February 01, 2011
— DrewM Follow through.
Confirmed: McConnell will offer repeal bill today as amdt to FAA legislation
That's from NRO's Robert Costa.
A couple of things...
It will probably be ruled out of order since ObamaCare isn't germane to the FAA bill. But they'll be a vote on that, which McConnell and the Republicans will lose but it will be a proxy vote for everyone's stand.
Still, it's a great follow up to yesterday's court decision and keeps the ball moving forward politically. Plus, it will just piss off the Democrats.
Also it's a great sign that Republicans are serious about this and will use every opportunity they have to talk about the jobs killing plan and force Democrats to defend it.
You want to know if the Republicans got 'the message' of November? Here's another sign they did.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:29 AM
| Comments (185)
Post contains 154 words, total size 1 kb.
Question: why, exactly, is it not being introduced as its own bill? Why must it be an amendment to some random bill?
If the republicans control the House, can't they just start a new bill there?
Posted by: dan-O at February 01, 2011 09:32 AM (bRLuD)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 09:33 AM (FcR7P)
Also, I've been wondering, would it be helpful to the lawsuits to pass 'sense of the' House and/or Senate resolutions declaring Obamacare unconstitutional?
Posted by: Methos at February 01, 2011 09:33 AM (Ew1k4)
Er, because Republicans are not in the majority in the Senate?
Posted by: navybrat at February 01, 2011 09:35 AM (09z7A)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at February 01, 2011 09:35 AM (/U/Mr)
If the republicans control the House, can't they just start a new bill there?
What is being added is the repeal bill which passed the House.
As to why they couldn't introduce it, the Senate Majority Leader determines the calendar of what will be voted on. This was the only way the minority could get it to a vote.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 01, 2011 09:35 AM (TpXEI)
Just because the House passes a bill doesn't mean the Senate has to take it up. Pelosi passed over 400 bills that never saw the light of day in the Senate.
Reid controls access to the floor (another reason why majorities matter). This is the only way the minority can get something brought up.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 09:36 AM (HicGG)
Posted by: John P. Squibob at February 01, 2011 09:36 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: cali grump at February 01, 2011 09:37 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 09:37 AM (FcR7P)
Then we'll have that community deodorizer where we want him.
Checkmate.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 01, 2011 09:38 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 09:38 AM (z5j8j)
I take it as a sign they're not serious. Putting up this fig leaf which is procedurally not going to be allowed. "See, we tried".
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 01:37 PM (FcR7P)
I'm not the biggest Senate Republican fan, but what's your alternative at this point in time?
Posted by: grognard at February 01, 2011 09:38 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 01, 2011 09:39 AM (1fwTy)
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 09:39 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 09:39 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 09:39 AM (cs819)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 09:40 AM (FcR7P)
Oh for fucks sake...you'd probably be bitching if they didn't do something like this.
What exactly would you like the Republicans, with their 47 votes, to do?
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 09:40 AM (HicGG)
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 09:40 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 09:41 AM (SJ6/3)
How about a bill demanding a Debate on the meaning of the Constitutional Meaning of the Commerce Clause?
Neither the House or Senate has bothered with that... and I'd LOVE to see that debate as the Dems tried to defend the O'care Mandate...
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 09:41 AM (AdK6a)
Is this a new rule? "Germane" has never stopped anyone from tacking wasteful pork shit onto unrelated bills...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:41 AM (TUpD9)
Liar. That's what state insurance pools are all about. Ever heard of Medicaid?
Posted by: tcn at February 01, 2011 09:41 AM (DjPot)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 09:42 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Precedent Toonces at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (SJ6/3)
Sorry, didn't see that before I posted my comment.
They are doing what they can..building support. We need another election to even have a chance at undoing this. The next 2 years are about the courts and laying the groundwork for repeal.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (HicGG)
Or should I send jelly beans and RC Cola?
mmmmm RC.
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (TUpD9)
I call BS (Barbara Streisand).
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (0GFWk)
It will probably be ruled out of order since ObamaCare isn't germane to the FAA bill.
Actualy, does not the FAA have to pay for Health Insurance? Thus Obamacare DOES affect the FAA!
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 09:43 AM (AdK6a)
What message?
