March 04, 2011
— Ace It's hard to make ends meet on that.
There is always the cry that teachers have to buy "supplies" for their students out of their own pockets. I can't help but think there's a reason for that -- that each year, a greater proportion of dollars earmarked for education goes to salaries, and is deducted from supplies.
$60,000 in actual money salary plus $41,000 per year in benefits package.
In a normal negotiation, management is a genuine adversary to the workers. Workers have a strong interest in getting the highest salaries possible, but management has a countervailing interest in keeping them lower.
This doesn't happen with the Government Worker Unions. In that situation, the money isn't even coming out of the hides of those negotiating with the workers -- the money comes from a third party, the taxpayer. So there's not a particularly strong incentive to negotiate vigorously on behalf of people who aren't even in the room.
Add to that the fact that a piece of every dollar granted the government workers is going to be paid back to those doing the "negotiating" and there's an actual incentive on the government side to increase salaries.
So both parties at the negotiation have incentives to increase salaries. The one party with an incentive to keep salaries down isn't in the room and is excluded from negotiations.
In business, if an agent of the business makes a deal which is bad for those he represents but benefits him personally via an under-the-table payment, we call this a kickback, and it's a crime of corruption.
In politics, though, it's not just legal but increasingly crucial to the Democrat Party's survival.
Corrected: The stat is about Milwaukee teachers, not Wisconsin-wide teachers, as I first wrote.
But other districts in Milwaukee county pay their teachers even more:
That was lower than eight other school districts in Milwaukee County, including Greendale, Greenfield, Shorewood, Cudahy, Fox Point, South Milwaukee, Franklin and Nicolet, which was highest at just over $103,000.
Posted by: Ace at
09:55 AM
| Comments (263)
Post contains 349 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Cooter at March 04, 2011 09:59 AM (6c0Hn)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 04, 2011 09:59 AM (AZGON)
THAT would get their attention in a hurry.
Posted by: jwb7605 at March 04, 2011 10:00 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: muggedbyreality at March 04, 2011 10:01 AM (pejtw)
Posted by: joncelli at March 04, 2011 10:01 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: vinny at March 04, 2011 10:02 AM (oyqh/)
Fundamentally prohibit shifting the "payment" portion off into the future. That is, you're fundamentally shifting to a IRA-like or annuity-based benefits package as opposed to a "pension plan".
You can still call an annuity a "pension plan" - it still has guaranteed outputs etc. But the money has basically already changed hands and is on a set path.
This should be government-wide at all freaking levels.
Posted by: Al at March 04, 2011 10:02 AM (MzQOZ)
Ah yes the beautiful Union People...Fricken Maggot Infested Pigs! And the Tea party people are ????
Madison - State officials said Thursday that damage to the marble inside and out the State Capitol would cost an estimated $7.5 million. Cari Anne Renlund, chief legal counsel for the state Department of Administration, said in Dane County court that estimates of damage to marble includes $6 million to repair damaged marble inside the Capitol, $1 million for damage outside and $500,000 for costs to supervise the damage. Much of the damage apparently has come from tape used to put up signs and placards at the Capitol. It was not immediately clear how the estimates were made, though the state is apparently relying on opinions by historical architects, one of whom works for the U.S. Park Service. One concern is the residue from tape that the state says is causing damage to stone and other surfaces inside the Capitol. Michele Curran, an architectural historian for the National Parks Service who coordinates national historic landmarks in Wisconsin, said she didn’t know how the state had arrived at its damage figures. She said certain kinds of tape can leave lasting residues on surfaces such as marble or wood if they are improperly removed. But she said only a professional cleaning service experienced in such work and familiar with the situation in the state Capitol could estimate any possible costs. “They need a quote from a company that specializes in cleaning historic surfaces,” Curran said. Many of the papers and banners posted in the state Capitol were put up using painter’s tape, which is employed to minimize effects on walls.
Posted by: Frank Stien at March 04, 2011 10:03 AM (By4wu)
It also needs to be remembered that teaching is a part-time job. Most don't work 40 hours a week when school is in session, and it's out of session for 3 months plus long holiday breaks.
The monthly pay for a $100,000 teacher is the same as someone who works 12 months a year making a $133,000 salary.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 04, 2011 10:03 AM (SY2Kh)
That's more than $30,000 than I make a year as a detective in a big-city police department. And that's including my OT.
But hey, these teachers deserve it. It's for the children.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 04, 2011 10:03 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: USA at March 04, 2011 10:04 AM (YZISw)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at March 04, 2011 10:04 AM (tf9Ne)
...In business, if an agent of the business makes a deal which is bad for those he represents but benefits him personally via an under-the-table payment, we call this a kickback, and it's a crime of corruption.
In politics, though, it's not just legal but increasingly crucial to the Democrat Party's survival.
Excellent...short and to the point. Will forward to this the folks I know who can't seem to wrap their heads around the crux of this issue.
Posted by: dananjcon at March 04, 2011 10:04 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 10:06 AM (Q1lie)
- Health Insurance (double secret hidden because your employer pays the insurance and the insurance pays the doctor)
- Withholding disguising the pain of taxes
- Student Loan, driving up the cost of education and biasing it from courses of study that have market value
Simple solutions - make health insurance a deduction for individuals, as it is for corporations; get rid of withholding, make taxes due Oct 30th; no student loans for general study - tie the value and cost of the loans to the value of the degree; etc
Posted by: Jean at March 04, 2011 10:06 AM (WkuV6)
That's bogus. That rate only applies if they hire union labor.
Posted by: AmishDude at March 04, 2011 10:06 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Tom at March 04, 2011 10:06 AM (MWXXs)
On the other hand, actual picketing is probably the hardest they have worked for years.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 04, 2011 10:07 AM (qqrPQ)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2011 10:08 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Frank Stien at March 04, 2011 10:08 AM (By4wu)
The pension scheme has been all but eliminated in almost all private sector markets, excepting unionized companies like GM.
Let them do 401Ks + SS. I'd even be okay with adding some matching contributions to 401Ks, under the same sort of rules private companies use. Yeah, even that would get abused but at least the costs are a straightforward calculation.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: emma gouldman at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (JaL+E)
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: logprof at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (kKA7V)
This should be government-wide at all freaking levels.
Posted by: Al
Defined benefit plan vs. Defined contribution; these are the two big branches of retirement plans.
Traditional 'pension' plans were defined benefit plans. That is the payouts were guaranteed at a certain level determined by the respective government or government sponsored retirement fund.
Defined contribution is what most of us know; ie we pay in a specified amount but receive only what we have paid in plus or minus investment returns.
Defined benefit plans are untenable. They cannot be maintained and this is the reason for the gaping holes in these public sector retirement funds. All public sector pensions need to be converted to defined contribution plans with graduated conversion rates.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at March 04, 2011 10:09 AM (S59+B)
I'm going into the tape residue removal business.
Yeh, I've got a great product you can buy. I call it Agua. It's expensive, but I'll cut ya a break.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 04, 2011 10:10 AM (XdlcF)
That's more than $30,000 than I make a year as a detective in a big-city police department. And that's including my OT.
But hey, these teachers deserve it. It's for the children.
They can't supplement their income by raiding the evidence storage locker like you can.
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 10:10 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 10:11 AM (EpapN)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 04, 2011 10:11 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: maddogg at March 04, 2011 10:11 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 10:12 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: USA at March 04, 2011 10:12 AM (YZISw)
Posted by: The Mayor Daley Time Travel Project at March 04, 2011 10:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Candy Dunham 2010 graduate from a Wisconsin HS at March 04, 2011 10:12 AM (By4wu)
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 02:09 PM (Q1lie)
Id take that anyday vs the overtime scam the other public sector stooges get.
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:12 AM (FIDMq)
The Florida Supreme Court has ruled that Governor Rick Scott can reject high-speed rail funds from the federal government.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 04, 2011 10:13 AM (qqrPQ)
Posted by: lewis at March 04, 2011 10:13 AM (i/Leq)
Marble is a very permeable rock. It stains extremely easily.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sFucksaw (NJConservative) at March 04, 2011 10:15 AM (LH6ir)
What does high speed rail have in common with Charlie Sheen?
