September 26, 2011
— Ace No flip-flops for The Big Man. Alas.
Despite some intense lobbying by wealthy Republican donors (especially those in the culturally-copacetic Northeast and California), Christie's aides say that no means no.
Mr. Christie's aides say the governor hasn't budged from his months-long insistence that he won't enter the presidential fray, despite what one described as a "relentless" stream of calls over the last week from prominent Republicans urging him to run."None of that triggers any new thinking on his part," said one Christie adviser. "He's very polite to these people: 'Thank you for calling. That's very flattering. I'll let you know.' And I think they interpret that, 'Ah-ha! A rethinking.' "
A speech Mr. Christie will deliver Tuesday evening at the Ronald Reagan presidential library in California has nonetheless intensified speculation about the governor's intentions. Aides insist he won't use the appearance to make any surprise announcement.
...
"Some in the conservative movement are still searching for Mr. or Ms. Wonderful," said one person who moves in Christie fund-raising circles. "But Christie is a guy who through his whole career has said what he means, and he has said no."
Christie's aides say that national-stage appearances are just "organic outreach" (whatever that means) and not an attempt to build support for a run.
Just a Thought: One of the reasons cited for Christie not getting in is that he wouldn't have time to properly prepare, and would, like Perry, come out rickety in debates.
I have a weird idea for Christie on this point (and it would have worked for Perry, too): Try the truth.
What is wrong with saying, shortly after you've gotten in, "I don't yet have a good answer to that question. I'm still being briefed. I know that presidential candidates are supposed to come out of the box with positions on everything, but frankly, that's just not true. It requires some prepping and thinking, and I confess I haven't yet come to a good conclusion on this issue."
Bonus points if you then say, "But let me give you my sense of it," and then repeat the standard-issue bullet-points on the issue, which is frankly what your opponents are doing anyway, so it seems like your "off the top of my head" thinking is equal to or better than other candidates' scripted answers.
Sometimes the truth "works." Sometimes people like hearing the truth.
Posted by: Ace at
08:09 AM
| Comments (230)
Post contains 403 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:13 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at September 26, 2011 08:13 AM (0iXge)
Ari Fleischer had a tweet saying his popularity is down in NJ. He probably won't be reelected. So it's now or never.
I don't know - I'm not sure how he's currently polling.
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:15 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Mr Fever Head at September 26, 2011 08:15 AM (ZgvjV)
For the record a pudding thread if she doesn't is fine by me too.
The day will be a hell of a read at this place though.
Posted by: H Badger at September 26, 2011 08:16 AM (n/0Nw)
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:16 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: DrewM. at September 26, 2011 08:17 AM (WNzUA)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:17 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:17 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: SurferDoc at September 26, 2011 08:18 AM (STdkO)
I would have liked him to get in. I'd rather have a lot of good candidates(whether i agree with their policies or not).
As it stands, Perry and Romney are the only viable candidates.
The rest are just ankle biters and time wasters.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:18 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at September 26, 2011 08:18 AM (iYbLN)
Many northeastern Republicans are using the conventional dating rules all men adhere to.
No means yes, and definitely no means probably or thinking about it.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:20 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:20 AM (UlUS4)
Please. Enough now on 'Christie- will he or won't he?'
Same for Obuttmunch.
We're wasting pixels and electrons on both topics.
Posted by: Jones at September 26, 2011 08:20 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:20 AM (eOXTH)
We don't need another member of the circular firing squad right now. We need to be attacking Obama.
Christie is a squish on gun control, immigration, global warming, against drilling for oil, is leaning towards being against drilling for gas. We just don't need everyone shooting at the new kid on the block over his squish positions.
Posted by: robtr at September 26, 2011 08:20 AM (MtwBb)
>>>Depends on your definition of "good."
Someone who could win at the national level.
I think Christie, Perry and Romney all could win at the national level. Regadless of what you think of their policies.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:21 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:21 AM (ZDUD4)
truth is Chris Christie is the reason that "RINO" always get spelled out in caps, we had to make sure it was big enough to fit him...
Posted by: Shoey at September 26, 2011 08:21 AM (Y7jCH)
They wanted me to go to Weight Watchers, I said no, no, no.
They wanted me to run for president, I said no, no, no, (wink-wink).
Posted by: Chris Christie at September 26, 2011 08:22 AM (sqkOB)
Maybe, but they don't like hearing that a particular candidate sounds stupid and unprepared.
I think that it speaks volumes about the current state of affairs among our political class that they can't memorize bullet points and spew them back to an audience.
Let's face it, there are no intellectual heavyweights among the current crop of contenders, and there aren't even any who are rhetorically nimble besides Newt.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:22 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:22 AM (UlUS4)
How is it that we've gotten into "____ was elected within the last two years and is kickin' a$$! ____ should run for President!" Talk about burning through your up-and-coming prospects for immediacy's sake.
