December 23, 2010
— Ace They're really pushing for top-dog status, and really seem to have so much money they can burn a lot of it.
China has said it is willing to bail out debt-ridden countries in the euro zone using its $2.7trillion overseas investment fund.In a fresh humiliation for Europe, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jiang Yu said it was one of the most important areas for China's foreign exchange investments.
The country has already approached struggling European countries with financial aid, including offering to buy Greece's debt in October and promising to buy $4billion of Portuguese government debt.
'To have any discernible effect China will have to buy a lot more than 5billion euros if they expect to have any impact on the negative sentiment surrounding Europe,' said Michael Hewson, currency analyst at CMC Markets.
China's astonishing economic growth has put it on track to overtake America as the world's economic powerhouse within two years, a recent report claimed.
I think this is a good thing. It means China's investing in stability and certainty, and aligns its interest more with our own (and against Iran and North Korea). When you invest in the established order you're more hostile to troublemaking threats to the return on your investment.
Posted by: Ace at
09:44 AM
| Comments (158)
Post contains 216 words, total size 1 kb.
There's a flip side, though. We've bought a lot of influence with our cash over the years. Presumably that money will have strings.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 09:47 AM (XIXhw)
I agree.
Ok everyone, weekly office parties are back on!
Posted by: Some Greek Bureaucrat at December 23, 2010 09:47 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 01:47 PM (XIXhw)
Wait, we are supposed to get thing when we give people money? Since when?
Posted by: SoS Hillary Clinton at December 23, 2010 09:48 AM (7BU4a)
Damn Chinese launderers.
Posted by: Actually at December 23, 2010 09:48 AM (yFU0t)
What a terrible investment, though.
Think about it.
Would you invest in a failing company deep in debt with lay-abouts for employees?
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 09:49 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 23, 2010 09:49 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Fritz at December 23, 2010 09:50 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 23, 2010 09:50 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 01:49 PM (uFokq)
Umm, yes?
Posted by: Troubled Asset Relief Program at December 23, 2010 09:50 AM (QKKT0)
This. Or, rather, this.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 09:51 AM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 01:47 PM (XIXhw)
Yes, the French in particular are known for their appreciation of their benefactors, for years to come.
Posted by: Sad Dalek at December 23, 2010 09:51 AM (z1N6a)
Malarkey. China is currently inflating the Mother of All Bubbles, with its building of lavish "factory" cities with nobody to live in them simply to create enough arificial demand to keep its unemployment down. When that bubble pops...only chaos, and there isn't enough of the Chicoms horses or men to put that house of cards back together again.
And does anybody, save for the Tom Friedmans of the world, really believe any of China's self-reported economic indicators? Me neither.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 09:53 AM (9hSKh)
We joke, but the naming rights to the US Naval Fleet will be sold to corporations or perhaps even China...who will own the US corporations.
USS Dunkin Donuts
or
USS PRC
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 09:53 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Oldcat at December 23, 2010 09:53 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: ed at December 23, 2010 09:53 AM (QLhy5)
Posted by: Cicero at December 23, 2010 09:53 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 01:47 PM (XIXhw)
Yes, the French in particular are known for their appreciation of their benefactors, for years to come.
Posted by: Sad Dalek at December 23, 2010 01:51 PM (z1N6a)
Oh, there's definitely a layer of prideful bullshit slathered over it. But even with Chirac and Shroeder (spit) in charge after 9/11 French and German intelligence services worked very closely with ours. Until it went public. But that's the way spook stuff works - once it goes public you have to stop whatever you're doing.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 09:54 AM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 01:53 PM (9hSKh)
You mean communists would lie? When does that ever happen?
Posted by: Oldcat at December 23, 2010 09:54 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: cali grump at December 23, 2010 09:55 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: CAC at December 23, 2010 09:55 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: CAC at December 23, 2010 09:58 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 09:58 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 23, 2010 09:59 AM (SJ6/3)
Meanwhile back in the United States...
we're putting 'all the marbles' in the hope of a 'green' economy.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:00 AM (uFokq)
Or China needs some more seed money to modernize and expand the People's Liberation Army for the glorious task of "reuniting" Taiwan with the Motherland.
