February 22, 2011
— DrewM Damn.
Four Americans, including a couple from Southern California, who were taken hostage by Somali pirates were fatally wounded by their captors while negotiations between the pirates and U.S. military forces were underway in the Gulf of Aden, U.S. Central Command said Tuesday.The four were aboard the vessel Quest, which was captured last week.
"We express our deepest condolences for the innocent lives callously lost aboard the Quest," said Marine Gen. James N. Mattis, commander of Central Command.
You know, it might be time for some punitive raids along the coast. The US Marines were really good at that at one point in time.
More: Via Galrahn of the indispensable Information Dissemination, the Navy's release on the incident.
TAMPA, Fla. (NNS) -- At approximately 1 a.m. EST today, while negotiations were ongoing to secure the release of four American hostages, U.S. forces responded to gunfire aboard the pirated vessel (S/V) Quest.As they responded to the gunfire, reaching and boarding the Quest, the forces discovered all four hostages had been shot by their captors. Despite immediate steps to provide life-saving care, all four hostages ultimately died of their wounds.
"We express our deepest condolences for the innocent lives callously lost aboard the Quest," said Gen James N. Mattis, U.S. Central Command Commander.
During the boarding of the Quest, the reaction force was engaged by pirates on board the vessel. Two pirates died during the confrontation and 13 were captured and detained along with two pirates already in US Forces custody. The US Forces also found the remains of two other pirates already dead aboard the Quest. In total, it is believed 19 pirates were involved in the hijacking of the S/V Quest.
US Forces have been closely monitoring the S/V Quest for approximately 3 days, once it became known to be pirated. Four U.S. Navy warships comprised the response force dedicated to recovering the S/V Quest: the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65), the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf (CG 55), the guided-missile destroyers USS Sterett (DDG 104) and USS Bulkeley (DDG 84). The ships are deployed to the region to conduct maritime security operations and to provide support to operations Enduring Freedom and New Dawn.
It's time for Obama to stop pretending he's Lincoln and start channeling Jefferson and Madison: blow some pirate shit up, NOW.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:34 AM
| Comments (267)
Post contains 400 words, total size 3 kb.
Nonsense, what we need to do is import another 100K of these poor, misunderstood Somalis, and give them every type of entitlement we have (maybe create some new ones, just for them).
It's humanitarian and culturally enriching for us to do so. Besides, they are our president's favorite group of people.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 06:37 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 06:38 AM (f9c2L)
Easy bet that they've become even better at it. Wonder if they will be allowed to showcase their prowess?
Posted by: irongrampa at February 22, 2011 06:38 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 22, 2011 06:38 AM (0GFWk)
That's awful. what a shame
Posted by: Marion "Cobra" Cobretti at February 22, 2011 06:38 AM (ko4DN)
Posted by: Ben at February 22, 2011 06:40 AM (wuv1c)
And a box of crackers.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at February 22, 2011 06:40 AM (p+mzQ)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 22, 2011 06:41 AM (081kp)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 22, 2011 06:41 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 06:41 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 22, 2011 06:42 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 06:43 AM (5/yRG)
If I was taken hostage I'd rather die in a hail of bullets because something went wrong in a rescue attempt. My last thoughts would be that some very proficient warriors would be exacting some revenge on my captors.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 5000 at February 22, 2011 06:43 AM (W58PC)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 06:43 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jean at February 22, 2011 06:43 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at February 22, 2011 06:43 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 06:44 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 06:44 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 22, 2011 06:45 AM (0fzsA)
And the waters 50 miles out from the coast of Somalia should be a "no sail" zone.
Posted by: mpurinTexas(kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at February 22, 2011 06:45 AM (jxuSt)
Posted by: Xoxotl at February 22, 2011 06:45 AM (CbVPH)
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at February 22, 2011 06:45 AM (0ZIqd)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC at February 22, 2011 06:46 AM (Y9kWb)
They were missionaries, distributing Bibles to remote African communities. IIRC, they were heading to Garacad before they were intercepted with by the pirates.
They knew the risks.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 06:47 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 06:47 AM (SJ6/3)
Why are we capturing pirates? Tie them to depth charges and walk them off the plank.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 5000 at February 22, 2011 06:49 AM (W58PC)
I've done alot of open water sailing between Florida and as far south as Venezuala. Mostly in the Carribian though. I was always armed and made a decision that no one was boarding my boat.
You're on your own in the ocean, nobody is going to get their quick enough to help you. You can either try to protect yourself or depend on the mercy of pirates.
Posted by: robtr at February 22, 2011 06:49 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: Jean at February 22, 2011 06:49 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: That's Mr. Jehovah To You! at February 22, 2011 06:49 AM (Hu/Da)
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at February 22, 2011 06:49 AM (F+Y9Z)
The couple who owned the yacht were involved in a yacht race sailing from India to somewhere else I forget. They strayed offcourse, whether deliberately or not, around Feb 15 when they eventually came across the pirates.
If you are rich enough to own a luxury yacht and are proficient in boating/sailing, navigation, and current world political/social events, then you KNOW not to venture into high risk areas around the Horn of Africa. Something tells me this couple wanted to shave off a few hours from their time and recklessly sailed offcourse, closer to pirate controlled waters, needlessly endangering their lives.
I'm sorry for their deaths, but you have to consider that they knew they were getting into dangerous territories by sailing closer to the Somali coast.
Oh yeah, turn those captured pirates into shark shit.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 06:50 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 22, 2011 06:51 AM (mHQ7T)
What are the bets and odds that these people didn't even have a gun on board their boat?
As for the pirates, we can thank the International community of liberal idiots for them. The LOST treaty makes sure that piracy is profitable now.
Keep in mind that even in the old days when pirates were actually hung by any ship captain that took them piracy was not stopped until their ports were razed and the merchants who bought their shit were hung.
There has NEVER been anything "romantic" about pirates in the real world contrary to certain Disney movies.
