February 10, 2011

Chairman Of House Appropriations Committee: Okay, $100 Billion In Cuts It Is
— DrewM

Not as dramatic a revolution as in Egypt but still pretty important.

Via Jamie Dupree.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers today announced his intent to cut $100 billion in spending in the upcoming Continuing Resolution (CR) compared to the PresidentÂ’s fiscal year 2011 request.

The statement by Chairman Rogers follows:

“My Committee has been working diligently to go line-by-line in every agency budget to find and cut unnecessary spending to reduce our deficit and help our economy thrive.

“After meeting with my subcommittee Chairs, we have determined that the CR can and will reach a total of $100 billion in cuts compared to the President’s request immediately - fully meeting the goal outlined in the Republican ‘Pledge to America’ in one fell swoop. Our intent is to make deep but manageable cuts in nearly every area of government, leaving no stone unturned and allowing no agency or program to be held sacred. I have instructed my committee to include these deeper cuts, and we are continuing to work to complete this critical legislation.”

This is a big change in how business is done. Usually cuts are announced and the amounts are lowered. Now they are going up.

As always...the Winston Wolfe rule is in effect. This is just a proposal and they tried to weasel out before. Keep the heat on until it's signed into law.

Posted by: DrewM at 11:33 AM | Comments (85)
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.

1
this is for the next budget?

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:36 AM (uFokq)

2 1 this is for the next budget?

The continuing resolution.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:37 AM (iMgAa)

3 Death to the NEA!

Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of logprof at February 10, 2011 11:37 AM (GTbGH)

4 Clapper : DrewM = Awesome

Posted by: Dr Spank at February 10, 2011 11:38 AM (1fB+3)

5 Death is too good for the NEA.

Posted by: Mark in Spokane at February 10, 2011 11:38 AM (Nmyyl)

6 Make them fund their departments out of their own pockets!

Posted by: AoSHQ's worst commenter, DarkLord© at February 10, 2011 11:39 AM (GBXon)

7 Guess who was against the full $100B to begin with because it was too much? Hal Rogers.

This was on Politico before it was "disappeared":

Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) warned his colleagues that to cut more now, risks forcing layoffs of federal employees at a time when both parties say their priority is to reduce unemployment.

For example, Rogers said the necessary cuts in the DEAÂ’s budget could put the agency at really pre-1992 levels in some cases, and cuts to FAA operations risk 41 day furloughs for the air traffic controller workforces."



Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:39 AM (iMgAa)

8
Cornel West just called and said Republicans are oligarchs and plutocrats and muskrats and pharaohs and weebles and...

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:39 AM (uFokq)

9

also pbs and DoE

cut them to death

Posted by: navycopjoe at February 10, 2011 11:40 AM (uIQK6)

10

The only country in history to demand the govt spend less. See what happens when the people are the ones responsible instead of some elite? Sense.

That being said, let's see if they can do it.

NEA, PBS/NPR, Moochelle's vacations make a tiny dent

Posted by: dagny: Free Logprof damnit! at February 10, 2011 11:40 AM (HLFbQ)

11 Winston Wolfe rule?????

Posted by: Vic at February 10, 2011 11:41 AM (M9Ie6)

12
Rush was reading a piece by someone today that kinda echoes what commenter Vic was saying about wait until the next full fiscal budget is done instead of getting upset over this.

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:41 AM (uFokq)

13 A'm gunna fwind a dick to suck anyway.

Posted by: Bwaney Fwank at February 10, 2011 11:41 AM (1ZYHh)

14 Cut the White House budget.

Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of logprof at February 10, 2011 11:42 AM (GTbGH)

15 Still off by an order of magnitude.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 10, 2011 11:42 AM (ElYV9)

16 Imagine a future where a new House cuts 100 billion from an annual budget already half spent.

Posted by: Vic at February 10, 2011 11:42 AM (M9Ie6)

17 No pay for Czars.

Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of logprof at February 10, 2011 11:42 AM (GTbGH)

18 What's stoppong Obama from just piling another $100 billion into his 2011 budget so they effectively aren't cutting anything? Let's start with the 2010 budget (or 2009) and cut $100 billion from there.