The cash-flux the Chicoms will receive once interest rates get back to even historic levels will be legendary...
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 10:00 AM (9hSKh)
I always thought the Chinese would fuel the next boom in Tangible Assets...
but I never thought they would do it by extending the Euro-Zone more Credit!?!?
Hey Europe, don't put down your Coke.
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 10:01 AM (teqkw)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 23, 2010 10:02 AM (TMB3S)
Meanwhile back in the United States...
we're putting 'all the marbles' in the hope of a 'green' economy.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 02:00 PM (uFokq)
Apparently that's Caleefornia's only hope for fiscal solvency.
Nah, doesn't make sense to me either.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 10:02 AM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Euro-Slogan Generator at December 23, 2010 10:03 AM (teqkw)
Indeed, who will stop China from annexing Taiwan, now?
The UN? The US? The EU?
China holds the notes on all of them.
btw,Tibet, you're fucked.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:03 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Randy Jackson at December 23, 2010 10:05 AM (V6CZ8)
We do too, and shortly thereafter there is no China. Or rather, there's like 12.
Posted by: Methos at December 23, 2010 10:06 AM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 10:06 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Dali Llama at December 23, 2010 10:07 AM (teqkw)
My second thought was, anyone (Goldman Sachs) up to their hips in Euro debt purchases must be chubbin' to think someone will be dumb enough to get them off the hook, right?
Posted by: The Hammer at December 23, 2010 10:08 AM (NI88S)
Posted by: Taiwan's universal military service laws and the toys we got from America back when we were allies at December 23, 2010 10:08 AM (Ew1k4)
China lining up against Iran? Maybe, maybe not. NK, sure, they have nothing the Chinese want. But Iran has fuel. Until China solves its incapacity to generate enough power to move its billion or so peasants into the middle class, it's going to be nothing but bubble city.
They've got to do something like triple their power output to do this and they can't do it internally, so they have to go outside their borders. Iran is their best bet because barring some major advancement in physics China ain't about to go green anytime in the next generation or two.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 23, 2010 10:10 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: doom/gloom at December 23, 2010 10:10 AM (gjUaP)
Isn't there a story about a city that was under siege and was about to starve to death. So, they decided to catapult their last cow at the enemy.
Zees ees how we beat back those silly English Kuh-nigits.
Now Go Away...or I shall Taunt you a Second Time!
Posted by: French Tower Guard at December 23, 2010 10:11 AM (teqkw)
Posted by: CAC at December 23, 2010 10:13 AM (lV4Fs)
the Middle East, India, Australia and Africa rule the world?
Posted by: CAC at December 23, 2010 02:13 PM (lV4Fs)
Well, yeah, I had to go with plan B after the rousing success of START.
Posted by: Lex Luthor, Ruler of Australia at December 23, 2010 10:15 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 23, 2010 10:17 AM (eOXTH)
Those things are nice and all, but high-tech toys and universal conscription laws for 20 some million people don't win wars - overwhelming firepower does. The Chinese have it, the Taiwanese don't. Any strategy for successfully staving-off a Chinese attack on Taiwan depends on the US Navy assisting Taiwian. If there aren't aircraft carriers in the Taiwan Strait to deal with the PLC's airforce and naval assets, it is pretty much game over for the Taiwanese. The only question remaining then is "when?".
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 10:17 AM (9hSKh)
My offer of $20 for Time magazine is still on the table.
Posted by: Follower of Cthulhu, former republican at December 23, 2010 10:17 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: CAC at December 23, 2010 10:19 AM (lV4Fs)
I'm still waiting for millionaire George Clooney to 'save' and bailout Darfur.
Funny how Clooney stopped giving a shit about Darfur when it no longer served as an embarrassment to the Bush admin.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:19 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 10:21 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: RWC at December 23, 2010 10:22 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Follower of Cthulhu, former republican at December 23, 2010 10:24 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 23, 2010 10:26 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: China at December 23, 2010 10:26 AM (mM7dK)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 23, 2010 10:27 AM (fLHQe)
You hear what that cocksucker Ben Affleck said?
I'll tell you right after this message from Cooter's, the Vagina Bath House chain.
