October 01, 2011
— Open Blogger Alabama just won a court battle allowing most of their new immigration law to take effect.Here's a video and a story. I'd like to get all schadenfreudey on the illegals profiled in the video but it's sad. I have a heart. But I still want them out of the country. Sometimes you gotta do stuff that makes you sad.On the other hand... if you are heartless this vid is a ball.Here's a link to the video from ABC. (there's an ad in front). It's 99% one-sided on the feelings but it does get the facts out and lets you know what's going on. So it's a worthwhile watch.
"A crackdown so severe it's been described as the Arizona law on steroids...""We talked with one parent who pulled her nephew out of school today anyway. She's undocumented and didn't want to be identified. Tomorrow they're moving to California."
Son of a ...! I guess I'm hoist on by my own petard. Hey aliens, stop at Stuckey's and get me some pecan pie on the way.
"Hispanic students vanish from Alabama schools"
In Montgomery County, more than 200 Hispanic students were absent the morning after the judge's Wednesday ruling. A handful withdrew.In tiny Albertville, 35 students withdrew in one day. And about 20 students in Shelby County, in suburban Birmingham, either withdrew or told teachers they were leaving.
The question is always asked, "How are you going to remove 12 million undocumented?" Here's an answer - cut off the reasons they come here (jobs (via that online id check) schools)and they'll remove themselves.
Also, I tweet @ComradeArthur
Posted by: Open Blogger at
01:01 AM
| Comments (217)
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Texan Economist at October 01, 2011 01:07 AM (TC/9F)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at October 01, 2011 01:10 AM (aRq7t)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 01, 2011 01:16 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 01, 2011 01:20 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Nickie Goomba at October 01, 2011 01:36 AM (jeLTI)
It is all very sad but obviously there is only so much we can do. We have taken on millions of people and they now have a better life here. We also do what we can to help the needy in their home countries. In the end the law must prevail however. It does no good to sink the only country that is propping up civilization.
Posted by: Ken Royall at October 01, 2011 01:52 AM (9zzk+)
Posted by: Intercontinental Railroad Passenger at October 01, 2011 01:57 AM (0ba8c)
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 01, 2011 02:03 AM (OGZqf)
Yeah and they plan on suing us next
You see what a difference NOT being in the 9th circuit makes.Yeah and they plan on suing us next
What really pisses me off is that we pay for them suing the States. It used to be unheard of for the federal government to sue the States in a civil action. What we need is a new law (as soon as we get the Senate) that prohibits the DOJ or anyone in the executive department from initiating ANY civil action against the States unless it involves a contract dispute.
In the meantime the House should defund the DOJ until all the Obamanite crooks beginning at the top are fired.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 02:03 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 02:08 AM (M9Ie6)
That was unexpected.
Posted by: The Spanish Inquisition at October 01, 2011 02:09 AM (mue7s)
Posted by: Berserker at October 01, 2011 02:09 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 02:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Nail-on-the-Head stuff. If I knew it was that easy, I'd'a done it myself!
Posted by: Roger at October 01, 2011 02:21 AM (tAwhy)
On the plus side, we now have three really good Mexican restaurants in town.
Posted by: toby928© at October 01, 2011 02:49 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: toby928© at October 01, 2011 02:51 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Jean at October 01, 2011 03:01 AM (6ziMD)
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 03:06 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Undocumented Commenter at October 01, 2011 03:24 AM (rXZJ0)
Posted by: Rule 5 at October 01, 2011 03:28 AM (cA6/i)
So it's good for the economy if locals have high unemployment and the immigrant workers that you hire to take their jobs send the majority of their money out of country?
Seems counter inuitive.
Posted by: kdny not a yankee at October 01, 2011 03:31 AM (KxHDw)
FIFY
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 03:33 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: San Antonio Rose at October 01, 2011 03:36 AM (7kVuw)
so there was an item in our local paper, a little ask-the-person-on-the-street deal, asking college students who they would like to see come speak at next year's convocation. They asked 5 students.
2 said "Obama".
1 said "Joe Paterno".
1 said someone I had never heard of.
1 said "Einstein".
Idiots.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 03:38 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: dagny at October 01, 2011 03:40 AM (MZjkn)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 07:38 AM (s7mIC)
Give 'em a break. Not a single one knew what "convocation" meant.
Posted by: dagny at October 01, 2011 03:41 AM (MZjkn)
Posted by: dagny at October 01, 2011 03:43 AM (MZjkn)
Posted by: Eric Cartman at October 01, 2011 03:45 AM (QBQcg)
Primary wars are on. Don't expect to see resolution today
I have never liked the way the RNC has set primary dates but what FL has done here is BS.
SC RNC discusses moving dates AND the problems it causes.
This story is plastered all over the papers and political sites. FL did the same shit in 2008 and will likely continue doing this same shit. Perhaps it does illustrate the fact that the RNC really does need to reform the process in a meaningful way instead of the last change they made which is BS. Hell, they made the first 3 primaries “proportional” while keeping the latter ones winner take all. So what is the punishment to one of those early States for moving its primary? Oh you lose half your delegates. Gee, they are already going to be split between 7 candidates so the totals are meaningless anyway. Some punishment eh.