Posted by: No Whining at September 26, 2011 08:22 AM (UzjcV)
Let's run Rubio. He sure as hell won't fold in a debate like Rick Perry did, and he can spar with Romney and make him out to be the jerk he is.
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 26, 2011 08:23 AM (4sQwu)
Posted by: Ann Coulter at September 26, 2011 08:23 AM (RD7QR)
He is made a lot of troubling statements just like Perry as well.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2011 08:23 AM (M9Ie6)
11So when Palin gets in will there be a pudding thread here for us...?
For the record a pudding thread if she doesn't is fine by me too.
The day will be a hell of a read at this place though.
-------
I like the word pudding and Palin in the same sentence. Pudding, Palin, & pole dancing would make a good sentence too.
Posted by: Jimmah at September 26, 2011 08:23 AM (g9KCn)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:24 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:24 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: I'm in a New York state of mind at September 26, 2011 08:24 AM (4sQwu)
C'mon. We can do better. Let him govern. Let him have a record to run (or not run) on before we start sucking at the dick of Mt. Christie.
Posted by: © Sponge at September 26, 2011 08:24 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Auntie Doodles at September 26, 2011 08:24 AM (6uXZa)
Posted by: joncelli at September 26, 2011 08:25 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Jimmah at September 26, 2011 08:26 AM (g9KCn)
We don't need another member of the circular firing squad right now. We need to be attacking Obama.
Christie is a squish on gun control, immigration, global warming, against drilling for oil, is leaning towards being against drilling for gas. We just don't need everyone shooting at the new kid on the block over his squish positions.
Posted by: robtr at September 26, 2011 12:20 PM (MtwBb)
And don't forget he says we have no fears of sharia law here.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 26, 2011 08:27 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:27 AM (deaac)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at September 26, 2011 08:27 AM (ItDg4)
But anyway, he said, "well, I THINK I would support the flights, because trade makes friends......." leaving it open, obviously to further information coming in, but making the point that with the relatively little that he knows about it at this point, this would be his judgement, instead of bullshitting some answer out.
Probably wasn't a subject he'd spent much time on, but he started with first principles "trade makes friends" and went from there. If a candidate knows who they are, and has a firm grasp on their worldview, they don't have to know every detail about every possible situation ahead of time. They apply first principles and their brand of common sense and can usually come up with a coherent, consistent approach to literally anything.
That's why it doesn't worry me if an executive isn't a policy wonk per se or doesn't have the names of every African head-of-state memorized. What's needed is the knack to find talent to bring you facts, and the smarts to sort the facts efficiently, drill down to what is really important in the argument and disregard the rest, and then use good judgement to apply your principles to the facts.
That's what makes a good leader.
Posted by: Cornfused Yet Again at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (AyzfE)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (21lBC)
Posted by: joncelli at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (RD7QR)
Let's face it, there are no intellectual heavyweights among the current crop of contenders, and there aren't even any who are rhetorically nimble besides Newt.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 12:22 PM (LH6ir)
Given the state of this country's education system and its products, matters and candidates by and large will only go downhill from here. There will be an outstanding person or two who will seek public office, but most will be of the nanosecond attention span types we now see texting, tweeting and facebooking at all times and to little avail.
Posted by: No Whining at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: In before the True Cons at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (D9z3D)
Maybe Perry has, and that is my fear when it comes to his 'heartless' and 'err on the side of life' comments.
As for Christie, I've cooled on him. He is a fiscal cleaning powerhouse, but he is too much of a nanny stater just like many we already have running.
Posted by: dogfish at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (UlUS4)
Or, "I used to know the answer to that question but I forgot it. Sorry."
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at September 26, 2011 08:28 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: joncelli at September 26, 2011 08:29 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ace at September 26, 2011 08:29 AM (nj1bB)
Ok, I'll run.
(oh, and braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaains)
Posted by: Zombie Reagan at September 26, 2011 08:30 AM (TSJb0)
He is great for NJ.
A Mistake for Prez.
How about Cain winning straw poll in FL.. Hahaha.... I like Cain. It aint over til the MamaGriz growls..
Posted by: I am the Walrus at September 26, 2011 08:30 AM (dh5Eu)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:30 AM (rJVPU)
>>>I fail to see what the Christie draw is. Sure, he is great at attacking NJ teacher unions. He cut a bloated NJ budget...some. Other than that, what else has he done?
His draw is exactly what Perry has failed at, the ability to articulate ideas and concepts in a way that anyone can understand.
That and he's been fairly successfuly in getting cuts in a dyed in the wool blue state.
