October 19, 2010
— LauraW "I have no idea."
"Sarah Palin?"
"I don't know."
This from the scary-smart braintrust at MSNBC's Morning Joe panel.
They moved on to discuss how, well, perhaps women join because many women are in charge of the family checkbook and are sensitive to how money is spent, etc.
Now, you might think most MSNBC contributors are retards, and you would be correct. However, this marks a moment of personal development for these snot-drooling imbeciles. Although they have sailed past RealityLand once again (where women join and lead the Tea Party FOR THE SAME REASONS EVERYBODY ELSE DOES), they're getting closer.
They sense somehow, some way, that this must have something to do with money, and that people think about money, and came up with "Eureka! Women must be having thoughts about money."
And they did not accuse us of being three-toothed trailer-livin' cousin-kissin' chicken-rapin' redneck hilbilly racists. For once.
See what I'm getting at? It's shocking.
These wretched dullards were actually able to set their corroded, calcified brains on an issue (which is no issue at all, really, but still), and in a once-in-a-lifetime flash of semi-mediocrity, deviated from a well-worn scratch in their broken record.
You grabbin' on to this? A panel full of clueless overpaid elitist pricks whose biggest contribution to the world is smelly water vapor didn't use this opportunity to launch a three-part series on how 'racism is surging among our nation's women.' This is a huge breakthrough.
This crack panel of mental defectives finally put their finger two inches away from the edge of the thing that has been screaming in their faces for two years.
This here comments section is reserved for applause, congratulations, and supportive messages of encouragement for these unbelievably thick muttonheads.
Posted by: LauraW at
06:42 AM
| Comments (168)
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 19, 2010 06:45 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at October 19, 2010 06:45 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: An Observation at October 19, 2010 06:46 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at October 19, 2010 06:46 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Kathleen Parker at October 19, 2010 06:46 AM (AZGON)
They sense somehow, some way, that this must have something to do with money, and that people think about money, and came up with "Eureka! Women must be having thoughts about money."
No no no, the Tea party is all about religion and abortions and racism. Its not at all about money and fiscal responsibility of the government. Charles Johnson told me so.
Posted by: buzzion at October 19, 2010 06:46 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Greg at October 19, 2010 06:48 AM (AZGON)
But then they couldn't have a ten-second political panel so they started throwing out ideas and accidentally almost stumbled upon the right one.
Posted by: lauraw at October 19, 2010 06:50 AM (hZQWf)
Posted by: blaster at October 19, 2010 06:50 AM (Ov86C)
Posted by: joncelli at October 19, 2010 06:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Dolly Madison at October 19, 2010 06:52 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 19, 2010 06:52 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 19, 2010 06:52 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: Megan McCain at October 19, 2010 06:54 AM (6ShUh)
Posted by: joncelli at October 19, 2010 06:54 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MSNBC at October 19, 2010 06:54 AM (Y81Xa)
And, hey, did I say "Glenn Beck?" Yeah, Glenn Beck. Hah! He's the leader of the whole Tea Party thing, and he's an extreme racist, and does he look like a woman? No, he is not a woman, so how can you say that there are women in the Tea Party?
Besides, they lack the requirements for teabagging anyway.
Posted by: blaster at October 19, 2010 06:55 AM (Ov86C)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 06:55 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: Clint Billman at October 19, 2010 06:56 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Meghan McMoron at October 19, 2010 06:56 AM (uvFJG)
They KNOW that various minority groups (though, I really don't like that term- can't come up with a better one, though) are represented very well within the Tea Party movement. They KNOW that the Tea Party movement is more supported by average Americans than either political party. They KNOW that most of their minority victimizing, race- and religion- baiting rhetoric isn't working.
And they can't figure out why.
So, they see the Writing on the Wall, but refuse to have it translated. At least the Persian king (was that one Artaxerxes? Can't remember and I don't have my Bible with me) was smart enough to call in someone he knew would be able to give him a clue.
Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (8y9MW)
Congratulations, Morning Joe panelists! You've made the first step into a wider world in which women aren't only concerned with a "woman's right to choose." You've begun to understand that women are not carbon copies of NOW elites, and are, in fact, fiscally conscious individuals who can THINK FOR THEMSELVES and -- pay attention to this part, it's very important -- and draw logical conclusions from available facts.
