March 18, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Now let's talk about useful whip counts and whip counts that, well, aren't. The Hill's whip count, which is tracking in terms of "firm", "leaning", and "likely" votes, is useful. It lists which member goes in which group and why. FireDogLake's whip count, which most closely matches my own in the totals if not all the placements, has a helpful table to track votes.
By contrast, Fox News' whip count has nothing except the score, which it thinks as of this writing is 214-217. There is no explanation of how they got that number or why. Now, that's about as useful as a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest. It does nothing but encourage folks to DON'T JUST STAND THERE, PANIC!
For the record, none of the people tracking votes on this bill have it as close as 214-217. Except Fox News. Now, maybe Fox has info the rest of us don't, but I rather suspect they're busy making news instead of reporting it. Please don't declare defeat prematurely. There was some wailing and gnashing of teeth earlier today, but no one is ready to call it quits. Pelosi doesn't have it yet. We'd know if she did.
That said, there were some big changes today, so on with the whip count:
Pelosi picked up four votes from Betsy Markey, Bart Gordon, Luis Gutierrez, and Solomon Ortiz. Markey and Gordon had been "maybes." Gutierrez is the fellow who made the bizarre switch from "yes" to "pass my immigration bill and we'll talk." Well, today the President announced that he supported Gutierrez's immigration reform framework and Gutierrez promptly switched back to "yes." The other sponsor on the immigration reform bill was Solomon Ortiz, who was thought to be a "maybe", but who can securely be put in the "Voting Yes" group.
Three congresscreeps came out of that group, however, when Dina Titus, Mike Capuano, and John Tierney announced that they are now undecided. Let's not be fooled. I think they're looking for a payoff of some kind and will switch back, but for now they're something for Pelosi to worry about and I'm putting them in the maybe group.
Another possible "yes" to "undecided" is Bobby Rush, but this is so transparently a request for a bribe, that I'm not moving him. I know I said I'd go by their public statements, but his "I'm still thinking about it" claim is inherently unbelievable.
The big surprise of the day was this morning's announcement from Steve Lynch on local radio that he will vote against the bill. Everyone thought he was a "yes" so that pulls another from Pelosi's total, which means her score for the day is a wash. She picked up four and lost four. Unless you're prone to jumpiness around sudden movement, today's events shouldn't have set you off.
Finally, Travis Childers, comes out of the "maybe" crowd and goes to the "Not No Way" group.
And, as ever, the group of timid "maybes" telling their constituents by phone that they will vote no, but not announcing to the media, includes Lincoln Davis and Harry Teague. Davis, Teague, and John Boccieri are expected to announce their position on Friday. Actually, Teague said he'd decide today (Thursday), but his announcement was that he was still thinking about it.
All told, Pelosi has 192 "definitely voting yes." This leaves her 24 votes shy of the necessary 216. There are 28 maybes, 13 who voted "no" on the November House bill.
Thanks to David, Jack, Myryea, Lawrence, Paul, enoxo, Josh and Nick. The categories and names are below the fold:
No Pretty Much Means No:
There are twenty-one "No" Democrats in November who still make noises that sound like "no". This group goes in the Definitely Not, Not No Way, Not No How category, having announced that they oppose the bill.
John Adler (NJ-3), Dan Boren (OK-2), Bobby Bright (AL-2), Ben Chandler (KY-6), Travis Childers (MS-1), Artur Davis (AL-7), Chet Edwards (TX-17), Tim Holden (PA-17), Larry Kissell (NC-8 ), Suzanne Kosmas (FL-24), Frank Kratovil (MD-1), Jim Marshall (GA-8 ), Mike McIntyre (NC-7), Mike McMahon (NY-13), Charlie Melancon (LA-3), Walt Minnick (ID-1), Collin Peterson (MN-7), Mike Ross (AR-7), Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD-All), Ike Skelton (MO-4), Gene Taylor (MS-4).
Wont Vote For A Bill That Kills Babies:
Then there are Stupak's Dozen Eleven. These are "yes" votes in November that are now "no" votes because of the Senate abortion funding. The confirmed members are: Bart Stupak (MI-1), Marion Berry (AR-1), Joe Cao (LA-2, Republican), Jerry Costello (IL-12), Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-3), Joe Donnelly (IN-2), Steve Driehaus (OH-1), Brad Ellsworth (IN-8 ), Dan Lipinski (IL-3). The conjectured final members include Henry Cuellar (TX-28 ), Marcy Kaptur (OH-9).
It's An Election Year:
Then there's the other "yes" votes who have publicly switched: Mike Arcuri (NY-24) and Chris Carney (PA-10).
Maybe:
That leaves the maybes. There are now fifteen who voted "yes" the first time, but have refused to commit to voting the same way this time:
Sanford Bishop (GA-2), Tim Bishop (NY-1), Mike Capuano (MA-8 ), Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8 ), Bill Foster (IL-14), Baron Hill (IN-9), Paul Kanjorski (PA-11), Alan Mollohan (WV-1), Bill Owens (NY-23), Tom Perriello (VA-5), Earl Pomeroy (ND-All), Nick Rahall (WV-3), Zack Space (OH-18 ), John Tierney (MA-6), Dina Titus (NV-3).
And there are thirteen left who voted "no" the first time who could be victims of Rahm-in-the-lockerroom-with-the-lead-pipe bullying or Cornhusker Compromise bribery because they haven't declared yet what they plan to do:
Jason Altmire (PA-4), Brian Baird (WA-3), John Barrow (GA-12), John Boccieri (OH-16), Rick Boucher (VA-9), Allen Boyd (FL-2), Lincoln Davis (TN-4), Jim Matheson (UT-2), Scott Murphy (NY-20), Glenn Nye (VA-2), Heath Shuler (NC-11), John Tanner (TN-8 ), Harry Teague (NM-2).
So Pelosi needs 24 out of 28 maybes to break her way.
