from the government. The Seattle company was in a bind over the State Department files, which were moved to Amazon's self-service Web hosting service after WikiLeaks released them on Sunday. Amazon tries to take a neutral stance toward content sold and stored on its infrastructure, but it removed the WikiLeaks material after complaints were raised, including protests by Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.”
Dudley goes on to quote pretty much the entire Amazon statement, which is pretty short and to the point, mostly concerning legal issues. And, as he states, they do deny that there was any government pressure on them to pull it from their servers, but they also go on to say that, wellÂ…this:
”There have also been reports that it was prompted by massive DDOS attacks. That too is inaccurate. There were indeed large-scale DDOS attacks, but they were successfully defended against.”
The statement is linked on the blog but here it is in its entirety if you have trouble reading it there: Amazon statement.
One thing that doesnÂ’t get mentioned is the rather large public relations hit that they took and whether or not that had any impact on their decision to throw WL under the bus. I suspect that had a lot to do with it as well. Thousands of pissed-off customers e-mailing their displeasure to the company tends to have that effect. After all, if they werenÂ’t pressured by the guvmint and the DDOS attacks were ineffective then what was it that made them pull the plug? A sudden moment of moral clarity? Patriotism? Bad hair day?
Doubtful, but whatever the case they finally did the right thing for whatever reasons (most likely self-preservation and damage-control)
As to whether Lieberman or any other elected or non-elected official had anything to do with it, there are voices of concern about that as well. Such as in this article by Rebecca MacKinnon from the New America Foundation on CNN.com this morning.
ItÂ’s an interesting piece. You wonÂ’t agree with some of it. I didnÂ’t, but at least she didn't defend Assange or dispute the fact that Amazon had the right to take action against WikiLeaks. It's mostly about the reasons why and concerns political intervention (Note I said "political" vs. "judicial" or "administrative." There is a distinction and Amazon is supposedly angling for some fat federal contracts) But thereÂ’s plenty of stuff there to debate about in the thread.
Posted by: Genghis at
05:20 AM
| Comments (104)
Post contains 461 words, total size 3 kb.
How about: "We didn't need this shit during the holiday shopping season!"
Or, "put political shit on servers run by a newspaper, pressure group or activist, not ones run by a merchant!"
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 05:33 AM (R2fpr)
Amazon says it didn't do this in response to government pressure,
but they did it after inquiries from Lieberman.
Isn't Sen. Lieberman a part of the government?
Posted by: Y-not at December 03, 2010 05:34 AM (IDL9N)
Follow up question: Why didn't the NYT, LA Times or any of the other guardians of truthiness step up and volunteer server space?
Wouldn't that be a fun question to ask the MFM?
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 05:34 AM (R2fpr)
Amazon says it didn't do this in response to government pressure,
but they did it after inquiries from Lieberman.
Isn't Sen. Lieberman a part of the government?
Posted by: Y-not
I told you people that the joooos control everything!! But did you listen? Noooooo.
Posted by: Helen Thomas at December 03, 2010 05:36 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Tami who is apparently on Ace's ass about This or That. at December 03, 2010 05:37 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Tami who is apparently on Ace's ass about This or That
I'm making a list and checking it twice,
gonna find out whose on me like lice,
Ace's list is writinnng, you down
Posted by: Ace's list at December 03, 2010 05:39 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: genghis at December 03, 2010 05:46 AM (1XErj)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at December 03, 2010 05:47 AM (0ZAEy)
It is interesting they mention Lieberman by name. I expect an amusing e-mail from Kos this afternoon.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 03, 2010 05:49 AM (4ucxv)
Posted by: Vlad at December 03, 2010 05:52 AM (zIl5z)
Posted by: genghis
How about covering the news that NASA dscovered ALF?
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 05:52 AM (R2fpr)
Follow up question: Why didn't the NYT, LA Times or any of the other guardians of truthiness step up and volunteer server space?
Wouldn't that be a fun question to ask the MFM?
