August 31, 2011
— Monty

As most of you know, I consider the WaPo's Ezra Klein to be the equivalent of an organ grinder's monkey in a little red vest and a fez: not all that bright, a good target for mockery, and occasionally a hazard to passers-by. (Monkeys bite, you know, and they throw their own poop at people.)
Well, it was inevitable -- once you have a sufficient number of unemployed people, a class of "activists" will rise up and make a living exploiting advocating for this newly-minted victim-group.
If you want to feel better about our own economic plight, just look at the Eurozone. However bad our problems are, they're in more dire straits than we are (and have an even worse political class, if that's even possible).
Veronique de Rugy perform s a public service and presents a Venn diagram comparing Social Security to a classic Ponzi scheme. Veronique says: "You're welcome."
Obama and his "pivot to jobs": his leftist ideology trumps everything else. His record so far is crystal-clear on this. He is neither a leader nor a technocrat in the usual sense, but a Simon-pure ideologue who will not let the mundane fact of failure prevent him from chasing his leftist dreams. He doesn't consider the various failures of his Administration his failures, but rather the ineptitude of his staff or the intransigent blindness of the American people. In his mind, he is Moses, and he will lead us to the Promised Land -- whether we want to go there or not.
Who else is boned, you ask? Why, Australia! Australia is boned! Crikey!
You know how I'm always going on about how badly-served the world has been by the so-called "economic experts"? About my confusion as to why we're still listening to these idiots? Well, I'm not the only one.
Macroeconomic models have not fared well in recent years – the models didn’t predict the financial crisis and gave little guidance to policymakers, and I was anxious to hear the laureates discuss what macroeconomists need to do to fix them. So I found the lack of consensus on what caused the crisis distressing. If the very best economists in the profession cannot come to anything close to agreement about why the crisis happened almost four years after the recession began, how can we possibly address the problems?Answer: common sense and fiscal probity go a long way, dude. Don't spend money you don't have. It's not complicated.
Europe continues to torture Greece. It takes a lot to make me feel sorry for the Greeks, who basically lied, cheated, and connived their way into the Eurozone and then spent like drunken sailors once they were in. But I do feel sorry for them -- they are being denied the expedient of default not for their own sake, but so German and French banks won't collapse. Greece will default at some point or another. It's just pointless cruelty to keep drawing it out like this.
As if Eric Holder's DoJ doesn't have enough on its hands what with running guns to narco-cartels in Mexico and raiding American guitar-builders, they're also finding time to pressure lenders to loan more money to minorities. What's the worst that could happen?
How a beloved children's story illustrates the concept that there's a sucker born every minute.
Annals of the boned: in California, cutting benefit payouts to new employees isn't going to solve the problem. The only way to start leveling the mountain is to cut the pensions of current retirees. This will end up in a huge court fight if someone tries it, of course, and being California, the pensioners will "win". But if the money can't be paid out, it won't be, no matter what the courts say.
[PERSONAL NOTE: Spare a thought (or a prayer, if you're inclined that way) for frequent commenter Vic, who will be in the hospital for awhile.]
----------------------
Come any closer and Ima cut you.

Posted by: Monty at
04:54 AM
| Comments (387)
Post contains 652 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 31, 2011 05:01 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at August 31, 2011 05:02 AM (0OJd9)
2) Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure
3) All economic illiterates suck.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:02 AM (8y9MW)
___________
Would it make it better if they threw someone else's?
Posted by: Anachronda at August 31, 2011 05:02 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Laughing in Texas at August 31, 2011 05:02 AM (dL9LY)
they and the cult of AGW don't understand that it takes a big man to realize how small they are
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 05:03 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at August 31, 2011 05:05 AM (71LDo)
Though, I have to ask: Is CNBC still owned by NBC? If so, how long do you think poor Joe will remain employed for going against the neo-marxist orthodoxy?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:07 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: James E. Carter at August 31, 2011 05:08 AM (iRlbA)
Posted by: POED at August 31, 2011 05:09 AM (CFhHo)
Posted by: GMan at August 31, 2011 05:14 AM (sxq57)
They'll keep him. He's their token.
He's almost the only reason CNBC is at all watchable in the morning. What a mess they made trying to make up for Mark Haines.
Posted by: Retread at August 31, 2011 05:16 AM (BO5ap)
Don't look know but Canada just confirmed the first signal of a recession, after its GDP printed negative
Posted by: MarkC at August 31, 2011 05:16 AM (yPPVC)
The URL you meant to type was "http://www.zerohedge.com". They're much more receptive to spittle-spewing fringe bibble-bibble than we are here. Just an FYI.
And I'm sure the local slackers layabouts louts "anarchists" have their own webpage somewhere too. Or you can just lay around your basement bedroom, or dorm room, or subsidized apartment, hit the bong, and mutter bitter imprecations to the society you leech off of.
Posted by: Monty at August 31, 2011 05:17 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: Darth Randall at August 31, 2011 05:17 AM (O/onO)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 05:17 AM (5H6zj)
Oh goody. A troll.
Let's try rational discussion first, and if that doesn't work, we'll release the proverbial Kracken.
Obama's economic policies are leftist (nay, Marxist) for a variety of reasons. The most important, of course, are his self admitted desire to "spread the wealth" and his self admitted opinion that "at some point, you've made enough money." Those are Marxist ideas. But it goes further than that: he's attempting to establish a command-and-control economy (also Marxist) through the EPA, ObamaCare, and a variety of other initiatives.
Now, as to the fact he's catering to big businesses: 1) Inasmuch as big businesses have more money than small businesses, you are correct that all politicians attempt to cater to big business. 2) Big Businesses actually prefer leftist economic policies, because they benefit from them immensely, at least to a point. More government regulation always disproportionately hurts mid-sized and small businesses. Worse, more regulation often has the side effect of "putting the consumer to sleep" in that too many consumers expect that where there are regulations, there is compliance- something that isn't necessarily true. So when there are more regulations, people are actually more likely to patronize large businesses on the theory that "they" wouldn't let "them" do anything wrong.
Now, I don't know if you're just a Paultard/tinfoil hat type, or if you're a liberal troll who is just trying to stir the pot. In either case, maybe you should reconsider your life choices.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (8y9MW)
CFhHo
#14 has been here before. It goes by many names. Not sure if it's that asshole average joe.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (326rv)
If the very best economists in the profession cannot come to anything close to agreement about why the crisis happened almost four years after the recession began, how can we possibly address the problems?
I'd like to tweak this question a bit.
If the "very best economists in the profession" cannot come to anything close to agreement about why the crisis happened almost four years after the recession began, why do we continue to consider them the best economists in the profession? Indeed, why do we bother asking them anything at all?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (4df7R)
See NLRB-Boeing for just one example.
And get your fucking shine box.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (OK/vv)
@14
Everyone back away slowly and don't make eye contact.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 31, 2011 09:15 AM (4df7R)
Don't make any sudden movements, either. They charge when startled.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (DrWcr)
_______
What I hear is someone yelling "I have no brains!" Let's see how it goes:
A) The underlying policies of BOTH parties are the same.
B) People with brains have not discovered this.
C) I *have* discovered this
Therefore, I am not a person with brains.
Logic is fun!
Posted by: Anachronda at August 31, 2011 05:18 AM (6fER6)
This will end up in a huge court fight if someone tries it, of course, and being California, the pensioners will "win". But if the money can't be paid out, it won't be, no matter what the courts say
Yup. If the money isn't there, it won't be paid. That's when things are going to get truly and utterly ugly.
The situation in Greece reminds me a bit of some things I've been reading about the US housing market. The bottom isn't close to being reached because of all the inventory that's being held back from the market, be it by the banks or by people who are not willing to understand the new reality of the market. At some point that inventory is going to have to be cleared off the books. Might as well rip off the bandage now.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 31, 2011 05:19 AM (VtjlW)
My money's on Paulbot.
This is their last gasp, folks. Soon, but not nearly soon enough, they will have no leader. Say it with me: Former Congressman Ron Paul.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 05:20 AM (5H6zj)
Don't make any sudden movements, either. They charge when startled.
Posted by: Insomniac
Piss themselves more like.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 31, 2011 05:20 AM (6rX0K)
Posted by: blaster at August 31, 2011 05:21 AM (Fw2Gg)
That does have a nice ring, doesn't it. Maybe I'll have my kids record it and use it as my phone ring-tone.
I imagine it'll be even better said by a 4yr old and a 2yr old.
Maybe I'll just have them say, "Good-bye Congressman Paul."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:21 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Count de Monet at August 31, 2011 05:22 AM (4q5tP)
Q-poll has Perry up.
I imagine the first couple of debates will be pretty annoying as the "journalists" try to trip up the Rickster and make a name for themselves in the process. Expect tons of questions about evolution, abortion, gay marriage... you know, the really pressing issues our country faces!
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 05:22 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:22 AM (8y9MW)
you are of course counting on the courts not finding "original meaning" in jurisprudence that says they can print their own money
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 05:23 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Trolls 'R' Us, a Soros company at August 31, 2011 05:23 AM (v+QvA)
Don't make any sudden movements, either. They charge when startled.
Posted by: Insomniac
Piss themselves more like.
Posted by: Blue Hen at August 31, 2011 09:20 AM (6rX0K)
I think, in certain situations, they'll do both. It's a defense mechanism to make up for their lack of actual muscle mass. After all, what's more disconcerting than a spittle-flecked psychotroll charging at you while pissing himself?
Which reminds me. I haven't gone hobo hunting in a while.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 31, 2011 05:23 AM (4df7R)
Did anyone else see the humor in a Governor (1 term, I think) with at least one other failed run (for Senate, yes?) complaining about "career politicians," in his speech to the VFW?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:24 AM (8y9MW)
Anybody got a herd of pigs handy?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:22 AM (8y9MW)
I just might, you f**king tosser.
Posted by: Brick Top at August 31, 2011 05:24 AM (v+QvA)
Posted by: Jean at August 31, 2011 05:25 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:25 AM (8y9MW)
Brick Top is a villainous character from the movie Snatch who uses pigs to dispose of foes he's had eliminated.
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 31, 2011 05:28 AM (OK/vv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:29 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:21 AM (8y9MW)
I assume this will be sung to the tune of "Goodbye, Yellow Brick Road" by Elton John?
So goodbye, Congressman Paul,
While your approval society howls.
You won't trap me in your nuthouse
With your anti-semitic, isolationist tendencies and nutbag foreign policy...
(that last lyric may need some tinkering)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit at August 31, 2011 05:29 AM (4df7R)
Ah. Okay.
Still haven't seen that movie. I guess I probably should, one of these days.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:29 AM (8y9MW)
Poor Vic, I spent 24 hours in a hospital a couple of years ago and can't imagine being stuck in one for an entire week.
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 31, 2011 05:29 AM (F/4zf)
Or maybe "Candle in the wind."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:30 AM (8y9MW)
Did I miss a reference, there?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:25 AM (8y9MW)
Yep. It's an allusion to Snatch.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 31, 2011 05:31 AM (v+QvA)
You know, I read that book, "The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History" (It's short, it took me about a day), and I came to realize that Obama isn't Wilson, or Roosevelt, or Truman, or LBJ, or Carter. He's all of them. Take the worst parts of each of those 5 presidents, and you pretty well have Barack Hussein Obama, who is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:32 AM (8y9MW)
Ah. Okay.
