February 11, 2011

Arizona Countersues US, Citing Fed's Failure to Control Border
— Ace

...resulting in huge costs due to an "invasion" of illegal immigrants.

The lawsuit claims the federal government has failed to protect Arizona from an "invasion" of illegal immigrants. It seeks increased reimbursements and extra safeguards, such as additional border fences.

Brewer's court filing serves as a countersuit in the federal government's legal challenge to Arizona's new enforcement immigration law. The U.S. Justice Department is seeking to invalidate the law.

"Because the federal government has failed to protect the citizens of Arizona, I am left with no other choice," Brewer said as sign-carrying protesters yelled chants at her and at other champions of the immigration law.

Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler declined to comment on the filing.

A flack for Obama said the suit was meritless and then, believe it or not, played the Patriotism Card -- he claimed that this suit "belittled" the "good men and women in uniform" on border duty.

Seriously?

I had an idea about that rancher being sued by illegal immigrants -- there's a type of lawsuit called a "reverse eminent domain" suit, where the plaintiff alleges that the government has taken his property without compensation, and without legally recognizing that they've taken it (or, actually, taken away his intangible rights to do with it as he wishes or his right to quiet enjoyment of it), and so sues the state to formally recognize this as a taking and so compensate him fairly under the Fifth Amendment.

The US government, through the courts, stripped this man of his right to quiet enjoyment of his property and to enjoy it solely. They have, essentially, created an easement (a legal right of way trumping the property owner's right) on the property for the use of illegal immigrants.

The government took part of his property for a federal illegal-immigrant throughway easement and he should sue to force them to compensate him.

Posted by: Ace at 08:19 AM | Comments (120)
Post contains 330 words, total size 2 kb.

1 As I said on this one yesterday, I wish she had submitted that as a Writ of Mandamus so that it would go straight to SCOTUS.

Posted by: Rick O'Connell at February 11, 2011 08:21 AM (M9Ie6)

2
Napolitano has decreed the border is secure.

Posted by: Soothsayerwing Plover at February 11, 2011 08:21 AM (uFokq)

3

Good. I've long wanted to see the Govt. justify abrogating one of their most basic responsibilities.  

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 11, 2011 08:22 AM (xMT+4)

4 Oops, sock off

Posted by: Vic at February 11, 2011 08:22 AM (M9Ie6)

5
Acutally, Napolitano said, "A secure border doesn't necessarily mean a sealed border."

I shit you not; that's what she said.

Posted by: Soothsayerwing Plover at February 11, 2011 08:22 AM (uFokq)

6 Acutally, Napolitano said, "A secure border doesn't necessarily mean a sealed border."

I shit you not; that's what she said.

Posted by: Soothsayerwing Plover at February 11, 2011 12:22 PM (uFokq)

Could this fucking woman be any dumber?

Posted by: Hedgehog at February 11, 2011 08:24 AM (Rn2kl)

7 5. She was thinking of her underwears

Posted by: BlackOrchid at February 11, 2011 08:25 AM (SB0V2)

8 An unsealed border is by it's very nature insecure, Madam Skunkpatch.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 11, 2011 08:26 AM (xMT+4)

9

Acutally, Napolitano said, "A secure border doesn't necessarily mean a sealed border."

Did Napolitano say what secured border meant?  I'm betting NO.  Her arguments are similar in quality to what you get from trolls on blogs.

Posted by: Speller at February 11, 2011 08:27 AM (J74Py)

10 Interesting choice by Arizona to use the term "invasion" in the suit. I believe a state has a right, under the constitution, to protect itself from invasion if the US does not.

Posted by: Dr Spank at February 11, 2011 08:28 AM (1fB+3)

11 The Obama family should go camping on the AZ border this summer.  Just to show us how safe it is.

Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 08:28 AM (UOM48)

12 Could this ******* woman be any dumber?

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no. 

