July 19, 2010
— DrewM Because sometimes, one just isn't enough.
Today marks the 6 month anniversary of Christie's inauguration and he's celebrating with a victory video.
Hmmmm....no Momma Bears in sight but it's still pretty good.
On Friday some asked why Christie is mentioned as '12 contender will so little time in office and Palin is still dismissed by some as not having enough experience.
My $.02...
First, it's a fair point, 6 months isn't enough experience. On the other hand...'12 is a year and a half away.
Second, Alaska is small (by population and budget) conservative state. New Jersey is much larger and much more liberal. Playing the successful bad ass conservative there requires a greater degree of difficulty.
After Friday's Mitt/Palin back and forth I really hope we have someone other than '08 rewinds to chose from in '12. Not sure I'm sold on Christie yet (mostly because the last governor I was kind of interested in looking at was Mark Sandford and that didn't work out well) but he makes a hell of a first impression.
I'm not sure this video was inspired by Palin's but you have to give her credit for showing the way in how to utilize new media to get attention and to communicate over the heads of the MFM. While a lot of people laugh at her, a lot more will be going to school on what she does.
UPDATE: As long as we're talking about 2012, Paul Ryan says he's not running and talks up Mitch Daniels. Mike Pence's very presidential hair has not weighed in on the subject.
FTR- As I wrote in the comments, I don't think Christie is going to run in '12. I just like the idea of a someone like him (combative, effective, conservative) being the standard against which others are measured.
As a bonus, I'll add the best Christie moment but one he didn't include (for obvious reasons) in his governing highlight reel.
Jana reminds me of this great Christie moment as well...
Posted by: DrewM at
12:51 PM
| Comments (199)
Post contains 348 words, total size 4 kb.
Yes, but I bet he could eat a moose. In a centrist sort of way.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 19, 2010 12:54 PM (RkRxq)
As long as Christie doesn't bail before the end of his term and/or draw Andi Sullivan's ire, he might be well worth a look. He's walkin' the walk and talkin' the talk.
Or, as GW Bush (I think) once said, "He's talkin' the walk."
Posted by: MrScribbler at July 19, 2010 12:55 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Palinisto! at July 19, 2010 12:55 PM (4OnPC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 12:55 PM (5jbD3)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 19, 2010 12:57 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: John at July 19, 2010 12:57 PM (6FYZ6)
Posted by: Palinisto! at July 19, 2010 04:56 PM (4OnPC)
He would need at least two.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 19, 2010 12:58 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 19, 2010 04:57 PM (RkRxq)
I like the fact is that he fights back without sounding like a dick.
Posted by: Ludicrous Speed at July 19, 2010 12:58 PM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Michelle Antoinette, Fat Czaress at July 19, 2010 12:59 PM (UOM48)
"I could say it where "you all" wouldn't understand it. ( NOT you guys)
This guy is a closet Southern, God Bless Him!
Posted by: Kemp at July 19, 2010 12:59 PM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: ChiTown Jerry at July 19, 2010 01:00 PM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 19, 2010 01:01 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: dogfish at July 19, 2010 01:02 PM (DVPCk)
Only six months in office...that should be enough for 2 or 3 autobiographies by Obama's standard.
Posted by: Knaws at July 19, 2010 01:02 PM (HMUR6)
Sarah, he has a voice that doesn't send dogs running from the room. Don't get me wrong, I like her, but sheesh....
You need a special voice to be heard over the rotar wash when you are Aerial Hunting Wolves!
Posted by: Palinisto! at July 19, 2010 01:04 PM (4OnPC)
Joysey accents can rub people the wrong way too. Fortunately, his isn't too bad.
Then again, I grew up in NYC so.....
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 01:04 PM (X/Lqh)
"2008 rewinds"?
Were you expecting McCain again in 2012, or was that an oblique reference to Sarah Palin?
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:04 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: t-bird at July 19, 2010 01:04 PM (FcR7P)
"He's talkin' the walk."
Heh...
So is this here blog starting to tell us who the official AOSHQ endorsed candidate for POTUS is?
Posted by: eleven at July 19, 2010 01:05 PM (7DB+a)
Posted by: Mark Sanford at July 19, 2010 01:05 PM (QKKT0)
It pisses off the "ruling class" Rs who plan to co-opt newly elected R legislators this fall. Of course, since you supported TARP, and since TARP was a "ruling class" measure foisted upon otherwise "country class" Rs, you may regard this as a bug not a feature.
Posted by: Steve Poling at July 19, 2010 01:05 PM (db5YN)
Posted by: THE SAVE GUAM PROJECT at July 19, 2010 01:06 PM (ngD76)
You forgot that his previous public service experience, as U.S. States Atty for one of the largest districts in the country for seven years, vastly outweighs (heh) hers. He managed over 100 lawyers and was very effective at rooting out corruption.
Yeah, I've given up on Palin as a potential POTUS. When I really looked at her record, I realized that I was putting too much stock into my personal affinity for her and not being realistic about what her qualifications really are.
Posted by: Y-not at July 19, 2010 01:06 PM (O627A)
19 Jane D'oh at July 19, 2010 05:01
Michelle Bachman of Minnesota is the same way. It is much more enjoyable to read their opinions than to here them spoken. TV mitigates the problem some but neither should do radio.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at July 19, 2010 01:06 PM (tf9Ne)
Besides, Louisiana and New Jersey could still benefit from having these men as governors for a while longer. There are other conservatives able to shoulder the load.
Posted by: Wolfwood at July 19, 2010 01:08 PM (F4g8J)
I beg to differ on Christie's most awesome moment... that one with the reporter was good, but I liked when he told the teacher if she didn't like the pay, she could get another job.
