February 22, 2011
— DrewM Epic smackdown.
My favorite part starts at 8 minutes where Mitchell uses Colin Powell as a shield and Rumsfeld calls her out on it. It's really all worth it.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
I love the way he refuses to accept the premise of a number of her questions. It's a skill I wish more political figures had. Far too often Republicans accept the framing of the question. They also tend to treat reporters as if they are trying to get information and not score liberal points. A few reporters but most aren't. Rumsfeld doesn't have any of it. He understands he's in an adversarial situation and acts accordingly.
Also fun? Hearing Rumsfeld pimp his website several times. Not sure why, it just is.
I'm telling you...Rummy for US Senate from New Mexico!
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Posted by: DrewM at
02:16 PM
| Comments (207)
Post contains 174 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Dick Cheney at February 22, 2011 02:20 PM (yojJG)
Posted by: Crusty at February 22, 2011 02:21 PM (qzgbP)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at February 22, 2011 02:23 PM (j84s0)
Two words: Megyn Kelly
(The Blaze) video
During an interview Tuesday, Fox News’ Megyn Kelly repeatedly tried to nail down an answer on whether Milwaukee Teachers Union president Mike Langyel condoned teachers using fake medical excuses to get out of work to attend protests in Madison. But when the union prez refused to address her question directly and suggested her question was “the wrong one to be asking,” Kelly laid down the law, reminding Langyel of his role as her show’s guest.
“For better or for worse, I’m the anchor and you’re the guest,” she said. “So I’ll come up with the questions and you can answer them or not.”
Posted by: momma at February 22, 2011 02:23 PM (penCf)
Posted by: Dan at February 22, 2011 02:24 PM (mXBxH)
Posted by: buzzion at February 22, 2011 02:25 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:27 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: Cicero at February 22, 2011 02:27 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 22, 2011 02:28 PM (F+Y9Z)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 06:27 PM (D45hw)
Just following in the footsteps of Ace. He doesn't read his own blog before writing a post, so why should we watch the videos
Oh and I was listening when I made my post and still listening so Nyah
Posted by: buzzion at February 22, 2011 02:30 PM (oVQFe)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 06:27 PM (D45hw)
Well, we are called morons. And don't mention lick on the same page as a video of Andrea Mitchell. That's castration-worthy.
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 22, 2011 02:31 PM (F+Y9Z)
You dumbasses haven't watched a lick of the vids and here you are posting already.
Who needs facts when you already have an opinion?
Posted by: The MFM at February 22, 2011 02:31 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 22, 2011 02:31 PM (HpT9p)
For a man approaching 8o, Donald Rumsfeld has a remarkable memory stick, and retains the ability to scrunt-slap whiny and condescending liberal matrons. He makes us white hairs proud.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 02:31 PM (ZHsNw)
Apparently the Mitchell's disposition is known as opposed to a known unknown or an unknown unknown.
Actually, I suspect it's less about him understanding anything and more about the sheer enjoyment of putting reporters in their place. After all those press conferences where the best he could do is break even, it must be nice to not have to be defending anyone else's policies.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 02:33 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 22, 2011 02:33 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 22, 2011 06:31 PM
-----------
I don't waste my breath ordering people off my lawn. I just open fire.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:34 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: Spike at February 22, 2011 02:35 PM (WLxeI)
Posted by: Ms Choksondik at February 22, 2011 06:28 PM (F+Y9Z)
In general I don't go out of my way to create a mental picture of over-65s bumping uglies. Why would that thought even pop into your mind?
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 02:36 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 02:36 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: BuddyPC at February 22, 2011 02:36 PM (nSkOL)
Posted by: Governor Walker's Fan Club at February 22, 2011 02:36 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 06:31 PM (ZHsNw)
Donald who? aw the hell with it! I don't care!
Posted by: white haired honey badger at February 22, 2011 02:37 PM (VcPAo)
Who the hell is this 'Republican Kingpen'? He made a video beggin' Repubs not to 'deport grandmothers' of Hispanics that we need voting with us.
But maybe, just maybe, you'll listen to Dr. Steve Hotze. Yes, that Hotze, Republican kingmaker, icon of the Far Right whose pristine conservative credentials and generous campaign donations cannot be disputed.
While some Texas Republicans are pushing Arizona-style anti-illegal immigrant legislation, and our governor is calling it an "emergency," Hotze and some of his like-minded GOPers are promoting a video featuring the good doctor that seeks to reset the tone in one of the country's most polarizing debates.
• See the YouTube video here.
Its point is clear: If Hispanics are the key to Texas GOP survival, and they are, then any hateful anti-immigrant rhetoric that pushes them away can be an instrument of the party's demise.