Two things need to happen. (1) Return piracy to "jus justinian"(?) where any military vessel may capture, kill, and hang pirates at will and (2) Burn, raze and kill all the people and ports in Somalia where pirates hang out. Kill them ALL and let God sort them out.
Oh, one last thing f*ck the UN and LOST.
Posted by: Vic at February 22, 2011 06:51 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at February 22, 2011 06:54 AM (VmVG3)
Posted by: The Somali Pirates at February 22, 2011 06:54 AM (SZy+Y)
The problem is, you really need a weapon capable of hulling a modest size, steel hulled fishing boat. The ITAR paperwork on a Javelin or a thermobaric RPG is a real bitch.
Posted by: Jean at February 22, 2011 06:54 AM (WkuV6)
Where did we go wrong in the interim?
Posted by: alwyr at February 22, 2011 06:55 AM (w2++y)
Posted by: President Jugears McFly at February 22, 2011 06:55 AM (mHQ7T)
Certainly not the best use of 6,000 sailors.
http://tinyurl.com/34e2el
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 06:55 AM (JpFM9)
Only for a Christian. Are you sure they're headed to heaven, now? See, I'd like them to have lived so they had plenty of time to get right with God. But that's just me, I suppose.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 06:56 AM (8y9MW)
President Barack Obama said in an interview with People magazine released Sunday that he has “no intention” of sending combat troops to the terrorist havens of Somalia and Yemen because “working with international partners is most effective at this point.”
“I have no intention of sending U.S. boots on the ground in these regions,” Obama said in the interview, which was conducted Friday and is to appear in the issue on newsstands this coming Friday.
“I have every intention of working with our international partners in lawless areas around the globe to make sure that we're keeping the American people safe.”
Obama added: “I never rule out any possibility in a world that is this complex…. In countries like Yemen, in countries like Somalia, I think working with international partners is most effective at this point.”
1/10/10
So, we're more effective by working with international partners -- to do nothing.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 06:56 AM (bOKG+)
Posted by: libtard tourist at February 22, 2011 06:56 AM (gWfpg)
Posted by: Zilla at February 22, 2011 06:57 AM (T8pPt)
Posted by: waiting at February 22, 2011 06:57 AM (dX5s2)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 06:58 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Jean at February 22, 2011 10:54 AM (WkuV6)
My boss had a 65' Irwin in St. Thomas and he had a pedestal mount 20mm canon. I just had a M 14 and a .45
Posted by: robtr at February 22, 2011 06:59 AM (hVDig)
I don't mean to seem unsympathetic. They were grossly naive or just didn't care. But this was a doomed venture from the start.
Scott and Jean Adams were retired and had been sailing around the world for the past six years on their yacht. The couple was on a worldwide trip to distribute Bibles.
On the couple's website, Jean Adams wrote, “Another aspect of our travels is friendship evangelism – that is, finding homes for thousands of Bibles, which have been donated through grants and gifts, as we travel from place to place.”
http://tli.tl/57A1NHPosted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 06:59 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: sTevo at February 22, 2011 07:00 AM (uIz80)
Posted by: Jon in TX at February 22, 2011 07:02 AM (lRqIF)
Posted by: President Jugears McFly
"Your Honor, my clients are obviously victims of racial profiling and excessive use of force by the government. Plus, one of them thinks he heard a sailor use the N-word."
"Case dismissed. Here's a couple of million dollars for your suffering, you poor unfortunates."
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 07:02 AM (bOKG+)
>It's time for Obama to stop pretending he's Lincoln and start channeling Jefferson and Madison: blow some pirate shit up, NOW.
How can he, when UNIONS ARE UNDER ASSAULT??
Posted by: BDJ at February 22, 2011 07:02 AM (cUNcx)
The organizers of an international yacht race called the Blue Water Rally said the Quest had been taking part in the race but left it Feb. 15 to chart an independent course from India to Oman.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:02 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Madelyn Albright at February 22, 2011 07:04 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: eman: United People's Front of Wisconsin at February 22, 2011 07:06 AM (VmVG3)
Posted by: Cu'Chulainn at February 22, 2011 07:06 AM (oW269)
Really? Some arrogant and clueless rich Californians decide to go slumming off the coast of Somalia and get murdered by the Islamic cave men? I am overcome with pity and regret. But Momma always said, "stupid is what stupid does". Amen.
Seems to me you go into a war zone as a last option, and before doing so you prepare for the worst. Or not.
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:06 AM (OlN4e)
Is there a bigger shithole than Somalia? Living here in MN we have a huge Somali population. I have no problems with immigrants who come here and do it right. But out of all the immigrant groups we have here, one stands out as a major problem. Guess which one. Not only do they not even attempt to assimilate but they are without a doubt the most rude and ungrateful people I have ever met. As for the pirates I agreee. Just start shooting them at sea or drop them off 200 miles or so out to sea. Or option B make the entire country a nuke test site.
Posted by: Bruce The Robert at February 22, 2011 07:06 AM (FDomG)
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:07 AM (SJ6/3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4NrT2oTQqE
Posted by: timwi at February 22, 2011 07:08 AM (Sxt4Z)
They're there more for protecting the shipping lanes. Nailing pirates is a side benefit sometimes.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:10 AM (mAhn3)
The uh, yachters acted stupidly
Posted by: President Jugears McFuckstick at February 22, 2011 07:10 AM (cUNcx)
The yachters putting themselves at risk is irrelevant.
Safe travel on the seas is the point.
Piracy should be eliminated like the plague of evil it is.
No mercy. No trial. No delay. Kill them. Destroy their vessels. Destroy their ports. All of them everywhere.
This.
And I will guarantee you that within two weeks of blowing shit out of the water, this crap would stop.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:10 AM (B+qrE)
Given how shitty we're learning our intelligence services are, that may actually be correct. Some raids along the Somali coast (or BUFF strikes, for all I care) would be great if we knew the right places to raid / bomb the shit out of. But it's becoming pretty clear from recent events that the CIA likely doesn't know any more than we do where exactly the pirate chiefs live.
