July 21, 2011
— Monty

Apparently, Obama blew a big debt deal. What struck me about this piece was the passive-aggressive tone -- US News is completely in Bammer's corner, yet feels compelled to call him out on his lies. I'm seeing a lot of this kind of thing on the Left these days.
The end of the growth consensus. The relevant bit:
[P]olicy veered in a different direction. Public officials from both parties apparently found the limited government approach to be a disadvantage, some simply because they wanted to do more—whether to tame the business cycle, increase homeownership, or provide the elderly with better drug coverage.And so policy swung back in a more interventionist direction, with the federal government assuming greater powers. The result was not the intended improvement, but rather an epidemic of unintended consequences—a financial crisis, a great recession, ballooning debt and today's nonexistent recovery.
Essentially, we decided to grow our government at the expense of the private-sector economy. Worse yet, we decided to debt-finance the growth with no plan to pay that debt off.
Wall Street is making Doomsday plans.
Dodd-Frank: Crony capitalism's triumph. Like ObamaCare, this is another law passed over GOP objections that just gets worse as more details come to light.
10% unemployment on the way. In reality, unemployment has been in the double-digits for a long time. The recent large-scale layoffs by Cicso, Borders Books, and now the United Space Alliance with the end of the Shuttle program (2,800 layoffs are expected) only exacerbate the situation. And most of these jobs are not blue-collar jobs; these are high-paying technical jobs that will be very difficult to replace in today's economy. Many of these laid-off workers are going to have a hell of a time finding work again at anything like the wages or benefits they were making before.
As Bill Gross notes at the Financial Times, economies cannot grow at "Stall Speed".
Annals of the boned: The good news? CalPERS got a whopping 21% return on their investments for the 12-month period ending in June 2011. The bad news? It doesn't come close to making up for the crappy performance for the five years prior to that. They still need a bailout. This is the grim truth of investment losses vs gains -- one bad year in the markets can take several up years to make up.
Greece (and maybe Europe as a whole) edges closer to the abyss. Fancisco Giavazzi and Anil Kashyap respond: Small enough to be allowed to fail under certain circumstances. A taste:
This plan would be unpopular in Germany and in the other stronger economies that would be the main contributors to the stability fund. A selling point would be that unlike the plans put forward so far, the taxpayers of contributor nations would be protected by collateral. If things go badly, the stability fund would effectively own the banking systems in the countries that donÂ’t come up with a private solution. These assets would have value because they would be limited to those countries that are poised for growth.Yeah, right up until the debtor countries nationalize the banks and leave the foreign collateral-holders hanging. The EU has done nothing but make this whole mess a huge moral-hazard sink-hole.
UPDATE 1: From the sidebar, "Layoffs Deepen Gloom". Obama has broken the mighty US jobs engine, and the results are going to be very bad indeed if we don't fix it pretty damned quick.
UPDATE 2: The bicycle overlords.
UPDATE 3: If this isn't a signpost on the way to DOOM, nothing is: Laura Ingraham's baggage robbed at NJ airport. (In Newark. I might have known. That joint is an utter pisshole.)
UPDATE 4: Via Andy: Not everything in the economy is in the dumper. Sex toy sales are doing just fine. Stay-cation, baby!
UPDATE 5: Paul Ryan brings the DOOM.
UPDATE 6: Keith Hennessey delivers the verdict on the "Gang of Six" plan -- it sucks.
The rest I'm getting is worth the crick in the neck I'm going to have when I wake up.
Posted by: Monty at
04:54 AM
| Comments (418)
Post contains 683 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: dogfish at July 21, 2011 04:58 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: torabora at July 21, 2011 05:02 AM (I/YjI)
I wish our so-called (ersatz?) "leaders" would wake up to the fact that their policies are ruining people's lives and get out of the Fother Mucking way.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:03 AM (8y9MW)
You may get your wish today or tomorrow. Greece is running out of time. Actually, Greece is going to default -- everyone is now just trying to figure out how to sugar-coat it so the bond markets don't freak right the fuck out. If Greece goes, there's nothing stopping Portugal or Ireland from going with them, and Spain is not far behind. Then maybe Italy? Don't let the budget shenanigans here blind you to the much bigger story over in Europe -- we may be seeing the collapse of the entire Eurozone within the next month or so.
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 05:04 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: dananjcon fapping to Cuntessa's greatest hits at July 21, 2011 05:05 AM (8ieXv)
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 05:08 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 05:10 AM (TMB3S)
Are you sure it wasn't ghost-written? I mean, I have some serious doubts that someone who couldn't figure out Turbo-Tax could write a coherent sentence- let alone a full editorial.
But, no, I didn't catch it. Was it more "Wah, wah, wah, meany Republicans, wah, wah, wah, Default (take our ball and go home), wah, wah, wah, increase taxes and spending?"
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:10 AM (8y9MW)
we may be seeing the collapse of the entire Eurozone within the next month or so.
Oh wonderful! May I please have some more?
Posted by: Oliver Twist at July 21, 2011 05:10 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 05:11 AM (wuv1c)
Alas, it doesn't take much of a mind to figure out what Turbo-Tax Timmeh is going to say.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:12 AM (8y9MW)
Owning banks that hold worthless paper is considered 'collateral'?
I see this is the new left meme - collapse the economy completely, then claim that you are poised for growth as you try to climb out of the abyss.
Posted by: blindside at July 21, 2011 05:14 AM (x7g7t)
FTFY, Monty. I don't care how fast we get it fixed, the results are going to be bad. The only question is if we'll get it fixed quick enough to prevent an irreversible decline.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:14 AM (8y9MW)
That may be the farthest we'll ever see the left go in acknowledging that the ship is sinking.
Posted by: Soap MacTavish
Wait one month. If the House manages to hold firm, we may see the following:
Greece tanking, followed by the rest of the PIIGS.
Obama and the press lying (badly) about his grand party being cancelled/downsized .
Perry, Romney AND Generic Republican outpolling Obama in several states that Obama carried in 2008.
yet another set of dismal numbers, kept company by downward revisions of earlier reports.
He's already been forced to talk constantly to try and counter the sand shifting underneath him. Is some or all of these things come to pass, he'll be seen as a lame duck. Not by us; but by his erstwhile friends. The CEO from Vegas was one of the opening shots.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 05:15 AM (326rv)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 09:04 AM (/0a60)
Not necessarily OT: We've all discussed what happens in the US if SS is eliminated outright, as many morons advocate. You once responded to a comment of mine by saying that the poor would be saved (if that is the right phrase) bythe religious community's various charities and social safety networks. I disagreed, but that's another story for another thread.
Here's the thing. No one can credibly say that there is anything like a private sector safety net in Greece, nor is there likely to be one created any time soon.
So what happens in Greece if their Government issue safety net disappears, or is so reduced as to not really function any more?
How do you say "Chaos" or Mad max" in Greek?
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 05:15 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at July 21, 2011 05:16 AM (ZDUD4)
Well, they have a point- once you hit the bottom, you've got nowhere to go but up.
Of course, I don't think they realize (or, at least, the average voter doesn't, I'm not so sure about the "leaders" anymore) exactly how bad it'll be for everyone involved on the way down.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:16 AM (8y9MW)
I wonder, with all that's been happening in Europe, how much longer Germany will remain quiet and calm.
They've essentially been bankrolling the European recovery since the 1950s wirtschaftswunder and have paid for the EU. We're about 66 years out from WW II, so first hand accounts are fading from their memory.
How much longer will their collective guilt for that war keep them silent in the face of their lazy and theiving "partners" in the EU?
At what point do they reassert themselves as the loan great power of Europe that they are?
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 05:18 AM (wuv1c)
You know, Tom Friedman can get it at least partially right when he gets his head out of Mao's decaying anus...
Warning, NYT linky ahead.
Natural resources create corruption, as groups compete for who controls the tap. That is exactly what happened in Greece when it got access to huge Euro-loans and subsidies. The natural entrepreneurship of Greeks was channeled in the wrong direction — in a competition for government funds and contracts. To be sure, it wasn’t all squandered. Greece had a real modernization spurt in the 1990s. But after 2002, it put its feet up, thinking it had arrived, and too much “Euro-oil” from the European Union went back to financing a corrupt, patrimonial system whereby politicians dispensed government jobs and projects to localities in return for votes. This reinforced a huge welfare state, where young people dreamed of a cushy government job and everyone from cabdrivers to truckers to pharmacists to lawyers was allowed to erect barriers to entry that artificially inflated prices.
Now if only he could transfer the knowledge gleaned from observing the Greek-EU crisis into his prescriptions for curing the US of it's current economic aliment...
Note - I don't like the "natural resources create corruption" bit, but I let it slide to highlight Friedman's overall point.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at July 21, 2011 05:19 AM (9hSKh)
My question is this: How is this different from when the government shuts down for budget fights? We weren't plunged into depressions when the gov't was shut down in the 90's.. how is this different? My guess is, it's not any different.. important stuff will be paid for.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at July 21, 2011 05:19 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther)
Actually, there is another option.
Posted by: Mayans, Incas, Roman s and a crapload of other civilizations that packed it in at July 21, 2011 05:19 AM (326rv)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at July 21, 2011 05:19 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 05:20 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:20 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:21 AM (WkuV6)
Luckily, they have a lot of water with fish in Greece. Also olives and grapes.
Here's the thing: I have very little pity for the Greeks- they chose this mess. They're actually a small enough nation with enough wealth (should they choose to harness it) that they could have prevented this slide. However, they chose (actively- all of them except maybe the children) to make a national hobby of tax avoidance in addition to demanding a cradle-to-grave nanny-State.
The latter would be bad enough on it's own. Added to the former it's a recipe for chaos.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:21 AM (8y9MW)
So what happens in Greece if their Government issue safety net disappears, or is so reduced as to not really function any more?
They vote with their feet.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 05:22 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Jean
Hey! Be Fair. We surfaced long enough to 'liberate' the Malvinas! And then got our asses kicked, but .........
Posted by: Mayans, Incas, Roman s and a crapload of other civilizations that packed it in at July 21, 2011 05:23 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:23 AM (WkuV6)
So what happens in Greece if their Government issue safety net disappears, or is so reduced as to not really function any more?
They vote with their feet.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 09:22 AM (s7mIC)
Great. Another bunch of freeloaders looking to suck at the US sugar Teat. One more reason to implement serious immigration reduction and reform.
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 05:24 AM (7+pP9)
There are two fallacies here.
1. That there ever really was a "safety net". Patronage and government jobs (with their fat pensions) were the mainstay of the Greek welfare state -- but this was predicated on the productivity of foreigners, not Greeks themselves. Greeks are finding out that income is tied to productivity; if you can't compete, you lose. That's it. It's an iron law of economics. (The short version is, "The world doesn't owe you a living.") The "saftey net" was an illusion, not a reality. And the same is true here with SS/Medicare.
2. That there is some moral requirement to sustain people who can't be bothered to sustain themselves. Civilization is a compact among people -- that they will work to provide for themselves and their families, and contribute some part of that income to the state to create public infrastructure. But this invites a "free rider" problem, and if enough "free riders" pile up, the state falls. It's a question of productivity and capital. Kindness and morality demands that we help people who through no fault of their own are in a bad way and unable to provide for themselves; it is the "civilized" thing to do. But kindness and morality are trumped when the money runs out. If there are too many of the "needy" and too few producers, the whole system fails. It cannot be otherwise.
What I'm trying to say is that sometimes, it's possible to be too nice to your citizens. The welfare state is great in theory, but in practice, it's proving completely untenable. If you want security in your old age, the only real answer is to save your own money and be prudent in your youth. If through mismanagement or misfortune a catastrophe occurs, you turn to your family. Otherwise, you must depend on the fey and unreliable kindness of strangers.
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 05:26 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:27 AM (WkuV6)
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 418,000, the Labor Department said on Thursday.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims rising to 410,000 from a previously reported 405,000.
