April 01, 2011
— Ace It's not that I didn't notice this story. It's that I want to take some time before writing about it.
I only see two options I can support:
1. We keep doing what we're doing. We fight the Bush way.
2. We recognize that the proper response to savagery and terror is savagery and terror, and we drop our illusions about being able to effect a good solution to this problem, and we begin revising our policy about bombing population centers. And we define a major terrorist attack as being a nuclear-level attack, inviting a nuclear response.
After 9/11 I was pretty sure what I wanted to see was Option 2. When Bush took nukes off the table, I was disappointed.
I did then, and still do, criticize Bush for being a Born-Again Christian. By which I mean: informed by the Christian ethics of mercy and regard for human life.
Which I thought were nice and everything but... too constraining.
After 9/11, I had a much less Christian sort of thought about how to deal with a murder cult.
Bush sort of changed my mind, and pursued, I thought, what seemed to be a less savage, more noble course. I gave him credit for that. Maybe I (and people who thought like me) were in fact giving license to genocidal hatred. Maybe Bush's decision to keep things civilized was a good one.
I was proud of what Bush, and the troops fighting for America, did for me, and for all of us. It wasn't just that they delivered justice -- justice could be more cheaply delivered via massive bombs dropped on cities and towns. They also delivered something finer than justice. Compassion, mercy.
I wouldn't have chosen that course -- but I was glad that cooler (or, warmer) heads chose it for me.
But as this goes on I am going back to thinking those are expensive luxuries and I no longer wish to pay for such things.
Posted by: Ace at
01:24 PM
| Comments (524)
Post contains 341 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 01:26 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 01:27 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:27 PM (nj1bB)
Civilization is for the civilized. Barbarians, well, they're barbarians for a reason.
My Catholic background saddles me with the whole 'just war' concept. I have, after much soul-searching, come to the conclusion that, proper as that is between civilized adversaries, against those who can most charitably described as atavistic barbarians, a cursory attempt to convert and merciless suppression of the remainder is called for.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:28 PM (GBXon)
I always figured you for one of those blood-drinking Jews.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:28 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: oldsailor's poet at April 01, 2011 01:29 PM (cDRYC)
Islamotard problem solved!
Posted by: wooga at April 01, 2011 01:29 PM (2p0e3)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:30 PM (nj1bB)
The smart bomb is one of the worst things we invented.
I think the world should know that if we're pissed off enough to load up the bombers, a Shitstorm of Biblical Proportions TM is headed their way.
The populace of some of these countries would hold their leaders accountable once knowing this to be true.
Posted by: Gunslinger at April 01, 2011 01:30 PM (Zi+FQ)
Foreign Aid is now Dillingers and ammo to everywhere that we feel is oppressive. Yes, this may include Chicago and Detroit.
Posted by: Al at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (MzQOZ)
[endless Diplomatic babble]
It's a bug-hunt.
Posted by: Hudson at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (a0Jhx)
Compassion and mercy are not expensive luxuries. They are some of the things that define us. But compassion and mercy have to be executed correctly, and with authority. One of the failings of our conduct of the Iraqi war was our inability to balance compassion and mercy with firm resolve and force.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: oldsailor's poet at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (cDRYC)
No, they just realize we won't use them. They certainly would, if the situations were reversed.
Which is why we ought to have been making sure they never could be. Alas...
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: joncelli at April 01, 2011 01:31 PM (Nvw83)
The "Bush Way" is also characterized by neglect of cultural differences resulting in absurd expectations about what is actually practical in these countries. We are still just as concerned with setting up quasi-stable, somewhat Islamist, somewhat republican forms of government in these areas than retribution or breaking the will of those who want to attack us. Even worse, we don't seem to realize when the two are in conflict.
Security should be the focus of US foreign policy in these matters. We shouldn't have to rely on a veneer of pseudo-liberalism to justify military actions which support our interest.
If it means that our actions run closer to #2, that is our mission.
Posted by: Paper at April 01, 2011 01:32 PM (VoSja)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:33 PM (nj1bB)
They also delivered something finer than justice. Compassion, mercy.
Of course the problem there is in the muslim world compassion and mercy are viewed has weakness
Posted by: kj at April 01, 2011 01:33 PM (P/tet)
We have changed, but Islam hasn't. What should be done to combat a 7th century mindset, when we are constrained by 21st century ideals?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:33 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 01:34 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 01:35 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: maddogg at April 01, 2011 01:35 PM (OlN4e)
This recent Koran thing is a convenient excuse they can use to generate sympathy in the Western media. You'll notice no one offered a justification for the murder of this British doctor and nine others, other than the usual "they were infidels, what did you expect?" You'll also remember it got zero attention from the BLM.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 01:36 PM (0vDuM)
The smart bomb is one of the worst things we invented.
Actually, no. It's one of the best force multipliers ever devised for aircraft. It makes a single F15 Strike Eagle equivalent to a WWII-era 1000 plane raid on Germany. The main reason that huge numbers of bombs were needed in times past was because of how difficult it was to destroy a single point target with the equipment of that era. Hence, throw more ordnance at the target until you hit the damned thing. Expensive in hardware, even more expensive in highly trained flight crews.
The problem is how our "political betters" mandate the military use them. Smart bombs have nothing to do with reducing collateral damage, but you can't convince a politician of that truth.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 01, 2011 01:37 PM (9daa6)
I meant not that compassion and mercy weren't expensive, but that they weren't luxuries.
Do you want to live in an America that isn't willing to spend gold and blood to protect what we believe is the right way to behave? And I don't care at all about the lives of the savages who are busy killing each other (and us when they can) all over the Muslim world. I care only about what our behavior says about us.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:37 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:38 PM (nj1bB)
Knowing that these Islamists would gleefully use nuclear weapons (or worse, as I consider biological weapons worse than nuclear or chem - at least for the latter two, the danger is more or less localized than the former), I still can't figure out what a modern society should do in the face of a threat with a 7th century mindset that would gladly yield 21st century weapons to facilitate our total destruction.
Does that make us weak? Or merely human? Or both?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 01:38 PM (muhWA)
How about cordoning off the Islamic world from civilization as option 3? Sure, we can buy oil from Arabia, but we don't have to let their citizens enter our country. Same for the rest of them. No more student visas, lottery visas, whatever. And let other countries know that their Islamic citizens (ahem, France & Britain, e.g.) won't be let in either. And that means expelling those that are already here unless they have citizenship.
Posted by: somebody else, not me at April 01, 2011 01:38 PM (7EV/g)
So with all the calls for violent uprisings and "Death to the West" throughout the Muslim world, particularly since "W.O.T. 3: Police Academy in Libya" premiered, the murderous Muslim mobs activated because a book got burned?
Their entire culture is an excuse.
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 01, 2011 01:39 PM (xMT+4)
Someone linked to an anagram maker in the previous thread.
My whole name including middle turns into HUM! LUCRATIVE AROMATIC
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 01, 2011 01:39 PM (c5RQr)
Current US policy assumes that democratic institutions (whatever that is supposed to mean in these countries) will drain the swamp of corruption, terrorism, and poverty.
I don't know how many generations this is supposed to take or why we are responsible for paying the absurd price for civilizational renewal. Our responsibility is the safety of our citizens. We shouldn't have to balance around the violence of a particular region/religion for fear of not being seen as liberators rather than crusaders.
And obviously, no matter what we have done or how 'born-again' the policy has been, are we really seen all that well in these countries? How much has this really earned us? Where are our gains in cultural transformation and how strong are their chances for continuing in the future?
Posted by: Paper at April 01, 2011 01:39 PM (VoSja)
Posted by: Hadrian at April 01, 2011 01:39 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 05:35 PM (7wmOW)
No, I don't believe that. And I am of the mindset that we will eventually have to use nuclear weapons on a good portion of the Islamic world before this century is over. But we once were and can be again, the greatest nation in the history of the world. We should show compassion and mercy until we can't any more, not until we just can't afford it.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:40 PM (LH6ir)
Tell me how it would work and map out the repercussions realistically and I'm on board. Emotionally I'm *already* on board. Practically, though? I don't see how it doesn't devolve into something uncontrollable and truly unwinnable.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 01:40 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: jwb7605 at April 01, 2011 01:40 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at April 01, 2011 01:41 PM (7EV/g)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 01:41 PM (7wmOW)
Posted by: oldsailor's poet at April 01, 2011 01:42 PM (cDRYC)
You'll excuse me if I prefer that to be debated in a 22nd century where the true West survived, and Islam was reduced to a few wandering tribes in a harsh place, far from reasonable people. As it stands, it's likely to be by Islamic scholars discussing the extinction of the West.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:42 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 05:38 PM (nj1bB)
Then let's start with Israel. We can hang them out to dry in return for a guaranteed supply of below-market oil from the Iranians. That is a smart realpolitik move that will be good for all of our wallets, and will help the economy to grow.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:42 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:42 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: nickless at April 01, 2011 01:43 PM (MMC8r)
I go for option 2.
Kill them all, let Allah sort them out.
And I mean that with the utmost sincerity.
When ALL your people are dead, you can no longer maneuver on the battlefield and consequently, you no longer have the means and where with all to kill the enemy (which is us).
Posted by: thebronze at April 01, 2011 01:44 PM (bIuCV)
Hell, that doesn't even work here. Bugger that idea for a foreign policy.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:44 PM (GBXon)
Yes, but what do we say to the Indians when the Pakistanis nuke THEM in retaliation for OUR nuking of an Islamic country? (A pretext? Sure. But one that'll happen.) And then the Indians nuke back? And then it turns into bellum omnia contra omnes? Have you really gamed this out?
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 01:44 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:44 PM (nj1bB)
Collateral damage happens in war, and we can't let the enemy survive for fear of it. It should be terrifying to be anywhere near a supporter of terrorism, and you should be frightened about not turning them in. You may be innocent, but sometimes you have to work to survive.
Make it difficult for anyone in support of a terrorist network to be within 10 meters of another human being.
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 01, 2011 01:45 PM (tsC/8)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 01:45 PM (7wmOW)
I hope that's sarcastic. Sacrificing a critical base and ally in a vain attempt to appease a mortal adversary is the exact opposite of 'smart'.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:45 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 01:46 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: gesc at April 01, 2011 01:46 PM (A22+V)
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 01:46 PM (7wmOW)
Point taken. Sadly, I fear you may be right.
Forgive my lament. It's just enervating to see the Islamists make their slow but inexorable march towards domination. Particularly when the learned people should know better. Even the liberals and communists, but they're too busy trying to use the Islamists to kill the "greater evil".
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 01:47 PM (muhWA)
Then let's start with Israel. We can hang them out to dry in return for a guaranteed supply of below-market oil from the Iranians. That is a smart realpolitik move that will be good for all of our wallets, and will help the economy to grow.
You're weak. I'm going to take advantage of you.
Posted by: Iran at April 01, 2011 01:47 PM (tsC/8)
Ron Paul!
Posted by: The Ron Paul! Guy at April 01, 2011 01:47 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 05:45 PM (GBXon)
Hum? But it seems to be the group think in this Administration?
Posted by: nevergiveup at April 01, 2011 05:46 PM (7wmOW)
I hope I don't actually have to explain what that says about this Administration...
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:48 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 01, 2011 01:48 PM (xMT+4)
Posted by: Soliders Mom at April 01, 2011 01:48 PM (la0MI)
Thanks for using the words 'did for me' and 'did for all of us'. That is one thing my lib-idiot brother will never understand. What Bush did he did for us, The American People. What our troops are doing, they are doing for us, again - the American People.
Now, as to compassion or compression, I say compression. These violent savages need to be boxed in. They need to fear the world.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 01:49 PM (penCf)
Posted by: maddogg at April 01, 2011 01:49 PM (OlN4e)
If "diversity" wasn't a euphemism for "fuck white people", the people who make their living touting "cross-cultural understanding " could have transmitted that information to Western society, and we could have adjusted our approach to better fit their worldview. Instead, we act like their culture has the same values and norms as the U.S., which is an act of actual racism and cultural imperialism (that we can't recognize because those words have been so twisted beyond parody).
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 01:49 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Guy who is new to the sight, but wants to turn the middle east into glass at April 01, 2011 01:50 PM (GS9dw)
I don't know if you mean this as well Ace, but there is another emotional element of the conflict.
In this country, Bush and many others were doing everything to convince us that Islam is not a real problem, the religion is peaceful, Muslim immigration is not a problem, etc. On top of that, citizens have been expected to pay huge sums to help rebuild countries and institutions, change their expectations of civil liberties, and still live in a reasonable expectation of another attack.
We have given up a lot to be in this 'born-again' policy, and we are right to ask what we are getting in return. Instead, we are supposed to be compelled by moral standing to not ask practical questions about sacrifices and to focus on the human rights of non-citizens thousands of miles away who more often than not, agree more with those against us than for us.
We can't fight the war we wish someone would fight against us. We have to fight the war that exists. If that involves acts of collective violence at times to reorganize incentives for collaborating or encouraging terrorism, so be it. Our current policy has a small chance of accomplishing our objective even over decades with billions and billions of dollars spent, and more importantly the loss of many brave soldiers lives.
Posted by: Paper at April 01, 2011 01:50 PM (VoSja)
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 01:50 PM (gWHrG)
Conducting a war with rules of engagement that are designed to satisfy lawyers in an office in the justice department is no way to win! But indiscriminate killing is anathema to the American spirit.
I am talking about the traditional, exceptional American view that all life is worth protecting, unless it demonstrates something else. And then kill it with everything in our arsenal. For example; we bent over backwards to minimize the killing of the Iraqi army, and in the process lost American soldiers. But in return we got a country that didn't understand that they had just gotten their asses kicked, and decided to fight for several more years. Too much compassion and mercy got us an insurgency that was responsible for the deaths of thousands of American soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqis.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:50 PM (LH6ir)
We used to understand that. We better remember it or we're toast.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:50 PM (GBXon)
Given that as part of their religion, muslims are required to make the pilgrimage to Mecca - would you support bombing Mecca and Medina? Not necessarily saying nuke them, but carpet bomb the hell out of each one.
I can see arguments for and against... and really, I'm not sure what side I'd come down on.
But for the record - after 9/11 - I wanted us to nuke someone.
Posted by: Naqamel at April 01, 2011 01:51 PM (UMwMT)
A lot of hostile people in the middle east need to be blown up or just wake up dead with lead slug in their head. And if some civilians are killed as part of this, well that's a shame but then war is a terrible thing. Plus it should be dangerous to be around Bad Guys.
