February 02, 2011
— rdbrewer



Note: Christina's World swapped with Helga painting.
I don't have the names or information on these three Andrew Wyeth paintings. If anyone does, please put it in comments. I do know that the last one is one of the Helga paintings. Wyeth had been painting nudes of his neighbor, Helga, for 15 years without either spouse's knowledge. According to Wikipedia:
[Wyeth was] primarily a realist painter, working predominantly in a regionalist style. He was one of the best-known U.S. artists of the middle 20th century, and was sometimes referred to as the "Painter of the People," due to his work's popularity with the American public. In his art, Wyeth's favorite subjects were the land and people around him, both in his hometown of Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, and at his summer home in Cushing, Maine.
I like his work--I think it's beautiful--but it makes me uneasy. It's profoundly melancholy, lonely-feeling. I think it's much darker than it may appear to some. And some of it is weirdly frightening. I've looked at dozens of his paintings, and I get no sense of invitation or warmth from any of them. To me, he's the visual equivalent of Robert Frost. CAC claims to still be busy with his work, but I am beginning to believe him. How else could he come up with pictures like this?

"Taken of the photoshoot while I was applying the latex on the model."
I want to put latex on a model too.
I have been after CAC to explain why he is doing this and what he does for a living. He has been giving me cryptic answers like "It puts the lotion on its skin," and "The dog watches time through the art of history." So, I'm like, "No, CAC, I'm asking why. Why are you gluing rubber to a woman's boobs? I'm sure people would like to know." He said, "This project was difficult because the model's breasts moved every time they were touched. It took two pairs of hands to hold them still." I said, "All I'm hearing is, 'I glue things to women's boobs.' Can you explain exactly what you do?"
I am a sculptor and painter. Much of my work deals with the hyperactive state of overinformation that surrounds us. Thanks to the internet we are flooded with conflicting data on literally everything and often major events go unnoticed as they get drowned in the general deluge of crap. I chose the controversy over Avastin for an installation.The installation itself runs two parallel sets of information, the top just blabber and data from the FDA, the bottom a series of shots much like an internet pinup. As you move from left to right across the installation the figure below is literally wasting away with these large green masses (actually outlines of the lymphatic system) spreading across from the breasts to the whole body. As bureaucracies like the FDA fritter and waste time, people die. With the health care law that frittering will only get worse.
I chose to use the pinup imagery mostly as a form of self reflection and it plays into the working title of the piece: Bureaucratic Masturbation. The vid and image files sent just documented the photoshoot as we were going none of them are being used for the final piece but gives a good hint as to how it will turn out.
Thanks, CAC. So, by "installation" and "final piece" he is referring to some method of display, perhaps a sculpture, that will contain photographs--not a live model. In this case, they will be in the form of pinup imagery. And it's about Avastin, a breast cancer drug for which there is some controversy surrounding its approval. Fascinating stuff. I can haz try?
Now on to moron art. CAC will be back next week, so send submissions to his email address: theoneandonlyfinn (at) yadayadayadagmail.com. Take out "(at)" and the yadas. Let me encourage the artists to volunteer their own critical analysis to supplement the discussion. And like I said last week, one participant asked about putting up a link for purchasing information. I think that would best be handled in comments and not up top in the post, since Ace has paying advertisers. For now, provide your own link and any other information you might have in comments. And we'll see how that goes. If I missed any emailed submissions, let me know.

Teaser poster for "Lloyd the Conqueror," Andrew Herman
Coming in 2011
(Andrew also wrote the script.)

Space Opera, Ariana S. ("Revvy"), 2010
8.1"x16", digital, Photoshop

Untitled, US Route 50 (somewhere in southern Illinois), J.P. Dawson, 2009
HDR digital photo, Canon D-40
Five exposures processed through Photomatix.