What the RNC needs to do is reward Republican States by having them go first in the primaries. IOW let the States with the most Republican base (based on % R win) have more say in determining who the candidate will be. Also, instead of having a few early States then massive “Super-Tuesday” BS, have it split up more and do 2 or 3 States at a time.
And put some punishment in the rules for States that violate the rules. Remove ALL their delegates and forbid candidates from campaigning in the State.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 03:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Bad-ass skeeters hitting Vermont?
Not really, just the same ones we put up with every summer. What is funny for me on a personal note having grown up with these little bastards is that they didnÂ’t use to bother me. I could go fishing down in the creeks and swamps and have clouds of them around me with no impact. But after I returned to the South after years of travel I lost my immunity. They aggravate the shit out of me now and I donÂ’t sit out in the evenings anymore with Deepwoods Off.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 03:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Yes, that’s $4.7B with a “B”. But we could only cut the rate of increase for spending this year by a few million, and then they couldn’t even live with that and threatened to shut down the government unless they got their green spending BS.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 03:59 AM (M9Ie6)
NRO discusses the $5 debit card fee and why it is being charged
I did not know this, thank you assholes in the press who hide the actions of the communists in congress. I thought this fee was on top of what they were charging merchants and it was designed to offset fees they were losing in other areas from the Piss Dodd – Bwarney Fwank bill. It is not.
Dickhead Durbin had put in an amendment that stopped them from charging merchants the fee (which was a percentage of the purchase). So now the banks will charge the consumer. ItÂ’s the law of consequences. I will no longer call it unintended consequences. The stupid SOBs like Durbin know full well what they are doing.
Once again thank Scott Brown, Susan Collins, and Olympia Snowe for breaking that filibuster and allowing this POS to hit the floor. Of course all of you lying RINO assholes then voted against it so you could make out like you were with the Party. Fuck you all. This is why RINOs do far more damage than just the occasional crossing over and why ACU ratings donÂ’t say it all. Those 3 RINOs will get credit for voting against this POS when they actually enabled the bill and voted for it.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Eco-tards lose in mining permit battle in AK.
WouldnÂ’t it be nice if they had to pay the court costs?
H/T BMWES
And now we can get back to trashing Alabama
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Having illegal aliens in the country never bothered me as much as it seems to bother those that it bothers more. Although it wouldn't bother me if they were arrested and kicked out either. Its fairly rude to hoist a mexican flag in the US, and refuse to assimilate into the culture though.
Posted by: Jimmah at October 01, 2011 04:02 AM (g9KCn)
1Ze papers please!
-----
Stupid mofo's that say things sarcasticly like "Show me your papers!" never seem to have a problem with giving the government the right to force you to show the IRS all your papers once a year, signed under penalty of perjury. But god forbid someone ask a mexican who doesn't speak the language to merely show an ID.
Posted by: Jimmah at October 01, 2011 04:07 AM (g9KCn)
One of my co-workers does a lot of business in Chicago, and the plan, according to a "well to do" Mexican (who may not be legal even after all these years) living in Chicago he knows, is for well-to-do Mexican immigrants to bring in more family, friends and acquaintances to work here for 5-10 years and have money to send home, then go home after their families have been able to buy land, and lead a good life in Mexico. This guy has allegedly already bought four farms in Mexico, per my co-worker.
The illegals hurt the economy in two ways:
1) they depress the value of the labor market,as they work for less and frequently are paid in cash, so they don't pay into Social Security, because they don't have SS number (or phony ones at that). They hurt native Americans at the bottom of the labor market.
2) they take money out of the economy and send it back to Mexico to buy land. Probably better than the drug trade, which takes a lot of money out of the economy in the US and sends it back to Mexico to fund more crime, but still a negative.
Plus, their continued long term presence undermines the Rule of Law, because is lessens the respect for law which is the glue which ties the country together. Poor illegals - lets look the other way while they break the law, because we don't want to seem heartless. Sweet. What kind of country will our kids inherit? Doesn't matter what happens to our kids, because we can't be mean or heartless to illegals from Mexico.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes.... at October 01, 2011 04:09 AM (sJTmU)
All RINOs should be rounded up and sent back to Afreaka! They took er jerbs!
Posted by: Skinny Leonard at October 01, 2011 08:05 AM (bZ8J6)
LOL, I know that comment was meant as snarc, but if you think about it, it really isn't.
This POS bill is almost as big a job killer as Obamacare.
