July 01, 2010

Whistleblower: DOJ Is Lying About New Black Panthers
— Ace

Hot stuff.

A former Justice Department attorney who resigned last month in protest of the Obama administration's handling of a voter intimidation case involving the New Black Panther Party accused a top Justice official of lying under oath about the circumstances surrounding the decision to drop the case.

J. Christian Adams, now an attorney in Virginia and a blogger for Pajamas Media, told Fox News in an exclusive interview that aired Wednesday that Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez provided false testimony in May to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, which is investigating the department's decision to drop charges against three members of the radical group in a case that the government won.

Perez told the commission that the facts and the law didn't support the case against the group.

"I know about the truthÂ…and I know what the truth is and I know to say the facts and law don't support the Black Panther case is not true," Adams said, adding that Perez ignored his warnings not to provide false testimony.

"We made it very clear that continuing to say that the facts and the law don't support this case would not be consistent with the truth," he said.

Here's his interview on FoxNews:

Here is an older interview on this, with a liberal civil rights lawyer named Bartle Bull:

He says this is plainly a civil rights violation. (Duh!)

J. Christian Adams wrote about his resignation-in-protest last week for Pajamas Media.

oon after his confirmation, Attorney General Eric Holder labeled us a nation of cowards, a people supposedly unwilling or afraid to discuss race. Based on my experience as an attorney at the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department, Holder has far more to fear from that discussion than do the rest of us.

If we had that frank, truthful discussion about race, weÂ’d learn that the Obama administration doesnÂ’t believe some civil rights laws protect every American. The Bush Civil Rights Division was willing to protect all Americans from racial discrimination; during the Obama years, the Holder years, only some Americans will be protected. Americans have a right to know and judge the racial policies of the administration they elected in 2008.

The dismissal of the voter intimidation lawsuit against armed New Black Panthers in Philadelphia is the most prominent example of this hostility toward race-neutral enforcement of civil rights laws. But that dismissal is far from the only manifestation of the beliefs infesting the Department. Many other cases and decisions — some of which I will detail below — are in question and deserve scrutiny.

On Election Day 2008, armed men wearing the uniforms and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were posted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the entrance to a polling site. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters. After the election, the Civil Rights Division at the U.S. Department of Justice brought a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and these armed thugs. I, and other Justice lawyers, obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the case against them.

Before a final judgment could be entered, however, our superiors ordered dismissal of the claims.

Congress has sought answers from the Department about why the Black Panther case was dismissed. The Department has repeatedly claimed the “facts and law” did not support the case — which of course is false. Others have speculated about a White House involvement. But I believe the best explanation for the corrupt dismissal of the case is the profound hostility by the Obama Civil Rights Division in the Justice Department towards a race-neutral enforcement of civil rights laws.

This hostility was — and is — on open display within the Department of Justice.

Example after example exists where this dirty little secret manifested itself within the Department and affected Department policy.

Attorney General Holder and his political appointees have traveled the country claiming that they have “reopened” the Civil Rights Division. The Civil Rights Division is “back in business,” they announce, without a sniff of media scrutiny. In time, statistics and other information will present truth to this lie, as the Bush Civil Rights Division had a more robust civil rights agenda than the Obama Civil Rights Division. During the Bush years, the Civil Rights Division brought more cases in many areas of the law, particularly voting rights.

Race-neutral enforcement of civil rights law is a principle nearly all Americans agree with. Equality before the law has been cherished since the founding, and a bloody Civil War sacrificed generations of treasure and life to enshrine race equality into constitutional law.

Thanks to JackStraw and Vic.

Posted by: Ace at 12:30 PM | Comments (67)
Post contains 795 words, total size 6 kb.

1 I really hope he made sure to take some emails, memos etc. - the Obamabots are going to come at him with everything they have.

Posted by: Holdfast at July 01, 2010 12:31 PM (Gzb30)

2 This is a really fucking huge scandal, IMO, and I sort of wonder why nobody seems to care.  Where's Hotair?

Posted by: Jeff B. at July 01, 2010 12:32 PM (l1KFP)

3 you whiteys deserve to get hit when you tries to vote!  Specially you evilllll jooooooooossssss!!!

