February 24, 2011
— Ace In an email, a blogger mentioned, off-handedly, the idea of "Purple Hearts for Tea Partiers."
I would suggest taking this idea seriously. I would suggest that when Tea Partiers congregate, they wear an armband of a specific color if there has been any assault on them in, say, the past month. I'd suggest Purple for a bruising attack/simple assault (as Tabitha Hale suffered), Red for any attack that draws blood, and black for a truly serious attack, a deadly sort of attack (which may or may not result in actual death).
I'd say that guy getting his fingers bitten off by a nonviolent, peaceful leftist Concern-Fag would be a black attack (and let's hope for no more of those).
The reason for this is simple: The media refuses to report these abuses. But they do love their pictures of Tea Partiers, so they have images of the people they're making snide remarks about.
If enough Tea Partiers adopt a specific sort of code system to demonstrate solidarity with the victims of leftist thuggery, the media will be forced to report it, even in their typical snide, dismissive manner. They will have to explain the presence of Purple or Red or Black armbands and note "They wear these to publicize attacks on them."
Which should make some viewers wonder: "Gee, why didn't the media itself publicize the attacks? I thought incivility was now Public Enemy Number one. Why are these people required to raise awareness of the attacks themselves?"
Oh, the media will have an answer: "Context." Whatever that means, because apparently there are some "contexts" that make an assault on a law-abiding girl non-newsworthy (and perhaps even justified). But at some point, they will have to break down and explain to their audience why so many in a crowd are wearing armbands.
And then the media can go on to explain why the usual rule of If It Bleeds It Leads has somehow stopped applying when someone on the right gets curb-stomped.
Posted by: Ace at
10:04 AM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 342 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: runningrn at February 24, 2011 10:06 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Have Blue at February 24, 2011 10:07 AM (mV+es)
Posted by: Paper at February 24, 2011 10:07 AM (VoSja)
Not if they frame the pictures in such a way that obscures/hides the armbands.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 24, 2011 10:08 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Bieber must die, for harvest at February 24, 2011 10:08 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 24, 2011 10:09 AM (HpT9p)
I've got plenty of faith in the media.
Faith that they will do anything to forward socialism.
Posted by: MīcÞeMūs at February 24, 2011 10:10 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:10 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:11 AM (uFokq)
#2
Wow. Isn't it sad that this is how little faith we have in our media?
It wouldn't be the first time the MFM/MBM edited pictures in such a way to deprive them of context:
Tea Partiers are Racist, and to prove it, we'll crop out the image of a black man carrying a gun.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 24, 2011 10:11 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:12 AM (qIHlG)
This.
Actually, it won't take anything so blatant. Just pictures of them in their arm-bands and references to The Wave.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:12 AM (8y9MW)
Arm bands are never something a political movement can wear, ever again.
Come up with a better marking Ace.
Maybe those neat colored ribbons that mean stuff.
Posted by: MīcÞeMūs at February 24, 2011 10:13 AM (0q2P7)
It's painfully obvious to me, Ace, that should this take off, the media will just stop taking pictures of anything but close-ups of signs that they deem to fit the narrative. You'll never see the arm of a TEA-partier again.
Posted by: © Sponge at February 24, 2011 10:13 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Guido's Skin Art at February 24, 2011 10:13 AM (xs5wK)
This guy is obviously a Lutheran, his religion is never mentioned, but Jihad is a Lutheran code word for Lutefisk.
http://tinyurl.com/6k75ym7
Posted by: Kemp at February 24, 2011 10:13 AM (PYhPS)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 24, 2011 10:15 AM (HpT9p)
Posted by: logprof at February 24, 2011 10:15 AM (RGp3s)
Muslims are purposefully getting arrested so they can be jailed and not have to make excuses for butt sex.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 24, 2011 10:16 AM (ZHsNw)
You obviously don't understand the issues. Your post isn't sufficiently nuanced. What do I mean by that? I have no fucking idea. But I sound smart while I say it. People look at me, nod their heads, and tell themselves, "He really knows what he's talking about."
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 24, 2011 10:16 AM (NG1bi)
Posted by: keninnorcal at February 24, 2011 10:16 AM (SDc54)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:16 AM (uFokq)
Now where have I seen that before...?
You might want to rethink that whole idea, Ace.
Posted by: JEA at February 24, 2011 10:17 AM (+Wvn3)
I think that's a AP story, so that explains the lack of mentioning his religion. However, they did at least admit to "jihad" being in his blog/journal and such, so that's a step up.