New Prospect, Robert McMahon, 2009
18"x36", oil on canvas

American Music, Robert McMahon, 2009
18"x39", oil on canvas

Memorial, Robert McMahon

Kandar, Robert McMahon, 2009
Posted by: rdbrewer at
07:00 PM
| Comments (91)
Post contains 815 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:03 PM (W6bJb)
Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:04 PM (W6bJb)
Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:04 PM (W6bJb)
Posted by: VA Gator at February 02, 2011 07:08 PM (uZdxA)
the nide is "overflow" 1978
http:// www.artknowledgenews .com/a ndrew-wyeth- remembrance.html ?q=patricia
Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:11 PM (W6bJb)
couldn't find the other two, but here's a pic of Wyeht and W Bush:
http://static. guim.co.uk/sys-images /Guardian/Pix/ pictures/2009/ 01/16/ 0116_wyethandbush _630x390.jpg
take out the spaces
Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:15 PM (W6bJb)
Well hell, if slathering boobs with goo is art, then I'm Rembrandt.
When I work on my next piece (see what I did there?), I'll claim it's for the greater good or some scathing social commentary. That's a new one.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 02, 2011 07:15 PM (A/oSU)
Posted by: Adrian at February 02, 2011 07:18 PM (PY4xx)
Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 07:21 PM (Gr1V1)
Posted by: VA Gator at February 02, 2011 07:22 PM (uZdxA)
Posted by: Crusty at February 02, 2011 07:25 PM (qzgbP)
Posted by: Erik Larsen at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (dZ9WB)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (TMB3S)
The first pic looks a lot like Christina's World, in reverse, without Christina.
dezoomified you mean?
Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 07:27 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: Indian Outlaw at February 02, 2011 07:28 PM (ATMEl)
Posted by: Ben at February 02, 2011 07:28 PM (DKV43)
Posted by: MB at February 02, 2011 07:29 PM (RwpbN)
Posted by: karenm at February 02, 2011 07:30 PM (2y90e)
I had the pleasure of meeting him (and his son Jamie) many times when I worked at the Hotel DuPont in Wilmington, DE, which had a number of his works (and those of Jamie, father N. C. and even one by his mother Carolyn) throughout the public rooms of the hotel. He was a delight, thoroughly unassuming and charming.
Interesting info. I would have guessed cold and distant.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:34 PM (HSJsW)
BTW if you say, "But you suck, BeckoningChasm!" you should still give me like, um, free bacon or something. For life.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at February 02, 2011 07:37 PM (081kp)
Now that's art. It's funny though I have never found him cold or put offish but I know what you mean. I think a big part of that is he seemed to paint for himself. Do you feel that way even about one like Master Bedroom?
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:40 PM (RuL8J)
I think a big part of that is he seemed to paint for himself.
It's funny you said that, because I amost wrote it about 18 times.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:41 PM (HSJsW)
lyle (Robert McMahon)
Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 11:38 PM (/0D5i)
Very, very,very nice indeed. And I mean nice in the good way. I especially like New Prospect.
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:42 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 07:43 PM (JxMqJ)
Posted by: F.B. at February 02, 2011 07:43 PM (v85We)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 07:45 PM (HSJsW)
It's funny you said that, because I amost wrote it about 18 times.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 11:41 PM (HSJsW)
Yeah, you definitely get the feeling you are peeking in on someone's private stash with Wyeth. But I think maybe he did that a little bit on purpose. To create a sort of illicit interest in "realistic" art at a time when abstract was so dominant. Sort of like "Shhh. It's okay to like this...between you and me."
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:48 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 07:50 PM (BOCjk)
Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 07:54 PM (JxMqJ)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 11:45 PM (HSJsW)
Yeah but it's different for me. I have had that hanging on a wall for many years so it's very familiar to me. I guess his stuff grows on you like scotch. I grew up in rooms like that with bedspreads and dogs like that. To me it says lazy fall/winter afternoon and comfy bed. Know what it's for? Did ya see the dog?
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 07:54 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: Peaches at February 02, 2011 07:55 PM (zxpIo)
Tineye .com is a reverse image search. Point it at an image, it finds other similar images. It found 20+ similar images for the first three of your mystery images. And the links seem to identify the images by artist, etc.
It did not, however, find "Model with Latex."
Posted by: Al at February 02, 2011 07:56 PM (MzQOZ)
Posted by: torabora at February 02, 2011 07:57 PM (TeAXB)