"We're just stuck in this trend between 410,000 and 430,000. Generally we're just really not seeing any improvement but also not much worsening," said Jeffrey Greenberg, an economist with Nomura Securities in New York.
Is Jeff trying to get a job with Barry's administration?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 21, 2011 05:27 AM (1Jaio)
Apparently, Obama blew a big debt deal.
And that's not all.
Posted by: Kal Penn at July 21, 2011 05:27 AM (7+pP9)
21, It's funny Ben, I think Loan works both ways, it can be Lone also.
ha. That's the only time a spelling error worked out for me.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 05:28 AM (wuv1c)
This sounds like a good time to divest and go on a cash-only basis, with as little interaction with gov't as is feasible. I guess having devalued cash is better than having NOTHING of ANY value.
Posted by: irongrampa at July 21, 2011 05:28 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:29 AM (WkuV6)
I guess having devalued cash is better than having NOTHING of ANY value.
I have my old toenail clippings. They gotta be worth something!
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 21, 2011 05:29 AM (zgZzy)
Greece will go insular; you will see local hoarding of basic supplies, dramatic cuts in prices for tourists to bring in cash, and as always, the outlying valleys, towns, islands will get by - Athens? I smell smoke.
I'm not sure I would want to be a tourist in Greece as the decline continues.
It's easier to beat up a tourist and take all of their money than it is to produce something and sell it to them for a bit off their money.
Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2011 05:29 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: irongrampa at July 21, 2011 09:28 AM (ud5dN)
yeah I am wondering about that too.
some people say pay off debt quickly.
some people say amortize loans for long terms and hoard cash.
not sure what to do.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 05:30 AM (s7mIC)
Initial claims have now been above the 400,000 mark for 15 straight weeks. That level is usually associated with a stable labor market.
Really? The MFM (Reuters) is going to try to spin 400,000+ for 15 straight weeks as a stable labor market.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 21, 2011 05:31 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:31 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: King Leonidas at July 21, 2011 09:27 AM (zgZzy)
LOL! Another computer screen almost bit the dust due to Pepsi Max spewing,
.
I should have just let Ares raze ancient Athens to the ground; better a quick death than a slow decline into decay and atrophy, leading to only death in the end.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at July 21, 2011 05:32 AM (9hSKh)
Really? The MFM (Reuters) is going to try to spin 400,000+ for 15 straight weeks as a stable labor market.
Oh it's stable all right. Stable != good
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 05:32 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:32 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: You're wrong at July 21, 2011 05:34 AM (jEEpE)
god it is so sad that I no longer have optimism for my great country.
Why do I get the feeling that in 20 years we will be in exactly the same spot we are in right now? Except then the numbers will be larger still.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 05:34 AM (s7mIC)
Really? The MFM (Reuters) is going to try to spin 400,000+ for 15 straight weeks as a stable labor market.
Oh it's stable all right. Stable != good
Posted by: chemjeff
So is a person in a coma.
Or,
What do we usually associate with stables? Besides piles of horse crap that is?
Posted by: Mayans, Incas, Roman s and a crapload of other civilizations that packed it in at July 21, 2011 05:35 AM (6rX0K)
I'm not sure I would want to be a tourist in Greece as the decline continues.
My friend was in Greece back in February. While he enjoyed his trip, there were several instances where his leisure/business was disrupted by protesters and by the stray dogs roaming the street. I'm sure it's just gotten worse since then.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at July 21, 2011 05:35 AM (9hSKh)
From Terry Pratchet's "Feet of Clay" (approximate)
Sam Vimes: "How is he, Littlebottom?"
Cheri Littlebottom: "He's stable, sir."
SV: "'Dead' is stable..."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:36 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 09:26 AM (/0a60)
This is what I was angling for. I've never argued in favor of a nanny state in any form, and I sure don't regard what is commonly termed the "Safety net," to be anything of the sort.
What I was wondering about is more along the lines of comments about towns hoarding and Athens burning. The PIIGS each have their own cultures - which we sometimes view as a monolithic European culture - and I'm starting to wonder just how each country will react to the elimination of the cushy government jobs, payments to the work-shy, etc.
A sociologist's dream: watching 5 countries revert back to 18th or 19th century social models in a matter of months or a few years. Maybe we should form MoronGames, Inc. to build games (MMRPG or otherwise) based on dystopias. Then we could get our dose of DOOM any time we want, and make a profit as well.
Posted by: Kal Penn at July 21, 2011 05:40 AM (7+pP9)
During the run-up to winning our personal war on poverty, we lived quite frugally, for obvious reasons. It's amusing to me now, that the habit of so doing is literally impossible to break, now that it is no longer demanded.
In light of the current situation, though, perhaps that ain't such a bad thing.
Posted by: irongrampa at July 21, 2011 05:41 AM (ud5dN)
There's a headline on Yahoo right now: Fresh Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly
UNEXPECTEDLY!!! Why is it unexpected? Did they think there weren't that many jobs left to lose?
http://tinyurl.com/3zthm4s
Posted by: yinzer at July 21, 2011 05:42 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 05:43 AM (7+pP9)
really? Okay Kratos, you tell us: is keratin digestible?
No. Keratin is a structural protein, so it is pretty resistant to proteolysis and many organisms wouldn't possess the keratinases to break it down.
I'd also imagine that you wouldn't get much energy or useful bi-products from keratin break-down.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at July 21, 2011 05:43 AM (9hSKh)
A sociologist's dream: watching 5 countries revert back to 18th or 19th century social models in a matter of months or a few years. Maybe we should form MoronGames, Inc. to build games (MMRPG or otherwise) based on dystopias. Then we could get our dose of DOOM any time we want, and make a profit as well.
Posted by: Kal Penn
If you want to know, look at the Irish. They love coming here and working here, but many go back to Eire to retire, so as to take advantage of the retirement scheme there (at least they used to). Their youth come over here in droves and work at the beaches on the East coast, mostly under the table, and thus depress wages and deny opportunities to American youth. There have already been articles how emigration is again increasing as Ireland's youth is fleeing the deepening hard times. Their avoidance of taxes and love for scamming EU development programs and agricultural subsidies are legion, and are considered to be a sport. Their love of the dole, combined with low tax compliance and a high VAT helped make the mess they're in. Toss in several spectacular instances of corruption and a failing socialist health system and you have the modern socialist Republic of Ireland.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 05:47 AM (326rv)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 05:49 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Gang of Six Crony Fucks at July 21, 2011 05:50 AM (agD4m)
I think we were supposed to deliver this intercepted note to you, right?
My Dear (classified),
Well, anyway, the vote was (classified) FOR and (classified) AGAINST, which means plans for packing it all in and waiting out the next Ice Age are a go. Please have your Sperm/Ova pairs ready for shipment by October 15. The seed bank project worked, and the Eloi think it's for some "disaster." The real bank at (classified) is near completion, and all the cryo chambers have passed initial testing.
The chairman has authorized me to tell you that the "no Krugerrands or Blood Diamonds" statement was his little joke, to keep the media happy. Those still sweating it out can make your next secure drop-payment in any of the durable forms of money you choose. For obvious reasons, $US are to be treated like any other fiat money, so please complete your conversion soon, if you had any dollars left hanging around after that incident with Michelle Obama in Prague (don't worry, she's not on the list, Barak is hanging the fallout from Rezko on her and her brother). I'm not sure about him, either.
I have to go prepare the final cut for breeds of animal companions. You did a good thing when you pressed hard for keeping wolf. Our breeding experts have finally jettisoned the entire contingent of domesticated food animals, since their hardiness is in serious doubt. Your investment in the Siberian group is turning out to guarantee your brood a sizeable share!
This is my last communication until operation Bankfall. We'll see you at the collection point in Nova Scotia.
Regards,
(classified)
Posted by: Found after The Bilderburger meeting at July 21, 2011 05:50 AM (c2fN9)
Posted by: Bob Saget at July 21, 2011 05:52 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 09:26 AM (/0a60)
So well said. Your ability to articulate these concepts is unparalleled.
Highest honors.
Posted by: Derak at July 21, 2011 05:53 AM (y2N9U)
Okay. So in less than 48 hours we've gone from "Sucks, but I guess I can support it," to "Sucks and I don't support it," to, "Really sucks, and I'll campaign/contribute against anyone I can who votes for it."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:53 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 05:54 AM (4df7R)
So, the Republicans tried to snatch defeat from the Jaws of victory, but Jaws gave the defeat to Obama instead? Jaws is conservative?
Posted by: yinzer at July 21, 2011 05:54 AM (/Mla1)
Well, by the MFM definition he'd have to be: he takes whatever he wants for himself, no matter the damage it does to anyone else. Sounds like the MFM definition of 'conservative' to me.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 05:56 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Gang of Six Crony Fucks
There is nothing wrong with this if it occurs to ALL Federal retirees. In truth, it should happen to SS retirees as well. That means current ones. This 'leave the current ones and the ones five years out' is crap.
WHat concerns me is that they will cut only the military, and point to that as proof that they 'cut something'.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 05:56 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 09:49 AM (WkuV6)
Actually, I sometimes play a game called Tropico, which was obviously written by a bunch of lefty/socialist types. You get to be El Presidente of a Caribbean isle and run it the way you want. Its a trifle, but amusing. I'm seriously considering learning game programming just to decompile games like it and make them better.
Most European-designed games suck. They need serious tweaking to go from disappointing to satisfying.
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 05:57 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: chillin the most at July 21, 2011 05:57 AM (6IV8T)
Posted by: Bob Saget
Perhaps this is why he is suddenly open to a short term deal? His teflon is wearing thin in spots. He might get stuck with this one.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 05:58 AM (6rX0K)
So, the Republicans tried to snatch defeat from the Jaws of victory, but Jaws gave the defeat to Obama instead? Jaws is conservative?
Posted by: yinzer at July 21, 2011 09:54 AM (/Mla1)
Jaws is pissed at George Soros for kidnapping his shark buddies, imprisoning them in his Soros Volcano Lair, and strapping laser beams to their heads.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 05:59 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 09:15 AM (7+pP9)
I doubt it will be that exciting. They'll dump the Euro and go back to a native currency. They'll limp things along, probably with significant inflation. Happily they're not overburdened with an up and coming glut of young people, which will help. Plus there's a vast underground economy as it is. That will simply have to swell yet further.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 06:01 AM (xUM1Q)
How far do prices need to go up before we get a negative COLA?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:03 AM (agD4m)
I doubt it will be that exciting. They'll dump the Euro and go back to a native currency. They'll limp things along, probably with significant inflation. Happily they're not overburdened with an up and coming glut of young people, which will help. Plus there's a vast underground economy as it is. That will simply have to swell yet further.
Posted by: Reactionary
And the only ones who will lend to them after that (should/will be those who are able and willing to take the risk. If we go back to nations or the IMF throwing money in, then the cycle begins anew.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 06:03 AM (326rv)
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy's Gullet at July 21, 2011 06:04 AM (N2yhW)
I'd kind of like to team up with an economist type (or, at least, someone who really knows about the economy) to program logic for SimCity / Civilization type game that actually followed some real behavior models.
Such as: When my taxes would go up more than my income, I choose not to gain more income. And: When my taxes go up, I try to find ways to shelter that income.
I'd love to see what that would do to such games.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 06:05 AM (8y9MW)
How far do prices need to go up before we get a negative COLA?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth
I'd agree, but the premise that we have money to support a COLA is equally as asinine. We do not have what we are pumping out, and the situation is only going to get worse.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 06:05 AM (6rX0K)
Here's a funny aside from all this DOOM:
ABC NewsÂ’ Sherisse Pham (@sherisse) reports: Martin Sheen was on Capitol Hill Tuesday, just in time to witness the partisan gridlock over the countryÂ’s debt and budget. In an interview with ABCÂ’s Jonathan Karl, the former West Wing star recalled what his character did when confronted with members of the opposition digging their heels in.
