November 30, 2011
— DrewM Welcome to Obama's "Green Economy".
Two high profile companies have gone bankrupt in the United States -- government-backed Solyndra and Evergreen -- and analysts anticipate more failures ahead."Solyndra was just the beginning," said Jessie Pichel, head of clean energy research at the investment bank Jefferies & Co. "We're going to see a lot of companies go bankrupt."
Just how many? Of the few hundred or so solar panel makers worldwide, just 20 to 40 are expected to remain standing in a few years time, said Mark Bachman, a renewables analyst at Avian Securities.
...
But just as all these new solar panels were making their way to market, the debit crisis hit in Europe. The generous subsidies offered to solar power by European governments and utilities were cut. Demand for solar panels fell.
Plus, solar project developers were having a hard time getting credit to build new power plants, further cutting into demand. Prices for solar panels began falling rapidly.
A year ago solar panels were selling for $1.50 to $2 per watt, said Ramesh Misra, a senior analyst at Brigantine Advisors, a research outfit. Now they sell for half that, and the decline hasn't stopped.
It's almost as if an industry built on government subsidies for producers and industry and government subsidies for consumers is doomed to failure. So naturally the liberal response will be...more subsidies!
Posted by: DrewM at
07:03 AM
| Comments (227)
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: fixerupper at November 30, 2011 07:07 AM (C8hzL)
Posted by: toby928 at November 30, 2011 07:08 AM (IfkGz)
Posted by: Jack Burton Mercer at November 30, 2011 07:09 AM (zEHWj)
Lawyer accused of seeking secretary 'with benefits' gets one-year suspension
“In addition to the legal work, you would be required to have sexual interaction with me and my partner, sometimes together, sometimes separate,” the email said. ‘This part of the job would require sexy dressing and flirtatious interaction with me and my partner, as well as sexual interaction. You will have to be comfortable doing this with us.”
I guess the the State Bar in IL frowns on this type of ad
link to the ABA
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 30, 2011 07:09 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: A Solar Panel at November 30, 2011 07:10 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: SFGoth at November 30, 2011 07:10 AM (dZ756)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at November 30, 2011 07:10 AM (qi5w5)
I have seen a comparison showing how many acres it takes to generate electricty for nuclear, coal, solar & wind. The land requirements for the "green" power is incredible.
Posted by: fluffy at November 30, 2011 07:11 AM (4Kl5M)
Can't wait until firms decide they cannot afford "free" charging stations for electric vehicles, and force the seven people who own one to charge them at home.
/Look Johnny! Their electric bill did something we like to call "skyrocket."
Posted by: shibumi at November 30, 2011 07:13 AM (z63Tr)
I want to work but I can't get a job without government help.
I owe a lot of people a lot of money.
I'm broke.
I am the 99% of the renewable energy "industry".
Posted by: A Solar Panel at November 30, 2011 07:13 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Alice's Clone Army at November 30, 2011 07:13 AM (SR/kL)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:13 AM (8y9MW)
We have 500 years of natural gas supply (it closed at $2.81/mcf yesterday) at current known reserves and nuclear energy is the cleanest, safest way to generate electricity. New designs of coal fired plants approach the air quality of natural gas. But try to get a new plant, of any design, permitted.
Posted by: Texas Secession, For the Children at November 30, 2011 07:14 AM (OBDWE)
Posted by: Henry Ford at November 30, 2011 07:16 AM (flFQn)
Posted by: Remaining Solar Panel Companies at November 30, 2011 07:17 AM (oif6Y)
Posted by: Lord Humungus Wasteland Teahadi at November 30, 2011 07:17 AM (Yv6gq)
Posted by: McLovin at November 30, 2011 07:17 AM (BKneV)
Dang it! It's simple.
If there were money to be made in those technologies, there would be companies lined up to produce it.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 30, 2011 07:18 AM (LyOUH)
For all of our infrastructure problems, the wind-farms in West Texas really are doing very well. It would be nice if we had the money to spend on creating a major energy pipeline from the West (where it can be generated, but isn't needed) to the East (where it can't be reliably generated, but is needed).
That said- it works in West Texas because they just get that much wind, and no one was using that land anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:18 AM (8y9MW)
Careful; don't give anyone any ideas. You live in San Fran, where the Happy Meal dare not speak its name. They might end up inserting a valve and make you fart into a methane tank.
Posted by: fluffy at November 30, 2011 07:18 AM (4Kl5M)
link to the ABA
Posted by: laceyunderalls
We just don't like the "honesty" of the ad. We're fine with the behavior.
Posted by: A room full of lawyers in IL at November 30, 2011 07:18 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is "curious" click the link at your own peril at November 30, 2011 07:18 AM (SH3gZ)
I say take them at their word and put them all on stationary bike-powered generators and let them produce something for once in their lives. If they are what they say they are, they should be delighted to do it.
Posted by: weew at November 30, 2011 07:19 AM (7RbIF)
I've never understood the mindset behind the investment funds that invest in "clean" this, or "sustainable" that, and then claim they're the best investments going. If they are a good investment, they'll prosper whether clean or not. Ah, well, it's only other people's money.
Posted by: pep at November 30, 2011 07:19 AM (YXmuI)
27 There are simply no alternatives to existing forms of energy production that can scale to meet our needs.
I have often wondered why there are not more geothermal plants? Any insight?
Posted by: Cicerokid at November 30, 2011 07:19 AM (zmJCR)
Hamster wheels.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:19 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Gaia at November 30, 2011 07:20 AM (flFQn)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is at November 30, 2011 07:20 AM (SH3gZ)
Dang it! It's simple.
