December 16, 2011
— Ace I'm really thinking about getting a Kindle.
But lately I've made a couple of comparisons among books I was interested in. Among three books, one ebook was actually more expensive than the real, physical version of the book. (Or as I call it, the Material Download version.)
In the other two cases we're talking about a buck or two cheaper.
Publishers seem hostile to this technology. Hostile enough to try killing it off early.
The digital price increases are the result of a decision by the six biggest publishers to set their own consumer e-book prices, a move that effectively bars retailers from discounting their e-books without permission. No such agreement exists for printed books—where retailers are free to set their own prices. So while a best-selling e-book price is often less than half of the hardcover price, heavy discounting of the print version closes the gap.
Industry executives say this new state of affairs may already be hurting e-book sales, which have skyrocketed over the past three years and are today 15% to 20% or more of major publishers' revenue."Some people who see $12.99 and $14.99 for e-books may find those prices a little expensive," says Scott Waxman, a literary agent and digital-books publisher.
Slublog writes:
You've got to love the backward thinking here. The cost of producing an e-book has got to be nothing compared to printing millions of hardcovers, so ebooks are the closest thing to pure profit that exists for everyone involved, but these publishers still feel the need to gouge and piss off customers. I loves me some capitalism, but hate what some industries do to it.
It's a dumb manner of pricing.
Let's say I accept that they are going to over-charge for an ebook. I do understand that. Prices are set not just by costs but by comparison to close alternatives. Since the close alternative here is a real book, I understand that the ebook price is going to be close-ish to real book price, even though the ebook costs practically zero to produce on the margins.
But the ebook really is much, much cheaper for publishers. They don't have to print books that they might never sell -- this is completely on-demand publishing. Furthermore, it is cost-free to actually produce a new unit. You don't even have to push a button; it's all automated.
Someone sends in real money, whether $12 or $15, and in return you send back $0. This is profitable.
But to me, this only makes sense if I'm saving, say, $5 on a $15 fat trade paperback, and $10 on a new $25 hardcover. I'll over-pay for content, but I do want a substantial discount to reflect the fact that I'm really saving the publisher printing, warehousing, and shipping costs. That's a lot of costs right there. It should be worth something to a publisher that I'm sparing them that. If they don't see it that way, then it just doesn't seem like a deal to me. I'd rather have the Material Download, then.
Posted by: Ace at
08:41 AM
| Comments (237)
Post contains 529 words, total size 3 kb.
Oh thank god, I'm not the only one who's noticed this. I was debating getting my sister a Kindle for Christmas (and ONLY a Kindle, because I'm a cheap yankee and that shit's expensive). Then I looked at the prices for your average e-book and said, "Why on earth would I bother? It's cheaper to just give her a B&N gift card and tell her to go to town." We both prefer the paper versions anyway, particularly hardcovers, so it's just not worth it.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 16, 2011 08:43 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Job-Creatin ' Obama at December 16, 2011 08:44 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at December 16, 2011 08:44 AM (DjKAG)
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 16, 2011 08:46 AM (Hx5uv)
I like the real thing. No inflatable dolls for me.
Posted by: Roger at December 16, 2011 08:46 AM (tAwhy)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 16, 2011 08:46 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: DarkLord© for Prez! at December 16, 2011 08:47 AM (GBXon)
I bought the kindle and have been disappointed by what books are available.
Let me off this advice to anyone thinking about buying one.
If you read popular fiction best sellers then the kindle is great for you.
If you're like me and you prefer semi-obscure fiction and niche history books, then I'd stay away from the kindle.
Also, I often overpay for books on the kindle. For example, I bought a bunch of Philip K. Dick books for kindle that I could have gotten cheaper in a book store.
Posted by: Ben at December 16, 2011 08:47 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 16, 2011 08:47 AM (fYOZx)
Posted by: maddogg at December 16, 2011 08:47 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 16, 2011 08:47 AM (i6RpT)
sounds like they may be trying to make money for the disposal of the printed versions that wont get sold to people only using e-books, as well as the loss of a sale of something already made.
Posted by: trailortrash at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (xllDV)
I wonder what effect the threat of piracy has on the pricey cost of e-books? It's pretty difficult to sell bootleg copies of, say, "War and Peace" unless you've got a photocopier and a LOT of spare time. But I imagine distributing PDF versions of an e-book would be no sweat.
Of course, that would make this pricing strategy even MORE ass backward. Who's going to spend the money on a legitimate e-copy of "War and Peace" (or "Harry Potter," or "Lord of the Rings" or the latest crime thriller) when you can get a PDF off a torrent site for nothing?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: gm at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (0WWPr)
Oh, and now she has more time to make me samwiches.
Posted by: Racist, Right-Wing Terrorist...or Tea Party Member for Short at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (F1JEL)
Posted by: Big Publisher at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (5wsU9)
I prefer Barnes & Noble - especially since I have a Nook and wifey has a PanDigital, which are hooked into B&N. But they are all raising their prices of all types of books.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 08:48 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Shtetl G at December 16, 2011 08:49 AM (VGIcl)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 16, 2011 08:49 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 08:49 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at December 16, 2011 08:50 AM (MyByM)
I like the real thing. No inflatable dolls for me.
Posted by: Roger at December 16, 2011 12:46 PM (tAwhy)
You can 'carry' many books at once in a small device, great for traveling or taking to work if you tend to multi-read. I have recently learned to appreciate the ability to enlarge text so I don't have to read with my glasses. I don't think of it as a replacement for all books but a handy alternative.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 16, 2011 08:50 AM (fYOZx)
Posted by: ace at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (nj1bB)
Like - store it at the used-book store (which will actually pay you something for it - or trade it). How's that work with e-books?
Posted by: Roger at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (tAwhy)
Posted by: toby928© at December 16, 2011 12:49 PM (GTbGH)
I would go to the library, but my local library is the size of a postage stamp and has absolutely nothing worth reading. My own personal library has more books than the local public one.
...I should open my own library.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: booger at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (EjNp5)
Haven't you geezers ever heard of torrent sites? Over 1100 available on Demonoid.
Next then you'll tell me is that you actually pay for music and movies too.
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at December 16, 2011 08:51 AM (HpT9p)
>>Ben, that's where I am too. I am interested on obscure biographies and history. I also think the copyright laws on books are ridiculous. Agatha Christie has been dead about 50 years now, yet only two of her books are free.