Posted by: Rev. Wright at July 01, 2010 12:34 PM (6SGWt)

4 Perez ignored his warnings not to provide false testimony

The left - shredding The Constitution, one page at a time. And proud of it. 

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at July 01, 2010 12:35 PM (554T5)

5 Where's Hotair? Too busy angling for Palin stories and scolding negativistic conservatives. Read the story two days ago. Snore. This will go nowhere because... well, Orrin Hatch personifies the reason.

Posted by: George Orwell at July 01, 2010 12:35 PM (AZGON)

6 We basically have the OJ jury running the DOJ.

Who's up for a good ol fashioned civil war?

Posted by: Bullets&Beer at July 01, 2010 12:35 PM (BedzM)

7 This is a really fucking huge scandal, IMO, and I sort of wonder why nobody seems to care. Where's Hotair? Posted by: Jeff B. at July 01, 2010 04:32 PM (l1KFP) Because how are you gonna prove it? Seems like a he says she says thing. Hey I believe the DOJ under Obama and Holder is racist, but with this MSM, go prove it. Shit the National Enquirer is our only hope?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 01, 2010 12:36 PM (0GFWk)

8 This is an accusation of perjury. If that doesn't wake up the MFM nothing will. Another one of those what if it was a Republican things.

If a DOJ thug from Bush had been accused thusly it would be the opening story in every news organization for a month.

Posted by: Vic at July 01, 2010 12:36 PM (6taRI)

9
"It's payback time."

-Obama DOJ

Posted by: Fish at July 01, 2010 12:38 PM (v1gw3)

10 If a DOJ thug from Bush had been accused thusly it would be the opening story in every news organization for a month. Hell, Bush couldn't even fire an attorney without a salvo of presstitute incendiaries. Let a Demotard apply Federal laws capriciously and with prejudice, and all is well.

Posted by: George Orwell at July 01, 2010 12:39 PM (AZGON)

11 6 We basically have the OJ jury running the DOJ.

Who's up for a good ol fashioned civil war?

(Raises hand)


Posted by: Sgt Martin Riggs at July 01, 2010 12:40 PM (HpT9p)

12 This is an accusation of perjury. If that doesn't wake up the MFM nothing will.

Oh yeah. Just like the woke up and made sure to get all the facts on Clenis, right?

Posted by: Farmer Joe at July 01, 2010 12:41 PM (z4es9)

13 This should be brought up daily until Eric Holder is behind bars.  Preferably in the same cell as the Radical Islamic Terrorists he says are a figment of my imagination.

Posted by: dfbaskwill at July 01, 2010 12:44 PM (ndlFj)

14 PJM Adams: Some said that unless whites were victims of historic discrimination, they shouldnÂ’t be protected. Voting Rights lawyers will recognize this as an argument grounded in Senate Factor One of the Supreme CourtÂ’s Gingles v. Thornburg jurisprudence. Other lawyers grounded their objections in Senate Factor Five, which speaks generally of educational and economic differences between races. Because whites were better off than blacks in Mississippi, no lawsuit should be allowed to protect whites, they argued. In other words, your rights are dangling from your skin color and what liberal gubmint sees in your wallet. You have no rights.

Posted by: George Orwell at July 01, 2010 12:44 PM (AZGON)

15 Megyn Kelly has been all over this story like a bra on tits.

This was obviously a political racial decision, how can you drop a case when you have a default judgement.  You already won.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 01, 2010 12:47 PM (T0bhq)

16 This administration has the world view of a 70s blaxplotation movie.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 01, 2010 12:48 PM (1Jaio)

17

The only guy 'punished' will be allowed near polling places carrying a club by the 2012 election.  Really.  He got very limited probation, can't go near the polls with a club for two years.

Not that I forsee any problems with this precedent.   

Posted by: Beagle at July 01, 2010 12:48 PM (sOtz/)

18 Barack is going to require you to work. He is going to require you to come out of your comfort zone. He might even require you to become three-fifths of a person, if you're white. Just to even the score. Cracker.

