October 18, 2010
— DrewM Endorsing liberal Democrats over honest to God war heroes wasn't exactly a winning plan. After much outrage the National Commander of the VFW has decided to withdraw the appointments of the PAC Board of Directors.
It is now evident to most of the VFW leadership, both National and especially the departments, that the VFW has been subjected to extreme negative publicity throughout the nation, and the recent endorsement decisions have, in fact, harmed the VFWÂ’ s reputation and future ability to fulfill our mission.I cannot let this erosion of public support for our great organization continue. The apparent lack of the committee to address these concerns will lead to a proposal by me, as Commander-in-Chief, to amend the by-laws at the 112th National Convention for the purpose of dissolving the PAC. Meanwhile, under the authority granted to me as Commander-in-Chief in section 619 of the VFW National By-Laws and under section 620 of the Manual of Procedure, I am withdrawing all PAC appointments effective October 15, 2010.
One vet that the VFW took a pass on endorsing and instead endorsed the non-vet Democrat is Iraq and USMC vet Nick Popaditch.
I'm not sure how close this race is (it's a Democratic district) but this year just about no Democrat is safe, so Be the Wave.
Posted by: DrewM at
11:09 AM
| Comments (61)
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: tarpon at October 18, 2010 11:12 AM (g0QB8)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 18, 2010 11:16 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 18, 2010 11:17 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: wooga at October 18, 2010 11:19 AM (2p0e3)
It just goes to show you: The Left Wing will infiltrate anywhere.
From the school committee to the CIA, the Left infiltrates and takes over and then destroys.
Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at October 18, 2010 11:20 AM (gM4zK)
Posted by: Soona at October 18, 2010 03:12 PM (HsoiQ)
Eh, he probably just realized they just sent their cash cow to the butcher, meaning no more calves and no more milk. And so he's trying to get it back before they kill it. I'm betting that this isn't the first year that the VFW has endorsed non-veteran Democrats over veteran Republicans. But everyone is looking and he's playing cleanup to save the organization.
Posted by: buzzion at October 18, 2010 11:22 AM (oVQFe)
Good job, VFW.
I've always been a Legion guy myself.
Posted by: trainer at October 18, 2010 11:22 AM (K5X44)
Posted by: John "magic hat" Kerry at October 18, 2010 11:22 AM (deaHT)
Posted by: maddogg at October 18, 2010 11:23 AM (OlN4e)
Ludmilla Muchobezerkski's secret to winning the AK election:
Whale blubber.
HotAir
No wonder Liza Porkfortsky isn't losing graciously. I'm sure there's a very large lump of blubber waiting for her at the end of that rainbow.
Posted by: Soona at October 18, 2010 11:23 AM (HsoiQ)
Posted by: Aqua Buddha at October 18, 2010 11:27 AM (pV1Y8)
My father, a long-time Donk, is voting for Popaditch. All you morons in the CA-51 should vote for him too. Be sure and vote like a Democrat (early and often).
Posted by: John P. Squibob at October 18, 2010 11:32 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: john F'kin Kerry at October 18, 2010 11:41 AM (TgXns)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at October 18, 2010 11:44 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Lou at October 18, 2010 11:44 AM (Cblyc)
To add, it's in my home town 2 hr. east of San Diego. The local paper is very left wing and the debate might not get much play time in the San Diego paper.
Also the east end of this district is Imperial County, which has the highest unemployment rate in the country. The field workers have become smarter; instead of following the crops around the state they pull unemployment checks till the season returns.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at October 18, 2010 11:44 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Babs Boxer at October 18, 2010 11:46 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at October 18, 2010 11:53 AM (to9Cz)
Yes. They were all VFW members, appointed by the CiC of the VFW.
http://www.vfwpac.org/bdofdir.html
Posted by: Y-not at October 18, 2010 11:57 AM (osFsP)
Question for the regulars here at AoS:
Let's say there was a primary situation where you have two Republicans running for the nomination in a congressional race. One is very conservative right down the line, knows his business, etc. etc. but is not a veteran. The other is a veteran who is not as conservative. The district itself is a conservative leaning district where either one would be pretty sure to go on and win the general, so there's no real question of "electability."
Which would you support?
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at October 18, 2010 11:59 AM (+tRwn)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at October 18, 2010 12:02 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: trainer at October 18, 2010 12:02 PM (K5X44)
The conservative. Not that it matters, as the VFW is in hot water for backing non-vet, non-conservative Dems.
Posted by: Methos at October 18, 2010 12:03 PM (Ew1k4)
It was a buyoff, pure and simple. A "certain class" of veterans are for sale, cheap. They were a major factor in Germany and Russia in 1917, and we're not immune.
