March 11, 2010
— Ace Is this a surrender? Is this now officially just playing to the leftist base?
Because with 25+ Democrats saying they'll vote No, plus Stupak's 12 or so... right there I think the bill fails, narrowly.
A top House Democrat says the leadership may be able to pass President Barack Obama's health care overhaul without resolving a dispute over abortion.Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman said Thursday that the leadership will try to secure the necessary 216 votes to pass the bill without reworking the divisive abortion provision.
Waxman says many of the pro-life Democrats will vote for the bill anyway.
But why would they? Not only is it unpopular, but the left is telling them "We'll appease our base in our safe districts, you slit your own throats in order to compromise your principles." The personal reaction there has to be a two-word dismissal.
Meanwhile, the co-chair of the progressive caucus says Obama isn't changing many -- or any -- minds or votes, and a top Obama 2008 campaign aide says Democrats could get "slaughtered" in November -- courtesy of the Democrats' easy-peasy-lemon-squeezey attitude towards corruption:
"I think that there is a real shot we are going to get slaughtered in elections this fall if we aren't leading the efforts to reform Washington," Steve Hildebrand, Obama's deputy national campaign director in 2008, told CNN. "We campaigned in '06 and '08, and if voters don't see that change, we haven't lived up to that promise."
Posted by: Ace at
09:54 AM
| Comments (78)
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: conscious and refusing to look at his face at March 11, 2010 09:57 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Vic at March 11, 2010 09:57 AM (QrA9E)
D principle #1: Because fuck you, that's why.
Posted by: oblig. at March 11, 2010 09:58 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Mjim at March 11, 2010 09:58 AM (mMdWG)
Posted by: Robin at March 11, 2010 09:59 AM (6uXZa)
Posted by: jewells at March 11, 2010 09:59 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: dagny at March 11, 2010 09:59 AM (ALoxL)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 11, 2010 10:00 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Brian O'Connor at March 11, 2010 10:00 AM (Mcny5)
They ain't got the guts. Plus they ain't got the votes or they would have already done it a long time ago.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at March 11, 2010 10:00 AM (JSetw)
Posted by: Fritz at March 11, 2010 10:00 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: joncelli at March 11, 2010 10:01 AM (RD7QR)
I think what Waxman is hoping for is that the pressure of actually having to be seen voting as the seconds tick down may lead to wavering Dems to wilt and side with the "yea" tally, realizing that it's for real and for keeps, and none of this "well, let the Senate deal with it now" silliness..
But, I have a feeling if that were the case, you will have a revival of the GOPers taunting the Dems who voted with Clinton with the "Goodbye" chorus.
Posted by: eddiebear at March 11, 2010 10:01 AM (wnU1W)
My nostrils are watching you! http://tinypic.com/r/2mnoetx/5
Posted by: conscious and refusing to look at his face at March 11, 2010 10:02 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Joffen at March 11, 2010 10:04 AM (Zo5Ek)
Posted by: Darth Henry at March 11, 2010 10:04 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Fritz at March 11, 2010 02:00 PM (GwPRU)
We believe have the hard drive space to hold that video.
Posted by: Google Server Farm at March 11, 2010 10:05 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 11, 2010 10:06 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Slasher Flick Fan at March 11, 2010 10:06 AM (mfpU1)
Posted by: dagny at March 11, 2010 10:06 AM (ALoxL)
"Lived up to our promises"? Whoa, I needed that laugh. Sort of like 'the check is in the mail' promise, or the "I won't ____ in your mouth' promise?
Yeah, like those sorts of promises.
Posted by: 141 Driver at March 11, 2010 10:08 AM (LEynS)
I'm starting to feel scared of falling asleep.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 11, 2010 10:08 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Ira at March 11, 2010 10:09 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Antimatter at March 11, 2010 10:10 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: sixpckr at March 11, 2010 10:11 AM (Aw7Iv)
No shit Sherlock. What was your first clue? And passing a bill detested by most of the public is going to endear your candidates as well?
Come on November!
Posted by: GarandFan at March 11, 2010 10:12 AM (6mwMs)
How? Pelosi is sort of stuck on buying votes. She has no leverage. All she has is "trust me. I'll get what you want in the Senate reconciliation process." Only problem there is, the Senate doesn't give a dick about what Pelosi promises. They can burn her as fast as Senator Nelson burned everyone in Nebraska and he was securing money for Nebraskans.
The as is bill is dead in my view. These House members would have to be complete idiots to put their faith in 28% approval rating Pelosi. She can't guarantee any members any deals. That's why Stupak is saying no to a sidecar bill. He knows the Senate will just screw him.
Posted by: wtfci at March 11, 2010 10:12 AM (+zo63)
Posted by: Darth Henry at March 11, 2010 10:13 AM (RD7QR)
we are going to get slaughtered in elections this fall if we aren't leading the efforts to reform Washington," Steve Hildebrand, Obama's deputy national campaign director in 2008, told CNN
This guy obviously LIKES the chicken.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 11, 2010 10:14 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: dagny at March 11, 2010 10:16 AM (ALoxL)
Posted by: rightzilla at March 11, 2010 10:16 AM (rVJH4)
Posted by: A. Skywalker at March 11, 2010 10:17 AM (mfpU1)
Posted by: L. Skywalker at March 11, 2010 10:18 AM (mfpU1)
This may be the "exit" strategy.
