July 21, 2011
— Ace I'm having trouble understanding this -- I think the guy did try to inform the officer he was armed, but the officer kept barking at him to shut up. When he finally did make his voice heard about the gun, the cop goes bananas with threats, demanding to know why the guy didn't tell him about the gun.
He seems to have been pulled over for picking up a prostitute on the street.
Here's my question: Is it, or is it not, standard police procedure to ask "Are you armed?" as one of the first questions (if not the first) at a stop? I believe it is.
So why didn't this idiot cop ask that? It's true that the law requires the license holder to announce he has a gun. He seems to have tried, but Officer Steroids ignored that.
But even if the cop didn't hear the guy attempting to tell him, why did the cop not ask the SOP question?
The cop goes berserk over the presence of a weapon on his subject after he learns of it, but apparently didn't care enough about that possibility to ask about it before that.
Captain Ed discusses the various laws one can have about announcing that one is armed. How about the simplest solution: The cop should ask, as they usually do.
Meanwhile, a conniption alert for the NYT, as they get pictures of a Knob Creek, KY., shooting event.
Posted by: Ace at
12:45 PM
| Comments (145)
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 12:47 PM (8y9MW)
it looks like after they have the suspect in the back of the car, while the cop is talking to the other cop, he knows he f*cked up big time and he's trying to convince himself that he did the right thing.
I've seen people do this a lot. When they realize they f*cked up they then talk to someone else and repeat the whole incident from their point of view, but in the back of their mind they know they are so screwed.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 12:48 PM (wuv1c)
I've been pulled over twice since getting my CHL. Both times I gave the officer my drivers license and my CHL. The next question was "are you armed?", answer "yes", and then I was asked "where?" and I answered (first time center console, second time shoulder holster).
And that was it. We went on to discuss whatever is was I was pulled over for. They didn't ask to see the weapon, didn't ask me to hand it over.
...
I haven't been stopped for pickin up a hooker.
Yet.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 21, 2011 12:48 PM (WvXvd)
Posted by: Central Services at July 21, 2011 12:48 PM (GTbGH)
Also, I'm not a cop, but when you pull someone over with the intent to arrest them, shouldn't dealing with the driver be the first thing on your list?
It seems dangerous to me that you would leave a potential perp in control of a 3000 ton vehicle that can be used as a weapon or for a speedy getaway.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 12:49 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ken at July 21, 2011 12:49 PM (fFh95)
Posted by: Mr. Furious at July 21, 2011 12:49 PM (8Z34F)
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 12:50 PM (5H6zj)
Damn, I bet that thing gets, what, 8 miles to the gallon? Better keep those tires inflated!
Posted by: Barry the Munificent, your Philosopher King at July 21, 2011 12:51 PM (2PTT7)
Posted by: hooker tied up in DiT's trunk at July 21, 2011 12:51 PM (4Kl5M)
also, you can hear at the end of the video dispatch telling them that he has a CCL. Maybe they should have waited for that information before getting out of the car.
And while beserk may be a fitting description, i think the death threat is pretty serious
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 12:51 PM (wuv1c)
I've never been braced by a cop while carrying, but my instructor's advice seems sound.
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 12:52 PM (/0a60)
Ace, I don't think that is any kind of a standard question to ask a driver (except maybe in NY); in MS, it is legal to carry a gun in your car with no permit. Your vehicle is considered an extension of your home. Standard legal disclaimer applies here in that I'm no lawyer yada yada check with your po po department.
Something else that disturbed me in this video was the vehicle search. At no time did I see the police request permission to search; without permission you need a warrant. Now THAT is against the law.
So who is the law breaker here?
Posted by: GnuBreed at July 21, 2011 12:52 PM (ENKCw)
Or Roid Rage. Ever notice how bulked up the cops are lately, and how quick tempered and excitable they are?
I think if you outlawed steroids and made cops piss in the cup to keep their jobs, at least half would lose their badges
Posted by: kbdabear at July 21, 2011 12:52 PM (so1xa)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 12:52 PM (8y9MW)
(in Poindexter voice)
Ummm, what he had was actually a sidearm, not that you would know that.
(/sarcastic Poindexter voice)
Posted by: gun dick at July 21, 2011 12:52 PM (UaxA0)
3000 ton vehicle? Dude...
