May 16, 2011
— Ace Hoh boy. We should have seen this coming. I didn't. I didn't read anyone predicting it.
The best solution, for conservatives and America, is to just spend less, of course.
But Democrats will never, ever do that.
So the first thing they do is raid the pension funds, because that's not current spending, and they figure that will be replaced.
Should have seen it coming. It's so liberal. Just keep borrowing and spending and taking money from one federal account to spend it for other purposes.
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has warned for months that the government would soon hit the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling — a legal limit on how much it can borrow. With that limit reached Monday, Geithner is undertaking special measures in an effort to postpone the day when he will no longer have enough funds to pay all of the government’s bills.Geithner, who has already suspended a program that helps state and local government manage their finances, will begin to borrow from retirement funds for federal workers. The measure won’t have an impact on retirees because the Treasury is legally required to reimburse the program.
The maneuver buys Geithner only a few months of time. If Congress does not vote by Aug. 2 to raise the debt limit, Geithner says the government is likely to default on some of its obligations...
Or we could just spend less, but of course that's not even a possibility.
There's a theory the liberals adopted in law. At some point it occurred to them that if the federal courts kept asserting power to interfere in state law, forcing them to be more liberal, than that same asserted power could be used against them one day, to force state law to become more conservative. Conservatives generally don't support that, as we don't think the federal government should overrule states generally, be we could support it. (Some do, actually.)
So, to avoid that possibility, they made up yet another double-standard "We can do this but you can't, just because" theory, called the "one-way ratchet theory." Like a one-way ratchet, courts can only overrule state legislatures in the direction of increasing liberality; the ratchet cannot go the other way, they say.
Because: ratchet.
Good to see the same sort of rule applies to the size of government and ever-growing mountain of government spending and debt.
I have to admit, liberals are at least consistent in their wild inconsistency.
Posted by: Ace at
11:18 AM
| Comments (233)
Post contains 426 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Barack Obama at May 16, 2011 11:20 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 11:20 AM (Jq4xH)
Posted by: Sheriff Sputnik at May 16, 2011 11:22 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: izoneguy at May 16, 2011 11:23 AM (83mM1)
Semi OT:
This will piss you off:
Gov. Jerry Brown not giving up on tax hikes to help California budget The governor is expected to ask lawmakers to approve some tax hikes first and seek voter approval later."Even Democratic leaders and the governor's union backers, doubting the odds of a tax measure passing at the ballot box, are pushing Brown to break his pledge and forgo voter input.
"Go get a deal done," said David Kieffer, executive director of the state council of the influential Service Employees International Union, in a challenge to Brown and the Legislature. Californians "would vote the taxes down," he said, and "they don't actually need to be involved in this decision.""
No need to worry taxpayers' pretty little heads. Just give your money to our communist and union thug (but I repeat myself) lords and masters commissars.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2011 11:23 AM (IdCuw)
Posted by: Herman Cain for President at May 16, 2011 11:24 AM (jx2j9)
"Here I shit. My hole is full of soap.
I think I'll kiss her snatch and pee,
before they cornhole me."
--Snakeshit, Shake-Shit...ah, Bullshit
Posted by: Puchlines R Us at May 16, 2011 11:24 AM (PF3FV)
No need to worry taxpayers' pretty little heads. Just give your money to our communist and union thug (but I repeat myself) lords and masters commissars.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2011 03:23 PM (IdCuw)
Yeah, what's wrong with that? I mean, it's working so well for Illinois right now. They raised taxes 58% in some cases and that state is just a rockin and a rollin right now, isn't it?
Posted by: © Sponge at May 16, 2011 11:24 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 16, 2011 11:25 AM (lor88)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:25 AM (AZGON)
Dude, I believe that they already have control over my IRA and 401k!
The good news is that now you don't have to plan for retirement--the liberals are going to do it for to you.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 11:26 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 16, 2011 11:27 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: Palerider at May 16, 2011 11:27 AM (dkExz)
We should have seen it coming because they have done it twice before with SS funding. Increase taxes and then spend spend spend. It is normal for Dems.
Besides, this is simply an accounting measure to place a veneer of legality on the debt ceiling bust. They a re simply moving zeros around in their databases.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 11:27 AM (M9Ie6)
How can you raid unfunded pensions?
Federal pensions are funded. It's the state pension system that's boned.
Well, until now that is.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:27 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 16, 2011 11:27 AM (/U/Mr)
But in the end, there will be only chaos bankruptcy.
An ethereal fiat currency cannot stand long against the unyielding reality of our entitlement crisis and 50+ years of fiscal mismanagement.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 16, 2011 11:28 AM (9hSKh)
Watch those assholes go for our 401k's next.It will happen.
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 11:28 AM (nj7LO)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 16, 2011 03:25 PM (lor8
The scary thing is that it IS only the first step--I can hardly wait to find out what the next step will be.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 11:29 AM (yrGif)
Geithner, who has already suspended a program that helps state and local government manage their finances
Words fail me.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 11:29 AM (B+qrE)
Let the government shut down. Force a vote on this thing and force some tough choices to be made. Stand your effing ground! Stop compromising. If the reps allow them to "negotiate" small symbolic cuts in order to keep it afloat, they are just as bad. (I think they are actually) We're at a point in this nation that we have to make some actually changes.