Posted by: Michelle Obama at July 01, 2010 12:49 PM (AZGON)

19 LYING appears to be a fundamental part of the "most transparent administration, evah!".

Posted by: GarandFan at July 01, 2010 12:50 PM (6mwMs)

20 Gingles v. Thornburg?????

I don't see how they can justify that. Gingles v. Thornburg effective ended "at large elections" but based on the story about the NY town last week, it only ended it in the South.  When SCOTUS says that is OK to discriminate based on race and location even though it is forbidden by the civil rights act and the 14th Amendment you know they care nothing for the Constitution.

Posted by: Vic at July 01, 2010 12:52 PM (6taRI)

21 Holder wouldn't do such a thing! Why, that would be dirty pool!

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at July 01, 2010 12:52 PM (YmPwQ)

22 Ok...those people who say that the Dems have nothing to fear this November because of vote rigging sound a little less crazy.

Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at July 01, 2010 12:54 PM (YmPwQ)

23 When SCOTUS says that is OK to discriminate based on race and location even though it is forbidden by the civil rights act and the 14th Amendment you know they care nothing for the Constitution. Constitution? I don't know. It certainly doesn't look like my handwriting.

Posted by: Elena Kagan at July 01, 2010 12:55 PM (AZGON)

24

16 Megyn Kelly has been all over this story like a bra on tits.

B....

Posted by: dananjcon at July 01, 2010 12:55 PM (pr+up)

25 18 This administration has the world view of a 70s blaxplotation movie. Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 01, 2010 04:48 PM (1Jaio) Holder. Can you dig it?

Posted by: joncelli at July 01, 2010 12:58 PM (RD7QR)

26 A nice follow up to the Hatch stuff below. 

Posted by: ed at July 01, 2010 01:01 PM (Urhve)

27 If true, this is arrest-worthy.

Of course Congress and the judiciary will give DoJ, Holder and Osama Obama his own self a free pass. After all, they're "leveling the playing field."

Isn't this the same kind of shit Grand Dragon Byrd fought for, only with the roles reversed?

Time for the Traitor-in-Chief to give another speech!

Anyone else would be led away in cuffs right about now.

Posted by: MrScribbler at July 01, 2010 01:02 PM (Ulu3i)

28 "We will drop all charges in this matter . . . but you will blow me first."

Posted by: Eric Holder at July 01, 2010 01:04 PM (zgZzy)

29

Jeez Loooeez, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the media is not covering this because they have all their crack reporters busy digging up dirt on Republicans and Tea Partyers. They can't be everywhere, you nimrods.

Sheesh.

Posted by: LGoPs at July 01, 2010 01:06 PM (lHn6+)

30 Someone called Rush this afternoon and suggested sending Tea Party members to the polls in November to see if Holder would do anything about it.  Signs point to no.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 01, 2010 01:08 PM (zgZzy)

31 Ray Charles could see this one coming.

Posted by: sifty at July 01, 2010 01:12 PM (JR2D9)

32

I'm not conspiracy-minded, but one of the best pieces of evidence I think is out there for how Obama is a Manchurian candidate was the interview of Percy Sutton - the Black Panthers' attorney - on NY1, where he explains how he came to know Barack Obama.

He said he was asked by an advisor to one of the world's wealthiest men to write a letter to get Obama into Harvard Law. 

How the hell was this what... 22 year-old kid? already on the radar of "one of the world's wealthiest men" and the attorney for the Black Panthers?  I don't care what background Obama came from, or what his academic reputation may have been, that's damned strange.  He's been groomed for the epic destruction he's carrying out for a long, long time by powerful people.

Everybody tried to say, "Oh, that's old Percy, he's getting senile."  Now he's dead and no one can ask any more questions, that is, even if anybody in a position of authority had a mind to.  Thank God that interview is still up on youtube and hasn't mysteriously disappeared.

Obama and his admin. are now the Black Panthers' attorneys.

Posted by: La Mauvaise New Yorkaise at July 01, 2010 01:13 PM (8uZ8A)

33 The Civil Rights Movement became the Civil Revenge Movement on January 20, 2009.

Eric Holder and Michellebacca listened to Rev. Wright and Malcom X, even if Barry was asleep in church for 20 years.

Posted by: sifty at July 01, 2010 01:14 PM (JR2D9)

34

I distinctly remember various R's drooling over Holder and telling us what a standup guy he is.  He was going to return the DOJ to the high standards of yesteryear.  Some "dirty" folks pointed out that the guy was a fraud and political opportunist but that came out in the wash and all sorts of good R's in the Senate voted to confirm, just like they will vote to confirm Kagan. 

