March 14, 2011
— Monty The federal budget is a shambles, but that's only half the story: the other half is the rolling trainwreck that is the state budgets. Pull quote:
It is no consolation that a few heartland states are in decent shape. The Dakotas, Nebraska, and Indiana cannot compensate for the disaster that is Illinois, let alone the bicoastal basket cases. Moreover, while a robust economic recovery would create breathing room for some states, the most afflicted states' problem is structural, not cyclical. Under any plausible economic scenario, revenues will barely cover their ongoing obligations, let alone repay their debts.(Emphasis mine.)
When people talk about "quality of life", they are in part referring to their local environment. Roads, parks, police, civic centers, playgrounds, little league baseball, firefighters, schools -- all things funded by municipalities, and all things in dire danger of being cut unless the states and cities find some way to get their spending and debt under control.
And remember: debt is a symptom; spending is the disease. The problem is too much damned public spending, not too little public income.
[UPDATE: Link was broken. It should be fixed now.]
[UPDATE 2: No cute kitty-cat pictures unless some other cob-logger (ahem: lauraw) wants to add one. Just looking at those treacly pictures of cats makes me want to vomit.]
Posted by: Monty at
07:16 AM
| Comments (131)
Post contains 202 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: joncelli at March 14, 2011 07:21 AM (RD7QR)
Slightly, slightly related: I was down by the WTC yesterday to take the PATH trains to NJ. The Freedom Tower. 1 WTC is approaching 40 stories. I'm surprised you don't hear any news about this, but more important WHO WILL WANT TO WORK IN THIS BUILDING? Not just the risk of another terrorist attack, but talk buildings are SO unnecessary and inefficient. What company is going to want to rent space in this boondoggle--Boomdoggle?
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 14, 2011 07:25 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at March 14, 2011 07:26 AM (iNfj/)
Posted by: joncelli at March 14, 2011 07:26 AM (RD7QR)
For non flat faced kittehs, google "sweet kitten" in images.
Although google does like their flat faced kittehs.
Posted by: shibumi at March 14, 2011 07:26 AM (OKZrE)
i saw a democrat on a sunday morning show that sounded kinda worried about getting the budget done this year because nothing would happen in 2012 because it is an election year.
i think it was a virginia democrat
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:27 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 07:27 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 07:27 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Al at March 14, 2011 07:28 AM (vbBXe)
Well as built currently yes because every project is loaded with crap that is well beyond the basic. some examples around me are.
A park and ride lot with a large brick building topped with a copper roof
A mostly empty community center with watersides and subsidized daycare.
There are plenty of private water parks around why am I paying for one?
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 14, 2011 07:28 AM (tf9Ne)
So you're saying if I make 70k/year a year and spend 250k/year, that i shouldn't try to fix my problem by praying that i land a 250k/year job, but instead cut my spending back to 70k/year or even less?
interesting..
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:28 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at March 14, 2011 07:29 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 07:31 AM (4Pleu)
You're fucking really, really stupid.
Unlike me, who lacks the capability to do anything but post the same shit over and over again. Shit I read somewhere else.
Hey, you know who has murdered a lot of religious people? Communists in Russia, Vietnam, China, Cambodia, and other places.
Yeah, I know. It's the cognitive dissonance that makes me so stupid-loony. It also explains why I enjoy putting lightly chilled fruit in my exhaust port.
Posted by: erg loughner jerking off over murdered nuns at March 14, 2011 07:31 AM (JaL+E)
Posted by: stc at March 14, 2011 07:31 AM (wQLiU)
But what about public employees' unions? If they have to contribute to their own benefits packages, their lives will be RUINED. Ruined, I tell you.
Posted by: WI Fleebaggers at March 14, 2011 07:31 AM (64S5N)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at March 14, 2011 07:32 AM (qIHlG)
If there is any group of people which -as a rule- is as incapable of accepting responsibility as teachers, I haven't found them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 14, 2011 07:32 AM (8y9MW)
So, at that exact moment, on the sidewalk outside the church, is some guy selling food, paying no business tax, having no health permit, collecting no sales tax, and probably paying no income tax.
Tell me why again I wake up in the morning.
Posted by: Chuckit at March 14, 2011 07:33 AM (80Aey)
Posted by: Sparky at March 14, 2011 07:34 AM (NjXSJ)
Our theory (can't claim it for my own) was to rebuild them exactly as they were, a foot higher, and put some intensively bright spotlights shining into the sky that reflect off a couple satellites and shine down on Mecca 24 hours a day so they would never know what time they were supposed to pray.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 14, 2011 07:34 AM (/izg2)
On a completely unrelated note. The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan is considering selling their 66% controlling share of the Toronto Maple Leafs. A franchise thought to be worth a billion dollars.