The "Window" is nice and I'm liking McMahon's works as well.
Space Opera - cool
Posted by: melvin at February 02, 2011 07:59 PM (3OCZw)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:00 PM (HSJsW)
Posted by: maddogg at February 02, 2011 11:54 PM (JxMqJ)
Well it was over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor too.
Posted by: torabora at February 02, 2011 08:00 PM (TeAXB)
The fact that he could capture that so readily and so frequently is positively amazing.
Posted by: tcn at February 02, 2011 08:01 PM (DjPot)
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:06 PM (RuL8J)
Really? Considering that this is, like, the second time I've even visited the art thread, that's interesting. Sorry if I offended your tender sensibilities, dude.
Posted by: Peaches at February 02, 2011 08:07 PM (zxpIo)
NC was larger than life - a great storyteller with a studio full of pirate costumes, sabers and flintlocks. He painted robust, vivid, action-packed illustrations. Andrew's world revolved around his charismatic father and Chadd's Ford.
NC was babysitting Andrew's toddler nephew when their car was struck by a train and both were killed. From then on, Andrew's work, which was already introspective, assumed a darker, more haunted tone. Much of it is a meditation on death and loss, and sometimes ghosts.
I'm just guessing at chronology here but I think the tree picture is earliest. I would guess that the huge spreading tree that dominates the tiny house and landscape represents old NC.
The top picture comes later. Tire tracks head up a hill and disappear. The ragged curtain billows inward. A breeze, or NC's ghost?
In his images of figures sleeping, Wyeth often used a window to represent the dreaming state. For Wyeth, dreams open a passageway between this world and another. I think sometimes Wyeth used Helga as a stand-in for himself.
Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:09 PM (/0D5i)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:11 PM (HSJsW)
You didn't offend me, Peaches. You can grate with rudeness without causing offense. But it was getting so old, I was wondering whether you'd chime in again tonight while I was writing the post.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:15 PM (HSJsW)
Christina Olsen was a middle-aged cripple. She had to drag herself around. That house and farm were her entire world. She lived there with her brother and almost never left.
Andrew saw her as being very much like himself. He had been crippled as a child and I think he felt damaged as an adult, and was psychologically unable to escape his world of Chad's Ford.
Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:17 PM (/0D5i)
I expect that is true, and that pretty much defines her world. On the other hand, I've heard it said that she was resting and heard something that made her start, and that is why she is turning and looking afar. Either one makes sense, I suppose.
Posted by: tcn at February 02, 2011 08:17 PM (DjPot)
Christina Olsen was a middle-aged cripple. She had to drag herself around. That house and farm were her entire world. She lived there with her brother and almost never left.
Fascinating. Bits of info like that are one of the reasons I love this thread.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:18 PM (HSJsW)
Andrew Wyeth wasn't just painting Helga, he was boinking her too.
Chadds Ford is only a few miles from my mom's house (it's in the same county as my mom).
A little farther down the road, you have Longwood Gardens in Kennett Square (it was a DuPont family owned thing) absolutely spectacular.
Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2011 08:26 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2011 08:28 PM (ihSHD)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:11 AM (HSJsW)
I would agree. To me it's obvious from her posture she is crippled. This painting without her is a pleasant landscape with a nearby farm. With her in it the farm becomes much more distant that it is. The painting screams "It's a long way home. Be careful." to me.
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:29 PM (RuL8J)
Andrew Wyeth wasn't just painting Helga, he was boinking her too.
I was wondering about that, and it made me wonder about something. Do you guys see love in his Helga paintings? Did he paint them with love? I was looking for it.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:29 PM (HSJsW)
You know how people can objectify others from a psychological standpoint? When someone has been objectified, they're no longer a person. They're an object, a tool. They no longer have feelings of their own. They are there to be used and then discarded.
Everything seems objectified in Wyeth. (Maybe that's the barrier I was trying to get at.)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 02, 2011 08:35 PM (HSJsW)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at February 02, 2011 08:36 PM (N49h9)
I like his work--I think it's beautiful--but it makes me uneasy. It's profoundly melancholy, lonely-feeling. I think it's much darker than it may appear to some. And some of it is weirdly frightening. I've looked at dozens of his paintings, and I get no sense of invitation or warmth from any of them.