Maybe what we should do is conduct two simultaneous wars: a clean, humane one in public plus a covert dirty, no mercy, no rules one in private with plausible deniability. I can live with that.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 01, 2011 01:51 PM (pAlYe)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 01, 2011 01:52 PM (c5RQr)
They have no compassion. They are pure evil. They use a book to justify all the evil things they do. Would the world just accept it if Jews or Christians did the same? Hell no.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 01:52 PM (penCf)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:52 PM (nj1bB)
The question you can ask yourselves: How do we make them police themselves? They should fight for their lives to uncover and turn in Jihadis in their midst.
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 01, 2011 01:52 PM (tsC/8)
A clue?
Map -- World Prevalence of Consanguinity
For the purposes of the study, consanguineous marriage is defined as unions beetween second cousins or closer. Globally, the most common form of consanguineous union contracted is between first cousins.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 01, 2011 01:53 PM (w41GQ)
If you could, for sake of argument, remove Islam from the earth for the past ten years, how many terrorist attacks would have occurred?
Would that number be less than the actual number? By how much? I submit over 99% of all attacks around the world an untold lives would have been spared without one religion in the world.
Now, let's look forward to the next ten years. How many attacks will be committed on behalf of Islam? Is it a lot? How many innocents will die at the hands of these sub-human bastards?
What should a reasonable person do, knowing what has happened in the past and what WILL happen going forward. What should we be willing to do to prevent the deaths we KNOW are coming?
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 01, 2011 01:53 PM (BPl2/)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 05:44 PM (nj1bB)
No, but American support for Israel is based not only on geopolitical reasons. It is also based on our shared beliefs. Israel acts in war even more carefully than we do. Remove those shared beliefs and Israel becomes a less defensible friend and ally.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (LH6ir)
Mistaking AQ's partly coercively occupied rural-hideout network for their nervous system is also a Bush/NEOCONS!/etc. error.
The thing we've decided to call "Islamism" is a ruling-class ideology with ethnic-nationalist and "watch the world burn"-type underclass support that really would, like the "blowback!" idiots say, strengthen with misdirected attacks on it.
The ululating goatfuckers living in dust-holes aren't the problem. The "professionals, lawyers, doctors, people who appear to be credible" the US and UK have installed above them as both rulers and terrorist/rebel opposition (i.e., future rulers) are. Carpet-bombing Oxford and Harvard would stop more future terror attacks than glassing all of Afghanistan would.
You in it to win it?
Posted by: oblig. at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (xvZW9)
I'm a believing and practicing Catholic convert. I chose it. I know what the Church says but I don't think they are looking at it right. They are looking at these criminal barbarians as if they weren't steeped in a satanic cult's sin and expecting us to behave as if we were ready to die at their hands as martyrs. If you adhere or understand the just war theory then you can certainly protect yourself and other innocents from carnage, rape, death, etc. How do you go about doing that? They have to be stopped, not appeased, not held back, not reeducated but stopped, period. I don't see how you stop a crazed freak bent on death without killing him and eradicating his nest. I pains me to say it.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (k52O3)
Unfortunately, you know this is just wishcasting. The truth is that there is a tremendous amount of American Compassion looking out for their families and I'm not sure how you ever change that. If a balls out attack on NYC & DC didn't do it, what would it take?
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (+lsX1)
I was on-board with a more subdued approach. Honestly, I think it was worth doing, even though it appears pretty certain now that these people are incapable of dragging themselves from the self-induced barbarism cultivated under millenia of competing tribal interests and magnified exponentially by a virulent death-cult of a religion.
We gave the compassionate side a go. We gave these people an opportunity to join us in the 21st century.
They have refused.
Hence krakatoa's rules for engaging in military action on foreign soil:
We knock the shit out of our enemy with extreme prejudice, only stopping at unconditional surrender. When they capitulate, we give them a constitution and enforce it.
Which isn't exactly a new rule [cough]japan[cough], but it certainly is a rule that has been proven effective.
If several decades of militarily enforcing a societal change is not acceptable, then we just continue knocking the shit out of these barbarians every time they achieve a technological level past spears & rocks.
It's brutal, but I just don't see how we have any justifiable rationale for spending our blood & resources attempting to reason with the clearly insane.
Yes, a lot of truly innocent people will die. Tough. Better those truly good innocent people die, than mine.
Given the trajectory of events this past decade, any other point of view is simply suicidal.
Posted by: krakatoa at April 01, 2011 01:54 PM (a0Jhx)
We are our own worst enemy going along with the pc crap that the leftists and apologist throw out there and it's probably too late to turn it around. I still think that the pig blood and bullet/bomb thing is a pretty good deterent. Cut off their path to heaven and the virgins and they'll think twice about martrying themselves.
Posted by: Bosk at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (pUO5u)
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 05:45 PM (GBXon)
Of course it is. Half my family is in Israel.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (LH6ir)
The 3 Muslims I know have asked exactly that question. Except they didn't say "fucking".
Actually, I exaggerate. One of the 3 said "I couldn't take it any more" after the Mumbai incident, and left the faith (he's from India). So I guess it's only 2.
Posted by: jwb7605 at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (Qxe/p)
I'd cut off every dime of aid, too. After decades of watching food aid rot in warehouses guarded by local warlords and financial aid spent on military hardware, I'm impervious to the pinko hippies' wails of "but, starving women and children!" (They were going to spend that money on aborting those babies instead of feeding them anyway, hypocritical assholes.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: Porn and Drugs at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (McG46)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (QxSug)
If I had to choose, I'd take Sherman and Patton over Augustus and Aquinas, at least under these circumstances.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:55 PM (GBXon)
Long-term, 'tis better to be feared than loved.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (swuwV)
Now we have a dozen dead people. And while I understand that people are tired of the mayhem and the ugliness of the region..I also know that the Taliban and AlQaida would like nothing better than to see us pack up and leave. After all, if we give up on these people, then they can get back to what they were doing before Bush went after the Taliban in the first place.
I am not making excuses for Muslims, I wish Mohammed had never been born. But we can not blame all of them for this...anymore than they should blame every American soldier for bad behavior of a few bad men.. But then again of course we as a nation will punish those young men. That is one of many things that makes us civilized.
I don't know. But I hate to do what I know AlQaida would love to see us do...give up and walk away. I would prefer to punish the people who did the deed.
Posted by: Terrye at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (j8jdm)
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: Dallas at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (Hb5CK)
Me like. And we need to scrap the whole "we won't assassinate Heads of State" policy. The Khomeinis and the Ahmedinejads need to be taught that there is a grave penalty for using terrorism as an instrument foreign policy.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (muhWA)
Publicly announce that if a any form of NBC weapon goes of in a western country then the first response will be to glass Mecca and Medina - It's in their best interest to ensure that the kooks don't get weapons then.
However if they really believe they're doing the will of Allah then surely he wouldn't let those cities disappear would he...
Posted by: Nuc-Al-Bomba at April 01, 2011 01:56 PM (CoWPm)
How about cordoning off the Islamic world from civilization as option 3? Sure, we can buy oil from Arabia, but we don't have to let their citizens enter our country. Same for the rest of them. No more student visas, lottery visas, whatever. And let other countries know that their Islamic citizens (ahem, France & Britain, e.g.) won't be let in either. And that means expelling those that are already here unless they have citizenship.
Yes.
Posted by: Average Joe at April 01, 2011 01:57 PM (mQMnK)
Our values are anathema to each other, and they do not disdain violence when they have the advantage. So we face perpetual war or submission unless one side manages to convert the other. I'm not optimistic about that working, but it is worth a try. Unfortunatly the west doesn't believe itself in anyway superior. We have to convince them to renounce significant parts of Islam, not merely to be more tolerant.
Of course, the other problem is that the same can be said concerning conservative and liberal values, absent, happily for the moment, the violence.
Posted by: Randy at April 01, 2011 01:57 PM (D0PNd)
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 01, 2011 05:52 PM (tsC/8
HEY ARE FOLLOWING THE KORAN. Sorry for the shouting but jezz this is the internet age. Look it up, M kay>
Posted by: xyz at April 01, 2011 01:57 PM (la0MI)
Or just steal the moon rock from Mecca. Every time something happens we don't like, it gets "humiliated" in some way, like a Jew touching it or someone heats it up with a heat gun and cooks bacon on it or whatever.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 01, 2011 01:57 PM (p05LM)
We tried it the Bush way. What has it gotten us? Nothing, except for a whole bunch of huge-ass debts and thousands of dead American soldiers. I give the man points for taking the high road, but enough is enough.
Islam stands alone as a religion that doesn't recognize the golden rule in some form or other. So, how do you deal with people who aren't morally or societally enjoined to treat others with compassion? Certainly not with compassion, because compassion to them is a sign of weakness. And it can't be reformed, because mad mo built mechanisms into it that make true reform impossible.
Sadly, the only way to "fix" islam is to eradicate it. As some evil jooo once said, if you show mercy to the cruel, you will ultimately bring cruelty to the merciful.
Posted by: TiredWench at April 01, 2011 01:57 PM (oPceJ)
Posted by: Donna at April 01, 2011 01:58 PM (bdE9c)
They already have. It's hard-coded into their 'faith'. I don't need anything more than how they've conducted themselves through history to decide that.
Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at April 01, 2011 01:59 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 01, 2011 01:59 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:00 PM (nj1bB)
But we can not blame all of them for this...anymore than they should blame every American soldier for bad behavior of a few bad men..
I have no problem blaming all of them for this. None. You're either an adherant to a medieval death cult's syphillic rantings or you're not.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:01 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: Lefty Hussein McMoonbat at April 01, 2011 02:01 PM (saRwI)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:01 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at April 01, 2011 02:02 PM (NZMKc)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:02 PM (nj1bB)
At least the British dealt decisively with the Thugee cults. But they gave their balls away too.
Posted by: Iblis at April 01, 2011 02:02 PM (CcNOT)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 01, 2011 02:02 PM (4ZxEW)
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 01, 2011 05:52 PM (tsC/8
HEY ARE FOLLOWING THE KORAN. Sorry for the shouting but jezz this is the internet age. Look it up, M kay>
Posted by: xyz at April 01, 2011 05:57 PM (la0MI)
What?
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 01, 2011 02:02 PM (tsC/8)
Posted by: Ian S. at April 01, 2011 02:03 PM (p05LM)
Posted by: Bosk at April 01, 2011 02:03 PM (pUO5u)
In their mindset, kindness= weakness. In his compassion, I think that Bush has shown us to be weak to a certain extent. We need not to be weak. I do not mean Muslim genocide or anything like that; I mean we need to start acting forcefully. Which will never happen under Teh Won.
It is a complex situation. Over the years, Israel has used "restraint" and how has that turned out for them? It seems like they're getting bombed on a daily basis.
As much as I liked the idea of "bringing Democracy to the Middle East," it's not a plan. It will not work. We are projecting our values on a vastly different culture, a culture that, in the end, does not have the same Judeo Christian values.
Posted by: shibumi at April 01, 2011 02:03 PM (OKZrE)
Now if we're talking about killing them anyway, why not really push abortion for them?
It's against their medieval death cult rules. I'd rather kill the parents and save the innocent but genetically compromised child.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:03 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 01, 2011 02:03 PM (BPl2/)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:04 PM (nj1bB)
So they tie this current massacre to a specific event here in the US, but how many others have happened in the past year with no match setting them off? They are trying to shut us up through fear, that's what the Muslims have been succeeding at for the last 10 years.
I do not see why we must continue to be compassionate and measured in response to their threats and actions when they constantly prove to us that they will only be brutal and inhuman in return.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at April 01, 2011 02:04 PM (RZ8pf)
Of course it is, silly. They kill the mother.
Posted by: jwb7605 at April 01, 2011 02:04 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: sTevo at April 01, 2011 02:04 PM (VMcEw)
I am not making excuses for Muslims, I wish Mohammed had never been born. But we can not blame all of them for this...anymore than they should blame every American soldier for bad behavior of a few bad men..
So do you blame all the Nazis for murdering Jews, or just the ones that dropped the crystals into the vents?
Islam is a virulent, hateful ideology, just like Nazism. That some muslims might not personally agitate for beheading infidels doesn't let them off the hook as far as I'm concerned. Lots of committed Nazis kept up the landscaping and raised polite kids.
When I see a groundswell of public revulsion by the mass of "moderate muslims," then I'll rethink whether I should blame all muslims for their barbaric co-religionists. Until then, they're all evil adherents to an evil cause in my book.
Posted by: Cicero at April 01, 2011 02:05 PM (QKKT0)
Or just steal the moon rock from Mecca. Every time something happens we don't like, it gets "humiliated" in some way, like a Jew touching it or someone heats it up with a heat gun and cooks bacon on it or whatever.
Awesome and funny. It's a GO!
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:05 PM (k52O3)
This, IMHO would be the most "compassionate" way to deal with the situation.
Stir the pot and then watch the fireworks.
Remember- the greatest killer of Muslims is other Muslims.
Posted by: shibumi at April 01, 2011 02:05 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:05 PM (nj1bB)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 02:07 PM (nj1bB)
Might be an ineffective strategy, unless women in the ME started having underground abortions en masse. Demographics is a key weapon in the Islamist's arsenal. To boot:
From: Fallaci issues a wake-up call to Europe.
In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.: "One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory." In other words, says Fallaci, what Islamic armies have not been able to do with force in more than 1,000 years can be achieved in less than a century through high birth rates. She cites as evidence a 1975 meeting of Islamic countries in Lahore, in which they announced their project to transform the flow of Muslim immigrants in Europe in "demographic preponderance."
The "sons of Allah," as Fallaci calls them, do not make a secret of their plans. A Catholic bishop recounted that, during an interfaith meeting in Turkey, a respected Muslim cleric told the crowd: "Thanks to your democratic laws we will invade you. Thanks to our Islamic laws we will conquer you."Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 02:07 PM (muhWA)
What are they mad about? A guy in a state they never heard of burning a book?
Something smells in all of this.
Posted by: Kemp at April 01, 2011 02:07 PM (JpFM9)
Another problem is the naive belief that people want liberty. Deep down, everyone just wants to be left alone to raise their children and goats and drink Coke, etc.
Most people don't want freedom for themselves, and very few care about it for their neighbors. People would rather have security for themselves, and cultural values imposed onto their neighbors than freedom for all--even many of the oppressed would rather be apart of the ruling party than see freedom.
And yes, many examples exist in western life.
Posted by: Randy at April 01, 2011 02:07 PM (D0PNd)
LOL. BRILLIANT!!!
Posted by: shibumi at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (OKZrE)
I am a firm believer in collateral damage...not on purpose, but also not unduly worrying about it.
I'm vicious, though; I'd be compiling a database with all these jihadis in it, and every time I caught one, I'd bomb the hell out of their village or hut or tent or goat encampment or whatever.