Ben recently acquired the vehicle that tows the space shuttle to the launch pad.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 12:53 PM (I2bQp)
Posted by: Officer 'Would You Like Fries With That', Camden PD (Ret) at July 21, 2011 12:53 PM (2PTT7)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at July 21, 2011 12:53 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Some open carry retard at July 21, 2011 12:54 PM (VmAoa)
I just wish that our libertarian martyrs didn't have to be skeevy men picking up hookers in Canton late at night.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 12:54 PM (wuv1c)
Posted by: The Shoveler at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (YmPwQ)
It would help if we never had to say, "With friends like these..."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (8y9MW)
It seems dangerous to me that you would leave a potential perp in control of a 3000 ton vehicle that can be used as a weapon or for a speedy getaway.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 04:49 PMDid the cop pull over a submarine?
Posted by: kbdabear at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (so1xa)
Don't worry, you've got me!
Posted by: Congressman Doctor Ron Paul! at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (2PTT7)
I just wish that our libertarian martyrs didn't have to be skeevy men picking up hookers in Canton late at night.
Maybe he just wanted to use the carpool lane?
Posted by: Larry David at July 21, 2011 12:55 PM (I2bQp)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 21, 2011 12:57 PM (QxSug)
Don't worry, you've got me!
Posted by: Congressman Doctor Ron Paul! at July 21, 2011 04:55 PM
---
Soon to be Former Congressman! Hooray!
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 12:57 PM (5H6zj)
It seems dangerous to me that you would leave a potential perp in control of a 3000 ton vehicle that can be used as a weapon or for a speedy getaway.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 04:49 PMDid the cop pull over a submarine?
Posted by: kbdabear at July 21, 2011 04:55 PM (so1xa)
Who's da U-Boat commander?
Posted by: The Porsche mechanic from Risky Business at July 21, 2011 12:57 PM (71Fka)
I watched this earlier today.
I respect law enforcement officers and teach my sons to do the same.
Having said that, this cop is nothing more than a punk.
Someone needs to handcuff him tightly, and then......well, I think I better stop it right there.
Posted by: Dave at July 21, 2011 12:57 PM (HPcQF)
What is a "gun dick"?
When you finish jerking off a 'gun dick', a little flag pops out with the word 'Squirt!' printed on it.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 12:58 PM (I2bQp)
3000 ton vehicle? Dude...
ha. 3000 pound.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 04:52 PMEven a 3000 pound vehicle? Shit, that's about what the smallest subcompact weighs. The cop could just kick the doors in to disable it
Posted by: kbdabear at July 21, 2011 12:58 PM (so1xa)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at July 21, 2011 12:58 PM (2PTT7)
When you finish jerking off a 'gun dick', a little flag pops out with the word 'Squirt!' printed on it.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 04:58 PM (I2bQp)
Thanks, but I swear mine says "BANG, BITCH!"
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at July 21, 2011 12:59 PM (qiOph)
Posted by: twiceblessedmom at July 21, 2011 12:59 PM (8Z34F)
But, I do not believe that the law requires you to tell an officer that you have a weapon. I believe that would be a violation of your 4th and/or 5th amendment rights.
Posted by: Scott at July 21, 2011 01:00 PM (8YE33)
Cops like this have always been around and always will be.
We're just seeing more of it with the advent of cellphone cameras and dash-video in patrol vehicles (which I think the police are beginning to realize might not have been such a hot idea).
Posted by: Dave at July 21, 2011 01:00 PM (HPcQF)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 01:01 PM (/0a60)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at July 21, 2011 01:01 PM (JKe0g)
It's an Ohio state law, like the one that demands that their residents drive like total buttholes when out of state.
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at July 21, 2011 01:02 PM (2PTT7)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 01:02 PM (QZjIq)
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 01:03 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Scott at July 21, 2011 05:00 PM (8YE33)
It is the law in Ohio. You MUST identify yourself as a permit holder and notify your status as a carrier.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 01:03 PM (I2bQp)
Posted by: Your Friendly President and His Lovely Wife at July 21, 2011 01:05 PM (lT0LC)
Picking up a hooker? That's some bible he's got there.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 01:06 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: rabidfox at July 21, 2011 01:06 PM (t+bts)
In all my years carrying with a CHL, I've been stopped 3 times and never had a problem with the LEO. I was respectful and courteous (rolled down all windows, had my DL and CHL in my hand, and both hands on the wheel when the cop came up.
Each time, I was sent on my way with a warning and one time, the LEO did not even bother to run my license.
Many Texas LEOs have told me their apprehension level goes down quite a bit when they see a Texas CHL because they know the stringent background check that is required to get it.
