March 28, 2011
— Monty Apparently, one Federal judge has worked it out: entitlement programs are apparently an "all or nothing" deal. If you choose not to take Medicare -- by this Judge's reasoning -- you are not eligible for Social Security either. Here's the money bit:
Yet in a stunning reversal, Judge Collyer last week revisited her decision and dismissed the case. In direct contravention to her prior ruling, the judge said the Medicare statute does — with a little creative reading — contain a requirement that Social Security recipients take government health care. The Medicare statute provides that only individuals who are “entitled” to Social Security are “entitled” to Medicare. Therefore, argues the judge, “The only way to avoid entitlement to Medicare Part A at age 65 is to forego the source of that entitlement, i.e., Social Security Retirement benefits.”This is convoluted enough, but Judge Collyer’s truly novel finding comes with her implicit argument that to be “entitled” to a government benefit is to be obligated to accept it.
Someone will bust out that classic C. S. Lewis quote in the comments, so I'll save them the time and do it here: Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baronÂ’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Over in England, the collapse of the welfare-state has stirred the populace to a bit of the old ultra-violence.
The Brits went all-in on the welfare-state after World War II, and they discovered the same thing we did: it's not sustainable. But they're also finding that when you take away government-sponsored goodies from the home folks, they tend to react rather like two-year-olds who had their binkies taken away.
I keep saying that the "entitlement mentality" is not just a problem here; it's a problem in the entire industrialized world. England, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Ireland, the USA...governments are beggaring themselves (and their productive taxpaying citizens) trying to fund their brobdingnagian welfare-state apparatus.

Posted by: Monty at
04:56 AM
| Comments (203)
Post contains 381 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 05:06 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 28, 2011 05:11 AM (pbCk0)
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 05:16 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: Red Rocks Rockin at March 28, 2011 05:19 AM (dO6S/)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 28, 2011 05:25 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 28, 2011 05:25 AM (Rn2kl)
Posted by: EC at March 28, 2011 05:26 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Oliver Cromwell at March 28, 2011 05:27 AM (yQWNf)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 05:27 AM (4Pleu)
The Human Right to Suspend Reality
In a democracy, there are not many easy ways back from insane levels of “social” spending, and certainly not when the leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition panders to the mob by comparing them to anti-apartheid activists. Judging from the many marchers partial to robotic, pseudo-ethnic West African drumming, the British left’s plan is presumably for the entire country to relaunch itself as the world’s least rhythmic percussion ensemble.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 28, 2011 05:28 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 28, 2011 09:25 AM (Rn2kl)
I have long argued that FDR and Harry Truman so badly bent the legal system that there is an inherent leftist bias in the entire institution. Even Republican appointees exude the poison of leftism.
20 years worth of Judicial appointments is responsible for redefining "normal" in our legal system.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 05:29 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 09:27 AM (4Pleu)
Ahhhhhhhhhh. Nothing like a hot cup of freshly-brewed DOOM on a Monday morning.
Now, I can face the day!
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 05:31 AM (WvFvd)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 28, 2011 05:35 AM (KxyHe)
Posted by: Couch Catnip at March 28, 2011 05:36 AM (KJlYb)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 05:37 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 05:37 AM (TATbF)
Posted by: brobdingnagian at March 28, 2011 05:39 AM (K/USr)
Unfortunately, that's a very simplistic take on the problem: welfare has allowed the government to tax people into oblivion (and let's be honest, it has allowed a lot of businesses to play a bit dirty with workers -- around here I saw a lot of people laid off, only to be replaced with temp service employees paid far less with no benefits, which the companies then proceeded to work into the ground and then let go before the standard amount of time was up; that was bullshit, probably not really even all that legal, although I don't know labor contract law, and yet they did it)...and not just the wealthy; higher taxes have caused people to seek welfare who wouldn't ordinarily be on it...the lower middle class, hell, now even some of the lower-mid, middle class. Instead of the working poor being allowed to socially advance, their mates in the next couple of social tiers above them have been brought low...and there is no hopes for advancement, just the crutch of welfare (which honestly, by that point, they are going to take -- what else are they supposed to do? Starve and go homeless? do a modern day version of the Okies? which could still happen, and I don't think we'd like to see the attendant social disruption).
It just isn't as simple as: fat, lazy welfare slobs sitting around doing nothing, and it's dangerous to think that way too...because eventually it only excoriates the problem. Plus it makes too many people comfortable with rather....harsh and extreme measures...don't any of you think you aren't capable of getting behind those; it's a human weakeness. That doesn't however, mean you should.
This is the group I was speaking of in regards to the housing/mortgage issue: they buy homes because renting is more expensive...then they lose their jobs or hours are cut, price of living goes up, and they are demolished. This however, is oftentimes not through any fault of theirs (many did live within their means, many still are working or trying to work), but now they are being hemmed in from both sides -- the Dems have thrown them to the wolves in return for the support of the lowest rungs of society (all the while holding out their false hope: "we'll take care of you with welfare") and now it appears as though the Repubs will also throw them to the wolves (all the while holding out their false hopes: "we'll take care of you through work") . Yeah, right...they'll "take care of them" for sure.
So far, they have been the most quiet, patient group...for how long though?
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 05:40 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at March 28, 2011 09:42 AM (vbh31)
Were you making disparaging comments about Ewoks? There's a filter for that.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 05:47 AM (WvFvd)
Posted by: MWR at March 28, 2011 05:54 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: MWR at March 28, 2011 05:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 05:55 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 05:55 AM (hlY6R)
One for you, nineteen for me. If five percent should appear too small, be thankful I don't take it all.
Posted by: The Tax Man at March 28, 2011 06:00 AM (/izg2)
The "Welfare Cat" picture you have displayed is racist and speciesist. Felis Catus has a long and noble history, stretching all the way to the birthplace of all civilization - Egypt. You can expect a contact from my office.
