February 02, 2011

CAC's Late Night Art Thread
— rdbrewer


Note: Christina's World swapped with Helga painting.

I don't have the names or information on these three Andrew Wyeth paintings. If anyone does, please put it in comments. I do know that the last one is one of the Helga paintings. Wyeth had been painting nudes of his neighbor, Helga, for 15 years without either spouse's knowledge. According to Wikipedia:

[Wyeth was] primarily a realist painter, working predominantly in a regionalist style. He was one of the best-known U.S. artists of the middle 20th century, and was sometimes referred to as the "Painter of the People," due to his work's popularity with the American public. In his art, Wyeth's favorite subjects were the land and people around him, both in his hometown of Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, and at his summer home in Cushing, Maine.

I like his work--I think it's beautiful--but it makes me uneasy. It's profoundly melancholy, lonely-feeling. I think it's much darker than it may appear to some. And some of it is weirdly frightening. I've looked at dozens of his paintings, and I get no sense of invitation or warmth from any of them. To me, he's the visual equivalent of Robert Frost. CAC claims to still be busy with his work, but I am beginning to believe him. How else could he come up with pictures like this?


"Taken of the photoshoot while I was applying the latex on the model."

I want to put latex on a model too.

I have been after CAC to explain why he is doing this and what he does for a living. He has been giving me cryptic answers like "It puts the lotion on its skin," and "The dog watches time through the art of history." So, I'm like, "No, CAC, I'm asking why. Why are you gluing rubber to a woman's boobs? I'm sure people would like to know." He said, "This project was difficult because the model's breasts moved every time they were touched. It took two pairs of hands to hold them still." I said, "All I'm hearing is, 'I glue things to women's boobs.' Can you explain exactly what you do?"

I am a sculptor and painter. Much of my work deals with the hyperactive state of overinformation that surrounds us. Thanks to the internet we are flooded with conflicting data on literally everything and often major events go unnoticed as they get drowned in the general deluge of crap. I chose the controversy over Avastin for an installation.

The installation itself runs two parallel sets of information, the top just blabber and data from the FDA, the bottom a series of shots much like an internet pinup. As you move from left to right across the installation the figure below is literally wasting away with these large green masses (actually outlines of the lymphatic system) spreading across from the breasts to the whole body. As bureaucracies like the FDA fritter and waste time, people die. With the health care law that frittering will only get worse.

I chose to use the pinup imagery mostly as a form of self reflection and it plays into the working title of the piece: Bureaucratic Masturbation. The vid and image files sent just documented the photoshoot as we were going none of them are being used for the final piece but gives a good hint as to how it will turn out.

Thanks, CAC. So, by "installation" and "final piece" he is referring to some method of display, perhaps a sculpture, that will contain photographs--not a live model. In this case, they will be in the form of pinup imagery. And it's about Avastin, a breast cancer drug for which there is some controversy surrounding its approval. Fascinating stuff. I can haz try?

Now on to moron art. CAC will be back next week, so send submissions to his email address: theoneandonlyfinn (at) yadayadayadagmail.com. Take out "(at)" and the yadas. Let me encourage the artists to volunteer their own critical analysis to supplement the discussion. And like I said last week, one participant asked about putting up a link for purchasing information. I think that would best be handled in comments and not up top in the post, since Ace has paying advertisers. For now, provide your own link and any other information you might have in comments. And we'll see how that goes. If I missed any emailed submissions, let me know.



Teaser poster for "Lloyd the Conqueror," Andrew Herman
Coming in 2011
(Andrew also wrote the script.)


Space Opera, Ariana S. ("Revvy"), 2010
8.1"x16", digital, Photoshop


Untitled, US Route 50 (somewhere in southern Illinois), J.P. Dawson, 2009
HDR digital photo, Canon D-40
Five exposures processed through Photomatix.


New Prospect, Robert McMahon, 2009
18"x36", oil on canvas


American Music, Robert McMahon, 2009
18"x39", oil on canvas


Memorial, Robert McMahon


Kandar, Robert McMahon, 2009

Posted by: rdbrewer at 07:00 PM | Comments (91)
Post contains 815 words, total size 6 kb.

