December 07, 2010

White House Blames Congressional Dems for Tax Deal
— Gabriel Malor

As DrewM reported last night, the White House and congressional Republicans cut a deal on the imminent tax hikes. The GOP walked away with a two-year Bush tax cut extension for all incomes, a two percent reduction in payroll taxes, and a limitation on the resurrected death tax -- 35% with a $5 million exemption. Obama got his unemployment benefits extension, but only for 13 months (and he was going to get that anyway). He also expanded the wealth-redistributing Earned Income Tax Credit (and he was going to get that anyway too).

When news broke last night, there were already rumors that congressional Democrats were considering mutiny and "progressives" on the internet were freaking out that Obama got "rolled" or "suckered." This post is representative if you'd like a little schadenfreude with your Wheaties this morning.

With his allies having conniptions over his "symbolic presidency", I expected the White House to lash out at Republicans. Something about "Party of No" and making "hard decisions." It's the standard move, especially when the President needs Democrats to get in line and vote for this thing.

Instead, the White House seems to be declaring war on the Democrats in Congress:

"We wanted a fight, the House didn't throw a punch," a senior White House official tells ABC News, pointing out that for months before the 2010 midterm elections, President Obama was making the case against the Bush tax cuts for wealthier Americans. "The House wouldn't vote before the Senate, and the Senate was afraid they'd lose a vote on it."

"It was like the Jets versus Sharks except there weren't any Jets," the official said. "Senator Schumer says he wants a fight? He couldn't hold his caucus together."

"This isn't a debate in a lab somewhere," the official continued. "People's taxes were going to go up, and then we were going to have a Senate with a slimmer margin and House under Republican control."

Message control is not one of this White House's strong attributes, is it? Vermont Independent Senator Sanders is already threatening to filibuster the tax deal.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 03:38 AM | Comments (230)
Post contains 362 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Coincidence? There weren't any Jets in Monday Night Football, either.

Posted by: real joe at December 07, 2010 03:43 AM (w7Lv+)

2 Obama got his unemployment benefits extension, but only for 13 months (and he was going to get that anyway). He also expanded the wealth-redistributing Earned Income Tax Credit (and he was going to get that anyway too).

Why was he going to get it anyway?

Yes Obama is attacking congressional Dems. He knows that he is in trouble for reelection and a lot of those Dems are already out.

He is in full campaign mode now.

As for Sanders filibustering? I thought this was a "revenue" bill which precluded filibuster.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 03:45 AM (e4sSD)

3

"It was like the Jets versus Sharks except there weren't any Jets,"

Wow.  A reference to '60s musical theater.  That's quite sad.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 03:47 AM (BvBKY)

4 Hugh Hewitt was totally against this deal last night; thought the GOP could really break the Dems.  I understand the sentiment, but don't really get the degree of his anger, or degree of his certainty.  Here's his post:

Two Years? The Country Votes The Biggest GOP Win In Two Generations And The D.C. GOP Settles For Two Years?
http://tinyurl.com/25to5uc


Posted by: ParisParamus at December 07, 2010 03:50 AM (gMzAL)

5 Stress is one of the greatest factors in determining if a cancer patient lives or dies (head of OSU cancer center told by dad that when he was first diagnosed).  Does this make John Edwards a criminal murderer(soon-to-be)?

My prayers to her, her children, and her family.

Posted by: mamma at December 07, 2010 03:51 AM (penCf)

6 He is in full campaign mode now.

We'll see.  Clinton could triangulate effectively.  I'm not so sure a pompous jerk who oozes "I'm better than you plebes" will be able to.  Also, his heart isn't in it.  He'd rather bash skulls.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 03:52 AM (BvBKY)

7 Hugh Hewitt was totally against this deal last night; thought the GOP could really break the Dems.  I understand the sentiment, but don't really get the degree of his anger, or degree of his certainty.

I agree with him.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 03:54 AM (e4sSD)

8

Hugh is pretty good at being wrong. But if he thought that the GOP could have gotten more than 2 years on the tax cuts, he's crazy.  If anything, they could have gotten a better deal on the unemployment benefits or the death tax.

Making the tax cuts an election-year issue is the smartest part of this deal.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 03:55 AM (BvBKY)

9 I think the White House knows that the only chance to get some hiring going on is to lock in the lower tax rates on the hiring class and kill the uncertainty that has caused them to humker down.

I'm not sure it will be enough anymore to pull the nose up out of this stall, but without it there was no chance.

Posted by: nickless at December 07, 2010 03:56 AM (MMC8r)

10 When news broke last night, there were already rumors that congressional Democrats were considering mutiny and "progressives" on the internet were freaking out that Obama got "rolled" or "suckered."

Behold, the God Who Bleeds!

Posted by: Salish the Space Indian at December 07, 2010 03:57 AM (MMC8r)

11 We'll see.  Clinton could triangulate effectively.

Don't misunderstand me, I am not saying he is campaigning "effectively" or that he is going to pull a Clinton and do a radical "comeback" (which didn't happen anyway).

Unless the Republican big-wigs screw up big time and run another McCain he will lose and lose badly. In fact, there is a good chance that he will get "primaried out".

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 03:58 AM (e4sSD)

12 Uhhhhhhhhh, children!....ummmmm, why are we, umm-uhhhhh, fighting?

Posted by: TEH WON (summoning my inner Mick Jagger) at December 07, 2010 03:59 AM (5qJM5)

13

Being a "Comanche Voter" and all, I can say that Hewitt was so far off the reservation last night that I simply turned him off.  And said "Grow up".

But it's nice to see the White House and the libs/Congress "Chuck You Schumer" et al engaging in a peeing contest.  Each accuses the other of being a pussy--and each of them is mostly right.   Certainly Obama has proved to be the personification of the pussification of the Presidency.  He can't apologize fast enough to damn near everybody he gets near.

As for the "deal"?  Was it a whole loaf, a 3/4 loaf or just half a loaf?  I say it's 3/4 of a loaf.  The idea that anyone can truthfully say that a "permanent" extension of the current rates is "permanent" is laughable.  Congress can turn around and change tax rates just as quickly as Barney Frank can change his shorts after an "encounter" with a friend.

Posted by: Comanche Voter at December 07, 2010 04:00 AM (3ESDJ)

14 This won't last. Too many RINOs, not enough ball-dangling men (however, most Conservative women have a brass set they aren't afraid to swing about).

Never Forget: Dec. 7. We were attacked. Then we went on the attack. 

Posted by: mamma at December 07, 2010 04:04 AM (penCf)

15 For fun, go to the Dailykos site and read some of the comments about this. One of the more polite ones called Obama a "douche."

Posted by: Mystery Meat at December 07, 2010 04:04 AM (9AJat)

16 Democrats, Meet Bus. Bus Meet Democrats.

I'd be mad at them as well. They dicked up the stimulus and Obamacare, and now they made the WH eat crow on something extremely symbolic and "ideological"

ouch

(I fucking loooove it)


Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:07 AM (zyaZ1)

17 I said it in the other thread, I don't think we could have done a better deal.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:10 AM (zyaZ1)

18 remember Pearl Harbor

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:10 AM (eOXTH)

19 I told all those MoFo's -- FEAR MY WHEELS!!!

Posted by: THE BUS at December 07, 2010 04:10 AM (5qJM5)

20

OT:  Fred Upton flips switch on his Edison lightbulb ban... will re-consider whether to sell his mother to a Bangkok pimp allow Edison lightbulbs again for a committee assignment.

 

You can call the House Republican Steering Committee and demand they oppose Upton at 202-225-2204.  They start voting early so call early.

Posted by: Truman North at December 07, 2010 04:10 AM (HLGCA)

21 Obama got his unemployment benefits extension, but only for 13 months (and he was going to get that anyway).

Obama extends the Bush/LBJ compassionate conservative great society budget: enhance the Federal Reserve's corruption, nationally spend more than you bring in, buy off voters who don't pay taxes, and give away the national treasury to international interests.

"He was going to get that anyway." from weenie-republicans.

Where are the conservatives? Playing progressive and "smart"? Not yet seated in Congress!

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:13 AM (H+LJc)

22 uh, i'd say this deal was a "c".....and a "c" at best for effort.....our party is filled with pussies....the people spoke and they didn't really pay any attention.....

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:14 AM (eOXTH)

23 there is no reason for a death tax....that is a gov't greed tax period......all i can say is die poor people

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:16 AM (eOXTH)

Posted by: Truman North at December 07, 2010 04:16 AM (HLGCA)

25 Off topic, but I was just at the Wal-Mart, checkout, guy in front of me, dark hair, shifty eyes, three-day beard, he's buying a handful of AA batteries.

I phoned it in.  Shit.  Ya never know.  Better safe than sorrow.

Posted by: Just-Another-Guy-on-the-Team at December 07, 2010 04:18 AM (4sQwu)

26

I could post this anywhere, but I'll post it here.  I really can't believe this man is our president.  I have never in my life (39 and counting) ever imagined anyone less presidential.  Even real novices grow into the job.  After 2 years even Bill Clinton was looking kind of statesmanish.  Obama looks less like a president now than he did when he took office, and he looked nothing like one then.  I get more amazed with every passing day.

It's a crazy world, I guess.

Posted by: Dan in Philly at December 07, 2010 04:19 AM (UpqKo)

27 How is it a c? We won on fucking everything. Unemployment was going to be extended, maybe not for the same length, but it was gonna happen. We got a pretty bad ass deal (much better than I expected) on the Death Tax, and the Juice box crowd is crying bloody murder.

Politically he is taking apart his own coalition without making a new one. If he wasn't getting 95% from the black population he'd be in the 30% range already. He's almost a lame duck.

