May 23, 2011
— DrewM Technically, it's a Pawlenty thread but really, what's the difference?
Ahead of his official announcement today, Pawlenty released a video promising to be honest with Americans. Today he follows up with some specifics on who will be hearing some harsh truths.
It's long past time for America's president — and anyone who wants to be president — to be straight with the American people.So here it is: Government money isn't "free." Either you and I pay for it in taxes, or our children pay for it in debt. The reforms we need are not in the billions, but in the trillions of dollars. And the cuts we must make cannot just be in other people's favorite programs.
That's why later this week I'm going to New York City to tell Wall Street that if I'm elected, the era of bailouts and handouts for big banks is over. I'm going to Florida to tell both young people and seniors that our entitlement programs are on an unsustainable path and have to be changed. And, today, I'm in Iowa to speak truthfully about farm subsidies.
Farm subsidies in Iowa? Ok, I'm interested. Yesterday I noted that it was unlikely that Pawlenty's tough truth talk wasn't likely to include Ethanol Subsidies or mandates. Now? Let's see.
If he follows through and starts laying out some harsh realities to groups not accustomed to this...Fresh Look at Pawlenty?
And yes, I know the guy that spams every thread with a dubiously sourced quote will show up and so will the folks who say, "He's an AGW believer!". The AGW stuff is a fair point but on the upside, it's not like even if he still supported it there's a chance in hell of it coming out of Congress.
Any candidate we put up is going to be flawed because every candidate is flawed. Some have long records with a few blemishes here and there, while others don't have much of a record and occasionally struggle with some basic facts. Either way it's still very early to be ruling people in or out. Let's keep our eyes on the prize...giving Barack Obama the chance to become a terrible ex-President as soon as possible.
Via Ben Domenech, who you might want to consider following on Twitter.
BTW- I'm not on Team Pawlenty, he's just the guy making news over the last day or two.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:24 AM
| Comments (302)
Post contains 408 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 23, 2011 06:27 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 23, 2011 06:28 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at May 23, 2011 06:30 AM (caOCZ)
The left wants to select the Republican candidate. IMIO, they know that a Cain ticket would be devastating to their lying narrative of the right being racists. A Cain/West ticket would mean never again could they even mention it.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at May 23, 2011 06:32 AM (jx2j9)
Which is why Iowa cannot play such a big role in the primaries.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 23, 2011 06:33 AM (136wp)
AP Exclusive: Former Palin aide pens tell-all
JUNEAU, Alaska – A former member of Sarah Palin's inner circle has written a scathing tell-all, saying Palin was ready to quit as governor months before she actually resigned and was eager to leave office when more lucrative opportunities came around.
"In 2009 I had the sense if she made it to the White House and I had stayed silent, I could never forgive myself," Frank Bailey told The Associated Press.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 23, 2011 06:34 AM (9hSKh)
No doubt buzzion will be here in a moment to shriek that you were the first to bring her up.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:34 AM (hIWe1)
In fact, anyone with an R after their name gets my vote against Osama Obama. Even the reprehensible Shuckabee if he does an about-face and decides to run.
There are, after all, priorities, and the overriding consideration has to be ridding the nation of the Traitor-in-Chief.
Would I prefer Cain, West or Bolton? Damn tootin' I would. Any candidate pimped by Ed Morrissey is naturally suspect. So too are pathetic hacks like Huntsman and Mutt Romney. Nor would I be enthused about voting for Palin who, in my opinion is more of a fanboi creation than a viable candidate.
But when the choice is between an out-and-out America-hater and yet another second-class nonentity, it's the nonentity all the way.
Posted by: Machine Gun Joe Viterbo at May 23, 2011 06:35 AM (L1E04)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at May 23, 2011 10:32 AM (jx2j9)
Right, a ticket of two hardcore conservatives with incredibly limited records. You know what else it would mean? A Mondale like wipe-out.
But hey, you'll have proven a point.
Posted by: DrewM. at May 23, 2011 06:36 AM (WnQJ3)
Posted by: Truman North at May 23, 2011 06:36 AM (K2wpv)
Posted this on the Doom thread but it's more appropriate here.
I didn't like Pawlenty a year ago but he has since repudiated his stance on man-made global warming. I still have my concerns, one of the major ones being that catchphrases like "I get it," "telling the truth to the American people," and others in that vein have been focus grouped and approved by cretins like Frank Luntz. My worry here is that Pawlenty is simply mouthing phrases that test well. I hope this is not the case.
Now if he actually goes out and starts saying the same types of things that Christie and Ryan are saying, then I will take a closer look at him.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at May 23, 2011 06:36 AM (JxMoP)
Either you and I pay for it in taxes, or our children pay for it in debt.
Statements like this would be easier to take if the huge governement CUTS were mentioned first. It is hard for me to take any candidate seriously that doesn't recognize it is a spend problem FIRST.
Posted by: dogfish at May 23, 2011 06:37 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Zakn at May 23, 2011 06:38 AM (zyaZ1)
Pawlenty/West 2012
A milquetoast and a firebrand. Not a bad combination.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 23, 2011 06:39 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: dogfish at May 23, 2011 06:40 AM (N2yhW)
Ioway evangelical corn-farmers are going to have to face their own hard truths in the primary: whom do they love more: God(here represented by evangelical Pawlenty) or Mammon(here represented by Newt/Bachmann and about everyone else in favor of those sweet, sweet subsidies).
Posted by: Lizbth at May 23, 2011 06:41 AM (JZBti)
Has T Paw done anything to show he is now firmly against green energy initiatives, global warming legislation, more control by the EPA? I know he has said it, but has he done anything to prove it?
Has he urged the Minn. legislature to draft legislation that stops all the bullshit regulations, etc that he helped put into place?
Posted by: momma at May 23, 2011 06:42 AM (penCf)
Of course, Barack Obama is also black, meaning he's got about half the country wanting him hung from a maple tree, so that doesn't help. Just being honest with you retards here. I'm sure you all agree with that half of the country - but you're not racist of course.
Posted by: another damn librul at May 23, 2011 06:43 AM (ikQVp)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 06:43 AM (NtTkA)
I saw him on the Daily Show a few months back and he handled himself very well with John Stewart who is normally a dirty cunt to all things not left wing.
He's a very good conversationalist.
I've never seen him give a speech or debate. I will be interested to see how he does.
He's my defacto candidate right now considering I won't vote for Romney, Gingrich, Santorum or Ron Paul.
I'm not sold on Herman Cain, he seems like a good guy but has no political experience. While I personally consider that a good thing, in reality you have to be somewhat good a politicking if you're going to run for the highest office in America. And i'm not convinced he won't be gaffe prone. And let's face it, if you though the media was bad in 2008, it's going to be muuuuuch worse in 2012. The mask is totally off and Obama is their man, a failure of him to get re-elected is a failure for them and they won't let that happen.