Posted by: ed at July 01, 2010 01:15 PM (Urhve)

35 If Perez, an Asst. AG, is allowed to get away with obstruction of justice and perjury in his sworn testimony before the Commission on Civil Rights, this administration will be allowed to get away with anything. Pretty fucking scary actually.

Posted by: JackStraw at July 01, 2010 01:31 PM (VW9/y)

36 Allowed to get away?  Who's going to stop him or raise a fuss about it so that it becomes embarassing to the Administration?  Graham?  Hatch?  Sessions?  They all voted to confirm Holder.

Posted by: ed at July 01, 2010 01:36 PM (Urhve)

37 If Perez, an Asst. AG, is allowed to get away with obstruction of justice and perjury in his sworn testimony before the Commission on Civil Rights, this administration will be allowed to get away with anything. Don't see the problem here.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at July 01, 2010 01:37 PM (AZGON)

38

It was just about a year ago that Obama fired Inspector General, Gerald Walpin, for investigating his buddy Kevin Johnson's abuse of Americorp grants.

Remember that? Johnson was paying kids to wash his car and run errands for him with taxpayer money. Oh, and some of it was being used for political purposes.

What ever came of that firing?

Nothing if I recall.

It's almost impossible to keep track of all the illegal dealings going on with this administration. If only there were a profession, separate from the government, whose mission it was to investigate and report to the public on corruption in high places.

 

 

 

Posted by: Clarence Thomas at July 01, 2010 01:37 PM (QoR4a)

39 Errr ... Clarence Thomas was me.

Posted by: Warden at July 01, 2010 01:42 PM (QoR4a)

40 I never got this thing.  Why go to the mat for this group?  Even by Obama's standards, they're a bunch of losers.  He would get much more mileage out of a Sistah Soulja moment by allowing them to be slapped on the wrist.

Posted by: AmishDude at July 01, 2010 01:44 PM (T0NGe)

41

Why go to the mat for this group?

Either Obama owes them a favor from long ago or it's just a gratuitous thumb in the eye of whitey.

Given Obama's arrogance and racist hatred of whites, I think the 2nd is as equally likely as the first.

What's anyone gonna do about it? Don't you remember? He won.

Posted by: Warden at July 01, 2010 01:48 PM (QoR4a)

42 If you listen to Bartle Bull, who is clearly no right wing partisan, he claims that there is a pattern in the DOJ of not following up on any complaint from the right because this is just the tip of the iceberg. He is on record in multiple venues claiming team Obama has engaged in massive voter fraud and is relying on it for his next election as well so no investigation of any voter irregularity brought against anyone on the left will ever see the light of day. I wouldn't be so quick to right off the Commission on Civil Rights. They are not letting this issue die.

Posted by: JackStraw at July 01, 2010 02:03 PM (VW9/y)

43 New Black Panthers , ooooooh , scary .
 Did I say scary ? I meant scariest buncha dudes since Rupaul .
Skinny little racist fucks .

Holder is Ramsey Clark  .

Posted by: awkward davies at July 01, 2010 02:13 PM (B4e7Q)

44 They all voted to confirm Holder.

Posted by: ed at July 01, 2010 05:36 PM (Urhve)


I distinctly remember people -- could it have been at HA, land of squishy Pillsbury Doughboy Ed Morrissey? -- saying it wasn't worth it for Repubs to oppose Holder, that they should keep their powder dry for those important battles in the future.

Thanks to the surrender monkeys in Congress and ball-less "conservatives" in the media, we've reached a point where the Constitution and everything else we revered about America is dead.

Oh, wait. It isn't worth questioning this travesty, either. Holder knows what he's doing, and is simply trying to face down the "race-cowards" in the country. We should wait for an important issue to get upset about....

Get used to it, crackers.

Posted by: MrScribbler at July 01, 2010 02:16 PM (Ulu3i)

45 I'm really glad and impressed that Adams put his money where his mouth is and resigned, to now tell the inside story ...but the fact is that there is nothing here that we didn't already know about or that anyone with a brain didn't assume was true.  We know that Holder should be jailed for this (among his other America-hating activites).