NOTE: If you think I've got one of these guys in the wrong group and have a public statement from the Congresscritter demonstrating it email me at [gabriel.malor at gmail] and I will update the count.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
08:37 PM
| Comments (255)
Post contains 1008 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Benson at March 18, 2010 09:03 PM (qzcNU)
But if it's defeated I'll gladly put up with it.
Posted by: Lone Marauder at March 18, 2010 09:09 PM (/bVuS)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 18, 2010 09:16 PM (hpWYW)
Posted by: Benson at March 18, 2010 09:17 PM (qzcNU)
Posted by: Purity Of Essence at March 18, 2010 09:17 PM (P1vpT)
Thanks for keeping up with this, Gabe. We come for the "accidental" busty lesbian pron, but we stay for the mind-numbing detailed analysis.
I also want to say that I think Boehner in a released statement is wrong in one respect. Pelosi is willing to bluff here. She has nothing to lose and I can't imagine another Obama deadline. The old rules don't apply. If she schedules a vote, she still may be several votes shy. Remember Marjorie Margolis-Mezvinsky in 1993. They did not have her vote and had to hold the vote for an hour to get it.
Also big news, after "reconsidering" the bill at the request of the president, Cao is a definite no. In the real world, that's a huge rebuke and the president would be diminished by this. In the bizarro world of our media, it's completely ignored.
Cao's citing abortion, but that's his fig leaf. The whole thing stinks from the head on down and he doesn't want a part of it anymore.
That means our post-partisan president doesn't even have the veneer of bipartisanship here. I think that's some cover that the Dems were hoping for.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2010 09:21 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at March 18, 2010 09:22 PM (/bVuS)
I was referring to Bill Schulz not as an individual person but as a gender. A third-way, if you will. You would've known this gender as "sequential hermaphrodite" back then.
Posted by: Benson at March 18, 2010 09:23 PM (qzcNU)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at March 18, 2010 09:24 PM (/bVuS)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 18, 2010 09:25 PM (9IdlD)
Posted by: Purity Of Essence at March 18, 2010 09:25 PM (P1vpT)
Posted by: Comrad Trotsky at March 18, 2010 09:26 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: Comrad Trotsky at March 18, 2010 09:30 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: newser at March 18, 2010 09:31 PM (D2axM)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2010 09:32 PM (T0NGe)
19 Steny Hoyer: "We're Gonna Get 216 Votes On Sunday"
Yeah. Sounds like a threat.
They don't have them. But, like I said, they will bluff.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2010 09:34 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: A Care Bear Sitting In a Rainbow at March 18, 2010 09:39 PM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: Phineas at March 18, 2010 09:41 PM (ZUNSI)
Posted by: TheJane at March 18, 2010 09:42 PM (TGIED)
Posted by: Smapty at March 18, 2010 09:45 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Mark at March 18, 2010 09:46 PM (a69kQ)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 18, 2010 09:47 PM (ympF8)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 18, 2010 09:49 PM (dQdrY)
I'm pretty sure they're a lot more worried about being the guy that stopped it, what with being fitted for the cement shoes and all.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 18, 2010 09:52 PM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: spike at March 18, 2010 09:53 PM (oRmZx)
Why did 10 more vote for the adoption of H Res. 1190 than voted for Congressman GriffithÂ’s Resolution for the Up or Down vote?
Posted by: sharrukin at March 18, 2010 09:54 PM (593B8)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 18, 2010 09:55 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: alaska trash at March 18, 2010 09:58 PM (WSML+)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 18, 2010 09:59 PM (ympF8)
I'm thinking... no.
People are angry, and angry people do crazy things.
Posted by: shibumi at March 18, 2010 10:04 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: obamastillsucks at March 18, 2010 10:06 PM (1l2bp)
Posted by: Smapty at March 18, 2010 10:08 PM (bAySe)
Not as much fun as small animals though.
Posted by: The Highland Pipes at March 18, 2010 10:09 PM (2hpnI)
Posted by: obamastillsucks at March 18, 2010 10:13 PM (1l2bp)
Posted by: pam at March 18, 2010 10:17 PM (h8R9p)
Never-mind then.
(Anyone know where I can get another hello kitty phone, cheap?)
Posted by: The Highland Pipes at March 18, 2010 10:18 PM (2hpnI)
Posted by: Smapty at March 18, 2010 10:22 PM (bAySe)
Posted by: Smapty at March 19, 2010 02:22 AM (bAySe)"
So then the republicans are taking away the will of the people just like the dems. And the dems will corrupt it in some way anyway. When you are dishonorable you are dishonorable.
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:28 PM (p302b)
you should ask on the geeky blogs like gizmodo and such.
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:31 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Smapty at March 19, 2010 02:08 AM (bAySe)"
You don't get through to the congress person you get the pissed off staff member who is tired of answering the phone. Three times I have said "I want to document this call, may I have your name please". they always tell you that it is none of your business. But, once you have said that and ask for it again, they back down and listen to you and are much nicer. But, they are not interested in my name, none of them. The last call I made I said are you even documenting these calls and she said, honestly, no cause he will vote the way he wants to vote and she hung up.
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:35 PM (p302b)
I believe at one point Obama tried to run against Bobby Rush back in Chicago. Bobby Rush mopped the floor with Obama.
He's just holding out for more bribes. It's the Chicago Way!
Posted by: Boots at March 18, 2010 10:43 PM (06JTY)
Bobby Rush? F'n Bobby Rush? Well yeah I knew that SOB is still a congressman but really, Bobby Rush? Worse than Sheila Jackson Lee. She's at least just delusional, not rabid. Sheesh. Where is the Slide of Civilization guy? Wheeeeeee.
Posted by: Dave in Singapore at March 18, 2010 10:44 PM (nN0p1)
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:45 PM (p302b)
I've been calling Bill Foster's office (IL-14). That's Denny Hastert's old seat. If Hastert hadn't taken the side of democrat William "cold cash" Jefferson (Louisiana) in that FBI sting, that seat would still be republican. Jerk.
Anyway, Foster's office keeps giving me the brush off. Won't commit, he wants to read the bill (don't we all), the usual.