Sigh... love when a smackdown is delivered to a union hack.
Posted by: jana at July 19, 2010 01:09 PM (vSRlG)
I'll denounce myself, just to be sure.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 19, 2010 01:09 PM (UOM48)
Christie/Palin 12 vs Blago/Greene* 12
If he had Sarah Palin chained up in Princess Leia gear, that would make a great campaign ad.
I keed, I keed, ewoks.
* - "I get paid to be vice president, right?"
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at July 19, 2010 01:09 PM (3iMgs)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 01:09 PM (5jbD3)
I thought it was Ace who supported the first TARP? I know it's hard to tell the cob-loggers apart.
Posted by: alexthechick at July 19, 2010 01:09 PM (bTNct)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 05:04 PM (oIp16)
And Romeny. And Huckabee.
(And Rudy and Fred if they were thinking about it)
We got our asses kicked. I'm not real sentimental for that cycle.
The lines are drawn on that class of candidates, sides have been picked. In this climate someone new (or a bunch of new folks) is the way to go.
I felt the same way after 96.
Yeah, you can point to Regan in '76 and '80 but I think we're all on board with the idea he's pretty much the exception, not the rule.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 01:10 PM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Obstetrician-General Sir Andrew S. Sullivan, Esq., O.B.E., W.T.F. at July 19, 2010 01:11 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 19, 2010 01:12 PM (UOM48)
Ironically, that could be ... bum-bah-bwahhhhh ..... Hillary!
Hillary Clinton/Harold Ford 2012 -
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist at July 19, 2010 01:13 PM (ruzrP)
Posted by: Republican National Convention 2012 at July 19, 2010 01:13 PM (3iMgs)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 01:13 PM (AZGON)
He's making a real difference here in just attitude. You don't hear so many people complaining they'll be leaving the state, for starters.
And it's always kind of fun to tell a crowd how happy you are with Christie and for a minute nobody says anything. Until one guy nods and then a few more and finally just about everybody but the diehard Mom/Teachers Union hippie realizes that it's okay to agree with you. It sure pisses off the hippies, too!
Posted by: spongeworthy at July 19, 2010 01:14 PM (rplL3)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat ( Nobel Prize winner ) at July 19, 2010 01:14 PM (NuAIL)
We got our asses kicked. I'm not real sentimental for that cycle.
I'm absolutely on board with that sentiment.
Whatever flaw in the process allowed McCain to be "the last man standing" in 2008 needs to be fixed or I feel we will be seeing a lot more of that.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:15 PM (oIp16)
Hasn't the current occupant of the White House proven that experience is not a qualification for getting elected?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at July 19, 2010 01:15 PM (fLHQe)
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 01:16 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Charlie Crist at July 19, 2010 01:16 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 01:17 PM (5jbD3)
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 05:16 PM (fwSHf)
Guns and illegals make Christie a deal killer for me too. Yes, I love to see his beat-down of the public sector employees and reporters, but he's just too flawed. He may be good for NJ, but not America.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:18 PM (oIp16)
Well, it's early still. I like Jan Brewer as a VP candidate. The Border is going to be an issue in 2012 and she's got actual (not just theoretical) credibility on that issue. She's not exciting, but she seems competent and like someone who could take the reins if anything ever did happen to the President.
As for the top spot, we need someone with credibility when it comes to finance, economics, and austerity. I'm not sure who that should be. Jindal's certainly not ready yet. As smart as he is, he's still awfully young and could benefit from a second term as Governor. If Christie were 2 1/2 years into his term I'd be all for him, but as it is I think it may just be too soon. Cantor is a smart partisan, but I don't think he has the charisma to run for President. Maybe Haley Barbour?
Pawlenty and the other governors aren't all that exciting, even if they're competent. If it's going to be someone in Congress, it should be someone with executive experience. Let's just wait a year or so and see how things shake out.
Posted by: Wolfwood at July 19, 2010 01:19 PM (F4g8J)
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 01:19 PM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 05:17 PM (5jbD3)
I disagree with you. Would you like him as much if he was fine with regulations on the firts amendment too?
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 01:19 PM (fwSHf)
There is the expectation that PA taxes could double after the election.
At least, New Jersey is ahead of the game thanks to Christie
Posted by: Neo at July 19, 2010 01:20 PM (tE8FB)
As for Palin, love her but the jig is up, I sure wish she was running the RNC, she can raise boat loads of cash.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 19, 2010 01:20 PM (JSghx)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 05:17 PM (5jbD3)
I'm sure a crappy Republican nominee had nothing to do with that. It's a bit too early to be selling party discipline as pragmatism yet.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:20 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: Dan at July 19, 2010 01:21 PM (1jzSs)
Posted by: Mitt Romney at July 19, 2010 01:21 PM (AZGON)
After Heller and McDonald, guns aren't going to be much of an issue nationally.
Actually, they weren't before hand.
Did you notice that with a left wing President and super majorities in both houses of Congress, the Democrats didn't touch gun control?
Yet you think a conservative Republican with a Republican Congress is going to?
Dude, stop seeing monsters under the bed.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 01:21 PM (X/Lqh)
I hear today that the Pennsylvania budget is full of holes. There is $350 million completely missing, while another $800 million Rendell was hoping would come from the feds won't be there either.
Pennsylvania budget full of holes? Don't blame me!
Posted by: Budd Dwyer at July 19, 2010 01:22 PM (3iMgs)
Agreed.
