April 14, 2010
— Open Blogger The latest video in my popular "Let's Make Lefty Heads Explode" series with near interchangeable clips of Obama and Bush talking about the threat of nuclear terrorism. Meet the new boss, moonbats:
More background at Perfunction, including this convoluted bit of logic:
The official said one likely motivation for the administration's new emphasis on preventing nuclear terrorism is to further the president's goal of eliminating nuclear weapons. While the U.S. nuclear arsenal would be useful in retaliating against a sovereign state, it would be less so against a terrorist group. But if the latter is the world's major nuclear threat, the official explained, then the U.S. giving up its weapons seems less risky.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
01:32 PM
| Comments (54)
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 14, 2010 01:36 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Liberal Twit at April 14, 2010 01:36 PM (G60Nl)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 14, 2010 01:38 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: Gerbille Mal and Malorer at April 14, 2010 01:40 PM (dP6Ky)
Where ya storin' all this spent fuel ya bringin' in there Obama?
(o/t wondering if the birther LTC will have standing to see the indonesian's birth certificate. His defence can use the Kenyan saying he was born there too.)
Posted by: dagny at April 14, 2010 01:41 PM (2gNDi)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 14, 2010 01:42 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 14, 2010 01:42 PM (xGIqT)
Don't forget your potassium iodine tablets, buy enough for the family! And you can't have enough ammo and canned food!
Plus... G. Gordon Liddy says "buy gold."
Posted by: shibumi at April 14, 2010 01:43 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff is hung like David Carradine at April 14, 2010 01:45 PM (xGIqT)
Posted by: Mindy at April 14, 2010 01:47 PM (6Musc)
Michelle Obama met Margarita Zavala, the wife of President Felipe Calderon on Wednesday in her first solo trip as she sought to trumpet close ties between the neighboring countries as they try to fight trade and boost violent drug cartels.
FIFY
Posted by: 86 proofed reader at April 14, 2010 01:51 PM (Oxen1)
Meanwhile back on Earth...Russia is Russia, China is China, India is India, POKEESTAHN is POKEESTAHN, Israel is Israel, Iran is Iran, North Korea is the Worker's paradise, the UK is the UK and France is ready to quote Chuck Heston over their nukes.
Reality. It's what's for dinner.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 14, 2010 01:54 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: dagny's naive sister at April 14, 2010 01:54 PM (2gNDi)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at April 14, 2010 01:55 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Gabriel Syme at April 14, 2010 02:01 PM (X2xSP)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 14, 2010 02:03 PM (w41GQ)
Also, apologies for dumping this here, but I thought some Morons would like to see it. It's something I wrote over at "The Anchoress" in a Palin thread. Lemmee know what you think. I'll check it later. Yes it's O/T. Sorry.
-----------------------------------
The dynamics of excitement and angst regarding Palin (on the right) is not about people refusing to see her flaws. Nor is it simply showcased by Palin supporters striking back at those who "merely point them out."
Those cliches were worn out last year.
A common feature of the same, repeated "honest criticisms" of Palin is the (usually implied) THEREFORE. As in, therefore she should not run. Or, therefore she will not win. Or, therefore she is incapable. Some of the less egregious therefore's are mere spin. The worst are cynical (and poorly hidden) attempts at political sabotage. None address the obvious difficulty they are charged to overcome: Palin says what her supporters want to hear. This is a fact that matters.
Meanwhile we are to believe all of the other potential candidates, *and* their flaws, are somehow ...more acceptable. The additional magic is that these "acceptably" flawed candidates are deemed acceptable without having to match Palin's positions on the issues. They match "close enough," we are often told, despite the evidence that Palin's positions are the ones for which her massive base clamors.
Being dismissive of the obvious frustration in her supporters over the bizarre standard of perfection (that Palin is expected to exemplify) is pointless (where it is not carried to the extreme of childishness). It is exactly why the occasional honest querent can feel as though he's stumbled into a maelstrom.
But let's be realistic: few commenters, and even fewer "pundits" are truly unaware of the groundswell of support for Palin, and fewer still are as ignorant of it--especially the "why"--as the critics often pretend to be. (I'll grant that among those feigning ignorance may be found the truly ignorant. I'm not addressing the truly ignorant, here.)
Palin detractors on the right who wish to make a lasting impression need to get past the fact that Palin supporters are serious, and have studied the issues.
Make a genuine case, if you can. It shouldn't be that difficult. Bad faith accusations of "blind loyalty" don't sell. Do something original. For example, building a case around the Couric interview is as silly as dealing with the occasional Obama supporter who wants to tell you about his time on the Law Review.
Show us why Palin's time on the Oil and Gas commission didn't really give her any relevant experience.
Show us why her resignation as Governor is a problem. Just stating it carries no weight. Her supporters all know the reason why she made that choice. Count on it.
Show us why she is capable of generating such a groundswell now, but somehow won't be able to "when it counts." And don't forget how badly Reagan was dismissed by the media, by the youth, by the "intelligentsia", and by the pundits.
Bring something into the game besides ordinary doubt. Outside of a courtroom, doubt is a very weak weapon.
Posted by: K~Bob at April 14, 2010 02:03 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 14, 2010 02:13 PM (yfJ6g)
In his mind, "even the playing field". It's not fair that the US has nukes and advanced weapon and defense technologies!
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 14, 2010 02:18 PM (c0A3e)
Allah bless Obama! Piss be upon him! This nuclear summit was a SUCCESS!