Posted by: JayBee at February 10, 2011 11:42 AM (fInbx)

19 They need to cut 500 billion just to break even on the vig for our current debt.

Posted by: kingfisher at February 10, 2011 11:43 AM (Rb259)

20 Cornel West just called and said Republicans are oligarchs and plutocrats and muskrats and pharaohs and weebles and...

'scuse me a second folks, I have to go have a word with somebody...

Posted by: Allen West, (R)-Awesome at February 10, 2011 11:43 AM (GBXon)

21 Also, an interview with Rep. Virginia Foxx last night:

“I do not know where Paul’s numbers came from,” she replies, when asked whether Ryan’s budget was set by the leadership.

She doesn't know? Just who's in charge here?


Also, according to Politico, the House freshmen and other members of the RSC are admitting that The Pledge doesn't specifically speak to $100B in cuts, but they were tired of explaining that.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:44 AM (iMgAa)

22

oh, and cut all funding to the AoShq until we see

FREEDOM FOR NICKLESS AND LOGPROF!!!!!!

Posted by: navycopjoe at February 10, 2011 11:44 AM (uIQK6)

23 Yeah, now the freshman should go and scream for more cuts!
Like Holder's DoJ!

Posted by: Iblis at February 10, 2011 11:44 AM (9221z)

24 "Going line by line through bills and cutting out unnecessary spending." Am I mistaken, didn't His Awesomeness promise to do this during the campaign? Isn't that why so many dumbasses, oops, I mean moderates, got tricked into, I mean convinced, to vote for him?

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 10, 2011 11:45 AM (urI8l)

25 Oh hell...let 'em think they cut. I'll just print it and hand it out to my buddies anyway. There's no way they can stop me.

Posted by: Helicopter Ben at February 10, 2011 11:45 AM (1ZYHh)

26

I have an OT question:

Why isn't anyone mentioning Jeff Flake for 2012?

Posted by: whatever at February 10, 2011 11:47 AM (LyOUH)

27 Suck it bitches!

Posted by: Hosni Mubarak at February 10, 2011 11:47 AM (yQWNf)

28

23  Like Holder's DoJ!

actually, this department and the military should get more money...in fact the career folks working there should get hefty pay raises imo

Posted by: navycopjoe at February 10, 2011 11:48 AM (uIQK6)

29

I will prosecute those who martyred people...

 

He aint going nowhere.... he is saying he will be there to persecute those who created errors.

Posted by: Romeo13 at February 10, 2011 11:48 AM (AdK6a)

30 On the plus side about 120x times as much as Obama wants to cut.

On the minus side only about 7% of deficit spending.

Note that with this "cut" deficit spending will  still be three times larger then it has ever been under a Republican congress.

Posted by: 18-1 at February 10, 2011 11:49 AM (7BU4a)

31
I don't exactly what will happen in 2011, but I'm quite certain that yours and my penises will be thoroughly massaged by both Obama and the Republicans.

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:49 AM (uFokq)

32 3 words: Across. The. Board.

(1-($100 billion / total budget)) * every line item.

Next.

Posted by: Andy at February 10, 2011 11:49 AM (5Rurq)

33  100 billion is chump change compared to what Obama has disappeared already.

Posted by: kansas at February 10, 2011 11:49 AM (mka2b)

34
question nobody is asking but should: How much of the Stimulus money is unspent?

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:50 AM (uFokq)

35
"After the Muslim Brotherhood takes power in Egypt, those pyramids points are going to make great aiming stakes."

General Curtis LaMay, Jr.

Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 10, 2011 11:50 AM (ZHsNw)

36 26 I have an OT question:

Why isn't anyone mentioning Jeff Flake for 2012?


Word is that he wants Kyl's seat.


Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:51 AM (iMgAa)

37 O/T, but the footage from Pebble Beach today is spectacular. 

Posted by: Y-not is enjoying sunshine and open windows at February 10, 2011 11:52 AM (pW2o8)

38

OT: Gov. Brewer filed suit today against the Feds for failing to enforce federal immigration laws.

Thank God some of them still get it.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 11:53 AM (pLTLS)

39 Let's face it - the unwashed masses aren't going to vote in a President Flake any more than they'd vote in a President Huckabee.  Or Pawlenty.

Those names aren't hip.  They're hick.  And our society is horribly shallow.

Posted by: grognard at February 10, 2011 11:54 AM (NS2Mo)

40 CPAC is really getting weird. Trump was mocking Ron and Rand Paul and now this gubernatorial candidate is talking about auditing the Fed. Ron Paul!!!!1!!!!

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:54 AM (iMgAa)

41

Mubarak DOESN'T step down.

Posted by: Ben Logprofshaviks at February 10, 2011 11:55 AM (wuv1c)

42 $100B "cut" from Obama's budget plays the whole "baseline budgeting" game.

Posted by: aquaviva at February 10, 2011 11:55 AM (7ALF2)

43 What's stoppong Obama from just piling another $100 billion into his 2011 budget so they effectively aren't cutting anything? Posted by: JayBee

Because all spending must originate in the House. The Administration's budget is only advisory. Remember, there is no line-item veto.

Let's start with the 2010 budget (or 2009) and cut $100 billion from there.

Again, this is a continuing resolution to cover March - Sept. of what was supposed to be the 2010 budget.

Again, that's only for a 6 month budget; annualized that would be $200 billion.

This is only an appetizer for the next full budget.

Posted by: goldbricker esq at February 10, 2011 11:55 AM (S59+B)

44

Rand Paul.  Mitch McConnell.  Hal Rogers.

How did Kentucky come to wield so much influence and/or power?

Posted by: Rocketeer at February 10, 2011 11:55 AM (Z7toi)

45

OT: Gov. Brewer filed suit today against the Feds for failing to enforce federal immigration laws.

Thank God some of them still get it.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 03:53 PM

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Posted by: E. Holder Esq. at February 10, 2011 11:56 AM (yQWNf)

46 @43 You really think I'll pay any attention to the Constitution if push comes to shove?

Posted by: Preznit Toonces, Esq. at February 10, 2011 11:56 AM (p05LM)

47 Cut Planned Parenthood funding. Let people who are pro abortion pay for abortion for poor people.NOW can set up a foundation to fund their beloved fetus killing.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 10, 2011 11:56 AM (urI8l)

48

Word is that he wants Kyl's seat.

Well, that would prepare him for 2016, but we need a fresh face now and he's anti-pork, a good family man, frugal, handsome and young.

Posted by: whatever at February 10, 2011 11:58 AM (LyOUH)

49 I'm really leery of Hal Rogers after this story about him being the one primarily hesitant about cutting. On the one hand, it's hardly surprising; on the other, he's been asked to do this job and he needs to get serious or be replaced.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 11:58 AM (iMgAa)

50

Well, that would prepare him for 2016, but we need a fresh face now and he's anti-pork, a good family man, frugal, handsome and young.

Posted by: whatever at February 10, 2011 03:58 PM (LyOUH)

But he's a Flake.

Thereby ending his ambition for higher office.  The media will crucify that name.

Posted by: grognard at February 10, 2011 11:59 AM (NS2Mo)

51
oooh, a good idea?

A bill that proposes tax returns come with the option to donate $1 to fund Abortions, or NPR, or...

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 11:59 AM (uFokq)

52 48 Well, that would prepare him for 2016, but we need a fresh face now and he's anti-pork, a good family man, frugal, handsome and young.

That describes a number of young conservatives in Congress. Plus:

Arizona Republican Rep. Jeff Flake didnÂ’t rule out the option of running for the open Senate seat that will be left vacant by Sen. Jon Kyl, who announced his retirement this afternoon.

The six-term member of Congress would not affirm that he will run, but said he will announce his choice “soon enough.”