I should note that I think he's a bit liberal on a lot of issues that matter to me, however I'm not going to pretend he doesn't have any appeal or qualifications.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:31 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: joncelli at September 26, 2011 08:31 AM (RD7QR)
Yeah, I'd have liked him to get in for the kicking @ss and taking names perception I have of him, but I don't think he'd be the answer to stopping the creeping blight of nannying us to death.
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOAMF is one and done! at September 26, 2011 08:31 AM (Zgfnd)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:32 AM (UlUS4)
2. His positions on environmental regulation are, frankly, disqualifying in the present situation. The EPA needs to be reigned in and/or eliminated. Is Christie the man to do it? Not hardly.
Posted by: Aruges at September 26, 2011 08:32 AM (MDchW)
Why are you yelling? We already know you are an asshole.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:32 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: The commentor who calls everyone and everything a RINO at September 26, 2011 12:31 PM (OWjjx)
New Jersey is a World Heritage RINO Preserve!
Posted by: No Whining at September 26, 2011 08:33 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: ace at September 26, 2011 12:29 PM (nj1bB)
Well, he's been campaigning for 5 + years, so he should be good at it by now.
I'm not impressed with his record when he was actually in politics. That's his problem.
Posted by: © Sponge at September 26, 2011 08:33 AM (UK9cE)
The best thing that Gov Christie offers is (which is the same thing Rudy offers) the "Fuck me?? Nooooo, fuck you" attitude that we desperately need in the GOP.
Posted by: Soothsayer at September 26, 2011 08:33 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: joncelli at September 26, 2011 08:33 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:34 AM (i6RpT)
11 months before the convention? It may as well be the length of his erection.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:34 AM (LH6ir)
>>>I'm not impressed with his record when he was actually in politics. That's his problem.
Indeed. If he had Perry's record on jobs, or Walker's on entitlement reform, I would be going door to door for Romney.
He's a decent candidate in terms of campaigning, speech giving and debating. It's the substance that bothers me.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:34 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Amanda Jane at September 26, 2011 08:34 AM (0P4qj)
My friends, for a small donation to my general coffers, I will mail you a red, white and blue, zircon encrusted clothespin for your nose, to be used at your discretion on November 6th, 2012.
Posted by: John McCain at September 26, 2011 12:32 PM (vbh31)
Okay. That's funny. Sad and true, but funny.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at September 26, 2011 08:34 AM (UOM48)
Sheesh. That woman loves her some CC for a POTUS run.
Her opinion changes according to which policy person is being pressed to run in a given month.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 26, 2011 08:35 AM (o2lIv)
""We don't need another member of the circular firing squad right now. We need to be attacking Obama.""
This.
I like what christie is doing here in jersey, but the dude is a fucking RINO. Jersey is already a lost cause, its a state that has a minimum of 5-6 cities filled with obama voters. We'll never get less restrictive gun laws, or a laundry list of other cool things thanks to those shitholes. I would not wish that on the rest of the country. Christie if anything is a fat herman cain, you might get some financial relieve, but not a damn thing more.
Posted by: Berserker at September 26, 2011 08:35 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:35 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:35 AM (deaac)
Didn't Herman Cain try that...
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 12:30 PM (rJVPU)
I knew somebody was pilloried for that exact thing.
Not to mention the various gotcha media questions about who is president of Nowhereistan that the Media likes trotting out every cycle.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:36 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Y-not at September 26, 2011 08:36 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:36 AM (deaac)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:36 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: I am the Walrus at September 26, 2011 12:30 PM (dh5Eu)
Oh, spare us your masturbatory fantasies about Sarah Palin. After her every appearance. Palinistas all across the country retire to their parents' basements to wack off to the suggestive photos of Sarah that they carefully clip out of the newspaper.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:37 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:37 AM (eOXTH)
Indeed. If he had Perry's record on jobs, or Walker's on entitlement reform, I would be going door to door for Romney.
He's a decent candidate in terms of campaigning, speech giving and debating. It's the substance that bothers me.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 12:34 PM (wuv1c)
Exactly. I'm asking the Romney supporters to show me why the conservative base should be excited about him and getting nothing of substance. He needs the base along with Indies, but he has nothing fiscally conservative to fall back on. Just the same old squishy leftist pandering and "what they want to hear" politics. I'm really quite tired of that.
Posted by: © Sponge at September 26, 2011 08:37 AM (UK9cE)
Sometimes the truth "works.
Ace has never been married.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at September 26, 2011 12:22 PM (OWjjx)
No shit!
Posted by: EC at September 26, 2011 08:38 AM (GQ8sn)
What is wrong with saying, shortly after you've gotten in, "I don't yet have a good answer to that question. I'm still being briefed. I know that presidential candidates are supposed to come out of the box with positions on everything, but frankly, that's just not true. It requires some prepping and thinking, and I confess I haven't yet come to a good conclusion on this issue."
