August 23, 2011
— Monty

The president has acknowledged that without reform, spending on entitlement programs is unsustainable. But he has also made clear that he would never support the type of structural changes to Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security needed to make these programs solvent as envisioned in our budget — even if Republicans agree to his demand for tax increases. While a compromise on the way to strengthen entitlements may be one thing, raising taxes in this economy is another. Doing so would exacerbate the jobs crisis for the 14 million Americans out of work. It would negatively affect the businesses across America that we are counting on to get our economy going.The comments are way better than the article itself, by the way. Comedy gold.
The Euro is doomed, ChinaÂ’s in for a radical slowdown, and America might yet end up as the least-worst economy left standing by the end of the decade. Yay us!
Why Amazon canÂ’t make the Kindle in the US.
Is the main driver of unemployment a lack of labor mobility? There is a shortage of jobs in certain geographical areas, but there is also a lack of qualified applicants for the jobs that exist. The author blames stubborn unemployment numbers on a lack of labor mobility, and there is some truth to that, but a bigger issue is the asymmetry between the skills being demanded of the workforce versus the skills that the citizens are actually learning. ItÂ’s a failure of the educational system first and foremost.
Brother, can you spare $1.2 Trillion? But keep it on the down-low. I don't want anybody to know I'm hard-up.
Eurocrats are still pushing fiscal unity. I don't think it's going to happen.
Yet another reason to give Boomers a high-stepping kick in the nads. I jest...but only a little. I feel like the smallest child in a house full of bigger siblings who clean out the fridge of all the good stuff before I can get there. Oreos? Gone. Twinkies? Gone. Brownies? Gone. Leftover fried chicken? Gone. All that's left is some old celery and prune juice.
CDS Market: WeÂ’re getting pretty alarmed over here.
President Obama to serve up yet another giant nothing-burger. You know, I just can't get enough of this guy. A day without a gassy meaningless speech from King Putt is like a day without sunshine.
Taking the fabled “dine and dash” to a whole new level.
Germany’s “us or them” moment.
In coming months, Germany may have to make an agonizing choice: stable money or European integration.My guess? “Stable money” wins in a walk.
More on the unpleasant choices facing Germany and the EU.
A reminder: The Fed canÂ’t cut rates below zero. And they canÂ’t force people to borrow money.
Amity Schlaes: WhatÂ’s the best thing Congress can do? Take their ball and go home.
Singer is blunter. About Washington's impact on the economy, he says simply: "Congress subtracts value."
Demographic DOOM. We're considerably less boned than Europe in this regard, so I guess we have that going for us.
The blue social modelÂ’s war on the young.
E. J. Dionne: We already consider you our Emperor, Barack! Please begin acting like one! The Imperium Americus will usher in a new age of freedom and prosperity!
Lie for years and get fat bonuses. Tell the truth and get fired. What a world. I'm sure this had nothing at all to do with the recent downgrade of US debt, that there was absolutely no pressure brought to bear by a red-faced Administration. (I wonder if Obama sent Luca Brasi over to S&P to deliver the message.)
King Putt: The $4 Trillion dollar man. And he doesnÂ’t even have a bionic eye.
UPDATE 1: Those evil GOP bastards want to tax the poor! Well...yeah. When half of the people in the country pay no federal income-tax at all, they have no skin in the game. Everybody should pay something for the government they receive, just to remind them that government isn't free.
UPDATE 2: Posner: Yeah, we're in a Depression, all right.
Unfortunately, even when the economy recovers, and tax revenues increase, the federal deficit will continue to rise because of the rapid growth of entitlement expenditures—primarily Medicare and Social Security and, because of the health-reform law, Medicaid.
-----------

Posted by: Monty at
04:41 AM
| Comments (280)
Post contains 746 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Tami at August 23, 2011 04:46 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 04:51 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 04:52 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 04:56 AM (eLCau)
Byron York saying something I have been saying all along.
And a lot of Morons have
given me grief about it. SS, Medicare, and other “entitlements” are not what
got us where we are at now. They may be a problem a few years down the road,
but we got hear when the Dems and Obama raised discretionary spending through
the roof and then moved it into “mandatory” spending.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 04:57 AM (M9Ie6)
Oh yay we haven't had an intergenerational Boomer fight in weeks! It'll make a nice change from the purity wars. (Bloomberg link is fubar'd btw).
There is some truth to the labor mobility issue. So long as the real estate market is fairly robost, then it's fairly easy to ignore. If it's not, well, then the asymetries in job distribution become plain.
Also, Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 23, 2011 04:57 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 04:57 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 04:59 AM (M9Ie6)
We used to make microchips here...until regulation and OSHA and EPA nonsense got so restrictive that they moved to low-wage markets. The yields aren't as good, but profit is higher.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 05:00 AM (LH6ir)
I hear chicks are kinda DOOMed in the Peace Corps and that the dems like it like that.
Now why I ask, would the dems block investigating this? Rape is a good thing on the left?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:00 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at August 23, 2011 05:01 AM (OVCfn)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 05:02 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:02 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: France and Poland, nervously watching their German borders at August 23, 2011 05:03 AM (iRlbA)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:03 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:04 AM (8y9MW)
You know my feelings on that, Vic. I've shown you the charts, the forecasts, everything else. You can choose not to believe it, but that doesn't make it false.
Entitlement spending is the main driver of our debt because we can't spend huge amounts on entitlements and do everything else the government is supposed to do. To say that our borrowing is disconnected from entitlement spending is just dumb.
Posted by: Monty at August 23, 2011 05:05 AM (/0a60)
The author blames stubborn unemployment numbers on a lack of labor mobility, and there is some truth to that, but a bigger issue is the asymmetry between the skills being demanded of the workforce versus the skills that the citizens are actually learning. ItÂ’s a failure of the educational system first and foremost.
I had mentioned this in a thread a while back.
In 2006 the U.S. Department of Labor spent $4B to put 189,000 people in jobs they otherwise would not have had. At that rate we could have simply cut everyone a check for $21K and eliminated all the overhead that administered that funding for a net savings.
Federal jobs programs do not work. They do not work in large measure because of the failure of the public education system. Half the people in these programs (I know because I worked in them) can't read, write, or do math at the level require to get a job, so the "jobs program" becomes a remedial high school. For those that do have the high school background, they end up training for the wrong jobs available locally because the training takes too long and all too frequently, thanks to bureaucratic inertia, is in the wrong job sector.
If you're a DOL bureaucrat, it's easier to stick you in the 5-week hairdressing class that starts next week than it is to find the exact right fit for the person. If you do it that way you can get back to your coffee and crossword puzzle sooner.
Exaggerated? Yes, but really not by all that much.
People with GEDs are not snagging high-tech jobs at $65K/year. No Federal program is going to fix that.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 05:05 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:06 AM (XEK+4)
Yes, but you are wrong. You are confusing mandatory spending with entitlements. The point is, our CURRENT deficit is not driven by entitlements. It is driven by Obama tripling spending. There will be problems down the road if they don't do something but the CURRENT mess is all Obama.
And I have shown you the charts.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:07 AM (M9Ie6)
By definition, the only "mandatory" spending is "entitlement" spending (this straight from the lips of Joe Barton- no, no link, it was in verbal remarks and I happened to be at the venue). Basically, for them to have made "discretionary" spending "mandatory" they would have had to change it into some entitlement program (which I'm sure they could do).
The only thing that makes spending "mandatory" is if someone qualifies (that is: is entitled to) for a specific program.
So, yes, it is specifically entitlements which must be reformed. Just because some of those entitlements are new doesn't change the fact that they're entitlements. And however we got here, the biggest offenders are SS, Medicare, and Medicaid. The new entitlements accelerated and empowered the DOOM, but they did not create it nor set it in motion.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:07 AM (8y9MW)
I see that you are against the concept of 'fair share' as contemporarily defined by the left.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:08 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 05:09 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: steevy at August 23, 2011 05:10 AM (pV6cO)
Down the road? Jesus, Vic, we're flat busted broke right now! How much more "road" do you think we have? Medicare is right on the edge of collapse, and SS won't be far behind. (SSDI, as I pointed out yesterday, is already pretty much insolvent.)
Posted by: Monty at August 23, 2011 05:10 AM (/0a60)
NO NO NO
Mandatory spending is not all entitlements. It is anything that they passed into law and stuck in the mandatory category. Obama stuck all the stimulus welfare programs in the Mandatory category.
When the current crop of shit-weasel politicians talk about "entitlements" they are talking about SS, Medicare, etc.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:11 AM (M9Ie6)
The point is, our CURRENT deficit is not driven by entitlements.