Shared principlesIn the video making its way around Republican blogs and e-mail lists, Hotze explains that many Hispanics share "our conservative principles," and values such as a willingness "to work harder for a better life." Demographic figures illustrate Hispanic population growth, and the video spotlights what might be to some a surprising figure: 39 percent of Hispanics voted for Republican Gov. Rick Perry's re-election.
The tone of the debate matters, the video's narrator says: "Republicans should not and cannot allow heated rhetoric to sound angry and anti-Latino. That is when Latinos stop listening and turn their backs."
One of several Hispanic Republican voters featured is Ivan Parra, a 40-year-old Ecuadoran immigrant who owns an auto leasing business in Houston. He told me he voted straight-ticket Republican for the first time in the latest election, but in the video he warns that anti-immigrant policies and hate speech can easily sour him and others on the Republican Party.
"Every family values-oriented conservative should understand this," Parra says in the video. "At the end of the day, you're going to put aside political opinions, political alliances, and vote for the party that you think (is) not going to deport your grandmother."Posted by: momma at February 22, 2011 02:37 PM (penCf)
Today's a two-fer. Megyn Kelly consumes the Milwaukee Teachers Union President, and Donald Rumsfeld crawls inside Andrea Mitchell's head and makes her brain fart liberal dogma.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 02:37 PM (ZHsNw)
Better, actually. Ther's no theater here, at least not intentionally.
Posted by: Governor Walker's Fan Club at February 22, 2011 02:38 PM (piMMO)
On Mess-NBC? I hope it was for an Anthropology project.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:39 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 22, 2011 02:40 PM (yfJ6g)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:41 PM (D45hw)
It's why he'll always be one of my favorite D.C. insiders. Speaking truth to "the Man" (which is now the MBM)? You betcha.
I miss the guy.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 02:41 PM (swuwV)
Juan Williams will make excuses for O'Dumbo's failure to comment on Libya.
I'm not disappointed, Juan is an asshole!
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 02:44 PM (ZHsNw)
Heh, yeah. Axis of Warcock, bitch.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:44 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 02:44 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at February 22, 2011 02:44 PM (uloio)
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood RN at February 22, 2011 02:44 PM (ZTn9N)
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 22, 2011 02:45 PM (MAC3t)
Last time she looked like one of the living she was washing a chariot on Caligula's lawn.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 02:45 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: Vic at February 22, 2011 02:46 PM (M9Ie6)
Ohhhh, so you're their viewer.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:46 PM (D45hw)
Andrea Mitchell isn't worthy to wipe his toilet.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at February 22, 2011 06:44 PM (uloio)
Andrea Mitchell isn't worthy to wipe his toilet ass.
Sir, excuse my impertinence, but on occasion we must identify a bung wiper for their contribution to mankind.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 02:47 PM (ZHsNw)
On the other hand, he's such a badass in explaining himself. It's style over substance in this case, but damn I do like his style.
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 22, 2011 02:48 PM (NjYDy)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 06:47 PM (swuwV)
Yes, Juan never disappoints, and The Kraut just spanked his butt.
Posted by: Fish the Impaler at February 22, 2011 02:49 PM (ZHsNw)
gotta love Colin Powell, though
For the war? Who me? No, not me. I was against the war, all along.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 22, 2011 02:49 PM (2NNz2)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 22, 2011 02:50 PM (T0NGe)
That's why she's a four-bagger.
One for her.
One for Alan.
And two for you when you enter the room (you get two in case the first one tears).
Posted by: John P. Squibob at February 22, 2011 02:51 PM (/U/Mr)
No, it wasn't Rumsfeld's fault the Iraq invasion went tits up.
It was the mostly the lawyers' fault for tying the hands of our military and partly the commanders' fault for being inept to battle 8th century barbarians streaming across Iraq's open borders.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 22, 2011 02:52 PM (se4E3)
You know who also does that? Liz Cheney, daughter of the Warcock.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at February 22, 2011 02:53 PM (/U/Mr)
How much is he being paid to sit on his ass and find new ways to say the same thing no matter what happens:
President Barak Obama is doing a great job.
Fox could just use some poster boards with the latest DNC talking points scrawled on them and save a mint. Maybe put a nice potted lily on the seat for people to look at.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 02:53 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:53 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 06:27 PM (D45hw)
I didnt read your comment before responding either,
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 02:54 PM (z1N6a)
It was the mostly the lawyers' fault for tying the hands of our military and partly the commanders' fault for being inept to battle 8th century barbarians streaming across Iraq's open borders.
Not to mention our "allies" the Turks didn't allow the 82nd Airborne to invade Iraq from the North.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 02:54 PM (c0A3e)
All those lies and rumors Andrea Mitchell was spewing was a product of George Bush not communicating with the American people.
