August 19, 2010

You Know Who Is Pretty Popular In NJ? That Chris Christie Fellow
— DrewM

Consider this part 3 of my "Democrats Are So Screwed" trilogy.

Fifty-one percent of voters approve of Christie, while 36 percent disapprove. ThatÂ’s a major jump from the last Quinnipiac poll, taken on June 17, when 44 percent approved and 43 percent disapproved.

“This is a good poll for Christie," said pollster Maurice Carroll. "People are getting to know him, and they apparently are getting to like him."

President Obama does not fare as well. Fourty-seven percent approve of the president and 47 percent disapprove. In June, 50 percent of New Jersey voters approved of his job performance and 46 percent disapproved.

Christie is also starting to be seen more as a leader and than a bully.

I know there were some folks down on him for things like guns and immigration (and his stance on the Victory Mosque, is not good) but forget for a moment about the conservative base and any national aspirations (which he says he doesn't have). If a hardcore, ass kicking fiscal conservative can do well in deeply blue NJ, there might, just might be some signs people are reaching their maximum tolerance on spending and taxing. I'm still skeptical but if you take those things away, what the hell do the Democrats have?

Posted by: DrewM at 07:45 AM | Comments (66)
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.

1

Fot the first time in my adult life, I am proud to be a fellow Garden State round guy. 

Posted by: dananjcon at August 19, 2010 07:51 AM (pr+up)

2 Starting to see people reaching those limits in MI, too.  We'll see, come November.

Posted by: jorgxmckie at August 19, 2010 07:51 AM (290l2)

3

Shhhh...ya hear that?  Its the gagging, belching sound of Trenton fat cats choking on their Kobi beef wraps and 3 martini lunches.

 

 

Posted by: dananjcon at August 19, 2010 07:55 AM (pr+up)

4

I'm still skeptical but if you take those things away, what the hell do the Democrats have?

Well, they have, um, uuhh, they have, wait a minute while I, Oh! I got it, but on second thought, that's not too good either...

I got nuthin', just like the Dims.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at August 19, 2010 07:56 AM (kFODZ)

5 Wait.  So you're saying that sticking with a set of core principles grounded in reality is something people like?  Why, that's so crazy it might just work!

Posted by: Michael Steele at August 19, 2010 07:57 AM (YXmuI)

6 I'd give Christie a D+.

Posted by: Barry Sotero at August 19, 2010 07:58 AM (YHdp/)

7 spending and taxing. I'm still skeptical but if you take those things away, what the hell do the Democrats have?

"gay marriage"?

Posted by: Rocks at August 19, 2010 07:58 AM (Q1lie)

8 You have to remember, his stance on immigration et al. are considered conservative by NJ standards. Had Lonegan gone against Corzine, I really believe Corzine would have won. That being said he is a law and order man and I have full faith that if he does seeks higher office, he will fully enforce the laws currently on the books, including the immigration statutes.

Posted by: Chris Christie at August 19, 2010 07:58 AM (oW269)

9
Second chakra... releasing... !

Posted by: The State of New Jersey at August 19, 2010 08:00 AM (YMZjg)

10 By golly I like the cut of this portly fellow's jib!

Posted by: T. Coddington Van Voohees VII at August 19, 2010 08:01 AM (RD7QR)

11 Well, I don't like his take on the mosque issue and while I would agree that it's not good, I wouldn't say it's bad either.  It's just sort of meh.

Posted by: Burn the Witch at August 19, 2010 08:02 AM (fLHQe)

12 "...but if you take those things away, what the hell do the Democrats have?"


Same sex marriage?

Posted by: mer at August 19, 2010 08:02 AM (4UpbX)

13

Chris Christie is Godlike--he rocks.

That said, I don't understand why so many GOP candidates have the Hispandering delusion, which is my understanding of Christie's going wobbly there.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 08:06 AM (ujg0T)

14

It's almost like core conservative principles are actually much more popular than the MFM wants us to believe. 