Posted by: Lindsey Graham (R-Lite-SC) at February 01, 2011 09:44 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 01:39 PM (M9Ie6)
That's a good question. McConnell ought to be taking him to the woodshed, along with Sen. John Barrasso.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 01, 2011 09:44 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 09:44 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 09:45 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 01:39 PM (cs819)
She needs a padlock for her fridge dimwit.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 01, 2011 09:45 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 09:45 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 09:45 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 01:39 PM (cs819)
Even if he has to commit sedition to do it.Posted by: Methos at February 01, 2011 09:46 AM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 01, 2011 09:46 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: nevergiveup at February 01, 2011 01:44 PM (0GFWk)
Yeah, but be careful which planes you get on...
Posted by: Ron Brown, getting ready to testify against the Clintons at February 01, 2011 09:46 AM (AdK6a)
Question: why, exactly, is it not being introduced as its own bill? Why must it be an amendment to some random bill?
Chistine O'Donnell!
Posted by: robtr at February 01, 2011 09:47 AM (hVDig)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 01, 2011 09:47 AM (AZGON)
"A good friend of mine has type II Diabetes. No insurance company will cover her. This should not be a political issue to get her the coverage she needs, but instead you people just want to say no and use this for some political advantage. Obama will make sure my friend gets the help she needs regardless of you Republicants".
Sympathy meter remains unbudged.
So I'm guessing your friend lives a sedentary lifestyle, has a piss poor diet, and weighs about a deuce and a half?
Posted by: George Carlin at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (jmf9+)
Posted by: Tom at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (MWXXs)
We totally support your right to get beaten in an alley with a 2x4 full of nails if you are anti-gun.
Big Tent! Big Tent, People!
Bathe your ass. -Redd Foxx
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (TUpD9)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 01, 2011 09:48 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 01:45 PM (BKOsZ)
Wrong, I support your right to get shot when you trespass on my property.
And don't worry, you won't need a doctor.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 01, 2011 09:50 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: Kelly
She should call up Wilford Brimley at Liberty for her diabeetus needs.
Posted by: MrCaniac at February 01, 2011 09:50 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: Lindsay Graham at February 01, 2011 09:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 01, 2011 09:52 AM (AZGON)
If she lives in a state that allows diabetics to be refused individual policies, she needs to take that up with her state, not with Congress (although petitioning Congress to remove the asinine "no policies across state lines" bullshit could work, too).
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:52 AM (TUpD9)
They support your right to get shot, but not your right to see a doctor afterwards.
Well it's kind of oxymoronic, isn't it?
What do YOU want to do, shoot people, patch them up, shoot them again, patch them back up again, shoot 'em agin... that's just fucking cruel man.
Posted by: Entropy at February 01, 2011 09:53 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Ol' President Bony Ass at February 01, 2011 09:53 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 09:53 AM (SJ6/3)
This is now a full-blown Constitutional Crisis. The Executive's willful, intentional and publicly-stated refusal to honor a declaratory judgment is an open act of willful and intentional violation of The Separation of Powers in The Constitution and, if combined with the use of or threat of use of force as is always present when government coercion is employed, treads awfully close to the line, and may cross it, of 18 USC Ch 115 Sec 2384
Posted by: Methos at February 01, 2011 09:53 AM (Ew1k4)
We'll need a list of gunshot victims who have been denied treatment at the ER. State, city, and hospital, please.
Here's a hint: this doesn't happen.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:53 AM (TUpD9)
They refuse to back down from their violent or angry rhetoric, because the language of violence is the only language they understand . They refuse to back down from their violent language and their violent system of beliefs even when it results in the death of a child during a political assassinat ion attempt. In fact, they are choosing this time to double down their efforts to push for more 'liberal' (meaning less restrictiv e) gun legislatio n and don't mind at all that they are, in effect, 'rubbing our noses in it.'
Posted by: Hippie Dude
Umm, you do know that this "assassination" attempt was carried out by a far left nut job, right?
Posted by: MrCaniac at February 01, 2011 09:54 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 01, 2011 09:54 AM (SY2Kh)
He is not up for election until 2014.
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 09:55 AM (M9Ie6)
I take it as a sign they're not serious. Putting up this fig leaf which is procedurally not going to be allowed. "See, we tried".
Posted by: t-bird
Posted by: Ohio Dan at February 01, 2011 09:55 AM (EH4cc)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 09:55 AM (SJ6/3)
It's good practice, just in case Axelrod ever sends us a full-assed troll.
FYNQ!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 09:56 AM (TUpD9)
What do YOU want to do, shoot people, patch them up, shoot them again, patch them back up again, shoot 'em agin... that's just fucking cruel man.