You read that right. The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns the Toronto Maples Leafs.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:38 AM (wuv1c)
You should hear the absolute howling going on in PA because Gov. Corbett has actually proposed a budget that is slightly less than last year's. These idiots are acting like all the teachers are going to be fired, the colleges will have to double their tuition, the hospitals will all close, old people will be thrown out of the streets, etc. etc.
The president of my State U. (in another state, not PA) unexpectedly annpounced his retirement a few months ago, in large part because the state funding for the U. has remained static despite his pleading for more more more every year. Nevermind that the overall U. budget has almost doubled in his 10 years, the U. just built the biggest pharmacy school building in the WORLD (mostly with donations from those eeeeevil Big Pharma companies) and the state is one of the poorest in the nation.
I am sick of these "educrats" as much as I am of the public employee unions. Our states and localities are getting hammered by the seemingly insatiable appetite of schools and colleges for more money, with negligible result from all that spending. New Jersey is spending vast gobs of money on K-12; almost half the state budget goes to education. It is a much bigger problem than state employee pensions.
Posted by: rockmom at March 14, 2011 07:38 AM (w/gVZ)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 07:39 AM (4Pleu)
24 FlaviusJulius
Must be the daylight saving thingie but I'm here with you even though it is after 2.30am Tuesday here in Sydney
A HUGE thank you for linking the YouTube series of lectures about ancient Rome the other week - I'm really enjoying them and exercising those brain cells to ward off dementia - much appreciated!
Posted by: aussie at March 14, 2011 07:39 AM (ZlbY9)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at March 14, 2011 11:29 AM (YmPwQ)
I would have gone a bit further... and built the largest Pyramid structure on the site possible... (pyramids are extrememly durable and stable)... then put in a built in SAM site.
Then advertised it as the saftest place in the world to have an office... and a NEW Wonder of the World...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 14, 2011 07:40 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: Chuckit at March 14, 2011 11:33 AM (80Aey)
Your love of the Jewish people?
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 07:40 AM (shp9b)
Posted by: Soooooothsayah at March 14, 2011 07:40 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: booger at March 14, 2011 07:41 AM (9RFH1)
Posted by: arhooley at March 14, 2011 07:41 AM (4QuwM)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 14, 2011 07:41 AM (0q2P7)
You read that right. The Ontario Teachers Pension Plan owns the Toronto Maples Leafs.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 11:38 AM (wuv1c)
But, but, its for the kids!
Posted by: NC Ref at March 14, 2011 07:42 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: Chuckit at March 14, 2011 11:33 AM (80Aey)
/drives an hour and a half to the Coast... looks around..
Nope... no drillin... they aint serious...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 14, 2011 07:42 AM (NtXW4)
I know things suck. I know what's coming down the road. What I don't know is what we can do to right the ship.
Posted by: Soooooothsayah at March 14, 2011 11:40 AM (uFokq)
There isn't anything that can be done. The will to do what needs doing does not exist in America any longer.
It is not for nothing that Monty says we are terminally boned.
We really are.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 14, 2011 07:43 AM (/2NEM)
• $601,035, or one year's pay, according to his contract.
• $236,385 to buy out the rest of his contract running though 2012, plus his tenured faculty spot.
• $60,005 in accrued vacation pay.
Oh and he worked at the University for five years.
Unreal.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 14, 2011 07:43 AM (pLTLS)
When people talk about "quality of life", they are in part referring their local environment. Roads, parks, police, civic centers, playgrounds, little league baseball, firefighters, schools...
I remember recently here in the burgh that a township fired one of its police dogs because it couldn't afford it. There was a big outcry, a ton of people showed up at the township meeting, a lot of media coverage, and the dog was reinstated.
people just have no freaking concept of what is coming.
Just wait until some of the things people take for granted are taken away. Things people don't even think about like subsidized schoo lunches, afterschool programs, debris clean up by municipalities after storms, road repairs, etc.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:44 AM (wuv1c)
Let me be clear. Many, if not all, of these fiscal difficulties will be solved when my high speed rail program kicks in.
Now, hand me my seven iron.