This is why some of us object to strongly to RINOs and squishes.  If fiscal conservatism as serious as Christie can get praise, Hell! a majority of support, in New f'in Jersey, what reason is there to settle for less in other places?  I know, I know; you have to pick your best option once it's time to pull the lever.  It just looks like theres no good reason why the Rs can't run solid fiscal conservatives as candidates pretty much anywhere. 

Posted by: shillelagh at August 19, 2010 08:08 AM (Oz4Bj)

15 HUGE fan of the big guy...too big to fail. I like almost all of his views, he is true cool cat. He gets the emotion behind some issues, and is pragmatic, and respectful. He does not come to a gun fight with a broom like most Pubs.. Chrisite should be the face of the northern Pubs, his body is the down to earth finishing touch that him look authentic. I gush over this guy to everyone I know.

Posted by: ford at August 19, 2010 08:10 AM (Ki7fm)

16 14

Chris Christie is Godlike--he rocks.

That said, I don't understand why so many GOP candidates have the Hispandering delusion, which is my understanding of Christie's going wobbly there.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 12:06 PM (ujg0T)

Simple, NJ has HUGE Hispanic populations and as much as I like Christie, he is still a politician.

 

 

Posted by: dananjcon at August 19, 2010 08:10 AM (pr+up)

17

The lefties that proclaim that they are really fiscally conservative, but socially liberal, seem to lose that fiscal conservativism pretty quickly and embrace full on totalitarianism...

But there have to be some that like the message of fiscal conservativism and we'll leave you the fuck alone-ism and that, to me, is a winning combo.

Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller at August 19, 2010 08:10 AM (9/2L1)

18 Obesiti illegitimo amo.

Posted by: an erection lasting longer than four hours at August 19, 2010 08:10 AM (ao9DD)

19
 Possibly, Curmudgeon, because of the size of the voting bloc, plus the historic unavailability of said bloc. Why that should be a concern isn't clear (to me), it would make more sense to approach them with the traditional values espoused by  the GOP. Pandering -in any form- indicates you act from the strength of anyone's opinion.

Posted by: irongrampa at August 19, 2010 08:12 AM (ud5dN)

20 Some people are born to leader and an event finds them,
for others an event find them and they rise to the challenge and lead.
Christie is the first,
Bush is the second,
Obama is neither of these.

Posted by: Neo at August 19, 2010 08:12 AM (tE8FB)

21 Christie does not seem to pander. to me it looks like he really believes a fiscally conservative, property rights, stay out of religion approach. I love it. Pub with a twist of Libertarian in the mix.

Posted by: ford at August 19, 2010 08:12 AM (Ki7fm)

22 Yeah, forget about those evil liberal things we have heard about.

LOL, what other liberal things have we not heard about?

Yeah, he is great in fighting the overpaid public employee unions but does one issue make him great?

Posted by: Vic at August 19, 2010 08:13 AM (/jbAw)

23 Vic, yes the entitlement problem is in all government budgets, local state ,federally. This untouchable "goodie" bag the taxpayers are fronting needs to be questioned.

Posted by: ford at August 19, 2010 08:16 AM (Ki7fm)

24 Gotta love the Round Mound of Fiscally Sound!

Posted by: Farmer Joe at August 19, 2010 08:17 AM (z4es9)

25

you know, I think we should be strong enough to let the dang Mosque be built.  Sure they are trying to insult us and claim victory.  I get that.

But I say that they win if we allow ourselves to impinge upon the religious freedoms of Americans.  This is private property, and I am a firm believer in private property rights and the 1st amendment.  I can't see how conservatives can honestly oppose the Mosque without twisting basic Constitutional assumptions.

To me the tragedy is not their Victory Mosque.  The tragedy is our failure, after 9 years, to build the tower(s) back up.  Right now, there should be a skyscraper at WTC that dominates the NY skyline.   The Stars and Stripes shoudl fly proudly above the city as a symbol that no one can conquer our economic system or our personal freedoms.  Instead, we have an empty hole, with political infighting, labor disputes, and this nonsense about the mosque.  In that sense, their Victory Mosque is perfectly apropos.   