Yeah. Project Gutenberg has a lot of free books, but I think they are at least 70 years old(maybe more).
I don't see why authors don't cut out the middle man. Why use a publisher? Just write your book, put it on amazon and charge what you want for it.
Posted by: Ben at December 16, 2011 08:52 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 16, 2011 08:52 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: TallDave at December 16, 2011 08:53 AM (/s1LA)
Plus built in dictionary and built in search function. If you are reading a mystery and you forget if Mr. Smith or Mr. Jones has the pet anaconda, you can easily find out. And I can increase font size when I am on the exercise machines at the gym.;
Posted by: WalrusRex at December 16, 2011 08:53 AM (Hx5uv)
You save about $25 per book, and $100 of material still weighs the same.
I'm also tired of waiting for the "MySQL Reference" movie.
I don't think they've even selected the plot twist.
Posted by: jwb7605 at December 16, 2011 08:53 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 16, 2011 08:54 AM (Ec6wH)
Posted by: TallDave at December 16, 2011 08:54 AM (/s1LA)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 16, 2011 08:54 AM (fYOZx)
Posted by: Ben at December 16, 2011 12:47 PM (wuv1c)
You pay for Dick?
Posted by: garrett at December 16, 2011 08:54 AM (YihYc)
I miss the pages and the smell of paper, but this is a better model. I think the big pubs will drop prices once they stop with the "NO! NO NONONONONO! AAAAAAGHHHHHHI DON'T WANNA" kicking/screaming part of their tantrum.
Posted by: mrmmosh at December 16, 2011 08:55 AM (K332w)
Posted by: JBrother at December 16, 2011 08:55 AM (xJDlm)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 16, 2011 08:56 AM (4df7R)
But lately I've made a couple of comparisons among books I was interested in. Among three books, one ebook was actually more expensive than the real, physical version of the book.
We have discussed this a lot on the book thread on Sundays. This is the publishers and Amazon is quick to point that out on their site. But, what gets me about Amazon they do the same damn thing with their CDs. Most of the time the MP3 download cost more than the actual physical CD.
So far I have refused to buy an MP3 download that cost more than the DC. I will wait until I am going to do an order before getting the CD.
It is an attempt to gain maximum profit from a venue that is becoming popular. I don't fault them for this, it is their right to charge what they can get.
Just as it is my right to not pay it because it is stupid.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 08:56 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at December 16, 2011 12:54 PM (Ec6wH)
That's it, time to go back to vellum.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at December 16, 2011 08:56 AM (4df7R)
Haven't you geezers ever heard of torrent sites? Over 1100 available on Demonoid.
Next then you'll tell me is that you actually pay for music and movies too.
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at December 16, 2011 12:51 PM (HpT9p)
Thats why you have to find the sweet spot in pricing. I've been buying a lot amazon mp3s. I mostly like jazz and you can get a lot of good albums from 3 to 10 dollars. I'll pay to not have a futz around with some torrent software and malware infested torrent site. I will also pay for the convenience of getting the music right then and there. I just won't pay full retail or more.
Posted by: Shtetl G at December 16, 2011 08:57 AM (VGIcl)
Posted by: jwb7605 at December 16, 2011 12:56 PM (Qxe/p)
I just want to point out I didn't have anything to do with it this time.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 16, 2011 08:57 AM (fYOZx)
Mostly, but there are some not quite that old where the publisher didn't renew the copyright. If you find an older book on Amazon for 99 cents, check Gutenberg and you'll probably find it free and DRM free too.
Posted by: Heorot at December 16, 2011 08:58 AM (Nq/UF)
Don't know if Llarry is lurking but I wanted to thank him. I got The Far Arena from my local library. It's a good book.
I wanted to get it on kindle, but alas it's not there.
Neither was Michael Crichton's State of Fear last time I checked. I want to read that too.
Posted by: Ben at December 16, 2011 08:58 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Joejm65 at December 16, 2011 08:58 AM (zjkh9)
As I've mentioned, I looooove my kindles. Looooooove them (my preciouses).
I would say that 95% plus of the book content on my kindles is from guttenberg or is from some of the writing groups with which I'm involved. I'm with you, ace, if there's only a minimal discount for buying digital, I will go with actual book instead.
That being said, there's a lot of indie publishing stuff out there going for between free and up to about 2.99-3.99. It's worth taking a flyer on something if it's .99. Amanda Hocking managed to make herself a best seller by marketing the crap out of her stuff on twitter/facebook and pricing between .99 and 3.99.
Sorry, but I don't get it. Why would anyone want to read an e-book? What are the advantages?
Because I can carry my entire book collection in a less than a pound device. Considering that I used to pack one bag for clothes and a larger bag for books when I travel, that's a considerable factor.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 16, 2011 08:58 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 08:59 AM (YdQQY)
I hate you guys with your high tech goose quills and your fancy "inks". Ooooh, look at me, I can carry a book without an oxcart.
Why do you hate the working man.
Posted by: Union of Stone Tablet Cutters at December 16, 2011 09:00 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: SamIam at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (BBm11)
One thing to recall is that you're buying a book, which is a special product. If it's new, it's copyrighted material, which means a monopoly exists for its production. Also, the "correct" price for any item is whatever the market will bear, and has no association to the cost of production other than to the extent that competitors making the same kind of thing can leverage efficiencies to bring down costs and attract consumers through price reduction.
They know the reader will pay "X" for a book. They also know that an ebook is in many ways more convenient than a paper one, and people like using their fancy readers. They can demand the same price as a physical book, because people will pay it.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (21lBC)
Posted by: alo89 at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (FMMjo)
Yeah - I just entered the search 'kindle' under books - there were over 1100 torrents.
Of course, you need an invite for Demonoid. But Pirate Bay has tons of books which you can 'share' without an invite.
FYI - I use muTorrent to download the torrents (google it), and PeerBlock so I won't get in trouble. I can't remember the last CD or movie that I actually went out and purchased.
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at December 16, 2011 09:01 AM (HpT9p)
Marketing. A publisher can get you on all the talking head shows.
Posted by: Heorot at December 16, 2011 09:02 AM (Nq/UF)
8Sorry, but I don't get it. Why would anyone want to read an e-book? What are the advantages?
First, space. For people who live in a small apartment, books can take up a lot of room. Second, portability. Moving boxes of books is a pain in the ass.