Still haven't seen that movie. I guess I probably should, one of these days.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:29 AM (8y9MW)
It's a good flick, you should check it out.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 31, 2011 05:33 AM (v+QvA)
Monty, I know you said you picked up Steyn's new book. What do you think of it?
I normally eschew quasi political books, but I've found it to be a good read, insightful, and extremely depressing.
I feel as though we're on a permanent road to decline because we've lost what makes us Americans. Specifically the municpal based problem solving and the idea that when problems arise that we should be the ones to fix them instead of some government official on high.
It just seems like a losing battle. How can you compete with someone who is giving away "free shit"?
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 05:33 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: POED at August 31, 2011 09:09 AM (CFhHo)
See, the corporations sit in their corporate buildings acting all corporation-y...
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 31, 2011 05:35 AM (FkKjr)
---
Yep.
Everyone here knows I don't hate Mitt, but this line of attack is ludicrous.
Perry was a farm kid who wanted to be a vet when he grew up, but didn't have the grades (he was obviously in the wrong major). He served his country in the military, then served his community in local government before becoming a very successful governor. (Whatever I may think of politicians, at least the ones at the local and state level actually, you know, occasionally listen to their constituents and do something useful on occasion like keeping the street lights operating.) He's now been essentially drafted to run for national office.
Romney was groomed from day one, as far as I can tell, for the presidency by his CEO turned politician father. He went from no community service and a failed Senate bid to the governorship, undoubtedly largely because of the political connections of his dad. From that one term he started running for the highest office in the land. As someone pointed out (at HA) yesterday, the difference between Romney and Perry as more to do with who has been successful at winning elections. Had Romney won more of his, he'd be a "career politician" too.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 05:35 AM (5H6zj)
That rich banking wallstreet business folk are holding all the fucking strings.
Does this include tampon strings?
Posted by: not feeling springtime fresh at August 31, 2011 05:37 AM (6rX0K)
Thanks for the doom, may I have another?
One thing that occurs to me is that government spending is included in GDP, dollar for dollar. Government spending has gone up dramatically in the past three years, but GDP has been relatively flat. Does it not follow that actual productivity has been negative every quarter, and that we have been in a continuous recession under the stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure?*
* note there is no * in clusterfuck
Posted by: Buck Ofama at August 31, 2011 05:38 AM (7VN/H)
>>>Did anyone else see the humor in a Governor (1 term, I think) with at least one other failed run (for Senate, yes?) complaining about "career politicians," in his speech to the VFW?
It should also be noted that he lost to Ted Kenndy by 17 points in 1994. If you recall, 1994 was one of the biggest wave elections of the 20th century.
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 05:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at August 31, 2011 05:42 AM (0fzsA)
Did anyone else see the humor in a Governor (1 term, I think) with at least one other failed run (for Senate, yes?) complaining about "career politicians," in his speech to the VFW?
Romney is running as an outsider. And I am Carmen Miranda.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 31, 2011 05:43 AM (B+qrE)
When I go down all that is left is chaos...
Posted by: sanity at August 31, 2011 05:43 AM (McHnx)
Posted by: Waterhouse at August 31, 2011 05:43 AM (OK/vv)
I know he's getting desperate, and he's hearing "You have to attack Perry" from all his advisers (and they're right, if he wants to win), but I think he's completely misunderstanding the country's mood, right now.
America never likes "career politicians" except at election time. Then we seem to love them. More importantly, despite being a "career politician" Rick Perry has far more Tea Party cred than Mittens will ever get.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:44 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Emperor Barakatine at August 31, 2011 05:44 AM (GTbGH)
Posted by: Count de Monet at August 31, 2011 05:46 AM (4q5tP)
As more and more cities and municipalities are unable to pay the lavish pensions and perks that their liberal politicians have indebted them to.... Bankruptcy seems like the only inevitablity.
Even though many legal 'experts' are saying that it would be illegal for cities/states to declare bankruptcy.... A state of financial insolvency is just *that* --- insolvency.
Maybe we will see some semantic creativity going on, then:
Such as.... The Formerly Insolvent State of California d/b/a Caliphornia.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 31, 2011 05:47 AM (2Mtxm)
Thats being kind, I kinda consider him to be the contents of the monkey's little porta-potty. Not a great bucket of shit, but a really small insignificant bucket of shit.
eh... I'm from jersey, I really think he's a fucking idiot who can't count his balls and come up with the same number twice.
Posted by: Berserker at August 31, 2011 05:48 AM (FMbng)
Posted by: Berserker at August 31, 2011 09:48 AM (FMbng)
And really, how hard is it to count to zero?
Posted by: Insomniac at August 31, 2011 05:48 AM (v+QvA)
If you go to the Australia link, and look at their next story on US foreclosures, you will find this gem:
The Foreclosure Pipeline in New York is 693 months (over 57 years) and 621 Months (over 51 years) in New Jersey!
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at August 31, 2011 05:49 AM (0N5pL)
Posted by: Ian S. at August 31, 2011 05:51 AM (WXhxA)
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 05:51 AM (lpWVn)
Which isn't to say that Rick Perry has Tea Party cred.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 05:52 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:52 AM (8y9MW)
"America never likes "career politicians" except at election time." [~AllenG]
It's crazy isn't it? If that were not true.....then guys like Herman Cain would have a chance.
Whenever someone who is not-a-career-politician tries to run for office.......there is this hue & cry about them having "no experience". But when someone runs who has more experience than anyone else in the race....they get slammed for being a "career politician"!
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 31, 2011 05:54 AM (2Mtxm)
Well, no. It is a low bar. But if you're trying to say that Rick Perry has no Tea Party cred, I think you need to look again. He's beating Bachman (I know) and (I think) Palin even within those self-identified as "Tea Party."
Now, that's self-identification, but since that's the closest a pollster is going to be able to get, it's still fairly significant.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:55 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:52 AM (8y9MW)
This sounds awfully invasive, especially coming from folks (conservatives) who generally want less government intrusion in their lives and businesses. Just my opinion, and I'm pretty anti-abortion.
Posted by: NC Ref at August 31, 2011 05:56 AM (/izg2)
Steyn isn't really at his best at book-length. He is one of the world's great essayists and raconteurs, but his style -- breezy, pun-filled, punchy -- tends to wear a bit in the long-form. But this is a stylistic thing: he's good no matter what, and After America is vintage Steyn. He's one of the best op-ed writers now working.
I do prefer the English Theodore Dalrymple (Anthony Daniels), though. He has a more dab hand with the language, and is better in the long form. He has written some truly great books about the cultural demise of Great Britain, and his stuff at the City Journal is almost always excellent.
Posted by: Monty at August 31, 2011 05:57 AM (/0a60)
The fact is that there is a perception (not entirely unfair, either) that someone who has never held elected office lacks a certain set of skills specific to elected office.
I think the issue is that there are enough "career politicians" that we use that as a blanket statement, when what we really mean are "politicians who seek political office for its own sake." But that's a mouthful, where "career politician" is not.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 05:57 AM (8y9MW)
@14
Everyone back away slowly and don't make eye contact.
Hell with that- I'm gettin' my shotgun...
Posted by: backhoe, Hobbit tea-roar-ist of Doom at August 31, 2011 05:57 AM (rFdqZ)
It just seems like a losing battle. How can you compete with someone who is giving away "free shit"?
Sever the umbilical cord and cut the apron strings. Make it obvious what no more means.
Direct the public wrath where it belongs and lay the pain at the door of the carnival barkers and medicine salesmen handing out pie in the falling sky, aka shrapnel.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 05:59 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: dagny at August 31, 2011 06:00 AM (P0l+a)
The thing is, Doctors are already supposed to give the sonogram. What isn't happening (mostly at PP offices) is they're not allowing (yep, not allowing) women to see and they're not allowing their doctors to describe what's seen. This is, apparently, to maintain the fiction that the unborn infant is "just a bunch of cells."
If the law could have been written with "should" instead of "shall" and still carried any weight, they would have. It's an unfortunately necessary "over-reach" if you're going to fight the dishonesty of abortion-mills like PP.
Also, the way to avoid that is, um, not to have an abortion. So I'm fairly sanguine with this amount of "over-reach." Also the fact that it is a state law (where I believe such things should be done, if they're going to be done), and I have absolutely no problem with enacting laws that prevent premeditated murder. (Yep, I said it.)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:01 AM (8y9MW)
Chain of passing ownership of titles was mismanaged when they bundled mortgages for CDS (Credit default swaps). They suspended foreclosures for a year in NJ, just recently lifted.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at August 31, 2011 06:01 AM (CHYRQ)
Posted by: Jean at August 31, 2011 06:02 AM (WkuV6)
Posted by: Jean at August 31, 2011 06:03 AM (WkuV6)
That's certainly true, too. It's why many people who "aim" for the Presidency start by doing something local (or even statewide, but with a local constituency). You have to learn those skills.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:03 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 10:01 AM (8y9MW)
Gotcha. Knowledge is power.
Posted by: NC Ref at August 31, 2011 06:04 AM (/izg2)
This sounds awfully invasive,
especially coming from folks (conservatives) who generally want less
government intrusion in their lives and businesses. Just my opinion,
and I'm pretty anti-abortion.
Posted by: NC Ref at August 31, 2011 09:56 AM (/izg2)
What's so invasive about it? If it's just a 'thing' that should be removed, what does it matter if the doctor describes it? If it is a living being, describing it seems like the least you could do for it.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 31, 2011 06:04 AM (FkKjr)
Apologies if I already said something yesterday - I honestly don't remember. The thesis writing is making my brain into the consistency of Swiss cheese...
Hope you had a great birthday!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 31, 2011 06:05 AM (9hSKh)
My name is Legion for I am many.
Anybody got a herd of pigs handy?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:22 AM (8y9MW)
Now what did I ever do to you?
(*sniffle*...)
Posted by: Warthog at August 31, 2011 06:05 AM (WDySP)
Posted by: Mark Levin at August 31, 2011 06:06 AM (lpWVn)
From my understanding, they setup procedures to clear title, they have not cleared all titles.
Posted by: The Robot Devil at August 31, 2011 06:06 AM (CHYRQ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 31, 2011 06:06 AM (XE2Oo)
Posted by: steevy at August 31, 2011 06:06 AM (1Nzoh)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 31, 2011 10:05 AM (9hSKh)
title?
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:07 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: bigred, Tearrorist at August 31, 2011 06:07 AM (weBtw)
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 31, 2011 06:08 AM (2Mtxm)
We should email bomb the White House with this message and direct it at SCoaMF
Posted by: The Robot Devil at August 31, 2011 06:08 AM (CHYRQ)
When our leader leaves this dimension, he will he transfigured into a pure being of light.
Posted by: Paul Bots at August 31, 2011 06:10 AM (CHYRQ)
Best of luck to you on your thesis. Do you have to write one from scratch or are you allowed to insert publications as chapters? I had to do the former and, being a dinosaur, I also had to print all of my electron micrographs the old-fashioned way, plus physically type the page numbers onto all of the figures. Needless to say, it was a nightmare. That and the fact that the Chicago Manual of Style was used by the on campus editor in charge of accepting or declining dissertation manuscripts. The defense was nothing compared to formatting the friggin' manuscript!
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:10 AM (5H6zj)
Yep. Their problem is that their budget, minus interest payments, is still 5% in the hole. If / when they default, no one's going to want to help them cover that 5%.
Don't feel sorry for the Greeks. Feel sorry for the suckers who are "loaning" them the money to cover that 5% + interest payments.
Posted by: Greg Q at August 31, 2011 06:11 AM (/0a60)
Fuck.