Posted by: Alex at February 22, 2011 07:10 AM (RqJdC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 22, 2011 07:10 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 22, 2011 07:11 AM (081kp)
Is that the same as "murdered"? Whoever wrote that seems to be trying to "soften" the act.
Is there a bigger shithole than Somalia? Posted by: Bruce The Robert
Africa? Yeah, I'm gonna go with Africa.Posted by: Dang at February 22, 2011 07:12 AM (TXKVh)
Posted by: brian at February 22, 2011 07:12 AM (y05cf)
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:12 AM (OlN4e)
Doesn't matter where they live, just bomb the shit out of their boats docked along the coastline. Keep it up for a couple months and they'll be too poor to replace their losses.
No boats = no piracy.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:13 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: moki at February 22, 2011 07:14 AM (dZmFh)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 07:15 AM (TMB3S)
I also hope that all the Ace-Tards are keeping firearms (hidden) on their boats. The PC cowards and statists are making it a crime to pull into their port armed
This is a big part of the problem. As I understand it from some friends in the sailing/cruising community, most foreign ports look ill upon any private yacht that has firearms aboard. If you're lucky, they'll just confiscate your weapons. Unlucky, they'll confiscate your boat and you'll spend some time in jail for gun-running.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 22, 2011 07:15 AM (yf5H9)
Posted by: Ohio Dan at February 22, 2011 07:16 AM (EH4cc)
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:16 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Techie at February 22, 2011 07:17 AM (gfg//)
Posted by: jewells45 at February 22, 2011 07:18 AM (l/N7H)
You know what? We should be going back to handing out Letters of Marque just like in the days of old.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:18 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Cicero at February 22, 2011 07:18 AM (jpUgO)
Nothing is going to happen nor should it. Right now the pirates have 650 hostages and 30 ships they are holding. The majority if not all of the ships going through that area choose to remain unarmed and sitting ducks. They treat it as a risk of doing business, pay the ransom after awhile and go on.
If they don't want to protect themselves fuck em, don't send our young people to die doing it.
Posted by: robtr at February 22, 2011 07:19 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: EC
Then the bleeding heart liberals will say they can't fish and there will be mass starvation!
So learn to surf fish, ya fucksticks. If ya don't get that down then, yup, I guess there just might be some of that starvation. When in Rome... !
Posted by: Dang at February 22, 2011 07:19 AM (TXKVh)
Posted by: Meeechelle O. at February 22, 2011 07:20 AM (pr+up)
And they paid for that mistake with their lives. They may have felt lucky sailing around those waters in the past without incident, but luck won't cover you forever.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:21 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Barack Sodajerk at February 22, 2011 07:21 AM (aZCQ+)
Then the bleeding heart liberals will say they can't fish and there will be mass starvation!
Allah loves a hongry moose-limb.
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:21 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:21 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: gp at February 22, 2011 07:22 AM (B9rV2)
No boats = no piracy.
Brilliant fucking idea there, just brilliant. I guess we could also solve the Mexican drug smuggling problem by blowing up every car and truck in Mexico too, right?
Hint: there are at least a few Somalis who are not pirates. Many of them are legitimately fishermen. I'm all for dealing with the pirates as ruthlessly as possible, but destroying what few legitimate livelihoods may exist along the Somali coast and seriously fucking with the food supply of what's already a desperate shithole of a country is not a measure I'm prepared to take.
Posted by: Alex at February 22, 2011 07:22 AM (RqJdC)
Me neither. These people didn't do anything to deserve this*. They were passing out bibles and some scumbags hijacked their boat.
*Anybody who says 'stupidity' means you deserve death basically condemns us all. All of us have done something stupid. It doesn't mean you deserve to be murdered by thugs.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 22, 2011 07:22 AM (TpXEI)
Yeah, that's what I keep hearing from other countries next to large bodies of water, who've never had large communities of pirates.
Next.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:23 AM (mAhn3)
Something doesn't smell quite right about the description put forth of how this incident went down.
Also, these pirates aren't humans. They are vermin. Kill them and their spawn like vermin.
Posted by: havedash at February 22, 2011 07:23 AM (sFD5n)
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson at February 22, 2011 07:23 AM (jpUgO)
Posted by: HBDGAS at February 22, 2011 07:23 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:24 AM (AZGON)
That is some crazy shit. Sounds like he is doubling down. Get off the streets or I am going to kill you ass.
In other news, Sec Clinton's ass is still bigger that Michelle's, but they are going to have an ass off this Easter to be sure who is the biggest ass.
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 07:24 AM (JpFM9)
Posted by: Henry Gladstone at February 22, 2011 07:25 AM (By4wu)
Maybe not specifically for the tourists, but it would be nice if international shipping could use those waters again.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
*Anybody who says 'stupidity' means you deserve death basically condemns us all. All of us have done something stupid. It doesn't mean you deserve to be murdered by thugs.
I never said they deserved it. But I had a hard time feeling sorry for my cousin when his house blew up due to a gas leak he knew about for a year beforehand too.
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:25 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:26 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:26 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Wolverine at February 22, 2011 07:26 AM (GvYeG)
Posted by: t-bird at February 22, 2011 07:26 AM (FcR7P)
Or what about just bombing all the known pirate vessels? Out at sea before they make it to shore? Following them back, and marking them for bombing later? Not every one of them can be legit fishing boats.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 07:26 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 11:24 AM (JpFM9)
I think I'll have something to say about this.
Posted by: Oprah W. at February 22, 2011 07:27 AM (pr+up)
It is all going to pivot on this, isn't it? We are so screwed.
Posted by: Dang at February 22, 2011 07:28 AM (TXKVh)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:28 AM (B+qrE)
Do you expect our Navy to board each and every ship (little to medium sized motor boats is more like it) it finds on the high seas? How does it tell fishermen from pirates? Search each ship?
