March 13, 2014

US Investigators Suspect Flight 370 Flew For Four More Hours After Last Confirmed Position
— Ace

Which would have major implications.

Four hours of flight time would mean it could be anywhere in a circle with a diameter of 2,200 nautical miles. It could be in India; it could be in Mongolia; it could be in Japan; it could be in Australia. And of course all the thousands of square miles of ocean around.

But it's more than that: Because pilots don't just shut off their transponders and stop all communications without a reason for doing so.

U.S. investigators suspect that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 stayed in the air for about four hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, according to two people familiar with the details, raising the possibility that the plane could have flown on for hundreds of additional miles under conditions that remain murky.

Aviation investigators and national security officials believe the plane flew for a total of five hours, based on data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from the Boeing Co. BA engines as part of a routine maintenance and monitoring program.

So, while the plane's transponders and radio were off, its engines were still sending out data to satellites. At least according to the WSJ's sources. And the engines sent out data for four hours past the plane's disappearance.

Which leads to this possibility:

U.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe.

Terrorism or some kind of skyjacking is not ruled out.

At Hot Air, Malaysian officials dispute these claims, and China is criticizing them on their response to the whole matter.

Via Nidermeyer's Dead Horse... An NPR interview with the WSJ reporter who wrote this story.

He says the new theory being explored is that the plane either landed, or crashed at some later point en route to a planned landing place. (Actually he doesn't clearly say that last "or" clause but it's implied by what he does say.)

Posted by: Ace at 10:44 AM | Comments (551)
Post contains 377 words, total size 3 kb.

1 It was the joos.

Posted by: Mel Gibson at March 13, 2014 10:47 AM (A0sHn)

2 Interesting

Posted by: game time decision at March 13, 2014 10:47 AM (WKKgC)

3 Hum?

Posted by: Rod Serling at March 13, 2014 10:47 AM (t3UFN)

4
Has anyone looked on the moon?

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 10:47 AM (BZAd3)

5 Nice, Mel.

Posted by: flounder at March 13, 2014 10:47 AM (Kkt/i)

6 Thing is, transponders ID the aircraft, but radars go on detecting planes whether the transponders are on or off.  If the plane flew on for hours more, it should have been
painted by some radars sets, somewhere,

Unless it was brought down to fly just above the deck.

Can't be first, really.

Cordially...

Posted by: Rick at March 13, 2014 10:48 AM (mOQjx)

7 I guess these would-be secret engine transponders are no longer secret, right?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 13, 2014 10:48 AM (qZr+9)

8 That sidebar link about the pro aviator/radio types forum is pretty damned interesting for informed speculation.

Posted by: flounder at March 13, 2014 10:48 AM (Kkt/i)

9 Curiouser and curiouser.  The fact that no national  air defence systems were alerted makes me suspect that it didn't head over land.

Posted by: Mikey NTH - Buy Four Outrages, get a Rightous Indignation Free! at March 13, 2014 10:49 AM (hLRSq)

10
The pilots must have chosen fish for dinner.

Posted by: dan-O at March 13, 2014 10:49 AM (D0bIN)

11 When the truth comes out (and most of it probably will) the Malaysian government is going to look very silly indeed.

Posted by: technite at March 13, 2014 10:49 AM (9PNNC)

12 Here... let me do the math. 

250,000 divided by, oh, say 600 mph equals

carry the 3...


yep.

Four hours.  There you have it.

It's on the moon.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 10:49 AM (BZAd3)

13 Honestly I'm not surprised that no one has any idea what's going on. The countries spear heading the search are Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand.

Posted by: Adam at March 13, 2014 10:49 AM (Aif/5)

14

If it was hijacked, or the pilot turned terrorist, and I was Malaysia - I would shoot it down before it was     flown to a city to     kill more people than those on board.

 

I would also misdirect the searchers.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 10:50 AM (CpbrP)

15 Sure, it landed on our secret carrier in Shangri-La!

Posted by: Zombie FDR at March 13, 2014 10:50 AM (71K6B)

16 Sadly, it's at the bottom of the ocean. In this case the simplest explanation seems far away the most likely.

Posted by: brak at March 13, 2014 10:50 AM (iEoiA)

17 SO

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 13, 2014 10:50 AM (t3UFN)

18 Too much weird stuff on this one... the cell phone thing was strange enough. Has anyone explained that away yet? I wonder can Rolls Royce or Boeing independently confirm that the engine transmissions were sent? I suspect there would be reasons to not do so, but it seems like 6 days in or whatever the circumstances are getting stranger and stranger. An acquaintance remarked that it might be similar to TWA flight 800, fuel explosions or whatever, but I have vivid recollections of the flaming wreckage field off the coast of long island from the evening news. I would think in a similar case that sort of thing would have been visible from satellite imagery.

Posted by: Dr. Shatterhand at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (n/ogz)

19 what seems most plausible to me is that malay gov't with assistance of unknown parties, shot down plane based on intelligence and/or plane movements. Kuala Lumpur has tallest building in world, or second tallest, and the plane was headed back that way. and now they may want to cover up taking down the plane for a host of reasons

Posted by: secretary of state at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (AX7W6)

20 At least the California legislators are smarter than Boeing on one sense. When they eventually require radio network links to our car emission controls, they will include GPS information.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (qZr+9)

21 Why are people so fascinated by Greatest Unsolved Aviation Mystery in Modern History? I just don't get it.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (ZPrif)

22 it was the jooos

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (zOTsN)

23 It was Mrs. Peacock with a rope in the Conservatory.

Posted by: Cluedo at March 13, 2014 10:51 AM (kGcrY)

24 21 Why are people so fascinated by Greatest Unsolved Aviation Mystery in Modern History? I just don't get it.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 02:51 PM (ZPrif)


I know!  Right?

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (BZAd3)

25 Wasn't there a story yesterday about every engine that Rolls Royce builds (which was on the 777) has performance telemetry data constantly sent to their HQ in England? They certainly know how long the engines ran if that is the case...

Posted by: Tony253 at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (PryWG)

26 Thing is, transponders ID the aircraft, but radars go on detecting planes whether the transponders are on or off. If the plane flew on for hours more, it should have been painted by some radars sets, somewhere, Unless it was brought down to fly just above the deck. Can't be first, really. Cordially... Posted by: Rick at March 13, 2014 02:48 PM (mOQjx) I thought I read somewhere that there are reports of unidentified radar pings along the corridor that would be expected if the flight had diverged the way it's speculated it might have.

Posted by: Dr. Shatterhand at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (n/ogz)

27 TWA 800 had tons of floating wreckage that was on fire for hours

Posted by: secretary of state at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (AX7W6)

28 the latest theory is that it was the Shi Langoliers I heard it somewhere.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (IW1TI)

29 I have this weird feeling that I should be building a model of Devils Postpile out of mashed potatoes.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (8ZskC)

30 Four hours would make it seem like it crossed land somewhere.  A radar station would have picked it up.

Posted by: EC at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (GQ8sn)

31 @BlogsofWar We treat him like heÂ’s mad, but Vladimir PutinÂ’s popularity has just hit a 3-year high http://goo.gl/h1XOOK

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 10:52 AM (ZPrif)

32 Could have made it to Pakistan, Maldives, a bunch of places. I think the graphic shows minimal range.

Posted by: forest at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (stMuz)

33 See, the Malaysian officials claim they checked with Boeing and Rolls Royce, and that both companies said the plane stopped transmitting engine data BEFORE it lost contact with the ground.    Yet    the American investigators say that the Boeing data continued transmitting.    Can someone please give me a definitive answer ehre?   Boeing, you care you weigh in with an official statement?   


This   prevaricating,    shadowy bullshit is REALLY getting old.   People's lives have been devastated by this.   CYA  is not an option.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (4df7R)

34 My theory: The plane did not crash. It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia. The passengers? Possibly all executed. The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack.

Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (mizYg)

35 The real question though ace, is can the guy in the wheelchair now walk?

Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (da5Wo)

36 There is no way the plane's engines were transmitting data for five hours.  Boeing did not adjust for International Date Line Savings Time. 

Posted by: Malaysian Spokesman at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (D+lxs)

37 Does a 777 have better range than a SCUD?  Yeah, I'd start looking at those bastards in the area.

Posted by: Fritz at March 13, 2014 10:53 AM (UzPAd)

38 Just this morning everyone was disavowing the auto-sent engine data, but if it's in the Indian Ocean, then we know those people were wrong/lying. Who led that charge?

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (ZshNr)

39 Could have made it to Pakistan, Maldives, a bunch of places. I think the graphic shows minimal range.


The Argentinians would have told us if it landed at Maldives.

Posted by: Barky O'Genius at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (8ZskC)

40
One thing I do sorta think is this: that national authorities know more about what happened than what we are being told about. And there is some reason, legitimate or illegitimate, that they are keeping it from us.

Or maybe nobody knows.

Posted by: dan-O at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (D0bIN)

41 " My theory: The plane did not crash. It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia. The passengers? Possibly all executed. The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg)" My worst case theory is along the same lines.

Posted by: Dr. Shatterhand at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (n/ogz)

42
My bet...

Kim Jong Un was running out of people to starve or shoot.


Hey... stranger things...

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (BZAd3)

43

It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia.

 

--

 

That is one heck of a homemade runway that can handle a 777

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (CpbrP)

44 You know what we do know? They're all dead. All of them are dead. And they died a horrible and frightening and violent death. Finding the result of their demise is incidental at this point.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (IW1TI)

45 anyway the last couple of years i had believed cell phones had gps system in them.
perhaps they don't work under water?  you'd think for a bit they would have.


Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (nqBYe)

46 Civilian radar isn't really radar.  It depends entirely on those transponders.  Now the Navy radar is really radar and they would have been able to track the plane.


Also, the Chinese would have been able to track it using their coastal defense radar.  Someone knows what happened to that plane.

Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (T2V/1)

47 I saw Contact so I feel I can comment as an expert on these matters, the Venusian's took it.

Posted by: lowandslow at March 13, 2014 10:54 AM (IV4od)

48 >> The suggestion seems to be that Malaysia isn't being straight, offering face-saving stuff in order to avoid accusations of incompetence, and that this is hindering the investigation.<<

That ship sailed when they failed to cross-check passports for authenticity. What century of air safety are they living in? September 11th ringing an bells guys?

It appears the transponder was deliberately shut off. The only way they could keep flying that long without panicking people, who would immediately pick up their cell phones, would be controlled flight. Then probably a deliberate flight into terrain that was catastrophic which was most likely preceded by a shout of Aloha Snack-bar!.

Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 10:55 AM (GGCsk)

49 The plot thickens.

Posted by: toby928© at March 13, 2014 10:55 AM (QupBk)

50 Speaking of kooky dudes ... John Schindler ‏@20committee Of course / MT @NoahCRothman Ron Paul says West overthrew Yanukovich, Putin has "law on his side" invading of Crimea. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ron-paul-putin-has-law-on-his-side-with-crimean-invasion/

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 10:55 AM (ZPrif)

51 The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg) Where? In China? Japan?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 13, 2014 10:55 AM (t3UFN)

52 I think someone accidentally shot it down and there is a coverup going on we are sending the Navy to look in the Indian Ocean I think China knows when it went down, and isn't saying for some reason I don't trust a thing the RMAF says. They haven't a clue and are deep in CYA. Rolls Royce/Boeing gave government officials this info days ago. We aren't being told everything. Either governments involved are afraid of sparking a shooting war, or it was terrorism and they do not want to admit it ala Benghazi

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 10:55 AM (zOTsN)

53 soothsayer, yes whether a stolen craft or a crash. I'm sure they didn't stand a chance .

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 10:56 AM (nqBYe)

54 6 Thing is, transponders ID the aircraft, but radars go on detecting planes whether the transponders are on or off. If the plane flew on for hours more, it should have been painted by some radars sets, somewhere,

There's not a lot of radar stations out in the ocean. So if it flew back over Malaysia and into the Indian ocean, it's possible that the Malaysian radar stations were the only ones to see it.

Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 10:56 AM (XkotV)

55

"It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar...."

 

The Germans!  Of course, why didn't I think of that!

Posted by: Mikey NTH - Buy Four Outrages, get a Rightous Indignation Free! at March 13, 2014 10:56 AM (hLRSq)

56

The Contrail Liberation Front sent a Feydayin squad to down it.  Because the Polluters/Breeders are spraying mind control drugs from them.  And here's the sad, true, scary part.  I didn't make that last bit up.  There really are mathematically and physics challenged idiots out there that believe that shit and VOTE, too.

Posted by: Todd Bridges, first to go bad, last to go down at March 13, 2014 10:56 AM (OJCL9)

57 "intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe." Why would turning off the transponder have any effect on radar detection?

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 10:56 AM (fWAjv)

58 OK.... plane missing is potential tragedy... but why are we giving so many US resources to this? NASA, DHS, NTSB, FBI have all got people on it... And we are using Search Planes and Destroyers from the Navy... at a time we are cutting Personnel due to budget constraints... To find a Jetliner that does not belong to us... and was flying mostly Chinese... to China... My give a shit meter is degrading rapidly.... as the US response seems to increase...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (84gbM)

59 Where? In China? Japan?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 13, 2014 02:55 PM (t3UFN)


Peruvia. 


You didn't hear that here.

Posted by: A Cabal of Diabolically Clever Shaved Alpacas at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (8ZskC)

60 "It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia."

What do the Germans have to do with it?

Posted by: flounder at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (Kkt/i)

61 God I hope you're wrong zombie.

Posted by: jewells45 at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (l/N7H)

62 Could be on Niue. Never trust the Niueans.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (7ObY1)

63 Aliens. The answer is always aliens.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 10:57 AM (ODr92)

64 16 Sadly, it's at the bottom of the ocean. In this case the simplest explanation seems far away the most likely. --- True. Problem is that the damn thing could be anywhere because there's a LOT of water in that part of the world.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (APuJ7)

65 They're all dead. All of them are dead. And they died a horrible and frightening and violent death. Finding the result of their demise is incidental at this point.


Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM (IW1TI)



That's just it.   We DON'T know that.  That's why this is so     frustrating.      Is it  incredibly likely that they're all dead?   Yes.    But   until there's some proof -- wreckage, bodies, SOMETHING -- there's still that hope that maybe they're out there somewhere, being held captive but still alive, waiting for rescue.      It's   every   child abduction and missing person    case     writ large:   "They're probably dead,   but maybe they aren't."



Hope is a wonderful thing, but it's    also   terribly painful. 

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (4df7R)

66 Crazypants theory: It was aliens. Duh. Actual theory: Someone accidentally shot it down and now they don't want to tell China what they did. I mean, would you?

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (VtjlW)

67 So a $320 million dollar plane is missing with 200 people and we don't know if it landed or crashed. NSA. Top men on the case. Seems to me it would not take a lot of time to plot all the landing strips that could handle a 777 and check them out. Or is this SPECTRE's work? Underwater landing strips and shit?

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (0FSuD)

68 Come on people. These conspiracy theories are insane. We all know where the plane is. It's at the bottom of the ocean covered by a giant net. SPECTRE has it. Just stop with the crazy already.

Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (da5Wo)

69 Also, you know who doesn't want the wreckage to be found? Boeing and the airline. Life will be a lot easier for those parties if Flight 370 remains a mystery.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (IW1TI)

70 34 My theory: The plane did not crash. It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg) It could happen.

Posted by: Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan in a Japanese POW camp at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (zoehZ)

71 got sucked into the black hole will return in year 2021 .

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (nqBYe)

72 I'm just glad that it isn't a Boeing 666 that went missing........

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 10:58 AM (CpbrP)

73 But seriously, where was Amanda Knox when the plane disappeared?

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 10:59 AM (IW1TI)

74 Where did they film 'Lost'?  Because that's the first place I'd look.

Just sayin'

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 10:59 AM (BZAd3)

75 Strange things happen on airplanes.  For awhile after I was widowed, I dated a guy who was a pilot flying 747s configured for cargo for transoceanic flights.  Parts of the crew were supposed to sleep while the other crew were flying the plane.  On route to Dublin, Ireland from Miami, Florida he woke up from his scheduled nap to find every single person in the crew asleep.  He said the auto-pilot had them right on course, at the right altitude, etc.  He also said that he had never been more frightened in his life.  He said until that incident he never understood how planes just disappeared off the face of the Earth.

Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes, We Be Bossy at March 13, 2014 10:59 AM (kXoT0)

76 We aren't being told everything. Either governments involved are afraid of sparking a shooting war, or it was terrorism and they do not want to admit it ala Benghazi


YouTube is now being combed for offensive videos by federal officials so they can be blamed when the world finally learns that muzzie terrororism is behind the loss of the plane.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 13, 2014 10:59 AM (8ZskC)

77 The plane was a Boeing 777; the mark of the beast is 666. 777 - 666 = 111. <<< === There's your answer! Work it, people; work it!!

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 10:59 AM (HsTG8)

78 74 Where did they film 'Lost'? Because that's the first place I'd look. Just sayin' --- Yeah, my stock response to people talking about the disappearance was "Desmond forgot to input the code, so they're now on The Island."