(I am sick to death of both stupidities)
Posted by: maddogg at March 04, 2011 10:15 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 04, 2011 02:11 PM (0q2P7)
You think that's great you should see what an administrator gets. Most of these people have salaries in excess of 100K. They are retiring at 55 and receiving a pension over 100K a year. They just move to another town and state and start again. I've heard of some who got another 20 years in somewhere else and are receiving 2 full pensions total in excess of 150K.
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 10:16 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 02:12 PM (wuv1c)
Only if you make the potus performance based
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:16 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Cooter at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (6c0Hn)
Posted by: Al Sharpton at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (TMB3S)
What would you wingnutz rather pay these public servants less tha garbage men?
Yes. Garbage men do a difficult job that few are willing to do. Like everyone else, they do it 12 months a year.
Teacher's don't. They are overpaid.
More importantly, they are over-valued.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (VJU+j)
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 02:06 PM (Q1lie)
And can go ahead and get another job teaching without issue.
to be fair i'm sure they have to report the pension payments as income just as private sector workers earning pensions do.
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: lewis at March 04, 2011 02:13 PM (i/Leq)
Your premise is faulty. Evidently you have not seen any of the WI protest videos.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (AZGON)
Wisconsin teachers: A stain on the marble of education.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (XdlcF)
So, could union campaign donations be banned under existing elections laws?
Alternately, can taxpayers sue if they don't like the contract that the unions and their politicians come up with?
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (7BU4a)
Id take that anyday vs the overtime scam the other public sector stooges get.
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 02:12 PM (FIDMq)
That's just it. Their high 5 is for total compensation in a year. That's why it's the high 5. It counts OT.
Posted by: Rocks at March 04, 2011 10:17 AM (Q1lie)
I don't want to demonize teachers- they provide a necessary service.
However, this "we need gold-plated pension benefits for the children" bullshit needs to be shot down hard.
Let's face it- it doesn't require a masters degree from MIT and a genius level IQ to teach K-12. If you graduated high school with good grades, you pretty much have the required knowledge.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 04, 2011 10:18 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 10:18 AM (F1BaX)
Posted by: Dan Collins at March 04, 2011 10:18 AM (oM9VK)
If you have a Teamster working for you, you submit his fringe benefits on his behalf monthly. This includes a payment to the pension fund ranging from $2.00 an hour to $8.00 an hour depending on where you are located. At that point, the cash is completely out of your hands and the IBT invests it in whatever manner they wish. For all I know, they go down to the Bellagio every month and take the entire amount and bet on black.
Apparently, the IBT has figured out the ponzi scheme that is their pension fund is way under funded. Is this their fault? No, of course not! How could you even ask? They have now come back to the signatory Companies, many who have been contributing to the Pension fund for decades, told them that they didn't pay enough and now they need to cough up more to keep the Pension program funded. The more that you've paid in over the years, the more you owe now as you are responsible for a higher percentage of the negative balance than someone who has paid in less than you.
I think they've been taking lessons from the Social Security program.
I don't know where all this stands right now. I think there are some appeals processes to go through yet, but what a deal, huh? Do you feel the love?
Posted by: not neo just conservative at March 04, 2011 10:18 AM (01RS2)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest? What would you wingnutz rather pay these public servants less tha garbage men?
At least if a Garbage man gets caught having sex with my rubbish he'll get fired. The same can't be said about teachers and students.
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 10:18 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 04, 2011 02:07 PM (qqrPQ)
You must've missed that pix of "Rotunda."
Posted by: RushBabe at March 04, 2011 10:19 AM (urYpw)
Why don't we let the market set their salaries? No unions, no tenure, etc.
Good teachers will be paid well, poor teachers will not.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2011 10:19 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: lewis at March 04, 2011 10:20 AM (i/Leq)
Posted by: Portnoy at March 04, 2011 10:20 AM (azgo2)
That is about twice what my dad makes as a private-school teacher now, and he has over thirty years experience, almost twenty-nine of that at a single school. He raised six children on his salary, too.
Playing the Devil's advocate here: Couldn't one argue that private businesses just pass the increased cost of wages on to their customers? Of course, they have more of an incentive to keep costs down than do governments, since they can't just borrow money the way governments think they can, but how are increased wages different from corporate taxes, which we usually say are just passed on to the consumer?
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 04, 2011 10:20 AM (dbYs8)
Well, troll, the answer is beyond simple; competition. If parents were able to direct vouchers to schools and teachers, then teachers would be rewarded at higher levels of compensation.
Oh, that's right, you're a commie and you don't believe in competition. Never the less, you still owe me $50 for my lesson.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at March 04, 2011 10:21 AM (S59+B)
At least if a Garbage man gets caught having sex with my rubbish he'll get fired. The same can't be said about teachers and students.
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 02:18 PM (wuv1c)
Ok, there goes one career choice, but teaching...hmmm...
Posted by: Wicket at March 04, 2011 10:21 AM (7BU4a)
That is another lie spewed forth by these turds. Here in my country the parents are expected to buy supplies. Not only that, but since some "parents" can't afford supplies and they are not on the food stamp list of allowable products, all the supplies that other parents buy are pooled into a common hoard and shared.
Sound familiar.
Oh when those run out, the parents buying are responsible for buying more.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2011 10:22 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: toby928™ at March 04, 2011 10:22 AM (GTbGH)
Membership on the school board, IMHO, is more about power, status, and social contacts, than about any ability. Conflicts of interest abound, with some board member's spouses being either teachers or other kinds of school workers.
School board meetings are not recorded, nor are minutes taken and then published for the public to view. If a meeting will have a topic such as a sports coach, the room will be jammed with parents. If it is just to discuss mundane other stuff like academics and money, attendance goes way down.
While the board is supposed to advise the superintendent, the super runs the show, and the board members always vote per his recommendations.
Problem teachers are not fired, but instead, are not given any assignment to teach or otherwise work. One of these has gone to the school each day for a couple years, to sleep in the break room all day.
In an interesting incident, plans were made for a handicapped child who was thought to be moving into the district, and a "teacher's aide," a full-time job, was created and filled to deal with the student. The child never entered the school district, but the aide, with nothing to do, has been on the payroll ever since.
No board member will ever speak up about anything, because it would be considered bad social form to not make nicey-nice.
Teachers get step-raises yearly. Their defined-benefit pensions are not subject to state income tax.
Really sucks, right?
Posted by: Usin-my-SS-checks-to-buy-MMJ at March 04, 2011 10:23 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: lewis at March 04, 2011 02:20 PM (i/Leq)
So the union government teachers will drive the high speed trains off of the bridges?
I guess that will be efficient.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2011 10:23 AM (7BU4a)
“They need a quote from a company that specializes in cleaning historic surfaces,”
This is where big gov gets into big trouble and why we're screwed; company that specializes is code language for I'm gonna hire my cousin Vinny to stick it up the tax payers corn hole. Get the friggin building janitor down there with a handful of solvents from home friggin depot and figure out which one best does the job and call it a day. Or simply leave it as a reminder to the people that this is what fat cat-spoiled union punks do when they don't get their way.
Done and DONE!!
Hmmm, ya think maybe someone can figure hot to gagggle "how to clean marble"
Posted by: dananjcon at March 04, 2011 10:23 AM (pr+up)
The headline in the sidebar about Helen Thomas has a bad link. Here it is:
When all you have is an oven, everything looks like a Jew.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sFucksaw (NJConservative) at March 04, 2011 10:23 AM (LH6ir)
Dems hate children worst!
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 04, 2011 10:23 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:24 AM (FIDMq)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest? What would you wingnutz rather pay these public servants less tha garbage men?
The "best and brightest" should be doing a job that demands being bright or the best. Teaching is a part-time job that doesn't demand a particularly high level of knowledge or education.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 04, 2011 10:24 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2011 10:25 AM (TMB3S)
Playing the Devil's advocate here: Couldn't one argue that private businesses just pass the increased cost of wages on to their customers? Of course, they have more of an incentive to keep costs down than do governments, since they can't just borrow money the way governments think they can, but how are increased wages different from corporate taxes, which we usually say are just passed on to the consumer?
Yes they do, but private businesses keep costs at a minimum so they don't have to raise prices. Public Unions and Elected Officials have no such incentive. They have a captive customer base. I can choose to stop buying a product if the price increase, however I can't avoid paying taxes
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 10:25 AM (wuv1c)
You generally have a pay rate and a benefits package. The benefits package is health care, pension, and miscellaneous funds like PAC's and such. The bulk is typically health care and pension. Both are usually a flat hourly rate, but can be a percentage of payroll. It depends on the agreement.