Not Vic.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Take it easy. He is just starting treatment and they've made huge strides in the last 15 years. Back in the 80s they didn't even use chemo for it. By the early 90s they did and have made progress. I'll keep this guy in my prayers but it is treatable and is very slow growing.
Posted by: dagny at August 31, 2011 06:13 AM (P0l+a)
THIS is the reason why. Even at 6 weeks you can identify the image on the sonogram as a baby. (personal note: we even knew the sex cause we saw his dink)
Posted by: The Robot Devil at August 31, 2011 06:13 AM (CHYRQ)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:13 AM (8y9MW)
Stuttering ClusterFuck of a Miserable Failure and Eric "what voter intimidation?" Holder couldn't do it without a LOT of career civil servants hopping on board willingly....we need to defang the beast
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 06:14 AM (AEIYh)
This is correct. And, for radiation (not sure if they're going that route) there have been so many advances that just 10 years ago seems like the dark ages.
The very existence of cancer sucks, but we're getting better at dealing with it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:15 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: In Exile at August 31, 2011 06:15 AM (sLDXC)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 31, 2011 10:04 AM (FkKjr)
I meant in terms of dictating the specifics of the doctor-patient relationship. Would it be a "form letter" so that everyone gets exactly the same spiel, or would there be just basic guidelines etc. Government is already in healthcare too much, that's whats invasive.
Providing information is not.
Posted by: NC Ref at August 31, 2011 06:17 AM (/izg2)
It's possible I'm paraphrasing a bit here.
My dad is convinced that Congress will refill the FEMA coffers so they can pump a bunch of billions into the Eastern seaboard. Sadly, I suspect he is probably right. Just the idea of people being responsible for their own care and cleanup horrifies DC; why, they might learn that DC isn't needed at all.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 31, 2011 06:17 AM (ENKCw)
Reuters via FoxBusiness on the ADP jobs report: http://fxn.ws/rfyefE
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:17 AM (8y9MW)
I think the law just said "Shall describe," or "Shall accurately describe," or something like that. I don't think they went in to exactly how it should be described.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:19 AM (8y9MW)
Myrtle Beach on Monday, Sept. 5.
Following the format of his previous town halls with presidential candidates, Rep. Scott will take questions from the live audience as well as from online Facebook followers, allowing as many voters as possible to ask Gov. Perry a question.
“I am proud to welcome Gov. Perry to Myrtle Beach to meet our voters,” said Rep. Scott. “Since his announcement speech in Charleston just over two weeks ago, the governor has excited our electorate, and I look forward to continuing that conversation.”
SoCal morons: don't forget he'll be in your neck of the woods on Sept 8th. Link to how to get tickets on yesterday's morning open thread.Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:19 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at August 31, 2011 10:00 AM
"Rapidly beginning" to look like Stalin-style repression?
You understate, friend.
One of the things that make me most certain we're headed for a total meltdown is the media's -- and the public's -- willingness to ignore everything that Eric Shabazz Holder (acting under the direct orders of the Traitor-in-Chief, I believe) has done -- and continues to do -- to destroy the rights of all but the protected classes.
What I fear -- but almost hope for -- is a vicious backlash against selective enforcement of the law. It won't be pretty, and some good people will inadvertently be swept up in the rush to clean things up.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 06:20 AM (YjjrR)
I know quite a few people on the "free shit" bandwagon. It's called "Unemployed due to lack of work." They have been working part time since the early 1980's, and supplement their income with -you guessed it- unemployment. Basically, their work is seasonal, and the rest of the year, it's free shit from Uncle Sugar. They don't want to work full time, don't want to get off unemployment and don't want their lives to change. The most successful among them have wives that support them.
Of course, they almost all drive newer cars than I do, several have boats, flat screen tvs and so on.
Posted by: shibumi at August 31, 2011 06:21 AM (z63Tr)
Best of luck to you on your thesis. Do you have to write one from scratch or are you allowed to insert publications as chapters? I had to do the former and, being a dinosaur, I also had to print all of my electron micrographs the old-fashioned way, plus physically type the page numbers onto all of the figures. Needless to say, it was a nightmare. That and the fact that the Chicago Manual of Style was used by the on campus editor in charge of accepting or declining dissertation manuscripts. The defense was nothing compared to formatting the friggin' manuscript!
From scratch, but that is mostly because I started several projects that yielded negative data; the data from those projects are going in my thesis as appendices. I think there was one grad student in my lab who used several publications as chapters in here thesis, but the norm here is that the thesis is written from scratch.
I really feel for you "dinosaurs" who had to format and edit your theses/publications in the ways of the ancients. Doing it electronically is demanding enough; using the old fashioned way must have been frustrating to the point of madness.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 31, 2011 06:21 AM (9hSKh)
http://bit.ly/rfQz3j
Apparently, it violates their free-speech rights because describing the unborn infant is "politically motivated speech." No. I'm not kidding.
Have I mentioned that I kind of hate liberals?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 31, 2011 06:22 AM (l9zgN)
... Of course, they almost all drive newer cars than I do, several have boats, flat screen tvs and so on.
Posted by: shibumi at August 31, 2011 10:21 AM (z63Tr)
Yes, but they have no soul.
Posted by: Warthog at August 31, 2011 06:25 AM (WDySP)
My in-laws in Michigan used to be like this. They'd work seasonal construction jobs in late spring and summer, and the other 8 months of the year they'd do make-work jobs or nothing at all and collect unemployment.
They've since stopped doing that, but it really annoyed me when I found out about it.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:25 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:27 AM (5H6zj)
I here to give you a sponge bath.
Ooopsie, my nurses uniform seemed to have slipped off...
BOW-CHICKA-WOW.-WOW
Posted by: Vic, dreaming while on pain meds at August 31, 2011 06:28 AM (AnTyA)
They've since stopped doing that, but it really annoyed me when I found out about it.
And strangely enough, I am in Michigan.
Sigh.
Posted by: shibumi at August 31, 2011 06:28 AM (z63Tr)
Posted by: joncelli at August 31, 2011 06:28 AM (RD7QR)
I here to give you a sponge bath.
Ooopsie, my nurses uniform seemed to have slipped off...
BOW-CHICKA-WOW.-WOW"
"Oh, GOD! You're Paul Krugman! Get away from me! Help! Help!"
Posted by: Vic, having a nightmare while on pain meds at August 31, 2011 06:29 AM (8y9MW)
Take care, dear moron.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 31, 2011 06:29 AM (UOM48)
I knew a guy who did landscaping...actually he just cut grass...in the warmer months here...and then spent the rest of the year in Florida in a house he owned while collecting unemployment. He did this for years
Posted by: beedubya at August 31, 2011 06:32 AM (AnTyA)
My understanding is that it's very prevalent up there. My Father-in-Law stopped because he just couldn't do that kind of hard labor anymore, so now he works in a granite shop cutting granite counter-tops. That's a year-round thing.
My B-i-L stopped because he was getting married, and figured out he couldn't support himself and his in-school (then fiance, now wife) by doing that. Now he does some kind of On-the-road delivery gig. He uses his personal pickup truck for it, so I'm not sure what he actually does, but it apparently pays pretty well.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:32 AM (8y9MW)
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The pace of U.S. private sector job growth slowed in August for the second month in a row with employers adding 91,000 positions, a report by a payrolls processor showed on Wednesday.
Economists surveyed by Reuters had forecast the ADP National Employment Report would show a gain of 100,000 jobs. July's private payrolls were revised down to an increase of 109,000 from the previously reported 114,000.
August's gain was the smallest number of private jobs added since May's disappointingly small reading of 35,000.
Have no fear Barry's jobs plan will fix everything!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at August 31, 2011 06:32 AM (1Jaio)
New Blue Nightmare: Clarence Thomas and the Amendment of Doom
It has some quite hopeful words in it though about how Thomas is pushing the Constitutional viewpoint back towards its original intent. It's worth a read.
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 31, 2011 06:32 AM (ENKCw)
Posted by: dagny at August 31, 2011 06:32 AM (P0l+a)
That's right! We won't have to worry about those additional jobs anymore!
Wait.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:33 AM (8y9MW)
BTW, when I was shopping yesterday I discovered that Macy's has their Christmas display up already.
That reminds me of when I was a little tyke back in the 1970's, when Sears had its Christmas "Wish Book" catalog printed and mailed in late August.
But at least Sears did not have the displays up that early.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 06:33 AM (ujg0T)
July's private payrolls were revised down to an increase of 109,000 from the previously reported 114,000.
No way, really?!?!?
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:34 AM (G/zuv)
Rush was talking about that yesterday. His take actually seemed to be that it's aimed at liberals so they can try to drum up something to force him to recuse himself from the OCare case.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 06:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 31, 2011 06:34 AM (0yt4x)
This sounds awfully invasive, especially coming from folks (conservatives) who generally want less government intrusion in their lives and businesses. Just my opinion, and I'm pretty anti-abortion.
Posted by: NC Ref at August 31, 2011 09:56 AM (/izg2)
This seems to be well within the authority of the state under its "police powers" and the Tenth Amendment. The licensing, oversight and regulation of doctors and other health care practitioners has long been within the purview of the state. Doctors are routinely required to provide certain information to their patients as a matter of state law, and are similarly prohibited from having certain kinds of communications with their patients. Considering that all medical procedures (the proper categorization of abortion as a medical procedure being a debate for anothr day) are supposed to take place only on the basis of informed consent, I don't see the problem with a state requiring that all the relevant information being provided.
Posted by: Insomniac at August 31, 2011 06:35 AM (v+QvA)
Obama was on the Tom Joyner show. Joyner asked, "What's the plan?"
Obama answered with excuses and obfuscation.
There. Is. No. Plan.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:36 AM (G/zuv)
Dead on, Monty. And thanks again, 52 percenters. And to the David Brooks -- David Frum -- Chris Buckley -- Peggy Noonan -- Colin Powell Axis of Stupid.
Posted by: al-Cicero, Tea Party Jihadist at August 31, 2011 06:37 AM (ehEyA)
"Black America" is becoming frustrated with Obama and the Democrats.
So the Democrats are doing the only thing they can do: Pull the race card and blame whitey.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:37 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: GnuBreed at August 31, 2011 06:37 AM (ENKCw)
TheyÂ’re complaining about a measly 125k foreign work permits every month? Are they racist? Xenophobes?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 06:37 AM (jx2j9)
Maybe he'll give She Who Must Be Obeyed instructions on how to leave us a message in a couple of days. A week is a looong time to go without his GLOOM ahead of the DOOM links.
Posted by: Retread at August 31, 2011 06:37 AM (BO5ap)
I think the congressional rating has a lot to do with GOP frustration that Boner can't force "change" down Barry and Harry's throat
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 06:38 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 31, 2011 10:06 AM (XE2Oo)
14 is a juvenile sowing oats of disillusionment. No matter the dogma, it hardly matters which side of the boat to go overboard in order to maintain a fictitious purity. Recall the moat/beam running punchline here that the infidel is just like you/me except for one unforgivable point. Live and learn, POED.
But Jeff, that's your personal response to his personal response to the national and global economic DOOM? Sure, attack the disagreeable idea. But attack the individual "infidel" who dares mention the taboo? Meh.
As if all major political parties AND the monopolized merging of banking/investment/insurance industry haven't led us to this brink of a valueless Dollar.
As if our taxes being used to bail out the Ponzi globalists hasn't and isn't occurring while the sovereignty issue for both nation and individual is no longer recognized by governing authoritarians.