Visit Cooter's today and get your cooter cleaned by a friendly and professional staff. Gift certificates available, too.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:28 AM (uFokq)
I don't know. Um, like six?
Posted by: Chairman Mao at December 23, 2010 10:29 AM (mM7dK)
Posted by: joncelli© at December 23, 2010 10:30 AM (RD7QR)
Ben Affleck said it is wrong for CEO's to make a hundred-times more than their workers.
Affleck said it should only be around "nine times" as much.
hmmm, I wonder if Ben Affleck made only nine times as much as, oh, the make-up assistant in his last film?
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:30 AM (uFokq)
Ben Affleck said it is wrong for CEO's to make a hundred-times more than their workers.
He's that guy that works at 'Fashionable Male', right?
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 10:32 AM (teqkw)
Posted by: Cicero at December 23, 2010 10:39 AM (QKKT0)
...link to maggiesfarm for a great x-mas pic. you are welcome
Umm, some of us are at work. : /
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 23, 2010 10:41 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Cicero at December 23, 2010 02:39 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: kathysaysso channeling Australia at December 23, 2010 10:44 AM (ZtwUX)
btw, did you know we totally agree with Ben Affleck? It's troo. Read.
=================================
AFFLECK: The banks shouldn’t — people shouldn’t make such a giant profit off just moving money back and forth. And CEOs’ pay shouldn’t be 200 times the average worker. It used to be nine times.
Okay, maybe itÂ’s legal and maybe it passes muster with shareholders. But thereÂ’s something about us that fundamentally feels it isnÂ’t right. And I think thatÂ’s the frustration that you feel on people speaking out from the left. I think itÂ’s the same frustration you hear from Tea Party activists. And that tells you that itÂ’s common to the entire spectrum of American people. We have a deep sense that whatÂ’s happening is wrong and unethical and that we are in decline because weÂ’ve lost our moral compass.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:45 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Dali Llama at December 23, 2010 02:07 PM (teqkw)
Be quiet and head out the back door... cant miss it.. its by the garbage.
oh and here is some cuff links from the Obama's.
Posted by: White house greeting staff at December 23, 2010 10:45 AM (ph9vn)
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 02:31 PM (teqkw)
My rage towards you has reached the intensity of a thousand Suns. Why the hell didn't you give any decadence warning - even a NSFW warning would have sufficed!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 10:45 AM (9hSKh)
how is China investing in Europe any different from them building all those empty cities and buildings?
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 23, 2010 10:45 AM (d1FhN)
it feels it feels it feels
that's all these ignorant campus-creeps who graduated from Leftist U have -- feelings.
They want to base policy on their fucking feelings.
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 10:47 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: redc1c4 at December 23, 2010 10:47 AM (d1FhN)
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2010 10:47 AM (OlN4e)
Because there will be strings attached to this money. Strings that may yet benefit the Chicoms in some unforeseen (to us) way.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 10:49 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 02:49 PM (9hSKh)
The Chinese are clever, no doubt. But what could they possible want from Europe? There is nothing there the Chinese can't make for themselves. The main product of Europe is fucking industrial grade useless.
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2010 10:53 AM (OlN4e)
Would you invest in a failing company deep in debt with lay-abouts for employees?
Depends on the collateral. What a great way to pick up a continent on the cheap.
Posted by: Derak at December 23, 2010 10:53 AM (CjpKH)
Posted by: steve walsh at December 23, 2010 10:54 AM (bzWBP)
Posted by: Louis Tully at December 23, 2010 10:55 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: eman at December 23, 2010 10:55 AM (XXyJt)
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2010 10:56 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dougf at December 23, 2010 10:56 AM (zG9C9)
Nice! That's for all the 'boobies' links in the past year, young Ghost of Sparta.
I don't get what's nsfw there.
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 10:57 AM (teqkw)
This is essentially a swap facility that the Chinese will use to exchange their US Treasuries for either hard assets, sovereign european obligations, or other things of value. It also has the side benefit of expanding the penetration of yuan denominated trading of assets around the globe. For those who do not read Jim Willie, you really should. he knew this was on the way (and how it would happen) months ago.
Posted by: mjhlaw at December 23, 2010 10:57 AM (YQ4mh)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 10:58 AM (tJjm/)
You forgot their great inventory of muslims. That's a gold mine, there.