Posted by: Bag O'Hammers at February 11, 2011 08:29 AM (3ll0O)

13 The powers that be have determined that you don't need a secure secure border.  Now go back to eating your unsalted, blanched brussel sprouts and quit your bitching.

Posted by: kathysaysso at February 11, 2011 08:29 AM (ZtwUX)

14
Her implication was that we have 'control' over almost every single mile of our Northern and Southern borders.


Posted by: Soothsayerwing Plover at February 11, 2011 08:30 AM (uFokq)

15 I believe a state has an OBLIGATION to do so.

Posted by: blindside at February 11, 2011 08:33 AM (x7g7t)

16 Anyone else seeing the front page of the blog san serif?

Posted by: Roadking at February 11, 2011 08:33 AM (JzKy8)

17

You know, I'm getting so sick and tired of our current administration and the way they are destroying America from within.  The sad thing is, I think it's going to be 6 years not 2 years before we will be rid of the scourge that is Obama.  I am completely exhausted as I helplessly watch our great Republic go down the tubes. 

 

Posted by: runningrn at February 11, 2011 08:33 AM (ihSHD)

18

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no.

We concur with your well-reasoned opinion.

Posted by: Box of Rocks at February 11, 2011 08:35 AM (b6qrg)

19

Anyone else seeing the front page of the blog san serif?

yes

Posted by: Ben-Free Logprof/nickless prisoners of conscience at February 11, 2011 08:35 AM (wuv1c)

20 Be gentle with Barry, runningrn.  Remember, Oprah tells us he's in a learning curve.

Baby steps.

Heh.  Rush is bitch-slapping Barry right now.

Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 08:36 AM (UOM48)

21 Yes on the san serif. Weird.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 11, 2011 08:37 AM (xMT+4)

22 Roadking at 16 - That happens to me from time to time especially if I try to load many pages at once. After a certain amount of time the page loads with no formating.

Posted by: Have Blue at February 11, 2011 08:37 AM (mV+es)

23 I am completely exhausted as I helplessly watch our great Republic go down the tubes. Posted by: runningrn at February 11, 2011 12:33 PM (ihSHD) yeah but hey, look at it this way, you got a ring side seat?

Posted by: nevergiveup at February 11, 2011 08:37 AM (0GFWk)

24

Posted by: nevergiveup at February 11, 2011 12:37 PM (0GFWk)

But do you have popcorn and valu-Rite?

Posted by: Hrothgar at February 11, 2011 08:39 AM (DCpHZ)

25

 >>> Yes on the san serif. Weird.

And a little slower as well?  Takes awhile to scroll.

Ace - you slowed my scroll.

Posted by: Roadking at February 11, 2011 08:39 AM (JzKy8)

26

Anyone else seeing the front page of the blog san serif?

I figured it was some "sand serif" support-for-Egypt thingie.

Or a fuck up.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 11, 2011 08:39 AM (XdlcF)

27

Section 4 - Republican government

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

 

I've been waiting for Arizona to figure this one out.  Its TWO issues...

1. Protect the against Invasion. 

2. Upon application of the Legislature or of the Executive AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

And on a side note, the exact same "clause" of the Consitution which gives the Congress the power to make and enforce Immigration law, ALSO says that all bankruptcy laws shall be uniform... yet... go look at what some states exclude in bankruptcy proceedings... its different from State to State...

Posted by: Romeo13 at February 11, 2011 08:40 AM (AdK6a)

28 I restlessly await an end of The Era of Stupidity, in this country.

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 08:41 AM (OlN4e)

29

Yeah, it kinda looks like it "loads" twice in rapid succession. 

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 11, 2011 08:41 AM (xMT+4)

30 Front page and comment pages are loading normally for me now. No issues with speed or formatting, serif or otherwise. Using IE8 on this machine.

Posted by: Have Blue at February 11, 2011 08:41 AM (mV+es)

31 26

Anyone else seeing the front page of the blog san serif?

I figured it was some "sand serif" support-for-Egypt thingie.