Posted by: not neo just conservative at March 04, 2011 10:26 AM (01RS2)
Posted by: Infidel Librarian at March 04, 2011 10:26 AM (vo+jf)
How does being able to get away with doing a shitty job, year after year, without being fired translate into 'Best and Brightest'?
Why don't we let the market set their salaries? No unions, no tenure, etc.
Good teachers will be paid well, poor teachers will not.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2011 02:19 PM (7BU4a)
Competition is like kryptonite to a liberal. Life isn't fair. When you go through life with the belief that you deserve everything simply because you're breathing, the idea that some people are better, work harder and maybe earn their way is just crazy talk.
Posted by: Portnoy at March 04, 2011 10:28 AM (azgo2)
Posted by: USA at March 04, 2011 10:28 AM (YZISw)
What job is that? Watching people DO the damage? That's the gig I want.
We have plenty of those jobs in my business!
Posted by: Ron Jeremy at March 04, 2011 10:28 AM (zgZzy)
But remember, people who make over $200,000 have too much money and need to be taxed out of existence.
Posted by: Quicksilver Madness at March 04, 2011 10:28 AM (00y9H)
How much does the President make? 200k? How about we have a rule that no one in government can make more the the Chief Executive of the USA
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 02:12 PM (wuv1c)
I think it's now $400K.
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 10:29 AM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 10:29 AM (4Pleu)
Fundamentally prohibit shifting the "payment" portion off into the future.
Al is dead on. I would think that a state constitutional amendment could be worded to say, in essence, that any guarantee, government insurance, promise of future payment, or the like which can be monetized MUST be monetized. Thus, if the government wants to promise a pension, and this can be done by purchasing an annuity or similar product, the government MUST purchase that product with money in its current budget, or purchase it now and float a bond to pay for it. Even at the federal level, this would work - try substituting private bank deposit insurance for FDIC insurance, with the government (or the banks, actually) paying the premiums up front. No more guesses about the government's (i.e., the taxpayers') future liability; just a fee to be paid. If it is worth providing, it is worth monetizing. No more of this "I'd gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today" crap.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at March 04, 2011 10:29 AM (sXUiz)
It's dangerous in the heat of the Wisconsin foolishness to generalize that experience to all teachers. My daughter works for a school district in Idaho. She has a Master's Degree and 9 years experience in Special Ed (and that's a tough job in anyone's book). She makes someplace in the mid $40m. Her union called for a walkout last week while the legislature is in session and was pulled up short when the teachers rebelled. They thought it to be unprofessional.
Also, this deal about only working 9 months of the year and drawing pay for 12. She goes to work at seven and is seldom out of there before six in the evening-----and that's not unusual for teachers. And it goes on year after year.
Wisconsin has surfaced some serious problems but to tar all teachers, all school systems, and all states with the same brush is...is...is, well, it's almost liberal in it's sweep.
Posted by: Dennis at March 04, 2011 10:29 AM (HE0fu)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 02:24 PM (FIDMq)
No, in most places they are based on your last years salary including accumulated sick days, overtime and vacation pay. Someone who had an average salary of $60,000 can save up their vakay and sick days then work overtime their last year and end up with a pension being more than their salary ever was.
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 10:30 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 04, 2011 10:30 AM (i/Leq)
Posted by: Marcus at March 04, 2011 10:30 AM (CHrmZ)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest?
Agreed. And since we want the best and the brightest in every occupation, let's just open the floodgates and give every worker in America $1 million a year.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 04, 2011 10:30 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 10:31 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: USA at March 04, 2011 10:32 AM (YZISw)
And they are probably contractually bound to only hire fucking union services, hence the 7 million dollar price tag for tape removal. Your first clue was the half-million dollar quote for supervision.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 10:32 AM (BebB7)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 02:29 PM (4Pleu)
I guess being from a smaller area, I dont see it, the schools around here do a pretty good job. I have no complaints especially seeing what other areas(Wis, NJ,NY) have to deal with.
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:32 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Barry Obama at March 04, 2011 10:32 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 04, 2011 10:32 AM (kKA7V)
As a small business owner, I would argue that management does not want to keep the employee wages as low as possible. I would love, love, love to see my employees making huge amounts, especially commisioned sales people.
I just have to make sure that what I pay can be justified based on the benefit the employee brings to the company.
I am more than happy to pay someone 100K a year of they are bringing in more than 100K in benefit. I will not pay someone 20K if they are bringing in less than 20K in benefit.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at March 04, 2011 10:33 AM (C2//T)
Posted by: Barry Obama at March 04, 2011 10:33 AM (zgZzy)
Hey all! Just dropping by to see if anyone had heard the story Rush was just telling about how live ammo was found at the Wisconsin capitol building. That's news to me! All the news items I can find are dated yesterday (3/3), so I know it may have already been discussed here and I just missed it. *sad face*
Here's a link to the story at Gateway Pundit:
Posted by: MWR at March 04, 2011 10:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 02:30 PM (MtwBb)
There arent any teachers that get OT....right?(if there are we are boned)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:36 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 04, 2011 10:36 AM (i/Leq)
Posted by: Bob Huntsman at March 04, 2011 10:37 AM (By4wu)
Posted by: Have Blue at March 04, 2011 10:37 AM (mV+es)
There arent any teachers that get OT....right?(if there are we are boned)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 02:36 PM (FIDMq)
Sure there are, they teach summer school their last year.
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 10:38 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Have Blue at March 04, 2011 10:39 AM (mV+es)
OK. Let's analyze that statement.
1. Unions only reward seniority, not performance, not experience, not dedication.
This acts as a bar for the "best and the brightest" because they are the best and brightest not because they like being in the rank and file with everyone else. But because they are driven to produce results and be rewarded for it. They don't want to be a rank and file.
It also acts as a bar for any experienced persons, say a journalist, or an engineer from entering teaching bringing real world experience, because despite their prowess and additional practical experience in fields using subject matter they must start out at the bottom.
It also acts as a bar for technical minded people. Who are always in greater demand than socially minded folks. In the private world their is a wage difference based on the rarity of your skills. If you have developed difficult and rare sought after skills you are payed more. Not so for education, a teacher who can teach Calculus gets payed the same as a teacher teaching history.
All of this is driven by: The Union.
Now if you think their overall salary is too big here is a comparison of major first world countries. Where are US teachers? That's right, more than anyone else.
U.S. average salary PPP $ 4,055 $ 4,055
UK median salary PPP $ 3,075 $ 3,568
Germany average salary PPP $ 3,065 $ 3,309
Australia average PPP $ 2,793 $ 2,742
France median salary PPP $ 2,483 $ 1,950
Canada average income PPP $ 2,238 $ 2,236
I wouldn't mind paying for top talent at the HS levels but, the first thing that would have to go is the union. Make the teachers differentially payed based on skill rarity, performance, real world experience, and academic qualification, just like the real world. And eliminate tenure and then so long as we can turn out better than the pathetic results we currently get for one of the most expensive systems in the world, then, maybe I could get behind paying the top tier more.
But as I see it, we should be ranked #1 right now based on pay, and expenses payed to educate. I wonder what keeps holding us back? *coughUNIONScough*
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 04, 2011 10:39 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Have Blue at March 04, 2011 02:37 PM (mV+es)
They are only in session 4 or 5 months a years.
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 10:40 AM (MtwBb)
I noticed you mentioned pay alone. What about her bennies? Are they of the gold plated type?
Can she earn an equivalent amount including these bennies in a private school?
I'm not putting your daughter down nor downplaying her efforts. I'm reframing the issue. Also, keep in mind that this isn't just about teachers, but ALL public sector employees and the non-adversarial relationship between public unions and their employers (us).
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 04, 2011 10:40 AM (h0RtZ)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest?
Posted by: lewis at March 04, 2011 02:13 PM (i/Leq)
I've got news for you, sunshine: the best and brightest opted out of a teaching career long ago. The majority of teachers being turned out today are the schlubs who couldn't cut it in tougher fields of study. However, make a simple switch to Education major, and voilà !, a substantial portion of the required course load becomes "how to edjimacate" classes that are worthless, absolutely worthless, because they are dedicated to the "participation is important, accomplishment is not" mindset that permeates our schools.