Holy. Shit. MINDFRAK.
I'm a Tea Party Woman, and I'm here to help. When you get a bit more of a clue -- say, when you can finally mention female conservatives without assuming that we're only taking an interest because of Sarah Palin -- get back to me. We'll do lunch. But you get to pick up the tab.
Posted by: MWR at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (4df7R)
Excellent post LauraW. Dripping in venomous snark.
BTW, I just voted a straight TEA party approved ticket.
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: three-toothedtrailer-livincousin-kissinchicken-rapinredneckhilbillyracist at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (f3Tf1)
The only reason they're scratching their collective head over this is simple. They don't understand that many women don't feel that it's the ultimate expression of empowered womanhood to have a fetus sucked out of the womb.
Even though the TP movement doesn't seem to have taken a stance on the issue, it's the perception of these festering swamp asses that anything conservative equals keeping the wimmen folk barefoot and pregnant.
The idea that a woman can have children and not see it as an inconvienence or a hinderance to her career, or even, god forbid, forgo a career is foreign to these fucksticks.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (E0EDC)
Who else is going to bring the cookies?
MSNBC. Welcome to the Doucheatorium.
Posted by: mpfs at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (iYbLN)
Settle down Laura..... statistical anomaly. I saw a blind squirrel find an acorn once..... And my busted Timex??? ...... yeah that's right..... twice a day.
You and me and the rest of the morons are still either uber slefish business moguls than would steal money from starving children in Bangladesh -or- back woods moonshine drinkin meth makin sister humping 8th grade educated tick pickin gun totin bitter clingin rednecks that drop the g's from all our words.
Nuthin's changed.
Posted by: Katrina and the Wave at October 19, 2010 06:57 AM (J5Hcw)
OOPS! Sorry about that! Sometimes I like, fart and stuff.....*tee hee hee*
Posted by: Megan McCain at October 19, 2010 06:58 AM (6ShUh)
The world liberals live in must be really fantastic.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 19, 2010 06:59 AM (XrvQ5)
Uh, because they're lesbians?
Do no taunt Happy Fun Alex. Also, this post would be more persuasive with a picture of Tri-corner Hat Girl.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 19, 2010 06:59 AM (bQ5xy)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at October 19, 2010 07:00 AM (OBDWE)
Posted by: blaster at October 19, 2010 07:00 AM (Ov86C)
“I don’t think he meant any harm whatsoever,”rank spokesman Harry Gural said of Ready. “I’m not sure where it kind of went off track.”
Ready did not return calls seeking comment. Gural said Ready, who is not paid by the campaign for his photos, will continue to hit the stump with Frank and may be at other events with Bielat.
Posted by: Rocks at October 19, 2010 07:00 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Overpaid 3-Toothed Elitist Redneck Racist Hillbilly Transexual Prick at October 19, 2010 07:00 AM (gbCNS)
Oh yeah, Christine O'Donnell is like, stupid and stuff and um...I'm rich...ummmm.
Posted by: Meggie McCain at October 19, 2010 07:00 AM (iYbLN)
Remember when the car salesman told Borat that women in America can choose who they have sex with?
"WHAAAAAAT?!?!"
Posted by: CrustyB at October 19, 2010 07:01 AM (qzgbP)
Naaa-- aside from the fact that calling Brooks a woman is an insult to women, we're not really sure what he is in the first place.
Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 07:02 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 07:02 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 19, 2010 07:02 AM (71LDo)
When they FINALLY understand that It's.For.The.Children., then we will know that they get it.
You don't mess with the future of a mother's children (or her grandchildren) without the danger of awakening a slumbering giant (and you KNOW how we ladies like our beauty sleep!). To paraphrase that great war quote, "They have filled us with a TERRIBLE resolve".
Of course, people who have no qualms whatsoever about killing unborn babies may not EVER understand this, but we can always hope.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 19, 2010 07:03 AM (lxuuX)
they have no idea because liberals think of abortion on demand in the same way that Catholics think of Communion: it's a tenet of the faith, and they can't grasp that many women have a different belief on the subject.
Also, you can't spell "jackass" without "ack". `Nuff said.