Keep this up and maybe we can get Tax Reform and Entitlement Reform next year. It's not like we are going to vote for him because of it. In the future we make those stronger and more lasting

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:22 AM (zyaZ1)

28 Never Forget: Dec. 7. We were attacked. Then we went on the attack.

And we WON victory over the initiating warfare enemy required to sign peace with no provisions. And we were MAGNANIMOUS.

"Nation building" in formerly modernized Japan and West Germany via the Marshall Plan mutated into the neoconservative propaganda to "spread democracy" and mob rule throughout Islam. In Muslim countries not already modernized practically, let alone ideologically, we are supposed to win hearts and minds of enemies who eschew the great satan America. Our military is refused to fight according to the Versailles Treaty by our own PC administrations. In fact, our troops must abide insanely suicidal American manufactured Rules of Engagement against military Jihad and terrorist Jihadists. And our CinC refuses terrorists caught on fields of battle military tribunals. The CinC has openly declared "warfare in Washington" on America, The Constitution and the Citizenry whom he denounces as "the enemy" and his cohorts term their congressional members of opposing views as unworthy "terrorists".

/So what gives with this:
Obama got his unemployment benefits extension, but only for 13 months (and he was going to get that anyway).

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:25 AM (H+LJc)

29 I phoned it in.  Shit.  Ya never know.  Better safe than sorrow.
Posted by: Just-Another-Guy-on-the-Team

...using the Walmart service center phone.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:27 AM (H+LJc)

30 This just in. Obumbles discovers snow in North Carolina!!1!!1!!

Posted by: Ex-Republican genius at December 07, 2010 04:28 AM (53X20)

31 Off topic, but I was just at the Wal-Mart, checkout, guy in front of me, dark hair, shifty eyes, three-day beard, he's buying a handful of AA batteries.

I phoned it in.  Shit.  Ya never know.  Better safe than sorrow.

I hope the hell you're kidding.  I just emailed WM corporate and told them I'd never shop in any of their stores again for having videos of Big Siss at each checkout lane encouraging shoppers to turn in their fellow Americans.

Fucking bullshit bitch.

Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 07, 2010 04:30 AM (jbCcb)

32 zakn the death tax.....the extension of 13 months of unemployment insurance.....i'm glad it appears that at least for the next 2 years my taxes will not be going up and that the payroll tax is going to be reduced but honestly....to extend unemployment by 13 months? i could see maybe 2 months and then the 99'ers or 101'ers can't ever receive those benefits again....ever

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:31 AM (eOXTH)

33 11 Don't misunderstand me, I am not saying he is campaigning "effectively" or that he is going to pull a Clinton and do a radical "comeback" (which didn't happen anyway).

Unless the Republican big-wigs screw up big time and run another McCain he will lose and lose badly.

Newt McCain?

Posted by: Reiver at December 07, 2010 04:31 AM (64S5N)

34 TCU @ Big Eastern via Onion, how did that turn of phrase go about looking at those woolly hos.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:32 AM (H+LJc)

35 so if i understand this right....janet runs the people of walmart site? or is she a person of walmart?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:32 AM (eOXTH)

36 We no longer worship the false god Obowma.

Posted by: Teal'c the Jaffa at December 07, 2010 04:32 AM (EhYdw)

37 ...using the Walmart service center phone.

Big Sis will announce a program later this week in which DHS peeps will be live-watching from above, much like is done in casinos, and all I'll have to do is look up at the ceiling, give the secret sign, and point to the suspect.

I'm gonna go to Wal-Mart every day.  And be vigilant.  It's what I can do to help.

Posted by: Just-Another-Guy-on-the-Team at December 07, 2010 04:35 AM (4sQwu)

38 videos of Big Siss at each checkout lane encouraging shoppers to turn in their fellow Americans.

As Michael Savage asked of this inane and vile public distraction, DEFINE SUSPICIOUS.

Janet Nincompoop did not just rev up the neighborhood watch program because this is NOT ABOUT looking out for your neighbor.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:35 AM (H+LJc)

39 The Republicans got this and they're still in the minority.  It's not like they're already in control-- this is what they achieved from Democrat disarray.  Considering they're no more powerful than they were six months ago, it was a success.

The Dem dream was to let the tax rates rise and there would be nothing the House GOP could do to override the Senate and a veto.  Now the rates are locked in until Obambi is out on his unqualified socialist ass.

Posted by: nickless© at December 07, 2010 04:37 AM (MMC8r)

40 The election showed blaming republicans had become a non-starter, so the Dems are Ogabe's obvious secondary target...because for a narcissist, someone else MUST be blamed.

The mistake people make is in thinking of Ogabe as a Democrat/Liberal, when in fact he has no loyalty to anyone but himself.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 07, 2010 04:37 AM (g5cS5)

41 DHS peeps will be live-watching from above, much like is done in casinos, and all I'll have to do is look up at the ceiling, give the secret sign, and point to the suspect.

Janet Nincompoop chose the only global chain with ready built-in wiring to implement that @ Walmart, coincidentally where urban jungle and suburban bumpkin peasants buy pitchforks.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:39 AM (H+LJc)

42 Unless the Republican big-wigs screw up big time and run another McCain he will lose and lose badly.

You're going to get whom I pick and you're going to fall in line. Don't go thinking of nominating someone who doesn't get my approval, I'm the ARCHITECT. Don't bitch at me, I'm only giving my honest opinion

Posted by: Karl Rove at December 07, 2010 04:39 AM (vdfwz)

43 Unless the Republican big-wigs screw up big time and run another McCain he will lose and lose badly.

Hi there!

Posted by: Mike Fuckabee at December 07, 2010 04:40 AM (vdfwz)

44 Phoenixgirl I totally agree. but read a little bit into the details http://tinyurl.com/323ecw9 We handed them a shit sandwich (for them) in return for something that's fairly trivial

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:41 AM (zyaZ1)

45 After I phoned in the guy buying the stash of batteries, I got a call from Janet, and she told me to start my monitoring over at the AOSHQ site.  The comments threads.

So I rang up my nephew, he's a hacker, see, a real wizard, and he is showing me how to break through these pseudo screen names we're all posting under, to get real names and addys.

Posted by: Just-Another-Guy-on-the-Team at December 07, 2010 04:41 AM (4sQwu)

46 in fact he has no loyalty to anyone but himself.
Posted by: Purple Avenger

Yeah, Mr. Malleable Neo-Marxist Revisionist "I am not an ideologue." aka, I am zod.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 04:42 AM (H+LJc)

47 Why don't we send in a mass emailing the pictures from People of Walmart's website? Let Big Sis pore over 300 lb buttcracks for a while

Posted by: kbdabear at December 07, 2010 04:42 AM (vdfwz)

48

Gabe, If I am reading it right it is a 2% reduction on the employees Social Security withholding tax, not a 2% cut on "payroll tax".

So it's 4.2% for the employees share of SS withholding instead of 6.2%.  The employer is still paying the whole 6.2% I believe, as well as all the other medicare, state, and federal witholding.

It isn't a 2% across the board cut of all payroll taxes.

It will be marginally noticiable at best.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 04:43 AM (wuv1c)

49

Yeah, the Walmart thing is pretty creepy -- and counterproductive.  I'm less inclined to think that Walmart fears an attack in one of their stores than the Obama administration is threatening them with the SEIU.

I trust my fellow Walmart voters to do what's right with markers, scissors and other materials to properly adorn the Big Sis posters.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 04:44 AM (BvBKY)

50 phoenixgirl sorry link broke http://tinyurl.com/2eoaw9g

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:45 AM (zyaZ1)

51 For fun, go to the Dailykos site and read some of the comments about this. One of the more polite ones called Obama a "douche." Posted by: Mystery Meat
--------------
Lol.. that's the first site I went to this morning.. sooo funny.. talk about schadenfreude!

The funny thing is, they banned me from posting on that site for saying stuff about Obama that was no worse than what is plastered all over there this morning! lol.

Posted by: Chitown Jerry at December 07, 2010 04:45 AM (Do528)

52

Hugh Hewitt was totally against this deal last night; thought the GOP could really break the Dems.  I understand the sentiment, but don't really get the degree of his anger, or degree of his certainty.

I agree with him.

I agree with the sentiment as well. We won 63 freaking seats people. We can't do better than this?  also 13 more months of UC? That brings it up to three  years.  So the republicans are elected to cut spending, and what is the first thing they do? endorse a massive unfunded spending.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 04:47 AM (wuv1c)

53 The thing about Obama is that he thinks -- being himself -- that anything he does is fine.  And, hell, if the minions get too uppity, he can just give another speech.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 04:49 AM (BvBKY)

54

Also, I would like to add that I understand there are political realities, but 13 months? counldnt they have just extended them to after the holidays? Maybe to march at the latest?  How much longer are we going to pay people not to work. We are well beyond the point where people are withdrawing what they contributed.  I don't know how state UC funds have any money left at this point

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 04:50 AM (wuv1c)

55

It will be marginally noticeable at best.

Posted by: Ben
----------

2 thousand bucks a year on a $100,000 income would hardly be noticeable?  That's $166 a month!  That will keep me in val-u-rite vodka and pudding!

Posted by: Chitown Jerry at December 07, 2010 04:51 AM (Do528)

56

Anybody else getting the "Bold Progressives" banner ad?