I have an advanced degree in chemistry. I'm more than capable of teaching the material at high school level at this very moment. (Whether I have the temperament for doing it is another question altogether.) But the teacher's unions have set up a closed shop and, for me to qualify to teach at that level, I would have to waste time and money "studying" the bilge water that passes for education courses. Ain't happening, buckeroo ...
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 10:41 AM (7GfKM)
I know "median" and "average" aren't the same, but half the HOUSEHOLDS in Milwaukee are making a third of what one average teacher makes. If the children in those households have health insurance at all, and it's not through BadgerCare (S-CHIP), it's sure as hell not the low-deductible low-copay get-yer-Viagra-here coverage the teachers get.
I feel like some sort of socialist when I point this out, but the teachers and Democrats and union goons want to extract money from the $32K HOUSEHOLDS so $100K INDIVIDUALS don't have to use their own precious wages to pay for a portion of their living expenses. WTF, people.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 10:41 AM (nAOMZ)
Given the fact that they only work around 8 months out of the year, that really comes out to a yearly compensation of 150K - along with the beauty of being able to charge the parents of the little shits up the wazoo for special tutoring.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 10:42 AM (Ikk5M)
I agree that that's the goal. We might even manage it on a case-by-case basis. But the next time the unmentionables are in control, "reforms" will just easily re-fix the problem back in the insane direction.
What I'm requesting and proposing is a succinct law (or Amendment if needed) general enough to cover all the loopholes categorically.
It would have 65% or more support right off the bat, and be a win-the-independents issue. Support would immediately drop steeply in the transition between 'Are you in favor of prohibiting...' to 'Republicans are proposing...', but would still get wild support from Republicans and Tea Party types, with decent support from Libertarians, and true Independents.
This is a reform that costs us nothing. Opposition will be from people that were always fundamentally opposed to anything we do. The backdrop of the rampant insanity in public sector pensions would mean even our lunatic fringe types would seem obviously on the right course championing this. Always pick offense. This is offense.
Posted by: Al at March 04, 2011 10:42 AM (MzQOZ)
But where will they enjoy their smoke/drink/coke breaks?
Posted by: Barry Obama at March 04, 2011 02:33 PM (zgZzy)
The same place their students do that now: in the restrooms.
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 10:42 AM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Spike at March 04, 2011 10:43 AM (WLxeI)
Posted by: capt soothsayer, uss caine at March 04, 2011 10:43 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: USA at March 04, 2011 10:44 AM (YZISw)
Who do you think watches us?
Posted by: The Chess and Curling Team at March 04, 2011 10:45 AM (EL+OC)
Actually, I have a close relative who retired on a pension peaking at $70K--20 years ago. I believe it now pays about $55K due to tough economic times.
Posted by: gary gulrud at March 04, 2011 10:46 AM (/g2vP)
Having lived with several teachers (my mom, one of my brothers, an aunt, etc.), I can say this is complete bunk. At least, in any substantive fashion.
The "supplies" they have to pay for "out of their own pockets" are pencils, paper, erasers, and that kind of crap. It's more expensive in elementary school (when kids are still expected to bring construction paper and crayons and crap) and they only "have to" because they actually do it.
If, just one year, they said "Sorry, can't afford it," the school districts would pony up that money. The other thing is it's not that expensive- except they all go out and do it all at once. So they're buying enough stuff for roughly 1/3 of their kids (figure 8 kids' worth of supplies for an "average" 22:1 class). Yes, in that case, it can cost a couple of hundred dollars. If they spent that over the entire year, they wouldn't even notice.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 10:46 AM (8y9MW)
Nikki Haley to add SC to list of States cutting back on health care and retirement for State employees.
http://tinyurl.com/4f3qxaq
Three things:
First SC does not have State employee unions and they are not getting the "golden" plans that the Blue State people are getting.
Second she will have to get this past the FDR legislature. That will be tough. She has a R majority but a sizable portion of them are ex-Dems and they still vote and act like Dems. They gave Sanford hell.
Third the problem in SC is that there are far to many employees and overlapping agencies. In short the problem isn't that they are paid too much. The problem we have way too of them. Every politician in the State has to have some agency under his control so that all his cousins and nephews can have a job.
This is all left over from the days when Pitchfork Ben Tillman took over the State and wrote the new Constitution that gave all the power to the legislature and committees within that legislature.
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2011 10:46 AM (M9Ie6)
Let me give you an example of Union insanity. My wife is a dedicated HS history teacher. That's all she has ever taught. She gets good results with her students. I've moved a couple of times in the past 6 years, so she has repeatedly had to restart building union seniority. Budgetary measures call for laying off teachers at the elementary level. She will get layed off due to lack of seniority if one of those elementary teachers also holds a credential in history; even if the other teacher has spent their career at the elementary level, never taught at the HS level, and has no proficiency at teaching the subject matter to HS students.
Union says one cog is as good as another. And the more senior cog always gets theirs first. Regardless of experience or performance.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 04, 2011 10:47 AM (0q2P7)
88 You don't have to argue it, that's exactly what happens. But there is an active feedback system in the market, if your costs are too high sales go down. In the public space costs are just passed on to taxpayers until they reach a breaking point. See Wisconsin.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2011 02:25 PM (TMB3S)
89 Yes they do, but private businesses keep costs at a minimum so they don't have to raise prices. Public Unions and Elected Officials have no such incentive. They have a captive customer base. I can choose to stop buying a product if the price increase, however I can't avoid paying taxes
Posted by: Ben at March 04, 2011 02:25 PM (wuv1c)
Right, but why are corporate taxes just passed on to the consumer and wages for a union in the private sector not? In other words, why don't businesses just jack up their prices to compensate for increased costs like they would for a tax increase? I am guessing that taxes are applied regardless of industry and thus affect the economy more directly as a whole, so that individual businesses are less likely to suffer due to increased prices, while union wages apply only to the companies which are unionized, so they are at a disadvantage beside non-unionized shops of the same industry and those outside the industry that consumers might be more inclined to patronize if prices go up.
I am trying to figure out why a liberal would be wrong to make the same argument about union wages - they are just passed along to the consumer - that we habitually do about corporate taxes.
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 04, 2011 10:48 AM (dbYs8)
There is always the cry that teachers have to buy "supplies" for their students out of their own pockets.
Last I knew, they could get up to $300 of classroom expenses back on their taxes.
You know, whenever I see HeatherRadish's name, I figure I might as well not even post; she says what's on my mind but does so a lot better than I can. But she's dead-on right in #125. And it really burns merchants when they overhear a mom tell her kid to pick something out for himself, then ask the store owner for a discount because she's a teacher.
I know this is rude, but FUCK.
Posted by: FireHorse at March 04, 2011 10:49 AM (k3RPu)
I don't know about other places, but in TX (depending on School District) it's 30 minutes (State mandated minimum) to 1 hour a day for "planning." Plus 30 minutes for lunch.
Teachers have a sweet deal, but let's not make it sound yet better than it is. More people might want to be teachers...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 10:49 AM (8y9MW)
I know "median" and "average" aren't the same, but half the HOUSEHOLDS in Milwaukee are making a third of what one average teacher makes. If the children in those households have health insurance at all, and it's not through BadgerCare (S-CHIP), it's sure as hell not the low-deductible low-copay get-yer-Viagra-here coverage the teachers get.Posted by:
HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 02:41 PM (nAOMZ)
Pedantic note: when you are comparing salaries, more often than not, the preferred statistic for comparison is the median, not the mean (average).
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 10:50 AM (7GfKM)
Also you have to be studying instead of partying for 5 years in college, so there's that, too.
Oh - and you don't get a pension. You get to work until you die.
Oh, and another thing. The architects don't have jobs right now. So that's $0 and falling.
Posted by: isostan at March 04, 2011 10:51 AM (mFWkR)
Playing the Devil's advocate here: Couldn't one argue that private businesses just pass the increased cost of wages on to their customers? Of course, they have more of an incentive to keep costs down than do governments, since they can't just borrow money the way governments think they can, but how are increased wages different from corporate taxes, which we usually say are just passed on to the consumer?
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 04, 2011 02:20 PM (dbYs
Corporate taxes apply uniformly (mostly) to every business in the same industry in the same town. So an increase in these corporate taxes can pass through to the customers because no business has to eat them to stay competitive (again mostly). Think of a hotel /car retal tax newly imposed or increased by the local town in order to fund the building of their new sports shrine.
