April 10, 2011
— CAC Very delayed edition.
After a long move, sketching, painting, tweaking a project, contacting a porn star for another mixed-media project, drinking,"falling" into a filing cabinet and a host of other things more important than blogging the art thread is here again.
First an introductory music video which both "gets" the bigger, sadder point of this weeks edition AND is the closest thing to actually seeing a Republican leadership meeting:
After the First World War, allegiances to many of the artistic traditions that had survived the challenges of cubism, expressionism, impressionism, fauvism and pure abstraction were shattered by a disillusioned, cynical generation of artists who inadvertently predicted much of what makes art "suck" in the eyes of today's majority. The most brilliant of these was Marcel Duchamp, whose horny woman-and-gay da Vinci two-for-one joke LHOOQ was blogged about here earlier:
Fountain, 1917. (photo from 1917 exhibition) Porcelain Urinal. Original lost, replicas at various institutions.
Funny thing is, I have had morons comment on this piece in multiple threads, and they actually sum it up well:
Duchamp ushered in modern art by establishing the idea of "ready made" art, which fit nicely with new developments in mass manufacturing, and it was an asshole, curmudgeonly comment on the modern age, anticipating the beatniks by several decades. He was a typical French misanthrope who stated that art has nothing to do with the artist once it's on display. The viewer gets to decide whether it's art, and they can "piss off." There was always punk.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane
That's the idea. Or half the idea. Duchamp was the original "Art is whatever crap I put my name (or someone else's) on" guy. So when he did it, it was funny.
It worked like a Don Rickles joke. If you're an art-world dink who thinks you're in on Duchamp's joke, and you're like "He's doing me! I'm in the show!" you can laugh and have a good time when he says you look like a drunk Mexican gorilla, but it's funny because you look like a drunk Mexican gorilla.
Posted by: oblig.
Here's a thought on the Duchamp: In the novel Infinite Jest, one of the characters, a filmmaker, pulls a huge hoax on the art world. He comes up with a concept called "found drama". Basically it goes like this: You pick a name out of the phone book, and whatever that person does for the next two hours is the "drama". You don't have to know what they actually do. Just the act of designating the person is the "art". It makes a big splash in the art world, until he reveals that it's all bullshit, at which point everybody gets pissed at him. That's pretty much how I feel about "Fountain" (only Duchamp never let the cat out of the bag).
Posted by: Farmer Joe
When Marcel Duchamp created "Fountain" in 1917 under the pseudonym "R. Mutt" as part of his "readymades", he was making a deliberate swipe at Western mainstream "fine art" traditions of elevating anything to art simply by setting it on a pedestal. Apparently, modern "artists" never quite got the joke.
Posted by: The Ghost of Flannery O'Connor
To all of the morons who had commented on it in the original threads, I will add just a bit more. Duchamp was being profound by pushing the ever-expanding boundaries of art to its inevitable conclusion- one in which the actual ability or skill of the artist is deemed irrelevant by the simple pronouncement of a given "work" as art. He geniunely believed that the declaration of art, and an audience, mattered as much if not more than the artist or his actual work. In the hands of tongue-in-cheek Duchamp, this idea is both thoughtful and comical- we can take the proposition seriously, but simultaneously laugh at its implications humorously expressed.
As for the copycats and the beatniks whose "art" erronously shove themselves onto the Duchampian family tree,
I simply give you Salvador Dali's reaction to them:
The first person to compare the cheeks of a young woman with a rose was plainly a poet. The second, who repeated the comparison, was probably an idiot...People have already forgotten that the founder of Dadaism, Tristan Tzara, stated in his mannifesto in the very infancy of the movements: "Dada is this, Dada is that...Either way, it's crap." This kind of more or less black humour is foreign to the new generation. They are genuinely convinced that their neo-Dadaism is subtler than the art of Praxiteles.
*****
Moron Art of the Week
Remember, to share your works, send JPEGs with title, dimensions, medium and year HERE to see it on AoS and to have your fellow morons praise/laugh at you.
First up is moronette MWR:
Autumn Birch 2009. Watercolor and Acrylic on watercolor paper, 4" x 5".
The Port of Ensenada 2010. Digital Photograph, 5" x 7".
Manmountain Molehill found his inner Duchamp and gave us this readymade, created on election night 2008:
Shattered LCD, Found object- glass, liquid crystal, gravity. 12"x9"
Exurban Kevin channels his inner Freud:
Backyard Agave #2, 2010. Digital Photo.
Mojo sent me a whateverthefuckitis:
Triskelion, 2010. Strange attractor visualization.
and finally, billypaintbrush gives us a standard feature of the art thread- at least one boob:
Robe, 2005. Acrylic on canvas, 24" x 28".
I will leave you this afternoon with a work in progress that should get Kratos mad because it uses my favorite painting/printing surface:
Now go away.
Posted by: CAC at
11:59 AM
| Comments (96)
Post contains 932 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Pablo KissmyassO at April 10, 2011 02:37 PM (2CGdt)
Fountain, 1917. (photo from 1917 exhibition) Porcelain Urinal. Original lost, replicas at various institutions.