If there were money to be made in those technologies, there would be companies lined up to produce it.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead HorseWell, yes. It is easy. When you forget to add the NUANCE!
Posted by: The Left at November 30, 2011 07:20 AM (BbX1b)
But they'll make a profit once the volume picks up!
I'm here 'til Thursday. Try the veal!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at November 30, 2011 07:20 AM (nEUpB)
Ah, you forgot me, though.
Posted by: Unicorn effluvia at November 30, 2011 07:20 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 30, 2011 07:21 AM (UlUS4)
Posted by: Wall-E at November 30, 2011 07:21 AM (48wze)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is curious link at your own peril at November 30, 2011 07:21 AM (SH3gZ)
Lack of usable sites, cost of upkeep, and a few other things. They're great where they can be set up and maintained, but they're still not a panacea.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:22 AM (8y9MW)
Success based on a huge subsidy? I doubt that those are market-based windmills.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at November 30, 2011 07:22 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Lord Humungus Wasteland Teahadi at November 30, 2011 07:23 AM (Yv6gq)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is curious link at your own peril at November 30, 2011 07:23 AM (SH3gZ)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is curious link at your own peril at November 30, 2011 07:23 AM (SH3gZ)
Care to share with the class?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Fritz at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (/ZZCn)
Just how many? Of the few hundred or so solar panel makers worldwide, just 20 to 40 are expected to remain standing in a few years time, said Mark Bachman, a renewables analyst at Avian Securities.
A failure rate (assuming 200 to 400 solar panel manufacturers) of at least 80% to 90%. No wonder the governments of the world are going broke, as our "betters" allocate money hand over fist on endeavors that have no chance of standing on their own.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (9hSKh)
The whole energy market is so skewed now, that it's hard to tell. But they are making a profit and paying dividends (as promised), so I'm guessing they're doing okay.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (UlUS4)
The good news is we are only about a month or so away from the full scale MFM telling us everyday how good the economy is and a little extra manipulation of govt numbers to be memory holed in the revisions.
Won't help you. But at least it will sound good. So there's that.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (JYheX)
But the price of pellets went way up because the wood products industry here is in the tank. Plus it needs electricity to operate, so where's the emergency value in that? So we stopped using it 2 years ago.
Posted by: jeanne! at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (GdalM)
You have been trying to kill us from the beginning, Medea. Now that the tables are turned, you want a truce? Hard cheese, Sister.
Posted by: Monty Byrne at November 30, 2011 07:24 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is cat piss at November 30, 2011 07:25 AM (SH3gZ)
Lawyer accused of seeking secretary 'with benefits' gets one-year suspension
Isn’t that really an ‘escort’ and (if I remember how much Elliot Spitzer paid) isn’t that about $4000 an hour?
Posted by: CUS at November 30, 2011 07:27 AM (84pE9)
I drove from Western Colorado to Olympia Washington last week and was amazed at the number of windmills that I saw, most of them not turning. I guess wind is racist.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 30, 2011 07:27 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Lefty Hussein McMoonbat at November 30, 2011 07:27 AM (2jQGY)
Didn't think it was. But it's interesting you felt compelled to offer up that information *snicker*
Posted by: laceyunderalls at November 30, 2011 07:27 AM (pLTLS)
None of this should have been a surprise to anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of how markets work. Any product -- and I mean any product, good or service -- that can be made and sold profitably, will be made and sold profitably. This is the work of the "invisible hand" that Adam Smith understood, oh, about 235 years ago. Any product -- and I mean any product, good or service -- that requires a subsidy in order to be made and sold profitably is, by definition, not something that can be made and sold profitably absent the subsidy. To put it simply for our liberal friends, if it's a good product, it's already being developed and sold without government subsidies. If it needs subsidies, it's a bad product to begin with. Solar panels are self-evidently a bad product.
The problem with crony capitalism and the steering of subsidies to favored industries is that it's all crony and no capitalism. It's not a question of the government being unable to consistently pick winners; it's really an axiom that government can only pick losers, because the winners would already be winning without the subsidy.
Unless by "winning" you mean getting rich by stealing money from taxpayers.
Posted by: The Regular Guy at November 30, 2011 07:27 AM (qHCyt)
POTUS stimulus investment strategy:
Green energy - bomb
Small Pox vaccine - huh?
Unicorns and sparkles - next
Posted by: dblwmy at November 30, 2011 07:28 AM (BvTwT)
Solar Energy economics.
The impregnable Maginot Line
Bernie Madoff's investing acumen
Enron's profits
Phar-Mor's inventory
Sunbeam's recovery
Chevy Volt's sales success
Reality.
One of these things is not like the others.
Posted by: Count de Monet at November 30, 2011 07:29 AM (4q5tP)
*chuckle*
Lesse', start with the energy output of one yard of the sun (we'll call that "lot's") and then we divide "lots" by 93000000mi squared equals, diddly-squat.
Wait, forgot to factor by like units.
(How many yards in a mile again?...)
Posted by: The Inverse-square law at November 30, 2011 07:29 AM (WDySP)
Won't help you. But at least it will sound good. So there's that.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk
I remember having to defend the 5% unemployment figure during the Bush presidency.
Posted by: Dang at November 30, 2011 07:29 AM (BbX1b)
When I saw that hash string in your name, my first instinct was to skip over it.
Posted by: fluffy at November 30, 2011 07:30 AM (4Kl5M)
Hey, the guy in Birdemic got $10 million to fund his company producing slrpnnls in the first week! (You have to have heard the Rifftrax commentary on how the "actor's" garbled enunciation.)