Posted by: Dr Snuess at May 16, 2011 11:29 AM (re6ik)
Posted by: Ronster at May 16, 2011 11:30 AM (CZBRL)
Yeah, what's wrong with that? I mean, it's working so well for Illinois right now. They raised taxes 58% in some cases and that state is just a rockin and a rollin right now, isn't it?
Yeah, but here's the kicker: the communist union thug and his lackey, Jerry Brown, don't want to submit the tax increase to the voters because they figure it'll be turned down.
So they're going to fucking do it anyway, just without a vote, because they know they would lose one. Who can say "taxation without representation?" I can!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2011 11:30 AM (IdCuw)
Posted by: Cicero at May 16, 2011 11:31 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Ronster at May 16, 2011 03:30 PM (CZBRL)
--Actually, Steyn has been using that metaphor for years.
Posted by: logprof at May 16, 2011 11:31 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Bob Saget at May 16, 2011 11:32 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: EC at May 16, 2011 11:32 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 11:33 AM (Jq4xH)
Posted by: Tim Geithner at May 16, 2011 11:33 AM (rkrOv)
very creative accounting is in our future which allows them to borrow more without actually calling it debt
Have you been paying attention to what the Fed is doing?
We passed that exit about twenty miles back.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 11:33 AM (B+qrE)
So, how long will it take to burn through the pension plans of every federal worker and retiree? 3 months? 6 months?
Posted by: Jimbo at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (O3R/2)
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (fsGgs)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Don Lemon at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (rkrOv)
Smart political move. Get the government employees hopping mad, because they always vote, thus ensuring Congressmen will kowtow to them and raise taxes on the rest of us.
Or raise the debt ceiling, which is a tax increase set in the future.
Here in Dallas County, only 10 percent of us voted in the municipal elections just concluded. If just one-fourth of those are government workers, you can see why there have been and will be no spending cuts, but only tax increases.
Posted by: Michael Smith at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (2Oas0)
Watch those assholes go for our 401k's next.It will happen.
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 03:28 PM (nj7LO)
Hey, anyone know where there's a big pile of unused money sitting around?
Posted by: Tim Geithner, Shitty at TurboTax But A Wizard At Shell Games at May 16, 2011 11:34 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:35 AM (AZGON)
It's a matter of fairness, you know.
And, yeah, I know that there's no such thing as an SS pension. SCOTUS settled that long time ago. But if Congress is still going to sell it as one, I might as well use that therm also.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 16, 2011 11:35 AM (/U/Mr)
--Actually, Steyn has been using that metaphor for years.
Posted by: logprof at May 16, 2011 03:31 PM (BP6Z1)
I'm older than Steyn. I just don't get the coverage.
Posted by: Ronster at May 16, 2011 11:35 AM (CZBRL)
Words fail me.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 03:29 PM (B+qrE)
The jokes write themselves.
Posted by: Cicero at May 16, 2011 11:35 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 11:36 AM (Q5+Og)
So, how long will it take to burn through the pension plans of every federal worker and retiree? 3 months? 6 months?
Posted by: Jimbo at May 16, 2011 03:34 PMYou think there's really money in those?
Posted by: Barry Obama at May 16, 2011 11:36 AM (IN2A4)
Posted by: The European Union at May 16, 2011 11:36 AM (6uiF7)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by: FUBAR at May 16, 2011 11:36 AM (1fanL)
Is there some kind of lock box I haven't heard of?
Yes, it's right next to Al Gore's Social Security lock box. It's on the top shelf in the back right hand corner of the Library of Congress.
But seriously folks, they are funded the same way Social Security is (which in itself scares the shit out of me), without near the liability. But no, the is no guarantee here either. It's just that the Federal system structurally set up to fail like the state systems are.
The Federal pension plan changed from the fantastically generous CSRS to the FERS (Federal Employee Retirement System) in 1986. FERS is less generous and requires higher contributions than CSRS. Even with that, it's much less generous than these state systems you're hearing about. These days, if you're a Fed your retirement system is pretty much limited to what you personally sock away in your Thrift Savings Plan.
So on behalf of those like me, I'd like to thank Tim Geither for the lack of a reach around.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:37 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Don Lemon at May 16, 2011 03:34 PM (rkrOv)
--That is as true figuratively as it is literally.
Posted by: logprof at May 16, 2011 11:37 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: nickless at May 16, 2011 11:37 AM (0sdvX)
Posted by: Fiona Apple at May 16, 2011 11:37 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: NEWSWEEK April 19, 2010 with 30 Perccent More Charlie Sheen at May 16, 2011 11:38 AM (NNf5U)
I've been debating whether or not to open up a Roth IRA for a while now, and I can't seem to think of a good reason to do so now.
It essentially locks my money away where i can't get it should the government decide to revoke the tax benefits .
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 11:38 AM (wuv1c)
Watch those assholes go for our 401k's next.It will happen.
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 03:28 PM (nj7LO)
Won't happen. Too many Senators and Congressmen get their campaign cash from folks with 401ks. This is a hit on those "valued" public employees. They can thank Sparky personally in November.
