April 13, 2011
— Ace As I noted: The Democrats offered Boehner a crooked "deal" wherein they'd offer some smoke and mirrors only-in-accounting-world "cuts" and all Boehner had to do was say yes and the Democrats would play along and pretend they'd been beaten.
First Boehner announced he would not go along with such a deceit.
And then he did, with the Democrats and their allies in the media playing "the Republicans won" narrative, per the agreement, until the Democrats could contain their quiet victory no longer and began announcing it.
So there you go. We started this process, we thought, with $101 billion in cuts, which we only found out after the election was a promise to cut $61 billion.
Then Hal Rodgers -- who must resign -- had an opening bid of around $30 billion, which the Tea Party got angry about and forced him to push a supposed $61 billion cut, but the hand was tipped, it was clear we were not only not holding out for $61 billion, but if we had our druthers, we wouldn't even start there, nevermind end there.
Then some Tea Party people and the Republican Study Group pushed to get it back up to $100 billion, but leadership, including Eric Cantor, voted that down, and some in our very own party used Democratic language in defending their precious spending, saying the cutters wanted to take a "meat axe" to the budget and hurt people who depend on government.
Then we started cutting every week, which turns out now to have been a scam, because we weren't cutting spending, we were cutting future spending authority which wasn't likely to be spent anyway. In essence, when I thought we were making progress, we were actually just giving the Democrats their way by funding government at the same level as usual.
Then we finally agreed on $38.5 billion. Later inspection checked more closely, and determined that most of that wasn't really cuts at all, but accounting gimmicks, fake cuts, and that the real amount of cuts was around $14 billion.
Then someone noticed -- actually, it's closer to $8 billion.
And now the CBO looks at it.
$352 million, with an m, in cuts. What the government spends in... oh, it's like $6 billion a day, so $352 million is what the government spends in about an hour and twenty minutes.
That's what we fought for in November--so that we could cut the 365 days of spending of 2010 into 354 days, twenty two hours, and forty minutes worth of spending.
Hal Rodgers has to go. Has to go. The party has to demand he resign from his post. There have to be consequences.
Someone has to pay.
The rest have to know they're next. We can't hang them all, but we can hang one of them. To encourage the others.
Biggest spending cut in history, huh?
GOP Leadership Lobbying for Votes: At Hot Air.
F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all.
Posted by: Ace at
02:46 PM
| Comments (364)
Post contains 521 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 13, 2011 02:50 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at April 13, 2011 02:51 PM (v0pFT)
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 13, 2011 02:52 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: Baricolas Ruric at April 13, 2011 02:53 PM (E3JkM)
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 02:53 PM (KVI8B)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 13, 2011 02:53 PM (7RwMf)
Posted by: TheGarbone at April 13, 2011 02:54 PM (KUjSN)
Posted by: fargin iceholes at April 13, 2011 02:54 PM (jn8Kq)
Posted by: Red Shirt at April 13, 2011 02:55 PM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Snoozefest Biden at April 13, 2011 02:55 PM (aa83J)
I had the naive belief that the only way to stop these cocksuckers is a national taxpayer strike. Now I am convinced even that wouldn't stop them; they are completely unmoored from corporeal reality, and nothing - absolutely nothing - will stop them from spending.
Posted by: iowahawk at April 13, 2011 02:55 PM (veL4N)
Yup. I'm definitely done voting. The political class cares nothing for us, no matter what letter they have after their name.
Posted by: Rod Rescueman at April 13, 2011 02:56 PM (HwE/1)
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 13, 2011 02:56 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: sTevo at April 13, 2011 02:56 PM (VMcEw)
Posted by: ParisParamus at April 13, 2011 02:57 PM (bgSjf)
I spent all day buying futures in tar, feathers and rope. I am looking forward to using the items I invested in real soon. Of course, I will have to pay taxes on the short terms gains, but it will be worth it. The only check I wrote to the IRS with a smile on my face.
We got butt fucked by our own party, and they sprinkled sand on the cock that was ramming us. Thanks Boner and Cantor.
We are so screwed.
Posted by: Andrew at April 13, 2011 02:57 PM (QddTs)
And this dream I'm in is becoming predictable.
Tomorrow we'll learn that the deal, in fact, raises spending at least $5B.
Just watch.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 02:57 PM (g73jP)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 02:58 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: iowahawk at April 13, 2011 06:55 PM (veL4N)
Who you gonna call?
Posted by: Ghostbusters at April 13, 2011 02:58 PM (sOtz/)
Only in a dream would a political party with momentum and the "right side" of an issue give away the store for three magic beans.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 02:58 PM (g73jP)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 13, 2011 02:58 PM (7RwMf)
Posted by: jwpaine at April 13, 2011 02:58 PM (FUozQ)
Posted by: lauren at April 13, 2011 02:59 PM (KRkoe)
Hal Rodgers has to go
Along with pretty much ENTIRE republican "leadership" in both fucking houses. Kiss our asses already. Go back to being a part time job, which is a SACRIFICE you make to server your COUNTRY not your lust for power. Congress is like Oracle. You fucking service it, it doesn't service you.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 13, 2011 02:59 PM (cniXs)
My DOOM train still has plenty of room for new passengers. Join my cult, kids. Get a free WE ARE SO BONED t-shirt! When I ask you to hold the FBI at bay at my mountain compound while I escape with all of your money, you'll understand that it's only a kind of tough love.
Posted by: Monty at April 13, 2011 02:59 PM (FC+dS)
Only in a dream would a political party with momentum and the "right side" of an issue give away the store for three magic beans.
And only in a dream would said party get blamed as irrational extremists by the media. Can red states just secede?
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 02:59 PM (zgZzy)
We're all on Chantix now.
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (7RwMf)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (zgZzy)
"Is six feet of rope too inflammatory?"
Soak it in lighter fluid first. Nice neck burns to go with the hanging!
Posted by: Andrew at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (QddTs)
F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all.
2012? Who cares?That's the spirit. Like I said earlier: If the worthless fucks in the GOP cared one damn bit about controlling the size and growth of government, they would have ended mandatory withholding yesterday.
That's the only way to bring this whole fucking scam to a screeching halt--when the taxpayers realize just how much damn money they are taking and then bribing you into compliance through a paltry-ass "refund" once a year, they'll scream bloody murder and run the worthless assholes out of town.
Who fucking cares indeed? It's not like one of those bastards do--they got theirs and fuck you for daring to question them.
Posted by: jimmuy at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (LkNeJ)
At least he (or she) will be able to blame all this shit on Barrack Hussein Obama
Posted by: sTevo at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (VMcEw)
Don't address me in that tone. I chair the appropriations committee.
Now go fetch me a bucket of KFC.
Posted by: Hal fuckin' Rodgers!! at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (SwkdU)
Posted by: Onlooker at April 13, 2011 03:00 PM (9f7qj)
Now we can see why PP, NPR, OCare and the EPA all came out unscathed. There were no cuts. There will be no cuts. They will keep blowing smoke up our asses until we all look like chimneys.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 13, 2011 03:01 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at April 13, 2011 03:01 PM (zpByr)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at April 13, 2011 03:02 PM (9eDbm)
2012? Who cares?
we all do, Ace, including you. we're all fighting the best way we know how, or can. do.not.give.up.
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at April 13, 2011 03:02 PM (GStPL)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (zpByr)
French peasnants were at starvation levels for 14 years before somebody decided to storm the Bastille.
May as well pack it up, start storing food and ammo. We are not going to change anything simply by voting Republican.
Posted by: USS Diversity at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (gJNMj)
Posted by: theadmiral at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (lUdKU)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (+vkOU)
Posted by: Dan at April 13, 2011 03:03 PM (mXBxH)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:04 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Chuckit at April 13, 2011 06:57 PM (G+sxF)
A lawyer. Seriously, behind every asshole Republican is a JD.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 13, 2011 03:04 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: USA at April 13, 2011 03:04 PM (YZISw)
I like John Boehner but he's in way over his head.
He's no Newt Gingrich. Yeah, Newt got rolled a little bit by Clinton, but Newt had balls and Newt was a leader.
The difference between Newt Gingrich and John Boehner is that Newt EARNED his Speakership; he fought for it and he deserved it.
John Boehner stumbled into the Speakership by happenstance -- he happened to be at the right place at the right time. But he did no heavy lifting to get the job. We GAVE him the job -- The TEA PARTY gave him and that fuck Hal Rogers their new jobs.
now I'm getting angry...