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at November 30, 2011 07:31 AM (2kVso)
Posted by: auscolpyr at November 30, 2011 07:32 AM (+KmL5)
One of my best students.
Posted by: Lesko! at November 30, 2011 07:32 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Dang at November 30, 2011 11:29 AM (BbX1b)
Dang and video of the homeless.
I wonder where all the homeless went, with this great economy I'm sure every soul is warm and fed in their comfy homes.
Posted by: willow at November 30, 2011 07:34 AM (h+qn8)
For all of our infrastructure problems, the wind-farms in West Texas really are doing very well. It would be nice if we had the money to spend on creating a major energy pipeline from the West (where it can be generated, but isn't needed) to the East (where it can't be reliably generated, but is needed).
That said- it works in West Texas because they just get that much wind, and no one was using that land anyway.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 11:18 AM (8y9MW)
-------
Uh no, sorry - try again. Neither Wind or Solar comes close to the efficiency of fossil fuels......and won't for at least a century or two - the technology just isn't there. I can't speak to west Texas, but the wind farms here in Oklahoma are affordable simply because the power companies that build them receive generous federal subsidies. And, even with the subsidies, we get far less than 1% of our energy from wind - and this is with several thousand wind turbines in place and operating. It's a waste of time and money.
Posted by: Racist, Right-Wing Terrorist in Midwest...Or Tea Party Member for Short at November 30, 2011 07:35 AM (YUwuZ)
I wonder where all the homeless went, with this great economy I'm sure every soul is warm and fed in their comfy homes.
Posted by: willow at November 30, 2011 11:34 AM (h+qn
They're all at OWS.
Posted by: CUS at November 30, 2011 07:35 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at November 30, 2011 07:36 AM (UlUS4)
Pay money to lose money.
So much nuance makes my head hurt.
Posted by: Dang at November 30, 2011 07:36 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: Barky O'Genius, Business Analyst Extraordinaire at November 30, 2011 07:36 AM (yQwq5)
Posted by: I am the 99% at November 30, 2011 07:37 AM (iZ6bV)
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 30, 2011 07:38 AM (Hx5uv)
Sarah Palin LINK
Excerpt:
Sarah Palin, still a paid commentator I believe for Fox, should go direct on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s show — he the honest, courageous dean of free comment today — and say this: “I am thinking of entering the Republican primary campaign.”
See what happens.
Posted by: mrp at November 30, 2011 07:38 AM (HjPtV)
That's right, you can't speak to West Texas (pedantry break: a direction is a Proper Noun). I have very close ties (most of my family) to that area, and they pay a great deal of attention (because they had to have a bond election to get one of the wind-farms set up). They know what kind of money is coming in, and what kind of production those farms get.
I know they don't work everywhere, and I know they're inefficient from a land use standpoint. In West Texas, they do work, and no one was using that particular land, anyway- so any use is more efficient than no use.
I'm not suggesting we further subsidize "green energy," I'm pointing out that there are some (very few) cases where it does work.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:39 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at November 30, 2011 07:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Fire with Fire at November 30, 2011 07:39 AM (lcwvr)
And robots that sang The Internationale.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 30, 2011 07:39 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Fire with Fire at November 30, 2011 07:40 AM (lcwvr)
We have 500 years of natural gas supply (it closed at $2.81/mcf
yesterday) at current known reserves and nuclear energy is the cleanest,
safest way to generate electricity. New designs of coal fired plants
approach the air quality of natural gas. But try to get a new plant, of
any design, permitted.
We are going to bankrupt the coal industry
Posted by: Sherrif Joe at November 30, 2011 07:40 AM (pdRb1)
Posted by: blaster at November 30, 2011 07:41 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Dang at November 30, 2011 07:41 AM (BbX1b)
Subsidizing green energy makes about as much sense as a Walking Dead Christmas special.
I would like that, provided I get to see Daryl in a Santa hat.
(And preferably nothing else).
*le coughie cough*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 07:41 AM (4df7R)
Was paying his wife $7000 per month as chief bookkeeper or something--even though she'd never been a bookkeeper in her life. Bought a Shelby Cobra from a NBA star.
Took a recent trip to Switzerland, seems to have had need to set up some accounts there.
As always, the "green" is not in the energy, but in the graft.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 30, 2011 07:42 AM (ycMO4)
With the price slashing under way, perhaps there will come a silver lining. Adoption. Folks sitting on the fence, waiting for panel prices to drop, may scoop up some really good deals, lowering inventories, which will drive demand, which will drive supply, and with the new price point established perhaps we will see increased adoption. This, perhaps, will give this important technology an opportunity to gain some much needed momentum, without the unseemly government subsidy. That is the objection, right, the subsidy? A conservative does not have to hate new tech, specifically solar, right? We just want things, products-services, to struggle uphill without the boost of the taxpayer rocket, right? I sure hope that is the conservative stance on this market.
Posted by: Errol at November 30, 2011 07:42 AM (vewos)
Posted by: Palerider at November 30, 2011 07:43 AM (FYUWS)
We could really use the earthy wisdom and insight of a Thorton Melon right about now:
Thorton Melon: Oh, you left out a bunch of stuff.
Dr. Phillip Barbay: Oh really? Like what for instance?
Thorton Melon: First of all you're going to have to grease the local politicians for the sudden zoning problems that always come up. Then there's the kickbacks to the carpenters, and if you plan on using any cement in this building I'm sure the teamsters would like to have a little chat with ya, and that'll cost ya. Oh and don't forget a little something for the building inspectors. Then there's long term costs such as waste disposal. I don't know if you're familiar with who runs that business but I assure you it's not the boyscouts.
