November 16, 2010

Upping the Ante: TSA to Start Putting Its Hands Down Your Pants
— Ace

This is indeed "security theater," but a special kind of security theater. TSA stand-abouts want to continue just standing around (BTW, does anyone really believe they're looking terribly hard at the x-ray imaging of your luggage?), and they don't like people opting out of the naked-body-scanners, because that forces them to not stand-about but do some actual work.

So they're attempting to make that as invasive as possible -- and let people know how invasive it's going to be -- to get you to walk through the body imager. So they can stand about some more.

Posted by: Ace at 10:21 AM | Comments (382)
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.

1 But it is all for the safety!!11!!!eleventy!!!!!

Posted by: Ella at November 16, 2010 10:22 AM (eIVfQ)

2 Uh, prisonplanet.com? Really?

Posted by: Grug, Moby Of Doom at November 16, 2010 10:23 AM (QgAFR)

3

You didn't credit me for my half of the article, Ace.

The *black* half.

Posted by: Alex Jones at November 16, 2010 10:25 AM (lPxkl)

4 They already do this.  I was flying to Boston in 2006 and a TSA guy asked if he could put his hand down the back of pants to check for....whatever.  I guess I looked like a terrorist that day.  No wait...I guess I didn't look like a terrorist that day if you catch my drift.

Posted by: EC at November 16, 2010 10:25 AM (mAhn3)

5 That's it. I'm putting a beaver trap down my baggy pants now.

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 10:25 AM (RD7QR)

6 Road Trip!

Posted by: Iblis at November 16, 2010 10:26 AM (9221z)

7 Prison planet. Really?

Posted by: lorien1973 at November 16, 2010 10:26 AM (IhQuA)

8

"I'm putting a beaver trap down my baggy pants now."

Weren't you born with one?

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at November 16, 2010 10:27 AM (HaYO4)

9 Saw a really interesting link at Coast to Coast the other day.. I'll send it to you.

Posted by: Dave C at November 16, 2010 10:28 AM (poJjg)

10 That's it. I'm putting a beaver trap down my baggy pants now.

Repost:  Peanut Butter.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 10:28 AM (wOGfT)

11 That's it. I'm putting a beaver trap down my baggy pants now. Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 02:25 PM (RD7QR) Interesting choice of words

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (0GFWk)

12 I need to take me some of those flying trips!

Posted by: Nobody touches me anymore, sad I know at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (/E3ql)

13 Ace,

Please don't link to Prison Planet.  Nothing good ever comes from that conspiracy-mongering shit-hole.

However true the story may be, the source casts too much doubt upon it.

Posted by: Lou at November 16, 2010 10:30 AM (MkXBH)

14 This has union stank all over it.  A few days ago, the Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that TSA employees can vote on union representation.  Re: Ace's first post below, this is an unfixable situation, by design. 

I had thought that legislation capping damages on "discrimination" lawsuits against private contractors might coax more capable companies back into the market, but there's no way the union would allow that to happen.

This is a union shake-down, pure and simple.

Posted by: angler at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (SwjAj)

15 I'd wear cloths I planned on trashing, then hold a monster turd or a gallon of piss until I could "fire for effect". 

Having to cleanup in a restroom and change cloths after would be a very small price to pay.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (/KqYi)

16

 Prison planet. Really?

Sure go ahead and laugh but uh, those chips you had with lunch are gonna make you ghey.

Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (uNgbA)

17 I have a solution Make 3 separate screening lines. One with TSA goons, one with attractive females for the morons and one with attractive males for the moronettes. The 2 attractive screener lines you will pay an extra fee for the fondling but it will bet one you can enjoy.  The search still gets done so it's win win right?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (tf9Ne)

18 Somebody's obviously looking for trouble, and not the muzzie kind.

The push back so far is only coming from CAIR but an orchestrated shitstorm is gathering.

Posted by: ontherocks at November 16, 2010 10:31 AM (HBqDo)

19

What are we supposed to do?

I hardly ever fly, but I don't want to go through this stuff.

I guess I'll be driving and taking trains everywhere from now on.

Good luck airlines, I'm sure you'll be bankrupted by this before next year. Their profits are so low they couldn't handle a reduction in passangers by 5-10%.

 

Heck I flew to D.C. earlier this year. One plane to Newark then a connecting plane to DC. both were smaller prop planes and neither was close to being full

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (wuv1c)

20 Hey, you don't need a link to Prison Planet to write a post about TSA screeners putting their hands in your nether regions.  I'll gladly recount my story from back in 2006.

Posted by: EC at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (mAhn3)

21 I'd wear cloths I planned on trashing, then hold a monster turd or a gallon of piss until I could "fire for effect". Having to cleanup in a restroom and change cloths after would be a very small price to pay. Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 02:31 PM (/KqYi) Clean up in THOSE bathrooms? Oh yeah I'd probably get stuck sitting next to you?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:32 AM (0GFWk)

22 Look I appreciate seeing these stories and even in the sidebar too.  But do we need 45 Napolitano and trannie pics accompanying them too?

Posted by: buzzion at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (oVQFe)

23 I remember a TSA thug in Atlanta a few years ago who stole a passenger's wallet while the guy was being wanded, and ended up being arrested at a nearby motel (which he paid for with the passenger's credit card) with his girlfriend.

What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (UOM48)

24

Disappointed in the Morons: I've been waiting a couple of days for somebody to fall into "I've got nothing to hide" so 300 commenters can add "I'll say!"

 

Posted by: comatus at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (hrwMe)

25 These jobs just get better and better. I got mine on a tip in The Atlantic.

Posted by: Randi Andi's Reacharound Buddy at November 16, 2010 10:33 AM (/E3ql)

26 Prison planet. Really?

Sure go ahead and laugh but uh, those chips you had with lunch are gonna make you ghey.

yeah, normally I am wary of them too, but a broken clock yada yada yada.

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (wuv1c)

27 A suggestion for the guys:  wear kilts. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (UOM48)

28 Now if they only hire cute college girls in Emma Peel outfits, and put leather manacles on you while they fondle you, I might continue flying. Otherwise, I will be taking the train or driving. Anything too far away for that is too far away, period. Anybody think this is an intentional way of destroying the airlines, so the Feds can step in and nationalize them like every other industry (cars, banks, insurance, medicine, etc)?

Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (FHlAi)

29 One with TSA goons, one with attractive females for the morons and one with attractive males for the moronettes. The 2 attractive screener lines you will pay an extra fee for the fondling but it will bet one you can enjoy.

You're on the right track.  Gimme a call.

Posted by: Senator Larry Craig at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (wOGfT)

30 What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

They probably take all the SEIU rejects.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (/KqYi)

31 I got the full pat down a couple of weeks ago because I had "baggy clothes". Now that they've got those scanners I'll probably never fly again.

Posted by: Ed Anger at November 16, 2010 10:34 AM (7+pP9)

32 What sort of background checks to these guys go through? Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 02:33 PM (UOM4 When they get fired from "Toys R Us", they come to work for the TSA

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (0GFWk)

33 Some of the over the top complaints and threats in the other thread remind me of the Chapell skit - 'Keeping it real'

Posted by: Can't believe its not bitter at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (9dERt)

34 Something else is going on with all this, I just can't figure out exactly what it is.

Posted by: Johnny at November 16, 2010 10:35 AM (mhmc7)

35

I am taking bets, over under 2 months  until some father literally beats the shit out of a TSA employee for fondling his son or daughter a little too sensually.

 

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:36 AM (wuv1c)

36 I'm bearish on penis extensions. Who manufacturers them?

Posted by: Barbarians at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (EL+OC)

37 I offer this old classic for the TSA:

http://tinyurl.com/3xx8hdy

Posted by: Vic at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (/jbAw)

38 Will you get in trouble if you fart on their hand or dick trickle?  Seems only fair.

Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (8/DeP)

39 What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

they show up on time. That's the only qualification for a job like that.

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (wuv1c)

40 Something else is going on with all this, I just can't figure out exactly what it is.

The airline industry probably donated more to Republicans than Democrats this cycle.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (/KqYi)

41 Anybody think this is an intentional way of destroying the airlines, so the Feds can step in and nationalize them like every other industry

Remember me?

Posted by: Amtrak at November 16, 2010 10:37 AM (wOGfT)

42 I'm thinking a TSA job would be heaven-on-earth for a sex offender.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:39 AM (UOM48)

43 The props are out  -202

Posted by: DJIA at November 16, 2010 10:39 AM (S5YRY)

44 Whoops, I got that from drudge, who's always linking PrisonPlanet. I didn't notice. I have a policy against linking them; I just didn't notice. I'll watch that.

Posted by: ace at November 16, 2010 10:39 AM (nj1bB)

45 I'm thinking a TSA job would be heaven-on-earth for a sex offender. Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 02:39 PM (UOM4 You got their address? /

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (0GFWk)

46 What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

Absolutely none.  From personal experience, if a TSA agent offers to hold something for you or put it on the conveyor belt for you, don't let them.  If you do, youll never see that item again.

Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (ctq0s)

47 #39  they show up on time. That's the only qualification for a job like that.

I'll bet that minimal requirement isn't even enforced.  They may show up on time every so often. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (9hSKh)

48 Prison planet. Really?

Well, it's no Enquirer, but Jones occasionally offers accounts of events that happened sort of like his story says they did.

Every time Ace brings us some shit breaking off the AP or Reuters wire, he has to retract it, walk back his OUTRAGE!, and hose down our fury a couple hours later. This is safer.

Posted by: oblig. at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (x7Ao8)

49 Anybody with me on the paranoid idea of the general public being prevented from traveling at all? Something is behind all this, and it surely isn't "security".

Posted by: wetblanket at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (VL4iq)

50

A lot of people fly w/lose fitting clothing.

This is getting insane.

If they tried that w/me I'd make that three year-old's tantrum look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (pLTLS)

51 Except if you are a Muslim.  Could the motherfuckers in the Obama administration be more tone deaf?

Muslim women are exempt from scanning or body searches.

Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 10:40 AM (bb3GK)

52

"Now if they only hire cute college girls in Emma Peel outfits, and put leather manacles on you while they fondle you, I might continue flying."

Yeah, can we request sailors? I need to see them lift heavy objects slowly first, though.  

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at November 16, 2010 10:41 AM (HaYO4)

53
What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 02:33 PM (UOM4

The same kind they're dishing out - ham handed.

Posted by: ontherocks at November 16, 2010 10:41 AM (HBqDo)

54 Step 1. Opt out of the scanner.

Step 2. Before you let the TSA goon touch you, insist very loudly upon whipping out your smartphone and looking him up in the sex offender registry.

Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (z4es9)

55

I'v been in some really dark, smelly places, but Prisonplanet? C'mon, even my standards are better than that.

Posted by: Your junk at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (1Rgee)

56 Prison Planet and seen a few articles from the sidebar from Lew Rockwell. It ain't my blog, but there must be better source for articles than these two bastions of nutty, 9/11 Truther, anti-semitic nonsense. Just my 2 cents.

Posted by: catmman at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (DTzwU)

57 Whenever I fly overseas, I ALWAYS have some kind of contraband (fork, etc.) that makes it through American security, but gets picked up when I go through another country's security on the way home. Eastern european countries in particular always find something that the TSA missed. Must be that Soviet heritage...

Posted by: James at November 16, 2010 10:42 AM (Nljcu)

58 Refuse the scanner, then tell the agent you have AIDs and open wounds.

Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (ctq0s)

59 The only way to stop this is to sent that West Virginia chick with the "strong vaginal odor" on random airline trips all over the country.

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (02uN6)

60 I'd wear cloths I planned on trashing, then hold a monster turd or a gallon of piss until I could "fire for effect". Having to cleanup in a restroom and change cloths after would be a very small price to pay. Not that I fly, but my plan is to dress a bit like the cross dresser in the sidebar. Not in women's clothes, just tighty-whiteys and a snug T-shirt. "You forgot to check under my fat roll. Try again."

Posted by: fluffy doesn't smell so good, either. at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (4Kl5M)

61

If they tried that w/me I'd make that three year-old's tantrum look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 02:40 PM (pLTLS)

I know!  Damn.  But it looks like they are going to make the 'junk' guy pay $10k.  Insane appears to be only scratching the surface.  

Looks like any decision on where to start cutting govt spending, has pretty much made itself.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (RkRxq)

62 54 Step 1. Opt out of the scanner.

Step 2. Before you let the TSA goon touch you, insist very loudly upon whipping out your smartphone and looking him up in the sex offender registry.

Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 02:42 PM (z4es9)


Oh, and step 2a: Hum the Bed Intruder song while you do it.

Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 16, 2010 10:43 AM (z4es9)

63

I feel bad for parents. the more i think about it, the more i get pissed about the idea of some parent having to watch this kid get fondled or looked at naked with one of those scanners.