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 01:22 PM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 01:22 PM (5jbD3)
Posted by: dogfish at July 19, 2010 01:23 PM (DVPCk)
Posted by: Truman North at July 19, 2010 01:24 PM (e8YaH)
Anecdotally, a lot of the objections I heard about Giuliani (I was a supporter) washis weakness on guns. My argument was that the 2nd Amendment dispute was settled (while suspecting their real opposition was due to the ethnic thing).
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at July 19, 2010 01:26 PM (3iMgs)
Yet you think a conservative Republican with a Republican Congress is going to?
Dude, stop seeing monsters under the bed.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 05:21 PM (X/Lqh)
No, I don't. I also didn't think a republican congress and president would pass a medicare drug bill either. You should probably crawl out from under the bed and realize the his public statements on guns and immigration on going to be used to hammer him in a primary.
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 01:27 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: John Fucking McCain at July 19, 2010 01:29 PM (AZGON)
I have absolutely no interest in running for president of the United States. None. Zero interest. Zero. None. Close the door. No chance. No way. Under no circumstances. I don’t know any other way I could put it. No hope, don’t try to talk me into it, nothing. Forget it. I’m staying here.”
I think that's about as clear as it gets.
Posted by: Editor at July 19, 2010 01:29 PM (pUfK9)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at July 19, 2010 05:26 PM (3iMgs)
What ethnic thing? If Obama can get elected I'd say it's pretty certain that nobody gives a rip if someone has an Italian last name anymore.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:29 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 01:31 PM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Wolfwood
I'm thinking a little salt and a lotta butter would be seasoning enough with Sarah...
Posted by: ChiTown Jerry at July 19, 2010 01:31 PM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Michael Steele at July 19, 2010 01:33 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Michael Steele at July 19, 2010 05:33 PM (UOM4
And you would look good on fire too.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:34 PM (oIp16)
Yeah, you know where I'm going with this.
Posted by: davidt at July 19, 2010 01:34 PM (HtIec)
I've still yet to see anyone in contention within the GOP who has half the qualifications that Romney has.
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 01:35 PM (4Lm8Z)
What put Obama in the White House is his skin color.
Then, I'm a shoo-in!
Posted by: Charlie Crist at July 19, 2010 05:24 PM
FIRST ORANGE PRESIDENT
Posted by: Truck Monkey at July 19, 2010 01:37 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 01:40 PM (AZGON)
Lets give him a chance to develop a record first. Sure he talks up fighting the teacher's unions in NJ. How good has he been at actually taking the fight too them though? I'll give him credit for actually trying as well and being defeated in an all Dem legislature.
But lets see something besides speeches before we go all head over heals for 2012.
And what are his positions and record on the other issues as well? Is he like Rudy as a NE gungrabber? Does he believe in low taxes and small government? Does he believe in a Constitution as written?
Posted by: Vic at July 19, 2010 01:42 PM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 19, 2010 01:42 PM (JSghx)
Posted by: davidt at July 19, 2010 01:43 PM (HtIec)
He must disavow MassCare. Inasmuch as he seems unwilling to do this, the main reason to elect a Republican over a Democrat is diluted heavily. Had he not been the author of MassCare, he would be the presumptive nominee now.
Much more of a deal-killer than Pawlenty's hard-on for global warming.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 01:43 PM (T0NGe)
So we can throw away people who aren't 100% on an issue that isn't going to come up because it might at some point?
That's brilliant!
I can't believe with thinking like that we ever lose.
As for Romney...what's he going to convince us of? That ObamCare isn't RomneyCare writ large? It's not a matter of doubt, it's a matter of facts (they are after all, stubborn things).
Sorry, I want to spend the 2012 campaign fighting to repeal that crap, not watching a candidate run away from his record on this very issue.
BTW- I don't think Christie is going to run in '12. I just like the idea of a someone like him (combative, effective, conservative) being the standard against which others are measured.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 01:44 PM (X/Lqh)
I for one like Christie a lot but do consider him just as green as Palin was. I'd rather see him stick with the Governor's job and build up a real record of accomplishment before running. Not that he's not off to a great start, but both for his state's sake and for any eventual career in national office it would be better to actually realize and consolidate his ambitions. (That's also what I would've liked for Palin, but the left set her up too perfectly with the nuisance ethics complaints. Christie, fairly or not, has a chance she didn't.) So I won't be boosting Christie in 2012, though I'd definitely vote for him if he somehow pulled it off.
The Romney aide's "not a serious human being" comment is a big effing deal to me and his disavowal didn't cut it for me. Unless totally fabricated (which he doesn't quite claim), the comment reveals something ugly about Romney's team and the attitudes he inspires. It patronizes Palin in about the worst possible way short of obscenity, it accepts the false premise of her competence offered by the left, and it patronizes all the people who support her because she really gets their concerns.
I do like Mitch Daniels on fiscal issues. If he can put the truce talk behind him, maybe by bringing on a social con or tea partier to balance him out I could back him.
Daniels/Palin, maybe? But it's still early. Maybe Jindal will catch fire, or someone else not yet on the radar.
Posted by: Dave R. at July 19, 2010 01:45 PM (kdTwX)
Just because someone coined the phrase "Romneycare" doesn't mean the best qualified man to lead the country is disqualified.
Read up on how MA health care became law, all 15 or 20 years of the process, and you'll see that it's hardly a "Romney" creation. He vetoed more than a dozen of the onerous components that make up the system, and watched all of his vetoes fall to overrides. I think a lot of conservatives would benefit from listening to him explain the process. When there's a 75-85% one Party rule in the Legislature, evil things like health care reform can't be stopped. Which is why someone who understands, and respects, the Constitution is so necessary. Not to mention his undeniable expertise in real world economics.
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 01:47 PM (4Lm8Z)
I don't think Christie will run either.