So I guess Pawlenty is my guy unless someone else gets in the race. I would love for Paul Ryan to jump in, or ever Christie, but I don't think it's gonna happen.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 06:44 AM (wuv1c)
--All right Timmeh, you have my attention.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 06:44 AM (BP6Z1)
I don't think so. He's currently in 3rd period gym class right now.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 23, 2011 06:44 AM (pLTLS)
Random concerned citizen
Joe nediB
Posted by: not joe biden at May 23, 2011 06:44 AM (mLAWK)
Posted by: DrewM. at May 23, 2011 10:36 AM (WnQJ3)
If current history means squat, your argument is meaningless. The thesis that candidates must have vast experience as politicians in order to be successful is equally idiotic based on history from at least the 20th century. Of course, those of you who know better will continue to insist that what got us to this point is the only thing that will get us out of this. Lecture away, Drew.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at May 23, 2011 06:45 AM (jx2j9)
@15
In fact, anyone with an R after their name gets my vote against Osama Obama.
I have to respectfully disagree. I think there is plenty of empirical proof that just having an "R" after a politician's name is no guarranty that they will have fiscal discipline or not support progressive social-engineering policy. A Republican of that stripe is worse than useless; he or she will actively continue down the road that is dooming the republic.
We need a candidate that will provide a stark contrast to Obama. Interestingly, it seems that the RINOish candidates aren't getting any traction and are rapidly dropping out.
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at May 23, 2011 06:45 AM (SW+Oc)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 06:45 AM (NtTkA)
Posted by: nevergiveup at May 23, 2011 06:45 AM (i6RpT)
I am still gob-smacked over BO's comments today. These statements make me sick: (Why the hell is he proud of the queen? He is listening to the common folk?!)
"I think, what the Queen symbolizes - not just to Great Britain but to the entire Commonwealth and obviously the entire world - is the best of England. And we're very proud of her" Politico quoted Obama, as saying.
"One of the great aspects of this job is it gives you an opportunity to meet with people from all walks of life. You've had a chance to talk to the Queen of England on one day, and the next day you have the chance to talk to somebody in a diner off a highway here in the United States. And what you find is that there's a lot of wisdom to be found - if you're willing to listen.
And I think most politicians spend most of their time talking instead of listening. That's a habit that I try to break," he added.
Posted by: momma at May 23, 2011 06:46 AM (penCf)
--And when you get down to it, same goes for a presidential candidate's abortion beliefs. The key with both issues is what kind of judges and administrators the guy will nominate.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 06:46 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: The Obamanators, Couple-in-Chief at May 23, 2011 06:47 AM (vC2SL)
Well here I am violating my own previous post...but I told you so. I mean, does this really shock anyone? Anyone not living in a fantasy world of Saint Sarah the Unimpeachable? Of COURSE she wanted to bail out of real world responsibilities in order to make millions of dollars. Who wouldn't? I sure as hell would. She sure as shit didn't resign out of virtuous principle or because she was "forced to" by all those horrible horrible ethics complaints.
Incidentally, that's why she won't run. She's stoking the fires, but she's playing her devoted fans for sucker rubes. She's not running. She wants money, money, money, attention, power, and money in that order. She ain't gonna get it by slogging through a campaign where she will be ripped to shreds by all sides on the merits.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:47 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 06:48 AM (UOM48)
Couldn't find a more boring guy. At least make 2012 interesting and entertaining, will you guys? I'll send money to Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann, just for the nightly ripping by Jon Stewart.
Posted by: another damn librul at May 23, 2011 06:48 AM (ikQVp)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 23, 2011 06:49 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 23, 2011 06:49 AM (f9c2L)
Once we get past that point, as Wizbang mentioned yesterday.....
It's not about the best person for the job. It's about the best person who is running for the job.
Keep posting, and keep educating me.
And I mean exactly that. No snark intended.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at May 23, 2011 06:50 AM (ppcPz)
All plausible and possibly true. But...she is also damned good at beating the snot out of Obama (pbuh) in 140 characters or less. That is a tremendous advantage for the Republican party.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 23, 2011 06:50 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 06:50 AM (NtTkA)
Posted by: Tough US Immigration Policies at May 23, 2011 06:51 AM (zL6Hj)
He won't be winning Iowa in the general election in that case, but I'm okay with that -- I had written off from the outset.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:51 AM (hIWe1)
Has T Paw done anything to show he is now firmly against green energy initiatives, global warming legislation, more control by the EPA? I know he has said it, but has he done anything to prove it?
Probably not, at least that I'm aware of, but we have to take into account what is required of someone who is governing a liberal state.
For example look at Democratic governors in the south(when they exist), then tend to be further to the right than the democratic establishment would like. Not neccasarily because they are ideologically more conservative, but because their state is and they have to reflect that to some degree if they wish to remain in office.
Minnsota is a liberal state. We're talking about the only state not to vote for Reagan in 1984.
Pawlenty, i'm guessing here, had to be a little more liberal on policy that he probably is ideologically because that is what is required in a left leaning state.
Now if he were president, would he carry on those policies, I don't know and I don't think so.
Ace has made this point before on Obama. Do you think Obama ideologically is further left than his policies? Yes of course. However because america is a center right country, he can only get away with so much.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 06:51 AM (wuv1c)
Can you even write this with a straight face? Let's play compare and contrast of 1983/1984 with 2011/2012.
Short version - Reagan wouldn't have won 49 states in 1984 if all he had was a great mug for the camera.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 23, 2011 06:51 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 06:52 AM (SHvKp)
If it's a sock it's being hidden well. (S)he is using another hash.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at May 23, 2011 06:52 AM (LH6ir)
Wait, is the same "tell-all" book as was being talked about several months ago? By the guy who couldn't get it published? In that case, fuck this guy, I don't trust him for shit. You're right, he's just telling me something that seems plausible enough but has no reliable proof.
Okay, back to Pawlenty.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:52 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (T8iAI)
What, that a staffer would claim Sarah! was evil? No, you could see that coming a mile away.
I'm hardly a Sarah Palin-ite, but come on. Staffers bring out the long knives for their former bosses all the time.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Tough US Immigration Policies at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (zL6Hj)
Posted by: Stankbraham Rincoln at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (mLAWK)
Figures. British Code Name for Obama Is “Smart Alec”
More than one person has wanted to call Barack Obama a ‘smart alec’, and now British police will get the chance to do so without getting reprimanded.
That’s because Scotland Yard has tapped the codename ‘Chalaque’ to refer to the U.S. president for security reasons during his upcoming state visit to the United Kingdom May 24-26.
Indarjit Singh, a Punjabi speaker in the UK who is director of the Network of Sikh Organisations, told the Sunday Times the word ‘is sometimes used when we want to denigrate someone who we think is too clever for their own good’.
Another Punjabi speaker told the paper the word Chalaque is ‘not considered rude’, but could be ‘mildly offensive’.
Posted by: momma at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Chuck Z at May 23, 2011 06:53 AM (Ig+B0)
Posted by: Tough US Immigration Policies at May 23, 2011 06:54 AM (zL6Hj)
THEN I'd have some respect for him.
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at May 23, 2011 06:54 AM (H+LJc)
Also,
Can I ask this question? Why do people keep mentioning John Bolton as a candidate? I mean I love the guy and his Mustache of justice, but really? John Bolton?
It's ridiculous. The perfect job for him is the one he was given by George Bush, which was to be at the UN. I think that's all he's qualified for.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 06:55 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 23, 2011 06:55 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 06:56 AM (NtTkA)
Incidentally, that's why she won't run. She's stoking the fires, but she's playing her devoted fans for sucker rubes. She's not running. She wants money, money, money, attention, power, and money in that order. She ain't gonna get it by slogging through a campaign where she will be ripped to shreds by all sides on the merits.