Vic, when you say that you are excluding all the other cumulative effects of entitlement spending BO (Before Obama). Interest we pay on the debt today ("current" in your parlance) form previous borrowing to support entitlements is still part of the deficit today.
Yes, JEF exploded the rate of spending. Or as AlGore used to say, "blew a hole through the budget."
But that doesn't make the borrowing that occured before Obama somehow not part of today's calculation.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 05:12 AM (sbV1u)
So here's a theory. What if Government, as a "Jobs program," issued block grants to companies (of any size). To qualify for a grant (amount based on the size of your business, your industry, and your average salary) you had to hire and provide training for a number of employees. Those employees' salaries would be paid by the block grant (that is, we'd take the formula to find a salary for one employee, multiply by the number of employees you decide to hire, and you get that much tax-exempt money).
Now, I'm not proposing this idea, and I think, as a Federal program it would be terrible (not to mention unconstitutional), but purely theoretically, do you think that would work better than the current situation?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:12 AM (8y9MW)
Yes, due to the Obamanite tripling of spending!
As for SSDI I have been pointing out that fraud for over a year. Over half of it is downright fraud.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:13 AM (M9Ie6)
It is only a matter of time before someone in Europe begins to propose that what is necessary is for these disparate countries to made to become more alike - that they should be truly one. Things should really get exciting then.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:15 AM (jx2j9)
That is the problem.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:15 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:18 AM (M9Ie6)
Now, it is irritating as heck when someone gets all the way through a job interview process to the offer stage and then announces they can't move, but I guess Mr Y-not and I are the only ones on the planet who actually do those life calculations before applying for jobs.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:18 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: sTevo at August 23, 2011 05:18 AM (hiMsy)
The reason nobody wants to hire Americans is that Americans sabotage products. Ask Boeing. Forty years back, the Brits did that. Killed them.
Posted by: comatus at August 23, 2011 05:19 AM (W5ilH)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 05:19 AM (ZDUD4)
Crying Boner and McGonnell have made a "deal" to make it better! They will decrease the rate of increase.
Delta-$/Delta-T < 100T/Month
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:20 AM (M9Ie6)
Here's an analogy:
Let's say you take home $1500 a month. You send Grandma $500 a month to help her meet expenses. This is fine if your own expenses are $1000 per month or less. But prices and expenses rise over time (and lately, much faster than wages). When your expenses go up -- if the rent goes up, if gas prices rise, if your car breaks down, if you get sick, etc. -- all of a sudden that $500 going to Grandma every month is looming very large in your economic world. It might come down to giving Gradma less money or going broke yourself -- and if you go broke yourself, Grandma will get zero dollars per month instead of the lesser amount.
Grandma might argue that her $500 a month isn't taking the majority of your paycheck, and that's both true and beside the point. Her $500 is the margin between solvency and insolvency, and it is the most elastic part of your expense picture. That expense must fall if you are to stay solvent because you cannot do without any of the other expenses.
Posted by: Monty at August 23, 2011 05:21 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Life of Pi Audiobook at August 23, 2011 05:21 AM (r8C32)
Sorry, Vic. I'm going to believe Joe Barton and his staff over you on this one. What makes spending mandatory is that whatever program "shall" be funded. The only way to add that little clause is if there is some qualification (so, with Medicare, it's being age 65, or a small number of other things. With SS, it's having paid into SS and reaching an eligible age. With Medicaid there are income requirements and a few other things). Any new program in "mandatory" spending has some kind of qualification: that is, some way that some entity can say, "Hey, I qualify for this money, you have to give it to me."
You could not, for instance, make road projects "mandatory" spending.
And, yes, when politicians say "Entitlements" they may mean, specifically, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. So what?
When a vase breaks, does it really matter where the golf-ball hit it? If I pour sugar in my gas-tank, does that mean I should only have to replace the gas-tank? The answer to both of those is "no." Once the vase is broken, it's broken all over. Once the sugar is in the gas tank, it's going to screw up the entire engine.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:21 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Ann d'Mestik at August 23, 2011 05:21 AM (4aekM)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 23, 2011 05:22 AM (lbo6/)
Famous People Sarah Palin Doesn't Like
Sarah Palin has taken issue with quite a few well-known people over the past couple of years. See who's not on Sarah's good side!
Full List:
David Letterman
Levi Johnston
Katie Couric
Ashley Judd
Oliver Stone
Michelle Obama
Alec Baldwin
Rachel Maddow
Tina Fey
Kathy Griffin
Common
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:23 AM (XEK+4)
-----
I guess people don't learn on the job any longer.
There's education, job training, and on the job training (experience). Education should provide the skills you need to learn not just the things in the classroom, but throughout your life. A well-educated person can adapt to new situations and translate skills from one arena to another.
That's not the same thing as job training (certificate programs, internships, etc) or experience. Those are required, too, especially in certain career tracks or for higher level positions.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:23 AM (5H6zj)
Now, I'm not proposing this idea, and I think, as a Federal program it would be terrible (not to mention unconstitutional), but purely theoretically, do you think that would work better than the current situation?
I worked in the Bush Labor Department. We tried to rewrite the Workforce Investment Act (which expired in 2003 BTW) to block grant funding to the States. I know your idea is to businesses, but Feds are not allowed to provide money to a private concern to do something that private concern would otherwise do. States can do that...Feds can't.
You know who stopped that? Dems.
After Dems heard from their (mostly Dem) constiuency among the "workforce professionals" who were afraid that taking money out of establish programs and giving it to the States meant that State "merit system" employees would lose their jobs. Maybe. Probably not, but that's what they thought.
Now, if you're a Governor, you love the idea of a block grant because it gives you flexibility to react to circumstances which may not have been foreseen. They liked it.
If you're a merit system employee you hate the idea of the Governor having flexibility because his "flexibility" might mean the loss of your job. Especially if the Governor is a nasty Republican.
::: sigh ::::
So trying to reform the workforce system to make it more responsive to the needs of job seekers was, in the end, torpedoed by State merit system employees. I could hear Mel Brooks all the way back to DC.
"We've got to protect our phony baloney jobs!"
One of the reason I left DOL was for shit like this. When I used to run into people like those workforce system employees my line was, "We run a jobs program. That doesn't mean a jobs program for you personally."
As you can tell, I was well liked.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 05:23 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:23 AM (M9Ie6)
When half of the people in the country pay no federal income-tax at all, they have no skin in the game. Everybody should pay something for the government they receive, just to remind them that government isn't free.
Yup. I don't care if it's $5, everyone needs to pay something that they don't get back. It drives me nuts when I hear people talking about going to Washington DC to see the sights because "they're free". No, you (by which I mean me since I actually pay freaking taxes) already paid for it, you blithering idiot!
Posted by: alexthechick at August 23, 2011 05:23 AM (VtjlW)
Some people apply to those jobs in the hopes that the offer will be enough that they can move, or will include relocation assistance.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:24 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Buck Ofama at August 23, 2011 05:24 AM (7VN/H)
Yes, all of our problems are due to Gen X and Y slugs electing communists to office and being too lazy to work and pay taxes.
Simple solution to this problem.
Death penalty for anyone over age 60.
Posted by: Gen X Slug at August 23, 2011 05:24 AM (sbV1u)
Full List:
David Letterman
Levi Johnston
Katie Couric
Ashley Judd
Oliver Stone
Michelle Obama
Alec Baldwin
Rachel Maddow
Tina Fey
Kathy Griffin
Common
Arnold Schwarzenegger
WHOA! What a coincidence those guys are on my list too! Mine's waaaay longer though.
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 05:25 AM (YFYRZ)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 05:26 AM (cbyrC)
Death penalty for anyone over age 60.
Posted by: Gen X Slug at August 23, 2011 09:24 AM (sbV1u)
How about people who don't pay taxes can't vote.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:26 AM (M9Ie6)
Okay, but that still doesn't speak to the merits of the program, unless you were implying "yes, that's the way it should work: block grants to States, and then States allocate the funds."
And I think the DOL is unconstitutional anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (qndXR)
Some people apply to those jobs in the hopes that the offer will be enough that they can move, or will include relocation assistance.
---
No, people are trapped in their houses. They need to confront the fact that they will either be selling at a loss or need to rent out their property until the market turns around.