Posted by: TexBob at July 21, 2011 01:07 PM (7cXE7)
Oh hell no.
If you run in with a cop who's a violently psychotic Command Presence™ guy (which is just about all of them nowadays), and he doesn't think you're his kinda guy, you'll have no time or opportunity to do anything like that—except maybe blurt out "I HAVE A GUN," which is not a good idea.
My suggestion would be that if you value your life, you don't ever, under any circumstances, talk to any policeman, ever, about anything, ever. Ever. About anything. EVER. Even if he's your dad and he's asking where your emergency inhaler is while you die from an asthma attack. Because he'll find a way to ruin what's left of your life with that info.
That might seem a bit much, in certain circumstances (that I can't imagine), so, y'know...balance.
But—hell no. Your instructor's advice is extreme high-risk behavior, and he doesn't know it, because he knows the cops and vibes "cop guy," so they don't treat interactions with him the way they do the rest of us. Which is pretty much like this video.
Posted by: oblig. at July 21, 2011 01:07 PM (xvZW9)
It is the law in Utah. You must tell the officer if you are armed. It isn't, in my experience, a typical question they ask when pulling you over.
Posted by: mrshad at July 21, 2011 01:08 PM (Xqfwb)
Ben makes the big bucks. He's kind of a big deal.
Here's my question: Is it, or is it not, standard police procedure to ask "Are you armed?" as one of the first questions (if not the first) at a stop? I believe it is.
I've never been asked that.
Posted by: eleven at July 21, 2011 01:08 PM (7DB+a)
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 01:09 PM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 01:09 PM (QZjIq)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 04:47 PM (8y9MW)
That was my experience. Somebody robbed a bank I happened to be unlucky enough to be walking away from twenty minutes later. When the cops decided I might be the guy they asked "Is there anything we should know about?" as they were about to frisk me.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:10 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: stace at July 21, 2011 01:12 PM (lYlx9)
Awesome. Let's ignore the news. What's important is stroking our gun-dicks. Posted by: ace at June 15, 2011
Posted by: soothsayer at July 21, 2011 01:12 PM (G/zuv)
#68
I have personal interaction with leo organizations everyday and have for over 20 years.
I don't think corruption or nutcases on the force is any worse or any better than it was 20 years ago, but that may be a factor of geography.
Posted by: Dave at July 21, 2011 01:14 PM (HPcQF)
Ask if armed.
If yes, where?
Weapon taken.
Frisk.
Cuffs
Car.
Rights
If no:
Frisk, cuffs, car, rights.
Only my experience in Arizona and California.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:14 PM (ECjvn)
Someone popped him with a towel too often in gym class or something.
Check his crawlspace for bodies and drugs and cash.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:15 PM (ECjvn)
Try speeding more.
Posted by: buzzion at July 21, 2011 05:13 PM (oVQFe)
Maybe I should do what the Kristen Wiig character did in Bridesmaids.
Posted by: stace at July 21, 2011 01:16 PM (lYlx9)
I think if the cop asks you to get out of the car it'd be wise to inform at that point. I'd also inform that I'm going to be compliant and make my movements as deliberate and non-threatening as possible.
The cop in the vid is out of control.
Posted by: bonhomme at July 21, 2011 01:18 PM (yN8NS)
Well, I don't live on Pluto. I live on Earth, where police are generally decent guys who are trying to do a difficult job. I find in my own life that NOT being a giant dick all the time works wonders. Informing a cop that I am legally entitled to carry a firearm, and that I am, in fact, carrying a legal firearm is just good sense. I don't announce in a big voice that "I HAVE A GUN!"; I would say, calmly, "Officer, here is my Concealed Carry Permit and my driver's license. I am currently carrying a pistol."
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 01:19 PM (/0a60)
Sometime around 1990 they started training cops to be more aggressive. To take control of every interaction with the public. I understand why - things got a lot more violent in the '80s with crack and all, and as a cop you're most likely to buy it on a routine traffic stop when there's something going on that you don't know about.
But when every cop you come across treats you like a criminal whether or not he has a reason, you start to wonder if this is really a healthy thing for a society.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:21 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: EM August at July 21, 2011 01:23 PM (zeBNm)
Posted by: sandy burger at July 21, 2011 01:23 PM (USp8I)
Posted by: Anonymoose at July 21, 2011 01:23 PM (ZgvjV)
Posted by: fly at July 21, 2011 01:24 PM (GzhjM)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 05:19 PM (/0a60)
And that woman sitting in the passenger seat. She's my....uh...er...cousin from Arkansas.