“I think I shut down the government if I’m not mistaken,” said Sheen. “And I walked up Pennsylvania Avenue to the Hill and waited in the speaker’s office and if that’s required I’ll do that again as well.”
President Obama — are you listening?
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 06:07 AM (ihSHD)
Very odd, as encircling and destroying those has always been a particularly satisfying part of wargaming for me.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:07 AM (agD4m)
It's FDR all over again - I've read articles that speculate that the Great Depression wouldn't have lasted as long as it did had he not been in office for 3+ terms.
And people forget that a Constitutional Amendment was passed quickly and overwhelmingly after his passing that limited a president to no more than 10 years in office, NO MATTER WHAT.
He did a lot of damage to the economy and the country, but Americans were - and still are - a resilient people.
If Obama wins a second term, it's going to be because a LOT of electoral fraud occurs (I'm convinced that's how Roosevelt won all of his re-elections). The difference this time is that people are much more aware of what is going on, and we are much more connected.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at July 21, 2011 06:08 AM (/kd4o)
That's just crazy talk. The next thing you'll tell me is that businesses pass costs on to consumers.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 21, 2011 06:09 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: K~Bob at July 21, 2011 06:09 AM (c2fN9)
Thomas Sowell would qualify that to "business pass costs on to their consumers when they can." You can't really pass your high labor costs on to your consumers if all your competitors have lower labor costs. Regulations, however, hit everyone (theoretically- in reality, not so much), and so those costs get passed onto consumers.
That's part of why tax increases and such here are so anti-competitive: it increases domestic companies' costs in such a way that they can't "pass them on to the consumer" because foreign companies would just undercut their prices.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 06:11 AM (8y9MW)
(I'm convinced that's how Roosevelt won all of his re-elections).
If FDR didn't have WWII, I don't think the U.S. would have come out of The Great Depression as quickly and as well as it did.
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 06:12 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: Evil Republican at July 21, 2011 06:12 AM (Qp7sN)
Martin understand it was a television show and that the writers controlled the outcome?
Obama could do a better job too if only he had better writers!
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 06:12 AM (ihSHD)
Speaking of those, the gay subvariant here is...odd, very odd. They dress like adolescent girls with money to burn. They are like an ironic parody of all our stereotypes of gay men.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:13 AM (agD4m)
That's part of why tax increases and such here are so anti-competitive: it increases domestic companies' costs in such a way that they can't "pass them on to the consumer" because foreign companies would just undercut their prices.
Attention people who think the private sector is the answer to space policy. Substitute "governments" for "companies" there.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 21, 2011 06:13 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth
It sounds like you live in the area that I used to live in. 30th and Broadway. The neighborhood turned over to Greek within ten years of our moving to Delaware.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 06:15 AM (326rv)
Posted by: PROGHOLE at July 21, 2011 06:16 AM (0fzsA)
I agree wholeheartedly. So many games could be so much better if they could be modified ...
The old MS Flight Sim games at least let you modify the aircraft skins and performance characteristics. That made for some interesting eye candy and some fun, if unrealistic planes zipping around in the sky.
I'd love to have a game - like Tropico or Sim City - where you run a small country that follows real (read, conservative) economic and social modeling. For example, raising taxes never brings in as much as it is supposed to.
Yeah, I think my new hobby is going to be programming; I can make better games than the kids that make them now. Time to get to it.
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 06:17 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Larry Summers at July 21, 2011 06:17 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Larry Summers
I thought that you dissed the wimmen and math?
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 06:18 AM (6rX0K)
The massive 2,300-page tome - commonly known as Dodd-Frank - promised to fix the financial system, streamline regulation and end bailouts. Like so much of President ObamaÂ’s legislative achievements, this bill promised much, delivered little and cost a great deal.
How about this, NO LAW that establishes new regulations has EVER streamlined regulations, that is no as in NONE. That sentence is a damn oxymoron.
What this new law will do is exactly like its predecessor, which is still on the books by the way, does. It will give the government a ton of new executive power, it will stifle business, especially small business, and it will cost the tax payer a shit ton of money at the same time it increases unemployment by driving buisness overseas. That at the same frakin time it doesn not acomplish a dman thing to fix the supposed problem that Dodd and Frank created to begin with.
Both of those SOBs should be in JAIL. And piss on Scott Brown for giving them the vote they needed to break the vote on this.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 06:18 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Larry Summers, snore monger at July 21, 2011 06:21 AM (4Kl5M)
Another proud member of the reality based community.
Posted by: rockhead at July 21, 2011 06:22 AM (ZMHGo)
Obama could do a better job too if only he had better writers!
Actually, I think you hit the nail on the head. I think that Obama honestly thought that being President was as "easy" as it looks on TV and in the movies. He never realized that those "Presidents" had their lines scripted and their scenes laid out in advance (after much writing and re-writing of the plot). Unfortunately, life doesn't work that way - nobody knows how "the story" is going to end.
To paraphrase a line from "Sleepless in Seattle":
"You don't want to be the President; you want to be "The President" in the movies."
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at July 21, 2011 06:22 AM (/kd4o)
@104 I notice that, in those games that allow you to set tax rates, one generally sees a decrease in growth and/or a shift from immigration to emigration when one raises tax rates.
IIRC SimCity was especially obvious about this, and it is about the only thing BattleGoat got dead on in their Supreme Ruler series.
P.S. At least in Civ5, Sid finally dropped the Global Warming bullshit.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:23 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at July 21, 2011 06:23 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 06:23 AM (o2lIv)
some people say amortize loans for long terms and hoard cash.
not sure what to do.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 09:30 AM (s7mIC)
During great depression 1.0 a good many of the sheriff's auction sales of property were not because people couldn't pay their mortgage. It was because people couldn't pay their property tax. So having cash on hand and no debt is good if you wish to hold your property.
Of course the general myth is that the evil bankers foreclosed on poor "Nellie's farm" and sent her into a life of prostitution.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 06:25 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:25 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: voters, MA-4 at July 21, 2011 06:26 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Legacy at July 21, 2011 06:26 AM (rjFpy)
What I found in SimCity (the last version I played was long ago, however) was that tax rates had to be relatively high before they stifled growth. And, indeed, SimCity was fairly realistic about it considering you were Simulating a City and your "Tax" was a sales-tax rate. Anything below about 5% is negligible (and not really enough to fund a city beyond a certain size) and anything above about 8% is going to get people to go elsewhere.
So I guess I'm talking more about Civilization than I am SimCity.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 06:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:28 AM (agD4m)
If FDR didn't have WWII, I don't think the U.S. would have come out of The Great Depression as quickly and as well as it did.
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 10:12 AM (ihSHD)
WWII did not bring us out of great depression 1.0. It only pasted over the symptoms by giving full employment to the military and full business to manufacturing for making military equipment.
What got us out of great depression 1.0 was repeal of some of the more onerous regulations and the fact that the rest of the world had no manufacturing so we could export everything.
As soon as the rest of the world got their buisness back in the mid 60s we started sliding again. The JFK tax cuts probably had more to do with helping our economy grow than anything but he didn't go far enough in killing a lot of the FDR regulations.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 06:30 AM (M9Ie6)
Just in case anyone is interested or knows someone who is.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 06:30 AM (8y9MW)
Hey, we've got a great idea for cutting the deficit: Let's stick it to military retirees.
This can't be avoided--it's not just Shaniqua and her 5 babies by 4 fathers that will get hit by government cutbacks. Anyone getting some form of government paycheck is going to feel the pain.
We might not like it when it hits folks we feel it shouldn't, but the math doesn't care how outraged we get about it.
Posted by: Red Rocks Rockin at July 21, 2011 06:31 AM (GAh/e)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:32 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:34 AM (agD4m)
True. Though it will be interesting to see whether the bills and other related amendments pass considering the hissy fit thrown by the moderate Rs on the Appropriations Committee.
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 06:35 AM (o2lIv)
This is OT, but has the matter of Cenk Uygur's departure from MSNBC been discussed here at the HQ?
All the bros down at the Delta Tard house are going to be soooo bummed, dude. The Cenker was like, a success and stuff, and now he's out of a job.
It ain't like fair, man- but at least we can have Cenks back to do beer bongs during Rush next semester. Paaaar TAY! Whooooooooooooh!!!!
Posted by: Chariots of Toast at July 21, 2011 06:35 AM (tk5O7)
http://tinyurl.com/5w3jhk9
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 06:40 AM (136wp)
I'd love to have a game - like Tropico or Sim City - where you run a small country that follows real (read, conservative) economic and social modeling. For example, raising taxes never brings in as much as it is supposed to.
Yeah, I think my new hobby is going to be programming; I can make better games than the kids that make them now. Time to get to it.
Posted by: Josef K. at July 21, 2011 10:17 AM (7+pP9)
Did you ever play Shadow President? That could be reworked into something awesome.
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at July 21, 2011 06:41 AM (Klxrr)
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 06:41 AM (o2lIv)
When they default the government is then on the hook to pay the bank they borrowed the money from.Of course here in the U.S. that will be seen as "bailing out the banks again" and thus we need even more GD regulation like frakin Dodd-Frank.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 06:41 AM (M9Ie6)
Obama blinked.
"President Obama could agree to a short-term hike of the debt ceiling only if there are concrete plans in place to move quickly with a grand bargain..."
Plus Obama's insisting on it being a "comprehensive" plan. In other words, it must include tax hikes. But who cares what Obama wants. He NEEDS an increase in the debt ceiling and will sign any bill that gets to his desk.
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 06:42 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 10:41 AM (o2lIv)
and the racism has increased in proportion to the decrease in his approval.
Posted by: MFM at July 21, 2011 06:42 AM (136wp)
If you want to know, look at the Irish.
Last month I was in Clifden, County Galway, for a wedding. The only sign of the problem in Ireland were some deals on real estate. The west of Ireland tends to be the poorer part of Eire, so they won't be affected as much if Ireland defaults. A tourist town, but the people were pretty upbeat.
And two:
It is only an Irishman's abiding sense of tragedy that gets him thru occasional periods of joy.
Whatever happens in Ireland...the bogtrotters will do what's necessary to get thru it, as the Greeks would not.
Posted by: trainer at July 21, 2011 06:44 AM (Rojyk)
Please excuse me if I am suffering from Peace Dividend flashbacks. Anyone who was in the surface navy during the 1990s (i.e. was gone all the time covering the jobs that used to be done by the ships we scrapped) knows all about what happens to the military when the geniuses with meat axes go hunting for money to prop up their entitlement spending. The problem is not with cutting the military per se, but with cutting the military while maintaining the same mission load. Sure you save money this year, but you wear out your personnel and equipment faster, which means you have to spend more a few years down the line.
It would be sort of nice if we could visit all the other rice bowls before raiding the military. Again.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:45 AM (agD4m)
"U.S. Budget Deficit Hits Record $438 Billion For Year"
And as long as I am posting, also from NRO, a description of England before the Great War:
"Until August 1914 a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state, beyond the post office and the policeman. He could live where he liked and as he liked. He had no official number or identity card. He could travel abroad or leave his country for ever without a passport or any sort of official permission. He could exchange his money for any other currency without restriction or limit. He could buy goods from any country in the world on the same terms as he bought goods at home. For that matter, a foreigner could spend his life in this country without permit and without informing the police. Unlike the countries of the European continent, the state did not require its citizens to perform military service. An Englishman could enlist, if he chose, in the regular army, the navy, or the territorials. He could also ignore, if he chose, the demands of national defence. Substantial householders were occasionally called on for jury service. Otherwise, only those helped the state who wished to do so. The Englishman paid taxes on a modest scale: nearly £200 million in 1913-14, or rather less than 8 per cent. of the national income. … broadly speaking, the state acted only to help those who could not help themselves. It left the adult citizen alone."
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 21, 2011 06:46 AM (TVvXc)
Posted by: ATMs at July 21, 2011 06:48 AM (zgZzy)
It's FDR all over again - I've read articles that speculate that the Great Depression wouldn't have lasted as long as it did had he not been in office for 3+ terms.