Posted by: Boots at March 18, 2010 10:47 PM (06JTY)
(a letter/fax to our Reps in DC)
Posted by: pam at March 18, 2010 10:48 PM (h8R9p)
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:49 PM (p302b)
Posted by: obamastillsucks at March 18, 2010 10:50 PM (1l2bp)
Late in the day one of my friends called to tell me that rumor is he is jumping party to Republican.
My heart sank. Essentially now they want to have both their hand picked candidates under both letters. So, in NY they win either way. That is downright devious.
I hope the NY Republicans pick a damn good challenger for the primary.
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 10:53 PM (p302b)
Posted by: obamastillsucks at March 18, 2010 10:53 PM (1l2bp)
Slaps head.
I had a lovely thought too. I was walking down the street and it started raining 19-year old women who'd just broken up with their boyfriends, but are in a good mood because their first modelling contracts came through.
Posted by: Christoph at March 18, 2010 10:57 PM (0fq7b)
Wasn't it the aristocrats that thought they could control the french revolution? How did that turn out?
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 18, 2010 11:00 PM (dQdrY)
Wasn't it the aristocrats that thought they could control the french revolution? How did that turn out?
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 19, 2010 03:00 AM (dQdrY)"
Didn't they lose their minds?
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 11:01 PM (p302b)
Posted by: sexypig at March 18, 2010 11:02 PM (0t7L8)
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 11:02 PM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 11:06 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Smapty at March 18, 2010 11:09 PM (bAySe)
Most guys who cheat do so with someone less attractive than who they are with.
Posted by: sharrukin at March 18, 2010 11:16 PM (593B8)
Didn't they lose their minds?
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 03:01 AM (p302b)
I do believe a whole bunch did lose their heads.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 18, 2010 11:16 PM (dQdrY)
When bush ran people were saying that he really utilized the internet to get on the ground reports from real people. These guys make the Bush team look like a bunch of amateurs.
Posted by: curious at March 18, 2010 11:18 PM (p302b)
Posted by: pam
Here's mine:
Representative,
Vote NO on this health care takeover or there will be CIVIL UNREST like you have never seen.
Whatever you stand to gain from anyone in D.C. for voting Yes, it wonÂ’t be worth it. Not for you, not for you kids, not for your grandkids.
Thank you.
Joan Maltese
A Concerned Citizen
San Diego, CA
Posted by: arhooley at March 18, 2010 11:22 PM (IVW7A)
Posted by: Rush Dittohead at March 18, 2010 11:26 PM (Hu/Da)
Half the people in the auditorium were wearing color-coordinated "XXXXX, local YYYY" shirts. They got 80% of the questions, which were all dumbass "what color skittles will my unicorn deposit on my doorstep?"
The rep's replies to the questions ranged from "what color do you want them to be? I'm sure they're in there." to "mmmmfpppffg mffmfng nnnmflg wrngfrlmph" -- when asked how anyone intends to pay for things.
I left the meeting with several thoughts in mind:
1. My rep cares not a whit about me.
2. My rep thinks I'm stupid.
3. Unions have too much influence with reps.
4. My rep has no integrity, whatsoever.
5. If his constituents don't suit him, the rep has no hesitation to screen them out and select other constituents.
6. While I haven't yet decided to lynch the son-of-a-bitch, anyone who does will get a free pass if I'm selected for jury duty.
Posted by: cthulhu at March 18, 2010 11:34 PM (u+gbs)
I still don't believe this will pass. If Obama's having to work on Joe Cao (whom I am going to be giving a piece of my mind later today) then they really are having trouble putting the votes together.
It's anyone's guess as to whether Lynch will really vote no when it comes down to it, but the fact he's even floating it should be far more worrying to the Dems than defections by guys like Gordon should be for us.
A key component of this whole fucking thing is the most massive psy-ops operation the Democrats have ever attempted. They really want us to believe this is inevitable and probably floated that 214-217 count to Fox, which is all too eager to report Doom, Defeat, Death and Despair on every subject imaginable. The Democrats are like the old Soviet Union: projecting an aura of invincibility, but in reality far more fragile than anyone knows.
Posted by: The War Between the Hungover But Still Insomniac States at March 19, 2010 12:05 AM (l+HjK)
It ain't over yet folks.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 19, 2010 12:19 AM (h0RtZ)
Phone, fax, email, mail. Go to your reps local office - it counts big time. Keep pushing family & friends to do the same.
Keep the pressure up. We are winning.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 19, 2010 12:48 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at March 19, 2010 12:56 AM (Ddu43)
Posted by: Smapty at March 19, 2010 01:20 AM (bAySe)
Posted by: fluffy at March 19, 2010 01:30 AM (SwkdU)
"If they are going to vote on the weekend, tell them they need to be available to take phone calls on the weekend."
Excellent point!
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 19, 2010 01:45 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: fluffsky at March 19, 2010 02:09 AM (SwkdU)
Fascinating; these 'pro-life' Democrats will vote against the bill if it pays for abortion BUT if the abortion clause is removed they will vote for the bill which is designed to deny health care to the sick and the elderly.
So 'pro-life' only applies to life in the womb however it will be the sick and the elderly whose lives will receive a FREE government-panel death sentence?
Universal Health Care means serving Social Justice by killing off the sick and the elderly.
In other words Universal Health Care means Hell on Earth.
Posted by: syn at March 19, 2010 02:50 AM (IlCz1)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 19, 2010 02:50 AM (TFs5o)
Posted by: Vic at March 19, 2010 03:08 AM (QrA9E)
I'm moving to fucking Tahiti.
Posted by: Nemo from Erewhon at March 19, 2010 03:16 AM (Xlw/P)
Pop takes another shot, neat,
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that I've got on mine, and
Makes me smell his smell, coming
From me ...
... as he grows small,
A spot in my brain, something
That may be squeezed out, like a
Watermelon seed between
Two fingers.
Most disturbingly, the poem is describing a boundary violation on several levels, mental and sexual. I'm pretty sure Davis molested Obama when he smoked out his grandfather back in Hawaii. Obama wrote his grandfather used to take him into bars and pool halls where he hung out with hookers.
