February 18, 2011
— Ace And Planned Parenthood.
The House voted to defund President Obama's health care overhaul on Friday during a sustained burst of floor activity on amendments to a temporary spending bill that would keep the government lights on but impose deep cuts on domestic programs.The House approved the amendment in a 239-187 vote.
Among the other actions the House took was to reject a controversial plan to end the Pentagon's sponsorship of a NASCAR team and to vote for a ban on federal aid to Planned Parenthood.
The proposals were among more than 120 amendments remaining for the House to vote on as Republican leaders wind down a week of frenzied action on the spending bill.
The overall bill is the first step in an increasingly bitter struggle between Democrats and Republicans over how much to cut federal agencies' funding over the second half of the budget year that ends Sept. 30. Current funding runs out March 4 and a temporary spending bill will be needed to avoid a government shutdown.
The news is not all good. A lot of Republicans defected on defunding the COPS nonsense, and what I guess was supposed to be a temporary Homeland Security payout to first responders (in the wake of 9/11) which has now become, like all government programs, permanent. And commenters say they haven't cut Amtrak yet (but they're offering amendments so they might) and you've got Dan Lundgren whining about cutting his staff budget.
Toughen up, buttercup.
I don't really think he's threatening to quit the caucus as the Washington Examiner claims. They're very nearly making that up. But he is whining like a schoolyard bitch, as Champ Kind would say.
I don't get these people. How do they politically think they can sell "shared sacrifice" if they insist on no sacrifice at all for themselves?
What the hell? What part of the sentence "We all must sacrifice" is throwing you there, Dan? Which word in that sentence is the read-bump causing your eyes to spin out of control?
I don't want to sound like Jim DeMint here but this is the mathematical fact: We only need 218 House members, plus say a dozen as spares and back-ups.
We can do anything we want with that many. We do not need more. If some of these assholes find this is too difficult for them, I support and encourage their defection to a third party. We will beat them next cycle.
Or not. Who cares. That's the wonderful thing -- it doesn't matter if we beat them or not. We only need 218 (230 for cover and backup).
Posted by: Ace at
11:45 AM
| Comments (89)
Post contains 447 words, total size 3 kb.
Boner needs to rule with an iron fist and punish all the Republicans who break ranks and vote with the Leftists and Porkists.
Posted by: dolphin-safe soothsayer at February 18, 2011 11:47 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: The Little Engine That Couldn't at February 18, 2011 11:48 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 18, 2011 11:49 AM (eh+ki)
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 11:49 AM (Q1lie)
Dan Lungren (no extra "d") is my congresscritter. Thanks for the heads up. I shall fire out a strongly worded letter for what it is worth.
Ack, I just realized where that term came from....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 18, 2011 11:49 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Ben at February 18, 2011 11:49 AM (wuv1c)
Jeff Bingaman (D) NM will not run for Senate in 2012.
What conservative R from NM will run to take that seat?
Posted by: Kortezzi at February 18, 2011 11:51 AM (zAZNI)
This is an important point, and one that needs to resonate with America. Anyone who resists the climb out of the huge hole that our government has dug for us (with our money) has to be shown as an uncooperative, prissy, whiny, spoiled little snotbag with a huge sense of entitlement.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 18, 2011 11:51 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:51 AM (AZGON)
The Abrams can hit 50mph easily, and it would chew up the track so badly at that speed that nobody else would finish without pitting 10 times for tires. They might not need the live rounds, although it would be immensely entertaining.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 18, 2011 11:53 AM (LH6ir)
*It was on an amendment not handled well by other side.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 11:55 AM (yfJ6g)
I know they're small potatoes right now (well, OCare, isn't, but Planned Parent hood really is) as far as the actual deficit, but a) it's nice to see them start saying "no" to things we unwashed rubes have been yelling about for a while, and b) it feeds into that whole "see, we've cut the small stuff. There's nowhere left to cut but entitlements" thing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 11:56 AM (8y9MW)
How can cutting $100B out of $3.7T be a deep cut? That's about 2.7% cut - and we'll still have more then twice the deficit we had the last time we had a Republican Congress.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 18, 2011 11:56 AM (7BU4a)
Dan Lundgren sounds like he appreciates the flavor of cock. Primary that bitch.
I can think of one guy who could pull it off, Thomas P. "Rico" Oller, who is a native of the area, a staunch patriot, and was just term limited out of the state government.
Lungren is a SoCal carpetbagger. Oddly enough, the Suburbs of Sacramento, which are quite patriotic and conservative even if downtown Sacramento is weenie left, have been the place where term limited State SoCal Republicans come to start their congressional careers. (See also Tom McClintock, a Ventura transplant, in neighboring district CA-4).
Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 18, 2011 11:57 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 11:58 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 11:58 AM (RD7QR)
And can I see the Green Lantern ring? Wait, that was Hal Jordan...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 11:58 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: dolphin-safe soothsayer at February 18, 2011 03:47 PM (uFokq)
That's hot.
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at February 18, 2011 11:58 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Martin Niemoller, F1 Fan at February 18, 2011 11:58 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 03:49 PM (Q1lie)
True dat!
Posted by: Soona at February 18, 2011 11:59 AM (1VLfs)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 12:00 PM (AZGON)
Someone should have asked GWAR to show up.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 18, 2011 12:00 PM (7BU4a)
I'm actually okay with the NASCAR funding, more or less. It's a recruitment tool, and you go where your audience is.
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 03:58 PM (RD7QR)
True, but if we put enough in there, that gives us a lot more room to maneuver.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:00 PM (8y9MW)
Bit of both. His group led the primary opposition to upping the cuts to $100B because said cuts might be "hurtful", but Boehner twisted his arm and he said yes. He's been getting lots of bipartisan support for the writing of this bill, but he's also been outspoken against certain amendments. So, he's okay so long as Boehner and the conservative members of Appropriations keep him in-line.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 12:01 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Skanky crack whore #32478 at February 18, 2011 12:03 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 12:03 PM (AZGON)
Remember the '90's?
Wanna be freaked out and feel really old?
Guess who's been dead since 1992 (19 years ago)?
Sam "WAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAAAAA! Kinnison
Posted by: dolphin-safe soothsayer at February 18, 2011 12:04 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at February 18, 2011 12:05 PM (Cm66w)
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 03:58 PM (RD7QR)
Little Nan and the dems want a government shut-down. Perhaps. Perhaps. I say that might be one of the best things that could happen to this country right now. Imagine. Our DC government doing absolutely nothing. Heaven!
Posted by: Soona at February 18, 2011 12:06 PM (1VLfs)
If the NASCAR thing is really getting special funding, I agree with you. I don't think it is, though. I don't think the amendment was preventing some special program, it was more a sort of anti-appropriations thing. The money, IIRC, comes out of the Army's recruitment advertising budget normally.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:06 PM (8y9MW)
Yep. Or the NEA, or the LSC (which is just a taxpayer funded coven of commies).
Posted by: toby928™ at February 18, 2011 12:06 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 04:03 PM (AZGON)
This is one of the things that drives me nuts. When you have a $1.5T deficit, and permanent $1T deficits in the future everything not absolutely necessary needs to go.
If you were facing a potential foreclosure on your house would you be arguing with your spouse about how important it is to buy "organic" veggies and have your weekly night out?
Posted by: 18-1 at February 18, 2011 12:07 PM (7BU4a)
Read-bump? Spares? Back-ups? NASCAR?
What would Freud say? Nevermind. "Read-bump" is very clever.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 18, 2011 12:09 PM (swuwV)
Why shouldn't the Pentagon sponsor NASCAR. it's called recruiting and in order to recruit, you need to advertise. It may be stereotyping but a lot of the pentagon's recruit demographic watch NASCAR.
It's like when the Dems in congress were having hearings on the banking collapse, they called in a bank executive and demanded to know why, when things were collapsing, they were sponsoring a golf tournament. The exec repied "It's called advertising. A lot of the people that we are trying to reach watch golf."
Dumbass politicians don't know how marketing works. They think that the only way to make more money is to raise taxes or wait for the government to give you some.
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 18, 2011 12:09 PM (lH6z9)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 12:09 PM (AZGON)
But Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, denounced the proposal as an "extreme and dangerous piece of legislation."
"The outcome of this vote is not a surprise, but it is radically out of step with mainstream American values and it is out of line with the issues voters want Congress to focus on," she said.
"To be clear, the amendment to prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving federal funding does nothing to reduce the deficit and it does nothing to improve the economy," she added. "In fact, health professionals will actually lose their jobs as a result, and, most egregiously, it takes health care the ability to kill unwanted children away from American women who cannot afford to pay for it to kill them on their own."
Posted by: MWTexas at February 18, 2011 12:10 PM (N05oL)
"The House rejected a measure cutting an additional $22 billion from the Republican spending bill, as conservatives ran into a wall of opposition from the GOP establishment over the depth of reductions to federal funding."
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 18, 2011 12:10 PM (S59+B)
Posted by: Sparky at February 18, 2011 12:10 PM (MNYI+)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 18, 2011 12:11 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Rocks at February 18, 2011 12:12 PM (Q1lie)
Say it with me now... "LOLWUT!?!"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:12 PM (8y9MW)
I think the answer to that is "Not directly or officially."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:13 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 18, 2011 12:15 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 12:15 PM (OlN4e)
A photo of you wearing an eye patch while holding a Luger to Lundgren's head in front of his staff would be highly effective in this effort.