No. The prudent thing to do is for tourists to stay out of those areas. Love sailing? Go to the Caribean.. the Mediterranean.. South Sea islands.. go to the millions of miles of sea that are safer than the Somali coast and the Horn of Africa.
Wanna get in trouble? Pass out Bibles to Muslims.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 07:29 AM (f9c2L)
The Obama campaign has accused the Clinton camp of "the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering" after the internet site, Drudge report, published an photo of Barack Obama in full Somali traditional dress, which it said it had been sent by a Clinton aide.
The photo, taken in 2006, shows the Democrat front-runner dressed as a Somali elder, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya, the Drudge Report said.
Retired Air Force General Scott Gration, who accompanied Senator Obama on his trip to Kenya in 2006, defended Obama's trying on of local garb over his clothes, saying Obama was merely being a "great guest".
"Played a few rounds of golf, did a little piracy The typical tourist stuff...."
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 07:30 AM (bOKG+)
This whole thing reminds me of an article I read a few years ago about Somalian piracy and how it's the only money-maker in town, so the Somalis love them some pirates. I remember it so clearly because of how morally bankrupt piracy is, yet the AP is only too happy to say, "See? Because Somalia is a destitute shithole, piracy is okay."
The only way you're going to get rid of Somali piracy is to make it as unprofitable as possible. Bomb the ships, take out the ports, and don't let them rebuild.
Posted by: MWR at February 22, 2011 07:31 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:31 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:32 AM (AZGON)
Slightly OT, but after watching Col. West totally own that CAIR propagandist, my man-crush on him is bigger than ever.
Back on topic, I think Col. West would have a few effective ideas for dealing with Somali pirates.
My understanding is there are pirate-controlled ports on the coast. Why isn't the US Navy shelling them right now? I also understand that these pirates tend to work from mothership-type configurations, using a larger vessel at a distance to launch faster, lighter craft to conduct the actual raids. Why aren't a few of these mothership vessels being spotted by radar or satellite and then bombed or torpedoed?
I mean, we do have the capability to do this, right? Or have I just read too many Tom Clancy novels?
Posted by: Insomniac at February 22, 2011 07:32 AM (DrWcr)
Then the bleeding heart liberals will say they can't fish and there will be mass starvation!
They've beat you to it. The lefties have been claiming for years that the only reason for piracy off of Somalia is the destruction of traditional fisheries by those nasty "commercial" fishermen.
Posted by: Ed Anger at February 22, 2011 07:32 AM (7+pP9)
No. The prudent thing to do is for tourists to stay out of those areas.
So, we ignore the commercial aspect then? Freedom of the seas has been a fundamental point of British and then U.S. foreign policy for three hundred years. We have allowed the situation in Somalia to become a industry. Enough.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:32 AM (B+qrE)
You left out got a few mill in donations from non traceable Credit Cards.
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 07:33 AM (JpFM9)
Ya, how bout that? He has been bat crazy this whole time. I predict he ends up dead soon.
Posted by: Mjim at February 22, 2011 07:33 AM (mMdWG)
Posted by: A.G. at February 22, 2011 07:33 AM (oAVyq)
I say it's time to act rationally by combining several problems into one solution:
Have the DNR issue Federal "Pirate Hunting" Licenses. For a fee, tags are issued and Southern Rednecks and Midwestern deer hunters would be allowed to go "hunting" in a restricted zone of international waters off the coast of Somalia. I can guarantee they'd be armed better than any pirates. Hunters would be allowed to sink or keep any pirate vessels they capture. Actual captured Pirates could be impressed into labor by the Peace Corps in the rathole they came from. We'd pay them what we pay Peace Corps Volunteers (nothing) and then tell all the locals they'd been converted to Christianity during their capture guaranteeing an end to that problem.
Bubba and friends would have a fun adventure and come home with photos of the "hunt". Also an occasional POS vessel to take home. If they chose to sink it on the spot: ecological win! Dead pirates commited to the deep would feed the endangered Great White Shark population. Sunken vessles would become a new instant artificial reef on the spot!
Meanwhile, back home, the funds from the "hunting licenses" could be used to lower the national debt.
Hey if this works out we could modify this plan on our own southern border to deal with the illegal mexican immigrants as well!
Posted by: DocGrins at February 22, 2011 07:33 AM (v4UYp)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:34 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:34 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Col. West at February 22, 2011 07:34 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:34 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Letters of Marque at February 22, 2011 07:35 AM (DrWcr)
Kill/arrest pirates?
Fire illegal striking teachers?
Arrest union thugs?
Pull medical licenses of unethical lying doctors?
Hell no! Lets arrest 11 year olds for inappropriate stick figures.
Yes Monty, we are doomed.
Posted by: Vic at February 22, 2011 07:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Could technology solve this problem? Satellites should be able to see anything moving on the ocean in that area. Issue any ships with legitimate business there a transponder with 24 hour renewable codes, limit Somali fishing to x miles off their coast, and......
blow the fuck out of anything else that moves.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 22, 2011 07:35 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: Green Peace at February 22, 2011 07:36 AM (JpFM9)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:36 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:36 AM (AZGON)
If I'm reading correctly, it's actually a more accurate term. While "murder" was the end result, they were actually (again, if I'm reading correctly) recovered alive and died while being treated. Thus: mortally wounded. Presumably the report would have used the word "murdered" (Okay, not really: it's the MBM) had they been shot in cold blood instead of during negotiations for their release.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 07:36 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 10:38 AM
FIFY
Posted by: kbdabear at February 22, 2011 07:37 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:37 AM (AZGON)
A little beer, a little sun, out on the fresh open sea....a weekend with the guys away from the "little woman" while hunting the most dangerous prey. WHAT could possibly make for a better weekend? You'd have to get NASCAR on water to improve that!
Posted by: DocGrins at February 22, 2011 07:37 AM (v4UYp)
I think not. These guys don't give a fuck and have moved their operations further out to sea, with mother boats and runners.