Posted by: Jugears Obummer at March 14, 2011 07:45 AM (mQMnK)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 07:46 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: some singing nuns climbing a mountain at March 14, 2011 07:48 AM (EDSBe)
The president of my State U. (in another state, not PA) unexpectedly annpounced his retirement a few months ago, in large part because the state funding for the U. has remained static despite his pleading for more more more every year. Nevermind that the overall U. budget has almost doubled in his 10 years, the U. just built the biggest pharmacy school building in the WORLD (mostly with donations from those eeeeevil Big Pharma companies) and the state is one of the poorest in the nation.
I think Corbett was cutting PSU's budget by like 52% or some really high number.
I guess we're no longer subsidizing tens of thousands of kids who want a piece of paper after getting drunk for four years
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:48 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 07:49 AM (AZGON)
I guess we're no longer subsidizing tens of thousands of kids who want a piece of paper after getting drunk for four years
Gov. Corbett has a novel solution for PSU. How about they *gasp* cut spending?
Corbett urges Penn State to trim spending, not raise tuition
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 14, 2011 07:51 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 11:46 AM (4Pleu)
I'd like to see my State assume a position between my wallet and the Federal Gov't.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 07:51 AM (shp9b)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 14, 2011 07:51 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 07:53 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 14, 2011 07:53 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 14, 2011 07:54 AM (SB0V2)
Corbett has been AWESOME. He had a good quote last week about PSU whining, something like "Well when they were getting more and more state moneys they were raising tuition like crazy, so obviously getting the state money doesn't mean they won't raise tuition astronomically!"
Actually, I am really disappointed he didn't address WAMs and the Legislature's pay.
I'm pretty happy with the rest of the budget though, but those were two issues that needed to be addressed.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:54 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: YRM's Bro at March 14, 2011 07:56 AM (UzBwz)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 07:56 AM (4Pleu)
Oh, they would be happy to be the first to have a crack at it.
Do doubt.
But they are a lot easier to affect.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 07:56 AM (shp9b)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 14, 2011 07:58 AM (pchXj)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 14, 2011 07:58 AM (UOM48)
/t: Is someone going to give me props for my art? C'mon! How hard do you have to fish for compliments around here?
Wait, you painted the picture in the side bar??
Good job, I didn't realize it. It does look a lot like the traditional asian sea paintings
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 07:59 AM (wuv1c)
Is someone going to give me props for my art?
At least it wasn't the art of the 'featured artist' that was shit...was yours the tryptic with the tree and Barbed Wire?
I liked that one...
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 07:59 AM (shp9b)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 14, 2011 11:49 AM (FIDMq)
I really hope Obama runs on gun control in 2012, he'll be in for a suprise when he sees how the public will react
Posted by: YRM (Ready To Battle) at March 14, 2011 08:00 AM (UzBwz)
That's not very kind and gentle of you.
Posted by: George HW Bush at March 14, 2011 08:00 AM (pchXj)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 08:00 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: rdbrewer at March 14, 2011 08:02 AM (pchXj)
really hope Obama runs on gun control in 2012, he'll be in for a suprise when he sees how the public will react
Alinsky is still the rulebook . He's using it to fire up the ultra-left base.
He will become increasingly polarizing (I know!) as we approach the 2012 Election.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 08:04 AM (shp9b)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 08:04 AM (AZGON)
Speaking of Corbett, I was kind of bored yesterday and was watching WVIA from Scranton. They were having a fund drive for "Pennsylvania Polka" because state and federal funding had been cut to the bone and the money 'was not coming back' according to their tag line. Looks like Corbett is really really on the right track. I kind of wish I would see the same things from Jersey public television, but nothing yet. 1 question though. Some lame attack ad on Bloomberg came on, typical teachers union propaganda. But the interesting thing, the lady says that NYC has a 143 billion surplus right now. WTF ? I'm pretty sure no fact checking needed to see that she's FOS but any idea where that number comes from ?
Posted by: Cu'Chulainn at March 14, 2011 08:05 AM (oW269)
Thanks Ben and Garret. Thing is, it's not a painting. Look closely. Guess again
I know it wasn't a Shrinky Dinks.
Posted by: garrett at March 14, 2011 08:06 AM (shp9b)
Rasmussen poll dumps of the day
- Obama Approval At 44% (Dems - 77%, Reps 11%, Indys 44%)
- 47% say daylight savings time pointless, 43% disagree
- 62% want healthcare law repealed
- 27% have positive view of bailouts
Posted by: YRM (Ready To Battle) at March 14, 2011 08:08 AM (UzBwz)
_________
Let me guess: bacon-wrapped hotdogs. Clearly a scofflaw.