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (APuJ7)

79 56 The Contrail Liberation Front sent a Feydayin squad to down it. Because the Polluters/Breeders are spraying mind control drugs from them. And here's the sad, true, scary part. I didn't make that last bit up. There really are mathematically and physics challenged idiots out there that believe that shit and VOTE, too. There are tards out there who insist that the 9-11 Shanksville flight landed safely in Ohio and all the "missing" passengers were then all killed by Booooosh. Just heard one of 'em on the radio spewing that shit again.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (7ObY1)

80 A hijacked airliner in a region rife with Islamic, among other, hostile parties? I have no idea why that would interest the US Military.

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (ZshNr)

81

Actual theory: Someone accidentally shot it down and now they don't want to tell China what they did. I mean, would you?

-

Assuming the transponder story is true, it wasn't accidentally shot down.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (CpbrP)

82 The poor families...

Posted by: Lauren at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (hFL/3)

83 77 The plane was a Boeing 777; the mark of the beast is 666. 777 - 666 = 111. Work it, people; work it!! --- If man is 5 and the devil is 6 than that must make me 7. This honky's gone to heaven...

Posted by: Bloodhound Gang at March 13, 2014 11:00 AM (APuJ7)

84 You didn't hear that here.

Posted by: A Cabal of Diabolically Clever Shaved Alpacas at March 13, 2014 02:57 PM (8ZskC)


Yeah right.  You prolly don't even speak Peruvian. 


Your Austrian sucks too.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:01 AM (BZAd3)

85 Many cellphones have GPS, but the only way to send its location is through a wireless network (i.e. a cell tower, WiFi, etc). Most phones were probably in "airplane mode" (meaning that their ability to talk to cell networks was disabled), but even if some were left on, there would probably be little chance of connecting to a cell far from land.

However, if the plane flew over land with cell coverage, there's some chance a phone left in normal cell communication mode might have communicated with a cell tower along the route (and left a trace in the cell tower's electronic logs).

Posted by: technite at March 13, 2014 11:01 AM (9PNNC)

86 76 YouTube is now being combed for offensive videos by federal officials so they can be blamed when the world finally learns that muzzie terrororism is behind the loss of the plane. Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 13, 2014 02:59 PM (8ZskC) Susan Rice is counting on it!

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 11:01 AM (HsTG8)

87 "intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe." I would think that the transponder shut off about the same time the plane arrowed into the ocean. That would be the logical answer.

Posted by: gdonovan at March 13, 2014 11:01 AM (0AeFt)

88 Oh i didn't know that. why would the transponders have been shut off?

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 11:01 AM (nqBYe)

89 38 Just this morning everyone was disavowing the auto-sent engine data, but if it's in the Indian Ocean, then we know those people were wrong/lying. Who led that charge?

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM (ZshNr)


Not necessarily. I suspect the engine data story is wrong but that there is other information (via US military methods) that points to a longer flight followed by a crash to the west.

Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 11:02 AM (XkotV)

90 malayasian officials, heh. I understand malayasian officials were originally looking in the wrong location because the are using a flat earth map. also, earlier press conference had a big hissyfit when a malayasian official was upset about photographers stealing his soul.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:02 AM (rDidD)

91 >>>I'm just glad that it isn't a Boeing 666 that went missing........<<<

A 777 has better range and access to the Hellholes of the world.

Posted by: Fritz at March 13, 2014 11:02 AM (UzPAd)

92 Well India is increasing their assets invested in the search.

Posted by: tasker at March 13, 2014 11:02 AM (RJMhd)

93 soothsayer you are wrong. Malaysia's AF ,ay not want it found, but Boeing sure as hell does their stock is or will plunge. They are already having trouble with the Dreamliner. This is a very reliable aircraft. If it was not aircraft failure, they will want to tell the universe about it who do you think leaked the Rolls Royce/Boeing info about getting feedback from the engines four hours after the last radar ping? they want it found. they want the world to know it was not their fault

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (zOTsN)

94 sigh, right . if it crashed.

sorry trying to catch up to the story and why everyone is worried.

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (nqBYe)

95 Why would turning off the transponder have any effect on radar detection? Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 02:56 PM (fWAjv) Radar is actually pretty short range... as the earth curves and you have to have direct line of sight to the target... you also have to get enough 'bounce' to get a return.... Even a Long Range air search active radar (non military) is in the 250 mile range of detection capability... and that's in the Half Mega Watt range... But the IFF Transponder is an active Radio Transmission.... so actually has both longer range, AND can be detected from a simple Antenna.... not needing a whole Radar Ant. set up... Most air traffic control uses the IFF Transponders, more than Active Radar (although they have access to both). (Ret. US Navy Electronics Tech, with NEC's in both Air Search Radars, and IFF).

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (84gbM)

96 Also, the Chinese would have been able to track it using their coastal defense radar. Someone knows what happened to that plane. Posted by: Vic at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM ...Yep. If that plane had made landfall or even 20 miles or so out their defense radars would have picked it up. So it either did and they aren't saying or it never made it that far and crashed and or landed somewhere else.

Posted by: Minnfidel at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (/rlXg)

97 So, how do you like our distraction. We'll be in Kiev for the St Pat's day parade! Save us some valu rite.

Posted by: Vladimir Putin at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (0FSuD)

98 I heard an earlier report about a couple of bi-planes full of somali pirates sneaking up on the malayasian plane shortly after it entered a no radar coverage zone. unconfirmed.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (rDidD)

99
It was the Reptoid Lizard-men wearing red dresses.

Posted by: David Icke at March 13, 2014 11:03 AM (TIIx5)

100 Yeah, my stock response to people talking about the disappearance was "Desmond forgot to input the code, so they're now on The Island."

Posted by:  B-in BR at March 13, 2014 03:00 PM (APuJ7)


But will they look?  Noooo!  Why?  BECAUSE IT WAS MY IDEA!

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (BZAd3)

101 The word is out, it was The Koch Brothers Liberation Front.

Posted by: Harry Reid at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (IV4od)

102 There was a time when our boomers would have heard everything in the vast expanse of the seas. Perhaps they are still out there but it takes a long time before they report in.

Posted by: toby928© at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (QupBk)

103 The Malaysian government should hire Banacek.  He solved a case like this once.

Posted by: Winston at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (FggW0)

104
The plane was a Boeing 777; the mark of the beast is 666.

777 - 666 = 111.

Work it, people; work it!!

---

If man is 5 and the devil is 6 than that must make me 7.

This honky's gone to heaven...

Posted by: Bloodhound Gang at March 13, 2014 03:00 PM (APuJ7)







667: Neighbor of the Beast

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (TIIx5)

105 James Bond shit ya'll.

Posted by: prescient11 at March 13, 2014 11:04 AM (tVTLU)

106 Thing is, transponders ID the aircraft, but radars go on detecting planes whether the transponders are on or off. If the plane flew on for hours more, it should have been painted by some radars sets, somewhere, Unless it was brought down to fly just above the deck. Can't be first, really. Cordially... *** From that forum: What kind of radar tracking capability would Myanmar have, would it be possible to sneak up through their airspace? Having flown in Burmese airspace on quite a few occasions (in a B777), (both East-West and North-South) in virtual radio blackout for an hour or more, I'd say it would be possible to take half the commercial airline fleet of western Europe in line abreast through that area without anyone being the wiser. And mods, that is not meant to be flippant. Any pilot who has flown over those routes would agree with my sentiments, if perhaps not my overstatement.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (DmNpO)

107 I still think it slowed to precisely 88 mph and actually landed in 1955.

Posted by: bkeyser at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (OsxDX)

108 The only thing I've learned so far is not to believe anything Malaysians say.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (ZPrif)

109 I had no idea that aircraft engines regularly send telemetry on their status. That's awesome.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (8ZskC)

110 At this point, what difference does it make?

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (Kkt/i)

111 Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:03 PM (84gbM) Thanks. I didn't take into account the range of the radar being used.

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 11:05 AM (fWAjv)

112 Malaysians have no business flying a Boeing jumbo jet, in the first place. (wait, they're pygmies, right?)

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (IW1TI)

113

The 777 is probably the greatest civilian jetliner of this generation.  Boeing has a huge interest in publicly pointing out that this wasn't mechanical failure.



Another note:  The data that the engines put out also sends a signal indicating how they stopped ('shut down', 'stopped' [crash] or 'failed').

 

I'm interested in knowing how the engines stopped.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (fwARV)

114 Professor???? Where did all these new people come from???

Posted by: Gilligan at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (84gbM)

115 So. .
they still don't know where it is or what happened?

Posted by: Teddy (Trust me) Felch at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (QZPtZ)

116 What difference, at this point, does it make?

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (GjPnA)

117 89 38 Just this morning everyone was disavowing the auto-sent engine data, but if it's in the Indian Ocean, then we know those people were wrong/lying. Who led that charge? Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM (ZshNr) Not necessarily. I suspect the engine data story is wrong but that there is other information (via US military methods) that points to a longer flight followed by a crash to the west. Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 03:02 PM (XkotV) ************** Lat I checked English newspapers were pressing Rolls Royce and they would neither confirm nor deny. Also last night when people started reacting to the news here--it became apparent that maybe for very obvious reasons--not everyone knows about the capability--and perhaps not everyone should.... Might explain the transport minister in Malaysia's spot of predicament.

Posted by: tasker at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (RJMhd)

118 107 I still think it slowed to precisely 88 mph and actually landed in 1955. --- If my calculations are correct, those people saw some serious shit.

Posted by: Dr. Emmet M. Brown at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (APuJ7)

119 They should ask Sherlock.  That Cumberbatch guy is wicked smart.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:06 AM (BZAd3)

120
"Which leads to this possibility..."



That someone on the plane knew just a little too much about Hillary's goings on?

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (kdS6q)

121 I had no idea that aircraft engines regularly send telemetry on their status. That's awesome. Posted by: Cicero so do helicopters

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (zOTsN)

122 Posted by: Bloodhound Gang at March 13, 2014 03:00 PM (APuJ7) Stuck in my head now! Looks like I'm spinnin' some Pixies when I get home.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (7ObY1)

123 -
Assuming the transponder story is true, it wasn't accidentally shot down.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 03:00 PM (CpbrP)



I don't know about that.  


Let's say   the transponder    was     shut off for some   reason.  W hat reason?   We don't know.   But for the sake of argument let's say it was.


Let's also say that there's something wrong with the plane's communication equipment.   Maybe the radio's dead  and   they can't receive or transmit   messages. 


Some   military   vessel -- probably Chinese given the   area -- detects a large, unidentified    plane    and   requests it identify itself.   No response.   No transponder signal to identify if it's    commercial or military.   Still no radio response.   They    fire   at   it ,   then realize their mistake   after the fact.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (4df7R)

124 It's the Rapture. It's almost like the Left Behind series is being played out in real time..

Posted by: spypeach, with tin foil hat on at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (10H0T)

125 I got this.

Posted by: Michelle Obama's Landing Strip at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (EZU5/)

126 109 I had no idea that aircraft engines regularly send telemetry on their status. That's awesome. Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 13, 2014 03:05 PM (8ZskC) Yeah.... and we're working on your CAR doing that too!!!! Not so we can track you.... but...

Posted by: Progresive Insurance. at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (84gbM)

127

ABC reporting the USN is sending the USS Kidd to the Indian Ocean to search for the plane based on "indications" that the plane crashed there:

 

http://tinyurl.com/kdh2ylz

Posted by: MacGruber at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (XxAYS)

128 Was Warren Lasky on the flight? i'd be amazeballs if someone gets that

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (fWAjv)

129 I'm interested in knowing how the engines stopped. --- Considering that Boeing is putting this info out there, my guess isn't "against the Pacific Ocean at 600 MPH".

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:07 AM (APuJ7)

130 A Boeing 777 handles like a wet sponge, or so I've heard.

Posted by: Sandra Fluke at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (C94J7)

131 I'm interested in knowing how the engines stopped.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 03:06 PM (fwARV)

Prepare to be disappointed.

Posted by: The Jews at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (QFxY5)

132 The plane did not crash. It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia. The passengers? Possibly all executed. The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg)" My worst case theory is along the same lines. *** Yep. I acquiesced a couple of days ago that I'm climbing aboard the crazy-ass-conspiracy-theory train.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (DmNpO)

133 Rolls Royce leaked to the WSJ that they got info from the engines four hours after the last ping Malaysia has no way to rebut that I believe NOTHING they are saying

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (zOTsN)

134

We haven't seen them

 

*burp*

Posted by: Uruguayan Soccer Team at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (3ZtZW)

135 Good luck Stryker, we're all counting on you.

Posted by: Zombie Leslie Neilsen at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (/rlXg)

136 So far pygmies and joos have been blamed. I'm waiting for the Koch Brothers to cop a plea bargain for crimes against humanity.

Posted by: Misanthopic Humanitarian at March 13, 2014 11:08 AM (HVff2)

137 The life of everyone on board depends upon just one thing: finding someone who can not only fly the plane, but who didn't have fish for dinner.

Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 13, 2014 11:09 AM (V4CBV)

138 130 A Boeing 777 handles like a wet sponge, or so I've heard. --- Was it sponge-worthy, Sandy?

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:09 AM (APuJ7)

139 Was Warren Lasky on the flight?


No but we got a mysterious message from his son.  All it said is WINNING!!!!

Posted by: Capt. Matt Yelland, USN at March 13, 2014 11:09 AM (8ZskC)

140 134 We haven't seen them *burp* --- "Thanks to the shelter of this airplane, we are still... ALIVE!" "Mmm... pass me a chunk of co-pilot!"

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:09 AM (APuJ7)

141 We know we have been visited in the past! Is it really such a stretch to say that these aliens would want to study us to learn more about us!?

Posted by: Erik Avon Daniken at March 13, 2014 11:09 AM (Aif/5)

142 RWC, #128: "i'd be amazeballs if someone gets that [Warren Lasky]" Are you kidding? CAPT Matt Yelland has already posted at this blog on this very subject.

Posted by: JPS at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (rWCei)

143 >>52 I think someone accidentally shot it down and there is a coverup going on <<

Between Malaysia and Vietnam? Be serious- who would actually do that and what is the motive for covering it up?

Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (GGCsk)

144 Pilot would have to be in on any hijacking as access to cockpit is now blocked unless a dumbass pilot inadvertanly allowed access. If there was a simultaneous loss of transponder and radar contact then you could assume a catastrophic event. If not, then something more devious at play. No cell phone attempts point to a catastrophic event or a collection of all cell phones by hijackers. That no group claims hijacking , points to attempt to retain plane for future use if it is indeed hijacked. Bottom line. Again. Aliens.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (ODr92)

145 I think they will find the plane somewhere along the normal flight path.  Perhaps in the jungle in Vietnam?

Posted by: rd at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (D+lxs)

146 Malaysia prides itself on being a modern, moderate muslim country.  I'm sure they wouldn't want to reveal a terrorist hijacking that originated there to save face. 

Posted by: no good deed at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (vBhbc)

147 They fire at it , then realize their mistake after the fact. Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit at March 13, 2014 03:07 PM (4df7R) Would have to be a real whack job... normal procedure is to IFF it... and if nothing comes back on a large target... you call shore based Fighters in to identify before you commit a potential Act of War. EVERY Military out there knows that equipment sometimes breaks...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (84gbM)

148

Some military vessel -- probably Chinese given the area -- detects a large, unidentified plane and requests it identify itself. No response. No transponder signal to identify if it's commercial or military. Still no radio response. They fire at it , then realize their mistake after the fact.

-

MWR, ok, technically an accident.  But not like "I was cleaning my missle launcher and it went off accidentally".

 

My current theory is Malaysia, not   China, and   they would do it     because it was inbound to KL

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (CpbrP)

149

So, if I'm understanding this right, they can lo jack your escalade better than a 777.

 

Got it.

 

The Rolls Royce data is very interesting.  I guess it shows the engines were running for those 4 hours...

Posted by: prescient11 at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (tVTLU)

150 If it was hijacked and hidden for later use, how much fuel would still have been on the plane? Assuming terrorists would have quite some trouble refueling a giant airliner. I'm wondering how much fuel would have been left and what the range would then be.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:10 AM (7ObY1)

151 Pilot would have to be in on any hijacking as access to cockpit is now blocked unless a dumbass pilot inadvertanly allowed access *** The co-pilot is already known to have invited hotties into the cockpit for one flight.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (DmNpO)

152 The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg) Where? In China? Japan? Posted by: Nevergiveup Anywhere within range of a 777 with a full tank. That's a loooooooong range. Possibilities: Sydney. Tokyo. Mumbai. Shanghai. Could it reach across the ocean and get me in SF? Lord knows. As for the difficulty of landing it: The planning for major terror attacks goes on for years (9/11 plans started in 199 . It's not unfeasible for terrorists to construct a mile-long runway only wide enough for one plane. Heck, that's like building a short road. Easy peasy.

Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (mizYg)

153 67 This does seem to be the work of SPECTRE. They've "kidnapped" space capsules, submarines, space shuttlesÂ… what *haven't* they kidnapped?

Posted by: Dr. Varno at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (V4CBV)

154 FOLKS!

Get a grip.