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:04 PM (UQjUb)
...If the worthless fucks in the GOP cared one damn bit about controlling the size and growth of government, they would have ended mandatory withholding yesterday. ...
Posted by: jimmuy at April 13, 2011 07:00 PM (LkNeJ)
Cut. Jib. Newsletter.
Posted by: Warthog at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (k9Ylc)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (9eDbm)
Posted by: mare at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (A98Xu)
Posted by: blaster at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (Fw2Gg)
So is bankruptcy a political strategy at this point? Do you vote for Emperor Zero in 2012 and root for the Dems burn it to the ground? Would default actually stop anything?
Posted by: Just Another Rube at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (JEvSn)
When you do, keep religion out of it, because if you don't, that would be cultic.
Posted by: sTevo at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (VMcEw)
Time to start over. Wholesale purging of D.C. and every of its tentacles is an absolute need.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 13, 2011 03:06 PM (swuwV)
I had the naive belief that the only way to stop these cocksuckers is a national taxpayer strike. Now I am convinced even that wouldn't stop them; they are completely unmoored from corporeal reality, and nothing - absolutely nothing - will stop them from spending.
Posted by: iowahawk at April 13, 2011 06:55 PM (veL4N)
I really wonder, given the speed of the printing presses, why they bother taxing at all?
Ah, yes, the punishment factor.
Posted by: Randy at April 13, 2011 03:07 PM (D0PNd)
Posted by: Dan at April 13, 2011 03:07 PM (mXBxH)
It's clear to most, we must vote these cocksuckers out of office and replace them with patriots. They fucked us, and we must return the fucking. And with extreme prejudice.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 03:07 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 13, 2011 03:07 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Mayan Calendar at April 13, 2011 03:07 PM (xs5wK)
I swear I think when you get elected and go up there for your freshman indoctrination they give you a pill, red for R-Marxist and blue for D-Marxist but the point is
It starts in law school, I'm telling you. That's where you fall in love with government. That's where you think of yourself as an elitist who knows better than the rest of us.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 13, 2011 03:08 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 13, 2011 03:08 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: goozer at April 13, 2011 03:08 PM (F1aIq)
Someone has to pay.
Oh, you can count that.
The rest have to know they're next. We can't hang them all, but we can hang one of them. To encourage the others.
People dependent on the government for their daily sustenance +
People dependent on affirmative action +
Union workers +
Gay rights activists +
Feminists +
Illegal immigrants +
Hard core leftists +
= A majority of America
That's your real problem.
Posted by: RayJ at April 13, 2011 03:08 PM (2oRAd)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 03:08 PM (+vkOU)
And only in a dream would said party get blamed as irrational extremists by the media. Can red states just secede?
I do believe that has been discussed before.
Posted by: Randy at April 13, 2011 03:09 PM (D0PNd)
Posted by: Alex #11 at April 13, 2011 03:09 PM (A2w5y)
For CA, blame the CA GOP. They're the bastards that didn't do shit to help Carly.
Posted by: Rum, Goddess of Doom & Sith Apprentice at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (YxBuk)
Jeebus on a motherfucking slice of white bread. I don't even know what to say. Right now I could pummel the living hell out of somebody. They can't be this damn stoopid. This was done on purpose. There's no question about it anymore. Any ignorant shit with a damn GED could have done better than this.
I'm so damn pissed off I can hear my blood pulsing.
Posted by: Steph at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (AkdC5)
WY
"Let's all uproot and move to Texas! Build a wall and let the rest of the country go all Road Warrior."
TX is going full blown wetback/scratch back. Don't put your faith there. Look at the statistics on white/black/hispanic, and then panic.
TX talks a good line, but it is changing fast.
Posted by: Andrew at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (QddTs)
Posted by: LGoPs at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (lHn6+)
Did I say you could speak? Now hurry up with that chicken, and make sure it's the Extra Crispy kind.
Posted by: Hal f'in Rogers at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (SwkdU)
Since I'll end up behind barbed wire soon anyway, I'm thinking of printing my own 20 dollar bills and passing them off on naive, pimple faced clerks at Kroger.
I gotta save money somewhere, dammit!
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (OgDRw)
You know what I saw on the way home, tonight in MA?
A red Toyota Prius...with Texas plates...
and a Ron Paul for president '08 bumper sticker.
thought it was funny...and it kinda made me think maybe Dr Paul's criticism about our spending was and is 100% right.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:10 PM (g73jP)
I used 'magic beans' a couple of weeks ago on Dwight.
Posted by: jim halpert at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (Y1DZt)
You know, I always used to laugh at idots that talked about a 3rd party.
After today? Not so much....not so much.
Posted by: Max Power at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (q177U)
From HA:
Update: NRO reports that Boehner, Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy were still busy making the pitch as of this morning. Freshman Tim Huelskamp, noting that $352 million is less than $2 per U.S. citizen, is unpersuaded:
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (penCf)
For CA, blame the CA GOP. They're the bastards that didn't do shit to help Carly.
Figures. Screwed as a party.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Soona at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (5FMhB)
Is it too much to ask for a list that doesn't discount things on whims?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (uVLrI)
Tell me again why I should vote for these Republican ass clowns. I am a libertarian. I shoudl vote that way.
Posted by: california red at April 13, 2011 03:11 PM (7uWb8)
They fucked us, and we must return the fucking.
Just make sure you use their dicks. Use your own, and any slight chance you may have had at 'ette ass is gone gone gone.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 13, 2011 03:12 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: Alex #11 at April 13, 2011 03:12 PM (A2w5y)
Since I'll end up behind barbed wire soon anyway, I'm thinking of printing my own 20 dollar bills and passing them off on naive, pimple faced clerks at Kroger.
I gotta save money somewhere, dammit!
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 07:10 PM (OgDRw)
High schoolers in OH just did this. But they were caught by a Wendy's clerk.
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 03:12 PM (penCf)
Let that sink in.
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 07:08 PM (+vkOU)
So I should invest in a really nice moped, helmet and orange flag?
Thanks for the head's up, yo.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 03:12 PM (OgDRw)
Posted by: Whatever! at April 13, 2011 03:12 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 03:14 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Alex #11 at April 13, 2011 03:14 PM (A2w5y)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at April 13, 2011 03:14 PM (cDRYC)
Posted by: Jon at April 13, 2011 03:14 PM (Xt7UU)
Posted by: Todd at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (9TcI8)
Boehner has been all over twitter today talking about how real the cuts were and they weren't just accounting gimmicks but fuck him. I was okay with the 38 billion, and hell i was even ok with the 14 billion because a cut is a cut. But I am livid about this. How can the GOP expect to be taken seriously if all they do is cave and roll over for the dems? I half expect to find out that Ryan's budget plan actually increases spending instead of seriously curtails it.
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (YhZFe)
You should probably stop. Liking people and then watching them fuck you over is no way to go through life. An amicable front man is not to be befriended. These people colluded on a fraud. At least with a Progressive, you know your enemy. Now we see our "allies" aren't.
Epic lying from the Dems I expected. Epic, intentional fail from the GOP I didn't. Not this time. There will be repercussions.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (uVLrI)
"F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all."
Not before the plug is irreversibly pulled on the dollar. Up until then, there's still a chance to avert disaster.
Posted by: Old Sailor at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 07:11 PM (penCf)
It's about $1.15.....less than a 1/3 gallon of gas.
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (VuLos)
Obama stands a very good chance to be re-elected.
Pretty hard to beat Obama without a challenger. So I'll go even further and say that Obama has a 99.9% probability of being reelected.
We'll get a challenger, eventually.
But the question remains: Will said challenger put up a challenge?
We have to be perfect in 2012 to beat Obama. No fuckups, no mis-steps, no kissing up to the middle or the media.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:15 PM (UQjUb)
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 07:07 PM (ZHsNw)
Meh, I don't give a fuck anymore. We just did that remember? When we do it we just go after the ones we just elected because they aren't giving us everything we want right fucking now!
If you read the article it isn't as bad as ace or the headline says it is. At worst the cuts made may not save money in the next six months. Like the highway fund money may not have been released this year but next year. Whether it's was going to be spent this year or next year now it isn't going to be spent.
On the other hand cuts to pell grants that will only save $1 Billion this year will save $40 Billion over the next ten years and those were permanent cuts.