Posted by: Eric Holder at March 28, 2011 06:01 AM (v+QvA)
Hay, here's some good news for the DOOM thread:
Radiation levels now at 100,000x normal.
Posted by: Whatever! at March 28, 2011 09:56 AM (LyOUH)
Not only that...Nuclear rain in Mass....ahhhhhhh!
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 28, 2011 06:02 AM (FIDMq)
I had the pleasure of interviewing the lead attorney on the Social Security/Medicare case (Kent M Brown) several times, as recently as last week. He noted that Judge Collyer will now have to argue with herself at the Apellate level:
Scary stuff.
Posted by: speedster1 at March 28, 2011 06:04 AM (v40Bj)
The good news is that we will have the wreckage of this atrociously expensive experiment in social-engineering as an object lesson in what not to do in future times.
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 09:55 AM (4Pleu)
The past examples of previous socialist collapses are not good enough? Of course not. It doesn't matter how many times socialism is demonstrated to be a complete failure, many people will simply not recognize it.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 06:05 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: mare at March 28, 2011 06:06 AM (A98Xu)
IIRC, their debt is now something like ~200% of GDP. Which is a number which makes Barry envious I'm sure -- both for debt and 18 holes of golfin'.
Posted by: Downscaled Upscale at March 28, 2011 10:00 AM (IhHdM)
Closer to 250%, I believe. It's what got the "Japan is going to sell off their dollar reserves overnight" panic going in a few corners of the interweb.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 06:06 AM (WvFvd)
That's the thing about necessity - it's NECESSARY. They don't have the option of welfare, so they endured incredible hardships to work for their living. And yet, many in this country think they have the right to live in their own homes forever. After all, it's not their fault that BIG CAR forced Almagamated Buggy Whip, Inc. to close the local plant, is it?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 09:55 AM (hlY6R)
I have long argued that Welfare should ALWAYS be more unpleasant to experience than working for a living.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 06:07 AM (/G5LI)
Hmmmmmmm - the stupid of that judge is strong. I guess she doesn't know that the medicare TAX has its own deduction line - just like ss - on your payroll stub. Ignorant c*** probably hasn't ever been employed in an real job where she actually got a paper check with attached stub.
Posted by: emdfl at March 28, 2011 06:09 AM (65/pK)
Hey! Everybody knows that it's critically important that the deck chairs be neatly arranged when the ship goes down.
Posted by: Heorot at March 28, 2011 06:11 AM (Nq/UF)
Posted by: Ebenezer Scrooge at March 28, 2011 06:12 AM (v+QvA)
Thanks for the tip. I'll stay here. That post can only end in DOOM anyway.
And I really don't know what the tax rates are in England, but I'd guess they're pretty high.
Posted by: NC Ref at March 28, 2011 06:17 AM (/izg2)
It's a rare poster indeed who mans up to his daily dose of DOOM. For some blog-hoppers, five DOOM days a week is too much.
Perhaps a DOOM-lite thread is required. Not a "Terminally Boned" deal, but rather, a "kinetic boning."
On second thought, that doesn't work well, either. <.< How about "Surprise perpetual-motion financial mugging with a side of bone".
No?
._. Fine, I quit.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 06:17 AM (WvFvd)
Posted by: Stuff Ben Franklin said vol 7 at March 28, 2011 06:18 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Jimmy Carter at March 28, 2011 06:19 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Stuff Ben Franklin said vol 7 at March 28, 2011 10:18 AM (tf9Ne)
Amen Brother Ben! The founders were brilliant. Subsequent elected officials not so much.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 06:20 AM (/G5LI)
Historically, almost every politician chooses the first path, in part because too damn few of them have any business experience and they buy the standard Hollywood/marxist plot line that bidnessmens are eeeevil people out to screw the workers every chance they get.
Of course this is utter crap, as anyone who's ever owned or run a business knows. But until the crunch comes, truth gets beaten by lies and melodrama every time.
Of course *someone* has to pay taxes to run the welfare system. Who might that be? Why sure: businessmen and hard-working employees. If govt needs more money (ha ha ha!), just raise taxes. Repeat as needed.
Then act surprised when businesses start failing at higher-than-normal rates (which are scary enough!)--or for larger companies, fleeing overseas to countries with lower production costs and fewer costly regulations.
After pols have bled businesses and reliable workers to death, it's just a matter of time before the number of folks on welfare rises to the point of busting the government budget. After all, when governments make it feasible to not work but still continue to live roughly as one has before, it can't come as a surprise that about half the population thinks that's not a bad choice. Obviously it's FAR easier than paying out of your own pocket to move to an area where more jobs are, or paying to re-train.
Finally there's the feedback of elections: Democrats (and more than a few RINOs) have known for years that promising more goodies--like 96 weeks of unemployment bennies--is a great way to get elected. Result is that states and c-districts with lots of unemployment end up with the most repulsive, flaming socialists/marxists as representatives.
And of course these assholes will resolutely vote against any measure designed to revive or encourage *business*--which is the only way to get out of the mess!
It's a perfect Gordian knot, made possible by the sneakiness of politicians in passing laws that violate the Constitution, by making the federal gubment the big welfare nanny.
Posted by: sf at March 28, 2011 06:23 AM (eSMQV)
Can't vouch for the accuracy, but this site indicates the top marginal rate in England is 50%.
The comments tools are acting up a bit.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 28, 2011 06:23 AM (DrWcr)
Former Dem Rep. Cynthia McKinney: The Reason WeÂ’re Targeting Gaddafi Is Because He Brought Socialized Health Care to Libya or SomethingÂ…
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 28, 2011 06:24 AM (9hSKh)
...remember?
Whatever happened to those guys??
Posted by: lauraw at March 28, 2011 06:25 AM (QB9Zw)
...remember?
Whatever happened to those guys??