There are very few positions in higher ed that would cover the cost of your mortgage until you sign on the dotted line. Most of the ones I know about are at the level of President, Provost, Athletic Director, and sometimes Sr. VP... and mostly in California.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Creative Gen X Slug at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (ZDUD4)
Pardon the mixage, but IÂ’ve thought that Katy Perry has been a little over the top in pushing the envelope. I forgive her. She can be as hot as she wants.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (jx2j9)
Education is what you have left over after you have forgotten everything you've learned.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 05:27 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: steevy at August 23, 2011 05:28 AM (pV6cO)
Obama Baits the Dependency Trap
The Obama administration is busy expanding the exact type of vicious, ungrateful underclass which recently exploded in London. An administration program will expand free school meal coverage to millions of young people who are not even supposed to be eligible.
A stated goal of the program is to eliminate the stigma of getting a free lunch. But that stigma is one of the only things separating dignified free people from wretched government dependants. There is a lot of gray in between, but the Obama program would take students from a young age and nudge them in the wrong direction.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 23, 2011 05:28 AM (9hSKh)
I like that plan. Unfortunately, it'll never fly. But I like it anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:29 AM (8y9MW)
And I think the DOL is unconstitutional anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 09:27 AM (8y9MW)
Yes that is what I was implying.
And I am with you on the Consitutionality argument - weakly.
I am more down with the argument that says, "It doesn't work. Kill it."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 05:29 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: steevy at August 23, 2011 05:29 AM (pV6cO)
How about people who don't pay taxes can't vote.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 09:26 AM (M9Ie6)
That works too.
Posted by: Gen X Slug at August 23, 2011 05:30 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:30 AM (M9Ie6)
Translation: Republicans support increasing payroll taxes.
I wasn't even aware that there was a 2 point cut in the employee side of the social security tax. Doing the rough math in my head that seems to be about a 15% cut in the total Social Security tax (employee and employer tax combined).
This did nothing to the employer's 6% contribution, only the employee side was cut. And since it was legislated to only last a year, and no one has called for a permanent cut, AND a permanent 15% cut in Social Security to pay for it where do they think the money will come from?
Last I checked Social Security was at a break even (hand to mouth) accounting situation, with massive red ink in its future.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:32 AM (XEK+4)
I didn't say "all" I said "some."
Indeed, when I was looking to move from Abilene to DFW I had to look until I found a job that would pay enough to pay back the expenses I would incur in moving.
I didn't have a mortgage at the time (and even if I had, it was before the bubble burst), but the same thing factors in even now. If I were looking to relocate, I would have to find a job that would pay well enough to cover rent at an apartment AND my mortgage payment until I could sell my house, for instance.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:33 AM (8y9MW)
funny, words mean something, huntsman, this is the first time I've seen him except for the debate, was on squawk box and characterized this beautifully when face with the question "how come republicans suddenly want to tax?".....he said he wants to "broaden the tax base" and eliminate gifts to corporations....
the other two might do well to listen and learn....start using the "broaden the tax base" idea, it sounds so much nicer and more civilized than "taxing the poor"..............
Posted by: at August 23, 2011 05:34 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 05:34 AM (ZDUD4)
I am more down with the argument that says, "It doesn't work. Kill it."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at August 23, 2011 09:29 AM (sbV1u)
You bitter clingers just don't understand the intricacies of government spending. If a program doesn't work, the problem is that it has not been funded correctly. Government programs by definition are good for the country. So if one isn't working, just up the budget!
Don't worry, we know what we are doing. We all went to Ivy League schools.
Posted by: Typical Progressive at August 23, 2011 05:35 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 05:36 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 09:34 AM (ZDUD4)
They already did that twice and simply spent the money. Those kind of "fixes" do not work. The only way to "fix" it is to privatize it or get rid of it totally.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:36 AM (M9Ie6)
As for that Bloomberg paper, what it neglects to mention is that most of that stock sell off will come from 401K accounts that people are REQUIRED BY LAW to start selling off by a certain age.
Yup. Also, and I could be way waaaaay wrong about this, but I do believe that much of that is in tax deferred not tax exempt holdings. If that's correct, then expect massive, massive shrieking about how unfair it is to be taxed at regular income rates for required selloffs on assets that are now worth 1/3 of what they were pre-2008. The whining, it will be epic. Oh and that's not a shot at Boomers, I think anyone, of any generation, would be pissed as hell as taking what is perceived as a double loss.
That's assuming, of course, that I'm not utterly wrong about the tax implications. I haven't been following this too closely.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 23, 2011 05:37 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 23, 2011 05:38 AM (lbo6/)
You know how I know that we’re DOOMed? I look on this mug and say to myself, “Self. We’re toast.”
That’s the look of, “When your money runs out, you’re dead! And I’ll kill you!”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:38 AM (jx2j9)
It's a waste of everyone's time to go through the song and dance of interviewing, particularly if you're an out of state applicant. That requirement should be raised in the first screening phone call.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:39 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 05:39 AM (ZDUD4)
The theory that these people don't appreciate how much the government is moving around money is just that: completely theoretical.
It's not just theoretical. I'm well aware of Federal (oh, yes, and State) gas taxes. I don't factor that into the price of a gallon of gasoline- largely because it is specifically an "invisible" tax (gas stations aren't allowed to tell you how much of that price-per-gallon is going to taxes). And, while I know about my (theoretical) 8% (or so) Payroll taxes (SS & Medicare), those are withheld from me, so I never actually see that money in the first place.
Now, I'm not some policy wonk, but if I can see that this one sentence is that full of crap, how bad is the rest of the article? The fact is, if you're not paying income tax you're not paying your "fair share." You don't get to scream about "fairness" when you're paying $0.00 or less (in way too many cases) in income taxes.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:41 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:41 AM (5H6zj)
-------
ACHIEVING REAL SOCIAL SECURITY
Written by Richard Rahn
Thursday, 15 May 2008
Berlin, Germany. If you were asked to name one person who has enabled more people to gain wealth and security than any other person on the globe, who would you name?
In 1881, here in Berlin, Otto von Bismarck started the world's first modern pay-as-you-go social security system which served as the model for the U.S. Social Security system and that of many other countries, including setting the retirement age at 65. No, Bismarck is not the answer to the opening question.
The answer is a fellow named José Piñera. Here is why.
Bismarck's social security system was basically a Ponzi scheme whereby young workers pay taxes to support the retirees. It only works over the long run where the population is growing and where most retirees do not live very long.
These conditions no longer exist in the high-income countries. And even in low- and middle-income countries, population growth has slowed, and lifespans increase rapidly. As a result, many of the world's social security systems have become retirement insecurity systems as they head toward bankruptcy.
Thirty years ago, a young José Piñera, who had earned a Ph.D. at Harvard, was Chile's labor minister. He saw the coming disaster in the government old-age pension system.
Inspired by an idea from the late Nobel Prize winning economist, Milton Friedman, he developed a solution that empowers workers and gives them real financial security. Pinera-type social security systems have now been adopted by more than 30 countries and cover several hundred million people - for a very simple reason - it works!
Under the Piñera-type social security systems, workers are required to invest in highly diversified, qualified funds. Because they actually own their pension funds (like 401(k) funds in the United States), workers can choose their age of retirement, whether it is age 50 or 80. The longer they work, the more money they will have - but again each individual determines his or her own retirement age. (The very poor and those unable to work are still covered by a government system.)
Mr. Piñera is here in Berlin, selling his concept to German opinion leaders, as part of a multi-country "Free Market Road Show" sponsored by the European Center for Economic Growth and the Hayek Institute of Vienna, Austria.
The Chilean privatized system began in 1981, exactly 100 years after Bismarck instituted his system in Germany. It has been 29 years since the system went into effect in Chile so Mr. Piñera now can answer his critics, not only with theoretical arguments, but with hard data.
The results are remarkable. Chile's citizens have on average experienced a 10 percent per year, above inflation, compounded growth rate in their pension funds for the last 29 years. The result is most Chileans are no longer poor, but are, in fact, "small capitalists."
The Chilean government, increasingly freed from paying pensions out of tax funds (almost all Chileans have moved into the private accounts, though they could have stayed in the old government system), is now running a budget surplus of 10 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), which could pave the way for the abolition of the income tax.
The new Chilean system has provided so much investment capital that Chile moved from being a poor country to being a solid middle-income country with the highest per capita income in South America.
Critics in the U.S. and elsewhere claim investing pension funds in stocks and bonds is risky, but the real risk to the elderly is being trapped in government social security schemes headed toward insolvency.
In 1981, the Dow Jones stock average stood at about 800. Despite all the ups and downs over the years, and the turmoil of this last year, the Dow Jones average stands about 12,800 or about 16 times where it was in 1981. Those Americans now retiring on Social Security will unfortunately receive only very modest payments in relation to what they could have received if their political leaders had not kept them locked into a fiscally unsustainable government system.