Posted by: Ca;ifornia Red at August 19, 2010 08:19 AM (7uWb8)

26

Possibly, Curmudgeon, because of the size of the voting bloc, plus the historic unavailability of said bloc. Why that should be a concern isn't clear (to me), it would make more sense to approach them with the traditional values espoused by  the GOP. Pandering -in any form- indicates you act from the strength of anyone's opinion.

But that voting bloc---wait for it---Won't.Vote.For.The.GOP.Anyway.

THE RULE OF ANYWAY!

*Of course* the GOP should recruit that Talented Third of Mexican Americans, just like it should recruit that Talented Tenth of African Americans.

But given the poison of "multiculturalism" and "identity politics" surging sadly through the nation's veins, I will say it again.THEY'RE ONLY GOING TO HATE US ANYWAY. The liberal commiecrat symps in the media will see to that.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 08:19 AM (ujg0T)

27 More power to the Chubby One® on fiscal matters, but he leaves me cold on the rest.  But that doesn't matter a whit since he's not running for anything nationally.  If he can get NJ's fiscal affairs under control that will be quite a miracle.

Posted by: RushBabe at August 19, 2010 08:22 AM (a3Z62)

28 I'd give Christie a D+.

Posted by: Barry Sotero

 

Is that a 'solid' D+?

Posted by: Blue Hen at August 19, 2010 08:25 AM (R2fpr)

29

Simple, NJ has HUGE Hispanic populations and as much as I like Christie, he is still a politician.

Woops, wrong response person. Take two:

But that HUGE Hispanic population---wait for it---Won't. Vote. For. Christie. Anyway.

THE RULE OF ANYWAY!

*Of course* Christie--and the rest of the GOP--should recruit that Talented Third of Mexican Americans, just like it should recruit that Talented Tenth of African Americans.

But given the poison of "multiculturalism" and "identity politics" surging sadly through the nation's veins, I will say it again.THEY'RE ONLY GOING TO HATE HIM ANYWAY. The liberal commiecrat symps in the media will see to that.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 08:26 AM (ujg0T)

30 But Intrade has .....uhhh, somebody up by 20%!!!!!!



Mwahahahahaha! All you're poll threads are belong to us!!!!

Posted by: In before the troll at August 19, 2010 08:30 AM (P9+0W)

31

Posted by: Ca;ifornia Red at August 19, 2010 12:19 PM (7uWb

See, you're coming at this from a position of the power of the Constitution.  The islamists are coming at it from a position of thuggery.  To their 7th century mentality, that's the only position that matters.  If they get to build this, they "win" in their tiny, evil minds and it further confirms to them that the US is a paper tiger, ripe for Shariah.   I find it ironic that the muzzies were the first official enemy of the colonists; I hope G-d won't use any irony to ensure that they're our last.

Posted by: RushBabe at August 19, 2010 08:30 AM (a3Z62)

32 Christie's major malfunction is a lack of knowledge regarding things not New Jersey and his inability to see when to STFU. He still has some East Coast Lefty nonsense to purge from his mind. Otherwise he is way groovy.

Posted by: eman at August 19, 2010 08:35 AM (Nw/hR)

33

But I say that they win if we allow ourselves to impinge upon the religious freedoms of Americans.  This is private property, and I am a firm believer in private property rights and the 1st amendment.  I can't see how conservatives can honestly oppose the Mosque without twisting basic Constitutional assumptions.



We're not necessarily talking about using the power of government to kill the Victory Mosque. That indeed would likely be an infringement of 1st Amendment rights. We are using OUR 1st Amendment rights to register our opposition to Cordoba in the realm of public sentiment.

1st Amendment rights vs 1st Amendment rights is about as Constitutional as it gets. As a supporter of the 1st Amendment, why would you insist that conservatives forgo that right to freedom of speech?

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 19, 2010 08:37 AM (P9+0W)

34

Off topic: does Ace realize that the a pro-Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown group is running attack ads against Meg Whitman on his site? Well, if they are paying...I can always ignore.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 08:38 AM (ujg0T)

35

Unlike Hairy Reed, Christie knows the Spanish folks are smart enough to make up their own minds and if they vote status quo...Oh well (he didn't have their vote anyway) . As long as he courts them with fiscal conservativism and not entitlements, I have no problem. When everyone in NJ starts to see more of their friends and family gainfully employed, the votes will be there regardless of ethnicity.

