November 16, 2010
— Ace This is indeed "security theater," but a special kind of security theater. TSA stand-abouts want to continue just standing around (BTW, does anyone really believe they're looking terribly hard at the x-ray imaging of your luggage?), and they don't like people opting out of the naked-body-scanners, because that forces them to not stand-about but do some actual work.
So they're attempting to make that as invasive as possible -- and let people know how invasive it's going to be -- to get you to walk through the body imager. So they can stand about some more.
Posted by: Ace at
10:21 AM
| Comments (382)
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: EC at November 16, 2010 10:25 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 10:25 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Dave C at November 16, 2010 10:28 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Nobody touches me anymore, sad I know at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (/E3ql)
Please don't link to Prison Planet. Nothing good ever comes from that conspiracy-mongering shit-hole.
However true the story may be, the source casts too much doubt upon it.
Posted by: Lou at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (MkXBH)
I had thought that legislation capping damages on "discrimination" lawsuits against private contractors might coax more capable companies back into the market, but there's no way the union would allow that to happen.
This is a union shake-down, pure and simple.
Posted by: angler at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (SwjAj)
Having to cleanup in a restroom and change cloths after would be a very small price to pay.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (/KqYi)
Prison planet. Really?
Sure go ahead and laugh but uh, those chips you had with lunch are gonna make you ghey.
Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (uNgbA)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (tf9Ne)
The push back so far is only coming from CAIR but an orchestrated shitstorm is gathering.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (HBqDo)
What are we supposed to do?
I hardly ever fly, but I don't want to go through this stuff.
I guess I'll be driving and taking trains everywhere from now on.
Good luck airlines, I'm sure you'll be bankrupted by this before next year. Their profits are so low they couldn't handle a reduction in passangers by 5-10%.
Heck I flew to D.C. earlier this year. One plane to Newark then a connecting plane to DC. both were smaller prop planes and neither was close to being full
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: EC at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: buzzion at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (oVQFe)
What sort of background checks to these guys go through?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (UOM48)
Disappointed in the Morons: I've been waiting a couple of days for somebody to fall into "I've got nothing to hide" so 300 commenters can add "I'll say!"
Posted by: comatus at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (hrwMe)
Posted by: Randi Andi's Reacharound Buddy at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (/E3ql)
Sure go ahead and laugh but uh, those chips you had with lunch are gonna make you ghey.
yeah, normally I am wary of them too, but a broken clock yada yada yada.
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (FHlAi)
You're on the right track. Gimme a call.
Posted by: Senator Larry Craig at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (/KqYi)
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Can't believe its not bitter at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (9dERt)
Posted by: Johnny at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (mhmc7)
I am taking bets, over under 2 months until some father literally beats the shit out of a TSA employee for fondling his son or daughter a little too sensually.
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:36 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (8/DeP)
they show up on time. That's the only qualification for a job like that.
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (wuv1c)
The airline industry probably donated more to Republicans than Democrats this cycle.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (/KqYi)
Remember me?
Posted by: Amtrak at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:39 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: ace at November 16, 2010 10:39 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (0GFWk)
Absolutely none. From personal experience, if a TSA agent offers to hold something for you or put it on the conveyor belt for you, don't let them. If you do, youll never see that item again.
Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (ctq0s)
I'll bet that minimal requirement isn't even enforced. They may show up on time every so often.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (9hSKh)
Well, it's no Enquirer, but Jones occasionally offers accounts of events that happened sort of like his story says they did.
Every time Ace brings us some shit breaking off the AP or Reuters wire, he has to retract it, walk back his OUTRAGE!, and hose down our fury a couple hours later. This is safer.
Posted by: oblig. at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: wetblanket at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (VL4iq)
A lot of people fly w/lose fitting clothing.
This is getting insane.
If they tried that w/me I'd make that three year-old's tantrum look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (pLTLS)
Muslim women are exempt from scanning or body searches.
Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (bb3GK)
"Now if they only hire cute college girls in Emma Peel outfits, and put leather manacles on you while they fondle you, I might continue flying."
Yeah, can we request sailors? I need to see them lift heavy objects slowly first, though.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at November 16, 2010 10:41 AM (HaYO4)
What sort of background checks to these guys go through?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 02:33 PM (UOM4
The same kind they're dishing out - ham handed.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 16, 2010 10:41 AM (HBqDo)
Step 2. Before you let the TSA goon touch you, insist very loudly upon whipping out your smartphone and looking him up in the sex offender registry.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (z4es9)
I'v been in some really dark, smelly places, but Prisonplanet? C'mon, even my standards are better than that.
Posted by: Your junk at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: catmman at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (DTzwU)
Posted by: James at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (Nljcu)
Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (ctq0s)
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: fluffy doesn't smell so good, either. at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (4Kl5M)
If they tried that w/me I'd make that three year-old's tantrum look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 02:40 PM (pLTLS)
I know! Damn. But it looks like they are going to make the 'junk' guy pay $10k. Insane appears to be only scratching the surface.
Looks like any decision on where to start cutting govt spending, has pretty much made itself.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (RkRxq)
Step 2. Before you let the TSA goon touch you, insist very loudly upon whipping out your smartphone and looking him up in the sex offender registry.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 02:42 PM (z4es9)
Oh, and step 2a: Hum the Bed Intruder song while you do it.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (z4es9)
I feel bad for parents. the more i think about it, the more i get pissed about the idea of some parent having to watch this kid get fondled or looked at naked with one of those scanners.
Also, what is the protocol for scanner pictures? Do they hold onto them forever? 3 weeks? 3 days?
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:44 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 16, 2010 10:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jaclyn at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (HV1jm)
I'm pretty sure I saw some of the guys on "to catch a predator"
Posted by: lorien1973 at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (IhQuA)
EVERY day is Buck Farack Day!!!!!!!
Welcome to the obamanation forrmerly known as The United States of America...the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.
He's just trying to prove that he's doing more to protect the United States from terrorism than that George Bush ever did.......
Posted by: Sponge at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (ctq0s)
Posted by: Ncj on the iphone4 saying you're fired biatch!!!!! at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (bLeYn)
It ain't my blog, but there must be better source for articles than these two bastions of nutty, 9/11 Truther, anti-semitic nonsense.
Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: catmman at November 16, 2010 02:42 PM (DTzwU)
Normally i would agree but in these Jones is using material from other people.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (bb3GK)
Muslim women are exempt from scanning or body searches.
Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 02:40 PM (bb3GK)
What is the motherfucking point? If this is true, damn!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (RkRxq)
The same federal government which refuses to acknowledge any link between Islam and international terrorism, the same federal government which acts as al-Qaeda's defense counsel....
....insists on feeling you up before you get on a plane.
Wow.
The Christmas Day Bomber has more rights and protections than WE do.
Posted by: Sam Adams at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (/KqYi)
Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (nTjSs)
The moral of the story is for all of us to become the WV 'lick it or I'll stick it' knife lady?!?!?