Now, suppose a national coffee franchise from Seattle makes a move into a rural Texas town and offers its employees twice the minimum wage, full paid health and dental insurance, two weeks paid vacations, 401(k) matching, etc. None of the local coffee shops pay or have benefits anything like this. While the employees all want to work at the new coffee shop, the locals laugh at the outrageous prices the new shop must charge for a cuppa joe and continue getting their caffeine jolts at the same local places their pappy and grandpappy did.
The market (represented by the combined decision making of the individuals buying coffee in that town) has decided the equilibrium price of a cuppa mud. The fancy vendi and biscotti notwithstanding, a single coffee shop just cannot pass through to customers, who have options, the above market wages and benefits it would like to pay to assuage its social justice group guilt.
There will be a quiz on Monday. Comprehensive Finals will be on Election Day.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 10:52 AM (XBM1t)
I lived in an all-women's dorm for my junior year. I have a fond memory of sitting in the lounge on a Thursday night wiring a circuit board for a lab as a "break" from debugging my assembler code (I'm old), and listening to a group of ElEd majors complain about having to make construction-paper cutouts for a bulletin board due the next day. It was cutting into their drinking-at-the-frats time.
Oh, I'm sure there was a super-important educational principle involved, like "putting a sun on a spring-themed display might alienate Eskimo children", but please. You do not need to be brilliant to do that work. You just have to be willing to do it.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 10:52 AM (nAOMZ)
Not to denigrate her in anyway, bit this is a pretty standard work day in my company. I work in aerospace, and 12 hour days are the norm. Then you get to go home and work online answering your emails and such till 11:30 or so. And God forbid somebody in Saudi or Oz needs you to do something for them during their working hours, because it's always an emergency and very complicated and you will go without sleep that night.
And we don't get three months off every summer, 2 weeks at Christmas or a week at Easter and 13 Federal holidays, nor pupil free days to catch up on our backlogs.
I don't begrudge teachers the time off, they need that. But long daily hours and correcting papers at home during their free time is an argument that doesn't cut it any more for me.
We're all free to seek employment elsewhere if we feel to put upon by our current working conditions.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 10:53 AM (BebB7)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at March 04, 2011 10:53 AM (c5RQr)
Appreciate the knowledge layed out. Some have issues with k-12 funding...whats the thoughts on higher ed?, guess I dont see how somebody that charges tuitition should be gettting any assistance
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 10:53 AM (FIDMq)
Ummm... they are. Part of the price of any product or service in the private sector is labor cost. The issue is that private companies have to compete with each other, so they have incintive to keep those labor costs as low as possible.
Government has exactly the opposite pressure. Because the Union donates to the politicians, it behooves the politicians to see to it that the Union has as much money as is possible. Thus required unionization, and bloated government salaries.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 10:54 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 02:50 PM (7GfKM)
You're corredct, but that's because there are usually some major outliers on the large side. With teacher pay there aren't many that fall outside of well-defined range, so the average salary is about as good as the median. But, you're correct, in the general case one wants to examine the median salary.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 10:54 AM (Ikk5M)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest?
Sadly, many of them are "The best and brightest"--at shoveling out Marxist dogma and "multicultural" education. The result? Kids who can't find America on a map but hate it anyway.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 04, 2011 10:54 AM (ujg0T)
142 Corporate taxes apply uniformly (mostly) to every business in the same industry in the same town. So an increase in these corporate taxes can pass through to the customers because no business has to eat them to stay competitive (again mostly). Think of a hotel /car retal tax newly imposed or increased by the local town in order to fund the building of their new sports shrine.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 02:52 PM (XBM1t)
That is about what I figured, but since economics beyond the basics are not something I have studied much in depth, I thought I'd better see what others had to say.
Posted by: Grey Fox at March 04, 2011 10:54 AM (dbYs8)
In my state of NY, a quick Google search using "new york state teacher pension database" will get you a lot of hits, and one choice is a site called something like "SeeThroughNY," which then gets the user into a .pdf copy of all the contracts in each and every school district of the state. Contracts for teachers, contracts for superintendents, all of them.
I've got smoke coming from my eyeballs after scanning through our 50-page contract for teachers, which expires this coming June.
Health care for life for all. Vision also. Dental also. And reaching 65 years of age has no effect on this joyride.
No Medicare for the teachers. Just a gold-plated ride off into the sunset of retirement.
Posted by: Usin-my-SS-checks-to-buy-MMJ at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (4sQwu)
On a teacher level....it doesn't work that way. Good teachers are usually motivated by a love of children, a love to teach or a desire to shape young minds. If teachers make subsistence level salary, only people who want to teach (i.e good teachers) will enter the profession. The higher salaries and benefits encourage others to enter the profession who don't really care about teaching.
Honestly, a lower pay scale would probably mean less full time teachers for life...and more "part time job for retired people". A supplemental income, not a full profession.
Now, if you believe in objective way to evaluate teaching performance...you can implement pay scales. But I think teachers actually have a point on this. A great teacher can be rated poorly for bad kids, and vice versa. I'd rather just pay them all next to nothing, and use volunteers and part time people. I'd volunteer to teach as a part time job for 30k a year. Hire more teachers with fewer hours and you get a better educational system, imo. That's just my crackpot idea, though.
Posted by: Crazee at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (xsoRi)
If the Right can't win this battle, it's over.
If liberals were willing to die on the hill for Obamacare, our side has to be willing to do the same for government unions and collective bargaining.
If we win, and government workers aren't starving in the streets in a few years, we feast on the Toldja Sos for years. We are so clearly right on this. The benefits - in policy and politics - are enormous.
Posted by: CJ at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Jean at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (WkuV6)
I was grading papers by the time I was in third grade, beginning with spelling tests and grammar tests with fixed answers.
Don't tell me that teachers don't work. They do.
All that said - the idea that the teachers' unions have benefited education is ridiculous.
Posted by: Dianna at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (qrFCz)
Teachers have a sweet deal, but let's not make it sound yet better than it is. More people might want to be teachers...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 02:49 PM (8y9MW)
Bill Gates gave a speech to the governors this week in D. C. (our governor gregoire tried to crawl under the table) and made the following points about teachers.
In 1960 there were 40 adults for every 1,000 students in the school system. In 2009 there were 125 adults per 1,000 students. Graduation rates and test scores have been flat since 1960.
Teachers in 1960 worked 8 hrs per day, in 2009 they worked 5 hrs. per day.
That pretty much sums up how unions are fucking us in addition to salaries and benefits.
Posted by: robtr at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (MtwBb)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 10:55 AM (F1BaX)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at March 04, 2011 10:56 AM (Pzf4N)
You mean, like the nuns at the Catholic school.
Posted by: Jean at March 04, 2011 10:56 AM (WkuV6)
They shouldn't. If they weren't, in fact, it's my bet that college would be much cheaper and "University Professor" would not be so highly-sought-after a career.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 10:57 AM (8y9MW)
Teachers should be paid even more. How else can you attract the best and brightest?
Why would any reasonably sane society want to waste its best and brightest on teaching kids?
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 10:57 AM (Ikk5M)
The school system is fucked, period. Gut it from the top down.
Posted by: melvin at March 04, 2011 10:57 AM (3OCZw)
She goes to work at seven and is seldom out of there before six in the evening
Pffft...light weight piker.
No offense, just sayin.
Posted by: dananjcon at March 04, 2011 10:58 AM (pr+up)
I lived in an all-women's dorm for my junior year. I have a fond memory of sitting in the lounge on a Thursday night wiring a circuit board for a lab as a "break" from debugging my assembler code (I'm old), and listening to a group of ElEd majors complain about having to make construction-paper cutouts for a bulletin board due the next day. It was cutting into their drinking-at-the-frats time.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 02:52 PM (nAOMZ)
A substantial part of the time I spent on my research was dedicated to programming a Digital PDP-8 at the assembly level to have it control the scanning by the spectrophotometer, acquire data, process it, and send it to the computing center at LBL over a 300 baud modem (this replaced punching out the data to paper tape).. Good times!
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 10:59 AM (7GfKM)
Yeah...I'd be happier comparing median to median, but I don't have the median salary info immediately available. I still think my point about extracting money applies. The MPS School Board has some power to raise property taxes...let me poke around a bit...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:00 AM (nAOMZ)
I make $10.00 an hour.
No bennies.
I can teach the average 8 year old to make a leather wallet, a braided keychain, and a ceramic mug...
all in about 3 hours a week over a 5 week span.