Later on at Occidental, Obama had a gay Pakistani sugar daddy. He went to Pakistan as a young adult on a mysterious passport. There was Al-Mansour and William Ayers. Obama was always looked after by older men who had a sexual interest in him, more often than not.
All his life, he has been passed around like a whore and told what to think. He has no sense of self. Obama never wanted to make friends, take risks and go have a normal life. He wanted to go where he was told to go, where it would be easy for him, where he would be comfortable around people just like the flaming commies he grew up among. That's why he went to Chicago, not Boston or New York. He always wanted to be in politics, and those cities are all run by rackets. He had an in in Chicago.
Oh, also Davis wrote Pop. "Watermelon seed" is too cynical to have come from a child and someone of Obama's generation. That was BLT gibberish. The excuses of a pedophile inflicting a sentimental education onto a child.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 03:20 AM (mHQ7T)
They figured life is expensive anyway, so just give away abortions and save society the cost of caring for these undesirables to begin with.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 03:24 AM (mHQ7T)
If having Dana makes them move back closer to the center I am all for having her on there permanently.
Posted by: Vic at March 19, 2010 03:24 AM (QrA9E)
I really have to stop watching that prick first thing in the morning.
Posted by: Mal at March 19, 2010 03:31 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 19, 2010 03:33 AM (mhD2v)
Contrary to rumor, Obama could have traveled to Pakistan on an American passport in 1981. Whether he did or not is another question. It was not until April 2008 at a San Francisco fundraiser that Obama casually let it be known that he had traveled to Pakistan at all. Curiously, he had not mentioned this trip in either of his two books or in any prior public discussion of Pakistan.Raising suspicions further was the fact that two weeks before the Pakistan admission, someone had improperly accessed Obama's passport on three occasions. That someone worked for John Brennan at Analysis Corp., a company with fewer than a hundred employees. A former CIA operative then advising Obama, Brennan is now Deputy National Security Adviser.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 03:40 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: CoolCzech at March 19, 2010 03:42 AM (9IHmo)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 03:45 AM (mHQ7T)
Why is no one talking about the IRS just keeping refunds to pay for Zero Care? I know one of the first editions of this wealth grab gives Uncle Sam the power to draw from your bank acct, but this will be easier for Timmeh! Time to change your withholding to "9" at HR (if you still have a job).
Posted by: RushBabe at March 19, 2010 03:50 AM (LKkE8)
Sarah Palin was talking about it on Glen Beck. The topic at hand was militias and civil insurrection. For the record, Sarah Palin urged against violence.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 03:55 AM (mHQ7T)
Gabe..you're doing yeoman's work. THANK YOU!!
...your mention on Rush was well-deserved
One thing...Steve Driehaus in the OH 1st is as dishonest as they can possibly come. He is hiding behind the abortion language for his yet undeclared stance for the moment....most probably with Pelosi's consent...to keep the pressure off him in his heavily Catholic district. He is way behind in the polls and is looking at the upcoming election
I know people that know him very well...and he is not the big pro-lifer that he makes himself out to be.
If it comes down to where his vote is needed to pass this thing...he will definitely jump on board
Posted by: beedubya at March 19, 2010 04:00 AM (AnTyA)
Why did 10 more vote for the adoption of H Res. 1190 than voted for Congressman GriffithÂ’s Resolution for the Up or Down vote?
This was a vote to table Cantor's resolution not the rule that the bill will be decided under.
Here is the text of the resolution:
H. RES. __
RESOLUTION
Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Whereas at least three members of the House Democratic Leadership have endorsed a procedural tactic for the sole purpose of avoiding an up-or-down vote, by the yeas and nays, on the Senate-passed health care bill;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, 2010 Representative James Clyburn, the House Majority Whip, stated, “We will deem passed the Senate bill…”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, The Washington Post reported, “After laying the groundwork for a decisive vote this week on the Senate’s health-care bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Monday that she might attempt to pass the measure without having members vote on it. Instead, Pelosi (D–Calif.) would rely on a procedural sleight of hand…”;
Whereas in the same Washington Post article, the Speaker declared, “…I like it because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, McClatchy Newspapers reported Representative John Larson, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, stated, “Many of our members would prefer not to have voted for the Senate bill.”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 9, U.S. News and World Report reported, “Pelosi gaffed, telling the local elected officials assembled ‘that Congress [has] to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it, away from the fog of controversy.’”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, The Washington Post editorialized, “…what is intended as a final sprint threatens to turn into something unseemly and, more important, contrary to Democrats’ promises of transparency and time for deliberation. …t strikes us as a dodgy way to reform the health-care system. Democrats who vote for the package will be tagged with supporting the Senate bill in any event.”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, the Cincinnati Enquirer editorialized, “This disgusting process, which Democrats brazenly wish to bring to conclusion this week, is being done with little regard for the opinions of a clear majority of Americans who, while they may believe health care reform is necessary, think this particular approach will take our nation down the wrong economic path.”;
Whereas bipartisan members of the House and Senate have expressed their opposition to using the Slaughter Solution;
Whereas on Wednesday, March 10, Representative Joe Donnelly released the following statement, “The process over the past few months has been frustrating, including the cutting of unacceptable special deals to assure a few senators’ votes.”;
Whereas Representative Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania has characterized the exploitation of the Slaughter Solution by Democratic Leadership as “wrong” and unpopular among his constituents;
Whereas on Friday, March 12, POLITICO reported on a memo sent from Representative Chris Van Hollen, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, to freshman and sophomore House Democrats that stated, “At this point, we have to just rip the band-aid off… Things like reconciliation and what the rules committee does is INSIDE BASEBALL.”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, Roll Call reported, “Hoyer argued that the American public isn’t interested in the process lawmakers use for approving reforms…”;
Whereas on Tuesday, March 16, Representative James Clyburn told Fox News, “Controversy doesn’t bother me at all.”;
Whereas the Democratic leadership of the House has conducted a calculated and coordinated attempt to willfully deceive the American people by embracing the “Slaughter Solution”;
Whereas resorting to the “Slaughter Solution” in this circumstance, is being done to intentionally hide from the American people a future vote that Members of Congress may take on the Senate-passed health care legislation;
Whereas the deceptive behavior demonstrated by the Democratic Leadership has brought discredit upon the House of Representatives; and
Whereas the Democratic leadership has willfully abused its power to chart a legislative course for the Senate health care bill that is deliberately calculated to obfuscate what the House will vote on, in an illegitimate effort to confuse the public and thereby fraudulently insulate certain Representatives from accountability for their conduct of their offices:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House disapproves of the malfeasant manner in which the Democratic Leadership has thereby discharged the duties of their offices.