Noooooooooo!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 02:47 PM (nTjSs)
You sure are...........
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy is taking notes at November 16, 2010 10:48 AM (uNgbA)
34 Something else is going on with all this, I just can't figure out exactly what it is.
Posted by: Johnny at November 16, 2010 02:35 PM (mhmc7)
The lefties at Wired claims it's because Chertoff owns the company that makes the scanners.As if Big Sis would actually do him a favor.
I don't how people that stupid can stay alive.
Posted by: Ed Anger at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Ncj on the iphone4 saying you're fired biatch!!!!! at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (bLeYn)
Posted by: James at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (Nljcu)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (9cflz)
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (IfUrl)
How can they fine that "don't touch my junk" guy 10,000 dollars, if i am not mistaken he didn't fly, correct?
He opted out of the scanner and the pat down and left. So why is he fined? he didn't fly anywhere.
Also, does anyone have a link to that blog pos Maet put up some weeks ago about a guy flying back into america and explaining the laws regarding re-entry into the US and how no TSA agent or anyone can legally refuse you re-entry, so you don't have to answer any of their question.
I think the guy was a lawyer and he went point by point through the laws of reentry into the US.
Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (AZGON)
"Last time I was in an airport (leaving DC National to fly back to California) the TSA agents were all openly grunting to one another about an attractive woman passing through security. I was 10 feet away and I could hear them. It was blatant. But of course no one wants to say anything because you could miss your flight or be subject to a search yourself."
Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 16, 2010 02:31 PM (tf9Ne)
Happy ending?
Posted by: wrg at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (mB2ub)
However true the story may be,
Yeah. I'm not even sure if it's true. I followed the link (stupidly), but did not find a primary source. Maybe I missed it, but it sounded like hearsay.
Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM (/KqYi)
I found the This Week in Tech stuff. It's legit. I'm trying to find the tv fgeed Jones used.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (bb3GK)
Ok... I think I just figured this out... had to put on my Lib hat to get through the Lib Logic... but here goes..
First, they will force 15% Ethanol Gasoline on us, which damages older cars.
Then, they make it so people do not want to fly, because of the Invasive security checks... and thus drive to distant destinations.
Some assembly required, but due to the amount of mileage now put on older cars and E-15 damaging them, you will have to buy new cars...
Of which MANY will be GM....
And as the Unions own a large part of GM....
(its like the 7 degrees from Kevin Bacon game, everything with this administration eventually comes back to the Unions...).
/sarc.... or.... hmmm... not?
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 10:52 AM (uNgbA)
Posted by: The 4th Amendment at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (LJ272)
Make a 4th. Form Muslims. Route them to the same place where Spinal Tap was trying to find their way to the stage.
Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (wOGfT)
I recall back as late as '08 my carry on (laptop bag) would get pulled aside for an extra check because of all the ethernet cables, serial cables, etc in the bag that I'd need for work. Haven't had that happen since maybe '09.
The last time I flew, it was out of Dayton OH. I actually got pulled aside for an extra pat down and a trace chemical check on my hands. Because the mild mannered white guy is the real problem, sure. The TSA r-tard doing the check seemed all too giddy to delay me an extra five minutes at the check out.
I'm happy that I get to fly out of smaller airports for business 90% of the time, so I haven't run into the body scanners yet. But its only a matter of time.
Posted by: Gaff at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (EFb2o)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:54 AM (UOM48)
So they're attempting to make that as invasive as possible -- and let people know how invasive it's going to be -- to get you to walk through the body imager.
Yep. If you opt-out, they all holler "OPT OUT!" over and over, so that you'll be embarrassed into never doing that again. And so that others will not opt out.
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 16, 2010 10:54 AM (2Sfpk)
Posted by: Holger at November 16, 2010 10:55 AM (V9Q+f)
The pictures are supposed to be erased immediately after examination. (yeah, right).
Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM (ctq0s)
Actualy, I don't think they CAN destroy the images, as IF they caught someone through using the scan, they would be evidence.
It will fall under the same rules as texts and emails, where EVERYTHING is now kept, just in case it may be needed for evidence someday.
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (AdK6a)
Airports: Americas NEW playgrounds.
Posted by: TSA Agent at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (sWgE+)
Posted by: MikeInBA at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (1hSHv)
Posted by: lasue at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (S25IC)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (WZFkG)
I think its time to bust out my official John The Wad Holmes E-Z Fit, Natural Look, Prosthetic Enhancement device®
...Hey it better than a cucumber wrapped in tin foil.
Posted by: Nigel Tufnel at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (pr+up)
I think that this is about increasing the need for TSA agents, and ergo, they can end up being unionized government employees. A way to 'increase employment'.
I also think that a healthy dose of 'sending government money to businesses that are being run by former Homeland Security Executives' is also going on.
Nothing says 'yahoo i'm rich' then scoring a contract with Uncle Sam where you charge 165 million bucks for a single scanner.
F*** our civil rights and the fourth amendment, there is some money to be made, eh.
Oh and our friend Soros is a stockholder in one of those companies. Must be a coincedence.
Posted by: JR at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (DEQXX)
Posted by: Jayne Cobb at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (AVbdY)
Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 02:47 PM (nTjSs)
Look buddy - I have a better chance of showing up in the US than you do.
Posted by: Easter Bunny at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (z1N6a)
Yeah, I read some of those.
Just horrible.
The TSA needs to demonstrate that this crap is helping in a meaningful way. If it isn't, they need to cut it out or the airlines should go with private screening companies.
Oh, and this is a very bi-partisan/non-partisan issue. People are outraged across the political spectrum. Unfortunately, we disagree on the best solution, but at least it is not really a GOP issue (which is good). I have noticed a little STFU sensibility coming from the Kool-Aid drinkers who think the complaints are meant as a criticism of Fearless Reader, but other than that it's got a lot of people pissed.
Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 10:57 AM (UcOiF)
Next time at the airport i'll just do a 'Silence of the Lambs' tuck-in and put a mouse trap down there.
That'll show 'em.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at November 16, 2010 10:58 AM (QMtmy)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 10:59 AM (9cflz)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:59 AM (bb3GK)
Yes, if Barry were smart this would be a nice time to throw them under the bus, which he is good at. He can always give the new jobs to a different union.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:00 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 11:00 AM (8/DeP)
Is that a rocket launcher I feel down there or are you just glad to see me?
Posted by: Fat, Gross TSA Rent-A-Cop at November 16, 2010 11:01 AM (QKKT0)
I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade.
Unfair. They are the only ones he has!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 11:01 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 02:56 PM (WZFkG)
If the lefties could organize something like this, I might consider joining them. They can't plan their way out of a paper bag.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (z1N6a)
How long before some guy who spent a couple of hours at the bar in the airport because of a flight delay just levels the TSA guy for getting to close his junk?