Yes, I still have faith in people.

 

 

Posted by: dananjcon at August 19, 2010 08:39 AM (pr+up)

36 Ace must have cut a good deal with the Moonbeams..it is his way of bleeding the enemy.

Posted by: ford at August 19, 2010 08:40 AM (Ki7fm)

37 What is this crap about some absolute Constitutional right to build a place of worship anywhere you want? Do you so soon forget that a local board had to vote to approve this Mosque? Stop being stupid!

Posted by: eman at August 19, 2010 08:40 AM (Nw/hR)

38

... if you take those things away, what the hell do the Democrats have?

Coexisting, moving society forward, making a difference, being part of history, and visualizing world peace.

Posted by: FireHorse at August 19, 2010 08:40 AM (cQyWA)

39
Note to squish republicans:  Notice how it's done -or voters are gonna throw you out too.


Posted by: Lemon Kitten at August 19, 2010 08:42 AM (0fzsA)

40

As long as he courts them with fiscal conservativism and not entitlements, I have no problem. When everyone in NJ starts to see more of their friends and family gainfully employed, the votes will be there regardless of ethnicity.

Sorry, but uh-uh. "Fiscal Conservatism" *does not* motivate them. Which brings us to what the Bushyrovies did--entitlements, Hispandering, Commiecrat Lite.

Moreover, it alienates the Reagan Democrats / Perot-nistas / Boll Weevils and Blue Dogs / Joe and Jane Lunchpails, who *could* be a natural and solid GOP voting bloc, if the Country Clubbers would only *let* them.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 08:49 AM (ujg0T)

41 If Christie can clean up the festering sore known as Trenton, he's a winner in my book.

Posted by: Reiver at August 19, 2010 08:50 AM (64S5N)

42 The mosque has nothing to do with the 1st amendment! Nobody is telling the muzzies that they can't practice their religion. They can prostrate themselves to their pedophile prophet anytime they want.

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (formerly NJConservative) at August 19, 2010 08:50 AM (LH6ir)

43 Dunno, if Christie ONLY follows through on his promise and nothing else, (it will take 2 terms) he'll have set a very high standard among politicians of either party.

  Interesting to watch if anyone else meets or exceeds that.

Posted by: irongrampa at August 19, 2010 08:53 AM (ud5dN)

44

As long as he courts them with fiscal conservativism and not entitlements, I have no problem. When everyone in NJ starts to see more of their friends and family gainfully employed, the votes will be there regardless of ethnicity.

Sorry, but uh-uh. "Fiscal Conservatism" *does not* motivate them. Which brings us to what the Bushyrovies did--entitlements, Hispandering, Commiecrat Lite.

Moreover, it alienates the Reagan Democrats / Perot-nistas / Boll Weevils and Blue Dogs / Joe and Jane Lunchpails, who *could* be a natural and solid GOP voting bloc, if the Country Clubbers would only *let* them.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 12:49 PM (ujg0T)

thats why I included in my original post this caviat; "oh well" (he didn't have their vote anyway)

 

Posted by: dananjcon at August 19, 2010 08:54 AM (pr+up)

45 For 2012, I would submit that we can ignore social issues, gun rights, or the mosque (which will be done or not done by then.) #1 priority would be fixing the economy. I would suggest candidates like Christie could simply promise not to do anything (novel) in the areas where people are worried, like guns. Plus, if he has a GOP Congress, nothing would happen anyways. I would suggest that to maximize the vote in 2012 to make sure we can repeal Obamacare, we will need to make a simple coalition of anyone who cares about fiscal conservativism and small government.

Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 08:56 AM (0t7L8)

46 It's inevitable that I'll disagree with a politician I like on some things because they're not perfect like me.  Chris Christie is no exception, but he is an exceptional Governor.   When he's finished fixing New Jersey, he's welcomed to become Governor of New York and I'll overlook the carpetbagging.