Or a fuck up.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 11, 2011 12:39 PM (XdlcF)

What... Sand's in town?

Posted by: The Spirit at February 11, 2011 08:42 AM (AdK6a)

32

The sad thing is, I think it's going to be 6 years not 2 years before we will be rid of the scourge that is Obama. 

Hold fast. There is an outside chance that we could take the Senate in 2012 even if The Vapid One™ manages to get reimmaculated.

Just think of the fun we could have if we had large enough majorities in Congress to turn it into a veto-overriding machine, rendering him a lame-duck president for four years.

I could open a container of pudding just at the thought of it...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 11, 2011 08:43 AM (b6qrg)

33

>>> I restlessly await an end of The Era of Stupidity, in this country.

The Era of Stupidity = Smart  Power

The Era of Stupidity = Adults in Charge

The Era of Stupidity = Etc, etc....

Posted by: Roadking at February 11, 2011 08:43 AM (JzKy8)

34 We could encircle Mubarack in the White House and chant "Get Out! Get Out!" in Egyptian.

Posted by: t-bird at February 11, 2011 08:43 AM (FcR7P)

35 I love when liberals attempt to play the patriotism card. It invariably comes off as disingenuous and highlights just how little these dipshits understand what makes the States exceptional.

Posted by: BackAsswards at February 11, 2011 08:44 AM (OCO/h)

36 yeah but hey, look at it this way, you got a ring side seat?

Oooooh Pretty Fires.

Where's my fiddle?

Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 11, 2011 08:44 AM (0q2P7)

37

New Font.  Really ties the room together. 

Posted by: garrett at February 11, 2011 08:44 AM (XgJoj)

38 I love when liberals attempt to play the patriotism card. It invariably comes off as disingenuous

It is the equivalent of "we'll double your order, you pay only shipping and handling".

Posted by: pep at February 11, 2011 08:46 AM (3ll0O)

39

 We could encircle Mubarack in the White House and chant "Get Out! Get Out!" in Egyptian.

"No Barky, No Jarret, No Jizya!"

Posted by: garrett at February 11, 2011 08:46 AM (XgJoj)

40 maddog @ 28: Don't hold your breath.

Posted by: that guy who never underestimates the power of Teh Stupid at February 11, 2011 08:47 AM (uPUfN)

41

Just think of the fun we could have if we had large enough majorities in Congress to turn it into a veto-overriding machine, rendering him a lame-duck president for four years.

Yeh, but look at all the international fuck ups and corruption he and his cronies are accomplishing. Congress couldn't do much to stop that.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 11, 2011 08:50 AM (XdlcF)

42 The Era of Stupidity =Change

Posted by: Buzzsaw at February 11, 2011 08:50 AM (tf9Ne)

Posted by: melvin at February 11, 2011 08:53 AM (3OCZw)

44 Just think of the fun we could have if we had large enough majorities in Congress to turn it into a veto-overriding machine, rendering him a lame-duck president for four years.

If you get there, you impeach his ass.

Posted by: grognard at February 11, 2011 08:55 AM (NS2Mo)

45 Sadly, there's no real hope or change on the horizon for Arizona. Justice Department seeks to "invalidate the law", the Administration is right behind them. Why would the Feds under their current ideology even pretend to want to seal the floodgates from legions of guaranteed Dem voters (provided they can register).

Posted by: BackAsswards at February 11, 2011 08:56 AM (OCO/h)

46 If you get there, you impeach his ass.

Ooh, I'd like some of those Congressmens doing things to my ass.

Posted by: Barack H. Obama, Man's Country Lifetime Member at February 11, 2011 08:56 AM (p05LM)

47 We could encircle Mubarack in the White House and chant "Get Out! Get Out!" in Egyptian Indonesian.

FTFY

Posted by: Armando at February 11, 2011 08:58 AM (nd0uY)

48

OT

Link

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 08:58 AM (OlN4e)

49 O'er the ramparts we crawled, where the welfare lay streaming.

Posted by: La Raza at February 11, 2011 08:59 AM (93Qr2)

50

Congress couldn't do much to stop that.