Just wanted to repost this, because it's the only true, honest statement I've seen in this thread. Jeff B, you are a smart, objective individual.
Posted by: another damn librul at May 23, 2011 06:56 AM (ikQVp)
Posted by: Stankbraham Rincoln at May 23, 2011 10:53 AM (mLAWK)
"The worst problems with the blog are hashes, socks and 19-year old losers who live in the overweight mama's basement pounding mouth-foaming reams of disconnected drivel. Also, made-up quotes" - Thomas "I Love the Sisters" Jefferson
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 23, 2011 06:56 AM (136wp)
Do you really need to ask? It's because he's "tough." Seems manly.
That's all. That's it.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:57 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 06:57 AM (NtTkA)
It's like listening to sports talk radio, "Yeah, I think we should trade our back up kicker and 3rd string left guard for Tom Brady".
Just a lot of shit disconnected from reality at this point.
Posted by: DrewM. at May 23, 2011 06:58 AM (WnQJ3)
Fuck off, sockpuppet troll. You know exactly what you're doing, too.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 06:58 AM (hIWe1)
Could this be part of the "split delegates" strategy in which he really doesn't give a shit how bad he does in Iowa since he will not lose many delegates?
Anyway, talk is cheap. It takes a damn lot of talk to undo a lifetime of liberal actions so we will see.
Posted by: Vic at May 23, 2011 06:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Herman Cain at May 23, 2011 06:59 AM (6uiF7)
Let's keep our eyes on the prize...giving Barack Obama the chance to become a terrible ex-President as soon as possible.
I must disagree on two points:
First, I support Barack Obama in his quest to become a great ex-President.
Second, I'm willing to wait until Jan. 20, 2013, for his brilliant career as ex-President to begin.
Posted by: FireHorse at May 23, 2011 06:59 AM (Rq1/g)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 06:59 AM (T8iAI)
Posted by: Crusty at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (GvSpB)
Posted by: CAC at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (JEVge)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 10:59 AM (T8iAI)
Logic, we don't need no stinkin' logic..
Posted by: The 52 Percenters at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Jean at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan, nor a particularly good troll at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (SHvKp)
Damn librul has posted before as "homos are sinners".
Librul, if you're that sure you're going to win, why bother posting here? Deep down you're nervous aren't you? You starting to worry that Obama is the Herbert Hoover of the left. You guys had both houses and the presidency and your greatest accomplishment is a stake in the heart of Keynesian economics.
Posted by: Matt at May 23, 2011 07:00 AM (ecpMe)
Posted by: Dan at May 23, 2011 07:01 AM (mXBxH)
Obama won because he lied his ass off about everything he was and everything he intended to do, and people believed him because he seemed a reasonable centrist.
Posted by: Slublog at May 23, 2011 07:01 AM (0nqdj)
45--oh nos, the guy whose gf hates Sarah is here to post on a Zzz-PAW thread. And he's still ridin the She Wont Run meme for all its worth. Sucka born every minute.
Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 23, 2011 07:01 AM (K/USr)
How does someone with "a lifetime of liberal actions" score an A grade from the Cato Institute? I understand he doesn't have a spotless record, but what I don't get is this need to cast him (and every other candidate) in such ridiculous maximalist terms. I think Tim Pawlenty's political career, from pushing through concealed-carry in MN through blood-and-guts persistence in the State House, to endless veto after veto of spending bill, to shutting down the whole goddamn state government twice, doesn't exactly scream "lifetime of liberality" to me.
And honestly, I'm pretty sure it doesn't scream that to you either. So why do you insist on casting it in those terms? Does it scratch some particular itch for you or something?
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:01 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Tim Pawlenty at May 23, 2011 07:01 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Tim Pawlenty at May 23, 2011 07:02 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: CAC at May 23, 2011 07:03 AM (JEVge)
I don't go to the fucking Cato institute to look at his goddamn record.
Posted by: Vic at May 23, 2011 07:03 AM (M9Ie6)
well maybe those godforsaken Necco wafers rank up there but aren't they out of business?
Best candy ever? Pez. Yeah, I'm a freak.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (zgZzy)
"The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive."
-- Tim Pawlenty, 2006.
Posted by: Dan at May 23, 2011 11:01 AM (mXBxH)
He's the guy alright.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (jx2j9)
worst candy ever.
seriously.
well maybe those godforsaken Necco wafers rank up there but aren't they out of business?
Posted by: CAC at May 23, 2011 11:03 AM (JEVge)
Nope, you can still get them at "Cracker Barrel". They stock a lot of old candies.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Barry Munny at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (4Kl5M)
This is the kind of way many of us have been asking someone to talk about fiscal conservatism. We've spent countless threads bitching about how Republicans don't seem to want to 'talk tough' about our fiscal problems, much less 'act tough'.
That said, I'd like to get out of the one sound bite or another disqualifies/qualifies someone for consideration. It seems to be a pretty low and frivolous standard.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (VoSja)
Obama won because he lied his ass off about everything he was and everything he intended to do, and people believed him because he seemed a reasonable centrist.
Posted by: Slublog at May 23, 2011 11:01 AM (0nqdj)
Don't forget the power of the "O" as in Orca. Her thighness declared Jugears "The one we've been waiting for," her minions fainted, and he was off and running.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 10:52 AM (SHvKp)
pick a new nick, dick
Posted by: Jean at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: joncelli at May 23, 2011 07:04 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (bAL0J)
Posted by: CAC at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (JEVge)
Nope. Saw them as I was checking out at Walmart. Gagged a little when I saw them.
Posted by: M1 at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (EL+OC)
Hey, maybe if people post it enough times I'll vote for Sarah Palin!
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: blaster at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (l5dj7)
wretched person who filed several complaints against her, Andrea McLeod,
a stooge of the oil companies, is suing the former for emails that they are not supposed to have, nice try, fool.
Posted by: ian cormac at May 23, 2011 07:05 AM (KqKD+)
Posted by: fluffy, damn Yankee at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (NtTkA)
"The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive."
-- Tim Pawlenty, 2006.
ah, hahahahaha. this should be posted in the DOOM threads, along with "I like mandates" by unowho.
Where do I sign up for his campaign? Another classic blue state Republican.
Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (K/USr)
Romney starts with the letter R.
You know what else starts with the letter R?
Thats right.
Rino.
Let's not forget that Ronald Reagan's name starts with two Rs. Double-dose of RINO!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Olliander at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (6uiF7)
Of course, Barack Obama is also black, meaning he's got about half the country wanting him hung from a maple tree, so that doesn't help. Just being honest with you retards here. I'm sure you all agree with that half of the country - but you're not racist of course.
Posted by: another damn librul at May 23, 2011 10:43 AM (ikQVp)
Mmmm. I bet that crack is delicious!