Posted by: lauraw at March 28, 2011 10:25 AM (QB9Zw)
We're all bully well dead!
Posted by: Zombie Teddy Roosevelt at March 28, 2011 06:27 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 06:28 AM (4Pleu)
Fire
I'll take you to burn.
Fire
I'll take you to learn.
I'll see you burn!
You fought hard and you saved and learned
but all of it's going to burn.
And your mind, your tiny mind you know you've really been so blind.
Now's your time burn your mind.
You're falling far too far behind.
Oh no
oh no
oh no
you gonna burn!
Posted by: BHO channeling his inner Arthur Brown at March 28, 2011 06:30 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Jean at March 28, 2011 06:30 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 06:30 AM (hlY6R)
You Should Have Listened to Farrakhan When You Were At His Table: New Black Panthers Turn on Obama in an N-word, Uncle Tom Tirade (Content Warning)
Posted by: Robert Duvall at March 28, 2011 06:32 AM (YVZlY)
Can't vouch for the accuracy, but this site indicates the top marginal rate in England is 50%.
That is in addition to a VAT, and I suspect their participation curves are a lot better then ours.Posted by: Jean at March 28, 2011 06:32 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: chuck in st paul at March 28, 2011 06:33 AM (EhYdw)
Yes, well...slavery vs. freedom is in the end always an all or nothing thing. Nothing new under the sun...
Posted by: Stu-22 at March 28, 2011 06:35 AM (k4bdL)
Posted by: momma at March 28, 2011 06:36 AM (penCf)
Tons of Monty links today. Thanks.
In terms of the welfare state, in the post-Doom future, I think the only fair type of 'welfare' or 'unemployment' would be in the form of a personal savings account an employee can choose to have money sent to every month from their paycheck. Any money they accumulate, they can access if they get fired. If you've never worked before, you have nothing in your account. If you opt to put in 50% of your pay, or nothing, every month, it's your personal choice.
Such a system also completely eliminates government agencies which is why we won't see that anytime soon.
Anytime you give someone free money, someone will take it.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 28, 2011 06:38 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 09:27 AM (4Pleu)
But Monty, here in the homeland, we have more people employed by the government than by manufacturing and construction combined.
Nearly 20 million Americans work for Federal, State, or local government. (That figure includes military.)
145 million Americans actualy work. So if my calculator is working, it is just under 14% of the work force in America working for the government. Add the voters who collect on the dole: 50 million on welfare and moving toward 50 million on SS we have around 120 million that receive some sort of government wage or benefit. Take all that to the voting booth and you can see why Honey-Bama and his ilk of freebie supporters win.
Posted by: rightzilla at March 28, 2011 06:38 AM (SPVfc)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 06:41 AM (hlY6R)
Posted by: Jean at March 28, 2011 06:42 AM (WkuV6)
And yet people keep sneering when I mention that we're currently governed by a cadre of clowns who are Left and Lefter.
Posted by: goy at March 28, 2011 06:42 AM (AfU1B)
I should chime in and note my situation: at one time, a machinist could relocate and find suitable, good-paying work just about anywhere in these United States. However, it seems that, in the zeal to engineer our society, we were forced (for reasons I have yet to fathom) into this thing called a "service economy" sometime during the Cliton administration. This forced a radical and unecessary change and the near-total elimination of what was once considered a vital part of the economy - manufacturing.
Now, here we are again being forced by this administration into something called a "global economy." I see more parallels with the previous push and the direction is, once again, away from allowing organic and natural growth in the American job market into someone else's idea of whatever it is that we should be doing for a living.
I wonder when we're going to wake up to the fact that our economy needs a new lease on life with increased monetary freedom instead of misguided efforts to control our economy by creating legal restrictions upon it that "guide" it into some uncharted new realm. This is good for us, we are told by our betters in Washington, although we aren't told why or how this is so.
In the wake of the disaster in Japan and its effects on American factories that are now idled due to the disruption of the parts chain from there, the upheaveal in the ME and the resulting high gas prices, I'm so sure that moving toward a global economy is a good idea. We seem to be more succeptible to disruptions elsewhere for no good reason.
How about we concentrate on us for a while and let the rest of the world do whatever it's going to do without harming our interests here? Such a thing is possible, however it would require the aforementioned awakening, particularly in Washington, today's home of the Big Sleep.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 28, 2011 06:44 AM (d0Tfm)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 06:45 AM (hlY6R)
Yeah, uh thanks? (steps away slowly, not making eye contact)
I'm looking for a 'kids take a nap' button, 'romantic' button, 'foreplay - not just 'wanna do it' button
Posted by: momma at March 28, 2011 06:46 AM (penCf)
Posted by: kansas at March 28, 2011 06:47 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: momma at March 28, 2011 10:46 AM (penCf)
Value-Rite works for all three.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 06:49 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: ef at March 28, 2011 06:49 AM (KIVK4)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 06:49 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 06:50 AM (hlY6R)
Ooops, that should read "I'm not so sure that moving toward a global economy is a good idea."
Too much doom, not enough coffee...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 28, 2011 06:50 AM (d0Tfm)
30 Hey...Jeffy...why are you using "you"? My family is, scarily, one of the more financially stable.
I'm not talking about should haves or ideals. I'm talking about what I see has happened. You have people who are on welfare now, who are working (and yet you want to talk about making sacrifices, that they are too comfortable -- some of you make me laugh -- what is so damned "comfortable" about somebody who works who has been forced to welfare, and worries daily about what is going to happen? I'm not talking about people who live in high cost areas and who make even 30K a year; how are they "comfortable"?)...and we have an economy that must make cuts (and probably raise taxes) or it will fall. Those workers drawing welfare caused some of their problems -- I'd say mostly in the voting booth, but then again, there hasn't been much choice there for quite a while...on either side.