Ransom is the only business these fuckers have. Till you either kill them all, or stop paying them, they will be around.
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 07:39 AM (JpFM9)
Here's another report, from the Weekly World News (NSFW in a "People of WalMart" way).
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 22, 2011 07:39 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:39 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 11:34 AM (B+qrE)
Unfortunately, that describes about 85% of the middle east (and eastern Europe and South America, for that matter). Are there any phallic, shiny towers in the background? If not, we can be assured that he's probably not in Dubai. Otherwise, it's anyone's guess.
Posted by: MWR at February 22, 2011 07:39 AM (4df7R)
My understanding is there are pirate-controlled ports on the coast. Why isn't the US Navy shelling them right now? I also understand that these pirates tend to work from mothership-type configurations, using a larger vessel at a distance to launch faster, lighter craft to conduct the actual raids. Why aren't a few of these mothership vessels being spotted by radar or satellite and then bombed or torpedoed?
I mean, we do have the capability to do this, right? Or have I just read too many Tom Clancy novels?
Posted by: Insomniac-----------
India just sunk 2 "motherships" when they got close to their waters. That is practical and should be done when they are identified as such.
But shelling pirate-controlled ports? Do you think the only residents are bucaneers drinking grog at the local pubs? The news services would just love to broadcast the pictures of bombed out homes and mangled babies from indiscriminate shelling of port towns by American warships.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 07:40 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:40 AM (AZGON)
Sorry, but fuck this.
The general is sorry? $700B/yr in defense, for what?
Why do we buy so many neat toys if we're never going to use them to protect precious American lives?
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 22, 2011 07:40 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 07:42 AM (TMB3S)
I actually believe in armed Merchant Men and private vessels. Heck, against what the Somali's are using right now, 18th/19th century tech would be more than sufficient (and would kind of undermine that whole "gun-running" idiocy: what badguy would want to buy a Gatling gun?).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 07:42 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 22, 2011 11:39 AM (nAOMZ) "The 'Badger 14'" That's offensive to badgers. Those dem rapscallions better not show their face around Honey Badger's burrow any time soon. Honey Badger don't give a fuck. Honey badger will mess their shit up.
Posted by: MWR at February 22, 2011 07:42 AM (4df7R)
I would pay real money if some hacker could greenscreen Star Wars Kid behind Gaddafi right now.
I'd prefer the Chris Hansen lean-in photo.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:42 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:43 AM (SJ6/3)
Why do we buy so many neat toys if we're never going to use them to protect precious American lives?
<voice of Bill Murry> AAAaaarmy training SIR!!!
Posted by: DocGrins at February 22, 2011 07:43 AM (v4UYp)
The solution to piracy is (as it has always been) to destroy their bases of operation. The "probability of intercept" solution is too hard to do it at sea and has an enormous resource cost. If you don't want to kill everyone; then park a warship with a reinforced company of Marines on board just off shore. Inspect, seize weapons, raid, etc. In Somalia, a safe assumption can be that anyone that look rich is a pirate - so hit all the big houses and vehicles first.
Posted by: Jean at February 22, 2011 07:43 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:43 AM (AZGON)
To look on the silver lining of this, (my condolences to the families involved,) Obama/Hillary is un-doing 30+ of Liberal Foreign Policy talking points. Sadly, this is and will continue to cost American and our alliesÂ’ lives but their arguments of "willing hearts and minds," will fall on deaf ears very soon.
On the negative side, we're going to have to break out the 20lb sledge hammer at some point to crack someone's egg, the days of "pin-point" attacks and COIN are quickly drawing to a close I'm afraid.
Posted by: ATLDiver at February 22, 2011 07:43 AM (Zpdgr)
They go well with Valu Rite. Going to see Sen DeMint after work(fundraiser), so will have to stay sober???
Ha Ha!
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 07:44 AM (JpFM9)
Maybe we need to spend another few billion on perfecting our negotiation skills.
Fucking negotiations with pirates.
So after the Americans were murdered, tell me that our Navy blew those muthafuckin Somali barbarians out of the water, please.
Posted by: Soothsayer, Republican Whip at February 22, 2011 07:45 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:46 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:46 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:46 AM (SJ6/3)
Until they start practicing piracy in the 'safe' areas because it's lucrative and we don't fight back.
Nobody said enforcing laws is easy, but this is the Navy's job. It's like complaining that our border is too big.
The US fucks around too much and lets people get away with killing American citizens and flouting our sovereignty.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 22, 2011 07:47 AM (TpXEI)
Would you call that a "trio of ass" er ribs all around!
Posted by: Kemp at February 22, 2011 11:28 AM (JpFM9)
Count me in and call it 8 cheeks in a week-week
or somthing.
Posted by: Queen Latifah at February 22, 2011 07:47 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 07:47 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 11:43 AM (SJ6/3)
Geez, what next? A twenty minute soliloquoy on Watergate?
Posted by: MWR at February 22, 2011 07:48 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 07:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at February 22, 2011 07:48 AM (AZGON)
My boss had a 65' Irwin in St. Thomas and he had a pedestal mount 20mm canon. I just had a M 14 and a .45
FWIW, pretty much anything is available for $$ outside of US territorial waters (including the USVI, oddly enough).
I care not why they were sailing (sailing = can be overtaken by a well rowed johnboat) in those waters - self defense is available if one is willing to use it.
I was involved w/a nasty maritime incident many years ago off the coast of a small SA "republic", and can vouch for the perception that small arms fire (.30 Caliber) can be an effective deterrent w/o worring that the other party is in a "steel hull fishing boat" - they have to expose themselves at some point...
May they Rest in Peace.
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 07:50 AM (OXvHP)
Preferred new American Piracy Policy that will never be enacted by the Muslim in the White House:
Any pirates caught in the act in open International Waters will be executed on the spot, at sea with bullets dipped in pork blood before loading. Bodies to be commited to the deep.