A statue of Buddha sitting cross-legged inside the fountain would make the sculpture complete.
Posted by: Kermit Gosnell at April 10, 2011 02:43 PM (7+pP9)
"Fountain, 1917. (photo from 1917 exhibition) Porcelain Urinal. Original lost, replicas at various institutions."
... actually, very many institutions.
Thomas Kincaide devastated.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 10, 2011 02:46 PM (SR7E2)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 02:46 PM (UQjUb)
Good on you, gurl!
And Charl Schwartzel who.......? Eh, whatever it ain't Tiger so I'll take it.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 10, 2011 02:50 PM (ijY7O)
"Fountain, 1917. (photo from 1917 exhibition) Porcelain Urinal. Original lost, replicas at various institutions."
Proof that Art seeks it's own level.
Posted by: Arbalest at April 10, 2011 02:50 PM (SR7E2)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at April 10, 2011 02:51 PM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 02:53 PM (UQjUb)
The first picture Autumn Birch with the centered giraffe neck must be on the Serengeti Plain during the fall?
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at April 10, 2011 02:55 PM (ZHsNw)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 02:58 PM (lT0LC)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:00 PM (UQjUb)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 10, 2011 03:00 PM (EiH7n)
And I'm linking this just for fun.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 10, 2011 03:01 PM (ijY7O)
Posted by: nickless at April 10, 2011 03:01 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:02 PM (UQjUb)
Charl Schwartzel of S. Africa wins The Masters
May the Schwartz be with you
Posted by: kbdabear at April 10, 2011 03:04 PM (vdfwz)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 03:06 PM (lT0LC)
I have, certainly not the sycophantic treatment that we usually see. I hadn't realized that Papa Joe had rigged the congressional race, nor had I realized that Jackie used Dr. feelgood as well as Jack.
Posted by: some wench at April 10, 2011 03:07 PM (bqjJT)
Roger Scruton - Why Beauty Matters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65YpzZrwKI4
An excellent fisking of Duchamp and those who came after.
Posted by: butch at April 10, 2011 03:08 PM (uPUfN)
Posted by: andycanuck at April 10, 2011 03:09 PM (Y1DZt)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 10, 2011 07:00 PM (EiH7n)
I like that snark, maybe you got my point.
No such thing as property value since what, 2008?
Posted by: CatLady at April 10, 2011 03:10 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 03:10 PM (lT0LC)
The commentary - don't even bother. You see "journalists" and the likes of Carl Maltin joking that it was a 'gentleman's agreement' between the Press and JFK with all his lady friends. Wink and a nod. And these fools are laughing while they say that.They of course go on to say that Bush was the next political dynasty but the antithesis to the Kennedy's in virtually every way. And that scrunt, Joan London, she can't fawn enough. I swear she was going to start crying as she relived how they were the closest thing to Royalty we'd see in this country. Puke.
But if you can get past that, I think from what I've seen (only pieces here and there) it's been very fair.
I didn't realize Jackie left Jack during the middle of the Cuban Missile Crises.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 10, 2011 03:13 PM (ijY7O)
Posted by: andycanuck at April 10, 2011 03:14 PM (Y1DZt)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:16 PM (g73jP)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:18 PM (g73jP)
It's the new name for local gardeners. The fancy name.
Restaurant talk...
Tender spring greens = first ones we could pull off.
Etc.
Posted by: Who Knows at April 10, 2011 03:19 PM (1cx/R)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:20 PM (UQjUb)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:21 PM (UQjUb)
Posted by: CDR M at April 10, 2011 03:21 PM (cqZXM)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:22 PM (g73jP)
Posted by: CAC at April 10, 2011 03:23 PM (JEVge)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 10, 2011 03:25 PM (ZGhSU)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 03:26 PM (lT0LC)
Posted by: Sunday Soothsayer with extra nuts at April 10, 2011 03:27 PM (g73jP)
Posted by: CAC at April 10, 2011 03:28 PM (JEVge)
Well the thing is the "art" part was wiped out in artisan, because now an idiot with an air nailer and a circular saw is a carpenter. Everything is bought as parts. There are very few plasterers, or cabinet makers, or furniture builders out there. There is very little art. I was taught by old masters, so I turned the skills to guitar building because that is one of the few areas left where you truly build something from nothing using traditional hand tools. When I did kitchens and baths years ago I saw the writing on the wall. The art was going away, only to be replaced by day laborers and power tools. Don't get me wrong, I love my power tools, but a lot of old world skills gets lost.
Perfect example, at least 75% of the known old world classical guitar builders were originally trained cabinet makers, including myself. It wasn't much of a leap because many of the tools and skills were the same. A dude today doing kitchens for home depot would not have 90% of the skills needed to build a guitar, because the skills for the tools needed were never learned. I'm in my 40's, but I learned from the last of the old breed. Those dude aren't around anymore. Everything today is cut and nail, but very little creating.
Posted by: Berserker at April 10, 2011 03:29 PM (gWHrG)
Of course you meant Liliacea.