I am not sure why Drew thinks that Christie wouldn't enact gun control. He said he believes in it and he showed that he does what he believes in. That's been his main talking point since he was elected governor. He believes what he believes and he acts on it.
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 01:50 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: t-bird at July 19, 2010 01:51 PM (FcR7P)
Republican candidates now hold a nine-point lead over Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot for the week ending Sunday, July 18, the widest gap between the two parties in several weeks.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% of Likely Voters would vote for their district's Republican congressional candidate, while 36% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent. Support for Republicans inched up a point from last week, while support for the Democrat fell two points.
While solid majorities of Democrats and Republicans support the candidates of their respective party, voters not affiliated with either party prefer the Republican candidate by a 47% to 21% margin.Posted by: Tami at July 19, 2010 01:51 PM (VuLos)
Yes, there are plenty of (reasonable) excuses that he can make based on the way things were going, but then he has to say, "I did the best I could and prevented an unmitigated disaster with a moderate disaster, but I couldn't manage to stop the inevitable problems."
In the same way that the Democrats could not nominate an Iraq war supporter in 2008, the Republicans cannot nominate a health control advocate in 2012. If Romney tries to make the case that he can implement Obamacare better than Obama, he is not going to get the GOP to turn out for him.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 01:52 PM (T0NGe)
None of the "top 4" listed by the MFM will or should be the candidate in 2012. I think it will be someone like Pence. A true dark horse candidate who can run on an anti-platform. That's not that I support Pence either because I haven't done any research on him. Just that it will be someone like him and it will be someone who has good conservative credentials (or at least who can be made to appear that way).
And I truly don't give a rat fk what the MFM thinks of the candidates. In fact, who ever they start pushing will make me run the other way from them.
Posted by: Vic at July 19, 2010 01:52 PM (/jbAw)
whats the deal with this Newark Mayor that joined Christie on the 2.5% cap?
is he...gasp...a Democrat with a conscience?
or is he actually a Republican plant in one of the biggest ghettos in the country?
Or is Christie grooming him privately to replace Lautenberg as a "Democratic" appointment when Lauty kicks over from cancer, only for that guy to then "announce" hes switching parties?
Posted by: theoneandonlyfinn at July 19, 2010 01:53 PM (Gr1V1)
Because it's so unpopular that the most Democratic government in two generations didn't dare touch it.
If Obama/Pelosi/Reid didn't go for it, I can't fathom a Christie/Boehner/McConnell team doing it.
As I said, I don't think Christie will run in '12 but come on, deal in the real world here.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 01:53 PM (X/Lqh)
From Talkradionews....
Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) told reporters Monday that he intends to join forces with Rep. Michele BachmannÂ’s (R-Minn.) newly created Tea Party Caucus.
The Republican Conference Chairman only had two words to say when asked if he would join, “You Betchya!”
Pence said being a part of a caucus allows for that he hopes the Tea Party Caucus will shed light on what he has seen the American people want in Indiana and across the country.
Pence went on to blast the financial regulatory reform bill that is currently awaiting President Barack ObamaÂ’s signature.
“This bill is nothing more than a permanent Wall Street bailout,” he said.
He continued to attack the Obama administrationÂ’s agenda by blasting the proposed extension for unemployment benefits that will be voted on by the Senate Tuesday, saying he expects legislation to return to the House.
“House Republicans believe that we can’t tax, spend or regulate ourselves back to prosperity,” Pence said.
Posted by: Tami at July 19, 2010 01:54 PM (VuLos)
I have absolutely no interest in running for president of the United States. None. Zero interest. Zero. None. Close the door. No chance. No way. Under no circumstances. I don’t know any other way I could put it. No hope, don’t try to talk me into it, nothing. Forget it. I’m staying here.”
I think that's about as clear as it gets.
Posted by: Editor at July 19, 2010 05:29 PM
I think that's part of the reason I'd like to see him run!
We've seen what happens when someone who has wanted the job since he was a wee lad in primary school madrasa gets in. Besides, Christie has almost two years to prove his ability before the '12 election.
Not saying I'm for Christie, because I'm not. Not yet, anyway.
But I'm pretty convinced that Mutt Romney, Shuckabee, Jindal, Palin and the darlings of the real political enthusiasts leave me cold. Any one of them (except Huckabee) would be preferable to Osama Obama, but it would be nice to get someone in the White House who can do the damn job.
Hasn't happened for way too many years. Since 1988, in fact.
Posted by: MrScribbler at July 19, 2010 01:55 PM (Ulu3i)
FIFY
(Note: Darth Cheney and Cheney's Mighty Warcock are close, but not the same thing.)
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at July 19, 2010 01:55 PM (51zMK)
The Constitution isn't an "excuse".
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 01:55 PM (4Lm8Z)
Whatever flaw in the process allowed McCain to be "the last man standing" in 2008 needs to be fixed or I feel we will be seeing a lot more of that.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 05:15 PM (oIp16)
They haven't been and the GOP has an amazing ability to pull defeat from the jaws of victory. Romney will likely win 'because its his turn' and we may well see a repeat of what happened with McCain and Sarah won't be there to even make it close.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 01:56 PM (eYgrz)
So we can throw away people who aren't 100% on an issue that isn't going to come up because it might at some point?
That's brilliant!
It's more brilliant than compromising on everything and winding up with another McCain. Republicans like that don't get elected. Ever.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 19, 2010 01:56 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: davidt at July 19, 2010 05:43 PM (HtIec)
Not sure if you saw my last post about who was the reason the community organizer gave the keynote speech in 2004
It was Tom Daschle
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at July 19, 2010 01:57 PM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at July 19, 2010 01:59 PM (w9bVp)
First, it's a fair point, 6 months isn't enough experience. On the other hand...'12 is a year and a half away.