Posted by: Anachronda at March 14, 2011 08:08 AM (NmR1a)
Things will certainly get interesting.
If spending, that is - government consumption of the produce of the country - continues, eventually it will have to be overtly monetized. That will cause a higher level of inflation, but it's hard to guess at this point how high. It would already be happening if they were spending this much in more normal times, but since we have so much slack capacity right now it's not showing up. And, of course, our taxes (real taxes - not just income tax) are so shockingly high already that this maintains a pretty strong demand for dollars.
Once that happens, the question will be whether the government wants to let the inflation go, or hold it to some arbitrary level. If they let it go, things could get really interesting for a few years until it runs its course, like in Brazil (a nation that currently has a booming economy but endured a lot of pain). If they want to hold it down, which is to say that they want to drive up the demand for dollars, the only sure routes I'm aware of are tax increases and interest rate hikes. I assume interest rates will not be raised, since they may hold back economic expansion or depress the economy further. That leaves taxes. Who to tax? And by what means? What is the best way to extract dollars out of circulation without starving the lower classes, and not crippling investment?
Not easy problems.
Posted by: Reactionary at March 14, 2011 08:08 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Michael Moore at March 14, 2011 08:12 AM (e11O8)
Posted by: Michael Moore at March 14, 2011 08:13 AM (e11O8)
This person has an advanced degree in medicine. Posted by: George Orwell at March 14, 2011 11:27 AM
And no doubt bitches about malpractice insurance while voting for socialists who are in the tort lawyers back pocket
Also the person is aghast when he hears people bitch about doctor fees and how rich doctors are ripping off "the folks"
Posted by: kbdabear at March 14, 2011 08:13 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Michael Moore at March 14, 2011 08:13 AM (e11O8)
Posted by: Chuckit at March 14, 2011 08:13 AM (80Aey)
Posted by: blaster at March 14, 2011 08:14 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: Michael Moore at March 14, 2011 08:14 AM (e11O8)
Is is possible there's a distinction here? Is it possible that the Government going belly-up is something that can happen without catastrophic impact on the rest of the country.
If the Government closed shop tomorrow, the rest of us could still grow crops, manufacture things, provide services to one another. Our poor and elderly might not get their SS or their Medicare, but we could find ways to take care of them, couldn't we?
Over time, could we not band together to replace many of the services formerly provided by the Government?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at March 14, 2011 08:15 AM (PLvLS)
There isn't anything that can be done. The will to do what needs doing does not exist in America any longer.
It is not for nothing that Monty says we are terminally boned.
We really are.And the Ray of Sunshine award for best motivational speaker goes to. . .
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 14, 2011 08:15 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Harry I'm looking for another Land Deal Reid at March 14, 2011 08:15 AM (M9Ie6)
No, it is easy. It's just unpleasant. And the conflation of those two terms/ideas is part of the problem, here.
Any 10th Grader can figure out the problem here: Government is spending too much, and every time they increase their own revenues (even just on paper) they don't choose to use those funds to pay down debt or anything, but instead to spend it on something completely new.
What's "not easy" is that the Democrats have convinced Gram and Gramps that doing any of the structural things which are necessary to fix the problem means they won't get "their" money and that they'll have to live on dog food without their Viagra. They've also convinced various other "victim groups" that any cutting in spending will be the death knell for them, and that the only people who have any concern for them are the Democrats themselves.
Turning that around is what isn't easy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 14, 2011 08:16 AM (8y9MW)
Interesting because my mom was going to class in Millersville during the TMI incident and when they canceled classes, she went home.
She lived in Middletown, which is right near TMI. She turned out alright after TMI...and so did I (well, some people will dispute that,
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 14, 2011 08:18 AM (9hSKh)
My town in Illinois has a canal that cuts through it. Four bridges cross the canal. The middle two were closed last year because they need to be worked on (general maintenance) and are currently considered unsafe (they were basically OK until the bridge in Minneapolis collapsed but now, not so much, since the standards are a little higher, I guess).
There is no work being done. There are no plans to have any work done, until, you know, "we get money from the state." Yeah, good luck with that.
So until then, it's like a foreign army bombed the bridges (they always go for the bridges first, you know). The middle of the town is cut in half.
Absolutely ridiculous. But hey, at least the people not working on the bridges have great pension plans.