Posted by: MissTammy at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (VnECg)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (UDCg4)
They do not respect compassion and mercy. They respect power and those willing to use it. And make no mistake, this attitude pre-dates Islam. All the Koran did was bring a secular attitude into a religion.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (/U/Mr)
Someone linked to an anagram maker in the previous thread.
My whole name including middle turns into HUM! LUCRATIVE AROMATIC
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at April 01, 2011 05:39 PM (c5RQr)
Heh, just tried my full name. Got: DAMN! FINE, ACCURSED JERK
Nailed it
Posted by: mugiwara at April 01, 2011 02:08 PM (KI/Ch)
Let's face it folks. We don't have the money for luxury anymore. And, without a draft, we'll never have the manpower to control the muslim horde. The day will come, if we're attacked again, that we'll have no choice but to use nukes.
I had an idea for the next president, if he/she's anywhere close to conservative. Call a private ME conference of all the leaders and tell them point blank that if the US is attacked again, we'll drop nukes on Mecca and Medina. If there's any retaliation of any kind after that than we'll start, using conventional weapons (including massive carpet bombing) to start taking out all of islam's sacred sites, mosques, and cities.
Yeah, I'm in agreement with some of you about Bush. I was sorely disappointed he didn't declare a national war mobilization like WWII.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 02:09 PM (1oAbV)
Yes, I can and do. Blame every last one of them. They are a scourge. A cancer that should be eradicated. And until someone can point out a concrete example of the mythical 'moderate Muslim', a Muslim denouncing the violence, the jihad, one who acknowledges that Islam is murderous cult than I shall not change my opinion.
Among the civilized there is a tendency, a real desire, to believe in basic human decency. We cannot continue to fool ourselves into believing that such basic decency exists in these barbarians.
Posted by: Dumb_Blonde at April 01, 2011 02:09 PM (G4Dm3)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (QxSug)
This is not about Jones.
Check out some of the seventeen thousand Muslim terror attacks that took place before this Koran thing.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: DaMav at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (QNU76)
Posted by: model_1066 at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (VnECg)
Why do we give special bennies to followers of the false prophet child rapist Muhammad?
Iran's nuclear facilities should be smoking holes in the ground -- as should have Pakistan's. We should routinely assassinate any Iranian nuclear scientists. Pretty much anybody in the muslim world that masters differential equations should probably be taken out just as a precautionary measure.
As long as they just stick to autisticly memorizing the Koran then I don't care that much. We can live with their evil pedophile, butt-raping, jihadi murder cult since their massacres are only a few people at a time.
It's when they start studying advanced nuclear physics and genetic engineering that I start thinking a little pre-emptive ethnic cleansing is in order.
What do we do when some jihadi learns how to craft a new smallpox that only will infect those of northern european descent? Or east asian
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 02:10 PM (QcFbt)
That's a fucking great idea!
Posted by: Margaret Sanger at April 01, 2011 02:11 PM (+lsX1)
I don't think that phrase means what you think it means. Just saying.
Also, I don't think GWB's decisions regarding Afghanistan or Iraq had anything to do with his Christianity. He was simply cowed by the war of information waged by the the bought and paid-for MFM and probably didn't think he could sell certain things--like nuking jihadis--to the public because of that entity. He gave up in that particular war without a fight.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 02:11 PM (T2/zQ)
"Crazed Nun Up Satan" including the middle name. My usual name and last gets me "Unzip Stud".
Both are the awesome.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:11 PM (k52O3)
That conjecture is unprovable. You could just as easily say we'll never cure cancer, because the scientists with the gifts to do so were aborted.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 02:12 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 05:54 PM (k52O3)
This!
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 01, 2011 02:12 PM (YVZlY)
Cut, jib, newsletter. You and me and Ann Coulter could solve this problem rather quickly.
Posted by: MissTammy at April 01, 2011 02:12 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 02:13 PM (PgmR7)
And until someone can point out a concrete example of the mythical 'moderate Muslim', a Muslim denouncing the violence, the jihad, one who acknowledges that Islam is murderous cult than I shall not change my opinion.
Right. And that makes them not muslim so the point is moot. I blame them all.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:13 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 02:14 PM (T2/zQ)
I still do
But I fear America has been too pussyfied to do it-- not even if we are the ones nuked first.
We just don't have the iron in enough Americans, anymore.
Posted by: backhoe at April 01, 2011 02:15 PM (0bk6W)
It is entirely possible to conduct unrestricted warfare against Militant Islam. The goals of that war can be the complete dismantling of the 7th century mindset that makes them do what they do. I would support that war. But it can be done with what you have described as "compassion and mercy." It need not be done with 7th century morality and respect for life. And that doesn't mean that those asshole human-rights lawyers get to decide who gets shot in each firefight. Collateral damage is a reality of war and should be minimized when possible, but not at the expense of the larger goals or American lives.
I watched the World Trade Center burn. My wife cried over lost friends. We went to memorial services. I understand all too well the desire to fight this war the way we have been attacked. But we don't have to. And not because their lives are worth anything; but because we are worth much, much more than they are!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at April 01, 2011 02:15 PM (LH6ir)
First and last married name: SCUMMY THREATS
Full maiden name: ACT MANLY MAN NYMPH
Posted by: MissTammy at April 01, 2011 02:15 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 02:15 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Machiavelli at April 01, 2011 02:15 PM (HGNu6)
Imagine the libtard howling. Them yelling, "They are just like us!"
They probably have a point. They are just like death loving disgusting liberty hating libtards. They see themselves in the mirror and LIKE IT.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:16 PM (k52O3)
What's MOST infuriating to me is that this isn't a Nazi Germany / Japan axis we're losing to but a bunch of 7th century barbarians that can barely master the art of road building, are easily pissed off and don't seem to show a lot of strategic brilliance fighting as a group.
If Western Civ, seriously, SERIOUSLY, got pissed off enought at these barbarians to wipe them out, even with the oil disruptions, etc, how long do you think it would take?
I'm looking forward to DOOM world simply because after the needed economic correction and the destruction of the welfare state, I also think the gloves come off. I'll pay to watch the Muslims hold a demonstration in Europe, for whatever reason, a year after the Euro collapses and austerity is in full force.
Posted by: Spuds Mckenzie at April 01, 2011 02:16 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 01, 2011 02:17 PM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at April 01, 2011 02:19 PM (wxHHM)
168 My sons as small children and teenagers (still prob) were the nuke mecca fans. They love to say to a liberal teacher--Bomb the Kabob. Teacher sputters and then first tries to explain that it's not "Kabob"---every single time. Funny as hell.
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:19 PM (k52O3)
The problem with Islam is there are just so many of the fuckers and they breed like cockroaches. And we spend our excess money on charity to feed their families of 8,9,10 kids that they can't afford to have.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 02:19 PM (QcFbt)
Afghanistan delenda est....or...'make them fear the chamber of Mazarbul'...or something like that...
Bottom line - go Roman on the motherfuckers.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 01, 2011 02:22 PM (lHn6+)
Nukes are the answer, but not the types discussed above. Through true energy independence, we can throttle these bastards economically. Increased use of Nuclear power is one way to see this through.
Posted by: Dathi at April 01, 2011 02:22 PM (ZR0eK)
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 02:22 PM (QcFbt)
Here's the rub. While it may be true that only a small portion of the 1.3 billion Muslims are "radical", a) The radical portion is still too high and b) too many of the "non-radicals" would still love to see the world in some state of Shariah, so while they don't support the means, they definitely support the ends.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 02:22 PM (muhWA)
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at April 01, 2011 02:23 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:24 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: LGoPs at April 01, 2011 02:26 PM (lHn6+)
Posted by: dagny at April 01, 2011 02:26 PM (k52O3)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 06:01 PM (nj1bB)
They would never accept abortion. Islamic Women are for procreating the armies of allah.
That is the be all and end all of a woman's existence in Islam. Abortion works when you appeal to the selfishness- less kids= more for me= Career, money, future, lowered carbon footprints. They don't have anything to begin with, no career, money, future, so having fewer or no children gets them nowhere, except perhaps a ticket to be the next recruit in the suicide bomber brigades.
Posted by: Derak at April 01, 2011 02:27 PM (CjpKH)
40 My problem with your approach, Ace, is: who do you bomb? Where do you start, where do you stop? How does one put your policy into practice in the real world?
Islam has a hell of a lot of "holiest sites in all Islam". Could stand to lose a few if they start getting uppity, and by uppity I mean killing folks.
Would never happen, though. We all know proggressives love foreign cultural sites more than people.
Posted by: Randy at April 01, 2011 02:30 PM (D0PNd)
1) Convert Africa to Christianity. There are still large populations in Africa that are neither Christian or Muslim. They are eventually going to be one or the other. I'm not religious, but I know which side I want to win.
If nothing else we know that a large % of our future immigrants will be African -- because that's who's making babies. Better we import future indigent African Christians than future murderous African muslims.
2) Mainstream Islamic blasphemy.
They got to get used to people mocking Muhammad and mocking Allah and mocking Islam. Christians got used to it, it can be done.
Desensitization therapy works. The first time a muslim reads - Muhammad was a false prophet, camel-fucking dipshit who butt-raped little boys -- they will freak out. The 20th time less so. The 200th time even less.
Mainstreaming of Islamic blasphemy is especially important in America and Europe.
Posted by: Muhammad's Left Nut at April 01, 2011 02:31 PM (QcFbt)
Civilization cannot defend itself against barbarism solely on its own terms.
We used to understand that. We better remember it or we're toast.
How was WWII won? Brute force. There were clear losers and winners.
The barbarians will not be going away peacefully. They will keep killing us until we are all dead. Look at how the barbarians kill the jews in Israel, with bombs, with rocks, with knives, with any weapon at all.
If they get a nuke, they will use it. At some point civilization will have to decide if it wants to live and destroy the barbarians, or if it would rather let the barbarians live and destroy civilization.
Posted by: Boots at April 01, 2011 02:31 PM (neKzn)
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 02:31 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: Joe Arpaio at April 01, 2011 02:32 PM (xs5wK)
Robert E. Lee
Posted by: kj at April 01, 2011 02:33 PM (P/tet)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at April 01, 2011 02:33 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: DaMav at April 01, 2011 02:34 PM (QNU76)
http://tinyurl.com/3bwqt7g "We wanted to raise awareness of this dangerous religion and dangerous element," pastor Terry Jones said of the Koran burning. "I think [today's attack] proves that there is a radical element of Islam."
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 01, 2011 02:34 PM (YVZlY)
As a born again Christian, an even an evangelical holiness Christian, I have reached the point where I feel you have described the lawlessness in the Mid East correctly as a cult of death. I am tempted to put 'scare' quotes around the word people, but that would seem to reduce them to something less than human, and I don't think that this is true. They are, however, lawless monsters, getting their hatred and contempt from the local madressa where they are constantly taught to kill or subjucate anyone who is not like them, and even that Christians, Jews, and anyone else are fair game for murder and destruction.
So, there comes a time when restraint is seen as weakness and an acceptance of muslim dominance. IMHO, it is time to adopt the Roman way of dealing with terrorists: If you kill one of us, we will kill 10 of yours. I think that this would slow them down somewhat in their killing. Sorry about the loss of life of innocents, but the muslims themselves say there are no innocents in this world.
Posted by: TimothyJ at April 01, 2011 02:35 PM (G5+tV)
This. They will not stop until they are extinct.
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 02:36 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: Sparky at April 01, 2011 02:36 PM (NjXSJ)
His theory was you get the bloodshed out of the way early, break the enemy, send him retreating, and that AFTER THAT, it's relatively low-casualty for you.
Realistically, with the overwhelming amount of "smart weapons" we have in the Western arsenal (and the people who are trained to know how to use it), almost all of the bloodshed would be on "their" side. Let's face it, we still have a relatively low mortality rate on the US side.
But we're not going to change minds over there - the people who aren't in charge are uneducated and have been conditioned to think like battered women.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Bush was so angry after 9/11 that taking out Mecca and Medina was something he was seriously considering doing. It might have changed things quite a bit.
Personally, I'm all for us carpetbombing Mecca, Medina, and all of their mosques with as much bacon grease, pork rinds, and pigs' feet as we can find.
When the men start praying in the streets, do the same thing. Make them all as "unclean" as possible. Instead of pat-downs at airports, require people to eat a piece of bacon before going through security; takes care of terrorists and vegans at the same time.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at April 01, 2011 02:36 PM (1Tcii)
Posted by: Damiano at April 01, 2011 02:36 PM (3nrx7)
btw -- I drew a picture of Muhammad on my left nut, it's my best nut.
Posted by: Muhammad's Left Nut at April 01, 2011 02:36 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at April 01, 2011 02:37 PM (Pzf4N)
Posted by: o.u. at April 01, 2011 02:38 PM (pI3CV)
Our biggest mistake in the Iraq war was that we stayed after we captured Saddam. Both Iraq and Afghanistan have the attitude of "it's a whole lot better for American soldiers to die than to hurt a hangnail on a muslim." These governments complain and complain and we give them more and more concessions ...and money. We put our soldiers at risk to keep the muslims sweet. In Iraq, we got rid of Saddam, freed 25 milion people, rebuilt the damn place and lost over 4,000 of our soldiers and marines. The Iraqi answer to all this. Thanks a lot, Charlie, now get out of our country but leave all your armamentss here...and oh, yeah, send us some more money.
After we got rid of the menace to the world, we should have let them sink or swim on their own. And if another menace just as bad grew, then we could go in again without "boots on the ground" and risk to our soldiers and do it all over again. It would have been cheaper and without collateral damage to us. We didn't even get any oil contracts out of this. China did. Way to go, Washington!!!
And on top of all that, they kill anyone who changes to Christianity. Never mind, their saviors are Christian. And our female soldiers have to wear head scarves so as not to offend these ingrates. Understand, it's their way or the highway and they know they can get away with all this stuff because the US government is full of wimps. No one fears us any more. They know we will leave our allies in the lurch if it suits our politicians. They know we will back down so as to make te rest of the world "like" us. I don't care if they "like" us. I would rather they fear us and respect us.
Posted by: BarbaraS at April 01, 2011 02:39 PM (Qe39G)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 01, 2011 02:39 PM (Z1jiu)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 02:40 PM (gt3o0)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 02:40 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 02:42 PM (Wzli+)
Meh. 4/1 is as good a day to nuke Mecca as any. Okay, 2/29, maybe. Not that they even use our calendar.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 02:42 PM (uqJo6)
How about convincing the men that heterosexual sex was invented by the Jews and that it's evil, so it must be avoided at all cost? That might solve some problems as well.