'12 is a year and a half away, but he'll have to "quit" his job as Governor to start campaigning full-time for the primary in less than a year (probably sooner, as he has no ground-game anywhere yet), giving him a year and a half of experience or less. If Palin is too inexperienced, you can sure as hell forget about Christie.
Second, Alaska is small (by population and budget) conservative state.
New Jersey is much larger and much more liberal.
Well that's certainly a new one. Keep raising that bar.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at July 19, 2010 01:59 PM (IoUF1)
The Constitution isn't an "excuse".
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 05:55 PM (4Lm8Z)
He means that the issue will be an albatross around Romney's neck, and face it, most voters will fall asleep the second he tries to explain it.
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 01:59 PM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 19, 2010 02:00 PM (5jbD3)
Good Morning America's George Stephanopoulos on Monday lobbied that if one were to "set aside" the Fort Hood terror attack and the botched Christmas bombing, there haven't been successful attacks on America in the last few years.
I think his brain has been set aside.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 19, 2010 02:00 PM (JSghx)
I am an avowed anti-lawyer. (BTW, I have jury duty in a few weeks, mwahahahahaha.) I could write a treatise on why it is disastrous to have so many lawyers in the high echelons of government, how law school teaches you lessons that are fundamentally anti-American, that the whole profession is parasitic and unproductive, that the more lawyers we have and the more attractive the profession is, the worse we are as a nation.
That being said, it isn't a killer for me. What I don't want is like Obama -- a lawyer's administration -- where everybody in every position is a lawyer. Like Michelle's hospital job, they're unqualified for it, but law school is apparently the O negative of politics.
The legal profession is corruption by definition. It is rent-seeking, it looks for government redress of all problems. If you want to find a picnic, follow the ants. If you want to find corruption, follow the lawyers. If a person who is a lawyer is willing to recognize that it's a major problem that our young people think that learning math is for chumps, because you can just party for 4 years, take the LSAT and find yourself making contacts in a fancy law school, then I'm cool with it.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:01 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: yippie21 at July 19, 2010 02:02 PM (bop5f)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 02:02 PM (AZGON)
It was Tom Daschle
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at July 19, 2010 05:57 PM (ACkhT)
Yeah, saw that. Thanks.
Posted by: davidt at July 19, 2010 02:02 PM (HtIec)
Posted by: ShreddyK at July 19, 2010 02:03 PM (5Wmn7)
If Obama/Pelosi/Reid didn't go for it, I can't fathom a Christie/Boehner/McConnell team doing it.
As I said, I don't think Christie will run in '12 but come on, deal in the real world here.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 05:53 PM (X/Lqh)
Well that pretty much ignores what he is doing in New Jersey. The things he's doing there aren't that popular. That's what I like about him, he does what he believes in. He isn't Obama/Reid/Pelosi. If you think he is then fine.
In case you havn't been in the real world for the past couple of generations, the democrats passed sweeping gun control measures with the assault rifle ban. It wasn't popular either but they did it.
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 02:04 PM (fwSHf)
Maybe.
But I'm hoping that some of the energy that everyone senses on the Repub. side translates to people taking the time to learn the truth about the candidates. It's easy enough to find official statements, read actual bills, read contemporaneous news accounts, etc. that here's really no excuse for not knowing what the differences between candidates are.
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 02:05 PM (4Lm8Z)
Ideally, he could have, while the thing was being bandied about, emphasized that it wasn't going to work. He could have predicted the problems. That being said, when Obamacare was going, he could have simply said, "We tried it in Mass and it didn't work."
Reagan admitted his mistake in the CA abortion law. Romney must do the same.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:05 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: polynikes at July 19, 2010 06:01 PM (m2CN7)
He performed poorly in a lot of the debates icluding statements about wanting Romneycare to serve as a model for the nation, and as I recall he was running in 2008. What points did he raise about Obama's skeleton's then?
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 02:05 PM (eYgrz)
Good Morning America's George Stephanopoulos on Monday lobbied that if one were to "set aside" the Fort Hood terror attack and the botched Christmas bombing, there haven't been successful attacks on America in the last few years.
I think his brain has been set aside.
Right off the top of my head, I can recall the kid in Dallas trying to blow up a building. I'm sure there are several more. Damn, what these folks won't do to apologize for Muslim Terrorism.
Posted by: dogfish at July 19, 2010 02:08 PM (DVPCk)
Posted by: Martin Harris at July 19, 2010 02:11 PM (w9bVp)
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 06:04 PM (fwSHf)
What he's doing in NJ isn't popular with elected Democrats but it's popular with voters. It's why he's able to role over the politicians.
Gun control isn't popular with voters, that's why Democrats won't touch it.
Has Christie proposed any gun control legislation? I haven't been able to find any.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 02:13 PM (X/Lqh)
Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at July 19, 2010 02:14 PM (w9bVp)
Well, that theory only goes so far, see ObamaCare. A necessary corollary is that they will go against the voters when the issue promises to either create new Dem voters or expand the dependent class.
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 02:14 PM (S8TF5)
Seriously...how does Romney get by RomneyCare and lead the repeal charge with any credibility?
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 02:15 PM (X/Lqh)
Apparently you and George Orwell were watching a different primary race than I did.
Posted by: polynikes at July 19, 2010 06:08 PM (m2CN7)
Guess so. I recall the debate where Romney raised his hand when asked if Global Warming was a serious threat. IIRC so did Huckabee. Iowa debate I believe. Me and George Orwell remember it well.