Essentially how Jesse Ventura won the governorship of Minnesota.
Posted by: The Heartless Truman North at September 26, 2011 08:38 AM (G5JPI)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:38 AM (deaac)
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:38 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:39 AM (eOXTH)
Oh, spare us your masturbatory
fantasies about Sarah Palin. After her every appearance. Palinistas all
across the country retire to their parents' basements to wack off to the
suggestive photos of Sarah that they carefully clip out of the
newspaper.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 12:37 PM (LH6ir)
Jeez, can you guys realize that they are doing it just to yank your chain?
If you can't make a funny comeback, you should just drop it.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:39 AM (z1N6a)
Mark Levin likes Orrin Hatch. Yet dislikes Chris Christie.
You figure it out.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 08:39 AM (D9z3D)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 12:35 PM (ZDUD4)
The "class" part of your comment is debatable, but I certainly agree that there are many Palin supporters, many of whom are energized.
But there aren't enough of you to elect her president.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:39 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:40 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 12:39 PM (eOXTH)
This week it is asthmatics. I'm not sure who their candidate is.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:40 AM (z1N6a)
But there aren't enough of you to elect her president.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 12:39 PM (LH6ir)
Then you should drop the god damn bile every day.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:41 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 12:38 PM (i6RpT)
Perry! Perry!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:41 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Go! at September 26, 2011 08:41 AM (J3FIT)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:41 AM (ZDUD4)
>>>The EPA needs to be reigned in and/or eliminated. Is Christie the man to do it? Not hardly.
New Jersey isn't Wyoming. We have brownfields here that you wouldn't fly over in a Kevlar hazmat suit. The EPA is about the only way we have to get this mess cleaned up, and the Big Man knows it.
I think the EPA has wandered far from their brief, but you still need them in these urban shitholes.
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 26, 2011 08:41 AM (rplL3)
Levin can be a bit of a douche. His whole anger schtick can get tiring. He like Hannity because how can you not like Hannity. He's like the retarded runt puppy. He's cute, playful and nice. You may not care about his opinion or listen to his show, but it's hard to hate him. You're more indifferent.
As for Savage, who knows. I haven't listened to him in years. There are times where he'll take diametrically opposite opinions on the same issue in the same sentence.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:42 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:42 AM (deaac)
Good, we need him here. Despite his misgivings. Gun grabber/Eco-leaner (both remain to be seen) NJ is still in deep shit.
Posted by: dananjcon at September 26, 2011 08:42 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 12:40 PM (UlUS4)
I listen to Savage from time to time. As best I can tell, he's taken the "a pox on all their houses" position.
Posted by: No Whining at September 26, 2011 08:42 AM (UzjcV)
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:43 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (rJVPU)
Who's the bigger tease?
Posted by: EC at September 26, 2011 12:43 PM (GQ8sn)
Christie by about 150 pounds.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 12:42 PM (deaac)
Really? We just had a thread where Cain was calling on Republicans to be civil to Democrats....
Posted by: KG at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (LD21B)
Or save them for the ONT, "Leave boots and glasses on, Sarah"
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (136wp)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (deaac)
Posted by: I am the Walrus at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (dh5Eu)
How do we know? He hasn't had one of these "debates" yet. How will he respond when Chris Wallace asks him to explain his conflicting stance on AGW in less than 30 sec? How will he explain his 50 point financial recovery plan that Mitt Romney has in less than 30 sec?
This is what I simply don't seem to get folks here to understand. These debates are designed to make Republicans step on their dicks. Particularly the non-Romney Republicans.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (M9Ie6)
I think Chrisie knows he has little chance of winning the GOP nomination b/c he is socially liberal. His entrance would basically split Romney's vote more than anything else.
I think he is keeping his name/face in the picture as a shot for VP - which I think is a valid possibility. He would make a great attack dog and could (big, huge maybe) put NJ or other NE states into play.
I think Christie's only real hope at ever getting the nomination is to win it from the Veep spot. Otherwise, he is going to have to flip-flop on a lot of issues, a la Romney, to have a chance in the GOP primary. And, he doesn't want to do that while he still may be interested in other NJ state-wide positions (re-election as Gov, U.S. Senate).
I like Christie and think he'd make a good president, but I think the social positions kill him in the GOP primary. Personally, I'm always leery of the fiscal conservative / social liberal politician. I myself am not a huge social conservative, but I have noticed that the Fiscal conservative/ social liberal types are the ones who tend to "grow" in office (i.e., lurch leftward).
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2011 08:44 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 08:45 AM (D9z3D)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 12:44 PM (LH6ir)
Not really
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:45 AM (z1N6a)
>>>Anyone that listens to Savage is a masochist. All he does is yell at the people that actually give him rating. I have no idea how people can listen to that shit.