Posted by: Soona at July 21, 2011 01:24 PM (zayET)
allegedly, maaaan.
Cop was just mad to see his favorite with some other guy.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:24 PM (ECjvn)
Amphetamines are a powerful drug. I think Officer Ferigno has been shopping in the evidence locker.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:25 PM (ECjvn)
in montana they always ask if you have any weapons in the vehicle.
every stop.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 05:21 PM (I2bQp)
Well, sure, but that's Montana. Every other car is a compound belonging to the Free State of Goober Creek or some such.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:25 PM (XIXhw)
Obviously my data are anecdotal, which means they are almost worthless, but I think that cops have, in general, become much more focused on their own safety and comfort zones at the expense of their connection to the real world of normal civilians.
Bad behavior has increased among cops, or it is just being reported more. Or both.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at July 21, 2011 01:26 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Soona at July 21, 2011 01:29 PM (zayET)
I was on the on the grounds at JSC this morning for the "Wheels Down" party and I hear it's for sale. Buyers will have to bring their own road.
Posted by: slug at July 21, 2011 01:29 PM (cPuUo)
Well, sure, but that's Montana.
it is typical to have a rifle and shotgun in our trucks at all times.
besides you never know when you are going to get hungry or have the opportunity to shoot a few (clay?) birds.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 01:30 PM (I2bQp)
There are assholes in every line of work.
This line of work just happens to have more ways to put the hurt on ya or kill ya.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:30 PM (ECjvn)
You are right about the .08, I am old, but the .03 is still the killer. That's one beer.
Posted by: Billy Bob, the guy who drinks in SC at July 21, 2011 05:26 PM (hXJOG)
Is that just for the license, or when you're actually carrying? I'm a bit sympathetic to the idea people who are packing ought to be in full control of their faculties.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:31 PM (XIXhw)
And that woman sitting in the passenger seat. She's my....uh...er...cousin from Arkansas.
I have cousins in Arkansas. That's not farfetched.
I know as a conservative that I'm supposed to like cops. I used to. Now, not so much. My impression is that they've (many) have been consumed by the state and are not only stupid but are corrupt as hell. Shit, here it's to their monetary advantage to charge you with as serious a crime as they can create. It's seriously f-d up. And wrong.
Posted by: dagny at July 21, 2011 01:31 PM (GnPWT)
Posted by: TXMarko at July 21, 2011 05:14 PM (5y3XA)
This is an excellent resource. I visit there often. The guy running the site tries very hard to be fair and balanced imho.
Posted by: GnuBreed at July 21, 2011 01:31 PM (ENKCw)
Posted by: dagny at July 21, 2011 05:31 PM (GnPWT)
My biggest fear when roaming the countryside, buying guitars, is running into / afoul of Law Enforcement.
Carrying large sums of cash and or valuables makes me trust them less than I want to.
Posted by: guitar buying moron at July 21, 2011 01:33 PM (I2bQp)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 01:37 PM (QZjIq)
Posted by: Phelps at July 21, 2011 01:37 PM (cWtxJ)
Posted by: Anthony Wiener at July 21, 2011 01:37 PM (7cXE7)
2 year CCW here, one time pulled over (unarmed).
I don't do ANYTHING until the cop is at my window - no touching ANYTHING - lower windows and leave hands on wheel. Hands on wheel at all times, no reaching for anything. Once the officer walks up to the window, inform and await instructions.
Cop arrives at window: "Good afternoon, officer, I have a duty to inform you that I have a CCW here in Ohio and I am [armed/unarmed]." If I am armed, I further have a duty to state where the gun is: in a holster on my person, locked in glove box, etc. There are (currently) three acceptable ways in Ohio to carry while in a vehicle.
The one time I was pulled over, I followed that exactly; having run my driver's license number, the officer (state hwy patrolman) was grateful for my reporting immediately, in spite of being unarmed... and later asked me what I typically carry (stainless steel Colt 1911 .45).
He thought I had nice taste in handguns, and wished me a nice day. Too bad the poor sap in the video encountered that knucklehead instead of the good guy I did.
Posted by: knob at July 21, 2011 01:39 PM (oOrVj)
I doubt they're any more corrupt than they've ever been. The LAPD of 60-70 years ago was as corrupt as hell. It was famous for beating confessions out of people and planting evidence.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:40 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 01:44 PM (QZjIq)
Posted by: Ellen at July 21, 2011 01:45 PM (B1FXc)
Posted by: sayyid412 at July 21, 2011 01:46 PM (j3Jmb)
How many cops does it take to beat a suspect?