If we are only going to give these guys three months on the job to fix 10 years of fuckups then what's the point. You are setting them up for failure so why work to elect them or replace them?
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 03:16 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: newrouter at April 13, 2011 03:16 PM (6BXlQ)
Posted by: Darth Prevaricator at April 13, 2011 03:16 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: William at April 13, 2011 03:16 PM (77TeU)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (081kp)
The CBO already scored it*, as did Heritage. It doesn't.
*They also hit it with partisan analysis afterward
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (uVLrI)
High schoolers in OH just did this. But they were caught by a Wendy's clerk.
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 07:12 PM (penCf)
So, don't pass off my counterfeit loot at Wendy's?
Thanks for the tip!
pssst, I'll hook you up with some Bomb Burritos from Speedway for the down low *wink, wink*
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (OgDRw)
It's about $1.15.....less than a 1/3 gallon of gas.
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 07:15 PM (VuLos)
Someone needs to buy a new electric car!
Posted by: Randy at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (D0PNd)
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (BvTwT)
Posted by: Drew in MO at April 13, 2011 03:17 PM (n6NRR)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:18 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: Upside to the Zombie Apocalypse at April 13, 2011 03:18 PM (gJNMj)
Excuse my fucking language but I am fucking pissed off.
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 03:19 PM (KVI8B)
Who gives a shit if Obamma is re-elected.
Today = game over. I'm going to start stocking up on drinking water. (and toilet paper)
Posted by: Max Power at April 13, 2011 03:19 PM (q177U)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 13, 2011 03:19 PM (fjoLg)
141 We need fucking term limits so these fucking fucks aren't so concerned about their re-election and start concentrating on what is fucking good for this country.
Agreed, but it'll never happen. Who votes to end their own meal ticket?
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:20 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: blaster at April 13, 2011 03:20 PM (Fw2Gg)
It's okay. It's spread cross the 57 states so, it all evens out.
Posted by: Whatever! at April 13, 2011 03:20 PM (piMMO)
Oh, and fuck you.
Posted by: jwpaine at April 13, 2011 06:58 PM (FUozQ)
jwpaine 2012! I like your platform.
Posted by: Princess Barry at April 13, 2011 03:21 PM (vIWL2)
That's my entry for the name of the new nation. (you know there's no other solution, really)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at April 13, 2011 07:13 PM (G/MYk)
I'll give 2012 a decent chance ( my hopes are diminishiing, though). If nothing changes after that and we get the same old tired shit, then let the sucession begin. I'll be all in. We'll literally have nothing to lose at that point.
Posted by: Soona at April 13, 2011 03:21 PM (5FMhB)
Posted by: Dan at April 13, 2011 03:21 PM (mXBxH)
You'll love me, I've already gone bankrupt, three/four times, I can take the country there before you can say "debtor in possession".
Did I mention I also hate guns and don't drink?
Posted by: H Ross Trump at April 13, 2011 03:21 PM (JpFM9)
Also, GET OUT OF DEBT RIGHT NOW! The government is almost guaran-tee going to collapse now. I think we'll all survive just fine, but if you expect anything, ANYTHING from the govn'ment to keep you alive, just start fucking your ass with household objects now. Save some damn time.
Posted by: William at April 13, 2011 03:22 PM (77TeU)
2012? I would care if I thought that the Communists would allow us to win. But we are not in a legitimate nation anymore, and the courts have held that the whims of the President/GodEmperor is more important than actual law, and the President and his co-conspirators are dyed-in-the-wool evil tyrannists (is that even a word? Nevermind, I am coining it.) dedicated to the destruction of our free society and the enslavement ("restricting rights for the betterment of the society") of all of us.
I sincerely doubt that any sham election will have any consequences. They will not allow 2010 to occur again. Ever.
So yeah, I understand, Ace.
Unfortunately, I really understand.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at April 13, 2011 03:22 PM (odfEr)
UN: Stabilization and Reconciliation Key in Ivory Coast
With the arrest on Monday of former Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo signaling an end to the post-election violence that has rocked the country for the past four months, the head of the U.N.Â’s peacekeeping mission in Ivory Coast, Choi Young-jin, said the challenge now will be to restore law and order and start the process of national healing.
The envoy briefed the U.N. Security Council via a video link from his headquarters in Abidjan. He said there are four major challenges that need the immediate attention of President Alassane OuattaraÂ’s administration.
"The first challenge is the restoration of peace and law and order throughout the country, particularly in Abidjan. The second challenge is the prevention of any further human rights abuses and violations and the delivery of humanitarian assistance - especially in the western part of the country where several serious problems have already been reported. The third challenge is national reconciliation. On this score, President Ouattara has been making a very clear stance in favor of reconciliation as opposed to retribution. The fourth and perhaps most formidable challenge awaiting the Ivorian people, appears to be national reconstruction - particularly with regard to the promotion of education, creation of youth employment, addressing the land ownership problem, poverty eradication and economic development," he said.
Posted by: momma at April 13, 2011 03:22 PM (penCf)
Posted by: George Orwell
(runs across the room with fingers in ears)
LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at April 13, 2011 03:23 PM (GStPL)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 13, 2011 03:23 PM (EiH7n)
Absolutely spot on. Indeed, it's clear at this point that they think deficits are completely meaningless; so why the fuck should we send them taxes at all?
In fact, I say let them continue to pay their loyal, vote-casting parasites. In "dollars," a/k/a Imperial Magic Bean Credits. The rest of us can create our own private currency.
Posted by: iowahawk at April 13, 2011 03:24 PM (veL4N)
How many democrats will bohner need to get this shit sandwhich passed? Cause I'm thinking the republicans rats are about to jump over board.
Yeah, I said it! RATS!
Posted by: Max Power yelling like that Levin guy! at April 13, 2011 03:24 PM (q177U)
Posted by: LGoPs at April 13, 2011 03:24 PM (lHn6+)
That's my entry for the name of the new nation. (you know there's no other solution, really)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at April 13, 2011 07:13 PM (G/MYk)
I already have the new name selected- The People's Republic of Obamaland. My people are working on the logo.
Posted by: Princess Barry at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (vIWL2)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (TMB3S)
"So John Q. Public is wheeled in with an arterial bleeder, and Dr. Reid says a bandaid should fix it, while Dr. Boehner wants one of those little 3" gauze squares. They compromised on a 2" gauze pad, but with only one strip of tape."
Posted by: Alex at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (/yzYn)
141
We need fucking term limits so these fucking fucks aren't so concerned
about their re-election and start concentrating on what is fucking good
for this country.
Agreed, but it'll never happen. Who votes to end their own meal ticket?
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 07:20 PM (zgZzy)
Oh yes, I know. But a girl can dream, can't she? A girl can fucking dream...
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (KVI8B)
Posted by: Mr Diddy Wah Diddy at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (62eAJ)
So will the republican elitists ass rape the new 87 members of the house, or will they be allowed to quietly return to their homes with their ball sacks attached?
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: g at April 13, 2011 03:25 PM (LJBsr)
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 13, 2011 03:26 PM (FYCiJ)
That's my entry for the name of the new nation. (you know there's no other solution, really)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at April 13, 2011 07:13 PM (G/MYk)
I'm leaning more towards something like: The Constitutional Union of Fuck All the Rest Of You All.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 13, 2011 03:26 PM (6IReR)
Oh yes, I know. But a girl can dream, can't she? A girl can fucking dream
Dream away!!! Better than facing reality.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:26 PM (zgZzy)
...If you read the article it isn't as bad as ace or the headline says it is. At worst the cuts made may not save money in the next six months. Like the highway fund money may not have been released this year but next year. Whether it's was going to be spent this year or next year now it isn't going to be spent.
On the other hand cuts to pell grants that will only save $1 Billion this year will save $40 Billion over the next ten years and those were permanent cuts...
That's indeed what it says. CBO has tallied immediate savings of discretionary according to bizarre budgetary rules. I want a complete and total list of what they predict is gone but not necessary by the end of this year.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (ZGhSU)
Posted by: Mr Diddy Wah Diddy at April 13, 2011 07:25 PM (62eAJ)
Bath house again?
Posted by: Bruce at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: John Fucking McCain at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (+vkOU)
you're a girl?
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 07:26 PM (UQjUb)
And probably a girl with hooter's and stuff.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 03:27 PM (KVI8B)
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 13, 2011 03:28 PM (FYCiJ)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 03:28 PM (+vkOU)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:29 PM (uVLrI)
All they have to say is, "I don't know why most people keep paying their taxes. All that happens we politicians and bureaucrats waste and squander it. I mean really: Does anyone think they are getting a good deal for the amount of taxes they are paying?"