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 11:38 AM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:38 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Barry Obama at May 16, 2011 03:36 PM (IN2A4)
With Geithner's personal accounting skills, I doubt that there is any more money in the Fed pension lock-box than there is in the SS lock-box.
Oh wait...
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (yrGif)
If I was Boehner, I'd be out there right now demanding the pay freeze for all cabinet czars.
And then I'd demand Debbie Wasserman Schultz to blow me.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (gM4zK)
A junkie's not gonna get clean, he's gonna steal your TV.
Posted by: nickless at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (0sdvX)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Like I said, change the law when you raise the debt ceiling: No refunding of Federal pension funds.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: A Guy With A Fist Up His Ass at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (gO39k)
Posted by: Jimbo at May 16, 2011 11:39 AM (O3R/2)
When he came into office wasn't one of the first things he did was to raise their salaries, many double and triple, some quadruple?
Maybe he knew this was an eventuality so he wanted to get the cash to them up front?
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Apple Paltrow-Martin, or whateverthefuck my last name is at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (fsGgs)
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (nj7LO)
Posted by: Anonymous French Guy Calling from Pay Phone on Riker's Island at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Jean at May 16, 2011 11:40 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 16, 2011 11:41 AM (/U/Mr)
And then I'd demand Debbie Wasserman Schultz to blow me.
Eeech, no thanks. That overbite would be a killer
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:41 AM (sbV1u)
Yes, it's right next to Al Gore's Social Security
lock box.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 03:37 PM (sbV1u)
What? I think there's been a misunderstanding. I didn't say "lock box," I said "cock box."
Posted by: Al "Chakra" Gore at May 16, 2011 11:41 AM (1fanL)
Jean, they are going after FERS. The Fed retirement system. Congress isn't in FERS so, well you know, they'll be fine.
But they will apreciate knowing you were concerned about their futures.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:42 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Don Lemon at May 16, 2011 11:43 AM (AZGON)
And then I'd demand Debbie Wasserman Schultz to blow me.
Eeech, no thanks. That overbite would be a killer
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 03:41 PM (sbV1u)
Oooo! Oooo!
I volunteer!
Posted by: Maria Cantwell at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: A Guy With A Fist Up His Ass at May 16, 2011 03:39 PM (gO39k)
Back from Fire Island, Sam?
Posted by: garrett at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (SMGgV)
OT:
Did I miss something? Is it national coming out day or soemthing?
The CNN guy, the President of the Phoenix Suns, and now ESPN has a front pager about some former Villanova basketball player.
What the hell?
Posted by: Circa (insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (B+qrE)
And then I'd demand But first, Debbie Wasserman Schultz to will blow me.
FIFY
Posted by: John P. Squibob at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Don Lemon at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 11:44 AM (nj7LO)
Posted by: Jean at May 16, 2011 03:40 PM (WkuV6)
Screw a politician, it is to laugh!
Screw a peasant (even a Federal peasant), now that is what we do for entertainment!
Posted by: TurboTimG at May 16, 2011 11:45 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: Jean at May 16, 2011 11:45 AM (WkuV6)
The cock box is out? The cock box is out??
Posted by: Don Lemon at May 16, 2011 03:43 PM (AZGON)
*KNOCK*
*KNOCK*
Posted by: Justin Timberlake at May 16, 2011 11:45 AM (BP6Z1)
Maria Cantwell at May 16, 2011 03:44 PM (BP6Z1)
Can't I just get Kristi Noem to call me? Please?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:45 AM (sbV1u)
Watch those assholes go for our 401k's next.It will happen.
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 03:28 PM (nj7LO)
I'm glad I got out of mine. I'm actually starting to rethink my Roth account. Those would be next. Secession is really starting to look good to me.
Posted by: Soona at May 16, 2011 11:46 AM (JIDys)
It's not their money, it's a resource that belongs to all of America.
Of course it belongs to some Americans more than others.
Posted by: Michael Moore at May 16, 2011 11:47 AM (iYwUw)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:47 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Cherry π at May 16, 2011 11:47 AM (+sBB4)
Sean - I thought FERS was basically a Federal 401K, with match and employee contribution to a bunch of stock funds...
No, you're thinking of the Thrift Saving Plan. That's an accurate description. FERS, though, is a supplement to the TSP. To give you an example of how thin FERS is, I've been a Fed for 2 1/2 years.
There's 2K in my FERS account. So, it's not like FERS is a good deal.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 11:48 AM (sbV1u)
OT:
Did I miss something? Is it national coming out day or soemthing?
The CNN guy, the President of the Phoenix Suns, and now ESPN has a front pager about some former Villanova basketball player.
What the hell?
Are you trying to tell us something Circa?
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 11:48 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 11:49 AM (nj7LO)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 11:49 AM (Jq4xH)
Posted by: Cherry π at May 16, 2011 11:49 AM (+sBB4)
And since the Federal pension funds are funded, does that mean that stocks and bonds are going to fall, with all that funding leaving?
Thanks to "QE-Infinity!" - you will never have to worry about stock market volatility!