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 09:34 AMHey, Buster, we ask the questions here.
Posted by: MFM at December 03, 2010 05:53 AM (QgmBR)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 05:57 AM (vjkov)
I have heard that retailers do 50 to 60% of their annual sales during Christmas. So, no they can ot afford to take a hit right now.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 05:59 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 03, 2010 06:02 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: nickless at December 03, 2010 06:05 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CoolCzech
It's possible that the stereotype that liberals have for corporations has some merit. They are independent of such things as patriotism or a sense of belonging to a nation. They play to a world stage, much of which is a welcome venue for anti-American hatred. They are interested in protecting themselves, their profits and the self interest of the decision makers. It is interesting to note that Hollywood, which for years has decried the dreaded mltinational corporation, is being just that, making anti-American films which may bomb here, but which apparently make money overseas.
Remember too that the blather about 'giving back to the community' is engrained now. It's at least PR to play this bit.
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 06:08 AM (R2fpr)
Oh good God. Amazon is a publicly traded company on NASDAQ. Even if people don't understand the concept of self-service hosting products (no crime there, most people don't, that's perfectly understandable), to presume that a company would shove a stick in the eye of their customer base, and that at their highest sales volume season, to score a political point is just silly.
It isn't that this wasn't a big PR deal, it surely was. But the presumption that Amazon is so blitheringly stupid as to have participated willingly in this, is absurd.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at December 03, 2010 06:10 AM (WvXvd)
I'm all for that. I expect the people who run the companies I have stock in to operate them such that I continue to get my dividends.
That being said, if they operate against the U.S. they will not be doing that because a lot of Americans will dump them like a bad debt.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 06:11 AM (e4sSD)
What the hell is up with Corporate America these days, anyway? Since when did they become socialist anti-American shills?
Posted by: CoolCzech
Except for the part where people could be killed, I hate that part, the WL proves what we all know about our unamerican prez. So what gives?
Posted by: sTevo at December 03, 2010 06:11 AM (24jtc)
Amazon can be pricey at times--- compare on Ebay if you can.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 03, 2010 06:12 AM (fa9yq)
Yay for amazon.com! For my heart, not so much, as I won't be brick-and-mortaring after all. ~_^
mac :]
Posted by: macbrooks at December 03, 2010 06:14 AM (J+MD4)
I have heard that retailers do 50 to 60% of their annual sales during Christmas. So, no they can ot afford to take a hit right now.
And Amazon is pushing, Pushing, PUSHING Kindle sales. Even folks who don't read that much or know what an Ereader is know what a Kindle is now.
Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 03, 2010 06:14 AM (fa9yq)
Posted by: Maxine Waters D-Dummy at December 03, 2010 06:15 AM (9htMr)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 06:18 AM (vjkov)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 03, 2010 06:19 AM (xxgag)
How about legality, like they said? Like most hosts, they don't pay much attention to their customers' activities until someone notifies them that a customer is breaking their terms of service. When that happens, they check to verify that the customer is indeed breaking their TOS, and if they are, they get cut off.
That's what happened here. Nothing special, no leverage needed, no public outrage or arm-twisting from the state department or what-have-you. Amazon simply did what any business would do when they found out their customers were illegally distributing pirated or otherwise stolen material via Amazon's servers.
Posted by: Caiwyn at December 03, 2010 06:19 AM (ttktr)
Go fuck yourselves WP. You know what would be a truly unexpected you cock-juggling troglodytes?
A decrease in unemployment.
Posted by: Sam at December 03, 2010 06:22 AM (Cxsey)
Posted by: Rob in Deep Blue Country at December 03, 2010 06:30 AM (Ol0Nn)
Slightly tangential - I haven't heard much discssion about the fact that earlier this week a German journalist for Der Speigel said that they and other pubs had gotten the State Dept stuff back in August! He said they had been analyzing it and "deciding what was important" to release. He specifically said that there had been collaboration among media outlets in deciding on these standards so that they all acted consistently.