Posted by: Entropy at February 01, 2011 01:53 PM (IsLT6)
Target practice is critical in saving both ammo and unnecessary healthcare costs.
Posted by: ontherocks at February 01, 2011 09:56 AM (HBqDo)
Have her lay off the donuts. You do know that type II is completely curable, right?
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 01:42 PM (FcR7P)
Its true, my wife dropped 40 and improved her diet. Diabetes II gone along with three different medications. Boom!! health care costs drastically decreased!!
Posted by: dananjcon at February 01, 2011 09:56 AM (pr+up)
Oh shit, if I had known this, I totally would have supported electable candidates in DE, CO and NV! Why didn't anyone tell me that control of the Senate mattered? I thought I was just sending message to RINOs!
Posted by: Republican Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 09:57 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: nickless at February 01, 2011 09:57 AM (qdtoY)
Umm, you do know that this "assassination" attempt was carried out by a far left nut job, right?
Forget it, he's rolling.
Posted by: laceyunderalls channeling Boon at February 01, 2011 09:57 AM (wZScH)
Posted by: dogfish at February 01, 2011 09:58 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 09:58 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 09:59 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Republican Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 09:59 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Wilford Brimley at February 01, 2011 09:59 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 10:00 AM (SJ6/3)
Yes, because which party would the Majority Leader be if there were three more R Senators?
Republican Purist Moron
Well, at least you got that part right.
Posted by: Methos at February 01, 2011 10:00 AM (Ew1k4)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:00 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 01:58 PM (GTbGH)
Right about now Kelly is going "Damn, I picked the wrong illness to give my fake friend. Should have gone with Crohn's. Shit."
Posted by: Tami at February 01, 2011 10:00 AM (VuLos)
Did anyone really think McCain was electable?
I don't remember the great, true conservative hope we tossed aside for the more electable McCain.
2008 was just a crappy field.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 01, 2011 10:01 AM (HicGG)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 10:01 AM (cs819)
And now we can't get any legislation to the floor of the Senate! Fuck!
Oh well, there's still time to primary Olympia Snowe and Scott Brown!
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:01 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Boxcar Joe Biden at February 01, 2011 10:01 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 01, 2011 10:02 AM (xmuv/)
Indeed. My wallet is open to primary challengers.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:03 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 10:03 AM (FcR7P)
I'll join the BS on Kelly chorus. Type II diabetes is non-insulin-dependent diabetes, and can usually be managed with diet and exercise.
Type I is the insulin-injection, Wilford Brimley diabeet-us diabetes. That's the one you REALLY don't want to have.
There's also a big difference between non-coverage of a pre-existing medical condition, and not issuing coverage at all. People with pre-existing medical conditions get health insurance all the time. There may be exclusions or waiting periods for the pre-existing condition, though.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 01, 2011 10:03 AM (DrWcr)
Icy mess.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 01, 2011 01:47 PM (wZScH)
Couldnt open the pic but yeah... Indy is an icy mess. About an inch of ice last night and its raining ice now... this evening.. more ice and snow. Schools are all closed and probably will be tomorrow too.
Indy is doing a really good job with getting ahead of the weather.. since the Superbowl is here next year, they want to show we can handle the weather.
Posted by: Timbo at February 01, 2011 10:03 AM (ph9vn)
When are the Kelly-concern-Libs goint to realize that this nonsense has never been about healthcare? Its about buying off votes and redistributing money from the producers to non-producers.
Posted by: dananjcon at February 01, 2011 10:03 AM (pr+up)
Google 'Tony Snow cancer Daily Kos' and get back to me.
Posted by: nickless at February 01, 2011 10:04 AM (qdtoY)
Or that you're old. My grandfather has always been slight, and developed it around age 85.
Of course, Obamacare would have prevented this by letting him die when he was 75 instead of letting him have a bypass.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 10:05 AM (TUpD9)
Sweet! Join me, my brother, in purifying our party of candidates who can win elections in Northeast states and caucus with us, and vote to repeal Obamacare! I would rather see the country burn than allow anyone who offends our sense of perfection! MUCH BETTER COAKLEY THAN BROWN! THAT FUCKER DOESN'T HATE FAGS THE WAY HE OUGHTA!
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:05 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 02:01 PM (cs819)
Anyone else hear the voice of one of Red Eye's computer generated robots when scanning Kelly's mindless drivel?