Posted by: mallfly at October 19, 2010 07:03 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 19, 2010 07:04 AM (6ShUh)
I prefer my Tea Party straight up with a Russian Standard vodka chaser thankyouverymuch.
Posted by: mpfs at October 19, 2010 07:04 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: lauraw at October 19, 2010 07:04 AM (hZQWf)
Posted by: uber selfish business mogul at October 19, 2010 07:04 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Corona at October 19, 2010 07:05 AM (h/nMz)
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 19, 2010 07:05 AM (pFdEk)
Posted by: eman at October 19, 2010 07:05 AM (GuTnD)
/The More You Know....
Posted by: MSNBC at October 19, 2010 07:06 AM (g4J4S)
Must be the Evil Empire playing mind tricks on them.
Hey, what ever happenned to women swooning and fainting when they would see Obama give a speech?
Posted by: markytom at October 19, 2010 07:06 AM (ZG9as)
~sigh~
Maybe it's because we work and pay taxes.
Maybe it's because we actually work with those folks that liberals opine about helping but run like scared bunnies when they actually come face to face with them,,, and we know first hand that the more you do for them, the less the can do for themselves.
Maybe it's because we really like being female, like males being male and think liberals worry too much about the way the world naturally falls.
Maybe it's because we simply want to be left alone to live our lives.
I dunno....
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 07:07 AM (Ty06w)
It's a fair question. After all, don't we ask how anyone with an IQ higher than a box a paperclips can be a Democrat?
Posted by: CrustyB at October 19, 2010 07:08 AM (qzgbP)
ACORN got defunded......???
Posted by: fixerupper at October 19, 2010 07:08 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at October 19, 2010 07:08 AM (Idoz0)
Posted by: Katie Couric at October 19, 2010 07:09 AM (6uiF7)
This from the scary-smart braintrust at MSNBC's Morning Joe panel.
Oh Laura, you are so funny. I laughed til I cried at that one.
Posted by: Dang Straights at October 19, 2010 07:09 AM (fx8sm)
Maybe it's because we work and pay taxes.
Maybe it's because we
actually work with those folks that liberals opine about helping but run
like scared bunnies when they actually come face to face with them,,,
and we know first hand that the more you do for them, the less the can
do for themselves.
Maybe it's because we really like being female,
like males being male and think liberals worry too much about the way
the world naturally falls.
Maybe it's because we simply want to be left alone to live our lives.
--EZB
Naw. That can't be it.
Posted by: MSNBC at October 19, 2010 07:09 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: mpfs at October 19, 2010 07:10 AM (iYbLN)
But I'm think most ladies would take Marco Rubio over Harry Reid, and Sean Duffy over Phil Hare any day.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 19, 2010 07:10 AM (PLvLS)
"Maybe it's because we really like being female..."
But not human female. Quite honestly, I'd rather be a koala bear.
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 19, 2010 07:10 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Sandra Lee at October 19, 2010 07:11 AM (UOM48)
The leftards will never "get it". They just can't conceive of a woman who isn't looking to the government to be their surrogate husband/parents. TEA party women are independent and feel quite capable of doing their own thinking and running their own lives without Uncle Sam there to tell them how to do it.
Not so for the libtard women who seem to need a "benevolent dictator" to take care of their lives due to the fact that they are imbeciles.
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 07:11 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Dr Spank at October 19, 2010 07:12 AM (Y81Xa)
Posted by: Will Folks at October 19, 2010 07:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Ken Begg at October 19, 2010 07:13 AM (0pNdu)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:13 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 19, 2010 07:13 AM (PLvLS)
BTW, I just voted a straight TEA party approved ticket.
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 10:57 AM (OlN4e)
_______________
Eh? Where do I get the list?
Posted by: Average Jen at October 19, 2010 07:13 AM (mnNty)
Posted by: Sean Hannity at October 19, 2010 07:14 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 19, 2010 07:14 AM (f9c2L)
"Women are in the Tea Party because of their faulty vaginas..."
It's my inverted cervix, actually
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 19, 2010 07:14 AM (HaYO4)
...and Sean Hannity is a better looking man than Rachel Maddow.
Maybe, but I've got a bigger dick.
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at October 19, 2010 07:15 AM (E0EDC)
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:17 AM (N1fth)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 19, 2010 07:17 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 19, 2010 07:17 AM (6ShUh)
Eh? Where do I get the list?