1 first

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:01 PM (W6bJb)

2 and if anyone can do it, it ain't art...

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:02 PM (W6bJb)

3 and I tend to doubt that photography is really one of the arts, talented photographers notwithstanding.

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:03 PM (W6bJb)

4 and it's one hell of an audience you have for art if I get the first four comments in...

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:04 PM (W6bJb)

5 did we ever decide if we wanted to see Joe Biden fix the brakes on anyone's car?

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:04 PM (W6bJb)

6 I'm pretty sure Wyeth titled the third pic from the top "Firepatch Ginger with the Perky Yabos Reclines on my Bunk".

Posted by: VA Gator at February 02, 2011 07:08 PM (uZdxA)

7 I feel very centered right now

Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 02, 2011 07:09 PM (g3OU+)

8

the nide is "overflow" 1978

http:// www.artknowledgenews .com/a ndrew-wyeth- remembrance.html ?q=patricia

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:11 PM (W6bJb)

9 Now, I'm moving to the left.

Posted by: The Robot Devil at February 02, 2011 07:11 PM (g3OU+)

10 nide... idiot...

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:11 PM (W6bJb)

11 VA Gator, with respect--

(1) Doesn't 'Yabbo' have two 'b's'?

(2) Damn, that girl's hairy.



Posted by: Mike James at February 02, 2011 07:12 PM (k3VCR)

12

couldn't find the other two, but here's a pic of Wyeht and W Bush:

http://static. guim.co.uk/sys-images /Guardian/Pix/ pictures/2009/ 01/16/ 0116_wyethandbush _630x390.jpg

take out the spaces

Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:15 PM (W6bJb)

13

Well hell, if slathering boobs with goo is art, then I'm Rembrandt. 

When I work on my next piece (see what I did there?), I'll claim it's for the greater good or some scathing social commentary.  That's a new one.

Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 02, 2011 07:15 PM (A/oSU)

14 the topmost one is called Wind from the Sea, it's in one of my favorite rooms of the National Gallery in DC.

Posted by: Adrian at February 02, 2011 07:18 PM (PY4xx)

15 The first pic looks a lot like Christina's World, in reverse, without Christina.

Posted by: cthulhu at February 02, 2011 07:20 PM (kaalw)

16 Wyeth died just two years ago too. Of all the regionalists he was the best, though the TIME critics always loved blasting him.

Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 07:21 PM (Gr1V1)

17 Mike James, you could be right, but I think it's only two B's when they're a D cup or better.  "Yah-Bohs!" probably works too.

Posted by: VA Gator at February 02, 2011 07:22 PM (uZdxA)

18 I wish I could cover every wall of my condo with N. C. Wyeth's paintings from  "The Scottish Chiefs."

Posted by: Crusty at February 02, 2011 07:25 PM (qzgbP)

19 Andrew Wyeth is one of my all-time favorite artists!

Just had to say that.

Posted by: sock puppeh at February 02, 2011 07:26 PM (VcPAo)

20

no love for the Neue Sachlichkeit

Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (DKV43)

21 Andrew Wyeth's brother Nathaniel was a chemist with DuPont - and came up with the plastic compound strong enought to allow pressurized liquids (ie pop) to be stored in plastic instead of glass.  True story.

Posted by: Erik Larsen at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (dZ9WB)

22 The first one is called window. The second is called tree. The third is some naked chick in a bed. All of them are haunting and have a nutty wrapper with a hint of stupid. Artistes are so fucking pretentious.

Posted by: JackStraw at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (TMB3S)

23

The first pic looks a lot like Christina's World, in reverse, without Christina.

dezoomified you mean?

Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (DKV43)

24 Art is great!  just sayin.   Nudes the aristocrat porn. 

Posted by: Indian Outlaw at February 02, 2011 07:28 PM (ATMEl)

25 I like the first one. he does a great job on the curtain

Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 07:28 PM (DKV43)

26 I had the pleasure of meeting him (and his son Jamie) many times when I worked at the Hotel DuPont in Wilmington, DE, which had a number of his works (and those of Jamie, father N. C. and even one by his mother Carolyn) throughout the public rooms of the hotel. He was a delight, thoroughly unassuming and charming. The same can be said for Jamie.