Posted by: Camp Conselor in the Arts and Crafts Tent at March 04, 2011 11:00 AM (VJU+j)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at March 04, 2011 11:00 AM (qIHlG)
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2011 11:00 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 02:54 PM (Ikk5M)
Point taken ...
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 11:02 AM (7GfKM)
Collective Bargaining Rights for Fucksaw Operators - YES!
That's how we got Trigger Locks and Stools.
We're with you, brother!
Posted by: Member - Fuckdrill Operators Local #13 at March 04, 2011 11:02 AM (VJU+j)
Posted by: Spike at March 04, 2011 11:02 AM (WLxeI)
Not disagreeing. I'm just pointing out that there is no need to make it sound worse than it really is, either.
I'm kind of spoiled on this, having grown up in (non-union) Texas (yes, there are Teachers Unions- 3, in fact. They're basically non-factors most of the time, though), but I also grew up with a teacher (my mom), my aunt was a teacher, my brother became a teacher (now an assistant principal), and several close friends of the family were teachers. I know almost all of this.
Additionally, I worked for BCBSTX (who administered the teacher's health plan until 2001, IIRC, and still administer the State Employees plan), so I know how awesome their benefits are, plus retirement, etc., etc.
I also know that making it seem worse than the reality is a bad tactic: once you're proven wrong on whatever exaggerated point, it's easier for people to believe you're wrong about other things.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 11:03 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Stirner at March 04, 2011 11:03 AM (nTjSs)
OK, on the $6.5M marble repair: it will probably cost that. I worked for a company that made an error on a historic building facade: 1" of marble was removed from the fascia to install a new sign.
That's what they call in court, "defacing a historic building." The repair must follow the guidelines for designated monuments, which include: finding the EXACT SAME stone, the repair work done by master stonemasons, etc.
Also, the finish on marble is easily damaged by chemicals. All that masking tape, etc., require solvents to remove the leftover adhesive, all of which will remove the finish from the marble. From what I've read, there were 100s - 1,000s of those on the inside and outside of the building -- mostly on marble.
I say take it out the union's dues -- they defaced a historic building. They should pay for it. My company had to, and ignorance of our error was no excuse, either.
Posted by: Biblio at March 04, 2011 11:03 AM (y5VNb)
- Just herd them on thru, -next!
Posted by: Fritz at March 04, 2011 11:03 AM (/8mBu)
12 months a year? Does she carry a pager on weekends and holidays in case there's an emergency and she needs to go in? Ever have to cancel plans to come in and meet a deadline? Have to take vacation days for "continuing education" for licensure (how about that automatic raise for getting another degree that the rest of us don't get?)?
People in other white-collar professional occupations have to do a lot of shit just to stay employed, and they don't whine about it on such a grand scale.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:05 AM (nAOMZ)
True, that. If you want to drive a teacher to mouth-frothing rage, point out to them that no one actually gets paid for days they miss. Teachers LOVE to claim that as some special burden they, alone, have to bear- and it's hilarious to watch their lips start to tremble as they realize the argument isn't gaining any traction.
Sometimes I do that to the teachers in my family when there's nothing good to watch and no one wants to play board games.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 11:07 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 11:11 AM (4Pleu)
Link
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2011 11:11 AM (/G5LI)
Yes. Garbage men do a difficult job that few are willing to do. Like everyone else, they do it 12 months a year.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2011 02:17 PM (VJU+j)
Collecting garbage is an honorable profession. It was something that I did for one summer about 20% of the time. That, and cleaning public restrooms.
You can learn a lot about people performing those jobs. The chief lesson is that far too many of them behave like the self-centered, ignorant, boorish slobs that we have seen infesting the capitol grounds in Madison for the past several weeks.
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 11:11 AM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Dennis at March 04, 2011 02:29 PM (HE0fu)
I have never worked 40 hour weeks in my life. It must be nice.
I certainly don't feel sorry for her that she works a normal day and has three months off.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sFucksaw (NJConservative) at March 04, 2011 11:12 AM (LH6ir)
Yea, forgot about this, although I have a Blackberry, not a pager, and it's expected to be on at all times.
Have to take vacation days for "continuing education" for licensure
Had to miss my grandmother's 100th birthday celebration at a huge family reunion to get my last CEUs in ITAR/EAR compliance.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 11:13 AM (BebB7)
Link again.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2011 11:13 AM (/G5LI)
Test Scores, Unions and Polls
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at March 04, 2011 11:13 AM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 03:11 PM (4Pleu)
I think the response was to Hollowpoint and it being a part time job, not being there 40 hours a week..etc etc.
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 11:13 AM (FIDMq)
Your mother was paid for work that was actually performed by an uncompensated 9 yr. old? Clearly it is children who are in need of union protection from the rapacious greed of teachers who don't hesitate to exploit untrained child labor.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at March 04, 2011 11:14 AM (+lsX1)
170 >>Right, but why are corporate taxes just passed on to the consumer and wages for a union in the private sector not?
They are tried to pass them through. I remember reading a study a while back that compared the labor cost of a car made in Detroit with union labor to the labor cost of a car made in Japan with non-union labor. I can't remember the exact ratio but the difference was enormous and a major reason for the collapse of the US auto industry. Many foreign manufacturers are now building their cars in the US. In Michigan? Nope, in South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, etc. Low cost labor and no unions.
****
Slight correction. Yes Detroit tried (and did so for a while) to stick the public with the uneconomic costs of their generous wages and benefits. Over time the scheme failed and the market voted to reject Detroit's offerings at their prices and chose Japan's offerings at their prices. Plus, Japan manufacturing locally in the USA removed the foreign currency exchange price gains and losses from the equation. Germany followed Japan into US based auto manufacturing with similar success.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 11:15 AM (XBM1t)
Posted by: Jean at March 04, 2011 11:15 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Donna at March 04, 2011 11:15 AM (DhK9/)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 11:16 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 03:00 PM (nAOMZ)
You needn't look any further on my account, because I am certain the picture wouldn't change: teachers in Milwaukee are grossly overcompensated relative to the taxpayers that support them.
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 11:17 AM (7GfKM)
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 04, 2011 11:18 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head
Bite your tongue! I was highly trained child labor! And I was compensated - my book habit was already severe, so for every class of quizzes graded, some of the cost of books was defrayed.
Posted by: Dianna at March 04, 2011 11:19 AM (qrFCz)
Posted by: Jean at March 04, 2011 03:15 PM (WkuV6)
Yup. It was a revelation to me, and it explained a lot. I sent the link to Ace through e-mail, but he didn't acknowledge if he had received it. Judging by his omission of mention in his article, I assume he thought it was spam and ignored it.
Seriously people, read that article!
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2011 11:19 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 11:20 AM (BebB7)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2011 11:21 AM (Cm66w)
Is it wrong that I became sexually aroused when I read this? ("A fully excited Millie Amp cried out, 'Ohm! Ohm! Ohm!'")
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 03:16 PM (4Pleu)
Someone else out there a skilled electron pusher? For what it's worth, I was building hardware and writing machine code when I was 14. Still make good money on the side doing that stuff.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 04, 2011 11:22 AM (/G5LI)
it was stopped about forty years ago, by the eager German-minded
reformers, who believed that the State can spend an
American's money for his, or his children's, education, much
more wisely than he can. American schooling is now compulsory,
enforced by the police and controlled by the State (that
is, by the politicians in office) and paid for by compulsory
taxes.
Rose Wilder Lane
1943
Posted by: MarkC at March 04, 2011 11:22 AM (yPPVC)
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 03:13 PM (BebB7)
I love it when you talk dirty!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sFucksaw (NJConservative) at March 04, 2011 11:22 AM (LH6ir)
Teachers in Afghanistan teach in the open air, under threat of death, and I'm guessing they don't get medical..
That right there is love of teaching.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 11:23 AM (BebB7)
Now that is a truly excellent question!
More, they did it with students ranging in age from about 6 to 16.
Do you, too, suspect that basic literacy was higher?
Posted by: Dianna at March 04, 2011 11:23 AM (qrFCz)
And one other point about teaching: they do the same thing day after day, year after year. The basics that are supposed to be taught in K-12 have not changed, measurably, over the last 100 years. All that has changed is that most students 60 years ago knew the information better than students today do. but the teachers' jobs have not changed much (with respect to actual teaching and curricula).