And, in reality, everything I'm hearing about it on the news today says "Terrorist." Terrorist + Jihad = Muslim. It might be nice if they drew the connection more obviously, but I don't actually think its necessary in this one.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:18 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: oblig. at February 24, 2011 10:18 AM (xvZW9)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:18 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: joncelli at February 24, 2011 10:19 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:19 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 24, 2011 10:19 AM (LTFga)
On the floor of the House is a microphone. We need more fiery speeches from our elected leaders.
I. Want. Outrage.
If you yell loud enough, long enough, those muthafuckas in the media will take notice.
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 02:16 PM (uFokq)
That is what I can't understand. Why isn't the Rep. in the WI gov't having hearing about the violence and hateful rhetoric being show in these demonstrations? Why weren't the protesters arrested for drugs?
Posted by: momma at February 24, 2011 10:20 AM (penCf)
Nope, I'm not volunteering, I don't even have a blog.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 24, 2011 10:20 AM (h0RtZ)
>>> go ahead, JEA
you can do it
push push push
Uhh...yeah someone get the troll wipes ready.......
Posted by: Roadking at February 24, 2011 10:20 AM (hempZ)
In fairness, he's really only saying what the rest of us say.
Which, I guess, just proves that JEA is a trained monkey, and can't actually comprehend what he's reading.
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 24, 2011 02:19 PM (LTFga)
IIRC, there were either two incidents, or the guy had both a pistol in a hip holster and his rifle (an AR, I think).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:21 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:21 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: ace at February 24, 2011 10:21 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: William_Shatner's_Pants at February 24, 2011 10:22 AM (dhz9q)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:22 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: ace at February 24, 2011 10:23 AM (nj1bB)
I agree that it will probably backfire, as the press will just make insinuations about Nazi armbands when they aren't publishing photoshopped versions of the same.
But still, it would be fun to have an "FYNQ" armband for the Tea Partiers.
And maybe a "Run Away!!!" armband for the Flee Baggers, ala The Brave Sir Robin.
Posted by: Sharkman at February 24, 2011 10:23 AM (sqNU7)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 24, 2011 02:19 PM (LTFga)
Nope, you have it right. Black guy was carrying via shoulder strap a semi automatic assault type weapon. They cropped the photo to hide any black skin.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 24, 2011 10:23 AM (h0RtZ)
Posted by: dogfish at February 24, 2011 10:23 AM (NuPNl)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 24, 2011 10:24 AM (LTFga)
I'm glad you said this. That was my immediate thought.
Bad. Idea.
Posted by: Y-not at February 24, 2011 10:24 AM (pW2o8)
It's sad, but the Media lives in Godwin's house. They've gotta live by his rules.
The fact is, though, that the arm bands wouldn't really do anything. I recommend badges or ribbons with pictures of the beaten face of the latest victim of the Saintly Left.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (uFokq)
But really the best way is for our new media to keep the footage out there and for some of our politicians with balls to actually bring it up in their interviews. This would, of course, exclude Mitch Daniels.
Posted by: Y-not at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (pW2o8)
And instead of on the arm, how about tied on the sign they are holding?
Might make people curious about what it means, plus... harder to photoshop something on.
Posted by: shibumi at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (OKZrE)
Sorry, Sooth. I'm just a fair guy, I guess.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: kansas at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (srmf8)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 24, 2011 10:26 AM (QxSug)
In case of a deadly assault, the next of kin can wear a Armband with three stars.
Posted by: Holger at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (YxGud)
"What's that armband for?"
"This? It's a Mauve I picked up in Altoona. Guy totally bumped into me.'
'Wow."
'Yeah, I've got a Lime on order because of a broad who stepped on my foot in Paducah. I have no idea what I'll wear with it."
"Fight on, brother."
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (xMT+4)
I think I'm going to wear a black panther print armband in honor of Malika Shebazz. Rush reporting that Malcolm X's daughter has been charged with defrauding the 74 year old widow of one of his father's body guards out of $55K.
Free Malika!
Posted by: runningrn at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (8b344)
Posted by: dogfish at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (NuPNl)
I actually like that idea. Or one of wrist-bands that have become so ubiquitous. We'd have to choose unusual colors, though.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (8y9MW)
With the Left's approval.
---
Actually, it was that the black armbands brought to my mind Nazis. The fact that the media might do something with it was secondary.
I don't like the imagery.
And it's somewhat disrespectful of the old tradition some still adhere to of wearing armbands of that type when they have a death in the family.
Posted by: Y-not at February 24, 2011 10:27 AM (pW2o8)
You simpleton. The mere hint of knowledge unavailable to you is sufficient to prove greater understanding.