Posted by: Sir William of Occam at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (QFxY5)

155 144 Pilot would have to be in on any hijacking as access to cockpit is now blocked unless a dumbass pilot inadvertanly allowed access. Ummm....you do know that the copilot has allowed passengers access to the cockpit before, right?

Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (da5Wo)

156 1 I had no idea that aircraft engines regularly send telemetry on their status. That's awesome.


Posted by: Cicero


See!  He said telemetry.  That's the word those space people use.  I told you it was on the moon.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (BZAd3)

157 145 I think they will find the plane somewhere along the normal flight path. Perhaps in the jungle in Vietnam? Posted by: rd at March 13, 2014 03:10 PM (D+lxs) May I volunteer that Honorable US Senator from AZ, John McCain to locate da plane?

Posted by: Misanthopic Humanitarian at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (HVff2)

158 In the Chinese shoot down scenario, which is as valid as any other conjecture, the question becomes why not send up fighters and ID the suspect plane that's flying a common route? Why not contact other ATC's in the region and try to account for it? Ground to air, nobody noticing seems tough to ull off. Maybe sea to air in the shoot down scenario?

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 11:11 AM (ZshNr)

159

Yeah, and apparently the Chinese are super pissed off at Malaysia...

 

Hope those people are still alive though, much better than a crash if they make it!!

Posted by: prescient11 at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (tVTLU)

160 Malaysia 370 heavy, be advised that you have a CHECK ENGINE light showing on the number 4 engine. Please copy...

Posted by: Rolls Royce Engine Telemetry Center at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (8ZskC)

161 #9 look at a map between takeoff and Pakistan, assuming the plane did make that left turn ...cou l it have flown south of India then into the Arabian sea w/o being detected?

Posted by: Anon at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (PQ3tU)

162 China is being very aggressive in the region and they may not want to tell their citizens they mistakenly killed a bunch of their own citizens. Malaysia and Vietnam may have no clue what happened and Malaysia is just trying to cover its ass no way china did not have some very good satellites in the region. They are not showing what they know. There is a reason for that

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (zOTsN)

163 Between Malaysia and Vietnam? Be serious- who would actually do that and what is the motive for covering it up? Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 03:10 PM (GGCsk) KONGGGG!!!!!

Posted by: Native Chief, on Skull Island at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (84gbM)

164 Would have to be a real whack job... -------- The hell you say about incompetence!?!?

Posted by: Malaysian Military at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (Aif/5)

165 They are on that island that Bush used to hide all the 9/11 passengers before he had the empty jets fly into the towers that were rigged to explode.

Posted by: Daybrother at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (Vv2+u)

166 This is just like Millenium, only with less skin!

Posted by: The Guy Who Wanted to See Cheryl Ladd's Boobs at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (kGcrY)

167 The Kochs turned the pilot into a newt.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (ImNRL)

168 666 is no longer alone, He's getting out the marrow in your back bone, And the seven trumpets blowing sweet rock and roll, Gonna blow right down inside your soul. Pythagoras with the looking glass reflects the full moon, In blood, he's writing the lyrics of a brand new tune.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (7ObY1)

169 Reported by Dow Jones :  Ukraine has requested arms.  U.S. has said no.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (BZAd3)

170 I think about the only thing that can be ruled out besides tinfoil hat theories is a crash on land, even in remote areas SE Asia is heavily forested and a crash would have set off a fire that would have made for smoke visible for many miles. My hunch is human error causing cascading failures, or a mechanical flaw that had not yet been discovered until the plane is in flight and crashes Terrorism is still possible, but who and for what reason would that flight be targeted or who would be the target?

Posted by: kbdabear at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (aTXUx)

171 Lessons learned: 1) Don't fly on 3rd world airline and 2) Especially, don't fly on 3rd world airline from a muslim majority country

Posted by: naturalfake at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (0cMkb)

172 FOr God's sake, check Guam!!!!

Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson [/i][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (ligos)

173 Here's a description of the system from Rolls Royce: A critical aspect of the EHM system is the transfer of data from aircraft to ground. Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) digital data-link systems are used as the primary method of communication. This transmits the Aircraft Condition Monitoring System (ACMS ) reports via a VHF radio or satellite link whilst the aircraft is in-flight. A worldwide ground network then transfers this data to the intended destination. The positive aspect of this system is its robust nature and ability to distribute information worldwide. On the other hand, the Airplane Condition Monitoring Function (ACMF) reports are limited to 3kB, hence the acquisition systems need to work within this limitation. Future systems are being deployed to increase data volumes through wireless data transmission as the aircraft approaches the gate after landing. This will enable more data to be analysed, but will not be as immediate as ACARS, where data can be assessed well before the aircraft lands again.

Posted by: jwest at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (u2a4R)

174 Spectre?

Posted by: Q at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (2lWnY)

175

Lawnmower man wasn't just a dumb swampbilly.  He had three separate accents. 

He puts on the Forrest Gump when he's talking to the 2012 cops, giving them directions. Then when they blow him off, he finishes "my family's been here a long time" with a much more patrician accent.  And when he's horsing around with retard girl sister he does a Jared Harris Mad Men accent.

Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at March 13, 2014 11:12 AM (A0sHn)

176 102 There was a time when our boomers would have heard everything in the vast expanse of the seas. Perhaps they are still out there but it takes a long time before they report in. Boomers can be contacted. I would think if they heard a crash they would report it ASAP. I suspect a crashing 777 makes quite a lot of sonic noise.

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (0FSuD)

177

I can't see how a plane gets hijacked and flown to a remote location where a bunch of terrorists retro-fit it to become a flying bomb.  Sounds great for a Die Hard script, but not so plausible in real life.

 

About the only scenario that seems plausible at this point is a crack in the hull led to hypoxia.  Maybe the crew only had time to try to turn around and try to get it to a lower altitude and that's it before they became unconcious.  The autopilot just kept the plane going until it went down.

Posted by: MacGruber at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (XxAYS)

178 Seriously, we have long reached the limits of what rectal probing can teach us. Now it's more of a party game to us.

Posted by: The Aliens at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (QupBk)

179 Has anyone looked on the moon? Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 02:47 PM (BZAd3 You stupid boob! The flag is planted on Mars! They're on Mars!

Posted by: Rep. Sheila Houston We Have a Problem Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (o6g4X)

180 Hollywood Moonbat Cher: Republicans Are “The Most Heinous Women Haters In History”… Weasel Zippers: No we just hate transexuals...ooops oh sorry you have one of those don't you?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (t3UFN)

181 4 hours? Well, you try to take a couple of hundred people off a plane in mid-flight and replace them with simulacra. It takes a while.

Especially if you have to use union labor.


Posted by: Cheryl Ladd at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (1Rgee)

182

Considering that Boeing is putting this info out there, my guess isn't "against the Pacific Ocean at 600 MPH"

 

Agreed.  My gut tells me this aircraft is on the bottom somewhere, but just the chance it could have been ... acquired... by a state interested in a delivery system for something nasty has me somewhere between interested and worried.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (fwARV)

183 Easy peasy.

Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 03:11 PM (mizYg)

Runways capable of handling both the landing (long) and takeoff (even longer) of a 777 are not insignificant country roads.

They are engineering marvels.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (QFxY5)

184 No but we got a mysterious message from his son. All it said is WINNING!!!! Posted by: Capt. Matt Yelland, USN at March 13, 2014 03:09 PM (8ZskC) Well Played!

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (fWAjv)

185 If it's aliens, what's the consensus, Greys or Reptilians? I'm betting on Reptilians.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (7ObY1)

186 Ummm....you do know that the copilot has allowed passengers access to the cockpit before, right? Posted by: BCochran1981 - Credible Hulk at March 13, 2014 03:11 PM (da5Wo) and Navigator... and stewardesses....

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (84gbM)

187 150 If it was hijacked and hidden for later use, how much fuel would still have been on the plane? Assuming terrorists would have quite some trouble refueling a giant airliner. I'm wondering how much fuel would have been left and what the range would then be. Posted by: Citizen X Like stealing fuel would be hard for Al Qaeda. C'mon. They could be siphoning off fuel little by little in all sorts of places where security is lax. Wouldn't take long to accumulate enough to fill a 777 tank.

Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 11:13 AM (mizYg)

188 Not being an expert on Malaysia, is there some common cultural phenomena that causes officials to "hedge their bets" and refuse to commit to statements? Just thinking about the possible clash between Western media, used to almost pathological certainty on the part of public officials, facing pathological uncertainty and going even more apeshit than usual. It does seem that there's an extraordinary amount of activity in the Cloud Castle Construction industry in this case.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (qyfb5)

189 "171 Lessons learned: 1) Don't fly on 3rd world airline and 2) Especially, don't fly on 3rd world airline from a muslim majority country" 3) Do dress like a Muslim woman to get through airport security faster and avoid patdowns.

Posted by: Naes1984 at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (LiHKo)

190 172 FOr God's sake, check Guam!!!!

Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson at March 13, 2014 03:12 PM (ligos)


Top or bottom?

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (BZAd3)

191 Maybe one of the pilots just really wanted to see the flag we put on Mars?

Posted by: Sheila Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (Aif/5)

192 Reported by Dow Jones : Ukraine has requested arms. U.S. has said no.

Of course.  Remember, Senator Obama was instrumental in disarming Ukraine (possibly the only thing he lifted a finger to do while he was there).

Posted by: Ian S. at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (B/VB5)

193 Posted by: The Aliens at March 13, 2014 03:13 PM (QupBk)

I love this place!

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (QFxY5)

194 My favorite tune, Citizen X

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (CpbrP)

195 Posted by: Michelle Obama's Landing Strip at March 13, 2014 03:07 Co Pilot: Is it big enough? Pilot: Oh yea, check it out at 3:00 it's huge. SCOAMF tower this is flight 2016 inbound VFR, we have a visual on the field. Request full stop landing on runway 69. SCOAMF Tower: Roger flight 2016 you are cleared VFR approach on runway 69.

Posted by: 777 Pilot at March 13, 2014 11:14 AM (/rlXg)

196 Would have to be a real whack job... normal procedure is to IFF it... and if nothing comes back on a large target... you call shore based Fighters in to identify before you commit a potential Act of War.

EVERY Military out there knows that equipment sometimes breaks...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:10 PM (84gbM)



Yes, but      there are things called    "clusterfucks" that tend to happen on occasion.    These are things that happen when someone does something unbelievably stupid       that    elicits      vast     negative   consequences.   



I rule out absolutely nothing, especially not in a region of the world that is currently   bubbling over with   nationalistic sentiment ,   with   a    China    that has been rattling its sabers for     years   and that just suffered a violent  Uighur   terrorist attack of its own.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (4df7R)

197 In news of the Pooty-Poot: Raymond Pritchett ‏@Galrahn This. RT @20committee: Nothing good comes of lots of tanks massing near Belogrod and Kursk. Trust me on this one.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (ZPrif)

198
The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack.
Posted by: zombie




The Petronas Towers are right there in Malaysia.  The 'ol 9-11 bootleg is Terrorism 101.  Why go for baroque?

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (kdS6q)

199 Somewhere, the Ginger vs. Mary Ann debate is being settled.

Posted by: Winged Minnow at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (FbMva)

200 Some military vessel -- probably Chinese given the area -- detects a large, unidentified plane and requests it identify itself. No response. No transponder signal to identify if it's commercial or military. Still no radio response. They fire at it , then realize their mistake after the fact. - MWR, ok, technically an accident. But not like "I was cleaning my missle launcher and it went off accidentally". My current theory is Malaysia, not China, and they would do it because it was inbound to KL Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 03:10 PM (CpbrP) Yup. Someone thought it was an unfriendly and got a little trigger happy and now whichever government did it is not about to tell China what it did. Of course, I like that theory because it's better than zombie's theory that it's being prepped for use.
That's assuming it's not just splashed in the ocean somewhere.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (VtjlW)

201 You stupid boob! The flag is planted on Mars! They're on Mars! Posted by: Rep. Sheila Houston We Have a Problem Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 03:13 PM (o6g4X) /Looks around.... Nope....

Posted by: Tars Tarkas, Jedeck of Thark at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (84gbM)

202 "Some military vessel -- probably Chinese given the area -- detects a large, unidentified plane and requests it identify itself. No response. No transponder signal to identify if it's commercial or military. Still no radio response. They fire at it , then realize their mistake after the fact."

The USAF have recently flown B-52s, large planes by anyone's measure, through areas of the South China Sea which the US claims as international airspace and which China says is theirs.

The Chinese were made well aware of this.

In that context, I strongly doubt the Chinese military would engage a large unknown. Unless in their own actual airspace, and probably not even then. Too much risk of provoking a confrontation if they were to down an American jet.

The Chinese have a pretty good understanding of the old principle that one does not interrupt an adversary while that adversary is making a mistake.

Right now, the Obama administration is shrinking American military muscle and is alienating or fostering doubt in American allies all over the world. Those things play to China's long run steady strategic push. They would not want to upset that dynamic with a rash tactical option based on incomplete info.

Posted by: torquewrench at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (gqT4g)

203

Submersible  aircraft carrier?

Posted by: Count de Monet at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (BAS5M)

204 All we know for sure at this point is the transponder stopped transmitting ID. This was caused by accident (structual failure) or intentional (explosive) or intentional (manually turned to standby). The lack of debris at the last known position points to the last option. Then if it was deliberately turned to standby it had to be done by the pilot, pilots or hijackers. In any event turning off the transponder has but one intent - to conceal position from ATC secondary radar. So we are left with a 777 being flown by persons wishing to conceal the flightpath to some unknown destination. Whether they made it or not time will tell but if they flew westward and did not make it I expect floating wreckage somewhere in the Indian Ocean far from where they have been actively searching.

Posted by: alf767 at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (5UnZF)

205 Sir William, #154: I'm a big fan of your work. Thing is, that Razor of yours sometimes cuts both ways. If I hear that a plane dropped off radar, the transponder seems to have been turned off, no debris has been definitively identified, and there are conflicting reports that the engines kept running for four hours after last contact, I conclude nothing. I consider that: - The plane crashed, it's a big damn ocean and we just haven't found it yet; - The transponder was turned off on purpose, the plane dropped to low altitude and didn't crash - and what, pray, is the simplest explanation that fits those facts? - The facts aren't known yet. Invoking your Razor is premature. Considering most likely scenarios (my first) and most dangerous (my second) is therefore reasonable.

Posted by: JPS at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (rWCei)

206 194 My favorite tune, Citizen X Which one, Supper's Ready or Monkey Gone to Heaven?

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (7ObY1)

207 Crap. Anyone know where I left my copy of To Serve Man?

Posted by: The Head Kanamit Chef at March 13, 2014 11:15 AM (8ZskC)

208 @181  Can we see your boobs?

Posted by: The Guy Who Wanted to See Cheryl Ladd's Boobs at March 13, 2014 11:16 AM (kGcrY)

209 You stupid boob! The flag is planted on Mars! They're on Mars!

Posted by: Rep. Sheila Houston We Have a Problem Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 03:13 PM (o6g4X)


Cell phones don't ring on Mars.  So there, you big smartie pants.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:16 AM (BZAd3)

210 172 FOr God's sake, check Guam!!!! Posted by: Rep. Hank Johnson at March 13, 2014 03:12 PM (ligos) Why? Has it tipped over?

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 11:16 AM (0FSuD)

211 /Looks around....

Nope....

Posted by: Tars Tarkas, Jedeck of Thark at March 13, 2014 03:15 PM (84gbM)


I wish I'd thought of that.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 11:17 AM (BZAd3)

212 Click: Transponder off

Controlled flight to deep ocean

Aloha Snack-bar!: CFIT

If it was on the normal flight path and a catastrophic event occurred at 35,000 AGL they would have already found debris.

The only thing missing is a motive.

Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 11:17 AM (GGCsk)

213

There was a time when our boomers would have heard everything in the vast expanse of the seas. Perhaps they are still out there but it takes a long time before they report in.

Posted by: toby928© at March 13, 2014 03:04 PM (QupBk)

 

We fixed that problem!  We called all the boats tied up at the dock.  They did not hear $h!t

Posted by: US Defense Budget Cuts at March 13, 2014 11:17 AM (D+lxs)

214 Those damn Koch Brothers. is there no limit to the depths they will go to to stop Obamacare?





Come back here little Timmy! You still have to kiss the elephant's trunk!

Posted by: Harry Reid at March 13, 2014 11:18 AM (YmPwQ)

215 If it's aliens, what's the consensus, Greys or Reptilians?

I initially misread that as "Gays or Republicans".

(Who opened for The Searchlight Stranglers on their '97 world tour).

Posted by: Ian S. at March 13, 2014 11:18 AM (B/VB5)

216 197 In news of the Pooty-Poot: Raymond Pritchett þ@Galrahn This. RT @20committee: Nothing good comes of lots of tanks massing near Belogrod and Kursk. Trust me on this one. Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 03:15 PM (ZPrif) It depends on whose side of history you are looking at...

Posted by: Zombie Gen. Zhukov at March 13, 2014 11:18 AM (84gbM)

217 Not to be a pedant, but if the 777 had enough fuel to travel 2,200 nautical miles, and we assume it's last known position as the center of the circle; then the search area would be a circle with a <i>radius</i> of 2,200 nautical miles, not a <i>diameter</i> of 2,200 nautical miles. So, the area to be searched would be equal to Pi times the radius squared; approx. 15 million square miles.