Posted by: Crack Whore at May 23, 2011 07:06 AM (YYaIP)
I want to see both Palin's and Pawlenty's long form birth certificates
We're not done with Obama's eligibility. The Constitution says the President was have attained the age of thirty-five years. But what if a person is in suspended animation, like in Demolition Man? Sure, a person can be alive for a certain number of years but doesn't actually attain the age that would normally accomapany those years. Obama has to prove that he wasn't in suspended animation! I demand to see his book reports from middle school, along with proof that he wrote them! I demand to see his second-grade macaroni art!!
Posted by: FireHorse at May 23, 2011 07:07 AM (Rq1/g)
That's the advantage of boring guys. Seriously. They can say controversial stuff, and nobody gets outraged. And if nobody gets outraged, then swing voters assume it must not be controversial.
I think I'm on Team T-Paw. Yeeha!
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at May 23, 2011 07:07 AM (epBek)
Posted by: blaster at May 23, 2011 11:05 AM (l5dj7)
So what we need to do is find a candidate for each open office that will lie their asses off. "Yes, you can keep all your benefits". "No, I won't cut programs". "Yes, I believe in food stamps". Get them all elected and straighten everything out!
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 23, 2011 07:08 AM (136wp)
Obama won because he lied his ass off about everything he was and everything he intended to do, and people believed him because he seemed a reasonable centrist.
He was sold by the infomercial crews at respected news outlets as such.
Reasonable attention to his statements and positions verbalized at über left wing events revealed his true nature.
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at May 23, 2011 07:08 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Ian S. at May 23, 2011 07:08 AM (tqwMN)
--What an ass.
He can brag about jetsetting all over and talking to all kinds of "folks" and getting so much wisdom, but in the end he absorb fuck-all of what he hears if he does not agree with it.
Fuck him.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 07:08 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Reggie Jackson at May 23, 2011 07:08 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: PaleRider at May 23, 2011 07:09 AM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: CAC at May 23, 2011 07:09 AM (JEVge)
I read the first sentence of this post and I was gearing up to blast another stupid Birther troll.
Then it got really good. Well played.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:10 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Reggie Jackson at May 23, 2011 11:08 AM (zgZzy)
Get in line, youngster!
Posted by: Babe Ruth at May 23, 2011 07:10 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Karl Rove at May 23, 2011 07:10 AM (6uiF7)
Ben , Bolton may not be electable but being unqualified isn't the reason. He will definitely add to the IQ and logic during the debates.
Can you tell me any of Bolton's positions on anything other than the UN, Iran, or the Middle East.
Anything? The EPA? Taxes? Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, guns, abortion, etc?
Again, I love the guy, he is entertaining as hell, but we're talking about the Presidency here.
He's a great commentator on some issues, but on other issues I have no idea what he believes and I don't think anyone does.
He's a one trick pony, specifically on foreign policy, but unfortunately in 2012 foreign policy isn't going to be much of an issue. This isn't 2004.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 07:10 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at May 23, 2011 07:11 AM (zgZzy)
If you don't energize people, you don't get anywhere. Obama won because he energized lefties in the media - they are blind adherents to his religion. The media always coddled Dems, but it sank to an unbelievable low then because they were - and remain - true believers in the cult of Obama.
A hostile media would have completely torn him to shreds. He would have fizzled out.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 23, 2011 07:11 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Tough US Immigration Policies at May 23, 2011 07:11 AM (zL6Hj)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (UOM48)
We beat the RINO thing to death yesterday, but I think it proved something.
Reagan signed amnesty into law as President, pro-abortion legislation as governor of California, and strongly supported gun control after leaving office. He was a big supporter of the Brady Bill and even penned a latter with Carter and Ford supporting the assualt weapons ban.
Palin raised taxes on oil companies in office, supported TARP, left office early handing power to a person who walked back her main achievements, and has made numerous other public gaffes.
Why aren't Reagan and Palin RINOs in most people's minds? Because they have a strong emotional connection with a large base of voters. If Pawlenty isn't able to do that, for right or wrong, he is going to be a weaker candidate because clearly people won't have the type of connection with him that allows them to give him passes on the same kinds of faults that every other candidate has.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (VoSja)
He's a one trick pony, specifically on foreign policy, but unfortunately in 2012 foreign policy isn't going to be much of an issue. This isn't 2004.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 11:10 AM (wuv1c)
I respectfully disagree, I think foreign policy will be a major issue when rolling defaults hit globally.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (7Vm2v)
Nice find there. You're right, that's amazingly tin-eared bullshit.
Wanna bet nobody calls him on it? (To be fair it's small beans given all the other problems with him.)
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:12 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Reggie Jackson at May 23, 2011 11:08 AM (zgZzy)
Damn straight. I was at opening day at Yankee stadium (not sure of the year) and they handed out two Reggie bars to everyone. Of course, people took both bars and through them on the field. Ever see an orange ball field? Delayed the game start for hours.
Posted by: M1 at May 23, 2011 07:13 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2011 07:13 AM (MtwBb)
Can you guys use your Google magic and figure out how much these pardons cost them/their families (list at link) in political donations?
Obama pardons eight: crimes include drug violations, sale of alligator hides
The new acts of presidential clemency bring to 17 the total number of pardons Mr. Obama has granted. At this same point in his presidency, George W. Bush had granted only 12 pardons.
Today's announcement of pardons came by way of a White House press release. Usually they're announced by the Department of Justice where the U.S. Pardon Attorney is based. The pardon attorney screens pardon petitions for the president and sends him recommendations for action.
The White House issued today's list of pardon recipients without further comment or explanation of the president's thinking.
Posted by: momma at May 23, 2011 07:13 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (SHvKp)
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: fluffy & chilly at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (wxHHM)
And T-Paw is firmly in the camp of "well, sometimes the media can be reasonable/I need them to help me get my message out, so I got to be nice" death spiral.
This is going to be the most lopsided fight in history until we get someone who will fight back. And T-Paw (and I don't care that he was just trying to score points against Palin, that's fine, she has her flaws) has as his first instinct to suck up to the MBM, to buy into and internalize their narrative. "That's not something I would have done." BS,( true, in that you are a ball-less bitch) but there is no way in hell had one of your advisers proposed the same thing to you at that time that you would have rejected it--no, you sad sack of donkey-shit, you bought into and helped perpetuate a smear of all conservatives for your own silly self-advancement. "Look at me! The media loves me! They let me on their show! Vote for me!"
No, screw you, I don't care what you say now because until you attack the MBM, you are just another in a long line of faux-conservative con-men who will say whatever it takes to get the nomination so you can go on to "lose with dignity" in the general, and if you accidentally get elected, you will be happy to sell out conservatives for a few lines of praise in the MBM all in the name of "bipartisanship and compromise."
Posted by: Jimmuy at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (YFds9)
I suppose the guy writing the anti-Palin book is donating all proceeds to charity because he's all about just telling the truth about Palin, not for the cash like he says motivates her. Pure Projection.
I like TPaw if Palin doesn't run. I accept his reversal on the greenie crap. A more convincing way would be for TPaw to say 'I , unlike the media, find the Climate-gate leaks very convincing that it is not nearly science, and more about money and control.'
Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at May 23, 2011 07:14 AM (UU0OF)
How long have you been around here on AoSHQ, Paper? I only seemed to notice you recently, but you're a real strong addition. I've been impressed with all your posts (as well as the fact that you're way calmer and more measured than spazzes like me).