As if getting small business loans at high interest from a banking/investment industry that enjoys 0% interest from funds "produced" from taxation meant to be responsibly returned into the economy through affordable loans is a reflection of the small business owners' PERSONAL failure.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:39 AM (lpWVn)
I'm getting really fed up with all the cries of racism being spewed from the black left. All the while it seems orchestrated that black gangs are running rampant attacking, robbing, and intimidating at will. It almost seems that someone wants a race war.
Also, Holder's "Justice" Dept is bullying banks to provide sub-prime loans to minorities to counteract discrimination.
How long will discrimination and race be used as a crutch for a group of people who clearly are deficient in their ability to act like humans? Go to YouTube and watch some videos of this sub-human trash flash-ganging in the streets. It's utterly disgusting and repulsive. Meanwhile, we dare not mention race, color, or ethnicity as a distingushing characteristic of these animals; just the same as we dare not call islamic savages by name.
Yes, there are scum and savages in all races - white very much included, but why does it seem so much more prevalent in some races and cultures? Why is it that instead of expecting standards of behavior and ability, we have coddled the worse elements of society and even idolized them? Look at professional sports and the rap music industry as an example - thugs that have not used their abilities to rise out of the ghetto, but rather have elevated their ghetto lifestyle into the mainstream of America. We've been told that we shouldn't even expect blacks to speak English and that we should learn ebonics. In other words, we should dumb down our well established societal and curtural standards to accomodate those who either refuse, or are incapable of, normality. There's coming a time when people are going to have to face facts and deal with it. "White guilt" is no different than the "blame Amercia first" guilt that's doing nothing but demonstrating our weakness and laying our heads on chopping blocks.
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 06:39 AM (sFD5n)
She was bitching about being unable to find permanent work as a "writer" and whining that she and her fellow college grads are considering going for advanced degrees since there's no work for them.
She complained about tech school grads getting jobs as skilled workers in welding, etc. and if people don't continue to attend four-year colleges and universities, our country will lose its intellectual power and we'll be dumbed down.
The fact that the local fishwrap gave her a column to bitch and moan pisses me off. And I'd bet good money she's an Obamabot.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at August 31, 2011 06:40 AM (UOM48)
I found that once the first professor reaches for it, and you smash his/her head with a sock full of D-cell batteries, the rest of them are less anxious to attack your work.
---
heh.
My thesis research went against a pretty widely held theory. My evidence was solid, but limited. (Basically I had pictures that directly refuted what was "supposed" to be happening.) Anyway, I was nervous about the defense part (justifiably), but it went ok. One thing in my favor was that the members of the committee started arguing amongst themselves about what my findings meant. I had about 10 minutes where I didn't have to say a word... until one of them noticed!
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:40 AM (5H6zj)
My money's on Paulbot.
Honestly, I say Commiecrat dupe. While Ron Paul is someone upon which many bongsmokers have projected all of their wishes, this guy comes across as a fully leftist troll. The Paulians at least do support laissez faire.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 06:41 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 31, 2011 06:42 AM (AZGON)
I'm getting really fed up with all the cries of racism being spewed from the black left. All the while it seems orchestrated that black gangs are running rampant attacking, robbing, and intimidating at will. It almost seems that someone wants a race war.
They do--and they expect their apparatchik media to cover for them. This has worked in the past, but I think people are fed up.
I am waiting for Bernard Goetz 2.0 to appear and turn a few "flash mob" members into rendering plant material.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 06:43 AM (ujg0T)
I think that the remedy for DOOM is more religiously motivated peace. Religiously motivated peace just gets things done. Consider if you will, a sports analogy. Look at how religiously motivated peace stack up against non-religiously motivated peace in these box scores. And this was during an extended holiday. These cats are productive, I tell you! All stars! (via Weasel Zippers)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 06:43 AM (jx2j9)
As of July 2011:
"The share of the eligible population holding a job declined to 58.1 percent, the lowest since July 1983."
This is an interesting indicator I never knew of until now.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:43 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 10:37 AM
The really sad part is that it will work.
Guilty white liberals, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will see to that, and the entitlement-fed, lazy percentage of the black population will find it easier to keep believing it than actually, you know, being productive.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 06:44 AM (YjjrR)
How will parents react when they find out they will be expected to provide workers' compensation benefits, rest and meal breaks and paid vacation time forÂ…babysitters? Dinner and a movie night may soon become much more complicated.
LINK (Union.Com - not the Onion)
PS Get Well, Vic
Posted by: Bill - Just Another Guy In The Neighborhood. at August 31, 2011 06:45 AM (HjPtV)
BREAKING: Palin's participation in Saturday's Tea Party of America rally is "on hold," 2 sources close to Palin tell RCP
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:45 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Ron Pall at August 31, 2011 06:46 AM (/ZZCn)
Obama will be out today demanding Congress pass two "jobs" bills.
Shovel ready, of course.
One bill is for union workers to work on unnecessary pork-barrel projects at airports.
The other bill is a "roads" bill, which is another slush fund for the trade unions.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:46 AM (G/zuv)
I found that once the first professor reaches for it, and you smash his/her head with a sock full of D-cell batteries, the rest of them are less anxious to attack your work.
I will keep that advice in mind, EoJ. Thanks! And a tube sock full of batteries will be easier to sneak in on campus than a 6 foot blue-luminescent buster sword...
174 My thesis research went against a pretty widely held theory. My evidence was solid, but limited. (Basically I had pictures that directly refuted what was "supposed" to be happening.) Anyway, I was nervous about the defense part (justifiably), but it went ok. One thing in my favor was that the members of the committee started arguing amongst themselves about what my findings meant. I had about 10 minutes where I didn't have to say a word... until one of them noticed!
Dissension amongst committee members is fun to watch during meetings.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at August 31, 2011 06:47 AM (9hSKh)
A class of 'activists' will rise up and make a living advocating for this newly minted victim-group.....
You talkin' to me?
Posted by: Professor Advocating For Special Rights For The Ugly at August 31, 2011 06:47 AM (K9C8Q)
Posted by: Shiggz at August 31, 2011 06:47 AM (v8Pb8)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 10:45 AM
I can hear the Palinoids' heads exploding!
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 06:48 AM (YjjrR)
I honestly have no idea how to interpret it, but it seems like the organizers are pretty clueless (based on their invite/disinvite fiasco with Christine O'Donnell).
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:49 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: George Orwell what knows Obama is a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure at August 31, 2011 06:50 AM (AZGON)
heh. My German history professor called me in for a run through prior to the date with destiny. After his grilling, he asked how I felt. "Like D-DAY."
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:51 AM (lpWVn)
That was suh-weet! Also, prayers going out to Vic. I was too late on the morning thread to send prayers to him before he left.
As if Eric Holder's DoJ doesn't have enough on its hands........
He's also apparently teaming up with ACORN for some fun 2012 voter fraud.
Posted by: Lady in Black at August 31, 2011 06:51 AM (ycuSb)
I can hear the Palinoids' heads exploding!
You prefer Mitt the Milquetoast or Perry the border squish?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 06:52 AM (ujg0T)
"WTF is going on? Via Twitter (and HA headlines):
BREAKING: Palin's participation in Saturday's Tea Party of America rally is "on hold," 2 sources close to Palin tell RCP."
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 10:45 AM (5H6zj)
------------
Interesting.....Maybe she's trying to milk the suspense of it all? Who knows, at this point.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 31, 2011 06:52 AM (2Mtxm)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 10:49 AM
Could be. Or maybe she's decided to take some time off. Or she has decided to run for president. Or she's in negotiation for a new TV series.
No way of knowing, until she says something or the Palinoids -- all of whom talk as if they have a direct pipeline into her thoughts -- let us know.
BTW: If she throws in with Mutt Romney, she is dead to me. She would go instantly from "not-my-first-choice" to "never, ever."
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 06:53 AM (YjjrR)
Those competitive personality conflicts really do flair.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:53 AM (lpWVn)
Let's see, that's such a difficult choice. To pick a governor who is actually having to deal with illegals or one who doesn't know how many there are in her state. Hmmm...
----
Governor, let me ask you about immigration. How many undocumented immigrants are there in Alaska?
I don't know, I don't know. That's a good question.
As governor, how do you deal with them? Do you think they all should be deported?
There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant -there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants- not only economically is that just an impossibility but that's not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration.
Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants?
No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.
To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:55 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: joncelli at August 31, 2011 06:55 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MrScribbler
That would be her dumb choice since she went out of her way to disavow the TX Tea Party to endorse Rick Perry's last run. Logically, she'd stick with Rick.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:55 AM (lpWVn)
BREAKING: Palin's participation in Saturday's Tea Party of America rally is "on hold," 2 sources close to Palin tell RCP
Someone on Palin's staff booked Christine O'Donnel to speak before Sarah. A bunch of teapartiers had a cow. Then some of Palin's staff tried to backtrack and say they hadn't read the schedule. So there is now a tiff amid the teaparty over Christine O'Donnell (who should suddenly get the stomach flu IFYKWIM)
Posted by: dagny at August 31, 2011 06:56 AM (P0l+a)
"I honestly have no idea how to interpret it, but it seems like the organizers are pretty clueless (based on their invite/disinvite fiasco with Christine O'Donnell)."
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 10:49 AM (5H6zj)
--------
But this morning there were reports that they 're-invited' Christine O'Donnell. It's all very curious.
Posted by: ConservativeMenAreJustHotter at August 31, 2011 06:56 AM (2Mtxm)
I support her as a force in the GOP, and there are reasons she may go with Mittens. As is most always the case in politics there is no candidate I support wholesale, but at least all are an improvement over McCain at this stage of the game. The newsies will go jihadi jim on Sarah or Bachman so IMHO they need to set up a VP or high cabinet run as the payoff for their backing.....
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 06:57 AM (AEIYh)
Back when I was an undergrad (and dinosaurs roamed the earth) I made some really lovely cash typing and formating grad student theses. I believe I mentioned yesterday that I hated The Bluebook with clown spider hate. I hate the Chicago Manual of Style with that times the hatred of Michael Moore with a heaping of what I feel for my Bastard Ex. It was an utter, utter bitch to do that stuff.
I do prefer the English Theodore Dalrymple (Anthony Daniels), though. He has a more dab hand with the language, and is better in the long form. He has written some truly great books about the cultural demise of Great Britain, and his stuff at the City Journal is almost always excellent.
Yeah, Steyn makes me want to down the pills while Dalrymple makes me want to slit my throat. Dooooooooooomed.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 31, 2011 06:57 AM (VtjlW)
You prefer Mitt the Milquetoast or Perry the border squish?
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 10:52 AMIt's obvious who you support. Wrap nearby things in plastic so they're easier to clean when your head explodes, mmmmmkay?
I haven't decided who I'll support yet, though among the current declared choices it will most likely be Perry.
Part of the reason I'm considering Perry is that the Paulbots and Palinoids have joined the Democrats in trashing him. If they all think he's that awful, I'm guessing he's a pretty good guy.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 06:57 AM (YjjrR)
Evangelical?
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 06:57 AM (lpWVn)
Michigan Republican Freakout
[redacted],
Last week, the campaign to recall Republican Governor Rick Snyder in Michigan, Fire Rick Snyder, passed 50% of the 806,522 signatures required to trigger a new election. In retrospect, maybe Snyder's latest "jobs plan" should have involved more than kicking 30,000 children off of food assistance.