Posted by: Ben Bernanke at May 16, 2011 11:49 AM (SMGgV)
Somebody remind me again why we have a debt ceiling if we always keep raising it?
I really wish someone would stand up and just tell those idiots to stop spending right fucking now! No more excuses, just get your asses in there and get started and don't come out until you've reduced spending to at least '06 levels.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 16, 2011 11:49 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Wallace Clevagnga at May 16, 2011 11:50 AM (48wze)
Ok, if it is him, what did he do that is "courageous"?
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:50 AM (k1rwm)
Ace, you're talkin' crazy!!
I, for one, am stunned there is even such a thing as a federal retirement fund that actually has a substantial amount of money in it!
Posted by: Optimizer at May 16, 2011 11:50 AM (F56VB)
Posted by: Cherry π at May 16, 2011 03:49 PM (+sBB4)
OK, fine. I banged me some of that sweet, sweet Obama booty.
Posted by: Fareed Zakaria at May 16, 2011 11:51 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Anderson Cooper at May 16, 2011 11:51 AM (0sdvX)
Posted by: your friendly neighborhood gangster at May 16, 2011 11:51 AM (GfhFm)
Direct parallel in the old Brezhnev doctrine. Once communism is established somewhere, it cannot be disestablished. That idea works for awhile, until it doesn't anymore, usually in a catastrophic fashion. Good times.
Posted by: pep at May 16, 2011 11:51 AM (GMG6W)
Posted by: Timmy Geitner at May 16, 2011 11:52 AM (48wze)
In the end it does not matter one bit "where" the money comes from. There is no 'where.' It's not like there are big piles of money sitting around in little cubby holes waiting to be spent. Money comes into existence as it is spent, just as taxes paid simply go out of existence once paid.
The real question is, what threats are being made? In this case they are making a threat against the pension benificiaries - suggesting that at some point those will go unpaid. I believe other similar threats will be made against various stakeholders in the current system.
Part of the folly of the current system is the refusal to acknowledge how the fiat money system works - we pretend it's still hard money. The government doesn't have to "borrow" a dime. It does so to control interest rates, and to "sterilize" new money created by spending so the circulating supply is theoretically unaltered. In the end we're going to be forced to "print" more money, because the cuts will never be made. We'd be better off just doing that now - the borrowing approach isn't doing anything other than increase the overall impact of the overspending by compounding it with interest that must be paid. We'd be better off risking inflation. That automatically creates a real-time tax on everybody, shared equally (% wise) by all holders of dollars. Suddenly everyone has a skin in the game.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 16, 2011 11:52 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 16, 2011 03:40 PM (9hSKh)
Erin Go Bragh!
Posted by: NC Ref at May 16, 2011 11:52 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:52 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Alan Goonspan at May 16, 2011 11:53 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: ziptie at May 16, 2011 11:53 AM (nj7LO)
Posted by: jewells45 at May 16, 2011 11:54 AM (l/N7H)
They're calling that kid in CT 'courageous.' The high school senior who vandalized the high school (or some such thing) and got suspended and banned from his prom.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 16, 2011 11:54 AM (gM4zK)
Posted by: Ronster at May 16, 2011 03:30 PM (CZBRL)
George Will has been using that for 30 years.
Posted by: pep at May 16, 2011 11:54 AM (GMG6W)
I really wish someone would stand up and just tell those idiots to stop spending right fucking now!
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 16, 2011 03:49 PM (d0Tfm)
Remember all the trouble we had getting Horton's buddies to hear us? There aren't quite enough Whos screaming at the top of their lungs.
Yeah, you just thought it was an allegory for the American post-war occupation of Japan.
Posted by: The Whos at May 16, 2011 11:55 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: chillin the most at May 16, 2011 11:55 AM (6IV8T)
I really wish someone would stand up and just tell those idiots to stop spending right fucking now! No more excuses, just get your asses in there and get started and don't come out until you've reduced spending to at least '06 levels.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 16, 2011 03:49 PM (d0Tfm)
Like who?
I, too, wish it could work that way. But alas - it doesn't.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 16, 2011 11:56 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 16, 2011 03:55 PM (RPYjQ)
Remind me again why I read this blog!
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 11:56 AM (yrGif)
Posted by: USS Diversity at May 16, 2011 03:55 PM (RPYjQ)
Who is this Erin and how do I get her newsletter?
Posted by: Moron at May 16, 2011 11:57 AM (/izg2)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:57 AM (AZGON)
OT:
Did I miss something? Is it national coming out day or soemthing?
The CNN guy, the President of the Phoenix Suns, and now ESPN has a front pager about some former Villanova basketball player.
What the hell?
Posted by: Circa (insert Year Here) at May 16, 2011 03:44 PM (B+qrE)
Isn't this National Fapping Month? Maybe there is a link....
Posted by: Museisluse at May 16, 2011 11:57 AM (a8aqn)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:58 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 11:58 AM (k1rwm)
Thanks to "QE-Infinity!" - you will never have to worry about stock market volatility!
Posted by: Ben Bernanke at May 16, 2011 03:49 PM (SMGgV)
The paper and cotton producers are ecstatic with the expectation of increased production of new paper money.