Posted by: amichel at March 13, 2014 11:19 AM (PWWdd)

218 Sincerely, I'm surprised planes don't crash more often.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:19 AM (IW1TI)

219 Umm, tough choice.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:19 AM (CpbrP)

220 WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE????????????

Posted by: Bossy Cankles at March 13, 2014 11:19 AM (QM5S2)

221 A lot of hijackings/unrest going on in that corner of the world attributed to Turk/Uyghur people, including the China mass-knife attack.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings#2010s

Posted by: flounder at March 13, 2014 11:19 AM (Kkt/i)

222 Malaysia 370 heavy, be advised that you have a CHECK ENGINE light showing on the number 4 engine. Please copy... Posted by: Rolls Royce Engine Telemetry Center at March 13, 2014 ..........Roger that Rolls Royce telemetry center, we will advise as we only have two engines. Over.

Posted by: 777 Pilot at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (/rlXg)

223 SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE Or what?

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (r7mtu)

224 At some point the terrorism-theft-for-future-use-as-a-bomb theory loses water, and that's at the expense/ease factor. Couldn't just about any State-sponsored terror group get their hands on one large jet, especially one that only has to be good for one flight? Hijacking and taking no credit for the cause in order to attempt a larger strike in the future? Easier to get a Saudi princeling to write a check.

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (ZshNr)

225 Peruvia. You didn't hear that here.
Those fuckers flew it into the Harlem buildings!!!
Gas, my ass!!! It was Zimmerman!!!

Posted by: reverand al at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (hn5v5)

226 151 The co-pilot is already known to have invited hotties into the cockpit for one flight. Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 03:11 PM (DmNpO) That's an important clue. We now know that the terrorists were hotties.

Posted by: rickl at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (zoehZ)

227 Reported by Dow Jones : Ukraine has requested arms. U.S. has said no. A billion dollars worth of manpads and anti-armor and Ukraine could hold it's own against the bear.

Posted by: toby928© at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (QupBk)

228 In the 300 years since George Washington Carver invented the hovercraft, airplanes been falling outta the sky. That's cuz we got a bunch of crazy Asians flyin the thing. And it's gonna keep happening until we nationalate the flying industry and let the unions do what they do best.

Posted by: Sheila Jackson Lee (Pre M&M Aviation Expert) at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (pgQxn)

229
Wanna fly safe?
Fly that joo airline El Al.


Posted by: Rehabilitated Mel Gibson at March 13, 2014 11:20 AM (mETGQ)

230 Yes? Go ahead for Over.

Posted by: Capt Over at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (IW1TI)

231 >>Or what?<<

He will stop eating caviar on his yacht.

Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (GGCsk)

232

U.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probeU.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probeU.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe

 

I'm betting this is   what happened.

Posted by: eleven at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (fsLdt)

233 TA- DAH~!!!!

Posted by: David Copperfield [/i][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (ligos)

234 "based on data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from the Boeing Co. BA engines"



It sends data but nothing having to do with the plane's location? So let me get this straight, many of the engine components can send data back to the ground, yet there is nothing on board that sends it's location in real time?

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (WdbF7)

235 Climb Mount Niitaka.

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 11:21 AM (HsTG8)

236 I think it crashed after running out of fuel. The passengers and crew died due to lack of oxygen hours earlier.

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (r7mtu)

237 I think the obvious answer is that the autopilot disengaged the transponder before it deflated.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (SY2Kh)

238 Your Barry is pussy. He thinks I want safe face. Safe face from what? I have 70% approval. You think I give fuck about what Europe or Barry thinks about me?

Posted by: Vlad Putin at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (Aif/5)

239 I have no idear how that happened.

Posted by: eleven at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (fsLdt)

240 SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE Or what? Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (r7mtu) They'll back the Russian Joos in Israel.

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (0FSuD)

241 principle that one does not interrupt an adversary while that adversary is making a mistake. Right now, the Obama administration is shrinking American military muscle and is alienating or fostering doubt in American allies all over the world. Those things play to China's long run steady strategic push. They would not want to upset that dynamic with a rash tactical option based on incomplete info. Posted by: torquewrench OK what if China accidentally shot it down. It was coming in a different route and they thought it was gonna be their 911. They shoot. Its a mistake. Now they have a problem. They know what happened They send everyone on a wild goose chase away from the site of the downing. My theory is China is covering it up to prevent problems domestically. Make Malaysia or Boeing the bad guy

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:22 AM (zOTsN)

242 They'll send back !

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (0FSuD)

243 A new eye witness claims he saw the plane from a secluded island thousands of miles away from it's destination: http://makeagif.com/uezXW3

Posted by: OxyCon at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (xBryS)

244 Who had "everybody will go in a million different directions on the disappearance, regardless of the facts or lack thereof?" Collect your winnings at window number *seven*.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (qyfb5)

245 He said until that incident he never understood how planes just disappeared off the face of the Earth.
'Cause the space aliens prefer doing the anal probes when the humans are sleeping.

Posted by: eric cartman at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (hn5v5)

246 This is a big fucking deal...

Posted by: cajun caret at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (UZQM8)

247 SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE


Or what?


Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (r7mtu)



"Or we give out   Putin's   mom's   super top secret borscht recipe TO THE ENTIRE WORLD."


- Horseface

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (4df7R)

248 Going back to the cell phone discussion.

I don't know about every cell system, but I do know that if any of our phones are off the network (Shut off, dead reception area,etc) the person calling will notice the ringing roll immediately to an automated voice mail, or recorded"The party you are calling is not available" type message.
I can tell immediately upon calling Mrs VIA if her phone is turned on or not.

I would suspect that a cellphone submerged in salt water would have the same issues.

Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (si68n)

249 Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:22 PM (r7mtu)

Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 11:23 AM (QFxY5)

250 224 At some point the terrorism-theft-for-future-use-as-a-bomb theory loses water, and that's at the expense/ease factor. Couldn't just about any State-sponsored terror group get their hands on one large jet, especially one that only has to be good for one flight? Hijacking and taking no credit for the cause in order to attempt a larger strike in the future? Easier to get a Saudi princeling to write a check.

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (ZshNr)


True. It would be far, far, far, far easier to just buy or lease a cargo plane and pack it full of explosives than hijack and redirect a passenger 777 in mid-flight, land it, reconfigure the interior, pack it with explosives, refuel it, and then launch an attack.

Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (XkotV)

251 At some point the terrorism-theft-for-future-use-as-a-bomb theory loses water, and that's at the expense/ease factor. Couldn't just about any State-sponsored terror group get their hands on one large jet, especially one that only has to be good for one flight? Hijacking and taking no credit for the cause in order to attempt a larger strike in the future? Easier to get a Saudi princeling to write a check. Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (ZshNr) Yeah, but then we don't get to talk about Domino. And we should talk about Domino. http://bit.ly/1nVcUKO

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (VtjlW)

252 I do think this incident is going to force major, and costly, changes to civilian aviation. People are not going to accept that a 777 can just vanish. More comms tool. Constant satcomms with status updates. Blackbox data that is constantly beamed back so you don't have to search the ocean for it. I don't know what else since I'm not an expert. And however costly these measures would be, we've probably already spent that much in this week of searching with hundreds of warships and planes scouring the ocean.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (ZPrif)

253 169 Reported by Dow Jones : Ukraine has requested arms. U.S. has said no.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at March 13, 2014 03:12 PM (BZAd3)


Next up: Ukraine joins Muslim Brotherhood and Mexican Cartel.

Posted by: flounder at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (Kkt/i)

254 Yeah, that phone ringing thing is interesting I suppose. Phones that are off or destroyed generally don't ring, they go straight to VM. That said, it is the easiest thing in the world for a wireless company to determine on which tower an active phone is registered. In fact, every time you call someone, the wireless company must determine on which tower the called phone is registered on so that it can complete the connection. If these phones were working and active, they would have determined the tower on which they were registered almost instantly and it would be a simple matter to search a relatively small radius around that tower. For that reason, I am throwing the BS flag on the idea the phones are active.

Posted by: RD Walker at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (6RtJb)

255 Sincerely, I'm surprised planes don't crash more often. Posted by: soothsayer at March 13, 2014 03:19 PM (IW1TI) Agreed. The Aviation Industry has an incredible safety record, overall. Then again, the R&D, the flight test process, the maintenance schedules etc.... are very thorough and in-depth.

Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at March 13, 2014 11:24 AM (71K6B)

256 I would suspect that a cellphone submerged in salt water would have the same issues. Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 13, 2014 03:23 PM Shit I can't get reception at my house sometimes so I can only imagine how swell it works at the bottom of the drink. Something is weird with that.

Posted by: Minnfidel at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (/rlXg)

257 Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand: "So let me get this straight, many of the engine components can send data back to the ground, yet there is nothing on board that sends it's location in real time?" I don't know, but look at it this way: If you were designing that system, would you build standalone GPS into it? Or would you assume that the aircrew know where they are, and that between ground and cockpit there are multiple resources to locate them if they get lost? What I mean is, someone would have to have anticipated something very close to this exact scenario. I don't know that they would, and I don't think I'd fault them if they didn't.

Posted by: JPS at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (rWCei)

258 There are just so many things wrong with this flight, right from the beginning. The two stolen passports ending up in the hands of a single Iranian ticket buyer who purchases tickets for two different destinations. The luggage which was checked for five people who never boarded the plane (MA claims to have removed the baggage before takeoff). The transponder The u-turn The engine data The complete absence of any debris in the search area The crew with a lax attitude toward cockpit rules I don't think it's all that crazy to say something truly bizarre could have transpired.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (DmNpO)

259 @48 The only way they could keep flying that long without panicking people, who would immediately pick up their cell phones, would be controlled flight


Well, assuming the cockpit occupants (whoever they were at the time) did not don oxygen masks and then depressurize the cabin.  Any way they could have stopped the O2 masks from dropping?

Posted by: Anon at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (PQ3tU)

260

SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE

 

Or what?

 

 

He'll double  dog dare them,    that's what.

Posted by: Count de Monet at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (BAS5M)

261 Try looking under things

Posted by: It's always the last place you look at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (FbMva)

262 228 In the 300 years since George Washington Carver invented the hovercraft, out of peanuts!

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (7ObY1)

263 I would suspect that a cellphone submerged in salt water would have the same issues.

Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 13, 2014 03:23 PM (si68n)


What if there all Nokia's?

Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (WdbF7)

264 Nobody can tell us what happened, but the NSA somehow knows what the in-flight movie was in 1st class.

Posted by: Fritz at March 13, 2014 11:25 AM (UzPAd)

265 233 TA- DAH~!!!! Posted by: David Copperfield at March 13, 2014 03:21 PM (ligos) Well done.... you got us stumped... But we still like Piff the Magic Dragon Better...

Posted by: Penn... as of course Teller remains not tellin... at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (84gbM)

266 169 Reported by Dow Jones : Ukraine has requested arms. U.S. has said no. --- Lovely. I'd give them a shit-ton of Exocet missiles, anti-aircraft guns, and anti-armor weapons if I were at State or the Pentagon instead of Guy Smiley and Schmuck Hagel.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (APuJ7)

267 SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE Or what? Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (r7mtu) Or it becomes Tuesday

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (t3UFN)

268 224 At some point the terrorism-theft-for-future-use-as-a-bomb theory loses water, and that's at the expense/ease factor. Couldn't just about any State-sponsored terror group get their hands on one large jet, especially one that only has to be good for one flight? Hijacking and taking no credit for the cause in order to attempt a larger strike in the future? Easier to get a Saudi princeling to write a check.


I approve of this comment.

Posted by: Occam at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (8ZskC)

269 Those poor people. Imagine how terrifying for them to know that something is radically wrong and they're flying for hours after they're supposed to land. And who knows what happened? Will they ever know? As a survivor of a family who simply disappeared having never been heard of again (but with weeks of searches and dragging the river and dogs sent out) there's always that eternal question, "What happened?"

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (XyM/Y)

270 Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is.

It can happen before you even realize you are oxygen deprived if you aren't alert to the symptoms.  It has happened before with albeit smaller private planes.  That's how Payne Stewart died. 

Posted by: no good deed at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (vBhbc)

271 262 228 In the 300 years since George Washington Carver invented the hovercraft, out of peanuts! --- That before or after his attempt to create phonograph needles out of peanuts?

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (APuJ7)

272 Just sent my daughter off on a plane to Texas for Spring Break with her friend. Praying her flight is safe. Really sucks not knowing what happened to this flight.

Posted by: spypeach at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (10H0T)

273 Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 03:24 PM (XkotV)

And if you are going to hijack....why bother landing, with all of its huge risks and challenges?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (QFxY5)

274 Or what?? Or john kerry's finger will wag twice as hard!

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (IW1TI)

275 128 Was Warren Lasky on the flight? Did we bring the Nimitiz back?

Posted by: Jprs at March 13, 2014 11:26 AM (ye4Wk)

276 Cheryl Ladd is here? Cool.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (7ObY1)

277 180 Hollywood Moonbat Cher: Republicans Are “The Most Heinous Women Haters In History”… She spelled "hyenous" wrong...

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (HsTG8)

278 Trey Gowdy on Twitchy, tearing Obama a new one.


great speaker, bad hair, awesome guy

Posted by: ( I learned the truth from ) Lenny Bruce at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (omBWL)

279 >> The only way they could keep flying that long without panicking people, who would immediately pick up their cell phones, would be controlled flight. A cell phone jammer would stop calls. Would it also keep the cell companies from being able to find the phones? Maybe it also jammed a few key systems of the plane...

Posted by: Mama AJ at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (SUKHu)

280 270 Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is. It can happen before you even realize you are oxygen deprived if you aren't alert to the symptoms. It has happened before with albeit smaller private planes. That's how Payne Stewart died. --- Yeah, no shit.

Posted by: Zombie Bo Rein and Mel Carnahan at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (APuJ7)

281 I tried calling my cellphone when I dropped it in the toilet. Nothing.

Posted by: Joe Biden at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (8ZskC)

282 Meant survivor of a "family member"

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (XyM/Y)

283 Posted by: JPS at March 13, 2014 03:25 PM (rWCei) The IFF Transponders send that data out realtime... But seem to have not been transmitting...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (84gbM)

284 The plane crashed in the Australian outback and feral kids are already telling the storytime of the Captain who will someday appear after the telling to take them home. Mel Gibson Callback!

Posted by: Daybrother at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (hXDMw)

285 Yeah, that phone ringing thing is interesting I suppose. Phones that are off or destroyed generally don't ring, they go straight to VM. *** IF the phone can be located and determined to be off or in-use. If the signal is not reaching the phone it will continue to search (ring) while doing so. The ring the caller hears doesn't originate with the actual phone, but with the network.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (DmNpO)

286 What if there all Nokia's? Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 13, 2014 03:25 PM (WdbF7) You have to respect the Japanese.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (VtjlW)

287 The complete absence of any debris in the search area china helped with that. Had them searching in the wrong area

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (zOTsN)

288 What's weirder is that this is exactly what happened to the dinosaurs 50 million years ago.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:27 AM (IW1TI)

289
Reported by Dow Jones : Ukraine has requested arms. U.S. has said no.


A billion dollars worth of manpads and anti-armor and Ukraine could hold it's own against the bear.

Posted by: toby928© at March 13, 2014 03:20 PM (QupBk)


U.S is saying no to Egypt for a request for more attack helicopters.



Posted by: Rehabilitated Mel Gibson at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (mETGQ)

290 "It sends data but nothing having to do with the plane's location? So let me get this straight, many of the engine components can send data back to the ground, yet there is nothing on board that sends it's location in real time?" Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 13, 2014 03:21 PM (WdbF7) The Rolls Royce EHM sensors send back a coded stream of 3kb that includes: Unique to engine: 8 different pressure and temperature readings and ratios Variable stator vanes position Low and intermediate shaft speeds HPshaft speed vibration metal in oil detection fuel flow, pressure oil pressure, temperature, quantity General Aircraft data: Altitude, speed, air temp, air quantity for cabin, electrical power.

Posted by: jwest at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (u2a4R)

291

As a survivor of a family who simply disappeared having never been heard of again (but with weeks of searches and dragging the river and dogs sent out) there's always that eternal question, "What happened?"

 

-

 

What?

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (CpbrP)

292 I think you mean the wong area.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (IW1TI)

293

It's always the last place you look

 

I can't *not* hear that in Jeff Foxworthy's voice.

Posted by: eleven at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (fsLdt)

294 We will know soon enough if it's SPECTRE.

The nations of the earth will be called on to pool their resources and pay a ransom of ONE MILLION dollars.

Since the Swiss don't have anonymous accounts anymore, gonna be the bitcoin.

Posted by: Stringer Davis at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (xq1UY)

295 And if you are going to hijack....why bother landing, with all of its huge risks and challenges?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 03:26 PM (QFxY5)



It could be:


Hijack   plane     to fly into building  --> struggle in the cockpit --> plane goes into the drink before it reaches its destination

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (4df7R)

296 If the phone can be located, problem solved. Determine the tower on which it is registered and go there.

Posted by: RD Walker at March 13, 2014 11:28 AM (6RtJb)

297 260 SHOWDOWN: KERRY GIVES RUSSIA MONDAY DEADLINE Or what? He'll double dog dare them, that's what. Posted by: Count de Monet at March 13, 2014 03:25 PM (BAS5M) He'll sic The Teresanator on them?