“Today is Kyl’s day, I don’t want to distract from that,” he told The Daily Caller, who caught up with him outside the Capitol building Thursday afternoon. “But I’ll announce my intentions soon enough.”

The tight-lipped congressman started to say more, but stopped, smiled and repeated, “Today is Kyl’s day.”

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:01 PM (iMgAa)

53
when does Kyl's retirement commence?

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 12:03 PM (uFokq)

54

oooh, a good idea?

A bill that proposes tax returns come with the option to donate $1 to fund Abortions, or NPR, or...

No. Not a good idea if you are thinking of the current Check Here box for political campaigns. That money does not come out of the taxpayers refund. If they want to fund it, let them write a check. However, that isn't the problem. They want YOU to fund it.

And, with that little check box, you will.

Posted by: whatever at February 10, 2011 12:03 PM (LyOUH)

55
when's Harman's last day?

when's Chris Lee's last day?

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 12:03 PM (uFokq)

56

Mubaraks speech went over about as well as a fart in church.  Let the riots commence.

Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 10, 2011 12:05 PM (yQWNf)

57 "when's Chris Lee's last day?" Just so he wears a shirt for the announcement.

Posted by: nerdygirl at February 10, 2011 12:06 PM (urI8l)

58 The CPAC speakers really need to talk a bit more about American exceptionalism in a positive sense. Whatever happened to potential to do great things?

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:10 PM (iMgAa)

59 OT: Gov. Brewer filed suit today against the Feds for failing to enforce federal immigration laws.

She should have filed for a writ of mandamus. That would go straight to SCOTUS as original jurisdiction.

Posted by: Vic at February 10, 2011 12:12 PM (M9Ie6)

60 Because all spending must originate in the House.

Not true, all "revenue bills" must originate in the House. But, the House has to approve it, even if it originates in the Senate.

Posted by: Vic at February 10, 2011 12:14 PM (M9Ie6)

61 34
question nobody is asking but should: How much of the Stimulus money is unspent?
Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 03:50 PM (uFokq)

A better question is: Where the hell are those funds on the books?

Posted by: no2daup at February 10, 2011 12:14 PM (FcKXR)

62 Cutting 100 billion out of a $3.5 trillion budget and $1.5 trillion deficit is tough work.

What I wonder is why not take the deficit off the top, all $1.5 trillion of it.

Who the hell is going to pay for this boondoggle.

Posted by: tarpon at February 10, 2011 12:16 PM (g0QB8)

63

Excuse me for not giving a rip about Egypt at the current moment.

We've got Paulbots infiltrating CPAC and wild cheers for The Toup??

In short? We're fucked.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 12:19 PM (pLTLS)

64 51
oooh, a good idea?
A bill that proposes tax returns come with the option to donate $1 to fund Abortions, or NPR, or...
Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 03:59 PM (uFokq)

Do.Not.Go.There

Fiscal democracy at its worst. Hell, the two concepts shouldn't even be side by side in the same sentence

It'll either be chaos as the number of choices balloons into the thousands
- or -
Any choice that is deemed "overfunded" by our overlords will be trimmed back to its "proper" level, with the remainder sent to other, less-loved choices (kind of like how the United Way does things).

Posted by: no2daup at February 10, 2011 12:20 PM (FcKXR)

65

Just put in cpac and watch the twitter feed.

Rumsfield is getting mass ive boos.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 12:20 PM (pLTLS)

66 Former VP Cheney is presenting an award to Donald Rumsfeld.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:20 PM (iMgAa)

67

Cheney got boos; albeit less that Rumsfield but WTH?

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 12:22 PM (pLTLS)

68 Someone was shouting "War criminal!" The crowd mostly came together to drown him out and Cheney laughed and made a comment.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:23 PM (iMgAa)

69 How about an outside audit of the stimulus money?

Posted by: toby928™: Popular Front for the Liberation of logprof at February 10, 2011 12:25 PM (GTbGH)

70
it sounds like a lotta libertarians and homosexuals are at CPAC this year

In other words, no conservatives are there.