That didn't take long.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 04:51 AM (BvBKY)

57 Hi there!

Posted by: Mike Fuckabee at December 07, 2010 08:40 AM (vdfwz)

I think even the hard core religious folks have woke up to the fact that he is a jerk and he will not get anything but possibly Iowa. (Which is bad because it is first, thank R party boss assholes)

Iowa is a liberal caucus State and caucuses can be bamboozled, especially if they have a liberal bent to begin with.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 04:52 AM (e4sSD)

58 thanks zakn the payroll tax reduction does nothing to spur job growth since it is geared only to the employee not and ignores the employer....that could have been something to help! i'm glad we got what we got...i just wish...it was more...and i fear that in future negotiations with this creep we will end up on the short end of the stick because the "r's" will only remember that obama compromised and now they must compromise too.....they held all three branches of gov't not too long ago and well.....all they did was compromise and bend over across the aisle....that's what as brought us here....

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:55 AM (eOXTH)

59 The Tea Party fucking pwnt Iowa. Fiscal Conservatism can trump Social Conservatism with the proper candidate.

Huckafewl is a non-factor against the candidate with the right bonifides. He could only beat Romney, and that's not sayin much

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 04:57 AM (zyaZ1)

60 ben EXACTLY!!!!!!! and just think if they had let the employers have a break on the payroll tax!!!! that could have encouraged businesses to hire! hey! how about eliminating that tax all together for businesses?

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 04:57 AM (eOXTH)

61 hey I'd let the tax cuts expire if it really meant a knock down drag out fight between the White House and the Dems in Congress. Then we can swoop in after Jan and extend the Tax Cuts retroactively.

Posted by: nevergiveup at December 07, 2010 04:57 AM (0GFWk)

62

They extended funding UC for 13 months. They did not extend the 99 weeks eligiblity by 13 months. Now they will not have to vote on it for another 13 months. If they had not done this, people who had only been unemployed for 26 weeks would no longer been eligible for any extention. Remember, they voted on this about 4 or 5 months ago and the funding they voted for then ran out on Dec. 1st. This is just status quo, nothing new.

63 house seats doesn't mean a thing until Jan. This was a pretty good win for this time. Enjoy it.

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 04:59 AM (cX9pO)

63 Phoenixgirl They still hold all three branches under this deal. Imagine what is/ could be possible with control of the House and operational control of the Senate?

Everyone needs to relax. This is a hell of a deal to get when the Dims control the entire fucking Government.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:00 AM (zyaZ1)

64 Huckafewl is a non-factor against the candidate with the right bonifides. He could only beat Romney, and that's not sayin much
Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 08:57 AM

I guess I'll have to spam twice as hard now

Posted by: Dan the Mitt Spam Man at December 07, 2010 05:00 AM (vdfwz)

65 You want a fight?  If you don't support this tax deal, we'll give you another fat lip, pussy boy!

Posted by: John Boner at December 07, 2010 05:03 AM (GwPRU)

66

It will be marginally noticeable at best.

Posted by: Ben
----------

2 thousand bucks a year on a $100,000 income would hardly be noticeable?  That's $166 a month!  That will keep me in val-u-rite vodka and pudding!

 

The average person doesn't earn 100,000 a year, they earn 44,000.00.  It'll be about 70 bucks and change a month(depending on if your paid monthly or bi-monthly). While that is nice, and I'll take it, keep in mind it is a payroll cut for the employee, not the employer. It is the employers we need to give incentives to in order for them to hire.

 

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:04 AM (wuv1c)

67

I think even the hard core religious folks have woke up to the fact that he is a jerk and he will not get anything but possibly Iowa. (Which is bad because it is first, thank R party boss assholes)

Iowa is a liberal caucus State and caucuses can be bamboozled, especially if they have a liberal bent to begin with.

I did the caucuses last time (and the straw poll, there should be a AoS meetup in Ames next time).  Since both R&D were competitive, the chances for shenanigans were less.  I still think there will be some nontrivial challenge to Obama.  You'd also be surprised at how difficult it is to shenaniganize the caucuses.  You can try, but you end up in a room with your neighbors.

I wouldn't describe Iowa as "liberal" in that way.  It's a prairie populism.

The Iowa religious voters (and there are many in the GOP) bought into Huck's evangelism-as-identity-politics.  I think they've soured on him, though.  As it stands now (a year out, remember), I think he wins the caucuses, but only with 15-20%.

The only one who can cut into his support significantly is Palin.

But don't worry about Iowa.  It never really determines the winner, it just weeds out the also-rans.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 05:05 AM (BvBKY)

68 bigred thank you for the clarification on the extension.... this is from about.com "The agreement does not include a tier 5 of unemployment for workers (99ers) who have exhausted all state and federal unemployment benefits."

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 05:07 AM (eOXTH)

69 Business will hire for one reason: they need people to do work. They are not going to hire for tax breaks or any other gimmick. Until they have work that needs to be done, they are not going to hire anyone. This is not government work, this is real world.  

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:07 AM (cX9pO)

70 The left is just blowing smoke for their far left.   We got played and it doesn't look good because our leadership thinks they won.

Posted by: erp at December 07, 2010 05:10 AM (Wkm4K)

71 Everyone needs to relax. This is a hell of a deal to get when the Dims control the entire fucking Government.
Posted by: Zakn
----------
Exactly.. As Sheriff Joe would say.. "This is a big effin deal!"

It says to teh American people that the adults are back in charge in Washington.. watch the stock market soar today..

Posted by: Chitown Jerry at December 07, 2010 05:11 AM (Do528)

72 zakn i realize this deal is pretty good...but it's not great and i can't relax because of the party's past performance......besides....i looked at too many of those posters with the caption "EXCELLENCE! BECAUSE GOOD IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH"

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 07, 2010 05:14 AM (eOXTH)

73 If Palin runs she will win Iowa. In Dramatic fashion. She has the Religious Right Bonifides and the Fiscal Bonifides. Imo she has the Nat. Sec Hawk Bonifides. That's all three legs of the Reagan coalition.

Everyone else will run to NH and whatever comes after SC.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:15 AM (zyaZ1)

74 phoenixgirl, you're welcome. There is enough to get mad about Bammie without wasting ammunition shooting at shadows.  :-)  We live in what's known as a target rich environment. Fun times ahead!

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:15 AM (cX9pO)

75

Everyone needs to relax. This is a hell of a deal to get when the Dims control the entire fucking Government.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 09:00 AM (zyaZ1)

I agree. Even after the new Congress is sworn in all the GOP can really do is put a check on spending.

We need another branch of government to accomplish anything substantive.

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 05:16 AM (7+pP9)

76 69 Business will hire for one reason: they need people to do work. They are not going to hire for tax breaks or any other gimmick. Until they have work that needs to be done, they are not going to hire anyone. This is not government work, this is real world.   Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 09:07 AM

But all the corporations are sitting on gazillions in cash. Why don't they hire lots of people rather than filling their executive swimming pools with $100 bills?

Posted by: Paul Krugman, Super Genius at December 07, 2010 05:16 AM (vdfwz)

77 62

They extended funding UC for 13 months. They did not extend the 99 weeks eligiblity by 13 months. Now they will not have to vote on it for another 13 months. If they had not done this, people who had only been unemployed for 26 weeks would no longer been eligible for any extention.

Thanks, bigred.  This is important to point out.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 05:17 AM (BvBKY)

78 The Iowa religious voters (and there are many in the GOP) bought into Huck's evangelism-as-identity-politics.

Huck ran on a fair tax platform in Iowa and Mitt's road to Damascus embrace of the pro-life movement seemed shallow and opportunistic.  That was the reason Huck won.

It's important to remember he was an unknown quantity back then and there hadn't been much scrutiny of his record.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 07, 2010 05:17 AM (TpXEI)

79 See I read the ""It was like the Jets versus Sharks except there weren't any Jets," and though doesn't that stupid fool know the Winnipeg jets moves to Phoenix?

Posted by: Rob B. at December 07, 2010 05:17 AM (q32Ly)

80 Dam Fox. They are regurgitating the Dem talking point on this deal. This tax CUT will cost xxxx billion dollars over two years.

Hey you stupid Fox producers; keeping tax rates the same cost NOTHING.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:18 AM (e4sSD)

81 It says to teh American people that the adults are back in charge in Washington.. watch the stock market soar today..
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at December 07, 2010 09:11 AM

But Warren Buffett, George Soros, and Bill Gates are just chomping at the bit to pay more taxes, and think we can only get back on track with 90 percent tax rates!

Posted by: Paul Krugman, Super Genius at December 07, 2010 05:18 AM (vdfwz)

82

Business will hire for one reason: they need people to do work. They are not going to hire for tax breaks or any other gimmick. Until they have work that needs to be done, they are not going to hire anyone. This is not government work, this is real world.  

That's only half accurate. There are a lot of employers, the company I work for included, that have the work to hire more people, but intentionally haven't because of cost related to employees and uncertainty. A company can have work to do but the government can make the company think twice about hiring new people. Just think about your local bank. When the recession began they cut bank tellers down. Now when you go to the bank, you have to wait in a long line because they only have a couple of tellers. The work is there. It's just too costly to hire people to do it. Sure if the economy goes gangbusters, then the banks will fill those spots immediately, however in the meantime, tax cuts on the employers payroll might help, and probably will, convince them to bring back at least 1 more teller at each branch location.

You're right in that a payroll tax won't spur massive hiring that will solve all our problems, but I'd be willing to bet it would spur enough hiring to shave a percentage point off the unemployment rolls.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:20 AM (wuv1c)

83 phoenixgirl

I'm with you, but shit that motivates you to win at wrestling, laying a beatdown in MMA, kick some fucking ass selling refrigerators, taking war to the enemy, are not what is indicative of what makes successful politics.

Bottom Line: We made them cry Mommy, and the new Congress hasn't even been sworn in yet. Alan Fucking Grayson is still a member of the House commenting on MSLSD FFS

This is near total victory. We just had to pay people that couldn't find or want a job some cash for a while.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:21 AM (zyaZ1)

84 I wouldn't describe Iowa as "liberal" in that way.  It's a prairie populism.

Iowa consistently votes Dem. It went for Obama by 10 points in 2008.