What's going to be scary is when they give these punks a gun to carry. We can kiss "polite but stern" goodbye. (Up against the wall, motherfucker)
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (IfUrl)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 03:00 PM (8/DeP)
It's interesting that Drudge can always pick the picture that makes someone look the gayest.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (bb3GK)
They can't just restrict us all to our enclaves (yet), but if they make it exceedingly difficult to go any significant distance, fewer people will travel. Less mobility = populace that is easier to control.
Just sayin'
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (8y9MW)
Unfortunately, as noted earlier, the private screening companies will be crippled as well due to all the lawsuits that will inevitably be thrown their way if they *gasp* actually try to screen somebody.
TSA should not be making air travel a "touching experience".
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (9hSKh)
PrisonPlanet? Seriously? You're linking to Alex Jones the 9-11 truther?
Good God WTF is happening to AoS?
Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 11:03 AM (XHR9b)
Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 11:03 AM (c3oPV)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:04 AM (9cflz)
What's going to be scary is when they give these punks a gun to carry. We can kiss "polite but stern" goodbye. (Up against the wall, motherfucker)
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 03:02 PM (IfUrl)
They will probably just shoot each other during coffee breaks.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:04 AM (z1N6a)
It will fall under the same rules as texts and emails, where EVERYTHING is now kept, just in case it may be needed for evidence someday.
So TSA lied? Go figure.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (9hSKh)
The educational requirement for employment with the TSA? A GED.
The attitude requirement for the same? Be a surly power tripper.
I've been yelled at in LAX and patted down in a back cubicle at SAN, full chest. All with maximum attitude.
TSA are collectively a revolting group of people.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (QLiYt)
Posted by: Guy who just got off HSR and realizes he needs a car to get to his destination at November 16, 2010 11:06 AM (gQ+XA)
So TSA lied? Go figure.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 03:05 PM (9hSKh)
Or they don't even know that the images are saved. That's technical mumbo jumbo.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:06 AM (z1N6a)
One of those clips was from the local ABC affiliate here in Houston, KTRK-13.
Posted by: John D. Rockefeller at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (jmf9+)
If the lefties could organize something like this, I might consider joining them. They can't plan their way out of a paper bag.
Yes. This is a bad idea that's being poorly executed. Double negative which is par for the course for this piece of shit administration.
Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (uNgbA)
Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (XHR9b)
Posted by: Andrew "Dice" Airline Passenger at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (kbGFh)
AllenG's Rebuttal: Upping the Ante: AllenG Tempted to Begin Using "Elbow Smash Diplomacy" to "Reason" With TSA Personnel.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (8y9MW)
When I took commuter rail in Chicago, it took 20 minutes to get out of the suburban rail parking lot after the train ride.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (NITzp)
http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2007/11/surprise-vagina.html
Posted by: Flounder at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (WZFkG)
Anyone want to take up a moron collection to buy our own plane? Moron Air.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: ParisParamus at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (del3r)
Posted by: fluffy doesn't smell so good, either. at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 03:09 PM (WZFkG)
So only smart people can do damage? You must not have lived in Chicago very long.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (z1N6a)
PrisonPlanet? Seriously? You're linking to Alex Jones the 9-11 truther?
Good God WTF is happening to AoS?
Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 03:03 PM (XHR9b)
Except in this instance Jones is using other sources. Forex, you could watch the entire 1:09:30 episode of This Week in Tech to get part of it.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (bb3GK)
Shhhh.
Posted by: Massive wealth transfers from burbs to cities, jacked-up gas prices, and boondoggle subsidies that o at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Fritz at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (GwPRU)
Ostracize any TSA 'worker' that you known.
Given that there are thousands of them, they have to be neighbors to someone.
Publicly snub them & their families by announcing whenever you see them that you don't want to associate with people who work for an organization that is suspected of condoning & encouraging sexual groping. Point them out to your children just like you would any other perv that they need to be careful of and stay away from.
Make sure that your & their neighbors know what the new policy is & what the TSAer does at work. It is reported that the majority of the public still listen to the evening news, which is not covering the new situation.
Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (w5RwR)
I've been yelled at in LAX and patted down in a back cubicle at SAN, full chest. All with maximum attitude.
TSA are collectively a revolting group of people.
I've never been to many east coast airports, but I'll add another two connections just to avoid LA. You're right. Their attitudes can only be described as third-world thugs on a power trip.
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (IfUrl)
When they direct as many man hours to cargo as they do to passenger screening, I'll be reassured that due diligence is being met.
Till then, it's security theater and nothing more.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:12 AM (QLiYt)
That knowledge is beyond the pay-grade of the average TSA agent? Makes me feel real safe should I ever choose to fly again...*rolls eyes*.
But never fear, Napolitano 'open' to fliers' gripes over screening
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:12 AM (9hSKh)
speaking of things that could make you cry...
that video of Cheney. he looks so thin. way too thin. not good.
it's at RCP video.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 11:13 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 03:11 PM (w5RwR)
This also works if your neighbors are Democrats, and supported Teddy Kennedy at any time.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:13 AM (z1N6a)
Just like those of Mrs. Bambi, you know that those where the best looking ones that could be found.
Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 11:15 AM (w5RwR)
But never fear, Napolitano 'open' to fliers' gripes over screening
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 03:12 PM (9hSKh)
Probably the best way to reform the TSA is to require all congressmen, their staffs, and their families to go through the lines several times per trip.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:15 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 11:17 AM (WZFkG)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:17 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: cali grump at November 16, 2010 11:18 AM (hL0k8)
Require Obama's girls to go through the procedures they want our children to go through. The older daughter is above the age limit they've set.
Public servants and their families should lead the way and show that is a-ok for all of us.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:19 AM (QLiYt)
Posted by: TSA at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (FcR7P)
Yep, unfortunately, the gov't is not on our side in this war....
Posted by: KG at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (DeCj1)
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (W7Ddq)
the TSA like every other government agency has lost sight of it's orginal mission and now only exists to perpetutate itself, how many times does this have to happen before people realize that giving any more power to the government than the Framers allowed it is an incredibly bad idea?
Posted by: Shoey at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: citizen khan at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (nwdIs)
We're fucking doomed. The libtards have figured out a way to inject some kind of gas into the atmosphere, and it is turning us all into PC sheep.
Posted by: Peasant-in-the-Forest at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (4sQwu)
1. If you're Muslim, you have to ride on your own airline. Blow up MuzzieAir if you want, ask me if I care.
Just not over populated areas, please.
Posted by: Cicero at November 16, 2010 11:23 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:23 AM (9cflz)
The majority of Americans have not been through it. Another sizable group are blissfully unaware that there may be health risks. Another group will do anything to appear to be supportive of the current administration.
It really doesn't matter if the majority say they approve on a poll. Someone will push this issue in the courts and they'll win.
Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 11:24 AM (UcOiF)
Now we'll have to worry about those inside-the-pants TSA grabs leaving chemtrails....