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (HsTG8)

298 Maybe the autopilots' manual inflation nozzles were blocked???

Posted by: ted stryker at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (hn5v5)

299

What's weirder is that this is exactly what happened to the dinosaurs 50 million years ago.

 

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 03:27 PM (IW1TI)

 

OMG, An asteroid destroyed the 777!!!!!!

 

/Hank, Guam tipper-over guy

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (fwARV)

300 It can happen before you even realize you are oxygen deprived if you aren't alert to the symptoms. It has happened before with albeit smaller private planes. That's how Payne Stewart died. there are redundancies in these large aircraft that prevent that from happening

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (zOTsN)

301 The transponder The u-turn The engine data The complete absence of any debris in the search area The crew with a lax attitude toward cockpit rules I don't think it's all that crazy to say something truly bizarre could have transpired. Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 03:25 PM And the whole phone thing too. I can almost see Robert Stack standing in his trench coat with the fog in the background listing it all.

Posted by: Minnfidel at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (/rlXg)

302 Posted by: no good deed at March 13, 2014 03:26 PM (vBhbc) 777 has depressurization alarms.... automatic I believe...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (84gbM)

303 I don't know, but look at it this way: If you were designing that system, would you build standalone GPS into it? Or would you assume that the aircrew know where they are, and that between ground and cockpit there are multiple resources to locate them if they get lost? I would think the NSA could make a good guess by tracking where the engine signals were received and at what time. You know where the satellite is at a given time and over time as it moves the signal is tracked. Like finding North with a shadow and a stick.

Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (0FSuD)

304 And we should talk about Domino. http://bit.ly/1nVcUKO Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 03:24 PM (VtjlW) Badonkadonk (VtjlW) I'll arm-wrestle you for her. Coin toss? Paper, glock, scissors?

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:29 AM (qyfb5)

305 so are we saying the chinese make chtty cell phones and the passengers didn't have a good world service like Vonage?

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (nqBYe)

306 That is one heck of a homemade runway that can handle a 777 Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM (CpbrP) The runway would need to be made firm enough to handle the weight of a the plane to not only land but take off again. It would have to be smooth enough to avoid loss of control on landing. Said runway would require at least 8000 ft by 200 ft. It would also be handy if they set up landing lights in the middle of nowhere. This isn't landing a drug runner's Gulfstream Aerocommander, it's a 63 ft long airliner with a 60 ft wingspan with a landing speed of 150 knots You could hide the plane, but hiding the airstrip and hangar from satellite surveillance is a little more difficult

Posted by: kbdabear at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (aTXUx)

307 299 What's weirder is that this is exactly what happened to the dinosaurs 50 million years ago. Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 03:27 PM (IW1TI) OMG, An asteroid destroyed the 777!!!!!! /Hank, Guam tipper-over guy Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 03:29 PM (fwARV) Hey now.... lets not get crazy here....

Posted by: SMOD... still coming... at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (84gbM)

308 my shi lang collision is my number on theory. my number two theory is that db cooper came back and did a reverse, he gave every passenger 1000 and a parachute, pushed 'em off and he stayed on the plane and flew it somewhere to sell it similar to the air America movie.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (rDidD)

309 279 >> The only way they could keep flying that long without panicking people, who would immediately pick up their cell phones, would be controlled flight. A cell phone jammer would stop calls. Would it also keep the cell companies from being able to find the phones? Maybe it also jammed a few key systems of the plane... Posted by: Mama AJ at March 13, 2014 03:27 PM (SUKHu) *************** Or you could..... ugh forget it. Love is like Oxygen

Posted by: tasker at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (RJMhd)

310 212 Click: Transponder off Controlled flight to deep ocean Aloha Snack-bar!: CFIT If it was on the normal flight path and a catastrophic event occurred at 35,000 AGL they would have already found debris. The only thing missing is a motive. Posted by: Marcus T. at March 13, 2014 03:17 PM (GGCsk) I thought that that was not possible from the cockpit and extraordinarily difficult/impossible to do, other than a total power failure.

Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (71K6B)

311 The complete absence of any debris in the search area china helped with that. Had them searching in the wrong area *** That occurred days after the initial search began

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (DmNpO)

312 I'll lead the charge across the Volga myself, that's what you Ruskie bastards!!!!

Posted by: John Kerry had too much Gin at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (Aif/5)

313
Sincerely, I'm surprised planes don't crash more often.
Posted by: soothsayer




Crash rates have been reduced remarkably in the last couple of decades, especially when you consider the vast expansion in the number of flights and routes.

http://www.planecrashinfo.com/cause.htm

Better pilot training and control/warning systems.

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 13, 2014 11:30 AM (kdS6q)

314 glock?


Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (nqBYe)

315 Maybe a hijack to get a hold of all those tech guys?

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (bitz6)

316 What's weirder is that this is exactly what happened to the dinosaurs 50 million years ago. Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 03:27 PM (IW1TI) Badonkadonk (IW1TI) So you're saying they went out for a pack of cigarettes and never came back?

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (qyfb5)

317

'Cause it's time, it's time in time with your time

And its news is captured for the queen to use

Posted by: that 70s earworm at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (3ZtZW)

318 http://tinyurl.com/mnd6d3c

Posted by: ( I learned the truth from ) Lenny Bruce at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (omBWL)

319 Pilot would have to be in on any hijacking as access to cockpit is now blocked unless a dumbass pilot inadvertanly allowed access... You mean like inviting some hotties into the cockpit to take photos?

Posted by: gewa76 at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (k8m83)

320
See! He said telemetry. That's the word those space people use. I told you it was on the moon.

The moon's only 400 years old. That's not enough time for it to evolve landing strips.

Posted by: Shiela Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (0IhFx)

321 there are redundancies in these large aircraft that prevent that from happening

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 03:29 PM (zOTsN)



But what if the redundancies failed?   


I know they're redundancies for a reason,   but this whole situation is so bizarre and so   amorphous that it's not impossible    that    this   was an incident where everything that could go wrong DID go wrong.

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (4df7R)

322 Not to be a pedant, but if the 777 had enough fuel to travel 2,200 nautical miles, and we assume it's last known position as the center of the circle; then the search area would be a circle with a <i>radius</i> of 2,200 nautical miles, not a <i>diameter</i> of 2,200 nautical miles. So, the area to be searched would be equal to Pi times the radius squared; approx. 15 million square miles.

Posted by: amichel at March 13, 2014 03:19 PM (PWWdd)



I was told there would be no math on this blog!



Posted by: EC at March 13, 2014 11:31 AM (GQ8sn)

323 "Did we bring the Nimitiz back?"

One  of my favorite movies.



"Charlie!!!!"

Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (si68n)

324 And the whole phone thing too. I can almost see Robert Stack standing in his trench coat with the fog in the background listing it all. --- *Unsolved Mysteries theme* We still have no fucking clue where that damn plane is.

Posted by: Zombie Robert Stack at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (APuJ7)

325 Posted by: Nip Sip at March 13, 2014 03:29 PM (0FSuD) Wait.... crap... we didn't think of that...

Posted by: Guy who monitors AOS for the NSA at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (84gbM)

326 Whatever caused the transponder to stop responding, they were over the ocean and out of cell phone range. That nobody called doesn't tell us much if they were out of cell tower range. At some 6 miles altitude I suspect that you'd have to be flying pretty close to a cell tower to get coverage.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (SY2Kh)

327 Dinosaurs were hijacked? That can't be right.

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (bitz6)

328
I'll lead the charge across the Volga myself, that's what you Ruskie bastards!!!!
Posted by: John Kerry had too much Gin




Shoots fleeing Russian peasants in the back.  Pins Purple Heart on himself.

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (kdS6q)

329 Jon Ostrower ‏@jonostrower The Malaysian 777's satellite comm. system kept pinging for hours "saying I'm here, I'm ready to send data." http://on.wsj.com/1lYx08l #MH370

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (ZPrif)

330
I am sticking with its in Iran.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 13, 2014 11:32 AM (gorVZ)

331 Merovign,  you are making me laugh  today, tks.

Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (nqBYe)

332 I posted the Thai jihad theory the other day and unless wreckage is found that's my theory. Cell phones: Jammed during hijacking then collected Passengers: Some shot, some held for later ransom Plane: Zombie's bomb

Posted by: Daybrother at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (NJVBQ)

333 277 180 Hollywood Moonbat Cher: Republicans Are “The Most Heinous Women Haters In History”… She spelled "hyenous" wrong... She spelled "Democrats" wrong too.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (7ObY1)

334 Love is like oxygen
I thought love was like a monkey battlefield?

Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (hn5v5)

335 319 Pilot would have to be in on any hijacking as access to cockpit is now blocked unless a dumbass pilot inadvertanly allowed access... You mean like inviting some hotties into the cockpit to take photos? Posted by: gewa76 at March 13, 2014 03:31 PM (k8m83) Hey now..... we don't call it the COCK pit for nothing...

Posted by: Airline Pilot at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (84gbM)

336 Dinosaurs were hijacked? That can't be right.

How you gonna fly a plane with those little arms?

Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (pgQxn)

337

Hmmm.  Plane flew for 4 hours after losing contact.

 

Viagra warns to seek medical  attention after 4 hours.

 

Coincidence?  I think not.

Posted by: Count de Monet at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (BAS5M)

338 Citizen X, wanna see my tits?



Posted by: Cheryl Ladd at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (1Rgee)

339 Not to mention the CO of the Kidd said the seas were heavy and they couldn't see shit.

Posted by: Dick (@DicksTrash) at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (GrtrJ)

340 What? My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (XyM/Y)

341 Anyone know the recent whereabouts of Doctor Manhattan?

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:33 AM (7ObY1)

342 Behold! The might of the world's foremost SUPERPOWER! If Russian-backed lawmakers in Crimea go through with the Sunday referendum, Kerry said the U.S. and its European allies will not recognize it as legitimate under international law.

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (fWAjv)

343 314 glock? Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 03:31 PM (nqBYe) Badonkadonk (nqBYe) Beats paper *and* scissors.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (qyfb5)

344 Ready my Swift Boat.

Posted by: Secretariat of State Kerry at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (bitz6)

345 70 Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is. It can happen before you even realize you are oxygen deprived if you aren't alert to the symptoms. It has happened before with albeit smaller private planes. That's how Payne Stewart died. --- Yeah, no shit. Posted by: Zombie Bo Rein and Mel Carnahan at the pprune site someone had a chart showing ho long you have before passing out at various altitudes. above 30000 you get something on the order of 2 - 5 secs.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (rDidD)

346 338 Citizen X, wanna see my tits? Yeah, but 30 years ago.

Posted by: Citizen X at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (7ObY1)

347 Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is. Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 03:23 PM (QFxY5) Didn't work for the pilot that flew the Greek Airline into the mountain or the US golfer.

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (r7mtu)

348 343 314 glock? Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 03:31 PM (nqBYe) Badonkadonk (nqBYe) Beats paper *and* scissors. --- Good, bad, *I'm* the guy with the gun!

Posted by: Ash Williams at March 13, 2014 11:34 AM (APuJ7)

349 If Russian-backed lawmakers in Crimea go through with the Sunday referendum, Kerry said the U.S. and its European allies will not recognize it as legitimate under international law.

Posted by: RWC at March 13, 2014 03:34 PM (fWAjv)



"Ooooh.   I shake in my boots."


- Vlad

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (4df7R)

350 331 Merovign, you are making me laugh today, tks. Posted by: willow at March 13, 2014 03:33 PM (nqBYe) Badonkadonk (nqBYe) Glad to be of service!

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (qyfb5)

351
STOP!
Or I shall say stop again.

Posted by: John Kerry at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (mETGQ)

352 I'll arm-wrestle you for her. Coin toss? Paper, glock, scissors? Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 13, 2014 03:29 PM (qyfb5) Rock paper scissors lizard Spock!

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (VtjlW)

353 Rock, paper, shotgun.


Posted by: EC at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (GQ8sn)

354 Stop, or I'll shoot... ...myself in the ass again.

Posted by: Lurch Kerry at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (7ObY1)

355 >>Pilots have almost instant access to oxygen, so I wonder how likely this scenario really is.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 13, 2014 03:23 PM (QFxY5)<<

 

The problem is, hypoxia can set in quite quickly, especially at higher altitudes.  And you may not even realize you have it until it's too late.

Posted by: MacGruber at March 13, 2014 11:35 AM (XxAYS)

356 From the wsj article: Corrections & Amplifications U.S. investigators suspect Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 flew for hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, based on an analysis of signals sent through the plane's satellite-communication link designed to automatically transmit the status of onboard systems, according to people familiar with the matter. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said investigators based their suspicions on signals from monitoring systems embedded in the plane's Rolls-Royce PLC engines and described that process.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (ZPrif)

357
The Catholic Church stole it!

Posted by: Neil deGrasse Tyson at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (gorVZ)

358 349 If Russian-backed lawmakers in Crimea go through with the Sunday referendum, Kerry said the U.S. and its European allies will not recognize it as legitimate under international law. -------- That's okay Barry, I no recognize you as a man.

Posted by: Vlad at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (Aif/5)

359 Rock, paper, shotgun.


Posted by: EC at March 13, 2014 03:35 PM (GQ8sn)



Aren't the rock and paper more or   less inconsequential in that scenario?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (4df7R)

360 An aspect of this that keeps bothering me is:

Why in the holy hell does the pilot have a switch "Transponder" in the first place?

Shouldn't it be like daytime running lights -> always on when the engines are on. (Or, wheels off the ground, or 'wheels -up-') Whatever makes sense. But not something where there's an actual -off- switch of any sort. (Other than 'fire axe to the wire', which is obviously a completely different problem.)

Posted by: Al at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (9ynpo)

361 at the pprune site someone had a chart showing ho long you have before passing out at various altitudes. above 30000 you get something on the order of 2 - 5 secs. Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:34 PM (rDidD) Uh.... you pass out due to lack of oxygen.... you can hold your breathe longer than that...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (84gbM)

362 Rock, Paper, Thermal Detonator.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (bitz6)

363 I FOUND IT! Sorry everybody, I found it. Put the darned thing in the freezer and forgot about it. My bad. Sorry.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (qyfb5)

364 34  zombie

This theory makes the most sense of all I've read.  Esp in today's climate.

Posted by: NCwoof at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (aUQgu)

365 I am now at the official "creeping out" threshold.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 11:36 AM (659DL)

366 41 " My theory: The plane did not crash. It is sitting right now in a jerry-built hangar at the end of a homemade runway in some Islamic land in either SE/central Asia or Indonesia. The passengers? Possibly all executed. The plane is being prepped for later use as a fully loaded bomb/plane in an upcoming major terror attack. Posted by: zombie at March 13, 2014 02:53 PM (mizYg)" My worst case theory is along the same lines. Posted by: Dr. Shatterhand at March 13, 2014 02:54 PM (n/ogz) ----____ This is also the theory of Jack Cashill. Interesting.

Posted by: Chillin the most at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (gxtMZ)

367 My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have. Posted by: FenelonSpoke I'm sorry Fen

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (zOTsN)

368 Just spitballing. Is it possible there could there have been a Flight 93 scenario? Not understanding why there were no phone calls if shit had got real.

Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Decade at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (hHFOx)

369 He says the new theory being explored is that the plane either landed, or crashed at some later point en route to a planned landing place. (Actually he doesn't clearly say that last "or" clause but it's implied by what he does say.)

It seems to me that the engine diagnostics would have recorded that big reverse thrust they all do on landing, so it should be known whether the plane landed.

*reads rest of thread to find the other dozen people who already figured this out*

Posted by: Methos at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (hO9ad)

370 Posted by: Al at March 13, 2014 03:36 PM (9ynpo) Its there for use in Wartime.... so you can both turn it off, AND switch it to your country's encrypted IFF settings.

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (84gbM)

371 These guys are giving Asian pilots a bad name!

Posted by: Capt. Sum Ting Wong, Asiana Airlines at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (k8m83)

372 there are redundancies in these large aircraft that prevent that from happening Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 03:29 PM (zOTsN) But what if the redundancies failed? I know they're redundancies for a reason, but this whole situation is so bizarre and so amorphous that it's not impossible that this was an incident where everything that could go wrong DID go wrong. *** I think about that show 'Seconds From Disaster' and their breakdown of the Concorde crash. If even one little thing had gone differently it never would have happened. It was a perfect storm.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (DmNpO)

373

I thought love was like a monkey battlefield?

 

Monkeys are pikers.