Think of the potential for the advancements in Mathmatics that they'll certainly achieve!
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 10:58 AM (teqkw)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 23, 2010 02:49 PM
Obviously, those eeeevil Chicoms know something we don't. We've pissed away money on "friends" around the world for many decades, and have gotten fuck-all back for it.
If Europe treats this new "bailout" from China the way they've treated our multiple billions, the Chinese have bought themselves a big load of disdain, snark and arrogance.
Fuck 'em. Let 'em learn the hard way, just like we haven't.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 23, 2010 10:59 AM (Ulu3i)
A communist country that wants to "bailout" the EU and that owns 3/4 of the world's natural resources, and agreed to bilateral trade with Russia in their own currency spells an expansion of economic hegemony - for the logic of such a move has nothing to do with balance in achieving world wide economic stasis. It is a move to establish Chinese dominance as an economic apex. A position which affords the golden corollary - dictating terms and conditions in international markets and more importantly, geopolitical policies.
Lets wake up here.
Posted by: journolist at December 23, 2010 10:59 AM (LwLqV)
Think of the potential for the advancements in Mathmatics that they'll certainly achieve!
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 02:58 PM (teqkw)
Well, they sure as Hell have multiplication down.
Posted by: maddogg at December 23, 2010 11:00 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Kublai Khan at December 23, 2010 11:00 AM (cN5zf)
I don't get what's nsfw there.
Posted by: garrett at December 23, 2010 02:57 PMYou don't? Hell, I'd love to have your job, then!
I'd love to have any friggin' job
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 23, 2010 11:01 AM (Ulu3i)
Couldn't of happened to a better bunch of half-assed commies. I hope they are happy with their new bundle of pensioners, muzzies, miscreants and ne'er-do-wells. Is it time to start hedgeing investments in Chinese realty, money, commodoties etc??
Posted by: dananjcon at December 23, 2010 11:02 AM (pr+up)
O/T
Did you see where the commies at EPA will be taking over the issuance of air permits in Texas?
Say hello to $7.00 gasoline.
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at December 23, 2010 11:02 AM (CcqND)
Posted by: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at December 23, 2010 11:02 AM (QKKT0)
Lets wake up here.
Posted by: journolist at December 23, 2010 02:59 PM (LwLqV)
Its more like finding out your Nigerian Money Transfer Deal didn't work out so hot. Not really on the road to world dominance.
Posted by: Oldcat at December 23, 2010 11:05 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: fluffy at December 23, 2010 11:11 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Timbo at December 23, 2010 11:11 AM (ph9vn)
Go China go! This will pump up the froth...the markets will steam ahead and put off the next crash a couple years. In 22 months I can liquidate that Roth IRA and pay the house off. *fingers crossed*
$13 trillion of US debt is a Big Fucking Deal. Get unlevered people.
Posted by: torabora at December 23, 2010 11:12 AM (K+KYS)
Posted by: joncelli© at December 23, 2010 11:12 AM (RD7QR)
Affleck doesn't understand jack
shit and he's blaming banks for just being banks. If moving money
around is not the main job of a bank, then what is? Affleck thinks, it
seems, that banks serve no function and shouldn't exist.
Posted by: iknowtheleft at December 23, 2010 02:52 PM (G/MYk)
Ben Affleck was never better cast than at the clueless douche in Chasing Amy, which started out good but ran out of steam so fucking badly in the middle that Kevin Smith must've had a brain aneurysm or something because he's only produced unwatchable garbage like Dogma ever since; in addition to being an ugly fat fuck. Affleck definitely doesn't deserve the sweet cooter of Jennifer Garner; the clueless cocksucker should get down on his knees every fucking day and thank God he gets to bang that instead of Kathy Griffin or Garofugly which is what he deserves.
Posted by: Captain Hate at December 23, 2010 11:13 AM (kOMUP)
Posted by: Chicom Overlords at December 23, 2010 11:14 AM (K+KYS)
Of COURSE not! It was 1 B.C.E., you Christianist Wingnuts!
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 02:58 PM (tJjm/)
But if you stay tuned, you can get that dude with the Heat Miser hairstyle on your TV telling you how it had to be ancient aliens who built the pyramids because man was just too fucking stupid...or something.