Just thought I'd point it out.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:15 AM (hIWe1)
Free enterprise will find a way, if you let it.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 23, 2011 07:16 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Jean Erg at May 23, 2011 07:16 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Bob Dole at May 23, 2011 11:14 AM (AZGON)
Bob, it's only six inches becuase you can go twice (3+3=6)
Posted by: Libby Dole at May 23, 2011 07:16 AM (136wp)
Posted by: KB at May 23, 2011 07:16 AM (YeiuA)
"The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive."
-- Tim Pawlenty, 2006.
Posted by: Dan at May 23, 2011 11:01 AM (mXBxH)
--So tell us, how has Mitt made government smaller in the liberal state he ran?
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 07:17 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at May 23, 2011 07:17 AM (6uiF7)
Should've brought an SVT Raptor instead.
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 23, 2011 07:17 AM (nLQrV)
No, you heathen. They have been pumping them out from their factory in Revere (aka Severe) MA since the 1800s. Necco wafers are the nectar of the goods compared to Good 'N Plenty.
Good'N Plenty has been reformulated, again. Even more disgusting this time than the last...
Posted by: garrett at May 23, 2011 07:17 AM (rcJCp)
Posted by: fluffy at May 23, 2011 07:17 AM (4Kl5M)
BUT, will the voters actually elect a guy who openly promises to make the hard choices? We might not be pleased to learn the answer.
Posted by: Cornfed at May 23, 2011 07:18 AM (BcYZo)
Let's nominate someone who fires the base up and will lose by a 60%-40% margin, then.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:18 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 07:18 AM (NtTkA)
Posted by: KB at May 23, 2011 11:16 AM (YeiuA)
We have a saying, "It's about exciting as watching Tim Palenty growing"
Posted by: Grass at May 23, 2011 07:18 AM (136wp)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 07:19 AM (T8iAI)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at May 23, 2011 07:19 AM (pLTLS)
Scanned Timmy's USA oped this AM. He's talking the talk, like he wants to bring the base back.
Still, he's going to need help to get the Nomination, like Romney finding no path to victory and doing the noble thing.
Is Plenty enough to stop a TEA revolt? Romney guarantees one.
Posted by: gary gulrud at May 23, 2011 07:20 AM (xKs9E)
Posted by: Callista Gingrich at May 23, 2011 07:20 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at May 23, 2011 07:20 AM (NtTkA)
holy crap.
You have an R and an O in your name.
Ronald Wilson Reagan
I can spell RINO from his name! Oh, the horror!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 23, 2011 07:20 AM (9hSKh)
They're the best for teaching kids to be a crack shot because you can threaten them with having to eat the missed ones.
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at May 23, 2011 07:21 AM (H+LJc)
I haven't had Good 'N Plenty since I was a kid. All's I know is that they were invariably the last things left in the bag of Halloween candy after I'd finished everything else. And that includes the rancid butterscotch candies and godawful Tootsie Rolls.
I'm really glad I don't like candy anymore.
One thing that has really maintained its appeal, however? Jolly Ranchers. Especially the "Tropical" bags, which are hard as fuck to find but include the awesome Orange flavor (and the loathsome Peach one, sadly).
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:21 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 07:21 AM (T8iAI)
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 23, 2011 07:21 AM (GBXon)
162--So tell us, how has Mitt made government smaller in the liberal state he ran?Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 11:17 AM (BP6Z1)
Good point. He hasn't either. Birds of a feather. Both blue state Republicans, doing what they do.
Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 23, 2011 07:22 AM (K/USr)
Obama was given a present of a hurley stick, used in Ireland's native sport, hurling, and practised swinging it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:23 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Prez. O. at May 23, 2011 07:23 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 23, 2011 11:21 AM (GBXon)
I just got a slurpee so I can watch his skinny ass push that caddy and Michelle over the hump.
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2011 07:23 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 07:23 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:24 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: mrp at May 23, 2011 07:24 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 23, 2011 11:21 AM (GBXon)
I just got a slurpee so I can watch his skinny ass push that caddy and Michelle over the hump.
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2011 11:23 AM (MtwBb)
:
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:24 AM (UOM48)
Either way it's still very early to be ruling people in or out.
Yep. It's time to be organizing your precinct for the primaries. With that, you're a team owner in 2012 instead of a spectator.
Posted by: Michael Smith at May 23, 2011 07:24 AM (2Oas0)
#157
Maybe six months or so. I'm a quant, and I started becoming more interested in politics after the 2008 election. The place where I worked at the time was hired to do some political data crunching (not what we usually do), and I about lost my mind with all the stupidity that is the electorate.
My background is in data analysis, so I tend to rely on that quite a bit. I come here for the funny and the angry and increasingly, the depressing.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:24 AM (VoSja)
Vermont Country Store (.com) has lots of old timey candy 'n stuff.
Pawlenty seems to know what to say, so that's nice. We shall see...
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 23, 2011 07:25 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 11:23 AM (wuv1c)
Ben, anything can be used as a suppository.
(You don't want links included with this assertion.)
Posted by: Michael Smith at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (2Oas0)
Paul Ryan gives libtard talking head some advice - kiss my ass (or words to that effect)
Damn too bad he is not running. He would jump to the top of my short list immediately.
Posted by: Vic at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (TMB3S)
It's a huge strength, and distinguishes you from most others around here. I'd say you're on your way to guest-blogger status if that's what you want.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (hIWe1)
Posted by: Tough US Immigration Policies at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (zL6Hj)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:26 AM (AZGON)
Can you tell me any of Bolton's positions on anything other than the UN, Iran, or the Middle East.
Anything? The EPA? Taxes? Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, guns, abortion, etc?
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 11:10 AM (wuv1c)--Pssssst, that's the whole point of a campaign!
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 07:27 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 07:27 AM (T8iAI)
Ben, anything can be used as a suppository.
Excellent. I need a colonic and it sounds like a Barack Obama suppository will clean me right out. Thanks for the tip.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:27 AM (sbV1u)
Sure, but why?
Furthermore, who would use this knowledge? Bear Grylls?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at May 23, 2011 07:28 AM (9hSKh)
Depressingly funny could be our motto.
I'm going to warn everyone not to go to JWF right now. Don't look at the top story unless you are some place where you can scream loudly without getting fired.
Posted by: Mama AJ at May 23, 2011 07:28 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 07:28 AM (SHvKp)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:28 AM (AZGON)
You know what? I'm really grateful you're around to offer a (qualified) defense of Romney. Because if he ends up being the nominee, we're going to need to adjust our understanding on these things right quick.
I tend to agree with you on this point, but then I'm a filthy RINO.
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:29 AM (hIWe1)
--Pssssst, that's the whole point of a campaign!
Logprof, that's too close for comfort to "we have to pass it to find out what's in it."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:29 AM (sbV1u)
Since his early rise in Illinois, the whole thing to me feels like a movie about some kid in high school and all his coaches and announcers decided to make this one kid the greatest basketball star ever born and never stopped talking him up for years until it eventually crescendos into nationwide hysteria with people literally fainting in his presence. Then in his junior year he was drafted straight into the NBA where in his momentous premier the whole world watches him double dribble and trip over his own feet. You cant buy this kind of pure comedy and tasty justice without a kamikaze spirit and Soros sized money.