It is liberal in every way. It is bad that there are some conservatives stuck there but it doesn't change the fact that it is liberal.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:23 AM (e4sSD)

85

Huck ran on a fair tax platform in Iowa and Mitt's road to Damascus embrace of the pro-life movement seemed shallow and opportunistic.  That was the reason Huck won.

It's important to remember he was an unknown quantity back then and there hadn't been much scrutiny of his record.

Good point about the fair tax.  That was a big deal in 2007 and he was the only one to embrace it.  I think that Huck's name came up in the evangelical churches quite a bit.  I do think that his stock has sunk, but he'll still be strong in Iowa.  I also think Mitt has a better standing vis-a-vis the pro-life issue than he did then.  But now he has the MassCare problem.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 05:23 AM (BvBKY)

86

I wouldn't describe Iowa as "liberal" in that way.  It's a prairie populism.

Iowa consistently votes Dem. It went for Obama by 10 points in 2008.

It is liberal in every way. It is bad that there are some conservatives stuck there but it doesn't change the fact that it is liberal.

farm subsidies.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:24 AM (wuv1c)

87
Vic:

Instead of torturing yourself by watching Fox News why don't you make it quick and simple -- by slamming your dick in the car door?

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 05:24 AM (7+pP9)

88 zakn, very true. Look, we waited for two years for the elections to happen. We can put up with another 3 weeks til the new guys get in. Then judge them on their actions, not on what guys no longer there did 5, 10 years ago. It's getting like "sure we beat Rommel in Africa, but that's not where Berlin is". This is a campaign, not a battle.

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:25 AM (cX9pO)

89

President Obama could be crippling his own reelection effort by making a deal with Republicans to extend all of the Bush-era tax cuts, Democratic strategists and liberal groups said Monday.

A two-year extension of tax rates ushered in by President George W. Bush nearly a decade ago, would ensure a resumption of todayÂ’s fiery debate in 2012, when Obama is expected to reapply for his job, strategists in both parties said.

It also is angering the left wing of the Democratic Party, which already has a long list of complaints about Obama.


“President Obama has shown a complete refusal to fight Republicans throughout his presidency even when the public is on his side — and millions of his former supporters are now growing disappointed and infuriated by this refusal to fight,” said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

Ahhh the tears and whining of libturds is a wonderful thing. However the best we can hope for is that they stay mad at Barry and stay home in 2012

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 07, 2010 05:27 AM (1Jaio)

90

farm subsidies.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 09:24 AM (wuv1c)

That plays some role, but you have to remember that most people aren't farmers.  It's that whole "little guy, working man" thing that Dems pull off so well that plays in Iowa.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 05:27 AM (BvBKY)

91 by slamming your dick in the car door?

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 09:24 AM (7+pP9)

I just turned it off but my dick is still stuck in the truck door. And on top of that it is till 27°F outside.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:29 AM (e4sSD)

92

Is Iowa a caucus for the republicans or a vote?

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:30 AM (wuv1c)

93 It is no wonder that Shuckabee supported the "Fair Tax". It is a tax increase for almost everyone.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:30 AM (e4sSD)

94 Bigred,

We cut our teeth in NAfrica. If we had sent that green force into Europe as-is we'd have bled Millions and might have lost. http://tinyurl.com/28qy7zv



Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:31 AM (zyaZ1)

95 “President Obama has shown a complete refusal to fight Republicans throughout his presidency even when the public is on his side

The public is on the side of the left? Is that why the GOP had a great day on 11/2?

If the public is screaming "raise them damn taxes", I haven't heard it. The looney left still deludes themselves into thinking that Obama won in 2008 by promising a far left agenda, not that he and the MFM fooled millions into thinking he was a post partisan uniter who was a centrist, not a socialist

Posted by: kbdabear at December 07, 2010 05:33 AM (vdfwz)

96 Iowa is a caucus , It's open to who shows up

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:33 AM (zyaZ1)

97 3
Wow.  A reference to '60s musical theater.  That's quite sad.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 07:47 AM (BvBKY)

I agree. To have cited Montagues and Capulets would have been more uplifting

Posted by: William Shakespeare, full of himself at December 07, 2010 05:33 AM (yRrAd)

98 It also is angering the left wing of the Democratic Party, which already has a long list of complaints about Obama.

For the odds that the lefties will be so angry they'll turn on King Barry, please see PUMA's 2008 for reference.

King Barry still has an 81 percent approval rate among Democrats, so the squeaky wheels aren't exactly creating a mass mutiny there

Posted by: kbdabear at December 07, 2010 05:36 AM (vdfwz)

99 True ben, but business has to weigh overtime costs to hiring costs, and I think many are opting to get by on current labor levels as opposed to hiring more. Better for now to give 4 guys 50 hours as opposed to hiring 1 guy for 40 hours, given the uncertainty of having 200 hours of work down the road a bit. My old job, our boss said it cost $5000 to hire a new driver, so you better have more work than that to be done.  

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:36 AM (cX9pO)

100 97 Iowa is a caucus , It's open to who shows up can get past the party hacks and union goons
Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 09:33 AM

FIFY

Posted by: kbdabear at December 07, 2010 05:37 AM (vdfwz)

101

Sarah Shourd was freed from prison in Iran in September after 410 days in solitary confinement. In her first op-ed since her release, she calls for improved relations and more conversation between the U.S. and Iran.

One of the hikers imprisoned by Iran

 

What is it with these people? It's like the women who sympathize with their rapists or husbands who beat them. It is beyond me.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:37 AM (wuv1c)

102 #92  I just turned it off but my dick is still stuck in the truck door. And on top of that it is till 27°F outside.

Obviously a sign of global warming.  Speaking of which:

Record low temperatures hit Florida; Fort Lauderdale drops to 40 degrees, coldest in 169 years http://bit.ly/ibyOnN

About this tax-deal, is Obama looking for some "ass to kick" amongst Congressional Democrats in its aftermath? Its always somebody else's fault with him, whether it be Bush's fault, or the Republicans fault, and now its the Dems fault.  It is so easy for a narcissist to throw other people under the bus. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 07, 2010 05:37 AM (9hSKh)

103 MN is a Caucus state and I always had to show ID/Residence. Granted I Caucus with the R's....

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:38 AM (zyaZ1)

104

 True ben, but business has to weigh overtime costs to hiring costs, and I think many are opting to get by on current labor levels as opposed to hiring more. Better for now to give 4 guys 50 hours as opposed to hiring 1 guy for 40 hours, given the uncertainty of having 200 hours of work down the road a bit. My old job, our boss said it cost $5000 to hire a new driver, so you better have more work than that to be done. 

Indeed. However, another reaosn people aren't hiring, and this is only for select businesses, is Obamacare. One we still don't know what the F is in it. But we do know that it becomes effective if your company has more than 50 employees. So there are a lot of companies out there that may have 40-49 employees and the work to hire more, but the potential profits of that work don't outweigh the costs if they have to comply with Obamacare.

There are so many things our government is doing that is directly resulting in keeping people out of work.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:39 AM (wuv1c)

105 What is it with these people? It's like the women who sympathize with their rapists or husbands who beat them. It is beyond me.

Being a progressive is more than just an ideology.

It's a terminal disease.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 07, 2010 05:40 AM (tf9Ne)

106 Hugh Hewitt's a complete asshole even if he's partially correct on who won,  The stupid cocksucker answered a caller by saying "Voinovich has been in office too long; he used to be good as a mayor of Cleveland and governor of Ohio",  Ummm, NO; he was always a backbenching cockwipe who never encountered a tax increase he didn't like and always endorsed balancing the books on the backs of productive citizens.  Maybe Mr I'm-a-Buckeye was off at Harvard or Meeeechigan when Groin-itch was a shitty mayor and governor because Hewitt is just flat out ignorant on just how fucking bad he was.  Hewitt should really just STFU about Ohio because he's talking out his simpleton ass every time he claims to be an expert about it.  The twat ought to just admit that he likes California a lot more and stop trying to bullshit people with his tired schtick.  I really fucking hate phony cunts like him.

Posted by: Captain Hate at December 07, 2010 05:40 AM (ccPlf)

107 Obviously a sign of global warming.  Speaking of which:

how's the weather in Lebanon? We're getting anywhere for 4" to 12" inches here in the western side of the state

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 05:41 AM (wuv1c)

108

Zakn, and remember, the first people to fire on us were the French. I guess the more things change, the more they remain the same.

btw, my uncle was one who served in his unit from the landings in North Africa to the end of the war in Czechoslovakia. At the last re-union, there were only 3 or 4 of those guys left. 

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:42 AM (cX9pO)

109 Bigred

Yup. C's read history and try and learn from it. Libs/Progs always try to declare a year zero.

Props to your uncle. It is mans work, and he left it on the field.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:46 AM (zyaZ1)

110 and unf many of his friends.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:47 AM (zyaZ1)

111 Of course Obama is attacking the Democrats now. They won't be there next year. They're now the previous administration he's always blaming for his failures.

Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 07, 2010 05:47 AM (LFAxM)

112 #108 how's the weather in Lebanon? We're getting anywhere for 4" to 12" inches here in the western side of the state

Lake effect snow? 

Cold, a few degrees below freezing, and windy, but no snow.  There is a chance for some precipitation over the next few days, but nothing that will stick to the ground yet.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 07, 2010 05:47 AM (9hSKh)

113

Ahhh the tears and whining of libturds is a wonderful thing. However the best we can hope for is that they stay mad at Barry and stay home in 2012

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 07, 2010 09:27 AM (1Jaio)

Or even the possibility of the media taking his dick out of his mouth for a breather.