Posted by: Guy Who Looks at Himself In His Mind's Mirror A Lot at February 24, 2011 10:28 AM (NG1bi)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 24, 2011 02:22 PM (HpT9p)
We think they make us look teh smart.
Posted by: Are We Not Men? at February 24, 2011 10:28 AM (urYpw)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 10:28 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Andy at February 24, 2011 10:28 AM (5Rurq)
Caller: You always said you'd tell us when it's time to panic; is it time?
Rush: No. It's time to gird your loins... It's time we realized Wisconsin is not Egypt, Wisconsin is Greece.
Posted by: RushBabe at February 24, 2011 10:30 AM (urYpw)
Flair shouldn't be a priority really imho.
Just keep getting these shitstains on film on post it online.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 24, 2011 10:30 AM (pLTLS)
How about bandaging up everyones faces? Throw in some ketchup for effect.
If they want to play the Egypt card, can't we too play?
Posted by: Derak at February 24, 2011 10:30 AM (CjpKH)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:30 AM (qIHlG)
Posted by: MJ at February 24, 2011 10:31 AM (BKOsZ)
I'm behind that idea!
And thongs for the ladies?
I'm in! I've got some really cute pink flip-flops!
Posted by: runningrn at February 24, 2011 10:31 AM (ihSHD)
http://tinyurl.com/4vrrsye
Posted by: Zombie Ted at February 24, 2011 02:20 PM (PYhPS)
--I take it you liked the "Property of the U.S. Government" one the most?
Posted by: logprof at February 24, 2011 10:32 AM (RGp3s)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 02:30 PM (qIHlG)
Saw Malkin on Calamity last night. She is starting to look like one sour hateful bitch. Good lord. PR negative.
Posted by: Barbarian at February 24, 2011 10:32 AM (EL+OC)
Can I haz a Honey Badger patch on my armband please?
Posted by: California Red at February 24, 2011 10:33 AM (7uWb8)
We need more of that far-thinking ability. Think how we can get more publicity but in a way that limits vulnerability.
Posted by: Holger at February 24, 2011 10:34 AM (YxGud)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:35 AM (qIHlG)
Posted by: Guido's Screen Printing at February 24, 2011 10:35 AM (xs5wK)
If you're a 24/7 subscriber, turn it on. Rush is trying to hold it together while Bo Snerdly questions him in the voice of Jesse Jackson.
Posted by: RushBabe at February 24, 2011 10:36 AM (urYpw)
Posted by: Bosk at February 24, 2011 10:37 AM (pUO5u)
If you're a 24/7 subscriber, turn it on. Rush is trying to hold it together while Bo Snerdly questions him in the voice of Jesse Jackson.
Posted by: RushBabe at February 24, 2011 02:36 PM (urYpw)
--I hope that gets put in free cyberspace.
Posted by: logprof at February 24, 2011 10:38 AM (IGeTJ)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 24, 2011 10:39 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:40 AM (qIHlG)
Make them chromakey green so the networks have an easier time replacing them with images more to their liking.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 10:40 AM (IuKAf)
Nice Deb thinks someone should start a blog with all the violence rounded up. I added my suggestion for the name.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 24, 2011 10:40 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 10:40 AM (IuKAf)
Maybe you want to withdraw that idea, Ace.
Why not a white tee-shirt with a logo. like "I heart the USA", or some such?
Let somebody pick on you for declaring your love of country.
Posted by: irongrampa at February 24, 2011 10:41 AM (ud5dN)
Ace is making a genuine attempt to surmount the inherent advantage enjoyed by those blessed by the support of the MFM.
Problems:
They got away with ignoring Gold Star mothers on tour while lauding Cindy Sheehan.
They got away with dumping Saint moonbat like a rock
they are getting away with ignoring violence now.
They got away with ignoring burning Sarah Palin in effigy, while with a concerned face reporting allegations of Obama being burned in effigy.
The Washington freakin' Post published a book review that openly stated that the reviewer hadn't even bothered to complete reading the book.
This advantage is serious, ingrained, and will take decades to kill, though inroads have been made. And I fear that this inherent advantage is what is in the minds to Republicans who are interested in being seen as anything other than a "fire-brand".
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 24, 2011 10:42 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at February 24, 2011 10:43 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at February 24, 2011 10:44 AM (psCad)
To review: the Official Tea Partier Uniform® consists of a Dick Cheney Mighty Warcock T-shirt, a lace wig, stompy boots, Don't Tread on Me banana hammock/thong and optional arm band of your choice.