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 16, 2010 11:25 AM (Ulu3i)
I'd have to see the questions and the polling sample before I believe that.
Oh, I know that's what the organization says (I can't remember which one, but I think I saw that this morning), but, if they keep to form, their question was something like this:
"Please state which of the following two statements better represent your view:
a) I'd like to be blown to smithereens.
b) I don't mind being subjected to increased security screening."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:26 AM (9cflz)
Posted by: tmitsss at November 16, 2010 11:26 AM (V4Pya)
Posted by: baldilocks at November 16, 2010 11:27 AM (aJ7NC)
According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report to Congress submitted tomorrow, 15 percent of the world's Internet traffic was redirected for 18-minutes through computer servers in China on April, 8, 2010. Obviously, that incident allowed severe malicious activities including the diversion of data and the interception of supposedly secure encrypted Internet traffic.
A draft copy reports for the first time that .gov and .mil websites were affected by the 18-minute-long April 8 redirection, including those for the Senate, all four military services, the office of the secretary of defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration "and many others," as well as commercial websites including those of Dell, Yahoo, Microsoft and IBM.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:27 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (9cflz)
WHOSE polls show that an overwhelming majority of the public approves of all this shit.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (H+LJc)
Not only the stupidity of the govt, but the absolute appeasment to the muzzies whose ROP caused us to go thru this crap in the first place.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:30 AM (9cflz)
My experience at LAX was waiting for screening. A twenty something guy a few places ahead of me said something which I couldn't quite hear and a TSA guy in his 50's came running over, got literally about 3 inches from his face and began bellowing "Do you want to fly today? Do you? Do you?" over and over, drill seargent style, while glaring anyone near him and directing it at the rest of us from time to time. Breathing hard and almost snorting. He was in a true rage.
I had said or done nothing, but when this dude let fly, I could have pissed my pants.
Everyone around me was staring at their shoes and not daring to move.
Group mentality set in.
It is making my hands shake right now. He was really frightening.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:30 AM (QLiYt)
This makes me wonder, what if we got, say, 100 morons together all at the same airport for the same flight- and then we just ignored the TSA. Walked right through, one after another, completely ignoring anything the TSA agents said or did?
No violence, no back-talk, just silence and completely ignoring/rejecting their authority.
I say 100, because it think that's a good number to get the rest of the passengers to follow along as well...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Xavier at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (ehmUT)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (9cflz)
Posted by: Truman Al-Shabbabi at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: Jaimo at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (9U1OG)
Posted by: baldilocks at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (aJ7NC)
190 I wonder if you can opt for opposite sex groping?
Get a bunch of Daniel Craig, Hugh Jackman, Alex OÂ’Loughlin or Tarkan look alikes, and you'd have ladies lining up to fly.
Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (Ty06w)
Something like tsamisconduct.com ?? Make it a clearing house for evidence of embarrassing, corrupt, criminal and negligent TSA behavior?
Posted by: ef at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (C49Fs)
speaking of things that could make you cry...
that video of Cheney. he looks so thin. way too thin. not good.
it's at RCP video.
That's not "thin." That's gaunt. Pray for him, folks.
Posted by: Lou at November 16, 2010 11:36 AM (MkXBH)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:37 AM (9cflz)
Do passengers have a right to refuse security checks?
Yes, the intrusion and inconvenience outweigh the security benefits.
No, aviation security is essential and passengers must get used to the new rules.
Words. Just words. The exact, detailed meaning of "Security Checks" is what? And if passengers have the right to refuse, that includes the terrorists' right to refuse security checks, which means that everyone has the right to refuse. That nullifies any point for said "security checks".
Bring on the dogs perusing lines at metal detectors.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:37 AM (H+LJc)
At $11K per violation, it looks like Big Sis has figured out how to pay for those sweet, sweet federal pensions.
Posted by: Fritz at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (RD7QR)
I thought the same when Fred Thompson lost so much weight so quickly during the fire in teh belly '08 campaign.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (xvYOH)
Posted by: KG at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (DeCj1)
So what's there protocol if they encounter a urostomy , colostomy, catheter or some other medical device?
Posted by: YIKES! at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (lzMVN)
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (IfUrl)
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 03:39 PM (xvYOH)
...and that is why I'll never fly again. I'll just butcher rental cars for company trips.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (x3YFz)
tune in radio tokyo on your nipples and moaning loudly during the erotic grope;
wearing the tightest, most revealing garments (bodysuits, G-strings, etc.) that you can get away with;
hip thrusts in the direction of the groper;
demanding opposite-sex groping;
all of the above.
This is getting out of hand.
Posted by: Flounder at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: cali grump at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (RD7QR)
...and that is why I'll never fly again. I'll just butcher rental cars for company trips.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 03:40 PM (x3YFz)
Neither will I. I've driven from Columbus to the West Coast and back and had a ball while doing it.
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (xvYOH)
I didn't, at the time this happened to me, see any need to be ready to record anything.
Being a super law and order kind of person, I fully supported any security measures in force. I wanted them.
I didn't know that a drill instructor impersonator could scream and berate people standing in line, in silence and complying with everything they were asked to do.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:43 AM (QLiYt)
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 03:41 PM (H+LJc)
FTFY
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:43 AM (x3YFz)
Most fun airline ever. If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:44 AM (UOM48)
Don't worry, I am a transvestite muslim woman when I am at the airport.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 11:44 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 03:42 PM (RD7QR)
I don't know... is there?
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Stanky Poozle at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (X67eL)
Hot ex-Marines with guns.
I'll fly that airline!
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (GBXon)
Most of the people I encountered during the process are just people trying to make a living, I doubt most of them want to be feeling you up anymore than you want to be.
My experience with the TSA hiring process was that it was thorough but it was excessively bureaucratic. First I had to apply online including supplying copies of my DD-214s then there was a screening test which is covered by NDA, but I think I can say that half of it was interpreting the images from the x-ray machines, and it was a lot harder than it looks. I don't really think I can say anything about the other portions. You also have to have a medical screening, and finally I had to fill out the same paperwork that I did when I had got my security clearance in the Navy. TSA screeners may not be the best and brightest but at this point they aren't just hiring warm bodies.
I also at one time worked for a security company that had the contract to run the screening points in my hometown (worked for them twice actually 10 years part) they did just throw warm bodies into that position, and when TSA took over some of them were grandfathered in but I know at least half have been fired since then.
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 11:46 AM (WNcvq)
206 194 Can a 260 pound guy legally fly in a speedo and a tube top?
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 03:34 PM (9cflz)
Legally, yes. Morally, no.
Spandex is a priviledge, not a right.
Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 11:46 AM (Ty06w)
Most fun airline ever. If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 03:44 PM (UOM4
Complimentary val-u-rite, free hobo-shooting games, topless flight attendants... b_c_n served in-flight. What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:47 AM (x3YFz)
Stompy-booted moronette flight attendants? Yes!