He spent his presidency like a friggin mime and allowed the Left Wing to spin incredible stories about the war that eventually became 'widely held beliefs' in minds of Americans.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 22, 2011 02:55 PM (2NNz2)
he indubitably made several massive mistakes
Indubitably??
I haven't heard that used since the Goofy Gophers
Posted by: beedubya at February 22, 2011 02:55 PM (AnTyA)
Scenes We'd Like To See:
[Rummy to Mitchell] Hey baby, you must've been something before electricity! Wanna make fourteen dollars the hard way?
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 22, 2011 02:55 PM (XBM1t)
I didnt read your comment before responding either,
-------
In that case it wasn't a "response"; it was a lucky guess.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 02:56 PM (D45hw)
Valerie Jarret is Chairman Mao dressed as Carol Burnett.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 02:56 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: Jeff B. at February 22, 2011 06:48 PM (NjYDy)
Fellow morons have had this discussion here before. I think most people believe that his early planning and execution were fucking A spot on and it was his unwillingness to change strategy as things subsequently developed (and I'm not even sure about that) that did him in. I think Rummy was unjustly made a fall guy by a lot of MFM nits who have the military acumen of Trandrea. He was probably getting burned out by the job and was a convenient scapegoat for turds like Rove to toss over the side to take the heat off everybody else.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 22, 2011 02:57 PM (MAC3t)
Fire Andrea Mitchell!
QuackyDaffy orders destruction of Pipelines -
(ya can't take it with you, when your going down you must be desperate)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/4uwsbqy
Posted by: SomewhereSouthWest at February 22, 2011 02:58 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 06:54 PM (c0A3e)
Nah, that was an infantry division (Flavius says 4ID). We ended up going with the 173 AB brigade on a shoestring instead.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 02:58 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 22, 2011 02:58 PM (LH6ir)
--Shih Tzu
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 22, 2011 06:58 PM (2NNz2)
On the carpet, usually, for Shih Tzus.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 02:59 PM (z1N6a)
I think this is probably the most accurate reading. The initial invasion went off far better than just about anybody expected: that was Rummy's plan. Where it went off the rails was during the occupation when we should have been implementing full COIN, and held off for quite some time.
I'm not even sure how much of the "delay" on starting COIN was due to Rummy, and how much was due to other factors/decision makers.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 02:59 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 22, 2011 06:58 PM (LH6ir)
That's an insult to kids with hands in cookie jars. Most are far more adept.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 02:59 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: CAC at February 22, 2011 03:00 PM (Gr1V1)
I love it! She constantly tries to insert words in peoples' mouths and substitute certain agencies for other agencies, and he is having none of it. If she had any shame, she would be embarrassed by the thrashing he gave her.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 22, 2011 03:00 PM (yfJ6g)
OT: UN Security Council condemns crackdown in Libya, demands immediate end to the violence http://exm.nr/egop0p
Thank goodness, I was getting concerned this would drag on.
Posted by: Meremortal at February 22, 2011 03:01 PM (DffuX)
I loved the part where she said that Powell had felt "pressured by the Pentagon," and Rumsfeld said, "He never said that."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:01 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: nerdygirl at February 22, 2011 03:02 PM (8jQbF)
Historically, Democrats have claimed to speak for voters with less education and lower incomes, but it is clear that many of those voters no longer think the party speaks for them. The new survey confirms the depth of the Democrats' challenges with whites in these categories: When asked which party better understands the economic problems that people in the country are having, non-college whites side with the Republicans by a 14-point margin.
Harvard says.
Posted by: MBM at February 22, 2011 03:02 PM (JXwyN)
And GW did let the MFM write the Iraq and Afghanistan story. And they took full advantage. It damn near lost us two wars. It still might lose us the Afghan war.
Then, in his second term Bush inexplicably starting running a campaign for president of Mexico.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:02 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 22, 2011 03:02 PM (XBM1t)
I'll take Meaningless Gestures for $600, Alex.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:02 PM (8y9MW)
"Any of the rest of you have any questions?"
all the press members slowly put their hands down in fear.
One of the funniest things ever on SNL.
Posted by: CAC at February 22, 2011 07:00 PM (Gr1V1)
I was between positions during the first Gulf War and a reporter actually did ask for them to describe the means used to identify our tanks against air attack. It was spoofed on SNL, but that question was not an exaggeration.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 03:03 PM (z1N6a)
Indubitably??
I haven't heard that used since the Goofy Gophers
Posted by: beedubya at February 22, 2011 06:55 PM (AnTyA)
Hell, I haven't heard it since Brother Dave, who also had the great line about "sitting in the shade of the Great Pyramid at Noon."