You thought Trump was stirring up shit?
Posted by: jimmuy at April 13, 2011 03:29 PM (LkNeJ)
I wonder if the Romans, as the Empire was collapsing, sat around and said "Wow. I am witnessing the fall of the Roman Empire".
Probbly not. It took their Empire hundreds of years to fall. Longer than we've even been around.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 13, 2011 03:29 PM (lHn6+)
The budget cannot be fixed. The GOP knows the voters will never stand for austerity, even if the end is collapse.
They are merely taking the path of least resistance until that collapse.
Posted by: Radiant at April 13, 2011 03:29 PM (dQdrY)
I'll bite - who is Hal Rodgers?
Here's a clue. Hal Rodgers Parkway used to be name Daniel Boone Parkway.
They should have renamed ATM's instead.
Posted by: Wink Dinkelman at April 13, 2011 03:30 PM (j/Hny)
The CBO already scored it*, as did Heritage. It doesn't.
*They also hit it with partisan analysis afterward
Oh I know. I actually like Ryan. I trust him and I would love to see him take the Presidential Oath of Office in 2013. But pretty much 95% of the rest can go to hell.
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at April 13, 2011 03:30 PM (YhZFe)
F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all.
2012? Who cares?I recall Ace smacking me down for saying something similar.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 13, 2011 03:30 PM (ZGhSU)
Probbly not. It took their Empire hundreds of years to fall. Longer than we've even been around.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 13, 2011 07:29 PM (lHn6+)
They had Nero, we got Toonces.
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at April 13, 2011 03:30 PM (6IReR)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (KVI8B)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (zgZzy)
I still can't get over the fact that John Boehner gave up the Debt Limit card in exchange of for nothing.
Actually he did get something, I'm sorry.
He got a barrage of nasty insults and ludicrous smears from the Democrats and Obama.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (g73jP)
Hal Rodgers has to go. Has to go. The party has to demand he resign from his post. There have to be consequences. Someone has to pay. F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all.
2012? Who cares?
But see, Ace, here's the problem with that. Let's say that Rodgers doesn't "go"; then you get even more pissed and demand that our House majority ALL pay. So then you get a bunch of us to stay home in November 2012. Next day we get up and discover that not only has Obama been re-elected, and Harry Reid is still Senate Majority Leader, but Nancy Pelosi has gotten back the Speaker's gavel.
Question for you: How does that help our cause?
Who cares? YOU should. We ALL should. We HAVE to. It was just this kind of "the hell with it all" attitude in 2006 that handed the whole kit & kaboodle to those Donk animals in the first place. Think we'd be looking at Debtageddon today if we'd had Boehner & McConnell at the helm and Bush/McCain at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue? Once you stop emoting, your answer will be "hell, no." But nooooo, all you tighty-righties had to take a walk on them, and we ended up with the Three Horsepersons of the Donkalypse. And now you want to do it again! It's like digging yourself into a huge hole you can't climb out of and then blaming the shovel.
The lesson you're refusing to learn? It can get worse. A lot worse. And a lot quicker. When the GOP is in power, if nothing else, it means the Dems aren't. And that can at least buy some additional time, even if only to go down, like the band on the Titanic, with some semblance of dignity.
Or maybe the economy'll collapse this summer and this budget fiasco will turn out to not have mattered.
And they say I can't be optimistic.
Posted by: JASmius at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (qtCHY)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 03:31 PM (+vkOU)
That's what's important. Not reality.
No wonder Pimco unloaded all their Treasuries. Bond holders will have to take a haircut soon. Just like GM bondholders. A 95% fucking haircut.
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 13, 2011 03:32 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at April 13, 2011 07:27 PM (vbh31)
Yeah, but I'm damn tired of waiting to bloody some fucking noses. I want to see some gushing, mile high, arterial bleeds.
Posted by: Steph at April 13, 2011 03:32 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at April 13, 2011 03:32 PM (npr0X)
Posted by: x11b1p at April 13, 2011 03:33 PM (nVLlM)
My wife is a prosecutor, and she fights the good fight just the same as you. Our side needs lawyers too.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 13, 2011 07:19 PM (fjoLg)
It was in 2008, when we were told that Barack Obama, only by virtue of having graduated from law school, was a certified genius.
Law school has no math.
Law school has no dissertation.
Law school has (almost) no foreign students.
Nobody ever flunks out of law school (except Al Gore).
There are inanimate objects that have almost graduated from Yale due of their lack of grades.
They have formed themselves into an oligarchy. Despite being an (entirely too large) 1% of the population, they are 1/3rd of the House of "Representatives", half of the Senate, all of the Judiciary and most of the executive branch. Look at Michelle Obama's job in Chicago -- lawyers are qualified for every job possible!
It doesn't occur to them that they don't know everything about everything, they went to law school.
The last time a country had a perfumed, out-of-touch elite like this, they sent them to the guillotine.
Lawyers are the KY jelly for corruption. You hire a lawyer to get around the law, not to enforce it. If the law were enforced properly, Lawyerbot 3000 could do all that you need. Why do you think Tom Hayden was so important to the Corleone family?
Having lawyers run government is a disaster because they don't operate like productive people. To a productive person, tedious unnecessary paperwork takes time from valuable labor. To a lawyer, tedious unnecessary paperwork is the whole point of the job -- they're paid by the hour.
Don't blame me for hating lawyers, when drooling idiot graduates from journalism school look with fawning admiration toward lawyers as an intellectual elite (and, from their perspective, they're right), you can't blame me for the antipathy.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 13, 2011 03:34 PM (T0NGe)
will the republican elitists ass rape the new 87 members of the house
Let's pray its the 87 freshman ass raping the elites.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 13, 2011 03:34 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 13, 2011 03:34 PM (+vkOU)
Make that 'wink, nudge'...ugh
I kinda like "wing-nudge"...they pretend to be right wing, but they nudge the RATS and enable the looting of the peasantry.
Posted by: USS Diversity at April 13, 2011 03:34 PM (gJNMj)
The GOP knows the voters will never stand for austerity, even if the end is collapse.
You're probably right; that is indeed their thinking.
It makes no sense because they were voted for in the first place to make BIG cuts in spending. But all they want to do is please the center-left, the people who hate them.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:35 PM (UQjUb)
Here's a clue. Hal Rodgers Parkway used to be name Daniel Boone Parkway.
They should have renamed ATM's instead.
I live right off of KY-80 and I voted for Rodgers opponent in November. Hell the only good thing about him is that Hal Rogers Parkway is a nice drive
Posted by: hueydiamondpooty at April 13, 2011 03:35 PM (YhZFe)
What the fuck are you talking about? Our cause is to get rid of everybody. And teach lessons. And use "primary" as a verb. And be, like, noble an' shit. Or something. Now get out of my bushes and go pre-pre-order my book.
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 13, 2011 03:36 PM (FYCiJ)
Somewhere deep in my reptile brain I have to think that this is a ploy. That there is some larger 3D chess going on for our country's betterment.
Then I remember that asshole Stupak, and those fucking choads who made that possible.
Then, I lose all hope.
I hate politicians...
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at April 13, 2011 03:36 PM (iJYib)
Posted by: thirteen28 at April 13, 2011 03:36 PM (AbmsP)
Posted by: theadmiral at April 13, 2011 03:36 PM (lUdKU)
The cut from a few big programs and agencies and that's it. They don't cut any departments, they don't cut foreign aid, they don't cut all of the bat shit taste test studies, they don't cut the farm subsidies, they don't cut the subsidies to giant corporations who don't need them, they won't consider scraping the tax system and replacing it with something even microscopically fair, they won't look at all of the redundancies on redundancies that pervades government. And then the fucking staff sizes of the congressmen themselves for cripes sakes.
The could literally cut a quarter of the governments budget and not cause a ripple in the cesspool that is Washington.
This just sucks and we are doing it to ourselves and allowing it to be done to us.
Obama gave it away in his speech yesterday when he said that "if we really do believe in creating the progressive society that we want". The motherfucker is out to destroy this country and it is his stated goal.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 13, 2011 03:36 PM (jx2j9)
If you volunteer, it's not rape. And: no.
Fuckin' pervy robot.