Also, what is the protocol for scanner pictures? Do they hold onto them forever? 3 weeks? 3 days?

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:44 AM (wuv1c)

64 GWB; some good, some bad. Of all the awful things George W. Bush did while president, creating the TSA is high on the list.

Posted by: George Orwell at November 16, 2010 10:44 AM (AZGON)

65 Out damn sock!

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:44 AM (bb3GK)

66 I can testify to the standing around business. I flew from Detroit to LaGuardia and back just this past weekend. I had cigarette lighters in my book bag and in my purse. None were found, at either end of the trip. They are paying strict attention, while touching up their make-up and filing their nails.

Posted by: Jaclyn at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (HV1jm)

67 What sort of background checks to these guys go through?

I'm pretty sure I saw some of the guys on "to catch a predator"

Posted by: lorien1973 at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (IhQuA)

68 Happy Buck Farack Day!!!!!

EVERY day is Buck Farack Day!!!!!!!


Welcome to the obamanation forrmerly known as The United States of America...the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. 

He's just trying to prove that he's doing more to protect the United States from terrorism than that George Bush ever did.......

Posted by: Sponge at November 16, 2010 10:45 AM (UK9cE)

69 The pictures are supposed to be erased immediately after examination.  (yeah, right).

Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (ctq0s)

70 Hmmm, the term sexual assault comes to mind I fly to chitown in about a month, hope tsa is ready for a massive lawsuit and is ready to stop me from beating down their agent And I pray for their souls if they play that on my wife....it will not be pretty

Posted by: Ncj on the iphone4 saying you're fired biatch!!!!! at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (bLeYn)

71 56 Prison Planet and seen a few articles from the sidebar from Lew Rockwell.

It ain't my blog, but there must be better source for articles than these two bastions of nutty, 9/11 Truther, anti-semitic nonsense.

Just my 2 cents.

Posted by: catmman at November 16, 2010 02:42 PM (DTzwU)


Normally i would agree but in these Jones is using material from other people.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (bb3GK)

72 51 Except if you are a Muslim.  Could the motherfuckers in the Obama administration be more tone deaf?

Muslim women are exempt from
scanning or body searches.

Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 02:40 PM (bb3GK)

What is the motherfucking point?  If this is true, damn!

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (RkRxq)

73

The same federal government which refuses to acknowledge any link between Islam and international terrorism, the same federal government which acts as al-Qaeda's defense counsel....

....insists on feeling you up before you get on a plane.

Wow.

The Christmas Day Bomber has more rights and protections than WE do.

Posted by: Sam Adams at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (GkYyh)

74 Alex Jones is a nut, but not infrequently his stuff can be accurate when you start drilling back to the original sources.  Maybe 50% is completely crank shit.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 10:46 AM (/KqYi)

75 Hey, I'm looking pretty good right now, aren't I?

Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (nTjSs)

76

The moral of the story is for all of us to become the WV 'lick it or I'll stick it' knife lady?!?!?

Noooooooooo!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (pLTLS)

77 The pictures are supposed to be erased immediately after examination. (yeah, right). Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM (ctq0s) Yeah that's what I told this old girlfriend about my polariod

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:47 AM (0GFWk)

78  Hey, I'm looking pretty good right now, aren't I?

Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 02:47 PM (nTjSs)

You sure are...........

Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy is taking notes at November 16, 2010 10:48 AM (uNgbA)

79

34 Something else is going on with all this, I just can't figure out exactly what it is.

Posted by: Johnny at November 16, 2010 02:35 PM (mhmc7)

The lefties at Wired claims it's because Chertoff owns the company that makes the scanners.

As if Big Sis would actually do him a favor.

I don't how people that stupid can stay alive.

Posted by: Ed Anger at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (7+pP9)

80 52. How YOU doing?

Posted by: Ncj on the iphone4 saying you're fired biatch!!!!! at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (bLeYn)

81 Oh yeah...Ace...come on man. Warn use before you link to conspiracy websites. Seriously...

Posted by: James at November 16, 2010 10:49 AM (Nljcu)

82 Do not follow Drudge into the lunatic fringe. Alex Jones is a crackpot and a domestic terrorist.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (9cflz)

83 I'll just walk through the machine if they have one.  I don't want some perv dressed in a bus-driver uniform feeling me up.  If my picture ends up on the internet, maybe my social life will pick up.

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (IfUrl)

84

How can they fine that "don't touch my junk" guy 10,000 dollars, if i am not mistaken he didn't fly, correct?

He opted out of the scanner and the pat down and left. So why is he fined? he didn't fly anywhere.

Also, does anyone have a link to that blog pos Maet put up some weeks ago about a guy flying back into america and explaining the laws regarding re-entry into the US and how no TSA agent or anyone can legally refuse you re-entry, so you don't have to answer any of their question.

I think the guy was a lawyer and he went point by point through the laws of reentry into the US.

Posted by: Ben at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (wuv1c)

85 In Ace's defense, this shit is getting pretty ridiculous. Non-prisonplanet source from drudge... Here is something from the San Francisco Chronicle's blog: You might think a 3-year-old would whiz through security. A child is non-threatening, wears slip-on shoes, and carries little luggage. Not the case for Mandy Simon who was passing through security with her dad at the airport in Chattanooga, Tenn. A TSA employee gave Mandy the pat down and she started screaming and kicking her legs. Her dad, Steve, happens to be a TV reporter and caught 17 seconds of the ordeal on his cell phone (watch below). Why was Mandy searched in the first place? She started crying when she was asked to put her teddy bear through the X-ray machine. This made it difficult for her to walk calmly through the metal detector and she set the machine off twice, which meant she "must be hand-searched."

Posted by: George Orwell at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (AZGON)

86 From Verum Serum :

"Last time I was in an airport (leaving DC National to fly back to California) the TSA agents were all openly grunting to one another about an attractive woman passing through security. I was 10 feet away and I could hear them. It was blatant. But of course no one wants to say anything because you could miss your flight or be subject to a search yourself."

Posted by: Dr. Spank at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (Y81Xa)

87 17 I have a solution Make 3 separate screening lines. One with TSA goons, one with attractive females for the morons and one with attractive males for the moronettes. The 2 attractive screener lines you will pay an extra fee for the fondling but it will bet one you can enjoy.  The search still gets done so it's win win right?

Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 16, 2010 02:31 PM (tf9Ne)


Happy ending?

Posted by: wrg at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (mB2ub)

88 Hey, I'm looking pretty good right now, aren't I?

I'm faster.

Posted by: The bus at November 16, 2010 10:50 AM (S5YRY)

89 Please don't link to Prison Planet.  Nothing good ever comes from that conspiracy-mongering shit-hole.

However true the story may be,

Yeah.  I'm not even sure if it's true.  I followed the link (stupidly), but did not find a primary source.  Maybe I missed it, but it sounded like hearsay. 

Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (UcOiF)

90 74 Alex Jones is a nut, but not infrequently his stuff can be accurate when you start drilling back to the original sources.  Maybe 50% is completely crank shit.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM (/KqYi)

I found the This Week in Tech stuff.  It's legit.  I'm trying to find the tv fgeed Jones used.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (bb3GK)

91

Ok... I think I just figured this out... had to put on my Lib hat to get through the Lib Logic... but here goes..

First, they will force 15% Ethanol Gasoline on us, which damages older cars.

Then, they make it so people do not want to fly, because of the Invasive security checks... and thus drive to distant destinations.

Some assembly required, but due to the amount of mileage now put on older cars and E-15 damaging them, you will have to buy new cars...

Of which MANY will be GM....

And as the Unions own a large part of GM....

(its like the 7 degrees from Kevin Bacon game, everything with this administration eventually comes back to the Unions...).

/sarc.... or.... hmmm... not?

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (AdK6a)

92 I'll just walk through the machine if they have one. I don't want some perv dressed in a bus-driver uniform feeling me up. If my picture ends up on the internet, maybe my social life will pick up. Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 02:50 PM (IfUrl) Now that's the attitude!

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 10:51 AM (0GFWk)

93 How long before some guy who spent a couple of hours at the bar in the airport because of a flight delay just levels the TSA guy for getting to close his junk?

Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 10:52 AM (uNgbA)

94 Never mind me, I'll just be over here.  Hangin' out.  Call me when you need me.

Posted by: The 4th Amendment at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (8y9MW)

95 They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (LJ272)

96 I have a solution Make 3 separate screening lines.

Make a 4th.  Form Muslims.  Route them to the same place where Spinal Tap was trying to find their way to the stage.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (wOGfT)

97 They're paying less attention these days then they used to, and more where they shouldn't.

I recall back as late as '08 my carry on (laptop bag) would get pulled aside for an extra check because of all the ethernet cables, serial cables, etc in the bag that I'd need for work. Haven't had that happen since maybe '09.

The last time I flew, it was out of Dayton OH. I actually got pulled aside for an extra pat down and a trace chemical check on my hands. Because the mild mannered white guy is the real problem, sure. The TSA r-tard doing the check seemed all too giddy to delay me an extra five minutes at the check out.

I'm happy that I get to fly out of smaller airports for business 90% of the time, so I haven't run into the body scanners yet. But its only a matter of time.

Posted by: Gaff at November 16, 2010 10:53 AM (EFb2o)

98 WaPo (yeah, I know) had a post up yesterday where people could discuss their experiences with enhanced screening.  The ones that were the saddest and most chilling were people with colonostopy bags, stomach tubes, diabetes pumps.  One person has to fly every three weeks to a cancer center for treatment.  What they put these poor people through, while showing absolutely no compassion, is criminal.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 10:54 AM (UOM48)

99

So they're attempting to make that as invasive as possible -- and let people know how invasive it's going to be -- to get you to walk through the body imager.

Yep.  If you opt-out, they all holler "OPT OUT!" over and over, so that you'll be embarrassed into never doing that again.  And so that others will not opt out.

Posted by: rdbrewer at November 16, 2010 10:54 AM (2Sfpk)

100 I have never flown before. And now I don't think I want to, ever.

Posted by: Holger at November 16, 2010 10:55 AM (V9Q+f)

101

The pictures are supposed to be erased immediately after examination. (yeah, right).


Posted by: JP at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM (ctq0s)

Actualy, I don't think they CAN destroy the images, as IF they caught someone through using the scan, they would be evidence.
 

It will fall under the same rules as texts and emails, where EVERYTHING is now kept, just in case it may be needed for evidence someday.

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (AdK6a)

102 Reach-arounds won't cost extra with us, unlike those tramps in vegas.

Airports: Americas NEW playgrounds.

Posted by: TSA Agent at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (sWgE+)

103 Too late for them, i already walk through security with my hands down my pants...after looking at the body scan pics.

Posted by: MikeInBA at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (1hSHv)

104 Anyone who flies through Sea Tac knows how professional and courteous the screeners can be. I don't know where they get the TSA lazy-asses at LAX, but they are a scary group. I wouldn't trust most of them to park my car. That they are in charge of airline safety is a sad joke.

Posted by: lasue at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (S25IC)

105 This all so simple. The left wants us trapped. If we don't fly on the planes because we don't like getting publicly molested then the airline industry goes out of business. This will have two main effects. It will damage the economy further. In the ongoing attempt to overload the system and crash the economy the airline is huge prize. They can nationalize the cherry-picked companies a la GM and let the rest cripple the economy further. it may even me the final straw than breaks us and leads to chaos. It also traps us. We usually talk about freedom in terms of God-given liberties. But liberty in terms of easy movement is also of vital importance. Travel will diminish. Leaving a failed state will be more difficult. Add in shitty hybrids and you'll never be able to escape a hellhole like California or Illinois except on foot. This is just another way for the left to fuck us over and pave the way to their tyrannical takeover.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (WZFkG)

106

I think its time to bust out my official John The Wad Holmes E-Z Fit, Natural Look, Prosthetic Enhancement device®

...Hey it better than a cucumber wrapped in tin foil.   

 

Posted by: Nigel Tufnel at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (pr+up)

107

I think that this is about increasing the need for TSA agents, and ergo, they can end up being unionized government employees.  A way to 'increase employment'.

I also think that a healthy dose of 'sending government money to businesses that are being run by former Homeland Security Executives' is also going on.

Nothing says 'yahoo i'm rich' then scoring a contract with Uncle Sam where you charge 165 million bucks for a single scanner.

F*** our civil rights and the fourth amendment, there is some money to be made, eh.

Oh and our friend Soros is a stockholder in one of those companies.  Must be a coincedence.

Posted by: JR at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (DEQXX)

108 Good bye, Airline Industry. It was nice knowing you.

Posted by: Jayne Cobb at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (AVbdY)

109 Hey, I'm looking pretty good right now, aren't I?

Posted by: High Speed Rail at November 16, 2010 02:47 PM (nTjSs)

Look buddy - I have a better chance of showing up in the US than you do.