Dr. Phillip Barbay: That will be quite enough, Mr. Melon! Maybe bribes, kickbacks and Mafia payoffs are how YOU do business! But they are NOT part of the legitimate business world! And they are certainly not part of anything I am doing in this class. Do I make myself clear, Mr. Melon!
Dr. Phillip Barbay: ...now, not withstanding Mr. Melon's input. The next question for us is where to build our factory?
Thorton Melon: how 'bout fantasyland?
Posted by: Count de Monet at November 30, 2011 07:43 AM (4q5tP)
I saw a rebroadcast of an interview with him made on the fiftieth anniversary of Hayek's Road to Serfdom; i.e., around 1994 shortly after the USSR went Solyndra. He said that now, that is, then, everybody knew that socialism was a failure. Milty, you were a smart guy but you blew that one.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 30, 2011 07:44 AM (Hx5uv)
There's one of those companies in my area: they claim "100% Green Energy!" or something like that. They show up at local fairs and such. Out of deference to my wife, I resist the urge to go up to them and make them look like fools.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:44 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Schwalbe : The Me-262© at November 30, 2011 07:44 AM (UU0OF)
A Christmas special. Hmmm.
Posted by: George Lucas at November 30, 2011 07:45 AM (yQwq5)
So a couple of nights ago while I was walking around the darkening neighborhood trying to cast off my PMS it dawned on me that the family (3 guys at home right now) were going to want dinner (this comes as a surprise to me at least 4 times a week). I had cooked a lot for them over thanksgiving, but no, they still want to eat. I didn't have anything so I decided to race to the grocery and buy a meal.
I flew around the store, got ingrediants and beef and got in line. There of course was a problem (because I was in that line, never fails) with some woman's coupon. Got that solved and the next broad moves up.
She's emaciated. She has a plastic box of organic greens, a 4 pack of brown eggs, a single zucchini, a single sweet potato, a single banana, a single pear, etc. Some other organic crap too and organic skim milk. She lets them load everything into plastic bags and only then reminds them that she wants it all in her Public Television ecoli ridden tote bags. They unpack everything and repack it so it can, without plastic, get as much ecoli exposure as possible.
I'm making shooting myself in my temple gestures to the other checkers. I will never again get behind the "personal" bag people. The checkers tell me how gross they are and how they've started wearing latex gloves for that reason.
Green my ass.
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 07:45 AM (I4h50)
Green Energy Economics 101
Green Energy is unreliable. The Wind only blows sometimes, and the Solar does not work at night... sooo...
You must also have more traditional methods of supplying energy for when those Green technologies do not provide energy. This means you MUST pay for the production facilities for that energy...
So, you CAN save on Fuel costs for the traditional plants... however...
Until the savings for Fuel exceed the cost of Contructing the Solar Plants/ Windmills, AND Transmission lines to get the energy where it needs to be???? Its a net Global LOSS to the Economy.
So, we are subsidizing, with Tax dollars, a technology which is a Net Loss to the overall economy... and then the Government wonders why the Economy is tanking???
Posted by: Romeo13 at November 30, 2011 07:46 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: The Inverse-square law at November 30, 2011 11:29 AM (WDySP)
Not only that, but because of various environmental factors (*ahem* dust and another particulates), the amount of sunlight that reaches the Earth's surface is even more diluted during transit from space to the ground.
This analogy is apt in describing the futility of utilizing solar panels as a major source of energy. There are tons and tons of gold and other valuable metals in dem seas, but because their concentrations are so slow and it would be tremendously expensive to obtain these metals, it would not be worth the effort to start mining the seas extensively with current technologies.
It might be feasible to one day harvest solar energy from satellites, but again there are enormous hurdles (transmission and such) to overcome before that is economically feasible.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2011 07:46 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is cat piss at November 30, 2011 07:46 AM (SH3gZ)
If AGW really existed and was a "crisis," Sec. Chu would just buy all those solar panels and distribute them to use for free.
But no...
Posted by: Taxpayer at November 30, 2011 07:47 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney
Same here, brother.
Posted by: Dang at November 30, 2011 07:47 AM (BbX1b)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:47 AM (8y9MW)
Someone please explain something to me.
"Green" energy is the "future," but green energy cannot produce enough energy to meet our needs. It must be supplemented with traditional fossil fuels if it's to have any feasibility whatsoever.
"Electric cars" are the "green" option for feelgoodhopey liberals who want people to like them. Electric cars need to be recharged. This uses energy.
So what do the lefties think they're doing when they plug in their Chevy Volts for the night (provided they haven't gone up in a fireball during the day)? Do they think the electricity that powers their little deathboxes is being generated by unicorns dancing with nymphs through fields of clover and daisies? How can they be so mind-numbingly stupid?
(That last question is rhetorical, but I have to ask anyway.)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 07:49 AM (4df7R)
When I see their stupid little tents, I do at least ask her if I can go mock them. Maybe one day she'll say "yes." Until then, my couch is not comfortable enough to make that fight worth it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:49 AM (8y9MW)
Obama is a Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure.
Posted by: © Sponge at November 30, 2011 07:50 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is at November 30, 2011 11:20 AM (SH3gZ)
Yes, it's on the shelf next to the carburetor that can get 80 mile per gallon.
Just above the engine that burns water.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 30, 2011 07:50 AM (ycMO4)
Yes.
How can they be so mind-numbingly stupid?