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 12:25 PM (uFokq)

71
I just want people to directly pay for abortions if they like it so much.

Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 12:26 PM (uFokq)

72
CPAC needs to be dissolved. It will go defunct anyway because Conservatives will simply refuse to go.


Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 12:29 PM (uFokq)

73 Rumsfeld is all class, sharing the award with the troops. He received a great response on that and from several service members.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:35 PM (iMgAa)

Posted by: RushBabe at February 10, 2011 12:37 PM (p5QXj)

75 Supposedly, Rummy's new book is negative about the surge in Iraq, which sounds kinda sour grapes-ish.  Haven't read it yet though.

Posted by: Ian S. at February 10, 2011 12:38 PM (p05LM)

76 I didn't know Rumsfeld so passionately disliked compassionate conservatism. He's also really giving it to the Obama Administration.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:40 PM (iMgAa)

77 Finally! Some positive statements about America instead of speaking only about days past.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 10, 2011 12:44 PM (iMgAa)

78 I'll bet the republicans could cut two or three hundred billlion by defunding Americorps and Organizing for America.

Posted by: BarbaraS at February 10, 2011 03:44 PM (YwBkP)

79

100 million out of 1.5 trillion... it's still a sad joke, the floggings must begin immediately!

Posted by: Let Loose the Hounds at February 10, 2011 04:23 PM (yCH89)

80 72
CPAC needs to be dissolved. It will go defunct anyway because Conservatives will simply refuse to go.


Posted by: microsoothsayer at February 10, 2011 04:29 PM (uFokq)

 

agreed

Posted by: Let Loose the Hounds at February 10, 2011 05:11 PM (yCH89)

81   67

Cheney got boos; albeit less that Rumsfield but WTH?

Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 10, 2011 04:22 PM (pLTLS)

 

 

because CPAC is no longer a place for conservatives it has been engulfed by wild-eyed Paulians and teh gay

Posted by: Let Loose the Hounds at February 10, 2011 05:13 PM (yCH89)

82 In the cuts listed last nite was $1.8 billion for the 'dept. of science'.  Didja see that in the stimulus bill?  $1.8 billion for 'science'?  gimme a break.

Posted by: wang dang doodle at February 10, 2011 06:44 PM (tXbf1)

83 Wait for the talking heads and the birds toilets papers to start bring all this poppycock about meean spirited replicans wanting to starve the school kids like that jerk DICKGEPHART did or having granny eating pet food becuase gephart is a blabbering nincompoop

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at February 10, 2011 08:18 PM (vA9ld)

84 Word to PDF Converter is specially designed to convert doc to pdf, convert a word to pdf excel to pdfconvert ppt to pdf Word to PDF Converter is specially designed to convert doc to pdf,  with the docx to PDF software, not only can you convert .docx to pdf format but also convert   word doc to pdf and more formats like PNG, JPEG, etc. Moreover using  the doc to PDF Converter, you can also realize pdf combination, document encryption and so forth. Now I will give a detail explanation about how to convert doc to pdf, docx to pdf with Docx to PDF Converter.How to convert xls to pdf, xlsx to pdf? This XLS to PDF Converter can assist you and convert xls, xlsx to pdf files.XLSX to PDF Converter is a splendid xlsx to pdf software to convert xls, xlsx to pdf. Apart from powerful conversion function, you also can edit pdf according to your need such as combine documents to one pdf, set password protection, etc. 

Posted by: oxpdf at February 24, 2011 05:36 PM (dmS1c)

85

 solar panelThe main products we manufacture and export as below:

  Monocrystalline silicon solar panel, polycrystalline silicon solar panel, solar power system.

  solar street light, wind solar hybrid street light, solar garden light, solar sensor light, solar lawn light.

LED lamp for solar garden light, solar brick light, solar street lightsolar post cap, solar road stud, other solar lights and accessories

Posted by: jb at February 27, 2011 09:28 PM (rsXld)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
110kb generated in CPU 0.099, elapsed 0.2644 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2336 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.