Panicked by Snyder's unpopularity, Michigan Republicans are making robocalls claiming the recall petitions are a form of identity theft. While that's pretty bad, just imagine their hysteria when we gather 100% of the signatures required to force a recall election.
Please help that freakout happen by chipping in $6 to the Daily Kos Michigan Recall Fund.
In the last five days, several hundred new volunteers joined Fire Rick Snyder, bringing their total number of recall petition circulators to over 6,000. On top of those efforts, the Michigan Education Association has distributed 25,000 petitions to its members, with space for ten signatures on each petition.
Now we are hiring organizing staff to supplement what has so far been an all-volunteer operation. For every $5,500 we raise a new organizer can be on the ground in 72 hours.
Please chip in $6 to Fire Rick Snyder and Daily Kos. The deadline to collect the signatures is the end of September so we have to move quickly.
Keep fighting,
Chris Cocksucker Bowers
Campaign Director & Chief Cocksucker, Daily Kos
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 06:58 AM (G/zuv)
my guess as well...
contrary to media meme Sarah was relatively moderate as a Pol in Alaska she is an anti-corruptocrat not really a theocrat like Chris Tingle thinks....
it is why Liza mukanski and her pals were filing frivolous suits along wwith the donks.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 06:58 AM (AEIYh)
Let's see, that's such a difficult choice. To pick a governor who is actually having to deal with illegals or one who doesn't know how many there are in her state. Hmmm...
Like Perry honestly knows how many there are either?
I do like Perry way more than Mitt, and he may be the most electable candidate we have, but I'm not going to be haciographic about him.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 06:58 AM (ujg0T)
I thought I read that O'Donnell had been re-invited.
I think COD was an odd choice, but it was incredibly tacky for the organizers to publicly un-invite her. All they had to do was say, "Oops, our schedule is packed, but we have asked Christine O'Donnell to lead the Pledge of Allegiance" or some other scripted (and short) thing and everyone could have saved face. So I really fault the organizers the most.
I would think that Palin would not feel threatened by COD given how firm and loyal her support is, but who knows.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 06:59 AM (5H6zj)
hear hear....
if you piss of Je$$e Jack$on and the Paultards it is an endorsement not a detriment
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 06:59 AM (AEIYh)
"When GOP lawmakers return, the president and his team are ready to deliver a flurry of attacks, castigating Congress for inaction on jobs, being on the wrong side of taxes and eager to destroy social safety net programs. If Obama and his team have their way, Americans will come to see every Republican as a Tea Party extremist. "
PS: Thoughts and prayers for Vic. Best wishes.
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at August 31, 2011 07:01 AM (o2lIv)
Fill in the blanks at will. No logic necessary.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 07:01 AM (lpWVn)
In Michigan, the Democrats have taken out billboards that basically claim that Republicans are stealing food from the mouths of children to help "big business."
I really wish the Michigan GOP would take out billboards that simply said "Democrats: Because that's worked so well for the last 40 years."
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:01 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:02 AM (TMB3S)
NONE of the candidates are willing openly to say what they really feel on "the hardest working 'almost' Americans"....
I will blindly support the first candidate that openly says he will engage in Mexican style immigration enforcement in reverse.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:02 AM (AEIYh)
yeah "attack" sure has worked for bambi hasn't it....
no seriously I WANT him to "come out swinging" shrill don't sell babe
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:03 AM (AEIYh)
Well, when "they" is: Democrats, the ACLU, La Raza, and Paulbots (we'll ignore the Palinistas, at the moment, but I don't think particularly highly of them, either) you're pretty well right. If all those people hate someone, I'm predisposed to like them.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:03 AM (8y9MW)
They're mocking Gov Snyder's ""jobs plan"" while Obama has one "plan" for everything: Blame Bush and Spend, Spend, Spend.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:05 AM (G/zuv)
Primary source on that, please. I know he's said he wouldn't mind a "path to citizenship" after securing the border. I'd not heard he actively wants an ID'd guest worker program.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:05 AM (8y9MW)
It's obvious who you support. Wrap nearby things in plastic so they're easier to clean when your head explodes, mmmmmkay?
No, you condescending asshole, it's not obvious who I support. But I do believe in the 11th Commandment--not speaking ill of a fellow republican--unless a candidate does something that is so wretchedly RINO (Romney) or so moonbat (Paul). Those who join in the smearing Sarah fest are liberal media stooges.
I haven't decided who I'll support yet, though among the current declared choices it will most likely be Perry.
At this point it probably *is* Perry. I just want him -- and the whole GOP -- to tell their Wall Street Journal greedhead wing to shut up. (And Lindsey Graham, fuck you too).
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:05 AM (ujg0T)
I'm not sure that's going to be Perry's strongest pillar. He has been much more like McCain and Bush on immigration than Jan Brewer.
---
He's been somewhere in between, I agree. We probably disagree about what end of the spectrum Perry is on.
Jan Brewer is not running. Which candidate is running who has an immigration policy that would satisfy you? To my knowledge, none of them are perfect on immigration. Certainly none of the viable candidates are.
Romney points to vetoing in-state tuition in Massachusetts but that's one thing, it's not a strategy or plan. Perry had a veto-proof bill presented to him. Sure, I wish he had not signed it, but it would not have changed the outcome.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:07 AM (5H6zj)
yeah "attack" sure has worked for bambi hasn't it....
no seriously I WANT him to "come out swinging" shrill don't sell babe
His only reason to hope this time is that people love him more than they do Congress. This is how he'll frame it:
"One White House official cautioned that ObamaÂ’s jobs speech will not be a 'fire-breathing' partisan speech. But the official said the president will be putting Congress on notice: Help him create jobs or get hammered as extremists more interested in playing politics."
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at August 31, 2011 07:08 AM (o2lIv)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:08 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:09 AM (5H6zj)
Well, when "they" is: Democrats, the ACLU, La Raza, and Paulbots
Which of these things is not like the other on immigration? As moonbatty as the Paul foreign policy is, he is no open border greedhead or immigration romantic. If anything, his isolationism is "Fortress America" Pat Buchanan like.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:09 AM (ujg0T)
Lemme see what I've got in between the couch cushions.
Posted by: Warren Buffet at August 31, 2011 07:09 AM (OK/vv)
Call that bluff!
Obama is the one imposing thousands of job-killing regulations, not to mention Obamacare.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:09 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: polynikes at August 31, 2011 07:10 AM (s0uvO)
"good luck SCoaMF"
all it takes is Boehner explaining that the last time Bambi got a blank check he swore that the trillion would put it below 8% and it is 9.1 and climbing.....
then highlight shit like bambi's EPA wanting to outlaw farming and restrict any new industrial growth with insane precautionary principle based hypochondrial overregulation.....
give HARD examples of EPA and DoI and DoJ overreach....
if bambi runs against congress we gain more seats I'll lay money on it
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:11 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 07:12 AM (jx2j9)
Okay, can't watch at work. I'll have to try to remember to do so at home tonight.
As I recall, he'd changed his tune by 2008, because (again) the Texas voters said "Oh hell no." He certainly wasn't okay with a guest worker program (including ID) during this past legislative session.
Now, whether that matters to you depends on whether you believe he was already planning to run for President (I don't think so, but I'm not a mind reader) or not. If you do, then he was probably just "positioning" for his run. Otherwise, he should get credit for a genuine (and possibly politically costly, here in Texas) change of heart.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:12 AM (8y9MW)
Let's see, that's such a difficult choice. To pick a governor who is actually having to deal with illegals or one who doesn't know how many there are in her state. Hmmm...
Like Perry honestly knows how many there are either?
As if Perry lifted a finger during his epic 10 years as Governor, not to mention those as a Legislator, to get the GOP sponsored House passed bills a Senate vote, to pass Voter Photo ID requirement. Au contraire. He enacted TX Dream Act for illegals. But a sternly written letter suffices his fans. Perry/McCain!
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 07:12 AM (lpWVn)
Holy shit, all you have to do ask business owners why they aren't hiring.
None of them will say it's because of Republicans in Congress.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:12 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:12 AM (TMB3S)
EXACTLY what barry will be doing is exposing every downticket Dem as complicit in his EPA three card monte game....
then Issa and Boner will play hardball on F&F and Gunrunner and the President allowing Mexican federales to stage out of El paso to hit the narcotraficantes....
he'll be done...we have Barry cornered all he can do is pray Acorn plants him a mighty tree of fraud
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:13 AM (AEIYh)
A little later Ace will probably post yet another one of his "Palin Might Be Running" posts.
And we'll have the same arguments all over again. Who cares? There's a lotta other shit we can waste our time on.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:14 AM (G/zuv)
yeah Buffet has shot his wad as well....Soros has yanked his money because he sees losing bets quick....
next time someone brings up buffet table tell him "hell yeah he wants your taxes raised...he doesn't pay his own"
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:14 AM (AEIYh)
then Issa and Boner will play hardball on F&F and Gunrunner and the President allowing Mexican federales to stage out of El paso to hit the narcotraficantes....
We can only hope.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:15 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: joncelli at August 31, 2011 07:15 AM (RD7QR)
How do you get "hate" out of my comments or AllenG's, polynikes? Seriously, come down off of the ledge.
Romney is pretty much a career politician, too, btw. It's just that he doesn't win every election he enters.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:15 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: formerly known as cherry pi at August 31, 2011 07:16 AM (OhYCU)
I judge a man by the qualities of his enemies, as much as by the qualities of his friends. The Paulbots are his enemies. I wasn't referring directly to immigration with my comment.
Posted by: polynikes at August 31, 2011 11:10 AM (s0uvO)
We never said it was "out of bounds" we said it was humorous. You see, I think (and some here agree with me) that the only reason Mitt Romney wasn't a "career politician" was that he failed to get elected, not because he didn't want to be.
And, as an executive in Government, which is more important: knowing how to run a business, or knowing how to run a government in such a way that businesses can do their thing? Those are two different knowledge bases and skill sets.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:16 AM (8y9MW)
So act now! Together we can visualize the end of the Obama administration.
Send your money to WalrusRex c/o WalrusRex Thinks Obama Should Go Project,
America, USA.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 31, 2011 07:16 AM (Hx5uv)
btw, Mr Speaker needs to condemn Rep Carson's ugly statements and demand an apology.
That shit cannot be ignored.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:16 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:17 AM (TMB3S)
>>A little later Ace will probably post yet another one of his "Palin Might Be Running" posts.And we'll have the same arguments all over again. Who cares? There's a lotta other shit we can waste our time on.
Well, it is a legitimate topic until she decides to get in or stay out, don't you think?
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 07:17 AM (wuv1c)
And get your fucking shine box.
Posted by: Waterhouse
sonofabitch I just spit coffee onto my keyboard!!
Posted by: Terry at August 31, 2011 07:18 AM (W1mrP)
Posted by: joncelli at August 31, 2011 07:18 AM (RD7QR)
Unfortunately, yes, Barack Obama, a stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failure if ever there was one, is still the President.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:18 AM (8y9MW)
Perry signed a voter ID bill into law in May.
Look, I'm with AllenG. Perry is not as strong on illegal aliens as I would like, but I am still waiting to hear who is stronger amongst our suite of available candidates.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:19 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 11:14 AM (AEIYh)
That article pretty much implies that Buffet might just as well burned that $5 billion dollars in BofA. If Barry did ask him to intervene, I wonder how he fees about that now?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 07:19 AM (jx2j9)
>>>No, Ben, not really.The topic is not "news" and has been flogged to death.t's a dead horse.