I could also say that a lot of people in the 90-250K a year group have also royally f**ked themselves, and continue to do so (quite a few of them that I know have been spending like drunken sailors on dainties and niceties, and have let responsiblities slide -- are they less culpable than the ones below them on the rung?). I have seen people in the 50-100K bracket who have cheated the welfare system for years...and who also have spent like drunken sailors on niceties and pretty things for themselves, still do. Are they to be given the excuse because they hold good jobs...and put the correct party's campaign signs in their yards? They are after all -- "the Producers of wealth", right?
And you talk about "these people should not be made comfortable"...I could turn it around on you...
The problem is that everyone wants to keep their stuff and are afraid of losing it...because that is exactly what is probably going to happen. Cuts across all financial, social, racial, religious, whatever groups and is likely inevitable. How we manage to come through out to the other side will determine whether or not we stay a society we can be proud of...or if we go down in the history books as nothing better than 30s Germany/Russia at best, the DRC at worst.
Mene mene tekel upharsin -- it applies to everyone. Maybe it's long overdue.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 06:51 AM (5/yRG)
My appointment to renounce citizenship is tomorrow at the US Embassy. Just for kicks, I'm going to ask if I get back all of the money I paid into Social Security. We all know the answer (paying into Social Security is a tax and you are not guaranteed anything) but maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised. Could you imagine the exodus of people in the United States if they could get back some or all of the money they put into SS if they renounced citizenship?
I'm allowed to submit something detailing why I'm renouncing citizenship but am not bothering. I'll just tell them the truth: the debt has increased $5 TRILLION dollars in 3 years, it's unsustainable, I don't see things ending well and don't foresee any opportunities where living in the United States in the future will be a good decision for me or my future family. I'm not going to tell them that I'm scared how much the government is going to be taking from it's citizens down the road, even those abroad. Also, long term, while I don't have much now, I still am going to work at being rich. I don't want the US government trying to take away much of what I worked for.
Never thought I'd say any of this. I remember how thrilled I was when I found out that my citizenship didn't expire at 18 and I could still claim US citizenship. That was the greatest gift in the world at the time.
Too early to start drinking....?
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 28, 2011 06:52 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: SCRednek at March 28, 2011 06:52 AM (Lv85W)
Posted by: joncelli at March 28, 2011 06:57 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 10:45 AM (hlY6R)
Tomorrow Empire of Jeff. I filled out all of the paperwork yesterday. I'll post Wednesday morning.
I was thinking of writing something silly like "I'm renouncing my citizenship in protest of the Libyan war!" but I fear the US government. I'm going quietly.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 28, 2011 06:58 AM (GKQDR)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 06:58 AM (4Pleu)
Benadryl works.
Posted by: CDR M at March 28, 2011 10:47 AM (5I8G0)
We tried the mommy and daddy need to talk excuse about how we are going to celebrate (insert next holiday here). Well, my hubby said bacon day once. Turns out my kids google it.
So, when we came out my kids asked what we decided, and hubby said, 'Well, we are going to Denny's next bacon day.'
My five year old didn't miss a beat: 'Cool!' Turns to his sister, 'We are going to Denny's tomorrow!'
Yeap, Bacon Day was the next day.
Posted by: momma at March 28, 2011 06:58 AM (penCf)
Posted by: CDR M at March 28, 2011 10:52 AM (5I8G
Only things I've held are Energy (adding on dips), Comm., Mining (Ag, Au, Cu, Al; also will add on dips), BioTech and Pharm. stocks. PANL looks interesting...
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 06:59 AM (6DDE+)
The house can increase their take two ways -- by increasing the rake or by increasing the number of players. If the rake is increased too much, people will go down the road to a cheaper game or quit playing as they are losing too fast. Only by increasing the number of players can they increase income; there are additional labor expenses (dealers) but fixed costs remain relatively flat. There are incentives to improve the playing environment so that more players will come. A piece of the house take is spent on security so that the players are safe there.
Now contrast this system to the US economy. Only the winners (job holders) pay tax but it is a ruinous 40% or more. There is no other game down the road for an individual, but a company can change their home game. And they do, moving to a lower raked game overseas. The losers get a slice of the winner's pie so that they don't have to have another source of income. In fact, they don't even have to play to benefit from the game.
This little essay is designed to show how far we have drifted from a capitalistic system. I have left out the role of investments and capital as it complicates the picture a lot. My point is primarily this -- the game is designed right now so that no one actually wants to play. The incentives are reversed. The house isn't providing a fair and level game.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 28, 2011 07:00 AM (ENKCw)
But we are doomed because the Morons are voting for evil Palin again and I missed the book thread yesterday!
Posted by: Vic at March 28, 2011 07:01 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: hoping for anything that might slam sense into the 52% at March 28, 2011 07:01 AM (FYUWS)
Vic -- Welfare Kitty not only has better cable than me, they also have newer TV's and better cell devices...guar-an-teed.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 07:03 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 07:08 AM (hlY6R)
Posted by: ya2daup at March 28, 2011 07:08 AM (jTDOq)
Within energy, I've been looking at some (pure) NatGas players -- I have some interest within the bigboys (XOM, CVX, etc.), but would like a pure play. Coins -- sold a bunch of Ag 'bag coins' ~$22...DOH!
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 07:08 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 28, 2011 11:00 AM (ENKCw)
Nice analogy.
Vic -- Welfare Kitty not only has better cable than me, they also have newer TV's and better cell devices...guar-an-teed.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 11:03 AM (6DDE+)
I owned Section 8 housing before. NOTHING will turn you against the welfare state faster than that experience.
Posted by: Canadian Infidel at March 28, 2011 07:09 AM (GKQDR)
NEI and WNN.
Kyodo has as much breathless bullshit as any American network.
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 28, 2011 07:09 AM (pbCk0)
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 07:12 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Frank Booth at March 28, 2011 07:14 AM (6DDE+)
48 The trouble is, that the government has led the working INTO poverty, and found a way to keep them there that assuages everyone's guilt and/or responsiblity.