Posted by: Easter Bunny at November 16, 2010 10:56 AM (z1N6a)

110 @98
Yeah, I read some of those.
Just horrible. 

The TSA needs to demonstrate that this crap is helping in a meaningful way.  If it isn't, they need to cut it out or the airlines should go with private screening companies. 

Oh, and this is a very bi-partisan/non-partisan issue.  People are outraged across the political spectrum.  Unfortunately, we disagree on the best solution, but at least it is not really a GOP issue (which is good).  I have noticed a little STFU sensibility coming from the Kool-Aid drinkers who think the complaints are meant as a criticism of Fearless Reader, but other than that it's got a lot of people pissed. 

Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 10:57 AM (UcOiF)

111

Next time at the airport i'll just do a 'Silence of the Lambs' tuck-in and put a mouse trap down there.

That'll show 'em.

Posted by: Dr. Varno at November 16, 2010 10:58 AM (QMtmy)

112 The TSA is worthless. In Atlanta they are just 60 IQ affirmative action hire fat guys talking about football. Neither looked at my things at all. This is conditioning.  A good employer would reject their crayola smeared resumes.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 10:59 AM (9cflz)

113 I'm wearing a freaking Hajib next time I go through. 

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 10:59 AM (bb3GK)

114 Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 02:57 PM (UcOiF)

Yes, if Barry were smart this would be a nice time to throw them under the bus, which he is good at. He can always give the new jobs to a different union.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:00 AM (z1N6a)

115 I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade.

Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 11:00 AM (8/DeP)

116

Is that a rocket launcher I feel down there or are you just glad to see me?

Posted by: Fat, Gross TSA Rent-A-Cop at November 16, 2010 11:01 AM (QKKT0)

117 Hey, a little warning if you're gonna link to Alex Jones' douchebaggery.


Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at November 16, 2010 11:01 AM (QV82F)

118

I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade.

Unfair. They are the only ones he has!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 11:01 AM (pLTLS)

119 I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade. Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 03:00 PM (8/DeP) I can't look at Drudge to day. they have that picture of the HERO dog that some jackass put to death. Makes me want to cry

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (0GFWk)

120 This is just another way for the left to fuck us over and pave the way to their tyrannical takeover.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 02:56 PM (WZFkG)

If the lefties could organize something like this, I might consider joining them. They can't plan their way out of a paper bag.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (z1N6a)

121

How long before some guy who spent a couple of hours at the bar in the airport because of a flight delay just levels the TSA guy for getting to close his junk?

 

What's going to be scary is when they give these punks a gun to carry.  We can kiss "polite but stern" goodbye.  (Up against the wall, motherfucker)

 

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (IfUrl)

122 The TSA thugett in Atlanta who screened me for escorting my un-accompanied minor to his gate back in 2002, was busy carrying on a personal, loud, phone call on her cellphone while she humiliated me.  Scrunt.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (UOM48)

123 115 I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade.

Posted by: Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 03:00 PM (8/DeP)

It's interesting that Drudge can always pick the picture that makes someone look the gayest.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (bb3GK)

124 On the cui bono side of things, one of the biggest pillars of Federalism (and Liberty in general) is freedom of movement.

They can't just restrict us all to our enclaves (yet), but if they make it exceedingly difficult to go any significant distance, fewer people will travel.  Less mobility = populace that is easier to control.

Just sayin'

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (8y9MW)

125 #110  The TSA needs to demonstrate that this crap is helping in a meaningful way.  If it isn't, they need to cut it out or the airlines should go with private screening companies.

Unfortunately, as noted earlier, the private screening companies will be crippled as well due to all the lawsuits that will inevitably be thrown their way if they *gasp* actually try to screen somebody.

TSA should not be making air travel a "touching experience". 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:02 AM (9hSKh)

126

PrisonPlanet? Seriously? You're linking to Alex Jones the 9-11 truther?

Good God WTF is happening to AoS?

Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 11:03 AM (XHR9b)

127

 

By the way, is there anyone on board who knows how to fly a plane?

Posted by: Dr. Varno at November 16, 2010 11:03 AM (QMtmy)

128 My experience has been - smaller airports have more professional TSA staff -- that is probably a function of the surrounding area. (and I denounce myself as racist).

Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 11:03 AM (c3oPV)

129 nevergiveup@119

omg.  I read that link and cried.  Heartbreaking.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:04 AM (UOM48)

130 Has anyone ever seen a photo of Napolitano where she does not look like a psycho lesbian child molester gym teacher?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:04 AM (9cflz)

131

What's going to be scary is when they give these punks a gun to carry.  We can kiss "polite but stern" goodbye.  (Up against the wall, motherfucker)

 

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 03:02 PM (IfUrl)

They will probably just shoot each other during coffee breaks.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:04 AM (z1N6a)

Posted by: newser at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (0MrVN)

133 #101 Actualy, I don't think they CAN destroy the images, as IF they caught someone through using the scan, they would be evidence.

It will fall under the same rules as texts and emails, where EVERYTHING is now kept, just in case it may be needed for evidence someday.

So TSA lied?  Go figure. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (9hSKh)

134

The educational requirement for employment with the TSA?  A GED.

The attitude requirement for the same?  Be a surly power tripper.

I've been yelled at in LAX and patted down in a back cubicle at SAN, full chest. All with maximum attitude.

TSA are collectively a revolting group of people.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (QLiYt)

135 TSA to Start Putting Its Hands Down Your Pants?

They're gonna have to get in line!

Posted by: Bill Clinton at November 16, 2010 11:05 AM (Kkt/i)

136 Hey, I'm looking pretty good right now, aren't I?

Yeah, for a few hours there...

Posted by: Guy who just got off HSR and realizes he needs a car to get to his destination at November 16, 2010 11:06 AM (gQ+XA)

137

So TSA lied?  Go figure. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 03:05 PM (9hSKh)

Or they don't even know that the images are saved. That's technical mumbo jumbo.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:06 AM (z1N6a)

138 "Please don't link to Prison Planet.  Nothing good ever comes from that conspiracy-mongering shit-hole."

One of those clips was from the local ABC affiliate here in Houston, KTRK-13.

Posted by: John D. Rockefeller at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (jmf9+)

139

If the lefties could organize something like this, I might consider joining them. They can't plan their way out of a paper bag.

Yes.  This is a bad idea that's being poorly executed.  Double negative which is par for the course for this piece of shit administration.

Posted by: Roadking at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (uNgbA)

140 OOPS! Sorry Ace, saw your response to a different Prisonplanet comment posted by someone earlier. My bad and My apologies!

Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (XHR9b)

141
Hickory dickory dock
This surly power-hungry scumbag put his hand on my.... OHHHHHH!!!

Posted by: Andrew "Dice" Airline Passenger at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (kbGFh)

142 Ace's Headline: Upping the Ante: TSA to Start Putting Its Hands Down Your Pants.

AllenG's Rebuttal: Upping the Ante: AllenG Tempted to Begin Using "Elbow Smash Diplomacy" to "Reason" With TSA Personnel.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (8y9MW)

143

Damn sock!

Posted by: Ernie McCracken at November 16, 2010 11:07 AM (jmf9+)

144 Guy who just got off HSR and realizes he needs a car to get to his destination at November 16, 2010 03:06 PM (gQ+XA)

When I took commuter rail in Chicago, it took 20 minutes to get out of the suburban rail parking lot after the train ride.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (z1N6a)

145 Prison planet. Really? Probably trying for a little variety here, since 90% of his links go to HotAir.

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (NITzp)

146 In unrelated news company that makes this device reports unprecedented 4th quarter profits.

http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2007/11/surprise-vagina.html

Posted by: Flounder at November 16, 2010 11:08 AM (Kkt/i)

147 I repeat:  This ends when 'screeners' start getting the crap beaten out of them for going way, way too far.  Either the outrages stop, or people will just stop flying and the whole thing collapses.

Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (GBXon)

148 Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 03:02 PM (z1N6a) Yeah cause they're so stupid they've managed to kill the country just like they planned to.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (WZFkG)

149 In the meantime, Gulfstream in Savannah announced yesterday they're doing a $500 million expansion (second in five years) and there will be 1,000 new jobs.

Anyone want to take up a moron collection to buy our own plane?  Moron Air.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (UOM48)

150 I guess when cute Israeli men and women do it to you, no one complains;  they must have been offering hand jobs for, like 30 years, already...

Posted by: ParisParamus at November 16, 2010 11:09 AM (del3r)

151 Has anyone ever seen a photo of Napolitano where she does not look like a psycho lesbian child molester gym teacher? Is this the new "Project Cockholster"?

Posted by: fluffy doesn't smell so good, either. at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (4Kl5M)

152 Yeah cause they're so stupid they've managed to kill the country just like they planned to.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 03:09 PM (WZFkG)

So only smart people can do damage? You must not have lived in Chicago very long.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (z1N6a)

153 126

PrisonPlanet? Seriously? You're linking to Alex Jones the 9-11 truther?

Good God WTF is happening to AoS?

Posted by: FreedomFighter at November 16, 2010 03:03 PM (XHR9b)

Except in this instance Jones is using other sources. Forex, you could watch the entire 1:09:30 episode of This Week in Tech to get part of it.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 16, 2010 11:10 AM (bb3GK)

154 They can't just restrict us all to our enclaves (yet), but if they make it exceedingly difficult to go any significant distance, fewer people will travel.  Less mobility = populace that is easier to control.

Shhhh.

Posted by: Massive wealth transfers from burbs to cities, jacked-up gas prices, and boondoggle subsidies that o at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (gQ+XA)

155 At this very moment, I'm dipping my balls in fluoride.

Posted by: Fritz at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (GwPRU)

156 Time to open up a second front.


Ostracize any TSA 'worker' that you known. 

Given that there are thousands of them, they have to be neighbors to someone. 

Publicly snub them & their families by announcing whenever you see them that you don't want to associate with people who work for an organization that is suspected of condoning & encouraging sexual groping.  Point them out to your children just like you would any other perv that they need to be careful of and stay away from.

Make sure that your & their neighbors know what the new policy is & what the TSAer does at work.  It is reported that the majority of the public still listen to the evening news, which is not covering the new situation.




Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (w5RwR)

157

I've been yelled at in LAX and patted down in a back cubicle at SAN, full chest. All with maximum attitude.

TSA are collectively a revolting group of people.

 

I've never been to many east coast airports, but I'll add another two connections just to avoid LA.  You're right.  Their attitudes can only be described as third-world thugs on a power trip.

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:11 AM (IfUrl)

158

When they direct as many man hours to cargo as they do to passenger screening, I'll be reassured that due diligence is being met.

Till then, it's security theater and nothing more.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:12 AM (QLiYt)

159 #137  Or they don't even know that the images are saved. That's technical mumbo jumbo.

That knowledge is beyond the pay-grade of the average TSA agent?  Makes me feel real safe should I ever choose to fly again...*rolls eyes*.

But never fear, Napolitano 'open' to fliers' gripes over screening

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 11:12 AM (9hSKh)

160 Yet another agency for Repubs to defund.

Posted by: KG at November 16, 2010 11:13 AM (DeCj1)

161

speaking of things that could make you cry...

that video of Cheney. he looks so thin. way too thin. not good.

it's at RCP video.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 11:13 AM (pLTLS)

162 Publicly snub them & their families by announcing whenever you see them that you don't want to associate with people who work for an organization that is suspected of condoning & encouraging sexual groping.  Point them out to your children just like you would any other perv that they need to be careful of and stay away from.
Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 03:11 PM (w5RwR)

This also works if your neighbors are Democrats, and supported Teddy Kennedy at any time.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:13 AM (z1N6a)

163 I like how Drudge only uses pictures of Napolitano that make her look like that creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher I had in sixth grade. (Thinking things over at November 16, 2010 03:00 PM (8/DeP))


Just like those of Mrs. Bambi, you know that those where the best looking ones that could be found.

Posted by: Mark E at November 16, 2010 11:15 AM (w5RwR)

164 That knowledge is beyond the pay-grade of the average TSA agent?  Makes me feel real safe should I ever choose to fly again...*rolls eyes*.