Posted by: Average Jen at October 19, 2010 11:13 AM (mnNty)
Every district is different. I attend all the meetings so I know who attends meetings and who are members. For the next county over, except for those running for state wide or national offices, I haven't a clue. Most of the chapters of the TEA party have web sites, and they should have an endorsement list. The TEA party considers local elections for school board and city council just as important as state wide and national elections.
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 07:17 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Gregorina at October 19, 2010 07:19 AM (XrvQ5)
Once Obama had to grapple with two wars, a crippled economy and reflexive Republican opposition, he had no place to go but down.
Not valid or reasoned or fuck no socialism opposition but reflexive---racist, and bitterly clinging. What an asswipe.
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:19 AM (N1fth)
Posted by: DavidL at October 19, 2010 07:20 AM (EmDLH)
Wait...um...what was the , ah ...question? But I'm a 26 year old woman!!
Posted by: Meggie McPainInTheAss at October 19, 2010 07:20 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 07:21 AM (AZGON)
Well, there is the whole Stepford Wives thing - hadn't really explored that possibility, but seems more and more likely.
Because, you know, women are really all about the socialism.
Posted by: blaster at October 19, 2010 07:21 AM (Ov86C)
Posted by: Greg at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (AZGON)
Feminism has come to a DEAD SCREECHING HALT.
They have to be worried if they are losing "gender" in their race, class, gender manipulation meme
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (N1fth)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (6ShUh)
Posted by: MSdumbBC Panel of Experts at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (ruu60)
/s
Posted by: Pelayo at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (qxog2)
Colonoscopies--on live TV? Well yes they do that nowadays in all the better appointed endoscopy clinics. You can lie there getting a colonoscopy and the doc invites you to get a "worm's eye view" on a laptop next to your head.
But that's just you and the doc. Now on the night of November 2, we're going to get to watch Keith Olberman, Larry O'Donnell, Rachel Maddow, Wolf Blitzer et all look at the election returns. As the horror of it all unfolds before their unbelieving eyes, they'll get "reamed, steamed and cleaned". Who knew you could see a colonoscopy on live national TV?
As for me--buckets of popcorn and an adult beverage or two. It'll be the biggest party night of the year.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at October 19, 2010 07:24 AM (3ESDJ)
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:24 AM (N1fth)
You think it's only two inches? They must be in the dark (and lucky) then.
They won't ever get it because they refuse to believe it. Nah, they were just having an off day.
Posted by: Kerry the Label Guy at October 19, 2010 07:25 AM (PteLM)
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (N1fth)
Posted by: Greg at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Greggy at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: Lisa "Rent An Eskimo" Lurkin' Murkowski at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (iYbLN)
"Women are in the Tea Party because of their faulty vaginas..."
Ha! Mine works just fine, thankyouverymuch.
Posted by: EZB at October 19, 2010 07:27 AM (Ty06w)
1990-something
Arlen Specter is mean! It is the end of the world because there aren't more women in Congress!!
2010
Eek! Women!!
Posted by: MFM at October 19, 2010 07:27 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: buzzion at October 19, 2010 07:27 AM (oVQFe)
When the panel discussion starts they regurgitate all these talking points usually liberal as hell on MSNBC.
The networks all like to make believe these discussion are spontaneous but they are not.
Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 07:27 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 19, 2010 07:28 AM (6ShUh)
Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:28 AM (N1fth)
Posted by: MSNBC at October 19, 2010 07:29 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 07:29 AM (OlN4e)
Note the distinction being drawn between "many voters" and "many journalists", and you have your solution.
One would think that he might draw the same conclusion.
Posted by: Drumwaster at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (dWFSK)
Posted by: Keffums Olberdouche at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Dumbocrats at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (rplL3)
Posted by: Greg Crying in a Fetal Position at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: MSNBC at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (AZGON)
Uh, because they're lesbians?
Hey, I'm just brainstorming.
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at October 19, 2010 10:45 AM (AZGON)
I think in your case, Ms. Maddow, its not so much brainstorming as it is wishful thinking.