You realize that the difference between being stupid and being "dumb" is that you choose to be stupid, yes?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:51 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: notropis at November 30, 2011 07:51 AM (Ca1QE)
That's right, you can't speak to West Texas (pedantry break: a direction is a Proper Noun). I have very close ties (most of my family) to that area, and they pay a great deal of attention (because they had to have a bond election to get one of the wind-farms set up). They know what kind of money is coming in, and what kind of production those farms get.
I know they don't work everywhere, and I know they're inefficient from a land use standpoint. In West Texas, they do work, and no one was using that particular land, anyway- so any use is more efficient than no use.
I'm not suggesting we further subsidize "green energy," I'm pointing out that there are some (very few) cases where it does work.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 11:39 AM (8y9MW)
----
Again, I'm not aware of what outside subsidies they may be receiving, but without "free money" there simply is no valid business case for wind energy ANYWHERE. If you look at the initial expenditures and long-term maintenance costs, they simply make no sense. There is no magic involved - it's simple physics.
Now, it is true that if wind energy made sense anywhere (it doesn't) it would make sense in west Texas. There is a swath of area in North America beginning about in central Oklahoma and running west to the desert where there is consistent wind year-round. However, again, physics and real-world costs get in the way of making it efficient and worth-while.
Posted by: Racist, Right-Wing Terrorist in Midwest...Or Tea Party Member for Short at November 30, 2011 07:51 AM (YUwuZ)
Posted by: maddogg at November 30, 2011 07:51 AM (OlN4e)
I was in a focus group where they wanted to know if I were more likely to shop in a store that was "powered with green energy".
"Like what?"
"Wind, solar, and other renewable energies?"
"Where would this store get wind energy? There aren't any local windmills."
"Ok, then solar and other renewables."
"I don't want my groceries being cooled by solar power since it is not reliable and I don't want to be poisoned."
"Well, it would be backed up and there would be other renewables."
"You keep saying other renewables, do you mean nuclear?"
"Oh, no!"
"What then?"
"I don't know, batteries?"
"Those are chemicals, that's not green, where is the power coming from that you put in the batteries? Did you know most of those chemicals come from china?"
" You know what we mean."
"Yeah, I know, but you don't. There are NO AFFORDABLE alternative sources of energy. The only viable sources are coal, hydroelectric if local, nuclear and other fossil fuels."
I screwed up their focus group
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 07:54 AM (I4h50)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 07:55 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The Swimmer's Pickled Liver Speaking From The Grave at November 30, 2011 07:56 AM (+hIci)
That's why you refer to the Volt as 'Coal-Powered'. Makes heads explode.
We just want things, products-services, to struggle uphill without the boost of the taxpayer rocket, right? I sure hope that is the conservative stance on this market.
Posted by: Errol at November 30, 2011 11:42 AM (vewos)
No Errol. Since we're paying for it, we just want the product to work. As it stands now and in the foreseeable future, solar does not.
Posted by: CUS at November 30, 2011 07:56 AM (84pE9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl..(oZfic) is at November 30, 2011 11:20 AM (SH3gZ)
Yes, it's on the shelf next to the carburetor that can get 80 mile per gallon.
Just above the engine that burns water.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 30, 2011 11:50 AM (ycMO4)
All those miracle devices and more can be found in the JC Whitney catalog. Operators are standing by ...
Posted by: Count de Monet at November 30, 2011 07:56 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: Johnnyreb at November 30, 2011 07:57 AM (NNrYJ)
That one, I would watch. It would be... historic, or maybe hysterical.
Posted by: Bob Saget at November 30, 2011 07:58 AM (SDkq3)
I screwed up their focus group
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 11:54 AM (I4h50)
You probably guaranteed a place for yourself in heaven.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJconservative) at November 30, 2011 07:58 AM (nEUpB)
Posted by: Rick Perry at November 30, 2011 07:58 AM (LNRLz)
Posted by: Fritz at November 30, 2011 11:24 AM (/ZZCn)
Is that with or without the spontaneous combustion?
Posted by: © Sponge at November 30, 2011 07:59 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 11:51 AM (8y9MW)
Well, yes. But I did say that question was rhetorical.
I've gotta say, I'm really looking forward to the days of unsolicited rolling blackouts up here in New England. Especially during the winter. Oooh, that'll be SO MUCH FUN.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:00 AM (4df7R)
My smart son who is no libtard didn't have the first clue where electricity comes from when we had this discussion the other day. I think he vaguely thought it was produced by lightening.
Apparently he's been ignoring my rants for over a decade. Probably a good thing really.
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 08:00 AM (I4h50)
So, how long till a post on your new blog?
Posted by: © Sponge at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (UK9cE)
They'll make it up on volume!
BUY BUY BUY !!!!
Posted by: Jim Cramer at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (7hwUm)
I screwed up their focus group
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 11:54 AM (I4h50)
and how!
kudos
Posted by: Count de Monet at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (4q5tP)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at November 30, 2011 08:01 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Rex the Wonder God at November 30, 2011 08:02 AM (vahvH)
Posted by: Matt Damon at November 30, 2011 08:02 AM (8ieXv)
Probably tonight. I might get a chance this afternoon, but it'll probably be this evening. I'm going to aim for Sunday and Wednesday evenings (so they'll be up for Monday and Thursday).
I still need to set up a twitter feed for that email address, too.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:03 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 12:01 PM (8y9MW)
When would someone ask for the government to tax them more?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:03 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:04 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: maddogg at November 30, 2011 12:01 PM (OlN4e)
By gum, it's so crazy it JUST MIGHT WORK.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:04 AM (4df7R)
When they're lying?