Believe it or not, he was fairly entertaining at one point in time. I think his biggest appeal is to older men who listen to him because he reminds them of their since passed fathers or grandfathers.
As I said above, I haven't listened to him in years, so I'm not sure what the appeal is anymore.
Posted by: Ben at September 26, 2011 08:45 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:46 AM (deaac)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:46 AM (rJVPU)
I think the EPA has wandered far from their brief, but you still need them in these urban shitholes.
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 26, 2011 12:41 PM (rplL3)
Total crap. The EPA is a huge danger to America, and pointing to a few real problems in the vast collection of fake sites just proves the point.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:46 AM (LH6ir)
Hannity got old on me 2 years ago. Use to listen to Steve Marlzberg but WOR replace him with David Patterson!
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 26, 2011 08:46 AM (136wp)
(from Pajamas Media)
ABO.
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOAMF is one and done! at September 26, 2011 08:46 AM (Zgfnd)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:47 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 12:44 PM (deaac)
I can't watch Hannity. He just is not that bright. He usually gets taken to the cleaners by any half-way intelligent liberal. I agree with Hannity, but he is not a really smart guy. He can't really do more than hit the talking points.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2011 08:48 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:48 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 12:45 PM (D9z3D)
He does when he's touting his books - "Abuse of Power is at #4 on the NYT's Best Sellers' List!"
Posted by: No Whining at September 26, 2011 08:48 AM (UzjcV)
Eleventy-Hundred? Math is HARD!
Posted by: Barack "Louis XVI" Obama at September 26, 2011 08:49 AM (136wp)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:49 AM (rJVPU)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:49 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Amanda Jane at September 26, 2011 08:50 AM (0P4qj)
Then you should drop the god damn bile every day.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 12:41 PM (z1N6a)
Bile? You call that bile? Just wait until that reality show drama queen from the northern wastelands declares for president. Then you will see bile, but not here. It will come from every major newspaper, every major TV news channel, and it will be unrelenting. Much of it will be unfair, and some of it will be lies, but it will destroy her.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:50 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 12:45 PM (D9z3D)
I don't know if I think he is a liberal, but he is definitely doing a character and total schtick. I can't listen to him, it is all schtick. I doubt very much that he believes 1/2 of what he says, or at least, doesn't believe it with nearly the passion he puts on.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2011 08:50 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:50 AM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:50 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2011 08:51 AM (UlUS4)
Clear as mud, eh?
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:51 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:52 AM (deaac)
Bile? You call that bile? Just
wait until that reality show drama queen from the northern wastelands
declares for president. Then you will see bile, but not here. It will
come from every major newspaper, every major TV news channel, and it
will be unrelenting. Much of it will be unfair, and some of it will be
lies, but it will destroy her.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 12:50 PM (LH6ir)
You have this on a hotkey, dude?
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:52 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Ann Coulter at September 26, 2011 08:53 AM (Z7toi)
What is wrong with saying, shortly after you've gotten in, "I don't yet have a good answer to that question. I'm still being briefed "]/quote]
Nothing in theory, but in practice ones milage may vary. ISTR you ripped Cain a new one for giving that very answer.
Posted by: Yhe Brickmuppet at September 26, 2011 08:53 AM (EJaOX)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 08:53 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Ann Coulter at September 26, 2011 08:54 AM (Z7toi)
You were 99% right on everything you said. Except for Cain. See the post below.
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 08:54 AM (pLTLS)
Nope, Christie stays out.
No one seems to be considering this but, maybe he just doesn't want to be POTUS. Brutal job, pay sucks and rough as hell on the family. He may also feel a responsibility to the good people of NJ.
I'm not a HUGE fan of Romney, but a Romney/Rubio ticket is looking awfully compelling and well-balanced. I'd pull the lever for that easily.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at September 26, 2011 08:54 AM (uVlA4)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 12:50 PM (ZDUD4)
LMAO!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:54 AM (LH6ir)
Cain is our talker. That's why I think he's going to get the nod.
I'm done.
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 12:52 PM (deaac)
Maybe that community needs people who can act rather than talk
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (z1N6a)
I'll have to see if another broadcast station picks him up. WOR is the same station that got rid of Beck's radio show. Must have had a change in management. Can't imagine what their ratings are now...
Posted by: The Robot Devil at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (136wp)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (i6RpT)
He wasn't limited to a 30 sec sound bite in responding to that scrunt.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (M9Ie6)
The truth would win but telling the truth seems to never occur to either the candidates or their high-powered strategists. The truth is fairly straightforward: Obama and the people surrounding him are hardcore, old-school socialists, AGW is a lie, the stimulus was a gargantuan payoff to the Democratic Party's base, and the fiscal policies advocated by the Obama Administration are unsustainable even in the short-term. But telling that truth is only part of the problem. Some of the GOP candidates have major shortcomings, and those shortcomings need to be addressed.
