June 16, 2011
— andy A government big enough to give you everything you want, as it turns out, is also so massively inefficient and convoluted that it gives you a whole bunch of crap you don't want. Two or three times over, even:
A review of the [Economic Development Administration]'s grants makes clear that, just like the stimulus, this program too often has used federal dollars to fund pet projects that have little relation to the national interest. In April, the bureau reported that it gave a $2 million grant to build a "culinary amphitheater," wine tasting room, and gift shop at the Port of Benton and the Walter Clore Wine and Culinary Center in Richland, Wash. The same month, it gave $1.5 million to promote tourism in the Northern Mariana Islands. In January, it spent $1 million on an "innovation conference center" in Arkansas to promote "cultural enrichment."
Ok, so that was probably old spending already in the system, but the message of fiscal responsibility we sent last November surely will fix this going forward, right? Well meet the new boss. Same as the old boss:
... the Senate is currently seeking to increase EDA funding to $500 million a year from $300 million. Worse, this bill passed out of a Senate authorization committee with unanimous, bipartisan support.
Continuing this kind of bullshit in the first place is one thing, but a 67% increase? Really?
Ben Franklin once said, "beware of little expenses; even a small leak will sink a great ship." It's hard to think of half a billion dollars as a little expense, but in the context of debt and deficit measured in trillions, I guess it is. And against Franklin's sage warning, we have a budget filled with thousands upon thousands of such little expenses, and the U.S.S. United States is leaking like a sieve.
The left continues to call for increased taxes as some sort of balance to budget cuts. Until frivolous make-work programs like the EDA are not merely suspended but completely eliminated, we shouldn't even entertain the discussion.
The biggest budget problem we have isn't debt service, unfunded pension obligations or entitlements. It's that we continue to be represented by (save for a handful) fundamentally unserious legislators who are not up to the task of addressing the fiscal problems we face.
Posted by: andy at
07:00 AM
| Comments (51)
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at June 16, 2011 07:03 AM (yQWNf)
Posted by: A. Weiner at June 16, 2011 07:04 AM (yQWNf)
Speaking of... I have a "mock congress budget session" thingy with Rep. Joe Barton tomorrow and Saturday. If you're interested in me asking him any questions, let me know- I can give my email address where you can send them. If I get a chance, I'll ask them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 16, 2011 07:04 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: alexthechick at June 16, 2011 07:05 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 07:06 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: SGT Ted at June 16, 2011 11:01 AM (arV2e)
Well how else is Nancy Pelosi supposed to increase her net worth?
Posted by: robviously at June 16, 2011 07:07 AM (BKPeM)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 07:08 AM (jx2j9)
Can someone much smart than I, please explain this legislation on patents that the GOP is pushing through?
Thanks. (link to TownHall)
Will the GOP Pull a 'Pelosi' on Patent Rights?
Posted by: momma at June 16, 2011 07:08 AM (nWikJ)
Posted by: t-bird at June 16, 2011 07:09 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Brian L. at June 16, 2011 07:10 AM (kPeSM)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 07:10 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: Mindy at June 16, 2011 07:11 AM (bsZfs)
Spend more than you make, unhappy.
It used to be that the press was a watchdog on spending, especially stupid spending. Now? The MSM is cheer-leading.
I want to know the teacher - administration ratios; not just head counts, but spending as well. I bet you could eliminate a lot of spending by cutting administration. Especially the high administrative salaries.
If only there was a way to make members of congress personally responsible when the shit they vote for goes wrong.
Posted by: Jack at June 16, 2011 07:11 AM (kCT7A)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 16, 2011 07:12 AM (ITYRW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at June 16, 2011 07:12 AM (NuCbo)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2011 07:15 AM (jx2j9)
When a guy in Michigan won a 2 million dollar lottery and called to find out what to do about his bridge card (food stamps), it was a state government official who told him to keep taking the food stamps.
From what I've read, the official had no choice but to tell him that due to a loophole in the law (iirc there was an issue about how the lottery funds would be counted for qualification purposes). An amendment to the law is being passed to deal with that. That being said, there's ways and ways to tell someone that - my response would have been "well, if you're fine being a parastic jackass who is, literally, taking food out of the mouth of someone who really needs it, by all means keep the card". Sadly, there are people who would be fine doing that.
I've dealt with this for people who get lawsuit settlements and the settlement is structured in such a way as to permit that person to keep getting public benefits. It's sleazy but, hey, set up a game with rules that can be manipulated and people will manipulate them.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 16, 2011 07:18 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at June 16, 2011 07:19 AM (6IReR)
But if they're Republicans, don't you dare criticize them.