I hope this goes somewhere because it's getting pretty ridiculous in America, these days.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 01, 2010 02:38 PM (Qp4DT)

46

I distinctly remember people -- could it have been at HA, land of squishy Pillsbury Doughboy Ed Morrissey? -- saying it wasn't worth it for Repubs to oppose Holder, that they should keep their powder dry for those important battles in the future.

Thanks to the surrender monkeys in Congress and ball-less "conservatives" in the media, we've reached a point where the Constitution and everything else we revered about America is dead.

Posted by: MrScribbler at July 01, 2010 06:16 PM (Ulu3i)

Yep.  It was the same set of the Vichy right who were screaming about "not dying on this hill" or some such idiotic bullshit.  They are one-trick ponies, and their trick is stale and useless.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 01, 2010 02:40 PM (Qp4DT)

47 .but the fact is that there is nothing here that we didn't already know about or that anyone with a brain didn't assume was true.

What is different from the "we knew" to the now is you have an actual lawyer from the commission with inside knowledge accusing him of perjury.

As Sheriff Joe would say, "this is a big fuckin' deal".

Posted by: Vic at July 01, 2010 02:44 PM (6taRI)

48 32 Someone called Rush this afternoon and suggested sending Tea Party members to the polls in November to see if Holder would do anything about it. Signs point to no. I heard this too. My thought was what if someone in a tri-cornered hat just opened the door for people at a polling place. nothing else, just served as a doorman. He'd be hauled off as fast as I typed this. But black panthers actually intimidating on tape? Nah...

Posted by: Doc at July 01, 2010 03:30 PM (riwHb)

49

Power to the People! Kill Whitey!!!!

Posted by: Zombie Chris Farley at July 01, 2010 04:38 PM (kmEfr)

50

"Why go to the mat for this group?"

Don't cost nothin'.

Posted by: Zombie Jon Blutarsky at July 01, 2010 04:42 PM (kmEfr)

51 This isn't just about Holder and the Obama Administration.  Apparently this rot has been festering in the DOJ even throughout the Bush years.  From Adams' PJM article:

Coates and I learned about the hostility towards equal enforcement of the civil rights laws long before United States v. New Black Panther Party. Coates brought, and we won, the case of United States v. Ike Brown arising out of Mississippi.

Brown was the head of the Democratic Party in Noxubee County, a majority black county. The party ran the Democratic primaries, which served as de facto general elections, and Brown made no secret about his desire to see every government office in the county held by a black officeholder. Brown ran a Tammany Hall-style political operation. During one election, he literally stuffed illegal ballots he knew were marked for black candidates through an optical scanner in front of a crowd of angry citizens shouting provisions of Mississippi law at him.

“You ain’t dealing with Mississippi law, this is Ike Brown’s law,” he replied...

...He allowed squads of “assistors” to pollute the voting sites and impose “assistance,” telling black voters how to vote inside the booth — in many cases marking the ballots for the voters. During one election, teams of federal observers counted hundreds of verified examples of illegal assistance. Brown lawlessly disqualified white candidates from running for office. He published the names of 174 white citizens in the newspaper, and said they would be subject to challenge if they tried to vote.

Ike Brown institutionalized racial lawlessness, and brazenly victimized white voters during the 2003 and 2007 elections. And yet, many in the Voting Section never wanted the Department even to investigate the matter.

They voiced explicit opposition to Coates about investigating the discrimination. Superiors were reluctant to recommend to political appointees approval of a lawsuit. After the case was filed, the hostility continued. Most attorneys — except one brave woman — refused to work on the matter with Coates. Hostility pervaded the Voting Section, directed at Coates personally and also towards the theory of the case.

I also encountered open skepticism about the Ike Brown case after I was assigned to work on it in 2005. All manner of reasoning was offered to me regarding why the case should not have been brought.


Posted by: Deety at July 01, 2010 05:04 PM (aVzyR)

52 black man are frightening !! that is why I always carry heat

Posted by: Denny Crane at July 01, 2010 06:18 PM (I+7Zv)

53

NAACP  and Black Panthers.... Just racist  by another name.. Same hate... same style...I wonder who is "keeping them down" now?... Mabe it's the Party that wanted to keep slavery (the Democrates) ran By the  President  ( a Black Man)?  Or Is it just ignorance in a diffrent color?