Posted by: The Bonobos at March 13, 2014 11:37 AM (A0sHn)

374 Maybe they were abducted by ancient aliens.

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:38 AM (bitz6)

375 can't keep up

Posted by: Frantic Commenter at March 13, 2014 11:38 AM (C94J7)

376 It seems to me that the engine diagnostics would have recorded that big reverse thrust they all do on landing, so it should be known whether the plane landed. *reads rest of thread to find the other dozen people who already figured this out* *** I wonder if the US will break off quietly and start following leads apart from the official investigation.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:38 AM (DmNpO)

377 So what was that blur in the Chinese satellite image? Oh that? That's just some other airliner, not the one we're looking for.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (IW1TI)

378 The problem is, hypoxia can set in quite quickly, especially at higher altitudes. And you may not even realize you have it until it's too late. Posted by: MacGruber at March 13, 2014 03:35 PM (XxAYS) So, they really need an alarm in the cockpit and an automatic oxygen flibbergibber? And if that fails, they're fucked?

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (r7mtu)

379 i dont think there is a record of a commercial airliner becoming oxygen deprived to point that pilots not able to utilize their oxygen masks. It would have to be a first.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (ODr92)

380 I'm so sorry FenelonSpoke. That must be the very worst.

Posted by: Daybrother at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (dM+IO)

381 Corrections & Amplifications
U.S. investigators suspect Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 flew for hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, based on an analysis of signals sent through the plane's satellite-communication link designed to automatically transmit the status of onboard systems, according to people familiar with the matter. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said investigators based their suspicions on signals from monitoring systems embedded in the plane's Rolls-Royce PLC engines and described that process.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 03:36 PM (ZPrif)/i]



Interesting.  

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (4df7R)

382 Posted by: Chillin the most at March 13, 2014 03:37 PM (gxtMZ) Yup.... a 777 is large enough to house an old style WW2 Atomic bomb.... Which is easy to manufacture... hell... they did in with 1940's technology... Put a Suicide type in the cockpit... and you have a 2200 mile range Nuclear delivery system.

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (84gbM)

383 I've always believed in the rule of threes, don't know how valid it is, but I consider it gospel. You can survive without critical damage/death for 3 minutes without Oxygen, 3 days without water and 3 weeks without food. Seems a bit convenient to be accurate but sounds close enough.

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (ZshNr)

384 That is not the airliner wreckage your looking for.

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:39 AM (bitz6)

385 Thanks, ThunderB. I appreciate that. I'd have much time to deal with it. I probably shouldn't have shared. It's just that I can understand a lack of closure for people with no body and no answers. And no, he wasn't cheating on my mother and didn't go off to start new life.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 11:40 AM (XyM/Y)

386 "346 338 Citizen X, wanna see my tits?


Yeah, but 30 years ago."

Tell me about it.

Posted by: Cheryl Ladd at March 13, 2014 11:40 AM (1Rgee)

387 Correction: Satellite, Not Engine, Data Drove InvestigatorsÂ’ Suspicions on Malaysia Jet Flying Time U.S. investigators suspect that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 stayed in the air for up to four hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, according to two people familiar with the details, raising the possibility that the plane could have flown on for hundreds of additional miles under conditions that remain murky. The investigators believe the plane flew for a total of up to five hours, according to these people, based on analysis of signals sent by the Boeing 777's satellite-communication link designed to automatically transmit the status of some onboard systems to the ground. Corrections & Amplifications: An earlier version of this article incorrectly said investigators based their suspicions on signals from monitoring systems embedded in the planeÂ’s Rolls-Royce PLC engines and described that process.

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:40 AM (zOTsN)

388

So, they really need an alarm in the cockpit and an automatic oxygen flibbergibber? And if that fails, they're fucked?

 

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:39 PM (r7mtu)

 

At 30k, you'd be unconscious in about 2 seconds.  I'm not sure that's long enough for your brain to process the alarm and get the O2 going.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:40 AM (fwARV)

389 Wait. Did anyone check that Missouri airport? Maybe Flight 770 landed there instead by mistake. Really, it happens.

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:41 AM (IW1TI)

390 Not understanding why there were no phone calls if shit had got real. Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Decade at March 13, 2014 03:37 PM (hHFOx) Over the Ocean, out of Cell Tower Range.

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:41 AM (84gbM)

391 Does one reporter on a certain cable look unstable--or seems to be? Go look at his wiki.

Posted by: tasker at March 13, 2014 11:41 AM (RJMhd)

392

My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke


I'm sorry Fen

 

 

This.

Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at March 13, 2014 11:41 AM (A0sHn)

393 (Voiceover) I was going to the worst place in the world and I didn't even know it yet. Weeks away and hundreds of miles up a river that snaked through the war like a main circuit cable plugged straight into Putin.  B.O.: Your mission is to proceed up the Volga River in a Navy patrol boat. Pick up President Putin's path in the Crimea, follow it, and learn what you can along the way. When you find the President, infiltrate his team by whatever means available and terminate the President's command.J.K.: Terminate the President?B.O: He's out there operating without any decent restraint, totally beyond the pale of any acceptable human conduct. And he is still in the field commanding troops. Terminate with extreme prejudice. You understand Mr. Secretary, that this mission does not exist, nor will it ever exist.  

Posted by: amichel at March 13, 2014 11:41 AM (PWWdd)

394

You can survive without critical damage/death for 3 minutes without Oxygen, 3 days without water and 3 weeks without food

 

3 seconds without bullets in a gunfight

Posted by: Bigby's Frostbitten Hands at March 13, 2014 11:42 AM (3ZtZW)

395 Do I even need to say it?

Posted by: Giorgio Tsoukalos at March 13, 2014 11:42 AM (vgIRn)

396 Just spitballing. Is it possible there could there have been a Flight 93 scenario? Not understanding why there were no phone calls if shit had got real. Lack of cell coverage could explain the lack of phone calls. If it was terrorism, they could have prevented passengers from calling before they flew into an area that did have coverage.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 13, 2014 11:42 AM (SY2Kh)

397
WEEeeeeee.

Posted by: Dow Jones at March 13, 2014 11:42 AM (mETGQ)

398 Rock paper scissors lizard Spock! Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 03:35 PM (VtjlW) Badonkadonk (VtjlW) Okay, you take Domino, I'll take Melissa Rauch or Kaley Cuoco. Deal?

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:42 AM (qyfb5)

399 Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 03:40 PM (fwARV) Even with explosive decompression, you have the time it takes to use the oxygen in your lungs, before you become unconscious...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (84gbM)

400 Yes I have to agree, Boeing really wants the aircraft found. Right now they are in a situation where a very reliable aircraft (the SF accident was pilot error not plane error) has just vanished. They have no idea if they are going to suddenly have 777s falling out of the sky everywhere and they have a lot of 777s in service.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (RZ8pf)

401 Let me speculate. I recall reading that the last transmission from MA370 had to do with everyone going to sleep. Was this flight in fact a night flight? What are the chances that the suspected maneuvers were carried out intentionally, and very slowly, so as not to alert the passengers? MA370 then flew west, across the narrowest part of the Malay peninsula, cleared any radars, then headed southeast to a point on Sumatra. Sumatra has more than a few Islamic radicals, and plenty of unobstructed, uninhabited and available flat space, at least on the western side.

Posted by: Arbalest at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (FlRtG)

402 Not understanding why there were no phone calls if shit had got real. I'm stumped. I don't think five dudes with boxcutters could take a plane these days, so them collecting the phones is out. If it continued to fly then it would have pinged a cell tower somewhere. The whole flight crew could not have been in on it, so SOMEBODY had to notice something was off at some point. I joked about Bond villains this morning, but I am having a hard time figuring out what happened. Even a gigantic bomb would have left some debris that would have been spotted by now.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (659DL)

403 Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 03:40 PM (XyM/Y)

No, I'm glad you shared. I'm also terribly sorry. No matter how long it's been, this kind of shit just brings it back to the fore.

Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Decade at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (hHFOx)

404
There is no plane.

Posted by: Little boy bending a spoon with his mind at March 13, 2014 11:43 AM (gorVZ)

405 Two words: Chem trails

Posted by: WalrusRex at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (XUKZU)

406 The Dow Jones Limbo.

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (bitz6)

407 "Why in the holy hell does the pilot have a switch "Transponder" in the first place?"

A lot of reasons. To prevent a surge from damaging it when the alternators or generators kick in, if it's squawking a different code then the one you have it set to, for airplanes operating within range of a class B airports tower but practicing at a different airport, etc., etc.

Posted by: lowandslow at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (IV4od)

408 Maybe the plane was being bullied and ran away.

Posted by: eman at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (18Nkm)

409 Uh.... you pass out due to lack of oxygen.... you can hold your breathe longer than that... Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 not sure it as simple as you seem to think. see here http://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/airman_education/media/IntroAviationPhys.pdf go to 3-3 faa assumes you get 9-12 seconds until unconsciousness at 50000, which is higher than these guys were flying, about a min at 30000.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (rDidD)

410

Even with explosive decompression, you have the time it takes to use the oxygen in your lungs, before you become unconscious...

 

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:43 PM (84gbM)

 

Agreed.  Still.  Panic is a strange animal. 

 

Also, I realize I'm vacillating between 'mechanical/operator error' and 'got fucking stolen'.  That's because I'm constantly back and forth in my head.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (fwARV)

411 So, they really need an alarm in the cockpit and an automatic oxygen flibbergibber? And if that fails, they're fucked? Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:39 PM (r7mtu) At 30k, you'd be unconscious in about 2 seconds. I'm not sure that's long enough for your brain to process the alarm and get the O2 going. Posted by: Washington Nearsider if the oxygen mix in the cockpit gets too low, oxygen masks automatically drop rapid oxygen drops are caused by catastrophic failure, like being hit my a missile

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:44 AM (zOTsN)

412 Sorry, Fenelon.  That must have been awful to go    through

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (CpbrP)

413 They didn't turn the transponder off. They turned it to 11. You NEVER turn your transponder to 11!!

Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (HsTG8)

414 Over the Ocean, out of Cell Tower Range.

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:41 PM (84gbM)


Oh... is that how those little cell thingies work? But seriously, that makes sense. F*ck the ocean.

Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Decade at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (hHFOx)

415 Yeah, the best non-bad guy scenario I've read is something like something goes wrong, depressurization, pilots panic, change course, then pass out. So then it's just a zombie plane for hours, everybody dead inside. No idea how plausible that is.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (ZPrif)

416

The pilot just needed to make a little overtime.

Posted by: Barry the Fern at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (wAQA5)

417 367 My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have. Posted by: FenelonSpoke -_-

Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at March 13, 2014 11:45 AM (71K6B)

418 "388 So, they really need an alarm in the cockpit and an automatic oxygen flibbergibber? And if that fails, they're fucked?

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 03:39 PM (r7mtu)

At 30k, you'd be unconscious in about 2 seconds. I'm not sure that's long enough for your brain to process the alarm and get the O2 going."


Huh? You can't hold your breath for more that 2 seconds at 30,000 feet?

Doesn't pass the smell test. I used to skydive, and we would jump at 14,000 or so, no oxy needed unless you spent more than 15-20 minutes at altitude.


Posted by: West at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (1Rgee)

419 What about the Satellite hookup phone thingies?

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (bitz6)

420 Even with explosive decompression, you have the time it takes to use the oxygen in your lungs, before you become unconscious... Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 see my comment at 409, but since the time you get varies according to altitude, I am guessing your premise is wrong.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (rDidD)

421 See, here's my problem with the "hijacked a plane to use as a bomb."


First, why hijack a plane that was going    on   a     flight of this length?       If   they wanted to fly the plane into   a high-visibility target in Kuala Lumpur, why would they wait so long after takeoff to do anything about    it?    Why wouldn't they hijack a flight that was staying closer to home?   The 9/11  hijackers didn't   hijack flights inbound from London;  they hijacked flights out of Boston.  



And if these     were foreign nationals hijacking the plane   -- Chinese   or   what have you -- why hijack a Malaysian airliner?   It's not like    other countries don't have major airports, too.       It would be quicker to hijack a plane in Turkey    to get it to Iran, or in India to get it to Pakistan,   or Japan to get it to China.   So why   make your life harder than it already is?

Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/u][/i][/s][/b] at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (4df7R)

422 Possible scenario? An electrical failure in the cockpit (fire?) caused the transponder to fail. The pilots still had control of the plane so executed a water landing. The plane stayed afloat for a few hours before slowly sinking, leaving little or no debris behind.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (SY2Kh)

423 Romeo, then I'd have the transponder send out -one- more ping with a code "Going silent because of pilot".

Not going to make a difference for "war footing".

Posted by: Al at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (9ynpo)

424

STENDEC

Late 1940's disappearance of a BOAC airliner in the Andes. Last known transmission was "STENDEC" before all contact lost. Searchers turned up nothing for years. The plane simply vanished with a few dozen (?) people on board.

UFO abduction was the reason for a series of magazines (ala LOST).

Late 90's hikers came across wreckage and body parts. It was the lost airplane, apparently before we knew as much as we do now about jet-streams, the pilots were WAY off  course and crashed into a vast snow field which then entombed the plane. Only until the glacier melted and gave up the evidence did we know.

One wouldn't think this could happen but obviously it did. We're just not the masters of our universe we sometimes think we are.

Posted by: Arizona Mike at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (tPznV)

425  I posted the Thai jihad theory the other day and unless wreckage is found that's my theory.

Cell phones: Jammed during hijacking then collected
Passengers: Some shot, some held for later ransom
Plane: Zombie's bomb

Posted by: Daybrother at March 13, 2014 03:33 PM (NJVBQ)

 

 

--------------------------------------------------

 

 

Sounds reasonable.  Plus, as I said yesterday, there's numersous corrupt governments in that  area  that, given enough sweet Saudi cash, would be more than glad to hide a plane and it's passengers.

 

A night landing at  one of these countrie's major airports would go unnoticed.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (Wz9US)

426 So, if the later data is from radar, they ought to know the place to be searching for wreckage

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (CpbrP)

427 Okay, you take Domino, I'll take Melissa Rauch or Kaley Cuoco. Deal? Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 13, 2014 03:42 PM (qyfb5) No. I'll just be taking all three of them, thank you very much. Corgis, corgis, corgis, get them corgis tumbling, new thread!

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 11:46 AM (VtjlW)

428 We DON'T know that. That's why this is so frustrating. Is it incredibly likely that they're all dead? Yes. But until there's some proof -- wreckage, bodies,,

a cat.

Posted by: Schroedinger[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 11:47 AM (DL2i+)

429 I blame the Uigurs.

Posted by: Boss Moss at March 13, 2014 11:47 AM (bitz6)

430 Even with explosive decompression...it would have crashed. We haven't seen a speck of debris yet.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 11:47 AM (659DL)

431 There is descent protocol if plane loses depressurization. It happens more than you think. Also remember the Aloha flight that sucked a couple of people out ?

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 11:48 AM (ODr92)

432 I wonder if the US will break off quietly and start following leads apart from the official investigation. Posted by: Niedermeyer's ----------------- Like they did with the Tsarnaev brothers.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 11:48 AM (aDwsi)

433 407 "Why in the holy hell does the pilot have a switch "Transponder" in the first place?"

A lot of reasons. To prevent a surge from damaging it when the alternators or generators kick in, if it's squawking a different code then the one you have it set to, for airplanes operating within range of a class B airports tower but practicing at a different airport, etc., etc.

Posted by: lowandslow at March 13, 2014 03:44 PM (IV4od)


Plus when you're changing settings digit by digit you don't want it squawking out codes until you're finished.

Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 11:48 AM (XkotV)

434 also,there is a lot of diference in the oxygen supplied and you effects, the purity, the pressurization, it is sorta complicated.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:48 AM (rDidD)

435 Yeah, the best non-bad guy scenario I've read is something like something goes wrong, depressurization, pilots panic, change course, then pass out. So then it's just a zombie plane for hours, everybody dead inside. No idea how plausible that is. Posted by: Costanza Defense why do the transponders shut off

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (zOTsN)

436 Right now John Kerry is enroute to Russia to make a show of force. He is commanding the Scaramouche at full speed, eyes steady at the helm, knife clenched between his teeth. Ammo bandoliers crossing his sweaty and manly chest. As he barks out orders to the crew of the Scaramouche. "I know we've entered Russian waters but I'm not turning back. We're going to show these Damn Ruskies who's boss" His rugged jaw clincheing as he strains his steely blue eyes towards the Russian coast. His days of bravery in Vietnam still a fresh wound after all these years. He clutches his dog tags in one hand as he thinks of going into the heat of battle once again. Sweat at his brow as he steels himself.

Posted by: Chris Mathews Finding a New Tingle. at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (/rlXg)

437
Pilots panicking wouldn't include turning off the transponder.

How about pilots are in on it, and they release something into the cabin to make people fall asleep, while they steal away.  There are gonna be dozens of movies and books if this thing is never found.


a ?.  What does a Boeing 777 cost?

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (gorVZ)

438 One more thing: I doubt we would send the Kidd to the west side of the Malay peninsula without good reason. Our birds have likely seen something.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (659DL)

439

Doesn't pass the smell test. I used to skydive, and we would jump at 14,000 or so, no oxy needed unless you spent more than 15-20 minutes at altitude.

 

Posted by: West at March 13, 2014 03:46 PM (1Rgee)

 

You're assuming that the crew knew they were about to enter an oxygen-free zone and needed to hold their breaths.