Posted by: ontherocks at February 01, 2011 10:05 AM (HBqDo)
What do YOU want to do, shoot people, patch them up, shoot them again, patch them back up again, shoot 'em agin... that's just fucking cruel man.
Posted by: Entropy at February 01, 2011 01:53 PM (IsLT6)
Depends on who you're talking about. Oh NOES!!!! UNCIVIL RHETORIC!!!!11!!!!111!!ELEVENTY!!!
Posted by: Insomniac at February 01, 2011 10:06 AM (DrWcr)
Question: why, exactly, is it not being introduced as its own bill? Why must it be an amendment to some random bill?
.
It's simple. . . By the inaction of FAA personnel to purchase health insurance, it in essence creates an action (inaction =1 / action) in the eyes of the Commerce Clause. So. . . by introducing the repeal amendment and attaching it to the FAA reauthorization bill you get the following equation:
Action = (Inaction) X (1 / Action)
Now if you solve for the derivative of Y . . .
Posted by: FireNWater at February 01, 2011 10:07 AM (qmw4U)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 10:07 AM (SJ6/3)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 01, 2011 10:07 AM (xmuv/)
Posted by: The Actual Real Kelly No Lie at February 01, 2011 10:08 AM (ERJIu)
#84
Had we won 50...would have been interesting to see how Manchin and Nelson acted post-election.
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:08 AM (rSY7Y)
Posted by: FireNWater at February 01, 2011 02:07 PM (qmw4U)
Ahhhhh!!!! Math!!!!!
/runs from thread....
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 10:08 AM (AdK6a)
Action = (Inaction) X (1 / Action)
Now if you solve for the derivative of Y . . .That looks suspiciously like math. Raaaaaacist.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 01, 2011 10:08 AM (TUpD9)
Posted by: Kelly
No, it is not "unAmerican" to be happy. Actually, we don't give a shit.
What is unAmerican is expecting others to pay for your friends diabeetus because she drools like Pavlov's dog at a picture of Little Debbie.
Posted by: MrCaniac at February 01, 2011 10:09 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 10:09 AM (BKOsZ)
Had we won 50...would have been interesting to see how Manchin and Nelson acted post-election.
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 02:08 PM (rSY7Y)
Nah, Joe Biden would have suddenly discovered that Sarah WAS right during the election, and that the VP is President of the Senate, and votes on ties...
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 01, 2011 10:10 AM (AdK6a)
Meh. Brown's going down anyway.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:10 AM (GTbGH)
You've got it all wrong, Flavius! The problem is that they DO vote with us. They vote with us on piddling, useless shit like repealing ObamaCare, or stopping the omnibus spending bill, or shooting down the DREAM Act...you know, stuff that doesn't matter, stuff we don't care about as Tea Partiers.
AND THEY THEY HAVE THE NERVE TO REPEAL DADT, OR VOTE FOR A MEANINGLESS MISSILE TREATY WITH NO CONCRETE REAL-WORLD EFFECT. HOW DARE THEY?!?!? HOW DARE THEY NOT DANCE SLAVISHLY TO OUR TUNE!!
I demand 100% Jim DeMint conservative purity from my Massachusetts and Maine Senators, or else let's set them on fire.
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:10 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 10:10 AM (SJ6/3)
Tell you "friend" to try cinnamon for her diabetes. A simple Google search will reveal a plethora of good advice. Not as easy as whining about your victim status and holding out your hand for Gubbermint help, but I hope it provides some help for her.
Posted by: MissTammy at February 01, 2011 10:12 AM (BebB7)
Neither of those are "rights", numbnuts.
Posted by: I dream of Kelly at February 01, 2011 10:12 AM (Wqfrr)
Cut, jib, newsletter.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:12 AM (GTbGH)
#113
You don't HAVE to drive a car. You can take a bus, ride a bike, or walk. All green options in fact.
FYNQ
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:13 AM (rSY7Y)
Otherwise they're probably just going to turn out to be sneaky 'bipartisan' RINO squish fucktards.
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:14 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 01, 2011 10:14 AM (SJ6/3)
Do you live in Massachussetts?
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at February 01, 2011 10:15 AM (qdtoY)
Sometimes I think you're the only one on this site that truly understands me. Together, brother, we will create a better, more pure minority. Who needs 50+ Senators and control of the legislative agenda when you could have an ideologically perfect minority of 35-40???
WHAT KIND OF RINO-HUMPING QUEERBOT WOULD MAKE THAT TRADE, HUH?