FDR benefitted for a long time from a very aggressive propoganda machine in both the press (beat reporters, in particular) and academia (no further explanation needed). The culture of credentialism--that a college degree automatically confers expertise--saw its genesis in his administration with the "Brain Trust," and there's been a very concerted effort in the universities since then to tow the Democratic party line as a result.
It's actually quite similar to what occurred in England following the death of Queen Elizabeth. For several hundred years, her reign was portrayed as a "golden age" of peace, harmony, and prosperity, and arguments to the contrary were simply dismissed as crackpot. It's only been recently that further investigation has shown that things were not quite as rosy as was assumed.
Posted by: Red Rocks Rockin at July 21, 2011 06:50 AM (GAh/e)
> 107 Both of those SOBs should be in JAIL. And piss on Scott Brown for giving them the vote they needed to break the vote on this.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 10:18 AM (M9Ie6)
He shoots, he SCOOOOOOOOOOOOORes!
(Except I like the term "Crony Capitalism." It's accurate.)
Posted by: K~Bob at July 21, 2011 06:51 AM (c2fN9)
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 06:51 AM (LyOUH)
If you recall, back in March, as part of the price to pass a ginormous omnibus spending bill for the remainder of FY 2011, the republicans asked for $38 billion in cuts. After much yelling, screaming and gnashing of teeth, the Democrats/President offered $6.5 billion in cuts, and the federal government was at peace.
Then came the headlines, "Democrats’ “$6.5 Billion” in Spending Cuts Actually $4.7 Billion," followed by shrinking numbers. And finally, when the dust settled, the budget cuts, we were told, were really only worth $352 million.
There is this old adage .. "fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me."
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at July 21, 2011 06:52 AM (e8kgV)
Aug 2nd, 2011: Sure, Mr. President, we will get working on that comprehensive plan right away. We will put our top men on it. Top. Men.
July 2nd, 2012: Yeah, sorry about those intransigent House Republicans. The nerve of that lot. Well, we can't do anything now that we are entering campaigning season, and, let me be clear, you wouldn't want a false choice of default or cutting off your base from the teat, would you? Here, sign this, it will get us through March 2013.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:52 AM (agD4m)
Did FDR milk the blame-game on his predecessor like Obama is doing?
He did, indeed! I watched the entire thing on television!
Posted by: Joe Biden at July 21, 2011 06:55 AM (zgZzy)
“As a practical matter I don’t think there’s anyone on Wall Street, speaking for the financial professionals, who doesn’t believe that ultimately people who are being difficult on Capitol Hill are going to say uncle,” said Daniel Alpert of Westwood Capital. [...]
Alpert is far from alone. Tim Ryan, CEO and chairman of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, says thereÂ’s a straightforward reason why markets so far havenÂ’t been responding to the ups and downs of the debt talks.
“Because nobody thinks this is going to happen,” Ryan said of a default and downgrading of the U.S.’s AAA credit rating. “Nobody believes this will happen.”
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 06:55 AM (o2lIv)
FDR, hell, you forgetting Pelosi and Kerry with "the worst economy if fifty years" bullshit in 2004?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 06:56 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 06:56 AM (iYbLN)
Did FDR milk the blame-game on his predecessor like Obama is doing?
He did, indeed! I watched the entire thing on television!
Posted by: Joe Biden at July 21, 2011 10:55 AM (zgZzy)
Just before I won World War One by flying to Tokyo on the Concorde and short-sheeting Hitler's bed.
Posted by: Joe "Gabby" Biden at July 21, 2011 06:57 AM (136wp)
I remember John Kerry's cockamamie "Middle-Class Misery Index."
It was so manipulated that even the media debunked it.
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 06:58 AM (G/zuv)
FDR, hell, you forgetting Pelosi and Kerry with "the worst economy if fifty years" bullshit in 2004?
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 10:56 AM (agD4m)
Truman and the "Do Nothing" Congress?
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 06:58 AM (136wp)
We have reached a technological stage in the West where most tasks can be automated. This includes even many 'expert' tasks. Yeah yeah, there are new jobs created assembling maintaining and programming the machines but try and picture the cashier at McDs (that can't even figure correct change) doing these tasks. Take something like auto repair; cars are built better and need less labor to maintain per mile driven now. Or look at meter readers, soon to be an extinct job.
Large companies are continuing to show decent profits mainly because of continued productivity gains, which is really a measure of output per employee hour. Reduce the number of hours with various automation strategies and presto -- instant profit and less employees. Those businesses with high personnel costs (much of this due to regulatory and mandated benefits) are doing less well.
So the question then comes up -- where do all these replaced and displaced workers go? Keep in mind if the job involves cheap and fairly mindless labor, there are 6 billion people in the rest of the world willing to work for peanuts.
I'm not saying that this is the only reason for continued high unemployment but it is a factor. The thing is, I don't see any new large scale labor needs to replace these low skill jobs. Add more TSA workers? Ninja please, I want them almost all shitcanned. Maybe replacing all our coal fired power plants with nukes would create a big enough tide over effect to wait for the next big thing that needs lots of bodies. One thing is for sure, energy use creates prosperity. Chart after chart shows the relation between national power use and national income. Energy use is a labor magnifier.
Posted by: GnuBreed at July 21, 2011 06:58 AM (ENKCw)
Post pics of nerdy babes in skimpy costumes!
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 06:59 AM (fFw5M)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 07:01 AM (/0a60)
Yeah, go sit on your tuffet, Nostradamus.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:01 AM (agD4m)
It's Limited Liability COMPANY, not Corporation. A corporation is a completely different animal that has limited liability built into it.
Sorry, just formed two LLCs this morning for a client.
And I am an irritating scold.
Posted by: Sharkman at July 21, 2011 07:02 AM (wMsKw)
I'll point out that expansion of wealth leads to more opportunities for jobs and entrepreneurs. Grow the economy, more people can find work...
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:02 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 11:01 AM (/0a60)
NJ State Prison is located next to Newark-Liberty Airport. Work release program...
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:04 AM (136wp)
Unless you're really expensive to insure, I really doubt it. What would their motivation be?
So the question then comes up -- where do all these replaced and displaced workers go?
Well, in our current paradigm- to the government teat. In a rational world, there would be constant innovation which would constantly need new workers- and that's where they'd go.
It's rather like asking what happened to all the buggy makers when automobiles became ubiquitous. It took far more people to make enough buggies for everyone who wanted one than it did to make automobiles- where did those "extra" workers go?
The answer is "other industries." Some of them started businesses, some of them started assembling cars, some of them became milk-men, or whatever.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 07:04 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: K~Bob at July 21, 2011 07:04 AM (c2fN9)
UPDATE 3: If this isn't a signpost on the way to DOOM, nothing is: Laura Ingraham's baggage robbed at NJ airport. (In Newark. I might have known. That joint is an utter pisshole.)
Damn Newark Airport! I hate that place. It's filthy and hideous. I was only there for half an hour between flights last year and immediately wanted to take a shower. And as I've mentioned before, the bathrooms are something out of a ghetto Burger King. All that's missing is the mob-like beating of a transvestite.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:05 AM (4df7R)
DOOM can be anything it wants to be. That's just how DOOM rolls.
(But yeah, LLC is "Limited Liability Company", not "Corporation".)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 07:05 AM (/0a60)
"Anyone with an Obama 2012 bumper sticker, I recognize them as a threat to the gene pool."
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 21, 2011 07:07 AM (TVvXc)
Posted by: cherry π at July 21, 2011 07:07 AM (OhYCU)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 07:07 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 11:05 AM (4df7R)
But we have bears!
NORTH CALDWELL — A small bear took a dip in a township resident’s backyard pool near the peak of the 90-degree heat Tuesday, police said.
The bear, about 100 pounds, was seen by a resident with its back feet on the pool steps at 2:20 p.m., said police spokesman Sgt. Bill Texas.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:08 AM (136wp)
NJ State Prison is located next to Newark-Liberty Airport.
You can get a ride there from downtown Newark for under a dollar. Making your entire trip to Newark Liberty's Long Term Parking Terminal not only economical, but quite profitable.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 07:08 AM (I2bQp)
We have money to burn. Because in Massachusetts the governor is again pushing for in-state tuition for illegals.
This is the big "disconnect." Obama is pretending to deal with the deficit and insists on higher taxes to pay down the debt. And at the same time Obama is pushing the DREAM Act which is a spending program for foreigners.
If we could only connect these two actions...
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 07:09 AM (G/zuv)
DOOM can be anything it wants to be. That's just how DOOM rolls.
You need to market a 'DOOM' ring.
...like the old 'mood' rings of the seventies.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 07:09 AM (I2bQp)
Posted by: cherry π at July 21, 2011 11:07 AM (OhYCU)
I worked in Newark for four years. The Ironbound section is great. It's a working-class neighborhood with excellent Portuguese food. That being said. avoid any other area on pain of death.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:10 AM (136wp)
Posted by: SFGoth at July 21, 2011 07:11 AM (dZ756)
It is, but it's troublesome that there are still people on Wall Street who think that it isn't. They're still insisting things are going to be okay because Congress is going to make sure that they will be, because Congress can't fail on something big. Well, what happens if/when they do? It certainly doesn't look like they're going to get a solid comprehensive deal anytime soon, short of a miracle.
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 07:12 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 10:56 AM (iYbLN)
Ah, stop yer complaining. You live in San Diego for chrissakes! Sure, it's part of California, but it's San Diego!
I was there for a week back in March and caled my boss and told him I wasn't coming home.
Of course, it would be an even better place with a few less Hello Kitty wearing folks running around....
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 07:12 AM (LyOUH)
Watch it, model_1066. Ace doesn't like that shit. At all.
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 07:12 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: K~Bob at July 21, 2011 10:51 AM (c2fN9)
What we are doing here, and in the past, has NOTHING to do with capitalism. It is pure outright corruption.
In any case, am hitting the beers and about to start new copy of Tombstone on Blu_Ray so I will be in and out.
Posted by: Vic at July 21, 2011 07:12 AM (M9Ie6)
Gov Deval Patrick was part of a shameless display yesterday. He and a few "poor" illegals spoke at hearings about how unfair it is that they have to pay out-of-state tuition.
Patrick said later we have to remember that these are "real people" were talking about.
On the radio this morning a woman made a good point: "What about us? Are we not real people?
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 07:13 AM (G/zuv)
I worked in Newark for four years. The Ironbound section is great. It's a working-class neighborhood with excellent Portuguese food. That being said. avoid any other area on pain of death.
Me, too.
Emilia's. That's where you eat.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 07:13 AM (I2bQp)
Posted by: SFGoth
First, it's medicinial, not recreational. Pot heads are doing it for the sick children.
Second, I doubt that it was the idea of anyone here, save perhaps you, to waste one minute of governmental time to either issue.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 07:14 AM (326rv)
Unemployment is high and mouths must be fed.
How many of the geniuses from NASA will wind up recruited into the space programs of other, perhaps, less friendly nations?
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 07:14 AM (LyOUH)
Posted by: cherry ð at July 21, 2011 11:07 AM (OhYCU)
I bet. *shudder* I wonder, does Newark or East Orange have a more engaging nightlife?
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:15 AM (4df7R)
How long before all those NASA engineers and the contractors who support space travel are included in this weekly jobless number.
hey Rocket Scientist, McDonalds is hiring!
Welcome to OBLahBLahland!
Next time I see a OBLahBLah voter I intend to ask them to give me one good solid reason to vote for that Jackass!
Maybe those Rocket Scientists can be converted to Muslim outreach works by OBLahBLahs re-education commission.
Posted by: Concealed Kerry or submit at July 21, 2011 07:15 AM (vXqv3)
And the really scary part is that he is the best mayor they have had in years.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at July 21, 2011 07:15 AM (LH6ir)
How long before all those NASA engineers and the contractors who support space travel are included in this weekly jobless number.
Those numbers will belong to Rick Scott and Rick Perry. No skin off Obama's nose.