I also remember the California debate where Romney sat like a bump on a log with McCain running off at the mouth lying about just about everything. 'Well excuse me but perhaps we might consider that the esteemed Senator McCains words, might perhaps be somewhat exaggerated?' Yeah great debater!
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 02:15 PM (eYgrz)
Could he have distanced himself from that whole Weld, etc. crew and completely disavowed Health Care? Yes. But he didn't do it early, so the die was cast the moment he took Office.
Anyway, if people are going to be single-issue voters, they should do their best to understand that single issue. Romney is still the class of the field as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 02:16 PM (4Lm8Z)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 02:17 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Girlfriends Everywhere at July 19, 2010 02:19 PM (yTy++)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 02:20 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 02:21 PM (4Lm8Z)
Well, ironically, I may get back some of that credibility by saying that I don't care what you think about my credibility. Really, I don't. I'm not working for anybody here, least of all myself.
Keep in mind that my major objection to lawyers is the notion that they are some sort of superintellectuals who were made to rule over us all, even though they are almost uniformly too stupid to do calculus. That's a major reason you go to law school, to avoid math. Keep in mind also that Mitt is an English major.
English. His native tongue.
So, I'm not impressed with his academic resume either.
On the other hand, I'm a conservative, I don't have to be. We don't need to elect ubermensches to rule over us. We elect people to represent us.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:22 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 02:23 PM (kVHXJ)
Thankyou lincolntf. That's right. The purity testers will be left with zombiereagan who can't win because he's DEAD.
Ok, who is the magical candidate who is still ALIVE?
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 02:26 PM (kVHXJ)
Maybe if he'd just written a paper about doing it, instead of actually doing it, he'd be an "expert".
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 02:26 PM (4Lm8Z)
I do love me that big hunk of man. They should name a candy bar after him then I could eat him up everyday!
Chris Christie is DELICIOUS.
Posted by: mpfs at July 19, 2010 02:28 PM (iYbLN)
Romneycare
Assault Weapons Ban
Abortion
Gay Marriage
Don't ask don't tell
Global Warming Scam
Illegal immigration
Bush Tax Cut's
He has been on both sides of all these issues. Does anyone really think the DNC won't dub him "The Prince of Nuance" as John Kerry was?
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 02:31 PM (eYgrz)
And they flopped. I really couldn't believe it. Part of it is that the IAGOP has a very large single-issue evangelical base that turned out for Huckabee. When I went into the caucus room, the number that voted for Huck was staggering. I think his people went directly to the churches and religious organizations, rather than a general campaign. This crowd also voted for a sore loser in the gov. race this year, who got beaten quite badly, so I don't think Huck, now that he's a known quantity, will be quite so attractive. Huck also got the FairTax endorsement and those people were big at the time.
Part of it was the high expectations. People expected Romney to win, but all of the reasons to vote for him were pretty shallow.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:33 PM (T0NGe)
MODERATOR: “You seem to have backed away from mandates on a national basis.”
ROMNEY: “No, no, I like mandates. The mandates work.”
Supports an unconstitutional plan. Plenty of video out there showing Mittens basically supporting the same things that make up Obamacare that would look just shittastic in Obama campaign ads. Mittens is clearly either a statist or a statist enabler and the choice of the Republican ruling class establishment.
No f'ing thank you.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at July 19, 2010 02:35 PM (aEZOo)
Huck sucks.
How a country can be bigoted against a run of the mill mormon causing the election of a muslim sympathizing black liberation theology pretending foreigner is beyond me.
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 02:36 PM (hw2bP)
Seem kind of presumptuous to state categorically that he will do such a thing. I don't really recall that he has done anything of the sort to date, what tells us that he will in the future?
Posted by: KG at July 19, 2010 02:37 PM (S8TF5)
The Dems have their stupid primary rules and the Repubs have their stupid primary rules but they both have one thing in common.
They are both designed to assure that the Party elite still get to control the outcome. The only real fight is between the elites and the public has little say.
The smoke filled rooms of the old days are gone but the damn crookedness isn't.
Posted by: Vic at July 19, 2010 02:39 PM (/jbAw)
Maybe if he'd just written a paper about doing it, instead of actually doing it, he'd be an "expert".
It's just the notion of being able to solve problems. If you haven't done so in the real world, at least you should have to face them in school. Obama has never solved a problem in his life. It's quite possible he could not solve a sudoku puzzle.
Think about it: Obama has never been faced with a problem and come up with a solution. Never.
Mitt has, and that's to his credit. It's more to his credit that he's done it in the real world, where the stakes are higher (albeit the solutions are generally easier).
First the MA healthplan and Obamacare are about as similar as the War in Afghanistan and Vietnam.
(a) In this soundbyte world, it doesn't matter. (b) MassCare is failing. Badly. Independent of Obamacare. (c) The GOP wants repeal and we aren't going to nominate a candidate who doesn't carry the banner into 2012. We're beyond nuance.
Second, the majority of voters believe we needed healthcare reform.
No. No. A thousand times, no. Repeal first. The ruling class cannot be trusted. Get rid of it.
I've got a real simple test: Whatever you do to doctors, you have to do to lawyers also. If you can get it passed, then I'll support it.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:41 PM (T0NGe)
Meanwhile, Paul "never spent a day in the dreaded private sector" Ryan is supposed to be a beacon of new Conservatism. The next 18 months are going to be interesting, to say the least.
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 19, 2010 02:41 PM (4Lm8Z)
Posted by: George Orwell at July 19, 2010 02:43 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: polynikes at July 19, 2010 06:28 PM (m2CN7)
You know what most people know about those wars? Neither of them went well for the US. That's the depth of interest most will have and it's enough to sink Romney.