Posted by: Book Geek at October 19, 2010 07:32 AM (1+OO5)
Posted by: Zombie Steve Irwin at October 19, 2010 07:32 AM (OBDWE)
Posted by: cali grump at October 19, 2010 07:33 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: Overpaid 3-Toothed Elitist Redneck Racist Hillbilly Transexual Prick at October 19, 2010 07:35 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Todd Seavey at October 19, 2010 07:39 AM (AZGON)
A whuuuut now? Quit it with your fancy talkin'.
Posted by: Cletus the slack-jawed yokel at October 19, 2010 07:40 AM (3ll0O)
Posted by: John McCain at October 19, 2010 07:41 AM (Snu7z)
I have a lot of damned good reasons for being a part of the Tea Party movement but now?
I would almost welcome the opportunity to represent myself as some sort of a fringey (yet articulate and within 90 miles of MSNB studio C) fucking nut-case just so's to get within punching distance of Mika and Joe
Not saying I would do anything but someone should be on set willing to paste these fatuous jack-holes, right on the nose, no?
I am but a small female creature, so timid that I'd bet that Joe Scarborough could totally kick my ass.
I'd still pop him one, given the opportunity.
Aaand take the beat down, delivered by by Mika.
(Okay. That's not realistic. Mika is like 50 years old, no way in hell could I let her beat up on me. Not even going through chemo. Sorry.)
Still, I bet that Joe Scarborough could totally whoop my ass, if he ever met me in a hospital corridor.
So there's that.
I'm such an "old-lady'" for the GOP MC, I'm willing to take a SCAR-BRO COUNTRY beat-down for the cause.
Posted by: Deety GOP "Old Lady" at October 19, 2010 07:41 AM (Jb3+B)
119 Someday Ed Anger, people will stop being fooled by your sockpuppetting of the trolls. And then where will you be?
Posted by: buzzion at October 19, 2010 11:27 AM (oVQFe)
I say live it up while you can.You gotta admit, though, I'm pretty darn good. I think Mr. Pink and NCJ have done better jobs.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 07:42 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at October 19, 2010 07:43 AM (JNqU9)
Oh, MSNBC, women are in the tea party because the meetings are close to the grocery store.
Posted by: Museisluse at October 19, 2010 07:44 AM (DTfXb)
What really drives them nuts is that these guys went to J-School with the idea of being rich and driving public opinion like Walter Conkite. And when they discover that the apex of their career is reading twenty-second soundbites or reading a teleprompter for thirty minutes... it's somewhat of a letdown.
And when they realize the people who really do get to shape public opinion didn't go to J-school, didn't pay their dues covering cat fashion shows for Channel 54 in Saginaw... and get three uninterrupted hours a day to express themselves to an audience ten times larger than network news ... yeah, the MFM gets a mite bitter.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 19, 2010 07:45 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 07:48 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jimmie McMillen, The "Rent Is Too Damn High" Party at October 19, 2010 07:48 AM (iYbLN)
Yeah, but wasn't Howie part of walk-on-water coverage, too? I seem to recall him cock-slobbering Obama like the rest of the MSM whores.
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 19, 2010 07:49 AM (pFdEk)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at October 19, 2010 07:51 AM (OBDWE)
“I wanted to ask all the gurus here, why so many of the Tea Partiers are women? I find that just intriguing and don’t quite understand why that has happened,” Stahl said.
Posted by: maverick muse at October 19, 2010 08:00 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 19, 2010 08:01 AM (bvfVF)
If a woman calls women racists, oops. Recall last week's article referencing WHY women won't vote for women.
My take? No woman wants to tolerate being bossed around by a bitch on ballot first choice. Women historically have vast experience manipulating men much more easily than manipulating another woman, political compromise being the game of mutual consent.
Notice what new female candidates flaunt for votes. Do better each time. Live and learn.
Oddly, despite vocal timbre, Palin seems to have "motherly loved" her fans including women. From providing Levi Johnston sleeping privileges in their home prior to Bristol's pregnancy, weirdly, the advertising narrative for female candidates has already progressed into "I am not a witch."
Posted by: maverick muse at October 19, 2010 08:20 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: chuck in st paul at October 19, 2010 08:26 AM (adr25)
160 There is an old Italian saying "when the men are in trouble, send for the women".
You menfolk are definitely in trouble...and well, damnit, you fellows do have your uses...time to saddle up and bust you out of jail.