Posted by: hadsil at August 19, 2010 08:57 AM (VBH8s)

47 Also, two more points: 1) The Mosque is like Nazi marches in Chicago...yes, we don't like either, but it will go through because even assholes have rights in the USA. This ground zero asshole will not budge, trust me. 2) For everyone saying that "hey, maybe conservative values are really popular" I want to send a warning...don't be like the Dems who thought that a vote for Obama meant a vote for everything under the sun. Take it slowly.

Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 09:03 AM (0t7L8)

48

For 2012, I would submit that we can ignore social issues

Sorry, but you *cannot* ignore immigration and border security anymore. Arizona proves this.

Moreover the "social issues" have definite fiscal impacts, and in many cases are in fact the underlying fiscal *causes*.

If you mean the A-Word (abortion) only, I could agree with you, but immigration, the poison of "multiculturalism", the Left's racial double standards...all of those are at breaking point.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 09:04 AM (ujg0T)

49 The most shocking result of 2010 will be the election of Carl Paladino as governor of New York. That is what will really convince the ruling class that insane spending and taxing deeply and adversely affect all sorts of folks who would not otherwise agree.

Posted by: Tonawanda at August 19, 2010 09:23 AM (bN5ZU)

50 You should check out the comments on any Christie article on nj.com (the Newark Star Ledger's website).  He has driven the NJEA (aka the teachers' union) wild.  That's priceless.

Posted by: Joyless Behar at August 19, 2010 09:24 AM (/H8uK)

51

It's inevitable that I'll disagree with a politician I like on some things

When he was still in politics, Ed Koch used to say, "Here's where I stand on a dozen issues. If you agree with me on nine of them, vote for me. If you agree with me on all twelve, get your head examined."

By 2004, he was saying that he disagreed with George Bush on every issue except one -- national security -- but that one issue was so important that Bush got his support.

Right now, the Democrats are so corrupt that the word corrupt seems inadequate. When I think of corruption, my mind thinks in the scale of thousands of dollars, maybe hundreds of thousands with some nepotism thrown in. But these people are stealing money by the trillions, making grabs at money that doesn't even exist yet.

That's my issue: Corruption beyond what I had imagined possible.

We need them to go, permanently and as soon as possible.

Posted by: FireHorse at August 19, 2010 09:27 AM (cQyWA)

52 Curmudgeon, I think he meant Abortion and Homosexuality can be ignored, politically.

Even if they can't be ignored morally, in many eyes, they can be ignored politically.

Immigration can't be ignored, I agree.  That's a 'domestic' issue, not a 'social' issue, to some, but I don't know how that division works.

Posted by: Da Death Panels! at August 19, 2010 09:28 AM (dUOK+)

53 For 2012, I would submit that we can ignore social issues

If Christie does decide to take on a 2012 Presidential run how will the Christie GROUPIES defend the fact that Christie will have to QUIT his eight month stint as Governor of NJ  in order to run as President of the United States?

The Politics of Walletism:  I have zero interest in investing tens of thousands of dollars into a Presidential campaign in which THE ONLY ISSUE that matters is keeping balding flaccid pricks own personal fat-pig wallets fat and fucking happy.

If elections are only going to be about The Politics of Walletism then balding flaccid pricks better pony up their own fat-slap-happy money FOR A CHANGE!

Posted by: Harvard Inbred=Liberal's Useful Idiots at August 19, 2010 09:38 AM (+xhL8)

54 Clapton Christie is God.

Watch the YouTube videos of him speaking to the press, to groups of citizens, or to nitwits like Matt Lauer.  The Big Mantm if the future of the GOP not only because of his fiscally sound policies and the success he is having in implementing them, but because of his ability to articulate his motivations in a way that immunizes him to successful attack by his enemies.  The way he is communicating, not only will none of the attacks stick, they will make NJ voters despise the attackers for beating on the only damn politician who is determinedly looking out for the people of his state.  Bush didn't have that.  Hell, I loved Reagan but I don't think he even did it as well as Christie does.  He has none of the Giuliani / Gingrich type baggage.  He has the "common sense conservatism" of Palin with no risk that people will view him as a lightweight.  (See what I did there?)  His popularity is likely to be sky high and nationwide a year from now.  I think we're looking at the Republican candidate for President in 2012.