Posted by: Meremortal at February 22, 2011 03:03 PM (DffuX)
Posted by: FlaviusJulius at February 22, 2011 03:04 PM (SJ6/3)
Okay, thanks for the correction. (I also believe Flavius).
Still, we should have reconsidered our alliance with Turkey right then and there. Fast forward a few years later, and you've got a Turkey that's on the cusp of becoming Islamist (if it isn't already).
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 03:04 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at February 22, 2011 06:40 PM (yfJ6g)
Straightforward, honest and logical is no way to go through life, son.
Posted by: The MBM at February 22, 2011 03:04 PM (/izg2)
Like what? How can you know something is a mistake if you don't know what would have happened had other choices been made? Iraq turned out just about the best it possibly could have. Rumsfeld deserves much of the credit.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 03:04 PM (XIXhw)
Reminds me of that time Sarah Palin questioned Charlie Gibson when he misquoted her to her own face. Then he doubled down on the wrong. Since then, I'm sure he's had a raise or two. I imagine such a disproportional relationship between pay and achievement will not exist in any organization Palin runs.
Posted by: arhooley at February 22, 2011 03:04 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 06:54 PM (c0A3e)
And that's when Turkey became just another ME shitstain as far as I was concerned.
Posted by: Soona at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (lNqJx)
Is this right?
the plan was:
1. Depose Saddam and the Baathist regime
2. Install new regime.
3. Continue support until democratically elected leaders are in office and in control.
But then it got all balluxed up when a) insurgent (mostly foreigners) kept terrorizing the Iraqis and being a deadly nuisance to our soldiers and troops, and b) we had to recruit & train a whole new friggin Iraqi army and police force.
Posted by: Leftover Soothsayers at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (se4E3)
It is like listening to a "Chatty Kathy" doll conduct an interview on Foreign Policy...you are either hoping the batteries go dead or the head falls off / explodes...utter evisceration.
Posted by: the forgotten man at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (yd08d)
Posted by: Reiver at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (pPK8C)
I remember watching several of the press briefings during the initial invasion into Iraq and media members asking things like "Where, exactly, are the [insert unit here]?" Or "How do ground units call for air support?" And the various military folks would deflect or whatever, but you could tell what they wanted to say was, "And would you like us to give you the combination to the planetary shield, Mr. Helmet?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (8y9MW)
In the second Video at 1:32, when he tells her just a minute, look at the face of that cunt.
(sorry ladies, i don't usually use the C word, but I have a special hatred of andrea mitchell and her asshole husband)
Posted by: Ben at February 22, 2011 03:05 PM (DKV43)
The funniest part was when she was all like, "..but I read Woodward's book, so I know what I'm talking about"..
...and Rummy basically said "I was actually there you dumb f**king scrunt"
Posted by: beedubya at February 22, 2011 03:06 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at February 22, 2011 07:04 PM (c0A3e)
It never pays to let someone stick a thumb in your eye without exacting a price.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 03:06 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: x11b1p at February 22, 2011 03:06 PM (nVLlM)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 07:02 PM
I'll just screw the question and take the $600, Alex.
Posted by: U.N. at February 22, 2011 03:07 PM (D45hw)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 03:07 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: U.N.
Yeah, but you'll screw anything that comes from a species that has two legs. The more defenseless, the better, if I understand correctly.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:09 PM (8y9MW)
That was so enjoyable I had to watch it a second time.
I believe Rumsfeld actually had fun. Money line of the interview from Rumsfeld -- "I don't think I ever heard anybody say that before besides you."
Posted by: JD at February 22, 2011 03:09 PM (WtMd2)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd at February 22, 2011 07:07 PM (eCAn3)
She's like a politburo member in the mid 80s. Trapped in the past and too old to change.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 03:09 PM (z1N6a)
When to change strategies is always an educated guess to be subsequently analyzed at places like West Point. There's a risk involved in doing things too quickly or late. In the case of Iraq the surge was probably started too late but I'm not even willing to concede that. As sifty said, you had the MFM yammering about sub-tertiary garbage like Abu Ghraib which removed resources from better deployment. You can't ignore how damaging it was to let the MFM set the narrative; the blame for which goes right by Rummy and up to the top.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 22, 2011 03:10 PM (MAC3t)
That is a filthy lie. I do not limit myself to two-legged screwees.