I agree. He is the polar opposite of his father, NC as far as subject matter and use of light/shadow. I appreciate his technique but I could never relate to the subject matter. I think one of the reasons was his regionalism but I'm more inclined to be put off by the starkness and emptiness of so much of his work. As for NC, I loved his early western paintings, but have a fondness for his illustrations because of the books I read as a child...yeah I read Stevenson. I have always felt that illustrators were given short shrift by the art community.
Posted by: Deanna at February 02, 2011 08:40 PM (jyx3Y)
Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 08:43 PM (BOCjk)
I was wondering about that, and it made me wonder about something. Do you guys see love in his Helga paintings? Did he paint them with love? I was looking for it.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:29 AM (HSJsW)
He wasn't sleeping with her and wasn't in love with her. It was a farce ginned up to spark interest. Helga had a very unique look and it fit well with the feeling of his paintings. She was chosen for look, not love.
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:43 PM (RuL8J)
Partly it's a matter of Wyeth's style. I don't think it's an effective vehicle for expressing love. But in the Helga portraits you can feel his fascination with every detail of her face and hair as if they are uniquely precious. He tries to see more deeply into her than he does in his other portraits.
And sometimes he conveys an awe and reverence for her face that is almost religious. There is a glory and a grandeur in some of her portraits that you won't see in portraits of his wife.
Posted by: lyle at February 02, 2011 08:48 PM (/0D5i)
You know how people can objectify others from a psychological standpoint? When someone has been objectified, they're no longer a person. They're an object, a tool. They no longer have feelings of their own. They are there to be used and then discarded.
Everything seems objectified in Wyeth. (Maybe that's the barrier I was trying to get at.)
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 03, 2011 12:35 AM (HSJsW)
I would agree with that too. To a point. This Helga painting doesn't fit that mold to me. But I think that was on purpose. I don't think he wanted the things in his paintings to be interpreted for what they looked like. He left you your imagination about what was going on or what it meant but not the look. The look was limited to how he saw it. Adjusting your view doesn't help with a Andrew Wyeth painting. They were objectified but they were his objects. He painting the same thinsg too often to say they were discarded either, IMHO.
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 08:52 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 08:53 PM (CZnXZ)
Posted by: Richard at February 02, 2011 08:53 PM (BOCjk)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 02, 2011 09:16 PM (F+Y9Z)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 03, 2011 01:16 AM (F+Y9Z)
True on so many levels. Well played.
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 09:20 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: CAC at February 02, 2011 09:47 PM (CZnXZ)
Posted by: CAC at February 03, 2011 01:47 AM (CZnXZ)
Dude, how do you work with all that yapping' goin' on?
Also do you just dig Febreze or something?
Posted by: Rocks at February 02, 2011 10:02 PM (RuL8J)
Posted by: Ezra "The Toddler" Klein, smirking and rolling his eyes at February 02, 2011 11:10 PM (qPTz0)
Posted by: not the droid you seek at February 03, 2011 02:43 AM (h35AH)
Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at February 03, 2011 04:38 AM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: apotheosis at February 03, 2011 04:52 AM (xWk3U)
The family used to roll Christina down the hill, and she would pull herself up every day. It was an exercise regimen, from my understanding.
I always found this painting intriguing, because the title implies Christina has a vivid imagination, yet there is a vulnerability in her pose. So, her movement is restricted, and that adds a touch of menace to an idyllic landscape.
The Helga painting reminds me of Gregory Crewdson's Ophelia. Helga is a bit fleshier, but she could be dead. You get the sense Wyeth is emotionally stunted and sees Helga as a young boy would see her. It's rather Freudian, and I suspect that was its appeal to the art world.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 03, 2011 05:02 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 03, 2011 05:25 AM (MdmMg)
Posted by: EC at February 03, 2011 06:05 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: anginak at February 03, 2011 06:54 AM (9CAoY)
Posted by: andrew herman at February 03, 2011 08:08 AM (PkolB)
Art critics hated it, one calling the "extreme right wing of American art."
Posted by: Fat Bald & Sassy at February 03, 2011 09:54 PM (3PyqP)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2571 seconds, 219 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: mallfly at February 02, 2011 07:01 PM (W6bJb)