Posted by: Z as in Jersey at August 19, 2010 09:48 AM (kZT4X)

55 As far as quitting the governorship early, I think Christie gets "drafted" and runs a short campaign.

Posted by: Z as in Jersey at August 19, 2010 09:52 AM (kZT4X)

56 Oh, and Bret Schundler can take over for Christie, which would be teh awesome.  Google him.

Posted by: Z as in Jersey at August 19, 2010 09:53 AM (kZT4X)

57 Oh, and Bret Schundler can take over for Christie, which would be teh awesome.  Google him.
actually I think Guadagno gets that job...

Posted by: Chris Christie at August 19, 2010 10:11 AM (oW269)

58

Curmudgeon, I think he meant Abortion and Homosexuality can be ignored, politically.

When the Bolshevik Buttpirates and Teabagging (the actual meaning of the term) Tyrants in Black Robes can overturn the will of the people, then yes, homosexuality is now an issue, too.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 10:24 AM (ujg0T)

59

The Politics of Walletism:  I have zero interest in investing tens of thousands of dollars into a Presidential campaign in which THE ONLY ISSUE that matters is keeping balding flaccid pricks own personal fat-pig wallets fat and fucking happy.

If elections are only going to be about The Politics of Walletism then balding flaccid pricks better pony up their own fat-slap-happy money FOR A CHANGE!

Actually, the social issues are having *very real* fiscal impacts now. I am mainly a Walletist, but I understand this. Your point is well taken--social issues *Do* matter.

Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 19, 2010 10:26 AM (ujg0T)

60

57 Christie has also shown leadership and Conservative cred in his attempt to rid the NJ Supreme Court of judges who do not adjudicate, but instead legislate.

 

Posted by: jersey girl at August 19, 2010 10:43 AM (AWxUm)

61 Curmudgeon, Immigration is part of the economic issue now - I personally would package enforcement with immigration reform (not amnesty.) I am referring to abortion, prayer in school, gay marriage, banning mosques etc. I know we aren't about banning mosques, but I guarantee you some asshole will run on it and the media will tar the whole right. Multiculturalism and education can be addressed by vouchers. My extremely liberal mother is now so disgusted by the state of the schools in CA that she's coming around.

Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 10:49 AM (0t7L8)

62 Question on SC appointments...do you really think Christie would appoint a "liberal?" I mean, that is an honest fear for socons, but is there a basis for it?

Posted by: sexypig at August 19, 2010 10:53 AM (0t7L8)

63

Speaking to reporters in Trenton, Mr. Christie had only kind words for Justice Wallace, but he described the historically liberal court as “out of control” over the last three decades, usurping the roles of the governor and the Legislature in setting social and tax policies.

That's from a report in the NYT. Christie does not have an agenda, he expects Supreme Court justices to observe the guidelines set forth by the Constitution.

It's the may 4, 2010 edition if you want to read the rest of the story. Also you can research his views in any of the New Jersey newspapers.

Posted by: jersey girl at August 19, 2010 11:24 AM (AWxUm)

Posted by: ebagssell at August 22, 2010 04:30 PM (HqUq3)

65 zayýflama hapý zayýflama zayýflamak

Posted by: zayýflama hapý at December 23, 2010 12:30 AM (wjZtk)

66 He found he had PDF to EPUB Converter little say over our choice of husbands. One by one, we got married. For the first, he threw a lavish church wedding and reception PDF to TIFF Converter dinner. His first son-in-law was not wealthy but he was gainfully employed. What more could he ask?
His second son-in-law had PDF to JPEG Converter known my sister since they were in middle school, and I was still in elementary school. I grew up thinking he was like the brother I never had. My father loved him like PDF to BMP Converter a son even though he, like son-in-law number one, was not rich.
Son-in-law number

Posted by: diandian at June 30, 2011 12:42 AM (YzdCn)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
108kb generated in CPU 0.0303, elapsed 0.2038 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1813 seconds, 194 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.