So, we have a stagnant profession that the workers think they are being undercompensated for and demand more ... for something that someone having done 50 years ago could step right into a classroom and teach the exact same stuff, again, and probably be better at it than today's teachers.
This is one of the beauties of teaching. The material, for the most part, never changes. I can teach the same course year after year. It takes me no time to prepare (since I have taught the class 50 times, already) and it takes little effort to do it well.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 11:23 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: polynikes at March 04, 2011 11:23 AM (R9YVs)
Posted by: Monty at March 04, 2011 11:25 AM (4Pleu)
I haven't had paid sick leave since 2005. On one hand, it sucks when you get sick. On the other, bosses are pretty generous about "Hey, I'm going to leave at noon because my team's in the tournament" when they know it'll save them some money.
(Speaking of tedious shit white-collar professionals have to do to stay employed, I'm looking for someplace to live in Indianapolis (south or SW side) for four months, starting a week from tomorrow. Pfeh.)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:26 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 11:27 AM (F1BaX)
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 11:27 AM (XBM1t)
Supposed to. It really feels like math and civics and language have been supplanted by sex and race and Gaia.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:27 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:29 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: manofaiki at March 04, 2011 11:30 AM (uSh7j)
The last numbers I saw was back during the auto bailout. Wages and benefits for union workers in Detroit were running $78.00/hr not counting the requirement to still get paid even after laid off.
The same auto workers in TN were getting about $40/hr in wages and benefits. (and no still getting paid if laid off)
Posted by: Vic at March 04, 2011 11:31 AM (M9Ie6)
Only if you start asking her for the measurements of her STACKSIZE and SECTORSIZE.
Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at March 04, 2011 03:22 PM (IhHdM)
Steer clear of asking whether you may POKE or PEEK at her handiwork, too.
Posted by: ya2daup at March 04, 2011 11:31 AM (7GfKM)
And so it follows that the expression "public education" is also misnamed by the very group responsible for language instruction.
These are the same people that gave us "political correctness" and "social justice". Mangling and bastardizing everything that they touch is their special talent.
Posted by: ontherocks at March 04, 2011 11:33 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Nekkid Therapist at March 04, 2011 11:34 AM (7GfKM)
Empire of Jeff, you are either a mean, sarcastic son of a bitch or sexy as hell; I'm hopin' for both.
I'm an old-fashioned, family oriented kind of female; it bothered me to have to miss the reunion and my grandma's birthday after my vacation time had been approved, but I did what I had to do, and I didn't whine about it at work.
I don't understand all this bitching about minor issues at work. Unions were formed to protect workers from ABUSE, not to prevent them from actually having to work.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 11:35 AM (BebB7)
diana
i think for the kids attending the one room school house regularly...yes their literacy was higher...the curriculum was tougher...look at the mcguffy readers...i'm not anti technology but i do think since everyone is hurting for money...classrooms should not be racing for the "latest" technology...
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 04, 2011 11:35 AM (Cm66w)
No. They don't.
Actually, I'm okay with Whiteboards having replaced chalk-boards, but "smart boards" are really just silly.
If they're not going to read the material at home, they're not going to remember what you showed them on the board anyway.
And that, really, is the crux of the matter. We don't (well, shouldn't) need "the best and brightest" to be teachers. We need parents to make sure their kids do their homework, and keep their noses to the proverbial grind-stone.
The best teacher in the world can't make a lazy student learn. The worst teacher in the world won't prevent a motivated student from doing the same.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 11:35 AM (8y9MW)
It's not much, just Schadenfreude, but I hope Obamacare gets deep sixed as it is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Angry White Male at March 04, 2011 11:36 AM (7cXE7)
Doubtful. Waivers.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 11:37 AM (BebB7)
It's not much, just Schadenfreude, but I hope Obamacare gets deep sixed as it is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Angry White Male at March 04, 2011 03:36 PM (7cXE7)
Really?
Posted by: Newest member of the elite 'Waiver Group' at March 04, 2011 11:37 AM (FIDMq)
Empire of Jeff, you are either a mean, sarcastic son of a bitch or sexy as hell; I'm hopin' for both.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 03:35 PM (BebB7)
He's a misogynistic, baby-makin' Pez dispenser who reduced me to tears yesterday
And I kind of liked it ... except for the glitter tits reference
Posted by: Nekkid Therapist at March 04, 2011 11:38 AM (7GfKM)
Really, no one (except maybe politicians) gets "paid sick leave." That PTO the rest of us get? Yeah, it's already figured into our salaries. Don't believe me? Work one year without taking any time off. Work the next year taking every single one of your allowed days.
Did you get paid any more for that year you didn't take vacation?
In point of fact, not taking vacation is like giving up one of your benefits; leaving "money on the table" as it were.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 04, 2011 11:38 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: FUBAR at March 04, 2011 11:38 AM (McG46)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 04, 2011 11:38 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: manofaiki at March 04, 2011 11:39 AM (uSh7j)
Posted by: maddogg at March 04, 2011 11:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at March 04, 2011 03:34 PM (IhHdM)
As far as I'm concerned, nothing beats a regular, old chalkboard. And not one of those nasty green ones, but a regular, black chalkboard with normal white chalk. Everything else is a waste, so far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: Henry Harold Humphries - you can call me 'H' at March 04, 2011 11:40 AM (Ikk5M)
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 04, 2011 11:40 AM (h0RtZ)
900 waivers and counting might just change your calculation. The nomenklatura will never suffer their own stupidity.
Posted by: goldbricker esq at March 04, 2011 11:42 AM (S59+B)
Posted by: Nekkid Therapist at March 04, 2011 11:42 AM (7GfKM)
Playing the Devil's advocate here: Couldn't one argue that private businesses just pass the increased cost of wages on to their customers?
First, I appreciate your saying that you're playing Devil's advocate. Thanks.
Second, you're right. That's not only a potential argument, it's also sound. That's exactly what private business do. Customers indeed pick up these expenses through the prices they pay. But they can also buy their stuff from someone else. In other words, they can choose not to pay.
Taxpayers can only exercise this choice by moving to a different state.
Posted by: FireHorse at March 04, 2011 11:47 AM (k3RPu)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 04, 2011 11:48 AM (nAOMZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 11:52 AM (EpapN)
Lot of valid criticism of teaching here. Then there's this:
And public school teachers don't TEACH classes all day. Half the time is "prep periods." And they have fucking assistants in their classes!
Sorry, EofJ that's not true, at least where I live. The assistants fuck outside of school.
Posted by: USS Diversity at March 04, 2011 11:53 AM (gJNMj)
In the private sector, you start out in a business at entry level and work your way up by showing the boss you handle more work and responsibility and therefore deserve greater pay.
Exactly...I started working for my boss at 19, I turned 40 last November. I started answering phones and making deliveries. Now I'm in charge of 2million in inventory, the cust svc dept and handle all the purchasing for two other companies. 20+ yrs and not once have I complained about workload or hours because in the private sector, if you carry yourself like a twat, you get treated like a twat. Thats not to say I have never discussed my pay or benefits with my employer, I have...just on a man to man basis, like gentleman without lawyers-on a handshake.
Posted by: dananjcon at March 04, 2011 11:57 AM (pr+up)
1) About the supplies, I gotta remember that one.
2) About the $41k in benefits, it's easy to go crazy when you're estimating such numbers, so it should be backed up. Nonetheless, benefits for private people are generally pretty substantial, too (although not nearly this high).
3) Management in private companies usually aren't spending their own money, either - they just get budgets handed down to them. The thing there is that there's competition, and some level of supply-and-demand at low levels. At the upper levels, it seems like a small clique is simply exercizing their control over the company, and dipping into the till.
4) Money is only coming back to the negotiator if Democrats are doing the negotiating, which is not true right now.
The bottom line is that the teachers are effectively political cronies, cashing in on the spoils system and the fact that they hold our children hostage. I don't like to see finger-pointing at what they're paid (which smacks of socialist class warfare rhetoric). The basic principle that seems to be missed by both sides is that we need salaries to start being based on supply and demand (none of this crying about how much money is there), and to stop letting teachers union hide behind our kids.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 04, 2011 11:59 AM (2lTU+)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 12:00 PM (EpapN)
It is clear that teachers in some places are well paid for what they do, though that is not true everywhere. But I know for a fact that in Houston, city workers are generally paid very poorly, in some departments as much as 30% or more below what their private counterparts make. I also know that the police and fire departments always get first priority, and that a very few of them, along with a very few city workers in management/administive positions, have gamed the system and gobbled tens of millions of dollars enriching themselves at the expense of the rest of the underpaid city workers and the public.