Posted by: Drillanwr at April 14, 2010 02:22 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Walt Kowalski at April 14, 2010 02:26 PM (nSkOL)
Which means Obama either doesn't believe in what he's saying, or he's going about solving this in a really lousy way.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 14, 2010 02:28 PM (yfJ6g)
Hey, how about if, in accordance with Sarah Palin's ditzy way of thinking, Michelle Obama could get together with the wives of all of the leaders of other countries, and then all of those gossipy women could decide and agree among themselves the best ways that they could nag their husbands to solve the world's problems as only women can solve problems? It could happen under this ditzy administration of girlie men and officious women.
And just think how much Sarah Palin's cutesy input would contribute to those discussions. Whoa, now there's a nightmarish scenario. (shudder)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 02:32 PM (ITzbJ)
Sweet holy Hiroshima, and they called that last president guy a verbal idiot. What kind of grammatical chainsaw would it take to cut through that thicket of ad lib retardation?
Johannesburg? You're grasping around for a city at risk for nuke attacks, and the best your geographic synapses can conjure is Jo-fucking-hannesburg? Never mind New Delhi or Jerusalem, let's be on the lookout for those racist Teabagger terrorists plotting to vaporize Nelson Mandela. Jesus Christ, this idiot either (a) learned everything he knows about geopolitics at an 1983 anti-apartheid drum circle, or (b) rented "District 9" last night.
Posted by: iowahawk at April 14, 2010 02:33 PM (veL4N)
I never in a million years dreamed I'd miss W the way I do. At least the guy worked to keep us safe, and didn't bow to dictators and our enemies, and insult our allies.
2012 can't get here soon enough.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at April 14, 2010 02:38 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: iowahawk
LMFAO! Priceless!
Posted by: Drillanwr at April 14, 2010 02:47 PM (GkYyh)
Almost responded with some pissed off comments since I was being snarky to begin with, until I remembered the name. Well played sir.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 14, 2010 02:49 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: Mindy at April 14, 2010 02:51 PM (6Musc)
Posted by: Mindy at April 14, 2010 06:51 PM (6Musc)
Hate to disappoint, but I'm Jim from Wichita Kansas. I have used Samuel Adams for quite some time since I am a true believer that Sam Adams beer is the best beer brewed here in the United States. Sorry, but hey, I am a twice honorably discharged veteran and was a cop for 10 years if that hypes up my stock any.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 14, 2010 03:16 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 07:08 PM (ITzbJ
WTF are you going on about?
Do you have something to contribute here?
Just wondering...
Posted by: HH at April 14, 2010 03:17 PM (GkYyh)
Peek-a-boo, Janey. I see you!
Oley, oley, olsen free, come out, come out from wherever you are? LOL
(Janey Duh is fuming, wondering which would be more effective, to say "Duh" or "Huh")
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 03:24 PM (ITzbJ)
I am a true believer that Sam Adams beer is the best beer brewed here in the United States.
Well, that Cream Stout can certainly give any beer I know of a run for it's money. And this is from someone who has a damn good brewery right here in Kansas City. Boulevard Brewing Company, Them boys make some fine, fine beer.
Posted by: HH at April 14, 2010 03:26 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: bulwark at April 14, 2010 03:28 PM (PO/9k)
I'm a little confused is" Dianne" trapped inside Brian's body screaming to get out or is it the other way around?
Posted by: bulwark at April 14, 2010 07:28 PM (PO/9k)
LOL - How lame. Is that the best that you've got?
What am I saying???? Of course that's the best that the diummy's got. LOL
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 03:33 PM (ITzbJ)
I like Boulevard. But they need to quit hyping their wheat beer because it really sucks. Oh, and I predict the Royals to go 65-97 this year due to their fucked up bullpen. I will admit that I loved watching Billy Butler hit when he was here in Wichita three years ago.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 14, 2010 03:36 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: bulwark at April 14, 2010 03:36 PM (PO/9k)
What am I saying????
Ya'know, we were wondering that ourselves.
Pray continue.Without the er, LOL stuff. Just sort of makes you look lame.
But really, carry on...
Posted by: HH at April 14, 2010 03:37 PM (GkYyh)
WOW!!!!! AWESOME!!!!!! Such snappy come-backs! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(Psssssst, this must be what it's like to take candy from babies, or to roll drunks.)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 03:48 PM (ITzbJ)
I like Boulevard. But they need to quit hyping their wheat beer because it really sucks
Actually, it's the only beer of theirs' I've never tried. Weird thing is, outside of any sort of concert or somesuch, Boulevard does no advertising that I'm aware of.
Go figure.
Posted by: HH at April 14, 2010 03:51 PM (GkYyh)
(Psssssst, this must be what it's like to take candy from babies, or to roll drunks.)
Heh....Keep going...
We are sure you all will get to a point. Us slow people are just waiting...
Posted by: HH at April 14, 2010 03:57 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: bulwark at April 14, 2010 03:58 PM (PO/9k)
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 04:00 PM (ITzbJ)
Awesome,snappy and Pssssst used together in the same post just screams I'm gay.
I gave you a break about the all caps because being gay and retarded must be tough on you.
Posted by: bulwark at April 14, 2010 07:58 PM (PO/9k)
Tsk, tsk, tsk, temper, temper. You just blew your cool, goofy. LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 14, 2010 04:03 PM (ITzbJ)
To those questioning the Johannesburg ref:
The guy up on stage with Toonces is South African President Jacob Zuma. It's customary to include his country in a talk on destruction if he's sitting right there.
Unless it's Bibi, but that's just how Toonces rolls.
Posted by: The Q at April 14, 2010 04:29 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: Mindy at April 14, 2010 05:11 PM (rrgzr)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2144 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 14, 2010 01:36 PM (nxUYP)