Posted by: MB at February 02, 2011 07:29 PM (RwpbN)

27 The Avastin drug was approved for breast cancer by the FDA. It is expensive. With Obamacare on the horizon the FDA (for the first time evah) reversed its approval of a drug based on the drug's price. Unconscionable.

Posted by: karenm at February 02, 2011 07:30 PM (2y90e)

28

dezoomified you mean?

Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 11:27 PM (DKV43)

....and de-enhanced!

Posted by: cthulhu at February 02, 2011 07:33 PM (kaalw)

29

I had the pleasure of meeting him (and his son Jamie) many times when I worked at the Hotel DuPont in Wilmington, DE, which had a number of his works (and those of Jamie, father N. C. and even one by his mother Carolyn) throughout the public rooms of the hotel. He was a delight, thoroughly unassuming and charming.

Interesting info.  I would have guessed cold and distant.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:34 PM (HSJsW)

30 I should already be a millionaire several times over, because I am a genius and things.  But I only got one chance at a CAC thread.

BTW if you say, "But you suck, BeckoningChasm!" you should still give me like, um, free bacon or something.  For life.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 02, 2011 07:37 PM (081kp)

31 Thanks RD, I had no idea you'd use all four. I feel like a greedy pig.

lyle (Robert McMahon)


Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 07:38 PM (/0D5i)

32 Andrew Wyeth

Now that's art. It's funny though I have never found him cold or put offish but I know what you mean. I think a big part of that is he seemed to paint for himself. Do you feel that way even about one like Master Bedroom?

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:40 PM (RuL8J)

33

No worries, lyle.  They're great.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:40 PM (HSJsW)

34

Memorial is a picture of my life.

Posted by: td at February 02, 2011 07:40 PM (w7TI0)

35

I think a big part of that is he seemed to paint for himself.

It's funny you said that, because I amost wrote it about 18 times.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:41 PM (HSJsW)

36 Thanks RD, I had no idea you'd use all four. I feel like a greedy pig.

lyle (Robert McMahon)


Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 11:38 PM (/0D5i)


Very, very,very nice indeed. And I mean nice in the good way. I especially like New Prospect.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:42 PM (RuL8J)

37 I appreciate art. I mean art that shows thought, impression, careful planning in the composition and materials, and great skill of execution by the artist. What I mean is, I don't consider an array of Campbell's soup cans on canvas or a crucifix in a jar of pee art. I consider that stuff an insult. 

Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 07:43 PM (JxMqJ)

38 I know it's not Moron art but it's awesome: http://sharpwriter.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d33u2nl

Posted by: F.B. at February 02, 2011 07:43 PM (v85We)

39 Rocks, yeah.  The dog helps a little, I guess.  But I feel like it's more "here is a picture of a dog" rather than "here is a dog."  There's some barrier between the artist and the viewer... whatever that means.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:45 PM (HSJsW)

40

It's funny you said that, because I amost wrote it about 18 times.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 11:41 PM (HSJsW)


 Yeah, you definitely get the feeling you are peeking in on someone's private stash with Wyeth. But I think maybe he did that a little bit on purpose. To create a sort of illicit interest in "realistic" art at a time when abstract was so dominant. Sort of like "Shhh. It's okay to like this...between you and me."

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:48 PM (RuL8J)

41 If one were to travel north in the land of the the ill today, you would see the seen captured by Dawson X 20. This is what you get when Detroitocrats get their claws into a region. YOU GET RUIN. You get desolation brought about by the "FEELINGS" and "NEEDINESS" of liberals doing "GOOD" SO I DEMOCRAT can FEEL GOOD about being a..."an" IDIOT! Pray 2012 can pump out the toxic bilge-water that threatens this great nation and right this ship of state. They have sold their collective souls to the great deceiver and that is THEIR legacy.

Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 07:50 PM (BOCjk)

42 BTW, all the Morons jokingly asking why Code Pink isn't in Egypt........well, the sag titted skags are there.

Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 07:54 PM (JxMqJ)

43 Rocks, yeah.  The dog helps a little, I guess.  But I feel like it's more "here is a picture of a dog" rather than "here is a dog."  There's some barrier between the artist and the viewer... whatever that means.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 11:45 PM (HSJsW)


Yeah but it's different for me. I have had that hanging on a wall for many years so it's very familiar to me. I guess his stuff grows on you like scotch. I grew up in rooms like that with bedspreads and dogs like that. To me it says lazy fall/winter afternoon and comfy bed. Know what it's for? Did ya see the dog?

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:54 PM (RuL8J)

44 Ya know, CAC, I am a big art person.  And I do actually love Andrew Wyeth.  But, all this post-ONT shit is, perhaps, a little passive aggressive, no?  Discuss.

Posted by: Peaches at February 02, 2011 07:55 PM (zxpIo)

45 CAC, I ran across the perfect tool for this.

Tineye .com is a reverse image search. Point it at an image, it finds other similar images. It found 20+ similar images for the first three of your mystery images. And the links seem to identify the images by artist, etc.

It did not, however, find "Model with Latex."

Posted by: Al at February 02, 2011 07:56 PM (MzQOZ)

46 Richard...you've got your Ayn Rand on good today!

Posted by: torabora at February 02, 2011 07:57 PM (TeAXB)

47 Dating rule # 1 never vomit on your woman's breasts - but if you must, do it artfully, musta been another great St Patricks day

The "Window" is nice and I'm liking McMahon's works as well.
Space Opera - cool

Posted by: melvin at February 02, 2011 07:59 PM (3OCZw)

48 Peaches, chill out.  It's not all about you.  A lot of people like the art thread, and this is, like, the sixth or seventh time I've seen the same comment from you.  You're like a rude parrot on acid.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:00 PM (HSJsW)

49 42 BTW, all the Morons jokingly asking why Code Pink isn't in Egypt........well, the sag titted skags are there.

Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 11:54 PM (JxMqJ)

Well it was over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor too.

Posted by: torabora at February 02, 2011 08:00 PM (TeAXB)

50 I think perhaps we see so many images now that are so busy that seeing images with peace makes us a bit uncomfortable. Wyeth always seemed to me to be about the intimate being a bit too exposed, and that made for the edginess. Why would we be looking at his bedroom? Isn't Christina just having a private moment, viewing her entire world? It is as if we are about to upset the peacefulness, or the epiphany, or whatever, depending on the painting.

The fact that he could capture that so readily and so frequently is positively amazing.

Posted by: tcn at February 02, 2011 08:01 PM (DjPot)

51 The other thing I like about Wyeth is his paintings remind me of a John Ford movie in some way and I really like John Ford.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:06 PM (RuL8J)

52 the sixth or seventh time I've seen the same comment from you

Really?  Considering that this is, like, the second time I've even visited the art thread, that's interesting.  Sorry if I offended your tender sensibilities, dude.

Posted by: Peaches at February 02, 2011 08:07 PM (zxpIo)

53 Janet Napolitano is in a "trance"

Posted by: newser at February 02, 2011 08:08 PM (dPmdD)

54 Andrew Wyeth was sickly as a boy and home-schooled by his father, the great illustrator NC Wyeth. Andrew had a unique apprenticeship in the basics of representation and the use of imagery.

NC was larger than life - a great storyteller with a studio full of pirate costumes, sabers and flintlocks. He painted robust, vivid, action-packed illustrations. Andrew's world revolved around his charismatic father and Chadd's Ford.

NC was babysitting Andrew's toddler nephew when their car was struck by a train and both were killed. From then on, Andrew's work, which was already introspective, assumed a darker, more haunted tone. Much of it is a meditation on death and loss, and sometimes ghosts.

I'm just guessing at chronology here but I think the tree picture is earliest. I would guess that the huge spreading tree that dominates the tiny house and landscape represents old NC.

The top picture comes later. Tire tracks head up a hill and disappear. The ragged curtain billows inward. A breeze, or NC's ghost?