Posted by: Dw Pepper at July 01, 2010 06:57 PM (8b9o/)

54 At least one reporter is on this, and for those wondering about proof, it's there, documented, and the only way prosecutions will be avoided is corruption.

BTW her name is Jennifer Rubin, Weekly Standard

http://tinyurl.com/32eb7eh

Have I mentioned I hate not being able to link directly? The link is to the Weekly Standard article on the subject, called Friends in High Places. It names names, those behind the decisions.

At least two political appointees need major punishment, at least four should be fired, and the DOJ needs a top-down cleanout - with a fire hose.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong On His Mountain at July 01, 2010 07:26 PM (bxiXv)

55 Hot Stuff?

We're talking about Megyn Kelly, right? Although I much prefer her in her librarian glasses.

Posted by: azlibertarian at July 02, 2010 03:53 AM (q64h3)

56 Third Party, Folks.

Posted by: Mike Meyer at July 02, 2010 05:33 PM (SkhDW)

57 Moncler doudounes Vente savoir clairement ce que nous besoins saisonniers, de sorte ¨¤ moncler vente vestes remplies de plumes 100% de pas cher moncler gel d¡¯entraînement ¨¤ l¡¯aide de la froideur de polyester et 99% nylon int¨¦rieur et de haute qualit¨¦ m¨¦lange!

Posted by: betong at December 16, 2010 05:24 PM (YuTJ9)

58 Moncler down jacket is very popular this year, outlet moncler the color purple is a unique, like a good game is not hard, white, gray or black T-shirt can be done. Snow boots attached to the same color. Black moncler jackets sale are very hectic, you need a balanced overview of the relationship between an unlined painted to the color pattern lining the strange effect is not only a good movie room, which is also very good.moncler discount

Posted by: www.mymonclercity.com at January 05, 2011 05:48 PM (g12N5)

59 I distinctly remember people -- could it have been at HA, land of squishy Pillsbury Doughboy Ed Morrissey? -- saying it wasn't worth it for Repubs to oppose Holder, that they should keep their powder dry for those important battles in the future.

Posted by: cheap cell phone at January 08, 2011 05:30 PM (NxJG3)

60 Thank you kart ipi for sharing  boyun aský ipi has been kart askýsý the subject of a baskýlý yaka ipi thought-provoking

Posted by: proximity kartý at January 13, 2011 03:12 AM (d9Acf)

61

I certainly enjoyed the way you explore your experience and knowledge of the subject! Keep up on it. Thanks for sharing the info

Posted by: Middleton Computer Repair at January 28, 2011 07:10 AM (grACb)

62

thanks for sharing the info

Posted by: prom dresses 2011 at February 14, 2011 04:33 PM (pq/Xj)

63 Louis Vuitton outlet, Hermes  bags is are reasonable and affordable.

Posted by: Gucci evening bag at March 05, 2011 12:05 AM (HtxQw)

64 gabion box enjoy high quality.-ning

Posted by: gabion box at April 06, 2011 12:00 AM (aFRfL)

65 thank you for the post
<a href=http://bicyclereview-site.com/garmin-edge-705>Garmin Edge 705</a>
<a href=http://bicyclereview-site.com/park-tool-kit>Park Advanced Tool Kit</a>
I'll be back soon

Posted by: Cygolite at June 01, 2011 12:30 PM (bL1Q8)

67 An awesome lv handbags for cheap shows to arrive throughout the remarkable good quality wholesale LV handbags can be to glimpse arround lv Damier Graphite Canvas concerning the properly recognized sweeping internet web-sites and make specific that there suggestions or ranking is excellent. buying lv Damier Ebene Canvas Bags< from the wholesaler is ordinarily a nicer choice then buying from what ever nearby supplier since it will permit that you evaluate the costs of many lv monogram purses for sale providers and assortments at a time. You can purchase the purses in bulk that will pass right into a deduction merchandising price to be certain that you just will lv monogram wallets capable to market them for some earnings that is your principal purpose while you leverage the sweeping lv monogram canvas handbag sale.

Posted by: lv at June 26, 2011 04:53 PM (pjYd2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
111kb generated in CPU 0.0466, elapsed 0.2282 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1887 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.