(I didn't know anyone still watched the History in name only Channel anymore)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 23, 2010 11:17 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Cicero at December 23, 2010 01:53 PM (QKKT0)
They can have it. I'd like to see the way they'd treat those Cali lefty loons
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 23, 2010 11:32 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at December 23, 2010 11:33 AM (6ftzF)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 23, 2010 02:02 PM (TMB3S)
I just figured that the Chinese thought european sex would be better. I mean look at Obama, it's got to be better across the pond.
Posted by: dagny at December 23, 2010 11:40 AM (DS1Ec)
Just remember folks . . . we built this city on rock n roll.
Posted by: journolist at December 23, 2010 11:41 AM (LwLqV)
Posted by: joncelli© at December 23, 2010 11:41 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Randy Jackson at December 23, 2010 11:42 AM (V6CZ8)
Posted by: dagny at December 23, 2010 11:42 AM (DS1Ec)
Posted by: joncelli© at December 23, 2010 11:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Aussies, Kiwis, Taiwanese, etc. at December 23, 2010 11:44 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at December 23, 2010 11:44 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at December 23, 2010 11:47 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 23, 2010 11:50 AM (0YS61)
Posted by: joncelli© at December 23, 2010 11:51 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 23, 2010 11:55 AM (0GFWk)
okay, I know what you're all thinking.
Did the Dukes of Hazzard have a Christmas episode?
Of course they did. Just one, though, in season 3 (1980). Directed by Uncle Jesse...really, no shit.
In The Series' Only Christmas-themed episode, Boss who is in an Ebenezer Scrooge like mood throughout this episode, hires a trio of criminals to hijack the Dukes' Christmas tree shipment, then pin the blame on the Dukes, The scheme involves two of the bad guys stealing the trees from Bo and Luke at gunpoint, then the third associate disguised as a clergyman giving the Duke boys a lift into town, and then telling them they forgot "their" $500 down payment on the trees, While Uncle Jesse and Daisy set out to clear their family's name, the criminals plot to double-cross Boss by taking more than their payment due on the trees, breaking into the safe while each one is dressed as Santa Clauses Meanwhile, Bo and Luke - with some help from Cooter - decide to take back the trees and have a little fun confusing Rosco and Cletus while delivering the trees (dressed as Santa Clauses, In the end, the episode takes a turn toward forgiveness and fellowship as the Dukes and Cooter invite Rosco and Cletus to their Christmas Eve gathering, Boss comes in later, reformed after having read Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol."
Posted by: Soothsayer Sees the Future, and it is bleak at December 23, 2010 11:55 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Cicero at December 23, 2010 01:53 PM (QKKT0)
Like anyone would notice.
Posted by: stuiec at December 23, 2010 12:01 PM (Di3Im)
Let's all just keep borrowing from each other until this problem is solved!
I know it can work; I just know it!
Posted by: Warden at December 23, 2010 12:02 PM (HzhBE)
Mandarin and English as a second language are the two language options at my kid's school here in California.
It is assumed that Spanish is understood by all.
Posted by: Who Knows at December 23, 2010 12:02 PM (QLiYt)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 23, 2010 12:02 PM (0GFWk)
It means China's investing in stability and certainty, and aligns its interest more with our own (and against Iran and North Korea). When you invest in the established order you're more hostile to troublemaking threats to the return on your investment.
The problem is that the Chinese see any interference with the status quo in Iran and North Korea as troublemaking threats. They like being able to buy Iranian oil and they like how North Korea pins down so much of the strategic attention of the US and its allies in the region. They're likely to want Europe to stop pushing for any sanctions that would cripple Iran's oil industry or interfere with North Korea's lively business of exporting anti-Western chaos (in the form of missile and nuclear technology) around the world.
Posted by: stuiec at December 23, 2010 12:06 PM (Di3Im)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 23, 2010 04:02 PM (0GFWk)
FIFY.
Posted by: stuiec at December 23, 2010 12:07 PM (Di3Im)
China's only hope when things start totally collapsing is going to be war.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 23, 2010 12:07 PM (61b7k)
I like Chinese food so it's all good to me.