Even if it's rumored that she will make some sort of announcement on September 3rd in Iowa?
I can understand the Palin's attributes and shortcomings argument has been flogged to death, but I think whether or now she decides to get in is legitimate news and we're about 3 days from getting some sort of decision.
So while I agree that there Palin Pros and Cons argument is tired and old, news of her entry or not are legitimate.
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 07:21 AM (wuv1c)
He also wants a guest worker program with IDs for illegals because he doesn't know how many illegals are in Texas.
Nice try.
Let's get something out of the way first--we have a guest worker program, they are called H visas and tons of them are issued legally every year for agricultural workers (H2A's). An ID for those folks is a great idea.
The thing you are trying rather pitifully to conflate JackStraw is that Perry favors illegal immigration--because....he doesn't know how many illegals are in Texas. Outside of the Almighty--WHO DOES?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 31, 2011 07:22 AM (B+qrE)
We've commented at least ten times on the speculation of Sarah Palin's candidacy.
What ground have we not covered?
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:22 AM (G/zuv)
I guess, to me, the difference is "what did he do about it."
Also the perception of why. Again, based on things Perry said in interviews, he had no intention of running for President until just a couple of months ago. If you believe that (and I do), then his pushing for the Voter ID bill in this legislative session (as well as pushing for the Sanctuary Cities bill) are potentially damaging to his political career, because they alienate (rightly or not) Hispanic voters.
What did Romney change position on, that he then made an actual stand on the new position? (Really, honest question here).
I've said before that Rick Perry isn't strong enough on the border for me. He is stronger than any Democrat would be, and a better choice than the other candidates in other ways- thus, he's my guy.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:22 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Miss80sBaby at August 31, 2011 11:08 AM (o2lIv)
Blackmail, pure and simple. "Go along with what I want, or I will slander you." The scary thing is, there will be spineless GOP members that will go along with Obama on whatever his "plan" is out of fear that someone will call them a bad name. Someone needs to step up and call the left out on this meme and their agenda.
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 07:22 AM (sFD5n)
BTW, although I've been away from Texas for over a decade (we lived there in the late 90s), I am bothered by this characterization of Texas as firmly red. It simply is not as red a state as, for example, Utah is. There is a strong Democrat party there, so to act as if Perry can get every conservative thing passed is ludicrous.
It really irritates me. My recollection of Texas was that it was a mixed political environment, a welcome change after living in (suffering in) Boston for several years.
So here in Utah, which is redder than red, they passed in-state tuition for illegals. And our illegals can get driving privileges cards. The whole shebang. It's disappointing that my governor signed it, but he's been a very good governor in most respects, so c'est la guerre.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:23 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:23 AM (AEIYh)
The thing you are trying rather pitifully to conflate JackStraw is that Perry favors illegal immigration--because....he doesn't know how many illegals are in Texas. Outside of the Almighty--WHO DOES?
But apparently, this is to be held against Sarah Palin but not against Rick Perry. Hmmm.....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:24 AM (ujg0T)
>>>Look, I'm with AllenG. Perry is not as strong on illegal aliens as I would like, but I am still waiting to hear who is stronger amongst our suite of available candidates.
Indeed,There is no perfect candidate, they all have flaws and no one really agrees with anyone else 100%.
But if the argument is that Perry isn't conservative enough, well then who in the primaries is conservative enough and electable.
I understand there are people who want Romney to win, and for the record I don't hate Romney, but I think you're making the wrong argument against Perry.
If your argument is that Perry isn't conservative enough and you convince me of that, do you think I'll jump behind Romney who is even less conservative? I just don't understand that line of reasoning.
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 07:24 AM (wuv1c)
Blackmail, pure and simple. "Go along with what I want, or I will slander you."
Which, we all know, is gonna happen, anyway.
/Lucy
/football
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:24 AM (G/zuv)
That unemployed woman needs a good knock upside the head. Everything changes lady and you have to roll with it in this economy. This is why I changed professions and am currently studying to become credentialed as a medical coder and medical records supervisor. Quit whining and DO something. I'm 50 years old and have learned to make lemonade out of lemons. Every day you are above ground is a good day.
I really, really hate these people who wallow in the "oh woe is me" attitude.
Posted by: mpfs, TPT at August 31, 2011 07:24 AM (iYbLN)
If you believe that (and I do), then his pushing for the Voter ID bill in this legislative session (as well as pushing for the Sanctuary Cities bill) are potentially damaging to his political career, because they alienate (rightly or not) Hispanic voters.
Perhaps Rick Perry understands the "Rule Of Anyway"? If so, there is hope for him.
"Rule Of Anyway" = when afraid to take a stand on an issue because "it will alienate ethnic or labor group X", just understand that the leadership of said group will only hate and vote against the GOP candidate anyway.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:27 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at August 31, 2011 07:27 AM (p/mfs)
But apparently, this is to be held against Sarah Palin but not against Rick Perry. Hmmm.....
---
That's my fault.
I was using that to illustrate that Palin never had to even think about the issue as governor of Alaska.
And, of course, she supports a path to citizenship. Not that it matters, because she is not a candidate.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:28 AM (5H6zj)
Breaking news...
TRENTON (AP) -- Gov Chris Christie on Monday farted in the general direction of New Hampshire. Some experts say it is a sign that the New Jersey governor is considering a run at the White House.
Discuss.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:28 AM (G/zuv)
Fifty seven percent DISapproval. DIS – approval. Kind of just goes right to the edge, and then swan dives off the end of the tongue. Plus – uninstalling Obama – kinda cool. Great idea.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 07:29 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: joncelli at August 31, 2011 07:30 AM (RD7QR)
I'm getting really fed up with all the cries of racism being spewed from the black left. All the while it seems orchestrated that black gangs are running rampant attacking, robbing, and intimidating at will. It almost seems that someone wants a race war.
They do--and they expect their apparatchik media to cover for them. This has worked in the past, but I think people are fed up.
I am waiting for Bernard Goetz 2.0 to appear and turn a few "flash mob" members into rendering plant material.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 10:43 AM (ujg0T)
I posted about a week ago about my work-related research regarding flash mobs and rioting in North America.
A race war is exactly what they want, and they think they'll get it once the first looter is shot. They might be right if the shooter fits the "expected" profile. It's a knife's edge right now.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 07:30 AM (NS2Mo)
This is a clear sign that he is running.
It is also a sign that he no longer believes in global warming.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 07:30 AM (5H6zj)
Yeah, Steyn makes me want to down the pills while Dalrymple makes me want to slit my throat. Dooooooooooomed.
Dalrymple should be regarded as Britian's Solzhenitsyn, chronicalling the toll more gradual rot cradle to grave socialism takes on a once great people. And the rot is pretty extensive, as we've seen recently.
Posted by: Randy M at August 31, 2011 07:31 AM (vI8R6)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:35 AM (TMB3S)
btw, Mr Speaker needs to condemn Rep Carson's ugly statements and demand an apology.
That shit cannot be ignored.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 11:16 AM (G/zuv)
Sure, it can be ignored! We've spent years ignoring this kind of stuff. We've been trained to accept these kinds of abuses and not utter a word. A race monger these days has it made, isn't that right Mr Sharpton?
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 07:36 AM (sFD5n)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 11:23 AM (5H6zj)
Not as strong as it used to be, but there are Legislative rules and traditions that give the minority party a fair amount of power, now matter how in the minority they are.
Among those (that a lot of conservatives hate at the moment, though they didn't hate it when we were in the minority in the Leg) is that, in the State House, committee chairs are divided proportionately between the parties.
That is, if Rs hold 60 percent of the seats, they Chair 60 percent of the committees, but the Ds get the other 40 percent.
The Democrats were very good about this while they held the majority, so Speaker Strousse (sp?) has been doing the same thing. That gives them a lot of power, since it means they can kill bills in committee essentially by fiat.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:36 AM (8y9MW)
Finally! A courageous dem congressperson steps up to light a fire under the economy.
Massive fire. Like magnesium. White phosphorous maybe. DOOMy in nature.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 07:37 AM (jx2j9)
The reasoning is based on the faulty premise that everyone believes Romney is the smartest and most capable candidate, but that some of us just can't get past his squishy nature. So if they prove the other candidates are just as squishy, we'll all flock to Romney.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at August 31, 2011 07:38 AM (FkKjr)
another poster pointed out that Mitt lost to Tedster back in '94....
ponder that a sec...the wave couldn't carry Mitt to scott brown land....
I'm pretty sure upon considering that an hour I am done with Mitt like I am with mccain....
if i want to elect a democrat I'll vote democrat
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 07:40 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Serious Cat at August 31, 2011 07:40 AM (gk1R6)
A Democrat in a scandal? Never happen.
Posted by: The MFM at August 31, 2011 07:42 AM (8y9MW)
>>>>The reasoning is based on the faulty premise that everyone believes Romney is the smartest and most capable candidate, but that some of us just can't get past his squishy nature. So if they prove the other candidates are just as squishy, we'll all flock to Romney.
Hm. I'll buy that. It makes more sense anyway.
Posted by: Ben at August 31, 2011 07:42 AM (wuv1c)
Obama's threat to slander Republicans in Congress reminds me of the SOTU address last January.
I'm glad the Republicans took time from lynching blacks to sat next to Democrats to show unity and civility.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:44 AM (G/zuv)
Prolly because this is not really a recession; this is a financial collapse caused by the actions of the policymakers. We won't "recover" until the Congress and The One roll back all the decades of interference they have wrought.
When the government solar factories are shut down and Gibson can make guitars again and I can buy a real light bulb, we will be in recovery.
I'm not holding my breath.
Posted by: PJ at August 31, 2011 07:45 AM (FlVA8)
A race war is exactly what they want, and they think they'll get it once the first looter is shot. They might be right if the shooter fits the "expected" profile. It's a knife's edge right now.
Honestly, I think looters shot are just what we need. Weakness and appeasement encourage them. Looters and muggers and rapists and murderers getting shot sends a message and forces the race hustlers back into their "academic" cubbyholes. From there, we just need targeted budget cuts and a revived Un-American Activities Committee to hunt them down in academia.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:47 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 11:37 AM (jx2j9)
Says Maxine Waters...
The Congressional Black Caucus is trying to help by organizing job fairs across the country. Congresswoman Maxine Waters also wants to help by putting more pressure on the big banks to help with mortgages.
“If they don’t come up with loan modifications and keep people in their homes that they’ve worked so hard for, we’re going to tax them out of business,” said Waters.
In a sane world, a statement like this not should be prosecuted. Intimidation? Blackmail? What if a conservative said something like this?
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 07:47 AM (sFD5n)
-Sorry not time to respond looking for a new place to live.
Any connection between these two? (And happy hunting regardless...)
Posted by: DarkLord© sez Obama is a stuttering clusterf--- of a miserable failure
Oh, and F--- Nevada! at August 31, 2011 07:49 AM (GBXon)
If Maxine Waters and the CBC try to even attempt to carry out her threat, she should be charged with extortion and RICO charges.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:50 AM (G/zuv)
That shit cannot be ignored.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 11:16 AM (G/zuv)
WashPo is saying he's standing by his remarks. It is an absolute imperative that the Tea Party be marginalized. The pendulum cannot be allowed to swing back to the right. Right now, left leaning Republicans, or even those who used to be blue dogs are defined as extremist right wingers. This demonization of the Tea Party is just getting warmed up. Alinsky would be proud.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 07:51 AM (jx2j9)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 07:51 AM (TMB3S)
curmudgeon
my parents told me when i was just a little girl.......there was nothing lower than a looter and...looters will be shot......no exceptions..........i've taught my kids the same thing...........