So call me the Breeze as I breeze through all this crap.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: UGAdawg at October 01, 2011 04:10 AM (H6JHE)
What is truly ironic about that is the courts have long ruled that police can stop people and ask for ID and name and that the people MUST answer.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:12 AM (M9Ie6)
Aha, a new paradigm, throw the entire agency under the bus.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:13 AM (M9Ie6)
plus, I did also post the link to Hank Aaron, famous Alabaman
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 04:14 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: jeanne! with two N's and an E at October 01, 2011 04:16 AM (1Ucn0)
==================================
From the article:
Presidential candidates campaign in the Palmetto State for one reason: For 31 years, South Carolina Republican primary voters have had a perfect record for picking their partyÂ’s presidential nominees. The message is: If you win South Carolina, you win the nomination.
==================================
I suspect, that the reason for having primaries on different dates in different states came about to allow candidates to go from state to state to campaign.. A holdover from the time of slow communications... Before Computers.. Before TV.. Maybe, even before Radio.
It really sticks in my craw, any one state has this much influence on the nomination process.
Posted by: franksalterego at October 01, 2011 04:17 AM (7/sDI)
Posted by: macintx at October 01, 2011 04:20 AM (ucs8Y)
Actually in most States they are not because federal law prohibits welfare to illegals. Where they get around it is that law does not apply to children. And after all those welfare reforms during the Gingrich congress that "eliminated welfare as we know it", the liberals simply moved it all into children services.
So we have welfare out the kazoo, while saying we don't, we prohibit welfare to illegals, while giving it to their "children".
Everything they do in Washington is a huge lie.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Survey sez at October 01, 2011 04:22 AM (wrGst)
Guess what, Mexico is the same way.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:23 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: macintx at October 01, 2011 04:25 AM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: macintx at October 01, 2011 08:25 AM (ucs8Y)
I've been there though!
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:26 AM (M9Ie6)
"Everything they do in Washington is a huge lie."
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 08:20 AM (M9Ie6)
And we are here uncovering the lies...Doing the job that tens of thousands of journalists won't do...
Posted by: Survey sez at October 01, 2011 04:27 AM (wrGst)
Read the story earlier. If the MSM was really about getting to the bottom of this story, they would ask some questions of wailing liberals that would highlight the contradictions of the liberal positions.
1) Why are we concerned about jobs for illegals when lots of Americans are out of work?
2) You want more money for education, so why is it a problem when money spent on children that shouldn't be here is freed up for actual American children? Also, doesn't this reduce the teacher to student ratio that you are always yammering about?
3) You clammer for a living wage with benefits, yet are silent when illegals are paid below minimum wage without any benefits. Why isn't it a good thing that these jobs are now being opened up for people that have to be paid a living wage with benefits?
4) Wouldn't it hurt all these illegals to make them American citizens or legal aliens because then they would be entitled to minimum wage and benefits and the corporations would turn around and lay them all off so they could hire new illegal aliens that could be paid substandard wages without benefits?
5) Would you be willing to lose your job so that an illegal alien could do it for less without any benefits? (NYT and many other liberal publications might actually become readable and intelligent with this one)
Right there, you raise liberal incoherence on three of their major issues: Jobs, living wage, and money for public education
Posted by: GrimJack at October 01, 2011 04:29 AM (3Qu2k)
Yeah but the MFM assholes never let the public know about all the lies. If you look at all the major papers and TV news shows on the $5 debit card fee BOA is getting all the blame. No mention that the other banks are doing it too.
And absolutely no mention that Durbin, Dodd, and Frank caused it.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:30 AM (M9Ie6)
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CPB) agency suggests erecting fences along parts of the Canadian-U.S. border might be one way to keep terrorists and criminals out in future.
http://tinyurl.com/3qsu79w
Posted by: Carolyn at October 01, 2011 04:30 AM (CQId4)
Yeah, if it costs $1.4T to build a fence on the southern border which is 2,000 miles long just think how much it would cost to build one on the border with Canada that is over 5,000 miles long.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:33 AM (M9Ie6)
Fixed it for ya, Vic.
When I lived in California I was enraged after every visit to the Department of Motor Vehicles. I had to show a Social Security number to renew my license, while others (mainly those who had surnames such as Lopez, Gomez, etc.) clearly did not.
Don't know why it bothered me. After all, I could take the written driver's test in my choice of 18 languages....
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 01, 2011 04:36 AM (YjjrR)
Posted by: macintx at October 01, 2011 04:37 AM (ucs8Y)
re:snowmobiles being used to transport contraband
It's just ironic that it's being floated/mentioned for the northern border, by the current administration.
Posted by: Carolyn at October 01, 2011 04:40 AM (CQId4)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 01, 2011 04:41 AM (niZvt)
they're actually kinda serious!
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 04:41 AM (s7mIC)
not really
it's the strategy of, "well we can't fence the southern border, because if we did that we'd have to fence the northern border too, to be fair, and that's like really hard, so we won't do anything"
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 04:43 AM (s7mIC)
...........
First, multiply each of those kids by roughly $10k.. the amount state and local governments pay to educate them. Then add in all the Medicaid services.. unpaid visits to the ER's around the state, and all the other social services used up by these folks.