Piracy is an act of war. Without proper uniform and identification, all pirates could be treated as spies during war time without reprisal and to my knowledge without violating any international treaties. Summary execution by the military on the scene.
That whole idea works for me.
Posted by: DocGrins at February 22, 2011 07:50 AM (v4UYp)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:50 AM (SJ6/3)
I won.
Posted by: B. Hussein Obama at February 22, 2011 11:48 AM (AZGON)
yeah, that's about what I figured too.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 07:50 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:52 AM (SJ6/3)
Basically says something along the lines that pirates have removed themselves outside the bounds and laws of humanity, and we can pretty much do what we want to them.
Anyone put me some effin knowledge?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 07:52 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:52 AM (AZGON)
I think his Sgt Peppers Lonely Dictators outfit looks more presidential.
He totally stole that look from Idi Amin. I bet they got into a slap fight about it.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:53 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: AllenG
-------
No problem with that idea.. except who funds it? I would think the commercial lines would be doing this already for as much as it has cost them over the years. I just don't think it is a U.S. military problem. Indepedent Merchant Men (as you call them) with private vessels would be able to solve the problem much easier without the political baggage a Navy would bring along. Don't know how that would jibe with modern maritime law, however.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 22, 2011 07:54 AM (f9c2L)
I'm starting to think the only thing limiting the length of a Gaddafi speech is the state of his bladder.
We can only see him from mid-chest up, you know.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:54 AM (B+qrE)
Skinny hunt. $50/set of trophy ears, $100/trophy head. No bag limit. Round-trip transportation and a sack lunch provided.
Posted by: Abiss at February 22, 2011 07:54 AM (1ilyW)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:54 AM (AZGON)
Pirates need to start feeling the hand of death that used to follow such professions.
Posted by: kidney at February 22, 2011 07:55 AM (3j6OS)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 11:52 AM (AZGON)
For all we know, there's a urinal in front of him.
Posted by: Tami at February 22, 2011 07:55 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: The Effete Pirate Barack at February 22, 2011 07:56 AM (O/Vkt)
I actually believe in armed Merchant Men and private vessels. Heck, against what the Somali's are using right now, 18th/19th century tech would be more than sufficient (and would kind of undermine that whole "gun-running" idiocy: what badguy would want to buy a Gatling gun?).
Posted by: AllenG
The problems are the whole arms coming into ports thing and insurance as I understand it.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 22, 2011 07:56 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 07:57 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:57 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Deanna at February 22, 2011 07:58 AM (0cSvo)
Posted by: Darren at February 22, 2011 07:58 AM (CB5Th)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 07:58 AM (AZGON)
Vice Adm. Mark Fox, Commander of the US Navy 5th fleet, told a news conference that negotiations were taking place between the U.S. forces and the pirates Tuesday morning when they suddenly fired a rocket-propelled grenade at the Sterett, which was about 600 yards away. The RPG missed.
That RPG shot seems a bit -- optimistic, doesn't it?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 08:00 AM (bOKG+)
I actually believe in armed Merchant Men and private vessels.
Heck, against what the Somali's are using right now, 18th/19th century
tech would be more than sufficient (and would kind of undermine that
whole "gun-running" idiocy: what badguy would want to buy a Gatling
gun?).
Posted by: AllenG
The problems are the whole arms coming into ports thing and insurance as I understand it.
Then have a dingy pull off from the main ship when they get close to territorial waters with the armed crew onboard. I get the whole issue with armed vessels coming into port, but there are bigger things at stake.
How much do these shipping companies pay in ransom for hijacked vessels and crew? Millions at a time? Why not invest a fraction of that amount into private security forces crewed with the vessel? That can go a long way in reducing losses from piracy, not just in money but lives as well.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 08:00 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 08:01 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 08:02 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 22, 2011 12:01 PM (AZGON)
PAL or NTSC?
Posted by: Tami at February 22, 2011 08:03 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Jugears O. at February 22, 2011 08:04 AM (mQMnK)
Harsh words like "murdered" don't fit into the man-caused disaster dictate of the current administration.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Barry's Hate Club at February 22, 2011 08:05 AM (xs5wK)
However, as the yacht was being cleared later, the special forces shot dead one pirate and killed another with a knife.
Having to kill a pirate with a knife when you all have guns seems odd.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 08:06 AM (bOKG+)
The pirates are too well connected with international terrorism and the international drug and black market trade -- they have too much political clout with certain people in high places for anything to be really done about them. Couple that with support from the international social justice bleeding heart set, and the bastards have near carte blanche. Top it off with the shipping companies getting to write off the loss to piracy. Only the little people truly suffer at the hands of the pirates.
We do have the ability (and the intelligence reports) to put an end to them tomorrow if we so desired, but it will never happen -- not while they perform an important role for the folks in charge.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 08:06 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 11:52 AM (eCAn3)
See post 41.
Posted by: Vic at February 22, 2011 08:07 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Cain's Pizzeria at February 22, 2011 08:10 AM (mAhn3)
"Why not invest a fraction of that amount into private security forces crewed with the vessel"
An excellent question, and one that strikes to the heart of the issue.
Ship owners & operators run on thin margins (% basis) - volume matters. Having a defensive mindset costs real money, and quite frankly it's cheaper to have the ship siezed, sit for a time, negotate with the various interested parties (which spreads the costs), and go back to day to day operations. Most operators thought of early Somali piracy as absolutely nothing more that a cost of doing business, and some (operators) were against any retaliation against the pirates (as that would drive up costs). In some circles, blame for the current state of piracy is laid at the feet of the responders/enforcers...
With the escalation - murdered crewmen are expensive, owners & operators are fairly united in favor of some action - just not on their part.
Oddly enough (heh), most of the pirated vessels are Euro owned/operated - much in the same fashion as two hundred years ago along the Barbary Coast...
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 08:11 AM (OXvHP)
Will never happen. Pirates are black and Muslim. Obama won't kill who he identifies most with.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 22, 2011 08:12 AM (QxGmu)
Asked about the two pirates who were already dead when the troops arrived, Vice Adm. Fox said he did not know the circumstances of their deaths.