It's the association with caskets and all. They're actually quite nice.
Posted by: Who Knows at April 10, 2011 03:29 PM (1cx/R)
Posted by: CAC at April 10, 2011 03:30 PM (JEVge)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 03:33 PM (lT0LC)
Sorry, In Bed, I have a different association with them.
Lily of the Valley is a nice, not over powering bulb. It's my favorite.
Posted by: Who Knows at April 10, 2011 03:42 PM (1cx/R)
Posted by: USS Diversity at April 10, 2011 03:47 PM (gJNMj)
Posted by: In Bed at April 10, 2011 03:49 PM (lT0LC)
Posted by: Excelsior! at April 10, 2011 03:51 PM (apRvb)
Now I know what to give hubby for his birthday.
Posted by: dagny at April 10, 2011 04:01 PM (burP8)
Posted by: Fritz at April 10, 2011 04:02 PM (ngf4R)
While persuing other degrees I found myself also getting a BA and a MA in english because it was tremendously easy for me. In fact, I was sent on scholarship to Cambridge just to refine my area of expertise. I never took it very seriously, because, really being an "expert" in someone else's writing seemed stupid. Regardless, in the end, I'm well trained in English literature and poetry and know what is considered good.
My 16 year old writes the most beautiful poetry with seemingly no effort. His product is quite impressive and in fact shocks me in its depth and use of literary devices.
It's all crap. He throws it together like he would a ham sandwich and with about as much thought. He doesn't have a sensitive bone in his body and would be insulted to be told that he does. I'm going to compile it and see if I can get it published. If I do, we will be amused forever.
Posted by: dagny at April 10, 2011 04:08 PM (burP8)
Posted by: USA at April 10, 2011 04:09 PM (YZISw)
By contrast, Picasso did some brilliant paintings but by the middle of his career he was already "Picasso" and he stopped trying.
Abstract expressionism killed art, in my opinion. Art (to me) is a form of communication, and abstract expressionism turned it into a monologue. Most other art schools since have similarly become the artist talking to him/herself, "Look at what a clever genius I am!"
I haven't done any painting in weeks, due to Circumstances. The lack makes me want to hang myself even more.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at April 10, 2011 04:10 PM (IEJ4J)
BJ?
Posted by: USA at April 10, 2011 08:09 PM (YZISw)
What else, I mean.
No, boob art!! He would love that.
Posted by: dagny at April 10, 2011 04:11 PM (burP8)
Posted by: eman: Japanese Babe Rescue Team at April 10, 2011 04:14 PM (dT+/n)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 10, 2011 04:23 PM (0vDuM)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 10, 2011 04:25 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: Truman North at April 10, 2011 04:26 PM (8ay4x)
There's a story behind the story of Fountain that's well worth retelling.
Tell Me more, I'm curious, even if it kills Me, I have a few lives left...
Posted by: CatLady at April 10, 2011 04:36 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: booger at April 10, 2011 04:42 PM (9RFH1)
Posted by: ExurbanKevin at April 10, 2011 04:52 PM (toqoX)
Posted by: dagny at April 10, 2011 04:58 PM (burP8)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 10, 2011 05:08 PM (RQtDB)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 10, 2011 09:08 PM (RQtDB)
Yeah but we got to kill some muslims so there's that.
Posted by: robtr at April 10, 2011 05:12 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 10, 2011 05:13 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 10, 2011 05:15 PM (RQtDB)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 10, 2011 09:15 PM (RQtDB)
Cows kill more people each year than nuclear energy. fuck the cows.
Posted by: robtr at April 10, 2011 05:17 PM (MtwBb)
Posted by: swamp_yankee at April 10, 2011 05:39 PM (ZIpcL)
Posted by: humphreyrobot at April 10, 2011 05:45 PM (EiH7n)
Posted by: CatLady at April 10, 2011 05:52 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 10, 2011 06:11 PM (RQtDB)
Unfortunately, I remember this DEVO Douchbaggery as it occurred. In those days it seemed amusing for its novelty, and if you were chemically confused enough you might mistake it for something, well, far out ... But there was something disturbing about it to anyone who was emotionally honest enough to admit it to themselves. It was the perverse pleasure taken in being absurd to the point of being a complete waste of time, and yet here we were wasting it on silly horseshit like this simply because we had it to waste! Kind of like lighting candles with $100 bills and getting off on it cause we can!
These are the death chords of a civilization. No wonder Islam hates us ...
(SURA 2:29)
Posted by: 7HEAVENS at April 10, 2011 06:23 PM (tuCVl)
Posted by: Gulermo at April 10, 2011 07:03 PM (f+EPI)
Posted by: Namirha at April 11, 2011 01:38 AM (xQy5K)
Posted by: TrueNorthist at April 11, 2011 07:04 AM (RQtDB)
Posted by: cackfinger at April 11, 2011 04:29 PM (HpG1y)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3265 seconds, 224 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
















That should get Moronland attention.
Posted by: some wench at April 10, 2011 02:23 PM (bqjJT)