So, as you listen and read the MSM reacting in wide-eyed amazement to today's revelations, be aware that they aren't really news at all - they are carefully stage-managed tidbits being dribbled out to last as long as possible (he said "months") and they are filtered by the MSM to make sure you don't get bothered by anything "unimportant". Whew, glad they are on the job looking out for our sacred right to know... what they think it is right for us to know.
Posted by: sherlock at December 03, 2010 06:31 AM (thr9V)
Assange in online Q&A: No credible allegation that 'a single person has come to harm as a result of our activities' http://bit.ly/ffTGMi
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 03, 2010 06:31 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 03, 2010 06:35 AM (o3bYL)
OT- Just reading about Bristol Palin sending a shot back at Keith Olbermann on her FB page (via Althouse). Must suck when even Sarah Palin's kids can make you look stupid.
http://tinyurl.com/33tnmle
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 03, 2010 06:37 AM (Z6Mgb)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 06:40 AM (vjkov)
To Mr. Olbermann let me say this: you can attack me all you want. But you will not stop me from getting my message out about teen pregnancy prevention. And one day, if you ever have a daughter, you may change your mind about me.
Hahahahahahahahah
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 03, 2010 06:44 AM (tf9Ne)
DDOS attacks against Amazon is a DDOS attack against those vendors as well. People protesting Amazon's hosting of WikiLeaks is a protest against those vendors as well..
Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 03, 2010 06:47 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Dave C
---------
I put a Nook on my Christmas wish list.. Barnes & Nobles is coming up very fast behind Amazon with their Nook against the Kindle. They've captured 20% of the market in just a year or so..
Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 03, 2010 06:49 AM (f9c2L)
OT- Just reading about Bristol Palin sending a shot back at Keith Olbermann on her FB page (via Althouse). Must suck when even Sarah Palin's kids can make you look stupid.
http://tinyurl.com/33tnmle
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 03, 2010 10:37 AM (Z6Mgb)
How to have an argument with a woman:
http://tinyurl.com/2cftano
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 03, 2010 06:52 AM (LdYLm)
As the statement explains, they never backed WikiLeaks in the first place. Someone from WikiLeaks signed up for their hosting service and paid the bill. That's it. Amazon wouldn't have even known they were involved with WikiLeaks until the news broke. Once they found out, they terminated the account for violation of terms of service (distributing stolen documents).
I don't know what people think is so heinous about this.
Posted by: Caiwyn at December 03, 2010 06:53 AM (ttktr)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 06:53 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 06:56 AM (vjkov)
Where is Geoff with the new 9.8% unemployment chart?
C'mon - this is the internet - we expect instantaneousness.
Posted by: Lindsey Grahamnesty licking Rahm Emanuel's salty shaven balls at December 03, 2010 06:57 AM (pfMMA)
Posted by: Caiwyn at December 03, 2010 10:53 AM (ttktr)
No, we must "Kill the Wabbit", whenever, however, whichever way we can!
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 03, 2010 06:57 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 06:57 AM (vjkov)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 06:57 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 03, 2010 06:58 AM (o3bYL)
http://tinyurl.com/33tnmle
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 03, 2010 10:37 AM
This ^, and Bristol hasn't even been to Cow College.
Posted by: huerfano at December 03, 2010 06:59 AM (QgmBR)
Oh good God. Amazon is a publicly traded company on NASDAQ. Even if people don't understand the concept of self-service hosting products (no crime there, most people don't, that's perfectly understandable), to presume that a company would shove a stick in the eye of their customer base, and that at their highest sales volume season, to score a political point is just silly.
It isn't that this wasn't a big PR deal, it surely was. But the presumption that Amazon is so blitheringly stupid as to have participated willingly in this, is absurd.