More to the point, they are very similar. RomneyCare didn't go as far because as a state plan it was limited in the damage it could do but it's far more related to ObamaCare than anything Republicans should be talking about.
I believe that his attempt to make a free market reform will not be held against him.
Sure it will because it's failing.
There are any number of reasons that it has not been a success that can be explained. He will acknowledge the failures and point out the positives. He will continue to maintain that States have a right to attempt these things where the same attempts are wrong for the Federal government.
And there in is the issue. Mitt "I Like Mandates" Romney will spend the whole time explaining away what he did 10 years before and trying to draw wonkish distinctions in defense of a failing plan instead of leading the fight against the hell we are faced with.
He's simply the worst imaginable candidate if you want repeal of ObamaCare.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 02:44 PM (X/Lqh)
The Iowa caucuses are basically primaries. You go into a room. You write down the name of your candidate and they announce the totals in the room.
I don't know how Dem primaries work, but I've heard they have the old system where you walk to a corner of the room.
The Iowa caucus system is interesting in that you do have to come face-to-face with your neighbors and you get to see who the local Mitt/McCain/Huck/etc. apparatchik is. It takes a lot of guts for those people (there are thousands of them, one for each "precinct") to stand up and give their schpeil).
Iowa really doesn't have an effect on who ultimately wins. It basically picks the top 3-4 candidates and the rest wither afterwards.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:47 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: jdun at July 19, 2010 02:49 PM (AGj54)
Has Christie proposed any gun control legislation? I haven't been able to find any.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 06:13 PM (X/Lqh)
No that's my point. New Jersey already has draconion gun regulation. He was asked if he would try to repeal any of it and he said no that he agreed with the regulations in New Jersey.
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 02:50 PM (fwSHf)
True dat. Of course, you and I know that Huck will come out of the gate savaging MassCare (not because he wouldn't implement something similar, because he's a slimy opportunist) and, of course, Romney will defend it reflexively.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 19, 2010 02:50 PM (T0NGe)
How a country can be bigoted against a run of the mill mormon causing the election of a muslim sympathizing black liberation theology pretending foreigner is beyond me.
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 06:36 PM (hw2bP)
Romney isn't a run of the mill Mormon. At least I hope not. Mormons tend to be conservative and Romney tends not to be. Romney is better than McCain or Huckabee, but that isn't saying much.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 02:51 PM (eYgrz)
How a country can be bigoted against a run of the mill mormon
If Mitt Romney were a run-of-the-mill Mormon--staunchly pro-life, gun owner--I'd have no problem voting for him. Unfortunately, he's a Mormon tainted by living on the East coast, and it shows in his policy preferences.
If Mike Lee (a real run-of-the-mill Mormon) wants to run in 2016 or 2020, it will be a different story entirely. I'm not saying I'd necessarily vote for him, but he wouldn't have Romney's problems.
Posted by: Ken at July 19, 2010 02:52 PM (fh5xr)
Posted by: jdun at July 19, 2010 02:53 PM (AGj54)
He's simply the worst imaginable candidate if you want repeal of ObamaCare.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 19, 2010 06:44 PM (X/Lqh)
By the way Drew, if you are looking to repeal Obamacare Chris Christie just isn't sure how he feels about it yet. He said the below while requesting the federal funds provided by Obamacare for high risk pools in his state.
But Christie said he is "nowhere near" making a decision on whether to join suit against the health care law and is awaiting the results of a "complete briefing" by his cabinet.
"We are looking at both the short-term and long-term ramifications of the legislation for the people of the state of New Jersey, and also the legal possibilities of success of any lawsuit," Christie said.
Vitale said Christie made the right choice to run the high risk pool in-state, calling it a "big step."
Posted by: robtr at July 19, 2010 02:58 PM (fwSHf)
We have to win some of the east coast to win, the west is lost. Sorry guys, I don't like it either but THERE IS NO ONE OUT THERE who will make the purity posse happy and not scare the coastal voters to death. If there is, name him/her/it.
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 03:07 PM (nCeq3)
Posted by: Real, Gin-u-wine Conservative at July 19, 2010 03:07 PM (9b6FB)
We have to win some of the east coast to win, the west is lost. Sorry guys, I don't like it either but THERE IS NO ONE OUT THERE who will make the purity posse happy and not scare the coastal voters to death. If there is, name him/her/it.
Posted by: dagny at July 19, 2010 07:07 PM (nCeq3)
There is simply NO POINT is electing someone that the DC insiders are comfortable with. Obama is who they wanted and choosing someone else who they are fine with isn't going to change anything.
Romney, McCain, Huckabee aren't going to do a thing to change the direction the country is headed in. There is some chance that Palin will. Not a great chance, but at least she will try. Romney has proven that in a liberal environment he adopts liberal sensibilities.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 03:13 PM (eYgrz)
Posted by: Optimizer at July 19, 2010 03:21 PM (acVo8)
Posted by: Hedgehog at July 19, 2010 03:28 PM (oQIfB)
Look, this lefty, "Delusion of Energy Independence" writer points out that the "Big Corn" is what wins the Iowa caucuses. Even a blind acorn chokes a squirrel now and then.
So any Republican who wants to win by following the Conventional Wisdom has to go to the shrine of the Iowa Caucuses prepared to suck up to Big Corn. And I mean suck up big-time. like ol' Bowin' Barry on a trip to the Middle East.
Screw Conventional Wisdom. If the Tea Party plans to have any impact at all, they need to push for something far bigger than "helping elect Republicans." This is why Palin matters, and deserves more that a brushoff for her twangy voice or lack of Ivy-League connections.