Moron/ettes in the cockpit? Ummm, I'm walking.
Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 11:47 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Truman North at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (G5JPI)
Most of the people I encountered during the process are just people trying to make a living, I doubt most of them want to be feeling you up anymore than you want to be.
My experience with the TSA hiring process was that it was thorough but it was excessively bureaucratic. First I had to apply online including supplying copies of my DD-214s then there was a screening test which is covered by NDA, but I think I can say that half of it was interpreting the images from the x-ray machines, and it was a lot harder than it looks. I don't really think I can say anything about the other portions. You also have to have a medical screening, and finally I had to fill out the same paperwork that I did when I had got my security clearance in the Navy. TSA screeners may not be the best and brightest but at this point they aren't just hiring warm bodies.
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 03:46 PM (WNcvq)
How many branches of the service did you get thrown out of?!
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: stevea28 at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (SnpkK)
Stompy-booted moronette flight attendants? Yes!
Moron/ettes in the cockpit? Ummm, I'm walking.
Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 03:47 PM (wOGfT)
stompy booted... incoming alex!
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:49 AM (x3YFz)
I'm going to get accused of being a SF street-fair type once this gets going. What I have is a large scrotum. The rest of me is pretty much in proportion, and I don't go around being weird about it, but it's the size of a grapefruit. I usually wear a cup, for modesty's sake, but that won't wash in the new security environment, will it? My cover will be blown, if you want to put it that way.
It doesn't matter whether it's the scanner or the quick feel, most of those inspectors are going to think something's amiss here, and I will end up dropping my trousers a lot. Believe it or not, I'm not looking forward to that. You can fantasize some outcomes, but in the real world, people's reaction to oversized packages is typically sneering disgust, or the presumption that you're some kind of men's-room crawler.
You can drive a truck from coast to coast, and nobody will give a damn what size your testicles are.
Posted by: nah, you'll have to look up my IP at November 16, 2010 11:50 AM (hrwMe)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (UOM48)
I'd like to see these TSA jackwagons do a pat down on MOH Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta.
Hilarity would not ensue.
Posted by: mpfs at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (iYbLN)
A great idea for Chris Christie after he gets done with the teachers' unions-- take on the TSA!
Posted by: PA Cat at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (Jtz0H)
Oh goodie! The next war to be blamed on a Republican:
This might be Barry's Vietnam, I mean, if he were a Republican.
HotAir
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (RkRxq)
Two words: Moron Air. Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes. Only passengers allowed: fellow morons. No screening, just the secret code word: b_c_n.
Most fun airline ever. If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.
And we get to fly FREE! ......or?
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (IfUrl)
"Squirrels in my Pants"-inator
http://tinyurl.com/58m2lx
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 16, 2010 11:52 AM (zqzYV)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 03:51 PM (UOM4
inverted supersonic fly-bys in a 747! Sign me up!
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:52 AM (x3YFz)
Been to Oakland Airport lately? Or IAD? Many of the TSA 'agents' at Dulles look like casbah rug-sellers. and at Oakland it's 'You Know You Ghetto'
Even the White 'agents' are officious dildoes and a waste of space
Several games are being played here........
Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (7Jipo)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 03:39 PM (xvYOH)
Except that Federal Law must follow the Constitution. You do NOT give up your Rights by entering private property.... you can voluntarily allow someone to violate your rights (the search) but can reassert your Rights at any time, heck, you can even ask for a LAWYER in an Airport if you think they are being too invasive...
But then... there are LOTS of things the Feds do which do not follow the Constitution....
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 11:54 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)
Cadillac CTS-V? /sarc off
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 16, 2010 11:54 AM (zqzYV)
You can drive a truck from coast to coast, and nobody will give a damn what size your testicles are.
Posted by: nah, you'll have to look up my IP at November 16, 2010 03:50 PM (hrwMe)
TMI
Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (UqKQV)
The Tata Nano?
Posted by: MrScribbler at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (Ulu3i)
Hilarity would not ensue.
I beg to differ. Highlight reel! Popcorn for everyone!
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Wascully Wabbit at November 16, 2010 11:57 AM (FweJ7)
Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)
I already know. What an effing joke.
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:57 AM (xvYOH)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius
Your denunciation amounts to Alinsky inspired hate speech. "Burn him!"
His style may resemble an oldfashioned hell fire and damnation preacher, "I have the documents!"
But your label would as likely target Sgt. York's hometown minister to an secular authoritarian inquisition for preaching from his own pulpit "Repent and be saved!"
Take a deep breath and admit that his stories come from news articles. Take those or leave them as you like. But targeting any law abiding opinionated American citizen taxpayer as a domestic terrorist illustrates the thought process of malicious and vindictive thugs.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:58 AM (H+LJc)
Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.
Yeah, he does this shit often.
Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 11:58 AM (pLTLS)
Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year? Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM
The Russian Lada? The Zil? Oh, the Volt. Same same.
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:59 AM (IfUrl)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:00 PM (9cflz)
Posted by: SarahW at November 16, 2010 12:01 PM (Z4T49)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (JcRgg)
Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year? Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM
The Russian Lada? The Zil? Oh, the Volt. Same same.
Posted by: Soona
It also received a Nobel peace prize.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (R2fpr)
I heard Friedman on MSDNC yesterday complaining that gas taxes need to go through the roof to "force" people to buy Priuses and other shitty cars. Typical elitist douchebag lib.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (UOM48)
Been to Oakland Airport lately? Or IAD? Many of the TSA 'agents' at Dulles look like casbah rug-sellers. and at Oakland it's 'You Know You Ghetto'
Even the White 'agents' are officious dildoes and a waste of space
Several games are being played here........
Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (UqKQV)
So... you're saying they're "union?"
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:03 PM (x3YFz)
Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers. That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.
Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)
If it isn't the Bugatti Veyron, then they chose wrong.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, Bacon Raconteur at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (eCAn3)
I heard Friedman on MSDNC yesterday complaining that gas taxes need to go through the roof to "force" people to buy Priuses and other shitty cars. Typical elitist douchebag lib.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 04:02 PM (UOM4
If I'm ever seen driving a princess, please empty your clip into the driver's side door. (zombie apocalypse notwithstanding)
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (x3YFz)
But then... there are LOTS of things the Feds do which do not follow the Constitution....Posted by: Romeo13
In Clinton's rationale for perjury, "Because they could." Only if the Feds are allowed by the citizenry to violate the Constitution. Evidently, that's not really the case.
As with the grassroots up swell of the Tea Party movement, though not limited to "those people", this repulsive sexual assault on the public by federal employees is meeting massive opposition that has only begun to awaken.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:05 PM (9cflz)
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:06 PM (H+LJc)
130, I've MET Secretary Napolitano, and she DOES look like a creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher in person. And she is a SHITTY speaker, even with a teleprompter setup. Either she was stopping every fifteen seconds trying to phrase her way around classification issues (doubtful, teleprompter), or she's too dumb to read her own notes.