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:16 AM (yemTi)
APPLICABLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this section—
‘‘(3) INDIVIDUALS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.—Such term shall
not include an individual for any month if for the month the
individual is not a citizen or national of the United States
or an alien lawfully present in the United States.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:16 AM (GTbGH)
A good friend of mine has type II Diabetes. No insurance company will cover her. This should not be a political issue to get her the coverage she needs, but instead you people just want to say no and use this for some political advantage. Obama will make sure my friend gets the help she needs regardless of you Republicants
As others have already mentioned, if you're going to have Diabetes, Type II is the best one to have. It's usually controlled by exercise and diet, and occasionally oral medications. As already stated, your friend needs to start monitoring what she eats and get off her fat ass!
Posted by: runningrn, And yes, I am a real nurse! at February 01, 2011 10:16 AM (ihSHD)
Now you're just playing with me.
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at February 01, 2011 10:17 AM (qdtoY)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 10:18 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 02:18 PM (BKOsZ)
You're welcome!
Posted by: Barry O. at February 01, 2011 10:19 AM (qdtoY)
Either you are a sock, or stupid.
A government that can make you buy a product with your own private property (money) from cradle to grave can make you buy or do anything.
My child can choose not to drive a car or purchase a car. He cannot choose not to be born.
The individual mandate in Commiecare is a Birth Tax.
It's about the freedom, dipshit.
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 10:19 AM (z5j8j)
Hey Kelly,
Your "friend" needs to back away from the Entenmenn's baked goods.. If she can't back a way under her own power then I guess we will have to chip in for a forklift. Will that help?
Science tip of the day: Physics states that spandex can stretch only so far until it explodes off your "friend's" ass and sucks her into a black hole of nothingness.
It's a fact!
Posted by: mpfs at February 01, 2011 10:20 AM (iYbLN)
Indeed. Tainting the brand was hardly worth electing Castle as the 48th Senator.
BTW, are you going to spill the beans about why Chief Justice Roberts is likely to uphold Obamacare, jeff?
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:20 AM (GTbGH)
BTW, you know who isn't required to buy insurance
Yup, no point in being a legal citizen of the U.S.S.A any more. Illegal aliens also get instate tuition at state schools in many states. If you're a legal citizen and you want to go to a public school in a neighboring state, well, you're screwed.
Posted by: runningrn, And yes, I am a real nurse! at February 01, 2011 10:20 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Hippie Dude
Drivers do not have to buy auto insurance, automobile owners buy auto insurance. Those who do not own a car do not pay auto insurance.
The State is able to mandate that you purchase auto insurance to drive on State maintained roads. But if your vehicle does not go on State maintained roads, auto insurance is not needed. Example, NASCAR race cars are not required to maintain auto insurance.
Actually, health costs will increase if "everyone" is covered. You see there is a simple economic concept called "supply and demand". As the demand increases, the supply decreases. When that happens, the price goes up. Since there is already a shortage of health care professionals in this country, the increased demand will cause the price to go up. The government's "fix" is to set the costs. This in turn will cause doctors to leave the system, meaning fewer doctors, which in turn will lead to fewer patients being able to see the doctor. Thus, the supply will decrease, and there will be a rise in the price.
Posted by: MrCaniac at February 01, 2011 10:21 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: Vic at February 01, 2011 10:21 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 10:21 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: Ryan Frank at February 01, 2011 10:23 AM (U17Lb)
Hippie Dude,
That is some weapons grade stupid right there. Buying a car is not mandatory in this country. If you purchase a car, your own choice, you must carry auto insurance. Gawd you are fucking dumb. What are you, twelve?
Posted by: mpfs at February 01, 2011 10:23 AM (iYbLN)
Either you are a sock, or stupid.
I'm pretty sure that one's a sock. Purity Guy and Kelly both need a 2x4 studded with 18-penny nails up their ass though.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 01, 2011 10:24 AM (ofEJm)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 02:21 PM (BKOsZ)
Ok, the sock status is becoming obvious at this point.
Because everyone knows the DoI with a painfully loose interpretation of "Life" as "health care" is the law of the land. What the fuck is this "Constitution" business anyway?
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:24 AM (rSY7Y)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:25 AM (GTbGH)
I take it as a sign they're not serious. Putting up this fig leaf which is procedurally not going to be allowed. "See, we tried".