Posted by: mpfs, still traumatized at December 23, 2010 12:07 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at December 23, 2010 12:08 PM (7f18s)
I absolutely love how the issue of GDP was used to establish that the U.S. still leads in market dominiance since GDP on a per person basis places the U.S. over China. Um, isn't China's population 5X that of the U.S.? And don't they admittedly have a lower standard of living? And um, isn't the U.S. a debtor nation and China a creditor nation?
Comparing China's GDP with that of the U.S. is like saying the neighbor who lives in a fancy house with a fancy new cadillac is better positioned than the person who lives in a small house that's paid for that drives a paid for pick-up that has money in the bank.
The U.S. is tooling around in the caddy and parks it in a garage attached to a house that has been completely financed by the guy who drives the old pick-up. A guy named Wen who's ready to make a deal with Europe, hmm, that must be good right?
Posted by: journolist at December 23, 2010 12:08 PM (LwLqV)
Posted by: Jean at December 23, 2010 12:14 PM (lnUW/)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at December 23, 2010 12:26 PM (41MJ2)
Pentagon planners have admitted publicly China is capable of taking Taiwan even if the US intervenes on Taiwan's behalf. If I remember the wording correctly it started something like "If the Chinese are willing to pay the diplomatic and economic price...". The price is, I think, all that's dissuading them.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 12:26 PM (QgI7g)
Posted by: Jean at December 23, 2010 12:32 PM (judfL)
Posted by: Damiano at December 23, 2010 12:33 PM (3nrx7)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at December 23, 2010 12:33 PM (6ftzF)
Posted by: Jean at December 23, 2010 12:37 PM (aemFw)
Posted by: crosspatch at December 23, 2010 12:47 PM (ZbLJZ)
Posted by: navybrat at December 23, 2010 12:51 PM (zBUlJ)
Posted by: Damiano at December 23, 2010 12:54 PM (3nrx7)
All that foreign property China "owns" will be worthless in the event of a collapse unless they have the military capability to go all over the world defending and collecting on it.
If there's a global economic collapse every single sovereign country will hanging on to their domestic resources as bargaining chips. Any contractual obligations of ownership to foreigners on land and resource rights are going to get voided so fast it isn't funny.
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at December 23, 2010 01:29 PM (ijjAe)
I heard there be bailout money today.. Where's my money? I'm here for da money!
Got my 'Bama money.. now I wants some Chinese money!
Posted by: Former "Obama Money" recipient at December 23, 2010 01:29 PM (Do528)
Posted by: sexypig at December 23, 2010 02:54 PM (UmEOs)
Not true. The plan is to use the missiles and GPS bombs to take out Taiwanese airfields, use subs, aircraft, and ballistic missiles to keep US ships out of the straight, and then do a reverse-Dunkirk using every spare leaky junk to move troops over to the island once a beachhead has been established (for which purpose they bought a half-dozen hulking Russian Zubr hovercraft). The Zubr is twice the size of a US LCAC, it's armed, armored, fast, and has enough range to make it to Taiwan from China.
They absolutely have the sealift capability if we can't deny them the straight.
Pentagon planners figure it'll take us about two weeks to get much in the way of land assets to the island, so if the Chicoms can take it in that time frame there's nothing we can do. They can do it, again, if they're willing to pay the price.
Posted by: Ace's liver at December 23, 2010 02:55 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: sexypig at December 23, 2010 02:58 PM (UmEOs)
Posted by: HSTAD at December 23, 2010 04:07 PM (e0+7F)
Posted by: Oldcat"
Hey, we're flexible. Pearl Harbor didn't work out so we got you with tape decks.
Posted by: Joe Takagi at December 23, 2010 04:24 PM (rXQWW)
Posted by: sexypig at December 23, 2010 07:31 PM (UmEOs)
The European sphere of influence will be shrinking dramatically soon. China will be demanding serious quid pro quos (not stated publicly of course) - which will undoubtedly be no challenges to their moving economically (and militarily) into Africa in a big way.
The era of European post-colonial African influence is finished, over, kaput, fini.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 24, 2010 11:55 PM (/TV5A)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3512 seconds, 286 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: CoolCzech at December 23, 2010 09:46 AM (tJjm/)