Posted by: dagny at December 07, 2010 05:48 AM (a4kWg)

114 As for buisnesses hiring my prediction early last year was that if the Republicans took both houses of congress (not likely) there would be a fast turnaround. If they only took the House the slide would stop (for real) and a slow recovery would begin provided we elected non-RINOs who demonstrated that they would not pass crap and tax type legislation and tax hikes. I further predicted if we didn't take either house we would collapse totally because we could not continue with what was going on.

We are now going to get the slow turnaround.....provided we don't get too many GD "deals" next year. Business will wait though until they see what the House is going to do.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:48 AM (e4sSD)

115

Just on ABC radio news:

"Stocks rise on Obama tax deal".

Our president is so awesome!

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 05:51 AM (7+pP9)

116 I'm still not sold this thing makes it to the floor on the house.

And then you'll really see Barry throw the dims under the Bus when a stronger R caucus shows up...

oh yeah.....Eat that sammich Nancy

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:53 AM (zyaZ1)

117 "Stocks rise on Obama tax deal".

Our president is so awesome!

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 09:51 AM (7+pP9)

Fox did essentially the same thing this morning.

Obama's Tax Cut Deal With Republicans Infuriates Liberals

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:54 AM (e4sSD)

118 OK, dick back in the door.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 05:54 AM (e4sSD)

119 Take it Baby, Take It!!!!!

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 05:55 AM (zyaZ1)

120

Or even the possibility of the media taking his dick out of his mouth for a breather.

Posted by: dagny at December 07, 2010 09:48 AM (a4kWg)

 

To quote Al Michaels, Do you believe in miracles?

 

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 07, 2010 05:55 AM (1Jaio)

121 Just the tip! Cmon!

Posted by: President Divot at December 07, 2010 05:57 AM (zyaZ1)

122 In times like these, try reading "Henry V", the speech on the eve of the battle of Agincourt. "We would not die in that man's presence who would not wish to do so in ours". Time to fight or go home. 

Posted by: bigred at December 07, 2010 05:58 AM (cX9pO)

123

Breaking: Congressional democrats upset that they had sex with Obama without a condom.

Posted by: dagny at December 07, 2010 05:59 AM (a4kWg)

124 15
For fun, go to the Dailykos site and read some of the comments about this. One of the more polite ones called Obama a "douche."
Posted by: Mystery Meat at December 07, 2010 08:04 AM (9AJat)

I am baffled that anyone who posts here can make the least bit of sense out of what gets posted at that site. Apart from choosing to quote some never-really-remembered "deep thinker" to signal each poster's intellectual depth, the remainder of what is written there reminds me of our grandson pulling out pots and pans in order to bang on them incessantly whenever he visits.

Posted by: ya2daup at December 07, 2010 05:59 AM (yRrAd)

125

To quote Al Michaels, Do you believe in miracles?

Just a quick gasp then back to business.

Posted by: dagny at December 07, 2010 06:00 AM (a4kWg)

126

 #108 how's the weather in Lebanon? We're getting anywhere for 4" to 12" inches here in the western side of the state

Lake effect snow? 

Cold, a few degrees below freezing, and windy, but no snow.  There is a chance for some precipitation over the next few days, but nothing that will stick to the ground yet.

Yeah, Lake  effect snow. The ridges and higher areas are getting more than a foot. It's light and fluffy snow, not the heavy kind, so it's easier to shovel and clean off the roads. Still it looks like we're going to have another cold and snowy winter. I just hope is isn't as bad as last year.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 06:06 AM (wuv1c)

127 It's very obvious to me that the dems and the WH were all talk on letting the tax cuts over 250k expire. The rich are their main contributors. The little lefty will be angry but will likely continue to vote dem but hurt the rich lefty and he may still vote for you but he won't give you his money. Besides they also took note of what liberal Washington state did when they had a chance to tax the rich. It was defeated with 60 percent of the vote.

Posted by: Dolittle did much at December 07, 2010 06:06 AM (0hLQ1)

128 So mebbe cause I am funemployed but the GOP was gonna get rolled on extension of benefits anyway. Christmas time? Even a freaking Commie like Jim McDermott suddenly got the Christmas spirit, so the Democrats were going to pass that through the House, and no way with the Senate would they have turned that down, and no way would there be enough Republican votes for a filibuster. The Democrats were going to extend the tax cuts up to 250k anyway and probably in their heart of hearts knew that raising taxes was 1) bad for any possible return of the economy and 2) bad for their electoral chances, so this gives them a chance to do the right thing and still gin up fund raising rhetoric for the Leftists. So mostly kabuki, but not a bad outcome for the Republicans. If Obama was as smart as people say he is he would have done a 3 year extension of the tax cuts to get it out of his election cycle.

Posted by: blaster at December 07, 2010 06:08 AM (MrMxG)

129 "A program of extended benefits for the long-term unemployed, which lapsed last month, would be revived for 13 months, the White House said. The jobless benefits would be financed by federal borrowing rather than by spending cuts."

Let's just pile on to the Federal deficit!

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 06:09 AM (LdYLm)

130 Assange gets to wear an Orange jumpsuit for the next month. Bonus!

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 06:11 AM (zyaZ1)

131 For the basement dwellers, income taxed at lower rate means you as individual have more money that is yours to control. If you have small business, that means you have more money to hire workers... The question everyone should be asking, how does/can president and minority republicans enact tax reform changes without using legislative process?

Posted by: Laughingmyasoff at December 07, 2010 06:12 AM (YlXYu)

132

Hugh Hewitt was totally against this deal last night; thought the GOP could really break the Dems.  I understand the sentiment, but don't really get the degree of his anger, or degree of his certainty.

I agree with him.

I agree with the sentiment as well. We won 63 freaking seats people. We can't do better than this?  also 13 more months of UC? That brings it up to three  years.  So the republicans are elected to cut spending, and what is the first thing they do? endorse a massive unfunded spending.

Posted by: Ben

I agree as well.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 06:16 AM (H+LJc)

133 I smoke 2 packs a day I hope this edwards shit won't happen to me

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 06:20 AM (zyaZ1)

134 keep in mind it is a payroll cut for the employee, not the employer. It is the employers we need to give incentives to in order for them to hire.

That would require actually spreading the opportunity to create wealth.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 06:20 AM (H+LJc)

135 making my oatmeal more tasty this morning............

local organic unpasteurized but filtered honey!

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 06:22 AM (H+LJc)

136 Look 'Rons. This vote is happening in the old Congresss.

the 63 seat congress Negotiates starting Jan 3rd.

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 06:22 AM (zyaZ1)

137 I will wager here and now that this a gmable for power. Democrats were fully aware that a limited ending to the Bush tax cuts would fail - they voted against it, and plan to use it for momentum in the next election cycle...I guarantee it.

Posted by: Tyler at December 07, 2010 06:23 AM (mOjPB)

138 The dims control all this shit yet we won the fuckin day

Posted by: Zakn at December 07, 2010 06:24 AM (zyaZ1)

139

"Patsy Campbell could tell you a thing or two about fighting foreclosure. She's been fighting hers for 25 years.

The 71-year-old retired insurance saleswoman has been living in her house, a two-story on a half acre in a tidy middle-class neighborhood here in central Florida, since 1978. The last time she made a mortgage payment was October 1985."

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 06:25 AM (LdYLm)

140 smoke 2 packs a day I hope this edwards shit won't happen

 Hope unicorns shit skittles.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 07, 2010 06:26 AM (H+LJc)

141 Excellent. What could be better than a girl fight between the empty suit and the idiots in Congress? Since O's radical agenda is largely to blame for the Dems getting pounded last election, giving them one more reason to hate the One is just aweseome. Commence the 2 year bickering, backstabbing, bitchy hissy fit any time. As a bonus, the entire MFM will be sad faced and teary eyed. On the other hand, the RINOs can still find a way to screw this up, so there's always that, too.

Posted by: cali grump at December 07, 2010 06:26 AM (hL0k8)

142 That tax reduction can now be applied to the community college tax that a bunch of idiots voted in, oh goodie.

Posted by: Wade1970 at December 07, 2010 06:28 AM (MQOrx)

143

 

No one is stopping hypocritical loud-mouth uber-lib capitalist richy-mans from writing big fat checks to the treasury

Come on John Kerry and Warren Buffet - we are wathcing you.  Pay up, tax cheats.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 07, 2010 06:29 AM (0fzsA)

144 One Year for Workers, Two Years for Bosses

Now that's a bullshit lead. Since the one year is for unemployment, how the hell can they be "workers"?


Posted by: kansas at December 07, 2010 06:29 AM (mka2b)

145 "Recently a camera was found containing pictures from the attacks on Pearl Harbor that had never been seen before. These pictures, almost 69 years old, show the devastation that occurred on that fateful day."

http://tinyurl.com/2bvkjox

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 06:31 AM (LdYLm)

146

OT

Time Magazine will name Asswedge "Person of the Year". So, who's shocked and surprised?

Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2010 06:34 AM (OlN4e)

147 Pearl Harbor Day!

Bing http://tinyurl.com/laa99p  vs Google, NOTHING!

Let's all use Bing for at least a day!

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 06:36 AM (JpFM9)

148

Making the tax cuts an election-year issue is the smartest part of this deal.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 07:55 AM (BvBKY)

 

Ding ding ding!

Obama just set himself up with that one.

There are 23 Dems up for reelection in the Senate in 2012. 7 of these are in the red zone right now. Their votes against this deal (like ClairBear) will be another free campaign ad.