Obama: America wants an up down vote.
Waxman: We'll vote without Stupak.
Vote taken.
Vote fails.
Dems say "well we tried" to appease base.
Political narrative moves on to amnesty and "cap and tax".
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 11, 2010 10:19 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: SaintGeorgeGentile at March 11, 2010 10:20 AM (xbXz6)
You've watched horror. You can't be guaranteed the monster doesn't get back up. If the credits roll, you might have a shot till the sequel, and make no mistake, as popular as this is to the left, we'll see many more installments.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 11, 2010 10:22 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: mpfs at March 11, 2010 10:22 AM (iYbLN)
I expect to nearly have a heart attack while the vote is in progress of course.
Posted by: Mord at March 11, 2010 10:25 AM (tTj19)
Vote taken.
Vote fails.
Dems say "well we tried" to appease base.
Political narrative moves on to amnesty and "cap and tax".
Oh, that would be a dream come true. Let man-made climate change be debunked for the fraud that it is, and let the GOP purge itself of the Hispandering romantic fools and shorsighted greedheads.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 11, 2010 10:29 AM (ujg0T)
Still, I don't know what to think about the abortion thing. They can't change the language now or add anything to the senate bill. I don't even know what the negotiations around that have to do with this bill.
I don't believe that the democrats with Stupak actually have abortion convictions. They just want money.
If Nancy could make them happy with anti abortion funding language then why isn't she? The feds paying to kill babies is more important to her than this bill?
With no bill she doesn't get to kill anybody?
Something is wrong here.
Posted by: dagny at March 11, 2010 10:32 AM (ALoxL)
Note that this doesn't have to be in the form of legislation; she could easily promise them nice cushy lobbying jobs to induce them to fall on their swords. You think these guys would turn down "analyst" jobs with MSDNC, especially when they get to have their name on Teh Most Historic Legislation Evar!!! ?
God I hope I'm wrong.
Posted by: bullfrog at March 11, 2010 10:36 AM (g+3Ca)
Posted by: steve at March 11, 2010 10:39 AM (2iVD6)
Enough gum-flapping. . .let's have the vote then.
Methinks the fact that Pelosi hasn't called for a vote yet is by itself pretty strong evidence that Waxman's bluff calling isn't going anywhere.
Posted by: looking closely at March 11, 2010 10:43 AM (PwGfd)
Suck it, winger. I can't sleep with those two hair-lined conch shells wheezing away all night next to me, so look for sympathy somewhere else.
Posted by: Mrs. Waxman at March 11, 2010 10:48 AM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Mrs. Waxman at March 11, 2010 02:48 PM (gQ+XA)
So, your wife has a beard too?
Posted by: The Former Rep Masaa at March 11, 2010 10:51 AM (rVJH4)
Pukelosi can't & won't call a vote until the reconciliation bill language is a fait accompli. That bill then spends as much as 48 hrs in some of the committees before it can be sent to the House & Senate for a vote. JMO, but some of the supposed hold-outs in the House are probably waiting to find out the specific language & CBO analysis of the reconciliation bill before they commit.
Honestly, they've probably already decided how they will vote. They're just looking for cover for that vote. I don't trust anything I'm hearing, right now. They've already pulled way more crap than I thought they would, and I'm cynical as hell about any of them. I won't believe this shit is dead until it is pierced thru the heart & burned at the stake.
Posted by: Steph at March 11, 2010 10:54 AM (riZEn)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at March 11, 2010 11:03 AM (xS3fe)
Posted by: Warden at March 11, 2010 11:24 AM (QoR4a)
Posted by: stuiec at March 11, 2010 11:27 AM (GU29T)
I'm really disappointed in all of you, criticizing the poor man's nose like that.
.
Especially since his ears are the size of dinner plates and his buckers put Bugs Bunny to shame.
low hanging fruit (oh wait, we're not talking about Barney)
Posted by: s'moron at March 11, 2010 11:31 AM (UaxA0)
This thing is the political equivalent of Norman Bate's mother.
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at March 11, 2010 11:36 AM (yIZJ3)
Posted by: Kristi at March 11, 2010 02:08 PM (7GgDy)
They hate you, so it works out.
Posted by: Darth Henry at March 11, 2010 02:13 PM (RD7QR)
HAHAHAHAA! Thanks.. needed that laugh!
Posted by: Kristi at March 11, 2010 12:24 PM (7GgDy)
skechers shape ups shoes under sales promotion, all the shape up shoes are sold nearly at its cost and free shipping. It is really high quality and cheap. china mlb jerseys china mlb jerseys
Posted by: shape ups shoes at March 11, 2010 04:51 PM (Phozt)
Posted by: taoruankeji at August 11, 2010 05:50 PM (MQ8Pt)
Posted by: Vizyon at August 16, 2010 05:58 AM (IonQJ)
Posted by: ¥ë¥¤ ¥ô¥£¥È¥ó at September 20, 2010 04:57 PM (xVUdb)
Posted by: laptop battery at September 27, 2010 12:59 AM (wJYAd)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2369 seconds, 206 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Do it, bitches!
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 11, 2010 09:55 AM (z37MR)