Posted by: Alvin Greene at December 16, 2011 09:02 AM (mQMnK)
Vic,
Who the hell would pay for an MP3 when they could have a lossless format to pull an MP3 off and keep the 'master' CD?
Posted by: garrett at December 16, 2011 09:02 AM (YihYc)
Posted by: blaster at December 16, 2011 09:03 AM (7vSU0)
A lot ARE doing that now, also musicians.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 09:03 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Empire1 at December 16, 2011 09:04 AM (Z/wtI)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at December 16, 2011 09:04 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at December 16, 2011 09:04 AM (FKQng)
I was going to get a Nook, but after doing some research, purchased an Android tablet, then downloaded the Nook, Kindle, and an EPub reader. That way I can read anything out there.
I agree the pricing of ebooks is obscene. But I love that I can have hundreds of books, and not fill up my closet storing them, or throwing them away after I've read them.
To find inexpensive books, I go to Amazon and look for books (mainly Sci-fi) for under $3.00. Many authors either give away or charge $.99 for the 1st book in a series, then under $3.00 for the rest. I've discovered some very good authors that way. Plus, if I didn't like the book, blowing $.99 doesn't bother me.
Posted by: I'm the Honey Badger, BITCH! at December 16, 2011 09:04 AM (nyxv/)
Posted by: MyCherryS'mores at December 16, 2011 09:05 AM (VOBGw)
And downloading torrents without an IP blocker is like hitting a whorehouse in Haiti w/o wearing a rubber.
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at December 16, 2011 09:05 AM (HpT9p)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at December 16, 2011 09:05 AM (136wp)
First, space. For people who live in a small apartment, books can take up a lot of room. Second, portability. Moving boxes of books is a pain in the ass.
When I moved last year I had 113 boxes. 53 of those were books. I will admit, however, the whole getting a kindle so as to not actually buy more physical books has not worked out as planned. Note to self: use part of Christmas bonus to buy another bookshelf.
To anyone considering torrenting books, I would strongly strongly advise caution, what with the whole otherly legal aspect thereof.
If you are trying to convert books from guttenberg or the other sites, calibre is fantastic.
Vic, I hope everything went well, you were in my prayers this morning.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 16, 2011 09:05 AM (VtjlW)
Then the Machines came for the travel agents, and I said nothing.
Then the Machines came for the bookbinders, and I said nothing.
Who will be left to speak when the Machines come for me?
Posted by: Wonder at December 16, 2011 09:06 AM (gVqQ3)
I don't get the whole 'experience of REAL books' thingy. I have tons of real books. I don't see that reading one of them is in any way superior to opening up my leather-covered Kindle.
As a matter of fact, it is not as nice of an experience, reading my 'real' books. No font changing, no search feature, no instant dictionary, no keeping my place when I have to set the book down in a hurry, etc...
Posted by: Lizabth at December 16, 2011 09:06 AM (JZBti)
And you don't have to deal with different sized books. Everything is standardized. You don't have to hold the book open, the pages never fade. Etc etc etc. By and large it just a better product than a actuall book. Annotations, book marking, note taking, highlighting, getting quick definitions of words you don't know. everything is better with the electronic version. Yeah, the profit margins are larger for the publisher because they don't have to make anything. But the prices will not always be as inflated as this I don't think. If I have any faith in a capitalist system, the prices will necessarily fall eventually. Don't deprive yourself now of it just because you don't like paying the essentially equivalent to lower price for something that costs the provider nothing to manufacture just on the principle. You will probably regret it once you finally do take the plunge.
*This comment is paid for by Amazon.com
Posted by: Sigh at December 16, 2011 09:07 AM (PGVRJ)
Posted by: garrett at December 16, 2011 01:02 PM (YihYc)
The Amazon MP3s are made at a sample rate that is indistinguishable from the master CD. Hell, even when I buy a new CD the first thing I do is rip it and put it on my MP3 player. I will also make a copy of the disk that I play on my DVD players through the stereo.
I do NOT use the original for playing. But I guess that is what you were saying anyway. But, if the download is cheaper than the CD I will get the download.
Also, in some cases you can only get the download because the CD is out of print.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 09:07 AM (YdQQY)
No, like "store it on a bookshelf until you're ready to read it again."
As for how selling or trading would work with e-books... that depends on the e-book format. With most, you get an actual file. Depending on the DRM level (from 0 to obscene), you can, occasionally just give them to whoever.
I do agree that the ability to re-sell or trade e-books would be nice, but I also see the difficulties inherent in such.
That said, I love my new Kindle Fire. A classic example for me is when I want to read while eating (it solves the one-hand-page-turning problem quite nicely) or if I want to read in bed (so I don't keep Mrs. AllenG awake). Also, for technical books (which tend to be thick, and require a paperweight to hold open if you're using it for reference or attempting to complete an exercise), it's great that I can just have it open to the page I need, and it'll just sit there.
Lost bookmarks, or forgot where you were? No more, the reader keeps track of that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 16, 2011 09:07 AM (8y9MW)
Don't forget author royalties. While standard royalty rates on a hardcover might by 10% to 15%, for an ebook they're 25% to 50%.
So much of what the publisher saves on printing costs goes right out the other door in royalties.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 16, 2011 09:07 AM (3wBRE)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 16, 2011 09:08 AM (21lBC)
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 16, 2011 09:08 AM (CKelT)
Marketing. A publisher can get you on all the talking head shows.
Only if you're one of a very few handful of authors. One of my friends writes romance novels. She promotes herself on Facebook and does local book signings. Not sure what the publisher does, but she's not going on any big shows. If someone is in the right groups online and knows how to promote himself, he can get his book out there.
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at December 16, 2011 09:08 AM (MyByM)
I got a Kindle back when we lived in a 2-bedroom house and had 5 kids, 3 of whom could read. That and Steve's book addiction (hey, it's more useful than oil cans) meant something had to give and it was my dead-tree collection. I was okay with it because now I don't have to decide which book I want to bring to doc's appointments; I can bring 'em all.
Now we've got a second Kindle. The kids pass around the first one and I can read one-handed while feeding the smallest Pirate.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate's Wife at December 16, 2011 09:08 AM (B0893)
Posted by: Wonder at December 16, 2011 01:06 PM (gVqQ3)
Hopefully by then the machine overmind will have reached a Matrix-like level of sophistication, allowing Libs and Cons to live, mentally, in worlds of their choosing without each other while plugged into nutrient tanks.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 16, 2011 09:08 AM (xUM1Q)
Vic, I hope everything went well, you were in my prayers this morning.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 16, 2011 01:05 PM (VtjlW)
Went well, taking it out is GOOD. Now 2 or 3 days and I can drink cold stuff again.