 

I am tired of people thinking we had "all this leverage" like if we just let the whole thing collapse, then we can make the calls in 2011. Here is reality- the media would be in fever pitch mode that  WE raised all the taxes and our fellow Americans would gobble it up, especially since the Dems can then feign sense and say "but you guys had a chance to cut all the taxes and said no", and don't you bother replying that "well Americans can see through that". If Americans were that sensible about cause and effect, Obama would not be fucking President. We have a DEMOCRATIC Senate, a DEMOCRATIC President, and a far-left media mouth machine we were fighting against over taxes. We forced President Obama to east rancid crow AND made the Dems in Congress look stupid in one fell swoop, yet this is failure?

We had a maniac to deal with and a socialist Congress to deal with. That we fought from the far right, instead of from the middle, and got 50% of what we wanted and 50% of what we didn't is a good compromise and sets up the Democrats, not the Republicans, as the obstructionists.

Posted by: CAC at December 07, 2010 06:38 AM (lV4Fs)

149 151 Pearl Harbor Day!

Bing http://tinyurl.com/laa99p  vs Google, NOTHING!

Let's all use Bing for at least a day!

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 10:36 AM (JpFM9)

Yea, I have Bing as default for Internet Explorer.

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 06:39 AM (LdYLm)

150

The complete leftist idiotÂ’s guide to Jeopardy:

 

Besides everything else negative about this country, what is BushÂ’s fault?

 

How with the United States collapse, Alex, for $400?

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 07, 2010 06:39 AM (RkRxq)

151 STFU, Barry. If looks could kill, Michelle would melt Barry's testicles in this photo.

http://tinyurl.com/2wdpycm

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 06:40 AM (LdYLm)

152

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at December 07, 2010 10:31 AM (LdYLm)

Awesome photos. They appear to have been taken by someone who knew something about photography, other than point and click.

Posted by: maddogg at December 07, 2010 06:41 AM (OlN4e)

153 That's $166 a month!  That will keep me in val-u-rite vodka and pudding!  That'll keep my landscaper employed.


Posted by: CUS at December 07, 2010 06:42 AM (wOGfT)

154 smoke 2 packs a day I hope this edwards shit won't happen

It didn't happen to me, it just nearly killed one quarter of my heart.  No problem, I had it rebuilt.  Only costs $500K.

Quit now.  The shit is bad for you.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 07, 2010 06:44 AM (o3bYL)

155 Any juicy links to view the Left's fury? 

Schadenfreude. ( I should be ashamed of myself.)

Posted by: Double Ply at December 07, 2010 06:50 AM (ezdtY)

156 It was like teeing off on a par 3 with a driver, except I shanked into the deep rough.

Posted by: Barry the young duffer at December 07, 2010 06:50 AM (GwPRU)

157

 I smoke 2 packs a day I hope this edwards shit won't happen to m

my old man smokes like that, he's been doing it for 40+ years. I don't look forward to spending days in the cancer ward watching him die slowly and painfully. He's fine now, but smoking that long, cancer seems inevitable.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 06:50 AM (wuv1c)

158 159 - I agree. One possible drawback for O'Dipshit.  The congressional dems will be MUCH more pre-disposed to impeachment, if it's ever pushed for whatever reason.  And if he tries to ignore the entire congress and move his marxist agenda by Exc. Order., the dems will turn on him as fast the Rs.

Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 07, 2010 06:51 AM (jbCcb)

159 I can't a list of how senators voted.

Anybody either have a link to one or the number for the bill?

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 06:53 AM (7+pP9)

160 Once more, with feeling:

I can't find a list of how senators voted.

Anybody either have a link to one or the number for the bill?

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 06:55 AM (7+pP9)

161 I think the administration had a plan all along that after they won bigger majorities in the 2010 elections, they would extend the tax rates to appease the taxpayers and reap the benefits of blaming republicans for everything that's wrong. They didn't change the plan really, just shifted the blame.

Posted by: Barry O'tard at December 07, 2010 06:55 AM (/E3ql)

162 I can't find a list of how senators voted.

I don't think they've voted yet.

Posted by: Y-not at December 07, 2010 07:01 AM (IDL9N)

163 Status of tax deal, likely support (via The Hill)

Posted by: Y-not at December 07, 2010 07:02 AM (IDL9N)

164

Once more, with feeling:

I can't find a list of how senators voted.

Anybody either have a link to one or the number for the bill?

I think it's a deal in progress. I don't think its been voted on yet.

Obviously it has the votes or it would not have been announced, but a formal vote hasn't taken place.

I think we can assume Manchin, Nelson, Tester, and all the other democrats in precarious positions are voting for it.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 07:03 AM (wuv1c)

165 I don't think they've voted yet.
Posted by: Y-not at December 07, 2010 11:01 AM

People should remember that this is not a done deal yet.

Yes, everyone's talking about it, and Osama Obama shot off his flapping mouth about it, but no action has been taken. From what I've read, no date for taking a vote -- or even an actual bill -- has been scheduled.

It's D.C., people. Talk, talk, talk, talk, talk....

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 07, 2010 07:04 AM (Ulu3i)

166 "148 One Year for Workers, Two Years for Bosses Now that's a bullshit lead. Since the one year is for unemployment, how the hell can they be "workers"?" So a guy who works ten, fifteen years and then loses his job because Obie closed the Chrysler dealership that employed him can't call himself a worker anymore? He's just a dole-prole, deserving of our scorn?

Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 07, 2010 07:04 AM (0GCID)

167 I believe this bill maintains the 99 week cap. All durations up to that will be funded for the next 13 months.

Posted by: texette at December 07, 2010 07:07 AM (OWL33)

168 You sorry excuses for men are the reason I punted on second down!

Posted by: Head Coach Barack Obama at December 07, 2010 07:08 AM (FcR7P)

169 BTW -- The other things no one is talking about amid the mass wind-breaking in Washington: what deals, measures and assort irrelevant crap will go into the bill when/if it appears?

I wouldn't put it past the Dems to load this up with all kinds of unacceptable bullshit. I'm mildly surprised that all the Repubs who are making the rounds of the talking-head circuit (and, of course, such astute squishes as "Poppin' Fresh") are concentrating on Osama Obama's "defeat" and ignoring the fact that this could well be scuttled before it even gets to a vote.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 07, 2010 07:09 AM (Ulu3i)

170 Senator Schumer says he wants a fight? He couldn't hold his caucus together. Chuck, together we can hold your caucus...

Posted by: Barney Frank at December 07, 2010 07:09 AM (FcR7P)

171 Vermont Independent Senator Sanders is already threatening to filibuster the tax deal.

Really?  He's going to push for an across the board tax increase in this economy?  Yeah, he's going to pretend the entire Bush tax cut was "for the rich"... I guess at least he's consistent when he's wrong.

I'll agree that it's a different plan than anything Bush would have done... Bush wouldn't raise taxes in an economic downturn.

If this dip gets his way we'll have a double-dip economy for sure.

Posted by: gekkobear at December 07, 2010 07:11 AM (X0NX1)

172

This is good news. Great news, in fact. Josh McDaniels is finally gone.

(Oh, and the tax thing is good, too.)

Posted by: FireHorse at December 07, 2010 07:11 AM (sWynj)

173

Way OT,

but over at Drudge, George Lucas is buying the rights to dead actors with the intention of digitally bringing them back in movies.

Jesus Christ this man who gave so much to cinema a long long time ago is doing so much to destroy it now.

It will be nice to see new Marlene Dietrich films, but still. This is ridiculous. This man needs to be stopped. He and James Cameron are doing everything they to innovate movie technology at the expense of script and storyline.

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 07:12 AM (wuv1c)

174 174:  Yeah.  The Demo Cong will probably scuttle this thing out of sheer pique and spite.  At which point O will say 'Hey, I tried' and wash his hands of it.

Kabuki.  All it is.

Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 07, 2010 07:14 AM (GBXon)

175 It seems that no matter what the Dems do at this point they either have to look like shit or eat a shit sandwich.  I like that.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 07, 2010 07:16 AM (o3bYL)

176 STFU, Barry. If looks could kill, Michelle would melt Barry's testicles in this photo.

http://tinyurl.com/2wdpycm

Someone should put a Slurpee in his hand.


Posted by: CUS at December 07, 2010 07:17 AM (wOGfT)

177

but over at Drudge, George Lucas is buying the rights to dead actors with the intention of digitally bringing them back in movies.

You maniac! You're blowing it all up!

Damn you.  God damn you to hell! 

Posted by: Charlton Heston at December 07, 2010 07:18 AM (9hSKh)

178 O/T, but I haven't seen it anywhere (except NRO - The Corner): impeachment trial for Clinton-appointee U.S. District Judge Porteous begins today.  CSPAN will have coverage.  http://www.c-span.org/

Posted by: Y-not at December 07, 2010 07:19 AM (IDL9N)

179

impeachment trial

And an angel gets its wings.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 07, 2010 07:25 AM (BvBKY)

180

He and James Cameron are doing everything they to innovate movie technology at the expense of script and storyline.

Terminator 2 was neat. It made no sense but it was fun to look at.

Posted by: FireHorse at December 07, 2010 07:25 AM (sWynj)

181
You guys think we have Obama over a barrel, eh?

Wrong.

This was a prudent move by Obama. This was about regaining support from Independents for 2012. Obama will never lose the Democrat or even the radical left wing, no matter what he does.

All that matters to Obama now are the stupid Indies.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:26 AM (uFokq)

182 185

He and James Cameron are doing everything they to innovate movie technology at the expense of script and storyline.

Terminator 2 was neat. It made no sense but it was fun to look at.

Posted by: FireHorse at December 07, 2010 11:25 AM (sWynj)

Movies, sh-movies, what until 3D TV arrives and I find another reason to re-issue Star Wars will all new crap grafted unto the movie (Like giant snakes with the heads of Dick Cheney!)