But people are still wanting to look at it from the standpoint that the consequences are still somewhere in the future. That, imho, is wrong thinking: it's already here. The time to have avoided it happened a long time ago...now, what is to be done?
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 07:15 AM (5/yRG)
Indeed. Rain gauge is just shy of 7 inches since Saturday, 1800hrs.
Put out topsoil and seed on Friday. I'm sure there is a political metaphor in there somewhere.
Posted by: SCRednek at March 28, 2011 07:15 AM (Lv85W)
For some reason the Courts have decided to read Limitations, as empowering language. When MAY becomes MUST, we do not have Freedom
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 28, 2011 07:15 AM (NtXW4)
Hay, here's some good news for the DOOM thread:
Radiation levels now at 100,000x normal.
Posted by: Whatever! at March 28, 2011 09:56 AM (LyOUH)
IT'S OVER 9000!
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 28, 2011 07:17 AM (6IReR)
112 Yes, I really can Jeff.
Did people NEED to go out and buy new cars every other year? Did they NEED to have a motorcoach or in ground pool? Did they NEED to go on expensive vacations each year? Did they NEED to buy huge new homes or flip properties? Did they NEED to play the stock market?
No, they didn't, and they probably shouldn't have if they weren't in a position to REALLY deal with what could be the bad consequences. Nevertheless, they did...and here we are.
Nobody is going to get out of this on a ride for free ticket -- except maybe the very, very extremely powerful and wealthy (and maybe not even some of them). Buckle up.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 07:19 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 07:20 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: CDR M at March 28, 2011 11:21 AM (5I8G0)
It'll be interesting to see how Iran responds to this action.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at March 28, 2011 07:24 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at March 28, 2011 07:24 AM (iNfj/)
Be careful with that "shouldn't," there, Jane. The only reason you have the ability to say "shouldn't" is that welfare state. Had it been left alone (as it should have been) their failure would not, necessarily, have cost you a dime or an hour's sleep. I don't know about EoJ, but my thought is, "Suck it up, buttercup." Or, put it another way, "You can do whatever you want, but you should know that actions have consequences, and you should consider the possible consequences of your actions."
If someone wasted their money, why should they be a concern of mine- governmentally speaking? If you won't make the sacrifices necessary to feed and clothe your family, why should the government force people half a continent away to pay for your food and clothing?
And why do we always discount the overwhelming generosity (which is on display all. The. Time) of the American spirit? I dare say that very, very few of those on welfare would go hungry or without shelter and clothing if the welfare state just went away tomorrow. Presuming, of course, that we got to keep all that money the government was not saving. Even without that, I imagine we'd find some way to take care of them- socially, not forced by the government.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at March 28, 2011 07:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 07:26 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: CDR M
at March 28, 2011 11:23 AM (5I8G0)
Agreed -- my current ride is a 2000 VW Passat 4-MO with 247k on the clock. I'm determined to get 300k on it...
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 07:26 AM (6DDE+)
I believe that after the film was released, there were some "incidents" blamed on the film and Stanley Kubrick, the films director, did indeed voluntarily ban the film in Britain.
So yes, it already happened in the 70's.
Posted by: shibumi at March 28, 2011 07:27 AM (OKZrE)
So here's the question of the day: Is Teh Won Sunni or Shia? I'm leaning toward Shia personally...
Posted by: shibumi at March 28, 2011 07:29 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 07:30 AM (+61wI)
That is what nobody seems to understand anymore. Nobody is required to deliver a job to your fucking doorstep. The unemployment office only requires you to look for work within 10 miles of where you live. Politicians will fight to get more unemployment/welfare to keep their voters(dependents) from leaving for another city/county/state.
When I was growing up my parents constantly improved our standard of living. We started out dirt poor, but my dad worked his ass off and we moved several times to go to where the jobs are. My dad dropped out of school in the 9th fucking grade and his final pay level at retirement around '99 was in the $60,000/year range (non-fucking-union).
Now I live in close proximity to several families that won't even lift a fucking finger to better themselves. Why? Because government programs keep them and their kids and their dogs fat, warm, and dry and even entertained. Our tax dollars and the generosity of multiple charities keep these people off of the streets but when it comes to their own money it goes for alcohol, tattoos, cigarettes, x-box games and body piercings.
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at March 28, 2011 07:34 AM (pdRb1)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 07:35 AM (4Pleu)
majority of the people are Sunni).
Iranian Government Releases Video Saying The Return Of The Mahdi Is Near, Islamic Regime Will Help Usher In The End TimesÂ…
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at March 28, 2011 07:35 AM (9hSKh)
Hello, all! Just gonna say, the Islamists in the ME have more and more reason to work with the NoKo's. Why?
Talmud Study is Mandatory in South Korea (link to the Muqata)
I find the story quite fascinating. Many of the comments at the post itself are skeptical, but I'm not. The South Koreans have made huge strides in recent years in catching up to the other industrial powerhouses in Asia - China, Japan - so I find it easy to believe that they'd wish to learn from the successes of other cultures worldwide to try and understand what's made them successful. I don't know if you can say "studying the Talmud" is what's made Jews so successful in so many fields, but all else being equal, why not?
Posted by: MWR at March 28, 2011 07:36 AM (4df7R)
And you talk about "these people should not be made comfortable"...I could turn it around on you...
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 10:51 AM (5/yRG)
Your experience with welfare recipients is quite different from my own. I know plenty of people who are on welfare and making no attempt to do any work of any sort. Often they trade their food stamps for drugs. It is these sort of people whom i'm referring to. I suspect the constitute the majority of Welfare Recipients.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 07:36 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 07:38 AM (TATbF)
A hypothetical for you: Why should anyone save at all. Doesn't the oncoming debt "reset" tell us that we should max our credit cards and get all the good stuff now? I mean, how much is your savings going to be worth if it is in US Dollars? In the housing bubble fiasco, rule-followers were boned and douche bags were rewarded. Why should anyone save at this point?