Posted by: U.N. at February 22, 2011 03:10 PM (D45hw)
(sorry ladies, i don't usually use the C word, but I have a special hatred of andrea mitchell and her asshole husband)
Posted by: Ben at February 22, 2011 07:05 PM (DKV43)
Jeebus, Ben...didn't you apologize the other night for using "shit" in a comment
Posted by: beedubya at February 22, 2011 03:10 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: rplat at February 22, 2011 03:11 PM (4vq8i)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 03:12 PM (TMB3S)
I think Ben is like me. We don't curse lightly.
That is a filthy lie. I do not limit myself to two-legged screwees.
Posted by: U.N.
I stand corrected. Well, I sit. But you'll just have to deal with that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:12 PM (8y9MW)
Exactamunda DM. Attacking the false premise of a question always presents an opportunity to advance your argument. Accepting the premise usually results in an admission and an apology. You would hope more of our guys and gals would do it. It doesn't take a moron to know what questions are coming.
Take "compromise."
"Why won't you compromise with the Democrats?"
What do you mean by compromise?
"Senator, you know what I mean by compromise."
Oh, you mean like ramming ObamaCare through the Senate on Christmas Eve? No hearings? Forty minutes of debate on 1/6 of the economy? That kind of compromise? Is that what you mean by compromise? Well, sir, I would never do that.
Posted by: Mr. Barky at February 22, 2011 03:12 PM (qwK3S)
I think this is probably the most accurate reading. The initial invasion went off far better than just about anybody expected: that was Rummy's plan. Where it went off the rails was during the occupation when we should have been implementing full COIN, and held off for quite some time.
I'm not even sure how much of the "delay" on starting COIN was due to Rummy, and how much was due to other factors/decision makers.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 06:59 PM (8y9MW)
I think it started to go haywire when politically correct military lawyers and the SoS decided, at first, not to go after Al Sadr and his thugs. The Iranians and AQ then saw their opening from that lull in the battle and they took it. The blunder was not the DoD/military.
Posted by: Soona at February 22, 2011 03:14 PM (lNqJx)
Mitchell has the pomposity that they teach in J school honed to a fine point. David Gregory might be the master, but this one is in the running.
They have never created anything in their lives. They have no idea how to make important decisions that have consequences. They simply parrot the Dem talking points, and only speak off the cuff when they see an opportunity for self-aggrandizement.
I hate them. They do not love their country; they love themselves and their wet dreams of a "gotcha moment" with someone who actually does things.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 22, 2011 03:16 PM (LH6ir)
Bitch fugly.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 22, 2011 03:18 PM (UOM48)
"But, but, but, but, you are EVIL and I can prove it!!!!11!! I read a book by a guy who hates Republicans!!!! I have QUOTES ABOUT STUFF!!!! YOU WILL AGREE OR DIE!!!!!111!!!
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:18 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 22, 2011 03:18 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Steph at February 22, 2011 03:19 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: U.N. at February 22, 2011 07:10 PM (D45hw)
Its true. FML, its true.
Posted by: The Goat at February 22, 2011 03:20 PM (/izg2)
This, is what is known as a smack-down! Wish more Republicans would challenge their interrogators false premises.
Posted by: American Elephant at February 22, 2011 03:20 PM (2+X4m)
Posted by: Barbarian at February 22, 2011 03:21 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: rinosSuck at February 22, 2011 03:21 PM (R2awl)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 22, 2011 03:22 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Portnoy at February 22, 2011 03:22 PM (azgo2)
Posted by: Barbarian at February 22, 2011 07:21 PM (EL+OC)
I think that was at a book signing. Palin ignored her until she had no choice. Mitchell looked like a fool, and the look on her face was priceless.
Posted by: Steph at February 22, 2011 03:23 PM (AkdC5)
Posted by: SOMEASSHOLESTOLEMYPEN at February 22, 2011 03:23 PM (VmAoa)
I think that was at a book signing. Palin ignored her until she had no choice. Mitchell looked like a fool, and the look on her face was priceless.
Posted by: Steph at February 22, 2011 07:23 PM (AkdC5)
That's it.
Thanks. I'll always remember that disturbed look on her face.
Posted by: Barbarian at February 22, 2011 03:24 PM (EL+OC)
Ann, Mere. Ann Richards. (Or it could be Anne, I don't remember if she had the appendix-like, vestigial 'e')
Besides, that, though, I LOL'd.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at February 22, 2011 03:25 PM (8y9MW)
First, he was never meant to be a wartime consigliere. He was supposed to compare the current out of control Pentagon bureaucracy to what it was when he was SecDef the first time, and trim where needed to allow resources to be spent in the field, not in HQ.
Second, he fucked with the deployment timelines and schedules. Iraq was not Afghanistan, and my entire 101st Airborne Division was jerked back and forth to keep the entire force for 1003V (what became known as Operation Iraqi Freedom) under some magical number in his head. We were going, we weren't, we were going, we weren't, then holy fuck, we're going. The tail end of the Division was coming off container ships in a Kuwaiti harbor when the lead elements were crossing the berm heading north.