Take Mitt Romney, for example. He and his people no doubt plan for every contingency, rehearse responses to every possible press query or debate scenario, conduct meticulous, multi-layered reviews of polling and focus group data, perform in-depth analyses of electoral maps, and so on. You know how Romney could win? He could deal head-on with why he does so badly at press-the-flesh and kiss-the-baby politicking.
ROMNEY: Hi, I'm Mitt Romney and I'm a candidate for President of the United States. Some of you voted against me in past primary and gubenatorial campaigns, and I think I know why. Truth is, I don't connect well with people. I never have. It isn't that I don't like people. I do. I like nearly everyone I meet. I just don't deal well with most of you on a one-to-one basis. I'm not good at small talk. Small talk bores me. Like I said, I'm not good at it and--even worse--I'm not good at faking it, either.
So let's cut the small-talk and get to the point: if you want ideas, I'm your guy. If you want smart and capable, that's me. President Obama went to Harvard. So did I--and unlike him, I'll even show you my transcripts because--unlike him--I'm not ashamed of my grades...
And so on. It would work.
Posted by: troyriser at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: Amanda Jane at September 26, 2011 08:55 AM (0P4qj)
Posted by: concealed carrie at September 26, 2011 08:56 AM (aVrNy)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 08:56 AM (rJVPU)
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOAMF is one and done! at September 26, 2011 08:56 AM (Zgfnd)
Posted by: nevergiveup at September 26, 2011 08:56 AM (i6RpT)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 08:58 AM (deaac)
You have this on a hotkey, dude?
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 12:52 PM (z1N6a)
Funny.
It gets a bit tedious hearing the same thing every single day about how wonderful Palin is and how she has this grand, inscrutably clever plan to wow us all into voting for her for president.
She is a fucking politician with a great rack and a fine backside. She has some extremely attractive general policy positions, and a seemingly honest and fervent love for this country. I think everyone on this blog would stipulate to this
But...she has huge negatives that she hasn't done much to reduce, and it is pretty damned late in the game.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 08:58 AM (LH6ir)
THIS!
I've felt this way for years. I'm not generally a big fan of the "this guy doesn't really believe what he's saying" shtick that liberals in particular like to occasionally try on Limbaugh, but I've long thought that Savage sounds more like a parody of a right wing extremist than the real thing.
He seems more like a WWE version of a talkradio host rather than a genuine conservative.
Posted by: Kensington at September 26, 2011 08:58 AM (Z7toi)
I think they men something, but it is mostly the Republican Party is going to have to find some other way to do debates that bypasses the MFM.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2011 08:58 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 12:44 PM (ZDUD4)
9 9 9 plan
9% personal tax rate
9% corporate tax rate
9% National sales tax (VAT)No state taxes?
Posted by: EC at September 26, 2011 09:00 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Ann Coulter at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (Z7toi)
I like that. Can you imagine a SCOAMF vs Cain debate? SCOAMF's entire campaign strategy would collapse, how could he shriek "RAAAAAACIST"?
Posted by: I am the Walrus at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (dh5Eu)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2011 12:55 PM (M9Ie6)
Yes, because he is politically aware and understands that he can be easily ambushed in somebody else's venue. That's why he has been successful nationally. He is very careful when and where he speaks, and only seems to be off-the-cuff because it is planned well and he is, in fact, an excellent speaker with a nimble mind.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (LH6ir)
I don't go as far as Vic in this as I think debates matter. I just don't think they mean *everything*. Actually I don't think they mean much, but they mean something.
Clear as mud, eh?
To me, in the primaries the debates tell us how principaled their conservative positions are - if they stupid things that aren't conservative, it hurts them (like Perry's "if you have a heart" comment).
Also, the primary debates are good toward sizing up how a candidate will fare against Obama in a debate. Again, at this point that hurts Perry. I am not panicking on that, yes Perry has been bad, but I think he is still new to the national stage and these debates and will improve. He probably will nevere become as smooth as Romney, b/c Romney has been preparing for this for more than 5 years. If Perry doesn't improve dramatically, then that will kill his chances for the nomination. We simply cannot have a nominee that is going to get creamed by Obama in teh debates in teh general election.
the other thing that debates do, is effect media and pundit coverage of the candidate. The better and more credible a candidate seems in a debate, the more the media treats him like a credible, serious candidate.