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 07:16 AM (LyOUH)
I like your instincts.
Posted by: garrettgarrett,
I'll keep on the lookout for a Judy Garland look a like that sings "clang, clang, clang goes the trolley."
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 07:17 AM (iYbLN)
TRENTON — Three major public worker unions’ committees stopped donating to state lawmakers while the legislators — who face elections in November — were preparing to vote on a landmark overhaul of pensions and health benefits.
....
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:18 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Tami at July 21, 2011 07:18 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 07:18 AM (WkuV6)
One bonus of a new Greek diaspora:
Styrofoam Greek Columns can be had for a steal! More competition and what not!
Oh, and my dad use to work in Newark for a few years. Lots of polish ladies worked in his plant. They use to make him pierogies. Delish!
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 07:18 AM (ihSHD)
This coming from a man who presides over a body which hasn't held as many sessions as the House until this month.
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 07:19 AM (o2lIv)
And the really scary part is that he is the best mayor they have had in years.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (NJConservative) at July 21, 2011 11:15 AM (LH6ir)
Ain't that the truth. Pathetic.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:19 AM (136wp)
But we have bears!
NORTH CALDWELL — A small bear took a dip in a township resident’s backyard pool near the peak of the 90-degree heat Tuesday, police said.
The bear, about 100 pounds, was seen by a resident with its back feet on the pool steps at 2:20 p.m., said police spokesman Sgt. Bill Texas.
Posted by: The Robot DevilBears gotta swim....birds gotta fly...
Posted by: mpfs at July 21, 2011 07:20 AM (iYbLN)
If, by "compliance" you mean, "Giving in to ObamaCare" I guess maybe... but mostly not (as long as they're making money off of you, and "complying" with all the regs, they have no reason to price you out).
If, by "compliance" you mean the cost of complying with the new regs... well, then it wouldn't be "deliberately trying to price you out" it would be trying to recoup their costs of compliance.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 07:20 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 07:20 AM (ihSHD)
re: Reid
What's his problem; the House passed their bill.
The House did its job. It's now up to Reid to do HIS job.
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 07:21 AM (G/zuv)
Just remember:
Tea Partiers saying "Remember November" in 2010: It's an act of sedition! They secretly want to blow up Parliament Congress!
Union thugs saying "Remember November" in 2011: It's legitimate discourse!
Posted by: chemjeff at July 21, 2011 07:21 AM (s7mIC)
Posted by: joncelli at July 21, 2011 07:21 AM (RD7QR)
This coming from a man who presides over a body which hasn't held as many sessions as the House until this month.
How about all the time Democrats have taken off since they refused to write a budget? Yeah, asshat!
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 07:22 AM (ihSHD)
Posted by: copper thieves at July 21, 2011 07:22 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 07:23 AM (WkuV6)
How about all the time Democrats have taken off since they refused to write a budget? Yeah, asshat!
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 11:22 AM (ihSHD)
And need we bring up the infamy of President Putt Putt?
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:23 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:23 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 11:23 AM (agD4m)
Just not Newark-Liberty International Airport.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:24 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Jean at July 21, 2011 07:26 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 07:27 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 07:29 AM (I2bQp)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 10:45 AM (agD4m)
Yep.... and according to reports I've been reading lately, Material Readiness of the Fleet is HORRIBLE... with years of maintenance backlog'd.... and ships going to sea with Major Systems down.... its been slipping for years but if reaching a crises point...
So... who do we put in charge of the Pentagon? Yep, the same dam Admirals who allowed Material Readiness to slide in the first place.
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 21, 2011 07:30 AM (NtXW4)
Obama has had sub-50% approval for 10 consecutive quarters... http://pwire.at/oN9RQd
Posted
by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 10:41 AM (o2lIv)
Dude has only been in office for 10 1/2 quarters......
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at July 21, 2011 07:31 AM (/kd4o)
Of course the actual engineers and wrench turners are getting the shaft, while the jerkoffs who push electrons around still get work.
Deja vu. See, Shipbuilding, US, Twentieth Century.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:32 AM (agD4m)
That said, every city principally laid out after the advent on the automobile isn't going to work too well with added bike lanes and pedestrian infrastructure because of the lack of density. Everything is so spread out that walking or biking everyone isn't practical. Nor is public transit going to be anything than a boondoggle, because once again there isn't sufficient density to make it anywhere near cost efficient for the population served.
America would be better off making cities more dense and preserving arable farmland rather than continuing to sprawl endlessly. It is a huge was of resources and time for people to have to drive an hour to get to work or spend a gallon of gas just to buy groceries. However, given the tendency for snob zoning in the suburbs and nanny staters trying to dictate or socially engineer every aspect of life in cities, I don't see that working out too well either.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 07:32 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 11:27 AM (TMB3S)
I'm guessing LA, Hispanic vs. Black. There is no love lost between them.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:32 AM (136wp)
Are you telling us that a 20% loss cannot be overcome by an immediate 20% gain? But it's the same number!!!
-- The Innumerati
Posted by: No Whining at July 21, 2011 07:32 AM (HmCnI)
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 11:29 AM (I2bQp)
Sounds kinky. I'm in!
Posted by: Sen. Trent Lott at July 21, 2011 07:33 AM (s7mIC)
Chuckie Schumer was bragging yesterday that he's the one who stopped the Senate Ds from doing more work on a budget. Apparently he told some D colleagues that doing their jobs would have cut-back on their ability to use the House budget as a weapon. All concerned came to agree with that assessment.
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 07:34 AM (o2lIv)
Are you telling us that a 20% loss cannot be overcome by an immediate 20% gain? But it's the same number!!!
-- The Innumerati
Posted by: No Whining at July 21, 2011 11:32 AM (HmCnI)
Hey, 20 plus -20 equals 40! Double win for Obama!
Posted by: MFM at July 21, 2011 07:34 AM (136wp)
So the question then comes up -- where do all these replaced and displaced workers go? Keep in mind if the job involves cheap and fairly mindless labor, there are 6 billion people in the rest of the world willing to work for peanuts.
Posted by: GnuBreed at July 21, 2011 10:58 AM (ENKCw)
I've been asking the same thing. Don't expect an answer. Nobody really has one. Trying to discuss that issue results in more ostrich like behavior than you can imagine. Nobody knows (or is willing to admit) what must be done to address the situation.
The traditional and time-tested principle, where one works for his bread, is becoming unworkable due to lack of real opportunity. This worsens continually as we make/import more and more humans, of whom we need fewer and fewer. If we slash the lowest wages lower and lower, to compete with the asian slaves, all it will do is create a deflationary death spiral while reducing most people to squallid and miserable poverty. You need consumers, but when everyone is driven to the absolute lowest worldwide bidder, that means that if you have low skills, or are redundant, you're working for food and shelter and basic utilities and that's about it. Consumption thus collapses, more people are out of work, and on it goes - swirling round the toilet until the whole structure has consumed itself and we have to start over.
Meanwhile the libtards have annihilated the core of the culture that allowed us to build up modern civilization in the first place. If the government fails to supply enough bread and circus rations to the ghettos, they'll rise up and try to eat the rest of us. If we win, then things can recover. If we lose (a choice we seem ever more likely to embrace) then good luck ever rebuilding.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 07:34 AM (xUM1Q)
nothing new
Posted by: maverick muse at July 21, 2011 07:34 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 11:27 AM (TMB3S)
That's an interesting philosophical question. Cities like Detroit and Chicago would seem like prime candidates for riots and looting, but they've been boned for so long, and subject to low-scale riots and looting for equally long, that the people may not bother themselves to really throw a brick through their cities' proverbial and literal windows without another city leading the charge. Will that city be one of the freshly minted COTB (Cities of the Terminally Boned), such as Memphis? Or leftist pits of insanity like San Francisco, that have been regulated and restricted and redistricted to the point that they have to blow up at some point, like someone trying to tighten a corset around a balloon.
I'm just glad I don't live in any of them.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:35 AM (4df7R)
NASA hired/kept the less than genius. They couldn't even design a proper means to land a portable camera on Mars without it breaking on landing. Oops, balloons pop on sharp rocks.
Posted by: maverick muse at July 21, 2011 07:36 AM (lpWVn)
I'm just glad I don't live in any of them.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 11:35 AM (4df7R)
Does Detroit even have enough people to hold a riot?
Posted by: Tami at July 21, 2011 07:36 AM (X6akg)
Yup, the Navy is boned. We are fortunate that nobody except for the PLA Navy is really shaping up to be a blue water threat, but I think it not to long before they could plausibly expect to assert control of pretty much everything they are claiming is their sphere of influence.
Throw in the Russians getting a little froggy, some cyber warfare, and maybe a surprise strike on our concentrated-in-only-four-major-ports surface Navy, and we could be SOL.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:37 AM (agD4m)
You're right. The headline on Political Wire should read "6 consecutive quarters".
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 07:38 AM (o2lIv)
nothing new
Posted by: maverick muse at July 21, 2011 11:34 AM (lpWVn)
Funny how all the 'terrorists' were White people...
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 21, 2011 07:38 AM (NtXW4)
Does Detroit even have enough people to hold a riot?
Posted by: Tami
Good point. And notice that the latest wave of attacks consists of roving bands. Fewer organizantional skills and numbers required.
All of this is an arguement against increasing population density, rather than for it. I'll take the sprawl, thanks.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 07:38 AM (6rX0K)
I'd love to read a follow-up story about those hippie/yuppies who bought houses in Detroit for $6K.
As you know, the houses were stripped. So the new owners used the opportunity to make them "green."
I wonder what happened...
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 07:39 AM (G/zuv)
Does Detroit even have enough people to hold a riot?
Posted by: Tami at July 21, 2011 11:36 AM (X6akg)
They'd import some AFL-CIO thugs from out of state. Then they'd complain about having to pay them time and a half to loot.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:40 AM (4df7R)
I don't trust the TSA or the 'tards who handle our luggage as far as I can throw them.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 07:41 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 11:37 AM (agD4m)
Nope... just a Ret. USN guy... who has friends and a Son on Active duty....
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 21, 2011 07:41 AM (NtXW4)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:41 AM (SB0V2)
As you know, the houses were stripped. So the new owners used the opportunity to make them "green."
I wonder what happened...
Posted by: Soothsayer
They paid money for those houses? Wilmington, Delaware offered houses for a dollar under a homesteading program if they were renovated and occupied for three years. It really improved parts of the city.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 07:42 AM (326rv)
It's the choice of a new boned generation. Welcome!
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 07:42 AM (/0a60)
Urban areas = Nanny states = Democrat voters = Elected Democrats = Stuff far worse than wasting a gallon of gas to get groceries.
Yeah, let's supercharge that fucking equation.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:42 AM (agD4m)
I'd love to read a follow-up story about those hippie/yuppies who bought houses in Detroit for $6K.
As you know, the houses were stripped. So the new owners used the opportunity to make them "green."
I wonder what happened...
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 11:39 AM (G/zuv)
Don't you know? It's a gold mine!!! Invest now!!!! (Do I need a /sarc flag?)http://tinyurl.com/3cfxgqh
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:43 AM (136wp)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 11:32 AM (ijjAe)
Screw densification. That's got to be the most dehumanizing force at work in modern society. The American suburb, minus the damn homeowners associations, is the highest form to human existence that most people can ever hope to achieve. Better to decentralize the work places. Spread out production. Indeed, make everyone live on more land so they can have a septic system, some trees, and maybe a plot to grow stuff on. We still have vast amounts of unoccupied land, and if we had the brains to stop immigration and let the population contract we'd have even more open space.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 07:44 AM (xUM1Q)
Other than the hard core professional criminal class, most residents of the ghetto only know food from take out restaurants and the microwave. The 300-400lb blobs living off processed everything wouldn't last long without a government check allowing them to purchase rear to eat food.