DiT's got it right. This has all along been about a public-relations mess for Amazon. One which they didn't exactly help themselves out with by jacking off for an entire news cycle. Is there a certain political culture at places like Amazon? Of course. But they aren't suicidal about these things. Those lattes ain't payin' for themselves.
Posted by: genghis at December 03, 2010 06:59 AM (1XErj)
Not really their biggest fan but they do have the biggest game in town..
Bezos is a Republican.
Barnes & Noble is one of the most hardcore Leftist firms in America.
Thank GOD that we have some [at least pseudo/ostensible] GOP-ers at Amazon and eBay and Buy.com.
If not, then we'd be just about completely shut out of the internet infrastructure.
Posted by: Lindsey Grahamnesty licking Rahm Emanuel's salty shaven balls at December 03, 2010 07:00 AM (pfMMA)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 07:00 AM (vjkov)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 10:57 AM (HLGCA)
Add this to your Xmas or Hanukkahs wish list:
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 03, 2010 07:01 AM (LdYLm)
I went out and did some research because wife has decided she wants one. Initially I wanted the Nook because we have been B&N customers for a long time and we have one located about 40 miles away. But since I read that review and Amazon decreased the price I have changed my mind.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 07:02 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 07:03 AM (HLGCA)
Dave - Yeah, the new Nook color is the first (I believe) where you can subscribe to full color magazines and they get downloaded directly to the Nook.
Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 03, 2010 07:03 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: ChiTown-Jerry at December 03, 2010 07:03 AM (f9c2L)
"I put Stankets on my Christmas list."
I don't know what that means, but if it's something perverted people do with poop & an electric blanket, I don't want one.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 03, 2010 07:04 AM (HaYO4)
Add this to your Xmas or Hanukkahs wish list:
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 03, 2010 11:01 AM (LdYLm)
This is better
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 07:05 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 07:06 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: David Letterman at December 03, 2010 07:11 AM (HLGCA)
Very Cool.
Last 2 Pearl Harbor vets in state homes to return to battle scene.
Both served on the USS Phoenix, never knew each other.
Posted by: momma at December 03, 2010 07:12 AM (penCf)
You may be more likely to get what you want if you call it a snuggie.
Or they may just pull your undies over your head. Depends on how good you've been.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 03, 2010 07:14 AM (tf9Ne)
As the statement explains, they never backed WikiLeaks in the first place. Someone from WikiLeaks signed up for their hosting service and paid the bill. That's it. Amazon wouldn't have even known they were involved with WikiLeaks until the news broke. Once they found out, they terminated the account for violation of terms of service (distributing stolen documents).
I don't know what people think is so heinous about this.
Caiwyn, just let it go. The post, articles and all that make it clear yet you keep shouting from the highest mountain that AMAZON IS INNOCENT OF ALL SINS!
Fine, we get your point. You bent yourself into such a defensive pretzel shape on yesterday's post about this that it seems clear you have a direct interest in the matter.
Posted by: genghis at December 03, 2010 07:15 AM (1XErj)
Posted by: Truman North at December 03, 2010 07:15 AM (HLGCA)
I'm not sure that I want my corporations to have a sense of morality and ethics. I want them to abide by the law and maximize profit. If I don't like the way they behave I will sell my stock or take my business elsewhere.
That's the glory of the capitalist system. We get to decide who survives and prospers, and who goes into the shitter.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at December 03, 2010 07:19 AM (LH6ir)
Just spitballin' here, but it was probably WikiLeaks' violations of the terms of service as Amazon clearly stated in their explanation.
Posted by: Andy at December 03, 2010 07:21 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 03, 2010 07:25 AM (o3bYL)
Posted by: Dave C at December 03, 2010 07:25 AM (vjkov)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 03, 2010 07:29 AM (9hSKh)
Forgive me if I don't carry the governments water here. Let's have us a national distraction. We'll focus on that non condom wearing arch criminal- and perhaps people will forget about those 15,000 peeps we whacked and didn't mention, or that innocent German national we kidnapped, or that photo journalist we smoked.