People will end up paying more for their lawn service and maybe more for restaurant food, and maybe a lot of other services/products.. but I would take that trade-off any day!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 01, 2011 04:43 AM (UTq/I)
Fences are worthless in unmonitored areas. A fence serves two purposes with regard to security:
1. It keeps honest people out (or in)
2. It acts as a force multiplier for all the rest.
IOW you will need fewer security personnel to enforce a boundary with a fence than without a fence. However, you STILL will need security personnel.
A fence does make sense in some areas that have high populations on both sides of the border where it would take a LOT of security people, but in the remote areas they cost more than they are worth.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 01, 2011 04:47 AM (UlUS4)
Yeah, but F&F is always liberal, and the weekend version even more so.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:48 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: GrimJack at October 01, 2011 04:49 AM (3Qu2k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 01, 2011 04:49 AM (UlUS4)
Pretty good... or looking up, anyway. Hubby had his first doctor appt (for his depression) yesterday and I think it went decently. He's pretty introverted, so doing this sort of thing is a huge step for him.
Also... and amazingly to me... we are refinancing our mortgage only three months after the first one. It's zero cost but we're still dropping almost half a percentage point and... miraculously... the house appreciated so we'll lose the PMI.
Make sure to check into yours after you pass the 120 day mark and see if it would make sense for you to refinance.
How's the semester going?
Posted by: Y-not at October 01, 2011 04:49 AM (5H6zj)
Whenever I hear about a partial fence all I can think of is the Maginot Line.
How are you feeling, Vic?
Posted by: Y-not at October 01, 2011 04:51 AM (5H6zj)
If I understand his plan correctly it is not a VAT. It is a one point sales tax.
But,. I am not for that either. If we are going to screw with the tax system I say repeal all taxes and then institute a flat tax on all income regardless of amount or source.
AND absolutely no deductions or exemptions.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: SurferDoc at October 01, 2011 04:52 AM (STdkO)
Oh I am feeling great. Will not actually start chemo until week after next.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:53 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 01, 2011 04:53 AM (niZvt)
5) Would you be willing to lose your job so that an illegal alien
could do it for less without any benefits?
Si, we can do that.
Posted by: trabajo! at October 01, 2011 04:54 AM (O8eoG)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 01, 2011 04:55 AM (/Sgtl)
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 04:56 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 08:41 AM
Blimps for all!
Shows you how far out of touch the Paulbots are. No mention of high-speed rail!!11!!!
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 01, 2011 04:56 AM (YjjrR)
Good morning, all.
More propaganda in the link in my name for Vic and anyone else looking for a new bank.
2010, USAA Bank returned the majority of the money it collected from merchants to its members in the form of benefits, such as free checking, ATM fee refunds and debit rewards.
Because the new law will reduce these interchange fees, USAA Bank had to re-evaluate the value of offering debit card rewards and other checking account benefits. ...
"USAA's survey found that members favored free checking and ATM fee refunds over debit card rewards. Based on this feedback, we decided to stop the debit card rewards to maintain the other benefits," Bohne says.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 04:58 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: fozzy at October 01, 2011 04:59 AM (FEzSe)
Posted by: Y-not at October 01, 2011 08:49 AM (5H6zj)
That is great news about your husband. Yeah I'm an introverted guy myself (can't you tell?
) so yeah it is a huge deal that he is going to get help.
Semester is going okay, it is a lot more work than I had planned on. I might have structured my courses differently if I had actually thought ahead a little bit. But I am slowly getting caught up on everything. Next week they have an exam, which is good for me (one less lecture to prepare for).
That is a great idea about refinancing. I don't think my house will have appreciated any by that point but I might have enough saved up & paid down to eliminate the PMI by that point. I am close. Plus rates are lower now, amazingly. I got 3.875% on 15 yr fixed and I thought that was a sweet deal. But then again that was before the downgrade.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:02 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: fozzy at October 01, 2011 08:59 AM (FEzSe)
because they have never studied history - French Revolution, etc.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:03 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at October 01, 2011 05:06 AM (6IV8T)
Hmm. I'm looking into re-financing the house that we are renting out, but I guess I should see about this one, too, since it's been 2 years since we bought it.
I looked at the rates for a 15 yr with gobs of points and it was under 3%.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:07 AM (XdlcF)
1.) At no point during the goddamned half hour I listened was the word "illegal" used. They talked about "immigrants" and "hispanics" and "the immigrant community" but a listen from goddamned Mars might think this law was somehow intended to expel foreign-born Americans who have worked hard to become citizens, instead of a bunch of goddamned criminals who are here in violation of Federal law.
2.) I noticed a new dog whistle code word. The goddamned local reporter mentioned that a lot of the support came from the northern part of Alabama, where there are "cultural issues." Apparently that's the new goddamned code phrase for "they're all racists, but I can't actually say that because it's not actually true, but this way my goddamned liberal listeners can nod their heads knowingly and picture a pack of Klansmen attacking poor Mexican kids."
The sheer goddamned dishonesty of this alledged news report galls my goddamned soul. It shows a startling combination of ignorance, arrogance, and contempt.
We need to shut down "public" broadcasting and bury all the equipment and documents at a crossroads with a stake pounded through them.