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 31, 2011 07:51 AM (IpiZb)
Excuse the rudeness of this post but -
Watched some dumb ass bitch with a morning show on CNN this morninf, showing all of the suffering in the hurricane areas, and didn't hear mention of FEMA or the presidunce one time. Also noticed no one demanding free debit cards for big screens and strip clubs.
Posted by: Borack the destroyer (alter ego) at August 31, 2011 07:51 AM (Ky8qS)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 11:22 AM
One thing to note about Perry: In the Gardasil issue -- the one that has Michelle "my way or the highway" Malkin's knickers in an ungodly tight twist -- and that cross-Texas transit corridor fiasco, Perry has had the guts to admit he was wrong. He accepted the will of the voters with good grace, and then moved on.
If the public makes its opposition to Perry's border policies (whatever they may be; it's hard to tell when you look at facts and not what the pro- and con forces are saying) clear, there's a chance the same thing will happen.
It seems Perry is capable of learning from his mistakes. Can't say that about most politicians.
Posted by: MrScribbler at August 31, 2011 07:52 AM (YjjrR)
I don't want a perfect candidate. I want an electable candidate with a solid track record and who's right on the most critical issues.
I'm cautiously enthusiastic about Perry, tolerant of Mitt, no one else in the field clears the first hurdle. I'm more concerned about Mitt's hesitant politically-enforced conversion to CAGW skepticism than I am about Perry's supposed squishiness on immigration.
Posted by: JEM at August 31, 2011 07:53 AM (o+SC1)
Now, why is this a "mistake"?
Posted by: Acorn at August 31, 2011 07:53 AM (FlVA8)
Maxine (burn LA burn) Waters deserves a treason trial. Followed by a choice of execution or deportation to the African Motherland Utopia of her choice.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at August 31, 2011 07:53 AM (ujg0T)
ot
i wonder if chaz bono will have the audacity to scratch or adjust its fake nuts on tv.....................
Posted by: phoenixgirl at August 31, 2011 07:54 AM (IpiZb)
It is an absolute imperative that the Tea Party be marginalized.
More like maligned and vilified.
When your base has 20-25% unemployment and have lived in perpetual squalor, you point your finger at the "real enemy." In this case, it's the Tea Party.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:55 AM (G/zuv)
The main reason I'm not too concerned about Perry's immigration stance is that he has been a solid "secure the border" guy (albeit, not specifically to curtail illegal immigration) for a long time. If he want's to secure the border because of drugs and violence and such, and, as a side effect, it's harder to immigrate illegally, I'm fine with that.
Same effect, different reasoning.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 07:55 AM (8y9MW)
If Maxine Waters and the CBC try to even attempt to carry out her threat, she should be charged with extortion and RICO charges.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 11:50 AM (G/zuv)
Even if she doesn't carry out the threat, the threat alone should be enough to prosecute her on charges. Who's to say that future bank actions and decisions will not now be based upon the risk of the threat. This kind of race mongering ignorant trash needs to be tossed into history's garbage dump.
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 07:56 AM (sFD5n)
Perry has called for Predator Drones on the border, and has stated there will be no immigration reform until the border is secured. Also, he just sent the feds a bill for Texas's costs to apprehend illegal aliens.
Just don't see him as pro open borders as many of the mittens fans do.
Posted by: Dick Nixon at August 31, 2011 07:56 AM (kaOJx)
I'm way late with my best wishes for a speedy recovery but you hang in there buddy .
Posted by: awkward davies at August 31, 2011 07:58 AM (YCW1b)
If I recall, Maxine Waters is in hot water for steering TARP funds to her husband's benefit.
Yes, no?
She's the LAST person who should be talking about extorting banks.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 07:58 AM (G/zuv)
Whereas Mitt's conversion to AGW skepticism is pretty much 100% politically calculated, and I wouldn't bet a dime on his willingness to cut headcount at the EPA or walk back this administration's CAFE and energy regulatory shenanigans.
Posted by: JEM at August 31, 2011 08:00 AM (o+SC1)
The last word in ann Coulter's book Demonic about the left's use of the mob to retain power is "overreact." I tend to agree.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 31, 2011 08:01 AM (Hx5uv)
He's a big 10th amendment guy, but I'd love for him to show he really means to cut the Federal Government back to its constitutional limits (or, at least, start the process).
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:01 AM (8y9MW)
WashPo is saying he's standing by his remarks. It is an absolute imperative that the Tea Party be marginalized. The pendulum cannot be allowed to swing back to the right. Right now, left leaning Republicans, or even those who used to be blue dogs are defined as extremist right wingers. This demonization of the Tea Party is just getting warmed up. Alinsky would be proud.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at August 31, 2011 11:51 AM (jx2j9)I think it's time for another march. This time, instead of confining it to the Mall, I suggest waiting until Congress is in session, and then surrounding the Hill and the White House. Silently. Just looking at the buildings, en masse. No speakers, no leaders, no fucking politicians. No interviews with the media, except to retort that the media already understands the message if they would have the honesty to report it.
Just ordinary Americans in a large group, watching and surrounding them for several days.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 08:03 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: Ma Bell at August 31, 2011 08:03 AM (H/MnC)
That would be awesome.
I wonder if we could get someone to organize that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:05 AM (8y9MW)
uh oh, a coloring book is offensive to Muslim terrorists!
"The book includes pictures of defining moments from the September 11th attacks. Some say pictures like one showing a bullet heading toward Osama Bin Laden hiding behind a woman are inappropriate. "It's called a graphic coloring novel, graphic meaning from the print industry graphics like a graphic comic book, it doesn't mean graphic pictures like blood and guts and bones that's not it at all," said Bell [the publisher].
Some are also criticizing the book for what they feel is a depiction that all Muslims are terrorists. "I don't see that Islam is like terrorize people, I mean we live peacefully we want peace," says Farhana Hough who lives in Southwest Charlotte."
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 08:06 AM (G/zuv)
I see a capable politician who's record was greatly enhanced by the state he governed.
Lame. Lamer. Lamest.
Being governor of ANY state is not an autopilot exercise. You can't have it both ways, you know--Texas cannot be simultaneoulsy an uncultured backwater and a smoothly running capitalist machine regardless of the chief executive.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at August 31, 2011 08:07 AM (B+qrE)
Patty Murray, the idiot in tennis shoes, just called me and said,
"I think it would be more appropriate to show images of Osama bin Laden building schools and hospitals."
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 08:08 AM (G/zuv)
That would be awesome.
I wonder if we could get someone to organize that.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 12:05 PM (8y9MW)
I think Americans are ready to do it, it just needs a date and publicity. That means a big name saying they'll be in the crowd, but not speaking or organizing.
No official organizers = no permits. Who are they going to arrest?
The message is that several hundred thousand average unarmed Americans could instantly overwhelm Congress and the White House and physically remove the offenders, and there isn't a damn thing they can do to stop it, so they had better get back on the side of the people.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 08:09 AM (NS2Mo)
Posted by: Fritz at August 31, 2011 08:10 AM (/ZZCn)
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 31, 2011 08:10 AM (F/4zf)
Not arguing against self determination and hard work. "By the sweat of thy brow"...
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 08:11 AM (lpWVn)
I wonder if we could get someone to organize that.
Hey, I have an idea. Let's not use the organizers of that Tea Party event in Iowa! Boy do they seem like a bunch of incompetents.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 08:13 AM (5H6zj)
Just ordinary Americans in a large group, watching and surrounding them for several days.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 12:03 PM (NS2Mo)
Brilliant idea!!!
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 08:14 AM (sFD5n)
bwaaaa-hahahahaha.
That's fantastic (not for those workers, of course, but in the aggregate).
I live in North Central Texas. West Texas gets wind. South Texas gets rain (usually). We get sun. So, for me, solar panels on my roof would not be a bad investment (well, if they're not too expensive, that is: right now, they're too expensive). But solar energy is never going to be enough to replace fossil fuels, and solar panels are not good investments for everybody (Portland, OR, anyone? Or Seattle, WA?).
Why is this hard to understand?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:16 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 11:19 AM (5H6zj)
You are deluded to credit Perry if denying that his repeated attempts to squish by without signing were at long last defeated by his opponents from the TX Tea Party forcing his hand to get a Senate vote despite Perry/Dewhurst sabotage.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 08:18 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:18 AM (8y9MW)
I'm not reading the entire comments section, but in case no one has mentioned it.......
RACIST!!!!!!
Posted by: © Sponge at August 31, 2011 08:18 AM (UK9cE)
speaking of chimps, which I hate...
Why don't we round them up and put them to work? Put them on energy-generating bicycles.
It's like slavery, yes. But I don't think the chimps would mind.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 08:20 AM (G/zuv)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 08:21 AM (TMB3S)
People still use horses to pull shit, ya?
Why not buy a chimp for your house to generate electricity?
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 08:22 AM (G/zuv)
That would be the sabotage where the first time he vetoed it, he said "Hey, change this stuff so we can get it past the SCOTUS, otherwise it'll just get over-turned," and then, when they tried to pass the exact same bill this session said, "Hey, guys, I don't want to veto that again, please fix it so I can sign it?" That sabotage.
MM, I know you don't like Rick Perry. Despite your protestations, it's obvious he annoys you, but he does deserve credit. It was not a veto-proof majority that voted for it, and Rick Perry had great incentive (if such was his wish) to veto it (again) on grounds that it might not pass SCOTUS muster. He didn't. They fixed the problems he (really, Greg Abbott) had with it, and he signed it. He also pushed the Sanctuary Cities bill into the emergency session, something no one would have blamed him for not doing.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:23 AM (8y9MW)
Right after reading THIS.
It's almost as if green energy and green jobs were a pipe dream of a bunch of out of touch fanatics.
Posted by: WalrusRex at August 31, 2011 08:23 AM (Hx5uv)
Then again, maybe we should be careful with chimps.
Because that's how the planet of the apes began.
Posted by: soothsayer at August 31, 2011 08:24 AM (G/zuv)
You are deluded to credit Perry if denying that his repeated attempts to
squish by without signing were at long last defeated by his opponents
from the TX Tea Party forcing his hand to get a Senate vote despite
Perry/Dewhurst sabotage.
-----
You'll have to back up that assertion. From what I see, Perry facilitated getting the thing passed by calling it an emergency item.
But I see that at least you are not in the "Perry as governor of Texas has no power" camp. Instead, everything wrong with Texas is his fault.
From the article I linked:
Gov. Rick Perry signed the voter ID bill into law this morning. The legislation requires voters to present one of five acceptable forms of photo ID—a drivers license, military ID, passport, concealed handgun license or a special voter ID card provided free of charge by the state. Gov. Perry designated voter ID as an “emergency item” early in the session, giving it particular priority as lawmakers rushed it through the legislative process.
"This simple action, no more complicated then cashing a check down at the HEB or applying for a library card down the street, will appropriately help maintain the integrity and fairness of our electoral system here in the Lone Star State,” Gov. Perry said at the signing.
Posted by: Y-not at August 31, 2011 08:24 AM (5H6zj)
__________
Looks like Ear Leader has decided to rant about jobs to a joint session of Congress at the same time as the big debate.
Posted by: Anachronda at August 31, 2011 08:26 AM (IrbU4)
because the last thing we need is giving Ogabe an excuse to say "armed insurrection"...basically the day is gonna come where he grasps only something HUGE will let him keep power....