Posted by: The "Victory uber alles" brigade at June 16, 2011 07:20 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: grognard at June 16, 2011 07:20 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 16, 2011 07:20 AM (TMB3S)
If the US doesn't change its profligate spending:
EU's Rehn Confident Of Greek Aid Deal
/Greece is our future.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 16, 2011 07:22 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at June 16, 2011 07:24 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Chi Lin the most at June 16, 2011 07:25 AM (RgMlE)
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2011 07:26 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: JackStraw
It's a good thing I got that degree in Philosophy! Dialectics baby! Oops, lunch break over--gotta head back to the stock room.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 16, 2011 07:29 AM (n2Voo)
Thanks. (link to TownHall)
Will the GOP Pull a 'Pelosi' on Patent Rights
Patent reform is in Obama's budget, and this legislation is essentially his proposal. My understanding is that Obama here is moving patents into mandatory spending. Those in-favor argue it would allow would encourage innovation and job creation, and those opposed worry it violates Congress' power to appropriate. Both Budget and Appropriations said they opposed the legislation unless major changes were made.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 16, 2011 07:29 AM (ITYRW)
Posted by: Douglas at June 16, 2011 07:30 AM (YKOnu)
The biggest budget problem we have isn't debt service, unfunded pension obligations or entitlements. It's that we continue to be represented by (save for a handful) fundamentally unserious legislators who are not up to the task of addressing the fiscal problems we face.
Don't the unserious legislators reflect pretty well the folks who vote for them? Look at it this way. We're all partners in in USA,LLC. And half or more of our partners have a raging drinking problem. They won't put down the bottle, we talked to them about it over and over and it does no good. They keep going on benders and buying shit we can't afford. What do the sober partners, who pay for the mistakes of the others, do?
Posted by: glowing blue meat at June 16, 2011 07:32 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 16, 2011 07:33 AM (TMB3S)
The biggest budget problem we have isn't debt service, unfunded pension obligations or entitlements. It's that we continue to be represented by (save for a handful) fundamentally unserious legislators who are not up to the task of addressing the fiscal problems we face.
And even that understates the problem. They're quite serious about what they do, and they'll continue to be as long as the treasury gives them the money to do it.
Whatever, as long as I get a pony.
Posted by: FireHorse at June 16, 2011 07:35 AM (peN5l)
Posted by: George Orwell at June 16, 2011 07:40 AM (AZGON)
Who foresaw the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1990? At that point, the bureaucracy could no longer instill fear in the individual, the goverment was insolvent, and packs of Marlboros were accepted as currency instead of the ruble.
I've stated before that we have to start making plans for a post-united republic--the tipping point would be the California/New York/Illinois bailout, which is gonna happen prior to the 2012 election.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at June 16, 2011 07:40 AM (n2Voo)
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2011 07:40 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 16, 2011 07:45 AM (ITYRW)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at June 16, 2011 07:47 AM (ITYRW)
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2011 11:40 AM (M9Ie6)
Our Harvard trained DoJ lawyers have thoroughly reviewed and edited the language in this bill, so there's nothing to see here--move along!
Besides, we really do need to "harmonize" with the world/global patent system just to be fair. That outdated stuff in the US Constitution dedicated to the rights of US citizens is not applicable for this modern world.
Posted by: Barky O at June 16, 2011 07:47 AM (yrGif)
Spend more than you make, unhappy.
It used to be that the press was a watchdog on spending, especially stupid spending. Now? The MSM is cheer-leading.
I want to know the teacher - administration ratios; not just head counts, but spending as well. I bet you could eliminate a lot of spending by cutting administration. Especially the high administrative salaries.
If only there was a way to make members of congress personally responsible when the shit they vote for goes wrong.
Posted by: Jack at June 16, 2011 11:11 AM (kCT7A)
You need to watch "The Cartel" you can get it on Netflix. It is about how wasteful our education system is. They want more and more money for the chiiiiiiildren but a lot of public schools already spend $300,000- $500,000 per classroom per year. My kids' private school spends around $100,000. Oregon public schools spend $12,000 per student per year. Private school $3,500 to $6,000. You don't even want to see the test scores between the 2.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at June 16, 2011 07:50 AM (pdRb1)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at June 16, 2011 08:05 AM (1yViP)
Posted by: Bob Saget has not been banned yet at June 16, 2011 08:10 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Stuff Bob Saget found in the Declaration of Independence at June 16, 2011 08:13 AM (F/4zf)
The question is, how long can the can be kicked down the road.
Posted by: MarkC at June 16, 2011 08:15 AM (yPPVC)
Protestor: Uhhhhh........
Posted by: PJ at June 16, 2011 01:26 PM (tybhV)
Posted by: Car Insurance Eau Claire at June 19, 2011 09:47 PM (Eak6F)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2152 seconds, 179 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: SGT Ted at June 16, 2011 07:01 AM (arV2e)