Imagine if Obama 08 hadn't been elected???
*He would now be an international post crucified demi-god even more powerful then he was before.
*How different would the policies and SC picks have been under McCain? *How much could McCain of done if he even tried, while undermined at every point by the rabidly fraudulent media and the glowing spotless Obama?
My thesis now is the same as back then, the only thing worse then Obama being elected would have been Obama not being elected. In 2012.... depends-on who we run, but we definitely need to focus on expanding maximum control on the house and Senate. That white house is a coin flip that always seems to come up tails for us either way. More tea partiers in congress is a heads heads for us.
Posted by: Stankbraham Rincoln at May 23, 2011 07:29 AM (mLAWK)
Fine: If Tpaw can look Iowans in the eye and tell them Ethanol needs to stop, I'll give him a fair fresh look.
But if he ever again mutters anything about curbing CO2 dealbreaker man.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at May 23, 2011 07:29 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Ian S. at May 23, 2011 07:30 AM (tqwMN)
maybe we've finally found a legitimate use for ethanol here at the HQ.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 07:30 AM (wuv1c)
Good'N Plenty has been reformulated, again. Even more disgusting this time than the last...
Posted by: garrett at May 23, 2011 11:17 AM (rcJCp)
--G'n'P are the bastard children of Mike and Ike.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 07:31 AM (BP6Z1)
I'm going to warn everyone not to go to JWF right now. Don't look at the top story unless you are some place where you can scream loudly without getting fired.
That headline made me laugh my ass off.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:31 AM (sbV1u)
they haven't banned me because perhaps this site believes in allowing dissent/freedom of exchange of opinions or ideas. it's something you neo-cons struggle with, the fact that others are allowed to form and express their own ideals.
Posted by: another damn librul at May 23, 2011 07:32 AM (ikQVp)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:32 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: joncelli at May 23, 2011 07:32 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:33 AM (AZGON)
Sarah Palin - former 1/2-term governor of Alaska, has a fan base approaching cult-like status, is an attention whore who talks more about what it's like to hunt and fish in Alaska rather than her plans and principles for the future, talks in broad folksy generalities rather than specifics, is utterly loathed by about half the country.
Mitt Romney - former governor of Massachusetts, has that whole Mormon thing going for him, likes mandates, was for abortion before he was against it, has great hair, is richer than God, is the establishment/"next in line" candidate of choice
Tim Pawlenty - former governor of Minnesota, has blue-collar bonafides, wants to tell people "hard truths", is more boring than dirt, was for AGW before he was against it, a guy you can count on never to spontaneously blow the rent money on a sudden trip to Vegas
Newt Gingrich - former Speaker of the House, likes to sit on comfy couches and have a "debate", thinks we need "bold new solutions", would rather think a lot rather than do things, thinks Medicare vouchers are "right-wing social engineering", is past his sell-by date
Jon Huntsman - former governor of Utah, thinks that being Obama's lackey for the past 3 years is a resume enhancement, angling to split that ever-critical Mormon vote, is the super-RINO
Gary Johnson - former governor of New Mexico, is the more serious libertarian dude, endorsed Ron Paul in 2008, wants to legalize pot, is anti-war, won't win the SoCon vote
Herman Cain - former pizza CEO and Fed regional bank chairman, has never won an election in his life but thinks a presidential election is a great chance for a first stab at it, frequently looks confused on camera
Ron Paul!!!! - nuff said
god we are boned
Posted by: chemjeff at May 23, 2011 07:33 AM (7mSYS)
Bwahahahahaa, Obama and Moochelle had to abandon the car and get one with stronger suspsension.
Jeeebus that guy is such a fuckup.
Posted by: robtr at May 23, 2011 07:33 AM (MtwBb)
Good'N Plenty has been reformulated, again. Even more disgusting this time than the last...
Posted by: garrett at May 23, 2011 11:17 AM (rcJCp)
--G'n'P are the bastard children of Mike and Ike.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 11:31 AM (BP6Z1)
Heretics, the lot of you. Junior Mints uber alles!
Posted by: AoSHQ's *second* worst commenter, DarkLord© at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (GBXon)
Posted by: mrp at May 23, 2011 11:24 AM (HjPtV)
Yup, this. Too busy governatin' and other awesome conservative-like stuff, I guess.
Posted by: Jimmuy at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (YFds9)
From the O'Bama in Ireland linky at the sidebar (I'd pay to see the pic):
Obama was given a present of a hurley stick, used in Ireland's native sport, hurling, and practised swinging it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 11:23 AM (UOM4
Here you go. BO playing with his stick.
Posted by: momma at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (penCf)
Posted by: sympleton at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (+zxy/)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 23, 2011 07:34 AM (IXLvN)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt, pickin your candidates so you don't have to get all dirty n stuff at May 23, 2011 07:36 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 11:27 AM (T8iAI)
--Sssshhhhhhh, I'm trying to silence the Romenyspambot.
Posted by: logprof at May 23, 2011 07:36 AM (BP6Z1)
I've yet to hear you anti-Palin morons speak honestly about your real resistance to a Palin Presidency...
You don't believe a woman should be President... Plain and simple - and no woman would convince you otherwise - especially not one as smokin' hot as Palin.
I know because I went through my own thought process of wondering whether I believe a woman should be in charge... Too emotional... Not logical enough, etc.
At least admit it - and then we can get around to discussing the realities around your absurd claims of "unelectability".
good work, this shit pot really needed stirring.
Posted by: Ben at May 23, 2011 07:36 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 07:36 AM (SHvKp)
Paul Ryan gives libtard talking head some advice - kiss my ass (or words to that effect)
Damn too bad he is not running. He would jump to the top of my short list immediately.
Posted by: Vic at May 23, 2011 11:26 AM (M9Ie6)
hahaha...nothin finer than watching Gregory get blown out of the water...what an asshat
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 23, 2011 07:36 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: sexypig at May 23, 2011 07:38 AM (UmEOs)
In The First Tamale's case he ties a 2 by12 across his ass so he doesn't fall in.
Posted by: ontherocks at May 23, 2011 07:38 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: George Orwell at May 23, 2011 07:38 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Herman Cain at May 23, 2011 07:38 AM (QcFbt)
From the O'Bama in Ireland linky at the sidebar (I'd pay to see the pic):
Obama was given a present of a hurley stick, used in Ireland's native sport, hurling, and practised swinging it.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 11:23 AM (UOM4
Thanks, momma. He looks as stupid as I imagined. (Do you have a PayPal account?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:39 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 23, 2011 07:39 AM (TMB3S)
Herman Cain - former pizza CEO and Fed regional bank chairman, has never won an election in his life but thinks a presidential election is a great chance for a first stab at it, frequently looks confused on camera
I stopped thinking about Cain this weekend when he didn't understand what "right of return" was.
That is about THE most basic concept in Middle East foreign policy right now, and he's clueless.
Now, he didn't have to be an expert on it. He just needed to be enough of a CEO to say to his staff, "Make sure I am briefed on the basics, and the next level. For every policy question after that where there is no solid position my answer is, 'evolving.'"
Seriously, it's not hard. Rock-solid prep for an interview is something any CEO would think about, and some Cainiac is now going to tell me that the uber-CEO couldn't handle the most basic prep function for an interview.