I have to admit a bit of inexperience on my part, but I'm pretty sure that Congress could start stripping away some of the powers they have given presidents over the years.

I need to find a way to keep my own spirits up. I think it could work even though it might take a more concerted effort than conservatives summoned in 2010 to take the House. Quite a few senators are up for reelection in 2012, many of them Dims. Since many state houses went red this last time, redistricting could be one weapon in the arsenal.

I remain optimistic even though I expect no viable presidential candidate from the GOP. There are alternatives...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at February 11, 2011 09:02 AM (b6qrg)

51 45 Sadly, there's no real hope or change on the horizon for Arizona.

Even if AZ wins the court challenges that O'bumbles' Administration have presented, it still may be too late for AZ.  Steyn brought up the point a few weeks ago that Hispanic kids make up the (or a near-) majority in AZ's schools.

Kids are the future, you know.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 11, 2011 09:02 AM (9hSKh)

52 Well, we knew already that the Obama administration was criminally irresponsible and bone-shatteringly stupid, so what else is new?

Yes, the aggrieved rancher should counter-sue. He clearly has no property rights, largely as a result of the government failing to enforce its own laws.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 11, 2011 09:03 AM (bxiXv)

53

Hope!

Change!

Incompetence!

Stupidity!

Cronyism!

Posted by: Hrothgar at February 11, 2011 09:04 AM (DCpHZ)

54 That's an insightful essay you've found, maddog. You should label it and post again.

Posted by: t-bird at February 11, 2011 09:04 AM (FcR7P)

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 09:05 AM (OlN4e)

56 Yes, the aggrieved rancher should counter-sue. He clearly has no property rights, largely as a result of the government failing to enforce its own laws.

Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 11, 2011 01:03 PM (bxiXv)

But none of those laws were written or approved by the Obama DoJ; hence, they have no validity and do not need to be enforced (unless they impact GE).

Posted by: Eric H Lawyer at large at February 11, 2011 09:06 AM (DCpHZ)

57 Our governor in California doesn't have the balls to do this.  I want to move to Arizona but it's too friggin hot.

Posted by: mpfs at February 11, 2011 09:08 AM (iYbLN)

58

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no.

We concur with your well-reasoned opinion.

Posted by: Box of Rocks at February 11, 2011 12:35 PM


I concur








Posted by: stump at February 11, 2011 09:09 AM (6fm5i)

59

But none of those laws were written or approved by the Obama DoJ; hence, they have no validity and do not need to be enforced (unless they impact GE).

Posted by: Eric H Lawyer at large at February 11, 2011 01:06 PM (DCpHZ)

Yes, its just a law... its not like its somthing important like a Regulation!

Posted by: Eric Holder at February 11, 2011 09:10 AM (AdK6a)

60 Has anyone seen a comment from douchebag Maverick on the  lawsuit?

Posted by: Barbarian at February 11, 2011 09:11 AM (EL+OC)

61

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no.

We concur with your well-reasoned opinion.

Posted by: Box of Rocks at February 11, 2011 12:35 PM


I concur

Posted by: stump at February 11, 2011 01:09 PM (6fm5i)


As do I.

Posted by: Post at February 11, 2011 09:11 AM (Rn2kl)

62 Acutally, Napolitano said, "A secure border doesn't necessarily mean a sealed border." And the members of the liberal media aren't going to ask her the obvious follow-up question. What exactly does a secure border mean?

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 09:13 AM (mfhdy)

63

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no.

We concur with your well-reasoned opinion.

Posted by: Box of Rocks at February 11, 2011 12:35 PM

I concur

Posted by: stump at February 11, 2011 01:09 PM (6fm5i)

As do I.