Thanks in advance.
Posted by: Bruceinsocal at March 28, 2011 07:39 AM (xikIn)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:35 AM (4Pleu)
Look, at a certain point, you've made enough money. We need to spread the wealth around. You greedy capitalist pig.
Pass the wagyu please?
Posted by: BHO School of Economics at March 28, 2011 07:39 AM (/izg2)
>>That's the central theme of my new book, You Are So FUCKED And NO ONE Is Coming To Help You, So You'd Better Figure Shit Out Quick: The Tao of Jeff.
Also known as Stuff Jeff Said?
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 28, 2011 07:41 AM (XdlcF)
keep those Kitteh's coming Monty, I am using them to make some real headway with some of my friends and relatives.
thanks
Posted by: Shoey at March 28, 2011 07:41 AM (473WA)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:26 AM (4Pleu)
If we were being sensible, we would never allow the Iranians to get anywhere near having a nuke. We would do whatever it takes to stop them.
Like I said, "being sensible" is a prerequisite.
Posted by: DiogenesLamp at March 28, 2011 07:42 AM (/G5LI)
Posted by: Vic at March 28, 2011 07:42 AM (M9Ie6)
Nobody is required to deliver a job to your fucking doorstep
Now that is a disappointment. I can get just about everything else delivered to my doorstep by Amazon now, how come they can't deliver me a job?
/sarc
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at March 28, 2011 07:44 AM (RZ8pf)
I fully expect a nuclear exchange to happen at some point over there -- there are too many nutbars and religious crazies running the governments of the various countries. The Paks will nuke India (or vice-versa); or Saudi will nuke Iran (or vice versa); and then everyone will turn on Israel.
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:26 AM (4Pleu)
That's crazy talk.Posted by: Mayan Calendar at March 28, 2011 07:45 AM (7+pP9)
Bruce -- It wouldn't matter if it were a good 'strategy' or not, fact is my head wont let me do it. My needs are my first priority and I only satisfy my wants when my wallet allows me the latitude. In other words, I pay for my wants as I can afford them. Do I live a simple existence? Yes, but it is still a rich life. I also sleep like a rock every night with no worries, because I've (almost) zero debt.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 07:48 AM (6DDE+)
I'm increasingly of the opinion that we can't really "do" anything at the governmental level -- the train is out of control, all we can do is get out of the way as much as we can.
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:20 AM (4Pleu)
I concur. I've been of that opinion for a few years now, but I don't really think there is much preparation that can be done, other than being out of debt, and staying the hell away from anything urban. Precious metals might well be confiscated again, so I haven't seen much point to that. We do have several acres of farmland, so we could grow our own food if need be, and, of course, the ammunition reserves are topped off - not so much in-case-of-war, but rather, because ammo might well become a currency in itself. <.<All of this ignores the rest of the world theatre, though. It isn't as though the rest of the world will slow down when America goes belly-up. Russia is practically salivating over their former satellite states, and the Middle East is, of course, the Middle East.
It looks like a revisiting of the 1940s with different actors.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 07:48 AM (WvFvd)
Posted by: ParanoidAnxietyGirlInSeattle at March 28, 2011 07:48 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: Palerider at March 28, 2011 07:50 AM (FYUWS)
Ace gives Matt Damon movie Three Thumbs Up! (iykwim).
"I can't wait until it's 'in the can'. "
I'm intwigued!!!
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at March 28, 2011 07:50 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:26 AM (4Pleu)
No idea how I missed this post, it's a good summation.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 07:51 AM (WvFvd)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 07:54 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Palerider at March 28, 2011 11:50 AM (FYUWS)
But why bother, sir? The current administration is even more grab-happy than FDR's was, and FDR went and snatched the gold right from safes across the fruited plain.
Isn't it reasonable to assume that the current administration, and whatever follows it, will do the same in an (admittedly vain) attempt to forestall the economic apocalypse? And with that in mind, wouldn't it be better to place your eggs in another basket?
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 07:55 AM (WvFvd)
Thanks in advance.
Posted by: Bruceinsocal at March 28, 2011 11:39 AM (xikIn)
Interesting fact many don't know.
If you 'settle' credit card debt, the IRS treats that as taxable income... in the 'other income' category (100-c)....
So.... if Max your cards, then settle, it tips you way up in the tax brackets, and they get you anyway...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 28, 2011 07:55 AM (NtXW4)
Interesting fact many don't know.
If you 'settle' credit card debt, the IRS treats that as taxable income... in the 'other income' category (100-c)....
So.... if Max your cards, then settle, it tips you way up in the tax brackets, and they get you anyway...
Posted by: Romeo13 at March 28, 2011 11:55 AM (NtXW4)
...wow.
Posted by: KinleyArdal at March 28, 2011 07:57 AM (WvFvd)
112 There you go using "you" again -- I'm quite ok with my life. Things could always be better; of course, but it could be worse.
What concerns me is when I have neighbors who come to me upset -- their hours have been cut, they've been laid off...and they are not in a good position. They haven't been extravagant with their lifestyle, but they were never well off to begin with -- I fail to find fault with their lives though; they are good people. My children tell me of people in their units with families who are in the same position. They are all being sucked into the welfare trap, and they don't deserve to be, nor do they deserve to be treated in such a blase manner or lumped into one big, overgeneralized category. The events that caused where they and everyone else is at right now happened long before most of them were born and often quite beyond them. They come looking for an answer, and what do you tell them?
Not everyone's lot in life is the same, and nothing is every cut and dried or black and white -- they are not you, you are not them, and I'm neither. But here we all are. So...what now?
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 07:58 AM (5/yRG)
Israel is being surrounded, we have people in our government who are aiding that surrounding.