Posted by: shibumi at April 01, 2011 02:43 PM (OKZrE)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 02:43 PM (Wzli+)
War, as a form of punishment which is what it is, is rightly reserved to God in the Christian religion for the most part. If we are going to take it upon ourselves, or are forced to by attack, to take on a role reserved to God it should be prosecuted the way God would. Once God decided someone was worthy of punishment I don't remember a lot of mercy on his part. Mercy was reserved for those who sought it and you don't seek mercy with defiance and a blade. There is no compassionate Christian way to prosecute a war. The Christian way is how to avoid war. If you have already determined you can't avoid war it makes little sense to attempt to be Christian about it.
If someone from a Muslim tribe makes war on us we should make war on them without mercy until such time as they seek our mercy. And by seek mercy I mean total compliance to our demands and a submissive attitude from every member of the tribe. Those that don't seek it won't get it, civilian or not.
Once we have obtained their submission the tribal mindset needs to be broken through a long occupation process and teaching like Germany and Japan. They don't need to become Christians but they must be made to accept completely that they will live by Christian ideals as represented by western civilization.
In the end someone is going to submit. We should not hesitate to insure it's not us.
Posted by: Rocks at April 01, 2011 02:44 PM (th0op)
Posted by: George Patton at April 01, 2011 02:44 PM (iVbrO)
If the Moose-limbs did that here, then finally the left would take notice.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at April 01, 2011 02:44 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: The Three Conjectures at April 01, 2011 02:46 PM (32ubA)
dammit, conscious! I wanted to make that comment for over two hours and you and ABC ruined it for me.
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 06:43 PM (Wzli+)
I like your comment. "Evil" is exactly the word to describe their cult.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 01, 2011 02:47 PM (YVZlY)
I actually think the Koran burnings are a good move.
If it's already on fire... surely nobody would care if I pissed on it, now?
Posted by: garrett at April 01, 2011 02:47 PM (Ijxso)
Posted by: TimothyJ at April 01, 2011 02:47 PM (G5+tV)
If we made it known that, if you go jihadi on us, then we'll remove your entire family from the gene pool .. it would end fairly quickly. Each muslim family would have to police their own. They won't ignore their jihadi brother or nephew.
That strategy wouldn't require eventually nuking mecca. And the actual death toll would be pretty small.
But like all these ideas, we won't act this way until after some horrible, horrible tragedy. Like an American city gets nuked type tragedy. Obviously 9/11 isn't enough to get us to take off the gloves. So our death toll will have to be in tends of thousands or hundreds of thousands before we get serious.
The earlier we go brutal the more lives saved in the long run.
Posted by: Muhammad's Left Nut at April 01, 2011 02:47 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: EC at April 01, 2011 02:48 PM (f4TZ2)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 02:48 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 02:49 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: Cooter at April 01, 2011 02:49 PM (HRdfR)
Nukes aren't the answer. Mulsims are have a tribal/sect mindset. Nukes would only bind the survivors together unless you left very few in the whole world.
Works for me.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 02:49 PM (1oAbV)
When I first stumbled upon AoSHQ, the first thing I saw was a quote about spitting upon hands, hoisting the black flag, and slitting throats. And then I thought, "well this is a place I could enjoy for a while."
Then, I had read some long-winded mealy-mouthed posts about various topics that gave me pause. Well, welcome back.
If the ultimate outcome we will have with this murderous cult hell bent on no peace without worldwide islamic domination is that we have all out war, then I say let's get on with it.
Listen, and understand! That Terminator islamic murder-cult is out there! It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.
Why kick the can down the road any longer for our children to have to deal with? Same applies with this debt business. This is America for F's sake! Not some highfalutin women's bridge club where we sit around and cackle to ourselves about news of the day and don't do nothing about it.
I am tired of pussyfooting around here. Kudos to Rand Paul today for jamming his thumb in Obrother's eye over his failure to consult Congress before entering American forces into Libya. That extra-constitutional crap has got to stop.
NB: Apologies if this sock puppet is already taken. I will put it back where I found it.
Posted by: Ghost of Thomas Jefferson at April 01, 2011 02:50 PM (Kkt/i)
Admiral William F. Halsey, upon entering Pearl Harbor with his task force the evening of the Japanese attack said "after we are done, the Japanese language will be spoken only in hell'. That was back in the days when our men were still men.
Ever since 9-11 I've been thinking of Admiral Halsey a lot.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 01, 2011 02:50 PM (lHn6+)
You never cover any of the stories of Christians going on murder sprees after "Piss Christ" art exhibits.
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 02:51 PM (mhmc7)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 02:52 PM (EiH7n)
That was my thought post 9/11. Particularly when the families of the hijackers denied their children's responsibility--or, worse, blamed Israel.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at April 01, 2011 02:52 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: EC at April 01, 2011 06:48 PM (f4TZ2)
Nah. Nuke 'em. And use the nastiest kind of nuke we have in our arsenal. Make the very ground of Mecca uninhabitable for a thousand years.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 02:53 PM (1oAbV)
We can engage in Internet fantasy all day long, but let's face it- carpet bombing villiages that harbor terrorists, using nukes, bombing Mecca- short of WWIII, it ain't going to happen.
If a Jihadi who was "radicalized" in a Virginia or Franfurt, Germany mosque launches an attack, who do we bomb?
All I can think of is to isolate countries like Pakistan as best we can. No more visas to or from Pakistan, Niger, Yemen, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, etc. No unappreciated aid, no more protecting them from themselves.
We shouldn't even try to stop them from forming an Islamist government. Countries like these are going to produce terrorists anyways, let their government own them so we have a target when they attack.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 01, 2011 02:53 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 02:54 PM (gt3o0)
Posted by: EC at April 01, 2011 06:48 PM (f4TZ2)
The Air Force could be reimbursed for the cost of the MOAB using the internet to sell a space on it where you could put your name and send a little greeting. They could charge by the word. A simple "Greeting from John Smith, Bombsville, Ohio" would cost $100.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 01, 2011 02:54 PM (YVZlY)
He comes home and finds the severed heads of his family in the fridge.
Next?
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 02:54 PM (gWHrG)
It does seem inevitable. I think Koran burning and Muhammad pedo-jokes might be all that could save us from that end. Either Islam lightens-the-fuck up or we're gonna have to nuke 'em.
I think the crazy pastor is doing the world a service by burning the Koran. I think we have to keep provoking them until they lighten-the-fuck up.
Desensitization therapy works. Even on those camel-fucking, moon-god worshipping, sodomy-loving Mohammedans.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 02:55 PM (QcFbt)
But will Barry do during his oh-so-long post-presidency?
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at April 01, 2011 02:56 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: gesc at April 01, 2011 02:56 PM (A22+V)
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 06:51 PM (mhmc7)
I was actively looking for websites like that after 9/11. Well anti-Islam sites. That's when I found LittleGreenFootballs.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at April 01, 2011 02:57 PM (GKQDR)
For a fairly exhaustive takedown of this topic, Wretchard over at the Belmont Club dissected it in gory detail. Problem is, I can't find the exact link since his workup of the subject was not very long after 9/11, around about the time it was becoming apparent that the US polity was splitting into the "go fight 'em" and "war is wrong no matter what" groups...
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at April 01, 2011 02:57 PM (PMGbu)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 02:58 PM (Wzli+)
Posted by: Ian S. at April 01, 2011 05:57 PM
Cut jib newsletter?
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 02:58 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: Bugler at April 01, 2011 02:59 PM (VXBR1)
If we are going to protect civilians against their own government, I vote that we at least choose the Christians to protect. And not just because I hate muslims, but because the US always ends up with tons of refugees after these little incursions, and I'm sick of all the refugees being muslims.
I feel bad for them, but let's face it- if they're willingly living in an overwhelmingly Muslim country as a Christian, they shouldn't be surprised when their Muslim countrymen behave like Muslims.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 01, 2011 02:59 PM (SY2Kh)
I really wasn't kidding. These fuckers need to see real hell on earth. I bet if half the people here were running the GWOT, it would be over in 6 months.
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 02:59 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 03:00 PM (EiH7n)
We can engage in Internet fantasy all day long, but let's face it- carpet bombing villiages that harbor terrorists, using nukes, bombing Mecca- short of WWIII, it ain't going to happen.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at April 01, 2011 06:53 PM (SY2Kh)
Not with that kind of thinking.... Considering how we bend forward for these barbarians, those close to me don't even look at me funny anymore when I tell them I can't wait until WW3. Well at least until we decide to actively participate.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at April 01, 2011 03:01 PM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 03:02 PM (mhmc7)
@11: "They don't seem to realize we have other options."
Oh, they realize it, they're just betting we won't ever exercise them. Good bet, too. If we didn't go all wrath-of-God after 9/11 (and the Russians didn't after Beslan), it's pretty much a certainty that we (the West + Russia) never will.
Posted by: Zombie Cooked Tommy in his brewed up tank at April 01, 2011 03:03 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Biff G. at April 01, 2011 03:04 PM (FYCiJ)
Posted by: Damiano at April 01, 2011 03:04 PM (3nrx7)
whatever happened to the neutron bomb?
The neutron bomb was design for use against heavy concentrations of Russian armor and hardend targets.,so it was more of a tactical nuke rather than a strategic one
Posted by: kj at April 01, 2011 03:04 PM (P/tet)
But, while sort of moot, I think it's interesting.
Kind of a "what do you really believe" sort of question. I like my idea better. When you find someone culpable of a terrorist attack (or rioting murderous mob) invade their village, take the children, and give them to Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc. to raise. No all that practical, but just painful.
Posted by: Randy at April 01, 2011 03:05 PM (D0PNd)
As bad as the dark ages mentality of these muslims is, they do not pose an existential threat to America. Not really. They can hurt us and they can hurt us badly - maybe even have the ability to take out one of our cities (Berkeley would be my choice) but that's all.
The real existential threat to this country is the liberal, collectivist, leftard mindset that has infected us for decades and has reduced us to a bunch of hand-wringing, impotent whiners. Taking out the enemy in our midst - the Left - that is the first order of business. After we've done that, and only after, can we get to work settling the Muslim's hash for them.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 01, 2011 03:05 PM (+Uv5V)
If he would have been a little smarter he would have shut the fucking borders down. He should have dealt swiftly with anyone trying to enter the country illegally.
He didn't. Know we are fucked. The US will be hit again, and soon.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 03:06 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 03:06 PM (gWHrG)
@28: "It makes a single F15 Strike Eagle equivalent to a WWII-era 1000 plane raid on Germany."
True enough, but 1,000 plane raids send a message all on their own, too - well beyond simply taking out a target.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 01, 2011 03:06 PM (xy9wk)
In the near term all I've really come up with is more Islamic blasphemy. Like at Diversity Day when we get told we have to respect all religions, we can ask the Diversity Nazi whether Muhammad raping his 9 year old child bride Aisha is something they respect, cause, you know, I was kinda raised to think that's the worst thing a grown man could do and really, really evil. Kind of the opposite of a thing I should respect.
Not clear how to get the Muslims to look at or even be aware of the blasphemy.
They'll never read my Muhammad the Pedo-Prophet jokes, but they sure are aware of that Koran burning, aren't they?
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 03:06 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 03:07 PM (mhmc7)
Posted by: Holger at April 01, 2011 03:07 PM (YxGud)
Posted by: Biff G. at April 01, 2011 07:04 PM (FYCiJ)
Hey, Biff! Here's some nuance: Fuck off!
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 03:07 PM (1oAbV)
Posted by: Dennis at April 01, 2011 03:08 PM (sb8LP)
Posted by: soothsayer in spades at April 01, 2011 03:08 PM (gt3o0)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 03:09 PM (PgmR7)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at April 01, 2011 03:09 PM (szsK6)
@30: "I care only about what our behavior says about us."
Not sure that "You can more or less attack us with impunity" is really the best message to be putting out. "Demons in Hell will weep in utter despair at the sight of the carnage that we will inflict upon you every time you look at us weird" is probably a lot more effective.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 01, 2011 03:10 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Margaret Cho at April 01, 2011 03:10 PM (VXBR1)
1) That we nuke mecca/go medieval on the Muslims.
or
2) That the true identity of the commenters here who have proposed nuking mecca (or something similarly brutal and violent) get tracked down and charged with a hate crime?
How about in 5 years? or 10? or 20?
Sadly I think #2 is much more likely than #1 in my lifetime. That a discussion like this will actually become a crime in the United States of America seems quite plausible.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 03:13 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: palerider at April 01, 2011 03:14 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: sTevo at April 01, 2011 03:15 PM (VMcEw)
My idea of nuance-
we will only vaporize these fucks on the 3 day of every week, with an additional surprise rotating day, and weekends we have off.
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 03:16 PM (gWHrG)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 01, 2011 03:16 PM (Opx4y)
1) If some guy with the reputation of George Patton gets elected, a lot of this shit will stop.
2) If Barky gets re-elected, this shit will pick up.
... In the meantime, look for more of the same shit at the same pace.
Posted by: jwb7605 at April 01, 2011 03:16 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Holger at April 01, 2011 03:17 PM (YxGud)
Honest to God, I don't know why we don't spread this as propaganda. Tell them we grease our guns and bullets and bombs with pig fat. Tell them we will bury them with pigs after we kill them. Who cares if it's true or not? These are people willing to believe anything they're told.
Posted by: Rum, Goddess of Doom and Sith Apprentice at April 01, 2011 03:17 PM (YxBuk)
Posted by: Holger at April 01, 2011 03:18 PM (YxGud)
@70: "I am talking about the traditional, exceptional American view that all life is worth protecting, unless it demonstrates something else."
Unless that life happened to be German or Japanese. Our air forces did a pretty good job of killing their civilians. Amerind tribes might also note that our soliders could kill civilians with the best of them.
We don't have the worst history by a long shot, but we don't always fight by Queensbury rules, either.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 01, 2011 03:19 PM (xy9wk)
I said for years remains of suicide bombers should be stuffed in a pigs ass and buried ass up in televised ceremonies.
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 03:19 PM (gWHrG)
@88: "We knock the shit out of our enemy with extreme prejudice, only stopping at unconditional surrender. When they capitulate, we give them a constitution and enforce it.
Which isn't exactly a new rule [cough]japan[cough], but it certainly is a rule that has been proven effective."
Forgiveness, please. Japan did not surrender entirely unconditionally.
Posted by: Zombie EMPEROR Hirohito at April 01, 2011 03:23 PM (xy9wk)
Did the Russians do that with the Moscow Opera House terrorists?
