December 27, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Over the weekend, actually on Christmas, the NYTimes published an article about the President's plans to go ahead with end-of-life advisory incentives even after Congress removed it from ObamaCare after massive public outcry. Ed says "better get used to this process" since it's how the President is going to get around the GOP House for the next two years.
In fact, the end run around Congress has been a regular feature of the Obama Presidency and it's been getting more frequent over time. He wanted Cap & Tax, Congress rejected it. Lo-and-behold the EPA, under Obama's direction, will do it anyway via regulation. He wanted Card Check and other pro-union laws; Congress rejected them and rejected his pro-union NLRB nominee, Craig Becker. Surprise! He recess-appointed Becker, who has been issuing pro-union regulatory decisions.
His executive fiat was also rejected this year by the courts. Both houses of Congress approved offshore drilling in a bill signed by Bush 43. Obama used the Interior Department to put a halt to it by regulation . . . until the courts found the regulations "arbitrary and capricious." That's legalese for "lawless." Both houses of Congress approved the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project in a bill signed by President Reagan. The legislation specifically prohibited future presidents from halting the project. That didn't stop Obama's Interior Department from pulling the plug last year. The courts stepped in again and found that it was indeed arbitrary and capricious for Obama to contravene the directly expressed wishes of Congress.
Most recently we've seen the same process at work at the FCC. First Congress rejected net neutrality. Then the DC Circuit did. That didn't stop Obama's FCC from proposing new net neutrality rules this past month.
Obama uses his control over Executive Branch agencies to do what Congress or the courts have forbidden. It's worked, sometimes, for him over the past few years. But he's out of time now: the GOP-led House can defund many of these efforts, even if it can't put a stop to them completely.
Thing to Look Forward to in the New Year: Watch as the Left repositions itself to yell "Obstruction!" every time the House fails to pass more appropriations for Obama's lawless agency action.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
04:08 AM
| Comments (76)
Post contains 385 words, total size 3 kb.
Even though Obama supposedly has banned the word "triangulation", the question for 2011 is going to be, can the president triangualte successfully against Congress, while Harry Reid and Chuckie Schumer are still running half of Congress?
The voters threw Pelosi out for a reason, and the Democrats and the big media folks are going to try and make it seem as though Obama's all that stands between the Republic and some sort of John Boehner-led corporate fascist nightmare. But can you get the moderates to believe that if none of the House Republican efforts ever make it to the president's desk to sign, because Obama still has the Democrat-run Senate to block any major reform legislation?
Posted by: John at December 27, 2010 04:22 AM (ESwk6)
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 04:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: maverick muse at December 27, 2010 04:25 AM (H+LJc)
You have to put the democrats on defense immediately, I think.
Second priority should be defunding the EPA.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 04:26 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 04:26 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Barak Hussein Stalin at December 27, 2010 04:27 AM (dYKl3)
I would, however, gladly pay to have the first family intrusively patted down before boarding Air Force One. Not because I want to see kids molested, but because leaders should lead from the front. What's good enough for my family is good enough for his.
Posted by: MarkD at December 27, 2010 04:29 AM (0Jy1K)
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 04:30 AM (Fo83G)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 27, 2010 04:30 AM (/Ibu8)
Posted by: Bugler at December 27, 2010 04:31 AM (VXBR1)
Can we weld the purse shut Miss Marple? Do they have the will power? When will the House committees slam Holder's ass in a witness chair for days on end?
Posted by: Mr. Dave at December 27, 2010 04:37 AM (dYKl3)
Can Fox now be recognizing that the AGW scam is all based on fraudulent data (as is 99.9% of all EPA regulation)?
It started with Nixon's asshole Rucklesnout who threw out the research on DDT which said it wasn't a problem despite the lying Rachel Scrunt book and banned it anyway.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 04:46 AM (M9Ie6)
Is this their Come to Jesus moment? Why now?
Another "As Europe Freezes" story (saw this on FB).
Tiptoeing in the snow, a f-f-frozen pheasant as the Met Office predicts it will be the coldest December for a century
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 27, 2010 04:52 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Zakn at December 27, 2010 05:02 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 27, 2010 05:02 AM (gNBvj)
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 27, 2010 05:04 AM (DLxD/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 27, 2010 05:06 AM (/Ibu8)
Posted by: Barry (AJ) Obama at December 27, 2010 05:10 AM (9hSKh)
Approximately 3% of 308,745,538 Citizens that are armed and waiting....
Posted by: TXMarko at December 27, 2010 05:15 AM (DJUOi)
How many divisions does Congress have?
Approximately 3% of 308,745,538 Citizens that are armed and waiting....
i saw a great link from either HA or Instapundit about hunters in america and their sheer numbers.
The article started off talking about how hunting season in Wisconsin had seen some 600,000 hunters and not one death related to hunting.
Well the author went on to point out, that if those hunters, in Wisconsin, got together, they would be the 8th largest stadning army in the world.
He then pointed out that if you added Pennsylvania(750,000), West Virgina(250,000), and Michigan(700,000) you have the largest standing army in the world.