Posted by: Soona at May 16, 2011 11:58 AM (JIDys)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 11:58 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Cheri at May 16, 2011 12:00 PM (oiNtH)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 12:00 PM (k1rwm)
"Suddenly everyone has a skin in the game."
Yep. Our system is fucked because of the fact that the all citizens do not share equally in the support of the system. A flat tax would start to fix that. Doing away with racially gerrimandered districts would also help. As long as a demographically insignificant minority can be sheltered from economic reality while being cosseted and given disproportionate non-competitive representation, then the concept of equality flys out the window. For some reason I don't see our post-racial President transforming these inequities for the good of all. I wonder why?
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 12:01 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 16, 2011 03:40 PM (9hSKh)
Erin Go Bragh!
Posted by: NC Ref at May 16, 2011 03:52 PM (/izg2)
Oy und be gattin' meh a point yeh wee coont!
Posted by: ErikO'W at May 16, 2011 12:01 PM (HZMAP)
"Let's raise the debt ceiling to $500 trillion. Right now. After all, everyone says the financial world will end if we cannot raise the ceiling and therefore pay our debts, so why keep returning here to do what we are told is inevitable anyway? C'mon guys, $500 trillion or bust."
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 03:57 PM (AZGON)
Actually, I'd like to see this, too. The debt ceiling is just a foolish, arbitrary number that doesn't really mean a damn thing. I would also prefer that we stopped this nonsense about "borrowing" money when we have no need to do so. I don't think it's the government's job to provide people with a savings vehicle.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 16, 2011 12:01 PM (xUM1Q)
Sure. Good Lord, I'll be eating cat food. And not the good stuff....the generic crap.
Oh, I feel your pain. I really do.
Because I fully expect to be royally screwed right as I retire as a Fed.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 12:01 PM (sbV1u)
That's Ramadan. So, which are bigger, the callouses on Muslims' foreheads, or the callouses on their foreskins?
Posted by: FUBAR, Cultural Imperialist at May 16, 2011 12:01 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Passably Affable at May 16, 2011 12:02 PM (2Ukpz)
maybe the chinese won't lend to us anymore.
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 12:02 PM (k1rwm)
The scary thing is that it IS only the first step--I can hardly wait to find out what the next step will be.
Posted by: Hrothgar at May 16, 2011 03:29 PM (yrGif)
Appropriating and nationalizing private retirement accounts. Say goodbye to your 401K.....as if you weren't losing it anyway.
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 12:03 PM (AnTyA)
ugh
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 12:03 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 12:04 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 12:04 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 12:04 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 04:01 PM (Q5+Og)
Pretty good comment for a sub-tard. But you forget - all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
Posted by: Reactionary at May 16, 2011 12:05 PM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: DJIA at May 16, 2011 12:05 PM (GTbGH)
Guys, this "raiding the pension funds" is just an accounting trick. The civil service pension fund holds nothing but govt. IOUs anyway, in the form of "special", non-marketable govt account series (GAS) Treasury bonds. This falls under the "intragovernmental" debt component of the total public debt. The other component is the "debt held by the public".
The latter represents real money borrowed from the bond market, real money that changes hands. The trick is to lower the intragov debt by the same amount you raise the other to keep the sum from increasing over the limit.
Here's the trick. Treasury redeems the GAS bonds with real money borrowed. That lowers the intragov by the same amount the debt held by the public increases. Net zero change in total public debt.
Now, the pension fund then takes that money and gives it back to Treasury, "reloaning" it. This latter "loan" *does not count toward the debt limit*.
They are merely replacing one type of IOU that counts toward the debt limit for one that does not.
These trust funds are not real and never have been -- they are just accounting gimicks that let Treasury spend the excess revenue slated for those trust funds.
Posted by: publius at May 16, 2011 12:05 PM (VVB18)
Oh, I feel your pain. I really do.
Because I fully expect to be royally screwed right as I retire as a Fed.
Yes - the same time that social security and medicare are bust. Tent cities - coming to a town near you!
Posted by: Cheri at May 16, 2011 12:06 PM (oiNtH)
And yet, it was Republican administrations who exploded the debt. As I recall, Clinton left Bush with the surplus. Oh well.
I suppose if you're a knucklehead you just have to forget everything and make shit up as you go along
Posted by: Lucifer, John Ashcroft's personal savior at May 16, 2011 12:06 PM (BHSVg)
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 16, 2011 03:54 PM (gM4zK)
He didn't vandalize the high school. He put up a big sign at night asking someone to prom so she would see it in the morning pulling into school. It was a stupid suspension.
Posted by: Tami at May 16, 2011 12:06 PM (VuLos)
In the 12 years of Republican Congress, average annual deficit: $104 billion
Erg's got nuthin.
Posted by: toby928™ at May 16, 2011 12:08 PM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 16, 2011 12:08 PM (Jq4xH)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 12:09 PM (sbV1u)
As a federal employee who contributes to a retirement fund, I am fully confident that these jackbooted weasels will replace every penny. Sure. Good Lord, I'll be eating cat food. And not the good stuff....the generic crap.
Cheri, I'll put a bowl of milk outside on my back porch every night to help supplement your diet.