Some critics of privatized social security claim that even though the returns are better under a privatized system, the "transition costs" are too great. In fact, there are no economic costs to the country of the transition, as Chile and other countries which have adopted the privatized system have shown.
We now know that both in theory and practice privatized social security works far better than pay-as-you-go government systems. Opponents can only keep their citizens from adopting Piñera-type systems by keeping them ignorant of the benefits, and making false statements about the privatized social security system's successes.
Fortunately, the world still has a very vigorous José Piñera, who for three decades has made it his life's work to empower workers and make them small capitalists, freed from the government foot upon their necks. Mr. Piñera has already made life more secure and prosperous for millions, and with luck it will soon be billions of people.
John McCain and Barack Obama, are you listening?
Richard W. Rahn is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:41 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at August 23, 2011 05:42 AM (6IV8T)
The whole idea was that you would be taxed at a lower income rate after you retire. IOW most people would be taxed at the 15% rate after retirement vs the 30% rate while working.
What a lot of people did not allow for was inflation and the fact that if they built up enough funds they could still wind up being taxed at the 30% rate.
I saw that coming and a lot of my retirement holdings are NOT part of a tax deferred 401K.
In any case, if you have to sell at a loss even if it is a 401K you can still take a capitol loss on those holdings to offset all or some of the tax deferred part.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:42 AM (M9Ie6)
Still nothing from Americans for Perry.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:43 AM (5H6zj)
Top o' the mornin', M&Ms!
Just skimmed over the comments to Cantor's op-ed at the WaPo, and read the EJ Dionne article. Teh stupid is strong over there. Actually, it goes beyond stupid into outright delusional.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 23, 2011 05:43 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Jugears McFuckstick at August 23, 2011 05:44 AM (/ZZCn)
Ummm... I don't think I said that. I'm talking purely about salary (and maybe some basic relocation assistance specifically with moving costs). If I were to relocate, the salary at the new position would have to cover those things.
And I don't know of any major position which posts the exact salary someone would be making, since those are negotiable so often.
Like I said, that's why you wait until the offer. It may also be a negotiating tactic (if so, they're doing it wrong). The actual tactic goes something like, "Well that's a nice salary and benefits package, but I can't afford to move all my stuff. I'll have to decline." At which point they're hoping you'll have liked them enough that you'll say, "Oh, don't worry about moving. We'll pay for a moving service!"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:45 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at August 23, 2011 09:39 AM (ZDUD4)
They raised the retirement age and started taxing SS income over a very small amount. That is a form of "means testing". They did that increase on two separate occasions to get past the so-called "baby boomer hump".
So yes, that electrician was paying a large portion of the SSI check back to the government in the form of double taxation.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 05:45 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Chuckit at August 23, 2011 05:46 AM (r2Bd4)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at August 23, 2011 05:46 AM (0M3AQ)
And I don't know of any major position which posts the exact salary someone would be making, since those are negotiable so often.
OK, that's our disconnect. Higher ed publics post salary ranges as well as the salaries of incumbents.
In addition, salaries (maxima) are generally discussed up-front in the screening call.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 05:47 AM (5H6zj)
Oh, really - not borrowing money seems to be more "commerce" than not buying health insurance.
Posted by: Chuckit at August 23, 2011 05:47 AM (r2Bd4)
----
First thing that surprised me was that his heirs didn't sue for illegal use of trademark. So I can only conclude they were paid off big time.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:48 AM (XEK+4)
The point is, our CURRENT deficit is not driven by entitlements
It certainly is in part. Medicare, Medicaid, SSDI, and Social Security spend more than they take in.
Posted by: Jay at August 23, 2011 05:51 AM (3LaGb)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:51 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at August 23, 2011 05:52 AM (PLvLS)
That is the problem.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 09:15 AM (M9Ie6)
I hope that was sarcasm.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 23, 2011 05:52 AM (v+QvA)
Ha! I got something right! Go Team Me!
What a lot of people did not allow for was inflation and the fact that if they built up enough funds they could still wind up being taxed at the 30% rate.
I saw that coming and a lot of my retirement holdings are NOT part of a tax deferred 401K.
In any case, if you have to sell at a loss even if it is a 401K you can still take a capitol loss on those holdings to offset all or some of the tax deferred part.
I'm presuming that the loss would be an actual loss vs. loss of prior accumulated earnings. In other words, sure, you get the loss if you have to sell for less than initial investment. I'm talking about the situation where people are looking at their statements from three years ago, hell, three weeks ago, as opposed to what they are selling for today and then finding out that not only have they lost a metric fuckton of the prior gains, hey, you owe 30% taxes on what's left as well. That's going to leave a mark.
I'm not advocating that any of that be changed, I'm simply saying that when people have to pay out the taxes in a lump sum, well, it's shocking. For example, a few years ago I received a very large bonus. When the actual check was finally issued it was for just about half of the gross amount after state, local and federal taxes. My mother was horrified by this while I wasn't shocked since I'd taken that into account when determining what I would actually received. I have a sneaking suspicion that the vast majority of those making these sales are going to be calling their brokers furious about where 1/3 of their money has gone.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 23, 2011 05:53 AM (VtjlW)
Star Trek did it.
---
As did logans run, but the age was 35 I think
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:54 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: Dr. Fritz, Presidential Strategist and Master of Outlines at August 23, 2011 05:54 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: The terrorist Hobbit formerly known as Donna at August 23, 2011 05:54 AM (OVCfn)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:55 AM (jx2j9)
Oh. Okay. Yes, then, in that circumstance, anyone even applying when they know they won't take the position is kind of stupid.
It doesn't work that way in the software biz.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:55 AM (8y9MW)
Pardon the mixage, but IÂ’ve thought that Katy Perry has been a little over the top in pushing the envelope. I forgive her. She can be as hot as she wants.
Did you read the update? Apparently, her request for a "prayer for Israel" wasn't as specific as originally thought - she pulled it back.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 23, 2011 05:55 AM (9hSKh)
Drop in the bucket. In the grand scheme of things, we don't send the UN that much of our money. So, yes, we need to get out (and let NY start charging them going rate for the use of that land), and that would save us some money, but it's not major enough to get a lot of air time.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:57 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 05:57 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 05:58 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 05:59 AM (v8Pb8)
I know it won't happen (we'll capitulate, I'm sure) but I'd love to say to them: You don't have to pay interest on a student loan. The way you avoid it is by not taking the loan.
So which is more important, your religion, or your education? I don't care which you pick, but they are incompatible in this particular instance.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 05:59 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 06:00 AM (v8Pb8)
I suspect I already know the answer, just wanted that one out of my system.
Posted by: F--- Nevada! (I'm AoSHQ's DarkLord©, and I approve this message) at August 23, 2011 06:01 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at August 23, 2011 06:03 AM (DUiNx)
Did you read the update?
Apparently, her request for a "prayer for Israel" wasn't as specific as
originally thought - she pulled it back.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 23, 2011 09:55 AM (9hSKh)
Yeah. I saw it. I didn't really see all that much wrong with it. She doesn't want people to kill people. Plus, I'm sure she's as pragmatic as anyone else in keeping her fans pacified and buying her songs. Didn't work too well from the comments. Maybe she'll see the inherent Anti-Semitism of her fans and see the problem there. She still prayed for Israel. That's the important thing, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 06:04 AM (jx2j9)
Sometimes, it's not the amount, it's the effect. And I posit the UN is now having a net negative effect far out of proportion to the actual dollar amount expended.
Kind of like the amount expended on regulatory regimes vs. the amount they retard the economy.
Sonofagun. There really is a multiplier effect!
Posted by: F--- Nevada! (I'm AoSHQ's DarkLord©, and I approve this message) at August 23, 2011 06:04 AM (GBXon)
Cannot understand why I should be forced to withdraw some of the money in my retirement accounts. This is scheduled to happen to me shortly--afaic, the ultimate disposition of MY money should rest with ME. If that means making a small neat pile and burning it in the driveway, so be it. I don't need some shitfaced asshole instructing me on what and when to do something.
Not earth shaking, but DAMN, that crap gets old quick.
Posted by: irongrampa at August 23, 2011 06:04 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 09:57 AM (XEK+4)
FIFY.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 23, 2011 06:05 AM (DrWcr)
---
90% comes from local property taxes & some state money. Feds kick in 4% to control the whole thing.
I'm pretty sure I could have hired someone for $450k to get my 3 kids to 12th grade level of education, and they probably could do it in half the time.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 06:05 AM (XEK+4)
Tell me about it. Part of my early retirement was a lump some payment. In any case when you reach the age for withdrawing 401K funds you begin to withdraw them on a reverse amortization schedule. You don't withdraw then at once.