Posted by: Trimegistus at October 01, 2011 05:10 AM (aSVj6)
Posted by: No Whining at October 01, 2011 05:10 AM (O8Q2G)
USAA member for 51 years and counting! One claim in '67
Awesome.
BTW, folks--and no, I'm not getting paid for this--anyone can get a bank account with them. For insurance, you need to either have been military or have had parents who had were USAA members.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:12 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: ela at October 01, 2011 05:12 AM (pt0J0)
But in practice they are almost the same thing, right?
If I buy wood at Home Depot and then turn it into a wooden bird house, then I pay sales tax when I buy the wood and I also charge sales tax when I sell the bird house.
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:14 AM (s7mIC)
whoaaaa
Yeh. Lots of points, though. And I guess I don't have to say what bank it was!
I have no idea what to do about the rental house. I don't want to start over on a 30 yr, but to get a 15 yr we have to pay more, when we are getting less rent because the market was so bad. It's still probably a good idea.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:15 AM (XdlcF)
A plain sales tax is a one time charge at the point of sale to the consumer. A VAT is a charge at every stage of the manufacturing process that adds value.
As for the "fair tax", it is a POS.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 05:16 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Illegal Bird Alien, what wants to buy the bird house, due to low interest rates at October 01, 2011 05:17 AM (XdlcF)
Ya gotta' get a thermacell . Keep plenty of gas cartridges and repellent pads to refill the unit when needed .
They even make a holster to use when moving around .
Posted by: awkward davies at October 01, 2011 05:17 AM (YCW1b)
Posted by: Quin at October 01, 2011 05:17 AM (3aJ/q)
When Arizona's economy crashed rock bottom, Drudge headlined stories of the illegals leaving AZ for greener northern pastures.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 01, 2011 05:19 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:21 AM (s7mIC)
The repellent is allethrin, a copy of a repellent that naturally occurs in chrysanthemum flowers. It repels up to 98 percent of mosquitoes, black flies, and no-see-ums, and will not harm humans or pets.
Does that mean that if I plant chrysanthemums around my porch and patio it will repel mosquitoes for free?
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 05:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Oh so businesses don't pay sales tax when they buy their materials?
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:22 AM (s7mIC)
One day, Perry and the rest of this generation will be looked on by conservatives as having done a pitiful job. Invasion immigration as a political ploy should be met with strong resistance, but because the invaders are sort of quiet and unassuming, we let it continue. American chump.
Posted by: pc at October 01, 2011 05:24 AM (I6KKl)
LOL. I'm feeling like I should stop mentioning USAA because I've said it 17 times in this thread alone, but the chemjeff...assures me that I haven't overdone it...or something...
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:24 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: No Whining at October 01, 2011 05:25 AM (LZEGu)
No they don't. The usually have a number that they supply for exemption from sales tax.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 05:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 09:24 AM (XdlcF)
Did you say USAA?
I'm not sure I caught that correctly.
Why don't you mention it one more time so that I can get it down right.
That's a "U", and a "S", and then TWO "A"s?
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:27 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 09:25 AM (M9Ie6)
huh, okay did not know that - I just thought everybody paid sales tax
thanx for puttin' me some knowledge
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:29 AM (s7mIC)
Maybe if you ran over them with a lawnmower before settin' on the porch . Thermacell's really do work and I say that as a long time outdoorsman who was very sceptical about them when I first heard about the product .
Posted by: awkward davies at October 01, 2011 05:30 AM (YCW1b)
Oh so businesses don't pay sales tax when they buy their materials?
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 09:22 AM (s7mIC)
Actually no, they don't. It's called a manufacturer's exemption and it's present in most state tax codes. And that's as it should be. You want to encourage manufacturing in your state and taxing product at each stage of production would be confiscatory and unnecessarily inflationary, which means a national VAT will probably become law. DC needs a good marching on.
Posted by: pc at October 01, 2011 05:30 AM (I6KKl)
No, chemjeff, I'm pretty sure there's a F and a U in there somewhere!
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:33 AM (XdlcF)
Heh. Since it is the time of the year for them anyway, get a few plants from the garden center and sit them around your rocker to test the theory.
I used to be impervious to skeeters when I was a kid but that changed years ago and I have gotten used to taking defensive measures. Skin-So-Soft works reasonably well for me but last week sitting out at my sister's house the little bastards actually bit my ears, that being the only exposed skin that I hadn't slathered up with S-S-S.
Posted by: Retread at October 01, 2011 05:34 AM (CVCBx)
Posted by: scottythrust at October 01, 2011 05:35 AM (VTeUD)
one-way gate fence
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:36 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 01, 2011 05:36 AM (vXr7p)
Cain was for the un-"fair" tax before proposing 9-9-9 rate(s).
Who's done the homework to figure similarities/differences and how the 9-9-9 would be added upon later by Congress, despite the proposal "promises" to prevent add-on tax baggage? And what to make of Cain's evolution from "fair tax" to 9-9-9? He saw the light, and came up with a functional and realistic solution?