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 12:09 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at May 16, 2011 12:09 PM (KE+Ya)
Posted by: curious at May 16, 2011 12:09 PM (k1rwm)
Gruel? You wish. It's Crusty Brand Imitation Gruel for you. 4 out of 5 orphans can't tell the difference.
Posted by: toby928™ at May 16, 2011 12:10 PM (GTbGH)
Guys, this "raiding the pension funds" is just an accounting trick. The civil service pension fund holds nothing but govt. IOUs anyway
Same thing with Social Security.
We're fucked....screwed.....boned...
Can we start using the "R" word yet?
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 12:10 PM (AnTyA)
How many flavors of gruel are there?
Gruel? You wish. It's Crusty Brand Imitation Gruel for you. 4 out of 5 orphans can't tell the difference
Every tenth box has a rusty metal Krusty-O
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 12:10 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Olliander at May 16, 2011 12:11 PM (6uiF7)
Guys, this "raiding the pension funds" is just an accounting trick. The civil service pension fund holds nothing but govt. IOUs anyway
Same thing with Social Security.
We're fucked....screwed.....boned...
Can we start using the "R" word yet?
Reanimation?
No, no, It's too early to release the zombies. That will come all in due time
Posted by: Ben at May 16, 2011 12:11 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: the economists! at May 16, 2011 12:11 PM (k1rwm)
168 for conservatives and America, is to just spend less, of course
And yet, it was Republican administrations who exploded the debt. As I recall, Clinton left Bush with the surplus. Oh well.
As I recall Clinton left Bush with CRA and a ballooning real estate market based on 0% equity and a nice calling card on 9/11 for his impetuous wiener explosion on an intern's blue dress. But I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Posted by: Sub-tard Goober at May 16, 2011 12:12 PM (Q5+Og)
Posted by: The federal deficit in February 2011 was $223 billion, the largest single-month deficit for any gove at May 16, 2011 12:13 PM (Y1DZt)
I love how eggamoobymuffin refuses to acknowledge any budget from 2007 forward.
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 16, 2011 12:14 PM (fsGgs)
I suppose if you're a knucklehead you just have to forget everything and make shit up as you go along
Posted by: Lucifer, John Ashcroft's personal savior at May 16, 2011 04:06 PM (BHSVg)
Oh I see. You think Presidents pass budgets.
Posted by: FUBAR, Cultural Imperialist at May 16, 2011 12:14 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: the economists! at May 16, 2011 12:14 PM (k1rwm)
Will the real Slim Shady please stand up?
Posted by: Cherry π at May 16, 2011 12:15 PM (+sBB4)
Oh I see. You think Presidents pass budgets.
He's a smart one, isn't he?
Do you think they get gene therapy to have the gene removed that allows them to recognize double standards?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 16, 2011 12:15 PM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at May 16, 2011 12:16 PM (UvFnc)
But he got all radical and made BIG changes and prompted a counter-revolution (tea-party) that possibly could undo stuff that was thought to be undoable.
Not so sure about that. We have nothing but a political class filled useless, spineless kleptocrat fucks who care only about being re-elected and getting theirs...and passing laws to ensure that while the rest of us are fucked.
I really have what little faith I had in our government. We are now a banana republic.
We don't have a functioning republic any more. The country club GOP let the left run roughshod, with the help of the media, by making deals to keep them fat and happy.
Fuck it all. It's time to burn it down.
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 12:17 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: the economists! at May 16, 2011 12:17 PM (k1rwm)
Next step is to "confiscate" "private pensions."
Posted by: shibumi at May 16, 2011 12:17 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 04:17 PM (AnTyA)
I told you that three years ago and all you do is ignore me...
Posted by: mike bloomberg, graduation speaker extraordinaire at May 16, 2011 12:19 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: toby928™ at May 16, 2011 12:20 PM (GTbGH)
well, with every thing so tightly censored, where else can someone say something like that but on conspiracy sites or little know financial sites or just on Zero Hedge repeatedly over the last year in the comments...
Posted by: mike bloomberg, graduation speaker extraordinaire at May 16, 2011 12:20 PM (k1rwm)
Posted by: toby928™ at May 16, 2011 04:12 PM (GTbGH)
Hobo skin wallets are excellent! Lots of stretch and very durable.
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 16, 2011 12:21 PM (6yyVB)
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 16, 2011 12:21 PM (Gzv/o)
Posted by: Kerry at May 16, 2011 12:22 PM (a/VXa)
Thinking ahead to 2016, remember how the Democrats always accuse Republicans of what they themselves are guilty of?
Posted by: guy giving the dems too much credit at May 16, 2011 12:22 PM (GfhFm)
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 04:17 PM (AnTyA)
I told you that three years ago and all you do is ignore me...
Posted by: mike bloomberg, graduation speaker extraordinaire at May 16, 2011 04:19 PM (k1rwm)
Your solution was to viilify business owners and ban trans fats. Fuck off Mike.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 16, 2011 12:23 PM (Gzv/o)
I suppose if you're a knucklehead you just have to forget everything and make shit up as you go along
Posted by: Lucifer, John Ashcroft's personal savior at May 16, 2011 04:06 PM (BHSVg)
Oh I see. You think Presidents pass budgets.