In his images of figures sleeping, Wyeth often used a window to represent the dreaming state. For Wyeth, dreams open a passageway between this world and another. I think sometimes Wyeth used Helga as a stand-in for himself.   


Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:09 PM (/0D5i)

55 I think Christina is a little spooky.  It's prolly a silly take, I know, but that's how I feel.  I think she looks incredibly vulnerable.  I'm not convinced she's appreciating her world more than she is striving to get away from it.  She isn't having a good time there in the grass.  She wants to get home.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:11 PM (HSJsW)

56

You didn't offend me, Peaches.  You can grate with rudeness without causing offense.  But it was getting so old, I was wondering whether you'd chime in again tonight while I was writing the post. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:15 PM (HSJsW)

57 RD,

Christina Olsen was a middle-aged cripple. She had to drag herself around. That house and farm were her entire world. She lived there with her brother and almost never left.

Andrew saw her as being very much like himself. He had been crippled as a child and I think he felt damaged as an adult, and was psychologically unable to escape his world of Chad's Ford.   

Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:17 PM (/0D5i)

58 She isn't having a good time there in the grass.  She want to get home.

I expect that is true, and that pretty much defines her world. On the other hand, I've heard it said that she was resting and heard something that made her start, and that is why she is turning and looking afar. Either one makes sense, I suppose.

Posted by: tcn at February 02, 2011 08:17 PM (DjPot)

59

Christina Olsen was a middle-aged cripple. She had to drag herself around. That house and farm were her entire world. She lived there with her brother and almost never left.

Fascinating.  Bits of info like that are one of the reasons I love this thread.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:18 PM (HSJsW)

60 Hooters, hooters, yum, yum, yum,
On a hyper-realist's model who's dumb!

Posted by: al bundy at February 02, 2011 08:22 PM (2rOwc)

61

Andrew Wyeth wasn't just painting Helga, he was boinking her too.

Chadds Ford is only a few miles from my mom's house (it's in the same county as my mom). 

A little farther down the road, you have Longwood Gardens in Kennett Square (it was a DuPont family owned thing) absolutely spectacular.

Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2011 08:26 PM (ihSHD)

62 Oh, and the latex boobs are real not silicone.

Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2011 08:28 PM (ihSHD)

63 I think Christina is a little spooky.  It's prolly a silly take, I know, but that's how I feel.  I think she looks incredibly vulnerable.  I'm not convinced she's appreciating her world more than she is striving to get away from it.  She isn't having a good time there in the grass.  She wants to get home.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:11 AM (HSJsW)


I would agree. To me it's obvious from her posture she is crippled. This painting without her is a pleasant landscape with a nearby farm. With her in it the farm becomes much more distant that it is. The painting screams "It's a long way home. Be careful." to me.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:29 PM (RuL8J)

64

Andrew Wyeth wasn't just painting Helga, he was boinking her too.

I was wondering about that, and it made me wonder about something.  Do you guys see love in his Helga paintings?  Did he paint them with love?  I was looking for it. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:29 PM (HSJsW)

65

You know how people can objectify others from a psychological standpoint?  When someone has been objectified, they're no longer a person.  They're an object, a tool.  They no longer have feelings of their own.  They are there to be used and then discarded. 

Everything seems objectified in Wyeth.  (Maybe that's the barrier I was trying to get at.)

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:35 PM (HSJsW)

66 That New Prospect piece is pretty damn good.

Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 02, 2011 08:36 PM (N49h9)

67 Turns out my cat is smarter than I am. 

I hope I have enough boxes.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 02, 2011 08:39 PM (081kp)

68

I like his work--I think it's beautiful--but it makes me uneasy. It's profoundly melancholy, lonely-feeling. I think it's much darker than it may appear to some. And some of it is weirdly frightening. I've looked at dozens of his paintings, and I get no sense of invitation or warmth from any of them.

I agree.  He is the polar opposite of his father, NC as far as subject matter and use of light/shadow.  I appreciate his technique but I could never relate to the subject matter.  I think one of the reasons was his regionalism but I'm more inclined to be put off by the starkness and emptiness of so much of his work.  As for NC, I loved his early western paintings, but have a fondness for his illustrations because of the books I read as a child...yeah I read Stevenson.  I have always felt that illustrators were given short shrift by the art community. 