I would imagine that democrats did not want to go on record as calling Pelosi's actions malfeasant.
Posted by: Amy at March 19, 2010 04:02 AM (NpRlM)
It's Friday. It's Lent. Duck out of lunch and hit a noontime service somewhere and pray like you've never prayed before. Stations of the Cross grant a plenary indulgence. I'd even take a "yes" to "no" instead.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 19, 2010 04:06 AM (LKkE8)
Morons:
I WILL BE IN DC tonight around 10 PM.
My cell phone is 401-578-0017.
Call me at your convenience if you feel like meeting me and my very lovely and talented +1.
That is all.
Posted by: Truman North at March 19, 2010 04:10 AM (FjC5u)
Posted by: fluffy at March 19, 2010 04:14 AM (SwkdU)
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:16 AM (QPhu5)
Posted by: Angela at March 19, 2010 04:19 AM (uXLmK)
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:19 AM (QPhu5)
The CHA is actually expecting a prochoice Senate and a prochoice White House to correct the Senate language. This is the "trust me" line. It won't work. The prochoice Senators will block all attempts to prohibit federal funding of abortion.
The press will use the CHA against the Catholic Bishops. The CHA is just a lobby like the teachers association. The Catholic Church does not fund it in any way.
This is a big problem for the Stupak 12.
Apparently the CHA board was divided on the letter to House members.
Posted by: wtfci at March 19, 2010 04:26 AM (EbpbH)
Sarah Palin is an unprincipled scrunt. She supports McCain and by extension his BFF L. Graham. She is less than dead to me.
Posted by: Barbarian at March 19, 2010 04:29 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: fishy comments at March 19, 2010 04:32 AM (IZzW/)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at March 19, 2010 04:34 AM (dJBOC)
This calls for something really stupid and futile to be done on somebody's. Part. Whose with me?
Harumph!
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:37 AM (QPhu5)
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:40 AM (QPhu5)
Posted by: dr kill at March 19, 2010 04:40 AM (w9bVp)
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:40 AM (QPhu5)
The buyoffs have begun...
1. Baird: $5 million for green jobs (Jan 6th)
2. Boccieri: $ 16.625 for an airport (Mar 15th)
3. Kosmas: $2 million pending airport grant (Mar 8th), $60 thousand for fire dept (Mar 7th)
4. Scott Murphy: $800 thousand for airport (Mar 11th), $4.7 million water system grant (Mar 17th)
5. Nye: DOD reinstates Military Spouse Education Program for his district (Mar 11th)
6. Berry: $1.5 Million joint grant for fire dept (Jan 29th)
7. Carney: $130 million for broadband (Feb 23rd)
8. Costello: This guy has received so many different grants since Mar 1st I don't want to type them all out
9. Donnelly: $25 million for broadband (Feb 18th)
10. Driehaus: $700 thousand for transportation (Feb 12th), $8 million education (Feb 26th)
11. Lipinski: $133 million for transportation (Mar 5th)
12. Stupak: $50 thousand smll business grant (Mar 11th), $265 thousand for fire dept (Mar 11th), $51 thousand for public safety ( Mar 9th), 3 permanent Social Security judges (Mar 8th)
Posted by: Hey Gabe at March 19, 2010 04:48 AM (UNW+D)
Posted by: Barbarian at March 19, 2010 04:48 AM (EL+OC)
"Scrunt" is a stupid and cowardly word.You're a child. Nobody cares who is dead to you, since you're such a weak example of living.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 04:48 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: This is I Hate Fuckin Chimps at March 19, 2010 04:50 AM (QPhu5)
This from a drooling imbecile that thinks this blog is a social networking site. Who's the child?
Posted by: Barbarian at March 19, 2010 04:52 AM (EL+OC)
That's going to be a great campaign commercial: watching Hopenchange morph into Bribesnextortion Am I the only one that gets kinda scared and nervous when calling my congress-critter?
Screw them, they work for you and don't let them forget it. Why did Obama go to Chicago? Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 02:49 AM (p302b)
He left Occidental for Columbia because Frank Marshall Davis had put him together with Henry Ayres who was doing something for Columbia at the time. Henry essentially brought Obama back with him. Secondly, Obama has long said that his favorite book is "Native Son" by Richard Wright. I have a masters in english and had never heard of it until my son was forced to read it in high school. It is the story of a poor black boy who is not at all sympathetic. He is a public masterbator, a murderer, a rapist, a blackmailer, an idiot and a thief. The boy, Bigger, runs into a couple of Communists (in the 30s) who try to help him but he kills one of them. Then the other comes to his aid after he is arrested and gets him a communist lawyer. The communist (real communists not these marxist/socialist communist-lites) lawyer spends 80 pages explaining why the whites and capitalism have made Bigger the evil guy that he is why Bigger is innocent of any evil that he does--it's the system that must be found guilty and changed. All this takes place in Chicago. Obama was in love with this story and wanted to be the communist lawyer for Bigger.
He was fulfilling a phantasy. It would be like plopping me down at Pemberly into the waiting arms of Fitzwilliam Darcy.
Read the sparknotes or summary of "Native Son", it tells you where Obama's head is.
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 04:56 AM (clgMu)
I'll probably be there...