Posted by: fluffy at April 13, 2011 03:37 PM (SwkdU)
I have to ask this: Mr. Ace of Spades, why are you freaking out so?
Maybe you aren't, and I'm just misreading it -- but it really seems like you're freaking out an awful lot lately.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 13, 2011 03:37 PM (5/yRG)
Also have a few questions:
(1) When a program expires, what happens to the money? Does it go back into the system or do they just shove that money elsewhere?
(2) Anyone familiar with CBO scoring tactics?
Why are recissions, reserve funds, and mandatory spending cuts automatically excluded under budgetary scoring processes? Why does this also happen to anything that doesn't have immediate impact?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:38 PM (uVLrI)
Yeah, but I'm damn tired of waiting to bloody some fucking noses. I want to see some gushing, mile high, arterial bleeds.
Posted by: Steph at April 13, 2011 07:32 PM (AkdC5)
Would you like a cookie?
We're hiring, by the way.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 03:38 PM (bxiXv)
Yes. It calls for spending over 20% of an implausibly grown GDP—and higher federal tax receipts than have ever been seen in American history. To do what with them? Class? What does the government do with your money? Right. Spend it.
Some people want to be boned by an accountant. I don't get it. It's a thing.
Posted by: oblig. at April 13, 2011 03:38 PM (xvZW9)
Posted by: iowahawk at April 13, 2011 06:51 PM (veL4N)
Hands in the air for the whole ride, everyone!
Posted by: That guy who says "Hands in the air!" at April 13, 2011 03:38 PM (QR9PP)
Posting links on this blog is a pain in the ass, and I posted 3 over there, so I'll just post 1.
I think it is quite illuminating, really. Buck up! Got a real stand up guy running on a tea party platform in Florida for 2012, and I think I even found Lindsay Graham's spine.
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 03:39 PM (SwWT6)
O/T You know what's more irritating than Hannity playing Obama clips all the time?
Hannity playing the WRONG Obama clips all the time and having to listen to Teh Won's voice twice as necessary.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 03:39 PM (OgDRw)
BTW anybody need a math tutor for their kids. I know some real nifty tricks.
Posted by: P T Barnum at April 13, 2011 03:39 PM (pOC9r)
Somewhere deep in my reptile brain I have to think that this is a ploy. That there is some larger 3D chess going on for our country's betterment.
Then I remember that asshole Stupak, and those fucking choads who made that possible.
Then, I lose all hope.
I hate politicians...
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at April 13, 2011 07:36 PM (iJYib)
There's the problem...there is no 3D chess going on. The only thing these bastards care about is keeping their job and getting that nice fat paycheck and pension. They don't give two craps about you or me. We're just stupid taxpayers who keep sending them our money.
Posted by: Geronimo at April 13, 2011 03:39 PM (KVI8B)
holy shit, how did we not see this coming?
Enough talk about keeping our powder dry. I don't EVER want to hear that again.
brb...
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at April 13, 2011 03:40 PM (UQjUb)
Little tease:
“There is nothing that I will not do to right this wrong,” Graham said. “I talked to the vice president. I made it clear to him that none of their nominees are going forward, that the squeaky wheel seems to get the oil. Well, nobody’s going forward in the Senate until we address this.”
Woh, Lindsay! Way to go to bat! Way to stick it to them and fight for us!
He wants $50k in pork.
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 03:40 PM (SwWT6)
I have to ask this: Mr. Ace of Spades, why are you freaking out so?
Maybe you aren't, and I'm just misreading it -- but it really seems like you're freaking out an awful lot lately.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 13, 2011 07:37 PM (5/yRG)Jane, not everyone is as self sufficient as you or I. Have you done any "sangin'" while out foraging? Here at the Boogie Southern Compound I know folks roundabouts that have done sangin' to raise a few bucks.
Posted by: That guy who says at April 13, 2011 03:41 PM (QR9PP)
Does no one here or in the media understand the difference between obligational authority (AKA "appropriations"), obligations, and outlays? Congress grants obligational authority, not obligations or outlays.
Deficits/surplusses are the difference between revenues and outlays. Outlays lag obligations (often by years), and obligations lag obligational authority (usually by months). The "budget deal" pertains to obligational authority.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 03:41 PM (U2BT3)
Oh, hush up and keep that powder dry, honey.
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 13, 2011 03:42 PM (FYCiJ)
^ This is a statement from the WaPo. I want a real, meaningful tally and not want CBO "believes".
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:42 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: K~Bob left on his dirty, dirty sock at April 13, 2011 03:42 PM (QR9PP)
O/T You know what's more irritating than Hannity playing Obama clips all the time?
Hannity playing the WRONG Obama clips all the time and having to listen to Teh Won's voice twice as necessary.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 07:39 PM (OgDRw)
WTF are listening to Hannity for? He's a RINO stool pusher. Fuck him and fuck the Fox PeRINO Network.
Posted by: Barbarian at April 13, 2011 03:42 PM (EL+OC)
Does no one here or in the media understand the difference between obligational authority (AKA "appropriations"), obligations, and outlays? Congress grants obligational authority, not obligations or outlays.
Deficits/surplusses are the difference between revenues and outlays. Outlays lag obligations (often by years), and obligations lag obligational authority (usually by months). The "budget deal" pertains to obligational authority.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 07:41 PM (U2BT3)
Huh?
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 03:42 PM (VuLos)
TRILLIONs of dollars in debt? Fuck you, poor optics.
$50,000.00 for start up the feasibility studies and such for my next big corrupt business hand out? I WILL SHUT THIS PLACE DOWN!
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (SwWT6)
Posted by: Kensington at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (mEyVv)
Allen West? Ruling Class cocksucking RINO. I told you people and told you and told you and told you but you just WOULDN'T LISTEN.
Posted by: Christine O'Donnell at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (FYCiJ)
We're hiring, by the way.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 07:38 PM (bxiXv)
If blood shooting out of my eyes is one of the requisite skills, I'm highly qualified.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (AkdC5)
Here's a clue. Hal Rodgers Parkway used to be name Daniel Boone Parkway.
They should have renamed ATM's instead.
I live right off of KY-80 and I voted for Rodgers opponent in November. Hell the only good thing about him is that Hal Rogers Parkway is a nice drive
Dad is from Blue Diamond (Hazard). Did you get stuck behind that big truck hauling a 12 ton solid block of coal on the way to Mount Rushmore?
Posted by: Wink Dinkelman at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (j/Hny)
Posted by: Turd Ferguson at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (6yyVB)
Deficits/surplusses are the difference between revenues and outlays. Outlays lag obligations (often by years), and obligations lag obligational authority (usually by months). The "budget deal" pertains to obligational authority.
So how does that change this picture?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (uVLrI)
Does no one here or in the media understand the difference between obligational authority (AKA "appropriations"), obligations, and outlays? Congress grants obligational authority, not obligations or outlays.
Classic lawyer talk.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (ZHsNw)
I am not surprised. They're all the same. Every time we vote, it doesn't actually do anything.
Throw them all out. Exile them. Burn their homes so they cannot return. Piss in their bathwater. All that.
Start anew with more stringent restrictions upon the government and tell the hangers on and bleeders to go fuck themselves. If they don't like it, they can move to Mexico or one of those Eurpoean countries which is now figuring out that, hey... socialism really doesn't work!
Posted by: soulpile is.. expendable at April 13, 2011 03:43 PM (gH+Hj)
Like you weren't doing that already, what with all the prosperity O-Dumbfuck has brought you.
Posted by: K~Bob took off his dirty, dirty sock at April 13, 2011 03:44 PM (QR9PP)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at April 13, 2011 07:43 PM (G/MYk)
Hell, he'd be better than the current Prezzzzzzzzident of the Senate.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 13, 2011 03:45 PM (T0NGe)
Why are recissions, reserve funds, and mandatory spending cuts automatically excluded under budgetary scoring processes? Why does this also happen to anything that doesn't have immediate impact?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 07:38 PM (uVLrI)
The CBO scored this on how it would affect the deficit this year. So if the money doesn't go out the door in september but October it doesn't affect this years deficit. It will affect next years.
Mandatory spending is spending already athorized under previous legislation like Pell grants. There is a certain amount of money that is mandatory that it go to that department each year whether they spend it that year or not. If they didn't spend it they keep it and spend it next year. For instance you could get a pell grant in September but your tuition wouldn't be due until December, they would pay that out of last years funds.