Or when they're really, really principled.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:05 AM (4df7R)
Gird your loins.
Posted by: PJ at November 30, 2011 08:05 AM (DQHjw)
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 08:06 AM (I4h50)
I for one am looking forward to the impending energy crisis. While ya'll were buying stocks in solar power companies, I've been hoarding Snuggies.
Cha-CHING!!
Posted by: dananjcon at November 30, 2011 08:06 AM (8ieXv)
"Ya know, this actually works! Been doing for quite a while now.
Folks used to really like it." *walks away, shaking head*
Posted by: The Earth at November 30, 2011 08:06 AM (BbX1b)
When they're lying?
Or when they're really, really principled.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 12:05 PM (8y9MW)
EXACTLY.
Or when they're lying about being really, really principled, and then go and use their tax breaks anyway. I'm looking at YOU, Hollywood.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:06 AM (4df7R)
Here's a clip where they test how far someone will go to sort their trash to recycle.
Gawd, it is all a stupid scam.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 30, 2011 08:07 AM (ycMO4)
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 11:54 AM (I4h50)
Dagny, you reminded me of my conversation over dinner at a big birthday party. I sat down with 6-8 young'uns near the pool and listened to two still in college, two just out, a 40ish couple talking about going to work for the World Bank or another do-gooder organization. Then the talk turned to the pipeline to bring Alberta tar sand oil to Texas for refining. The runner was bemoaning the air quality decline that was sure to result and sighed "I wish we could just outlaw petroleum."
I couldn't take any more and asked if she was prepared to give up the plastic water bottle from which she was drinking. Answer: Yep! Did she and Don walk to Rolf's house that night or drive their car? Drove. Was she prepared to give up all the medicine made from petroleum and accept that she might die at age 45 of infection? Unsure. The 6 billion people in the world were nourished by the fertilizer that made the crops grow. Are you prepared to have half, 3 billion people, die of famine?
They got up and left.
Posted by: Texas Secession, For the Children at November 30, 2011 08:07 AM (OBDWE)
Now, it is true that if wind energy made sense anywhere (it doesn't) it would make sense in west Texas. There is a swath of area in North America beginning about in central Oklahoma and running west to the desert where there is consistent wind year-round. However, again, physics and real-world costs get in the way of making it efficient and worth-while.
Posted by: Racist, Right-Wing Terrorist in Midwest...Or Tea Party Member for Short at November 30, 2011 11:51 AM (YUwuZ)
They intersperse the windmills between the oil wells in West Texas. Efficient use of otherwise wasted land.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at November 30, 2011 08:08 AM (hsIYw)
There's a reason that the label 'Green' is also associated with mold and rotting.
And envy. Don't forget envy.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at November 30, 2011 08:08 AM (LyOUH)
Just like the happy meal thing.
Just like everything libs do - double down on the stupid.
It's like sticking your hand into a flame.
You burn your hand.
A conservative would stop sticking his hand into the flame.
A liberal will try tying a towel around his hand and stick it into the flame.
Then, when the towel catches on fire and their hand burns even worse, the liberal tries tying another towel around that one. Only now, it's harder to take the burning towels off of your hand and then their arm gets burned too. So the response is to wrap another towel around that one. Then their face gets burned. And so on. And so on.
Posted by: I can see my house from here at November 30, 2011 08:09 AM (Qxdfp)
Posted by: blaster at November 30, 2011 08:10 AM (Fw2Gg)
Posted by: Miss'80s at November 30, 2011 08:10 AM (d6QMz)
The temperature delta is there, but it is impractical to drill down to get it; you are limited by the size of the pipe as to how much energy you can extract that way.
Imagine a hydroelectric plant only instead of a Dam and a river somebody tried to run it with a garden hose - you can only spin a very small generator that way.
Posted by: An Observation at November 30, 2011 08:11 AM (ylhEn)
And envy. Don't forget envy.
Meh.... and a whole gaggle of tree huggers can be classified as gang green.
**rimshot**
Posted by: fixerupper at November 30, 2011 08:13 AM (C8hzL)
So the F and F whistleblowers basically get demoted, the higher ups basically get promoted and the OdipO administration seals the records in the Brian Terry murder.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at November 30, 2011 08:15 AM (JYheX)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at November 30, 2011 08:18 AM (4df7R)
It's deja vu all over again
Posted by: Spain at November 30, 2011 08:18 AM (ZtwUX)
Posted by: dananjcon at November 30, 2011 08:18 AM (8ieXv)
Thanks for the heads up. Tipton is close enough for me to drive to when they eventually go bust. The going out of business sale will hopefully have units I could afford.
Posted by: GrumpyUnk at November 30, 2011 08:21 AM (8HStJ)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at November 30, 2011 08:22 AM (7hwUm)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 30, 2011 12:19 PM (tqwMN)
Pfft. http://tinyurl.com/7ftsae9
nsfw..kinda
Posted by: Christina Hendricks at November 30, 2011 08:22 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Slow Joe Biden at November 30, 2011 08:24 AM (DrWcr)
The Obama Administration has abruptly sealed court records containing alarming details of how Mexican drug smugglers murdered a U.S. Border patrol agent with a gun connected to a failed federal experiment that allowed firearms to be smuggled into Mexico.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at November 30, 2011 08:24 AM (Qxdfp)
RUSSIA has threatened to cut off the only alternative US and NATO supply route into Afghanistan, raising the possibility that 130,000 coalition troops, including Australians, could be left isolated.