But never fear, Napolitano 'open' to fliers' gripes over screening

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 16, 2010 03:12 PM (9hSKh)

Probably the best way to reform the TSA is to require all congressmen, their staffs, and their families to go through the lines several times per trip.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 11:15 AM (z1N6a)

165 Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 03:10 PM (z1N6a) Every box on the leftist 'kill America' list has been checked off. They've published endless literature highlighting their own plans to destroy us. If you still don't think there is an agenda in spite of clear evidence... You can't look at the useful idiots at the bottom on the left and assume they're all like that. Do you really believe George Soros is an idiot? People like him are pulling the strings. And they don't have to formulate every government clusterfuck. That's why idiots are so useful. You pack the government full of them and destruction is assured. I'd wager that most 'simple mistakes' on the government's part is all according to plan.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 11:17 AM (WZFkG)

166 My husband HATES LAX.  He was going through security once on a business trip, and a scrunt ordered him to open his briefcase.  She then "accidentally" dumped its entire contents on the floor, and made no effort to help him pick everything up.  He said he was literally seething, as she ordered him to hurry up and get out of the way.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:17 AM (UOM48)

167 My Solution: 1. If you're Muslim, you have to ride on your own airline. Blow up MuzzieAir if you want, ask me if I care. 2. Every (nonMuslim) can request an advanced security assessment. Once you pass, no TSA screening ever again. 3. Fire the air waitresses and replace them with ex-Marines armed with handguns with frangible ammunition. 4. Expel all Muslim non-citizens until they can grow up and join the civilized world. 5. No Muslims allowed to enter the US on visas. This is a religious war. The Muzzies act that way, TSA is busy fondling your mom. Enough. Unless your mom is into that sort of stuff.

Posted by: cali grump at November 16, 2010 11:18 AM (hL0k8)

168

Require Obama's girls to go through the procedures they want our children to go through. The older daughter is above the age limit they've set.

Public servants and their families should lead the way and show that is a-ok for all of us.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:19 AM (QLiYt)

169 To alleviate concerns, Muslims will not be subject to naked-body-scanning or frisking. Feel better?

Posted by: TSA at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (FcR7P)

170 Posted by: cali grump at November 16, 2010 03:18 PM (hL0k

Yep, unfortunately, the gov't is not on our side in this war....

Posted by: KG at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (DeCj1)

171 "Sister Napolitano" as teh Fred said of her today, "DON'T bring up gender issues. Not from you."

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:20 AM (H+LJc)

172 I recently had to submit to a pat-down when flying out of Buffalo. The screener was thorough but professional, although it probably would have been more efficient for him to stand in front of me instead of wrapping his arms around from behind. And it would have kept his boner from poking me in the hamstring.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (W7Ddq)

173

the TSA like every other government agency has lost sight of it's orginal mission and now only exists to perpetutate itself, how many times does this have to happen before people realize that giving any more power to the government than the Framers allowed it is an incredibly bad idea?

 

Posted by: Shoey at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (ehKDD)

174 Any legal types out there actually seen the provision that gives an $11k fine for refusing screening?

Posted by: citizen khan at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (nwdIs)

175 And the polls show that an overwhelming majority of the public approves of all this shit.

We're fucking doomed.  The libtards have figured out a way to inject some kind of gas into the atmosphere, and it is turning us all into PC sheep.

Posted by: Peasant-in-the-Forest at November 16, 2010 11:21 AM (4sQwu)

176

1. If you're Muslim, you have to ride on your own airline. Blow up MuzzieAir if you want, ask me if I care.

Just not over populated areas, please.

Posted by: Cicero at November 16, 2010 11:23 AM (QKKT0)

177 Can we opt for opposite sex groping?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:23 AM (9cflz)

178 Just not over populated areas, please.

No fly zones.  No problem.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 11:24 AM (wOGfT)

179 175 And the polls show that an overwhelming majority of the public approves of all this shit.

The majority of Americans have not been through it.  Another sizable group are blissfully unaware that there may be health risks.  Another group will do anything to appear to be supportive of the current administration. 

It really doesn't matter if the majority say they approve on a poll.  Someone will push this issue in the courts and they'll win. 

Posted by: Y-not at November 16, 2010 11:24 AM (UcOiF)

180 Alex Jones, eh? Sheeeeyut....

Now we'll have to worry about those inside-the-pants TSA grabs leaving chemtrails....

Posted by: MrScribbler at November 16, 2010 11:25 AM (Ulu3i)

181 Posted by: Peasant-in-the-Forest at November 16, 2010 03:21 PM (4sQwu)

I'd have to see the questions and the polling sample before I believe that.

Oh, I know that's what the organization says (I can't remember which one, but I think I saw that this morning), but, if they keep to form, their question was something like this:

"Please state which of the following two statements better represent your view:
a) I'd like to be blown to smithereens.
b) I don't mind being subjected to increased security screening."

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:25 AM (8y9MW)

182 Muslims should fly the way the child molester mohamed did, on unicorn back. Chum the waters and throw the entire CAIR membership to the sharks.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:26 AM (9cflz)

183

#181

exactly

 

Posted by: Shoey at November 16, 2010 11:26 AM (ehKDD)

184 Carry some dollar bills to stuff in the waistband of the TSA screener after an erotic grope.

Posted by: tmitsss at November 16, 2010 11:26 AM (V4Pya)

185 34 Something else is going on with all this, I just can't figure out exactly what it is. Posted by: Johnny at November 16, 2010 02:35 PM (mhmc7) Um, hello? The destruction of America is the strategic goal. This is just one of the tactics. It has a two-fold purpose: economic--bankrupting the airlines--and security: emboldening the Islamists.

Posted by: baldilocks at November 16, 2010 11:27 AM (aJ7NC)

186 btw ot:

According to
the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report to Congress submitted tomorrow, 15 percent of the world's Internet traffic was redirected for 18-minutes through computer servers in China on April, 8, 2010. Obviously, that incident allowed severe malicious activities including the diversion of data and the interception of supposedly secure encrypted Internet traffic.

A draft copy reports for the first time that .gov and .mil websites were affected by the 18-minute-long April 8 redirection, including those for the Senate, all four military services, the office of the secretary of defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration "and many others," as well as commercial websites including those of Dell, Yahoo, Microsoft and IBM.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:27 AM (H+LJc)

187 Use smaller hyperlinks, or all will assume it is spam.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (9cflz)

188 Think twice.

WHOSE polls show that an overwhelming majority of the public approves of all this shit.


Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (H+LJc)

189 The link in comment 51 should be the real highlight of this story.

Not only the stupidity of the govt, but the absolute appeasment to the muzzies whose ROP caused us to go thru this crap in the first place.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 11:29 AM (JcRgg)

190 I wonder if you can opt for opposite sex groping?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:30 AM (9cflz)

191

My experience at LAX was waiting for screening. A twenty something guy a few places ahead of me said something which I couldn't quite hear and a TSA guy in his 50's came running over, got literally about 3 inches from his face and began bellowing "Do you want to fly today? Do you? Do you?" over and over, drill seargent style, while glaring anyone near him and directing it at the rest of us from time to time. Breathing hard and almost snorting. He was in a true rage.

I had said or done nothing, but when this dude let fly, I could have pissed my pants.

Everyone around me was staring at their shoes and not daring to move.

Group mentality set in.

It is making my hands shake right now. He was really frightening.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:30 AM (QLiYt)

192 Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 03:30 PM (QLiYt)

This makes me wonder, what if we got, say, 100 morons together all at the same airport for the same flight- and then we just ignored the TSA.  Walked right through, one after another, completely ignoring anything the TSA agents said or did?

No violence, no back-talk, just silence and completely ignoring/rejecting their authority.

I say 100, because it think that's a good number to get the rest of the passengers to follow along as well...

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (8y9MW)

193 http://gizmodo.com/5690749/these-are-the-first-100-leaked-body-scans From a Florida Federal Courthouse. Coming soon to an airport near you.

Posted by: Xavier at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (ehmUT)

194 Can a 260 pound guy legally fly in a speedo and a tube top?

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (9cflz)

195

#191

too bad you didn't have a camera phone.

Posted by: Shoey at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (ehKDD)

196 I think you're all missing the obvious circumvention of this onerous intrusion:  convert to Islam

Posted by: Truman Al-Shabbabi at November 16, 2010 11:34 AM (G5JPI)

197 Beck said today that Soros owns 11,000 shares of those TSA machines.  Chertoff and Soros, interesting combination.

Posted by: Jaimo at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (9U1OG)

198 Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 02:56 PM (WZFkG) Beat me to it.

Posted by: baldilocks at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (aJ7NC)

199

190 I wonder if you can opt for opposite sex groping?

Get a bunch of Daniel Craig, Hugh Jackman, Alex OÂ’Loughlin or Tarkan look alikes, and you'd have ladies lining up to fly. 

Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (Ty06w)

200 Any of you web savvy folks up for starting a website for TSA videos and images?

Something like tsamisconduct.com ?? Make it a clearing house for evidence of embarrassing, corrupt, criminal and negligent TSA behavior?


Posted by: ef at November 16, 2010 11:35 AM (C49Fs)

201

speaking of things that could make you cry...

that video of Cheney. he looks so thin. way too thin. not good.

it's at RCP video.

That's not "thin."  That's gaunt.  Pray for him, folks.


Posted by: Lou at November 16, 2010 11:36 AM (MkXBH)

202 11,000 shares is nothing to the Soros.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 11:37 AM (9cflz)

203
Do passengers have a right to refuse security checks?

Yes, the intrusion and inconvenience outweigh the security benefits.

No, aviation security is essential and passengers must get used to the new rules.


Words. Just words. The exact, detailed meaning of "Security Checks" is what? And if passengers have the right to refuse, that includes the terrorists' right to refuse security checks, which means that everyone has the right to refuse. That nullifies any point for said "security checks".

Bring on the dogs perusing lines at metal detectors.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:37 AM (H+LJc)

204 Hmm.

At $11K per violation, it looks like Big Sis has figured out how to pay for those sweet, sweet federal pensions.

Posted by: Fritz at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (GwPRU)

205

192

that or something like it would certainly cause a rukus, a good rukus that is...

 

Posted by: Shoey at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (ehKDD)

206 194 Can a 260 pound guy legally fly in a speedo and a tube top? Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 03:34 PM (9cflz) Legally, yes. Morally, no.

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (RD7QR)

207 3 words:  pants on the ground.

that's 3 right?

Posted by: Alvin Greene at November 16, 2010 11:38 AM (x3YFz)

208 That's not "thin."  That's gaunt.  Pray for him, folks.

I thought the same when Fred Thompson lost so much weight so quickly during the fire in teh belly '08 campaign.


Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (H+LJc)

209 So I'm hearing on the radio that when you enter an airport and begin the screening process you must complete it otherwise you are in violation of Federal law, hence the $11,000 fine.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (xvYOH)

210 The fine is probably just bluster, it'll get tossed out in court, I bet.

Posted by: KG at November 16, 2010 11:39 AM (DeCj1)

211
So what's there protocol if they encounter a urostomy , colostomy, catheter or some other medical device?
 

Posted by: YIKES! at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (lzMVN)

212 Muslims don't fly - period.  In or out of the US. And I'm including the non-middle-east muslims as well.  If one has a muslim name....you don't fly.  Political correctness is going to kill this nation. 

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (IfUrl)

213 209 So I'm hearing on the radio that when you enter an airport and begin the screening process you must complete it otherwise you are in violation of Federal law, hence the $11,000 fine.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 03:39 PM (xvYOH)

...and that is why I'll never fly again.  I'll just butcher rental cars for company trips.

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:40 AM (x3YFz)

214 Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:41 AM (H+LJc)

215 Some other options:
tune in radio tokyo on your nipples and moaning loudly during the erotic grope;
wearing the tightest, most revealing garments (bodysuits, G-strings, etc.) that you can get away with;
hip thrusts in the direction of the groper;
demanding opposite-sex groping;
all of the above.

This is getting out of hand.

Posted by: Flounder at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (Kkt/i)

216 OK, maybe this is a good enough reason to fly: Big Party in Haiti -- massive violent protests based on the rumor that it was the UN that brought the cholera epidemic in. Would it be too much to ask that Sean Penn be captured, thrown on a plane and airdropped in, dressed in cute blue UN peacekeeper garb? Haiti vs. the UN -- who do you root for? Would it be wrong to root for the cholera?

Posted by: cali grump at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (hL0k8)

217 So is there a particular reason why I'm getting an ad for the Trojan brand vibrator? On my work machine?

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (RD7QR)

218

...and that is why I'll never fly again.  I'll just butcher rental cars for company trips.

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 03:40 PM (x3YFz)

Neither will I. I've driven from Columbus to the West Coast and back and had a ball while doing it.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:42 AM (xvYOH)

219

I didn't, at the time this happened to me, see any need to be ready to record anything.

Being a super law and order kind of person, I fully supported any security measures in force. I wanted them.

I didn't know that a drill instructor impersonator could scream and berate people standing in line, in silence and complying with everything they were asked to do.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 11:43 AM (QLiYt)

220 214 Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 03:41 PM (H+LJc)

FTFY

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:43 AM (x3YFz)

221 Two words:  Moron Air.  Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes.  Only passengers allowed:  fellow morons.  No screening, just the secret code word:  b_c_n. 