Third, he continued to abet the "information dominance net-centric warfare" fallacies coming out of the Navy's struggle to stay relevant and never saw an Air Force guy he didn't like. The reason the Army is a bunch of conservative stick in the mud types is because the fundamentals of ground warfare don't change very much.
Fourth, when Iraq was starting to fall apart for lack of pacification troops, the American proconsul-wannabe Paul Bremer (who I hope dies of a painful and inoperative form of cancer over several years) repeatedly went against professional advice to do his own thing. That fuckbag worked for either Rumsfeld or Cheney, and neither one exercised any form of command authority over Bremer to make him stop doing stupid shit. I seriously doubt General Petraeus will ever write a memoir, but somebody ask Jack Keane or Ray Ordierno. They saw the whole thing.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 22, 2011 03:25 PM (HBTr7)
The funniest part was when she was all like, "..but I read Woodward's book, so I know what I'm talking about"..
...and Rummy basically said "I was actually there you dumb f**king scrunt"
Comedy gold.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 22, 2011 03:25 PM (UOM48)
The process is now called The Cheney Procedure.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:26 PM (cK4d/)
COIN really only works once the populace grows tired of being murdered by an insurgency. Only then do you get their cooperation. Until that inflection point arrives, you just do your best to project (and actualize) the image of being a better choice. It may take a while for that to sink in, and in the interim things will be pretty messy.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 03:27 PM (dYhmw)
Posted by: Iron Balls McGinty at February 22, 2011 03:27 PM (/7n/7)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 22, 2011 03:27 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 03:28 PM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Insane Clown Andrea at February 22, 2011 03:28 PM (pUO5u)
Posted by: beedubya at February 22, 2011 03:28 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 07:27 PM (dYhmw)
Or you look bad-ass enough that the insurgency never gets on track in the first place. Which is where we missed the bus - after the shock and awe we looked like we wouldn't follow through on civilian insurgents.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 03:30 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 07:28 PM (TMB3S)
There are no perfect plans in wartime. The secret is to adapt and win, and we did - the war and the other war that followed.
Posted by: Oldcat at February 22, 2011 03:31 PM (z1N6a)
Posted by: Frank G at February 22, 2011 03:32 PM (4X0aT)
We left too many bad people alive at first.
How we fixed it:
After we killed some more bad people the less bad people decided that it was better to be alive and maybe relax a bit.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:33 PM (cK4d/)
I always think of him as being somehow semi-mythical and epic -- "The Once and Future SecDef".
Posted by: cthulhu at February 22, 2011 03:33 PM (kaalw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 22, 2011 03:35 PM (HB4NY)
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:35 PM (cK4d/)
Drew - this is classic. I just got done watching part I and will be watching part II here shortly. But I wanted to first comment and say that Rumsfeld indeed schooled the ambivalent Andrea Mitchell. I wonder how much responsibility her husband has taken for his 19 years at the fed wherein he drove asset class bubbles allowing the central bank to establish interest rates with trillions of working capital to be loaned out in toxic enterprises based on toxic derivatives which in turn have led to a complete insolvency of our banking system.
I wonder if there was any "stove piping" going on there as Ms. Mitchell suggests of Rumsfeld!
Posted by: journolist at February 22, 2011 03:36 PM (iHfo1)
That was my idea. My bad. Now, Everyone, rush to the middle! We can't possibly lose!
Posted by: Karl Rove, Munificent Bastard at February 22, 2011 03:36 PM (swuwV)
The Humvee was never designed or meant to take more punishment than a Main Battle Tank.
Patton would have laughed at the concept.
Modern America would have surrendered after Kasserine Pass.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 03:39 PM (cK4d/)
The problem in Iraq was four-fold - Islam itself has an insurgency built-in in the form of various dictates in the Koran, Saddam had a pre-fab insurgency already organized and well armed, there was decades of generalized Arab anti-American propaganda to overcome, and Iran had (and still has) a vested interest in promoting chaos in Iraq.
It would have taken an invasion force of millions to overcome those four aspects in one-shot, and it would have fed into a self fulfilling prophesy of us being there as conquerors rather than liberators to go in that heavy.
In retrospect, invasion "lite" was the correct choice IMO.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 03:42 PM (dYhmw)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 22, 2011 03:42 PM (TMB3S)
Pimp hand left - Donald Rumsfeld.
I was just telling my students the other day how I would be willing to pay to see a Donald Rumsfeld press conference. Unfortunately, they didn't know what a "have you stopped beating your wife" type question was. I recall once when Rumsfeld replied to one with "Dose anyone have an intellignet question? Anyone?"