Thanks
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 09:09 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Realist at December 16, 2011 09:09 AM (QgAFR)
Posted by: mrmmosh at December 16, 2011 09:10 AM (K332w)
-They are more comfortable to read than real books.
Also, text to speech which for some bizarre reason isn't on the kindle fire. I use it constantly so that the kindle can read to me while I'm driving.
Posted by: alexthechick at December 16, 2011 09:10 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Texan Economist at December 16, 2011 09:10 AM (xTW2k)
Posted by: Phelps at December 16, 2011 09:11 AM (PA4y8)
The problem is with top tier author books priced at $14 for both the paperback and the Ebook, give or take a buck. This is due to these authors being under publisher contract, and I'm afraid the book publishers have become every bit as paranoid and greedy as the music labels. Instead of embracing a new market and distribution channel, they look at their declining sales and blame the internet and Ebooks, rather than the pricing and demographic/cultural shift away from reading anything at all.
They should be flooding the market with cheaper Ebooks from many more authors that were too risky to print copies in the past, and make reading more popular for the younger generation that reads little more than a menu.
Will they figure it out, or go through the slow suicide the music labels seem intent on?
Posted by: Sixiron at December 16, 2011 09:12 AM (lKumT)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 16, 2011 01:08 PM (21lBC)
Good list. I've not bought one yet, but one other thing that I think is nice is that you can blow up the font. I'm not ancient yet, but even so it's easier on my eyes to have a little bigger print than is often found in paperbacks.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 16, 2011 09:12 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Phelps at December 16, 2011 09:12 AM (PA4y8)
Not just the space but the fact that Amazon (at least) "backs up" you library to the cloud, even if your Kindle is... kindled. Of course, what they back up is the fact that you bought the book. Oh, and your annotations. Yeah, I annotate the shit out of my ebooks all the time, don't you?
BTW I hear the Kindle Fire isn't exactly catching... fire.
Posted by: sherlock at December 16, 2011 09:13 AM (TQbuA)
Posted by: booger at December 16, 2011 09:13 AM (EjNp5)
Marketing. Those publishers pay for space (both physical and virtual) to have their books easier to find. Finding an indie book can be difficult- it's also hard (for me at least) to shell out money for a book I may hate.
Of course, that said, when I have enough of them, I bundle a bunch of posts from my Simple Truths mini-essays, edit and re-work them, and publish an e-book on Amazon with them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at December 16, 2011 09:13 AM (8y9MW)
What she said^^^ :p
Posted by: booger at December 16, 2011 09:15 AM (EjNp5)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 16, 2011 09:15 AM (Y/aF4)
Went well, taking it out is GOOD. Now 2 or 3 days and I can drink cold stuff again.
That is wonderful news!
Posted by: alexthechick at December 16, 2011 09:15 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Hedgehog at December 16, 2011 09:15 AM (VUawY)
Posted by: NYCcon at December 16, 2011 09:16 AM (jLXdE)
This isn't to justify price hikes or defend old school publishers, but the paper/printing does not make up for the bulk of their costs.
Posted by: Ken Wheaton at December 16, 2011 09:16 AM (YxsNd)
Ebook piracy is rampant. And all it takes is a moment of weakness. Since the files are so small you can download practically every book every published in an afternoon.
With movies people succumb to temptation and download a movie. But then maybe they feel guilty. Or scared they might get caught. So maybe they stop for a while. So the movie industry can invest in social pressure and enforcement to get people to pirate the material less often.
But with books it just takes one afternoon of weakness, or feeling fearless, or anger at high ebook prices. Even if you feel guilty or scared afterwards, you never have to do it again.
The whole back catalog business of book publishers seems to be fundamentally screwed.
When I was a kid reading sci-fi voraciously, most of the books I bought were at least a decade old. The Asimovs and Heinleins. Now there are just files where somebody packages -- here's the greatest 1000 SF novels ever written.. Boom. Done.
Posted by: Clubber Lang at December 16, 2011 09:17 AM (QcFbt)
I could easily see a bunch of SF writers getting together as an author group, and self publishing on Amazon and Apple.
Someone like Baen is pretty damned close to that already.
If yer favorite author's stuff is available on a writer's group webpage, would you be likely to buy content by other authors that your favorite author was pimping there?
Posted by: Kristopher at December 16, 2011 09:17 AM (Z3y1K)
I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but I'll tell you another thing I've noticed, generally speaking, about e-books: they're not well-edited, for shit. I have read several e-books from various sources, and have seen error after error. Spelling, grammar, lay-out, pagination... it's ridiculous. Some of them, like the e-book versions of Diana Gabaldon's books, are EXTREMELY well-done, but others are just so much shit, because someone can't be bothered to edit the text properly, and it's just a drag.
I like e-books - they're convenient because I can take more than one with me on my phone -- but I much prefer the actual book.
Know what I mean, Vern?
Posted by: Miller at December 16, 2011 09:18 AM (xhZmJ)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at December 16, 2011 01:08 PM (21lBC)
OK; well I see your point. Doesn't work for me (I only read one book at a time - and have always traveled with 4-5 pbs packed in my bag), but I guess I see why some people like 'em. As for "search" - I like searching the real thing; I find myself not only finding what I was looking for, but being reminded of other things during my search. I enjoy that.
Posted by: Roger at December 16, 2011 09:19 AM (tAwhy)
Posted by: meeeghan mccain at December 16, 2011 09:19 AM (sHY5w)
The other thing that's worth mention on the iPad is the GoodReader app. If you buy PDF versions of books like I do, it's the best reader out there. (It also lets you take notes, too.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 16, 2011 09:20 AM (bjRNS)
20 years is fine. Even with the current laws, authors make next to nothing once a book gets to the book club stage.
Posted by: Kristopher at December 16, 2011 09:20 AM (Z3y1K)
If you pay for and download something, then decide it sucks and isn't worth finishing 15 minutes later, its still yours -- they got your money and ain't giving it back.