So did someone fight back, or perhaps was there a bit of inter-buccaneer fratricide?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 08:13 AM (bOKG+)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 08:14 AM (eCAn3)
An excellent question, and one that strikes to the heart of the issue.
Ship owners & operators run on thin margins (% basis) - volume matters. Having a defensive mindset costs real money, and quite frankly it's cheaper to have the ship siezed, sit for a time, negotate with the various interested parties (which spreads the costs), and go back to day to day operations. Most operators thought of early Somali piracy as absolutely nothing more that a cost of doing business, and some (operators) were against any retaliation against the pirates (as that would drive up costs). In some circles, blame for the current state of piracy is laid at the feet of the responders/enforcers...
With the escalation - murdered crewmen are expensive, owners & operators are fairly united in favor of some action - just not on their part.
Oddly enough (heh), most of the pirated vessels are Euro owned/operated - much in the same fashion as two hundred years ago along the Barbary Coast...
That is absolutely absurd. Paying millions in ransom can't be more worthwhile than paying a fraction of that for armed security. If they truly believe that piracy and ransoms are a "part of the business", then that mindset is fucked up. How about paying armed security personnel as the new "part of the business" without having to worry about ransoms that are 10-100 times that amount?
Posted by: Cain's at February 22, 2011 08:14 AM (mAhn3)
they have too much political clout with certain people in high places for anything to be really done about them.
You want to clarify that?
...not while they perform an important role for the folks in charge.
In charge of what?
Posted by: HH at February 22, 2011 08:16 AM (6oDXl)
I'd say sign me up, but you need to up the bounties. A man's gotta eat.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 22, 2011 08:18 AM (QxGmu)
"Having to kill a pirate with a knife when you all have guns seems odd."
Maybe he didn't "have" to use a knife.
Like when people have asked me if I ever had to kill anybody, I always answered, "Well, I didn't have to".
Posted by: gebrauchshund at February 22, 2011 08:18 AM (iYwUw)
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 22, 2011 12:06 PM (bOKG+)
Hurts more.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 08:20 AM (eCAn3)
Having to kill a pirate with a knife when you all have guns seems odd.
Obviously, the Marine was a sportsman.
Posted by: maddogg at February 22, 2011 08:20 AM (OlN4e)
That is absolutely absurd. Paying millions in ransom can't be more worthwhile than paying a fraction of that for armed security
"Worthwile" is subjective. Most shippers could get their goverments to kick in some $, thus getting the crews released & the ships back on course fairly quickly (thus reducing overages)
"If they truly believe that piracy and ransoms are a "part of the business", then that mindset is fucked up"
Then you clearly aren't European. (Kidding... sort of. Ok, not really.)
Read the history of the Barbary Pirates. The European powers did exactly as I've described until the Americans decided that, yes, this is "f*cked up"...
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 08:22 AM (OXvHP)
228 NIce rhetorical question!
Follow the money: who financed some of our leader's political aspirations?
Posted by: unknown jane at February 22, 2011 08:23 AM (5/yRG)
Why not? Make it painfully clear to the Somalis that these pirates are ruining their lives and their livelihoods. And simply hang pirates, caught in piracy. Why are we wasting time and effort seeing that these ocean going pond scum get all their rights? I'm beginning to think we have lost our collective minds. And what about retaliation? Attack an American flag vessel and jets show up to work over the countryside. Just make sure that there is some way to alert the West every time one of the pirate vessels puts to sea. From where and what they look like. Sell out your village mates, save your boats. If you're so worried about the Somalis being unable to fish, AFTER we sink all their boats, along a particular section of coast, then the Marines can land - armed to the teeth - and hand out some food.
Posted by: Mike Giles at February 22, 2011 08:23 AM (sAz/g)
Posted by: havedash at February 22, 2011 08:25 AM (sFD5n)
Then you clearly aren't European. (Kidding... sort of. Ok, not really.)
Read the history of the Barbary Pirates. The European powers did exactly as I've described until the Americans decided that, yes, this is "f*cked up"...
Yes, I'm aware of the history of Barbary Pirates. I'm of the type that doesn't accept this kind of behavior. If business means intentionally funding an industry of criminal activity, but not taking measures to prevent it or avoid it, then the true blame lies with them and no one else.
Posted by: EC at February 22, 2011 08:26 AM (mAhn3)
"but not taking measures to prevent it or avoid it, then the true blame lies with them and no one else"
I am in full agreement.
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 08:28 AM (OXvHP)
Posted by: Janet Napolitano's bunghole at February 22, 2011 08:29 AM (lRqIF)
I think some morons here think Somalia is in the Southern portion of Africa. It ain't.
The best strategy is to make a beeline from Australia to Mauritius, avoiding the Maldives and Seychelles entirely (pirates love those waters), and from there go around Madagascar's southern tip and into East London (Buffalo City).
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 22, 2011 08:33 AM (QxGmu)
"Do you expect our Navy to board each and every ship (little to medium sized motor boats is more like it) it finds on the high seas"
Sure. FWIW, "fishing" boats are easy to spot & track - lots of exposed equipment, consistant routes, and a relatively few number of hands on board. A "fishing boat" out of coastal range (operated & refueled from a "mother ship") w/many "fishermen" on board and not dragging nets nor being followed by clouds of gulls would be highly suspect & easily identified.
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 08:33 AM (OXvHP)
Posted by: mpfs, Mother may I sleep with badgers? at February 22, 2011 08:34 AM (iYbLN)
Ah, "Rod" - ?????
Somalia is part of the "Horn of Africa", and there are very few private vessels that can readily sail, say Perth to Port Louis, much less any SA port or the Cape, thus the Northerly route thru Aden to the Suez...
Posted by: Jess at February 22, 2011 08:41 AM (OXvHP)
Land a battalion of Marine Honey Badgers on the Somali coast and let them have their way.