I have a nifty camera.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 18, 2011 12:15 PM (HBqDo)
Cecile Richards, daughter of that Texas-sized dead douche bag Anne Richards, makes almost $400K/yr.
Posted by: dolphin-safe soothsayer at February 18, 2011 12:15 PM (uFokq)
My favorite program. Been on it a couple times in my beer soaked wife-beater. Bitch set me up.
Posted by: Trailer Park Resident at February 18, 2011 04:00 PM (IhHdM)
That made me lol. Gawd knows I needed a laugh today. Whew.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 18, 2011 12:17 PM (UOM48)
Was what too harsh? Calling her a douche-bag? Maybe, but more or less accurate.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:18 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Mr. Ed at February 18, 2011 12:18 PM (AZGON)
"The House rejected a measure cutting an additional $22 billion from the Republican spending bill, as conservatives ran into a wall of opposition from the GOP establishment over the depth of reductions to federal funding."
Blackburn and Jordan drafted a bill further cutting spending but it let the OMB decide what and where to cut. Further, Hal Rogers and Appropriations subcommittee leaders spoke-out against the amendment because (1) they don't want to make further cuts and (2) they likely felt slighted. So it was a good idea opposed by the usual suspects but the sponsors also went about it the wrong way.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 12:18 PM (yfJ6g)
Jack straw
obama already made that argument....he didn't want his daughters getting stuck with a kid........
Posted by: phoenixgirl at February 18, 2011 12:19 PM (Cm66w)
Not that it matters much but the CR is $1.2 trillion. So it would have been 8% and change.
Plus there is this !
"A proposal by Texas Republican Ted Poe to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of its authority to issue regulations on global warming passed by a 249-177 vote."
Woohoo!!!
Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 18, 2011 12:19 PM (S59+B)
Posted by: maddogg at February 18, 2011 12:20 PM (OlN4e)
"A proposal by Texas Republican Ted Poe to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of its authority to issue regulations on global warming passed by a 249-177 vote."
I love my congressman (most of the time, anyway).
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 12:21 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 18, 2011 12:22 PM (AZGON)
Someday, I'll have a country full of politicians that use their fucking brains before they open there stupid fucking mouths.
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at February 18, 2011 12:22 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 12:23 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: your friendly neighborhood Taliban at February 18, 2011 12:25 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 18, 2011 12:26 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: joncelli at February 18, 2011 04:23 PM (RD7QR)
Or the kit from the caboodle.
Posted by: Soona at February 18, 2011 12:27 PM (1VLfs)
Rep. Gomert was yelling at Barney Frank last night about that after Frank complained about Boehner's open debate process not being fair.
Seriously? Frank acutally complained about the open debate process not being fair? Why is it unfair? Because when he speaks everyone either clears the room or has to grab their umbrella? WTF??
Posted by: jewells45 at February 18, 2011 12:29 PM (l/N7H)
"Punished" was the word he used. I find that both highly important, and highly illuminating.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 18, 2011 12:34 PM (8y9MW)
NHRA's most desired crew chief and manager used to work for the Army team and they hardly ever lost. It seems they couldn't pay him enough money, so he is now employed by His Royal Highness Sheikh Khalid Bin Hamad Al Thani, a member of Qatar's ruling family.
Every TV interview with any member of the Al-Anabi team always includes a grovel on how benevolent the dear, greasy sheik is to his humble servants, and believe me, that's hardly an exaggeration. Gee, it's almost like it's in their contracts.
The Pentagon's NASCAR budget is 7 mil and its NHRA budget is 5 mil. In perspective, that falls in between what most candidates running for president spend out of their own pockets.
Do we need more oil sheiks to come over with unlimited budgets and kick ass in NASCAR, too?
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at February 18, 2011 03:36 PM (8K+v+)
Posted by: DAve at February 18, 2011 08:44 PM (tG4br)
Obtain the latest LED watches as well as other tech gadgets around today. Visit <a href="http://www.flash-watch.com/intercrew">www.flash-watch.com</a>
Posted by: ray at March 08, 2011 06:39 PM (zXDGL)
I found a hot place to share with you, there are lots of High quality designer handbags with low price are all here!^_^
Wow, I would like to recommend a very good place for you,There are so many fashion items you need and all the big brand you love on =======^_^(mygoodbag)^_^==========
Like: Louis Vuitton Chanel Gucci Burberry Chloe Hermes Prada Fendi etc.There are all in http://www.cheapshoesmarket.com/ and http://www.topmbtshop.com/.
Posted by: fhhdhgdabc at April 07, 2011 01:36 AM (6234x)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2441 seconds, 217 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at February 18, 2011 11:47 AM (0IPsJ)