The CBO only scored it on what checks would be written by sept. 30.
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 03:45 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Spliff Menendez at April 13, 2011 03:46 PM (NHlhT)
If there's a spending cut at all, it sure as hell isn't in discretionary spending.
FY2010 discretionary spending outlays (via the CBO) - $1,347 billion
FY2011 discretionary spending outlays (via the CBO) - $1,365 billion
I may be but a public-school graduate, but the last I checked, $1,365 billion was higher than $1,347 billion, not less.
Posted by: steveegg at April 13, 2011 03:46 PM (o44nj)
Here's a clue. Hal Rodgers Parkway used to be name Daniel Boone Parkway.
They should have renamed ATM's instead.
I'll have a little "Hal Rogers," Please
Posted by: Client No. 9 at April 13, 2011 03:47 PM (QR9PP)
My wife is a prosecutor, and she fights the good fight just the same as you. Our side needs lawyers too.
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at April 13, 2011 07:19 PM (fjoLg)
Hey, I hate lawyers too! Don't forget me!
The purpose of a lawyer is to facilitate the transfer of all wealth from the rest of the world to lawyers. This is done by creating an unnavigable maze of laws, regulations, and rules, and requiring you to hire them to navigate it. You pay them more than any other tradesman, and if you don't you suffer fees, penalties, and then get sued on top of it all.
My Dad's a lawyer. He *hates* lawyers.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 03:47 PM (bxiXv)
Tami
Somewhat shorter version: The deficit is based on outlays. The reduction in outlays from the recent budget deal (which reduces obligations, not outlays) will occur over years.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 03:47 PM (U2BT3)
Mandatory spending is spending already athorized under previous legislation like Pell grants. There is a certain amount of money that is mandatory that it go to that department each year whether they spend it that year or not. If they didn't spend it they keep it and spend it next year. For instance you could get a pell grant in September but your tuition wouldn't be due until December, they would pay that out of last years funds.
The CBO only scored it on what checks would be written by sept. 30.
Which is what I thought, but it changes this picture from what is being reported. Immediate savings are also not equal to actual cuts.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 03:47 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: Chris at April 13, 2011 03:47 PM (GT1x2)
I'm voting democrat. I want it to fucking BLEEEEEEEEEEED!!!!
I want to see the piq squeel and writhe as the maggots maggots gorge on its pustulent flesh.
Posted by: Max Power at April 13, 2011 03:48 PM (q177U)
WTF are listening to Hannity for? He's a RINO stool pusher. Fuck him and fuck the Fox PeRINO Network.
Posted by: Barbarian at April 13, 2011 07:42 PM (EL+OC)
Yeah, I know. I guess I like him because he seems to be a genuinely regular guy, albeit naive as hell.
That and local AM programming kinda sucks around here.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 03:48 PM (OgDRw)
Posted by: Better Homes and Bunker at April 13, 2011 03:49 PM (fb52c)
I may be but a public-school graduate, but the last I checked, $1,365 billion was higher than $1,347 billion, not less.
Posted by: steveegg at April 13, 2011 07:46 PM (o44nj)
You just don't have those highfalutin' business school skills.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (AkdC5)
"Our Speaker negotiated, outnumbered 3-1"
Don't you SEE? How GOOD he did against such ODDS?
There is gonna be a BIG tea party soon. The sweeping has just begun. Its gonna be a long haul, but giving up is... giving up.
Liberty or Death. I'm goin down swingin.
Posted by: PHenry at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (oOXkS)
But they've screwed us too often, we don't trust any long-term plans.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: MostlyRight at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (LaqL2)
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 13, 2011 07:43 PM (ZHsNw)
Dazzle them with bullshit.
Posted by: Radiant at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (dQdrY)
If blood shooting out of my eyes is one of the requisite skills, I'm highly qualified.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 07:43 PM (AkdC5)
Can you make blood shoot out of other people's eyes? That would be more useful.
When you shoot blood out of your eyes, does it blind people and make then run in circles and scream?
Maybe that's what happened to the Honey Badger last night.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 03:50 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: K~Bob at April 13, 2011 03:51 PM (QR9PP)
That and local AM programming kinda sucks around here.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 07:48 PM (OgDRw)
If you live in the Seattle area you are forgiven because nothing sucks worse than AM radio in Seattle. LOL
Posted by: Barbarian at April 13, 2011 03:51 PM (EL+OC)
Radiant
It may sound like Greek but it's not bullshit. It's how the federal financial system works.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 03:52 PM (U2BT3)
Posted by: Soona at April 13, 2011 03:53 PM (5FMhB)
Posted by: The Electorate Entire at April 13, 2011 03:53 PM (QR9PP)
Posted by: AD at April 13, 2011 03:54 PM (4b8Gq)
So how does that change this picture?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 07:43 PM (uVLrI)
It's like the $1.5 Billion cut in High Speed Rail. Obama wanted 8 Billion. None of that money was going to be spent this year so there is no credit on the deficit for this year for the $1.5 Billion.
Next year when the money would have gone out will be $1.5 Billion less.
What the republicans did was cut from authorised spending for this year. That doesn't mean the money would have been spent this year though. The deficit is the amount of checks we write this year and the CBO is only counting that.
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 03:54 PM (MtwBb)
"GOP: We want 100 billion in cuts.
Dems: No way, too much.
GOP: Alright. How about 110 billion?
Dems: Wait, what?
GOP: 120 billion.
Dems: You're crazy.
GOP: 130 billion."
That is my idea of how to conduct the FY 2012 budget negotiation, about every time the House effort gets rejected by the Senate or vetoed by OBummer.
ALL THE WAY to a Government shutdown, and into election season.
Posted by: jwb7605 at April 13, 2011 03:55 PM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 13, 2011 03:56 PM (ZGhSU)
Can you make blood shoot out of other people's eyes? That would be more useful.
When you shoot blood out of your eyes, does it blind people and make then run in circles and scream?
Maybe that's what happened to the Honey Badger last night.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 07:50 PM (bxiXv)
Oh, you just don't know. I'm one scary ass bitch when I'm angry. I've been known to make big ass, grown men cower in fear. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry. And, right now, I'm really, really angry.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 03:56 PM (AkdC5)
You just don't have those highfalutin' business school skills.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 07:50 PM (AkdC5)
I'll run it by my CFO co-blogger.
Posted by: steveegg at April 13, 2011 03:56 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at April 13, 2011 07:52 PM (G/MYk)
They already voted to repeal Obamacare and sent it to the senate.
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 03:56 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: gus at April 13, 2011 03:57 PM (Vqruj)
i'm wondering , are all these guys being blackmailed?
i just don't know what to think so my mind is going wild here.
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 03:57 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: John Boner at April 13, 2011 03:57 PM (mEyVv)
i'm wondering , are all these guys being blackmailed?
i just don't know what to think so my mind is going wild here.
It's simple: they're in on the scam.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 13, 2011 03:58 PM (ZGhSU)
Well, the next time I get a fundraising letter from the NRCC, I know how much to send them.
Posted by: chemjeff at April 13, 2011 03:59 PM (czcue)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at April 13, 2011 03:59 PM (mEyVv)
robt
Close enough for government work! (Couldn't resist.)
What the republicans did was reduce the amount of money the Executive Branch can obligate ... commit to, via various forms of contracts and grants ... in the current Fiscal Year. Outlays ... checks written ... against such contracts and grants always lag the obligations/commitments, often by several years.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 03:59 PM (U2BT3)
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 04:00 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 04:01 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 04:02 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 07:59 PM (U2BT3)
Right, but the CBO scored it on what money would be actually spent this year. It's apples and oranges.
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 04:03 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: gus at April 13, 2011 04:04 PM (Vqruj)
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 04:05 PM (U2BT3)
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 07:58 PM (h+qn
Tonight, drinking hard liquor on an empty stomach.
Tomorrow, do all the shzt Glenn Beck has been talking about (other than his bizarre posturing and love for that weasel, Huntsman, Jr.). Build up your own self-reliance.
Posted by: K~Bob at April 13, 2011 04:06 PM (QR9PP)
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 08:01 PM (h+qn
Our homey Hastings:
http://tinyurl.com/3rpxr6q
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 04:06 PM (OgDRw)
laughing
my country tis of thee , sweet land of liberty of thee i sing..sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing; land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrims' pride, from every mountainside let Freedon ring.
do kids sing that anymore?
weeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 04:06 PM (h+qn8)
Boehner just released this
Posted by: booger at April 13, 2011 08:03 PM (9RFH1)
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 04:07 PM (VuLos)
robt
Totally agree. Apples and oranges. With an Ugli or two thrown in.
