March 19, 2010
— DrewM North Dakota has a state owned bank, in fact Kent Conrad tried to get an exemption for it from the federal takeover of student loans, now other states are considering it.
What in the world could go wrong with this idea?
Bank of North Dakota officials said that at least 10 states have turned to them for guidance, including some states, like Michigan, hardest hit by the financial crisis. They include California, Florida and Illinois, where a bill to create a state bank already is under consideration by the state legislature.Michigan State Sen. Hansen Clarke hopes his state will be the first to follow North Dakota's lead and establish what he and others call an economic development bank.
Michigan currently carries the dubious distinction of having the highest unemployment rate in the nation.
"What I'm trying to do is help create jobs for probably one of the most economically-depressed states in the country," Clarke said. "The state economic development bank would be one way to be able to provide small businesses the capital they need to expand and create jobs."
The people who have run their states into financial holes so deep they can't even see the sky anymore think they are qualified to run a bank? It would be funny if it weren't so damn scary.
And gee, what are the odds that a bank run by a state government would wind up pushing loans to politically connected individuals or groups? Can you imagine what kind of loans say, the State Bank of Illinois would be making to ACORN approved groups or Tony Rezko connected politicians for home purchases?
Guess who would be on the hook for those bad loans? Yeah, all of us.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:43 AM
| Comments (50)
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 19, 2010 09:46 AM (mhD2v)
And that would differ from what has already happened exactly how? For all intents and purposes this has already happened. It certainly shouldn't be expanded but honestly that ship has already sailed.
Posted by: sharrukin at March 19, 2010 09:47 AM (593B8)
Posted by: ACORN at March 19, 2010 09:48 AM (UA4gE)
...'cause that's what yer sayin', here.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 19, 2010 09:49 AM (ZV4dD)
Posted by: This is Vince from Slap-Chop at March 19, 2010 09:50 AM (z37MR)
Well, yeah, that's the downside. But look at the upside. If you make the right friends, you get your money for nothing and your chicks for free.
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 19, 2010 09:50 AM (xxgag)
That would make things a lot easier for the State of California I guess. Instead of having to wait and withold your tax refund check because they can't afford it, the politicians could just have you deposit all your money in their bank, and then not let you withdraw it because they need it to pay off yet another monster spending bill.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 19, 2010 09:50 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: This is Vince from Slap-Chop at March 19, 2010 09:51 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 19, 2010 09:53 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at March 19, 2010 09:53 AM (lk70u)
early on in the history of my State (Illinois) a State bank was created for the purpose of creating economic activity (basically to fund the Chicago Canal)
it failed miserably and put Illinois to the hole for generations.
State controlled banks are a horrible idea that never end well and that includes the Fed.
Posted by: shoey at March 19, 2010 09:54 AM (Ed9Xn)
Posted by: notropis at March 19, 2010 09:55 AM (4myGJ)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 09:56 AM (0TrEd)
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 09:56 AM (p302b)
Posted by: ford at March 19, 2010 09:56 AM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: ford at March 19, 2010 09:57 AM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: This is Vince from Slap-Chop at March 19, 2010 09:58 AM (z37MR)
Banks have money. The state needs money. Therefore, the state needs to get access to those banks, since banks have money, and the state needs money.
Plus, a bank is where money is squirreled away by rich fat cats. We all hate rich fat cats, because they look out for Wall Street, not Main Street. And by "rich" we mean any family with a combined gross income of over $80,000.
Posted by: Barbara Boxer at March 19, 2010 09:58 AM (2p0e3)
It is a strange thing with Midwestern states. A lot of them do have a great deal of socialism, which is one reason why so many middle America red states have so many Dem senators and reps. But it all comes down to the character of the people running those states. North Dakota is not known for being a hotbed of corruption and cronyism. The state I'm most familiar with is Nebraska, and there, if you spend state money or are involved with a state agency, your finances and actions are scrutinized to within an inch of your life, as they should be, to ferret out waste and illegitimate activities. These places can accommodate "big government", for a while, because the people there are responsible enough not to use it for their own personal cash cow. This is different from a place like, say, Illinois, where using state funds for personal and/or corrupt uses is considered a perk of the job.
The problem, of course, is that socialism inevitably erodes the character of the people over time, as they become dependent on the state, and the people ask the very logical question "well, why NOT tax the rich more to provide more bennies for me?" So socialism slides into looter-ism.
That is the most dangerous part of the big-government statism that Obama et al. propose. That it will become irreversible not just politically, but also culturally.
Posted by: chemjeff at March 19, 2010 09:59 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: This is Vince from Slap-Chop at March 19, 2010 09:59 AM (z37MR)
any financial enitity created by the government for the government will ALWAYS end up being a slush fund for the power elite, who will use it for their own interests until it collapses.