Most fun airline ever.  If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:44 AM (UOM48)

222 I think you're all missing the obvious circumvention of this onerous intrusion:  convert to Islam

Don't worry, I am a transvestite muslim woman when I am at the airport.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 11:44 AM (JcRgg)

223 217 So is there a particular reason why I'm getting an ad for the Trojan brand vibrator? On my work machine?

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 03:42 PM (RD7QR)

I don't know... is there?

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (x3YFz)

224 Know of a guy out on the West Coast that always has a just-under-the-legal limit blade stashed in his carry-on and oriented just-so that the scanners will miss it most, not all, of the time. I salute him for showing just how useless the TSA really is since they miss it more times than not. Abolishing the TSA would not make me feel any less safe than I do now, since I know that the best and the brightest aren't the ones working there. Now, if they wanted to start profiling and making everyone in Muzzie-duds go thru a full search, cavities and all, that would make me feel safer.

Posted by: Stanky Poozle at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (X67eL)

225 3. Fire the air waitresses and replace them with ex-Marines armed with handguns with frangible ammunition.

Hot ex-Marines with guns.

I'll fly that airline!

Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:45 AM (GBXon)

226 You know back in Jan. TSA was hiring and I was unemployed so I applied. 

Most of the people I encountered during the process are just people trying to make a living, I doubt most of them want to be feeling you up anymore than you want to be.

My experience with the TSA hiring process was that it was thorough but it was excessively bureaucratic.  First I had to apply online including supplying copies of my DD-214s then there was a screening test which is covered by NDA, but I think I can say that half of it was interpreting the images from the x-ray machines, and it was a lot harder than it looks.  I don't really think I can say anything about the other portions.  You also have to have a medical screening, and finally I had to fill out the same paperwork that I did when I had got my security clearance in the Navy.  TSA screeners may not be the best and brightest but at this point they aren't just hiring warm bodies. 

I also at one time worked for a security company that had the contract to run the screening points in my hometown (worked for them twice actually 10 years part) they did just throw warm bodies into that position, and when TSA took over some of them were grandfathered in but I know at least half have been fired since then.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 11:46 AM (WNcvq)

227

206 194 Can a 260 pound guy legally fly in a speedo and a tube top?
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 03:34 PM (9cflz)


Legally, yes. Morally, no.

Spandex is a priviledge, not a right.

Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 11:46 AM (Ty06w)

228 221 Two words:  Moron Air.  Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes.  Only passengers allowed:  fellow morons.  No screening, just the secret code word:  b_c_n. 

Most fun airline ever.  If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 03:44 PM (UOM4

Complimentary val-u-rite, free hobo-shooting games, topless flight attendants... b_c_n served in-flight.  What could possibly go wrong?

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:47 AM (x3YFz)

229 Two words:  Moron Air.  Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes.

Stompy-booted moronette flight attendants?  Yes!

Moron/ettes in the cockpit?  Ummm, I'm walking.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 11:47 AM (wOGfT)

230 Seriously... this is a scheme to prop up Amtrak's ticket sales

Posted by: Truman North at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (G5JPI)

231 226 You know back in Jan. TSA was hiring and I was unemployed so I applied. 

Most of the people I encountered during the process are just people trying to make a living, I doubt most of them want to be feeling you up anymore than you want to be.

My experience with the TSA hiring process was that it was thorough but it was excessively bureaucratic.  First I had to apply online including supplying copies of my DD-214s then there was a screening test which is covered by NDA, but I think I can say that half of it was interpreting the images from the x-ray machines, and it was a lot harder than it looks.  I don't really think I can say anything about the other portions.  You also have to have a medical screening, and finally I had to fill out the same paperwork that I did when I had got my security clearance in the Navy.  TSA screeners may not be the best and brightest but at this point they aren't just hiring warm bodies. 
Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 03:46 PM (WNcvq)

How many branches of the service did you get thrown out of?!

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (x3YFz)

232 hey, if I tip well, can I get a "happy ending"?

Posted by: stevea28 at November 16, 2010 11:48 AM (SnpkK)

233 229 Two words:  Moron Air.  Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes.

Stompy-booted moronette flight attendants?  Yes!

Moron/ettes in the cockpit?  Ummm, I'm walking.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 03:47 PM (wOGfT)

stompy booted... incoming alex!

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:49 AM (x3YFz)

234

I'm going to get accused of being a SF street-fair type once this gets going. What I have is a large scrotum. The rest of me is pretty much in proportion, and I don't go around being weird about it, but it's the size of a grapefruit. I usually wear a cup, for modesty's sake, but that won't wash in the new security environment, will it? My cover will be blown, if you want to put it that way.

It doesn't matter whether it's the scanner or the quick feel, most of those inspectors are going to think something's amiss here, and I will end up dropping my trousers a lot. Believe it or not, I'm not looking forward to that. You can fantasize some outcomes, but in the real world, people's reaction to oversized packages is typically sneering disgust, or the presumption that you're some kind of men's-room crawler.

You can drive a truck from coast to coast, and nobody will give a damn what size your testicles are.

Posted by: nah, you'll have to look up my IP at November 16, 2010 11:50 AM (hrwMe)

235 hey, if I tip well, can I get a "happy ending"?

Don't count on it, pal.

Posted by: Al Gore Unreleased Second Shakra at November 16, 2010 11:50 AM (wOGfT)

236 Moron Air pilots would all be former military fighter pilots.  And we'd serve lots of pork products.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (UOM48)

237 I repeat myself but...

I'd like to see these TSA jackwagons do a pat down on MOH Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta.

Hilarity would not ensue.

Posted by: mpfs at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (iYbLN)

238 Can a 260 pound guy legally fly in a speedo and a tube top?

A great idea for Chris Christie after he gets done with the teachers' unions-- take on the TSA!

Posted by: PA Cat at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (Jtz0H)

239

Oh goodie!  The next war to be blamed on a Republican:

http://tinyurl.com/36ktn93

This might be Barry's Vietnam, I mean, if he were a Republican.

HotAir

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (RkRxq)

240

Two words:  Moron Air.  Imagine an airline owned by, run by, staffed by morons/ettes.  Only passengers allowed:  fellow morons.  No screening, just the secret code word:  b_c_n. 

Most fun airline ever.  If I win Powerball, I'll buy the first Gulfstream.

And we get to fly FREE!  ......or?

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:51 AM (IfUrl)

241 We need to fund Dr. Doofenshmirtz to make a
"Squirrels in my Pants"-inator
http://tinyurl.com/58m2lx

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 16, 2010 11:52 AM (zqzYV)

242 236 Moron Air pilots would all be former military fighter pilots.  And we'd serve lots of pork products.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 03:51 PM (UOM4

inverted supersonic fly-bys in a 747!  Sign me up!

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 11:52 AM (x3YFz)

243

My cover will be blown, if you want to put it that way.

Oh my!

I'm sorry but I did laugh....

Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (pLTLS)

244 ( sigh )  I guess no one is supposed to mention the Elephant in the Room:  TSA hand-jobbers are disproportionately non-White.  Airline passengers are disproportionately White

Been to Oakland Airport lately?  Or IAD?   Many of the TSA 'agents' at Dulles look like casbah rug-sellers.  and at Oakland it's 'You Know You Ghetto'

Even the White 'agents' are officious dildoes and a waste of space

Several games are being played here........

Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (UqKQV)

245 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year?

Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (7Jipo)

246 We should all commit to taking a handful of bacon bits in our pockets whenever we fly and sprinkling them on the floor and seats of the airplanes we fly on.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (RkRxq)

247 I'm going to get accused of being a SF street-fair type once this gets going. What I have is a large scrotum. The rest of me is pretty much in proportion, and I don't go around being weird about it, but it's the size of a grapefruit. I usually wear a cup, for modesty's sake, but that won't wash in the new security environment, will it? My cover will be blown, if you want to put it that way. So have you been getting the Trojan vibrator ads too?

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 11:53 AM (RD7QR)

248 209 So I'm hearing on the radio that when you enter an airport and begin the screening process you must complete it otherwise you are in violation of Federal law, hence the $11,000 fine.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 03:39 PM (xvYOH)

Except that Federal Law must follow the Constitution.  You do NOT give up your Rights by entering private property.... you can voluntarily allow someone to violate your rights (the search) but can reassert your Rights at any time, heck, you can even ask for a LAWYER in an Airport if you think they are being too invasive...

But then... there are LOTS of things the Feds do which do not follow the Constitution....

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 11:54 AM (AdK6a)

249 246 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year?

Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)

Cadillac CTS-V? /sarc off

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 16, 2010 11:54 AM (zqzYV)

250  I am a meat popsicle

Posted by: Korben Dallas at November 16, 2010 11:55 AM (S5YRY)

251 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year?

One without a single unit sold?

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 11:55 AM (wOGfT)

252

You can drive a truck from coast to coast, and nobody will give a damn what size your testicles are.

Posted by: nah, you'll have to look up my IP at November 16, 2010 03:50 PM (hrwMe)

TMI

Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (UqKQV)

253 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year? Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM

The Tata Nano?

Posted by: MrScribbler at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (Ulu3i)

254 I'd like to see these TSA jackwagons do a pat down on MOH Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta.

Hilarity would not ensue.

I beg to differ.  Highlight reel!  Popcorn for everyone!

Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at November 16, 2010 11:56 AM (GBXon)

255 @ 15: Sorta gives new meaning to junk in the trunk, no?

Posted by: Wascully Wabbit at November 16, 2010 11:57 AM (FweJ7)

256 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year?

Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)

I already know. What an effing joke.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 11:57 AM (xvYOH)

257 and a domestic terrorist.
Posted by: FlaviusJulius

Your denunciation amounts to Alinsky inspired hate speech. "Burn him!"

His style may resemble an oldfashioned hell fire and damnation preacher, "I have the documents!"

But your label would as likely target Sgt. York's hometown minister to an secular authoritarian inquisition for preaching from his own pulpit "Repent and be saved!"

Take a deep breath and admit that his stories come from news articles. Take those or leave them as you like. But targeting any law abiding opinionated American citizen taxpayer as a domestic terrorist illustrates the thought process of malicious and vindictive thugs.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 11:58 AM (H+LJc)

258

Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.

Yeah, he does this shit often.

Posted by: Mark Levin at November 16, 2010 11:58 AM (pLTLS)

259

Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year? Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM

The Russian Lada?  The Zil?  Oh, the Volt.  Same same.

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 11:59 AM (IfUrl)

260 Wrong sherlock. Alex Jones and his terrorist sleeper cell has already struck a few times. You are a troll and your links are attack sites.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:00 PM (9cflz)

261 ErikW There is one court ruling that rolls that way, but it's out of the 9th circuit and it never contemplated the kinds of invasive searching done now, moreover on persons not in anyway singled out for suspicion of wrongdoing. I think the court erred then and would not rule that way about the airline searched now - only persons suspected of wrongdoing should have to comply, all others free to refuse in real time, and leave. I might agree to be searched at one place, by one agent, and feel very uncomfortable at another airport and the agents involved there. Getting felt up by a goon who is rude or salivating or not very careful with the feeding tube of the person ahead of you... Ok, I'm not flying today. Goodbye. That's the way it should be.

Posted by: SarahW at November 16, 2010 12:01 PM (Z4T49)

262 Over at HA there is a story on the govt trying to figure out how to disable cell phones in cars.  Not that you would ever need to use one in case of an accident or breakdown.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (JcRgg)

263

Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year? Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM

The Russian Lada?  The Zil?  Oh, the Volt.  Same same.

Posted by: Soona

 

It also received a Nobel peace prize.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (R2fpr)

264 Isn't the Ford F-150 the hottest selling vehicle?  How many Government Motors clown cars have been sold?

I heard Friedman on MSDNC yesterday complaining that gas taxes need to go through the roof to "force" people to buy Priuses and other shitty cars.  Typical elitist douchebag lib.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:02 PM (UOM48)

265 244 ( sigh )  I guess no one is supposed to mention the Elephant in the Room:  TSA hand-jobbers are disproportionately non-White.  Airline passengers are disproportionately White

Been to Oakland Airport lately?  Or IAD?   Many of the TSA 'agents' at Dulles look like casbah rug-sellers.  and at Oakland it's 'You Know You Ghetto'

Even the White 'agents' are officious dildoes and a waste of space

Several games are being played here........

Posted by: Roger Ebert's colon at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (UqKQV)

So... you're saying they're "union?"

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:03 PM (x3YFz)

266 Over at HA there is a story on the govt trying to figure out how to disable cell phones in cars.

Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers.  That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (wOGfT)

267 246 Anyone want to guess what car is MotorTrend's Car of the Year?

Posted by: Jean at November 16, 2010 03:53 PM (7Jipo)


If it isn't the Bugatti Veyron, then they chose wrong.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, Bacon Raconteur at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (eCAn3)

268 265 Isn't the Ford F-150 the hottest selling vehicle?  How many Government Motors clown cars have been sold?