If you're browsing a dead tree store and flip through something and decide it sucks, you walk out with your money still in your pocket.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 16, 2011 09:20 AM (Y/aF4)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 16, 2011 09:21 AM (0yt4x)
Posted by: Andrew at December 16, 2011 09:24 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: blah at December 16, 2011 09:24 AM (fUadS)
I can't tell if this is a joke, or serious. If it's a joke:
Vinyl is actually better for storing sound than the current digital formats. One of the down sides to digital is that there are limits to the size of the waveform that can be stored -- the result is that sounds get "chopped".
At some point, the compression algorithms for digital will catch up, but it's not there yet.
(All that said, I use an iPod + speakers as my stereo. The convenience of being able to store and access all my music that easily outweighs the small difference in sound quality.)
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 16, 2011 09:24 AM (bjRNS)
Hopefully by then the machine overmind will have reached a Matrix-like level of sophistication, allowing Libs and Cons to live, mentally, in worlds of their choosing without each other while plugged into nutrient tanks.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 16, 2011 01:08 PM (xUM1Q)
That only works for me if I can electronically nuke those fuckers from my world.
Posted by: maddogg at December 16, 2011 09:27 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: mitch Rapp at December 16, 2011 09:28 AM (UPRe0)
I can't tell if this is a joke, or serious. If it's a joke:
Not a joke.
I prefer every aspect of the analog experience and I loathe the convenience of digital music files.
Posted by: garrett at December 16, 2011 09:29 AM (YihYc)
Posted by: some friggin dope at December 16, 2011 09:30 AM (K/USr)
'Breeding a Master Race, for Dummies!' is now available for download.
Nein, nein, nein, sie nennen "Mein Kampf"
Posted by: Zombie Hitler at December 16, 2011 09:30 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 09:32 AM (IGkEP)
I prefer every aspect of the analog experience and I loathe the convenience of digital music files.
Posted by: garrett at December 16, 2011 01:29 PM (YihYc)
Hey, I like your style, do you have a newsletter?
Posted by: Barack "Malcom-Y" Obama at December 16, 2011 09:32 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik, hoping for a Rick Perry miracle at December 16, 2011 09:33 AM (fYOZx)
I think all of H. Beam Piper's books are available on Gutenberg, if you need a Sci-Fi fix.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 16, 2011 09:33 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 01:32 PM (IGkEP)
Belay that, ye lubber!
Posted by: Capt'n Ahab, stamping his peg leg at December 16, 2011 09:34 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dontheflyer at December 16, 2011 09:34 AM (vOcVu)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 01:32 PM (IGkEP)
if you stop sitting on it, the xcreen will stop cracking.
Posted by: Racefan at December 16, 2011 09:35 AM (Un8iB)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 09:36 AM (IGkEP)
Posted by: Ken Wheaton at December 16, 2011 01:16 PM (YxsNd)
I'm glad somebody got around to saying that. Conversion from print to e-book is startlingly labor-intensive. It keeps proofreaders employed, for which some of my colleagues are very grateful.
Posted by: joncelli at December 16, 2011 09:37 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 09:37 AM (IGkEP)
If you pay for and download something, then decide it sucks and isn't worth finishing 15 minutes later, its still yours -- they got your money and ain't giving it back.
Actually, a lot of Kindle books let you download the first chapter for free.
Given that when I'm in a book store I have 3 kids with me, I have a much better chance of checking out the Kindle book than a paper book at the store!
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 16, 2011 09:37 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 09:38 AM (IGkEP)
Yep. Others have pointed out that self-publishing will become the next wave, especially since publishers aren't passing on the revenues from increases in e-book pricing to the authors. Established authors can now realistically ditch publishers and offer their wares independently. In the long view, these authors can introduce new authors for a small piece of the pie.
Publishers are being incredibly short-sighted by trying to price gouge e-books, just as music publishers tried to do with MP3s and movie studios are trying to do with on-demand movies.
Posted by: JohnTant at December 16, 2011 09:39 AM (eytER)
There's absolutely NO REASON to charge more for an ebook than a discounted paperback.
Publishers are also pissed as folks self publishing on Amazon and selling their work for 99 cents to $3.99 in Kindle format.
Posted by: TexBob at December 16, 2011 09:39 AM (51Nv7)
I prefer every aspect of the analog experience and I loathe the convenience of digital
You printed out this thread to read, didn't you?
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 16, 2011 09:40 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Ernst Blofeld at December 16, 2011 09:40 AM (XZWie)
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 01:37 PM (IGkEP)
and that right there is why you come to the HQ. you learn something new everyday.
Posted by: Racefan at December 16, 2011 09:41 AM (Un8iB)
Posted by: aivanther at December 16, 2011 09:41 AM (4oCrg)
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 16, 2011 09:41 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: 66chevelle at December 16, 2011 09:45 AM (QjSgY)
I am so aiming for your nice, shiny, recently-washed car.
Posted by: Constipated Carrier Pigeon at December 16, 2011 09:46 AM (GBXon)
One aspect that impacted the decision for my husband and I - we can share the books. And we can read them at the same time. We bought two Kindles last year, and we read many of the same books, so we have enjoyed the decision immensely. Recently we bought his mother a Kindle as well, and now all three of us buy books that we can (if we so choose) all read at the same time. And none of us has to buy physical books or store them.
The biggest downside? No used books to send in care packages, actually ;-)
Posted by: Barb at December 16, 2011 09:53 AM (9VSWS)
Posted by: holdfast at December 16, 2011 09:53 AM (Gzb30)
Publishers must be using some antique hand set lead type processes. A decent typesetting system would have pluggable output media modules and treat the text in a more generic way.
If they used PS or Acrobat as the high level editing media, the output system should handle the device specific aspects.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 16, 2011 09:56 AM (Y/aF4)
Posted by: Tom at December 16, 2011 09:57 AM (i8fNK)
Recently we bought his mother a Kindle as well, and now all three of us buy books that we can (if we so choose) all read at the same time.
Hmm. I am thinking about buying a Kindle for my mom and I wonder if I should put it on my account...she doesn't like using her credit card online and I like the cash back I get from using mine...we could share books...hmmm...
Posted by: Mama AJ at December 16, 2011 10:01 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Jordan at December 16, 2011 10:02 AM (RSG1I)
Posted by: President Chet Roosevelt at December 16, 2011 10:02 AM (Sm0AZ)
This is like the music industry meltdown.
I buy a CD with 12 songs for $10, I can burn it to MP3, have a permanent electronic copy, and use it where I want how I want.