Posted by: George Lucas at December 07, 2010 07:30 AM (LdYLm)

183  I will wager here and now that this a gmable for power. Democrats were fully aware that a limited ending to the Bush tax cuts would fail - they voted against it, and plan to use it for momentum in the next election cycle...I guarantee it.

Posted by: Tyler at December 07, 2010 10:23 AM (mOjPB)

If the Dems want to try and gain power by cutting taxes faster than the GOP, more power to them. Its the same thing as R's trying to suck up to unions or government workers.

Posted by: Oldcat at December 07, 2010 07:31 AM (CN+Qv)

184

By the way, it's December 7.

Isn't anyone going to recognize that it's T.O.'s birthday?

Posted by: FireHorse at December 07, 2010 07:32 AM (sWynj)

185 This was a prudent move by Obama. This was about regaining support from Independents for 2012. Obama will never lose the Democrat or even the radical left wing, no matter what he does.

All that matters to Obama now are the stupid Indies.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 11:26 AM (uFokq)

If its prudent to fight your side in Congress and piss off your base, I hope he gets extra super prudent going forward.

Indies are lost to Obama. The Rainbow and Skittles ship has sailed.

Posted by: Oldcat at December 07, 2010 07:33 AM (CN+Qv)

186 186
You guys think we have Obama over a barrel, eh?

Wrong.

This was a prudent move by Obama. This was about regaining support from Independents for 2012. Obama will never lose the Democrat or even the radical left wing, no matter what he does.

All that matters to Obama now are the stupid Indies.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 11:26 AM (uFokq)

I sense a trap!

Posted by: Obi Wan-Kenobi at December 07, 2010 07:33 AM (LdYLm)

187 Posted by: CAC at December 07, 2010 10:38 AM (lV4Fs)

This, ladies and gentlemen.  We don't have the House until January, and letting the tax rates go up now would make it almost impossible (Remember, still Dem Senate and Prez) to bring them back down (even retro-actively) in 2011.

Much of this was probably Kabuki, but it does really help with some things right now, and we can look at making things better when we actually have some power (as opposed to what we have right now which is an expectation of power).

I'm not thrilled about everything in it, but the full Conservative option wasn't going to be enacted anyway.  Yes, you fight for that (and our Reps did), but when you get a compromise you can actually work with, sometimes you just need to take it.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 07, 2010 07:34 AM (8y9MW)

188
You watch.

You'll be hearing Obama quoting Ronald Reagan a lot in the next year.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:35 AM (uFokq)

189 One Year for Workers, Two Years for Bosses

Now that's a bullshit lead. Since the one year is for unemployment, how the hell can they be "workers"?


Posted by: kansas at December 07, 2010 10:29 AM (mka2b)

Workers in that context is a Marxist Class term. Like Peasant, but greasy instead of dirty.

Posted by: Oldcat at December 07, 2010 07:36 AM (CN+Qv)

190

The ratings for "The Walking Dead's" just-ended first season have been such that perhaps AMC is wishing that it had lasted more than just six weeks.

The anticipation for the season finale garnered six million viewers, according to the network, and it received the highest ratings of any basic cable show, ever, in the all-important 18-49 demographic.

 

Posted by: Ben at December 07, 2010 07:39 AM (wuv1c)

191 Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 11:35 AM (uFokq)

Let him.  As others have said, as long as we don't have McCain or Huckabee (or, now Jeb Bush- but he wasn't likely anyway), we should win pretty solidly.  Democrats only win when two things happen: 1) They pretend to be "centrist" and 2) so do Republicans.  Democrats basically only win when we let them out-conservative us.

As long as we have a Conservative candidate, he can't move far enough right without actually making his base stay home.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 07, 2010 07:41 AM (8y9MW)

192
okay, so who watched the game, last night?

If you watched the game, you might have noticed that Coach Belichick spoke his Defense on the sidelines near the end of the game. Vincent Wilfork came away yelling, "Alright!"

This morning, Tom Brady told the guys on the radio what Coach said to the D.

Tom Brady: "Coach said, 'We play for the full sixty minutes; I don't give a bleep what the score is. We play for sixty minutes."

At first I was like 'heh,', then I was like 'fuckyeah!'



Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:44 AM (uFokq)

193 Workers in that context is a Marxist Class term. Like Peasant, but greasy instead of dirty.

Peasants are not Proletariats in Marxism.  They are too primitive, being leftovers from the Feudal system.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at December 07, 2010 07:45 AM (TpXEI)

194
OT:

The Obamacare waiver list is now up to 222.

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 07, 2010 07:47 AM (7+pP9)

195
I'm looking at rdbrewer's mini-blog over there, and I'm really starting to dislike the entire Bush family.

GWB was a lousy president. Not nearly as bad as Obama, but Bush really sucked. Sorry, polynikes; it's true.


Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:48 AM (uFokq)

196 Someone should put a Slurpee in his hand.


Posted by: CUS at December 07, 2010 11:17 AM (wOGfT

Couldn't we get a bucket full of them and dump it on his head, like a victory dunk?

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 07:51 AM (JpFM9)

197
Michael "Grimace" Moore used to say that Clinton was the 'best Republican president we ever had.'

Nevermind how stupid that is, for a moment.

I'm beginning to think George W Bush was the best 'Democrat' president we ever had since AJ.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:53 AM (uFokq)

198 True, Bevel, that's why Lenin, a lawyer, came up with the idea of the Vanguard to transition to Pure Communism

Posted by: solomon grundy at December 07, 2010 07:53 AM (c0+w5)

199
Bush was certainly better than the alternatives Gore and Kerry, though.


Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:55 AM (uFokq)

200 On Pearl Harbor day, Never Forget.

http://tinyurl.com/23wx5qf

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 07:56 AM (JpFM9)

201 206 Unless the Republican big-wigs screw up big time and run another McCain he will lose and lose badly.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 07:58 AM (e4sSD)


Never count us out.

Posted by: A Vote For Bob Dole is a Vote For Bob Dole at December 07, 2010 11:54 AM (wOtDN)

I say starve them, not a single dollar for any National Republican Organization. Contribute to local candidates!

Posted by: Obi Wan-Kenobi at December 07, 2010 07:56 AM (LdYLm)

202 OT: Iowahawk's "Headlines1941" series on Twitter is hilarious.  He's doing Pearl Harbor as reported by the modern MFM.

Some samples:
"'Roosevelt Lied, Germans Died' Say Zoot Suit Hepcat Protesters"

"
FDR Hosts German-American Bund at White House For Schnitzel Dinner; 'Nazism Is an Ism of Peace' Sez Prez"

"
Mayor of Pearl Harbor Gives $1m Grant for Divine Emperor Shrine / Community Center"

Posted by: Ian S. at December 07, 2010 07:57 AM (p05LM)

203
What's more likely, the "boy" who fell out of the jet's wheel-well, or that it was indeed a missile off the coast of California?

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 07:59 AM (uFokq)

204 so what do we think? This gets passed? I need to know if there's going to be the predicted end of year firesale on stocks or not.

Posted by: joeindc44 at December 07, 2010 08:00 AM (QxSug)

205 Can someone give me a link to Obama visiting Pearl Harbor today. I must have missed it.

Posted by: ingenus at December 07, 2010 08:00 AM (+sBB4)

206
Should George W Bush speak at the 2012 convention?

Of course, right? Yeah, I guess so. I dunno.

Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 07, 2010 08:01 AM (uFokq)

207 Pearl Harbor and the last good speech FDR ever gave.

http://tinyurl.com/cjgs4o

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 08:02 AM (JpFM9)

208 Mind controlled sharks work for Israel! Check the article "Egyptian Official: Israel Could Be Behind Deadly Shark Attack" at FoxNews.... duh, because I don't know how to enter a link here without being scolded...

Posted by: Errol at December 07, 2010 08:02 AM (7f/h+)

209 Posted by: Mallamutt at December 07, 2010 11:52 AM

Gotta disagree with you on Dubya's "strengths." GWOT? I'd call his actions against terrorists half-hearted and wimpy, at best. He had plenty of intel after 9/11/01, but let the real supporters of the attackers slide while going after Saddam, the guy who threatened his daddy. He started two wars that could -- and should have been won quickly but, like Bush 41, he couldn't bring himself to give orders to close the deal.

Supreme Court? The man who nominated Harriet Meiers is right there with the dude who picked Clement Haynsworth and G. Harold Carswell, in my view.

Taxes? Yeah, he reduced tax rates, but followed up with the kind of government spending only a Democrat could love.

What bugs me is that a comparison between Dubya and most other recent Presidents -- and candidates -- makes one conclude that he was damn good. That's really pathetic.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 07, 2010 08:04 AM (Ulu3i)

210 Time Magazine will name Asswedge "Person of the Year". So, who's shocked and surprised?

Not me.  Then again, it's probably deserved.  For better or for worse, his actions over the past year have had a huge impact in the world.  Of course, TIME no doubt named him because they think that he's a hero.

Posted by: Alex at December 07, 2010 08:06 AM (yY28H)

211 I say starve them, not a single dollar for any National Republican Organization. Contribute to local candidates!

Exactly, the RNC is tits on a bull.  Give money directly to who you want to support.  Otherwise, its taxation all over again--- watching your money wasted.

Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 07, 2010 08:06 AM (Ty06w)

212 #218

To link go to tinyurl paste in your story, it makes a tiny.  then use the little button above comments box, next to the omega sign, open it.  Insert the tiny in the top, then click on the insert button bottom right corner, you may have to make the box bigger to see it, I always do, and then click ok.  Your link will appear in blue in the comment box!

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 08:07 AM (JpFM9)

213 222 #218

To link go to tinyurl paste in your story, it makes a tiny.  then use the little button above comments box, next to the omega sign, open it.  Insert the tiny in the top, then click on the insert button bottom right corner, you may have to make the box bigger to see it, I always do, and then click ok.  Your link will appear in blue in the comment box!