167, no, I'm still trying to get a couple more of my Iraqi interpreters out of Iraq and into the States.
Me, I'll be the one making porno noises in the checkout line, and offering the screener twenty bucks if they "finish, if you know what I'm sayin'" I spent part of a year searching Iraqis. I know all kinds of ways to make a screener's life hellish.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 16, 2010 12:06 PM (QUuUE)
Glad we're not flying anywhere.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:07 PM (UOM48)
Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers. That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.
Exceptions would of course be made for important people transacting federal business; people like me, peasant!
Posted by: Supreme Safety Law Lord Ray LaHood at November 16, 2010 12:07 PM (ERJIu)
That's the way it should be.
Posted by: SarahW at November 16, 2010 04:01 PM (Z4T49)
Well at least there's a pencil-thin ray of light in all of this insanity.
I'm still never flying again, tho.
Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 12:08 PM (xvYOH)
Posted by: nickless at November 16, 2010 12:09 PM (MMC8r)
Not in Illinois.
I've seen guys shaving while driving. Girls plucking eyebrows. The usual cosmetics and reading stuff. And road head. Don't forget the road head. Are they going to outlaw that, too?
Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:10 PM (wOGfT)
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:10 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (+lsX1)
When they pry it from my cold, dead hand.
Or something like that.
Posted by: nickless at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (MMC8r)
Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.
Yeah, he does this shit often. -- Posted by: Mark Levin
lolPosted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (9cflz)
Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers. That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.
Exceptions would of course be made for important people transacting federal business; people like me, peasant!
Posted by: Supreme Safety Law Lord Ray LaHood
Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (R2fpr)
This was because the guy has an artificial knee.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (UOM48)
I'd like to see these TSA jackwagons do a pat down on MOH Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta.
Hilarity would not ensue."
Remember this?
HOENIX, Arizona (CNN) -- Retired Gen. Joe Foss, 86, one of the most highly decorated U.S. war veterans, recently was detained at a security checkpoint at the Phoenix, Arizona, airport because he was carrying an item with sharp edges.
The sharp object turned out to be the Congressional Medal of Honor, which he had received in 1943 from President Franklin D. Roosevelt
Posted by: tmitsss at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (V4Pya)
130, I've MET Secretary Napolitano, and she DOES look like a creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher in person. And she is a SHITTY speaker, even with a teleprompter setup. Either she was stopping every fifteen seconds trying to phrase her way around classification issues (doubtful, teleprompter), or she's too dumb to read her own notes.
167, no, I'm still trying to get a couple more of my Iraqi interpreters out of Iraq and into the States.
Me, I'll be the one making porno noises in the checkout line, and offering the screener twenty bucks if they "finish, if you know what I'm sayin'" I spent part of a year searching Iraqis. I know all kinds of ways to make a screener's life hellish.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 16, 2010 04:06 PM (QUuUE)
Were I to ever fly again, I'd soak my underwear in a combination garlic/cat piss paste.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (x3YFz)
282 If all TSA personnel were clones of Kate Beckinsale, I would wholeheartedly support this screening process.
Not all,
Hunky hotties for us girls (OK, one Hugh Jackman is all I ask!)
Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (Ty06w)
LOL.... DROVE from Denver to Chicago and back last week, to see my Son Graduate Navy Bootcamp... 2100 miles...
And best part? the only one who gropped my crotch was the Hotty I picked up in a bar in Chicago.... /smile
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (AdK6a)
74 Alex Jones is a nut, but not infrequently his stuff can be accurate when you start drilling back to the original sources. Maybe 50% is completely crank shit.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:15 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 04:10 PM (x3YFz)
Ain't youuse got no imagination?
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 04:11 PM (0GFWk)
I haz a 1-track imagination.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:15 PM (x3YFz)
Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?
Posted by: Feldwebel Franz, Grammar Nazi at November 16, 2010 12:16 PM (f1jQH)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:16 PM (UOM48)
Two. 2 years in the Army as a 19E10/20. 12 years in the Navy as a Corpsman. 8 of those were with USMC units as an 8404/8432/8425, and I had a 1 year break in service while in the Navy so I have 3 DD-214s, as well as the Honorable Discharge certificates that go with them.
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:18 PM (WNcvq)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:18 PM (9cflz)
Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?
Posted by: Feldwebel Franz, Grammar Nazi at November 16, 2010 04:16 PM (f1jQH)
wow.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 12:20 PM (0GFWk)
Holy crap. The Judge is on Cavuto, and said a friend of his went through a TSA crotch grab yesterday that included removing his jacket, ripping his shirt, unzipping his pants, and looking inside. All this in full view of the rest of the travelers.
This was because the guy has an artificial knee.
I saw that too. Frightening. I've got steel running up and down my leg from a bad accident I had a few years ago. I have to fly the first week of December, and I think I'm going to go commando and taking a dose of Viagra. Thank God that the American people are waking up to this kind of shit.
Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (IfUrl)
Two. 2 years in the Army as a 19E10/20. 12 years in the Navy as a Corpsman. 8 of those were with USMC units as an 8404/8432/8425, and I had a 1 year break in service while in the Navy so I have 3 DD-214s, as well as the Honorable Discharge certificates that go with them.
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 04:18 PM (WNcvq)
DoD passed you around like a phillipino bar slut! Gratz!
(and I was just giving you shit)
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: A.G. at November 16, 2010 12:22 PM (/ErxX)
Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?
I say! Your understanding is underdeveloped! I must place you under arrest for failure of comprehension!
I will also be passing the records to Interlingual Interpol, as I draw from your statement the idea that your German may also be sketchy...
Posted by: Inspector Spector, Vocabulary Constabulary at November 16, 2010 12:23 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 04:19 PM (WZFkG)
this is fow the sawfty of amewica!
Posted by: Barney Frank at November 16, 2010 12:23 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 16, 2010 12:24 PM (2Sfpk)
I received a farewell groping from Chicago O'Hare TSA last Thursday.
Before going through the bodyscan/metal detector, the TSA people put me to one side between the metal detector and the scanner and told me to stand facing the lines of people passing me through both machines. I stood there several minutes while my wallet and other items went through the machine.
I was ignored for a few minutes until two new guys came up to me, took me by the arm, stopped the metal detector line and escorted me through. They asked me if someone was taking care of my property. I responded that I didn't know because I was not allowed to proceed through the line with it.
Then the two guys took me to the center of three little foot print search mats about 30 feet directly in front and center of all the other security lines, so people in line were all facing me. I asked my wife to secure my property as I passed, but she could not come back into the designated area at the end of the machine, so there it sat.