Let the nationalism start in earnest. We enable this government to behave this way. The right thing? What the fuck is that?
Posted by: Frankenstein Government at December 03, 2010 07:31 AM (GOG1H)
Posted by: texette at December 03, 2010 07:32 AM (TATbF)
Posted by: texette at December 03, 2010 11:32 AM (TATbF)
What will you get the other ones?
Posted by: Tami who is apparently on Ace's ass about This or That. at December 03, 2010 07:34 AM (VuLos)
Translation: The golfing sucks in A-stan this time of year.
Posted by: Andy at December 03, 2010 07:35 AM (5Rurq)
I don't know how any conservative in his right mind could do business with Barnes & Noble.
Amazon might not be perfect, but Barnes & Noble is like Stalin & Mao.
Good grief.
Posted by: Lindsey Grahamnesty licking Rahm Emanuel's salty shaven balls at December 03, 2010 07:35 AM (pfMMA)
Posted by: texette at December 03, 2010 11:32 AM (TATbF)
How do I get my wife a subscription to your newsletter as a Xmas gift?
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 03, 2010 07:35 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 03, 2010 11:29 AM (9hSKh)
No he won't they can't get that to work either, he might call him now. According to MSNBC the weather is fine.
Posted by: robtr at December 03, 2010 07:39 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: texette at December 03, 2010 07:47 AM (+61wI)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 03, 2010 07:50 AM (tJjm/)
WH travel budget for 2011/2012, ZERO.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 08:01 AM (e4sSD)
QFT. You get the most interesting reactions from the cashier buying, say, an Ann Coulter book at a physical B&N store (assuming you can find where they mis-filed it).
Posted by: Ian S. at December 03, 2010 08:02 AM (p05LM)
genghis, I'm not sure I get how you can agree with me and dump on Caiwyn, we're saying exactly the same thing. She's exactly right.
It went a day, they looked into it, verified a violation of their Terms of Use, ran it by legal, and then they dropped wiki-douche like a used rubber.
End of story.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at December 03, 2010 08:03 AM (WvXvd)
Not here, they display them on the "just released" shelf just as you come in the door.
Posted by: Vic at December 03, 2010 08:03 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Ian S.
---
For even more fun, go in with a list of politically incorrect books and ask one of the clerks at the info desk to help you find them, commenting all the while about how the friends on your CHRISTMAS list are so looking forward to receiving them.
Posted by: Retread at December 03, 2010 08:07 AM (YhiBM)
I don't understand how America can be the greatest country in the world, and simultaneously justified in keeping classified even the most obvious information.
I for one will be reading these cables at my leisure.
Posted by: Stan at December 03, 2010 08:07 AM (NYDyd)
I don't understand how America can be the greatest country in the world, and simultaneously justified in keeping classified even the most obvious information.
I for one will be reading these cables at my leisure.
Posted by: Stan
You act as though information that was stolen was not, in fact stolen. The shit was stolen.
Receiving and handling stolen items is a crime. Ask a pawn broker, or someone trying to use a credit card. I suppose now you'll be calling for lighter sentences for rich, connected people who think as you do, while allowing the poor and minorities to serve prison time?
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 08:20 AM (R2fpr)
Like die, not like in a video game, but die. Like they won't get to breathe anymore.
Posted by: Mr. Carr, Guard from Cool Hand Luke at December 03, 2010 08:23 AM (jXC9M)
If the KGB had stolen this shit and released it and not some jilted protected-class candy-ass, people would be getting bullets behind the ear in dark allies by now.
Posted by: Mr. Carr, Guard from Cool Hand Luke at December 03, 2010 08:27 AM (jXC9M)
don't understand how America can be the greatest country in the world, and simultaneously justified in keeping classified even the most obvious information.
I for one will be reading these cables at my leisure.