In fact, if you withdraw more than the scheduled amount (or less) you have to pay a 10% surcharge tax on top of what ever your normal tax rate is.
As for people who see their total drop by a huge amount due to the stock market collapse they should know what they have and they will certainly know what they are withdrawing when they take it out of the 401K.
And BTW, my 401K dropped about 25% during the collapse but soon recovered. In any case, I am making withdrawals of the dividends now which do not change as long as the company does not change their dividend payout. You don't pay a penalty on the dividends as they are not reinvested and are not tax deferred.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 06:07 AM (M9Ie6)
What is always "fun" to watch are the ways the media/entertainment complex spread out their bias. For example, how many positive stories have we seen about home gardens and "meatless Mondays" etc since entering the joy-joy world of Barry and Michelle's fabulously fun depression? And how many positive stories have their been about Portugese water dogs at doggy sites and Sunday supplements?
Anyway, I am predicting a wave of stories about how over-bred Labrador retrievers are and how irresponsible it is for people to buy them.
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 06:08 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 08:59 AM (M9Ie6)
Don't give them any fucking ideas. We of the post-Boom are already royally boned.
Posted by: steveegg at August 23, 2011 06:09 AM (o44nj)
Not necessarily. If you're talking a married couple, without kids, making 34,400, then, yes, you're right, they probably don't have enough to save very much (though you'd be surprised at how little you have to save to "save for retirement" if you do it right). But, if they're a married couple without kids, why are they only making 34k/yr?
Is it because they're "just starting out?" Well, then, in a couple of years they'll probably be making more money (not to mention having a kid or two so they, too, can get that child tax credit (no, not supporting the ctc, even though I get it and really, really like it)), and then it's a different ball of wax.
Are they only making 34K/yr because they've decided to be a one income family, and that's the best job the bread-winner (probably the husband, but not always) can make? Well, maybe they need to re-evaluate their priorities, and the other spouse can go get a job.
The fact is, we look at income in working years like it is static, and it isn't. In just the last 2 years (by switching jobs as I became more marketable) I've had about a 50% raise. That's what happens when you're still fairly young and gaining more experience and skills. At some point, that will "top out" for me. I'm in software development, so that "top out" point will probably be between 80 & 110k/yr. A family of 4 can live on 110k/yr and have a house, and save for retirement, and all kinds of other things- if they budget properly and spend wisely.
Now, if you're talking about a single person, those numbers change again. YMMV based on cost of living, but in DFW, a single person making 34,400/yr might not have their own house, but they're not going to be hurting, either.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:09 AM (8y9MW)
I banged my head repeatedly on the desk.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 06:10 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: DJIA Death Watch at August 23, 2011 06:10 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Boulder Toilet Hobo at August 23, 2011 06:10 AM (kCFvQ)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 09:48 AM (XEK+4)
I don't think I've seen a family that's been so blatantly shameless in their overarching desire to cash in on every opportunity of reference to MLK.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 23, 2011 06:11 AM (yKL37)
While I am against tax increases, this isn't one. It is a return to regular tax law. Also keep in mind that the courts have ruled that it is not a savings account, but just a tax.
The liberals would naturally target this tax is it is levied against your very first dollar of earnings and is not refundable at the end of the year.
I actually want the whole thing scrapped and a 401k type system set up in its place. One thing is obvious -- it must be reformed somehow.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 23, 2011 06:12 AM (ENKCw)
While I am against tax increases, this isn't one. It is a return to regular tax law. Also keep in mind that the courts have ruled that it is not a savings account, but just a tax.
The liberals would naturally target this tax is it is levied against your very first dollar of earnings and is not refundable at the end of the year.
I actually want the whole thing scrapped and a 401k type system set up in its place. One thing is obvious -- it must be reformed somehow.
------
(R's) proposed that in 2006 (or was it 2003?) in the big reform fight. Dems flipped out. And what reps proposed was an extrememly watered down version of what would have needed to be done to save Social Security.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 06:16 AM (XEK+4)
My father-in-law sent me an e-mail yesterday complaining about Perry and suggesting he may vote for.....Ron Paul.
I banged my head repeatedly on the desk.
I'm right there with you on the parental head/desk. I went over to my parents' house last night for dinner for to catch them up on the Wedding O'Doom and discovered that my father fell and broke his collar bone on Friday but they didn't want to call and tell me because they didn't want me to worry. And they wonder why I am considering functional alcoholism as a life choice.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 23, 2011 06:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: King Putt at August 23, 2011 06:17 AM (4u+LN)
Talk about a photo being worth a thousand words.......
Taken at the National Cemetery in Minneapolis on a June morning as it appeared in the Minneapolis Star/Tribune.
This should become an official Memorial Day, 4th of July and/o r Veterans Day remembrance photo; "Our symbol standing guard".
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 06:21 AM (YFYRZ)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 06:21 AM (cbyrC)
Cantor is screwing the pooch, again. I am getting SOOOOO sick of this shit. It's pathetic.
First of all, he speaks about Barky as if the Indonesian were a serious person whose thoughts merited any consideration, at all. They don't. I'd sooner listen to a 7 year old opine about anything than treat Barky as if he were a sentient being. Barky can barely breathe without the aid of machines. Who cares what the Indonesian Imbecile has "made clear"?
The second problem - and the worst - is that Cantor is, yet once again, conflating SS and Medicare with MediCAID, as if they are all the same. THEY ARE NOT. Not even close. To continue to speak about them as if they are the same is to miss one of the most important points and to aid the Indonesian in keeping ObamaCare alive, so that it can insure the ruin of America, even if SS and MediCare were totally cut to ZERO - which Barky wouldn't mind doing. Cantor is helping the America-hater out in this, as the rest of the GOP leadership has been doing.
We need to get rid of the whole of this GOP leadership. They all suck shit.
Cantor shows what a dipshit he is by continuing on:
While a compromise on the way to strengthen entitlements may be one thing,
This is the sort of thing that only an idiot would even think to say. Cantor let Barky slap himi down during the debt-limit "negotiation" and he then shut his mouth for the duration. Cantor has the distinction of being the first person on the right who Barky trash-talked in the media about and whho actually shut his mouth because of it.
Cantor's a loser. He loses for himself. Get him out of the leadership so he doesn't lose for America, too.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 06:22 AM (F5tJy)
Because "conventional wisdom" really means "what the media supports." And the media supports complete dependance of the peasantry upon the noble class.
Liberalism = Neo-Feudalism. Never forget it.
Also: Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:23 AM (8y9MW)
Star Trek did it.
---
As did logans run, but the age was 35 I think
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 09:54 AM (XEK+4)
Anything to get rid of David Ogden Stiers as a love interest.
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 06:24 AM (YFYRZ)
Mrs928 loves it. Quote: If I ever had a statue made of me, I want it to look like that.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 23, 2011 06:25 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 06:26 AM (cbyrC)
It's been a while since I took organizational behavior, but I recall that there are pressures to conform as the decision-making group gets larger. This is the issue in congress; they lose their convictions when faced with the pressure of the group.
Unfortunately this tells me that our politicians are, by and large, cocksucking cowards.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 06:26 AM (LH6ir)
Where?
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 06:28 AM (WkuV6)
The statue body does look like Mao. It's creepy.
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 06:28 AM (YFYRZ)
Posted by: Y-not at August 23, 2011 06:29 AM (5H6zj)
Arlington, TX, among other places. Between us, my wife and I make less than that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:29 AM (8y9MW)
Re: Boomers
Just the kind of monkey slinging shit analysis I've become accustomed to around here...BTW, I'm a retired military business owner...My handyman is seventy and gets more done than the two whiny 35 year olds I had before. When I see how hard that guy works and think of the mindless insults directed at him and others by people like you...Fucking pathetic punk comes to mind, flinging shit from the safety of your electronic world...Weak!
Posted by: Nozzle at August 23, 2011 06:30 AM (wrGst)
You know how I know that we’re DOOMed? I look on this mug and say to myself, “Self. We’re toast.”
That’s the look of, “When your money runs out, you’re dead! And I’ll kill you!”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 09:38 AM (jx2j9)
Holy shit, it's Thulsa Doom in drag!
Posted by: joncelli at August 23, 2011 06:31 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 06:31 AM (YFYRZ)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 06:31 AM (WkuV6)
I'm pretty sure I could have hired someone for $450k to get my 3 kids to 12th grade level of education, and they probably could do it in half the time.
The average amount spent per pupil in this country is $10k, which means that for an average class of 30 the cost is $300k. I know plenty of people who'd be willing to take $200K to teach 30 kids for a year, and pay for the cost of a building and supplies.