If nothing else, this get-up will disable Trumka and his goons by doubling them over with laughter. Success!
Posted by: RushBabe at February 24, 2011 10:44 AM (urYpw)
The problem is that in towns with "blue" administrations, which is any town with a population > 30K leftest activity is condoned and winked at. This is just as bad as any "redneck" town in the evil South that winked at blacks being beaten and intimidated.
As I said in the previous thread, we need to give the authorities a chance to enforce the law first. When that doesn't work we need to start having our own goons beat the crap out of their goons.
Ace, we are back to that "game theory" thing that you brought up about SC justices; tit for tat. As long as we accept this behavior from them we will get more of it.
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2011 10:45 AM (M9Ie6)
If nothing else, this get-up will disable Trumka and his goons by doubling them over with laughter. Success!
As if they'd be able to tell someone dressed like that from one of the more flamboyent supporters.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 10:45 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: Blue Hen at February 24, 2011 10:45 AM (R2fpr)
As I said in the previous thread, we need to give the authorities a chance to enforce the law first.
Yeah, you ask Gladney how that's working out for him.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 10:45 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 24, 2011 10:46 AM (TATbF)
Plus, we all wear tie clip/brooch video/audio cameras
Posted by: momma at February 24, 2011 10:46 AM (penCf)
Wouldn't crutches, slings and bandages worn by Tea Partiers convey the message at a glance?
Posted by: RushBabe at February 24, 2011 10:47 AM (urYpw)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:50 AM (qIHlG)
If prosecutions were forthcoming, I'd agree with you.
My point, in the earlier thread, about "this didn't happen in Texas," was partially about the fact they know where they can get away with it. They know where the police will be on their side, at least tacitly, and let things go with "it's a regrettable situation..."
It would help if the assaultees would actually press charges, and then sue the city if charges get dropped ("It's all on tape. I gave you a copy, but I can make more since you obviously lost yours. What more do you want?") But they don't. I don't know if that's because they think they won't get a fair hearing, or out of a desire to be "fair" or what, but that's the way it is.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 10:50 AM (8y9MW)
The Madison police chief believes the protestors are peaceful and expressing their rights. Why would he arrest them? He's more interested in something Walker said when he was pranked at the moment.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 24, 2011 10:51 AM (iMgAa)
Posted by: negentropy at February 24, 2011 10:51 AM (27KAF)
Wouldn't crutches, slings and bandages worn by Tea Partiers convey the message at a glance?
Solidarity Band-Aids!
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 24, 2011 10:51 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 24, 2011 10:52 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at February 24, 2011 10:53 AM (psCad)
Well if the damn people are not going to even press charges there is zero damn chance that anything will happen.
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2011 10:54 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 24, 2011 10:54 AM (0GF2j)
Posted by: Matthew Broderick at February 24, 2011 02:50 PM (38mCL)
You're blocked.
Posted by: Jim Rome at February 24, 2011 10:54 AM (IGeTJ)
Posted by: Keith Olbermann at February 24, 2011 10:55 AM (EAtJr)
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 02:40 PM (IuKAf)
When you figure out how to enforce laws against Democrats and their corrupt press and bureaucracy machines, you let us know.
You'll probably go down in history.
Until then, hey, we're brainstorming.
Posted by: Merovign, Bond Villain at February 24, 2011 10:55 AM (bxiXv)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 24, 2011 10:55 AM (QxSug)
No no no no no no no!
First, it's displaying victim status (literally) almost like wearing a medal for it.
Second, it's never a good idea to point out who suffered violent attacks. It's unethical, sometimes it's illegal, but the main reason is that you're setting them up for future attacks. (In this case, they'd be setting themselves up.)
Third, the media still won't have to report anything. If they can't ignore these visuals, they can make something up, or say the Tea Patriers are making something up, or something.
Then, the Left will try to do the same thing -- but by this time, it will be a good idea. Can you imagine if people wore color-coded baseball hats with every handicap, disability, trauma or trait that entitles them out for special treatment? I know that's not what you're suggesting, but that's where it would be headed.)
Glad you're using the old noodle, Ace, but this isn't the way to go.
Posted by: FireHorse at February 24, 2011 10:57 AM (k3RPu)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 24, 2011 10:57 AM (qIHlG)
When you figure out how to enforce laws against Democrats and their corrupt press and bureaucracy machines, you let us know.
You'll probably go down in history.
Until then, hey, we're brainstorming.