I heard Friedman on MSDNC yesterday complaining that gas taxes need to go through the roof to "force" people to buy Priuses and other shitty cars.  Typical elitist douchebag lib.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 04:02 PM (UOM4

If I'm ever seen driving a princess, please empty your clip into the driver's side door.  (zombie apocalypse notwithstanding)

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (x3YFz)

269

The pigs are saved!  The pigs are saved!

http://tinyurl.com/33qrxke

Black pudding for everyone!

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (RkRxq)

270

But then... there are LOTS of things the Feds do which do not follow the Constitution....Posted by: Romeo13

In Clinton's rationale for perjury, "Because they could." Only if the Feds are allowed by the citizenry to violate the Constitution. Evidently, that's not really the case.

As with the grassroots up swell of the Tea Party movement, though not limited to "those people", this repulsive sexual assault on the public by federal employees is meeting massive opposition that has only begun to awaken.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:04 PM (H+LJc)

271

 

It also received a Nobel peace prize.


Pulitzer, too.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:05 PM (wOGfT)

272 Talking on the phone while driving is legal.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:05 PM (9cflz)

273 #270 "some customers" offended by the pig. No doubt.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:06 PM (H+LJc)

274

130, I've MET Secretary Napolitano, and she DOES look like a creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher in person. And she is a SHITTY speaker, even with a teleprompter setup. Either she was stopping every fifteen seconds trying to phrase her way around classification issues (doubtful, teleprompter), or she's too dumb to read her own notes.

167, no, I'm still trying to get a couple more of my Iraqi interpreters out of Iraq and into the States.

Me, I'll be the one making porno noises in the checkout line, and offering the screener twenty bucks if they "finish, if you know what I'm sayin'" I spent part of a year searching Iraqis. I know all kinds of ways to make a screener's life hellish.

Posted by: SGT Dan at November 16, 2010 12:06 PM (QUuUE)

275 Cavuto is talking about TSA pat downs now.  There's a guy who wants a national opt-out day, next Wednesday, the day before Thanksgiving. 

Glad we're not flying anywhere. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:07 PM (UOM48)

276

Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers.  That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.
 

Exceptions would of course be made for important people transacting federal business; people like me, peasant!

Posted by: Supreme Safety Law Lord Ray LaHood at November 16, 2010 12:07 PM (ERJIu)

277 Ok, I'm not flying today. Goodbye.

That's the way it should be.

Posted by: SarahW at November 16, 2010 04:01 PM (Z4T49)

Well at least there's a pencil-thin ray of light in all of this insanity.

I'm still never flying again, tho.

Posted by: ErikW at November 16, 2010 12:08 PM (xvYOH)

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:08 PM (H+LJc)

279 I'll concede we all need to be screened when the TSAstapo can tell me the last time a non-muslim hijcked or blew up an airliner.

Posted by: nickless at November 16, 2010 12:09 PM (MMC8r)

280 Talking on the phone while driving is legal.

Not in Illinois.

I've seen guys shaving while driving.  Girls plucking eyebrows.  The usual cosmetics and reading stuff.  And road head.  Don't forget the road head.  Are they going to outlaw that, too?

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:10 PM (wOGfT)

281 If all TSA personnel were clones of Kate Beckinsale, I would wholeheartedly support this screening process.

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:10 PM (x3YFz)

282 If all TSA personnel were clones of Kate Beckinsale, I would wholeheartedly support this screening process. Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 04:10 PM (x3YFz) Ain't youuse got no imagination?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (0GFWk)

283 Do you get in trouble for having a boner when you go through the machine?

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (+lsX1)

284 Don't forget the road head.  Are they going to outlaw that, too?

When they pry it from my cold, dead hand.

Or something like that.

Posted by: nickless at November 16, 2010 12:11 PM (MMC8r)

285

Beck said today something that Michael Savage wrote in Trickle Up Poverty.

Yeah, he does this shit often. -- Posted by: Mark Levin

lol

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (H+LJc)

286 Shitlock Colmes. Go away punk. Go watch your mouth breathing retard Alex Jones. There must be a Ron Paul clan rally for you to go to. Have some fluoride and mellow out. The lunatic fringe is no place to live.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (9cflz)

287

Yeah, and it would disable the phones of your passengers.  That means of course that I may actually have to talk to my wife while I'm driving.
 

Exceptions would of course be made for important people transacting federal business; people like me, peasant!

Posted by: Supreme Safety Law Lord Ray LaHood

 

Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:12 PM (R2fpr)

288 Holy crap.  The Judge is on Cavuto, and said a friend of his went through a TSA crotch grab yesterday that included removing his jacket, ripping his shirt, unzipping his pants, and looking inside.  All this in full view of the rest of the travelers. 

This was because the guy has an artificial knee. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (UOM48)

289 "237 I repeat myself but...

I'd like to see these TSA jackwagons do a pat down on MOH Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta.

Hilarity would not ensue."

Remember this?

HOENIX, Arizona (CNN) -- Retired Gen. Joe Foss, 86, one of the most highly decorated U.S. war veterans, recently was detained at a security checkpoint at the Phoenix, Arizona, airport because he was carrying an item with sharp edges.

The sharp object turned out to be the Congressional Medal of Honor, which he had received in 1943 from President Franklin D. Roosevelt


Posted by: tmitsss at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (V4Pya)

290 275

130, I've MET Secretary Napolitano, and she DOES look like a creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher in person. And she is a SHITTY speaker, even with a teleprompter setup. Either she was stopping every fifteen seconds trying to phrase her way around classification issues (doubtful, teleprompter), or she's too dumb to read her own notes.

167, no, I'm still trying to get a couple more of my Iraqi interpreters out of Iraq and into the States.

Me, I'll be the one making porno noises in the checkout line, and offering the screener twenty bucks if they "finish, if you know what I'm sayin'" I spent part of a year searching Iraqis. I know all kinds of ways to make a screener's life hellish.

Posted by: SGT Dan at November 16, 2010 04:06 PM (QUuUE)

Were I to ever fly again, I'd soak my underwear in a combination garlic/cat piss paste. 

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:13 PM (x3YFz)

291

282 If all TSA personnel were clones of Kate Beckinsale, I would wholeheartedly support this screening process.

Not all,

Hunky hotties for us girls (OK, one Hugh Jackman is all I ask!)

Posted by: EZB at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (Ty06w)

292

LOL.... DROVE from Denver to Chicago and back last week, to see my Son Graduate Navy Bootcamp... 2100 miles...

And best part? the only one who gropped my crotch was the Hotty I picked up in a bar in Chicago.... /smile

Posted by: Romeo13 at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (AdK6a)

293 : FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 04:12 PM

74 Alex Jones is a nut, but not infrequently his stuff can be accurate when you start drilling back to the original sources.  Maybe 50% is completely crank shit.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 16, 2010 02:46 PM

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 12:14 PM (H+LJc)

294 Well, I was asked to support a project in Florida early next year. I said fine, but I won't travel by air. Fortunately, travel isn't a mandated part of my job, so I should be able to stick to it.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:15 PM (R2fpr)

295 283 If all TSA personnel were clones of Kate Beckinsale, I would wholeheartedly support this screening process.
Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 04:10 PM (x3YFz)

Ain't youuse got no imagination?

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 04:11 PM (0GFWk)

I haz a 1-track imagination.

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:15 PM (x3YFz)

296 OK, one Hugh Jackman is all I ask!

Mr Jackman is not available.  May I help you?

Posted by: Hugh Janus at November 16, 2010 12:16 PM (wOGfT)

297 If I'm ever seen driving a princess, please empty your clip into the driver's side door.

Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?

Posted by: Feldwebel Franz, Grammar Nazi at November 16, 2010 12:16 PM (f1jQH)

298 One of the commenters on the WaPo site yesterday, said he has a voluptuous wife and two beautiful teen-aged daughters, and they single out his wife for extra screening every.single.time. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 12:16 PM (UOM48)

299 How many branches of the service did you get thrown out of?!

Two.  2 years in the Army as a 19E10/20.  12 years in the Navy as a Corpsman.  8 of those were with USMC units as an 8404/8432/8425, and I had a 1 year break in service while in the Navy so I have 3 DD-214s, as well as the Honorable Discharge certificates that go with them.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:18 PM (WNcvq)

300 You will wreck your credibility if you follow the tin foil hat wearing violent cretin. I think Alex Jones is working for the government spreading disinformation. You link to him and you are him.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at November 16, 2010 12:18 PM (9cflz)

301 298 If I'm ever seen driving a princess, please empty your clip into the driver's side door.

Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?

Posted by: Feldwebel Franz, Grammar Nazi at November 16, 2010 04:16 PM (f1jQH)

wow.

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (x3YFz)

302 299 One of the commenters on the WaPo site yesterday, said he has a voluptuous wife and two beautiful teen-aged daughters, and they single out his wife for extra screening every.single.time. Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 04:16 PM (UOM4 Dear Penthouse Forum: I never thought I would write to you, but my training as a TSA screener never prepared me for this...

Posted by: joncelli at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (RD7QR)

303 Don't know if it's been suggested yet, but if you have enough people who don't want a public handjob from Bruno the TSA superstar pool your money and charter a flight. Now it won't be a leer jet but you could probably find a good deal with the right numbers. And your smaller local airports have flights going out and probably don't have TSA snakecharmers and radiation baths. For example instead of going to O'Hare or Midway i can hit up Joliet or Lansing. Might not work but could be stop gap measures until all this bullshit is stopped.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 12:19 PM (WZFkG)

304 Two. 2 years in the Army as a 19E10/20. 12 years in the Navy as a Corpsman. 8 of those were with USMC units as an 8404/8432/8425, and I had a 1 year break in service while in the Navy so I have 3 DD-214s, as well as the Honorable Discharge certificates that go with them. Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 04:18 PM (WNcvq) There are no people I think more of than US Navy Corpsmen.

Posted by: nevergiveup at November 16, 2010 12:20 PM (0GFWk)

305

Holy crap.  The Judge is on Cavuto, and said a friend of his went through a TSA crotch grab yesterday that included removing his jacket, ripping his shirt, unzipping his pants, and looking inside.  All this in full view of the rest of the travelers. 

This was because the guy has an artificial knee

 

I saw that too.  Frightening.  I've got steel running up and down my leg from a bad accident I had a few years ago.  I have to fly the first week of December, and I think I'm going to go commando and taking a dose of Viagra.  Thank God that the American people are waking up to this kind of shit. 

Posted by: Soona at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (IfUrl)

306 300 How many branches of the service did you get thrown out of?!

Two.  2 years in the Army as a 19E10/20.  12 years in the Navy as a Corpsman.  8 of those were with USMC units as an 8404/8432/8425, and I had a 1 year break in service while in the Navy so I have 3 DD-214s, as well as the Honorable Discharge certificates that go with them.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 04:18 PM (WNcvq)

DoD passed you around like a phillipino bar slut!  Gratz!

(and I was just giving you shit)

Posted by: tangonine at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (x3YFz)

307 For example instead of going to O'Hare or Midway i can hit up Joliet or Lansing.

Try Rockford.

Posted by: CUS at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (wOGfT)

308

A question for fellow morons:

What would happen if the TSA found this book in my bag?

Posted by: Ed Anger at November 16, 2010 12:21 PM (7+pP9)

309 This story always had a prisonplanet-esque feel to it. That said, I think I will only fly out of vegas from now on. Hopefully they have enough sense to hire the bunny ranch for their tsa

Posted by: A.G. at November 16, 2010 12:22 PM (/ErxX)

310

#291, cats I've got, garlic I've got.

Posted by: SGT Dan at November 16, 2010 12:22 PM (GgXZc)

311 298 If I'm ever seen driving a princess, please empty your clip into the driver's side door.

Clip? Was ist dieses? Are we throwing around piles of paper?

I say!  Your understanding is underdeveloped!  I must place you under arrest for failure of comprehension!

I will also be passing the records to Interlingual Interpol, as I draw from your statement the idea that your German may also be sketchy...

Posted by: Inspector Spector, Vocabulary Constabulary at November 16, 2010 12:23 PM (GBXon)

312 304 Don't know if it's been suggested yet, but if you have enough people who don't want a public handjob from Bruno the TSA superstar pool your money and charter a flight. Now it won't be a leer jet but you could probably find a good deal with the right numbers. And your smaller local airports have flights going out and probably don't have TSA snakecharmers and radiation baths. For example instead of going to O'Hare or Midway i can hit up Joliet or Lansing. Might not work but could be stop gap measures until all this bullshit is stopped.

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at November 16, 2010 04:19 PM (WZFkG)

this is fow the sawfty of amewica!