Posted by: s☺mej☼e at March 19, 2010 04:57 AM (EVoH+)
I just don't know if phone calls, faxes, e-mails, whatever can compete with all these bribes. Seriously, I could call/fax/e-mail around the clock and how can that compete with the bullshit that is going on behind closed doors? They've been inundated with people calling/faxing/e-mailing for over a year and we're still at the point where ever. single. vote. is being analyzed over and over again.....
Posted by: Tami at March 19, 2010 04:58 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: maddogg at March 19, 2010 05:01 AM (OlN4e)
Here in Colorado - Michael Bennet (D-hard left socialist) is already running ads attempting to prove he's a "moderate".
This must be countered. Voters must be reminded that democrats who run as moderates are liars. Democrats always fool voters to get in, but once in, they are a reliable vote for the left-wing.
Andrew Romanof(D) is already claiming he will fight the party insiders. BULLSHIT. Andrew will be a reliable vote for the left.
Voters must wake up to this trickery. Republicans must point it out at every turn.
Flush the blue dogs, flush the phony democrats who promise moderation. They are all liars.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 19, 2010 05:02 AM (0fzsA)
I tend to agree.
If the GOP had any organizing capacity whatsoever we/they would be beating the crap out of the businesses/corporations that fund these a-holes.
Posted by: Barbarian at March 19, 2010 05:02 AM (EL+OC)
Sounds like Frank Marshall Davis and any number of Obama's friends since reaching adulthood. Rumor has it he has a body count that's on track with the Clintons. He probably wanted to be Bigger.
I just watched The Lady From Shanghai the other day. I think that's how this plays out in the end. Sharks occasionally eat one another.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 05:03 AM (mHQ7T)
This health care sham is just a huge tax increase - filled with goodies and bribes and government run student loans.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 19, 2010 05:03 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Kemp at March 19, 2010 05:04 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:04 AM (p302b)
Posted by: ford at March 19, 2010 05:05 AM (Ki7fm)
On his Facebook page, Andrew Bernstein makes a pledge against ObamaCare:"If the government takes over health care, I will refuse to buy their package, refuse to pay the fine imposed, and make them arrest me. I will broadcast my refusal to cave to socialism on my website, on Facebook, to my students, in my lectures, and on the radio. I will fight this in the courts--or will the DC Fascists suspend the right to trial by jury? I suspect--and hope--that millions of Americans will do the same."
-----
I'm in.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 19, 2010 05:05 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 05:05 AM (mHQ7T)
Emailed Altmire. This might be useless, but is cathartic. Polite but very firm and clear. Will donate and ask everyone to donate to his opponent.
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at March 19, 2010 05:06 AM (MFQJZ)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 05:06 AM (clgMu)
Nice.
Posted by: Barbarian at March 19, 2010 05:08 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 05:09 AM (clgMu)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:09 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:18 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at March 19, 2010 05:19 AM (z4es9)
Listening now, and he's pulling the God card...
Posted by: Mjim at March 19, 2010 05:21 AM (V8B//)
I mean if they vote him out, which this caller said was quite likely if he ignored his own polls then what did he accomplish?
Why, he has struck his blow for the socialist collective. Just like the rest of those sorry cockholsters.
Posted by: maddogg at March 19, 2010 05:22 AM (OlN4e)
This could easily lead to the repeal of this monstrosity but also the destruction of the Democrat party.
Posted by: Mal at March 19, 2010 05:23 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:23 AM (p302b)
From a top level source in the House comes the news that the Democrats are still short of the 216 votes they need to pass Obamacare. They have decided, however, to go for broke on Sunday and attempt to pass it whether or not they have enough support. They feel that only by forcing a vote can the force members off the fence. They hope that by employing all means at their disposal, they can round up enough votes for passage. But, if they don't have the votes, they will allow the measure to be defeated. One source called it a "suicide run."
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 19, 2010 05:26 AM (TFs5o)
Listening now, and he's pulling the God card...
Posted by: Mjim at March 19, 2010 09:21 AM (V8B//)"
Yeah, those pesky founders used to pull the same card, all day, every day.
He's asking people to pray that there is no violence this weekend in DC.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:26 AM (p302b)
From a top level source in the House comes the news that the Democrats are still short of the 216 votes they need to pass Obamacare. They have decided, however, to go for broke on Sunday and attempt to pass it whether or not they have enough support. They feel that only by forcing a vote can the force members off the fence. They hope that by employing all means at their disposal, they can round up enough votes for passage. But, if they don't have the votes, they will allow the measure to be defeated. One source called it a "suicide run."
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 19, 2010 09:26 AM (TFs5o)"
Morris was a clintonite. Don't believe him. Everyone else is saying "she won't vote unless she has the votes".
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:27 AM (p302b)
I mean if they vote him out, which this caller said was quite likely if he ignored his own polls then what did he accomplish?
Doing his part to establish to the collectivist utopia
Posted by: beedubya at March 19, 2010 05:27 AM (AnTyA)
I may just take it a step or two further
Posted by: beedubya at March 19, 2010 05:29 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Mjim at March 19, 2010 05:30 AM (V8B//)
Mike Pence up next on Beck.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:31 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Blue Hen at March 19, 2010 05:33 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Dick Morris, Sucker of Toes and Maker of Worthless Predictions at March 19, 2010 05:37 AM (F5Gxy)
We need to keep our eyes on the ball and ignore everything else. The way I see it is this whole ballgame boils down to 16 congressmen. Any other announcement by a politician not in one of these two groups is irrelevant noise. The two groups are as follows:
7 Previous no votes that are now undecided: Altmire, Baird, Boccieri, Kosmas, Scott Murphy, Nye, Tanner
9 Previous yes votes that are now possible yes votes: Arcuri, Berry, Carney, Costello, Donnelly, Driehaus, Lipinski, Lynch, Stupak.
In order to defeat this we need 11 out of these 16 to vote no. Or put another way, if all previous noes remain that way we need 4 of the potential yes to noes to flip.