Yes it's a stereotype, but I see it ever damn day here in Boston.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 07:45 AM (ijjAe)
Urban areas = Nanny states = Democrat voters = Elected Democrats = Stuff far worse than wasting a gallon of gas to get groceries.
Yeah, let's supercharge that fucking equation.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth
Agreed. I have one response to the call for further density: SEPTA. It's a freaking pit of scum and villany. Cities and unions breed such stupidity. Every time they go on strike, they drive away permanently a percentage of their ridership. But their costs never go down. Sound familiar?
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 07:45 AM (326rv)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 07:45 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:47 AM (SB0V2)
there are still a lot of people in them. It will be a two-fer - maybe pulling DC into it too.
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 11:41 AM (SB0V2)
You know... it might turn into a full-scale East Coast megalopolis riot, from Boston to Miami. Especially if it were to happen in summer during a heat wave. Someone's landlord doesn't respond fast enough to fix a broken air conditioner in downtown Philadelphia, the renter goes and busts the landlord's window, the landlord retaliates with a baseball bat to the renter's car, the renter starts throwing produce from the nearby neighborhood market at the landlord, the shopkeeper tries to intervene and gets shoved, the shopkeeper's son comes to his aid... and someone just happens to have their camera phone recording the whole thing.
It goes viral, racial and class divides start blazing, and the whole eastern seaboard goes up in smoke.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:47 AM (4df7R)
Speaker Boehner calls CutCap&Balance Bill a responsible way forward on the deficit and urges Senate to pass it.
At news conf, Boehner says the deficit ball is in the president's court "and has been there for some time."
Boehner calls on Pres Obama to "step up and work with us" on spending cuts and reforms that Americans demanding.
Posted by: '80sBaby at July 21, 2011 07:47 AM (o2lIv)
They paid money for those houses? Wilmington, Delaware offered houses for a dollar under a homesteading program if they were renovated and occupied for three years. It really improved parts of the city.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 11:42 AM (326rv)
David Bromberg opened a business selling upscale violins. I think he also hosts an open-mike. Read about it in Fretboard Journal.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:48 AM (136wp)
You seem to think that everyone is suburbia is living in some sort of self sufficient mini farm. They sure as Hell aren't and if the supply of gasoline ever was interrupted most of suburbia would be in very deep shit. There's a big difference from real self sustaining rural living and the green acres lifestyle sold in this country in the postwar period.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 07:48 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:49 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 11:49 AM (SB0V2)
Just keep yourself and your loved ones safe, BlackOrchid.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 11:27 AM
...ahem, July 20, 1967
"Most revolutions don't take place where people are depressed, but where there is hope like in the South during the 1960s." That's as dumb as revisionism gets.
Posted by: maverick muse at July 21, 2011 07:51 AM (lpWVn)
So would dense cities. How do you think food gets there?
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 07:52 AM (ktytq)
David Bromberg opened a business
selling upscale violins. I think he also hosts an open-mike. Read about
it in Fretboard Journal.
Here'es a link to the article:
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:53 AM (136wp)
Here's a random thought: as a compassionate measure, spending cuts should be accompanied by reductions in minimum wage, so those laid off gov't workers can find a competitive job they are qualified for.
(Any present company excluded, of course).
Posted by: Some says at July 21, 2011 07:53 AM (vI8R6)
They sure as Hell aren't and if the supply of gasoline ever was interrupted most of suburbia would be in very deep shit.
no. they wouldn't.
and good luck heating those 20 floor walk-ups when there's no Heating Oil.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 07:53 AM (I2bQp)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:53 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:53 AM (SB0V2)
"Most revolutions don't take place where people are depressed, but where there is hope like in the South during the 1960s." That's as dumb as revisionism gets.
Posted by: maverick muse at July 21, 2011 11:51 AM (lpWVn)
WOW.
That spin is so hard, it may actually have slowed the rotation of the earth.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:54 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: SFGoth
First, it's medicinial, not recreational. Pot heads are doing it for the sick children.
Second, I doubt that it was the idea of anyone here, save perhaps you, to waste one minute of governmental time to either issue.
///
First, it's medicinal, not medicinial, unless you're referring to cannabadiol, in which case that's kind of a cool play on words. Second, I haven't once had the idea to waste any government time on either issue: the government should butt out and spend no time on either.
Posted by: SFGoth at July 21, 2011 07:54 AM (dZ756)
I love that mag. Pure Grade-A guitar porn.
The mandolin porn is pretty hot, too.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 07:54 AM (136wp)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 11:48 AM (ijjAe)
No - that wasn't really the point I wanted to make. That's why I said "Indeed, make everyone live on more land..." Because suburban lots are not big enough. We need more spread, not less.
Yes - if the gas supply is cut, big problems ensue. But there would have to be a pretty systemic break down for something like that to happen. I would want to be as far away from dense cities as possible in that case. Plus there would still (presumably) be natural gas and hopefully some electricity, so basics of life could be sustained. In the suburb where I live there are two grocery stores within walking distance, and plenty of people still have well water. Heck, while I don't use it, I still have my well pipe accessible in the basement.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 07:54 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 07:55 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: SFGoth at July 21, 2011 07:56 AM (dZ756)
and good luck heating those 20 floor walk-ups when there's no Heating Oil.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 11:53 AM (I2bQp)
Or running the city buses with no gasoline.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:56 AM (4df7R)
and
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 11:48 AM (ijjAe)
For an excellent take on the issue of sprawl and densification (rather, the move over the past 50 years toward un-densification, if I can invent a word) ... Edge City by Joel Garreau.
He notes the evolution of suburbia, and the rise of edge cities (think Tysons Corner, VA) to accommodate a new model of life and work.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at July 21, 2011 07:57 AM (qiOph)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:58 AM (SB0V2)
Of course, one needs to be verging on rich to avoid renting out two of the three floors of such a row house (now deeply discounted to to $999,999. More if you want off-street parking).
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 07:58 AM (agD4m)
the article I posted yesterday said that many agencies were caught off guard by this and I had a link to a map from the government. (sorry don't have time to go back and try to find it now)
bloomberg, CNBC and a host of others have had articles pop up overnight.
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 07:58 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: fluffy at July 21, 2011 07:59 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at July 21, 2011 07:59 AM (SB0V2)
No - that wasn't really the point I wanted to make. That's why I said "Indeed, make everyone live on more land..." Because suburban lots are not big enough. We need more spread, not less.
But first get rid of the regulations that get homeowners fined for growing vegetables in their front yard.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 07:59 AM (4df7R)
The only parts of the country that won't be screwed are the old small towns which still have farms to grow food, density around main street so that people can still walk to what they need and there are enough people to have skills/services provided, actual stores on main street with stuff in them, and some industry to keep making new stuff somehow.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:00 AM (ijjAe)
"feels like" 97
Dew point is 77F. That's enough to wilt concrete.
Posted by: fluffy at July 21, 2011 11:59 AM (4Kl5M)
But it won't melt steel!
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at July 21, 2011 08:00 AM (136wp)
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 08:00 AM (ktytq)
279 Oh, MWR, don't worry about me, I'm long gone from my hometown (well, about 40 miles west of it now).
But thanks! I do worry about friends and family still there. (esp Wyatt who has a rough job in a rough town in a roughish area of it)
Thanks, Orchid! For the record, I'm at work now and the a/c is kaput. Temp is currently 79.2 in the office.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 21, 2011 08:00 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 11:55 AM (TMB3S)
That may be what started it, but that's not what keeps it going. Most people who want a regular family life are at least tempted to flee the cities, to get as far as possible from the underclass and the commies running the government. They used to call it white flight and say it was racism that was to blame, but really it was just plain old flight - getting away from the threats posed by the ever growning scum demographic created by leftist social policies.
The thought of having to live within mere miles of a metro slum gives me the chills. Many of those people are essentially feral. There are serious no-go zones in many US cities - we just like to pretend they don't exist.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 08:01 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 12:00 PM (ktytq)
One more day to go in the Alps. We'll see how he does in the next stage.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at July 21, 2011 08:02 AM (136wp)
Currently 89F in Concord, NH. Feels like 95. Temps expected to reach 96F with a heat index around 105.
I am a cold northern critter. I was not made for heat and humidity. I will melt.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 08:03 AM (4df7R)
Heard someone discuss "the bandwagon effect" yesterday and it made me realize that the press is pumping this plan and all of a sudden everyone is "jumping on the band wagon" cause they don't want to be left out.
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 08:03 AM (k1rwm)
One more day to go in the Alps. We'll see how he does in the next stage.
I was amazed how many riders wiped out during the downhill yesterday.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 21, 2011 08:03 AM (zgZzy)
The only parts of the country that won't be screwed are the old small towns which still have farms to grow food, density around main street so that people can still walk to what they need and there are enough people to have skills/services provided, actual stores on main street with stuff in them, and some industry to keep making new stuff somehow.
Because there are no people with these skillsets in suburbia?
You are a fool to believe such things.
If shit hits the fan, the free-riders are the ones who will have a problem.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 08:04 AM (I2bQp)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:05 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: JackStraw at July 21, 2011 08:06 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 08:06 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: The Donkey Show
You went from the assertion: 'densification is desirable' to the false notion that people think that suburbs are self sufficient. You also asserted that there would be no difference where one would be if Things went Bad.
No, I would not be just as fucked if things crashed down in suburbia. Why? Because I'm not living cheek by jowl with a suddenly deprived underclass, corrupt municipal organization, and an infastructure courtesy of some Dem machine organization. Check out the death toll in New Orleans versus other areas, who suffered the exact same storm.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 08:06 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at July 21, 2011 08:07 AM (M5A8b)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:08 AM (ijjAe)
316 In July it's hot because it's summer, in November it's cold because it's winter......wash, rinse, repeat.
BLASPHEMY!!!
Posted by: Algore at July 21, 2011 08:09 AM (zgZzy)
One of the most miserable summer experiences I had was in Minnesota in 1983. You'd think it would be mild.
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 08:09 AM (G/zuv)
The answer to problems in a city is rudy guiliani. Without him, NY wouldn't be the ny you see today. The man did an amazing job after the tennis stadium building mayor nearly destroyed ny.
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 12:06 PM (k1rwm)
Yes. Of course, how long will it take the new guy to wreck it all? The one thing Rudy couldn't do was fix the culture.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 08:09 AM (xUM1Q)
Was just there (well, back and forth here to there every week for a month or so) ... consulting for a large public utility (guess who). the second week i was there - mid-May - it was like 60 degrees.
I froze my ass off.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at July 21, 2011 08:10 AM (qiOph)
And I am still mystified by this idea we are running out of arable farmland. Sure we are, wherever government officials are doing things like cutting off the water supply in aid of some species of minnow. Government officials of the sort who elsewhere try to ban smoking in outdoors and regularly swap out parking spaces for bike lanes-that see little or no use. You decry the nanny state, yet wish to encourage more people to live in its birth creche. Damned odd chain of logic there.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 08:11 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at July 21, 2011 12:07 PM (M5A8b)
This *waves to 'Nam Grunt*
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 08:11 AM (UOM48)
It used to be that moving to a city was done to find work as farms and rural work dried up. Living in a city was a status symbol (provided you lived in the right part of the city). Now, being able to afford NOT living in the city is what people aspire to. It means you can afford a car, a commute, a home of your own instead of an apartment. Why else do wealthy individuals buy "country homes" in the Hamptons, or up in northern Maine, or ranches out in Montana? Because they can, and because almost no one wants to spend their lives cooped up in the smelly, dirty, crime-ridden wastes of urban America.
Piling everyone together in cities is just another progressive goal that is REgressive in form but not function. The Industrial Revolution spurred both economic growth and migration to urban areas for work. But it was the economic growth that spurred the migration; the migration did not spur the economic growth. Putting people in boxy apartments in cities doesn't find them jobs. All it does is take away their freedom of movement and thus hamstring their opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 08:12 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:12 AM (ijjAe)
American cities really became hellholes following FDR & LBJ. The urban model as a physical structure isn't broken, but the POLITICAL structure of American cities is broken. Given the political structure's attempts at social engineering, the social structure is often broken as well.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 12:05 PM (ijjAe)
Well said. And they will stay broken, as was intended. That rat bastard LBJ bragged when he did it - saying he'd secured Dem electoral victory forever. He knew he was breeding a dependency class. But then, I must say no more. Bringing up the demographics is frowned upon...