Posted by: Barney Frank at November 16, 2010 12:23 PM (x3YFz)

313 Anyone gotta handy list of all those stupid things Napolitano said last year?  Remember when people were talking about her being fired?

Posted by: rdbrewer at November 16, 2010 12:24 PM (2Sfpk)

314

I received a farewell groping from Chicago O'Hare TSA last Thursday.   

Before going through the bodyscan/metal detector, the TSA people put me to one side between the metal detector and the scanner and told me to stand facing the lines of people passing me through both machines.  I stood there several minutes while my wallet and other items went through the machine. 

I was ignored for a few minutes until two new guys came up to me, took me by the arm, stopped the metal detector line and escorted me through.  They asked me if someone was taking care of my property.  I responded that I didn't know because I was not allowed to proceed through the line with it.

Then the two guys took me to the center of three little foot print search mats about 30 feet directly in front and center of all the other security lines, so people in line were all facing me.  I asked my wife to secure my property as I passed, but she could not come back into the designated area at the end of the machine, so there it sat. 

The TSA guys repeatedly asked if I wanted a private screening room, but I said no.  In my line of work, I've been thoroughly and professionally patted down innumerable times, so I just told them to get on with it.  The young TSA guys repeatedly warned me that they were going to pat down "sensitive areas"  The patdown was thorough, but slow.   At one point I attempted to untuck my shirt to assist the search, but they firmly instructed me to keep my hands out to the sides.  I've never had the waistband of my pants turned over and examined so carefully and slowly, though.  That's when they advised me that they were putting their hands inside the waistband of my pants and clothing.

I clearly functioned as an example to anyone who might be selected for special treatment.  I was made to face the huge crowd of people standing in line nearly all of whom were watching the pat down.  Kind of a spectacle.

On the return trip on Sunday, I was selected for the body scan.  In my opinion, the pat down is less invasive with no attendant health risks, but I didn't want to delay getting to my flight.

I am still amazed that people put up with this stuff on a regular basis, but if you want to fly you have no choice.  Watching grown people from all walks of life wander around in their socks with their shoes, clothing and personal property in garbage bins at the direction of low level government functionaries is absurd.

Posted by: casual at November 16, 2010 12:24 PM (hajhV)

315 How many non-muslim hijackings?  I count 4 out 15 hijackings listed since 2000 or about 27%.



Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:25 PM (WNcvq)

316

3 day old underwear, or older was a thought of mine, but what about the poor person you end up sitting next to?

Well, the seats do stink already and are still warm when you get on, so not much difference there.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:27 PM (QLiYt)

317 317

3 day old underwear, or older was a thought of mine, but what about the poor person you end up sitting next to?

Well, the seats do stink already and are still warm when you get on, so not much difference there.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 04:27 PM (QLiYt)

If anyone said anything, I scream "TERRORIST!" jump up and point at them and call for the air marshall.

Posted by: Barney Frank at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (x3YFz)

318 I suggest that all male passengers that want to opt out of the naked scanner:

1. Take Viagra
2. Wear a condom
and last but not least
3. Bring along a boombox and play Barry White music.

That will get this nonsense stopped quickly.

Posted by: kf at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (ytCsK)

319 How many non-muslim hijackings?  I count 4 out 15 hijackings listed since 2000 or about 27%.



Posted by: chad

 

And these originated in the US?

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:29 PM (R2fpr)

320 I recently submitted to a pat-down when flying out of Buffalo. The screener was polite, professional and thorough. However, I did feel it would have been more efficient for him to stand in front of me, rather than behind me with his arms wrapping around front. Also, it would have kept his erection from poking into my hamstring.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 16, 2010 12:31 PM (eQrQ9)

321

Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 04:12 PM (R2fpr)

Or what happened when they tried out the ignition cutout for unbuckled seatbelts. First woman assaulted because she couldn't drive off put paid to the entire idea.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 12:32 PM (z1N6a)

322

Seriously, Empire of Jeff? He liked you that much?

How did you handle that?

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:33 PM (QLiYt)

323 I recently submitted to a pat-down when flying out of Buffalo. The screener was polite, professional and thorough. However, I did feel it would have been more efficient for him to stand in front of me, rather than behind me with his arms wrapping around front.

Also, it would have kept his erection from poking into my hamstring.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff

Would be interesting to know the public reaction if someone accused a TSA type of carrying a concealed weapon, and it turned out that it was an erection.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:34 PM (R2fpr)

324 One of the commenters on the WaPo site yesterday, said he has a voluptuous wife and two beautiful teen-aged daughters, and they single out his wife for extra screening every.single.time. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at November 16, 2010 04:16 PM (UOM4

Those weren't TSA guys. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Oldcat at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (z1N6a)

325

Simple really, I don't intend to fly and have written to several airlines I have used in the past informing them.

I'll not be treated like cattle for a service I'm paying for.

Posted by: gdonovan at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (ri/ny)

326

Lookfor kludged versions being set out by hacker types. People will start running into odd 'dead' cell areas. It could be fun doing such frolics in the swanky neighborhoods around DC.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 04:12 PM (R2fpr)

Or what happened when they tried out the ignition cutout for unbuckled seatbelts. First woman assaulted because she couldn't drive off put paid to the entire idea.

Posted by: Oldcat

 

my current favorite is the remote ignition kill that apparantly Onstar can do. Suppsoedly some police forces can do this trick as well. I believe that there have been allegations of hacking ad remotely disabling passing cars.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 12:35 PM (R2fpr)

327 Imagine if you will the revenge of a TSA agent. Are they above being bribed by a ROP type to let them on a plane?  Would they let a person through just to serve as a reminder, submit or die?  What to do about it?  I'm not certain.  You could let the military handle it, but then you have the police state (but we sort of already have that with TSA invading our space).  We have allowed to have ourselves PC'd out of existence.

Posted by: SJR2 at November 16, 2010 12:37 PM (oCbCP)

328

It also received a Nobel peace prize.


Pulitzer, too.

Posted by: CUS

And a blue ribbon at the 4-H Fair!

Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:37 PM (oREHE)

329 No, 1 was a Russian Jew who wanted to fly to Israel, 1 was in the PI, 1 was in Canada and 1 was in Mexico, but that wasn't the question.  The question was how many hijackers are non-muslim in regards to justifying profiling (which I support BTW).  When I was flying often for my job I was pulled every single flight for 2 years and subjected to the extra search at both the security checkpoint and at the gate before boarding.  It was a pain but no more intrusive than the roving checkpoints on Camp Pendleton where every occupant of every car is handcuffed and the car searched as well as all the occupants as an anti-gang counter measure.  (or at least they were doing that in 1996)

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:38 PM (WNcvq)

330 Why can't I buy my TSA scanner picture like I can buy the Splash Mountain pictures at Disneyland?  Let's turn this thing into a profit center.

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 12:38 PM (+lsX1)

331 Of those, how many were perpetrated by nuns, and 3yo's?

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 16, 2010 12:40 PM (0q2P7)

332 Next time I fly, I'm going commando and cutting the bottoms of my front pockets out. That should give them a nice surprise.

Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:40 PM (oREHE)

333 The obvious point, chad, is that Camp Pendleton is a military base and airports aren't. Technically. Yet. Maybe.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:41 PM (QLiYt)

334 Ace of Spades HQ:  All Napolitano, all the time.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 16, 2010 12:43 PM (xxgag)

335 Next time I fly, I'm going commando and cutting the bottoms of my front pockets out. That should give them a nice surprise.

Hum when the reach the bottom and say something like, "oh yeah, I put on the easy access pants today"

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at November 16, 2010 12:43 PM (0q2P7)

336 True but read the sign posted at every airport I have been to recently and it is essentially the same sign that hangs at the gate to Camp Pendleton stating that once you enter you have agreed to the searches, but while we are on that point are you saying that service members are less trust-worthy than the general public and therefore should be treated like criminals until itis proven they aren't.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 12:45 PM (WNcvq)

337 Hum when the reach the bottom and say something like, "oh yeah, I put on the easy access pants today"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose

I may ask them if they want to join me for a Marlboro and a nightcap afterwards. Then I should complain that they didn't take me out to dinner beforehand.

Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:46 PM (oREHE)

338 No, that wasn't my point. Only noting that military installations operate under different expectations and regulations than most civilian locations.

Posted by: Who Knows at November 16, 2010 12:48 PM (QLiYt)

339 True but read the sign posted at every airport I have been to recently and it is essentially the same sign that hangs at the gate to Camp Pendleton stating that once you enter you have agreed to the searches, but while we are on that point are you saying that service members are less trust-worthy than the general public and therefore should be treated like criminals until itis proven they aren't.
Posted by: chad

Billy Jeff was also the CIC in 1996, so they probably did think the military should be treated like criminals.

Posted by: MrCaniac at November 16, 2010 12:48 PM (oREHE)

340

I was listening to a "Passenger Rights" person talk about this today.  She says the manufacturer's FAQ page stated that the machine only "sees" through 1/10th of an inch of skin. It cannot see inside body cavities, or underneath breasts or inside folds of skin.

The manufacturer removed that FAQ after the contents were revealed.

Posted by: davod at November 16, 2010 12:53 PM (GUZAT)

341

@185: "The destruction of America is the strategic goal."

America's already been pretty well destroyed.  This is just jumping up and down on the corpse.

 

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 16, 2010 12:56 PM (xy9wk)

342 I want some hot young stud to put his hands down my pants. No chick pat down for me. On second thoughts, if offered a choice between irradiation and a kinky pat down, I'm gonna start stripping.

Posted by: apodoca at November 16, 2010 01:02 PM (JCHdz)

343 Of those, how many were perpetrated by nuns, and 3yo's?

 I don't know about Nuns and 3 year olds but I do know that in Israel there is a fairly substantial number of suicide bombings committed by kids.  I also kind of recall a case about 4 years ago where the Israeli's caught a woman going thru a checkpoint with explosives in her babies stroller and there was a security alert in NY for the same thing.  That turned out to be a false alarm but using kids as bomb couriers has been considered at least once.

I said before I agree with profiling for airport security, but I also realize profiles will change as terrorists adapt so Nuns and 3 year olds don't automatically get a pass as far as I am concerned.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 01:06 PM (WNcvq)

344 Hum when the reach the bottom and say something like, "oh yeah, I put on the easy access pants today"

Off topic war story:  Ten years ago I was asked to charge a sex assault against a worker at a community corrections facility.  Community corrections is like long term work release.  The inmates can't drive so they are driven to work.  Among this guy's duties was to drive inmates to work.

One of the inmates was a reasonably attractive young women.  She told the cops that this guy had put the moves on her, was fondling her, and the next thing she knew, he was sitting there without benefit of pants.  She said that he altered his pants so that they closed with Velcro so that he could strip down in no time.  I thought that this couldn't be right.  Nobody would do that.  But then his side of the story was yeah, he had those easy access pants.  When you're getting hot and heavy and down to business, you can't be fumbling around with buttons and zippers and what not.  You've got to be able go, baby, go!

Posted by: Montgomery Burns at November 16, 2010 01:11 PM (xxgag)

345 Yow!  Forgot to change my socks.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 16, 2010 01:11 PM (xxgag)

346 Do you have these pants in khaki?

Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at November 16, 2010 01:15 PM (+lsX1)

347 @ 4:18 "You link to him and you are him."

That's pure absolutist bullshit, you intolerant narrow minded nitwit. You'd better not read ANYTHING that hasn't your preconceived approval stamp marked on its packaging.

By constitutional conservative choice, I like Fred Thompson, and always have. There's the pigeon hole you require for identity politics.

Obviously, you never graduated from any school of merit requiring your mind to be challenged with broad research.

No one ever said that Jones is the brightest bulb in the box. I certainly NEVER said that I follow Jones. Anyone who takes something too far does just that.  I don't like his distasteful mannerisms any more than I like Obama's bullshit, Palin's screech at rallies, or Hannity's broken recording.

Since he isn't anything other than a loud spokesperson willing to stick his neck out further than others, right or wrong, calling Jones the devil only reflects on the person hurling that label. What you fault as "evil" in Jones is his use of Constitutional Rights to get out his message. But to squash those rights is what would be evil. Late-18th-century Classical Liberal Voltaire Motto:  I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.

Stupid is as stupid does, Chicken Liver is calling for the annihilation of an opinionated blow hard because Chicken Liver doesn't like him because Chicken Liver doesn't agree with him. You'll go far but only as another grotesque authoritarian attempting to control what people think.

Consider the mote in the beam.




Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 01:18 PM (H+LJc)

348 How many non-muslim hijackings?  I count 4 out 15 hijackings listed since 2000 or about 27%.

So back when a hijacker thought he could get out of this thing alive.  September 11, 2001, the rules changed- for them as much as for us.  How many non-muslim hijackings since then?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 16, 2010 01:21 PM (8y9MW)

349 Double Down!
What could possibly go wrong?

My prediction?