Posted by: FUBAR, Cultural Imperialist at May 16, 2011 04:14 PM (1fanL)
____________________
This.
It's amazing how many liberals/ leftists/ communists/ Democrats/ progressives / whatever else they call themselves seem unaware of the Constitution, or how the government functions. Or at least, used to function, and God willing, one day will again function.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2011 12:23 PM (IdCuw)
Posted by: Kerry at May 16, 2011 04:22 PM (a/VXa)
Yeah, The Man is always sticking it to...The...um...Man.
Posted by: FUBAR, Truther to Power at May 16, 2011 12:23 PM (1fanL)
Part of the folly of the current system is the refusal to acknowledge how the fiat money system works - we pretend it's still hard money.
It's been said before, but since our money has no actual basis in reality why not just let Big Ben and TurboTax Tim print all the money we need and have a balanced budget every year? Why do they even need to talk about taxes or debt or any such thing, just print the money and we can all pretend that it actually has some real value. It's what we do right now.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at May 16, 2011 12:23 PM (JxMoP)
Next step is to "confiscate" "private pensions."
Posted by: shibumi at May 16, 2011 04:17 PM (OKZrE)
I'm not dismissing it as fringe. I've heard this since 2008.
Right after McCain and the media installed Petey in the WH, I was in a Delta lounge in Atlanta. I had a very frightening conversation with a man who started a financial house whose name you would recognize where he told me that even back then they considered this a possibility and were working on ways to position themselves against it.
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 12:24 PM (AnTyA)
This.
It's amazing how many liberals/ leftists/ communists/ Democrats/ progressives / whatever else they call themselves seem unaware of the Constitution, or how the government functions. Or at least, used to function, and God willing, one day will again function.
Posted by: Jay Guevara
You think that you have troubles? They used me, quoted me, took me to fancy parties, and then tossed me aside.
Posted by: The debt clock at May 16, 2011 12:25 PM (Gzv/o)
And BTW, Treasury has the legal authority to do this "IOU swap" trick with only about $140B (they can't do with the entirety of the pension funds, nor can they do it with other trust funds according to the law). There's probably some other tricks clever Treasury lawyers can come up that have the same effect. From what I gather the drop-dead date is July 8th. At that point, they'll run out of tricks.
But they can always change the law to allow more tricks, of course. One thing that is talked about it just to declare that the intragov debt doesn't count toward the limit and only the debt held by the public component does. That would immediately free up all $4.65T held in all the trust funds.
This would be something the Repubs might do to allow them to raise the limit without raising it.
Posted by: publius at May 16, 2011 12:29 PM (VVB18)
Cheri, I'll put a bowl of milk outside on my back porch every night to help supplement your diet.
You are too kind...purrrrr
Posted by: Cheri at May 16, 2011 12:29 PM (oiNtH)
When you have a White House who knows they can say something like this with impunity..
“I think there are discussions, even about transparency and developing rules about transparency that we need to be able to have quietly and behind closed doors.” – Daniel Gordon, White House staff
...they know they can get away with anything.
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 12:29 PM (AnTyA)
Not only that, but you hear from liberals how pensions are legally inviolable, etc, yet here they are doing what they say is unpossible.
Posted by: KG at May 16, 2011 12:30 PM (4L0zr)
We have Democrats that wish to dig with mega-steam shovels like they use in the open pit copper mines of Colorado.
We have Republicans that want to dig with a backhoe.
Sometime ago they passed a law that limited the depth of the hole. Just about every year since then they increase the maximum depth.
Now that there is a real fight over the depth the liars in office now want to use some kind of accounting lie to say it really isn't getting any deeper even though we continue to dig with that mega-steam shovel.
Oh, and any attempt to get rid of the digging at all is treated with contempt and scorn by the leaders of both Parties.
Posted by: Vic at May 16, 2011 12:30 PM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 16, 2011 12:34 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: The US Treasury at May 16, 2011 12:36 PM (AZGON)
Posted by: Paul Kroenke at May 16, 2011 12:38 PM (VF+Fe)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 16, 2011 04:23 PM (IdCuw)
Sadly, it's not just the left that thinks the President controls budgets.
I've pretty much given up trying to correct people on that because no one ever listens.
It's like watching people file a class-action suit against the tooth fairy.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 16, 2011 12:43 PM (bxiXv)
Re 217: The thing to appeciate is that all the "trust funds", SS and everything are just one titantic accounting trick. The only source of funding for them are Uncle's ability to tax and borrow real money from the bond market. These "trust funds" are nothing but Bernie Madoff write large in trillions, not mere billions.
And analogy is this: You've got a sorry Uncle, call him Uncle Sam. He blows money on beer and hookers and the like all the time. His poor wife, call her Auntie Social Security/Medicare makes her own money (payroll taxes). She tries to care for the family properly, buying the food and necessities out of her paycheck. But (until 2010) she was making more than the she was spending.
Being repsonsible, she wants to save the money for a rainy day. So Uncle says, hey why don't you invest that money with me. She trusts him and gives in the money. He gives her IOUs in return. He even pays her interest on the IOUs, in the form of yet more IOUs (this is absolutely true -- interest payments to the trust funds are paid in yet more special GAS Treasury bonds, no joke).