Houston may wind up pulling an ERON on its retierees as a result, and I doubt we are alone in this.
Posted by: 7HEAVENS at March 04, 2011 12:03 PM (tuCVl)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 04, 2011 12:03 PM (2lTU+)
Teacher salaries are the tip of the iceberg. The real money is in administration and administration is always growing. In my state there are fewer then one million people and there are 23 school districts. Each one has a district admin who pulls 6 figures in actual salary. He then has an entire staff and an office. When you finally arrive at a school the principles are pulling 80 plus and they have multiple vice principles. Each has staff. Then you have to pay a cop to sit in the schools and you pay bully councilors and other types of social workers.
No one in that group instructs one child.
It is so ludicrous that we have a tech school with no actual district attached to it that has a superintendent. So there is a single school that has an entire district administration.
Posted by: kidney at March 04, 2011 12:05 PM (3j6OS)
Seeing a question in post 72 and answering it in 240 will be repetitive. Sorry. To make up for that, let me add something new:
Another option people have is to not pay their taxes. They can do this by becoming poor. Sure, renters pay property taxes; that owner's expense is included in the tenants' rent. But not if the tenants are deemed to be poor. If the tenants qualify and their rent is subsidized by the government, they avoid the issue. They avoid all issues, really.
It used to be that people didn't want to be poor. Poverty used to be an undesirable state to be in. Now, it makes increasing sense to people. If you're poor, you're the "little guy" that everyone is "sticking up for." People in government care about you. They'll make your life in poverty possible, then bearable, then comfortable. Eventually, you'll have good status as a poor person. Then you'll have a measure of power. In a way, you'll become one of society's elites.
So then something comes up, like this thing with the teachers union in Wisconsin. You don't really care one way or another. But if you have to take sides, you'll go with the side that keeps your lifestyle and station in life intact. It just makes sense.
I used a broad brush and went outside the lines, admittedly. But what we have to do to get this logic to stop making sense to people. To do this, we have to make it so people in goverenment don't benefit by the existence of so many poor people.
How about we start by implementing merit pay for elected officials?
Posted by: FireHorse at March 04, 2011 12:12 PM (k3RPu)
Just look at what Catholic school teachers are paid, to accomplish pretty much the same thing as public school kids, and it becomes obvious that supply and demand has gone pretty much out the window. Granted, there's a sort of "charity work" aspect to such work, but it's not like there's a shortage of qualified teachers in the world, and the fact that good ones aren't rewarded and bad ones are rarely fired isn't even questioned. The latter part alone tells you it's a politcal patronage job.
But, again - it shouldn't be about "we can't afford it", or drumming up jealousy regarding what they're paid. We should pay what's fair, and if we can't come up with the money, then should be our problem, not theirs. But the evidence suggests that "what's fair" (which can only be determined by supply and demand) is WAY less than what they currently get.
Posted by: Optimizer at March 04, 2011 12:13 PM (2lTU+)
*ahem*
Before the election last November that swept Dims from many state Legislatures and replaced them with real, live conservatives (courtesy of the Tea Party) across this wonderful land of ours, how many Americans were aware of this growing problem? Did we hear as much about it on the evening news as we do today? Was there a public backlash against the racket of teachers' unions funding Dim candidates for office who then gave unions lavish salaries and benefits, a portion of which went right back to said Dims?
Is there a much greater public awareness of this situation today that there was even six months ago? Is there a higher probability of this problem getting fixed today than six months ago? Do we finally see conservative Republicans getting serious about fiscal matters?
I'd say we're starting to turn the tide in our favor, don't you think?
What's a henway? I know that's not relevant, but as long as I was asking questions, I'd thought I'd throw that one in there, too.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 04, 2011 12:17 PM (b6qrg)
Oh, MissTammy makes a damn fine sammich, and will happily bring it right to you with all the fixins up to and including ice-cold beer, provided certain basic needs of hers are met. If they are met multiple times, she will hand feed you, but be warned; she is a greedy little minx.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 12:17 PM (BebB7)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 04, 2011 12:27 PM (EpapN)
What's a henway? I know that's not relevant, but as long as I was asking questions, I'd thought I'd throw that one in there, too.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 04, 2011 04:17 PM (b6qrg)
My favorite setup joke. Depends, about 3-1/2 to 5 lbs on average.
Posted by: Count de Monet at March 04, 2011 12:27 PM (XBM1t)
Q-Whats the ideal weight for a lawyer?
A- 5lbs including the urn.
Posted by: Berserker at March 04, 2011 12:30 PM (gWHrG)
Optimizer [and fellow Knickerbocker] at 251: We should pay what's fair, and if we can't come up with the money, then should be our problem, not theirs. But the evidence suggests that "what's fair" (which can only be determined by supply and demand) is WAY less than what they currently get.
I'd say most teachers get exactly what's fair. Make two of school districts within a region: one rank-ordering quality of schools by comparable standards, the other by faculty pay. The lists will be almost identical.
Every now and then, you see one that's out of place -- maybe an average school district with way-above-average pay for its teachers. That's out of whack. And I'll bet you a dozen donuts that there's a lot of shenanigans there.
(Where, roughly, in NYS are you?)
Posted by: FireHorse at March 04, 2011 12:32 PM (k3RPu)
MissTammy is childless, I'm sure her mama would adore you because you'd treat her daughter so well, and MissTammy has never asked her husband to get anything of that nature for her....but yes, you will take out the trash, because I will ask you nicely to do so, and help cleaning up would not be necessary if we had a housekeeper.
Also, she finally realized after the first 5 years of cohabitation/marriage than mens' minds shut off after 10 or 15 seconds of spousal speech, so she has learned to be succinct in her speech, if not her posts.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 12:35 PM (BebB7)
MissTammy,
Let me fill you in on a little secret!
The man's mind isn't shutting off after 10 or 15 seconds.....it's in defense mode.....and has told his mouth to stop all operation to protect the larger portions of the body. It kinda like the screen saver on your computer.
It is part of the "Fight or Flight" Mechanism
Posted by: Jimi at March 04, 2011 12:41 PM (JMsOK)
LOL! But seriously, I realized early on that I talk too much about things he isn't all that interested in. So now I save most of my venting/rambling for my girlfriends or mom.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 12:48 PM (BebB7)
@260
You can vent to him but when you do you have to stay on point. You can't let the conversation wander all over the place, like every other woman I know.
If you stay on topic, bypass all the flowery details, and ask specific and important questions.......You Know The Meat & Potatoes......I'm sure he will respond in kind!
Posted by: Jimi at March 04, 2011 12:52 PM (JMsOK)
bypass all the flowery details
Oh sure, take all the fun out of it....
I do get it, and that's what I try to do.
He doesn't mind hearing that a coworker is driving me insane because she globs on perfume. He very helpfully recommends that I either talk to her or the supervisor about it. At which point he assumes this particular conversation is over.
But me being female, I am just getting started; I don't want to get her in trouble, I just want to TALK about it with someone, in all the gory detail.....like how anyone could even LIKE that kind of perfume, how she complains when other people eat fish or onion-heavy food at their desks, but she herself gasses the entire floor out with her perfume...etc etc etc.
I have learned to recognize the glazed look in his eyes when I have wandered all over with flowery details....much like yourself, now, I'm sure!
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 01:04 PM (BebB7)
Oh, MissTammy makes a damn fine sammich, and will happily bring it right to you with all the fixins up to and including ice-cold beer, provided certain basic needs of hers are met. If they are met multiple times, she will hand feed you, but be warned; she is a greedy little minx.
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 04:17 PM (BebB7)
too bad I'm married. I'd be stalking you like Rosie Odonnell on a baked ham.
Posted by: tangonine at March 04, 2011 01:05 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: MissTammy at March 04, 2011 04:35 PM (BebB7)
Depends on what you're talking about.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at March 04, 2011 05:25 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at March 04, 2011 05:25 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: sexypig at March 05, 2011 05:35 AM (GATX7)
Posted by: Bad Science at March 07, 2011 04:06 PM (pJnEv)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2315 seconds, 391 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: GnuBreed at March 04, 2011 09:58 AM (h0RtZ)