Hell - I'm straight, and I'm getting a crush on the guy. We need a tripartate Executive Branch - West, Rumsfeld, and Cheney.
Posted by: RightWingProf at February 22, 2011 03:45 PM (avT4H)
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 07:39 PM (cK4d/)
Modern America (especially under the present regime) would have aquiessed to all Japanese demands after Pearl Harbor.
Posted by: Soona at February 22, 2011 03:46 PM (lNqJx)
Yes, that was fantastic. I was just waiting for Rumsfeld to spit that out. It was like waiting for Christmas. I knew it was coming and just wanted to see the unwrapping of the present.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 03:47 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Moi at February 22, 2011 03:49 PM (Ez4Ql)
That was some seriously great awesomeness.
She is a massive cunt. You would NEVER find this twat pulling this same confrontation with anyone in the Barry cadre.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz at February 22, 2011 03:49 PM (F6tN3)
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else." - Winston Churchill.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 03:50 PM (dYhmw)
Well yea, its probably difficult to speak clearly on your knees with someone's dick in your mouth.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 03:52 PM (dYhmw)
Exactly. The Sunni Awakening had to reach critical mass for even a surge to work. Surge too soon and the enemy doesn't realize how bad things can really get. The "enemy" needs to understand just who the real opponents are, first, and then understand how to best defend their own interests. Plus, a directed surge is clearly more humane and less damaging than a mass purge since retreat is not an option.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 03:54 PM (swuwV)
Letting the low-dismount strength 3rd ID have Baghdad, then replacing them with another low-dismount strength unit (1st Armored Division) while having a revolving door at CENTCOM, JTF-7, and ORA/CPA was a disaster waiting to happen. And a lot falls on Tommy Franks at CENTCOM and Richard Meyers, Rumsfeld's pet four-star CJCS.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 22, 2011 03:55 PM (HBTr7)
Just watched part II. Drew I agree. Conservative politicians need to understand that words have meaning and you should always, especially during an interview, only respond to questions that are accurately framed and to insist on plain English and clarification.
Andrea Mitchell is sloppy yet, she is supposedly at the apex of MSM "journalism" it is pathetic and Rumsfeld could have let her twist but he didn't because he is sage and understands that her ineptness and political aggression would be on full display.
This would be a good video to educate journalism students as to the failings of the fourth estate and their nuanced and not so nuanced agenda.
Posted by: journolist at February 22, 2011 03:56 PM (iHfo1)
Technically Bremer worked for Rumsfeld, but in an interview I read Rumsfeld claimed Bremer told him he worked at the pleasure of the president and wouldn't be taking direction from SecDef. Bush apparently backed him up on it, too. I got the distinct impression Rumsfeld didn't like Bremer personally and liked the split authority even less.
Seems like Rumsfeld's biggest frustration was the lack of clear lines of authority. Bush was content to have everybody work things out by consensus, and it didn't always pan out. Sometimes decisions that needed to be made didn't get made in a timely manner, or at all, especially when it came to DoD/State conflicts.
In my mind the person who comes out looking a bit tarnished is Bush.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 03:56 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: BarbaraS at February 22, 2011 04:01 PM (baw5A)
That war mongering son-of-a-bitch is never going to be on my show again!!!
Where's Bruce....goddamit you told me he was a doddering old man!! I'm married to a doddering old man...you bastard!!! Where's Jill...get me a goddamn Fresca you skinny bitch..oh!!..and you are so fired. Get that sack of bones I'm married to on the phone...he knows people...he can get that fucker Killed!!!
Posted by: Andrea 'I totally am not walking funny after that ass rape'Mitchel at February 22, 2011 04:01 PM (azgo2)
"Andrea, what you need is some serious deep dickin'. How 'bout you come back to my place and let's boogie?"
It would have been Scanners all over Liberalville.
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 04:04 PM (cK4d/)
Fuck! I laughed out loud!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 22, 2011 04:05 PM (LH6ir)
I could never stand Franks. The problem with prolonged periods of peace is the people who end up at the top are the ones who know how to succeed at peacetime soldiering.
Felt the same way about Abizaid.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 04:06 PM (XIXhw)
Seems like Rumsfeld's biggest frustration was the lack of clear lines of authority. Bush was content to have everybody work things out by consensus, and it didn't always pan out.