Posted by: Alex at August 23, 2011 06:32 AM (J2ejK)
Arlington, TX, among other places. Between us, my wife and I make less than that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 10:29 AM (8y9MW)
In Arlington Va, not so much. But then you can use the public schools.
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 06:33 AM (YFYRZ)
The average amount spent per pupil in this country is $10k, which means that for an average class of 30 the cost is $300k. I know plenty of people who'd be willing to take $200K to teach 30 kids for a year, and pay for the cost of a building and supplies.
Posted by: Alex
Yup. Like any Catholic school for example. And this is why vouchers are being fought.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 23, 2011 06:35 AM (326rv)
If my wife were to keep working next year (our plan is for her to stay home with our kids) we could afford private school. Indeed, it would be cheaper than the daycare we're paying right now (avg. private school tuition for a year in my area is about $7,000/yr per kid. Right now I'm paying better than 20k/yr (combined) for my kid's daycare.)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:35 AM (8y9MW)
You know how I know that we’re DOOMed? I look on this mug and say to myself, “Self. We’re toast.”
That’s the look of, “When your money runs out, you’re dead! And I’ll kill you!”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 09:38 AM (jx2j9)
Holy shit, it's Thulsa Doom in drag!
----
Gonna need an old priest and a young priest to fix that ladies problem.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 06:35 AM (XEK+4)
It might well be retarded peer pressure that Cantor is succumbing to, but that is just another argument why such a sheep shouldn't be in the leadership. As Alexander the Great said,
"I am more afraid of an army of 100 sheep led by a lion than an army of 100 lions led by a sheep."
Unfortunately this tells me that our politicians are, by and large, cocksucking cowards.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 10:26 AM (LH6ir)
They are. But, all we need are a few brave souls for the leadership. Bachmann has never been cowed by any of these people and she has shown herself fairly immune to peer pressure. Marsha Blackburn, for example, is another one I'd rather see in the leadership than Cantor of the Weeping Boner.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 06:35 AM (F5tJy)
(Cliffs notes version)
Whimsical or Amusing lede.
Eeyore paragraph.
Whine paragraph.
Short seller pushes doom story.
Boomers suck paragraph.
More whine or a boomers suck paragraph.
More short seller prognostications.
Snark and/or Seniors suck paragraph.
Amusing kitteh photo.
Posted by: I don't know WHO I am anymore at August 23, 2011 06:36 AM (iniPz)
Posted by: polynikes at August 23, 2011 06:36 AM (r8Vu0)
Strongly approve: 19%
Strongly disapprove: 45%
Total approve: 44%
Total disapprove: 56%
"Approval index": -26
"Abyss index": -1
The first time he's hit 19. He's had higher strongly disapproves before.
The base is not happy.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 23, 2011 06:36 AM (73tyQ)
Damn it's expensive where you live. Come to rural Texas where you can do it with half that.
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 23, 2011 06:36 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 10:21 AM (YFYRZ)
Wow. Talk about heart in the throat. Got the chills. Absolutely awesome pic.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 06:39 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 06:40 AM (v8Pb8)
We'll be able to make it (albeit with a tighter budget) on just my 62/yr starting next year, if some things line up properly (it looks like they will). I was just pointing out that 110/yr is more than enough.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:40 AM (8y9MW)
sigh
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 06:42 AM (UOM48)
This is ridiculous. Beyond ridiculous, actually.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 06:42 AM (F5tJy)
Talk about a stupid Fox headline/link:
The Fall of Qaddafi Could Mean Big Boost to Struggling U.S. EconomyAnalysts say a post-Qaddafi increase in Libyan oil production could mean lower prices at the U.S. gas pump.
Good old unknown “analysts” say that huh. Well I say they are full of shit because we get no oil from there and the Europeans are already getting a large amount of oil from there so there will no impact. Soi go suck Obama’s nutsack some more.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 06:44 AM (M9Ie6)
This is what I have been saying. If they are allowed to cut SS and Medicare, it will not result in savings, as Medicaid will continue to expand and eat whatever profits there are. I don't know when they were all grouped together, but since they are grouped, they should throw welfare in the group, as that might make the distinctions visible to people.
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at August 23, 2011 06:45 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: I don't know WHO I am anymore at August 23, 2011 10:36 AM (iniPz)
Nobody's making you read it.
Posted by: joncelli at August 23, 2011 06:45 AM (RD7QR)
__________
FIFY
Posted by: Anachronda at August 23, 2011 06:47 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 06:47 AM (cbyrC)
Good old unknown “analysts” say that huh. Well I say they are full of shit because we get no oil from there and the Europeans are already getting a large amount of oil from there so there will no impact. Soi go suck Obama’s nutsack some more.
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 10:44 AM (M9Ie6)
Besides, I thought that that asinine release of OUR oil from the SPR (I would call that another impeachable act by Barky) was argued to be needed to specifically offset the difference in Libyan production. Maybe the writer wasn't watching the news that day? Or, has everyone in the MFM forgotten about the SPR release, already?
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 06:47 AM (F5tJy)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 06:48 AM (v8Pb8)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 06:48 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: glowing blue meat at August 23, 2011 06:49 AM (K/USr)
Parents can be bizarre with adult children. I drove my mother her doctor last week and when we came to a T intersection she told me I had to wait for the cars on the upright of the T to turn left in front of me. Thanks, mom, for the vote of confidence.
Posted by: Retread at August 23, 2011 06:51 AM (BO5ap)
Posted by: Jane D'oh
Yeah, right. I wonder how much that crowd cost?
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 23, 2011 06:51 AM (h1p5V)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 06:54 AM (cbyrC)
My old man always used to tell me, "the opposite of progress is...."
Posted by: rockhead at August 23, 2011 06:54 AM (ZMHGo)
Posted by: Jane D'oh
Yeah, right. I wonder how much that crowd cost?
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 23, 2011 10:51 AM (h1p5V)
That's confidential, er, I mean, how dare you insinuate such a thing!
Posted by: David Axelrod, Astroturfer Extraordinaire at August 23, 2011 06:54 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Hobbitopoly at August 23, 2011 10:51 AM (h1p5V)
In Martha's Vineyard? They were probably sincere. Which is even worse than if they had been a rent-a-mob, if you ask me.
Posted by: joncelli at August 23, 2011 06:54 AM (RD7QR)
Pfft. DOOM is like crack. Once I've got you hooked, it's impossible to look away!
Posted by: Monty at August 23, 2011 06:54 AM (/0a60)
We also celebrate a carpenter and a hypothetical, calculating son-of-a-gun.
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 10:47 AM (cbyrC)
By name and by all the rhetoric that accompanies the holiday, there is nothing but MLK Day. It's a joke. "Washington's Birthday" has had all specific references to GW removed, in favor of a general holiday celebrating The Presidency (which is pretty un-American, frankly).
What's next? Muslim Day, to celebrate the many (though secret) contributions of muslims to America (over the few decades that the US has actually been unlucky enough to have muslims here)? Maybe NASA will donate an old rocket for it. I'm sure they can find a muslim who worked as a janitor in one of the companies that had something to do with the construction of the rocket ... muslim contribution to American space exploration!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 06:55 AM (F5tJy)
Relax baby, you can blame me for all your problems, especially after I hit NYC early next week. I might even bring a "black"cloud over the Vineyard if you're lucky.
Posted by: Hurricane Irene at August 23, 2011 06:57 AM (vSiVD)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 23, 2011 06:59 AM (4nfy2)
Ouch.
Yeah, we're paying almost 1500/mo in daycare right now. That's actually down significantly from the 1700/mo we were paying just a couple of months ago (as the kids get older, their rates decrease, so that's something). But that's more than my mortgage. We figured out that my wife only brings in a little more than their daycare each month (net, of course). So, once my van is paid off (end of the year, in theory), she could stay home with them, and that would still free up room in our budget from where we are now.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 06:59 AM (8y9MW)
Sweetheart, it's not rape-rape.
Posted by: I'm Whoppie! G. at August 23, 2011 06:59 AM (z63Tr)
You gave a link to the tax brackets page but failed to use the calculator they provided!
First off, $34,400 is in the 15% tax bracket.. A person filing singly pays $4,735, not the $8000 plus you quoted.. Their effective tax rate as a percentage of income is 13.76%.
Even people in the 25% rate don't pay 25%. A single person making $36,000 pays $5125 in taxes, for a real rate of 14.24% of income.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at August 23, 2011 06:59 AM (f9c2L)
Talk about a stupid Fox headline/link:
The Fall of Qaddafi Could Mean Big Boost to Struggling U.S. EconomyAnalysts say a post-Qaddafi increase in Libyan oil production could mean lower prices at the U.S. gas pump.