Posted by: Michael at March 14, 2011 08:18 AM (FC2+c)
Posted by: that guy that always thinks we're bored at March 14, 2011 08:19 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: blaster at March 14, 2011 12:14 PM (l5dj7)
You're right. The founders of this country warned us about the absolute danger of the lack of spiritual morals. Morality and responsibility for one's actions are the backbone of freedom.
Posted by: Soona at March 14, 2011 08:19 AM (on2Qa)
The last stage of grief--acceptance.
I am finally there. The crash is going to happen. It can't be averted. Your typical voter doesn't have the brains, discipline, courage, and self-honesty to reward politicians for doing what must be done.
So they'll continue to play kick-the-can in whatever short time we have left.
I post stories like this constantly on social media. My friends and acquaintances rarely comment on them. They don't care. They just ignore what's happening and stay focused on trivialities.
I estimate that less than 10% of the populace actually get it. It may be as low as 1%.
Most of America is in for a very nasty surprise.
Oh, well. You can't make people learn and educate themselves. You can't make them acknowledge the very simple and inescapable math. And you can't make them give a shit.
We're fat, dumb, greedy and lazy.
And that means we're fucked. Congratulations, lefties. The social, cultural, and educational rot has finally eaten away the last of our exceptional-ism.
You got what you wanted. And when you experience the ugly result, you'll still blame it on the nebulous, all-purpose boogey-man, "The Rich."
Posted by: Warden at March 14, 2011 08:20 AM (fVIlG)
They saw the tsunami of cap-gains tax revenue from the dot-com boom begin to roll ashore in the mid '90s, and as they all conclude we're permanently flooded in money it suddenly recedes back into the ocean in 2000* leaving the state desolate.
They saw the tidal currents of the real-estate boom begin to rise a few years later, once again built up the pillars of state spending to ride atop the new sea of lucre just as the waves break and roll back into the sea, leaving us all propped up atop giant pillars of government spending.
And now they're desperately hoping for the next wave before those pillars rot and dump them all into the mud that remains.
Posted by: JEM at March 14, 2011 08:21 AM (o+SC1)
I have NEVER seen any city cut the socialist spending during any of these budget cuts. Normally all they ever do is raise taxes during hard times and then increase spending on more socialism if the economy ever does recover.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2011 08:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: JEM at March 14, 2011 08:24 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: Fritz at March 14, 2011 08:26 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 14, 2011 08:38 AM (gSGAu)
The problem is the assholes, no one will want to support them, either individually or collectively. Government handouts are asshole enabling. When support has to come out of the pockets of family or charity, it will be off to the ice flow with them.
The world will be a healthier place though.
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 08:41 AM (GTbGH)
Over time, could we not band together to replace many of the services formerly provided by the Government?
The problem is the assholes, no one will want to support them, either individually or collectively. Government handouts are asshole enabling. When support has to come out of the pockets of family or charity, it will be off to the ice flow with them.
The world will be a healthier place though.
Yeah, it's like that situation a year ago about the fire department letting a guys house burn down because he didn't pay his bill.
Everyone was outraged, but I kinda sided with the fire department.
As I have said before, I want to live in an America with consequences.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 08:42 AM (wuv1c)
Effectively the two are so inextricably linked that one failing will cause the other to fail.
If private enterprise fails, there's no money (and even printing more won't really help) to keep the Government going. If Government fails, you can be sure it will have taxed every dollar it possibly can, first, so private enterprise will go down with it.
Now, in a sane world, we would never have allowed that intertwining to happen. However, if there has ever been a sane world, it must have been during the antediluvian age, and my Bible suggests that wasn't such a sane world, either.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 14, 2011 08:44 AM (8y9MW)
That's how I feel about CA (where I live). Just let it tank and get it over with!
Posted by: sock puppeh at March 14, 2011 08:46 AM (VcPAo)
Posted by: Andy at March 14, 2011 08:48 AM (5Rurq)
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 08:48 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 12:48 PM (GTbGH)
Nothing.
Posted by: just another reason why we're boned at March 14, 2011 08:53 AM (VcPAo)
My kid asks, "Dad, what are those people doing with those signs?"
Me: "Protesting."
Kid: "What's that?"
Me: "They want more money."
Kid: "If they want more money, then they should work more."
4 years old! 4 years old and he gets it!
So, I told him that they thought they deserved to live better than me, and that I should be taxed more to pay for their pay increases.
He said, "That's not fair."