However, as far as having a direct impact on primary voters, I doubt teh primary debates directly swing votes much more than 1-2%, if that. they simply aren't watched by that many, and those who do watch, probably already have a candidate they support and the debate doesn't generally change that.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Roger at September 26, 2011 09:01 AM (tAwhy)
Charlie Brown's Dildo: Perfect reactionary response. The EPA is a danger to America so it follows that Christie should, as governor of our state, be seeking to rein them in.
I suppose you have the money to do this:
http://tinyurl.com/od8bx8
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 26, 2011 09:02 AM (rplL3)
Posted by: The Heartless Truman North at September 26, 2011 09:02 AM (G5JPI)
What I said the other day was that I would be concerned if he was tongue-tied during every townhall, meet & greet, and interview he did. That would make him unfit for the national stage.
As it is, I'm not happy with debate #3 but I really think that people are overreacting to debate #1 and debate #2. I think expectations were way too high on #1 and then even more on #2 when he, once again, didn't "knock it out of the park".
ps...good to see you as the top commenter last week
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 09:02 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Tourettes Survivors For Herman Cain at September 26, 2011 09:03 AM (uRPoU)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at September 26, 2011 09:03 AM (ZDUD4)
You have written 20 times as much about her in this post than anyone else.
Posted by: Oldcat at September 26, 2011 09:03 AM (z1N6a)
Hol.E.Shit.
Funneh stuff, right there!
Posted by: lu at September 26, 2011 09:03 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: tasker at September 26, 2011 12:56 PM (rJVPU)
I beg your pardon. Take that back!
Posted by: Ace movie review at September 26, 2011 09:06 AM (uoloY)
Posted by: Ken Royall at September 26, 2011 09:06 AM (9zzk+)
Yes, Vic, congratulations for top commenter spot!
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOAMF is one and done! at September 26, 2011 09:06 AM (Zgfnd)
The reason conversatives drool over Christie is quite simple: he can talk. This is our achilles heel, though I don't know why it has to be so. We can't talk, at least not on stage, not under pressure, not like Obama. My guess is 90% of the animosity towards Palin is rooted in her voice, her accent, her sentence structure style
I'm guessing the reason conservatives generally don't sound that good is that it is much easier to sell b.s. about how the gov't is going to solve all your problems than it is to sell the ideas of personal responsibility, liberty (i.e., having to face teh consequences of your own choices) and allowing the market to respond to problems as the most efficient method.
It's much easier to claim that teh gov't can make all kids einsteins trhough public education if we just raised taxes a little more on the rich than to say - you know what, some kids just aren't that smart and are going to have to make careers out of unskilled labor, no matter how much money we pump into public education.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2011 09:07 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Go! at September 26, 2011 09:09 AM (0PAAk)
Which, if true, is completely ridiculous because her voice is fine. She just has a midwest accent. But I doubt it's true, anyway. 90% of the animosity toward Palin is rooted in the fact that she didn't kill her baby and she isn't a liberal.
Posted by: Kensington at September 26, 2011 09:10 AM (Z7toi)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at September 26, 2011 09:11 AM (b68Df)
Screw that. "I plead the 5th"
Posted by: cherry pi, terrorist hostage taking SOB at September 26, 2011 09:12 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 09:14 AM (deaac)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at September 26, 2011 09:15 AM (deaac)
Or maybe he is indeed the Moby that many suspect he is, and so was pushing Trump precisely because he is/was the havoc-wreaking "GOP loses" candidate that liberals love and want.
Seriously, this isn't hard to figure out.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 09:16 AM (D9z3D)
The Federal EPA has to get involved in cleaning up a gas station? Give me a break.
NJ has an EPA, and they are sufficiently fanatical to cause huge problems without a federal version.
The vast majority of EPA efforts are to mitigate minor problems. Chromium in the groundwater? Oh, no! It doesn't cause human illness, but let's clean it up to the tune of billions, because that's how we justify our existence.
PCB in the stable silt at the bottom of the river? Dredge it! Stir it up! Spread it all over the fucking place...because that's how we justify our existence.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 09:18 AM (LH6ir)
So word count is some measure of...what?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at September 26, 2011 09:20 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Theresa D., TPT--SCOAMF is one and done! at September 26, 2011 09:21 AM (Zgfnd)
Truth is a good idea. Here's another truth:
"I would never make that kind of decision without being briefed on America's up-to-the-minute intelligence sources and without consulting the finest minds in America's military. No one who has America's best interests in minds is going to commit to a course of action for such a dangerous situation in a 30-second soundbite. That said, here are some general thoughts. First, my administration would work to prevent the Taliban from ever getting nukes in the first place. . . ."
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at September 26, 2011 09:22 AM (epBek)
209 ...."My guess is 90% of the animosity towards Palin is rooted in her voice, her accent, her sentence structure style"
Which, if true, is completely ridiculous because her voice is fine. She just has a midwest accent.