Imagine if you included Oklahoma, Texas and the rest of the south and midwest.
I thought it was an interesting way of looking at things
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 05:30 AM (wuv1c)
Key word there is "can". Let's see if that turns into "will". Odds, anyone?
Posted by: Roger at December 27, 2010 05:31 AM (tAwhy)
For the first time in 60 years, no Kennedys in Washington
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 05:32 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 05:34 AM (kho+0)
The realbirther argument should be:
How many law firms and how many hundreds of thousands of dollars has Obama used to supress his Birth Certificate?
My liberal friends have trouble arguing that ;-)
Posted by: LouisianaLightning at December 27, 2010 05:35 AM (fJhBR)
Looks like Miller is conceding and we have 6 more years of Snortcokeski.
I guess that seat is hers for life.
She's voted for every Democrat initiative in the lame duck session.
Thanks to all you people who told me that she wasn't stripped of her positions because they were worried she would side with the dems in the lame duck session if they did.
Thanks NRSC for everything you did too.
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 05:36 AM (wuv1c)
i saw a great link from either HA or Instapundit about hunters in america and their sheer numbers.
The article started off talking about how hunting season in Wisconsin had seen some 600,000 hunters and not one death related to hunting.
Well the author went on to point out, that if those hunters, in Wisconsin, got together, they would be the 8th largest stadning army in the world.
He then pointed out that if you added Pennsylvania(750,000), West Virgina(250,000), and Michigan(700,000) you have the largest standing army in the world.
Imagine if you included Oklahoma, Texas and the rest of the south and midwest.
I thought it was an interesting way of looking at things
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (wuv1c)
Ben, did you read the asinine comments below that post? Some people just don't get it.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at December 27, 2010 05:39 AM (zdaIQ)
Posted by: USS Delusional Diversity at December 27, 2010 05:40 AM (DLxD/)
What we have to figure out is what is REALLY motivating her. I have a horrible feeling it's personal revenge on Palin, in which case she is going to be a loose cannon for the next 6 years.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 05:41 AM (Fo83G)
... and THAT is why they want to take away our guns.
Have you seen a picture of the guy nominated to take over the BATFE?
All he needs is some SS lapel pins, and he would fit right in....
Posted by: TXMarko at December 27, 2010 05:42 AM (DJUOi)
So our best case scenario is that she's a vindictive, childish scumbag who treats her votes as "revenge".
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 05:47 AM (BHLuE)
Electability means we get to be held hostage by the whimsy of fickle Republicans.
Fuck. That.
We didn't have the best outcome in Delaware, but we had the second best outcome in Delaware.
Posted by: Soothsayer for RNC Chair at December 27, 2010 05:51 AM (mpQs4)
So our best case scenario is that she's a vindictive, childish scumbag who treats her votes as "revenge".
It do appear that way, don't it.
Posted by: USS Diversity at December 27, 2010 05:52 AM (DLxD/)
Imagine if you included Oklahoma, Texas and the rest of the south and midwest.
I thought it was an interesting way of looking at things
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (wuv1c)
Yamamoto : You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.
Don't forget those of us gun owners who choose not to hunt... yet have... interesting... backgrounds...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2010 05:56 AM (AdK6a)
Oh, and the OP missed the coming HUGE Land Grab by the Feds... Millions and Millions of acres are about to be placed off limits by the Feds... by Imperial Order...
The Mandarins of Washington continue in their Hubris...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2010 05:58 AM (AdK6a)
Don't forget those of us gun owners who choose not to hunt... yet have... interesting... backgrounds...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2010 09:56 AM (AdK6a)
Yes, I gave up hunting years ago when every piece of woods and swamp became posted. I refuse to pay money and join a "hunting club" to be able to hunt.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 05:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Oh, and the OP missed the coming HUGE Land Grab by the Feds... Millions and Millions of acres are about to be placed off limits by the Feds... by Imperial Order...
The Mandarins of Washington continue in their Hubris...
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (AdK6a)
Clinton tried that crap just before he left office, however his intent was to force Bush to undo it so they could accuse him of being "anti-environment".
Obama is doing it because he is a communist and truly believes ALL land should belong to the government.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 06:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Essentially it does already...we just pretend it doesn't by ransoming it back from them each year. In reality, property taxes are nothing but ransom, cuz they'll take your shit in a flash when you stop paying.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 27, 2010 06:08 AM (efLB+)
Posted by: Amor de Cosmos at December 27, 2010 06:10 AM (gI0Ku)
Posted by: steevy at December 27, 2010 06:11 AM (gNxja)
Posted by: naturalfake at December 27, 2010 06:13 AM (I49Jm)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 27, 2010 06:16 AM (IEJ4J)
FIFY
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 06:24 AM (tf9Ne)
BWA-Hahahahahahaaa !!
Try telling that to the Executive Branch! Or to Congress!
Don't you UNDERSTAND? There ARE no more RULES for THEM.
Only RULES for US. Now shut up and pay your taxes !