I buy a downloaded song, I can use it limited times, in limited areas, with limited functionality, and pay $1.00/song. It costs more, has less utility, and technically I never "own" it the way they have it set up.
So I don't buy electronic music.
When the books come along, the same thing happens; and I expect the same issues. What happens when you get a new e-book reader? If it's not owned by the same proprietary company can you transfer your books over? Can you move them wherever you want? Or do you find they belong to the reader you're using and not you; so you can't use them as you wish?
So I'm not buying eBooks either.
How about movies? Oh, you can "buy" a rental download, but you can't get a valid working long term copy of a DVD downloaded. They simply won't sell it that way.
Electronic sales of electronic media tend to be too limited in value to be useful; and too costly compared to a physical copy to justify the reasoning.
The only exception I've made is video games, and then specifically online games (MMORPG's and such). There is no drawback to not having say your old Everquest discs. If you want to play, you can re-up your account and DL the client without media, you can only play through an account... not having the physical media isn't a limitation.
But for Music, books, videos, etc... you're just buying trouble from the publishers who are trying so hard to manage "security" they end up charging more for less value in the electronic market.
Posted by: gekkobear at December 16, 2011 10:02 AM (X0NX1)
Posted by: John Morris at December 16, 2011 10:05 AM (sCRhB)
Is like the record store where old guys like me can get all of the music that we like from the discount rack? Do the ebooks get cheaper the longer they've been published.
Oh, and thanks for the link to the paid site. I'm taking a lesson from the Occufreeloaders and I'm not payin for stuff anymore. Occupy Wall St. Journal!
Posted by: Max Entropy at December 16, 2011 10:06 AM (pYA9l)
Posted by: dagny at December 16, 2011 10:06 AM (tb5pQ)
Yep.
Posted by: booger at December 16, 2011 10:07 AM (EjNp5)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 16, 2011 10:07 AM (Y/aF4)
Not unlike the Blu-ray/DVD combo packs. Pay a little more, get both.
Posted by: john T at December 16, 2011 10:07 AM (iaajL)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at December 16, 2011 10:08 AM (Gkhxf)
Do the ebooks get cheaper the longer they've been published.
Yeah. But not in a predictable way. I loves me some library e book download. Their audio book download to ipod is also awesome. Makes exercising great because I get to "read" several chapters. Love that.
Posted by: dagny at December 16, 2011 10:08 AM (tb5pQ)
I'm not a sci-fi person, but I'll check it out. Jane Austen and even Dickens becomes just slightly repetitive after awhile.
Posted by: Paul Zummo at December 16, 2011 01:36 PM (IGkEP)
Amazon has collections of thirty to fifty SF stories, novels for about a buck. Much of Piper, including works that are unavailable, is in there.
Posted by: Oldcat at December 16, 2011 10:08 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: LauraNotW at December 16, 2011 10:10 AM (NUU3Z)
What? What? Project Gutenberg? Another place I can get free books? Really? Pant pant pant.
(Seriously, I am so cheap that I got nauseated christmas shopping yesterday.)
Posted by: dagny at December 16, 2011 10:11 AM (tb5pQ)
Posted by: LauraNotW at December 16, 2011 10:16 AM (NUU3Z)
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 16, 2011 10:18 AM (dp+c+)
Ace says: " I'd rather have the Material Download, then."
That is <i>exactly</i> what they're counting on!
I have yet to convert to ebooks. I still like holding a paper book in my hands when I read. And I'm a big consumer of the cheapest form yet: the library. (Oh, I know...don't get on my case about how taxpayers pay for the library. I get it.) I only buy a book nowadays if it's something I know I'll read more than once.
Some books are easier to find in e-form, so I have downloaded or borrowed a few electronic versions. But it'll be a while before I'm a full or even partial convert.
Posted by: amosjo at December 16, 2011 10:18 AM (U4XOm)
Posted by: That Stupid Valley Girl in the Video Ace Posted 3 Years Later at December 16, 2011 10:20 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: steveha at December 16, 2011 10:22 AM (TMG3G)
You must be talking about i-tunes. The Amazon downloads are not like that.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 10:22 AM (YdQQY)
The link below shows a cost breakdown for a published work, and it seems about right in my experience.
Go take a look at:
Book cost breakdown
Physical stuff is cheap. Now, there are probably some efficiencies to gain once you remove both distribution and warehousing costs, but that's not necessarily what is driving the price. Large publishers right now are crazy scared. They do not know what to do. They see their whole thing going down the tubes, quite possibly in a catastrophically short span of time. So, you see pricing policies that might be counter-intuitive or just flat out don't make sense. They may be trying to see what demand is really like. What will the market truly support? Is there a place for them in the world of the future? If so, how could they fund an all-digital pipeline?
In general, the very cheap books on Amazon most likely have more lightweight publishing concerns behind them. Just an author and MAYBE someone to read it through once and format it for Kindle direct publishing. The fact that they don't have a paper copy available isn't the reason for the lower price -- it's just a completely different business model.
Posted by: mr.frakypants at December 16, 2011 10:23 AM (HegGA)
There is no reason any more for publishing companies to have a stranglehold on book marketing. If you don't have to negotiate shelf space and placement with retailers, your book is just a product like any other that can be sold directly to the consumer. There are great opportunities here for creative literary agents with a stable of talent to build their own distribution.
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 16, 2011 10:23 AM (+lsX1)
If there's been a book in the last 25 years that wasn't put into electronic format before printing, I'll eat it. Shuffling bits ain't a big thing; why do you think Amazon will let you E-mail any ebook file to your Kindle e-mail and convert it on the fly?
Posted by: SDN at December 16, 2011 10:23 AM (uOUKR)
You guys don't really understand book economics because none of you are actually publishers. The fact is, the cost to produce a paper book is very cheap, on the order of $4.00-$8.00. That's what you hold and see, so you mistake that for the value. Producing a book in e-book format really only saves the cost of the physical book. Publishers are not dealing with "pure profit." They still have all the other production costs, including the whopper of advertising.
You can see the economics play out in the "remainders" section. What do remainders cost? $5-$10. They actually can be more profitable than a book sold at full price, certainly more profitable than one sold at a discount. The publisher very carefully assesses how many copies they will be able to sell. If they figure they can sell 10,000, the cost to physically make the book might be, say $3.00, but if they print 12,500, the cost would drop to $2.50. They intentionally print 12,500, thereby reducing their print cost to $2.50, sell the 10,000, then remainder the 2500 extra books at $5.00, handily recovering their print cost, plus some tidy profit.