If you google it, I get a link to an Israelnational news story, but the link is dead. But I seem to recall them burying them in this fashion.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 03:23 PM (muhWA)
Posted by: Infidel Librarian at April 01, 2011 03:24 PM (PfiCf)
Posted by: Squawling Sissy Under the Covers at April 01, 2011 03:25 PM (VXBR1)
Posted by: Holger at April 01, 2011 03:25 PM (YxGud)
Fa Cube.
You seem to have missed the " unless it demonstrates something else." part.
The Germans, Japanese, and Amerind tribes (with the exception of the Nez Perce and perhaps a few others) specifically targeted civilians and therefore sacrificed the rights of their own.
Posted by: Splinterhead at April 01, 2011 03:25 PM (1yQQ9)
I now refuse to eat there as a matter of principle. I'll happily eat at a Kosher deli since the Jews aren't trying to kill me, my family, and my country.
I didn't make a fuss or let him know why he lost a customer. Maybe I should have.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 03:25 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 03:27 PM (muhWA)
Posted by: The Hammer at April 01, 2011 03:27 PM (32ubA)
OK.... pre emptive condemnation of myself.. but...
WE are bombing Libya to prevent a Massacre... so when do we start to bomb these folks?
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 01, 2011 03:27 PM (NtXW4)
Posted by: likwidshoe at April 01, 2011 03:28 PM (PhHuS)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 01, 2011 03:28 PM (OBXDf)
@110: "Now if we're talking about killing them anyway, why not really push abortion for them?"
Dead enemies are dead enemies are dead enemies. The means of getting them there are simply tactical choices - so yes.
Posted by: Zombie EMPEROR Hirohito at April 01, 2011 03:28 PM (xy9wk)
Yes, particularly in a rural area where the police response will be defuse and delayed. I think US troops have found documents in Iraq and Afghanistan detailing preliminary planning for such attacks in the US heartland.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 03:29 PM (muhWA)
Posted by: The Grillmaster at April 01, 2011 03:32 PM (z3FEK)
My ex's name became HOLLOW, CARNAL JERK. ...which pretty well tells the tale. I laughed so hard it feels like something broke.
Posted by: EyeTest at April 01, 2011 03:34 PM (QLiGO)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 03:34 PM (OW0nw)
I second LGoPs #265. But the PC mentality rules on the Right, too. Look at MyPetJawa's take on Herman Cain's comments. (More familiar to y'all as Drew's take, but I don't count him.)
If even the pro-Tea-Party Right thinks there's something wrong with the statement "the US government needs to avoid putting its most-fervent ideological enemies in positions of power", then we may as well embrace the suck, the DOOOM, the boning, whatever you call it.
Posted by: Zimriel at April 01, 2011 03:35 PM (pl1+G)
Posted by: Druid at April 01, 2011 03:36 PM (RnujI)
Our freedoms are not as important as making sure we are the nicest people on the planet, and we never piss anybody off.
Especially people who will kill us.
Posted by: Biff Dhimmi at April 01, 2011 03:36 PM (DffuX)
Posted by: backhoe at April 01, 2011 03:38 PM (0bk6W)
Umm, I posted this yesterday:
AQAP Urges US Sympathizers to Attack Malls, Nightclubs [UPDATE/BUMPED] (JAWA)
But Samir, like all al Qaeda leaders with inflated egos, thinks he's too important to do the actual dying himself.
From Inspire #5's Q&A with readers:
Question:
As-Salâm ‘Alaykum. I live in the West and greatly desire hijrah to the lands of jihad such as Afghanistan or Yemen. I have the money ready and have an idea of where to go...
RESPONSE: ..... What we recommend is that you focus on planning out attacks in the West .... Similarly, the mujahidin leadership are today asking the brothers in the West specifically to attack Western interests in the West instead of coming here to Yemen for example. ...
The foreign brothers that join the mujahidin, many amongst them, conclude
that it would have been better for them to return to the West and launch operations.
This is because killing 10 soldiers in America for example, is much
more effective than killing 100 apostates in the Yemeni military.
With that said, based on your ability, you choose the target. Your pool of targets are large, so make sure to think of all of the available options. An example of something local, easy and effective is attacking an army recruiting center, nightclub, highway or busy shopping mall.
The article then goes on to say that nearly all of the [ed note by Democrats on House Homeland Security Committee: nonexistent] homegrown terrorists caught last year were part of groups planning attacks. The inference the author draws is that would-be jihadis should not try and contact others before attacking. He notes successful jihadis such as Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood killers, and Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly, the Stockholm suicide bomber, were lone wolfs.Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 03:38 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 07:29 PM (muhWA)
If the theater is showing "Eat Pray Love" I'd say let them do what they want.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 03:38 PM (1oAbV)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 03:38 PM (muhWA)
FIFY
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 03:38 PM (uqJo6)
Have I mentioned recently how Mark Kirk is totally full of win?
Posted by: Jeff B, resident concern fag netscold at April 01, 2011 03:42 PM (uqJo6)
And the only possible way to stop an attack in progress in some places is an armed citizenry. I may start carrying my father's M1 Carbine or Mini-14 in the trunk of my car.
Posted by: Holger at April 01, 2011 03:44 PM (YxGud)
Posted by: Minstrel Boy at April 01, 2011 03:44 PM (rwioF)
Posted by: Barry O, King of Bracket Mathletics at April 01, 2011 03:46 PM (kb0wl)
They haven't been very good at it yet.
"Hope they continue to be bumbling idiots" isn't going to work forever.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 03:46 PM (0vDuM)
FNC talking about the royal wedding. In my mind I can't help but think it would be the perfect event for a terrorist attack. I'm sure I'm wrong and just conjecturing.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 03:46 PM (1oAbV)
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 05:25 PM (NjYDy)
Hey, I may use the word fuck later too. You need some headsup on that?
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 01, 2011 03:49 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: gesc at April 01, 2011 03:49 PM (A22+V)
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 03:51 PM (mhmc7)
The groom's father has all but converted...
I've been expecting an attack on every Super Bowl, but if they were smart, they'd pick a high school game in some football-crazed hinterland. Two thousand dead, no one in the East Coast city-based BLM cares enough to get the news out nationwide, so you can repeat in a different state next Friday.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 01, 2011 03:51 PM (0vDuM)
I thought all DOOM! threads were animated with a kitteh?
Methinks Bush should have followed up his 'we will pursue these terrorists and those that harbor them' with a WWII type of national call-to-arms. Instead we got "everybody go shopping"!
Posted by: Not a Moro at April 01, 2011 03:52 PM (YIesF)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 03:52 PM (EiH7n)
Islamotard problem solved!
Posted by: wooga at April 01, 2011 05:29 PM (2p0e3)
Thanks wooga, I'll be thinking of you when I shop for a new screen.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at April 01, 2011 03:53 PM (Q1qy3)
My Catholic background saddles me with the whole 'just war' concept.
------------------------
Cf. Jesus Christ's disposition of crazed swine.
Posted by: arhooley at April 01, 2011 03:53 PM (HvxZq)
Posted by: William Tecumseh Sherman at April 01, 2011 03:55 PM (erPX9)
The line that only a small percentage of the muslims are jihadi-inclined just doesn't wash with me. I have never heard any of the moderate to "liberal" muslims condemn publically any heinous act commited by the muslim terrorists, thus I am forced to consider them part of the problem as well. In particular, their actions give the lie to the notion that all cultures are of equal value and deserving of respect.
If I was interested in the survival of Western Civilization (as I know it), I would rapidly conclude that there is no effective way for us and our principles to co-exist with any adherent to this 7th century barbaric evil religion. The West has deliberately been so neutered by decades of progressive double-think that Bush could not even realistically consider retribution for 9/11 on the cosmic scale, even though this was what was called for. A gentlemen's war will not suffice.
The only rational way to get their attention is to by attrition on the large scale. Since none of the goat fu**ers wear uniforms, carry insignia of rank, or answer to a higher command authority, they and anyone in their vicinity is guilty enough for me to consider them as worhty of vaporization. I rest assured that if (and eventually when) they have the same tools (NBW) they will use them indiscriminantly (see IED's and truck bomb in the ME).
Unfortunately, the required operational action seems to be kill them in as ordered a manner possible and continue to kill them in large quantities whenever these scum raise their heads out of the sand. It may take a generation or three, but eventually we will get their attention!
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 01, 2011 03:56 PM (DCpHZ)
I understand the feeling, but I'm worried at what the comments here are going to devolve into.
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 05:25 PM (NjYDy)
Thankfully none of our modern day president's were in office during WWII or the Concern Fag's mother would have been fucking a Kraut or Jap and he would be speaking their language. Over.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 01, 2011 03:56 PM (ZHsNw)
FNC talking about the royal wedding. In my mind I can't help but think it would be the perfect event for a terrorist attack. I'm sure I'm wrong and just conjecturing.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 07:46 PM
I was in England in 1981, my father had me fly home 6 months early because he was concerned about attacks during the Diana Chuck Royal Wedding. Flew home in June of 1981, Heathrow to New York on Pan Am flight 103 on the Princess of the Skies.
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 03:57 PM (ZUWaD)
Shep seemed to put the blame firmly where it belonged during his story, on "so-called preacher" Jones.
*end-of-civilization facepalm*
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 03:58 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 03:59 PM (mhmc7)
Posted by: Minstrel Boy at April 01, 2011 03:59 PM (rwioF)
Posted by: StrangernFiction at April 01, 2011 03:59 PM (dKCBV)
Shep seemed to put the blame firmly where it belonged during his story, on "so-called preacher" Jones.
*end-of-civilization facepalm*
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 07:58 PM (sOtz/)
Even FOX doesn't understand reality.
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 01, 2011 04:00 PM (DCpHZ)
The problem with the Born-Agains is they don't understand the just war concept. Give me some Medieval Catholics and another Crusade. Fuck-a-Bee and Bush don't understand that "turning the other cheek" , doesn't mean bending over an taking it up the ass.
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 04:00 PM (g3OU+)
Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 05:25 PM (NjYDy)
Puss Puss. Why not fly to Saudi Arabia and go skipping down the highway toward mecca or medina and watch all the hilarius devolvement ensue.
Posted by: Soona at April 01, 2011 04:02 PM (1oAbV)
Shep seemed to put the blame firmly where it belonged during his story, on "so-called preacher" Jones.
*end-of-civilization facepalm*
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 07:58 PM (sOtz/)
Shep needs a teachable moment, and by that I mean he needs to go to Afghanistan for a while to do news stories. While there, he needs to 'unfortunately' get kidnapped by the Taliban. It may bring a new perspective to him while he pisses himself wondering when they're going to kill him. I would want him to survive so he could come back a changed man/woman.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at April 01, 2011 04:02 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Havedash at April 01, 2011 04:02 PM (pQJ1M)
Posted by: Rob in katy at April 01, 2011 04:03 PM (PiTBB)
Posted by: Rob in katy at April 01, 2011 08:03 PM (PiTBB)
Wait, wait, we would have never got to the Moon, if they didn't steal the number system from the Hindi!
Posted by: NASA at April 01, 2011 04:04 PM (g3OU+)
Posted by: NASA at April 01, 2011 08:04 PM
And introducing the metric system killed our Mars lander...
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 04:07 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at April 01, 2011 04:08 PM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: NASA at April 01, 2011 08:04 PM
And introducing the metric system killed our Mars lander...
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:07 PM (ZUWaD)
The spaceship that landed on Mars was not metric, but it did land and return safely.
Posted by: Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Moonbattery at April 01, 2011 04:09 PM (ZHsNw)
And introducing the metric system killed our Mars lander...
Is that the one we sent to the moon?
Posted by: Sheila Jackson 'Too Stupid to Breathe' Lee at April 01, 2011 04:09 PM (+Uv5V)
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 04:09 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: Stirner at April 01, 2011 04:10 PM (nTjSs)
You see my thank you to you in the other post? I was the one asking about HOP. My hubby and kids (mostly hubby) can't wait to see it. He laughs like a school boy that just saw his brother kiss a girl, every time that damn blond eats the 'jelly beans'.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 04:10 PM (penCf)
Posted by: steve l at April 01, 2011 04:10 PM (CvPhw)
Link: http://tinyurl.com/5939a
Posted by: Johnny at April 01, 2011 04:12 PM (mhmc7)
This one was turning into a kinda cooking thread....
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:09 PM (ZUWaD)
Were you looking for me?
Posted by: Giada Delaurentis at April 01, 2011 04:12 PM (ZHsNw)
Anyone else really like hummus? On pita, natch.
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 04:12 PM (sOtz/)
1.) Leave Afghanistan, after:
- destroying everything we can't bring home
-destroying all their poppy fields. Hell, after destroying all their arable fields if we have to. Agent Orange, burning and sowing with salt, whatever. A nice, focused strategy.
-disarming their worthless-ass army, right down to the uniforms we bought them. Leave them just like we found them.
2.) Point out to the Iraqis what happened to the Afghanis when they pushed us too far.
3.) Since we don't need to suck up to the Pakis any more, get to work sabotaging their infrastructure and, eventually, destroying their nukes/delivery and targeting systems.
4.) Get back into the political assassination business.
5.) start buying foreign made explosives and using it on Iranian oil pipelines, depots, roads, airports, planes, bridges, dams, etc.
No need to use nukes, and we'll get the attention of a lot of powerful leaders. Just before we kill them.
Oh, and just keep going from there. Find them, fix them, kill them, wherever they are, whenever we can.
I know Obama and the Dems would never dare to do any of this, but maybe we can after the first week in January 2013.
Posted by: Josef K. at April 01, 2011 04:13 PM (7+pP9)
I knew Tami was, but are you the other moron interested in the eagle cams?
If so, Another eagle cam. The eaglets might hatch today!
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 04:13 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 01, 2011 04:13 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Barack Obama, Sr. at April 01, 2011 04:15 PM (g3OU+)
Posted by: HoneyBadger at April 01, 2011 04:16 PM (rlh8d)
Posted by: Barack Obama, Sr. at April 01, 2011 08:15 PM (g3OU+)
Wanna hear my story?
Posted by: Sonny Bono at April 01, 2011 04:16 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Tacky O at April 01, 2011 04:16 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 04:17 PM (EiH7n)
We need another thread, Ace
Please blog it, 1 ..2 ..3
If we don't get another thread
I'm sorry to say
It will cap this gloomy, gloomy day
Posted by: Zombie Dr Seuss at April 01, 2011 04:17 PM (g3OU+)
You see my thank you to you in the other post?
momma, yes I replied to you over there but I'll say it here too (and sorry for the name confusion) I am apparently more immune to the "adult" humor in kids movies than other people because I read some reviews of Hop and apparently I should've been more offended. So, you might want to read about it on Common Sense Media or one of those other sites to be sure the humor is OK for your kids.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at April 01, 2011 04:18 PM (RZ8pf)
The flaw in this plan is that muslims want the publicity.They need high casualties and lots of cameras (se 9/11, Beltway Sniper, wannabe Times Square bomber). The only way this scenario happens is sheer laziness (Fort Hood Jihadi).