The threat by Russia's NATO envoy Dmitri Rogozin to protest against plans for a ballistic missile defence system in Europe capitalises on the row with Pakistan, which closed its borders to NATO trucks this week after a deadly attack on two military bases.
Posted by: Jared Loughner at November 30, 2011 08:24 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:24 AM (8y9MW)
The greeting on the celebration of Obama's birthday will be, "Faith in Government."
And you will respond with, "And in all those in Washington Capital City."
Posted by: Soothsayer 2021 at November 30, 2011 08:25 AM (sqkOB)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 30, 2011 08:26 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: MayBee at November 30, 2011 08:26 AM (PLixr)
Watergate didn't have a body count.
Posted by: Soothsayer 2021 at November 30, 2011 12:25 PM (sqkOB)
Have you read The Hunger Games, by chance?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: notropis at November 30, 2011 11:51 AM
Prices have never been lower, come on down !!!
Posted by: Crazy Eddie's 8-track store at November 30, 2011 08:27 AM (Y+DPZ)
_________
It's similarly annoying when my checkbook doesn't stay balanced and the bills don't remain paid.
Sigh.
Posted by: Anachronda at November 30, 2011 08:28 AM (xGZ+b)
Those quotes could have been pulled directly from it.
It's actually a better book than I feared it would be. Which means I have no hope for the movie that is slated to come out.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:28 AM (8y9MW)
To obtain 1 oz of gold from the sea one has to discard $50,000 worth of salt. Bottom line - nobody is ever going to mine metals from the sea.
Posted by: An Observation at November 30, 2011 08:28 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at November 30, 2011 08:30 AM (qndXR)
Sorta O/T: The inconvenient truth about photosynthesis.
Japanese Satellites say 3rd World Owes CO2 Reparations to The West
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at November 30, 2011 08:31 AM (5kPex)
Posted by: Government Advisers at November 30, 2011 08:32 AM (GTbGH)
Bottom line - nobody is ever going to mine metals from the sea.
I heard that on the deep ocean floors there are huge nodules of precious metals that just need to be scooped up...or maybe I'm on dope.
Posted by: model_1066 at November 30, 2011 08:33 AM (YbQJm)
Heh.
After having read it, I wonder if Liberals (who love the book), just completely lack the introspection necessary to realize it's pointing out what a bad plan their ideal government is. Or if they've really deluded themselves into thinking that's what Conservatives want to set up.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) says 'No' to RINO Romney at November 30, 2011 08:33 AM (8y9MW)
Apparently he's been ignoring my rants for over a decade. Probably a good thing really.
_________
Dagny's son in the distant future:
"It's times like this that I wish I had listened to what my mother said."
"Why? What did she say?"
"I don't know. I wasn't listening."
Posted by: Anachronda at November 30, 2011 08:33 AM (xGZ+b)
Can you imagine passing others on the street and saying to each other, "Faith in Government?"
I can.
Posted by: Soothsayer 2021 at November 30, 2011 08:33 AM (sqkOB)
ChadPergram Chad Pergram House now debating resolution to name a room in the Capitol Visitor's Center after slain Giffords' aide Gabe Zimmerman.
Posted by: Tami at November 30, 2011 08:35 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: model_1066 at November 30, 2011 08:35 AM (YbQJm)
hey for us grouchy guys, cant there be some peace thread of sorts?
*gets angry looks from morons who now think i'm a hippie spy*
Posted by: AuthorLMendez Wants Trolls Trolled & Co-Bloggers Less Arrogant at November 30, 2011 08:35 AM (3XDPM)
The first thing leftists throw out of the equation: supply and demand. Much better for the left-winger to impose their will, hit up the tax payer, then watch it burn without consequence. Then again, as we know, leftists use emotion, feelings, bad faith (corrupt science) and communist theory as the backbone of their understanding of economics and how the world works.
Solid economic theory is an absolutely foreign concept to the left. Hence: Krugman.
Posted by: ecd at November 30, 2011 08:35 AM (O7ksG)
Any product -- and I mean any product, good or service -- that can be made and sold profitably, will be made and sold profitably.
Bending over backwards to be fair to our sinister friends (don't dare bend over forwards around them), this needs the qualifier "that people perceive" before "can be made and sold profitably." In principle, government could perceive a profitable opportunity before the market (stop laughing) and induce the market to pursue it.
In practice, however, the chances that a GS-13 time server will be a shrewder judge of investment opportunities than a VC standing to make millions are about the same as a T-ball team winning the World Series.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 30, 2011 08:36 AM (SKzd9)
Posted by: model_1066 at November 30, 2011 08:39 AM (YbQJm)
To obtain 1 oz of gold from the sea one has to discard $50,000 worth of salt. Bottom line - nobody is ever going to mine metals from the sea.
Researchers have tried to extract gold from sea water through use of ion exchange resins specifically-designed to select for heavy metals. The problem? Running a few cubic kilometers of sea water through them - i.e., a volume necessary to get any decent amount of gold - dissolves the ion exchange resin. The resin isn't water soluble by ordinary standards, but when you're talking about cubic kilometers of water, everything is water soluble.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 30, 2011 08:41 AM (SKzd9)
May the Blessings of the Bomb Almighty, and the Fellowship of the Holy Fallout, descend upon us all. This day and forever more.
Amen!
Posted by: Beneath the Planet of the Apes at November 30, 2011 08:42 AM (4q5tP)
Can you imagine passing others on the street and saying to each other, "Faith in Government?"
I can.
Posted by: Soothsayer 2021 at November 30, 2011 12:33 PM (sqkOB)
How about:
[holds out a penny] Christmas Eve.