Michael, Fox Cove Press
Posted by: Michael at December 16, 2011 10:24 AM (qNRMo)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at December 16, 2011 10:26 AM (DxKBi)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at December 16, 2011 10:26 AM (HegGA)
Posted by: Michael at December 16, 2011 02:24 PM (qNRMo)
OK, so what about e-books makes them just as, if not more expensive than paper books...especially in 2011 where manuscripts are already in electronic format?
Posted by: JohnTant at December 16, 2011 10:30 AM (eytER)
Posted by: 2nd Ammendment Mother at December 16, 2011 10:32 AM (L4CWX)
Whatever the market will bear. If people will pay it, why wouldn't they charge the same price?
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 16, 2011 10:34 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: BuddyPC at December 16, 2011 10:37 AM (KCuY9)
What am I gonna do to fill up unallocated time on my $10 million dollar printing press now, fella? We had a contract.
Posted by: Fritz at December 16, 2011 10:38 AM (FabC8)
Nope, you can return a Kindle book. I know, because one person did that for one of my books (only one, please no more, I promise to be good!) I also love the free sample (I think it is the first 10% of the book) and use it religiously to weed out the also-rans in the indie selection. Now we just have to train authors to compress the front matter (where you thank your mother, your first-grade teacher, and all your cats, by name) so the first five pages are not useless (to the reader).
Posted by: bad cat robot at December 16, 2011 10:38 AM (95J/0)
Posted by: Ryan at December 16, 2011 10:40 AM (V922g)
Posted by: Ryan at December 16, 2011 10:44 AM (V922g)
The publishing industry is running around with its hair on fire so logic is playing less and less of a role in its decisions of late. There are fewer slots available for books (decline and fall of Borders, Barnes & Noble physical store now offering mostly Nooks and plastic toys) so fiction pretty much has to be a guaranteed bestseller to get picked up. For the non-fiction, it depends on the topic.
Check out blogs like Joe Konrath and Dean Wesley Smith for the skinny on the current state of play, and advice. Full disclosure: I am biased in favor of self-publishing, since a) I did it and it is easy-peasy, and b) I spent many years with an agent trying to get in the door with traditional publishing and getting nowhere.
Posted by: bad cat robot at December 16, 2011 10:49 AM (95J/0)
Believe it or not, there are titles that are cheaper on iBooks. There probably are on Nook, too.
Posted by: Meiczyslaw at December 16, 2011 10:49 AM (bjRNS)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at December 16, 2011 02:34 PM (+lsX1)
Then the argument from Michael doesn't hold water and we're back to publishing companies gouging customers as a way to dampen e-book sales.
Posted by: JohnTant at December 16, 2011 10:55 AM (eytER)
Posted by: Thulsa Doom at December 16, 2011 10:56 AM (yEPg5)
http://gutenberg.net.au/
Posted by: someone2 at December 16, 2011 10:59 AM (/hia0)
Posted by: gulfkraken at December 16, 2011 11:00 AM (WBfjO)
My relatively new Kindle has a lot on it for less than twenty bucks. Check out the classics available for free. I am considering dumping Netflix for Amazon Prime. Amazon has a lot of books available for lending for Prime members. Then there is the video and free shipping. If only I'd had the foresight when I bought the hundred dollar streaming blu-ray. Who knows, maybe a firmware will come along for Amazon streaming on my low wnd Vizio dvd player.
Posted by: technology is cool at December 16, 2011 11:04 AM (lHdBc)
Space, for me. My Kindle can hold 3000 books. I don't need a library in my house to store 3000 books. It would be nice to have a sliding two story ladder, fireplace, leather chairs, a cognac decanter, etc. I can't afford it. I can have a library now, just not the kind them rich people gots. Mine comes with a lawn chair and cans of Natty Light. But I have one. Thank God for smart people and capitalism!
Posted by: technology is cool at December 16, 2011 11:10 AM (lHdBc)
I am guilty of making a copy of a CD now and then for my friends when I'm trying to expose them to new music, but with you tube, that's not even necessary. ( I do make Christmas compilation CDs every year.)
You rip off the artist when you steal stuff, too, not just the publishers.
If there is a way the artist gets paid from the torrent sites, I apologize for my comments.
Posted by: Tammy al' Thor at December 16, 2011 11:12 AM (SsG4J)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at December 16, 2011 11:13 AM (rJMw2)
It's not surprising that this would happen. Some years back, I used to play hockey on a regular basis, and I always used wood sticks. They were typically priced around $32 - $37, depending on the maker. I decided one time to try a composite stick, and while it had its nice points, I wasn't convinced that abandoning all-wood sticks was a wise idea.
One day while at the blue line I wound up and let a shot go and the blade snapped, so I headed on down to the local shop after to see about getting a replacement. You can imagine my surprise when I found that price-wise, there was no difference between an all-wood stick and just the blade for the composite stick. Some of the blades even cost more. Less wood used, same price or higher? And if I somehow managed to snap the composite shaft, it would cost about $80 to replace.
I don't play much now, for various reasons, but when I do I use the wood stick.
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at December 16, 2011 11:20 AM (KXXIv)
As long as you are making them for yourself it is fair use despite what the assholes say. If you give it away though you are in trouble.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 11:24 AM (YdQQY)
Posted by: Ryan at December 16, 2011 11:28 AM (V922g)
A few nights ago in the ONT, epobirs gave some really excellent advice on pricing your work; it's Dec 12th, comment 748, if you care to read it.
As long as you are making them for yourself it is fair use despite what the assholes say. If you give it away though you are in trouble.
Saw upthread or on another post that you're getting ready to be able to have cold things again, and I was so happy to hear it!
Posted by: Tammy al' Thor at December 16, 2011 11:37 AM (SsG4J)
Posted by: Tammy al' Thor at December 16, 2011 03:37 PM (SsG4J)
Oh I get cold stuff about 3 days after chemo. That blocks out about 1 week out of two. Its killing me today though. One of those rare days in Dec in the 70s.
Posted by: Vic at December 16, 2011 11:46 AM (YdQQY)
1. Read Anywhere!
If Im in the office, I can just pull out my Nook during some downtime and just crack open ANY of the books that I've downloaded... i don't have to limit myself to the one or two books I took to the office.