Posted by: t-bird at February 01, 2011 01:37 PM (FcR7P)
I'm not the biggest Senate Republican fan, but what's your alternative at this point in time?
Posted by: grognard at February 01, 2011 01:38 PM (NS2Mo)
Bitching on the inter-webz. Duh.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 01, 2011 10:25 AM (z1N6a)
Health care is a right. Just ask the Declaration of Independence.
Posted by: Hippie Dude
"Fucking hippies are douchebags".
From Stuff Jefferson Said
Posted by: MrCaniac at February 01, 2011 10:25 AM (oREHE)
Posted by: Hippie Dude at February 01, 2011 10:25 AM (BKOsZ)
How about all those dead babies that you liberals kill every year in abortions, Hippie? Do they have rights?
Life (not medical care), Liberty (from government oppression), PURSUIT (not guaranty) of Happiness
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 10:26 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: FU52 at February 01, 2011 10:27 AM (BSVaa)
Posted by: MJ at February 01, 2011 10:28 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 10:28 AM (z5j8j)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 01, 2011 10:29 AM (ofEJm)
And pretty soon it will be mandatory to buy an electric car for everyone not living near high speed rail. You know I'm right. Posted by: Hippie Dude
You drive??!!! Shame on you. You should be taking pubic (I meant that) transportation, riding a bicycle or walking to your community organizer "job". Electric cars? Umm, how are we going to create the energy to supply the electricity? Oh yes, the wind. Uh huh. Where are we going to dispose of the batteries? Tell me more. I'm simply fascinated by your lack of brainpower.
Posted by: mpfs at February 01, 2011 10:30 AM (iYbLN)
lets do a thought experiment.
My "pursuit of happiness" is to be in a world surrounded by big tits.
So the government should mandate all women to have big tits, but don't worry, they will subsidize that by taxing other women who already have them so its all gravy, and they will protect my "right" to a pursuit of happiness by telling women with big tits they cannot hack their god-crafted breasts off because of back pain.
You see the utter selfishness and stupidity of this? (Actually besides the DDtax it would be pretty awesome) This was the point of the SD proposal on guns. If the government can mandate your behavior through forced purchase on something you agree with they certainly can do it on something you disagree with. It is a bad precedent.
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:30 AM (rSY7Y)
Exactly. Let's replace them all with Democrats! At least we know how they'll vote! Anything to rid ourselves of the agony of uncertainty!
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:30 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: mpfs at February 01, 2011 10:30 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: sifty at February 01, 2011 10:33 AM (z5j8j)
The selfishness in the HC debate is NOT on the side of the majority that has it. It is on the minority that DEMANDS they get something they didn't qualify or pay for just because they are sick and someone else should pay for their misfortune. They do not care that the costs to everyone else who already pay will explode, or that the quality of care will decline, or that other nations like the UK, Sweden and Canada are all quietly rolling back "free" health care because it isn't fucking free.
They don't care. They are sick, and they have special illnesses, and we all have to bend over backwards for them.
Again, I have an illness- I need to see huge tits everywhere I go. Why? Just because! How dare you intrude on my rights! ELEVENTY!!
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:34 AM (rSY7Y)
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:34 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Tami at February 01, 2011 10:36 AM (VuLos)
That offends my sense of propriety. Pretty soon people are going to start sending Republicans and conservatives to the Senate from all sorts of strange, formerly blue states.
And I won't feel special anymore.
Posted by: Tea Party Purist Moron at February 01, 2011 10:36 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Joe Biden at February 01, 2011 10:38 AM (AnTyA)
The reasons Roberts may well not be on board are many, but for one I'm very concerned that he's on the wrong side of Comstock jurisprudence (ask Malor, he'll explain).
Also, Kennedy really, really, dislikes Obama on a personal level. I know from his clerks. Don't underestimate the powers of personal pique when it comes to swing voters on SCOTUS.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 01, 2011 10:39 AM (yemTi)
Of course. And people in hell want ice water.
Anyway, spill it, jeff. Why do we need to worry about Justice Roberts on HC? You threw that out yesterday but didn't elaborate.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:39 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 10:40 AM (GTbGH)
#159
sensitivity training to "correct" your thoughts.
also we can fund artists through the NEA to "promote" my plans.
See? I really tapped into the left's thought process here...
Posted by: CAC at February 01, 2011 10:40 AM (rSY7Y)
Posted by: MJ at February 01, 2011 10:40 AM (BKOsZ)
Posted by: cthulhu at February 01, 2011 10:47 AM (kaalw)
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 01, 2011 10:56 AM (yemTi)
Then we're boned. It was a 7-2 decision.