I look for another financial crisis in the near future, maybe right before the next election.
Posted by: MarkC at March 28, 2011 07:58 AM (yPPVC)
Posted by: Palerider
at March 28, 2011 11:50 AM (FYUWS)
Palerider -- If you're so inclined, this (NYSE -- BHP) is a good play in the Pt arena.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 08:03 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Palerider at March 28, 2011 08:03 AM (FYUWS)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 08:05 AM (4Pleu)
OT (this seems to be all I can muster today, OT items):
Would anyone like to wager how often Obama will say "let me be perfectly clear" and "As I've said previously" in his address to the nation tonight about Libya? I think I'm on the lowside with 4 and 3 times, respectively. This is provided Bammy even DOES the address, and doesn't bail last minute so that Hillary or Bubba can fill in for him.
Posted by: MWR at March 28, 2011 08:06 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Palerider
at March 28, 2011 12:03 PM (FYUWS)
Yup...I don't worry too much about the Gubmint Man at my door either...
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 08:07 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 08:07 AM (4Pleu)
I wont be watching the Bamster tonight -- I'm sure there's something more compelling to do instead.
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 08:08 AM (6DDE+)
Only if the debt is "forgiven". Simply paying it off is not considered income. This is reported under a 1099C. If you didn'ty get one you don't declare it.
Posted by: Vic at March 28, 2011 08:08 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 08:17 AM (TATbF)
Posted by: torabora at March 28, 2011 12:17 PM (3ZyT6)
HEH!...I think not...teets-a-plenty!!!
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 08:19 AM (6DDE+)
141 That's because I don't live in an urban area. I live in a very rural area that has never been economically flush, but people have always been able to get by and live fairly ok. The cost of living is low compared to the rest of the country (that's why people move here or stay here). For the last decade it has been in a bit of an economic slump, but for the past two years it's been in a tailspin (heh).
A fair number of the welfare recipients we have are military families (not officers' of course), the rural/small town poor (who have always been there, but a lot/most of them do work -- and somebody has to clean out your grain elevators and fix the grain trucks folks, so before you start looking down your nose and saying: "well, they should move on", think about it a bit first), and whatever inner city welfare recipients we get are usually overwhelmingly those who want to get out of the city and find a nice, quiet place that might offer up at least some sort of job and a more decent place to raise their families (and hopefully get off welfare...boy, did those poor bastards get reamed...and again, somebody has to serve the tables at your restaurants and stock the shelves). There are of course exceptions that prove the stereotype, but the group I just mentioned have been increasingly forced onto some sort of welfare program; the price of living is getting too high for them, even here...they are the growing percentage -- the people who have been on the borderline. They are hardly happy about it, and neither am I. Those are the people I'm concerned about -- and the way I see it, they can either be left in the crap pile they've been shoved into now, or thrown to the wolves....or they can be shepherded through these bad times.
That isn't advocating welfare (far from it!), but it is advocating taking care of your people. Right now these people have been cruelly set up to stumble and fall -- and to be turned against (I'm guessing) most of you...if you allow it.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 08:20 AM (5/yRG)
Nah, gold doesn't lose value, the dollar floats in relation to it. Usually down.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 28, 2011 08:22 AM (Z1jiu)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 08:26 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Crabby Appleton at March 28, 2011 12:08 PM (6DDE+)
How about a colonoscopy prep? That is much more fun and educational than listening to Obama (pbuh).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 28, 2011 08:28 AM (LH6ir)
I'm glad you have a lot of fun non-political hobbies that can take your mind off the DOOM!. Otherwise I'd worry about your mental and physical health!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 28, 2011 08:29 AM (pLTLS)
How about a colonoscopy prep? That
is much more fun and educational than listening to Obama (pbuh).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 28, 2011 12:28
PM (LH6ir)
Wunce again -- I'm intwigued!!!
Posted by: Bawney Fwank at March 28, 2011 08:30 AM (6DDE+)
Posted by: Unclefacts Luxury-Yacht at March 28, 2011 11:17 AM (6IReR)
How did you train your unicorn to go on the paper? I get so frustrated...always on the carpet!
Posted by: Red Shirt at March 28, 2011 08:32 AM (FIDMq)
Don't accept the paradigm (even in jest) that criticism of government largess means that you are a cold-hearted bastard. The biggest, cruelest, cold-hearted bastards in history are the government functionaries who say that they are going to help. As you know, that "help" is a huge push toward permanent poverty and dependence.
We have allowed the left to control the language. Orwell was correct: words have meaning and power. Your belief that government can never care as much as the private sector is the most caring stance one can take. Anything else is just cruel.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at March 28, 2011 08:35 AM (LH6ir)
Being poor, in this country, is a choice. You can choose not to be poor, but it requires personal sacrifice and dedication. Monty
I am somewhere between you two. I have about as much sympathy as Monty, yet the more knowledgeable I get, particularly with monetary policy, I can see Jane's point. The virtual straight up production of the money supply is having a devastating effect on the personal finances of the middle class and poor. Someone of low skills can only work 24 hours a day, if that can't keep up with inflation, there is no zone that is safe.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 28, 2011 08:38 AM (Z1jiu)
Logic fail.
Since the logical term "only" is used you can not assume all inclusiveness. If I have a group of blue marbles and red marbles and some of the marbles have cracks and some do not. If I say only the blue marbles can have cracks, it does not imply all blue marbles are cracked.
Simple logic A implies B, does not imply by extension B implies A so:
A implies B where A is "entitled to medicare" and B is "entitled to social security" does not mean necessarily that given B "entitled to social security"
If this decision stands it will be one of the most horrendous examples of the legal raping of the English language, where the legal definition of a word (entitlement) no longer reasonably or even remotely resembles the commonly understood definition of that same word. It is full on Orwellian
where War = Peace Kinetic Military Operation
and Slavery = Freedom Entitlement.
and 2 + 2 = 5
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 28, 2011 08:39 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 08:40 AM (OW0nw)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 12:26 PM (4Pleu)
Don't you get a kick out of the libtard media who blame that on being poor. They try to claim that "good" food is more expensive so the poor can't buy it and are forced to eat at the junk food emporiums every day.