That's why Ace's (and Rush's. And Levin's. Etc.) hysterics are so off the wall. They know not what they do, and are playing into the Dem's hands.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 04:08 PM (U2BT3)
Oh, you just don't know. I'm one scary ass bitch when I'm angry. I've been known to make big ass, grown men cower in fear. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry. And, right now, I'm really, really angry.
Posted by: Steph, Sith apprentice on bended knee at April 13, 2011 07:56 PM (AkdC5)
Hired.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2011 04:09 PM (bxiXv)
from Boogers article cuts in bill
and will result in $315 billion worth of savings over the next decade
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 04:09 PM (h+qn8)
Boehner on Hannity now, tape delayed.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 08:08 PM (OgDRw)
Why you might care, I don't know.
Posted by: ErikW at April 13, 2011 04:10 PM (OgDRw)
Then I remember that asshole Stupak, and those fucking choads who made that possible.
and since Stewie is hanging out with Planned Parenthood, these daze, can we all NOW refer to all those little busted up skeletons, as having been STUPAKED.
to much?
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at April 13, 2011 04:10 PM (GStPL)
What has Rand said about this?
He's thinking about filibustering but he hasn't committed himself to it yet.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 04:10 PM (uVLrI)
Boehner just releasedthis
Posted by: booger at April 13, 2011 08:03 PM (9RFH1)
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 08:07 PM (VuLos)
You should delete that post. Ace and a bunch of the commenters are getting their rightous rage on and ready to vote for the peace party.
You shouldn't try to stop them with actual facts or anything.
Posted by: robtr at April 13, 2011 04:11 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: booger at April 13, 2011 08:03 PM (9RFH1)
Posted by: Tami at April 13, 2011 08:07 PM (VuLos)
Hmmmmm. Could Ace be wrong? Could the "bipartisan" CBO be blowing smoke up our asses just to get us pissed off at repubs?
Posted by: Soona at April 13, 2011 04:16 PM (5FMhB)
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) confirms that the spending cut agreement on the House floor tomorrow will cut spending by nearly $40 billion – or $78.5 billion less than President Obama proposed in his FY 2011 budget. These are real cuts and will result in $315 billion worth of savings over the next decade.
Posted by: mfm willow at April 13, 2011 04:16 PM (h+qn8)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 04:18 PM (uVLrI)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 13, 2011 04:20 PM (mHQ7T)
F*** it all. Shut it down. Burn it down. The hell with it all.
2012? Who cares?Couldn't have said it better myself
Posted by: brak at April 13, 2011 04:22 PM (nIoiW)
233 Well thank you for the snarky, assholish response.
Here's the way I look at it; the options if you will:
1) primary the people in out -- that could work, or it could blow up in everyone's faces: I really don't think a Congress full of Christine O'Donnells is going to help, but if you throw in Trump as president it could make for some serious entertainment (yes, the trouble I see is people falling for whoever says the right things, at least enough people to sway an election); besides, even if you did get the very best and most patriotic people out there it could still not work (or not work as quickly as everybody wants, and then what?)
2) third party -- but honestly I'm not sure that's really workable (see above)
3) revolution, secession!!!! Ok, ok, tree of liberty and all that, but people could wind up in a helluva lot worse shape on the other side of one of those (revolutions usually don't end well, just ask the French or the Russians or even the Germans when they decided tossing the decrepit Weimar Republic, ask a few million Africans for that matter) -- and secession...yeah, like the country is just going to voluntarily break apart all peacefully and shit, hahahhaa
4) massive protests -- could work, but then again first hint of violence (even manufactured) we could have martial law declared, and then we are at #3 or the screws really get tightened down (ask the old Soviet bloc countries about how that worked), which usually doesn't end well, so it would have to be played pretty cool (which I'm not sure people are going to be capable of at this point)
5) default -- ah forget it, nobody likes that option
6) sit tight and see how this plays out
And the outlying unknown here is: a big enough terrorist attack or natural, non-man caused disaster and even the best roadmap out of this mess goes belly up along with the economy, and then the whole global house of cards goes "poof" too (which kinda makes running off to another country not such a viable option either, unless you can live in a gated community and hire your own private security firm...and evne then you never know).
Now, that's pretty grim...but freaking about it really isn't going to help one damn bit, not one. In fact, it might be playing right into the hands of the Dems (I'm beginning to believe this more and more). They want you to get really, really upset. I would advise not giving it to them.
Anyway, those are what I see as the end game options -- pick one.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 13, 2011 04:31 PM (5/yRG)
Miss'80sBaby
was wondering what I would do, without you around, puttin some knowlege to us...i see you've decided not to take a few days off.. *thanks for all you do*
Posted by: pitchforksandpowder at April 13, 2011 04:33 PM (GStPL)
Posted by: The Great State of Florida at April 13, 2011 04:34 PM (KUjSN)
Posted by: Spike at April 13, 2011 04:37 PM (WLxeI)
@12: "On the plus side, max out your credit cards, the Yellowstone caldera is even bigger than previously thought!"
How big is thought?
Posted by: James Taranto at April 13, 2011 04:39 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Damiano at April 13, 2011 04:39 PM (3nrx7)
Posted by: John Musser at April 13, 2011 04:47 PM (Qbs3S)
was wondering what I would do, without you around, puttin some knowlege to us...i see you've decided not to take a few days off.. *thanks for all you do*
Thank you for the compliment.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at April 13, 2011 04:50 PM (uVLrI)
All of you who have your panties in a twist over this: you are being played.
Given the "sanctity" of existing contractual agreements, there is no way in hell that federal OUTLAYS could be cut by $100 billion for the current fiscal year.
Could. Not. Legally. Be. Done.
The game is necessarily about limiting new contractual obligations in FY2011, thereby limiting outlays pursuant to those contracts in future years. Anybody who tells you otherwise is either uninformed or playing you.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 05:00 PM (U2BT3)
I know something that would work....
Posted by: Arnaud Amalric at April 13, 2011 05:00 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: Bugler at April 13, 2011 05:00 PM (VXBR1)
Yes; it offers far too quick a release. Piano wire and meathooks enhance the experience so much more.
Posted by: Arnaud Amalric at April 13, 2011 05:04 PM (xy9wk)
Welcome to the party pal!
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at April 13, 2011 05:07 PM (Q1qy3)
That's why it pains me to see so much thought and so many words put into this when it could all be explained once and then everyone would understand.
They're all stealing from us.
They're all stealing our freedoms and destroying everything good.
They just use different faces to do it.
Hey, I like the puppet on the left...no, no, no the puppet on the right is more to my liking.
Change is no longer available at the ballot box. Pixels aren't going to solve the problem either.
Action is now required.
Posted by: Oh, Hi Mark at April 13, 2011 05:07 PM (DoTwI)
Posted by: cackfinger at April 13, 2011 05:08 PM (HpG1y)
Posted by: R. Sherman at April 13, 2011 05:09 PM (aMXGk)
Posted by: proreason at April 13, 2011 05:11 PM (+8dSJ)
What a fucking hypocritical piece of shit.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at April 13, 2011 05:15 PM (AB8DI)
Posted by: Shiggz at April 13, 2011 05:18 PM (mLAWK)
Given what's to come, an awful lot of people can probably say that now. Most of them don't know it yet, but that won't change the outcome.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 13, 2011 05:18 PM (xy9wk)
Now there's one hell of a campaign slogan!
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 13, 2011 05:21 PM (xy9wk)
Nobody ever flunks out of law school (except Al Gore)."
And our resident taxpayer supported half-wit drags out his two favorite lines of bullshit:
1. Law schools have relatively few foreign students for a simple reason: they don't teach foreign law. Unless a foreigner wants to work in a law-related field in the US, or work back home as an expert in US law, there is no reason for them to come here.
2. Yeah, no one ever flunks out at all. There are schools that cut the entire bottom third of the class at the end of One L. I guess those folks would be happy to know that the schools were just kidding.