----------
No. It's not a midwest accent. ....If anything, it's an Alaska-Canadian type accent. Which is why it sounds so foreign to so many people down here in the lower 48.
It's when she all-of-a-sudden goes from an even cadence in her speaking ---to going up a couple of octaves....and then cascading back downward in that sing-song way that she does. ....That is what is severely off-putting.
I've lived in the midwest all my life. ....and that is not a midwest accent.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at September 26, 2011 09:23 AM (iCeCI)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 26, 2011 09:23 AM (o2lIv)
Well, if you've ever spent any time in Wisconsin or Minnesota (as I have), then...yeah, there's definitely a similarity. But it's definitely NOT an accent you'd hear in Illinois or Missouri or Kansas, if that's the "Midwest" you're thinking about.
Either way, I can't fucking stand it anymore.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 09:26 AM (D9z3D)
I grew up in the Midwest and lived there for almost thirty-five years. She sounds like any number of women I've known. It's "off-putting" if you want it to be off-putting, but there's nothing inherently, objectively off-putting about her voice.
Posted by: Kensington at September 26, 2011 09:28 AM (Z7toi)
My aunt who lived her entire life in Chicago sounded like that.
Posted by: Kensington at September 26, 2011 09:29 AM (Z7toi)
Huh. I've spent tons of time in Chicago and the (northwest) suburbs, and I've never heard that accent there. Go figure.
Anyway, we basically agree: for me it's the sort of accent that turns up all the time in Wisconsin and Minnesota as well. You say you've heard it in northen Illinois. We'll split the difference and say it's common in the upper Midwest.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 09:32 AM (D9z3D)
Yes. It's her tone and pitch.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 26, 2011 09:33 AM (o2lIv)
>>>The Federal EPA has to get involved in cleaning up a gas station?
Obviously I don't think we need the EPA to clean up our gas stations. But it would be stupid for Christie to do as you suggest and tell them to fuck off rather than paying for the NJDEP to clean up our gas stations.
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 26, 2011 09:35 AM (rplL3)
Someone who could win at the national level.
Yeah, like me! I won!
Posted by: Barry SCOAMF Obama at September 26, 2011 09:39 AM (tQHzJ)
Maybe it's significant that I spent almost a decade on the east coast as well. It's possible that this has given me an ear for accents that someone who has only lived in the same geographic area their whole life might not have. I dunno.
Posted by: Kensington at September 26, 2011 09:49 AM (Z7toi)
Chris Christie is way out of sync on immigration, ObamaCare, "global warming" and -- worst of all -- accommodations to radical Islam. Indeed, he has actively and vociferously defended people who want to replace our Constitution with sharia and have said so.
http://tinyurl.com/655fhwg
Christie is in bed with our #1 enemy. Screw him.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at September 26, 2011 10:09 AM (2AfqM)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 26, 2011 10:10 AM (r4wIV)
Christie has a lot more he can do in NJ, and to abandon it would be selfish right now.
Posted by: Douglas at September 26, 2011 10:23 AM (YKOnu)
you would be so blessed to have Chris Christie as your president but you are so filled with the rhetoric that the MSM wants you to be filled with, you wouldn't know a good thing if it fell right into your lap.
Please write something supporting all the charges against Mr. Christie, me and annie are waiting for it
Posted by: the rest of the world at September 26, 2011 10:25 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: kansas at September 26, 2011 10:35 AM (mka2b)
Before the FL straw poll results came out, I ordered bumperstickers and yardsigns from Cain.
So, I'm voting for the guy I'd like to see have the job. In the general, I'll vote anybody but SCOAMF.
Posted by: Jewish janitor in SF at September 26, 2011 10:46 AM (HrHr5)
Well, except for the fact that I was born and raised (and currently live) on the East Coast myself. So, maybe not so much.
Posted by: Jeff B. at September 26, 2011 10:48 AM (D9z3D)
Put LBJ in the "can't" category - his public speeches were brutal, much like Ford's, and his major accomplishments were done moreso by convincing Congresscritters behind doors than convincing the American people.
Really, since the advent of the TV era, we've only had 3 great Prez communicators: JFK, Reagan, & Clinton.
Captain Kickass gave some great speeches during the campaign but has been revealed as a SCOAMF
Posted by: The Q at September 26, 2011 10:54 AM (CJIam)
Posted by: DefendUSA at September 26, 2011 11:29 AM (c81D+)
Posted by: Bill Kristol at September 26, 2011 11:30 AM (EiGL0)
Posted by: steevy at September 26, 2011 12:11 PM (fyOgS)
Posted by: The Dog Who Knew Too Much AudioBook at September 26, 2011 04:25 PM (YrF3W)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2461 seconds, 358 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: phoenixgirl at September 26, 2011 08:10 AM (eOXTH)