He of course takes that money and blows it. But even then, he's still spending more than he's taking in and has to run up the credit card (this is the debt held by the public, the real money borrowed).
Now, when Auntie runs out of money and needs to cash in those IOUs, where's she going to get it? Only from Uncle. And where's he going to get the money? Well..... he can put it on the credit card, if they'll let him.
That is what the "trust funds" are.
Posted by: publius at May 16, 2011 12:47 PM (VVB18)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 16, 2011 12:57 PM (2+ZFl)
Posted by: Tiny Teeny Timmy Geitner at May 16, 2011 01:05 PM (48wze)
Look, I just had to raid your college fund. Just to pay a few bills that piled up over the holidays. I'll put it back just as soon as the Super Bow is over. I got a great tip. Dallas is going to cream the Steelers by at 21. You can take it to the bank.
Posted by: Dad during Christmas 1978 at May 16, 2011 01:10 PM (Xv7f/)
When you have a White House who knows they can say something like this with impunity..
“I think there are discussions, even about transparency and developing rules about transparency that we need to be able to have quietly and behind closed doors.” – Daniel Gordon, White House staff
...they know they can get away with anything.
Posted by: beedubya at May 16, 2011 04:29 PM
They are beyond embarrassment or even caring. Here's my (current) favorite. This was in Politico on March 30. It is not from The Onion, hard as that is to believe:
“President Obama finally and
quietly accepted his “transparency” award from the open government community
this week — in a closed, undisclosed meeting at the White House on Monday…
...Obama met quietly in the Oval Office with Gary Bass of OMB Watch, Tom Blanton of the National Security Archive, Danielle Brian of the Project on Government Oversight, Lucy Dalglish of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and Patrice McDermott of OpenTheGovernment.org, without disclosing the meeting on his public schedule or letting photographers or print reporters into the room...”
Posted by: USS Nixon at May 16, 2011 01:19 PM (Xv7f/)
Hey wait a second.
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, I have a question.
Did Turbo-tax Timmy just raid the pension funds of the military?
Posted by: booter at May 16, 2011 01:20 PM (w43sl)
Sooo... they borrow from an existing account, which they have to pay back...
1. How is that LEGAL? The money was spent, by law... how does the Administration override the spending bills which put this money in place...
and
2. How does borrowing money you have to pay back NOT equal debt? The same debt that only CONGRESS can authorize? (at least according to that antique and outdated document, the Constitution...).
Posted by: Snootie Theatre Person at May 16, 2011 01:32 PM (NtXW4)
Back when social security was going bankrupt and rather than put it on a more solid footing they simply patched it enough so it would not go bankrupt on their watch (this includes Republicans, lot of blame to spread around here), I knew then that there is absolutely no resolve in our political class to fix this debt problem. Even some prominent Republicans were insulting those calling for a balanced budget amendment (a past era's equivalent of the Tea Party).
Now Boehner has succumbed to Beltway Disease (and I'm not real sure he was ever free of the virus); he's learned the routine -- say the right words but then do essentially nothing. You think he's going to risk his fat pension and future political prospects for you morons???
Is it possible the Democrats want the US to go bankrupt? Unless all of these idiots flunked basic math, they have to know this cannot continue forever -- and, quite frankly, the probability of a crash because of this unsustainable debt load is approaching 100% -- so what's their game? I know modern liberals live in a cloud but surely they have to know this. If I were a liberal I'd be more than a little frightened that a crash could bring the end to my feverish dreams of Kindly Big Brother. Are they hoping the economic distress will allow them to raise taxes or even do away with the inflation indexing Reagan insisted on during his term?
I've yet to see a satisfactory explanation for this. Unless Democrats truly are that blind, they know what's going on but seem to want the worst to happen. That would indicate they think they will gain from the disaster somehow.
The GOP was blamed for the Great Depression and Democrats benefited from that, unfairly to a large degree, but is this perhaps what the Democrats hope to accomplish? They do seem to have the mass media in their pockets.
(This is not an attempt to start another conspiracy theory -- it truly does not make sense to me)
Posted by: Full Moon at May 16, 2011 01:58 PM (m75CK)
And all the while in the background, a hundred foot tall neon sign has been flashing the words: STOP SPENDING.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 16, 2011 02:27 PM (1rHeD)
Posted by: Alex #11 at May 16, 2011 03:29 PM (J7BNt)
"Or we could just spend less, but of course that's not even a possibility."
You missed it: the sickening re-framing of the issue. "Spending less" is being turned into "defaulting on some of our obligations." Get that? Spending less is "defaulting." If we ever cut spending, we've "defaulted." Lord have mercy on us, we're doomed.
Posted by: sayyid412 at May 16, 2011 04:49 PM (TktQM)
Posted by: Sushi at May 16, 2011 07:36 PM (v2EoP)
Posted by: John at May 17, 2011 04:31 PM (lU+6B)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2776 seconds, 361 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








High Speed Rail isn't gonna fund itself, you know.
Posted by: Soothsayer at May 16, 2011 11:20 AM (gM4zK)