/Cain off
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:39 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at May 23, 2011 11:34 AM (IXLvN)
I vote head in the sand...it all sounds good till the chopping actually effects somebody. Want heads to explode...propose the end to all subsidies, green energy dept hardest hit
Posted by: Red Shirt at May 23, 2011 07:40 AM (FIDMq)
>>>You don't believe a woman should be President... Plain and simple - and no woman would convince you otherwise - especially not one as smokin' hot as Palin.
*slow clap*
Posted by: Jeff B. at May 23, 2011 07:40 AM (hIWe1)
Even among our weakest we are still putting up people who have been proven to be superior to Obama in almost every way. Seriously compare our batting order with the lefts batting order?
They've got one who can hit but cant run, one who can run but cant hit. And a bunch of people hitting on the batboys while trying to get out of having to play. To say nothing of a few so old they are literally buried in the outfield. All this and their policy and worldview playbook is half 1930's socialist and the other "newer" half is 1960's irrational radical.
Posted by: Stankbraham Rincoln at May 23, 2011 07:41 AM (mLAWK)
#230
Palin would be a bad nominee. That is the part that stops me. She can't overcome her negative ratings to win the election.
It is completely irrelevant to talk about what kind of President she would be.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:41 AM (VoSja)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 11:36 AM (SHvKp)
NORAD called.
They say you're all over the place, and ask you to sit the hell down.
"requests" from NORAD ought to be treated as very specific orders.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at May 23, 2011 07:42 AM (lAPtt)
This is only superficially true. I think it is another variation of the perfection fallacy. We went through this already. Reagan signed an amnesty bill. McCain also supported amnesty. So McCain is simply another flawed candidate like Reagan?
I think Tpaw is an acceptable candidate for our side. He will be much better than Obama. Given that Palin is a known quitter, I think she should get in the race to take it to Obama and to defend the Paul Ryan plan. This will allow other candidates to distance themselves from Ryan 's plan. Also she will show herself an idiot and selfish money seeking rube. This will make other candidates look better too. Besides, the Rove wing of the Republican party will work with the MSM to trash her in any case. So other candidates should have nothing to fear from her. Under the heat, she will quit before the campaign will be over in any case. I see more upside to her joining the race now.
Posted by: LAI at May 23, 2011 07:42 AM (R4ub4)
Holding the stick like a baseball bat, Obama said, “if members of Congress aren’t behaving, give ‘em a little paddle, a little hurl.”
What an ass.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 23, 2011 07:43 AM (UOM48)
Palin would be a bad nominee. That is the part that stops me. She can't overcome her negative ratings to win the election.
Ditto.
She ruined her own brand, on her own. No one made her do it. Even with all the demonizing after the election, she could have rehabilitated herself. She didn't.
She did a reality show.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:44 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 23, 2011 07:45 AM (QF8uk)
I believe she was sunk the most by her slut daughter and the crap weasel who was raping her.
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at May 23, 2011 07:45 AM (H+LJc)
John Boehner is superior to Obama in every aspect, but he's still useless.
It's not enough to just win this time. We need someone who will fix things, because we are facing an existential crisis.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 23, 2011 07:45 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: polynikes at May 23, 2011 07:45 AM (T8iAI)
Posted by: Ace's Greatest Hits at May 23, 2011 07:46 AM (a/VXa)
Posted by: Harry at May 23, 2011 07:46 AM (AZd7r)
Posted by: TexMex at May 23, 2011 07:46 AM (uVDzX)
I just did 19 town hall meetings, David, in a district that I work for that went for Obama, Dukakis, Clinton and Gore. People are hungry for solutions, and I really fundamentally believe that the people are way ahead of the political class and I think they're going to reward the leader who steps up to the plate and actually fixes these problems, no matter how much demagoguery, no matter how much distortion, no matter how much political parties try to scare seniors in the next election. I just don't think they're going to buy it this year and they're hungry for leaders to fix this problem before it gets out of our control.
Just exactly how shitty IS his district?!? Good god man.......Dukakis?!? You fucking people ARE on dope.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 23, 2011 07:47 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 23, 2011 07:47 AM (TMB3S)
Like my dad used to tell me: "Think of a person you know who is of average intelligence. Now, realize half the population is dumber than him. And they vote."
Posted by: Troika37 at May 23, 2011 07:49 AM (eqTkp)
You demonstrate what I said up thread, a large portion of the voting public are functionally retarded and need the bread and circuses of modern campaigns. No wonder you support Obama, most idiots do.
Hear, hear!
An empty head is not really empty; it is stuffed with rubbish. Hence the difficulty of forcing anything into an empty head. - Eric Hofer
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 23, 2011 07:51 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 07:51 AM (SHvKp)
#200
That is a nice thing to say, but I feel like we have enough people who know about what is going on. We just don't have the electorate nationally, and it sucks.
Winning a national election in a country with a large and quickly expanding base of Dem voters, means that the median voter is more and more a squishy moderate, rather than a right-leaning independent.
Unless we start winning these voters, as much talking in person with the people we know as with grand political 'strategy', we can't have the policy we want.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:52 AM (VoSja)
I just did 19 town hall meetings, David, in a district that I work for that went for Obama, Dukakis, Clinton and Gore. People are hungry for solutions, and I really fundamentally believe that the people are way ahead of the political class and I think they're going to reward the leader who steps up to the plate and actually fixes these problems, no matter how much demagoguery, no matter how much distortion, no matter how much political parties try to scare seniors in the next election. I just don't think they're going to buy it this year and they're hungry for leaders to fix this problem before it gets out of our control.
Just exactly how shitty IS his district?!? Good god man.......Dukakis?!? You fucking people ARE on dope.
It's a heavily unionized district, is my understanding. Some of the legislators who repeatedly spoke-out against Scott Walker are inside that district and the state senator from Janesville was a fleebagger.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at May 23, 2011 07:52 AM (CLYmB)
Posted by: Jean..not a Palin fan at May 23, 2011 11:51 AM (SHvKp)
Yet you have no proof of any of it. You probably can't win that show either, so not only are you a hypocrite, you're stupid too.
See how easy it is? I just called you stupid without knowing a damn thing about you....just like you did Palin.
Posted by: © Sponge at May 23, 2011 07:54 AM (UK9cE)
BTW- I'm not on Team Pawlenty, he's just the guy making news over the last day or two.
Posted by: DrewM. at 10:24 AMI'm not either, just an analyst doing my job of stabbing Republicans not on my team in the back.
I'm the ARCHITECT, and I'm a Great American. Hannity says so
Posted by: Karl Rove at May 23, 2011 07:54 AM (vdfwz)
Miss'80s, I think the money issue might have been the main reason Huck didn't want to run. He raised about as half as much money in his entire 2008 run as Romney will raise this quarter.
Posted by: Paper at May 23, 2011 07:54 AM (VoSja)
Their whole argument is, PALIN IZ STOOPID!!! HAHA. it's juvenile and infantile and not worth responding to.
Have you ever noticed that when you have a conversation with a lefty on some topic, that their own grasp of liberalism is exceptionally shallow? Here is a typical exchange I might have:
Me: "I don't favor single-payer health care because it would deprive me of the liberty to make choices over the direction of my health care, and my life generally."