As I vaguely recall, FDR pulled some of the same consensus garbage. But where W seemed to do it because he wanted to avoid playing favorites among the staff, FDR was more interested in playing one off against another like the Cabinet was his personal stable of gladiators, fighting amongst themselves for the President's pleasure.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 22, 2011 04:09 PM (yf5H9)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at February 22, 2011 04:09 PM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 22, 2011 04:09 PM (HB4NY)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 04:12 PM (swuwV)
The closest thing the US has been involved with in its history probably was reconstruction after the Civil War, so there wasn't a lot of precedent to work with. When you're experimenting breaking new ground, shit's gonna happen.
Even the Japan/Germany surrender/reconstruction weren't really analogous as those populations generally accepted their defeat with some grace and resistance was (relatively) minimal. With Germany it was generally understood that surrendering to the Americans/Brits was greatly preferable to the Soviets, so there was some motivation to go along with the program. With the Japanese, the American occupation forces, and their general good behavior and helpfulness, pretty quickly eroded the pre-surrender fear the populace had due to being propagandized.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at February 22, 2011 04:16 PM (dYhmw)
Posted by: sifty at February 22, 2011 04:26 PM (cK4d/)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 22, 2011 04:28 PM (0fzsA)
I bet her ass hurts from it.
Posted by: GrumpyUnk at February 22, 2011 04:29 PM (ATLuo)
Oh, I agree with everything you wrote. Things ended up turning out okay, which isn't something that just happens by accident. I just don't think that kind of management style is appropriate in wartime. Decisions need to be made and you make them - you don't leave your subordinates twisting in the wind and unable to plan.
Posted by: Ace's liver at February 22, 2011 04:43 PM (XIXhw)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at February 22, 2011 04:44 PM (rdpCA)
I think it started to go haywire
when politically correct military lawyers and the SoS decided, at first,
not to go after Al Sadr and his thugs. The Iranians and AQ then saw
their opening from that lull in the battle and they took it. The
blunder was not the DoD/military.
Posted by: Soona at February 22, 2011 07:14 PM (lNqJx)
Thanks Soona that needed to be said. The minute lawyers got involved with defining ROE and SecState defined targets, the game was over. There was no way to accomplish anything like a coherent mission after that
Posted by: Hrothgar at February 22, 2011 04:54 PM (DCpHZ)
Posted by: Jerry at February 22, 2011 05:00 PM (4SKYj)
Posted by: NC Mountain Girl at February 22, 2011 05:08 PM (7XP0/)
Posted by: the struggler at February 22, 2011 06:11 PM (Fcgbu)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 22, 2011 07:22 PM (UOM4
He had me thinking about my bunk.
Posted by: baldilocks at February 22, 2011 06:43 PM (T2/zQ)
Posted by: Kerry's Behemoth Laptop at February 22, 2011 06:57 PM (Z0EF7)
Posted by: ichi at February 22, 2011 07:12 PM (BrxjK)
Posted by: sexypig at February 22, 2011 10:07 PM (UmEOs)
Kinda like voting "present"? I guess it's easier to be popular if you never take a hard stand. Either/or equivocation is expected from a politician, not from a leader... which explains Powell to me.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 22, 2011 10:31 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: Miles at February 23, 2011 12:19 AM (7JDyg)
Posted by: MDH3 at February 23, 2011 02:07 AM (ShSoH)
Can't have that on MSNBC
Posted by: brian at February 23, 2011 05:39 AM (FKXeO)
Posted by: Wolverine at February 23, 2011 07:03 AM (GvYeG)
Why? Because it's all part of the pwnage.
Posted by: Clutch Cargo at February 23, 2011 07:37 AM (p+mzQ)
Posted by: The Obama Timeline author at February 23, 2011 08:53 AM (EHIYw)
With this Mac DVD Ripper, it is also possible to capture DVD pictures in batches, crop the image frame size, adjust video effects and subtitles, clip segments, merge and split files, and add watermarks for customized DVD ripping.
Download and install Xilisoft DVD Ripper for Mac FREE now, and start ripping your favorite DVD movies to files viewable on the iPod, iPhone, iPad2, Apple TV, PS3, PSP, 3GP phone or other MP4/MP3 players!
¡¤Rip DVD to AVI, MPEG, WMV, DivX, MP4, H.264/AVC, RM, MOV, 3GP and other video formats
¡¤Rip DVD to audio formats such as MP3, WAV, WMA, M4A, AAC, OGG
¡¤Extract JPG, BMP, PNG or GIF pictures in batches from DVD movie
¡¤Convert DVD movies to video formats compatible with the iPod, PSP, PS3, mobile phone, and other multimedia devices
¡¤Output to devices, like iPad and iPhone directly after ripping.
http://www.xilisoft.com/dvd-ripper-mac.html
Posted by: peteryang at May 20, 2011 09:54 PM (7BggY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2334 seconds, 335 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Navin R Johnson at February 22, 2011 02:18 PM (HpT9p)