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 04:19 PM (uqJo6)
War? To what end? We'll "teach them a lesson"? Better to be feared than to be loved? I don't frankly care if they love "me" (the US), but the "fear" of the surivvors will surely spur them to revenge. As they say in Wazirastan (home of Ramzi Yusef , etc) "A thousand years for revenge!".
One freaking turn of revenge upon another. Well, that's an advance of civilization, I'm sure.
Frankly, it's a victory for the cult of Death that is Islam. We then become more like them.
Funny that I just read this over at The Belmont Club , as Richard Fernandez wrote about the madness that is the Libyan Campaign:
This would not have been news to William Tecumseh Sherman who once said, “I confess, without shame, that I am sick and tired of fighting — its glory is all moonshine; even success the most brilliant is over dead and mangled bodies, with the anguish and lamentations of distant families, appealing to me for sons, husbands, and fathers … it is only those who have never heard a shot, never heard the shriek and groans of the wounded and lacerated … that cry aloud for more blood, more vengeance, more desolation.”
If you REALLY want to hurt the Muslim Arab world, burn their oilfields. Sure, it will hurt us too. But that is the modern source of their wealth and relative power. We can overcome that loss, eventually. They never will.
If you want your 7th century death cult, you can keep your 7th century death cult.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at April 01, 2011 04:20 PM (sJTmU)
Couple games of beer pong.
Trip to Man's Country.
Couple trips around the world...
Presidentin' is hard.
Tell ya what. I'll send a herd of armed unicorns into Afghanistan when I get around to it.
Valerie! Can I please have some more of those pills?
Posted by: Precedent JJ Walker-Obama at April 01, 2011 04:20 PM (txssN)
If you REALLY want to hurt the Muslim Arab world, burn their oilfields. Sure, it will hurt us too. But that is the modern source of their wealth and relative power. We can overcome that loss, eventually. They never will.
If you want your 7th century death cult, you can keep your 7th century death cult.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at April 01, 2011 08:20 PM (sJTmU)
Fly over Mecca and drop pig blood on the stupid meteorite they worship.
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 04:21 PM (g3OU+)
As long as it doesn't teach my kids to disrespect me (mouth off) or have two bunnies humping, I am okay with it.
Since my 3 and 5 year old read, there isn't much they haven't heard/read.
The only things my kids hate in a movie are evil (bullies, true hateful characters, etc) and death.
Posted by: zombie momma at April 01, 2011 04:22 PM (penCf)
And introducing the metric system killed our Mars lander...
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:07 PM (ZUWaD)
You keep thinking that, squishy.
Posted by: Megatron at April 01, 2011 04:23 PM (uqJo6)
Fly over Mecca and drop pig blood on the stupid meteorite they worship.
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 08:21 PM
I always envisioned burying the town in a layer of pig carcasses dropped by waves of B-52s. They would have the paradox of moving them or allowing non-muzzies to Mecca.
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 04:24 PM (ZUWaD)
I keep thinking of OBLs comment way back when about his people following a strong horse.
They see weakness in our humanity. They only place a value on the muslim umma, or whatever they call it. We should hit them very, very, hard when we need to and then leave them to their own desperation. This democracy exercise is only going to lead to a caliphate. And that will unlease the nukes. Its only a matter of time before we nuke some part of the middle east, because it is only a matter of time before they detonate one here.
Posted by: jeff in hell at April 01, 2011 04:25 PM (Ja1KB)
I always envisioned burying the town in a layer of pig carcasses dropped by waves of B-52s. They would have the paradox of moving them or allowing non-muzzies to Mecca.
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:24 PM (ZUWaD)
See #279
Posted by: momma - queen of ignoring my kids at April 01, 2011 04:26 PM (penCf)
Fly over Mecca and drop pig blood on the stupid meteorite they worship.
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 08:21 PM
I always envisioned burying the town in a layer of pig carcasses dropped by waves of B-52s. They would have the paradox of moving them or allowing non-muzzies to Mecca.
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:24 PM (ZUWaD)
The one drawback is the waste of bacon.
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 04:26 PM (g3OU+)
zombie momma, no humping bunnies and not really any disrespect. No one dies, and even the evil chicken isn't really all that evil. The good guys are in a semi-perilous situation at one point, but it's pretty obvious that they'll get themselves out of it. Early on, EB is sort of in peril but since it is at the beginning of the movie there's no doubt about the outcome.
The adult humor comes in the Playboy Mansion scenes which were dumb, and the Fatal Attraction reference which had me cackling out loud.
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at April 01, 2011 04:28 PM (RZ8pf)
Terry Jones, the pastor whose Quran-burning event on Mar. 20 triggered mob violence that resulted in at least 11 deaths in Afghanistan on Friday, offered a fiery response to the bloodletting.
The killings are "a very tragic and criminal action," he said in a statement. "We must hold these countries and people accountable for what they have done as well as for any excuses they may use to promote their terrorist activities."
Posted by: momma - queen of ignoring my kids at April 01, 2011 04:30 PM (penCf)
Some future generation of Americans (and maybe in our lifetimes) will either have to nuke or surrender. You can't stop this avalanche of Dark Ages barbarism with a flower and a smile now any more than you could when their pedophile bandit leader was still alive. It will take the atom.
There are three types of muz:
1. Jihadis
2. Coward muz who are waiting for the chance to be jihadis if they get the chance to do it without risk.
3. Apathetic "moderate" muz who will bite their lower lip for 3 seconds, throw a party, and then move into our houses after we infidels are all dead.
Posted by: sifty at April 01, 2011 04:31 PM (txssN)
@303: "The Germans, Japanese, and Amerind tribes (with the exception of the Nez Perce and perhaps a few others) specifically targeted civilians and therefore sacrificed the rights of their own."
Germans - certainly true in the East, and to a lesser extent in UK and elsewhere in the West, but false with respect to the US.
Japanese - certainly true in China, P.I., etc., but false with respect to US (limited exceptions: (1) for civilian workers captured on Wake, etc.; (2) unless you count the balloon bombs, but they weren't "specifically aimed" at anything smaller than North America).
Amerind - didn't really have a concept of combatant/non-combatant, only friend/enemy. US did have concept of combatant/non-combatant, but many units/commanders ignored it when dealing with the Indians.
Posted by: Zombie EMPEROR Hirohito at April 01, 2011 04:32 PM (xy9wk)
O/T Last night some Dodger fan thugs beat a Giants fan in the parking lot (Note their team won), and tonight is:
**Fireworks Night **
Only Randy Newman can really love LA..
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 04:32 PM (ZUWaD)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 04:32 PM (+61wI)
It was me momma. I just forgot to take my sock off. Sorry. I was trying to see why everyone changes socks, but it is a pain in the ass. Plus, I'm just too lazy
It sounds like my family will love that movie! In fact, hubby just drove into town after reading your review, to buy tickets for tomorrow.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 04:32 PM (penCf)
On the upside, a united caliphate makes the justification for widespread nuclear bombardment easier.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 04:33 PM (uqJo6)
Only Randy Newman can really love LA..
Posted by: KZnextzone at April 01, 2011 08:32 PM (ZUWaD)
only real difference between LA and Baghdad is you can get a decent cup of coffee in Baghdad.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 01, 2011 04:35 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Minstrel Boy at April 01, 2011 04:35 PM (rwioF)
Posted by: OxyCon at April 01, 2011 04:36 PM (eJ7Yr)
Nuking Mecca is pointless. Due to the size of the explosion, a myth, that allah took the Kube up to heaven, or some other 9/11 Truther-esque silly shit, will appear, and never go away.
Unobscured video, electronic AND film, is the only way.
Air strikes, to allow a division in, makes much more sense. Televise the entry to the Kube, video the entire event. Pull out the Black Coprolyte and the inscribed tablets inside, use sledgehammers to pound them to gravel with sledgehammers, then have a few pigs empty their colons on the rocks.
Drag the three columns outside, then break them into 3 or 4 pieces. Same for the door to the stairs.
Use just enough explosives to topple the Kube, then use some more explosives to collapse the remainder. Minimize the dust, make sure the building is clearly visible at all times. Add more incontinent pigs. Shovel up a bunch of the result, and spread it around the countryside; outhouses, garbage dumps, slaughter houses, etc.
Televise it all.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 01, 2011 04:36 PM (wyXNQ)
And gives more solid targets to hit. Although we aren't bereft of said targets today, with Tehran and Damascus being the top ones in my mind.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 04:38 PM (muhWA)
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's contentious union-rights law will likely be on hold for two more months under a timeline spelled out by a Dane County Circuit Court Judge on Friday—unless the state Supreme Court intervenes.
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 04:38 PM (penCf)
You keep talking like that, and Jeff B's gonna get upset.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 01, 2011 04:38 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Arbalest at April 01, 2011 04:40 PM (wyXNQ)
Does Option 2 put me in the barbarian category? So be it.
Bush was wrong but I doubt Clinton would have retaliated any differently. Something in the ideology turns muslims into HINOS. (human in name only).
No more visas from that part of the world. Bandar had the Saudis so far up both Bush backsides they were blinded to the deception.
Posted by: Texasmom at April 01, 2011 04:41 PM (72PXw)
After 9/11, I had a much less Christian sort of thought about how to deal with a murder cult.
At some point yesterday, what with bombing Khadafy's forces AND the rebel forces, weren't we getting close to a "Kill them all and let God sort 'em out" solution?
Posted by: NC Ref at April 01, 2011 04:42 PM (/izg2)
Posted by: VRWC Agent at April 01, 2011 04:42 PM (gjy1/)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 04:42 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Minstrel Boy at April 01, 2011 04:42 PM (rwioF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 04:42 PM (TATbF)
Probably until after we get nuked, at which point people will start *hanging* politicians *here* if there isn't ground-shakingly massive retaliation.
And forget what the Europeans think, because it will be the same as what they think now, only moreso.
I'd rather contain the problem but that's not going to happen because it requires concerted, long-term action, political sacrifices and international cooperation, and that's halfway to Alice's six impossible things.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 01, 2011 04:44 PM (bxiXv)
Fuckin' guy is pissin' on the Jeff Brand.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 08:42 PM (TATbF)
pissin or pussin?
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 01, 2011 04:45 PM (6IReR)
But I completely agree with this comment:
They wish to make war, but they want to do so insulated from the horrors of war. They're being infantilized by permitting to choose this course, war without consequences.
That's the problem in a nutshell.
I'm not sure exactly what we should do, but this current dynamic of pretending we're guests in the country we're occupying clearly isn't working.
Posted by: sandy burger at April 01, 2011 04:45 PM (MT+0i)
Posted by: Ellen Ripley at April 01, 2011 04:45 PM (9eDbm)
I have a feeling we'll be adding Cairo sometime around July.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 04:47 PM (uqJo6)
Meanwhile in the real, PC, world it would be nice to make sure any military officer who gives powerpoints on jihad against the unbeliever does not make general.
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 04:47 PM (sOtz/)
But guess who gets a waiver?
Let me guess, the Presidential fleet? Makes sense as those vehicles have armor plating comparable to tanks, but still. This directive will just make all Fed vehicles 3-5x more expensive. More taxpayer moolah down the drain, huzzah!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 04:48 PM (muhWA)
Actually that's almost 5 a day.
And that's not the number of dead, that's the number of *attacks* that resulted in one or more deaths.
This is not a tiny problem, this is not exceptions or aberrations, and that doesn't include ordinary violent crime.
We'll get a handle on it or "war of all against all" will stop being a scary phrase and become reality.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 01, 2011 04:49 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 04:49 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at April 01, 2011 04:51 PM (1ZnTv)
We just need to talk the language they understand. The difference is we can turn off the savagery like a switch when the necessary killing is done since its not something we would choose as a 1st option and its really not our nature.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 01, 2011 04:51 PM (cifRH)
Posted by: D. Hopper at April 01, 2011 04:52 PM (qPTz0)
Posted by: rian at April 01, 2011 04:52 PM (sAk1C)
Now, as to compassion or compression, I say compression. These violent savages need to be boxed in. They need to fear the world.
Momma, in the past, moslems were always non-threatening and reasonable after being trounced by a superior military power. Then during a period of peace they get enboldened and try again.
Posted by: Decaf at April 01, 2011 04:53 PM (3+xlM)
Posted by: iknowtheleft
Exactly right. Winston knew whereof he spoke.
As much as possible, shut off the Mulsim world from the West (and the East). no cell phones, no cars, no steel, no technology. No visas, no vists to the west, no emigres from Muslim lands, and kick out those who are already here. They are a poison on our culture and politics.
If they are so smart, they will develop that stuff themselves. They won't.
Destroy the oilfields, and they will collapse back to their previous primitive existence. Let them devour each other.
Multi-culturalism didn't work, the democracy project initiated by Bush probably won't work, so what is left? Annihilation or prophilaxis?
A blockade of technology and the tools from the West (and East - the Chinese and others must be part of this).
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch writes..... at April 01, 2011 04:54 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 01, 2011 04:54 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: rld77 at April 01, 2011 04:55 PM (OHY+M)
Posted by: Dr Spank
---------------------------
Dr. Spank,
This is the mistake people make. It is not a religion. In America, we provide freedoms to and about religion that should not include Islam.
If you know muslims, ask them to denounce the extremists. They can't do it.
Take off your politically correct thinking cap and evaluate the value of your life and country. There is a goal to Islam: world domination!
Funny that Christians are called extremists!
Posted by: my own opinion at April 01, 2011 04:57 PM (1YIG9)
Posted by: D. Hopper at April 01, 2011 04:57 PM (qPTz0)
The same day of Qaddafi's victory, even before the last of the defeated rebel's bodies have assumed room temperature.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 04:57 PM (muhWA)
Posted by: Papa Editor at April 01, 2011 04:58 PM (YX6i/)
... and, as an interim measure:
Raise the price of wheat/corn/food that we sell to them (and start controlling all exports and foreign aid, real tightly); tie it to the price of oil.
Worst case, we start plowing fields with windmill-powered tractors, and they start drinking their oil.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 01, 2011 04:59 PM (wyXNQ)
That's the big mistake a huge number of people make -- thinking Islam is just a religion, when in fact its an all-encompassing alternative (albeit dysfunctional) socio-economic system.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 01, 2011 04:59 PM (cifRH)
Every day, they grow like a cancer.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 05:00 PM (QcFbt)
Liberal Christian circles describe it as being culture-to-culture, which President Bush belongs to a denomination which has been known to embrace more liberal ideas.
