September 13, 2011
— DrewM I've long advocated that Republicans focus on the job killing nature of regulations and I'm glad it's really taking hold. Unfortunately, I don't think the GOP presidential candidates quite have the hang of it yet.
Last night and at other times multiple candidates took shots at the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill. That's a great start but most people haven't a clue what it is or why it's bad. Simply invoking the name isn't enough, candidates need to offer real world examples of how the Democratic regulatory regime is killing this country.
Fortunately for them, the Wall Street Journal gets it. They connect Bank of America's decision to cut 40,000 jobs in part to new rules in Dodd-Frank.
Mr. Durbin's amendment instructed the Federal Reserve to limit the amount of "swipe fees" that banks can charge merchants when customers use debit cards.How exactly does forcing banks to charge Wal-Mart less money for operating an electronic payment system prevent the next financial crisis? Readers may wait a long time for a satisfactory answer, but the cost of this Dodd-Frank directive is straightforward.
The Fed dutifully ordered banks to cut their fees almost in half. Bank of America disclosed in its most recent quarterly report that this change will reduce the bank's debit-card revenues by $475 million in just the fourth quarter of this year. The new rules take effect on October 1, so BofA seems to have sensible timing as it begins to shed workers from a consumer business that has become suddenly less profitable by federal edict.
That might not be the best example because cutting fees will be popular but there are likely to be hundreds of such examples in Dodd-Frank alone. Toss in ObamaCare and you'll have a campaign season full of examples. But unless candidates make this stuff real tossing out Beltway terms will be meaningless to most voters.
Republicans in Congress would be wise to get on this as well, especially since they are in a position to actually do something about them. Start passing bills that repeal egregious job killing regulations and tell Obama he can't have any new debt funded "stimulus" to "create or save" jobs until his regulators stop killing them.
Make Obama and the Democrats OWN every bit of this economy and do it with examples that resonate with voters.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:09 AM
| Comments (51)
Post contains 398 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: walrus at September 13, 2011 08:11 AM (Qr/Eg)
Posted by: Michelle Obama's Landing Strip at September 13, 2011 08:11 AM (PU8wf)
Most classless administration ever.
And yes, the Dems are completely culpable for the economy. Make them own it.
Posted by: Ian S. at September 13, 2011 08:14 AM (tqwMN)
Posted by: Michael at September 13, 2011 08:15 AM (5tCYE)
Posted by: Sub-Tard at September 13, 2011 08:16 AM (0M3AQ)
Posted by: Mr Pink (not in a good mood today) at September 13, 2011 08:16 AM (7rRUb)
Posted by: t-bird at September 13, 2011 08:17 AM (FcR7P)
Purpose: "To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any circumstance."
Committee activity of the week: EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 13, 2011 08:20 AM (o2lIv)
Obama is telling people that the thing standing between them and a paycheck is Big Oil and the "super rich."
Posted by: soothsayer at September 13, 2011 08:20 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: t-bird at September 13, 2011 08:22 AM (FcR7P)
I would say that it is the unique confluence of multiple factors: over-regulation, alarm at the federal government's total lack of seriousness about getting its financial house in order, the Obama administration's inability to resist using Chicago-style tactics to pick winners and losers (Obamacare waivers, Gibson and Solyndra come to mind) and extreme volatility of both markets and the global economy.
All of these combined create not so much "uncertainty" but rather certainty that any major new business investment will operate in a climate of risk that is much higher than investors or entrepreneurs can tolerate.
All the better, they think, to wait it out and see what November 2012 brings.
Posted by: Arms Merchant at September 13, 2011 08:23 AM (jx6di)
Posted by: blaster at September 13, 2011 08:23 AM (l5dj7)
All posturing and pure politics with no connection to reality. Typical for the mule school of thought.
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at September 13, 2011 08:26 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: blaster at September 13, 2011 08:26 AM (l5dj7)
Posted by: Jean at September 13, 2011 08:30 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Borg at September 13, 2011 08:30 AM (Ibilr)
Calling out productive versus unproductive labor during a debate would be good as well. Fifty people working in a factory and paying taxes are sure as Hell more productive than 50 government workers sitting on their asses idle all day collecting a paycheck from the 50 factory worker's paychecks.
Heck I'd even settle for someone calling out union greed and pointing out that most unions, as structured today, are in fact major corporations themselves with tons of professional lobbyists.
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at September 13, 2011 08:30 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: Arms Merchant at September 13, 2011 08:31 AM (jx6di)
Obama plans in his next speech to propose a way to pay for his new jobs plan.
He will propose 1) a new excise tax on union dues 2) a surcharge on all movie receipts for releases coming out of Hollywood and 3) a new tax on all lobbyist salaries above $100K. Then, a unicorn will fly out of his butt.
Posted by: Roy at September 13, 2011 08:33 AM (bm4vI)
The commentary accompanying the article states "because cutting fees will be popular" won't stay that way. The banks will recover their losses one way or the other. Well, actually, just one way - by passing fees on to debit card users. Various banks are already promising to charge their customers fees - as high as $3 per swipe - for everytime we use our debit cards. You'll still be able to use your banks ATM for free to get cash. But you will be charged a fee if you use your debit card for purchases. So, Dodd-Frank - in regulating banks - does exactly what most Democrat policies do - forwards the costs on to consumers.
Posted by: JDW at September 13, 2011 08:34 AM (uw+0A)
Buffett bought himself a $5B stake in BoA.