You don't like her voice? Her fzcking voice? Really? Christie's fat. Turning the sound off doesn't help you unsee his wideness. So what? Bachmann's voice is irritating. McCain says "My Friendsh" so often you wanna slap him. Limbaugh has a Letterman Lisp. Glenn Beck has weird hair. George Will wears an ugly Bow Tie and dorky glasses. Krauthammer's shoe-polished hair looks like a dying chia pet, Ace is a wookie/jawa/thingy, and you all are a bunch of unclean, unshaven Morons (yeah, me too). So Freaking What?
Maybe y'all need to stand a little closer to the issues, and maybe get some on you. Let the lefties be the ones who operate like American Idol Survivor.
Posted by: K~Bob at July 19, 2010 03:39 PM (9b6FB)
One of them routinely deals or dealt with foreign governments.
One has has a long (more than 6 months) history of beating down corruption. One does not.
One.....screw it. Let's cut to the chase>
One has a penis (we assume) and one does not (or Andi Sullivan would have told us).
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at July 19, 2010 03:51 PM (mMcLI)
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at July 19, 2010 07:51 PM (mMcLI)
And one has a garden that Andie dreams about!
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 19, 2010 03:54 PM (eYgrz)
Posted by: Muddywood at July 19, 2010 03:59 PM (u/VIG)
Posted by: Moi at July 19, 2010 04:28 PM (bjYAr)
Posted by: Moi at July 19, 2010 04:34 PM (bjYAr)
Posted by: Moi at July 19, 2010 04:36 PM (bjYAr)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at July 19, 2010 05:16 PM (fLHQe)
Now, if you look at the potential 2012 nominees, ask which are likely to represent the "ruling class?" Mittens is as sure as his dad was the Governor of Michigan who said he was brainwashed. Sure, he'll repeal ObamaCare and shrink the size of government, and he won't be co-opted by Trent Lott, either.
OTOH, the "ruling class" narrative perfectly fits the utter, bipartisan distaste for everyone in the pundit class, R or D, foreign & domestic for Mrs. Palin. And again, I call upon all right thinking Americans to piss off the ruling class by supporting any candidate at any level of government who demonstrates NON-membership in this class. PARTICULARLY, in the R primaries.
Posted by: Steve Poling at July 19, 2010 05:19 PM (db5YN)
We need another McCarthyist purge of all those evil bastard commies in entertainment, media, education, and politics. hell, if you want immigration reform, give me ten million of theirs for ten million of ours, starting with sean penn.
Posted by: befuddled at July 19, 2010 05:23 PM (xJU23)
Yeah, Christie's great and all that. And I know we shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, but Jeebus can't we find just ONE republican who will stand up and make the proactive case for responsible off-shore drilling instead of running like a scared poll watching rabbit?
The numbnuts here in FL drive me crazy, they go on and on about how bad it is for the environment and how ugly it all is, despite the fact you couldn't see any such wells from shore, and all without even considering the enormous potential bonanza to the state coffers they're leaving on the table by pushing now for a constitutional ban on off shore drilling along the state's enormous 1200 mile long coastline. That's just irresponsible.
But, yeah, Christie's great and all that.
Posted by: Leonard Pinth-Garnell at July 19, 2010 05:52 PM (PtuJp)
Posted by: DJ at July 19, 2010 07:00 PM (h64Ae)
Posted by: cheshirecat at July 19, 2010 07:03 PM (kHbWt)
Posted by: cheshirecat at July 19, 2010 07:04 PM (kHbWt)
Posted by: cheshirecat at July 19, 2010 07:15 PM (kHbWt)
Sorry but I along with the majority of Americans don't agree with Christie on guns. It's a deal killer for me
Guns and illegals make Christie a deal killer for me too. Yes, I love to see his beat-down of the public sector employees and reporters, but he's just too flawed. He may be good for NJ, but not America.
Guys, flush out your headgear. This is just the kind of single-issue crap that saddles us with Dems. Face it, there are probably about three people in the United States who agree with every one of your positions 100%. Are you substantially in agreement with Christie, on most matters? Close enough.
Otherwise, prepare to watch Obama get re-inaugurated in 2013.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at July 19, 2010 07:38 PM (buEIm)
Unfortunately all The Ruling Class wanna-a-bes at Ace of Spades and Allahpukes pulled out the QUITTER card which means Christie cannot run until 2016 because he would have to QUIT the governorship in order to run in 2012.
Hey Ruling Class wanna-a-bes, no matter how good you are at sucking on your Jon 'fucking asshole' Stewart you will never receive full membership into The Ruling class VIP room.
That said; please fix your impotent problem first before exposing your political idiocy.
Posted by: Harvard Inbred=Liberal's Useful Idiots at July 20, 2010 06:34 AM (+xhL8)
Thanks to the "conservative" Christie, taxes will be going UP in New Jersey and spending will be going UP in Trenton. He's good at talking the talk but not walking the walk.
Posted by: NJConservative at July 22, 2010 05:59 AM (0PYWg)
Posted by: permanent eyelash at September 17, 2010 03:51 AM (+LkfN)
Posted by: women health at September 17, 2010 04:22 AM (A89l8)
Posted by: clocks jewelry directory at September 19, 2010 04:38 AM (BW8UX)
Posted by: data storage at September 26, 2010 05:12 AM (MKWPQ)
Posted by: antique clocks directory at September 27, 2010 07:36 AM (iRnRY)
Posted by: Allergy and Immunology in North Carolina at September 29, 2010 06:42 AM (UpH69)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3115 seconds, 327 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Palinisto! at July 19, 2010 12:54 PM (4OnPC)