None. He fell down the stairs.
----
heh.
I hope somebody's writin' this down.
Let's get our story straight, boys, 'fore we get back to town.
My guess is, he just went insane,
tried to swim away with too much change.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 01:47 PM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at July 21, 2011 01:47 PM (MyByM)
This is an excellent resource. I visit there often. The guy running the site tries very hard to be fair and balanced imho. Posted by: GnuBreed at July 21, 2011 05:31 PM (ENKCw)
That website pretty much exposes the Lie of the "Few Bad Apples" argument....
Posted by: TXMarko at July 21, 2011 01:48 PM (5y3XA)
Posted by: Larry Dickman at July 21, 2011 01:52 PM (4t9J5)
As a CCL holder in a state without a legal requirement to inform, I frankly would not inform a police officer in simple conversation - why complicate things and prolong the encounter when I know I'm certainly not going to draw or display? I would pass the card along with a driver's license, then put my hands back on the steering wheel, that's a pretty widely agreed upon courtesy. But it ought to be a courtesy rather than a potential six-months-in-jail gotcha. Anyone who's bothered to get a license and who would obey an obligation to declare isn't going to draw on a police officer anyway, so they don't really need to know unless they're cuffing.
Posted by: Dave R. at July 21, 2011 01:53 PM (oa3Qa)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 01:54 PM (QZjIq)
The LAPD of 60-70 years ago was as corrupt as hell. It was famous for beating confessions out of people and planting evidence.
The hell you say.
Posted by: LAPD Hat Squad at July 21, 2011 01:57 PM (71Fka)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 05:54 PM (QZjIq)
Yeah. The difference is 20 years ago it was your word against the cop's when something happened. Now half the time there's video.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 01:57 PM (XIXhw)
The left? The left ye have with ye always. So (re)learn to own meaningful rights no matter what. I mean, damn.
Posted by: Ten at July 21, 2011 02:02 PM (4nN10)
Er, no.
As a CCL holder in a state without a legal requirement to inform, I frankly would not inform a police officer in simple conversation - why complicate things and prolong the encounter when I know I'm certainly not going to draw or display? I would pass the card along with a driver's license, then put my hands back on the steering wheel, that's a pretty widely agreed upon courtesy. But it ought to be a courtesy rather than a potential six-months-in-jail gotcha. Anyone who's bothered to get a license and who would obey an obligation to declare isn't going to draw on a police officer anyway, so they don't really need to know unless they're cuffing.
Yes. Thank you.
Posted by: Ten at July 21, 2011 02:03 PM (4nN10)
Then NC voters have their heads entirely up their asses.
Posted by: Ten at July 21, 2011 02:06 PM (4nN10)
Posted by: Alabaster Jones at July 21, 2011 02:06 PM (QZjIq)
The whole thing is ridiculous. He could have pulled out the gun and shot them while they weren't paying attention, but he didn't. He told them as soon as they payed any mind to him.
Really, there's no good reason for the law. The guy wasn't shooting anybody, he should have been able to just sit there with his gun in his pocket while the cop the harrassed that hooker for being a slut, been given his ticket, and left.
Posted by: Entropy at July 21, 2011 02:14 PM (KeJbA)
If this had gone down here, that crap would have been spread all over the news. Officer would have been relieved of duty in the same way and a dramatic trial would ensue (or dramatically covered by the local news media). Then, depending on if it was Seattle PD, KingCo Sherriff, or State Patrol, the officer would be unlikely, less likely, more likely to lose their job, respectively.
Posted by: Jamfish at July 21, 2011 02:46 PM (14vVh)
Posted by: scr_north at July 21, 2011 02:55 PM (cfJTS)
So, did they actually establish that the passengers were a hooker and a pimp? Or was that just a story to make it seem somehow more legitimate?
I've been pulled over in CA and asked about weapons, pulled over in TX with no questions and in my home state of Oklahoma it seems to depend on what city you're in. In my hometown the police are extremely polite. In OKC my only contact was pretty rude. In Yukon it was a genuine speed trap (no speeding required). Shortly after the YPD had a scandal involving six of their officers getting head from some skank working at an all night gas station. The only one that got fired was the one that they found a VPO on during the investigation. VPO = means you can't have a gun here.
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at July 21, 2011 03:04 PM (C6OjH)
People who "lose it" at all should not be cops. One time, ten times, doesn't matter.