I gave two options.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at February 24, 2011 10:58 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: SnowSun at February 24, 2011 10:58 AM (UAUr6)
So Tea Partiers showing up at protests in their assorted t-shirts and unmatched casual wear=Astro-turf.
Union Thugs and assorted Organizing for America Stooges showing up at protests in matching red and purple pre-printed sloganed t-shirts=Grass roots.
Posted by: runningrn at February 24, 2011 10:58 AM (ihSHD)
"Can we also put little hammer and sickles on our sleeves for victories? Kind of like the rising suns and swastikas that Allied pilots put on their planes?"
lol, yeah. Reminds me of this
Posted by: Vercingetorix at February 24, 2011 10:59 AM (psCad)
Arm bands with the NBC peacock on them. I'd like to see them explain that one on the news.
I like that one. lol.
Posted by: jewells45 at February 24, 2011 11:00 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 11:00 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Soothsayer at February 24, 2011 11:01 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: negentropy at February 24, 2011 02:51 PM (27KAF)
With color-coordinated Pez clasps.
Posted by: LC LaWedgie at February 24, 2011 11:04 AM (9YVHf)
It would also show a sort of fraud, like a neck brace after you tap the car in front of you at a stoplight.
Bandages as an armband. It would be obvious* that we weren't claiming to all be injured on the upper arm.
*Unfortunately, this wouldn't work for the MBM's idea of obvious.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 24, 2011 11:10 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 24, 2011 11:13 AM (QxSug)
In that case, I'd rather dress in my plate and mail and carry my broadsword. If'n it's all the same to you.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 24, 2011 11:13 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at February 24, 2011 11:17 AM (psCad)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at February 24, 2011 11:25 AM (fjoLg)
Wow! What a brilliant idea! We're hitting the like button on that one!
Posted by: Patrick Kennedy, Ted Kennedy, etc. at February 24, 2011 11:32 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2011 11:34 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: grognard at February 24, 2011 11:41 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: Frightened, yet somewhat intrigued at February 24, 2011 11:45 AM (B60j2)
Holsters. Strapped to the thigh, Old-West-style.
A non-leather (empty) holster worn at a tea party means you're a regular tea-partier.
A brown (empty) leather holster means that you have personally witnessed politically-motivated violence against another tea-partier.
A black (empty) leather holster means that you have been the victim of politically-motivated violence yourself.
A gun in any of the above holsters means the shit has hit the fan.
Posted by: filbert at February 24, 2011 12:36 PM (smvTK)
Posted by: Mr. Diddy Wah Diddy at February 24, 2011 01:31 PM (8legJ)
Posted by: Vercingetorix at February 24, 2011 01:32 PM (psCad)
Whatever that means, because apparently there are some "contexts" that make an assault on a law-abiding girl non-newsworthy (and perhaps even justified).
Yeah, sharia law, you dirty RethugliKKKans. Sheesh, she wasn't veiled, and she wasn't escorted by male kin, so she got what she deserved. Hell, she should be lucky they didn't rape and stone her on the spot.
That would have been sweet union sharia justice, baybeee!
(so did I hit enough moonbat catch phrase?)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at February 24, 2011 01:45 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Michael K. at February 24, 2011 02:15 PM (HFN9k)
Posted by: tangonine at February 24, 2011 02:33 PM (x3YFz)
You have either a very poetic definition of "curb-stomping" going on, or some truly devastating drugs in your bloodstream - or both. By the way, good job omitting the trivial detail about the infamous atrocity of that poor helpless Patriot with the missing digit: he just happened to be punching his assailant's face in at the time. Also, please try to remember that "the media" includes me & thee in the age of Teh Interwebs, & that it's literally no longer possible for it to "refuse to report" ANYTHING any more. Censorship is looking more & more like the passenger pigeon of the 21st Century, a trend that's causing the usual suspects to suffer a quite predictable (& hilariously futile) spasm of chronic butthurt.
I'd bet every dime in my wallet that if/when a Tea Party Warrior eventually gets killed at an event it's going to be either themselves or another Tea Party Warrior that helps them shuffle off the mortal coil (unless they're stupid enough to pull heat on a cop) - because many of those folks have a real chubby on for their guns, & oddly enough, folks with constant proximity to guns tend to wind up being killed by them ... a lot ... & nearly always with their own gun.
A+++++ WOULD ROTFLMAO AGAIN
Posted by: jim at February 25, 2011 09:12 AM (HLoR7)
Posted by: James Bluth at February 25, 2011 04:01 PM (VrHs6)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2235 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Posted by: spongeworthy at February 24, 2011 10:06 AM (rplL3)