Posted by: Not This August - CM Kornbluth at November 30, 2011 08:46 AM (4q5tP)
Dagny's son in the distant future:
"It's times like this that I wish I had listened to what my mother said."
"Why? What did she say?"
"I don't know. I wasn't listening."
Posted by: Anachronda at November 30, 2011 12:33 PM (xGZ+b)
I think they can remember most things before the hormones kick in. After that it's hard to grasp concepts because they keep getting interrupted by the thought *boobies*.
Another son's little catholic school used to have pizza and soda day once per month. We paid at the beginning of the year for them to get 1-2 slices of pizza and 1-2 cups of soda 1 (one) just ONE day per month. This year, they said they would still have pizza but no soda. Milk or water would be served. My 2nd grader wanted to know why. (I don't buy soda here at home so this was the only soda he was getting). I told him that there were parents who decided it was unhealthy. He asked why those children couldn't just have milk then and why his was taken away. I then got the chance to describe 1. Liberals 2. Statists 3. Democrats 4. Obama
This lesson will stick because he's listening and hasn't thought about boobies yet.
Posted by: dagny at November 30, 2011 08:46 AM (I4h50)
Festival !!!!
Posted by: Occupy Beta III at November 30, 2011 08:48 AM (Y+DPZ)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2011 08:56 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2011 08:58 AM (WkuV6)
dagny, my first grader asked why a restaurant closed, her 2nd grade brother answered Obama before I could chime in.
On our family trip to Western NC last summer my 2nd grader wanted to go to Asheville and find a hippie to punch.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at November 30, 2011 09:04 AM (JxMoP)
A year ago solar panels were selling for $1.50 to $2 per watt, said Ramesh Misra, a senior analyst at Brigantine Advisors, a research outfit. Now they sell for half that, and the decline hasn't stopped.
Where?
Posted by: rickb223 at November 30, 2011 09:05 AM (zji3t)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2011 09:18 AM (WkuV6)
The most cost effective way to use solar power is to let crops convert it to energy. Then let the plants build up for 100,000 years and compress. Then dig the plants up and burn them. We could call the resulting resource coal or something.
You just jostled loose a memory from my childhood that I had long forgotten. Back in the very early '90s, my junior high "Earth Sciences" teacher was going through the unit on "non-renewable" resources versus "renewable" resources. Non-renewable being filthy evil fossil fuels, and technically, nuclear (since we can't make more uranium), and renewable being everything else. Yes, the indoctrination of how awesome those prototype solar panels could someday be had already begun.
Knowing full-well the answer, I raised my hand and asked where fossil fuels came from again.
Teacher: "Dinosaurs and plant matter from hundreds of thousands of years ago, which have decayed."
Me: "Don't plants still die and decay now? Seems like that should be considered a renewable resource."
Teacher: "...well, we...uhm...uh, use it up considerably faster than any could possibly be created..."
Me: "How quickly we use it isn't part of the definition you just gave us, though. Nonrenewable meant we don't get any more of it, renewable meant more can be created."
Teacher: "...*sigh*...see me after class."
Girl I Secretly Liked: "Man, what a nerd!"
Entire Class: *laughter*
My Heart: *cumpling sounds similar to when you ball up a sheet of paper*
...wait, where was I going with this...?
Posted by: reason at November 30, 2011 09:20 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2011 12:58 PM (WkuV6)
Love it!
Posted by: Insomniac at November 30, 2011 09:27 AM (DrWcr)
________
Oddly enough, I can sympathize with your son...
Posted by: Anachronda at November 30, 2011 09:32 AM (FzhYM)
Wood pellet stove.
Wood. Pellet. Wood-pellets.
I'm sorry. These are different from "logs" how, exactly?
Posted by: reason at November 30, 2011 09:36 AM (+hPIb)
@224, 236 - Yeah, unfortunately, we never revert back to "listening" mode. Granted, we get better at pretending to listen, but that's really about it.
Posted by: reason at November 30, 2011 09:38 AM (+hPIb)
The threat by Russia's NATO envoy Dmitri Rogozin to protest against plans for a ballistic missile defence system in Europe capitalises on the row with Pakistan, which closed its borders to NATO trucks this week after a deadly attack on two military bases.
Posted by: Jared Loughner at November 30, 2011 12:24 PM (e8kgV)
Yes, selling out Georgia was just the down payment for those supply lines...
What? you think we had a Deal? Be thankful we do not alter it further....
Posted by: Darth Puttin at November 30, 2011 09:40 AM (NtXW4)
Uniformity I think. Which means the furnace can be mechanically fed from a hopper.
Posted by: toby928 at November 30, 2011 11:25 AM (IfkGz)
Posted by: steevy at November 30, 2011 01:32 PM (7WJOC)
Posted by: JonathanG at November 30, 2011 03:35 PM (11H3F)
Posted by: JonathanG at November 30, 2011 04:14 PM (11H3F)
Posted by: Fate’s Edge ePub at November 30, 2011 05:04 PM (vaJa6)
Posted by: Hedy’s Folly iBooks at November 30, 2011 05:46 PM (vaobd)
Posted by: Will I Ever Be Good Enough AudioBook at November 30, 2011 06:03 PM (mLPSm)
Posted by: December 1941 ePub at November 30, 2011 10:33 PM (5FOUx)
pdf to word transfer
Posted by: nanonu at November 30, 2011 11:01 PM (vzqIo)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2752 seconds, 355 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: fluffy at November 30, 2011 07:05 AM (4Kl5M)