Given Bachmann's expertise in the current tax law, the voter would have thought she'd have come up with the "best" new tax rate proposal/platform from her staged campaign.
Any one can say they'll lower taxes in order to improve the economy. Promising to "lower taxes" is meaningless without specifics and without Congressional backing. It isn't as if any candidate alone should be making promises if voters are supposed to "trust" fruition. There should be a Republican Party Leadership platform that all elected officials agree to uphold, a specifically outlined bill that they'll pass given voter '12 turn-out. I'm surprised Newt hasn't already arranged it with the necessary Congressional coalition of voters in his promised "new" contract with America. "Mandate" from the people wasn't the dirty word "mandate" from government or authoritarian is.
Posted by: didn't take long at October 01, 2011 05:38 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: macintx at October 01, 2011 05:41 AM (ucs8Y)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 01, 2011 09:36 AM (vXr7p)
wow that sucks
but look on the bright side, at least you're not this guy
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:41 AM (s7mIC)
Thanks for making me laugh this morning.
Gotta run around like crazy to give the 11 yr old a good b-day, despite this that and the other thing, so I'm glad I'm smiling.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:41 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 05:41 AM (OhYCU)
All before my first cup of coffee.
Ah, that's where the problem started. Well, that and not having the right bank.
Hang in there!
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 01, 2011 05:44 AM (XdlcF)
(well, sort of - if enriching lawyers is considered 'heartwarming')
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:49 AM (s7mIC)
fify surfer dude
Posted by: Ron F#ckin' Paul at October 01, 2011 05:50 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 05:54 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 05:58 AM (OhYCU)
no kidding
we don't need moats with alligators, we need purple SEIU thugs
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 05:59 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 05:59 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:01 AM (ieDPL)
I have a question... how did the government raise revenue before the income tax?
I have a Cyclopedia of Knowledge from 1898 that has the answer -- tariffs and sin taxes.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 01, 2011 06:01 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:01 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:02 AM (ieDPL)
the morons must have had some tardisil slipped into their val-u-rite last night, or something
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 06:02 AM (s7mIC)
I have done very extensive analysis of the "fair tax" and it truly is crap. On the Cain 9-9-9 plan I don't think he has published any details. And as the CBO says you can't analyze a proposal.
In any case, even if he did details you still would not know what it would do until the assholes in congress wrote the law. That means every special interest group in the country getting hold of congressional ears.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:02 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:03 AM (ieDPL)
If you mean the federal government it was initially financed through tariffs and excise taxes. (see whiskey rebellion)
States did it via property tax and excise taxes. States also raised money via lotteries.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:05 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: lowandslow at October 01, 2011 06:05 AM (GZitp)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:07 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Asscheeks of saturn at October 01, 2011 06:08 AM (le5qc)
Import Duties. Customs house.
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 10:02 AM (ieDPL)
My Cyclopedia of Knowledge from 1898 has great illustrations of the sin taxes -- hoppers of tobacco and barrels of liquor pouring out gold coins, along with dollar amounts. It even has a section on phrenology.Posted by: Ed Anger at October 01, 2011 06:08 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:08 AM (OhYCU)
You can put me in the heartless camp.
I'm fucking sick and tired of the attitude of entitlement I see from these people. This high school kid wants to know "what is really a citizen?" Here's an idea--why don't you go look up how the naturalization process works, you fuck?
And what's with you thinking you don't have to follow the rules that everyone else does? What, are you special?
No, you are not special. Get the fuck out of my country and take your goddamned Mexican flag with you. Fly it in Mexico if you're so fucking proud of your roots.
Posted by: Warden at October 01, 2011 06:09 AM (qN8cZ)
I know that it would have to be accompanied by a repeal of the income tax amemdment, I get that. Is there another reason you don't like it?
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 06:10 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:10 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 10:10 AM
Petards are the carriers.
Posted by: huerfano at October 01, 2011 06:14 AM (263hv)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:15 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:16 AM (ieDPL)
If it has I haven't seen it and I don't see how it could be "scored" until they write the actual proposed law.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:16 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:19 AM (ieDPL)
It is a HUGE tax increase for most people and it maintains the same defects with regard to "special exemptions" that the old system has.
In additon, for me personally (and all other retirees) it would be a screwing of "epic" proportions. It would literally drive me into bankruptcy on nothing but taxes.
It also depends heavily on a lot of assumptions that are nothing more than wishful thinking regarding "birds in the bush". Things like manufactured prices are going to come down by 25 to 30% because of elimination of corporate taxes and all employees will immediately get a "raise" of 8 to 9% when the withholding taxes are removed on companies.
They also lie about the tax rate. It is actually about 31%. Imagine going to buy a new $400K house and paying a 31% sales tax on it.
There were a whole lot of other things that I don't remember all of the specifics to it, but when I worked out test cases using the current taxes and standard deductions for a family of 4 they did not break even on the system until incomes exceeded 500K.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:29 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 01, 2011 06:31 AM (hiMsy)
More Valu-Rite!