I'd rather it not be a reenactment of the assault on the winter palace
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:31 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: Jean at August 31, 2011 08:32 AM (WkuV6)
Don't pull the wool over your eyes on the Trans TX Corridor just yet.
NAFTA! Perry/McCain '12
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 08:34 AM (lpWVn)
Posted by: Jean at August 31, 2011 12:26 PM (kUxiO)
Funny post number for that question....
I am assuming this is referring to the march idea to surround Congress and the White House...
1) Weapons aren't needed. Pure numbers cannot be stopped anyway, if the crowd is determined.
2) More people would show up if the crowd is unarmed. *I* wouldn't even show up if I knew the crowd would be armed, and its my idea. There are a lot of idiots that are not law-abiding safety-focused gun owners.
3) It is a distraction to have armed individuals in a crowd and gives authorities justification to crack down. Open carry is illegal in DC and marching on those buildings with weapons could be considered open sedition.
4) The story then becomes the weapons, and not the vigil or the warning.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 08:36 AM (NS2Mo)
"Joel Salatin: How to Prepare for A Future Increasingly Defined By Localized Food & Energy"
This article reminds me of when the first lady was saying "buy local produce"
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:36 AM (k1rwm)
Let's see. Despite much pressure to do otherwise, Perry has insisted on not raising general taxes (Property Taxes, the State Sales Tax, or the State Gasoline tax) and instead has always used fee increases when additional revenue was actually required, and budget cuts where he could to balance the budget.
When necessary items like road infrastructure (just so you understand, the two largest Urban areas in Texas are nearly 4 times as far apart as New York City and Philadelphia, and El Paso is closer to San Diego than it is to Dallas) come up, we don't have much choice except to use toll roads or raise taxes (the last time the Gasoline Tax was raised in Texas was 1991- more than 20 years ago).
You cite a study by people invested in seeing more growth due to their industry (nothing wrong with it, just how it is) than may be there. There was a piece linked many times in the comments of various threads on this very blog that set that same percentage around 10%. I'll dig around and see if I can find it, but I'm sure if you did some digging you could as well.
He also instituted the State Enterprise Fund (or something like that) a Public/Private fund used to help businesses with expenses related to relocating- that is, a fund to help bring business to Texas. It has been very successful.
He fought for (and got) a business tax restructuring which increased State Revenue (something the advisability of which we can debate) while actually decreasing the net tax burden on most medium and small businesses, which, as you know, can help spur business growth.
He fights the EPA tooth-and-nail to prevent job-killing policies that would stunt our energy and industrial infrastructure: something that "saves" far more jobs than Porkulus ever could have.
If you're looking to fight Perry's pro-business bonafides, you've got your work cut out for you.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:36 AM (8y9MW)
the only people he needs to halfway convince are the DHS denizens and his flash mob allies....
Barry is either gonna go with a bang or a whimper and I am not sure which
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:37 AM (AEIYh)
NAFTA! Perry/McCain '12
Really? How tightly is your tinfoil hat tied on?
First, it was post TTC that Texas made it much harder (via Constitutional amendment (which isn't actually saying much, in Texas)) to use imminent domain in the first place.
Second, whether you like the TTC plan itself or not, you don't think that Texas Road infrastructure, especially major trade arteries like those from DFW to Houston, needs some major overhaul?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 08:39 AM (8y9MW)
Barry still thinks his minor league political theatrics and gamesmanship will work.....
essentially he is going to go to congress and either present his half assed current bullshit "plan" of payroll holiday or say "hey we just got downgraded I have a swell idea let's blow another trillion for no gain other than Union liquor cabinets being full".....
fuck him
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:39 AM (AEIYh)
there is stuff surfacing all over on other blogs stating that he wanted joint health care with mexico and was a big supporter of hillarycare. I don't post on the sites so can't ask the posters for legitimate proof of this stuff, however, it looks like a small army is out there to disseminate this kind of stuff and, as usual, people just read it and don't ask for some kind of proof.
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:40 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 12:18 PM (8y9MW)
Our decades of silence and cowardice has enabled the kind of corruption and outright crime that we see today. We are all to blame. It's time that we build upon what the Tea Party movement started and show our pompous "leaders" what a representative democracy is all about.
Posted by: Havedash at August 31, 2011 08:41 AM (sFD5n)
don't look now but 'joint healthcare" with mexopolis would likely be a good idea....
you can get your teeth yanked or worked on for a tenth the cost by a mexican dentist precisely because it is then a market driven transaction instead of having to compete with uncle Sugar's ATM that never runs out of money....
(devalued money but money naytheless)
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:42 AM (AEIYh)
I'm sure it will be a big fan fare with media coverage, meant to minimize the impact of the republican debate. I wonder if it is a political move?
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:42 AM (k1rwm)
Posted by: Berserker at August 31, 2011 08:42 AM (FMbng)
I suspect they'd call in the army to arrest every last person.
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:45 AM (k1rwm)
he looks like a petulant child....
and sooner or later he is gonna get a very healthy dose of payback by the House....
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:46 AM (AEIYh)
Been there, done that while it was going down. Made the local tv news, and I noted it here at that time.
Instead, everything wrong with Texas is his fault.
You said it. Not I.
governor of Texas has no power
You're arguing that the Lt.Gov. doesn't hold a balance of authority in the TX Legislature not vested in the Governor's constitutional role?
Again, compare constitutionally limited powers to "no power".
And on that note of limited power, Perry abused his office in efforts to assert powers not vested by the constitution. So those dreams that somehow Perry will constrain himself as potus to US Constitutional limitations on the Chief Executive Office are deceptive, to say the least.
Posted by: maverick muse at August 31, 2011 08:48 AM (lpWVn)
But it would be like "PC", it would serve to show anyone else even thinking about it, not to do it. And the folks arrested would now have given DHL a nice beginning data base of who should be "watched".
I feel as though the world has changed so much since when MLK was around. I feel that things are ass backwards.
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:49 AM (k1rwm)
I suspect they'd call in the army to arrest every last person.
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 12:45 PM (k1rwm)
I don't listen to Hannity, and Darryl Hannah is a scrunt. This idea came to me spontaneously.
And no, they wouldn't call in the army to arrest several hundred thousand people standing peacefully, unarmed, quietly watching. That's absurd. Any heavy-handed response to something so obviously peaceful would blow up in their faces.
Posted by: grognard at August 31, 2011 08:50 AM (NS2Mo)
I hear you. But, have the responses to anything been what one would "normally assume"?
Posted by: city gal at August 31, 2011 08:51 AM (k1rwm)
take heart the main thing is the cynic in me is starting to think that as bush left chimpy the keys for a police state Barry will leave us with a police state so strong that once we cow the civil servants we can finally smite the domestic enablers of global terror once and for all easily.
Their silence as Soetoro cranks up the police state after their histrionics under bush means they have ceded any moral claim to liberty.
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:54 AM (AEIYh)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 08:55 AM (TMB3S)
meant to say as Bush left Barry or chimpy left Barry the keys to a police state....
Barry really is pushing the Federal DHS into a gestapo like creature of political hatchet work....
when we take back power time to decertify the tax exemption of black Churches whose main faith is politics and defund the AGW hysterics federal gravy train....
impeaching Judges who practice that collusion in their awards for "pollution"
Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 08:57 AM (AEIYh)
Actually, "he" didn't take that 17 billion at all- the veto-proof act of the legislature did. Even then, he's only used the funds with "no strings attached." He even complained about the leg taking the money for the exact reason you claim- when it's gone, there's an even bigger hole to fill. That's what so much of this year's budget fight was about- you know, the one where (once again) he didn't raise taxes and had actual net budget cuts to balance the budget.
I don't have a problem with him using taxes for state infrastructure needs. That's what governors do. I do have a problem with him posing as a small government guy when he's not. A huge number of the new jobs in Texas are also government jobs. He has grown government greatly, not shrunk it.
Bull-crap from any reasonable perspective. The population of Texas grew, so, yes, Government grew, too. Government employees per capita, however, shrank.
Yep. Lots of governors do that. Romney used something similar to bring jobs to MA. People say that Romney's record doesn't stack up to Perry on jobs. Maybe, but when Romney took over jobs were flocking out of MA and he turned it toward growth and the unemployment number never got to where it is in Texas right now.
Of course it didn't. MA is still losing (or at least not gaining) population. Texas is growing in population faster than we can grow our economy.
People hack on Romney for "raising fees" which includes minor things like marriage licenses and boat mooring fees at MA state parks while ignoring the cuts he made to MA government to close a $3 billion deficit he inherited when taking office but ignore the fact that Perry proposed massive new road fees and took $6 billion in Obama stimulus to close the budget hole that he oversaw.
My only problems with Romney are (in order from least to most): His stance on ethanol subsidies, his stance on AGW <sorry, that does look more politically motivated a switch to me than Perry's stance on the guest-worker programs, etc.>, and his continued defense of RomneyCare. Specifically that he can't even bring himself to say (that I've ever been able to find) that RomneyCare seemed like a good idea at the time, but has obviously morphed into something he didn't intend (now it would be too late to say that, but there was a window when he could). Worse, he won't even admit the moral hazard in an individual mandate. He's absolutely right that, if such a thing is to be done, it should be done at the state level. He's absolutely wrong that such a thing should ever be done.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) is tired beyond tired of the trolls at August 31, 2011 09:05 AM (8y9MW)
Poor Vic, I spent 24 hours in a hospital a couple of years ago and can't imagine being stuck in one for an entire week.
Posted by: Bob Saget at August 31, 2011 09:29 AM (F/4zf)
I spent three days in one a few years back. Had some hot Filipino nurses, thought those damn scrubs just don't cut it compared to Florence Nightingales.
What was I saying? Oh, yeah. Wouldn't be so bad if they'd let you sleep. After three days I was on the verge of collapse purely from lack of sleep.
Posted by: Ace's liver at August 31, 2011 09:21 AM (1+XRG)
2 Timothy 3:7 TranslationsKing James Version (KJV) Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Posted by: Greg at August 31, 2011 09:45 AM (fBm8S)
Posted by: JackStraw at August 31, 2011 09:54 AM (TMB3S)
As most of you know, I consider the WaPo's Ezra Klein to be the equivalent of an organ grinder's monkey in a little red vest and a fez
++++++++++++++++
*snorts coffee through nose while laughing*
Posted by: Campesino at August 31, 2011 10:00 AM (sADRg)
I think people are missing something when comparing Social Security to a Ponzi Scheme.
Social Security is not supposed to be a Ponzi Scheme; It just looks like one because it has been twisted from what it was supposed to be.
Social Security is not supposed to pay out at all. When the precursor was set up by Bismarck in Germany, very few people lived to be 65. Very few even lived that long when it was started here.
Social Security is supposed to be an outright Insurance Fraud - you pay in for an annuity that you have virtually no chance of living to collect and the insurer keeps the proceeds to use as a slush fund.
Which of course is why most object to any "fix" - it changes it back to an Insurance Fraud and government slush fund.
Posted by: Sam at August 31, 2011 10:40 AM (V9Tsq)
Posted by: The Ice Limit AudioBook at August 31, 2011 07:18 PM (qhonK)
I'm loving the headline over at Drudge: A picture of Obama and a 0.
He probably didn't mean it to read as I read it, but that doesn't matter.
Posted by: Clueless at September 02, 2011 05:52 AM (LyOUH)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3984 seconds, 515 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: sven10077 at August 31, 2011 04:58 AM (AEIYh)