Some guy is arrested by Thanksgiving for assaulting a TSA worker after groping his wife/daughter/girlfriend.

I'm starting a pool if anyone is interested.

Posted by: Oh, Hi Mark at November 16, 2010 01:26 PM (dp9VJ)

350 Any of you homos touch me, I'll kill ya.

Posted by: Frances at November 16, 2010 01:27 PM (AYAWx)

351 Put their hands down your pants?? I don't know if I believe all this.

I flew home to see my family in October. I did the body scan thing and I got a pat down as well..and I am a 59 year old woman. I did not have a fit, because I knew when I got the ticket that this is the kind of crap you go through at the airport.

I am sure that some of the people that work for the TSA are bullying idiots, but most of them are just regular people with a not so great job and no doubt they get their asses chewed out if they don't do a lot of this stuff.

We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.

Posted by: Terrye at November 16, 2010 01:34 PM (j8jdm)

352 What's the likelihood of a TSA agent charging you with assault if you let slip a long, smelly fart during the pat-down?

Posted by: Weew at November 16, 2010 01:35 PM (p05LM)

353 Double Down!
What could possibly go wrong?

My prediction?... -- Oh, Hi Mark

sad but likely the case

The point we should consider is what we do about that when it happens.

Demand a Lawyer if it's you. But the rest of us need to organize demands for the demise of PC from Congress, the Potus, and a firm constitutional constructionist policy upon which Courts must abide. Imagine being the one legitimately protesting the TSA groping, singled out for prosecution by the cumulative forces of our Federal Government. Not pretty.

Posted by: Sherlock Holmes at November 16, 2010 01:36 PM (H+LJc)

354
We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.

You cool with them touching the crotch of your 3 yr old?

Posted by: Warden at November 16, 2010 01:50 PM (HzhBE)

355 The reason I ask is because it's not a security-no security proposition.

It's a continuum.

You cool with cavity searches?

Posted by: Warden at November 16, 2010 01:52 PM (HzhBE)

356 292: I believe they are already employing several Huge Jack-men.

Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 01:58 PM (FHlAi)

357 how about wearing pudding pants?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 16, 2010 02:00 PM (eOXTH)

358 The fundamental problem with the TSA philosophy is that 99.999999999999999999999% of passengers are becoming collateral damage in their escalating arms race with terrorists. Eventually, terrorists will start giving themselves colostomies, and putting bombs in their colostomy bags, and the TSA's response will be to give every man, woman and infant laparoscopic biopsies to see if they have anything implanted in their bodies. Similiar to how the drug war has shredded the civil rights of all citizens, and internationally, the mantra of "security" has allowed an increasingly fascist bureaucracy to ignore the Constitution. And they get away with it. Who the F gave these people waivers against the Constitution?! They need to have their asses hauled into court, where they can be fondled and groped by men and women in long black robes.

Posted by: Korla Pundit at November 16, 2010 02:03 PM (FHlAi)

359

"We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists"

Like at Israeli airports?  Each time I've flown out I've not seen a scanner or patdown, yet mystery of mystery, they have no such issues.

I wonder why?

Feh.

Posted by: Jess at November 16, 2010 02:11 PM (C1gln)

360 I will submit to the pat down, but first you will blow me.

Posted by: mel gibson at November 16, 2010 02:11 PM (S5YRY)

361 2 of the 4 I recounted so 13.5%

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 02:28 PM (WNcvq)

362 actually let me revise that.  There have been 7 hijackings since 9/11 and 2 of those were by non-muslims so almost 29%.  it would be 13.5% of the hijackings since 2000 have been done by non-muslims since 9/11.

Posted by: chad at November 16, 2010 02:32 PM (WNcvq)

363 Y'all prolly don't know that Dubya and our ol' pal Karl Rove campaigned against and then ELIMINATED passenger profiling in airports a few months before 9/11. READ HERE How do you like Bush now? No, really..miss him yet? How about no? k thx bye

Posted by: Contemplationist at November 16, 2010 02:33 PM (FPtHm)

364 CORRECTED URL HERE for Bush/Rove profiling elimination link

Posted by: Contemplationist at November 16, 2010 02:34 PM (eRsMQ)

365 No joke just punchline:

"Damn, he had both hands on my shoulders."

Posted by: Holger at November 16, 2010 02:47 PM (V9Q+f)

366 130, I've MET Secretary Napolitano, and she DOES look like a creepy predatory lesbian gym teacher in person. And she is a SHITTY speaker, even with a teleprompter setup. Either she was stopping every fifteen seconds trying to phrase her way around classification issues (doubtful, teleprompter), or she's too dumb to read her own notes.

So, I get paid to run a teleprompter. Really.

Anyone who can read out loud can read a teleprompter. ANYONE. There is no mystery to it at all. It is extremely simple, and many people can figure it out in one short sitting.

In other words, Janet must be a complete idiot.

Posted by: shibumi at November 16, 2010 02:51 PM (OKZrE)

367 Try this: Stand in the scanner, and when they turn it on, place both hands on your temples, and scream while falling unto a quivering heap.

Posted by: Pelayo at November 16, 2010 03:02 PM (V9Q+f)

368 Hey, that link and story is from Prison Planet, Alex Jones.  Right now I believe it is one of Jones' fabrications.  We should all demand confirmation.  Alex Jones is a damned liar.

Posted by: Pelayo at November 16, 2010 03:14 PM (V9Q+f)

369
We could just forget all the security and take our chances with the terrorists.

Posted by: Terrye

We could waste time with your absurd exaggerations. Or we could try finding out how nations that have faced protracted terrorist threats have coped. You tried peddling this line of shit over at Hot Air. They aren't allowed to say that this is a piece of shit and that you are an asinine blowhard. We can say that here though. You are an asinine blowhard.

And this line is a piece of shit.

Posted by: Blue Hen at November 16, 2010 03:44 PM (1O93r)

370 Screw it. I'm flying Al Queda Air this holiday season.

http://tinyurl.com/39jbrk4

Posted by: Barbarian at November 16, 2010 05:07 PM (EL+OC)

371 I'm thinking I'll short circuit this feeljob by coming to the airport with a speedo to flash underneath my trench coat.   They can pretty much see anything they want, sort of like taking your shoes off, just a trench coat instead of shoes and speedo instead of socks.  Could be a trend setter...   I suppose if I had a full body speedo, that would be good too -- wouldn't need the coat.  

If this searching stuff means more ten rated babes show up in bikinis, I may forgo the coat -- or not... 

Posted by: drfredc at November 16, 2010 05:17 PM (/+GW9)

372 What this world needs is some competition.  How about letting an alternative airline run, flying old DC3s off of gravel runways.   Change access to the cockpit to a hatch under the plane so hijacking is not possible.  Require at least 20% of the passengers carry heat and profile like no tomorrow.

Want to bet on what airline makes money?

Posted by: snookered at November 16, 2010 05:37 PM (jchJh)

373 I did not have the opportunity to read all up-thread, but....what about the rights of gays? Say I am a lesbian and ain't no other female touching or tootin' on my private parts unless it's my partner. So, can I then demand a male-only pat down, as that would be less of a violation for me? Seems as valid as being opted out of a pat down session because of my religion, right? Or do Muslim religious rights trump sexual/gender rights?

Posted by: calyx at November 16, 2010 06:52 PM (ehlWj)

374 I am going baggy ass jeans, polo shirt, flip flops and nothing else next time I travel.

If selected, will opt out, hold my "Papers" (DoD Travel Orders), let 'em know I am allergic to latex and want some clean hand bags, and hang-sack for all to see; while letting the general public know that this is a routine exercise, "Like you'all know - We only check those we know are clean.".




Posted by: Druid at November 16, 2010 07:12 PM (adCDx)

375 Will I get to choose who puts their hands down my pants.

Posted by: Smorgasbord at November 16, 2010 08:55 PM (DEZm3)

376  It's a win for the greeners though. I hear Al Gore is going to start flying commercial, hoping for a 'happy ending' pat down ;-)

Posted by: Mike at November 16, 2010 09:16 PM (m3QSi)

377 There is only one way to end this and only men can end it: ERECTIONS. If men around the country agreed to refuse the scan and have fully-engaged, eye-poking erections in the pat down area, this policy would change! Make 'em handle and inspect every stiff cock on the plane, I say!

Posted by: Y7 at November 17, 2010 03:42 AM (+VuVK)

378 ayten kocasinin yaragini içine alýp sertce porno izle meltem ve yelize hadi türk seks sakso çekmiþlerdi bende ýsrar edince tamam ama yavaþ olucak ve sadece arkadan yapýcaksýn dedi bnse tamm dedim ve bunlar türk sex soyundu zehrayý býrakýp türk pornomelteme geçtim bu ara aslý iþini biliyor kameraya porno video ufacýk kalçalrýný tutup yaragýmý götune yavaþça soktum bendeporno yavaþça soktum yaragý kökune kadar soktum meltem sex video nolur çok acýyo diyordu bense artýk çileden çýkmýþtým ve baþladým köküne kadar sokup çýkarýyordum meltem kendini ileri atýyor

Posted by: seninle at November 17, 2010 06:18 AM (d2uuZ)

379 Anyone down for wearing Scottish kilts the traditional way? Though I must admit that the speedo and trench coat could be equally disturbing.<] )=

Posted by: Tommikepat at November 17, 2010 02:38 PM (8IGmf)

380 Could TSA Black Ball Americans Using All Forms Of Public Transportation?

A song titled, TSA Boots Are Going To Walk All Over You, might make a great sequel to Nancy Sinatra’s “These Boots Are Going To Walk All Over You.”

TSA’s mistreatment, humiliation and general abrasive handling of Americans at airports, may be a portent to Americans (next) getting a Boot in their face if they refuse to be stripped searched, molested or x-rayed before boarding—any form of public transportation; bus, train, cruse ship. It is obvious TSA intends to extend its reach beyond airports; that TSA will blackball Americans from using other forms of public transportation, including preventing Citizens from driving beyond highway checkpoints, for alleged security reasons. TSA appears headed toward shutting down Americans' Right To Travel Freely in their own Country.

The Nazis used national emergency as a premise to repeatedly target, search and detain Germans boarding or taking trains considered political dissidents or morally unfit; Citizens were intentionally delayed by police/military so they would be late or miss work. As a result many Citizens lost there jobs and could not survive.

TSAÂ’s physical searches of air passengersÂ’ private body parts, is intimidating passengers to submit to x-rays scans. Continued Low Radiation Exposure is Accumulative and believed to cause Cancer. Americans need to draw a line in the sand; Boycott airlines: that would get TSA's attention and stockholders of airlines. Meanwhile, not just pilots and flight attendants,  “ordinary air passengers” should also be afforded privacy when physically searched at public airports.

The government intends to invade your bedroom. The government purchased hundreds’ of X-Ray Vans that will travel our streets without warrants, x-ray scan, see Americans naked when walking, standing, riding their bike and may—retain your scan-photos.

Government/police will use x-ray vans to peer though CitizensÂ’ homes and vehicles, exposing Americans and their families to radiation; government will view Citizens in their bedrooms. Americans need to ask Obama if independent studies were conducted to determine if Citizens could develop Cancer, if (repeatedly bombarded) by police X-ray scans. It is expected government/police with or without a warrant, will repeatedly X-ray scan a person of interest, in his or her home.

ObamaÂ’s X-Ray Vans can ALSO be used by the military or police to secure perimeters to control civil unrest and instances of revolt, to screen and stop Citizens carrying guns, cameras; any item.  Does Obama expect Americans to revolt?

Posted by: Rwolf at November 20, 2010 08:12 AM (TqYgA)

381 here is a pratical and professional AVCHD Editing software for HD Camcorders.Easily archivable and vesatile functions make AVCHD Editor stand edit avchd ,you can have a try efsdaf

Posted by: ruth at December 07, 2010 12:10 AM (vNZ8G)

382 I recently flew out of Dayton Ohio airport.  They have no body scanners.  I did not have baggy pants on - actually my jeans were a little tight.  The TSA guy ordered me to lift up my shirt.  He then puts his hands in my pants and went all the way around.  I felt humiliated.  It was just very creepy having him put his hands there.  I imagine he was trying to look down my underwear.  And what is really messed up is that in first and business class seating on international flights everyone gets 2 real knives and a real fork.  The flight attendants have a half dozen wine bottles.  The man puts his hands in my pants looking for a weapon, I fly to Chicago, get on an international flight, and then they put two metal knives on my plate.  These people have lost their minds.

Posted by: Steve at December 18, 2010 03:52 PM (omaSl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
304kb generated in CPU 0.3652, elapsed 0.5051 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.434 seconds, 510 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.