 

Panic is, as I said about, a strange animal.  Nothing teaches that lesson like drown-proofing.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (fwARV)

440 I love it when a plan comes together.

Posted by: Black Widow Terrorist Trainer at March 13, 2014 11:49 AM (C94J7)

441

"Why in the holy hell does the pilot have a switch "Transponder" in the first place?"

-

Transponders are regularly changed by the pilots.  They transmit a 4 digit number to ID on radar, and this number will change based on the ATC being communicated with.  The pilots make these changes.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (CpbrP)

442 lots of tanks massing near . . .  Kursk

-
Hey, I read that book.

Posted by: WalrusRex at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (XUKZU)

443 Like they did with the Tsarnaev brothers. *** Yeah, but the Tsarnaevs were small-ball until they blew shit up. Finding this plane will make them heroes.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (DmNpO)

444 big difference between 14000 and 30000 oxygen levels.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (rDidD)

445 Why is there an "off switch" on transponders? Why not leave them on all the time?

Posted by: gp at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (mk9aG)

446 I saw malayasian officials open for the EPA cocksuckers back in '47

Posted by: Killerdog at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (MbTc0)

447 After 75 years, we *may* have found Earhart's plane. Just saying.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 11:50 AM (aDwsi)

448 "Why in the holy hell does the pilot have a switch "Transponder" in the first place?" - Transponders are regularly changed by the pilots. They transmit a 4 digit number to ID on radar, and this number will change based on the ATC being communicated with. The pilots make these changes. ** From what I've read, the pilots can make changes to the transponder but that it is not easily turned off. Is that not the case?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:51 AM (DmNpO)

449 No. I'll just be taking all three of them, thank you very much. Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at March 13, 2014 03:46 PM (VtjlW) Badonkadonk (VtjlW) SMOD will be the least of your problems if you want to be greedy here.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 13, 2014 11:51 AM (qyfb5)

450 If even one little thing had gone differently it never would have happened. It was a perfect storm.

True enough, but in aviation that's not the term. In aviation, it's
[crushed AAF officer's cap off]
Fate Is The Hunter.
[crushed AAF officer's cap back on]

Posted by: Ernest K. Gann at March 13, 2014 11:51 AM (xq1UY)

451 pilot turned off transponder to snooze? Then oxygen failure and passed out. Runs out of gas and crashes. Debris will be found in the Indian Ocean where we weren't looking?

Posted by: thunderb at March 13, 2014 11:52 AM (zOTsN)

452 I suspect the engine data story is wrong but

Maybe from some outside human error easily checked but if they've got the right log from the right engine at the right time that's pretty definitive unless it's spoofed.

Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 11:52 AM (DL2i+)

453 doon

Posted by: Soothsayer at March 13, 2014 11:52 AM (IW1TI)

454 depressurization can occur without the plane exploding. And all the experts are saying the hypoxia angle is definitely possible. Highly unlikely, of course. But we are in highly unlikely territory. It would probably involve multiple failures combined with pilot error (like panic). But most commercial airline accidents end up being a result of multiple unlikely failures and pilot error.

Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 13, 2014 11:52 AM (ZPrif)

455 436 Nicely done.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 11:52 AM (aDwsi)

456 I also believe the Payne Stewart plane was flying at a huger altitude than commercial planes as would be normal for these private jets IIRC.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 11:53 AM (ODr92)

457 see my comment at 409, but since the time you get varies according to altitude, I am guessing your premise is wrong. Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:46 PM (rDidD) FAA says TUC (time of useful consciousness), at 35,000 feet, is .5 to 1 MINUTE....

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 11:53 AM (84gbM)

458 I have actually been on a plane that depressurized. Flying back from new York when I was in college. It was not catastrophic though. The oxygen masks dropped, the pilot flew really low and we landed in Denver.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at March 13, 2014 11:53 AM (RZ8pf)

459

big difference between 14000 and 30000 oxygen levels.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:50 PM (rDidD)


We're only talking about a couple of hundred feet  here.

Posted by: Sheila Jackson Lee at March 13, 2014 11:53 AM (mETGQ)

460 I want that plane.

Posted by: Vladimir Putin at March 13, 2014 11:53 AM (bitz6)

461 I also believe the Payne Stewart plane was flying at a huger altitude than commercial planes as would be normal for these private jets IIRC. Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 yeah but they passed out in the climb before reaching cruising altitude

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:54 AM (rDidD)

462 Yankeefifth, your info is a little more credible and sounds accurate to me. 9-12 secs at 50K (almost outer space at that point) should translate to a minute or so at 30K.

The problem is probably not the amount of air in your lungs, but the partial pressure of oxygen and tissue permeability at the reduced pressures.

Posted by: West at March 13, 2014 11:54 AM (1Rgee)

463 The pilots can turn off the transponder in order to change codes without pinging out the 'wrong' codes.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 11:54 AM (CpbrP)

464 Huger = Higher . Auto correct to the unwanted rescue again.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 11:55 AM (ODr92)

465 I recall reading that the last transmission from MA370 had to do with everyone going to sleep. Was this flight in fact a night flight?

What are the chances that the suspected maneuvers were carried out intentionally, and very slowly, so as not to alert the passengers? MA370 then flew west, across the narrowest part of the Malay peninsula, cleared any radars, then headed southeast to a point on Sumatra.

Sumatra has more than a few Islamic radicals, and plenty of unobstructed, uninhabited and available flat space, at least on the western side.

Posted by: Arbalest at March 13, 2014 03:43 PM (FlRtG)

 

 

-----------------------------------------

 

 

Yes.  It was at night.  So any number of hijacking scenarios could be carried out without anyone  but ATC's noticing.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 11:55 AM (Wz9US)

466 Also remember the Aloha flight that sucked a couple of people out ? That was only one flight attendant and it was never proven that she didn't go voluntarily. I denounce myself.

Posted by: Boeing at March 13, 2014 11:55 AM (dJt67)

467 I've read a couple of folks floating the idea that it was possibly diverted to North Korea.

Posted by: palooka at March 13, 2014 11:56 AM (N6t4x)

468 In the Greek airline crash that someone linked earlier, they had 12 min of oxygen which is enough to bring the plane down to 10k feet. Jets flying along side it reported seeing the pilot slumped over the controls and then another person trying to control the plane. Maybe, someone can link it again. It was wiki but detailed.

Posted by: The Yellow Pug at March 13, 2014 11:56 AM (r7mtu)

469 Perhaps the pilot got bossy, and the co-pilot became intolerant of his bossiness. Slapfest deteriorates into crash.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 11:57 AM (aDwsi)

470 Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 03:33 PM (XyM/Y)

A little late to the thread, but Fen, please know that I am very sorry for your loss.  Unfinished lives are really tough on the survivors!

Posted by: Hrothgar at March 13, 2014 11:57 AM (o3MSL)

471 I've read a couple of folks floating the idea that it was possibly diverted to North Korea. *** North Korea was well out of fuel range.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 11:57 AM (DmNpO)

472 see my comment at 409, but since the time you get varies according to altitude, I am guessing your premise is wrong. Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:46 PM (rDidD) FAA says TUC (time of useful consciousness), at 35,000 feet, is .5 to 1 MINUTE.... Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:53 yeah. you mean like I mentioned in my comment about getting a min at 30000? well if it is merely a matter of holding your breath why does time of useful consciousness vary by altitude? if all you have to do is hold your breath it should be the same at every altitude.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 11:57 AM (rDidD)

473 "Is that not the case?"

No, it's just an on/off switch on it.  In most cases the avionics/radios are wired on a separate buss then the rest of the electrical so I'm sure something probable tripped the entire avionics buss circuit breaker, or they inadvertently shut off all the avionics or for some other reason it lost all avionics buss power. I don't think anyone physically just shut off the transponder.

Posted by: lowandslow at March 13, 2014 11:58 AM (IV4od)

474 FAA says TUC (time of useful consciousness), at 35,000 feet, is .5 to 1 MINUTE....

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 03:53 PM (84gbM)

 

 

---------------------------------------------

 

 

Pilots train for this.  So do flight attendants.  Even sudden depressurization.  I find this scenario lacking.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 11:58 AM (Wz9US)

475

You know, a mark against the 'stolen/hijacked' theory is this:

 

It would have to land somewhere.  In a country.  Which would have to allow it to land. 

 

If that aircraft was later used for terror, there's a clear-cut, no-shit state-sponsor directly involved.  I don't think too many states are willing to operate that openly.

 

Of course, they've got a three-year free-fire zone set up, so maybe...

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 11:58 AM (fwARV)

476 We're only talking about a couple of hundred feet here. Posted by: Sheila Jackson Lee --------------- Okay, best chuckle today.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 11:59 AM (aDwsi)

477 175
Lawnmower man wasn't just a dumb swampbilly. He had three separate accents.
He puts on the Forrest Gump when he's talking to the 2012 cops, giving them directions. Then when they blow him off, he finishes "my family's been here a long time" with a much more patrician accent. And when he's horsing around with retard girl sister he does a Jared HarrisMad Men accent.

Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at March 13, 2014 03:12 PM (A0sHn)

+++

The scene Lawnmower Man was watching on TV before doing his impersonation was with Cary Grant and James Mason in North by Northwest. I think he was trying to do Grant, but it wasn't spot-on, so maybe it was Mason he was going for.



Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at March 13, 2014 12:00 PM (IN7k+)

478 Adam Air Flt 574

Went down on 1 Jan 2007.  Suspected crash site found on 7 Jan 2007.  9 Jan 2007 crash site was confirmed on ocean floor.  And this was a 737 that went down in Indonesia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Air_Flight_574

And Boeing says the satellite transmitter directive does not apply to the Malaysian 777-200ER since this model of the plane did not have this installed.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-03-05/pdf/2014-04547.pdf

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 12:00 PM (o9ypU)

479 Pilots train for this. So do flight attendants. Even sudden depressurization. I find this scenario lacking. Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 03:58 here is the faa data, see page 3-3 http://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/airman_education/media/IntroAviationPhys.pdf

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:00 PM (rDidD)

480 Someone should cross-check the passenger list with Embry-Riddle students/alumni.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 13, 2014 12:01 PM (aDwsi)

481 "The pilots can turn off the transponder in order to change codes without pinging out the 'wrong' codes." But why not give every airframe its own fixed transponder code that never changes? Then you could leave it on all the time. I know there are only about 10000 codes available with the current standard; maybe that's not enough to go around right now, but that could be expanded eventually.

Posted by: gp at March 13, 2014 12:01 PM (mk9aG)

482 Air Pirates... I'm telling you.... Air Pirates...

Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 13, 2014 12:01 PM (84gbM)

483 463 The pilots can turn off the transponder in order o change codes without pinging out the 'wrong' codes. Posted by: Vashta Nerada at March 13, 2014 03:54 PM (CpbrP) "Pinging" is what we used to call Squawk Ident, I believe. I was under the impression that that was a separate button/switch that required a conscious effort to preform. If they can turn off the transponder and change codes without a squawk, that could seriously fuck up some enroute controllers' day, night and life. I was primarily Tower/GCA. No enroute stuff.

Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at March 13, 2014 12:03 PM (71K6B)

484 Washington Nearsider, in 2003 a 727 was stolen.  As tower personnel watched the plane took off and vanished. Pilot and plane never to be seen again.

http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/the-727-that-vanished-2371187/?no-ist

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 12:03 PM (o9ypU)

485 well if it is merely a matter of holding your breath why does time of useful consciousness vary by altitude? if all you have to do is hold your breath it should be the same at every altitude.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:57 PM (rDidD)


Y5, taking a breath and then holding that breath at sea level is  a far cry from taking a breath at 30000+ feet and holding that breath at 30000+ feet.

Posted by: Hrothgar at March 13, 2014 12:03 PM (o3MSL)

486 481 "The pilots can turn off the transponder in order to change codes without pinging out the 'wrong' codes." But why not give every airframe its own fixed transponder code that never changes? Then you could leave it on all the time. I know there are only about 10000 codes available with the current standard; maybe that's not enough to go around right now, but that could be expanded eventually.

Posted by: gp at March 13, 2014 04:01 PM (mk9aG)


They do. There's a 24bit code (I believe) that hard-coded to the transponder/aircraft. The pilots can set the flight id part of the return info. And since the flight id can change, the pilots need to be able to update it.

Posted by: Mætenloch at March 13, 2014 12:04 PM (XkotV)

487

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 04:03 PM (o9ypU)

 

I love reading about stuff like that.  Blows my mind that you can steal a damn plane...

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 12:04 PM (fwARV)

488 Too much risk of provoking a confrontation embarrassment if they were to down an American jet shoot at and miss a B-52.

Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 12:04 PM (DL2i+)

489 Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 03:57 PM (rDidD) Because the FAA figures you are going to be hyperventilating.... ie.... breathing OUT more oxygen than you are taking in on your initial breathes.

Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 13, 2014 12:05 PM (84gbM)

490 Why don't they just make the whole plane out of the black box? What is the deal with that??

Posted by: gewa76 at March 13, 2014 12:05 PM (k8m83)

491 Y5, taking a breath and then holding that breath at sea level is a far cry from taking a breath at 30000+ feet and holding that breath at 30000+ feet. Posted by: Hrothgar at March 13, 2014 agreed. I am making the point that it is not a matter of simply holding your breath as Romeo13 believes.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:06 PM (rDidD)

492 ... and, at Gateway Pundit: BREAKING: US Officials Believe Malaysian Air Flight 370 May Have Been Hijacked ‘For Later Use’ GP links to the Daily Mail. Apparently, hijacking is now being considered as a real possibility.

Posted by: Arbalest at March 13, 2014 12:06 PM (FlRtG)

493 From what I've read, if the black box is sitting on the seabed the searchers have until the first week of April to pick up the signal before the battery goes dead After that, it's searching the sea floor with shitloads of false returns from metallic scrap that's been there since WWII

Posted by: kbdabear at March 13, 2014 12:07 PM (aTXUx)

494 "Then you could leave it on all the time. I know there are only about 10000 codes available with the current standard; maybe that's not enough to go around right now, but that could be expanded eventually."

The transponder wasn't meant to be tracking devise for every airplane at all times. It's main purpose is to track the aircraft under enroute IFR and monitor separation in controlled airspace near the airport. If all aircraft were squawking at all times in would be to much for conrollers at center or in the tower to keep track off, the screen would be lit up like Christmas.

Posted by: lowandslow at March 13, 2014 12:07 PM (IV4od)

495 I've figured out where it's at. It's sitting right next to Amelia Earhart's plane.

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 12:07 PM (ODr92)

496 BREAKING: US Officials Believe Malaysian Air Flight 370 May Have Been Hijacked ‘For Later Use’ GP links to the Daily Mail. Apparently, hijacking is now being considered as a real possibility. My fellow Americans, we have nothing to fear with Barack Obama in the White House!

Posted by: John McCain at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (k8m83)

497 Washington Nearsider, in 2003 a 727 was stolen. As tower personnel watched the plane took off and vanished. Pilot and plane never to be seen again.

http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/the-727-that-vanished-2371187/?no-ist

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 04:03 PM (o9ypU)

 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

 

If no debris or any evidence of a  crash turns up in the next week, then there's really no place to go but to a well-coordinated plane theft/passenger kidnapping for money or a hijacking for political or other nefarious reasons.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (Wz9US)

498 From what I've read, if the black box is sitting on the seabed the searchers have until the first week of April to pick up the signal before the battery goes dead After that, it's searching the sea floor with shitloads of false returns from metallic scrap that's been there since WWII *** they said the same thing about the Air France crash but found it much later at a depth of about 13k feet

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (DmNpO)

499 The WSJ is correcting it's story to say the extra flight hours were reported by the Boeing monitoring system, but Bloomberg reported at noon that Malaysia Airlines didn't opt to take that system. The data that Boeing would have received on the engines is the same as what Roll Royce receives. There is no "opting out" of the Rolls monitoring, as they have a liability reason to have the data. There is too much confusion being caused by reporters who have no fucking idea of what they are reporting on.

Posted by: jwest at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (u2a4R)

500 Posted by: gp at March 13, 2014 04:01 PM (mk9aG) Because these systems are also built with Identify Friend Foe in mind for wartime use. They can be set so the info is encrypted... so only your allies can ping them to get a response...

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (84gbM)

501 424 STENDEC Late 1940's disappearance of a BOAC airliner in the Andes. Last known transmission was "STENDEC" before all contact lost. Searchers turned up nothing for years. The plane simply vanished with a few dozen (?) people on board. UFO abduction was the reason for a series of magazines (ala LOST). Late 90's hikers came across wreckage and body parts. It was the lost airplane, apparently before we knew as much as we do now about jet-streams, the pilots were WAY off course and crashed into a vast snow field which then entombed the plane. Only until the glacier melted and gave up the evidence did we know. Posted by: Arizona Mike at March 13, 2014 03:46 PM (tPznV) It's even more interesting than that. The pieces of wreckage were found at the bottom of the glacier far from the crash site. They had been slowly carried there by the glacier over a 50 year period. Only then did searchers backtrack uphill and find the crash site. There was a Nova episode about it years ago. We still don't know what STENDEC means. They used Morse code instead of voice communications, so it's thought to have been a keying or transcription error.

Posted by: rickl at March 13, 2014 12:08 PM (zoehZ)

502 And we should talk about Domino.

Not if I have to ride the exercise machine 1st.

Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 12:10 PM (DL2i+)

503 agreed. I am making the point that it is not a matter of simply holding your breath as Romeo13 believes. Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 04:06 PM (rDidD) and I'm making the point that its not the 2 or 3 Seconds as someone's post earlier said....

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 12:10 PM (84gbM)

504 If it was easy to find stuff in the ocean I would have a crap load of gold doubloons right now .

Posted by: Rob Banks at March 13, 2014 12:11 PM (ODr92)

505 498 "From what I've read, if the black box is sitting on the seabed the searchers have until the first week of April to pick up the signal before the battery goes dead " We have subs that can hear that pinger from hundreds of miles. It's hard to believe one of our 70 subs isn't somewhere near.

Posted by: jwest at March 13, 2014 12:13 PM (u2a4R)

506 The classic example of an attempted inside job for insurance purposes is FedEx Flt 705.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Express_Flight_705

Luckily the flight crew was man enough to survive being bludgeoned and everything else to keep the plane aloft and to subdue their attacker.  So the DC-10 did not crash.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 12:14 PM (o9ypU)

507 I feel very sorry for the family members. Usually don't want your loved ones to be hijacked and kidnapped but it beats the alternative of a watery grave. They probably have their hopes falsely up now when there is strong probability everyone on the flight is dead.

Posted by: Frank at March 13, 2014 12:16 PM (7Nabg)

508 cough ::in hanger:: Indonesia, China or Iran/Pakistan near sea.

They know, they just don't want to frighten us chickens.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 13, 2014 12:16 PM (baL2B)

509 Because the FAA figures you are going to be hyperventilating.... ie.... breathing OUT more oxygen than you are taking in on your initial breathes. Posted by: Clutch Cargo at March 13, 2014 04:05 PM (84gbM) listen you retards, I ain' your fuckin daddy and I ain't a fuckin flight surgeon, I am simply tellin' y'all what I done been readin'. here you go. her is why explosive decompression is a problem, it is not holdin' your breath and it is not hyperventilation it is physics and biology and maths: QUOTE FOLLOWS: One fact to keep in mind is that, with a rapid decompression to and above 30,000 feet, the average EPT/TUC will be reduced from 1/3 to 1/2 of its original value. This is due to a phenomenon known as reverse diffusion or fulminating hypoxia. This phenomenon is where oxygen, due to the rapid expansion of gas during a decompression, is forced from the lungs and creates a very acute hypoxia that is immediate. QUOTE ENDS http://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/airman_education/media/IntroAviationPhys.pdf see here page 3-4 so the previously discussed 30 to 60 seconds for time of useful consciousness may be reduced in an explosive decompression event and it is the gas being forced from your effin body whether you like it or not, sheesh.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:16 PM (rDidD)

510 If it was a hijacking, and they murdered all of the crew/passengers and they end up crashing it into a populated area killing many more, then what the fuck is there to say?

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 13, 2014 12:17 PM (ZshNr)

511 471 I've read a couple of folks floating the idea that it was possibly diverted to North Korea. *** North Korea was well out of fuel range. Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse +++++++ Maybe the flew the jet faster so they'd get there before they ran out of fuel...

Posted by: Countrysquire at March 13, 2014 12:18 PM (LSJmV)

512 and I'm making the point that its not the 2 or 3 Seconds as someone's post earlier said.... Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 04:10 yeah, but there is a difference in being of by a few seconds and in not even having an understanding of the concepts involved.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:18 PM (rDidD)

513 by the way, I wsa using retards in the affecionate sense, like I do with my mom dad, and sisters in church

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:19 PM (rDidD)

514 so the previously discussed 30 to 60 seconds for time of useful consciousness may be reduced in an explosive decompression event and it is the gas being forced from your effin body whether you like it or not, sheesh.

 

posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 04:16 PM (rDidD)

 

Thank you.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at March 13, 2014 12:19 PM (fwARV)

515 511 Maybe they refueled.

Posted by: Vladimir Putin at March 13, 2014 12:20 PM (bitz6)

516

I'm looking at the basics here.  At this point, there's absolutely no evidence that the plane has crashed.   I'm going with the  hijack theory until proven otherwise. 

 

Why?  Just because of the nature of the demographics of that area.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 12:20 PM (Wz9US)

517 Maybe the flew the jet faster so they'd get there before they ran out of fuel... Posted by: Countrysquire at March 13, 2014 04:18 PM (LSJmV) Your cabinet secretary nomination is in the mail.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 12:21 PM (659DL)

518 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Express_Flight_705 Luckily the flight crew was man enough to survive being bludgeoned and everything else to keep the plane aloft and to subdue their attacker. So the DC-10 did not crash. Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 13, 2014 04:14 PM (o9ypU) I saw a reenactment of that on some tv show. I was amazed that the men were able to land it after suffering skull fractures, and I was also amazed that I didn't remember that event happening. They had to put the huge plane into a very tight turn to land it.

Posted by: stace at March 13, 2014 12:21 PM (9PXzx)

519 My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing,

Condolences Fen,

It's pause-worthy to look around the boat and realize no one will see you if you get into trouble sometimes.  Slowed my yank the trolling motor up on a windy day a few times.

Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 12:21 PM (DL2i+)

520 A jet airliner, en route from Kuala Lumpur to Bejing on an uneventful night in the year 2014, but now reported overdue and missing, and by now searched for on land, sea, and air by anguished human beings fearful of what they'll find. But you and I know where she is, you and I know what's happened. So if some moment, any moment, you hear the sound of jet engines flying atop the overcast, engines that sound searching and lost, engines that sound desperate, shoot up a flare or do something. That would be MH 370 trying to get home from the Twilight Zone.

Posted by: Rod Serling at March 13, 2014 12:23 PM (aTXUx)

521 417 367 My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke


Very sorry for this, Fenelon.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 13, 2014 12:24 PM (baL2B)

522 cough ::in hanger:: Indonesia, China or Iran/Pakistan near sea.

They know, they just don't want to frighten us chickens.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 13, 2014 04:16 PM (baL2B)

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

And the passengers.  We know that jihadis don't care about that and would think nothing of killing them.  What evidence?  Flts. 93, 11, and 175, among others.

Posted by: Soona at March 13, 2014 12:25 PM (Wz9US)

523 I just can't see how one could pull off the theft of an airliner with everyone board--even with a locked cockpit door.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 12:27 PM (659DL)

524 417 367 My father disappeared in a remote area of Canada . He went out to go fishing, searches were made, no body was never recovered and he was declared legally dead years later. And I didn't really want to make it about that-only that i think I can relate to some of the feelings the survivors might have. Posted by: FenelonSpoke Sorry to hear this Fen. Not knowing just adds to the grief. Hope it helps to know that many others also understand.

Posted by: Jen at March 13, 2014 12:28 PM (JqB3t)

525 I just can't see how one could pull off the theft of an airliner with everyone board--even with a locked cockpit door.

The inside-the-plane part is the easy part as long as you've got the pilots on your side.

Posted by: Al at March 13, 2014 12:30 PM (9ynpo)

526 Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 04:16 PM (rDidD) Even 1/2 of 30 to 60 seconds is still 15 to 30 seconds, not the 2 to 3 seconds that brought this up in the first place... And that is only in the case of EXPOSIVE decompression as well.... and 15 to 30 seconds is plenty of time to get on an AUTOMATICALLY deployed Oxygen mask... Oh.... and that would have to be explosive decompression of the Cockpit... as the door between cabin and cockpit would alleviate some of the effects of explosive decompression from the rest of the plane... Add in that there is a pilot AND copilot??? Don't buy the scenario. But hey.... I'm apparently a RETARD.... /looks at the Mensa Cert in the closet.... laughs..

Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 12:30 PM (84gbM)

527 Now...I'm also of the opnion that if one were to go to all the trouble to do this, it would not be to fly the thing into a building.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 12:34 PM (659DL)

528 Now...I'm also of the opnion that if one were to go to all the trouble to do this, it would not be to fly the thing into a building. *** Why target one building when you can take out a metropolitan area?

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 12:35 PM (DmNpO)

529 Why target one building when you can take out a metropolitan area? Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 04:35 PM (DmNpO) One word: It's starts with the letter you think it does. I hope that I am just being crazy here.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 13, 2014 12:37 PM (659DL)

530 they said the same thing about the Air France crash but found it much later at a depth of about 13k feet Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 04:08 PM (DmNpO) AF 447 went down in a fairly "clean" area, not nearly as heavily trafficked by fishing boats and ferries that more often than most end up feeding the fish they're trying to catch. Throw in a lot of wartime planes and boats sitting on the bottom from WW II. The Brits and Aussies were busy fighting the Rising Sun there Doesn't make it harder to find something, it makes it harder for the shitload of something down there to be the tail section of a 777

Posted by: Rod Serling at March 13, 2014 12:37 PM (aTXUx)

531 Because these systems are also built with Identify Friend Foe in mind for wartime use.

And it's a transmitter so, off switch.
And it's a piece of electronics so, off switch.
And it could break and start smoking so, off switch.
etc... so, off switch.

Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 13, 2014 12:37 PM (DL2i+)

532
Late to thread.....

let me add to the tin foil....

Iranians now control this plane and has been squirrelled away on a remote south Pacific island.  Raw Plutonium or a Nuke is placed aboard.   All crew and passengers are killed.

A flight to LA is chosen at a later date.  That flight  will be hijacked and splashed in the middle of nowhere while the current missing plane with its payload will assume the flight plan of the newly downed plane.   Transponders have been reprogrammed to mimic that flight and the plane unsuspectingly enters LA airspace and..... well..... you all can finish the story.  BOOM.

Posted by: fixerupper at March 13, 2014 12:38 PM (nELVU)

533 Hope it helps to know that many others also understand. Thx, Jen. I appreciate the understanding. I've never actually known anyone who had a parent disappear, but I'm sure they're are a number of them. I was young. It's the people whose children disappear who have a wrenching heartache I can only imagine.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 12:42 PM (XyM/Y)

534 But hey.... I'm apparently a RETARD.... /looks at the Mensa Cert in the closet.... laughs.. Posted by: Romeo13 at March 13, 2014 well you do understand it is not a matter of holding your breath now, right? I explained waaaaaaaaaaaaaayu upthead it was not as simple as holding your breath. then we discussed why there would be a variance in time to unconsciousness based on altitude. so, you are right, my initial times were off, however, you lacked a basic understanding about the processes involved as well as the ability to grasp that someone might be giving you some useful information you might wish to consider even after providing a relevant document. by the way mensa, there is an L in explosive, just sayin.

Posted by: yankeefifth at March 13, 2014 12:49 PM (rDidD)

535 It appears that the US has reliable satellite data that puts the aircraft in the Indian Ocean.   They believe it went down.    The USS Kidd has been ordered to a new search area in the Indian Ocean by the US Navy.    I think this will pan out.     Still not a clue how they got into that part of the world.  

Posted by: Jprs at March 13, 2014 12:51 PM (YQ4mh)

536 Thanks, everybody. I really appreciate your concern. Now I feel embarrassed at making myself an object of attention. It's just that it's better to know what happened, rather than having years of never knowing and wondering. If you have a plane in the ocean, you know your loved ones are dead and you go through that journey of grief, but now they may be thinking "Maybe they're held by pirates. Maybe they'll come back." when it seems so unlikely they will. And some of the women who were waiting for their husbands to come back would be the age that my mother was who couldn't really talk about it to us because we were kids.. That's all

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 13, 2014 12:51 PM (XyM/Y)

537

I  originally  thought  the  co-pilot  would  be  the  rogue,  since  he  was  younger,  but  having  read  that  he  was  just  transitioning  to  777s,  I  vote  for  the  pilot  being  the  rogue ,  with  help  from  (Iranian)  conspirators  in  the  cabin  to  keep  the  passengers  in  line.  It  just  strikes  me  as  damned  odd  that  this  guy  had  his  own  simulator,  a  very  expensive  piece  of  equipment.  Was  he  spending  his  off-time  figuring  drag  and  fuel  consumption  at  low  altitude?  Did  he  wait  to  do  this  until  he  had  a  completely  inexperienced  777  pilot  in  the  other  seat?

Posted by: Tired Wench at March 13, 2014 12:51 PM (HGPVQ)

538 I originally thought the co-pilot would be the rogue, since he was younger, but having read that he was just transitioning to 777s, I vote for the pilot being the rogue , with help from (Iranian) conspirators in the cabin to keep the passengers in line. It just strikes me as damned odd that this guy had his own simulator, a very expensive piece of equipment. Was he spending his off-time figuring drag and fuel consumption at low altitude? Did he wait to do this until he had a completely inexperienced 777 pilot in the other seat? *** Perhaps the simulator was for training others.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 12:53 PM (DmNpO)

539 See Payne Stewart crash. Their cockpit froze up after decompression. Sudden. Slow. Regardless. I suspect same for 370. I'm sure a Lear jet in 99 has the o2 masks that would deploy. Apparently there are not seconds. Less than that. Maybe pilot cranked on autopilot knobs and sent it west while passing out. They'll find it. US knows where to look. Sad that one can tell where their teenager via GPS is but can't keep up with a 777 tho. I haven't been checked for Mensa BTW. Good possibility tho. God bless Fenelon Spoke.

Posted by: Golfman in NC at March 13, 2014 01:05 PM (/djtm)

540 So sorry, Fen. This whole plane episode must bring back a lot of hurt to your family. I imagine your mother never lost hope. She was lucky to have you.

Posted by: Chillin the most at March 13, 2014 01:14 PM (gxtMZ)

541

Yeah, Fenelon...this has got to be pure hell for the relatives of the passengers and crew.

 

The 'not knowing' is worse than knowing.

Because you have that little bit of hope to cling to, keeping you from starting to deal with the grief.

Sorry you had to go through that. 

Posted by: wheatie at March 13, 2014 01:17 PM (8quPO)

542 It's the people whose children disappear who have a wrenching heartache I can only imagine.
--

Just last night at church a woman was telling us about a friend who's 18 year old daughter just disappeared yesterday.  She took 3 items (clothing I think but I didn't hear that part) but left her cell phone on the bed.  They think she ran away but don't know for sure.

Also, I think often about Michelle Malkin's cousin (or was it neice) who disappeared a couple of years ago.  That must be very hard to deal with.

Posted by: Mayday at March 13, 2014 01:22 PM (eHc+1)

543 538 I originally thought the co-pilot would be the rogue, since he was younger, but having read that he was just transitioning to 777s, I vote for the pilot being the rogue , with help from (Iranian) conspirators in the cabin to keep the passengers in line. It just strikes me as damned odd that this guy had his own simulator, a very expensive piece of equipment. Was he spending his off-time figuring drag and fuel consumption at low altitude? Did he wait to do this until he had a completely inexperienced 777 pilot in the other seat?

***

Perhaps the simulator was for training others.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 13, 2014 04:53 PM (DmNpO)


It is pretty wild that Morons probably know more than the "experts." The Maylasian people seem to be running around in circles, as plane has been in several seas and gone west now east. Big things in ocean seen on Chinese radar are "nothing" just big things.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 13, 2014 01:47 PM (baL2B)

544 Here's what happened to the missing Air Mayonnaise flight:  As soon as the pilots entered Vietnam air space, they donned air masks and took the plane up at a steep, steep altitude and entered the Earth's stratosphere.  They then turned off the engines and floated around the Earth, praying to Allah all the while, until they were above Mecca.  Then they turned on the engines and began a steep, steep descent, burning up in the atmosphere.

Posted by: Cookie 915L48 at March 13, 2014 01:56 PM (yhJhK)

545 I farted and plane go boom.  So sorry.

Posted by: Achmed's Ghost at March 13, 2014 01:58 PM (yhJhK)

546 What if China deliberately shot it down to prevent an imminent attack?

Posted by: Walter Freeman at March 13, 2014 02:01 PM (kqGWM)

547 536 "Thanks, everybody. I really appreciate your concern. Now I feel embarrassed at making myself an object of attention. " No need to be embarrassed.

Posted by: Tuna at March 13, 2014 02:11 PM (M/TDA)

548 During explosive decompression, one does not want to hold one's breath. The pressure differential will blow your lungs up, if you could manage to hold it against the pain. Take an air compressor and try to pressure your lungs to even a couple of psi against ambient pressure. You'll do great injury to yourself.

Posted by: publius(NotBreitbartPublius) at March 13, 2014 10:14 PM (ClQSA)

549 I think it was a loss of pressurization that killed everyone instantly and the plane cruised on auto pilot for 4 hours which happened to be between transponder modes... they were in an area where vhf signals were weak, probably turned it off.

Posted by: dip it in cider at March 13, 2014 11:24 PM (IbpEC)

550 #128, we've been waiting for you, Mr. Lasky. We've been waiting for you a long time.

Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at March 15, 2014 01:17 PM (/I/Y7)

551 Latest report i just read was the aircraft flew for 6 hours after turning, and the malaysian government acknowledges it was a terrorist attack.

Posted by: ron n. at March 16, 2014 01:46 AM (c7HxG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
382kb generated in CPU 0.1765, elapsed 0.4549 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3534 seconds, 679 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.