But it takes so long that by the time you get all that done, the conversation has moved on to something else or a new headline has been posted.  It's part of the way this site is constructed, but it's a bugger when it comes to timeliness and going with the flow of discussion.

Posted by: ¤§EZB§¤ at December 07, 2010 08:10 AM (Ty06w)

214 Hahahahahahaha!

Jane Fonda is 72!

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 07, 2010 08:12 AM (o3bYL)

215 Hahahahahahaha! Jane Fonda is 72!

...and Hanoi Jane still makes a wonderful urinal target.

Posted by: The Highland Pipes at December 07, 2010 08:15 AM (G/Shp)

216 Parking a democratic regime, across the border from Arabia,  was a much better move than the Afghan operation. That is why we get Zazi, AbdulMutallab, and the
third level bomb makers, instead of the A Team, who perished between Baghdad and Ramadi. The reason that the Miers pick was the Gang of 14, including McCain and Graham, did you forget that

Posted by: solomon grundy at December 07, 2010 08:17 AM (c0+w5)

217 Getting US boots on the ground in two countries the Sandbox was balls.  Nothing flies in the ME skies unless we let it and nearly every (still living) Jihadi dumbfuck in the world is over there instead of over here.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 07, 2010 08:27 AM (o3bYL)

218 George Bush was not a good President, but he wasn't as bad as his 8 years wound up being. A lot of his failures were not because of him, but because of RINOs like McCain who stabbed him in the back at every opportunity. The three biggest things that come to mind are:

1) These damn temporary tax cuts we are arguing about today would have been "permanent" except for the RINO wing led by McCain.

2) We would be pumping oil in ANWR right now except for McCain and his RINOs.

3) Gang of 12 and court picks failure

and... We may have even got somewhere with SS reform.

Posted by: Vic at December 07, 2010 08:28 AM (e4sSD)

219 At the end of the day, BO still sucks.

Posted by: Mazzuchelli at December 07, 2010 08:49 AM (piR98)

220

Theater for morons. No wonder this move/compromise is popular here.

Football to be snatched away shortly.

Posted by: Pelvis at December 07, 2010 08:58 AM (LlaBi)

221 Dear Hugh Hewitt,

Go Fuck Yourself! 

Could the GOP have scored bigger political points over this tax bill compromise?

I don't doubt they could have.

Theoretically...

I'm at about the bottom of the damn (legitimate) food chain as far as procuring work for myself goes.  I hire out part-time sometimes 2 or 3 companies at a time and take any reasonably compensated IC work I can find, to boot!

I NEED some of my clients /employers to have even the small beans, surety about their tax rates, next Q1!

(This wreaks havoc with the government fat-asses who punch a clock for the State Unemployment Board, let me tell you!)

"You said you made $800 last week.  Why did you quit your job?"

"I didn't fucking quit any job, asshole!  I was offered, a one time project, that will eventually (60-90 days) will pay me $800.  I took them up on their offer, did the work last week, and reported it to you, as requested."

"Why did you quit your job?"

"I was never employed by the company!  All I did was work for them as an IC for 3 days, last week, and they are going to pay me $800 for this project!"

"This sounds like a very good company, at $800 per week.  You should have tried to become a full-time employee!  Why did you quit your job?"

*weeps*  "There was no 'job'!  It was a project!  They offered to pay me, I took them up on it!  Now that I'm trying to collect UI, my resume is out there for all the world to see!  I'm going to get offers like this!"

"Why did you quit your job?"

"I never quit any 'job'!  It was a one time, project!  How can I explain this to you?"

"If this is true,you should be seeking permanent full-time employment at 40 hours per week from this company.  Why did you quit your job, with them?"

*gives up*

"You know, you are entirely correct!  I should be doing something better with my working days than haggling over a paltry $200 per week UI benefit!  I've just decided.  I may, or may not, ever get another offer from this company to do some work for them, at outrageous rates but I'll be damned if I ever play "Mother, may I?" with you bastards ever again because I had the temerity to seek and accept whatever paying work comes my way whilst unemployed!"

"I hope you become Homeless and starve to death!  Because that's what's gonna happen to you!  You don't have any children, so you don't even qualify for WIC.  I hope you know that!"

"Spoken like a true AFSCME member!  Go fuck yourself."













Posted by: Deety at December 07, 2010 09:02 AM (Jb3+B)

222 Pubs settled for two years so they could hold the spectre of a tax hike over voters in 2014 -- Obama should have gone for 3 years.

Posted by: Jean at December 07, 2010 09:26 AM (Ja6pC)

223

#231, that needs to get put into that "text to movie" converter people are using on YouTube and Facebook. That would sound great in that flat computer-synthesized voice.

Posted by: SGT Dan at December 07, 2010 09:32 AM (QUuUE)

224 Pearl Harbor Day...I guess in retrospect, sinking the enemy fleet in twenty feet of water wasn't such a hot idea.

Posted by: Craig at December 07, 2010 09:40 AM (xP8Aq)

225 In retrospect, sinking the enemy fleet in twenty feet of water wasn't such a hot idea.

You've got that right.

Posted by: Tojo soul in Hell at December 07, 2010 09:46 AM (xP8Aq)

226 The Greedy Takers are the problem...not the unemployed. The greedy people should just hire more of the unemployed...or gov't will take your money in taxes. Death and taxes are certain.

Posted by: Meg Mass at December 07, 2010 09:58 AM (f4Ndo)

227 The good thing about people lazing about and collecting UI for 3 godammned years?

More lower tier jobs for me!

I'll do pretty much anything! (Except for food service, that's a young man's game.)

If, in 3 damned years, you haven't even managed to score at least a PT job at the local Staples store, you suck.

(I was very diligent and TRIED for about 7 months but I find working at $10 per hour for 15-30 hours per week much less stressful than collecting UI.  Not sure how my landlord feels about it, though!)

*This might sound crazy and I'm all about fighting for basic economic survival at this point but I'm still, really interested in how retailers (at the corporate level) make their decisions as to what goes in and out of individual stores.  I think that I should get an MA in accounting at some point, if I want to pursue this.

I can't reliably make my damned rent but this is the kind of crap I wonder about! and want to look at with maths!

P.S. I suck at basic arithmetic.  Always have, always will (my 7x tables got garbled somewhere in my education and to this day I have to check and re-check myself using addition like some OCD patient washing their hands!


Posted by: Deety at December 07, 2010 10:02 AM (Jb3+B)

228 Food Service is not bad..sometimes get free food at end of shift at night. The problem is that unemployment pays more than many of the low wage jobs out there... employers should be forced to hire and pay a living wage.

Posted by: Meg Mass at December 07, 2010 10:10 AM (f4Ndo)

229 employers should be forced to hire and pay a living wage.

WRONG!

Nobody but nobody owes me anything more than what I can sell my services for.

Sometimes it comes out as $45-$90 per hour (after fuel and lodging are taken out) but those are mostly urgent (or architectural) cases.

(P.S. In addition to the incredibly specific measurements we are asking you to take of every piece of signage and the floorplan of this soon to be defunct Mortgage Company, no matter how insignificant, and the 3 to 7 photos  to document them, could you also give us a scalable sketch of the larger facility that indicates, traffic patterns?

(Sure. Why not?  It's hot as hell out here. [Tempe ,AZ]  I hate fucking graph paper and yet I have some waiting in the wings. Please, please let that Blue Mustang with the asshole-driver mow me down.  Ahh crap! He saw me! Fine, where is true north? Fucking traffic patterns? Blow me!)

Mostly, what I do, (it ain't fuckin' Rocket Science!) is paid at about $10 per hour, base rate.

And I'm happy to get any sort of steady paying job at that rate, even if it means I might not get 20 hours in a given week.

Can I command better rates?

Yeah, sometimes.  Depends on the project and depends on the time-frame.

It's a trade-off.

I'm a freaking animal when it comes to scheduling and pulling off $$$ jobs, scheduling is why I get paid the big bucks by my IC companies.

Honestly, scheduling is also why I get paid crap by my "regular" employers and eat it up!

Give me at least 20 hours per week and I'll stick with you, at this rate.  So long as you give me at least 20 hours per week, every damn week, I will represent you.

(Honestly, I haven't even got that, lately!  Some stores, the time budget is 90 min. but seriously, I'm just DONE after 40 min. or so...  I have tried but Lord Knows, I am incapable of dicking around for more than 5 minutes.  Just makes me itch!)

Would I like it better if my employer had MORE stores for me to visit, every week at $10 per hour?

Sure!

Do they OWE me that?

Hell, no!

"If you can't find 40 hours per week to occupy my time, I guess I'l just find mischief and $$ elsewhere!"

Part-Time, DO have some advantages if you're the kind of person to take on some "extra" employment.

Nobody owes me a damned thing!

I get paid by people who value my services







Posted by: Deety at December 07, 2010 11:50 AM (Jb3+B)

230 f small buttons, delicate and high, build a romantic and warm atmosphere vogue.Cream white sweater is sending out sweet vogue taste, delicate and close-fitting modelling, shoulder adopted benfica side adornment, portray a high sense of small shrug modelling, soft fabrics, easy for you mould warm feeling, early spring wear take a warm vogueDark blue sweater give people clothing in the elegant texture, shoulder pearl ornament, instantaneous promotion unlined upper garment unlined upper garment of nobility and mellow feeling small round collar, send out attr

Posted by: baiasasdu.com at March 12, 2011 09:14 PM (u9UTq)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
221kb generated in CPU 0.1467, elapsed 0.3289 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2853 seconds, 358 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.