Just don't use a Cobra helicopter as the transport. Could get ugly real fast.
Posted by: HH at February 22, 2011 08:42 AM (6oDXl)
First of all, my bad about the "horn". I got horn mixed up with cape. Sorry. But still, there is simply no way to be in the Gulf of Aden without being right off the Somali coast. So I still like my route better.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 22, 2011 08:48 AM (QxGmu)
The honey badger doesn't know he's been stung by the Cobra's 20mm cannon. Look, he's going to sleep. Now, he's waking up. 20mm cannon fire can't stop the honey badger. He's going right back to eating that f***ing Cobra.
Posted by: Oddly-voiced nature show narrator at February 22, 2011 08:55 AM (DrWcr)
Now, that's an idea.
Posted by: Dept of the Treasury at February 22, 2011 08:57 AM (dJ7er)
FWIW, I like that route too - with a few hundred lbs. of supplies, ammo, etc.
Oh - and two or three months off. Just like a Wisconson Teacher...
(couldn't resist)
Posted by: Barry (Teleprompter) McJugears at February 22, 2011 08:59 AM (OXvHP)
Posted by: Berserker at February 22, 2011 09:05 AM (gWHrG)
As for the time off, assuming you're in a position to sail around the world, time off really shouldn't be a factor.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at February 22, 2011 09:08 AM (QxGmu)
Posted by: Penultimatum at February 22, 2011 09:19 AM (dJ7er)
/sarc
Soon, I'd suspect.
Posted by: Carolyn at February 22, 2011 09:41 AM (NYjsM)
An Iowa-class battleship would have been ideal for the task...
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at February 22, 2011 10:06 AM (nD3Pg)
Posted by: curious at February 22, 2011 10:14 AM (p302b)
They have balls. We have military and civilian leadership which is risk averse and incompetent.
Posted by: Alex at February 22, 2011 10:20 AM (x40U+)
Posted by: curious at February 22, 2011 02:14 PM (p302b)
Honestly, dumb luck. Something happened here, the pirates did something idiotic, and everything went to shit.
We don't know what happened on the boat beforehand, maybe one of the pirates got frisky with a hostage and a fight broke out, maybe the pirates started fighting, but one of them fired an RPG at the Navy and we had to go in, found the hostages dead.
We don't know if they were killed in a struggle or if the pirates executed them.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 22, 2011 10:28 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Extremely drunk and stoned nuanced thinker at February 22, 2011 10:33 AM (G60Nl)
You don't need to get all of them, though hey, that would be nice. If pirates simply disappear 1/5th of the time they go out, they will run out of pirates.
As far as the existing 650 hostages, how the hell did we let it get that far? Oh, yeah, everybody's a sissy.
We just don't have the credibility to threaten for the release of the hostages right now because we've been letting them get away with it.
We need to take care of this horseshit because it's in international waters and its spreading, and it's not the only place in the world with a pirate problem, and we're *letting* it spread.
Either arm the merchant ships or go after the pirates, or just continue to lose people and money hand over fist to the world's largest criminal racket.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 22, 2011 10:34 AM (bxiXv)
We need some "trap" ships in the area, mid-sized (captured drug yachts?) refit with concealed heavy weapons. Sail 'em through the area as bait and blow the fuck out of pirates that attack.The day Obama signs off on sinking skinnies off the African coast is the day I start preparing for the impending apocalypse.
Posted by: Encarn at February 22, 2011 10:52 AM (WVyhq)
Posted by: Darren at February 22, 2011 10:56 AM (Vqn1t)
link peddling donations to AMISON...?
Why weren't the American Christian Evangelists carrying Bibles to distribute into Somalia in contact with AMISOM for protective guard to have the AMISON police/military coordinated with the Somali government meet and greet them before entering the coastal pirate waters under protective guard? Because the amison peacekeepers are just another pirating scam fronting for UN corruption?
from their home page: AMISOM conducts a Peace Support Operation in Somalia to stabilize the security situation, including the take over from Ethiopian Forces, and to create a safe and secure environment in preparation for the transition to the UN.
Posted by: El Presidenté at February 22, 2011 10:58 AM (H+LJc)
The American Bar Association (ABA) has decided to undertake the fight for Sharia law...to develop "an informal set of ‘talking points' that local opponents of these [anti-Sharia state legislative] initiatives could use to make their case in each of the 14 states that have introduced anti-Sharia legislation. -- Pamela Geller
Posted by: El Presidenté at February 22, 2011 11:08 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Vic at February 22, 2011 11:10 AM (M9Ie6)
Gotta love Wikipedia. From the linked article on "The First Barary War":
Even so, most captives were pressed into hard labor in the service of the Barbary pirates, and struggled under extremely poor conditions that exposed them to vermin, disease, and Muslims. [emphasis added]
The vermin and disease were bad enough.
Posted by: OCBill at February 22, 2011 11:33 AM (YJvVE)
Gotta love Wikipedia. From the linked article on "The First Barary War":
Posted by: OCBill at February 22, 2011 03:33 PM (YJvVE)And that's the sanitized version. A million Europeans taken as slaves, brutalized, tortured, raped and forced into slavery, in the name of Allah.
The few actual individual stories that escaped were incredibly horrific.
And the ideas behind it haven't really changed.
Yeah, I have trust issues.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 22, 2011 11:44 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: tom at February 22, 2011 09:36 PM (DIsqs)
1. ralph lauren polo with a sumptuous series of Ralph Lauren polo shirts hot online for new season promotion sale! ralph lauren polo shirts online will certainly enjoy you with impressive styles, 100% guaranteed quality and luxurious choosing options! Besides, ralph lauren sale exclusive online wholesale price is nicely offered for you to order the most trendy shirts easily!
Posted by: bush88 at April 11, 2011 12:15 AM (PQVOk)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2237 seconds, 395 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Gazpacho at February 22, 2011 06:36 AM (8ay4x)