Posted by: Deanna at February 02, 2011 08:40 PM (jyx3Y)

69 46 I have Family there, my Grandfather farmed peas along the Rock River for Jolly Green in a town called Rockford ill (sic) now, going to ground and look who the UNIONS just elected to lead the state to loser status (or WINNER status if you happen to be ethiopia) welcome to the 3rd world Land O Lincoln!! SSSHHHH.... secret The FEDS are gonna throw you under the bus as is their M O, your gonna be the poster child for DEFAULTS and BANKRUPTCY!! and maybe the CHI-COMS will bail you out which may be the new world order coming to a state near.....YOU???

Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 08:43 PM (BOCjk)

70

I was wondering about that, and it made me wonder about something.  Do you guys see love in his Helga paintings?  Did he paint them with love?  I was looking for it. 

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:29 AM (HSJsW)


He wasn't sleeping with her and wasn't in love with her. It was a farce ginned up to spark interest. Helga had a very unique look and it fit well with the feeling of his paintings. She was chosen for look, not love.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:43 PM (RuL8J)

71 Do you guys see love in his Helga paintings?  Did he paint them with love?  

Partly it's a matter of Wyeth's style. I don't think it's an effective vehicle for expressing love. But in the Helga portraits you can feel his fascination with every detail of her face and hair as if they are uniquely precious. He tries to see more deeply into her than he does in his other portraits.

And sometimes he conveys an awe and reverence for her face that is almost religious. There is a glory and a grandeur in some of her portraits that you won't see in portraits of his wife.   

Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:48 PM (/0D5i)

72 That New Prospect piece is pretty damn good.

Thanks.

Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:51 PM (/0D5i)

73

You know how people can objectify others from a psychological standpoint?  When someone has been objectified, they're no longer a person.  They're an object, a tool.  They no longer have feelings of their own.  They are there to be used and then discarded. 

Everything seems objectified in Wyeth.  (Maybe that's the barrier I was trying to get at.)

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:35 AM (HSJsW)


I would agree with that too. To a point. This Helga painting doesn't fit that mold to me. But I think that was on purpose. I don't think he wanted the things in his paintings to be interpreted for what they looked like. He left you your imagination about what was going on or what it meant but not the look. The look was limited to how he saw it. Adjusting your view doesn't help with a Andrew Wyeth painting. They were objectified but they were his objects. He painting the same thinsg too often to say they were discarded either, IMHO.


Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:52 PM (RuL8J)

74 Everything seems objectified in Wyeth. (Maybe that's the barrier I was trying to get at.) Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:35 AM (HSJsW) It also seems like even when the objects in his work were right in your face you were looking at them through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars.

Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 08:53 PM (CZnXZ)

75 That is my artistic impression of the Wyeth, it is a luxury to be free of the day to day when your most fav of muses is just a farmhouse away. Should all of us be so lucky, even to have a muse to begin with. By the way... WHAT THE FUCK IS A MUSE????

Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 08:53 PM (BOCjk)

76 WHAT THE FUCK IS A MUSE???? Posted by: Richard at February 03, 2011 12:53 AM It's a chick who lets you put goo on her boobs.

Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 02, 2011 09:16 PM (F+Y9Z)

77 It's a chick who lets you put goo on her boobs.

Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 03, 2011 01:16 AM (F+Y9Z)


True on so many levels. Well played.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 09:20 PM (RuL8J)

78 Bureaucratic Masturbation.

You should add a subtitle. Pearl Necklace.

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 09:24 PM (RuL8J)

79 #78 comical for maybe an image or too but not really relevant giving the look in the final images, as you could get from the short video Erinn shot of me towards the end applying the final layers of paint and latex appliances here: http://tinyurl.com/6bb9ljr

Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 09:47 PM (CZnXZ)

80 comical for maybe an image or too but not really relevant giving the look in the final images, as you could get from the short video Erinn shot of me towards the end applying the final layers of paint and latex appliances here: http://tinyurl.com/6bb9ljr

Posted by: CAC at February 03, 2011 01:47 AM (CZnXZ)


Dude, how do you work with all that yapping' goin' on? 