Lib: "There he goes with that stupid 'liberty' talk, he is just one of those teabaggers waving around an idiot flag, huhuhuh"
Posted by: chemjeff at May 23, 2011 07:57 AM (7mSYS)
Oddly enough, since Pezzydent Dickmitten has been in office, I've been giving little hurls. Damned inconvenient, and more than a little messy. Which describes the first "lady", I suppose.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 23, 2011 07:57 AM (XyjRQ)
See how easy it is? I just called you stupid without knowing a damn thing about you....just like you did Palin.
Sponge, don't waste your time with that imbecile Jean- it's a known fact that she's completely stoopit, an absolute drooling dunce. Completely known fact.
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at May 23, 2011 07:59 AM (XyjRQ)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at May 23, 2011 08:03 AM (f9c2L)
Who was the governor of Mineeesoetah when Al Franken cheated his way to the US Senate?
You can't lay that at the hands of Pawlenty. The Dem attorney general controlled the recount process; Pawlenty had no real say in the matter.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 23, 2011 08:09 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at May 23, 2011 08:18 AM (ELdDv)
Posted by: Dan at May 23, 2011 08:22 AM (mXBxH)
I test drove a Pawlenty once.
Sure, it had the great hip and head room of a Pacer, but it kind of reminded me of the Â’08 McCain Family Truckster.
IÂ’ve still have my heart set on shiny red Â’12 Palin.
Posted by: jwest at May 23, 2011 08:23 AM (qeYI9)
Politicians are often afraid that if theyÂ’re too honest, they might lose an election. IÂ’m afraid that in 2012, if weÂ’re not honest enough, we may lose our country.
From HA's interview with Pawlenty. If he sticks to this, and that last bit is pure gold, he will be President in Jan. 2013.
Posted by: Rocks at May 23, 2011 08:27 AM (Q1lie)
Who was the governor of Mineeesoetah when Al Franken cheated his way to the US Senate?
You can't lay that at the hands of Pawlenty. The Dem attorney
general controlled the recount process; Pawlenty had no real say in the
matter.
So Pawlenty gets a pass, but you can't cut Palin any slack on her resignation - she should have let the frivolous ethics complaints bankrupt her family because the flawed Alaskan law made her pay for the defense out her pockets, and permitted an infinite number of frivolous complaints.
Posted by: real joe at May 23, 2011 08:29 AM (IpIBJ)
If Pawlenty was to stand behind a podium in Iowa holding an ear of corn aloft and say, "Using one of these for a dildo is an old joke but you're all fucking the world with these right now."
THEN I'd have some respect for him.
Posted by: De' Debil Hisself at May 23, 2011 10:54 AM
If Barack Obama said to the Brits, "While we think your system of government is silly, we still realize your Queen did a great job in Red,"
THEN I'd have some respect for him.
Posted by: arhooley at May 23, 2011 08:33 AM (m3Djl)
Politicians are often afraid that if theyÂ’re too honest, they might lose an election. IÂ’m afraid that in 2012, if weÂ’re not honest enough, we may lose our country.
The trouble is, he whispers.
Posted by: arhooley at May 23, 2011 08:35 AM (m3Djl)
Posted by: John425 at May 23, 2011 08:37 AM (Lx/Bc)
The trouble is, he whispers.
Posted by: arhooley at May 23, 2011 12:35 PM (m3Djl)
No major party nominee whispers.Every word they utter is reported. If he gets the nomination he can whisper all day long and the only person standing between him and it at this point is Romney.
Posted by: Rocks at May 23, 2011 08:43 AM (Q1lie)
Please, tell us what Pawlenty could have realistically done, what choices he had the authority as governor to make regarding the Senate election and the recount.
Palin was in an unfortunate situation, and the left should be shamed for what they did to her and her family. However, as governor, she had some authority to push for a change in the laws.
Posted by: Slublog at May 23, 2011 08:59 AM (0nqdj)
Posted by: andycanuck at May 23, 2011 09:00 AM (wPxqH)
Posted by: Damiano at May 23, 2011 09:19 AM (3nrx7)
I liked this video a lot and then one of my friends said "don't get sucked in by pawlenty, don't get sucked in, his media people are real good but a month in, you'll say to yourself, "this guy is a total wimp".
Posted by: curious at May 23, 2011 09:29 AM (k1rwm)
Y'all have been mighty entertaining this morning.
I haven't laughed this hard in a while.
On a somber note, Reagan carried 49 states, 8 million nuck futted 'conservatives' stayed home in '08, the trick with this election will be to keep ALL the conservatives seriously pissed off right into election day. Trust me when I tell you the bamster is equal to the task.
I'll stick with Sarah.
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at May 23, 2011 09:31 AM (Q1qy3)
>> Drew, why do you hate Pawlenty so much that you sabotage what could have been an honest discussion of his candidacy?
What? How in the world is this "hating" Pawlenty?
Posted by: Dave in Texas at May 23, 2011 09:34 AM (Wh0W+)
Posted by: curious at May 23, 2011 09:36 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Tim the Enchanter at May 23, 2011 09:37 AM (izA2D)
278 Holding the stick like a baseball bat, Obama said, “if members of Congress aren’t behaving, give ‘em a little paddle, a little hurl.”
New Tone and civility
Posted by: Schwalbe : The © at May 23, 2011 09:41 AM (UU0OF)
Palin pushed for and signed the ethics-reform laws that were later used by her opponents to hound her out of office. The charges weren't filed until after Palin became the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee. Ironic, perhaps and after destroying Frank Murkowski's gubernatorial re-election bid, she had enemies in both parties. So, no chance of changing the ethics laws while 15+ frivolous suits were pending. After she resigned, Parnell had zero ethics charges filed against him. IIRC, the law was later changed.
I'm a Palin supporter because the woman is fearless, intelligent, and has the finest political instincts of any politician in either party. On the issues of life, limited government, and the 2nd Amendment, she has been solid and unswerving.
Posted by: mrp at May 23, 2011 09:42 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: rightwingva at May 23, 2011 09:54 AM (pDXql)
Strange how this astroturf on twitter and various blog comment sections just switched instantly from Daniels to Pawlenty. Same scam, new enemy, and one likely high funded candidate who was threatened mostly by Daniels, and now is by Pawlenty.
It's much easier and cheaper to win elections by starting these memes as early as possible. Your opponent has to fight much harder to overcome them, especially if they are currently a Governor and simply unable to juggle doing a good job there with a good job answering every specious claim.
So if you hear something about a candidate that just doesn't seem to show the full source info, assume you're being manipulated.
Posted by: Dustin at May 23, 2011 11:27 AM (Q3nWV)
If Pawlenty best represents the issues you can't compromise on, go for it. Same thing with Cain, Palin, or even Romney. True, there's no such thing as a dream candidate, (Ronulans notwithstanding) but don't make the mistake of thinking conservatives sticking to their guns was what gave us the current situation.
Posted by: The Ghost of Flannery O'Connor at May 23, 2011 02:52 PM (DNX55)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3907 seconds, 430 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Its Morning in the Pension Fund of America at May 23, 2011 06:25 AM (K/USr)