Posted by: Ace's liver at July 21, 2011 03:07 PM (XIXhw)
Kind of a related story: A few years back we had an OHP officer pull over an ambulance for passing him on the turnpike. An ambulance with a passenger in back and flashing lights on the roof. Then he roughed up the EMT for questioning his authority to pull over an ambulance in transit with a patient.
The cop was on video acting a lot like this one. I'm not even sure if he was fired over it.
White cop. Black EMT.
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at July 21, 2011 03:09 PM (C6OjH)
10 weeks of tradeschool training and you too could be a "007 secret agent" just like this hothead cop who clearly lacks the basic self control for the job...so yea, let's give a gun and "license to kill" to anger management failures!
Posted by: CharlieDontSurf at July 21, 2011 03:21 PM (DSPvf)
Posted by: Rasputin at July 21, 2011 03:38 PM (ncTmf)
This whole traffic stop was FUBAR from the start. Why didn't the officer first address the driver? He seemed much more interested in the passengers. The second officer actually crawled around in the back seat without ever addressing the driver.
It's hard to inform the officer that you are lawfully carrying if he never comes to the driver's side window or asks you to step out of the vehicle. The law is fckd up because of the difficulty in having to segue "I have a gun" into the conversation.
As for the cop's reaction, we don't know what was going on with him. He may have had a recent incident, or a friend of his did, or he just read an article about another cop being shot down. He might have been having a really bad day.
Posted by: Cooter at July 21, 2011 03:58 PM (C06Qq)
Posted by: Rae4palin at July 21, 2011 04:09 PM (G4RRM)
Posted by: Cooter at July 21, 2011 07:58 PM (C06Qq)
One thing we do know for sure is that he has to go, and immediately, before he does actually empty his glock into a lawfully carrying citizen
I really would like someone to justify arresting and searching a car whose only crime is being pulled over on the side of the road.
Posted by: Yoshi, Aggrieved Victim of the White Man at July 21, 2011 04:20 PM (8Zpuz)
Posted by: CoolCzech at July 21, 2011 04:26 PM (kUaEF)
Posted by: Rex Harrison's Hat at July 21, 2011 05:41 PM (v7OxS)
I fully believe there are two personality types drawn to police work: the tough guy wanna-be alpha male who was never quite good enough to get that football scholarship and never quite good looking enough to get the girl, and the normal not-very-ambitious civil servant type.
I really don't get why we act like working for the town, pulling over citizens in "gotcha" situations ("You didn't count to three when stopping at that stop sign" or "you went 40 in a 30 while going down that hill and I caught you while hiding in someones driveway behind a rock wall" -- both of which I've encountered (once as a driver, once as a passenger) is some kind of noble profession. It's not. 90% of cops are not dealing with "real criminals" and the ones that are, well... they should stick with doing that. Harassing people lawfully carrying a gun, or being young, or being a minority, or "possibly being under the influence in public" is ridiculous and a total abuse of power.
(full disclosure: I got a DUI when I was 19 for blowing a .01 in PA --which subsequently got dropped--, a drunk in public / possession of alcohol by consumption for stupidly admitting I'd had a few beers on private property in my friends back yard in GA)
Posted by: TimtheLurker at July 21, 2011 05:44 PM (d1JmE)
Posted by: digitalbrownshirt at July 21, 2011 06:12 PM (C6OjH)
Posted by: CharlieDontSurf at July 21, 2011 09:33 PM (DSPvf)
Posted by: oic at July 21, 2011 10:14 PM (hoyu4)
This officer should be fired and then evaluated by a psychiatrist to see if HE should be allowed anywhere near a gun for the rest of his life.
It looks like the concealed carry permit holder did everything right, and this poor excuse for a police officer did everything wrong.
Posted by: My Weapons Permit at July 22, 2011 05:41 AM (gJHyo)
She won't go on raids anymore - says the male officers are all on steroids and so full of roid rage that everything has gotten too explosively dangerous.
Steroids, adrenaline and guns are a very dangerous mixture.
Notice in the video that the roid head has got his hand on his gun after the driver tells him he has a concealed carry permit. That driver was one slip on a loose rock and a sudden move to regain his balance away from being shot - and then having the tape accidentally erased.
Posted by: An Observation at July 22, 2011 11:26 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: A Mindful Webworker at July 22, 2011 12:57 PM (g9gb0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2118 seconds, 273 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: kbdabear at July 21, 2011 12:46 PM (so1xa)