Now to be even with the board, VFW ought to PAC some cash to all the wronged opponent candidates. Then they'd earn some serious respect.
I had heard Popaditch was a good guy, but I hadn't seen him before this. That "Hathaway shirt" he's wearing just earned him 50 bucks from my personal PAC. I'm a longtime fan of Hathaway shirt guys. Kids, look it up.
Also, a Marine put an AFA clip in his ad...now there is a man who plays well with others.
Posted by: comatus at October 18, 2010 12:04 PM (hrwMe)
Posted by: Gerber Baby Food at October 18, 2010 12:04 PM (BP6Z1)
The VFW needs to get out and tell the media why they dissolved their PAC: why the canidates endorsed were not worthy of endorsement...then I might respect them again (although I'll always go to the local hall for cheap beer and excellent conversation).
This was bullshit.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 18, 2010 12:14 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Kemp at October 18, 2010 12:21 PM (AQxTm)
The conservative non-vet. Problem was, the VFW PAC endorsed candidates who were neither conservative nor veterans, when there were candidates available for endorsement who would have filled the bill quite nicely. I expect this kind of thing from industry PACs; from a group of war veterans, not so much.
Posted by: antisocialist at October 18, 2010 01:07 PM (Rwudm)
The more conservative of the two.
Posted by: Deety at October 18, 2010 01:12 PM (Jb3+B)
Posted by: Jack Murtha, from the great beyond at October 18, 2010 01:14 PM (BP6Z1)
Ahem.
Posted by: Peter DeFazio (D, OR-4) at October 18, 2010 01:17 PM (Id5+U)
I will not support a Vet, just because they are a Vet... I knew WAY too many idiots during my Navy Carreer...
Case in point, John Kerry... (did not know him, just using him as an example that Military life does not make you smart)...
However, if the two candidates were about equal??? Then their Service would Tip the Scale for me.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 18, 2010 01:18 PM (AdK6a)
Posted by: jules at October 18, 2010 01:56 PM (NLUwe)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at October 18, 2010 02:33 PM (K03lE)
Posted by: Chris R at October 18, 2010 02:47 PM (AO4qz)
Posted by: Chris R
So is Tom Perriello in Va 5th.
Posted by: MrCaniac at October 18, 2010 02:54 PM (aaULJ)
This whole thing really gave me a case of the ass.
If it was the intention of the douche bags on the VFW PAC to drive a spike through the heart of the VFW, congratulations; mission accomplished.
And the stupid geezers running the VFW didn't do a damn thing about it until veterans and veteran blogs started making a big deal about it.
This organization was having a hard enough time recruiting from the returning vets of our nation's wars without this idiocy. Now they can kiss my ass. I will actively discourage my fellow vets from joining or in any way supporting this group.
Posted by: Swede at October 18, 2010 02:56 PM (492cu)
Posted by: Retired GYSGT, USMC at October 18, 2010 03:51 PM (/STNv)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at October 18, 2010 03:32 PM (/U/Mr)
Hell, I made my mind up the minute I found out he was running. I've convinced my mom and dad (a retired Jarhead himself) to vote for him- not difficult, since we all know what a sleazy cumbucket Filner is- and I've talked to a few of my neighbors about Popaditch.
Posted by: Bill H at October 18, 2010 03:59 PM (q8CmE)
Posted by: Peaches at October 18, 2010 05:53 PM (zxpIo)
The American Moshe Dyan...??
An American Congress with a plurality of Veterans...??... !! Cool! Senate cloakroom replaced with a dueling chamber..!! I wantz haz some of dat.
Posted by: chuck in st paul at October 18, 2010 05:58 PM (adr25)
The candidates the PAC endorsed in WA, that I disapproved of, were Norm Dicks, Rick Larsen, Patty Murray and, wait for it... "Baghdad Jim" McDermott. No way, no how, should those people be endorsed by a veteran's PAC. The email I received in response to my, ugh, intemperate, emails to State and National lead me to believe that they felt betrayed by the PAC as well. I do not want to leave the VFW, and I hope that it can be salvaged. Unfortunately, as the baby boomers gain control, things seem to always go downhill. In my opinion.
Posted by: Big Mo at October 18, 2010 08:52 PM (s6lRw)
Posted by: African Mango Extract at March 03, 2011 10:57 PM (LTLy7)
Posted by: ray ban sale at July 03, 2011 06:24 PM (5sw71)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2509 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Dick Blumenthal at October 18, 2010 11:10 AM (6uiF7)