---
Headline at MSNBC?
What about Haaalibuurrton!!!!!
Blood for oil!!!!
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 06:59 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 07:00 AM (v8Pb8)
Wouldn't an articulated and deliberate policy of inflation be against the Federal Reserves charter of stable money?
Federal Reserve Act Section 2A. Monetary Policy Objectives
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy's long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.
Posted by: toby928™ at August 23, 2011 07:01 AM (GTbGH)
A crying shame.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 07:01 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther)
I once again thank God for my mother in law,who is a very nice person, and who not only watched our kids, continues to come over to the house and watch them before and after school. The kids are safe, Mrs Hen is happy and our budget probably wouldn't have survived without it. When we moved, we chose a house close to her (but I nixed getting a house in the same neighborhood).
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 23, 2011 07:02 AM (326rv)
Barry has settled on title for new book, “The Monumental, Breathtaking Audacity of Hypocrisy.”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:02 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 07:02 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 07:03 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: General Gutsy Call at August 23, 2011 07:04 AM (UOM48)
We also celebrate a carpenter and a hypothetical, calculating son-of-a-gun.
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 10:47 AM (cbyrC)
Just heard that for the first time two weeks ago while visiting our Troop's participant at NYLT ...
Posted by: No Whining at August 23, 2011 07:04 AM (HmCnI)
This is ridiculous. Beyond ridiculous, actually.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 10:42 AM (F5tJy)
I kind of like it. I was born in 1973 and what you don't hear from my generation is why MLK was so great. Oh, he was great and all -- you're supposed to say it -- but, especially for those of us who didn't grow up in the South, Jim Crow happened a long time ago in a country far, far away. So he's a guy who made a speech about the content of one's character that's constantly quoted by right-wingers.
He was also murdered.
Oh, and we hear things every once in a while about a plagiarized dissertation and philandering, but that never gets too much play.
And that's about it.
Meanwhile, we have the First Black President, which is an accomplishment. Someone who "achieved" public office, could actually do things...and he looks like an ant in comparison to King.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 23, 2011 07:05 AM (73tyQ)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 07:05 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: chillin the most for Perry at August 23, 2011 07:05 AM (6IV8T)
LOL. What geniuses. You can only inflate yourself out of EXISTING debt. But, when you have to roll your debt over often (as the US national debt is now more concentrated in the shortest maturities than ever before - which is pathetic as long maturities are at record low rates, which we are not taking any advantage of, at all), then the engineered inflation becomes part of the varying interest rates (varying UP). Further, you build up even more debt as spending isn't changed.
You can only inflate yourself out of a debt if you stop accumulating debt at that point. If you are still accumulating debt (as we are and will be for the foreseeable future) then inflation just makes things that much worse, and destroys the transactional utility of the currency (which things far, far worse - especially given our JIT inventory controls and dpendence on transactional processes in real-time more than ever ... just to keep food on the shelves for more than a few days).
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 07:06 AM (F5tJy)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 07:06 AM (cbyrC)
Posted by: Vic at August 23, 2011 10:44 AM (M9Ie6)
Beckel tried floating that canard, yesterday.
Posted by: garrett at August 23, 2011 07:07 AM (nk6+B)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 07:07 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 07:08 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 07:08 AM (XEK+4)
Meanwhile, we have the First Black President, which is an accomplishment. Someone who "achieved" public office, could actually do things...and he looks like an ant in comparison to King.
Posted by: AmishDude at August 23, 2011 11:05 AM (73tyQ)
One who, contrary to MLK's expressed wish, was elected for the color of his skin and not the content of his character.
Posted by: No Whining at August 23, 2011 07:08 AM (HmCnI)
Here's a bit you likely did not hear:
"The queen she gave him three fine ships,
Each one a triple-decker.
The queen she waved her hankerchief,
And Columbo waved his. . . "
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT
leather doublet?
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 23, 2011 07:09 AM (6rX0K)
Here's a bit you likely did not hear:
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 11:06 AM (cbyrC)
LOL - you are correct!
Posted by: No Whining at August 23, 2011 07:09 AM (HmCnI)
Failure of the favored obamaite hard left Alinsky Method tactics being exposed when Alinsky Method deployed against Perry.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:09 AM (jx2j9)
Where?
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 10:28 AM (WkuV6)
Texas, easily.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 23, 2011 07:10 AM (0N5pL)
That 0bamacare reduces medical costs and the deficit . . .
That 80% of the wealth in the country is in the hands of 20% . . .
That the 47% who don't pay taxes only have 2.5% of the wealth . . .
That those who don't pay taxes really do pay their share through sales, gas and property taxes . . .
That Jon Stewart is an authority . . .
That corporations don't pay taxes, causing the deficit . . .
And pretty much any insult they can think of along with a sprinkling of death wishes.
Yeah, we are totally fucking doomed--these willing fools are allowed to vote.
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 23, 2011 07:14 AM (JRjWw)
Where?
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 10:28 AM (WkuV6)
Barry is working on fixing that little issue.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:16 AM (jx2j9)
Yeah, my parents live 3 hours away, and my in-laws live 5 states away, so that wouldn't work for us.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:17 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 07:18 AM (cbyrC)
Yeah, we are totally fucking doomed--these willing fools are allowed to vote.
Posted by: Jimmuy at August 23, 2011 11:14 AM (JRjWw)
That's why one campaign plank should be to install the poleax in its rightful place at the voting booth. It would be a small sacrifice the 52% should be willing to make for the good of all, especially the children.
Posted by: No Whining at August 23, 2011 07:18 AM (HmCnI)
EPA Chorus releases new single, “All We Are Saying, Is Give DOOM a Chance.”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:19 AM (jx2j9)
Actually, it did $1,000's in improvements.
Posted by: observer at August 23, 2011 07:19 AM (kMyKg)
Politico's rather gloomy portrait of the public's perception of our president's prowess as Commander-in-Chief and leader in world affairs may be based on some insider interviews and some polls, but I think all that will change in a year. President Obama clearly has restored dignity and respect for the USA around the world. He is immensely more popular than the Bush/Cheney Republicans with their disrespectful, arrogant bullying foreign policy that led to worldwide American contempt and an enormously expensive, heavy-handed, cowardly pre-emptive-strike, basically go-it-alone strategy militarily. We are finally seeing what smart mutual respect, trust and cooperation can achieve around the world. In next year's presidential race Obama will dwarf any Republican candidate on foreign policy and military issues. No one but Huntsman has any foreign policy experience on the Republican side and no one has the gravitas our president has. I think President Obama's low-key military humility concerning military triumphs and the tragedies of war and death is more fitting any military leader and will prove more appealing to most Americans.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 07:20 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 23, 2011 07:21 AM (v8Pb8)
Join the chorus of "17% Flat Tax. No Deductions. Income now defined as 'any money you make' regardless of source."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:22 AM (8y9MW)
For forty days and forty nights
they sailed in search of booty
When on the shore, they spied a whore
By God, she was a beauty!
They went over the rails by heads and tails
a-tearing off their collars
In 14 minutes, by the clock,
she made nine thousand dollars.
Posted by: I never quote song lyrics here at August 23, 2011 07:22 AM (W5ilH)
Posted by: Jean at August 23, 2011 07:23 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 11:20 AM (UOM4
Subtle! Subtle and futile!
Posted by: No Whining at August 23, 2011 07:23 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:23 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
That's exactly what I am looking for...when I sock! But I haven't found the correct balance of utter stupidity and ignorance coupled with overweening pride and arrogance.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 07:25 AM (LH6ir)
NPR geniuses say smart shit that Tea Partiers are too racist to understand. But I didnÂ’t understand the smart shit they said so the first sentence is just a guess.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:25 AM (jx2j9)
That does sound a lot like your socks. How can we be sure that wasn't you, and your persona here isn't a sock?
Hey! Everybody! CBD is a Marxist infiltrator! Ban CBD now!
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:27 AM (8y9MW)
That's exactly what I am looking for...when I sock! But I haven't found the correct balance of utter stupidity and ignorance coupled with overweening pride and arrogance.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 11:25 AM (LH6ir)
I love the use of the word "humility" in the same paragraph with Obama.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 07:28 AM (UOM48)
http://tinyurl.com/pmfk6
You can thank me later.
Posted by: Bill Clinton at August 23, 2011 11:24 AM (vSiVD)
I'm cured! Uh, wait.