Posted by: TXMarko at December 27, 2010 06:26 AM (DJUOi)
Darn, the politicians can no longer sit back and enjoy a cushy job. This administration is going to make them work for it. The Republicans by working against everything and the Democrats by continuing to push to get things through. If the R's keep their end up, it'll be a hard job, but I think they can do it. Just two more years, people.
That's not to say anyone can relax then. Obama and friends have taken us so far down the hole, it'll be a lot of time, money and personal sacrifice to get us out. But it's doable.
Never give up.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 27, 2010 06:29 AM (aPeks)
Posted by: TennDon at December 27, 2010 06:31 AM (o6Yv2)
Again, an impeachable act that just got swept under the rug ...
More jobs saved/created: rug-sweepers.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 27, 2010 06:31 AM (aPeks)
He's another petty little commie dictator
That's really what he wants to be. They can get away with murder (literally), have awesome parties and throw hissy fits.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 27, 2010 06:34 AM (aPeks)
This might make the fight a little easier;
For the first time in 60 years, no Kennedys in Washington.
Wow. I hadn't thought of that. That's pretty awesome.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 27, 2010 06:37 AM (aPeks)
Public sector union pensions and perks will bankrupt this nation. No matter. The Corruptocrats could not care less. Just shake-down the tax payer for more.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 27, 2010 06:45 AM (0fzsA)
I did not expect the Michael Moore's and Soros' of the world to yell "Nazism!" when Obama decided to actually do what they falsely accused Bush of doing. It has always been a given that the liberal loons have no clue what "hypocrisy" means. If they honored consistency, they wouldn't be liberals.
My question is this --- why should we as conservatives fear if they DO yell "obstructionists"? Isn't that why the conservatives displaced the Democrats to begin with? Voters, for the most part, woke up to what Obama and his minions wanted to do and reacted accordingly. They didn't say to themselves, "Let's elect more Democrats to put a check on this guy!"
So, if I were the GOP I would stand in front of the camera when they start shouting "obstructionists" (and eventually "RAAAACISTS!" (credit: Michelle Malkin)) and proudly accept that label. Nothing we do will ever sway the left wing loons but they form only a small part of the electorate. The US is still largely a conservative country and with the upcoming redistricting process favoring the GOP and under the control of the GOP in many important places, the US will remain so. We only have to stop the Puss Belt from having so much influence on future elections and we do that by standing up and proudly displaying our brand name.
"We're tired of sorry socialists and we're not gonna take it anymore!"
In other words, let's develop the attitude that we own as much of the communication as the liberals and stand up and be counted for what we are, not for what they hope to paint us. We should never be ashamed of explaining WHY we oppose socialist crap no matter how Obama tries to package it.
Reaching across the aisle didn't get us very far, Gabe. There's a reason why.
Posted by: Full Moon at December 27, 2010 06:45 AM (DtbEv)
The leftwinger democrats (like Arriana) will also cry about how "Washington is broken". Yeah assholes, you broke it(D). You corrupt freaks (D).
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 27, 2010 06:46 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 27, 2010 07:02 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: AmishDude at December 27, 2010 07:05 AM (EXp9c)
Posted by: AmishDude at December 27, 2010 07:07 AM (EXp9c)
Since the EPA has told Texas that it is taking over regulation of refineries and power plants in Texas, I think its time for Gov. Perry and AG Abbott to send a "Come and Take It" flag to the EPA. Just modify the cannon to look like a carbon-emitting smokestack and we're in business, boys.
Q: What is the relative firepower of the EPA vs. the Texas National Guard?? (augmented by citizen defenders who happen to like abundant, sorta cheap power to keep their loved ones fed and warm during global climate disruption events like the current one)
Posted by: Count de Monet at December 27, 2010 07:21 AM (XBM1t)
I want to believe that isn't true, but evidence is beginning to prove your thesis.
Posted by: Yankee Mechanic at December 27, 2010 07:53 AM (SsNRK)
Posted by: Mark at December 27, 2010 08:00 AM (nCmeo)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 11:34 AM (S5YRY)
That can be arranged. What role would you like to play? Tarred-and-feathered?
Posted by: Full Moon at December 27, 2010 09:01 AM (DtbEv)
Posted by: Steve Michaelson at December 27, 2010 09:28 AM (h4ijK)
I don't have any liberal friends. I cannot stand mentally unstable 7 year olds.
Posted by: USMC Steve at December 27, 2010 09:37 AM (mqp9H)
Posted by: rrpjr at December 27, 2010 10:57 AM (iY4nh)
If the Republicans are smart, they won't budge on any of it, and they'll counter every single instance of leftist caterwauling on the subject by reminding the public that putting the brakes on Obie's power grabs is what they were put into office to do.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at December 27, 2010 11:49 AM (nD3Pg)
Posted by: JTaylor at December 27, 2010 04:35 PM (+H1vS)
The creditors of GM were NOT paid first. The bond holders, creditors, were NOT paid first.
When are we going to have some impeachment papers?
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at December 28, 2010 02:24 AM (flz+b)
Posted by: SDN at December 29, 2010 04:34 AM (7Nkl9)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2379 seconds, 204 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Let's see if they do.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 04:17 AM (M9Ie6)