Posted by: Semper Gumby at March 19, 2010 05:37 AM (UNW+D)
I mean if they vote him out, which this caller said was quite likely if he ignored his own polls then what did he accomplish?
What, you think these people have to go become plumbers when they get voted out of office?
Posted by: Entropy at March 19, 2010 05:38 AM (IsLT6)
Ugh, I can't get Beck in the DC metro. I think they have him scrambled.
I'm really attached to the "and free exercise thereof" line of the constitution.
God doesn't offend me nearly as much as I offend Him.
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 05:40 AM (clgMu)
my plumber and my doctor know each other. my plumber makes more than my doctor, that's the running joke among our friends. The plumber always says "you can avoid going to the doctor but when you need the plumber, you need the plumber"
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:45 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 05:46 AM (clgMu)
Beck said that "when this unravels it is going to make Watergate look like a picnic"
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:47 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Semper Gumby at March 19, 2010 05:53 AM (UNW+D)
and Gabe who has become the "go to source" for all the conservative commentators on the radio.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 05:57 AM (p302b)
He's asking people to pray that
there is no violence this weekend in DC.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 09:26 AM (p302b)
Beck's the biggest drama queen on the air.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at March 19, 2010 06:04 AM (F5Gxy)
Please don't declare defeat prematurely. There was some wailing and gnashing of teeth earlier today, but no one is ready to call it quits. Pelosi doesn't have it yet. We'd know if she did.
I think, you're whistling past the graveyard.
Pelosi won't allow a vote, unless she has the votes.
Posted by: franksalterego at March 19, 2010 06:06 AM (+6fgE)
But here is Byron York:
You have to look at the issue from three different Democratic perspectives: the House of Representatives, the White House and the Senate.
"In the House, the view of [California Rep. Henry] Waxman and [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi is that we've waited two generations to get health care passed, and the 20 or 40 members of Congress who are going to lose their seats as a result are transitional players at best," he said. "This is something the party has wanted since Franklin Roosevelt." In this view, losses are just the price of doing something great and historic. (The strategist also noted that it's easy for Waxman and Pelosi to say that, since they come from safely liberal districts.)
"At the White House, the picture is slightly different," he continued. "Their view is, 'We're all in on this, totally committed, and we don't have to run for re-election next year. There will never be a better time to do it than now.'"
"And in the Senate, they look at the most vulnerable Democrats -- like [Christopher] Dodd and [Majority Leader Harry] Reid -- and say those vulnerabilities will probably not change whether health care reform passes or fails. So in that view, if they pass reform, Democrats will lose the same number of seats they were going to lose before."
All those scenarios have a certain logic (even if the Senate calculation undercounts the number of potentially vulnerable Democrats). But each scenario is premised on passing an unpopular bill that hurts the party. Even if there's a strategic rationale for doing it, why are Democrats dead-set on hurting themselves?
"Because they think they know what's best for the public," the strategist said. "They think the facts are being distorted and the public's being told a story that is not entirely true, and that they are in Congress to be leaders. And they are going to make the decision because Goddammit, it's good for the public."
Of course, going forward has turned out to be harder than many Democrats thought. And now, with various proposals lying wrecked along the road, the true believers are practicing what the strategist calls "principled damage control."
But still, does it make sense? In the end, perhaps the most compelling explanation for Democratic behavior is that they are simply in too deep to do anything else. "Once you've gone this far, what is the cost of failure?" asks the strategist.
At that point -- Republicans will love this -- he compared congressional Democrats with robbers who have passed the point of no return in deciding to hold up a bank. Whatever they do, they're guilty of something. "They're in the bank, they've got their guns out. They can run outside with no money, or they can stick it out, go through the gunfight, and get away with the money."
That's it. Democrats are all in. They're going through with it. Even if it kills them. (Let me add here... WATERLOO.)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 06:08 AM (mHQ7T)
It's over. The maybes will cave, as any idiot can see. They sure as hell ain't going to retire back in their districts, where they will have to check under their car every morning and stay away from the windows and besides, they'll get nice cushy lobbying jobs in DC.
This will not end well, but that's a good thing.
Posted by: TexasJew at March 19, 2010 06:12 AM (wMXOq)
He's asking people to pray
that
there is no violence this weekend in DC.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 09:26 AM (p302b)
Beck's the biggest drama queen on the air.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at March 19, 2010 10:04 AM (F5Gxy)"
He may be a "drama queen" but his ratings are through the roof. Guess people like watching a drama queen.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 06:20 AM (p302b)
Remember how Clinton burned up all those women and children in Waco? You're marching to your deaths this weekend. There is no reason you have to go down with the cult. You're disposable to them. They will leave you behind, and there's no glory in this. It's suicide. You can still have a political future and make a meaningful contribution to the American people. Please vote NO.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 06:23 AM (mHQ7T)
The congressman on Batchelor last night said they are "being kept in DC". I'm wondering if anyone is even telling them how angry the American people are. I'm wondering if they are hearing from their office staff what their constituents are saying. It does seem quite bizarre that they are all willing to sacrifice their own jobs for this one bill, as though they think all of the country wants it.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 06:24 AM (p302b)
They have decided, however, to go for broke on Sunday and attempt to pass it whether or not they have enough support.
curious, I'd said this before. Now I'm no fancy-pants pundit, but it's abundantly clear she has nothing to lose by forcing a vote without the votes. They cannot delay the vote anymore.
Do not give up.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 19, 2010 06:28 AM (Vo2Ef)
I rarely laugh out loud at anything. I did when I saw this.
Go to jammie wearing fool and scroll down.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 19, 2010 06:44 AM (LKkE8)
my plumber and my doctor know each other. my plumber makes more than my doctor
That's great, but plumbers have to work for their money. Which makes them decidely unlike defeated congress critters who also make more then doctors.