The TSA guys repeatedly asked if I wanted a private screening room, but I said no. In my line of work, I've been thoroughly and professionally patted down innumerable times, so I just told them to get on with it. The young TSA guys repeatedly warned me that they were going to pat down "sensitive areas" The patdown was thorough, but slow. At one point I attempted to untuck my shirt to assist the search, but they firmly instructed me to keep my hands out to the sides. I've never had the waistband of my pants turned over and examined so carefully and slowly, though. That's when they advised me that they were putting their hands inside the waistband of my pants and clothing.
I clearly functioned as an example to anyone who might be selected for special treatment. I was made to face the huge crowd of people standing in line nearly all of whom were watching the pat down. Kind of a spectacle.
On the return trip on Sunday, I was selected for the body scan. In my opinion, the pat down is less invasive with no attendant health risks, but I didn't want to delay getting to my flight.
I am still amazed that people put up with this stuff on a regular basis, but if you want to fly you have no choice. Watching grown people from all walks of life wander around in their socks with their shoes, clothing and personal property in garbage bins at the direction of low level government functionaries is absurd.
Posted by: casual at November 16, 2010 12:24 PM (hajhV)
3 day old underwear, or older was a thought of mine, but what about the poor person you end up sitting next to?
Well, the seats do stink already and are still warm when you get on, so not much difference there.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:27 PM (QLiYt)
3 day old underwear, or older was a thought of mine, but what about the poor person you end up sitting next to?
Well, the seats do stink already and are still warm when you get on, so not much difference there.
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 04:27 PM (QLiYt)
If anyone said anything, I scream "TERRORIST!" jump up and point at them and call for the air marshall.
Posted by: Barney Frank at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (x3YFz)
1. Take Viagra
2. Wear a condom
and last but not least
3. Bring along a boombox and play Barry White music.
That will get this nonsense stopped quickly.
Posted by: kf at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (ytCsK)
Posted by: chad
And these originated in the US?
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 16, 2010 12:31 PM (eQrQ9)
Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 04:12 PM (R2fpr)
Or what happened when they tried out the ignition cutout for unbuckled seatbelts. First woman assaulted because she couldn't drive off put paid to the entire idea.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 12:32 PM (z1N6a)
Also, it would have kept his erection from poking into my hamstring.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff
Would be interesting to know the public reaction if someone accused a TSA type of carrying a concealed weapon, and it turned out that it was an erection.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:34 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 04:16 PM (UOM4
Those weren't TSA guys. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (z1N6a)
Simple really, I don't intend to fly and have written to several airlines I have used in the past informing them.
I'll not be treated like cattle for a service I'm paying for.
Posted by: gdonovan at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (ri/ny)
Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 04:12 PM (R2fpr)
Or what happened when they tried out the ignition cutout for unbuckled seatbelts. First woman assaulted because she couldn't drive off put paid to the entire idea.
Posted by: Oldcat
my current favorite is the remote ignition kill that apparantly Onstar can do. Suppsoedly some police forces can do this trick as well. I believe that there have been allegations of hacking ad remotely disabling passing cars.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: SJR2 at November 16, 2010 12:37 PM (oCbCP)
It also received a Nobel peace prize.
Pulitzer, too.
Posted by: CUS
And a blue ribbon at the 4-H Fair!
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:37 PM (oREHE)
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:38 PM (WNcvq)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 12:38 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 16, 2010 12:40 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:40 PM (oREHE)
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:41 PM (QLiYt)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 16, 2010 12:43 PM (xxgag)
Hum when the reach the bottom and say something like, "oh yeah, I put on the easy access pants today"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 16, 2010 12:43 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:45 PM (WNcvq)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose
I may ask them if they want to join me for a Marlboro and a nightcap afterwards. Then I should complain that they didn't take me out to dinner beforehand.
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:46 PM (oREHE)
Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:48 PM (QLiYt)
Posted by: chad
Billy Jeff was also the CIC in 1996, so they probably did think the military should be treated like criminals.
Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:48 PM (oREHE)
I was listening to a "Passenger Rights" person talk about this today. She says the manufacturer's FAQ page stated that the machine only "sees" through 1/10th of an inch of skin. It cannot see inside body cavities, or underneath breasts or inside folds of skin.
The manufacturer removed that FAQ after the contents were revealed.
Posted by: davod at November 16, 2010 12:53 PM (GUZAT)
@185: "The destruction of America is the strategic goal."
America's already been pretty well destroyed. This is just jumping up and down on the corpse.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 16, 2010 12:56 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: apodoca at November 16, 2010 01:02 PM (JCHdz)
I don't know about Nuns and 3 year olds but I do know that in Israel there is a fairly substantial number of suicide bombings committed by kids. I also kind of recall a case about 4 years ago where the Israeli's caught a woman going thru a checkpoint with explosives in her babies stroller and there was a security alert in NY for the same thing. That turned out to be a false alarm but using kids as bomb couriers has been considered at least once.
I said before I agree with profiling for airport security, but I also realize profiles will change as terrorists adapt so Nuns and 3 year olds don't automatically get a pass as far as I am concerned.
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 01:06 PM (WNcvq)
Off topic war story: Ten years ago I was asked to charge a sex assault against a worker at a community corrections facility. Community corrections is like long term work release. The inmates can't drive so they are driven to work. Among this guy's duties was to drive inmates to work.
One of the inmates was a reasonably attractive young women. She told the cops that this guy had put the moves on her, was fondling her, and the next thing she knew, he was sitting there without benefit of pants. She said that he altered his pants so that they closed with Velcro so that he could strip down in no time. I thought that this couldn't be right. Nobody would do that. But then his side of the story was yeah, he had those easy access pants. When you're getting hot and heavy and down to business, you can't be fumbling around with buttons and zippers and what not. You've got to be able go, baby, go!
Posted by: Montgomery Burns at November 16, 2010 01:11 PM (xxgag)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 01:15 PM (+lsX1)
That's pure absolutist bullshit, you intolerant narrow minded nitwit. You'd better not read ANYTHING that hasn't your preconceived approval stamp marked on its packaging.
By constitutional conservative choice, I like Fred Thompson, and always have. There's the pigeon hole you require for identity politics.
Obviously, you never graduated from any school of merit requiring your mind to be challenged with broad research.
No one ever said that Jones is the brightest bulb in the box. I certainly NEVER said that I follow Jones. Anyone who takes something too far does just that. I don't like his distasteful mannerisms any more than I like Obama's bullshit, Palin's screech at rallies, or Hannity's broken recording.
Since he isn't anything other than a loud spokesperson willing to stick his neck out further than others, right or wrong, calling Jones the devil only reflects on the person hurling that label. What you fault as "evil" in Jones is his use of Constitutional Rights to get out his message. But to squash those rights is what would be evil. Late-18th-century Classical Liberal Voltaire Motto: I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
Stupid is as stupid does, Chicken Liver is calling for the annihilation of an opinionated blow hard because Chicken Liver doesn't like him because Chicken Liver doesn't agree with him. You'll go far but only as another grotesque authoritarian attempting to control what people think.