I laughed and told him that they were nothing but useless bums and bozos. Then we drove past the protesters and gave 'em a big 'ol thumbs down.
Afterward we cracked up all the way home about the "bozos having their big stupid bozo party on Bozo Street."
4 year olds are fun.
Posted by: Warden at March 14, 2011 08:54 AM (fVIlG)
Sure they can.
Posted by: Weimar Republic Department of Treasury at March 14, 2011 08:54 AM (5Rurq)
The federal budget is a shambles, ...
I can deal with that because I know there'll be a kitty picture soon.
Posted by: FireHorse at March 14, 2011 08:57 AM (k3RPu)
... but that's only half the story: ...
Oh, this is bad, but the kitty picture will get me through. ...
Posted by: FireHorse at March 14, 2011 08:58 AM (k3RPu)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 08:59 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 08:59 AM (GTbGH)
Yup, state budgets are in big trouble, and the government employees/public sector unions will make sure there's hell to pay if they even think about touching their salaries, benefits or pensions for the sake of long term solvency.
Yeah, we think WI was bad. Wait until congress starts benefits cuts on fed workers (if it happens). Or if congress prohibits fed public unions. Even better; what happens when taxpayer support for GM retirement bennies runs out. Any one or all of these scenarios will provoke the burning to start. BUT, they will happen one way or the other.
Posted by: Soona at March 14, 2011 09:00 AM (on2Qa)
Posted by: nerdygirl's kitteh hating beagle at March 14, 2011 09:01 AM (e11O8)
I'm drawing a distinction between increasing the money supply legally, through borrowing, versus coinage. Can the Mint print unlimited amounts of cash at Barry's orders?
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 09:01 AM (GTbGH)
If we default, the world economy goes straight into the shitter -- for decades, probably. China won't save us; the EU won't save us.
If we default who suffers more? America or the world?
Sure we won't be able to borrow at low rates, but many nations will have most of their savings completely disappear. China hold some 2 Trillion in our debt right? What happens if it is worth 0?
I'm not saying this is optimal, but I have a feeling that the world might get it worse in the default.
Posted by: Ben at March 14, 2011 09:10 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 09:11 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Monty at March 14, 2011 09:16 AM (4Pleu)
The AP is up to its old shenanigans.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 14, 2011 12:11 PM
They really lightened his skin in that pic, didn't they ...
Posted by: kbdabear at March 14, 2011 09:22 AM (vdfwz)
the disaster that is Illinois
Disaster is too nice a word for the complete catastrophic financial pit that Illinois is in. But have no fears, the genius Gov. Quinn has a solution - tax everything in sight
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2011 09:25 AM (1Jaio)
International trade has been around a lot longer than the dollar and I'm not sure why you think the world needs a "reserve" currency. There are active markets in all kinds of currency crosses like Aus$/Yen, Euro/Zloty, etc. Not every transaction on the planet gets routed through a dollar exchange. This idea that merchants worldwide, including the US, will curl up in a fetal position due to a devalued dollar is a bit histrionic.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at March 14, 2011 09:55 AM (+lsX1)
So the answer is No, nothing stops the creation of US Dollars but policy? Not the debt limit or any other law. It's just that the Congress has declared that Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender. Just as tomorrow they could declare eggs as legal tender, yes?
As an aside, are the mints, where the actual printing takes place, owned by the Federal Reserve? Or the treasury?
Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of Wisconsin at March 14, 2011 10:29 AM (GTbGH)
Me, I'm leaning toward giggling uncontrollably over some unbidden recollection from my high school years, like the time I tripped and went ass-over-teakettle at marching band practice.
(I left off "get stupid drunk" because that's a beforehand-type activity.)
Posted by: Joanna at March 14, 2011 10:29 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: fastfreefall at March 14, 2011 01:49 PM (9wOfB)
The crazed increase in spending since the Dems passed their first budget for FY2007, and their reaction to any criticism, has all of the hallmarks of a fill-in-the-blank addiction. What do addicts do when confronted with their addiction?
1. Blame someone else.
2. Make excuses.
3. Deny there is a problem.
4. Attack the messenger.
BHO and the Dems are pathological in their addiction to spending. The disease (mental disorder) is Liberalism/Progressivism/Collectivism.
Posted by: Cooter at March 14, 2011 03:32 PM (wA3/3)
Posted by: fashionmonkey at March 14, 2011 06:22 PM (ygKy4)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1977 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Andy at March 14, 2011 07:21 AM (5Rurq)