2. New Authors
I can find some good reads at low prices, particularly among authors who are just getting started.. (one of my favorite books I ever downloaded was "Bubba and the Dead Woman".. absolutely hilarious read, and i'm definitely now a big fan of C.L. Bevill ... someone I would have never picked up if it werent for an e-book read, simply because i wouldnt' have found them other than through a deal, because no publisher ever pushed them out to the public eye.)
As for sites:
I'm not sure how much they share layouts.. but if you're a regular user of Gutenberg books, you might also want to try manybooks.net (Ive found a few on there that were actually good reads, but they may already be on Gutenberg)
Posted by: Mark S. at December 16, 2011 11:58 AM (iQTJ7)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 16, 2011 12:04 PM (DuH+r)
Posted by: rock(me)hardplace at December 16, 2011 12:11 PM (Kjq7r)
___________
Dude. Speaking machines are sooooo last century.
Posted by: Thomas Edison at December 16, 2011 12:15 PM (FzhYM)
Posted by: Rodney C. Johnson at December 16, 2011 12:21 PM (5uGq7)
Posted by: Rodney C. Johnson at December 16, 2011 12:23 PM (5uGq7)
Posted by: bennett at December 16, 2011 12:25 PM (GSeIF)
Posted by: dri at December 16, 2011 12:26 PM (VseJU)
Stick it to the publishing houses. They screw their writers.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at December 16, 2011 12:29 PM (r4wIV)
Not to mention that the product you are getting, or at least, the enjoyment of that product, or even the experience you have interacting with the product is vastly different between an E-book and a real book. As good as a Kindle may be, it still doesn't really compare - on a quality basis - to a REAL book. So not only do I want to see a significant savings based on the fact that the additional cost to the publisher is ZERO, but also I want to see a decent discount based on the fact that I'm settling for a lesser version of the same product.
The fact is, the entirety of the media publishing and distributing industries are FUCKED UP on this topic. Music, TV, Movies and Books are all now subject to the same irrational stupidity whereby you effectively try and make the digital experience WORSE for a paying customer than for pirates.
Its completely idiotic. And what's more, they don't seem to have a clue that people are MORE drawn to the e-book version for the instant gratification of a download now that there are less and less brick and mortar book stores that can sell you a hardcopy of a book right now. Brick and mortar stores likely being the absolute smallest profit margins for publishers, THAT's the model they still want to prop up.
Posted by: deadrody at December 16, 2011 12:34 PM (b2D8X)
The place this pricing system pisses me off the most with my kindle is in older books that are in paperback, that I can find used or at target for 2-4 dollars off, but are selling on kindle for full retail price. That is ridiculous!
I know it isn't amazon but they need to convince these idiots that used makes them NO money, while a moderately priced kindle book might make them 4 dollars (or whatever).
I do love my kindle still. If you like classics you can get tons for cheap or free, and you can get independent books, which are fun but of variable quality
Posted by: Lea at December 16, 2011 01:08 PM (lIU4e)
Posted by: MrTea at December 16, 2011 01:08 PM (uSdvi)
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at December 16, 2011 01:21 PM (AnE2K)
Yes, quite a few of them are either bad writers, or did not have anyone edit the work, so a lot are rather messy. However, the so-called "publisher" e-books are just as often badly formatted and not edited. Given a choice between an indie messy book and a "published" messy book, I'll go with the indie book, which is pretty much always cheaper. If an indie's work is bad, I'm only out a few cents. If a "published" work is bad, I'm out a whole lot more. Furthermore, the self-published author gets 70% (35% in EU countries) of the book's price, versus 10-15% after a "publisher" has taken its cut.
The publishing industry has moved far away from proofreading and editing. The author is stuck doing the vast majority of that work, and the publishing house just takes the info, throws it at their particular computer software, and the book gets published with bad writing, worse grammar, and awful spelling and formatting.
I'd rather support the author, not the publishing house.
Posted by: MAJ Arkay at December 16, 2011 01:48 PM (TnUAk)
Posted by: sandspur at December 16, 2011 02:02 PM (d7MnY)
I much prefer my Kindle to hard copy books, and I've been reading a lot more since getting it this past January than I did in previous years. I don't really compare prices between hard copies and ebooks... if I want an ebook and the price is one I'm willing to pay, I'll buy it.
Also, I've seen many people on the Amazon forums completely ignore the fact that, at least for new releases, the ebooks need to pull their weight in helping recoup all the costs associated with advances, editing, marketing, etc.
I don't like the "Agency Model", where the retailer just acts as an agent for the publisher, who is the actual seller, much, but I guess we can thank Steve Jobs for that. But, what are we asking for as an alternative? An "Ebook Czar" under the Obama administration to set prices?
Posted by: malclave at December 16, 2011 02:08 PM (W1Ndc)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at December 16, 2011 02:34 PM (DxKBi)
Posted by: Barack Obama at December 16, 2011 03:45 PM (t5KBI)
Posted by: Ryan at December 16, 2011 04:26 PM (V922g)
Posted by: Charlie at December 16, 2011 04:49 PM (qRouG)
Posted by: karenm at December 16, 2011 05:02 PM (Xnxty)
Posted by: Theodoric of York at December 16, 2011 05:03 PM (hW8WT)
Posted by: karenm at December 16, 2011 05:04 PM (Xnxty)
Posted by: D.C. Dead iBooks at December 16, 2011 05:06 PM (GeprT)
Excellent blog, thanks for the share. I'll be a regular viewer.
Posted by: Christmas Sleigh Plan at December 16, 2011 05:36 PM (l94RK)
Posted by: MrTea at December 16, 2011 05:52 PM (pkDQP)
Posted by: RSS Newsreader Apps at December 16, 2011 06:00 PM (fA4z/)
The kindle bookstore is overwhelmed with free books right now because Amazon published authors were allowed to reduce their price to free if they participated in the Amazon prime lending library.
Posted by: MrTea at December 16, 2011 06:19 PM (pkDQP)
Posted by: wtf here comes a drunken rant at December 16, 2011 09:10 PM (lHdBc)
Posted by: Apollo’s Angels ePub at December 16, 2011 09:19 PM (m1psR)
Posted by: corsets at December 17, 2011 06:18 AM (HvC/j)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2093 seconds, 365 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: maddogg at December 16, 2011 08:43 AM (OlN4e)