Posted by: Entropy at March 19, 2010 07:29 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 19, 2010 01:11 PM (mHQ7T)
parca tl kontör
catý cephe kaplama
evden eve nakliyat
jet tl kontör
seo web tasarým
Posted by: parça TL kontör at April 17, 2010 03:19 AM (Xh65/)
Posted by: link hunter at May 10, 2010 04:57 AM (EMyZf)
Posted by: tutorial clickbank at May 20, 2010 05:26 AM (XqKxO)
but it shows that how kind you are
: P
sorry i put my links too in here
Sealkazz MiZzu
Posted by: aaaaaa at June 11, 2010 02:16 AM (kSIgc)
Siapa yang tidak mengenal Kota Solo? mungkin Anda semua kalau membicarakan soal batik pasti ingat Solo. betul tidak?
Posted by: Ingat Solo Ingat Soloaja.com at June 16, 2010 09:42 AM (D1e8o)
Posted by: analisa saham hari ini at June 24, 2010 07:10 PM (NWX31)
Posted by: jual beli rumah at June 24, 2010 10:08 PM (NWX31)
Posted by: soal cpns at June 24, 2010 11:07 PM (NWX31)
Posted by: Falko Follert Art-FF77 at July 02, 2010 05:05 AM (A6prd)
Here my site Digital Imaging
You can also visit Article Directory
Posted by: Digital Imaging at July 04, 2010 10:03 PM (HFslL)
Nevermind, we've all seen how Democrats fold, when push comes to shove.
by Really Cheap Flights
Posted by: Cheap Air Flights at July 29, 2010 12:21 AM (FFRnL)
make my life easier as I use this article for my next plan, great resource, well done! Just sharing my blog:
<a href="http://www.turbovps.com/">linux vps</a>
Posted by: cheap vps at August 09, 2010 05:15 AM (Zo+5R)
<a href="http://www.pennyreport.com">Penny Stocks</a>
Posted by: Penny Stocks at August 18, 2010 02:45 AM (Zo+5R)
Penny Stocks
Posted by: Penny Stocks at August 18, 2010 02:49 AM (Zo+5R)
Penny Stocks
Posted by: Penny Stocks at August 18, 2010 02:52 AM (Zo+5R)
ÃÑÃÔÉ ÇáÎáÃÃŒ - ÇáÎáÃÃŒ ÔÇÊ - ÇáÃÈ - ÔÇÊ ÇáÃÈ - ÃÑÃÔÉ ÇáÃÈ
Posted by: fofo at August 21, 2010 04:28 PM (okHHq)
Posted by: Niek Air Max 90 at August 22, 2010 09:38 PM (bhaoN)
Posted by: yabinlee at August 24, 2010 05:09 PM (w17Gl)
Hosting murah
yourschool
kedaiopini
Posted by: Hosting Murah at August 30, 2010 06:01 PM (uED1j)
Posted by: Samsung phone systems at September 26, 2010 12:02 PM (Zo+5R)
Posted by: Samsung phone systems at September 26, 2010 12:02 PM (Zo+5R)
Posted by: Samsung phone systems at September 26, 2010 12:04 PM (Zo+5R)
Posted by: xen vps vm at October 10, 2010 08:58 AM (Zo+5R)
<a href="http://widyabusanamuslim.com">baju muslim</a>
Posted by: busana muslim at October 15, 2010 07:09 AM (PMc7m)
Posted by: Esha Putra at October 31, 2010 07:03 PM (IF03d)
Posted by: toko baju online at November 06, 2010 08:42 AM (HaaiX)
Posted by: Gadis Bugil at December 01, 2010 08:39 AM (RLE2A)
<a href="http://blog.umy.ac.id/tutorialblogging/" rel="dofollow">tutorialblogging</a>
Posted by: tutorial bloggingg at December 01, 2010 09:12 AM (gfZke)
Posted by: ivon at December 29, 2010 11:16 PM (YQhX5)
Thanks,
Grego
Posted by: Grego at January 05, 2011 10:39 PM (qhibH)
Posted by: Pang haidar at January 08, 2011 02:20 AM (1bu/s)
Posted by: ari topan at January 11, 2011 09:25 AM (nBdls)
Posted by: tempe at January 18, 2011 03:37 PM (r6KT5)
Posted by: oki at January 18, 2011 03:42 PM (r6KT5)
Posted by: koskomputer at February 13, 2011 03:09 PM (zwFCR)
Posted by: insico at February 14, 2011 01:01 AM (9kIWd)
Posted by: jasa pembuatan webite at February 24, 2011 09:29 PM (jOtPt)
Posted by: valkpim at February 24, 2011 11:13 PM (dxFvI)
Posted by: kopi rasa buah at April 06, 2011 06:25 PM (r6KT5)
<a href="http://www.1700cc.co.uk">Phone Systems</a>
Posted by: Phone Systems at April 20, 2011 10:47 PM (g4Iad)
Posted by: Softersins at April 28, 2011 12:10 AM (5FGAe)
Posted by: Yudi at May 02, 2011 10:28 AM (jvUHl)
Posted by: Health Community Center at May 11, 2011 01:58 AM (k/2oU)
Posted by: Audrey at May 14, 2011 01:12 AM (Ei4d+)
Posted by: Dr. Smith at May 24, 2011 09:16 AM (m3/WK)
Posted by: Mo at June 01, 2011 09:52 AM (iIsPJ)
Posted by: jurnalanalisasaham at June 01, 2011 08:35 PM (EUyo9)
Posted by: obatherbal at June 06, 2011 06:53 PM (vDbmx)
Posted by: Share With Irfan at June 11, 2011 03:52 AM (Nsqek)
Posted by: intifadha at June 22, 2011 07:41 AM (Ds7Pj)
Posted by: A TechnoLedge Blog at July 04, 2011 08:15 PM (kxi5n)
regard: Download Lagu Terbaru - http://www.laguterbaru.net
Posted by: Download Lagu Terbaru at July 06, 2011 06:50 PM (c21qW)
Posted by: SUV for Family at July 13, 2011 11:04 PM (icPY4)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2277 seconds, 383 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Having a one-legged man is very useful for ass-kicking contests; at least you know you won't come in last place.
Posted by: wooga at March 18, 2010 09:02 PM (IhzyJ)