I still am not in total agreement that the Urban Model is a desireable thing - I see it more as a necessary evil - but it certainly could be a LOT more liveable than it is.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 08:13 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: The Donkey Show
And in cities, things are nice and concentrated, like parking lots full of buses which are left unused to drown (aong with the people). And since no city can begin to feed itself or provide energy for fuel, power and light, it will somehow overcome that because they don't have that day long commute.
A city is as at least an artificial construct as a suburb. It's actually worse, since it requires far greater infastructure support, and is usually in the thrall of a machine that exists to perpetuate itself.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 08:14 AM (6rX0K)
I thought I heard beck say something about if you make over I think it was $250 grand then you probably won't be getting SS but you will be paying it with no cap on the amount to be paid.
Right now, I believe it's capped at $106,000 - nowhere NEAR that magical $250K the Dems are always blabbering on about. We actually count on that "extra" income later in the year - it comes in handy at Christmas time.....
And if an "insurance" company tried to pull that crap (taking payments in but not paying annuities out) in the private sector, they'd be out of business - and their CEO in jail - so fast, it would make your head spin.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at July 21, 2011 08:14 AM (/kd4o)
You'd think that, but you'd be wrong. Minnesota gets the worst of both words: brutal heat in the summer and brutal cold in the winter. It has a temperature swing of 150F -- from -30F in really cold snaps to 120F in high summer on certain days. And this is prime growth-season for corn and soybeans, which means that they're busy pumping out all kinds of humidity. I've lived down south, and this kind of heat is the kind of stuff I remember from Jackson, Mississippi and Columbus, Georgia in high summer.
Minnesota is not for the weak.
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 08:15 AM (/0a60)
One of the most miserable summer experiences I had was in Minnesota in 1983. You'd think it would be mild.
Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2011 12:09 PM (G/zuv)
Pfft, you wingers have no clue.
Posted by: Ted Kennedy a bit south of heaven at July 21, 2011 08:15 AM (8ieXv)
if the skilled people are spread out over 40 square miles of subdivisions, and there's no gas for cars or communications are down, it's going to make life hard to pool skills together effectively with everyone walking a day or so to get together!
Can you do math?
40 square miles...really...10 miles by 4 miles...or even 8 by 5...
you think it takes all day to walk 10 miles?
You are wrong. Give it up...
and for what it's worth, the further you get out of a population center, the less specialization you will encounter.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 08:15 AM (I2bQp)
Yep, that's it. If you're far apart from others, you can't possibly pool your resources. No one has ever done that before.
Except, you know, everybody prior to about 1800. But other than that, nobody has ever collaborated based their skills, knowledge, and resources with someone who wasn't a next-door neighbor until cars came along.
Okay. If that's what you want to believe.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:15 AM (8y9MW)
Waves back how are you darlin?
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at July 21, 2011 12:13 PM (M5A8b)
I'm great (but hot...summer on the Georgia coast, and now we've got an outbreak of West Nile virus).
How you doin'?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 08:17 AM (UOM48)
I froze my ass off.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at July 21, 2011 12:10 PM (qiOph)
Now, that would be awesome right now.
I was out in LA in January 2010 and the temps were in the 50s or 60s. There were people walking around in winter jackets and scarves, long sleeves and jeans. I, meanwhile, was in shorts and a t-shirt. Hell, I only wear a coat in winter if I'm outside for longer than five minutes or the temperature is below 25F and feels colder with a wind chill.
It's all about the climate you're used to.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 08:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 12:15 PM (/0a60)
One of the best times my husband and son ever had together was canoeing the Northern Tier with the Boy Scouts.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 08:19 AM (UOM48)
I'll be happy out here away from the worst of it, and save ammo for those really smart gang-bangers who realize salvation may not lie within their immediate environs.
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at July 21, 2011 08:20 AM (qiOph)
*sobs*
Everyone stayin' cool?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 21, 2011 08:20 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Ernie McCracken at July 21, 2011 08:20 AM (FUEui)
Bloomberg is actually a step up (compare him to the current mayors of Philadelphia, LA and Washington D.C.) from the usual big city mayor. We've been rather lucky in New York City the last twenty years.
And this gascentric suburbia thing is a load of crap. Most of our problems with gasoline price and supply are government-imposed. Why do we want to further empower the ecotards who wish to get all the peons out of their automobiles? Fortunately, all those things required for urban life are transported by vehicles powered with magic and earnest good intentions.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 08:20 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:21 AM (ijjAe)
From what I'm reading, they're buying into the premise that Obama wins on a short-term increase and that they're being "boxed in [to supply]... their own" idea on debt reduction.
Hey, idiot: They already did: it's called "Cut, Cap, and Balance" and passed the house yesterday. Since Dems are in control of the Senate and White House, what are their specific proposals?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:22 AM (8y9MW)
*sobs*
Everyone stayin' cool?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 21, 2011 12:20 PM (pLTLS)
You poor thing.
I'm avoiding going outside because the humidity will make my hair look like DWS's if DWS didn't use a full bottle of LA Looks Ultra Hold gel every morning.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 08:22 AM (4df7R)
And eye make-up? Fughetaboutit!
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 21, 2011 08:23 AM (pLTLS)
You poor thing. I'm avoiding going outside because the humidity will make my hair look like DWS's if DWS didn't use a full bottle of LA Looks Ultra Hold gel every morning.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 12:22 PM (4df7R)
Another curly-head here. I should buy stock in styling products.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 08:23 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: fluffy, logistician at July 21, 2011 08:23 AM (4Kl5M)
Due to this drought mosquitoes have been on the downlow, I actually sit out my deck at night very comfortably.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at July 21, 2011 08:24 AM (M5A8b)
Do you really want to tell me that you know all your neighbors within a 10 mile radius? And that in the event of a total collapse of civilization you could find a doctor or a mechanic if something went catastrophically wrong among those neighbors without difficulty?
ALL? No. That's unreasonable and un-necessary.
but that's not at question...I only need to know 5-6 of them.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 08:24 AM (I2bQp)
Sad thing is, the first riots were people tearing shzt up.
The second, longer riots, were older, more connected people, getting control of the system, and voting themselves benefits like limos and expense accounts for low-level school admin functionaries. People like John Conyers' wife. And the Kilpatrick family.
Any guesses which group did more damage?
Posted by: K~Bob at July 21, 2011 08:24 AM (c2fN9)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 21, 2011 12:23 PM (pLTLS)
Oh HELL no.
Posted by: MWR at July 21, 2011 08:25 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Rondinellamamma at July 21, 2011 08:25 AM (165ZM)
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 08:25 AM (326rv)
Posted by: An annoymous poster.....aren't you curious who? at July 21, 2011 12:23 PM (OWjjx)
And its SCOLDING hot-here today!! Phew!
Posted by: Curious showing off her vocabulary skills at July 21, 2011 08:26 AM (8ieXv)
Gotta walk home, too. With your tools. How long can you sustain a pace of 3 mph? I'd say he may be within hand grenade range on this one.
Bullshit.
Ever heard of the wheel?, a cart?, wagon?
Don't be foolish. Look to the Amish.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 08:26 AM (I2bQp)
No, but I don't have to. I know enough of them now, and could meet the others later. Do you really think it's all that different from "networking?" I know people- they know other people. You meet those other people and so on. It's not actually as hard as Liberals would have you believe.
And that in the event of a total collapse of civilization you could find a doctor or a mechanic if something went catastrophically wrong among those neighbors without difficulty?
Who said anything about "without difficulty?" I think by the time we're talking about "a total collapse of civilization" difficulty is a given. I do think people (by and large) would man up and band together for mutual protection. That means that finding doctors and mechanics (well, more handy-men than actual mechanics in many cases- but it would be close enough) would not be easy, but it would be done anyway.
You seem to think we can only survive on the say-so, and by the largess of, our government.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:27 AM (ijjAe)
You morons(ettes) are so good for a much needed laugh.
I don't even need to point out what comment is bringing the funneh. It's fairly obvious.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 21, 2011 08:27 AM (pLTLS)
Mobility is freedom. Eliminate weapons, mobility, and food and you have yourself a herd of cattle.
Make cars that won't let you get more than 50 miles without re-charging and showing your location on a grid. Cars that can be de-activated remotely via police cruiser or OnStar-type gadgets.
Make gasoline so expensive that you can't afford to commute more than a few miles or not at all. Causing you to have to move closer to the center of command and control.
They'll do everything possible to have us living like rats piled 300 deep.
We are being herded like cattle ever closer together so that we are easier to find, fence, watch, arrest, and re-educate when we step out of line.
The fact that most of this plan is being implemented by sub-retards may be the only thing that saves us.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 08:27 AM (ECjvn)
That may be the farthest we'll ever see the left go in acknowledging that the ship is sinking.
Pretty much. All I saw was them trotting out how it was also the republicans fault because obuma won't make a deal on anything but his terms. Whatever they are. I also liked how this article points out obuma is at the heart of these issues but needs another term to fix what he broke.
Posted by: Deathknyte at July 21, 2011 08:28 AM (VwUPm)
that's the second best kind.
Ha! I had to read that twice. I thought it said "Pure Grade-A gutter porn."
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 08:31 AM (ihSHD)
I was shocked when Adrian Fenty lost. Yeah I know the schools gal allegedly pissed off the teachers and now they are trying to pin other stuff in that direction. But fenty turned that city around and then they reward him with his exit papers? Never understood that.
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 08:31 AM (k1rwm)
And?
Let's see: let's say I get up in the morning and say, "Gee, I need X. Well, so-and-so can do that for me, and he lives 10 miles away." I get my stuff and I'm out the door by 7 (because, in this post-apocalyptic world, I know I need to get off my lazy behind and actually work to survive, you see). So I'm to so-and-so's place by 10:30 (stopped to catch my breath a time or two).
Now, if it's a big job I need him to do, I leave it with him and go do something else, and then head home. If it's a small job, maybe I stay, maybe I go do other errands and then pick up whatever. But, I still head home.
Only if it's a big job that requires my direct involvement does this preclude me going home that night. And, you know what, I could survive a night or two at so-and-so's place.
People did it for millennia before the car. I think we'd be able to learn how again.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:32 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: fluffy at July 21, 2011 08:32 AM (4Kl5M)
That happens, we city dwellers are well and truly screwed. Unless the collapse is precipitated by a terrorist nuke detonation or two, in which case we likely will be precipitation, raining down on those rubes we smugly turned up our noses at for failing to embrace our plan to pack them into the cities.
Anyone who seriously wants to be in the city during an epic disaster has rocks in their heads. You and your mechanic and doctor will be on the menu then, but hey, at least you'll be able to find one another first.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 08:32 AM (agD4m)
Have any of you ever heard the audio of the CIA agent who infiltrated the WU testifying? Those WU bastards discussed overthrowing the government and letting China, Cuba and Russia split up and share the U. S.
They also discussed in great detail the re-education camps, the "necessary" killing of all white babies, and the "necessity" of murdering 25 million U. S. citizens.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at July 21, 2011 08:32 AM (UOM48)
10 miles takes about 2-3 hours to walk depending on your pace and what you're carrying. This is also assuming you know exactly where your going and whom your are meeting.
It depends on how much the dead hobo weighs. Some of the big ones will really slow you down.
Posted by: runningrn at July 21, 2011 08:33 AM (ihSHD)
I'm not a fan of shit hole Democrat controlled pits sometimes referred to as "cities" in this country. But I do like real cities and reasonably sized towns that don't require driving for a fucking hour to buy a gallon of milk. If you don't live in a rural area and it takes an hour worth of driving just to buy everyday necessities, SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG.