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:31 AM (OhYCU)
No, each "poor" person using the gov number for poverty based on number of people in household would receive a monthly check adding into the thousands per year (don't remember the exact number)
That is one of the bad parts of the current system that it retains.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:32 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:33 AM (OhYCU)
I've got a time share condo I have been trying to sell, you interested?
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:33 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:34 AM (OhYCU)
vic, give me the keys, I'll try it out. Charlie Sheen is looking for a place to party.
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at October 01, 2011 06:35 AM (OhYCU)
That is not what I recall from the actual House bill that was written. My recollection was that it was means tested.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 06:36 AM (M9Ie6)
Is it next to that bridge in New York, or that prime real estate in Florida?
Posted by: chemjeff at October 01, 2011 06:40 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 06:44 AM (ieDPL)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at October 01, 2011 06:55 AM (ijjAe)
I predict higher wages and costs for construction jobs as a labor shortage lowers the unemployment rate in the state. I also predict fewer drugs, drunk driving deaths and that crime rates related to illegals will fall dramatically thereby lowering law enforcement costs in our court and jail systems. It will also be nicer to have less waiting time in ER's as well as having more classroom space available.
At least they are leaving here in droves now.
The benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
Posted by: Gmac at October 01, 2011 06:56 AM (O7VIw)
Unfortunately when I went to Thomas to get a fresh copy of the bill it is off-line for hardware maintenance.
In any case I have to go. May be back later.
Posted by: Vic at October 01, 2011 07:04 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: DaMav at October 01, 2011 07:08 AM (QNU76)
I fully expect a massive influx of undocumented immigrants into my home state of Massachusetts where they will discover that they are the undocumented owners of other people's property, undocumented drivers, undocumented sexual partners, undocumented loan holders, undocumented mortgage holders, undocumented firearms carriers, undocumented students, and undocumented voters for the Democrat machine just in time for Red Queen Bitch Warren's election vs. Senator Brown. Springfield, Fitchburg, Lawrence, Lynn, Fall River, New Bedford, Framingham, Boston, Somerville, Revere, Chelsea, Lowell, will all suddenly find themselves with tens of thousand of new 'residents' to break the backs of their police, school, and social service budgets.
Thanks Deval & Coakley!
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at October 01, 2011 07:09 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Ignacius Percival Frehley at October 01, 2011 07:10 AM (ieDPL)
Posted by: bruce at October 01, 2011 07:18 AM (apXFs)
Supreme court ruled in the 80's that schools must educate the children of illegals (Plyer v. Doe). Not sure how the Alabama law is squaring with this if they are not allowing illegal children to attend.
Or is it just a fear of identification is causing the parents to withdrawl the children voluntarily?
Not syaing Plyer v. Dow was correct, but i figured it would act as a barrier to the denial of public school benefits to children of illegal immigrants.
Posted by: California Red at October 01, 2011 07:27 AM (DXTKe)
conservative: The law's the law.
Lib: The law's wrong.
Conservative: Without a border do we have a country?
Lib: They have human rights just like you do.
Conservative: They are holding down our wages.
Lib: They do jobs Americans won't.
Conservative: Black's black and White's white.
Lib: Not really. There are really just shades of gray.
Conservative: As surely as the sun will rise.
Lib: Someday the sun won't rise. It could be tomorrow.
Conservative: What reality do you live in?
Lib: You're just an ignorant Bible thumping racist redneck.
Conservative: Pulling out the intellectual big guns I see.
Lib: Fuck you you stupid bastard.
Conservative: And THAT'S the game.
Posted by: Ohio Dan at October 01, 2011 07:31 AM (JKNDp)
Posted by: Dispirited California Resident at October 01, 2011 07:43 AM (FlVA8)
Posted by: Yip in Texas at October 01, 2011 07:45 AM (Sh+fu)
Posted by: PJ at October 01, 2011 07:45 AM (FlVA8)
Once these illegal students leave, school overcrowding will decrease. Test scores will improve. The need for special services, from tutors, to bilingual/ESL programs, free and reduced lunches, will decrease. The need to write bilingual notices, school bulletins, newsletters, and have translators phone home or make home visits will be lessened. I predict that attendance will improve and truancy will decrease.
Unlike Rick Perry, I must look beyond my feelings for these kids, many of whom are genuinely likable, and consider what is best for my state and the country.
Posted by: Darrin at October 01, 2011 08:06 AM (sRavC)
Oregon gives its drivers license examination in 5
languages.
When Oregon finally adopted
the REAL ID standards 3 years ago, the number of examinations in all languages remained
the same except for the number given in Spanish. That number dropped by 83%. As a byproduct, what used to take an hour or more at the DMV
now takes 10 to 20 minutes.