Posted by: toby928™ at February 01, 2011 11:07 AM (GTbGH)
What I cannot seem to get, without paying an astronomical amount of money, is life insurance.
FREE LIFE INSURANCE IS A RIGHT!!!!!
Posted by: wiserbud at February 01, 2011 11:07 AM (EW49d)
Not necessarily boned, but let's just say that it would be a big mistake to rely upon the court to overturn Obamacare. The way we're going to do it is through legislative action with a GOP president in 2013.
Which is why I care so fucking much about electing as many Republicans as possible to the Senate and choosing a Presidential candidate that gives us a real shot at winning. That's the only way out.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 01, 2011 11:24 AM (yemTi)
Umm...that's old news. Somebody didn't read the thread in its entirety.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 01, 2011 11:25 AM (yemTi)
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 01, 2011 03:25 PM (yemTi)
My most sincere apology Dear Sir.
Posted by: Ronster at February 01, 2011 11:30 AM (1F/m8)
he's the most popular politician in Massachusetts right now despite being a Republican who has voted with us on everything that matters.
I'm so glad we have you to determine what matters.
Could you imagine if I got to call the shots about what matters to me? It would be chaos. I'd be liable to vote for a libertarian.
Oh wait... I DO vote for libertarians.
FYNQ.
Posted by: Entropy at February 01, 2011 11:42 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Kelly at February 01, 2011 01:39 PM (cs819)
I was getting teary eyed reading your friend's story. Then I realized it's bullshit. The truth is you, your friend, me, and everyone else is responsible for their own health and medical coverage. I have had Type I diabetes for 26 years, and my insurance company gladly provides coverage for my medication, pump supplies, doctor visits, and if necessary hospitalization. There are plenty of insurance plans available to diabetics. All you need to do is pay the premium not beg others to pay it for you.
Just like we diabetics must sacrifice and make lifestyle changes to maintain their blood sugar levels and their health, we must sacrifice to pay our insurance premiums. If a type one diabetic of 26 years such as myself can get and keep medical coverage so can your friend. It's all a matter of what your priority is and what you choose to spend your money on.
Nice try though...
Posted by: An Insured Diabetic at February 01, 2011 11:44 AM (B8HE2)
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 01, 2011 11:58 AM (XBM1t)
They vote with us on piddling, useless shit like repealing ObamaCare
Which hasn't happened yet. I'm not sure but I don't think these Grade A's are gonna sprout 12 chickens if I leave them in the fridge too long.
Besides...
or stopping the omnibus spending bill,
Yes thank god they stopped that! Oh wait... they didn't.
Imagine if we only had 41 Jim DeMints, what would they have done, fillibuster it? Well.. yes. Yes they would have.
Empirically speaking 41 DeMints would have done more for you than 51 or 55 75 of your average republican on the TARP and the porkulus.
Same goes for OBAMACARE. Thank god they're voting to repeal it in a symbolic bill that everyone knows will not pass. After they let O-Care pass in the first place.
Fact: 49 republicans, or for that matter 55 republicans, often fail to do what 41 conservatives could be relied upon to.
REPEAL OBAMACARE?
A country with a permanent minority of 41 Jim DeMints and Rand Pauls is a country that will never have socialized medicine in the first place.
or shooting down the DREAM Act...
Which half of those goobers you're talking about started the push for under Bush. When they do nothing for you, you excuse their incompitence and credit them anyway for trying, but when they actively try to harm you and fail, you excuse their incompitence and don't discredit them for trying.
Do you ever wonder why our 'betters' are all incompitent fools?
Posted by: Entropy at February 01, 2011 11:59 AM (IsLT6)
Obama is really the root of the problem suffered by Kelly's friend. I blame the Skittles. She needs to get the Unicorns out of the house, stat.
Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 01, 2011 12:28 PM (qwK3S)
Here's a tapeworm, dear!
Posted by: Ol' President Bony Ass at February 01, 2011 01:53 PM (FcR7P)
Teh funny! I recall the Oregon Health Plan chose to buy blenders for its supplicants because they were cheaper than a new set of chompers.
Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 01, 2011 12:30 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 01, 2011 12:30 PM (qwK3S)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.5699 seconds, 313 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: MissTammy at February 01, 2011 09:32 AM (BebB7)