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at August 23, 2011 07:29 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 23, 2011 07:30 AM (O6l28)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:30 AM (8y9MW)
This lying dickbag doesn't get to make up his own facts. Bush was extremely popular in India from his steps to improve relations; El JEFe not so much.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 23, 2011 07:31 AM (yKL37)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:32 AM (jx2j9)
I once again thank God for my mother in law,who is a very nice person, and who not only watched our kids, continues to come over to the house and watch them before and after school. The kids are safe, Mrs Hen is happy and our budget probably wouldn't have survived without it. When we moved, we chose a house close to her (but I nixed getting a house in the same neighborhood).
Holy F. You should build a statue of her and have M-in-l day and friggin rub her feet. You have no idea what a blessing that is. I've moved heaven and earth for 20 years finding and managing part time work that would allow me to not be absent from the kids. Some years I didn't work at all. Hubby can't be less than 150% at work so it's left to me to manage.
Posted by: dagny at August 23, 2011 07:34 AM (YFYRZ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at August 23, 2011 07:34 AM (i6RpT)
Mr. Obama was back at home in Chilmark before 5 p.m. before the motorcade carrying the President sped down Lambert’s Cove Road, and then bottomed out (four times, according to a pool report) on the rocky (“big, scary boulders,” said the pool report), unpaved John Cottle Road to attend another informal reception at the West Tisbury home of Aileen and Brian Roberts. Mr. Roberts, a seasonal resident, is chief executive of Comcast.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 23, 2011 07:34 AM (UOM48)
Because even when I try, I can't be that stupid. That is a rare skill.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at August 23, 2011 07:34 AM (LH6ir)
This lying dickbag doesn't get to make up his own facts. Bush was extremely popular in India from his steps to improve relations; El JEFe not so much.
Posted by: Captain Hate
The sad part is that if this clown came here, squatted and emitted that, he'd be torn apart for making such pathetic fan boy comments without even attempting to support them. There, he's paid to do it.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 23, 2011 07:35 AM (326rv)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 23, 2011 07:35 AM (lbo6/)
Captain, you're forgetting that "worldwide" means "France" in liberal parlance.
Let me translate that statement from libard into Moron:
President Obama clearly has restored dignity and respect for the USA around the world. He is immensely more popular than the Bush/Cheney Republicans with their disrespectful, arrogant bullying foreign policy that led to worldwide American contempt
The SCOAMF has clearly made us a complete laughing stock to our enemies, and lessened the trust placed in us by our allies. He is much more popular- in the way the "easy" girls are- than Bush/Cheney with their principled, no-nonsense foregin policy that led France to wet itself.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:35 AM (8y9MW)
BarryÂ’s laser-like focus on jobs is like a master stroke of genius. We bask in the awesomeness of his unfathomable wisdom.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 07:36 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: blaster at August 23, 2011 07:36 AM (l5dj7)
I once again thank God for my mother in law,who is a very nice person, and who not only watched our kids, continues to come over to the house and watch them before and after school. The kids are safe, Mrs Hen is happy and our budget probably wouldn't have survived without it. When we moved, we chose a house close to her (but I nixed getting a house in the same neighborhood).
Holy F. You should build a statue of her and have M-in-l day and friggin rub her feet. You have no idea what a blessing that is. I've moved heaven and earth for 20 years finding and managing part time work that would allow me to not be absent from the kids. Some years I didn't work at all. Hubby can't be less than 150% at work so it's left to me to manage.
Posted by: dagny
We had her over for dinner last night. As others have mentioned before regarding employment, we based our house buying decision upon her 'range'. it was a clear factor as to what and where we bought. It clearly was to our advantage.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 23, 2011 07:39 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: bill mitchell at August 23, 2011 07:39 AM (dLVeF)
@263
He's got a team of 1000 focused like a laser on keeping his job. And a team of 20 focused on putting together a plan for the rest of us.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 07:40 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: Brock O'Bama at August 23, 2011 07:40 AM (n1JN0)
Well, it's PPP, but I have to say, those numbers give me the tinglies. Go Perry!
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:41 AM (8y9MW)
By "France" I hope you mean the elite shitbags that aren't worth the effort it takes to type about them; because the regular "man on the street", at least when I was there, is much more down to earth and in contact with reality than those effete fucksticks.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 23, 2011 07:42 AM (yKL37)
You know how I know that we’re DOOMed? I look on this mug and say to myself, “Self. We’re toast.”
That’s the look of, “When your money runs out, you’re dead! And I’ll kill you!”
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 23, 2011 09:38 AM (jx2j9)
Holy shit, it's Thulsa Doom in drag!
----
I've worked in Inglewood (Hollywood Park). She's one of the nice ones.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 07:43 AM (XEK+4)
Well, yes, I meant "official" France. Their politicians and "elites."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 23, 2011 07:44 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Frum one slacker to another at August 23, 2011 07:48 AM (/ZZCn)
"Just heard that for the first time two weeks ago while visiting our Troop's participant at NYLT ..."
Here's a bit you likely did not hear:
"The queen she gave him three fine ships,
Each one a triple-decker.
The queen she waved her hankerchief,
And Columbo waved his. . . "
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at August 23, 2011 11:06 AM (cbyrC)
Or better yet, this verse:
"The captain had a cabin boy,
A perky little nipper.
He packed his ass with pieces of glass,
And circumcised the skipper."
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at August 23, 2011 07:48 AM (3AuGS)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at August 23, 2011 07:49 AM (4nfy2)
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 09:48 AM (XEK+4)
I don't think I've seen a family that's been so blatantly shameless in their overarching desire to cash in on every opportunity of reference to MLK.
-------
Ha, my suspicion was correct. Looks like they were paid $800K to allow the use of a sentence and his image.
WASHINGTON -- The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s family has charged the foundation building a monument to the civil-rights leader on the National Mall about $800,000 to use his words and image -- and at least one scholar thinks that Dr. King would find such an arrangement offensive.
The memorial is being paid for almost entirely through a fund-raising campaign led by the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation.
"I don't think the Jefferson family, the Lincoln family [or] any other group of family ancestors has been paid a licensing fee for a memorial in Washington," said Cambridge University historian David Garrow, author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Dr. King. ". . . [He would've been] absolutely scandalized."
Financial documents revealed that the foundation paid $761,160 in 2007 to Intellectual Properties Management Inc., an entity run by the King family. They also showed that a $71,700 "management" fee was paid to the family estate in 2003.
Posted by: Jimmah at August 23, 2011 07:51 AM (XEK+4)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 23, 2011 07:57 AM (yMmkt)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 23, 2011 10:55 AM (F5tJy)
Frankly, "Independance Day" is our most ironically named holiday, since our government promotes and celebrates dependance at all levels.
Posted by: Brer Texas at August 23, 2011 07:59 AM (vI8R6)
At my grandkids school everyone pays the lunch fees on line or by check to the system's office. Each child has an account on computer and simply goes through the line, gives their PIN number, and the lunch cost is deducted from their account.
Kids who qualify for free or reduced lunches have the aid money added to their account. NO ONE knows who is on free lunches except whoever it is in the central office who does the entries into the accounts.
So the entire excuse for this program is totally bogus.
Posted by: Miss Marple at August 23, 2011 08:05 AM (Fo83G)
wrt Boomer Hatred: The system was in place long before we came along. We just tried to do our best to live within the parameters we were given. We didn't help much, after we came of age and started voting, but the same can be said for Gen X, Y and the Millenials.
Plus...
"Lie for years and get fat bonuses.Tell the truth and get fired."
Guess who gets all of the promotions in the workplace? (The person who tells the truth and gets promoted is usually being set up as a future fall guy.) Tact? Yeah, that's a common military term. Tactics are used in warfare...where lies are used to fool your enemies and are a common part military strategy.
What that says about our society is that we would sooner believe a lie than to hear the unvarnished truth. Yeah? Think about how you react when someone tells you the unvarnished truth about something you already believe, or something you think you already know? How do you react? Dont lie to yourself, now.
How do you react when someone tells you exactly what you want to hear, just the way you want to hear it?
Hint: The person telling you exactly what you want to hear, just the way you want to hear it is usually trying to pick your pocket or steal your stuff.
iow, we have to rexamine everything we think we know about ourselves and our society, kids...because what we know obviously isn't working.
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at August 23, 2011 08:13 AM (E7Z1r)
Optimal flv to dvd converter s ipad 3 converter
Video to ipad Converter is then designed ipad video converter for iPad fans to convert avi to iPad
Posted by: lusefer at August 23, 2011 09:23 PM (KcRHl)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2923 seconds, 408 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: EC at August 23, 2011 04:45 AM (GQ8sn)