Us too

Posted by: The 52% at February 11, 2011 09:13 AM (tf9Ne)

64 Regulations, now that's something you can sink your teeth into.  Written by unaccountable faceless bureaucrats (with lobbyist assistance), enforced by the monstrous power of the IRS and DoJ, thousands of obscure pages long, carrying the force of law, and impossible to ignore--what's not to like.

Posted by: Eric H Lawyer At Large at February 11, 2011 09:17 AM (DCpHZ)

65 ARTICLE 4

Section 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


Posted by: Guy Fawkes, free logprof secular brotherhood at February 11, 2011 09:17 AM (xdHzq)

66

WSJ pics of the protesters. Check out #16. Yeah, democracy.

http://tinyurl.com/4je4ft3

Posted by: dagny: Free Logprof damnit! at February 11, 2011 09:18 AM (l3g1A)

67 "Acutally, Napolitano said, "A secure border doesn't necessarily mean a sealed border."" Every time one of these dumb statements comes out of the mouth of a member of this administration a musical strain runs through my head. Remember from Saturday Night Live? "Lowered expecta-a-tions".

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 09:18 AM (mfhdy)

68

Posted by: Guy Fawkes, free logprof secular brotherhood at February 11, 2011 01:17 PM (xdHzq)

Sorry--Looks like this was written at least a 100 years ago--Thus not applicable to today's issues.

Posted by: Eric H Lawyer At Large at February 11, 2011 09:19 AM (DCpHZ)

69 "Remember, Oprah tells us he's in a learning curve." Oprah really said that? So, even Oprah admits that he was unprepared for office?

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 09:21 AM (mfhdy)

70 Clapper: Mubarak is firmly in charge.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 11, 2011 09:22 AM (P33XN)

71

The Presidency of the US should not be a candidate for the application of an OJT program.

Gee, I wish I had seen a resume of his capabilites and experience before I voted for him.

Posted by: Hrothgar Folder of History at February 11, 2011 09:23 AM (DCpHZ)

72

From the insightful essay-

" ...and this lack of discipline combined with the “flower children” of the sixties coming of age and grasping for power, would bring about a situation.."

There's nothing more pathetic than watching the Sixties holdovers who insisted "anything goes" during their younger decades introducing "zero tolerance" policies as they approach dotage. The most selfish, useless generation in US history will continue to beclown itself until the last hippie dipshit expires.

Posted by: Lincolntf at February 11, 2011 09:24 AM (xMT+4)

73 Clapp on - Mubarak has left.

Clapp off- Mubarak is still in power.

The Clapper- The MFM is better than a spy network.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at February 11, 2011 09:26 AM (tf9Ne)

74 Nerdygirl@69:

Oprah called on President Obama's critics on Friday to “show some level of respect.”

"I feel that everybody has a learning curve, and I feel that the reason why I was willing to step out for him was because I believed in his integrity and I believed in his heart," the influential TV host said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in Chicago.

Of the negative mood of the country, Oprah added, “I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.”

Yes, yes she did.


Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 09:26 AM (UOM48)

75

Ah but they never exercised any responsibility in their prime, and zero tolerance (live by the rule book) is just an extension of that approach to life as quasi-adults. 

After all, if the "rules" say this is the way to do it, how can anyone fault them for their actions.

Posted by: Hrothgar Folder of History at February 11, 2011 09:27 AM (DCpHZ)

76

“I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.”

Oh, OK. I'll get right on that.

But I don't think you'll be happy with my time in office, Oprah.

Posted by: dagny: Free Logprof damnit! at February 11, 2011 09:30 AM (l3g1A)

77

A de facto easement. That's brilliant!

I would like to believe that this case would get traction in the courts.

Yes. I would like to believe that.

Posted by: Cluebat from Exodar at February 11, 2011 09:31 AM (JSetw)

78

Well, speaking as an expert, the answer is no.

We concur with your well-reasoned opinion.