And while you're on about how great math is, take a wild guess about who fucked up the economy with all those new investment strategies. A bunch of math and hard science majors in the big Wall Street firms coming up with utterly shitbrained schemes.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 13, 2011 05:28 PM (xy9wk)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 13, 2011 05:32 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: cackfinger at April 13, 2011 05:38 PM (HpG1y)
Posted by: DaMav at April 13, 2011 05:47 PM (QNU76)
Posted by: BuddyPC at April 13, 2011 05:49 PM (N/Bgb)
Posted by: BuddyPC at April 13, 2011 05:52 PM (N/Bgb)
Where do I pick up my pitchfork? Evidently, nobody in Washington will understand anything less. Honestly, something has to be done.
I expect a rollcall posted alongside your links to other blogs that shows exactly who voted for this monstrosity and who was wise enough to vote against it. Not one thin damned dime will ever grace the campaign coffers of any coward who votes in favor of this sell out.
Posted by: slackmac at April 13, 2011 05:59 PM (MiOtx)
Please make sure that every damned one of them is held accountable!
Posted by: slackmac at April 13, 2011 06:03 PM (MiOtx)
Oh, it was that, too.
The CRA, Fannie and Freddie, etc., piled up the kindling.
But the "quants" in the financial sector doused it with gasoline.
Almost everyone was to blame - except for the non-deadbeat homeowners who did everything right but got screwed anyway.
We turned an extra tenth of the population into (nominal) homeowners over the course of about 20 years. We then created a bubble based on the delusion that the value of their (and everyone else's) homes would go up 10% or more each year, forever. No one wanted to kill the goose ... but eventually it choked on its own fat.
No One Is Innocent.
Posted by: Knemon at April 13, 2011 06:11 PM (nsxc+)
Posted by: Rollory at April 13, 2011 06:15 PM (RutCd)
Posted by: DieTrying at April 13, 2011 06:21 PM (+6REq)
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofensmirtz at April 13, 2011 06:24 PM (jtrzE)
All of you who have your panties in a twist over this: you are being played....Could. Not. Legally. Be. Done.
Bullshit.
Laws. Can. Be. Repealed.
It's a feature of our bicameral legislature. There is NO LAW that is passed by Congress which cannot be repealed. Period.
They were supposed to do what we sent them to do. They did not, and are using the rule of thumb that you are thinking is actually Constitutional limits and making the same mistake as you are.
In short, no, they are lying and you are the one being played.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at April 13, 2011 06:26 PM (odfEr)
Posted by: The Great State of Florida at April 13, 2011 08:34 PM (KUjSN)
We're in!
Posted by: The Great Besieged State of Arizona at April 13, 2011 06:35 PM (DRR4t)
When I think of how the mountain of regulations, taxes, bureaucratic legislative authority and bureaucratic sloth, it's like looking at the Rockies, hoping to level them with a teaspoon.
Bone-age, anyone?
Posted by: The Great Besieged State of Arizona at April 13, 2011 06:42 PM (DRR4t)
Can't we all just get along?
Posted by: Pablo at April 13, 2011 06:57 PM (1fuCG)
Im actually sad that Ace and all you others thought this would actually work and bought into the fairy tail.
Sorry Ace but gettin played is what they teach in first term DC 101.
Posted by: Rich K at April 13, 2011 07:08 PM (X4l3T)
Posted by: Dr. Heinz Doofensmirtz at April 13, 2011 07:19 PM (jtrzE)
So yeah, Paul Ryan. I'm all in.
Posted by: Killface at April 13, 2011 07:27 PM (7lAxC)
Posted by: cackfinger at April 13, 2011 07:31 PM (HpG1y)
Posted by: canada at April 13, 2011 07:58 PM (RNVJh)
Heinie -
The only stage of federal funding that the Legislature controls is obligational authority ... permission for the Executive to make contractual commitments up to a certain dollar level. Outlays ... actual payments ... pursuant to those contracts are established by the terms of each contract. (I'm using "contract" rather loosely here.) The deficit is strictly a revenue-minus-outlay matter, and is affected by the obligational authority only in the long run. The lag can be months to years.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 13, 2011 08:01 PM (U2BT3)
Posted by: hare at April 13, 2011 08:19 PM (UTbqL)
All of you who have your panties in a twist over this: you are being played....Could. Not. Legally. Be. Done.
Bullshit.
Laws. Can. Be. Repealed.
Yeah. I love how the people who write the laws complain about being bound by them.
Until they violate them, and then they're totally fucking exempt.
Almost as rich as when they fuck up their taxes, and then complain how complicated the tax laws are.
WHO THE HELL WRITES THEM THAT WAY?
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 08:25 PM (SwWT6)
Kudos to WSJ:in January, they warned against Boehner supporting big-spending Hal Rogers in Appropriations,.
Wait wait wait. Wait.
Wait.
Wait.
Wait.
None of this is Boehners fault! It's all that nasty blackguard Hal Rogers. He stabbed Boehner in the back. Just because he's the leader doesn't mean you can blaim him for insubordinate subordinates! How could poor Boehner have known?
You're telling me Boehner's support put the dude in there?
Wait.
Wait.
Wait.
It'll come to me.
Just wait.
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 08:32 PM (SwWT6)
And while you're on about how great math is, take a wild guess about who fucked up the economy with all those new investment strategies. A bunch of math and hard science majors in the big Wall Street firms coming up with utterly shitbrained schemes.
Right... Wallstreet is chock full of physicists and nary a lawyer in sight.
Posted by: Entropy at April 13, 2011 08:37 PM (SwWT6)
Posted by: JCred at April 13, 2011 09:11 PM (w4AJI)
57 WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO STOP FUCKING US
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 13, 2011 07:02 PM (pdRb1)
</quote>
When we start fucking them..........All of them.
Posted by: John Galt at April 13, 2011 09:49 PM (XGTye)
Inspector Dipshitz -
Congress can change a law, yes
Ok, hey thanks for the personal attack and insult.
Sorry, if Congress is making contracts with vendors for periods extending beyond that Congress's Term (2 years) then, Constitutionally, those contracts are not valid after the next Congress is voted in. That's why multi-year contracts must continually be called back up in committee and reviewed during each term of Congress - but it is a usurpation of the Will of the Governed for a rule allowing a former Congress the ability to limit the power of the next Congress. It's fundamentally contrary to our system of Government. (Article 1 Section
But, they have a trick to get around that Constitutional limit. It's not a contract. It'what we've been yelling about- Mandatory expenditures and programs.
Mandatory (Medicade, etc) programs have, in their enabling legislation the trick of avoiding being put on an appropriations bill by mandating by law the funding once. That isn't a contract, and is not covered under the UCC or any contract law.
It is law itself, and can and should be repealed. At least, the "mandatory" funding part - and by passing that repeal, Congress itself cannot be sued or charged. Hell, Constitutionally, it would be completely legal for Congressman Barney Frank to stab anyone he wants with a katana in the aisles of the House if he was on his way to vote. Or play Tetris like a fiend, or whatever those dingbats do all day in there. So the idea they are bound or likely to be punished is false - Constitutionally.
But, the Federal Government is fatally broken so I wouldn't be surprised if the Congressional herd is so out of touch with the concepts of our Federal Republic that they don't realize any of this.
Anyway, a mandatory program's funding is not actually "mandatory". It's there for convenience, but a Congress can choose to either repeal that section of the enabling legislation or it can get some balls and state, "Article 1 Section 1 vests each Congress with certain powers which cannot be shared with another body; Article 1 Section 8 clearly outlines the limits of the power of the purse to each Congress in turn. Thus, any argument that the 101st Congress can tie the hands and usurp the vested power of the 112th Congress is false. Each "mandatory" program passed by a prior Congress shall be re-authorized by each Congress as it Wills."
And there is nothing anyone can do in that case.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at April 13, 2011 10:02 PM (odfEr)
You all can say what you want, honey badger don't give a shit.
#282 is spot on. Hookers and blow (before it's too late)
Posted by: wearesofuckeditsnotevenfunny at April 13, 2011 10:03 PM (rFRNQ)
#282 is spot on. Hookers and blow (before it's too late)
Oh, good, at least I'm not the only moron advocating the Charlie Sheen Lifestyle™.
I guess this really points up the need for the government (all of them) to abide by the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) before actually tackling budget issues.
As my dear ol' dad used to say, numbers don't lie but liars can figure.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at April 14, 2011 05:08 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Ago Solvo at April 14, 2011 06:04 AM (k8JkR)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3476 seconds, 492 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Clearly they have nothing but contempt for us.
Posted by: blindside at April 13, 2011 02:49 PM (x7g7t)