/Not all churches, mind, but the church hierarchy.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 01, 2011 05:01 PM (UO6+e)
That reminds me of a story from a book about Blackwater my libtard sister recommended to me. The author was outraged over an incident in Iraq where something like an embassy was being overrun and in the heat of the moment a Blackwater employee was "giving orders" (coordinating, really) a half dozen marines on site. I thought the bigger part of the tale was that 7 guys on a rooftop with machineguns held off over 2000 attackers coming in waves from the local mosque, leaving half that number dead in the street.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 05:01 PM (uqJo6)
The locals did not repeat this strategy. For the record, I think the commander and our troops acted wisely.
Posted by: VRWC Agent at April 01, 2011 08:42 PM (gjy1/)
Sorry....I'm having trouble believing this. Someone, somewhere would have run to the press. If not a local, I have a feeling someone in the unit would have reported it. That would be too hard to live with.
Posted by: Tami at April 01, 2011 05:01 PM (VuLos)
This is the west's biggest long term strategic challenge -- to remove the oil weapon as a lever against our economies.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 01, 2011 05:03 PM (cifRH)
Sorry--horseshit.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 01, 2011 05:03 PM (7utQ2)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at April 01, 2011 05:03 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: D. Hopper at April 01, 2011 05:06 PM (qPTz0)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 05:07 PM (EiH7n)
Islam was written to prevent reformation. You have to convince them to change their core beliefs, in defiance of EXPLICIT instruction from their prophet, and then erase that instruction and the violent and intolerant portions of the faith, or it WILL come back. It always does.
That's why even truly "moderate" families sometimes produce a terrorist - he studied the text and it told him to kill the infidel.
So we contain the problem, which it's too late to do because they're spreading the faith here and in Europe and in South America and Africa... or, what?
We're not going to slaughter everyone who declares themselves part of a certain culture, burn all the books, and delete it from the internet. Even if we were that heartless, that just ain't gonna happen.
We can't force them to behave, unless you have a really clever idea I haven't thought of.
We can't wall them in because they're everywhere.
We can't really just let the mass murder and brush wars continue forever, especially with nuclear escalation.
No, sorry, I don't have the answer. Hope somebody comes up with one.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 01, 2011 05:09 PM (bxiXv)
Eman, if you'd like to go convert them to the faith of evolution, you're more than welcome to try. Let us know how that works out.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 05:13 PM (uqJo6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 01, 2011 05:14 PM (hlY6R)
Posted by: momma at April 01, 2011 08:52 PM (penCf)
Awwwww....thanks for that!
Posted by: Tami at April 01, 2011 05:15 PM (VuLos)
This one by "Roland Shirk" is a classic.
Toth explained that U.S. intelligence agencies have for the past 12 months been working with new security partners: the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood. “This once-controversial group, which long ago renounced the use of force, has an incredibly far-ranging web of connections,” Toth said. “Their assets extend through every Middle Eastern country, a number of nations in Asia, and even extend to a network of campus student organizations in the U.S. They have so much to offer us, now that we have won their trust,” Toth said. “It took time for us to convince some of the 'Old Guard' inside our intel agencies that we have no long-term quarrel with the Brothers,” Toth told Fox reporters. “But this administration has been unrelenting about this, making a number of transfers and forced retirements in order to clear away irrational opposition to our new approach.”
Disturbing verisimilitude.
Posted by: Beagle at April 01, 2011 05:15 PM (sOtz/)
Posted by: VRWC Agent at April 01, 2011 05:16 PM (gjy1/)
When you think about it, they probably have a better percentage than lawyers, so there's that.
I actually do know actual, real, moderate, friendly, against-violence Muslims. They do exist.
But they can't do a lot because they're in the minority and are afraid of blockheads on every side.
They're kind of like our commenter curious, in a way. They know other Muslims who go on about bigoted Westerners and they believe it even though they never see it happening.
So most of them just don't see any profit in speaking out. They need a mass movement but no one wants to be the first to stand up, and the majority of Muslims (according to polls in our and their nation, the slanted example of student clubs and protests, and my personal "have met people" poll) at least support most of the violent, bigoted portions of Islam, even if they don't act that way themselves.
It is a problem.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 01, 2011 05:17 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: pd at April 01, 2011 05:19 PM (VCZce)
Posted by: Jehu at April 01, 2011 05:19 PM (gICS4)
Christians are about 1 out of every 3.
Hindus 1 out of 8.
Buddhists 1 out of 20.
Every other religion is miniscule.
It's pretty much Islam vs Christianity vs Secularism. Those are the big 3.
We should work hard to demand religious freedom and religious pluralism in other countries. In countries we trade with. I'm fine if the convert to Christianity, or the become atheist, or become Buddhist. Anything but Islam.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at April 01, 2011 05:19 PM (QcFbt)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 05:22 PM (EiH7n)
I don't doubt that there were embellishments and outright misrpresentations made. I was just amused of having told this Herculean tale, the chain of command thing was his big takeaway. I don't remember the details of the conversation he claimed were "giving orders," just that it seemed a creative interpretation at the time I read it.
Posted by: Methos at April 01, 2011 05:22 PM (uqJo6)
1. Steyn wrote America Alone and that pretty much covers the demographics.
2. It is a little hard to bomb Mecca when you need their oil.
3. If there is any nuclear MAD fear by Muslims, that will be lost when the next one goes off. I would not plan on living near a major city.
4. If politicians will grandstand and pout over cutting 1.5% of a budget train wreck and will not secure the borders, do you think they have the stomach to take out Iran? They will pontificate until the Arabs take on Israel and then God help us all.
5. "Responsibility to Protect" is the next "Global Warming" it is just crap political science instead of crap science science. Obama will continue to thumb his nose at congress. He does not fear a constitutional crisis, he welcomes it.
I'm glad we took back the house, but unfortunately the parasites are killing the host.
Posted by: AE at April 01, 2011 05:22 PM (YYjeh)
Are we talking madison WI ,or the middle east?
Posted by: Berserker at April 01, 2011 05:23 PM (gWHrG)
Dressing up in costumes
Playing silly games
hiding out in tree tops
Shouting out rude names
It's a knock-out
If looks could kill they probably will
in games without frontiers
War without tears
Posted by: Peter Gabriel at April 01, 2011 05:24 PM (ZUWaD)
You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.
We can say something similar:
You say that it is your custom to kill those who insult Islam. Very well. We also have a custom: when men kill others over mere insults, we drop 2,000-lb. bombs on them and we vaporize. Have your riot; over it, my aircraft will patrol. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours.
Posted by: Vina the Moose at April 01, 2011 05:25 PM (ELpjS)
That may be the dumbest smart comment I've ever read.
Posted by: The Hammer at April 01, 2011 05:25 PM (32ubA)
Posted by: melvin at April 01, 2011 05:28 PM (3OCZw)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 01, 2011 05:29 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at April 01, 2011 05:30 PM (E7F5+)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at April 01, 2011 05:39 PM (E7F5+)
Posted by: Mike H at April 01, 2011 08:00 PM (g3OU+)
You must not know many born-again Christians. Neither Bush nor Huckabee (spit) represent their views. The two are politicians--enough said.
I'd be willing to bet that our armed forces are made up of a lot of born-again Christians. I'd also be willing to bet that many of the civilian born-agains are the ones who are cleaning out the gun stores in anticipation of the coming "zombie apocalypse." Well, I know that at least one born-again is doing that and has been doing that since Mumbai.
Someone said that the Muslims might be planning attacks in the Heartland. If so, it would be a strategic blunder as most heartland sorts would probably take the opportunity to "renovate" the local mosque. But Islamic terrorists aren't long on strategic thinking so it's best to keep watch.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 05:42 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: Fortunata at April 01, 2011 05:53 PM (90H1N)
The West has a lot to loose, the barbarians - not so much. Whats ours is theirs for the taking, and Islam is the vehicle.
Start at the ends, in Morocco and Indosnesia and work our way inward until islam is a cursed but only whispered creed, worshipped by 6th century sand crawlers and widowed old hags in the ruin of Mecca. If they can find it. Nukes and smart bombs alone wont do it, Not a chance. What effect does a modern weapon have on the religious rightousness of the local iman ? None.
Throw them from the minarets, then topple all.
Christianity as in the West (but maybe not Asian and African Christianity) is neutered and modern eurocentric non-believers are even more compromised by the welfare state to worship their oppressors. The death of islam will come, by a force born and lead only by US.
Posted by: meleager at April 01, 2011 05:56 PM (4q9xh)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 09:42 PM (T2/zQ)
Agree with most all of the above, but you need to shake the "someone said" intro because Youknowwhooski uses it for his straw dogs all the time and your arguments can stand up without that crutch.
As far as the Heartland attack strategy, we can only hope that they'll be that foolish since that is the game changer.
Posted by: ontherocks at April 01, 2011 06:02 PM (HBqDo)
Why do you fight wars? To win them; there is no other option. What do you have to do to win wars? You have to be stronger, more cunning, tougher than your opponent; you have to go to whatever level it takes to defeat them, so they no longer want to wage war against you (at least for a very long time, and even then the memory of their past defeat will give them pause).
There is no other way, as war has never been, nor will ever be a clean and completely noble thing; it is by it's nature untidy and bloody -- this that we're doing right now is a long defeat and will wind up costing more lives and instigating more suffering than if we had decided to win in the first place.
Since it will cost more lives and will resolve nothing, other than more war, can it really be considered humane?
Posted by: unknown jane at April 01, 2011 06:06 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 09:42 PM (T2/zQ)
Agree with most all of the above, but you need to shake the "someone said" intro because Youknowwhooski uses it for his straw dogs all the time and your arguments can stand up without that crutch.
The "someone" was upthread and I didn't feel like scrolling up to see who. Who's youknowwhoski? Fuck him in the squeakhole (surprise!)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 06:07 PM (T2/zQ)
I read now that women soldiers in Afghanistan are supposed to start wearing head scarves -- INSTEAD of a helmet! (Well, they're "strongly encouraged to).. Never thought it would come to this.
Although I'm sure it looks TOTALLY fierce...
Posted by: Elizabeth Cady Stanton at April 01, 2011 06:08 PM (c66df)
Who's youknowwhoski? Fuck him in the squeakhole (surprise!)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 10:07 PM (T2/zQ)
Why give him what he likes?
Posted by: ontherocks at April 01, 2011 06:14 PM (HBqDo)
There's a reason that Obama singled out those who cling "bitterly" to their Bibles and to their guns.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 01, 2011 06:21 PM (T2/zQ)
483 Depending upon where and what they would attack in the Heartland, I'm pretty sure the situation could turn very, very nasty in a suprisingly short amount of time. The cities, college towns (some of them), the coasts...there might be apologists there and the peace might (might) be kept, but out in the back of beyond? That's a different story.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 01, 2011 06:23 PM (5/yRG)
@303: "The Germans, Japanese, and Amerind tribes (with the exception of the Nez Perce and perhaps a few others) specifically targeted civilians and therefore sacrificed the rights of their own."
Japanese - certainly true in China, P.I., etc., but false with respect to US Â…
Posted by: Zombie EMPEROR Hirohito at April 01, 2011 08:32 PM (xy9wk)
American citizens interned by Japan faced a mortality rate about ten times higher than military POWs held by Germany.
Japan murdered 100k American nationals in the P.I. – then a US Territory, not unlike Pearl Harbor.
In turn, Japan had almost ALL of their 300k military occupation army in the P.I. “killed in action”. At least they armed combatants.
Posted by: Druid at April 01, 2011 06:30 PM (RnujI)
But guess who gets a waiver?
Let me guess, the Presidential fleet? Makes sense as those vehicles have
armor plating comparable to tanks, but still. This directive will just
make all Fed vehicles 3-5x more expensive. More taxpayer moolah down the
drain, huzzah!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at April 01, 2011 08:48 PM (muhWA)
3-5x more expensive – there is an effectively proportional relationship between $$$ and natural resources expended – to be green would be to go low-bid traditional econo car – low cost and low fuel consumption.
Posted by: Druid at April 01, 2011 06:31 PM (RnujI)
They need to be mocked. Not encouraged, as all of our fearless leaders continue to do. Stop with religion of peace allready. Submission is not peace. Bellow that from the bully pulpit.
Posted by: jeff in hell at April 01, 2011 06:44 PM (Ja1KB)
1. We keep doing what we're doing. We fight the Bush way.
2. We recognize that the proper response to savagery and terror is savagery and terror, and we drop our illusions about being able to effect a good solution to this problem, and we begin revising our policy about bombing population centers. And we define a major terrorist attack as being a nuclear-level attack, inviting a nuclear response.
Ok Ace, I'll play.
One, you fall into a reactionary view - they do this- so-we must do that.
Two. Bush played poker with the jihadas and especially the europeons. That was a win. For then. If we could be so lucky now....go fish ?
Two, and more important, the proper response to savagery and terror ? None.
You do what you do. Should we require uninterupped oil supplies - we secure them. Should we require non- interference in freedon of religion - we negate authoritive voices against it, should we require freedom of the seas - we sink pirates who oppose it.
Yours is not an active voice.
Posted by: meleager at April 01, 2011 06:45 PM (4q9xh)
1. Secure our borders
2. Drill our own oil
3. Send troops to Isreal to help protect them
4. Notify the muslim world that the next confirmed terrorist attack anywhere will result in destruction of Mecca, then Medina, etc.
Maybe that would put pressure on the leaders of Muslim countries, as well as muslims worldwide to start speaking out and controlling themselves. If not, we should start deporting them and stop any aid to any of these countries.
Posted by: Not usually like this at April 01, 2011 06:46 PM (3AnLn)
We were not attacked on 9/11 because Alqaeda was in Afghanistan, we were attacked because Alqaeda was in the US.
Posted by: sartana at April 01, 2011 06:50 PM (7Xm5b)
Posted by: Corona at April 01, 2011 06:59 PM (fh2Y7)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 01, 2011 07:05 PM (5/yRG)
But as this goes on I am going back to thinking those are expensive luxuries and I no longer wish to pay for such things
Ace. We will all be lucky to get out alive, or with our personal creed, let alone worry about paying for it. . Get real, stop the North-Eastern protective class mentality and get real, your wishes and mine, are on the line. Yankees once had balls you know.