Also do you just dig Febreze or something?

Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 10:02 PM (RuL8J)

81 >>Really? Considering that this is, like, the second time I've even visited the art thread, that's interesting. Sorry if I offended your tender sensibilities, dude.>> Mom? Is that you? My mom knows from passive aggressive, oy.

Posted by: Ezra "The Toddler" Klein, smirking and rolling his eyes at February 02, 2011 11:10 PM (qPTz0)

82 Sweet art.  I love photo-realism.  Also, Space Opera needs to be a book cover.

Posted by: not the droid you seek at February 03, 2011 02:43 AM (h35AH)

83 I went to see the Helga Series when they were in DC. The older couple behind me was really impressed...the elderly white lady remarked to her husband.. "Wow, that's quite a bush!", while staring at a full frontal nude of Helga....I have to admit she was correct. I am from the area where Wyeth lived in PA....and each of his pieces always makes me homesick for PA....

Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at February 03, 2011 04:38 AM (Ki7fm)

84 RE Lloyd the Conqueror: Why is Baron Harkonnen menacing James May?

Posted by: apotheosis at February 03, 2011 04:52 AM (xWk3U)

85 Christina Olsen was a middle-aged cripple. She had to drag herself around. That house and farm were her entire world. She lived there with her brother and almost never left.

The family used to roll Christina down the hill, and she would pull herself up every day. It was an exercise regimen, from my understanding.

I always found this painting intriguing, because the title implies Christina has a vivid imagination, yet there is a vulnerability in her pose. So, her movement is restricted, and that adds a touch of menace to an idyllic landscape.

The Helga painting reminds me of Gregory Crewdson's Ophelia. Helga is a bit fleshier, but she could be dead. You get the sense Wyeth is emotionally stunted and sees Helga as a young boy would see her. It's rather Freudian, and I suspect that was its appeal to the art world.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 03, 2011 05:02 AM (mHQ7T)

86 I'm with rdbrewer on the uneasiness Wyeth's paintings give me. The top one I would have guessed was titled "No One Can Hear You" and is the view of a serial killer out the window of an abandoned house. His victim is trussed and gagged in another room and this is part of his ritual - gazing out the window and letting the anticipation build. On a brighter note, I think he renders titties more accurately and lovingly than any of the Old Masters. Women's titties, especially in repose, are not perfectly round hemisphe res. They flatten and elongate. Plus, you know it's art when it's nekkid. I love photography, but I could never be a full-time artist. It just doesn't pay enough for most of them. Then again, they say that work is its own reward. And CAC works with some impressive titties, so good for him. I really enjoy the art threads. Keep 'em coming.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 03, 2011 05:25 AM (MdmMg)

87 So CAC gets to hold titties (both hands!), spread goo all over them, take pictures, and call it art?  Oh man, I'm gonna go to art school!

Posted by: EC at February 03, 2011 06:05 AM (mAhn3)

88 His work always made me uneasy too. Christina's World makes me feel that she wants to get away from the house. That she is looking back to make sure no one can see her. Attempting to escape her 'world' and perhaps her disability? Or something more sinister....

Posted by: anginak at February 03, 2011 06:54 AM (9CAoY)

89 @apotheosis  It's Mike Smith terrorizing Brian Posehn  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1675439/

Posted by: andrew herman at February 03, 2011 08:08 AM (PkolB)

90 A lot of people think that Christina is a young woman or teen, but she was a fifty year old invalid living on the farm in the background at the time of  Wyeth's painting. The youthfulness of her pose has captivated and perplexed millions of admirers.

Art critics hated it, one calling the "extreme right wing of American art."

Posted by: Fat Bald & Sassy at February 03, 2011 09:54 PM (3PyqP)

Posted by: henry at February 07, 2011 10:47 AM (va41F)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
120kb generated in CPU 0.1682, elapsed 0.311 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2571 seconds, 219 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.