Posted by: Stan
Can President Nixon quote you on that? Because some of his playmates got into a fuss over the 'unauthorized' acquisition of some information, and you seem to be the kinda guy that would be proud to allow information to see the light of day, rather than let the persnickety 'owners' deprive this once great nation.
What was that? When someone steals information form the Democrats, then it's a crime? And they should be prosecuted for it? As should anyone involved?
I see.
Posted by: Exceptionally deep throat at December 03, 2010 08:37 AM (R2fpr)
what was it that made them pull the plug? A sudden moment of moral clarity? Patriotism? Bad hair day?
They read their own terms of service, and realized that WL was violating them?
Thousands of irate customers certainly, umm, clarifies things, too.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at December 03, 2010 09:00 AM (1hM1d)
But I see his point. And it would please me to no end if this scumbag was an equal opportunity offender until caught.
What I guess I was getting at, was that either we (and governments in general) will be more open and honest, or more secretive. And many commentators expect or fear one of those outcomes from big leaks like this. There's no stopping leaks, and I imagine they will increase.
With that in mind I don't see any other good risk aversion strategy than to become more transparent, especially with regard to the crap that's obvious, the crap we should know about, and the crap that's secret for only CYA purposes.
Posted by: Stan at December 03, 2010 09:08 AM (NYDyd)
But I see his point. And it would please me to no end if this scumbag was an equal opportunity offender until caught.
What I guess I was getting at, was that either we (and governments in general) will be more open and honest, or more secretive. And many commentators expect or fear one of those outcomes from big leaks like this. There's no stopping leaks, and I imagine they will increase.
With that in mind I don't see any other good risk aversion strategy than to become more transparent, especially with regard to the crap that's obvious, the crap we should know about, and the crap that's secret for only CYA purposes.
Posted by: Stan
You complained about Amazon kicking Wikileaks off, and bragged about reading this crap.
Now you are.. I'm not sure what in Hell you are doing.
If you want to have a conversation about what should and should not be public, fine. You want to talk about the government being more transparent, fine.
That is NOT what happened here. Somebody who was pissed off lashed out, grabbed a metric shitload of stuff which was entrusted to him, and gave it to somebody, violating laws and that trust.
That someone is now acting like a Martin Luther/National Enquirer hybrid. In his spare time, he may also be a rapist.
If I do have a conversation about what my government does and does not classify, that conversation will not include this posturing turd.
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 03, 2010 09:18 AM (R2fpr)
I'm honestly kind of on the fence on a lot of these issues. But I don't think information is like any other tangible good: once stolen and disseminated, it's not really stolen property anymore. It's de facto public domain, no matter what law says otherwise. If Manning hadn't given it to Assange, I'm sure the NYT would have been happy to take it from him. Or some other paper. That's why I don't see the big deal about some site hosting the information, as it's way too late to plug that hole.
If this is just about Assange being an anti-American leaker, then yeah, I'm all for making it harder for them to operate. But I also like to look at the bigger picture, which is what I'm wobbly about at the moment.
Posted by: Stan at December 03, 2010 09:29 AM (NYDyd)
And we had a cure for their disease that made it "harder for them to operate".
Posted by: sifty at December 03, 2010 09:48 AM (jXC9M)
I don't know how any conservative in his right mind could do business with Barnes & Noble.
Amazon might not be perfect, but Barnes & Noble is like Stalin & Maoorder essays
Posted by: Terry at December 04, 2010 03:29 AM (tjdRo)
Welcome to our website
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ =======
accept paypal and free shipping
We need your support and trust!!!
Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps
To our website Walk around A look at
Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth
You'll find our price is more suitable for you.
And we shall be offer you free gift about MP4 if you more order.
===== http://www.1shopping.us/ ========
Posted by: shoestrade97 at December 05, 2010 04:46 PM (qhdv0)
buy term papers online
Posted by: Terry at December 07, 2010 11:45 AM (tm3rW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2612 seconds, 232 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Don't fuck it up.
Posted by: EC at December 03, 2010 05:32 AM (mAhn3)