Posted by: Box of Rocks at February 11, 2011 12:35 PM


I concur

Posted by: stump at February 11, 2011 01:09 PM (6fm5i)


As do I.


The motion carries.

Posted by: Box of Hair at February 11, 2011 09:32 AM (0q2P7)

79

The most selfish, useless generation in US history will continue to beclown itself until the last hippie dipshit expires.

We weren't ALL like that, but yeah, I pretty much hate my generation.

But dayum, we sure made some great music.

Posted by: Muskwa at February 11, 2011 09:32 AM (DXa2e)

80 Of the negative mood of the country, Oprah added, “I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.”

Yes, yes she did.


Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 01:26 PM (UOM4

 

Uhhh... try what? being Negative? or trusting a Prooven Liars Integrity? I'm all confused...

Posted by: Romeo13 at February 11, 2011 09:33 AM (AdK6a)

81 Every time one of these dumb statements comes out of the mouth of a member of this administration a musical strain runs through my head. Remember from Saturday Night Live? "Lowered expecta-a-tions".

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 01:18 PM (mfhdy)


Remember the good times, back before the 2008 election, when everyone was pointing out what little the utter lack of executive experience Obama had, when situations like this Egypt fiasco were only a troubling forecast?

Posted by: NC Ref at February 11, 2011 09:33 AM (/izg2)

82 dagny, photo 21 shows a whole lot of muslims in the "Full Lewinsky " position.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 09:34 AM (mfhdy)

83 To be fair, the media expressed the same level of tolerance and respect for Dubya during his "blossoming" phase as an early-term President. Oprah is merely appealing for the same treatment regarding Precedent Barry. After all, he is the new Reagan.

Posted by: BackAsswards at February 11, 2011 09:34 AM (OCO/h)

84 Remember the good times, back before the 2008 election, when everyone was pointing out what little the utter lack of executive experience Obama had, when situations like this Egypt fiasco were only a troubling forecast?

Posted by: NC Ref at February 11, 2011 01:33 PM (/izg2)

What... who would say anything abou that?  Wait, its 3 AM, why is the phone ringing??

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at February 11, 2011 09:35 AM (AdK6a)

85 For heaven's sake, if somebody invades my house, I shoot them. So, if someone or someones invade AZ, they should shoot them. Simple. Why can't anyone in the federal government see this?

Posted by: tcn at February 11, 2011 09:35 AM (DjPot)

86 Zero wouldn't make a pimple on Reagan's ass.

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 09:36 AM (OlN4e)

87 @86 Racist

Posted by: BackAsswards at February 11, 2011 09:37 AM (OCO/h)

88 7 5. She was thinking of her underwears

Posted by: BlackOrchid at February 11, 2011 12:25 PM (SB0V2)

I think we can be satisfied that magic carpet ain't bein ridden.

Posted by: rightzilla at February 11, 2011 09:37 AM (ujT7B)

89

I think we can be satisfied that magic carpet ain't bein ridden.

Posted by: rightzilla at February 11, 2011 01:37 PM (ujT7B)

Hard to say. Does she have a dog?

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 09:38 AM (OlN4e)

90 Thanks, Jane D'oh. Someone should tell Oprah, who thinks we should all give it a try, that most of us are bright enough to know that we aren't qualified to be president of the U.S., and therefore, don't have the arrogance to run. I really resent people in the entertainment industry who think that they are qualified to advise us on political matters, the damn, self important, narcissists.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 11, 2011 09:38 AM (mfhdy)

91 86 For heaven's sake, if somebody invades my house, I shoot them. So, if someone or someones invade AZ, they should shoot them. Simple. Why can't anyone in the federal government see this?

Posted by: tcn at February 11, 2011 01:35 PM (DjPot)

But, after you shoot them, and hopefully shot to kill, you will face endless lawsuits brought against you by your local, state, and national "law enforcement "agencies.  All in the name of fairness of course.