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:34 AM (ijjAe)
The powers that be are debating which new thread to post from this set of topics:
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life
YIkes. We'd be better off discussing medicinal gay marriage.
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 21, 2011 08:35 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: curious at July 21, 2011 08:35 AM (k1rwm)
Should Sarah Palin Run for President on a Platform of Legalizing Marijuana?
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 12:33 PM (ECjvn)
Meh...its gonna work for me in Jersey. All those teachers that hate me are HUGE pot-heads!
Posted by: Chris Christie at July 21, 2011 08:36 AM (8ieXv)
Because you say so.
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 08:36 AM (ktytq)
Why, because you don't like it?
I'll admit it would be inconvenient, but inconvenient != wrong. So explain what, exactly, would be very wrong about it. Without assuming everyone is an incompetent who wouldn't be able to at least learn to fend for themselves.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:37 AM (8y9MW)
You're making a shitload of assumptions about me based on my screen name.
I don't need to assume you are stupid. The proof is in your posts.
Posted by: garrett at July 21, 2011 08:38 AM (I2bQp)
*As little as one minute if running from a mob. Somewhat more if caught and dragged into the alley to be gang raped and despoiled of one's possessions.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 08:39 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: fluffy at July 21, 2011 08:39 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at July 21, 2011 08:39 AM (ZDUD4)
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 21, 2011 08:40 AM (ktytq)
Are we assuming pack animals are gone, as well?
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 08:41 AM (OonVm)
Humans will adapt.
The problems I see are the millions of hungry, desperate, amoral, ignorant humans who will attempt to live off of their fellow man.
The population level we have now is supported by trains and trucks full of food moving freely over rails and roads. Those trains and trucks stop and things are going to be ugly within three months.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 08:41 AM (ECjvn)
Only one hour is fricken nirvana.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at July 21, 2011 08:42 AM (agD4m)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at July 21, 2011 08:42 AM (ZDUD4)
Should Sarah Palin Run for President on a Platform of Legalizing Marijuana?
Oddly enough, Palin did come out for the decriminalization of pot.
Posted by: Armando at July 21, 2011 08:42 AM (nd0uY)
Those trains and trucks stop and things are going to be ugly within three months.
IIRC, I read somewhere that it would be less than a week.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 08:44 AM (OonVm)
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 08:45 AM (ECjvn)
Posted by: CLP at July 21, 2011 08:45 AM (oKIbw)
Posted by: All the FlyOverRedStates at July 21, 2011 08:46 AM (H87Hu)
Posted by: Just Sam at July 21, 2011 08:46 AM (pKDDq)
Unless you really enjoy driving, though the right car does help, do you really want to spend so much time and money doing it rather than other things?
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:47 AM (ijjAe)
I agree, as a city dweller, that living here during a SHTF situation would not be ideal, but I have to smile at some of the suburbanite posts. Are you saying that all of those fine folks in Delaware County, or the Jersey 'burbs, are suddenly going to become self-sufficient farmers? I see it as a slower-motion train wreck. Most ofthose people are ex-city dwellers who may have a tomato plant growing in the large yards, next to the swimming pool.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at July 21, 2011 08:50 AM (YmPwQ)
Most adults have at least three days to a week worth of food (maybe not their favorites) laying around the house or apartment.
All store shelves will be completely bare and/or burned up within 10 days. That's if owners stay to defend them rather than abandoning them.
I imagine the folks at Costco may just decide to bring their families to the store, roll down the steel shutters, climb up on the roof with a rifle and create a little fiefdom.
Government rations, if available at all, will be gone in a month.
I revise my estimate down to six weeks to total anarchy and street warfare.
This society couldn't make three months without cable TV.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 08:50 AM (ECjvn)
But having a large yard sure comes in handy when you need to grow food and meat animals.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 08:52 AM (ECjvn)
The Mormons would probably do well. They're required (kinda) to keep a years worth of food in the pantry for their families.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 08:54 AM (OonVm)
Posted by: The Donkey Show at July 21, 2011 08:55 AM (ijjAe)
You don't live in Texas, do you?
I drive an hour each direction (if traffic is light) to work. What makes you think I'd think twice about doing the same to buy stuff or go see a movie? I've driven six hours round-trip just because the restaurant I wanted to eat at was that far away.
And, I'm sorry, but even at $4.00/gal (we're not there, yet, btw, here in Dallas) I spend far less in gas than the difference in my mortgate/rent would be in "the city" for the kind of space (square footage, not my yard) I've got.
Is it far more convenient to have a grocery store and restaurants and movie theaters closer? Yes. But that doesn't mean being far away is some terrible thing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 08:56 AM (8y9MW)
I'm sure there's something sinister about Mormonism to be gleaned from that... heh
Posted by: Y-not is sitting pretty in Utah at July 21, 2011 08:56 AM (5H6zj)
They're absolutely required, from what I've seen. Plus, from time to time several families in each ward are selected to live off of their stored foods, either for several weeks or in some cases a couple of months. Some neighbors of ours just came off of two weeks without electricity and running water.
I'm not sure how that brings them closer to God, but I sure do salute them for being prepared, especially in these times!
Posted by: Y-not is sitting pretty in Utah at July 21, 2011 08:58 AM (5H6zj)
The answer to problems in a city is rudy guiliani. Without him, NY wouldn't be the ny you see today. The man did an amazing job after the tennis stadium building mayor nearly destroyed ny.
Take it on the road? A roving mayoral road-show? I like it!
How long would he have to reside in a place like Chicago before he could run?
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 08:59 AM (LyOUH)
I think the key difference I found between living in the boonies and living in the city is that the boonies require better planning.
If you run out of milk and the store is a few blocks away, no biggie. When I lived out in the boonies, trips were planned to buy everything we'd need for at least a week. Fill the tank, stock up on groceries, etc. Now I live in the city and I just stop on my way home from work to pick up milk or buy gas or whatever.
One thing I do love about city dwelling is Chinese food delivery.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 09:00 AM (OonVm)
Posted by: Oldsailor's poet at July 21, 2011 09:00 AM (ZDUD4)
#408, and I'm sure you have livestock stored in your garage along with plenty of seedstock too? Farming is a lot harder than people think. The backyard plot isn't going to be sufficient for the average family to make it an entire
And, if it is, you're gonna need a whole lot of ammo to hold on to it.
Posted by: As If... at July 21, 2011 09:00 AM (LyOUH)
One hour and twenty minutes here. Thirty years ago I moved to 30 wooded acres with a 15 acre pond for exactly the reasons being discussed plus I just enjoy the lifestyle. Go to town about once a month. It is a surprise to most how much one can provide or can find suitable replacement. I know all of my neighbors and we share both skills, produce, meat and assorted other stuff.
If one wants to get picky, I guess an MRI machine might not be within walking distance but the sacrifices are relatively few.
As far as someone coming this far out to rape, pillage or plunder? Bring 'em.
Posted by: SCRednek at July 21, 2011 09:00 AM (UfvyB)
I've enjoyed living in a real city and being able to walk to work, but at this stage of life with a dog and different priorities, it's nice to have a suburban yard. I expect we'll return to a mid to smaller urban environment when we hit retirement age.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:02 AM (5H6zj)
I'm not sure how that brings them closer to God, but I sure do salute them for being prepared, especially in these times!
Heh. My in-laws are jack Mormons, but even so, my FIL keeps water and dry goods stored.
I might disagree with the Mormon tenets, but I have a huge respect for their family and social structure.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 09:03 AM (OonVm)
Yeah, I miss that. When we lived in the South Side of Chicago (well, Hyde Park, but close enough) we could get so much delivered, including Mexican and Middle Eastern food. It was heaven.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:04 AM (5H6zj)
You know, you'd think living in Austin you'd be able to get BBQ and Mexican food delivered, but no. Bastards.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 09:05 AM (OonVm)
----
One hour and twenty minutes here.
---
Yeah, distances are relative, aren't they? I remember when we lived in Texas being kind of shocked at the distances folks were willing to travel routinely. We discovered that fact one day when we (foolishly) offered to give a friend a lift home. Took three hours round trip!
A friend of ours lives in the Berkshires. Everything is twenty minutes away. It's become a running joke now.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:07 AM (5H6zj)
Frustrating, but I guess they want the liquor sales.
I'm still amazed no one (to my knowledge) has started up a donut delivery place. I would definitely subscribe to a regular delivery of donuts (coffee, juice, and perhaps a paper) on the weekends.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:09 AM (5H6zj)
In Chicago? It might have been called Mexican food, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 09:10 AM (8y9MW)
Well, probably not. It wasn't Frontera Grill or Topolabambo. There were some pretty Mexican neighborhoods even back in the 80s, although not near us.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:12 AM (5H6zj)
In my experience, the quality of Mexican (really, Tex-Mex) food varies inversely with one's distance from the Mexican border.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 09:14 AM (8y9MW)
We were really disappointed by what passed for Mexican in SoCal.
Texas was obviously great.
I think it's more a function of demand (not just volume but the standards of the clientele). Chicago had, of any place I've lived, the best of the best. We even got the best seafood there.
Posted by: Y-not at July 21, 2011 09:17 AM (5H6zj)
I think it's a function of who is making it. Nothing I've ever had beats the little hole-in-the wall places here in Texas. The city almost doesn't matter, though San Antonio probably wins there.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at July 21, 2011 09:19 AM (8y9MW)
I look for the places where certain people actually eat. Mexican food, look for the little restaurant that Mexicans eat at, if it's full of gringos, move on (I'm looking at you, Chuy's.) Same with Chinese. Want a good old fashioned country breakfast with biscuits and gravy? Hit any small town in Texas and look for the cafe surrounded by pickups.
Best Mexican food I ever had was in NM. Some place out around Three Rivers, IIRC. I love my Tex-Mex, but some places are too fond of cilantro.
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 09:27 AM (OonVm)
Posted by: Monty at July 21, 2011 11:01 AM (/0a60)
Laura Ingraham must certainly be smarter than this. Valuables always go in the carry on. No exceptions.
I travel overseas 2-3 times per year. On my return trips, booze gets properly wrapped and placed in the bottom, dirty underware and sweaty socks go right on the top for TSA to paw thru. In over 30 trans-Pacific trips have seen not one thing stolen or lost.
Posted by: Cicerokid at July 21, 2011 09:28 AM (9jvhM)
It is insanely hard, which makes it nice that I grew up on a farm. And rabbits are a great source of protein for the amount of feed required.
A family of four can live on rabbit, potatoes, corn and tomatoes from 1/4 acre if a supply of water is available. Seen it done.
Protecting it is the hardest part.
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 09:28 AM (ECjvn)
Posted by: glowing blue meat at July 21, 2011 09:32 AM (K/USr)
Posted by: sifty at July 21, 2011 01:28 PM (ECjvn)
This is true. People tend to underestimate what an advanced technology it is nowadays. And if we were really to lose the gasoline supply, it would go from hard to impossible. But happily only the most total and complete anarchy would result in that. If there's a horredous disaster, farm and food processing facitilies have to be near the tippy-top of the power distribution priority list.
And I think it will be easier in such a case to deliver supplies to the more orderly burbs than to the festering cities. Less risk of being mobbed. More cooperation among citizens. Smaller nest of underclass to make trouble.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 21, 2011 09:51 AM (xUM1Q)
So, the Republicans tried to snatch defeat from the Jaws of victory, but Jaws gave the defeat to Obama instead? Jaws is conservative?
That's it, blame it on the Jaws.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at July 21, 2011 09:54 AM (HC4/R)
Posted by: mpurinTexas supports Rick Perry, bitch at July 21, 2011 01:27 PM (OonVm)
We call Chuy's: "Tex-Mex for New Yorkers"
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at July 21, 2011 01:21 PM (u3fg7)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3048 seconds, 546 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Yep, still DOOMED and still fapping.
Posted by: dananjcon fapping to Cuntessa's greatest hits at July 21, 2011 04:56 AM (8ieXv)