... and guess who gets to pay off the shortfall.
Posted by: shoey at March 19, 2010 10:00 AM (Ed9Xn)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 10:00 AM (0TrEd)
I've seen two NYS representatives today and I have to wonder what NYer's are thinking when they are electing these people. Both seemed to just be spouting talking points. Ortiz was busy trying to make her understand that salt causes strokes and strokes are expensive and then health care costs go up. Never saw her show. This, this was too funny.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 10:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at March 19, 2010 10:05 AM (0TrEd)
Breathing causes death. Therefore ban air. For the CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: chemjeff at March 19, 2010 10:05 AM (Gk/wA)
FIFY.
I have to wonder what NYer's are thinking when they are electing these people.
They're checking the box the nice ACORN lady told them to check if they want to keep their state checks.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 19, 2010 10:06 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: wtfci at March 19, 2010 10:06 AM (+zo63)
Except it doesn't, unless you already have high blood pressure, and even then it's only a problem for about half of 'em.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 19, 2010 10:08 AM (mR7mk)
Online Library of Liberty.
Jefferson's opinion was:
"The incorporation of a bank and the powers assumed have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution. They are not among the powers specially enumerated."
However, most of us have become used to a credit, consumerist, Keynesian lifestyle, which Jefferson and colleagues would never have approved.
Most of the things we rely upon or take for granted, including our lifestyles and the many government services to which we are accustomed, would simply disappear under a plain and simple reading of The Constitution. These services, if available at all, would be provided by privately owned businesses. Others would revert to state control.
Most would simply disappear...including easy credit. (Without assets or real property - collateral - a bank would provide no credit.)
In a sense, be careful what you wish for. Freedom comes with numerous inbuilt costs.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at March 19, 2010 10:11 AM (ZV4dD)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 19, 2010 10:11 AM (w5ptJ)
The private sector is for suckers. Obama and Rahm are rich.
Posted by: bobbo at March 19, 2010 10:12 AM (+ABdJ)
So pray to Saint Joseph to ask him to please ignore nancy pelosi and her dumb bill.
Posted by: curious at March 19, 2010 10:13 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Gosbank 1923-1987 at March 19, 2010 10:14 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at March 19, 2010 10:21 AM (7z7bU)
North Dakota is doing well because they have a prohibitive 11% tax on their oil production (soon to be dropped down, however). They fret about how to spend their large surplus. A little behind the free-market ball up there.
I'm sort of a local, btw - I am active in the exploration biz there and am quite politically active in ND politics.
Gov. and soon-to-be Senator Hoeven is a big-govt. RINO. He used to be the head of the North Dakota-owned bank. Not a good sign.
Posted by: TexasJew at March 19, 2010 10:28 AM (KXW8j)
I follow the web bots (for entertainment purposes only!) and, if you listen to what they say, we are in for a rocky, rocky ride.
First meme:
Death of the Dollar.
next:
R*volution.
Key dates are July 8th and early November.
It's a scary time.
Buy more ammo and can some food.
Posted by: shibumi at March 19, 2010 10:59 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 19, 2010 11:11 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: exdem13 at March 19, 2010 11:12 AM (lYKj1)
Posted by: cashin at March 19, 2010 01:09 PM (RJ9mi)
Illinois already has a "state owned bank" in a sense. Broadway Bank in Chicago is owned by Alexi Giannoulias' family, Alexi is the Illinois Treasurer (a statewide elected office). Alexi is also the democrat candidate for US Senate from Illinois for Obama's old senate seat (the one Blago wanted to sell because it was worth 'fn gold').
Broadway Bank is about to be taken over by the feds, it's connected to the mob for making loans to the mob at favorable terms, and his family has sucked maybe $15 million out of it recently.
That's what any state owned bank in the US will turn into, a giant sinkhole of corruption, waste, graft, and hard earned tax dollars going to politicians and the mob. Great.
Posted by: Boots at March 19, 2010 05:22 PM (06JTY)
I appreciate your bright ideas in this Ray Ban sunglasses article. Great work!
We share the opinion on eyeglass frames and I really enjoy reading your article.
Posted by: eyeglasses online at March 28, 2010 11:42 PM (vw76K)
Posted by: hats shop at February 26, 2011 05:26 AM (YTvDP)
Posted by: Mark at April 15, 2011 05:47 AM (pmp9C)
Posted by: Nikola at May 29, 2011 12:58 AM (pmp9C)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.274 seconds, 178 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








And more casinos!
That'll solve everything.
Posted by: This is Vince from Slap-Chop at March 19, 2010 09:46 AM (z37MR)