Posted by: jrg at October 01, 2011 08:16 AM (BkQvr)
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 01, 2011 08:18 AM (2FR7y)
Posted by: Yip in Texas at October 01, 2011 08:23 AM (Sh+fu)
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 01, 2011 08:33 AM (2FR7y)
Now, I think there is a program (Federally) that allows for something where an illegal alien kid, like the one you mentioned, can enlist and serve in the Armed forces and after a set amount of service, qualify for citizenship or a green card or something. I don't know about serving as an officer or anything, (probably not) but I would assume if he could hack it, the Rangers would take him. It's tough though and the better the kids grades, etc, the better as far as getting in the Army. Also, no issues with bad checks, debt, or law enforcement encounters beyond misdemeanor traffic tickets, etc. He probably has to be squeaky-clean.
The problem too is, the Army is trying to downsize. They always have room for grunts at the bottom, but with the economy like it is, getting in will not be as easy as typing it. All of the services are fairly tough to get into unless you are squared away.
Posted by: Yip in Texas at October 01, 2011 08:52 AM (Sh+fu)
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 01, 2011 09:16 AM (2FR7y)
Someday, Mexico should have to get their country working and this would not be near the problem it is and too, we need to stop them at the border from getting here. Also, stop the welfare state from throwing money at them in the hope that they'll not starve or steal to maintain themselves in the US.
Not a debate that really fits on TV very well. I wish the kid you mentioned the best... ( also, if he's in ROTC, maybe they can help give him info on serving).
Posted by: Yip in Texas at October 01, 2011 09:33 AM (Sh+fu)
Posted by: ManeiNeko at October 01, 2011 10:05 AM (TiE76)
Posted by: steevy at October 01, 2011 10:08 AM (fyOgS)
Posted by: Mr Disco at October 01, 2011 10:13 AM (UwDKY)
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 01, 2011 10:34 AM (2FR7y)
Posted by: middleagedhousewife at October 01, 2011 10:36 AM (2FR7y)
Posted by: Lonelyconservativeinmi at October 01, 2011 11:28 AM (rZZA3)
The question is always asked, "How are you going to remove 12 million undocumented?" Here's an answer - cut off the reasons they come here (jobs (via that online id check) schools)and they'll remove themselves.
Too right. What Rick Perry doesn't get, but most real conservatives do, is that subsidizing the schooling of illegal's kids incentivises illegal immigration. The issue has nothing to do with "heart".
Posted by: Speller at October 01, 2011 11:33 AM (J74Py)
If I were to cross illegally into Mexico tomorrow, I would not be allowed to register my kids at school, I could not obtain a job and I would be denied even the most basic government services before being deported.
I am sick to death of wealthy, insulated, out-of-touch liberals telling me I have to put up with the increased crime, the lower property values and the overall suckification of my country (especially my home state of California, where I can no longer live and where my parents continue to just barely get by thanks to the stifling taxes) for the sake of "humanity". Mexicans don't come to this country because they are refugees, they come because they know they will get services their own country won't give them...paid for in part by me.
Posted by: Sgt. York at October 01, 2011 12:15 PM (r/+n3)
#2
I predict the crackdown will severely impact California's economy. So many welfare cases so few taxpayers.
I am going to lobby for this in Texas. If we can get rid of the loon Perry. His motto is "I never met an illegal I didn't love."
Posted by: Molon Labe at October 01, 2011 01:49 PM (S7K8x)
Because, as we all know, traffic signs are in those 5 languages as well!
The reason they do this, IMHO, is that a license is an entry level citizenship doc; and they can then sign them up to vote, making them easy pickins' for the ward heelers.
Posted by: PJ at October 01, 2011 01:49 PM (FlVA8)
#17
How are you going to remove illegals?
One at a time. Funny do you suppose the IRS has to ask how do we get 130 million peopleto pay taxes?
Posted by: Molon Labe at October 01, 2011 01:51 PM (S7K8x)
Vic, you think the border with Canada is 5,000 miles long and it will cost over a trillion dollars to build a fence along the Mexican border?
Are you the cost estimator for the Big Dig Project or just Moochelle's vacation coordinator?
Posted by: Molon Labe at October 01, 2011 02:00 PM (S7K8x)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at October 01, 2011 03:10 PM (aRq7t)
bummer, I guess I didn't know I was a heartless bastard.
don't stop in Arizona on your way to California.
Posted by: msqtube at October 02, 2011 07:17 PM (L0X6x)
In tiny Albertville, 35 students withdrew in one day.
Ah yes, Albertville, Alabama. Why would 35 students leave school in one day? Well, one of Albertville's employers is Tyson, as in Tyson chicken. Chicken processing plants hire a great many illegal immigrants. Companies like Tyson should be fined for employing these people. And the fine should be so much that they would never think about hiring illegals again. I'm sure Tyson is politically connected which is why they get away with such things in the first place. The people who run companies like Tyson don't care about working conditions or fair wages. All they care about is their bottom line, more money for them, fuck everybody else. Well, fuck you Tyson and anyone who thinks like you do.
Posted by: Case at October 02, 2011 10:57 PM (FD6YW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5065 seconds, 345 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Texan Economist at October 01, 2011 01:07 AM (TC/9F)