I guess that is logical for them though since they say globull warming causes record cold and blizzards as well.
Posted by: Vic at March 28, 2011 08:48 AM (M9Ie6)
where War = Peace Kinetic Military Operation
and Slavery = Freedom Entitlement.
and 2 + 2 = 5
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at March 28, 2011 12:39 PM (0q2P7)
You're absolutely right. We have been witnessing the writing of Orwell's 1984 into our government. It's under the rubric of "political correctness" and beyond into national policy. It's going to take a long time to unravel this stinking pile of rotting intestines if it can be done at all. I'm of the opinion of some here to just let it all burn down and then start over again.
Posted by: Soona at March 28, 2011 08:49 AM (R+wl4)
Posted by: The MBM at March 28, 2011 08:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 08:51 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 08:52 AM (g6nyw)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 28, 2011 08:53 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 28, 2011 08:54 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 08:55 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 28, 2011 08:56 AM (AZGON)
You're a cruel master. Cruel, but fair.
Posted by: George Orwell at March 28, 2011 12:56 PM (AZGON)
I'm not quite sure where the cruelty lies here.
Posted by: Soona at March 28, 2011 08:59 AM (R+wl4)
Posted by: rightzilla at March 28, 2011 09:30 AM (SPVfc)
191 That is exactly what I'm talking about! That problem is already here, and it's getting worse (I'm not too proud to admit -- my family is now the new borderline...and I've always considered us to be doing pretty ok...if we're the new "just above welfare and just above the tax line", then things are getting very, very bad).
This has been a long time coming...and I see people being herded into very extremist stances that don't benefit anyone -- and yeah, quite a few of you are going right along with it. That usually doesn't end well. The time for talking about the reactionary stuff is over -- it's just the same old, same old, and gets nowhere.
Which leads me to you Jeff -- have fun with that...I think you'll find it's kinda hard to protect your family when you're very outnumbered (unless you've got the kinda cash Soros does, in which case good for you). Same with the tough talk and the moving out of country talk: unless you are a billionaire (at least), you aren't going to escape this for long -- money isn't going to save anybody this time around, savings will come to naught, possessions too. This is already global, and everybody is going to get the haircut. Thinking otherwise is just wishful thinking now.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 09:42 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 09:49 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 10:05 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 28, 2011 10:18 AM (16i6H)
The poor will always be with us, as the Apostle Matthew pointed out. In a world of varying skills and abilities and fortunes, many people will end up poor -- it's just life.
Moreover, I would argue (and in some venues, have argued) that no one in the U.S. is in fact poor. By "poor" I mean lacking food, clothing, or shelter; I don't mean lacking premium cable, designer sneaks, or a new car. Something like 98+% of the households in America own color TVs. I would argue that anyone who owns a color TV is not poor, i.e., not lacking in life's necessities.
Recently a charity came to our door collecting to "fight hunger in America." Hunger? WTF? We have an obesity problem, and it's most severe among ... the poorest!
Their website (CanningHunger.org) featured photos of people they'd "helped." Most of them weighed about 300 lbs. (Seriously. I thought I'd wandered onto the Jenny Craig "before" photos.) I sent them a comment pointing that out, and how it undercut their message. Their response? They got rid of the testimonials featuring the wide-rides. True story.
The fact is that in absolute terms, everyone in America is wealthy. Very wealthy, by the standards of the Third World, where I've traveled extensively. Indoor plumbing, central heating and air, color TVs, cell phones, cars? They wish.
The problem is that Americans in general (and leftards in particular) apply a relative standard. It's not whether they have enough to live comfortably; it's that other people have more. Goddamnit, I can't keep pace with Bill Gates! Something ought to be done!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 28, 2011 10:31 AM (16i6H)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 10:44 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: Vic at March 28, 2011 10:45 AM (M9Ie6)
209 That's not what I asked...what if they do get to the point where a bowl of rice is a luxury? And it was not a philosophical question -- it was a pragmatic one...what do you do? I ask, because I don't think that people in that position stay that way without a certain amount of protest (and this is being born out, isn't it?).
The very, very wealthy can always lock themselves away from it, hire private armies. I suppose that could be an answer (for some), but it doesn't seem to work out too well for the majority, and it's been known to backfire anyway.
Certainly doesn't do a very good thing for a free country of laws, so if your true goal is to keep that, then probably need to find a different solution.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 28, 2011 10:51 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Monty at March 28, 2011 11:01 AM (4Pleu)
That's not what I asked...what if they do get to the point where a bowl of rice is a luxury?
And what happens if we evolve a second head? (Third head, in the case of guys.) I toss and turn every night thinking about that, and the impact it will have on barbers and hat manufacturers.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 28, 2011 11:12 AM (16i6H)
The pilgrims were starving at Plymouth when they were trying the communal farming thing. After everyone got their own plot to work, Thanksgiving!
Posted by: toby928™ at March 28, 2011 11:57 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 28, 2011 12:11 PM (hlY6R)
Posted by: Bruceinsocal at March 28, 2011 01:17 PM (xikIn)
Posted by: juice at March 29, 2011 09:56 PM (kW4bB)
It's possible to buy Asics Running Shoes at low price with best price at online sale store. Today, our store supply Cheap Asics Shoes for youth who are like to do any sport/running. So, you can shop your favorite Asics from us. Recommend you Asics Tiger Sale for running or any sport exercise.
Posted by: asics running shoes at April 13, 2011 04:50 PM (K2Fky)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2184 seconds, 331 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Waterhouse at March 28, 2011 05:05 AM (pbCk0)