That's my hillbilly philosophy take on why women are in the Tea Party.
Besides, contrary to what leftists seem to believe, we really don't like metrosexual girly-men and latte sipping frilly-boys: don't want them as mates, don't want them as dads, don't want to see our sons turned into one.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 19, 2010 08:38 AM (5/yRG)
LauraW, I love you with the passion of a thousand crazed Ewoks.
Posted by: Mary in LA at October 19, 2010 08:41 AM (JYxmy)
Posted by: Deety GOP "Old Lady" at October 19, 2010 11:41 AM (Jb3+B)
{{{{{hugs Deety}}}}}
Posted by: Mary in LA at October 19, 2010 08:44 AM (JYxmy)
Why don't women have a peepee?
I dunno. Amanda Marcotte?
Hmmm.
I dunno.
Did you break it off as a baby or something?
Posted by: Joe & Mika, with their thinkin' caps at October 19, 2010 08:47 AM (XiVKO)
Posted by: alexthechick at October 19, 2010 10:59 AM (bQ5xy)
How'd I miss that? Where can we see her? I've worn a tricorne hat or two in my time...
(with clothes on, though...)
Posted by: Mary in LA at October 19, 2010 08:55 AM (JYxmy)
Truly, if these dolts were involved in local politics of any kind, they wouldn't ask the question. The women make things hum. I have a friend who works, runs her own animal charity as well as the county 'Pub party behind the scenes. She's chaired twice but pulled the strings to get the latest in place. At the conventions, if someone gets too wordy or she doesn't agree with their position: Run like the wind because she's going to take the mike. Love it, love it, love it. How I could end up so lucky as to find myself in the most conservative district in Iowa, I don't know. Is this heaven? Hell, yes.
Plus, Laura, you are hilarious. Thought it was one of our potty-mouthed boys. Well said.
Posted by: Mazzuchelli at October 19, 2010 09:06 AM (piR98)
Posted by: hadsil at October 19, 2010 09:17 AM (VBH8s)
how 'racism is surging among our nation's women.'
That would be a misognist claim, therefore they can not make it. Remember women = oppressed group, therefore they're incapable of many "isms".
Unless they're self-identifying conservative women. In which case, send 'em to Saddam's rape attitude readjustment rooms.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at October 19, 2010 09:56 AM (1hM1d)
That there's some fine poetry. Can you give us a version for CD's and MP3's? I'd like to share that pearl with the yoots.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 19, 2010 10:27 AM (swuwV)
Women can do MATH?
Posted by: Just Another Cat at October 19, 2010 01:34 PM (RXxwz)
Hey, gang! Larry Summers is blogging here!
Posted by: ya2daup at October 19, 2010 10:34 AM (HmCnI)
Why do women join the Tea Party?
Because they're mean, plain and simple. Didn't you read my latest column? That bitch Sharron Angle actually told poor gentlemanly Harry Reid to "man up." That was so mean I started to cry for Harry's sake.
Posted by: Maureen Dowd at October 19, 2010 12:31 PM (mnNty)
Every district is different. I attend all the meetings so I know who attends meetings and who are members. For the next county over, except for those running for state wide or national offices, I haven't a clue. Most of the chapters of the TEA party have web sites, and they should have an endorsement list. The TEA party considers local elections for school board and city council just as important as state wide and national elections.
Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 11:17 AM (OlN4e)
Thanks maddogg--I'll check the local websites.
Posted by: Average Jen at October 19, 2010 12:32 PM (mnNty)
I'd love to see the answer to why there are women in the Tea party that are life long (or life long former) Democrats. That one would give them an anyurism. After 27 years as a registered dem. I changed my affiliation minutes after the primary vote even though I have voted straight repub for 2 years.
I don't think they have enough creativity to come up with even insanely absurd spin to explain that one. But i'd love to get a good laugh seeing them try
Posted by: Female Ex Dem at October 19, 2010 03:51 PM (UO76L)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2188 seconds, 296 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








This is quickly becoming a "crazy women drivers" level cliche'.
May not be fair, but it kinda gives the impression that women are generally pretty shallow.
Hearing from Meghan McCain every freaking day doesn't help.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 19, 2010 06:45 AM (RkRxq)