I'd find it hard to believe that he's not pushing his weight around and influencing BoA's CEO and board.
Posted by: soothsayer at September 13, 2011 08:34 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: JDW at September 13, 2011 08:34 AM (uw+0A)
So, Dodd-Frank - in regulating banks - does exactly what most Democrat policies do - forwards the costs on to consumers.
Unfortunately the name of the game is Politics, not, Who's Right. Otherwise we would always win. In reality as true as all of what you said is, we can't sink our paltry resources to win a message war on that tiny topic defending the bank fees. So overall the provision will remain popular. That's Politics.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose Camellia Sinensis Operative at September 13, 2011 08:38 AM (0q2P7)
He will propose 1) a new excise tax on union dues 2) a surcharge on all movie receipts for releases coming out of Hollywood and 3) a new tax on all lobbyist salaries above $100K. Then, a unicorn will fly out of his butt.
His proposal to pay for his 'jobs' bill:
$400 billion by limiting itemized deductions, including the one for charitable giving, for individuals earning more than $200,000 a year ($250,000 for couples).
$40 billion by eliminating tax breaks for oil-and-gas companies.
$18 billion by taxing “carried interest” income (common among hedge fund managers) as regular income as opposed to capital gains, which are taxed at a much lower rate.
$3 billion by adjusting the depreciation rate on corporate jets.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 13, 2011 08:40 AM (o2lIv)
Don't you see the benefit of getting out that job you've worked at for years, and trying something different?
so the money is 1/3 of your previous income, do you really need to live in a house or have electricity?
I imagine there are wonderful recipes for cooking beans on the back of the package, might need a little fixing for over fire recipes but hey learning new stuff is awesome!
who needs internet anyway.
you've forgotten what doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
no pain no gain.
Posted by: willow at September 13, 2011 08:43 AM (h+qn8)
I can't say that! Government workers vote, too.
Posted by: Mittens at September 13, 2011 08:44 AM (jx6di)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at September 13, 2011 08:45 AM (o2lIv)
Au contraire!
Posted by: Paul Krugman, Former Enron Advisor and Repulsive Dwarf at September 13, 2011 08:48 AM (jx6di)
Because finding a Obama coat tail riding, cocktail partying bitch, with the same personality as AG Coakley, soppy wet panties for union thuggery, and a blatant condescending attitude toward the little people, is considered a winning strategy here. I dislike our RINO senator, but he's better than a Donk rubber stamp senator and hope he still wins.
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston training for the ONT mudwrestling match at September 13, 2011 08:48 AM (ijjAe)
Dodd-Frank is a prime example of the connected business getting to tool the process. The large financial services houses use these regulations to force smaller ones into compliance. Only problem is, smaller ones get killed by the costs and fade away.
Now the large houses don't even try to sell you stocks and bonds or GOLD, even to Joos! They collect your money and put you in a pool of others similarly situated and allocate you a share of the pool.
This brings their costs way down. In fairness, they are pretty good at this and it works well for some folks.
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 13, 2011 08:48 AM (rplL3)
Posted by: SkepticalMI at September 13, 2011 08:51 AM (UwY65)
I am on a listserv of people in mortgage compliance. It would stun most of you to read the dozens of emails going around this list every day. Even the existing rules are so vague that 10 people can often come up with 10 different interpretations of them. There are rules about providing those disclosure forms you get when you apply for a mortgage and at closing, but there are about 50 lines on those forms and literally dozens of ways a vendor can charge for their services. Which line do you put that fee on? What do you call it? If you get it wrong you can be sued. Then there are rules on advertising and kickbacks. Can this person take you out for lunch, or is that an illegal kickback or referral fee? Again, if you get it wrong you can be sued. Very little of this regulation actually protects consumers.
And now the feds have told lenders how they have to compensate their salespeople. The rules may look simple on their face, but they aren't. Companies have spent millions on outside counsel to write new compensation plans hoping they are in compliance. Salespeople have faced pretty sizable pay cuts too. While some of this may have been warranted - for example, paying people more to bring in loans with higher interest rates certainly fueled the subprime boom and a lot of fraud by loan officers - but a lot of it is simply closing the barn door well after the horse is already dead.
All the national banks used to enjoy preemption from state laws. In return, they got heavy annual examinations by the federal regulators. Dodd-Frank eliminated that preemption. So now the banks have to figure out how to comply with 51 sets of state laws, answer inquiries from 51 banking commissioners and state Attorneys General (some of whom are political appointees and aspiring Governors and Senators), and follow legislation in 51 legislatures.
This is just a small sample of regulations that are killing the banks. One reason banks have had to get bigger is because smaller banks cannot afford the compliance costs or liability. And the bigger the banks get, the riskier they are for the system and the likelier it becomes that the taxpayers will have to bail them out.
Posted by: rockmom at September 13, 2011 09:01 AM (lSyyU)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at September 13, 2011 09:28 AM (LyF0H)
Posted by: steevy at September 13, 2011 02:22 PM (fyOgS)
1r0719,0020922801,5i-8670x,sakura filter china 2934053
mann filter w67/1,mann filter wd13145/3,901-048 perkins,caterpillar 199
fuel wather separator brands on the market
Posted by: christine at September 13, 2011 08:43 PM (RkJ5/)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2202 seconds, 179 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Ronny Pauly at September 13, 2011 08:10 AM (uAMYd)