Posted by: meleager at April 01, 2011 07:08 PM (4q9xh)
"The old law of war, you see, was a fragile thing, easily broken. And when the enemy ignored it and some of our own people tried to mold it to do too much, it broke. Now there's no law except for who is fastest, who is best armed and trained, who is most ruthless. And when the enemy demonstrated the planet wasn't big enough for both of us and we demonstrated that it didn't necessarily have to contain both of us? That's when--"
From Caliphate by Tom Kratman, p. 74. Baen Books, New York, 2008.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate at April 01, 2011 07:45 PM (B0893)
4. Notify the muslim world that the next confirmed terrorist attack anywhere will result in destruction of Mecca, then Medina, etc.
Maybe that would put pressure on the leaders of Muslim countries, as well as muslims worldwide to start speaking out and controlling themselves. If not, we should start deporting them and stop any aid to any of these countries.
We could do that and explain
We have studied you. You have said to insulting Islam it is to bring murder to other people(/anyone will do) That is your tradition. we have seen your tradition throughout the world slaughtering of peoples and their children from africa to russia, you chose to kill children(Belsan) and women and men not even compatants but citizens of those countries. You blame innocents for their murder, not your sin/crime but transfer the guilt to them. (sick)? All in the name of offense.
Our tradition/justice is to kill those who kill OUR innocents. and to destroy your ability to reak anymore havoc. You must make a decision. it is survival and prosper. moderate or reap the wind. We will fight mercilessly we will come to your city and knock down your mosques. if you do not stop ,your home , next Mecca, Then we will blame you as it should be because You would not see the faults of your own way. and you chose to be held to a religion that will not allow for other to chose their lives, G-d or destiny. you chose to put on your yoke , and to make us assume the same yoke.
sorry i'm sick of trying to assume a position of fairness when every.fkn.thing. seems.to be an insult and a reason for them to murder. I don't want to assume anylonger that treating them with a kind hand, and blaming some supposed RARE Radical muslim for everything when I see very few Moderates speak against this behavior.
also it would be nice if the media would glorify give more airtime to those Few that speak of the needed moderation in Islam. Like Jasser ,Gabriella (forgot her last name). ali kirsi? Make them Heros . minimize and heckle those Bitter clinging: hitlerish, muslims that think murdering anyone that doesn't agree with them as what they are ,Monsters.
drill oil here, build nuclear, no more visas to Muslims until they get their fellows under control.
Posted by: willow at April 01, 2011 07:49 PM (h+qn8)
Or you can pull a tooth gently by tying a string to it and hanging a five pound weight on the other end. And waiting. . . .
Posted by: Beverly at April 01, 2011 07:50 PM (qXQKs)
i'm pretty full of hyperbole tonight. I 'm pretty raw from the murder for offense shit.
apologies.
Posted by: willow at April 01, 2011 08:09 PM (h+qn8)
I wouldn't have chosen that course -- but I was glad that cooler (or, warmer) heads chose it for me.
But as this goes on I am going back to thinking those are expensive luxuries and I no longer wish to pay for such things.
I felt no joy when we struck back. But i certainly wanted to but the fear of US into them so they wouldn't again slaughter 3000 innocent people doing nothing more nefarious than going to work.
And i see they still party and hand out candy after each succesful murder.
i also see a few of the countries as Turkey turning back to extremism, What will we have after all of the upheavel now with Polls showing they want sharia?
Posted by: willow at April 01, 2011 08:19 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: MissTammy at April 01, 2011 08:45 PM (BebB7)
Hello callateral damage. I was entertained by the coversation about Christian warfare. Really? Did you READ the old testament??? God was not nearly as persnicky as the Christians letting us all know His thoughts in 2011. Might want to check that backstory.
Or as Reagan once said, "We win, they lose." We will decide one of those two options. I'm not betting on our odds. I think we'll eventually win, but the problem? We'll win AFTER the civil war in this country because of the pansies who will not let us win until we get that pesky little arguement cleared up. But hey, I'm a pessimist. It could work out.
Posted by: Lana at April 01, 2011 08:52 PM (MpHql)
Posted by: Hvy Mtl Hntr at April 01, 2011 09:05 PM (u4GpV)
We have allowed people within our own countries here in the West to turn this into another Vietnam -- but far worse, because it potentially covers more of the globe and concerns a group that make the Viet Cong look like paragons of restraint and civility. It is going to have severe repercussions on us, but now there is probably nothing left to do but to pull out or keep wasting men and treasure on that long defeat I spoke of up earlier. We will never respond militarily as we should, and we will not let anyone else respond as they should (and by this I mean the entire West, not just America, although America is a part of it).
It appears as though we have chosen our lot; let's not make our troops pay unjustly for our choice. At this point the only way the West has any chance is a united front, the draft, increasing terrorist attacks and war without mercy -- I am afraid we no longer have the stomach for that.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 01, 2011 09:30 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at April 01, 2011 10:16 PM (vKUhG)
Posted by: Abiss at April 01, 2011 11:06 PM (efUrF)
What would Sun-Tzu do?
I'm paraphrasing here but it would be something like this:
There is no substitute for victory.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 04:21 AM (3+xlM)
--willow
One thing: Brigitte Gabriel and Ayaan Hirsi Ali aren't Muslims. Gabriel was born a Christian and her family immigrated from Ethiopia to Lebanon. Ali is an apostate and an atheist. Both women use pseudonyms.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 02, 2011 04:41 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 02, 2011 04:44 AM (T2/zQ)
Personally, I'm all for us carpetbombing Mecca, Medina, and all of their mosques with as much bacon grease, pork rinds, and pigs' feet as we can find.
When the men start praying in the streets, do the same thing. Make them all as "unclean" as possible. Instead of pat-downs at airports, require people to eat a piece of bacon before going through security; takes care of terrorists and vegans at the same time.....
Teresa, only someone from Texas would come up with a brilliant solution like this. Two birds, one stone.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 05:14 AM (3+xlM)
Oh yeah and Ali was born in Somalia. I think it's interesting that both women have roots in Africa--a continent which has been ravished and continues to be ravished by Islam.
Baldilocks, you would think that Obama, with his African heritage and vaunted Christian faith would be sympathetic to African Christians. But alas no, the Christian cover was only there to get him elected.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 05:19 AM (3+xlM)
Meh. 4/1 is as good a day to nuke Mecca as any. Okay, 2/29, maybe. Not that they even use our calendar.
Though I believe all computers are using our calendar. Can't really say 'beware the ides of march' if it happens in Feb, but then again this is not ancient Rome.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 05:25 AM (3+xlM)
That strategy wouldn't require eventually nuking mecca.
If you want to get rid of the problem they won't need Mecca after it.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 05:30 AM (3+xlM)
Posted by: Chuckit at April 02, 2011 05:39 AM (a2DBe)
We're still at war, which means we need a clear understanding of goals, objectives, and mission. My understanding of the general goals are as follows, in this order:
1. Defense against terror attacks.
2. Inclusion of those who wish to join the civilized world.
It's constraining as all get-out. So the choice is between (a) deal with the constraints, or (b) abandon the second goal and deal with the consequences.
The Bush way (a) is harder and will take longer, but it's all-around better.
Posted by: FireHorse at April 02, 2011 05:53 AM (JuKNT)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at April 02, 2011 06:12 AM (1abMg)
I can't believe I missed this thread when it was going strong. Sigh...
I'm glad to see this being talked about. We must talk about this kind of thing to make it more real, and seem more feasilbe, in peoples' minds. In my own little sphere, the number of people who feel any sympathy toward the muz is shrinking day by day. Slowly, people are learning that it's OK to talk about the unfortunate things that must be done to solve the muslim problem.
There isn't a very large contingent at this point who are ready to go the lengths I personally advocate, but the muslims are gaining enemies, not friends, each day that passes. One day, hopefully before it is too late, a majority (or large plurality) will finally see that ugly, brutal thinsg must be done to save civilization. Once that happens, it will finally be possible to push aside the limp wristed, hand wringing do-gooders and bring about a solution to the muslim problem, hopefully once and for all.
Posted by: Reactionary at April 02, 2011 06:12 AM (4nbyM)
Baldilocks, you would think that Obama, with his
African heritage and vaunted Christian faith would be sympathetic to
African Christians. But alas no, the Christian cover was only there to
get him elected.
Posted by: Decaf at April 02, 2011 09:19 AM (3+xlM)
He is as willfully ignorant of the African, Christian and Islamic history as he is of all other history--including that of socialism/Marxism.
And any who knew the least bit about actual Christianity ("There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is
neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." Gal. 3:28; KJV) wrt Trinity United Church of "Christ" (Black Liberation "Theology") knew that he had been fed false doctrine for twenty years.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 02, 2011 06:38 AM (T2/zQ)
Brigitte Gabriel and Ayaan Hirsi Ali aren't Muslims
Baldilocks, drats, You're correct they spoke of that and the treatment and fear they lived under. Hirsi was related to the Submission film van Gohg (assasinated )did and threatened - fatwad .
Thank you for the heads up, hangs head in shame .
Posted by: willow at April 02, 2011 07:07 AM (h+qn8)
Posted by: MissTammy at April 02, 2011 12:45 AM (BebB7)
best song ever.
Posted by: tangonine at April 02, 2011 07:15 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at April 02, 2011 10:12 AM (1abMg)
or in the basement deli as a cutting block for the pulled pork.
Posted by: tangonine at April 02, 2011 07:16 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: willow at April 02, 2011 07:20 AM (h+qn8)
Thank you for the heads up, hangs head in shame .
Posted by: willow at April 02, 2011 11:07 AM (h+qn
No need for shame!
Yeah, Theo van Gogh (Vincent's nephew) directed it and Ali wrote the screenplay, IIRC. When van Gogh was murdered (butchered, to be specific), the jihadi that killed him stuck a threatening note to his body. The note said that Ali was next. That's why she fled the Netherlands to the US.
Posted by: baldilocks at April 02, 2011 07:22 AM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 02, 2011 11:22 AM (T2/zQ)
Ali has an amazing story of fighting this despotic religion for decades, she puts to shame (lie)our supposed concerned feminists in the west.
Posted by: willow at April 02, 2011 07:39 AM (h+qn8)
Every single capitol city on the planet has been either occupied or visited by some form of destruction.
London by the Blitz, Washington, D.C. was occupied and burned by the British. Moscow occupied by Napoleon and repeatedly by savage forces from Asia. Rome was sacked. Tokyo firebombed and occupied. Berlin ransacked and raped, Paris too submitted to occupation. Peking too had a period of foreign occupation.
So every major player has had a period of foreign occupation.
EXCEPT the Hejaz, EXCEPT MEDINA and MECCA.
And don't think that fact hasn't traction within the world of mohammad.
Medina and Mecca never heard the boots of Christians tramping round the black rock. Medina never was encircled by Christians or foreigners.
That's understood by them as DIVINE ratification of their religious superiority, and what's more, as their own religious AUTHENTICITY.
You guys want to end this thing, then you MUST go where it all originated from, and you must reduce their religious pretensions to dust.
Posted by: Dan at April 02, 2011 07:59 AM (jD6eh)
Posted by: torabora at April 02, 2011 07:59 AM (2KxEE)
Imagine if we fought WWII with a promise the war wouldn't harm any Nazi or Imperial civilians. I'm sure Hitler would have appreciated that as he hid among civilians from then on.
Will a GOP candidate make this case? I think a lot of Americans are open to the idea, if it's presented sanely.
Posted by: Dustin at April 02, 2011 07:59 AM (Q3nWV)
Posted by: irenefingirene at April 02, 2011 08:04 AM (SEEEs)
EXCEPT the Hejaz, EXCEPT MEDINA and MECCA.
What about Brasilia?
Posted by: FireHorse at April 02, 2011 08:28 AM (JuKNT)
The military and taxpayers paid, and are still paying the price for his ignorance.
There's nothing to admire or laud, there.
Posted by: MlR at April 02, 2011 08:38 AM (uxyPr)
Posted by: ErisGuy at April 02, 2011 10:28 AM (xfvCt)
Posted by: ace at April 01, 2011 06:00 PM (nj1bB)
I'll be honest. While I can sympathize with the OP on a gut level, I found this comment to be absolutely disgusting. You want to punish innocent unborn children for the crimes of their parents? This isn't collateral damage. It's not even genocide because genocide is indiscriminate and you at least occasionally bag someone who had it coming. It's liberalism, and tbh I find this "final solution" far worse than anything the muslims do. If it got to the point where something like this is the only solution to preserving our existence, then our existence is not worth preserving.
Posted by: Johnny at April 02, 2011 10:40 AM (FYwGn)
Bush's position I think, is basically this:
The people of say, North Korea, are oppressed, and just beacuse the tinpot tyrant who terrorizes them launches a nuke at us, does not mean they should be nuked, because they are just innocent victimized people yearning to be free or some such. So we won't nuke them.
My position is this - power comes from the people. The liberal philosophy of human equality and individual sovereignity is descriptive, not perscriptive. It simply is.
Kim Jong Il's (to continue using NK as an example) power flows from the people of North Korea. He is not some super-ninja with x-ray vision and sub-zero breath. He's not even very tall. And he's old and probably can't take a punch very well anymore.
The crackpot has no noteworthy power except the power he wields by commanding the people of North Korea.
The people of North Korea enable Kim Jong Il to do whatever he does with their collective resources by tolerating his rule of them. They are morally culpable and responsible for anything the crackpot does. If they did not endorse what he was doing, they should not have allowed it to be done on their backs, and in their name.
At the moment Kim Jong launches nukes at Hawaii, is there an active revolt in his country against him? No? Well then in that sense, there is no such thing as a civillian. Nukes away.
If the North Koreans don't want to be nuked, then they should not have put a crackpot in charge of them, and then build nukes for him, and watched idle while he launches them about the globe.
Since the power of the government and sole legitimacy emmanates from the populace, the people are responsible for the acts of the government they choose to accept.
Posted by: Entropy at April 02, 2011 11:30 AM (eL+YD)
<i>Forcing Catholicism to admit that every knee must not bow to the Pope did not require obliterating the Sistine Chapel, and this will not require obliterating Mecca. That did require millions dead (10 millions in in 30 Year's War alone).</i>
Forcing Catholicism to admit that every knee must not bow to the Pope required Christians (some with very little theological deviation), to fight it.
Had the Turk and the Mohameddans come to teach Catholicism that lesson, it may only have strengthened the Pope's leadership over Christendom as it united against a common 'other' enemy.
To the extent that the Turk did come, the Catholics did ward him off. The protestants did not get busy until the that had largely stopped, and/or at least, the protestants got most busy in the places furthest from that threat.
Posted by: Entropy at April 02, 2011 11:50 AM (eL+YD)
Posted by: 0574mina at April 02, 2011 06:26 PM (a004l)
Posted by: alexanderrcm at April 02, 2011 09:16 PM (qSX0R)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3788 seconds, 652 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jeff B. at April 01, 2011 01:25 PM (NjYDy)