Consider the mote in the beam.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 01:18 PM (H+LJc)
So back when a hijacker thought he could get out of this thing alive. September 11, 2001, the rules changed- for them as much as for us. How many non-muslim hijackings since then?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 01:21 PM (8y9MW)
What could possibly go wrong?
My prediction?
Some guy is arrested by Thanksgiving for assaulting a TSA worker after groping his wife/daughter/girlfriend.
I'm starting a pool if anyone is interested.
Posted by: Oh, Hi Mark at November 16, 2010 01:26 PM (dp9VJ)
Posted by: Frances at November 16, 2010 01:27 PM (AYAWx)
I flew home to see my family in October. I did the body scan thing and I got a pat down as well..and I am a 59 year old woman. I did not have a fit, because I knew when I got the ticket that this is the kind of crap you go through at the airport.
I am sure that some of the people that work for the TSA are bullying idiots, but most of them are just regular people with a not so great job and no doubt they get their asses chewed out if they don't do a lot of this stuff.
We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.
Posted by: Terrye at November 16, 2010 01:34 PM (j8jdm)
Posted by: Weew at November 16, 2010 01:35 PM (p05LM)
What could possibly go wrong?
My prediction?... -- Oh, Hi Mark
sad but likely the case
The point we should consider is what we do about that when it happens.
Demand a Lawyer if it's you. But the rest of us need to organize demands for the demise of PC from Congress, the Potus, and a firm constitutional constructionist policy upon which Courts must abide. Imagine being the one legitimately protesting the TSA groping, singled out for prosecution by the cumulative forces of our Federal Government. Not pretty.
Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 01:36 PM (H+LJc)
We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.
You cool with them touching the crotch of your 3 yr old?
Posted by: Warden at November 16, 2010 01:50 PM (HzhBE)
It's a continuum.
You cool with cavity searches?
Posted by: Warden at November 16, 2010 01:52 PM (HzhBE)
Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 01:58 PM (FHlAi)
Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 02:03 PM (FHlAi)
"We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists"
Like at Israeli airports? Each time I've flown out I've not seen a scanner or patdown, yet mystery of mystery, they have no such issues.
I wonder why?
Feh.
Posted by: Jess at November 16, 2010 02:11 PM (C1gln)
Posted by: mel gibson at November 16, 2010 02:11 PM (S5YRY)
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 02:32 PM (WNcvq)
Posted by: Contemplationist at November 16, 2010 02:33 PM (FPtHm)
Posted by: Contemplationist at November 16, 2010 02:34 PM (eRsMQ)
So, I get paid to run a teleprompter. Really.
Anyone who can read out loud can read a teleprompter. ANYONE. There is no mystery to it at all. It is extremely simple, and many people can figure it out in one short sitting.
In other words, Janet must be a complete idiot.
Posted by: shibumi at November 16, 2010 02:51 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 16, 2010 03:02 PM (V9Q+f)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 16, 2010 03:14 PM (V9Q+f)
We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.
Posted by: Terrye
We could waste time with your absurd exaggerations. Or we could try finding out how nations that have faced protracted terrorist threats have coped. You tried peddling this line of shit over at Hot Air. They aren't allowed to say that this is a piece of shit and that you are an asinine blowhard. We can say that here though. You are an asinine blowhard.
And this line is a piece of shit.
Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 03:44 PM (1O93r)
If this searching stuff means more ten rated babes show up in bikinis, I may forgo the coat -- or not...
Posted by: drfredc at November 16, 2010 05:17 PM (/+GW9)
Want to bet on what airline makes money?
Posted by: snookered at November 16, 2010 05:37 PM (jchJh)
Posted by: calyx at November 16, 2010 06:52 PM (ehlWj)
If selected, will opt out, hold my "Papers" (DoD Travel Orders), let 'em know I am allergic to latex and want some clean hand bags, and hang-sack for all to see; while letting the general public know that this is a routine exercise, "Like you'all know - We only check those we know are clean.".
Posted by: Druid at November 16, 2010 07:12 PM (adCDx)
Posted by: Smorgasbord at November 16, 2010 08:55 PM (DEZm3)
Posted by: Mike at November 16, 2010 09:16 PM (m3QSi)
Posted by: Y7 at November 17, 2010 03:42 AM (+VuVK)
Posted by: seninle at November 17, 2010 06:18 AM (d2uuZ)
Posted by: Tommikepat at November 17, 2010 02:38 PM (8IGmf)
A song titled, TSA Boots Are Going To Walk All Over You, might make a great sequel to Nancy Sinatra’s “These Boots Are Going To Walk All Over You.”
TSA’s mistreatment, humiliation and general abrasive handling of Americans at airports, may be a portent to Americans (next) getting a Boot in their face if they refuse to be stripped searched, molested or x-rayed before boarding—any form of public transportation; bus, train, cruse ship. It is obvious TSA intends to extend its reach beyond airports; that TSA will blackball Americans from using other forms of public transportation, including preventing Citizens from driving beyond highway checkpoints, for alleged security reasons. TSA appears headed toward shutting down Americans' Right To Travel Freely in their own Country.
The Nazis used national emergency as a premise to repeatedly target, search and detain Germans boarding or taking trains considered political dissidents or morally unfit; Citizens were intentionally delayed by police/military so they would be late or miss work. As a result many Citizens lost there jobs and could not survive.
TSA’s physical searches of air passengers’ private body parts, is intimidating passengers to submit to x-rays scans. Continued Low Radiation Exposure is Accumulative and believed to cause Cancer. Americans need to draw a line in the sand; Boycott airlines: that would get TSA's attention and stockholders of airlines. Meanwhile, not just pilots and flight attendants, “ordinary air passengers” should also be afforded privacy when physically searched at public airports.
The government intends to invade your bedroom. The government purchased hundreds’ of X-Ray Vans that will travel our streets without warrants, x-ray scan, see Americans naked when walking, standing, riding their bike and may—retain your scan-photos.
Government/police will use x-ray vans to peer though CitizensÂ’ homes and vehicles, exposing Americans and their families to radiation; government will view Citizens in their bedrooms. Americans need to ask Obama if independent studies were conducted to determine if Citizens could develop Cancer, if (repeatedly bombarded) by police X-ray scans. It is expected government/police with or without a warrant, will repeatedly X-ray scan a person of interest, in his or her home.
ObamaÂ’s X-Ray Vans can ALSO be used by the military or police to secure perimeters to control civil unrest and instances of revolt, to screen and stop Citizens carrying guns, cameras; any item. Does Obama expect Americans to revolt?
Posted by: Rwolf at November 20, 2010 08:12 AM (TqYgA)
Posted by: ruth at December 07, 2010 12:10 AM (vNZ8G)
Posted by: Steve at December 18, 2010 03:52 PM (omaSl)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.434 seconds, 510 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Ella at November 16, 2010 10:22 AM (eIVfQ)