Posted by: Hrothgar Folder of History at February 11, 2011 09:40 AM (DCpHZ)

92 Dead men can't afford attorneys.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 11, 2011 09:42 AM (SJ6/3)

93 The Oprah/Barky comments over at Politico are over 1,000 now, and so far I believe they're about 99.9% negative. 

Payback's a bitch, Orca. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 09:42 AM (UOM48)

94 On Bammy and the learning curve, there is something else that should be pointed out.

He has a team of advisers that he picked for their knowledge and they all suck too.


Posted by: Buzzsaw at February 11, 2011 09:43 AM (tf9Ne)

95 I feel that everybody has a learning curve, and I feel that the reason why I was willing to step out for him was because I believed in his integrity and I believed in his heart

So he was in no way qualified, and you though some OJT and a few serious mistakes with foriegn relations, the economy, and national security was OK? And half a term later you're still trying to give him the same bye?

Oprah:
He's the President. He's in the fucking big boys league now not the coddle league. Learning curve or no, he has to take is g-damn lumps just like every other President all the way back to Washington. Don't tell us to fucking shut up just because you like him. He's had two+ years to get comfy with the big chair before he grabbed that chicken and went to town. TWO YEARS! HALF A TERM! When can we expect him to be qualified!? AT WHAT POINT CAN WE HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE!?

Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 11, 2011 09:43 AM (0q2P7)

96 Of the negative mood of the country, Oprah added, “I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.” Yes, yes she did. Wow. Just wow. Where was she with this attitude when Bush was president? I still don't get the cognitive dissonance of the left on their ability to vilify W, while demanding that we "give O a chance, and stop being mean." Can these people not see their hypocrisy or do they willfully ignore it?

Posted by: moki at February 11, 2011 09:44 AM (dZmFh)

97 I was gathering intelligence from a CIA source, cable news.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 11, 2011 09:44 AM (SJ6/3)

98 Anyone believe that the feral courts will recognize a litigation remedy for states harmed by the Feral Gov't's dereliction of constitutional duty?  Me neither.  Plan B has to be under consideration.

Posted by: some dope at February 11, 2011 09:46 AM (K/USr)

99 No real man needs Orca to stand up for him and tell folks to just be nice to him. So, who has Barky's balls in a jar?

Posted by: tcn at February 11, 2011 09:46 AM (DjPot)

100 It must be easy working for the CIA. Laying around in your underdrawers watching cable news all day,  being a pundit and Red Eye guest at night.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 11, 2011 09:47 AM (SJ6/3)

101 Arizona should raise a militia.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 11, 2011 09:48 AM (SJ6/3)

102 Wow, Oprah is making excuses for Zero's ineptitude? Wow, I really have respect for him now.....

Posted by: maddogg at February 11, 2011 09:49 AM (OlN4e)

103 moki, did you catch the Money Quote of the Year?  Barry's in a freaking learning curve the past two years, according to Orca.

What a pig.

Posted by: Jane D'oh, sez save logprof and nickless at February 11, 2011 09:50 AM (UOM48)

104

Geraghty:

Sen. John Thune's most recent ACU rating is 100 out of 100. Yet someone, somewhere, right now is dismissing him as a RINO

Anyone?

Posted by: dagny: Free Logprof damnit! at February 11, 2011 09:51 AM (l3g1A)

105 I still don't get the cognitive dissonance of the left on their ability to vilify W, while demanding that we "give O a chance, and stop being mean." Can these people not see their hypocrisy or do they willfully ignore it?

It's called doublethink
It lets you believe two contradicting realities at the same time.
It's integral to all sorts progressive beliefs.

Like Climate models are perfect so we should destroy our economy for them.
Climate models are flawed which explains the cold weather.

Christianity in America wants a theocracy, all of which are inherently bad.
Islam wants a theocracy and we should accept that as part of their culture.

Government needs to tell us what to eat because we are unhealthy.
Government shouldn't tell us we can't smoke pot even if its bad for us.

The list goes on and on.

Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 11, 2011 09:53 AM (0q2P7)

106 Well, Bill, I was astounded, overwhelmed actually, when I finally realized that I would be dealing with only the hard problems.  The small ones were solved before they got this far.  Up the old chain, you know.

Can I finish my waffle now and just watch the damn game?

Posted by: Stitches the Clown at February 11, 2011 09:53 AM (93Qr2)

107 104-no, my bifocal's must not be working right, because I missed that. You have GOT to be kidding, right? Right? I should get used to this type of blather, but I find it continually shocks me. Mostly because these fools have the ability to send your son, my husband and countless others into harm's way, and they have no gravitas about what they do. They don't care. Praying still for your boy, by the way. Hope he's well.

Posted by: moki at February 11, 2011 09:55 AM (dZmFh)

108 88 @86 Racist

Posted by: BackAsswards at February 11, 2011 01:37 PM (OCO/h)

Wow, I haven't been called a racist since adopting my Mayan baby boy from Guatemala. The social workers reminded me of my "white privilege," whatever the heck that is. Essentially, I was told I was racist by definition.

Haven't been back to see those particular folks.

Posted by: tcn at February 11, 2011 09:55 AM (DjPot)

109 20 Be gentle with Barry, runningrn.  Remember, Oprah tells us he's in a learning curve.

Ah, Obama the boy-king.  I knew this would be a major meme.

Well, we don't have a hereditary monarchy, so the word Oprah wants is: incompetent.

Posted by: AmishDude at February 11, 2011 09:56 AM (T0NGe)

110 106-what a succinct description. Absolutely brilliant. I guess because I would never think to do something like that, that I can apply those parameters to others. For most people, it would work. But progressives? Not so much, I guess. I may have to steal your quote for future arguments!

Posted by: moki at February 11, 2011 09:59 AM (dZmFh)

111 There are over 1,000 anti-Oprah/Obama comments over at Politico. 

Posted by: Preznit Sand Trap at February 11, 2011 10:02 AM (UOM48)

112 I may have to steal your quote for future arguments!

Feel free to swipe.

Posted by: MīcÞeMūß at February 11, 2011 10:03 AM (0q2P7)

113

Hard to say. Does she have a dog?

You rang?

Posted by: Toby the Beagle at February 11, 2011 10:06 AM (b6qrg)

114 101 It must be easy working for the CIA. Laying around in your underdrawers watching cable news all day,  being a pundit and Red Eye guest at night.

Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 11, 2011 01:47 PM (SJ6/3)


Where do I apply?  I'm over-qualified!

Posted by: NC Ref at February 11, 2011 10:14 AM (/izg2)

115 114

Hard to say. Does she have a dog?

and some peanut butter?

Posted by: Seriel Mom at February 11, 2011 10:50 AM (ujT7B)

116

Oprah added, “I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.”

That statement is incoherent bad grammar.

Posted by: Speller at February 11, 2011 11:08 AM (J74Py)

117 Could this fucking woman be any dumber more treasonous?

Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 11, 2011 12:29 PM (ujg0T)

118 Tine for the DEPT of INJUSTICE to feel the wrath of americans who are fed up with the way our goverment is opening the floodgates to thousands of illegal aliens Its time ERIC HOLDER got a dose of his own medicine and same to that rotten OBAMA as well

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at February 11, 2011 01:14 PM (vA9ld)

119 Spurwing is back!!!!

Posted by: Luca Brasi at February 11, 2011 01:53 PM (YmPwQ)

120 Late, late post but Gov. Brewer might want to check out whats going on with the ATF's "gunrunner" scandal... namely the ATF let the gun that shot a border agent 3 months ago be sold from a Arizona gun shop (shop was working with the ATF)... Just google "project gunwalker"

Posted by: JS at February 11, 2011 09:45 PM (NB4vc)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
131kb generated in CPU 0.1626, elapsed 0.3324 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2981 seconds, 248 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.